BHT *1

$1

ANNUAL REPORT—1982

CITY DEPARTMENTS Office of the Mayor 2 City Attorney (Department of Law) 3 Municipal Court (Clerk of Courts) 15 Charitable, Solicitations Board 18 Department of Health 18 Department of Community Services 24 Department of Energy & Telecommunications 29 Municipal Civil Service Commission 34

Affirmative Action (EEOC) City Auditor 37

Division of Income Tax Department of Recreation & Parks 38

Columbus Zoo Council of the City of Columbus 63

Office of the City Clerk Hare Charity Trust Fund City Treasurer

Department of Finance 76 Data Center Division of Purchasing Municipal Garage Building Services Contract Compliance COSHA

Department of Development 83 Building Regulations Division of Planning and Economic Development Code Enforcement Division of Community Development

)iumos,oHio

FICIAL PUBLICATION

THE CITY BULLETIN Official Publication of the City of Columbus

Published weekly under authority of the City Charter and direction of the City Clerk. Contains official report of proceedings of council , ordinances passed and resolutions adopted; civil service notes and announcements of examinations; advertisements for bids; details pertaining to official actions of all city departments.

Subscriptions by mail, $15.00 a Year in advance Second-Class Postage Paid at Columbus, Ohio

FRANCINE C. RYAN City Clerk

Telephone 222-7316

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

OFFICE OF THE MAYOR ANNUAL REPORT—1982

Notwithstanding the impact of a sluggish national econ­omy, 1982 can be viewed as a year of continuing progress for the City of Columbus. While some activities remained con­strained by the economic environment, other projects con­tinued on schedule and as planned. The net effect was con­tinued growth and development, and an enhancement of Columbus' image as a truly great city in which to live.

Largely because economic recovery was not expected to materialize fully in 1982, city officials sought a .5% increase in the city income tax so as to avoid any reduction in vital city services. The leadership provided by both public offi­cials and community leaders in promoting this issue re­sulted in its passage by the voters in the November election. The positive reaction by the voters on this tax issue is a reflection of confidence in the future of their city. Prudent financial management resulted in 3.4 million dollars being available for "carry-over" into the General Fund for 1983. In spite of the income tax increase and the aforementioned carry-over, labor settlements and other unanticipated costs will continue to cause considerable strain on the budget for the foreseeable future.

The construction of the refuse/coal-fired municipal elec­tric plant remained a high priority. The plant is scheduled to come on line in the Spring of 1983, and will provide the City of Columbus with the latest technology in refuse disposal and municipal electric power generation. Another major capital project nearing completion was the Parsons Avenue Water Treatment Plant. This plant is the city's third major supply system and it will be in operation in the summer of 1983. The facility will provide an additional 50 million gal­lons of water per day and is designed to be fully computer-izd, thereby reducing personnel operating costs and opti­mizing the water treatment process.

Investment in the downtown by the private sector re­mained strong. Both the 32 story American Electric Power Company building and the Columbia Gas building were nearing completion. Additionally, construction began on a new hotel and a new office building in the Capital South area. These projects, in addition to the expansion and re­habilitation work begun on such landmark buildings as the Ohio Theatre and the Southern Hotel, are all blending in a way so as to preserve the city's architectural heritage, while at the same time providing the most modern facilities and accommodations available.

City departments continue to seek better ways and methods for improving delivery of services. Several new approaches and concepts were initiated, while other pro­grams begun in previous years were reaching maturity. The Department of Finance contracted with Battelle Columbus Division to develop a system that would assist the city in setting priorities and ranking proposed project cuts and ex­pansions for its 1983 operating budget. The Battelle Study represented a preliminary effort to implement a more sys­tematic and goal-oriented budgeting system. This effort has received considerable attention nationally, and the system is certain to be utilized by other major cities as they attempt to develop budget priorities in the future. Another unique feature of this approach is that it involved not only city offi­cials, but also participants from business neighborhood groups and the media.

One program reaching maturity in 1982 was the Columbus Countywide Development Corporation (CCDC). This pro­gram, administered by the Department of Development was created to help small businesses obtain financing needed for job-created business expansion. The program in­volved banks, savings and loans, investment companies and the Small Business Administration. Since February, CCDC has assisted in the financing of projects involving 34 com­

pany expansions. This is expected to result in the creation of 793 permanent jobs during the next one (1) to three (3) years, while retaining 1,764 existing jobs. This program has enor­mous potential and is expected to have a very positive im­pact in improving the overall employment picture through­out the area.

