Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Whether you call it ethnographic research, contextual inquiry, or field studies, there's no better way to find out who your users are and what they need. By observing users in action in their normal working environment, you'll learn about needs that can't be expressed verbally. Best of all, this kind of information doesn't just benefit technical communicators; it can help software companies provide better products. Nicki Davis will present a case study in which ethnographic research helped to reduce the scope of a new product by 50%, while providing functionality that was missing in the existing legacy product.
Citation preview
Nicki L Davis, Ph.D. Society for Technical Communication 20 May 2013
Senior Technical Writer OSIsoft, LLC Formerly Advisory Technical Communicator MDL Information Systems, Inc.
What is it? What’s in it for technical communicators? Why should companies do it?
4
The Interaction Design Process
5
The Interaction Design Process
NOT the same as market research
Market research is Useful for feedback on the known or tangible, but not effective for discovering what is not known. Does not achieve insight about actual user behavior
Ethnographic research is user research
“Users in the mist”
Plenty!
Why NOT do it?
“We can’t afford to spend the resources”
Why NOT do it?
“We can’t afford to spend the resources”
12
Molecular Design Limited (MDL) made chemical drawing and database software Primary customers were drug discovery chemists in the pharmaceutical industry 1/3 of MDL employees had chemistry degrees MDL wanted to replace its legacy chemical drawing product
13
Legacy product
14
Designed to fit a niche market Created in 1994 by a developer with extensive domain knowledge Released in 1996 Code had been neglected for years and was still very buggy
Legacy product tool
15
The original product was being replaced by 2nd -generation product Marketing had discovered 14 additional user tasks in 6 years We did not have the resources to implement all (47+14) = 61 tasks in the first release We could not prioritize features because we had no information on which tasks were most important
Research team
1 technical communicator 1 lead developer 2 marketing (1 chemist, 1 non-chemist)
Research activities
Observe scientists using the legacy product in their work Record the tasks that scientists performed Analyze data from the field study to find everyday, frequently-performed, tasks (“critical tasks”)
18
Observe
19
Record & analyze
Legacy product did not support 9 critical tasks
21
Initial release of new product covered 26 of 27
22
New product – Second release
Best-case outcome
More user-friendly
Eliminated an entire tool in the legacy product
X
Eliminated 12 of 13 controls on this dialog box
X X
X
X
2 weeks at customer site (2 visits @ 1 week each) 2 weeks transcribing notes from customer site visits 13 weeks writing documentation 17 weeks total time spent for the first release
30
TechCom Tasks With Field Studies Without Field Studies
Field research 4 weeks n/a
Documenting features
13 weeks 30 weeks
Total 17 weeks 30 weeks
31
13 weeks = time saved by field studies 4 weeks = time invested in field studies
32
