Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Academic Integrity
What Does This Term
Mean For Students?
Presented by Dr. Thomas Lancasterat University of Montenegroon Monday 7 November 2016
http://[email protected]@DrLancaster
3@DrLancaster
Questions To Answer During The Workshop
What is academic integrity?
Why is academic integrity important?
What bearing does the term have on student life?
What is the problem of plagiarism within a wider culture of academic integrity?
How can you support the teaching staff you work with to maintain academic integrity?
4@DrLancaster
About Dr. Thomas Lancaster
Principal Lecturer (Computing) at Coventry University, United Kingdom
Academic background in computer programming and mathematics
Regular international speaker on academic integrity, student cheatingand contract cheating (students buying ghost written work)
Part of the Coventry University team representing the EuropeanNetwork for Academic Integrity (ENAI)
Conducting research for South East European Project on Policies forAcademic Integrity (SEEPPAI)
Twitter: @DrLancaster
Email: [email protected]
Slides: http://www.slideshare.net/ThomasLancaster
Speaking to BBC TV in the United Kingdom
5@DrLancaster
European Network for Academic Integrity (ENAI)
A newly formed network of 12 European partners (and growing) with opportunities for students to join
Lead partner is Mendel University in Brno, Czech Republic
The network aims to develop resources and materials promoting and supporting academic integrity
Holds annual conferences (next one in Brno on 24 to 26 May 2017)
https://www.academicintegrity.eu
6@DrLancaster
South East European Project on Policies for Academic Integrity (SEEPPAI)
Investigating Higher Education approaches to plagiarism and academic misconduct across six countries
Funded by the Council of Europe (CoE) with completion due by 1 April 2017
Consortium between Mendel University in Brno, Czech Republic and Coventry University, United Kingdom
Collecting data to investigate the policies towards academic integrity that take place in individual universities and on a national level
http://plagiarism.cz/seeppai
7@DrLancaster
SEEPPAI Online Student Survey
Please complete the online student survey after the workshop
http://plagiarism.cz/seeppai
8@DrLancaster
With Thanks To Irene Glendinning
Irene is also representing Coventry University working on the SEEPPAI
project. She works tirelessly to promote academic integrity. Several
slides in this presentation are based on her ideas.
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/irene-glendinning-81013752
10@DrLancaster
Academic Integrity For Students (1)
Academic Integrity means not cheating
http://www.gsm-earpiece.com/howto/tips-on-cheating-exam
11@DrLancaster
Academic Integrity For Students (2)
Academic Integrity is
not aiding others in cheating
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/hundreds-arrested-following-indian-exam-cheating-scandal-10125509.html
12@DrLancaster
Academic Integrity For Students (3)
Academic Integrity is
not being complacent when other people are cheating
13@DrLancaster
Academic Integrity For Students (4)
Academic Integrity is
understanding and using proper academic conventions
Main Essay BodyHersey and Lancaster (2015) discussed the implications of online services offering to write work for students. They found that…
ReferencesHersey, C. and Lancaster, T. (2015). The Online Industry of Paper Mills, Contract Cheating Services, and Auction Sites, Clute Institute International Education Conference, London, June 2015
14@DrLancaster
Academic Integrity For Students (5)
Academic Integrity is
displaying rigour in academic research
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
18-21 22-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-100
Ho
w L
ikel
y St
ud
ents
Are
To
Ch
eat
Student Age Range
How Likely Are Students In Different Age Ranges To Cheat?
Made Up Data!
15@DrLancaster
Academic Integrity For Universities (1)
Academic Integrity is
maintaining academic standards
https://pixabay.com/en/graduation-man-cap-gown-education-879941/
16@DrLancaster
Academic Integrity For Universities (2)
Academic Integrity is
acknowledging everyone’s contributions
http://www.bcu.ac.uk/Download/Asset/e822f1c3-8b1b-4ce5-a6eb-b74ebdfba6ad
17@DrLancaster
Academic Integrity For Universities (3)
Academic Integrity is
ensuring excellent teaching
Academic Integrity is
treating all students equitably
https://pixabay.com/en/teacher-silhouette-black-isolated-309533
18@DrLancaster
Academic Integrity For All
Academic Integrity is
“doing the right thing when nobody is watching”
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Half_target_eyes.svg
20@DrLancaster
If a student buys an essay from a web site and uses the text provided without changing it, is it:
1. Serious plagiarism
2. Plagiarism
3. Not sure
4. Poor academic practice
5. None of the above
Question 1
21@DrLancaster
If a student buys an essay from a web site and uses the text provided but makes a few changes to it, is it:
1. Serious plagiarism
2. Plagiarism
3. Not sure
4. Poor academic practice
5. None of the above
Question 2
22@DrLancaster
If a student copies a piece of work from another student, is it:
1. Serious plagiarism
2. Plagiarism
3. Not sure
4. Poor academic practice
5. None of the above
Question 3
23@DrLancaster
If two students work closely together and then hand in similar work, is it:
1. Serious plagiarism
2. Plagiarism
3. Not sure
4. Poor academic practice
5. None of the above
Question 4
24@DrLancaster
If a student finds an answer on the Internet in English, then translates that answer, is it:
1. Serious plagiarism
2. Plagiarism
3. Not sure
4. Poor academic practice
5. None of the above
Question 5
26@DrLancaster
My Standard Definition
Taking words or ideas from someone else and then
using these words or ideas without acknowledgement
28@DrLancaster
A Few Reasons Why Students Plagiarise
Students don’t understand what plagiarism is
They have always plagiarised
They’ve run of time
It is too easy to plagiarise
They are lazy!