The Department of Energy and Telecommunication com­pleted the District Heating and Cooling Feasibility Study that had been initiated in 1981, with funding from the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. This effort led to an agreement with the Royal Danish Govern­ment by which Columbus was designated as a test city for the feasibility of lower-cost hot water district heating and cooling technology as currently utilized in western Europe. The agreement, a first of its kind, calls for an 18-month, $500,000 effort by Danish engineers, universities, labo­ratories and consultants in conjunction with Brookhaven National Laboratory and the Department of Energy & Tele­communication.

Significant progress was made in 1982 toward the de­velopment of a cable interconnect program. This network when completed will connect City Hall with the four cable companies and facilitate video programming, voice and data transmission. Engineering work is to be completed in the Spring of 1983 and completion of construction later in the summer.

Early in the year, the Department of Community Services was notified of the passage of new employment and training legislation by the U. S. Congress to replace the Comprehen­sive Employment & Training Act (CETA). This legislation, the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA), provides a one-year transition period before becoming fully effective Octo­ber 1, 1983. Its primary objective is to teach people skills, thereby increasing their opportunity for gainful employ­ment. The new legislation provides that funding be made available to state governors who will allocate the funds to local service delivery areas with a population of at least 200,000 persons. The Columbus/Franklin County area will receive funds under the new act. Again, the City of Co­lumbus will work closely with the Franklin County Com­missioners and private industry in overseeing the planning and operation of the new program.

Another program making considerable progress in 1982 was the Columbus Volunteer Corps (CVC). CVC, under the policy direction of the Mayor's Advisory Council on Volun­tary Service, was established to recruit and coordinate volunteer efforts that impact on city government. During its first year of operation CVC recruited 292 volunteers who registered over 3,850 hours of volunteer service. The CVC is a joint community and city government partnership and is proving to be a vital adjunct to city departments, especially this period of budget austerity.

Because of higher than usual unemployment and a cut­back in certain Federally funded social programs, the prob­lem of providing housing and other forms of assistance for the needy became acute. The city, in a cooperative effort with Franklin County, social service agencies, and the pri­vate sector, contributed significantly to efforts designed to alleviate this problem. It is anticipated that such efforts will continue until full economic recovery is realized.

This report summarizes only those activities, events and programs which were "new" in 1982 or which represent sig­nificant impact in the operation of city government as it relates to the citizenry. There were, in fact, many other im­portant activities involving all city departments and numer­ous city personnel. Such activities are explained in greater detail in the annual reports of those departments.

CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY ANNUAL REPORT—1982

INTRODUCTION Columbus City Attorney Gregory S. Lashutka is now serv­

ing his second term in this office. According to the Co­lumbus City Charter and the Columbus City Codes an annual report " . . . in comprehensive and systematized de­tail . . . " must be submitted to Council by the various City departments and divisions. This annual report addresses the issues and accomplishments of the City Attorney's office for the year 1982. This was a year highlighted by the continued development of important programs and the successful achievement of many goals.

The following pages set forth the facts and figures about the case load, the programs and policies, the office staff, and the responsibilities of the Columbus City Attorney's office. Even a quick glance at the figures will show that the office handles an incredibly large number of cases—both civil and criminal. But cases involve people, and a closer examination of the operation of this office reveals the situations that dra­matically affect the day-to-day lives of the citizens of Co­lumbus.

This office deals with people in all walks of life and in all types of situations. The extremes of responsibility extend from the barking dog on the east side to the unfixed pothole on the west side; from the purchase of City property on the north end to contracts for City services on the south end. The Department of Law helps resolve neighborhood dis­putes and damage claims as well as the filing and prosecu­tion of criminal cases. The office represents all Columbus citizens in such matters as testimony before the PUCO and other regulatory commissions.

The Department of Law is the legal representative for all other City departments and City employees involved in the scope of their work. This position requires of the civil Vtaff continual research and trial work and constitutes a substan­tial portion of the daily tasks of the office. Since the various City departments are involved in so many areas of munici­pal business and because the work performed by City em­ployees is so all-encompassing, the challenge of meeting these legal needs is a great one.

