Upload
network-for-innovation-in-career-guidance-and-counselling-in-europe
View
50
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PEER LEARNING in NICE
Topping (2005, p.631) “defined as the acquisition of knowledge and skill through
active helping and supporting among status equals or matched companions”.
Aim & Objectives of Peer Learning Group
Process and Outcome:
A). Process- descriptive case study methodology –series of case studies of Peer Learning Activities (PLA) – facilitated collaboration of NICE members working on quality development of programmes
B). Outcome – Guidelines for conducting PLA’s by NICE members for quality development process
3
Quality Development in Programmes: Change Process
Underlying assumptions:
Relational: work alliances as key for mutual learning –intrapersonal and interactional process
Peer learning is an intentional learning process
amongst peers
Analysis of current situation/system in change process (organisational/programme)
Change can be restricted by organisational norms
environment
Reflection and reflexivity
4
Peer Learning Group
Use of Case Study in Peer Learning Activity (PLA)
May 2014 – 2015: Iterative design of a Case Study Framework to guide peer learning process, gather data and produce case vignettes
Framework based on Topping (2005) and Topping & Ehly (2001) peer learning plan that incorporated different areas for recording of peer learning activity
6
Peer Learning Activities Schedule: May 2014-May 2015
Peer learning instances – case studies 1. Gödöllö, Hungary – CGC BA programs, 3
Universities2. Oslo, Norway – CGC MA program in Norway, 2 Universities3. Bordeaux, France – CGC MA program in Bordeaux, 5
Universities4. Mannheim, Germany – CGC BA programs, 4
Universities
These PLA’s facilitated, data recorded and analysed by members of the Peer Learning Group
Case Study Framework for NICE PLA’s (May 2015)
Data Areas:
Contextual information of PLA – programmes, organisations, location and date
Aim & objectives of PLA
Participant details
Agenda and items in PLA
Methods and experiences in work-phase of PLA
Resources used in PLA – documentation, recording etc
Outcomes of PLA – short and long-term
Follow-up Work of PLA – further meetings, location, participation, goals
Evaluation of PLA:- what were the expectations of the individuals?
- did outcomes meet their expectations?
- how has the peer learning process been for individuals?
8
Three Stage Framework
1. Preparation :
Selection of the PLA partners
Identifying and agreeing on the aim and objectives of the PLA
Deciding type of activity, location and time
2. Implementation
Sharing of material, documents and relevant information
Refining common goals and objectives of PLA
10
Building trust and collaborative relationships
Moderation of the PLA
Recording of the PLA
Deciding next steps (short and long-term outcomes) of the PLA
3. Evaluation and follow-up
Evaluating outcomes of the PLA for members in the group at end of the activity, reflection on this by members
11Three Stage Framework
Reflexivity – Opportunities & Challenges of PLA
Identifying and contacting possible PLA partners
Trust and collaboration of equals
Diversity of NICE membership – culture, traditions, history, context and disciplinary affiliations (e.g. education, psychology)
Language, power and gender considerations
On-line technology usage
Sustainability of the activity over time
12
References
Yin, R.K. (2009) Case Study Research; Design and Methods, 4th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Topping, K. J. (2005) ‘Trends in Peer Learning’, Educational Psychology, 25 (6), pp. 631-645.
13
Members of the mobility team1. Active members of the mobility team
Below the active group members are presented.
Rebeca García-Murias
Spain
Jaana Kettunen
Finland
Monika Kukyte
Germany
Dione Mifsud
Malta
Sasa Niklanovic
Slovenia
Sauli Puukari
Finland
Jean-Jacques Ruppert
Luxembourg
Teresa Maria Sgaramella
Italy
Jan Woldendorp
The Netherlands
NICE Mobility: why?
