Upload
nick-barter
View
169
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This is a presentation I made to the IABS conference on 22nd June. It outlines how strategy textbooks are not enabling sustainability because they perpetuate a dualism
Citation preview
The Environment and Textbooks: Are they enabling corporate strategists to realise sustainable outcomes?
Nick Barter
@greenstratdoc/@griffthmba4life
Download at app store/Google play
The power of this paper is not necessarily what it proves but rather what it suggests (Fiol, 1989)
“there are no inputs from outside and no outputs to the outside; indeed there is no outside at all” (Boulding, 1966, p.2),
“It is quite simple wrong to regard action on the psyche, the socius, and the environment as separate…[to present these areas as if they are separate is]…acquiescing to a general infantilisation of opinion” (Guattari, 1989, pp.134)
“foundational epistemological assumption-that they have a status, a bona fide status with a potential for universal application” (Issitt, 2004, p. 685).
Individuals act upon the basis of their cognitive representations of the world around them
“the environment does not exist as a sphere separate from human actions, ambitions and needs, and attempts to defend it in isolation from human concerns have given the very word environment a connotation of naivety” (WCED, 1987, p. xi)
“our weedy domain may be isolated and fractured by a profound epistemological crisis: the conceptual division and resultant disassociation between humankind (and its organizations) and the remainder of the natural world” (Gladwin et al., 1995, p. 875)
“according to most strategic management literature, an organization … exists within an independently given environment” (Smircich & Stubbart, 1985, pp. 724),
Mutual embedding may be “so obvious…all human organisations are embedded within the natural environment and all of those which have human managers and other employees, also contain the natural environment in their respective biophysical bodies” (Starik & Kanashiro, 2013, p.8/9)
“corporate strategists…have more opportunity than ever….to drive sustainable development” (UNSGHLPS, 2012, p.22)
What are the strategy textbooks saying? It might matter as corporate strategists are key actors?
• Wiley, Pearson, McGraw Hill, Cengage• Amazon, Co-Op Bookshop• Neilsen BookScan
• No help from USA • UK and Australia focus – 2011 • 46 titles condensed to 23• 10 titles account for 95% of sales in Oz
• Definitions of environment, sustainability….& more
• “the external environment represents all those aspects outside of an organisation that affect the business strategy of an organisation”
• “long been a factor in firm strategy, primarily from the standpoint of access to raw materials”
• “external environment is where the opportunities and threats arise from to confront the organisation”
• “the environment is what gives organisations their means of survival”
There is an external environment – there must be an internal one as well….
(that’s a source of strengths and weaknesses)
• Environment is…..
• A dehumanised place confronting the organisation
• It can be split into internal and external…this ...”objectifies the environment to which…[individuals]…then turn and respond” (Hatch, 2011, p.55)
• “something outside and completely unrelated to the observer, except in a very narrow utilitarian sense” (Purser et al., 1995, p.1064)
Still a long way from reflecting the near obvious
regarding our mutual embedding and inseparability (Starik & Kanashiro, 2013) & thus realising sustainability
• “intrinsically dynamic, interconnected web of relation in which there are no absolutely discrete entities and no absolute dividing lines” (Eckersley, 2003, p. 49)
• “the wind blows”
• “the wind is its blowing” (Ingold, 2011)
“The modern mind is still haunted by the belief that
the only meaningful concepts are those capable
of mathematical elucidation…This rationalism
supports the doctrine that facts are separate from
values…and that truth is a function of objective reality”
(Gladwin, et al, 1997)