The City Attorney's office is also involved in the analysis of two recent important changes in municipal law. First, the Ohio Supreme Court last year in Haverlack v. Portage Homes, Inc. has apparently judicially abolished the doctrine of sovereign immunity for municipalities in Ohio unless specifically provided for by statute. This case should signifi­cantly expand municipal liability and increase the cost of municipal government throughtout the entire state of Ohio. Secondly, the United States Supreme Court has stripped cities of their federal antitrust immunity in the operation of municipal government. This office, with the cooperation of the City administration and Council, has reviewed the expo­sure of Columbus, Ohio. Through that review our expertise has become widely recognized. In 1982, City Attorney Lashutka testified before the United States Senate Judici­ary Committee to encourage a federal statutory change to restore immunity. He and Senior Assistant Douglas W. Vanscoy have presented papers and the Columbus experi­ence to such groups as the Ohio Municipal League, the National League of Cities, the American Law Institute and the New York State Association of County Attorneys.

GENERAL ADMINISTRATION In general, the responsibilities of the City Attorney's

Office can be outlined as follows: Under the Charter of the City of Columbus, Ohio, the City

Attorney is required to be an elector of the City and an attor­ney at law, admitted to practice in the State of Ohio. He is elected for a term of four years and serves as the legal advis­er, attorney and counsel for the City, and for all City offices and departments in matters relating to their official duties.

The City Attorney is required by the City Charter to prose­cute or defend all suits for and in behalf of the City; to pre­pare all contracts, bonds and other instruments in writing in which the City is concerned and to certify in writing his approval as to the form and correctness of these instru­ments.

The City Attorney is the prosecuting attorney of the Mu­nicipal Court of Franklin County, Ohio, and may detail such of his assistants as he deems proper to assist in this work. In performing these duties, the City Attorney's office prose­cutes all misdemeanor violations brought before such court and performs the same duties, so far as they are applicable

thereto, as are required of the prosecuting attorney of Franklin County, Ohio.

Furthermore, the City Attorney is required to prosecute or defend on behalf of the City of Columbus, and all its em­ployees, all complaints, suits and controversies in which the City is a party, and such other suits, matters and con­troversies relating to City affairs as he shall be directed by City Council.

The Council, director of any department, or any officer, board or commission not included within a department, may request in writing, the opinion of the City Attorney upon questions of law involving their respective powers and duties.

In addition to the duties imposed upon the City Attorney by the Charter, which have hereinabove been set forth in a general way, or those duties required of him by City ordi­nance, the City Attorney also performs the duties which are legally required of him by the general law of the State of Ohio.

In order to discharge these duties, the City Attorney's Office is organized into two basic divisions: the Civil Divi­sion and the Prosecutor Division. The Civil Division is com­prised of assistant city attorneys, investigators, legal interns, and secretaries involved in responding to the requests of all of the various City officials in need of legal advice, whether by formal opinion or by day-to-day oral and informal written advice; contract review and approval; ordinance review and approval; and prosecuting and defending all civil actions on behalf of the City in various courts. The Civil Division also includes the Land Acquisition Office, the Police Legal Ad­visor, and the Claims Section.

The Prosector Division includes all of the assistant city prosecutors, investigators, legal interns and secretaries necessary to fulfill the responsibility of acting as prosecut­ing attorney in the Franklin COunty Municipal Court. In addition, the Night Prosecutor's Program, Intake Section, and Witness Assistance Program function as a part of the Prosecutor Division.

CITY ATTORNEY OPINIONS As noted above, the Columbus City Charter (§ 70) imposes

upon the City Attorney the duty of rendering opinions to City Council, the director of any department, or any officer, board or commission not included within a department, upon any question of law involving their respective powers or duties when the request for such opinion is made in writ­ing. These formal opinions, which usually require extensive research and preparation, are far outnumbered by advice provided by the office orally, by letter, or by less formal memoranda.

The City Attorney's office has established a policy over the past five years to increase the informal legal advice pro­vided its clients. This less formal advice is often given be­fore a real problem arises within a particular department thereby eliminating the need for a formal opinion. Addi­tionally, the less formal advice, usually in the form of memoranda, provides greater flexibility for the affected de­partment, office, board or commission, and City Council.

