Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Illinois Standardized Tests2012 ResultsGrades 3‐8 and 11
Naperville CUSD 203ape e CUS 03
Assessment Philosophyp y– Primary goal is to improve student learning.
– Any one assessment should be used in conjunction with all other available information.with all other available information.
– Students should be involved in their learning, g,assessment, and evaluation.
– Results should be used to design educational opportunities for all learners.
Tests Given– ISAT
• Reading : Grades 3 – 8– IAA
• Reading : Grades 3 – 8 & 11• Reading : Grades 3 – 8 • Math: Grades 3 – 8 • Science: Grades 4 & 7
• Reading : Grades 3 – 8, & 11 • Math: Grades 3 – 8, & 11 • Science: Grades 4, 7 & 11
– PSAE – Grade 11• ACT• ACT• WorkKeys
– Reading for Information– Applied Mathematics
• ISBE Science
Tests Given– ISAT
• Reading : Grades 3 – 8– IAA
• Reading : Grades 3 – 8 & 11• Reading : Grades 3 – 8 • Math: Grades 3 – 8 • Science: Grades 4 & 7
• Reading : Grades 3 – 8, & 11 • Math: Grades 3 – 8, & 11 • Science: Grades 4, 7 & 11
– PSAE – Grade 11• ACT• ACT• WorkKeys
– Reading for Information2013: addition of the “Locating Information” WorkKeys test
t d t li ibl f– Applied Mathematics
• ISBE Scienceso students are eligible for ACT’s “National Career Readiness” Certificate
Adequate Yearly Progressq y gState Benchmarks for AYP95% of Students Participate in taking the test– 95% of Students Participate in taking the test
– 85% of Students Meet or Exceed in each Subgroup• Safe Harbor• State Waiver
– 82% Graduation Rate• Including Adjusted Graduation Cohort Rate
– 91% Attendance Rate
Adequate Yearly Progressq y g
2012 State Requirement District Performance
Participation 95.0% 100.0%Meets & Exceeds 85.0% 89.8%
Summary
Graduation 82.0% 96.8%Attendance 91.0% 96.3%
– District 203 achieved 334 out of 363 indicators
Status– State Improvement Status
• If any school does not make AYP for 2 consecutive years in y ythe same subject area, the school is on Academic Early Warning Status.
– Federal Improvement Status• If a Title 1 school does not make AYP for 2 consecutive years in the same subject area the school is on Schoolin the same subject area, the school is on School Improvement.
– The School Improvement Plan is in the Rising Star system provided by the State of Illinoisby the State of Illinois.
– School Choice must be offered.– After 3 consecutive years, Supplemental Educational Services must be provided.be provided.
Naperville 203 AYP Summaryp y
Elementary School AYPy– 11 out of 14 Elementary Schools made AYP in Reading and Mathand Math
– Beebe made AYP in all areas exceptR di f Hi i St d t d E i ll• Reading for Hispanic Students and Economically Disadvantaged
Ell th d AYP i ll t– Ellsworth made AYP in all areas except• Reading for All
– Mill Street made AYP in all areas except• Reading for Hispanic Students and Economically DisadvantagedDisadvantaged
Junior High AYPg– Lincoln Junior High School made AYP in Reading and MathMath
– Jefferson made AYP in all areas except• Math for Black Students• Math for Black Students
– Kennedy made AYP in all areas except• Reading and Math for Students with Disabilities• Reading and Math for Students with Disabilities
– Madison made AYP in all areas exceptM th f St d t ith Di biliti• Math for Students with Disabilities
– Washington made AYP in all areas exceptR di d M th f St d t ith Di biliti• Reading and Math for Students with Disabilities
High School AYPg– Naperville Central made AYP in all areas except
• Reading for All and White Students• Reading for All and White Students• Math for All, White Students, and Students with DisabilitiesDisabilities
