Illinois Standardized Tests 2012 Results

Illinois Standardized Tests2012 ResultsGrades 3‐8 and 11

Naperville CUSD 203ape e CUS 03

Assessment Philosophyp y– Primary goal is to improve student learning.

– Any one assessment should be used in conjunction with all other available information.with all other available information.

– Students should be involved in their learning, g,assessment, and evaluation.

– Results should be used to design educational opportunities for all learners.

Tests Given– ISAT

• Reading : Grades 3 – 8– IAA

• Reading : Grades 3 – 8 & 11• Reading : Grades 3 – 8 • Math: Grades 3 – 8 • Science: Grades 4 & 7

• Reading : Grades 3 – 8, & 11 • Math: Grades 3 – 8, & 11 • Science: Grades 4, 7 & 11

– PSAE – Grade 11• ACT• ACT• WorkKeys

– Reading for Information– Applied Mathematics

• ISBE Science

Tests Given– ISAT

• Reading : Grades 3 – 8– IAA

• Reading : Grades 3 – 8 & 11• Reading : Grades 3 – 8 • Math: Grades 3 – 8 • Science: Grades 4 & 7

• Reading : Grades 3 – 8, & 11 • Math: Grades 3 – 8, & 11 • Science: Grades 4, 7 & 11

– PSAE – Grade 11• ACT• ACT• WorkKeys

– Reading for Information2013: addition of the “Locating Information” WorkKeys test 

t d t li ibl f– Applied Mathematics

• ISBE Scienceso students are eligible for ACT’s “National Career Readiness” Certificate

Adequate Yearly Progressq y gState Benchmarks for AYP95% of Students Participate in taking the test– 95%  of Students Participate in taking the test

– 85% of Students Meet or Exceed in each Subgroup• Safe Harbor• State Waiver

– 82% Graduation Rate• Including Adjusted Graduation Cohort Rate

– 91% Attendance Rate

Adequate Yearly Progressq y g

2012 State Requirement District Performance

Participation 95.0% 100.0%Meets & Exceeds 85.0% 89.8%

Summary

Graduation 82.0% 96.8%Attendance 91.0% 96.3%

– District 203 achieved 334 out of 363 indicators

Status– State Improvement Status 

• If any school does not make AYP for 2 consecutive years in y ythe same subject area, the school is on Academic Early Warning Status.

– Federal Improvement Status• If a Title 1 school does not make AYP for 2 consecutive years in the same subject area the school is on Schoolin the same subject area, the school is on School Improvement.  

– The School Improvement Plan is in the Rising Star system provided by the State of Illinoisby the State of Illinois.

– School Choice must be offered.– After 3 consecutive years, Supplemental Educational Services must be provided.be provided.

Naperville 203 AYP Summaryp y

Elementary School AYPy– 11 out of 14 Elementary Schools made AYP in Reading and Mathand Math

– Beebe made AYP in all areas exceptR di f Hi i St d t d E i ll• Reading for Hispanic  Students and Economically Disadvantaged

Ell th d AYP i ll t– Ellsworth made AYP in all areas except• Reading for All

– Mill Street made AYP in all areas except• Reading for Hispanic Students and Economically DisadvantagedDisadvantaged

Junior High AYPg– Lincoln Junior High School made AYP in Reading and MathMath

– Jefferson made AYP in all areas except• Math for Black Students• Math for Black Students

– Kennedy made AYP in all areas except• Reading and Math for Students with Disabilities• Reading and Math for Students with Disabilities

– Madison made AYP in all areas exceptM th f St d t ith Di biliti• Math for Students with Disabilities

– Washington made AYP in all areas exceptR di d M th f St d t ith Di biliti• Reading and Math for Students with Disabilities

High School AYPg– Naperville Central made AYP in all areas except

• Reading for All and White Students• Reading for All and White Students• Math for All, White Students, and Students with DisabilitiesDisabilities

– Naperville North made AYP in all areas exceptp p• Reading for All and Students with Disabilities • Math for All, White Students, Hispanic Students, and Students with Disabilities