“One needs only to existto travel”
Fernando Pessoa
“One needs only to exit to travel”+
Key Assumption
Mobility (mental and physical) is the core business of our NICE network (career = mobility)
Work of the mobility team
Tuning roadmap on mobility (handy when travelling!) Mission statement “To be or not to be… Mobile” (work
in progress) Practical guidelines for NICE mobility (Student + Staff
edition) Inventory of current NICE Mobility (Erasmus +) Survey on NICE Mobility (Work in Progress) Collection and development of presentation materials
to underpin the value of mobility (work in progress)
Inventory of NICE Mobility within Erasmus + 19
Jean-Jacques Ruppert Luxembourg Yes KA1 Learning mobility of individuals ACADEMIA Project for European mobility
KA2 to implement further training for practitioners (planned) No title yet
Roberta Piazza Catania, Italia Yes KA1 Learning Mobility of Individuals Adult education staff mobility.
Rachel Mulvey East London, UK
Sif Einarsdóttir Reykjavik, Iceland Yes KA2: Cooperation for innovation and exchange of good practises YOUTHYES: develop a career game for use with young people in school settings to help them develop/ refine their career management skills
Hazel Reid Canterbury, UK Yes Development of NICE Knowledge Alliance
working on a bid for a 'strategic partnership' building on a previous EIP working with Doctoral students.
Rebeca García-Murias Santiago de Compostella, Spain Yes KA2: Cooperation for innovation and exchange of good practices Guide My W@y! A European Career Guidance Concept for International Youth Mobility.
Monica Petermandl Danube-University Krems, Austria Yes Tools fOr Impact³ - Development of web-based evaluation-tools fostering impact-oriented project-consortia for ERASMUS+
Yes EDU-FIN : Developing participative processes for the generation of a financial education curriculum addressed to young adults at risk
Jan Woldendorp Saxion, Deventer, The Netherlands KA2: Cooperation for innovation and exchange of good practises ESL: Development of an (online) tool for early detection and preventuion of Early School Leavers
Laura Gressnerova University of Technology, Bratislava (STU) Yes STU is involved in KA1 Learning mobility of individuals. Mobility actions for students and pedagogues provide another Office of our Department of international relations.
Submittion of application in the frame of ERASMUS+ Knowledge Alliances in 2014, project has not been approved.
This year we are submitting 2 projects in KA2 Knowledge Alliance and KA2 Capacity Building in the field of Higher Education.
Inge van der Putten Fontys university, Tilburg, The Netherlands Yes Involved in the NICE Knowledge Alliance KA3 project
Stefan Vendel University of Presov, Slovakia No
Peter Weber Heidelberg University/IBW No We are working on a KA application (with other NICE partners)
Jaana Kettunen University of Jyväskylä, Finland No Preparing a KA2 application
Lucy Hearne University of Limerick, Ireland No Involved in an application for Erasmus+ Strategic Partnerships (in VET) in 2014. We were unsucccessful but may apply again this year.
Kestutis Pukelis Kaunas, Lithuania No
Mini-convention
Mobility & Peer Learning
Sif Einarsdóttir & Jan Woldendorp
Subtitle: “Action!” (Dauwalder, 2014)
Initiatives for mobility & peer learning
Proposal 1: Creation of a collaborate circle for global development of a CGC competence standard (Peter, Jutta & Frans)
Proposal 2: Peer Learning for establishment/Improvement of Bachelor programs (István)
Proposal 3: Development of a joint module for training in entrepreneurship -skills (Jacques)
Proposal 4: Development of joint e-learning modules (Jukka)
Proposal 5: Development of joint learning – materials for training in careercounselling, based on the standards (Koorosh & Jean Pierre)
Proposal 6: Mobility for the International week of Saxion (Jan)
Proposal 7: Joint development of innovative approaches for training of reflective competences (Sif + Stella)
Proposal 8 Develloping the future of NICE (Christiane)
Proposal 9 Scandi translation (Randi, Rie & ...)
Working in groups
Planary pitches (1’’) of the proposals
Creating groups
Choosing a voluntary moderator
Introduction of the idea by the developer: WHY? andWHAT?
Questioning by the group members
Brainstorming on the HOW?, the WHO? and the WHEN?
Minutes are made on the circle sheet
Planary report by the moderator
Inventory on what help do you need
Who (what NICE working group) is taking this further