60
60F T2 T1 T1FS con T1 T1FS con

Radiological assessment – Part 2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Radiological assessment – Part 2

60F

T2 T1 T1FS con

T1 T1FS con

Page 2: Radiological assessment – Part 2

70M

T2 T1 T1FS con

T1 T1FS con

Page 3: Radiological assessment – Part 2

35M PBA T2 T2 T1

Page 4: Radiological assessment – Part 2
Page 5: Radiological assessment – Part 2

• 72 year old male• Non mechanical back pain• Known prostate Ca:

– Raised PSA (20)– Nodule on DRE– +ve on biopsy

• Staging investigations

Page 6: Radiological assessment – Part 2

What is the most appropriate imaging modality for the spine?

1. Plain film2. CT3. Scintigraphy (bone scan) 4. MRI

Page 7: Radiological assessment – Part 2
Page 8: Radiological assessment – Part 2
Page 9: Radiological assessment – Part 2
Page 10: Radiological assessment – Part 2

64F Breast Ca

Page 11: Radiological assessment – Part 2

T2 T1 T1FS con

76M CRC

Page 12: Radiological assessment – Part 2

T2

54M RCC

Page 13: Radiological assessment – Part 2
Page 14: Radiological assessment – Part 2

• 62 year old male• Severe low back pain of rapid onset• Febrile and unwell• 4 weeks ago underwent abdominal surgery for

perforated diverticulitis

Page 15: Radiological assessment – Part 2

What is the most likely diagnosis?

1. Acute disc herniation2. Discitis/ osteomyelitis3. Crush fracture secondary to osteoporosis4. Metastatic cancer

Page 16: Radiological assessment – Part 2

What is the most appropriate imaging modality?

1. Plain film2. CT3. Scintigraphy (bone scan) 4. MRI

Page 17: Radiological assessment – Part 2

T2 T1 T1FS con

Page 18: Radiological assessment – Part 2

T2 T1FS con

Page 19: Radiological assessment – Part 2
Page 20: Radiological assessment – Part 2

• 37 year old male• Low back and buttock pain, increasing over

several months• Worse in morning; reduced by activity

Page 21: Radiological assessment – Part 2

What is the most likely diagnosis?

1. Acute disc herniation2. Facet joint degeneration3. Inflammatory spondyloarthropathy4. Metastatic cancer

Page 22: Radiological assessment – Part 2
Page 23: Radiological assessment – Part 2

Seronegative spondyloarthropathies (SpA)

• European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group (ESSG) Arthritis Rheum 1991;34:1218-1227– Ankylosing spondylitis– Reactive arthritis– Arthritis spondylitis with inflammatory bowel disease– Arthritis spondylitis with psoriasis– Undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy (uSpA)

• Clinical features + HLA-B27• Rheumatoid factor –ve = seronegative

Page 24: Radiological assessment – Part 2

ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS

• Chronic inflammatory disease, primarily affecting spine and sacroiliac joints

• Osteitis:– Bone erosions; sclerosis; ankylosis

• Peripheral arthritis: – Asymmetrical; lower limb

• Enthesopathy: – Plantar fasciitis– Distal Achilles tendonosis and paratendonitis

Page 25: Radiological assessment – Part 2

DIAGNOSIS OF AS

• Radiographic grading of sacroiliitis 0-4Kellegren Atlas of Standard Radiographs in Arthritis,

Oxford 1963• Grade 0 = normal• Grade 1 = suspicious (mild blurring)• Grade 2 = minimal sclerosis, some erosions• Grade 3 = severe erosions, joint widening, partial

ankylosis• Grade 4 = complete ankylosis

Page 26: Radiological assessment – Part 2

Radiographic grading of AS• Grade 0• Grade 1 • Grade 2• Grade 3 • Grade 4

Page 27: Radiological assessment – Part 2

Radiographic grading of AS• Grade 0• Grade 1 • Grade 2• Grade 3 • Grade 4

Page 28: Radiological assessment – Part 2

Radiographic grading of AS• Grade 0• Grade 1 • Grade 2• Grade 3 • Grade 4

Page 29: Radiological assessment – Part 2

Radiographic grading of AS• Grade 0• Grade 1 • Grade 2• Grade 3 • Grade 4

Page 30: Radiological assessment – Part 2

Radiographic grading of AS• Grade 0• Grade 1 • Grade 2• Grade 3 • Grade 4

Page 31: Radiological assessment – Part 2

Radiographic grading of AS• Grade 0• Grade 1 • Grade 2• Grade 3 • Grade 4

Page 32: Radiological assessment – Part 2

Dx of AS: Modified New York criteria

• Arthritis Rheum 1984;27:361-368• Clinical:

1. LBP & stiffness > 3/12 improved by exercise2. ↓ motion lumbar spine sagittal and frontal3. ↓ chest expansion for age & sex

• Radiological: – Grade ≥ 2 bilateral– Grade 3-4 unilateral

• AS = 2/3 clinical + radiological

Page 33: Radiological assessment – Part 2

Problems with radiographic grading

• May take years for radiographic changes to develop– Early cases excluded from research and treatment

• Most radiographic signs in AS reflect healing processes, not disease activity– cf erosions in RA

• Most radiographic signs in AS irreversible• Radiographs do not detect inflammation

Page 34: Radiological assessment – Part 2

T2FS

Page 35: Radiological assessment – Part 2

T1

STIR

STIR

Page 36: Radiological assessment – Part 2

Response to DMARD eg infliximab

– Braun Ann Rheum Dis 2002;61:iii51-iii60

Page 37: Radiological assessment – Part 2
Page 38: Radiological assessment – Part 2

• 45 year old male• 2 weeks post discectomy L4/5• Recurrent bilateral leg pain

Page 39: Radiological assessment – Part 2

What is the most appropriate imaging modality?

1. Plain film2. CT3. Scintigraphy (bone scan) 4. MRI

Page 40: Radiological assessment – Part 2

T2T1

Page 41: Radiological assessment – Part 2

T2

T1FScon

T2

Page 42: Radiological assessment – Part 2

T1FScon

Page 43: Radiological assessment – Part 2

• Dx: recurrent disc:– Central herniation + huge sequestration virtually filling

the spinal canal• Note peripheral enhancement pattern• DD: fibrosis

Page 44: Radiological assessment – Part 2
Page 45: Radiological assessment – Part 2

• 51 year old female• Left sciatica

– Intermittent pain and paraesthesia

Page 46: Radiological assessment – Part 2

T2 T1 T1FS con

Page 47: Radiological assessment – Part 2

What is the most likely diagnosis?

1. Massive disc sequestration2. Discitis complicated by abscess3. Synovial cyst4. Benign peripheral nerve sheath tumour

Page 48: Radiological assessment – Part 2

T2 T1 T1FS con

Page 49: Radiological assessment – Part 2

• Dx: benign peripheral nerve sheath tumour (BPNST) of left L3 nerve root– Many clinicians use the term ‘neuroma’

• Pathologically imprecise term– Most are benign

• Schwannoma or neurofibroma• Difficult (impossible) to differentiate on imaging

– BPNST is probably the best terminology– Associated with NF1 and ‘NF2’ (MISME)

Page 50: Radiological assessment – Part 2
Page 51: Radiological assessment – Part 2

• 66 year old female• Severe lower back pain on and off for years• More recent (2 months) development of right

sciatica

Page 52: Radiological assessment – Part 2
Page 53: Radiological assessment – Part 2

What is the most likely diagnosis?

1. Massive disc sequestration2. Discitis complicated by abscess3. Synovial cyst4. Benign peripheral nerve sheath tumour

Page 54: Radiological assessment – Part 2

L4/5

Page 55: Radiological assessment – Part 2

• Severe OA of facet (zygoapophyseal) joints• Round heterogeneous lesion projecting into right

spinal canal• Note: close relationship to facet joint• Dx: synovial cyst

Page 56: Radiological assessment – Part 2

Synovial cyst lumbar facet joint

• Fairly common• Key is relationship to degenerate facet joint• Density may vary from pure cyst to varying levels of

calcification and heterogeneity• Usually present clinically with intractable sciatica• May respond to aspiration and steroid injection, but

usually treated surgically

Page 57: Radiological assessment – Part 2

T2 T1

Page 58: Radiological assessment – Part 2

T2 T1

Page 59: Radiological assessment – Part 2

Image interpretation: spine

• Anatomy• Cross sectional techniques:

– CT– MRI

• Nomenclature of disc herniations and spinal stenosis

• A few cases

Page 60: Radiological assessment – Part 2