Upload
athenista1
View
107
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Cerebral Artery Occlusion/Stenosis with Infarction
5
*ICD-10 Changes Appear in RED BOLD
ICD-9-CM ICD-10-CM
Etiology:• Embolism• Thrombosis• Unspecified occlusion/stenosis
Etiology: Same as ICD-9-CM• Embolism• Thrombosis• Unspecified occlusion/stenosis
Site:• Cerebral artery
• Anterior• Middle• Posterior
• Cerebellar• Other specified cerebral
artery• Unspecified cerebral artery
Laterality:• Right • Left• Bilateral• Unspecified
ICD-10 History
7
1975 WHO
approves ICD-9
1981 AIDS
clinically observed for the first time
75 8580 9590 0500 1510
2015 U.S.
adopts ICD-10
2008
Korea adopts ICD-10
2010 ICD-11
released
1990 WHO
approves ICD-10
1999 US adopts ICD-10 for mortality
coding
2007 Thailand adopts ICD-10
1997 Sweden adopts ICD-10
1998 Australia
adopts ICD-10
2000 Canada adopts ICD-10
2014Ebola
Outbreak
Image Source: http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/icd-10-debate-hits-washington-most-prepared-worry-persists
April 14th
• Sustainable Growth Rate Repealed
• No ICD-10 Delay
News from
Washington
The ICD-10 transition broadly affects the patient visit
10
Intake
Select chief complaint
Enter vitals
Review of symptoms
Review past medical and social
history
Review medications and
allergies
Exam
Review Intake
Document patient exam
Select diagnosis
Enter orders
Review quality measures
Sign-Off
Review assessment and
plan
Sign off on orders
Complete billing slip
Generate letters
Review charges
Close the patient encounter
Check-In
Verify appointment, demographic,
insurance information
Collect patient payments
Print billing slip
Forms
Check-Out
Schedule follow up appointments
Collect outstanding
balances
Distribute patient
education materials
Enter charges
Five areas of focus
11
1 Will vendors be ready?
2 Payer readiness
3 Training & knowledge retention
4 Cut in productivity
5 Planning for payment disruption
Get your upgrade date
12
2014 2015
2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q
Payer Testing
FamiliarizationPlanning / Impact Assessment
Interface Testing (Orders, Labs, EHR)
Payer Readiness
Upgrade date?
Sample ICD-10 Deployment Timeline
1
CMS End-to-End Testing Dates
What is supposed to happen
DATE OF SERVICEPOST-
COMPLIANCE ICD-10
ONLY ICD-10 REQUIRED
Get paid regardless of payer status
13
Only ICD-9 required
Date of servicePre-compliance
ICD-9
2
ICD-10 Enforcement Date
What’s likely to happen
DATE OF SERVICEPOST-
COMPLIANCE AND PAYER
READINESS ICD-10
ICD-10 AND ICD-9 Required
Pre October 1, 2015
Focus on training and learning
14
Coding and Documentation(Specialty-Specific)
Technology systems
Providers
Clinical Staff
Administrative Clerical
Management
Billing Staff
Role-based learning needs for the ICD-10 transition
3
A smart EHR will bolster productivity
16
Healing TypeEncounter TypeBody Part
M84.361 M84.362M84.361
SM84.362
GM84.362
SM84.369
SM84.369
K
M84.369A
M84.361K
M84.362A
M84.361P
M84.361A
M84.369D
M84.369P
M84.361D
M84.362K
M84.362D
M84.362P
M84.369S
M84.369G
M84.361G
Stress fracture of tibia 21 Possible Codes
4
A smart EHR will bolster productivity
17
• Unspecified tibia and fibula
• Tibia and fibula• Right tibia• Left tibia
Healing TypeEncounter TypeBody Part
M84.361 M84.362M84.361
SM84.362
GM84.362
SM84.369
SM84.369
K
M84.369A
M84.361K
M84.362A
M84.361P
M84.361A
M84.369D
M84.369P
M84.361D
M84.362K
M84.362D
M84.362P
M84.369S
M84.369G
M84.361G
Stress fracture of tibia 21 Possible Codes
4
A smart EHR will bolster productivity
18
• Initial encounter• Subsequent
encounter
• Unspecified tibia and fibula
• Tibia and fibula• Right tibia• Left tibia
Healing TypeEncounter TypeBody Part
M84.361 M84.362M84.361
SM84.362
GM84.362
SM84.369
SM84.369
K
M84.369A
M84.361K
M84.362A
M84.361P
M84.361A
M84.369D
M84.369P
M84.361D
M84.362K
M84.362D
M84.362P
M84.369S