The City Attorney's office has also worked hard over the past five years to make sure that opinion requests received a prompt response rather than to remain pending for long periods of time. There were no opinion requests pending on January 1, 1982. There were 8 opinion requests received in 1982 and 6 opinions were issued (2 requests were answered in the same opinion) in 1982 and 1 opinion was rendered early in January 1983.

Some of the formal opinions of interest issued during 1982 are summarized below:

Opinion No. 1-82, issued April 5, 1982, to Columbus City Councilman Ben Espy.

Mr. Espy asked the City Attorney three questions regard­ing the circumstances surrounding the City's contract with City Wide Towing and Storage. A brief background discus­sion is necessary to understand the nature of Mr. Espy's question and the City Attorney's response.

At a Council meeting on February 20, 1982, it was decided to once again open bidding for professional services of tow­ing and storing impounded vehicles. From 1975 through 1981, City Wide Towing and Storage was perceived as the "only company capable of supplying the needed quantity of wreckers." In November of 1981, bids were opened on a contract for towing and storage services but since no other bids were received except from City Wide, the original con­tract was extended rather than awarding a new contract.

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

At the February 20 Council meeting, when an ordinance was introduced to further extend the contract of City Wide through January 1, 1983, it was once again decided to open bidding because it had come to the attention of Council that another entity was prepared to submit a bid At that meet­ing, Council decided to extend the contract of City Wide Towing and Storage through January 1, 1983, with the understanding that: . . . . i J

(1) the contract had a 30 day termination clause and could be cancelled upon proper notice by the City; and

(2) the Director of Public Safety would again open bid­ding on the contract.

Mr Espy's questions centered on three concerns: (1) May the City, after advertising for bids, and receiving

one or more bids, reject said bid or bids and enter no contract?

In his opinion, the City Attorney first reviewed § 329.06 of the Columbus City Codes which sets forth a comprehensive method where expenditures in excess of $5,000 within any fiscal year shall be made.

The City Attorney concluded that all methods were fol­lowed and that common sense dictates that once bids are made the City is not necessarily bound to accept one. One could imagine many situations in which no submitted bids would be accepted. The City has provided for this eventual­ity by including the following language in its notice proper­ly advertised:

"The Director of Public Safety reserves the right to reject any and all bids."

The City Attorney concluded that an advertisement for bids is not an offer, but an invitation to make an offer. Until acceptance, there is no contractual obligation on the City.

(2) May the City unilaterally cancel the contract in ques­tion?

The City Attorney noted that the contract in question con­tains language which specifically speaks to termination questions. It provides:

"The City shall have the right to terminate this agree­ment upon giving thirty (30) days written notice to the company without any claim of damage being made by the company."

Similar language allows the company the same right of termination. Accordingly, the City Attorney explained, either party may terminate upon proper notice and such right has been uniformly enforced by the courts. D. W. Kauf­man Realty Co. v. Lucas, 23 Ohio Op. 470 (1925).

(3) If the existing contract had been awarded pursuant to bid, which it was not, could the City of Columbus uni­laterally cancel the contract?

After a thorough review of contract law covering this question, the City Attorney concluded that if the contract signed contained the termination clauses as set forth above, either party could terminate accordingly. The answer to any hypothetical question regarding a contract would have to be made after a complete examination of the specific contract language.

Opinion No. 2-82, issued October 15, 1982, to Donald A. Ochs, Income Tax Administrator.

Mr. Ochs' inquiry concerned the taxation of gain from the sale of depreciable business property. The City Attorney re­sponded through a brief discussion of 5 361.16 of the Co­lumbus City Codes, 1959, which defines taxable income:

'"Taxable income' means wages, salaries, commis­sions and other compensation paid by any employer or employers before deductions and/or the net profits from the operation of a business, profession or other enterprise or activity adjusted in accordance with the provisions of the chapter."