3rd Grade Performance LevelsReading

4th Grade Performance LevelsReading

5th Grade Performance LevelsReading

6th Grade Performance LevelsReading

7th Grade Performance LevelsReading

8th Grade Performance LevelsReading

11th Grade Performance LevelsReading

3rd Grade Performance LevelsMath

4th Grade Performance LevelsMath

5th Grade Performance LevelsMath

6th Grade Performance LevelsMath

7th Grade Performance LevelsMath

8th Grade Performance LevelsMath

11th Grade Performance LevelsMath

4th Grade Performance LevelsScience

7th Grade Performance LevelsScience

11th Grade Performance LevelsScience

Benchmark Districts– Large unit districts in northern Illinois that have similar demographics:similar demographics:

• Barrington 220

• Elmhurst 205

I di P i i 204• Indian Prairie 204

• Lisle 202

• St. Charles 303

• Wheaton 200

Benchmark DistrictsRace/Ethnicity

White Black Hispanic Asian Nat HA/PcIsl Amer Ind 2 or More

Naperville 203 68.7% 5.2% 8.1% 14.6% 0.1% 0.2% 3.2%Barrington 220 69 3% 1 4% 15 7% 10 1% 0 0% 0 1% 3 4%Barrington 220 69.3% 1.4% 15.7% 10.1% 0.0% 0.1% 3.4%Elmhurst 205 76.4% 2.7% 12.4% 5.4% 0.2% 0.2% 2.7%Indian Prairie 204 56.6% 9.3% 9.8% 20.1% 0.0% 0.2% 4.0%Lisle 202 68.0% 10.3% 10.2% 6.1% 0.1% 0.2% 5.3%St Charles 303 81.5% 1.5% 9.9% 5.0% 0.0% 0.4% 1.7%

68 0% 6 7% 15 5% 5 4% 0 2% 0 1% 4 1%Wheaton 200 68.0% 6.7% 15.5% 5.4% 0.2% 0.1% 4.1%State 51.0% 18.0% 23.6% 4.2% 0.1% 0.3% 2.8%

Benchmark DistrictsSubgroupsEc Disadv LEP IEP

Naperville 203 11.1% 3.7% 9.4%Barrington 220 17.4% 6.5% 14.9%Elmhurst 205 13.4% 4.9% 13.4%Indian Prairie 204 14.5% 5.2% 9.0%Lisle 202 26.1% 3.7% 17.0%St Charles 303 13.1% 3.5% 14.0%Wheaton 200 27.3% 8.5% 15.7%State 49.0% 9.4% 13.6%

Benchmark Districts

Benchmark DistrictsAll State Tests

Benchmark DistrictsAll State Tests

Achievement GappRace/Ethnicity

Achievement GapRace/Ethnicity

Achievement GapSubgroup

Achievement GapSubgroup

Achievement GapSubgroup

Achievement GapSubgroup

Achievement GapSubgroup

Achievement GapSubgroup

Changes Coming ‐ Stateg g– 5 Essentials Survey

• Provided by the State through the Performance• Provided by the State through the Performance Evaluation Advisory Committee (PEAC)

• Intended to provide a cross‐district collaborationIntended to provide a cross district collaboration data set

–Feedback about School Improvement efforts–Articulate School Growth goals– Inform professional growth plans of Principals–Provide a basis for discussions concerning school climate.

Changes Coming ‐ Stateg g– Changes to Benchmarks 

• Expected release of new cut scores in January• Expected release of new cut scores in January

• Purpose is to increase rigor to be in alignment with• Purpose is to increase rigor to be in alignment with the upcoming Common Core assessment and high school state assessment rigor

• Discussion with the State Assessment office – they ll d l h hwill provide our last 5 years with the new cut 

scores for data analysis.

Alignment of State testingAlignment of State testing

• Partnership for Assessment  10th d

11th Grade 

& PR‐a t e s p o ssess e tof Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC)

9th grade

10th grade

8th Grade

& PR‐

• 2014‐156th Grade

7th Grade

3rd Grade

4th Grade

5th Grade

3rd Grade

Kindergarten – 2nd GradeKindergarten  2 GradeStill in Development(Portfolio of Tasks?)

Current and FutureWork– School Improvement Process

• Multi Level System of Support• Multi‐Level System of Support• Culturally Responsive Practices 

– Curriculum revisions to align to the Common Core State Standards

– Performance Series to measure student growth

– Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC)(PARCC)