M84.369G
M84.361G
Stress fracture of tibia 21 Possible Codes
4
A smart EHR will bolster productivity
19
• Routine healing• Delayed healing• Nonunion• Malunion
• Initial encounter• Subsequent
encounter
• Unspecified tibia and fibula
• Tibia and fibula• Right tibia• Left tibia
M84.361P Stress fracture, right tibia, subsequent encounter for fracture with malunion
Healing TypeEncounter TypeBody Part
M84.361 M84.362M84.361
SM84.362
GM84.362
SM84.369
SM84.369
K
M84.369A
M84.361K
M84.362A
M84.361P
M84.361A
M84.369D
M84.369P
M84.361D
M84.362K
M84.362D
M84.362P
M84.369S
M84.369G
M84.361G
Stress fracture of tibia 21 Possible Codes
4
Change isn’t cheap…
20
http://www.ama-assn.org/resources/doc/washington/icd-10-costs-for-physician-practices-study.pdf
Typical Small Practice
Typical Medium Practice
Typical Large Practice
Training $2,700-3,000 $4,800-7,900 $75,100
Assessment $4,300-7,000 $6,535-9,600 $19,320
Software upgrades
$0-60,000 $0-200,000 $0-2,000,000
Process remediation
$3,312-6,701 $6,211-12,990 $14,874-31,821
Testing $15,248-28,805 $47,906-93,098 $428,740-880,660
Productivity loss $8,500-20,250$72,649-166,649
$726,487-1,666,487
Payment Disruption
$22,579-100,349
$75,263-334,498
$752,630-3,344,976
TotalUp to $226,105
Up to $824,735
Up to $8,018,364
5
We provide five integrated services that deliver immediate value to providers
22
Improved clinical care and patient outcomes
Population Health Management
Documentation and workflow efficiency
athenaCommunicator® Patient Engagement
athenaCollector® Practice Management
athenaClinicals®
Clinical Performance
athenaCoordinator®
Population Health
Epocrates®
Point of Care Medical Applications
athenahealth’s award-winning services can help you thrive through change
23“2014 Best in KLAS Awards: Software & Services,” January, 2015. © 2015 KLAS Enterprises, LLC. All rights reserved. www.KLASresearch.com
#1 Practice
Management System
(1-10, 11-75 physicians)
#2 Practice
Management System
(over 75 physicians)
#2 EHR
(over 75 physicians)
#2 Patient Portal
#2 Overall
Physician Practice Vendor
2014 Best in KLAS
• 64,000+ providers on athenaNet®
• Clients ranging from 1 to 5,000+ providers
• 50 states and 112 medical specialties
• $14 billion in client collections per year
• Acquired Epocrates March, 2013
24
Software Knowledge Service
• Ranked #1 Most Usable EHR by KLAS
• Single instance of continuously updated software
• ICD-10 upgrade pushed out February 22, 2014 at no additional cost
• Practice coding tools for coders and providers
• Tracking payer, clearinghouse, and interface readiness
• Managing ICD-9/10 codes based on payer readiness
• Using clinical terminology (SNOMED) to present ICD-10 codes intelligently at the point of care
• Working directly with payers and clearinghouses to define and execute a comprehensive testing schedule
• Behave like a 59,000 provider health organization for priority access to payers
• Supporting client readiness through ICD-10 Readiness Center and Coaching
US Patent # 7,720,70
1
And we were also ranked as the most likely to keep up with regulations
25
© 2014 KLAS Enterprises, LLC. All rights reserved. www.KLASresearch.com
How confident are you in your RCM vendor’s ability to keep up with regulatory and government demands?
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0% athenahealth Kareo NextGen Cerner eClinicalWorks
1
1
5
2
1
1
2
5
9
6
2
2
4
5
20
Pre
lim
inary
Data
Confident
Very Confident Unsure
Unconfident
Very Unconfident
In summary, address key areas to mitigate business continuity risk
26
Assess impact of ICD-10 throughout patient workflow
Know your vendors’ readiness plan
Practice early and often on real patient data in your PM and EHR post 10/1 environment
Identify and address gaps in payer readiness
Payer and interface testing
Plan for cash flow disruption
1
2
3
4
5
6