Upload
huyen-nguyen
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 Client Final Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/client-final-report 1/6
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University
RMIT International University Viet Nam
Client Management - COMM 2384
Final Assessment Report Brief
Lecturer: Melanie Casul
Student: Nguyen Thi Bich Huyen
ID: s3210216
Group: 2
8/3/2019 Client Final Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/client-final-report 2/6
COMM 2384
Client Management - COMM 2384 2
Topic 1: “Client acquisition is a higher priority than client retention”. Discuss both sides of this
statement and state which is more important in your view and why. In your discussion, make
reference to a minimum of three (3) strategies discussed in any of the lectures, assigned readings,
group reports presented in this course and your wider research.
I. Introduction
A successful business could be evaluated with the quantity of clients and the strategy
it maintains effectively these relationships. With the increase in society demanded,
day by day there are countless companies with variety of sizes which pop up as fast as
mushroom growing after a rain. Imperceptibly, that situation has placed pressures onbusiness activities, especially on client management departments when targeting the
right customers to maximize company‟s profit. Thus, the opinion “Client acquisition
is a higher priority than client retention” becomes a controversial topic. This paper
will emphasize the important role of client retention over client acquisition in an
organization as well as provide reasons and also strategies in following paragraphs.
II. Overview of the terms “Client acquisition” and “Client retention”
According to Lewis (2006), client acquisition could be defined as potential customers
that the business focuses to measure their potential values and to allocate acquired
resources with greater long-term value. On the contrary, client retention focuses on
“obtaining information and allocating resources to manage relationship with existing
customers on the basic of their long-term value” (Reinartz et al. 2004).
III. Discussion on “Client acquisition is a higher priority than client retention”
1. General view on both sides of Client acquisition and Client retention
Client acquisition and client retention are not mutually exclusive because a
business might concentrate on one or both terms depending on companies‟ visions
and characteristics such as products, services or business‟ goals.
For client‟s acquisition, Bolton & Tarasi (n.d.) suggest that it is the first step in
building a customer base. Client acquisition is inadequate but it is obviously true
8/3/2019 Client Final Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/client-final-report 3/6
COMM 2384
Client Management - COMM 2384 3
for new establishment firm due to lots of risks. Additionally, Mittal & Kamakura
(2001) state “customers with different characteristics have different satisfaction
thresholds and different probabilities of repurchase”. Hence, client acquisition
carries a lot of risk such as waste time and money to research what do they want,
need and aspire. These elements will directly diminish to company‟s revenue.
In sum, client retention is often easier and cheaper than client acquisition.
According to the data of CRMGuru – the world‟s best community for business
leaders, releases that 80% business leader believes in loyalty which means their
client retentions are crucial to business success (Thompson 2005). The data also
shows the different respondents in investment between client acquisition (40%)
and client retention (22%). In the other word, catching up a new customer is very
hard but if it not fit for organization‟s value or future profitability, it will waste
the amount of company‟s resources such as financial, time and people. Thus, the
expense for client acquisition is double amount and it directly diminishes to
business profit.
2. Methods used to analysis client’s strategies.
Boston Consulting Group matrix (BCG matrix)
Every business needs to build
effective and strong relationships
with its customers in order to
enrich its own business potential.
Thus, before making any decision,
a thoughtful analysis to select a
proper strategy for long-term
maintain and development
agency-client relationship is highly
required a serious attention. BCG matrix is a portfolio planning method
that evaluates a company‟s strategic business units in terms of their
business growth rate and relative share with four categories including
starts, cash cow, question mark and dog (Kotler et al 2008). In case of
client-agency relationship, the matrix is used to evaluate an agency‟s
Figure 1. Adapted from: Magdy 2010
8/3/2019 Client Final Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/client-final-report 4/6
COMM 2384
Client Management - COMM 2384 4
strategic client units in term of its client growth rate and relative share
with the same four categories. The categories that beat the target profit
easily is cash cow with low client growth but high client share which is
usually suitable to target client retention (Bolton & Tarasi n.d.). The other
categories including star and question mark could be invested for client
retention but it does not strong enough because it is just right in case of
special characteristic of company.