The City Attorney stated that Chapter 361 of the Co­lumbus City Codes does not speak directly to taxation of gam from the sale, exchange or disposition of depreciable business property. The City Attorney further explained that since the foregoing definition and the entire language of the Columbus City Codes regarding taxable gain does not address the question, and because the law of this State is that tax statutes are to be construed against the taxing au­thority and in favor of the taxpayer, Estate of Lanae v Com­missioner 164 Ohio St. 500 (1956), the gain from the sale of depreciable business property is not taxable

Furthermore, prior to 1981 the City's Income Tax Division specifically instructed taxpayers that in arriving at net prof­its, gain from the sale, exchange or other disposition of de­preciable business property should not be taken into consid­eration. This administrative position of the past, in the opin­ion ot the City Attorney, cast considerable doubt upon the scope and meaning of net profits. The City would be hard pressed to convince a taxpayer or court of law that the gains in question are taxable. 5«""=>

Opinion No. 4-82, issued April 23, 1982, to Jerry Ham­mond, Columbus City Councilman.

Opinion Requests 3 and 4 involved issues and questions presented by the revelation that Councilman Hammond had been convicted of a felony in the State of Indiana in 1974. Both opinion requests (one from Mayor Tom Moody and the other from Mr. Hammond) sought clarification of the legal effect of Mr. Hammond's past, present, and future votes on City Council and his qualification to serve on City Council "in the event of expungement" (sealing) of his criminal rec­ord pursuant to Ohio law.

After contacting both the Ohio Senate and House Judici­ary Committee for purposes of clarifying the effect on an "expungement" on a convicted felon's right and privilege to serve in public office, the City Attorney issued a lengthy opinion concluding that an expungement would remove any legal impediment to Mr. Hammond's serving on City Council. The City Attorney opined that Mr. Hammond's past, present, and future votes on City Council were lawful and proper.

Opinion No. 5-82, issued October 19, 1982, to Donald A. Ochs, Income Tax Administrator.

The City Attorney responded to Mr. Och's request for an opinion on whether a partner may deduct business ex­penses from his partnership distributive shares.

After reviewing Chapter 361.16 and 361.09 of the Co­lumbus City Codes, the City Attorney opined that net profits of a business are taxable after "provision for all ordinary and necessary expenses." The City Attorney further explained that § 361.03 exempts partnerships from taxation because a partner is taxed individually on his net profit "share."

Usually, the net profits of a partnership will equal the total net profits earned by the partners. The City Attorney noted, however, that in some instances, partnership agreements specifically require a partner to pay expenses without reim­bursement. These unreimbursed expenses are deductible by the partner from the business income.

Therefore, in one opinion of the City Attorney, a partner who has received a distributive share of partnership net profits can, with the provisions of the City Codes, deduct business expenses provided the partnership agreement spe­cifically requires the partner to pay expenses of the business without reimbursement.

Opinion No. 6-82, issued July 1, 1982, to the Franklinton Area Commission, John Spinelli, Chairperson.

The City Attorney received a written request for his opin­ion as to the legal/financial status of the Franklinton Area Commission. Before addressing the specific question en­tailed in the request, the City Attorney briefly reviewed the general powers and limitations of area commissions accord­ing to statute.

The City Attorney discussed the general nature of area commissions as advisory bodies pursuant to Chapters 3313 and 3315 of the Columbus City Codes. Area commissions have only such athority as expressly granted by ordinance (Davis v. State (1944), 127 Ohio St. 261). A copy of pertinent paragraphs from the Columbus City Codes was attached with the opinion addressed to Mr. Spinelli. The functions and duties of the Franklinton Area Commission, the City Attorney reiterated, are to represent the concerns, problems and needs of Franklinton before Council and the various City departments and commissions. The Franklinton Area Commission has no independen t legal s ta tus . THis answered the Franklinton Area Commission's initial ques­tion.

The second question posed by the Franklinton Area Com­mission was the constraints on funds donated or earmarked for the commission. The City Attorney noted that all funds donated to the Franklinton Area Commission are funds be­longing to the City and must be deposited with the Co­lumbus City Treasurer per Columbus City Charter §§ 88, 90 and 84.

If funds are donated specifically for the sole use of the Franklinton Area Commission, and if the City of Columbus, through councilmatic action, accepts those funds with such conditions, then § 88 of the Columbus City Charter would require the City Treasurer to abide by the provisions of the donation. The City Attorney explained that the provisions of the donation cannot expand the powers of the Franklinton Area Commission unless authorized by Council and the ex­penditures are always limited to those functions of area commissions contained in Columbus City Codes 3313.14.