– Naperville North made AYP in all areas exceptp p• Reading for All and Students with Disabilities • Math for All, White Students, Hispanic Students, and Students with Disabilities
3rd Grade Performance LevelsReading
4th Grade Performance LevelsReading
5th Grade Performance LevelsReading
6th Grade Performance LevelsReading
7th Grade Performance LevelsReading
8th Grade Performance LevelsReading
11th Grade Performance LevelsReading
3rd Grade Performance LevelsMath
4th Grade Performance LevelsMath
5th Grade Performance LevelsMath
6th Grade Performance LevelsMath
7th Grade Performance LevelsMath
8th Grade Performance LevelsMath
11th Grade Performance LevelsMath
4th Grade Performance LevelsScience
7th Grade Performance LevelsScience
11th Grade Performance LevelsScience
Benchmark Districts– Large unit districts in northern Illinois that have similar demographics:similar demographics:
• Barrington 220
• Elmhurst 205
I di P i i 204• Indian Prairie 204
• Lisle 202
• St. Charles 303
• Wheaton 200
Benchmark DistrictsRace/Ethnicity
White Black Hispanic Asian Nat HA/PcIsl Amer Ind 2 or More
Naperville 203 68.7% 5.2% 8.1% 14.6% 0.1% 0.2% 3.2%Barrington 220 69 3% 1 4% 15 7% 10 1% 0 0% 0 1% 3 4%Barrington 220 69.3% 1.4% 15.7% 10.1% 0.0% 0.1% 3.4%Elmhurst 205 76.4% 2.7% 12.4% 5.4% 0.2% 0.2% 2.7%Indian Prairie 204 56.6% 9.3% 9.8% 20.1% 0.0% 0.2% 4.0%Lisle 202 68.0% 10.3% 10.2% 6.1% 0.1% 0.2% 5.3%St Charles 303 81.5% 1.5% 9.9% 5.0% 0.0% 0.4% 1.7%
68 0% 6 7% 15 5% 5 4% 0 2% 0 1% 4 1%Wheaton 200 68.0% 6.7% 15.5% 5.4% 0.2% 0.1% 4.1%State 51.0% 18.0% 23.6% 4.2% 0.1% 0.3% 2.8%
Benchmark DistrictsSubgroupsEc Disadv LEP IEP
Naperville 203 11.1% 3.7% 9.4%Barrington 220 17.4% 6.5% 14.9%Elmhurst 205 13.4% 4.9% 13.4%Indian Prairie 204 14.5% 5.2% 9.0%Lisle 202 26.1% 3.7% 17.0%St Charles 303 13.1% 3.5% 14.0%Wheaton 200 27.3% 8.5% 15.7%State 49.0% 9.4% 13.6%
Benchmark Districts
Benchmark DistrictsAll State Tests
Benchmark DistrictsAll State Tests
Achievement GappRace/Ethnicity
Achievement GapRace/Ethnicity
Achievement GapSubgroup
Achievement GapSubgroup
Achievement GapSubgroup
Achievement GapSubgroup
Achievement GapSubgroup
Achievement GapSubgroup
Changes Coming ‐ Stateg g– 5 Essentials Survey
• Provided by the State through the Performance• Provided by the State through the Performance Evaluation Advisory Committee (PEAC)
• Intended to provide a cross‐district collaborationIntended to provide a cross district collaboration data set
–Feedback about School Improvement efforts–Articulate School Growth goals– Inform professional growth plans of Principals–Provide a basis for discussions concerning school climate.
Changes Coming ‐ Stateg g– Changes to Benchmarks
• Expected release of new cut scores in January• Expected release of new cut scores in January
• Purpose is to increase rigor to be in alignment with• Purpose is to increase rigor to be in alignment with the upcoming Common Core assessment and high school state assessment rigor
• Discussion with the State Assessment office – they ll d l h hwill provide our last 5 years with the new cut
scores for data analysis.
Alignment of State testingAlignment of State testing
• Partnership for Assessment 10th d
11th Grade
& PR‐a t e s p o ssess e tof Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC)
9th grade
10th grade
8th Grade
& PR‐
• 2014‐156th Grade
7th Grade
3rd Grade
4th Grade
5th Grade
3rd Grade
Kindergarten – 2nd GradeKindergarten 2 GradeStill in Development(Portfolio of Tasks?)
Current and FutureWork– School Improvement Process
• Multi Level System of Support• Multi‐Level System of Support• Culturally Responsive Practices
– Curriculum revisions to align to the Common Core State Standards
– Performance Series to measure student growth
– Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC)(PARCC)