View
197
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
LAP CBD EXPLORATION
DR SREEJOY PATNAIK
E.C MEMBER EAST ZONE , IAGES
FIAGES FAMS FAIS
G.C MEMBER , ASI, ODISHA
POPULARITY OF LAP.CBDE
Is preferred more frequently.
Increasing surgeon’s expertise in Laparoscopy.
Increasing demand of a single procedure .
One time hospitalisation and anaesthesia.
Reduction of costs.
Success rate is 80-90%.
LAPAROSCOPIC APPROACHES TO CBD STONES
1. TRANS- CYSTIC DUCT APPROACH
2. LAP. CHOLEDOCHOTOMY APPROACH
INDICATIONS OF TRANS CYSTIC APPROACH
CBD diameter < 6 mm
Stone location distal to the cystic duct / CBDjunction
Cystic duct diameter > 4 mm
Fewer than 3 to 6 stones within the CBD
Stones smaller than 10 mm
Cystic duct entrance into CBD is straight and lateral
Laparoscopic suturing ability poor
Laparoscopic Trans Cystic Duct Approach to CBD stones
Contra-indications
1. Stone diameter > 6mm2. Cystic duct diameter < 4mm3. Intra hepatic stones4. Cystic duct entrance - posterior or distal to CBD stones
Advantages
1. T-tube is eliminated2. Risk of CBD stricture post. choledochotomy is eliminated
INDICATIONS FOR CHOLEDOCHOTOMY
• Failed laparoscopic trans cystic exploration or preoperative ERCP stone extraction
• Narrow entrance & course of cystic duct ( spiral,very low, post.)
• Valves in the cystic duct.
• Dilated CBD > 1 cm
• Large stones > 10 mm or impacted, requiring lithotripsy.
• Multiple stones
• Intra-hepatic stones.
• Suturing ability -good
Laparoscopic choledochotomy for CBD stones
Contra-indications
1. CBD diameter less than 6mm
2. Poor laparoscopic suturing ability
FACTORS FOR LAP CBDE
• STONE FACTORS:• Single stone
• Muliple stones
• Stones< 6 mm
• Stones > 6 mm
• Intra- hepatic stones
DUCT FACTORS:Diameter of CD < 4 mmDiameter of CD > 4mmDiameter of CBD < 6mmDiameter of CBD >6mmCD entrance- lateralCD entrance- posteriorCD entrance- distal
INFLAMMATORY FACTORS:
Inflammation – mildInflammation - marked
SURGEON FACTORS :
Suturing ability- PoorSuturing ability - Good
STANDARD LAP PORT PLACEMENTS
TRANS CYSTIC EXPLORATIONThe Steps
Cystic duct preparation .
IOC + confirm stones/location.
Extraction of stone- flushing, wire basket, balloon.
Fibreoptic Choledocoscopy + extraction
Completion IOC (Fluroscopy)
Stent CBD(Antegrade) +/-
Close Cystic duct- Endoloop / LT-400 Clip
LAP CHOLEDOCHOTOMY Important steps
Exposure of CBD
Choledochotomy- 1cm
Rigid / Flex. choledochoscopy
Stone Extraction- saline flush, endo-basket, endo-balloon.
Stone clearance- mech.lithotrpsy / Holmium laser, graspers.
Check for residual stones - IOC
Antegrade stent, T-tube, CDD
Primary closure of CBD
TRANS-CYSTIC VS CHOLEDOCHOTOMY
Trans-cystic Choledochotomy
No. of CBD stones < 3 Any number
Size of stone Smaller than cystic duct
< 6mm
Any size
Location of stone Below the insertion of cystic duct
Any location
Anatomy of cystic duct (long, valve, medial insertion, low insertion)
Important Not so
Diameter of CBD Any > 7mm
Operating time Less More
Hospital stay Less More
Surgical technique Easy Difficult
Stone clearance 60 – 65% 95 – 100%
VIDEO PROCEDURE
Complications
• Biliary leak (2 to 3%)
• Haemoperitoneum
• Sub-diaphragmatic collection (1-1.4%)
• Bilioma (2.1 – 3.6%)
• Stone over Stent
• Left over stone (2 – 8%)
• Conversion (1 - 4.5%)
BILIO-ENTERIC BYPASS
WHY, WHEN & HOW.
Indications:
Multiple CBD stones
Recurrent choledocholithiasis
Unsuccessful sphincterotomy
Impacted large CBD stones
Markedly dilated CBD
Choices:
Choledochoduodenostomy
Transduodenal
sphincteroplasty/ERCP + ST
Choledochojejunostomy