The City Attorney also pointed out, in response to con­cerns about "earmarked" funds, that in the event that feder­al or other funds are targeted for the Franklinton area, those funds must first be deposited with the City Treasurer and cannot be held or expended independently by the Franklin­ton Area Commission.

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

Opinion No. 7-82 will be issued to Hugh Dorrian, City Au­ditor, in early 1983.

The questions asked by Mr. Dorrian in this opinion re­quest concern the crediting of interest earned on monies in its Street Construction, Maintenance and Repair Fund, No. 02-265, and the County Auto License Fund, No. 02-260. (These questions were researched, and a formal opinion answering those questions was rendered in early 1983.)

Opinion No. 8-82, issued November 24, 1982, to Dr. Thel­ma I. Schoonover, President of the Columbus Civil Service Commission.

The Columbus Civil Service Commission requested an opinion from the City Attorney concerning the contract be­tween the Commission and the Board of Education for hear­ing appeals and providing other services. The question was posed because the Commission was considering either re­negotiating or terminating said contract.

In 1975, a former City Attorney addressed the same issue and reached the conclusion that the Columbus Civil Service Commission is not required to perform any services for the Columbus Board of Education. However, the City Attorney concluded that even though the Columbus City Charter does not by its terms require the Civil Service Commission to perform services for the Board of Education, the Ohio Revised Code § 124.40 does make such a provision and sub­sequent cases, including State, ex rel. Strong v. Bd. ofEduc, 50 Ohio St. 2d 47 (1977), (per curiam) from the Ohio Supreme Court do suggest that the Civil Service Commission is man­dated by law to perform the functionary services for the Board of Education.

The City Attorney explained in detail the associated legal question surrounding the relationship between the Co­lumbus Civil Service Commission and the Columbus Board of Education. The final conclusions of the opinion are as follows:

1) The Columbus Civil Service Commission has a legal duty to provide the Columbus Board of Education those civil service functions set forth in the Ohio Re­vised Code, Chapter 124.

2) In accordance with current law, the City Board of Education may refuse to contribute to a municipal civil service commission for the services rendered pursuant to Revised Code Chapter 124. In the event the Board chooses to voluntarily contribute to the cost of the administration of the Civil Service Commission, pur­suant to Revised Code Section 124.54, the maximum amount which the Board can contribute is the amount determined by the ratio formula therein.

3) If challenged, that portion of Revised Section 124.40 which requires the City to provide free civil service functions to the Board of Education may be held to be in violation of the City's power of local self govern­ment, and therfore, unconstitutional.

CONTRACT AND BOND APPROVAL The Columbus City Charter, § 67, requires that the City

Attorney certify in writing his approval of the form and cor-A rectness of all contracts, bonds and other instruments in . writing in which the City is concerned. During 1982, the City : Attorney reviewed and either approved or disapproved i 1,465 contracts, bonds and other written instruments on be-

,.i half of the City. Some of the more important cases handled by the City

Attorney's office in 1982 are described below:

Q. Alleged Deprivation of Constitutional Rights. Brewer v. Hunt, et a!., Case No. C-2-82-1155, is a federal

i case alleging false arrest and illegal detention in violation of 42 U.S.C § 1983 and the Fourth and Fourteenth Amend-

i ments of the U.S. Constitution. Plaintiff is demanding $200,000 in damages. The case is still pending.

Johnson v. Cottrill, et al., Case No. C-2-80-377, is a civil rights and wrongful death action involving the police shoot-

,.ii ing of Larry Mennifield on October 12, 1978. The action was io originally filed in the Franklin County Court of Common 4 Pleas, but after that court granted certain defense motions,

Ml the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the state court action and • .1 refiled the same lawsuit in the Federal District Court. The i a damages sought total $2,600,000. Individual officers have re-11 tained private counsel; this office represented police super-/ visory personnel, the Mayor, Safety Director, and the City of

1 .3 Columbus, all of whom have moved to dismiss the action because the plaintiff has failed to respond to discovery re­quests.

