16
Challenge the future Delft University of Technology Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading Eva Lantsoght, Yuguang Yang, Rik Tersteeg, Cor van der Veen, Ane de Boer

Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

Challenge the future

DelftUniversity ofTechnology

Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

Eva Lantsoght, Yuguang Yang, Rik Tersteeg, Cor van der Veen, Ane de Boer

Page 2: Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

2Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

Overview• Introduction• Why proof loading?• Stop criteria?

• Overview of existing guidelines• Lab testing for analysis• Recommendations• Summary and conclusions

Slab shear experiments, TU Delft

Page 3: Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

3Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

Why load testing? (1)Bridges from 60s and 70s

The Hague in 1959

Increased live loads

common heavy and long truck (600 kN)

End of service life + larger loads

Page 4: Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

4Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

Why load testing? (2)

Page 5: Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

5Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

Stop criteria

• Safety philosophy• Stop criteria:• Further loading not permitted• Failure near• Irreversible damage near

MSc Thesis W. Vos

Page 6: Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

6Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

Proof load testing of bridges

• Apply predetermined load to bridge• Information lacking• Damage due to ASR, …

• Proof load testing• Immediate approval of

bridge• Recalculate updated β

Page 7: Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

7Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

Existing Guidelines for proof loading

• Europe: DAfStB Richtlinie• Stop criteria• Concrete strain• Steel strain• Crack width and residual

crack width• Residual deflection

• For flexure• Structures with large

existing cracking?

Page 8: Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

8Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

Existing Guidelines for proof loading

• North America: • Buildings: ACI 437.2M-

13• Bridges: Manual of

Bridge Rating Through Load Testing (1998)

• ACI 437.2M-13 stop criteria:• Residual deflection• Permanency ratio• Deviation from Linearity

Index

Page 9: Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

9Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

Research need

• Guideline for proof loading of existing bridges for the Netherlands

• Flexure + shear• Stop criteria?

Page 10: Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

10Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

Lab testing for analysis (1)

• Beams from Ruytenschildt Bridge• Cyclic loading protocol• Tests: Failure in shear and flexure• Measurements:

• Lasers: deflection of beam• LVDTs: crack opening • Acoustic emission sensors

Beams RSB01 after failure (Yang, 2015)

Yang, Y. (2015). "Experimental Studies on the Structural Behaviours of Beams from Ruytenschildt Bridge," Stevin Report 25.5-15-09, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 76 pp.

Beams RSB02B after failure (Yang, 2015)

Page 11: Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

11Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

Lab testing for analysis (2)RSB 01F 02A 02B 03F 03Ad (mm) 503 515.5 520 521 515Ac (m2) 0.290 0.297 0.307 0.596 0.537Rebar 4Ø22

4Ø194Ø224Ø19

4Ø225Ø19

9Ø228Ø19

7Ø228Ø19

ρl 0.91% 0.89% 0.96% 0.95% 0.92%

Page 12: Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

12Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

Lab Testing for analysis (2)• Analysis of stop criteria ACI 437.2M-13 and DAfStB

Richtlinie for RSB03F – Flexure testACI 437.2M-13 Criterion

Load (kN) DAfStBCriterion

Load (kN)

Δr 340 Δr 150Ipr >Pu w new crack 300

IDL 250 Strain -PACI,st 250 PDA,st 150

Pu 606.6 Pu 606.6PACI,st/Pu 0.41 PDA,st/Pu 0.25

Tersteeg, R. H. D. (2015). "Proefbelastingen op betonnen bruggen," B.Sc. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, pp. 69.

Page 13: Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

13Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

Lab Testing for analysis (3)• Analysis of stop criteria ACI 437.2M-13 and DAfStB

Richtlinie for RSB03A – Shear testACI 437.2M-13 Criterion

Load (kN) DAfStBCriterion

Load (kN)

Δr >Pu Δr >Pu

Ipr >Pu w new crack 690

IDL 390 Strain -PACI,st 390 PDA,st 690

Pu 706.7 Pu 706.7PACI,st/Pu 0.55 PDA,st/Pu 0.98

Tersteeg, R. H. D. (2015). "Proefbelastingen op betonnen bruggen," B.Sc. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, pp. 69.

Page 14: Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

14Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

Recommendations• Use cyclic load protocol• Study linearity and repeatability of results

• Flexure: Stop criteria exceeded long before failure• Suitable stop criteria

• Crack width criterion from DAfStB + add lower bound• Residual deflection DAfStB / ACI 437.2M-13 + minimum load level• Deviation from Linearity ACI 437.2M-13: consistent performance

except for retested beam• BUT: Deviation from Linearity and Permanency Ratio depend on

applied loading protocol• Shear: • Need to develop stop criteria• Research on acoustic emission measurements

Page 15: Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

15Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

Summary and conclusions• Proof loading to approve existing

bridges• Existing guidelines: • Only flexure• Cracked structures?

• Development of stop criteria for Dutch Guideline• Laboratory experiments• Check existing stop criteria

• Stop criteria• Available for flexure• Adaptations for bridges needed• Current research: shear

Viaduct Zijlweg, tested in summer 2015

Page 16: Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

16Development of Stop Criteria for Proof Loading

Contact:Eva [email protected] // [email protected]+31(0)152787449