17
Lancer Parking Structure Conceptual Design CLIENT: Mr. Steve Smith, CBU TECHNICAL CONSULTANTS Ms. Kristen Brown, Rick Engineering, Mr. Don Marks, ipd-global, Dr. Jong-Wha Bai, CBU-College of Engineering -Alejandra Gastelum, -Danielle Lynch, -Manzi Dusabimana, -Suhail Farah EGR 401 CAPSTONE DESIGN

Final conceptual design client

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Lancer Parking Structure Conceptual Design

CLIENT: Mr. Steve Smith, CBU

TECHNICAL CONSULTANTS

Ms. Kristen Brown, Rick Engineering,

Mr. Don Marks, ipd-global,

Dr. Jong-Wha Bai, CBU-College of Engineering

-Alejandra Gastelum, -Danielle Lynch, -Manzi Dusabimana, -Suhail Farah

EGR 401

CAPSTONE DESIGN

The team proposed the construction of a parking structure

on campus, and offered to do the design.

Width: 249 ft

Area:132468 S.F. =3.04 Acres 2 Customer needs analysis methods:

-Meetings with client

-Research (Online,Tour of a parking structure)

The client’s proposed needs in the

project:

❏ 2,200 parking spots

❏ Make a statement from the 91 freeway

❏ Relocate cell towers

❏ Demolish/ relocate church

❏ 3.04 acre site Length: 532 ft

Cast-in-place concrete allows for the structure to

be built as a single unit.

● —No leaks, better drainage

● —Lower maintenance

● —Wider spans allows for better lighting, less joints

● —Higher cost to construct

● —Longer construction time

Comparison of Alternatives for construction

Materials.

Three selected alternatives for

the internal configuration...

This Double Ramp alternative utilizes the length of the site and provides roughly 440 spots per level

Compact SpotsRamp

Elevator(s) Electric Vehicle Charging Station

Handicap Parking

----------D

ian

a ----------

There are both advantages and disadvantages to this alternative.

•Flexible with the entrance and exit locations

•Large number of parking spots per level

2200 / 440 = 5 Levels

•Solar panels on the roof

• Congestion on the ramps

• Cross-traffic

5 Level Side By Side Parking Ramp System in shown in the following pictures.

Slope for Parking: No greater

than 5% Max.-Two-way Circulation System

-Side-by-side ramps

Here are some of the calculations derived for a Five Level Side-by-Side design

Here is a top view of the first floor.

Ramp

Elevator

exit

Entrance

-90 Degrees, Cars can park in

any direction.

-Easier traffic flow throughout

the structure.

-Less safe

Handicap

Parking

D

i

a

n

a

A

v

e

n

u

e

Camel-Back configuration

Below are some of the calculations derived for this design.

1.

2.

3.

4.

● 45 degree parking spots on the perimeter

● 90 Degree parking spots in the middle

● One-way Exits and Entrances

● 450 Spots per level

Below is a rough Sketch of the Parking layouts for

each level, advantages and disadvantages.

● Reduced potential for collisions

● 50 Extra parking spots

● Flexible Layout

● Smooth traffic flow(Few Left-Turns)

● Long drives from upper levels to the entrances

Comparing the alternatives for internal configurations.

Camelback Double Ramp Bay Side by Side

Number Spots 5 +0 -1

Traffic Flow 4 -1 +0

Safety 4 +0 -1

Travel Time between levels 2 +2 +2

User Friendly 3 +1 +1

Total 0 +2 +1

RS-Means Cost Estimation

Precast with Reinforced Concrete frames

Pre-Cast concrete with Steel Frames

RS-Means Cost Estimation

Reinforced Concrete and Reinforced Frames

Reinforced Concrete and Steel Frames

A quick overview of the structure

QUESTIONS?