Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 55 ( 2012 ) 1089 – 1097
1877-0428 © 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of The Association of Science, Education and Technologydoi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.601
Faculty of Sociology and Psychology, Department of Sciences of Education West University of Timişoara, Boulevard V. Parvan, no. 4, Timisoara, Romania
Abstract
Research objectives
The general hypothesis
© 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of The Association of Science, Education and Technology
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
© 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of The Association of Science, Education and Technology
1090 Otilia Sanda Bersan / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 55 ( 2012 ) 1089 – 1097
Specific hypotheses
The research design
The subject sample
Data analysis and interpretation
1094 Otilia Sanda Bersan / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 55 ( 2012 ) 1089 – 1097
reflective journal
1096 Otilia Sanda Bersan / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 55 ( 2012 ) 1089 – 1097
Final conclusions
1097 Otilia Sanda Bersan / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 55 ( 2012 ) 1089 – 1097
References: Teoria şi metodologia instruirii. Teoria şi metodologia evaluării
Repere şi instrumente didactice pentru formarea profesorilorEvaluation scolaire et pratique
Evaluarea şcolară. Metode, tehnici, instrumente
Strategii didactice interactivePregătirea
psihopedagogică.Evaluation.
Teroarea creionului roşu. Evaluarea educaţională
Competence – based assesment