Other students are also doing this
30@DrLancaster
A Few Reasons Why Plagiarism Is Wrong
It is dishonest for the student to claim to have done the work
Not giving credit to the originator of the work
Unfair to other students
Damages the reputation of the university
Means that students don’t learn the subject
The lack of learning leads to later failure
32@DrLancaster
Some Ways In Which Plagiarism Is Detected
The writing style seems wrong
Found by text matching software
Found using Google and search engines
The student can’t answer questions about the work
Other students report the cheating
33@DrLancaster
Remember - Sources Are Valuable
They give credit to the original authors
They show how you have used wider knowledge to influence your work
They demonstrate your awareness of outside research
They add academic value and credibility
They allow people to follow up your research and find out more
35@DrLancaster
Reminder - Online Student Survey
Please complete the online student survey after the workshop
http://plagiarism.cz/seeppai
36@DrLancaster
#defeatthecheat
From International Day Of Action
https://twitter.com/search?f=images&q=%23defeatthecheat
37@DrLancaster
You CanShow Academic
Integrity Leadership
Through Example
39@DrLancaster
Dr. Thomas Lancaster
Email: [email protected]
Website: http://thomaslancaster.co.uk
Blog: http://thomaslancaster.co.uk/blog
LinkedIn: https://uk.linkedin.com/in/thomaslancaster
Twitter: @DrLancaster
General Resources:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract_cheatinghttp://contractcheating.com
Contract Cheating Special Interest Group(originally supported by the Higher Education Academy):https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=CONTRACTCHEATING
40@DrLancaster
Lancaster, T. and Clarke, R. (2015). Contract Cheating – The Outsourcing Of Assessed Student Work, in Handbook of Academic Integrity, Bretag, T. (editor): SpringerReference.
Lancaster, T. and Clarke, R. (2015). The Implications of Plagiarism and Contract Cheating for the Assessment of Database Modules. 13th International Workshop on Teaching, Learning and Assessment of Databases (TLAD2015), Birmingham, UK, July 2015.
Hersey, C. and Lancaster, T. (2015). The Online Industry of Paper Mills, Contract Cheating Services, and Auction Sites, Clute Institute International Education Conference, London, June 2015.
Lancaster, T. and Clarke, R. (2014). An Observational Analysis Of The Range And Extent Of Contract Cheating From Online Courses Found On Agency Websites; 8th International Conference on Complex, Intelligent andSoftware Intensive Systems (CISIS 2014), Birmingham City University, UK, July 2014.
Lancaster, T. and Clarke, R. (2014). An Initial Analysis Of The Contextual Information Available Within Auction Posts On Contract Cheating Agency Websites, 28th IEEE International Conference on Advanced InformationNetworking and Applications, University of Victoria, May 2014
Lancaster, T. and Clarke, R. (2014). Using Turnitin As A Tool For Attribution In Cases Of Contract Cheating; 3rd Annual Higher Education Academy Conference in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, Universityof Edinburgh, Edinburgh, April 2014.
Clarke, R. and Lancaster, T. (2013). Commercial Aspects Of Contract Cheating; 8th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK, July 2013.
Lancaster, T and Clarke, R (2012). Dealing With Contract Cheating: A Question Of Attribution; 1st Annual Higher Education Academy Conference in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, Imperial College,London, April 2012.
Lancaster, T and Clarke, R (2010). Staff-Led Individualised Assessment – A Case Study; 11th Annual Higher Education Academy Conference in Information and Computer Sciences, Durham University, August 2010.
Lancaster, T and Clarke, R (2008). How to Succeed at Cheating Without Really Trying: Five Top Tips for Successful Cheating; 9th Annual Higher Education Academy Conference in Information and Computer Sciences,Liverpool Hope University, August 2008.
Clarke, R, and Lancaster, T (2007). Establishing a Systematic Six-Stage Process for Detecting Contract Cheating; The Second International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Applications, Birmingham City University,July 2007.
Lancaster, T and Clarke, R (2007). Assessing Contract Cheating Through Auction Sites – A Computing Perspective; 8th Annual Higher Education Academy Conference in Information and Computer Sciences, University ofSouthampton, August 2007.
Lancaster, T and Clarke, R (2007). The Phenomena of Contract Cheating, in Student Plagiarism in an Online World: Problems and solutions, Roberts, T. S. (editor), Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA: Idea Group Inc.
Clarke, R and Lancaster, T (2006). Eliminating The Successor To Plagiarism? Identifying The Usage Of Contract Cheating Sites; 2nd Plagiarism: Prevention, Practice and Policy Conference 2006 - Newcastle, UK, June 2006.
Culwin F. and Lancaster T. (2001), Plagiarism Issues for Higher Education. Vine 31(2), pp. 36-41.
Some References For My Academic Integrity Publications
![[Spycob] Montenegro](https://img.pdfslide.net/doc/110x75/55d59e79bb61eb85778b4618/spycob-montenegro.jpg)