Iceberg strategy
The strategy supports the idea that
measures and enhances the profitability
of customer relationship through a better
understanding of customer‟s behavior
(Icebergstrategy 2010). For client
retention, due to long-term working
together the agency and client might have
better mutual understandings about
organizational cultures, goals or
behaviors than in case of client acquisition which requires much time and
even money to get good knowledge about them to serve their needs. In the
other word, continue maintaining and developing current clients could
save time and finance as the agency somehow could reach some levels of
the invisible parts of the iceberg. Hence, client retention seems a safety
way to limit the expense and risk.
Risk/Revenue matrix
When determining client retention, the major and final aim is that the
company also needs to decide which customers are the most valuable or
most costly to lose for. Hughes (cited in Thompson 2005) suggests using a
Risk/Revenue matrix to figure out which customers needs to care mostly.
In the table, the priority A and B are the most important regardless of
lifetime value, those who are client most likely stay with you and the
priority C vice versa. Hughes states that the priority C could be the loyal
Figure 2. Adapted from: Haines 2005
8/3/2019 Client Final Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/client-final-report 5/6
COMM 2384
Client Management - COMM 2384 5
client that is never going to leave you; so in this case, the business does
not need spending much of money on to build healthier relationship.
High Medium Low
High Priority A Priority B Priority C
Medium Priority B Priority B Priority C
Low Priority C Priority C Priority C
Figure 3. Adapted from: Hughes n.d.
IV. Conclusion
Different customers provide different revenue as well as require variety expenses onto the organization. To maximize profitability, it is essential to establish the right
target clients which divided into two main types including client retention and client
acquisition. By the utilization of three strategies: BBG, Iceberg, and Risk/Revenue
matrix, although client‟s acquisition is the first step in building a customer base, it
maintains a lot of cost and risks. Thus, client retention is the best choice for the
agency to earn profits and strengthen long-term company‟s development.
Word count: 1003
Probability of leaving soon
Life-
Time
Value
8/3/2019 Client Final Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/client-final-report 6/6
COMM 2384
Client Management - COMM 2384 6
V. References
Bolton, R N & Tarasi, C O n.d., „Managing customer relationship‟, Marketing
Science, pp. 3-31.
Haines, S G 2005, „The Iceberg theory of change‟, image, Hainescentre, viewed 10
May 2011, <http://www.hainescentre.com/consulting/pdfs/MEWC-01.pdf >
Gupta, S & Lehmann D R 2005, Managing customer as investment – the strategic
value of customer in the long run, Pearson Education, USA.
Hughes, M n.d., „Risk/Revenue Matrix‟, image, The customer Loyalty Solution,
viewed 12 May 2011,
<http://www.omdec.com/moxie/Technical/reliability-continuous-improvement---
living-rcm.shtml>Icebergstrategy 2010, homepage, Icebergstrategy, viewed 12 May 2011,
<http://icebergstrategy.com/ >
Kotler, P, Armstrong, G, And, S H, Leong, S M, Tan, C T & Hon-Ming, O Y 2008,
Principle of marketing – a global perspective, 12th edn, Pearson/Prentice Hall, New
York.
Lewis, M 2006, „The effects of shipping fees on customer acquisition, customer
retention, and purchase quantities‟, Journal of Retailing, vol 82, issue 1, pp. 13 – 23.
Magdy, M 2010, „BCG Matrix‟, image, How to be a marketer , 24 March, viewed 12
May 2011, <http://www.howtobeamarketer.com/articles/marketing-mix/3-
product/39-bcg-matrix/how-to-make-a-bcg-matrix-model-boston-consultancy-group-
matrix-model
Mittal, V & Kakakuma, W A 2001, „Satisfaction, repurchase intent, and repurchase
behaviour: investigating the moderating of customer characteristics‟, Journal of
Marketing Research, vol XXXVIII, pp. 131 – 142.
Reinartz, W, Krafft, M, & Hoyer, W D 2004, „The customer relationship management
processes: its measurement and impact on performance‟, Journal of Marketing
Research, vol 41, pp. 293 – 305
Thompson, B 2005, „The loyalty connection: Secrets to customer retention and
increase profits‟, Right Now Technologies, USA.