Little Men, Inc. v. City of Columbus, et al., United States District Court, Case No. C-2-7864. The plaintiff, Little Men,

Inc., dba the Needle's Eye Bar, alleged in its complaint in federal court that the City of Columbus, its police force, various individual officers, and certain Columbus citizens conspired against the Needle's Eye Bar located in the vicin­ity of the downtown south area in an attempt to run the bar out of business. Plaintiff asserted that the motivation for this unlawful action was because the bar was black owned and operated. The defendants generally agreed that there were considerable police actions taken against the bar but such actions were lawful and a result of the bar being the center of prostitution in the area. Plaintiff sought damages in the amount of $11,000,000. Some of the private defendants and some of the Columbus officals and certain claims raised in the complaint were dismissed upon motion by the federal judge and the case was scheduled for trial on December 13, 1982. Shortly before trial the matter was settled for $5,500. The Needle's Eye Bar had lost its license a couple of years ago, incurred considerable sums in discovery costs and attorney fees, and had to pay back taxes to IRS when discrepancies in its reported income were discovered while this case was being prepared for trial by City attorneys.

Tim Rice v. City of Columbus, et al, Case No. C-2-82-1103, was filed in the U. S. District Court seeking damages in the amount of $600,000. Plaintiff has alleged violation of his con­stitutional rights under § 1983 of the U. S. Code, Title 42, arising out of his participation as a contractor in the Hous­ing Rehabilitation Program. The basis of alleged discrimina­tion is religion. Discovery is continuing in this case.

White v. Moody, et al, Case No. 79CV-08-4185, is a civil rights and wrongful death action concerning the death of Noble Jackson, a pretrail detainee at the Women's Correc­tional Institute. The damage demand totals $44,000. Discov­ery is continuing in this case and presently the matter is scheduled for trial May 2, 1983.

b. Stale Tort Claims. Bailey v. Kovach, Case No. 81CV-08-4120, was filed in

1981, involved police officers as plaintiff and defendant. Plaintiff was injured by defendant during an emergency run and sought damages of $500,000. The defendant officer was represented by the City Attorney's office and had judgment rendered in his favor in Common Pleas Court.

Sandra Bankston v. City of Columbus, et al., Case No. 81CV-07-3552. This was an action involving malicious pros­ecution and false arrest alleged by the plaintiff who sought damages in the sum of $100,000. Plaintiff had been arrested for shoplifting at a store called Waterbeds & Stuff. Motions for dismissal were filed on behalf of the City, its officials, and employees. The court granted all of those motions. The City paid no money in this case.

Empire Properties, Inc. v. City of Columbus, Case No. 82CV-04-2102, is an action for property damage to a ware­house and its contenst during a fire on April 17, 1980. The plaintiff claims that the building and contents could have been saved but were totally destroyed because of a failure in the water pressure which allegedly hampered firefighting efforts. The prayer is for $1.25 million; discovery is con­tinuing.

Rosa Foreman v. David Barr, et at., Case No. 81CV-02-974. This is a personal injury case which stems from an auto­mobile accident which arose when a truck driven by a City employee and an automobile being driven by the plaintiff collided in an intersection. The plaintiff claimed permanent injuries and was seeking $250,000 in damages. During the discovery stage of this action, the City succeeded in having this case dismissed by the court for plaintiffs failure to com­ply with discovery requests ordered by the Court. This case is now closed.

Margaret Jenkins v.H&R Body Shop & City of Columbus, Case No. 81CV-03-1496. This was a slip and fall case filed against H & R Body Shop and the City of Columbus seeking damages in the sum of $200,000. Plaintiff allegedly sustained serious knee injuries when she fell on the "sidewalk" as she was leaving H & R Body Shop on May 29, 1979. A jury was impaneled on December 1, 1982, and trial proceeded for the next five days until the plaintiff and H & R Body Shop agreed to settle the case for $10,000. The City paid no money in this action and was dismissed with prejudice by all par­ties.

Marge Leeseberg v. City of Columbus, et al, Case No. 81CV-08-4090. This was a personal injury case of a 50-year old woman who was walking to the Palmer Haus from the southeast corner of Beck and Mohawk. She was accompa­nied by her husband on one side and her son on the other side, each of whom were holding her elbow. She noticed that there were bricks missing from the sidewalk in front of

the Palmer Haus as she approached the building Despite this knowledge, she attempted to step over the hole and failed to negotiate that move. She fell and fractured her wrist. Through treatment by an orthopedic specialist, she has received almost a full range of motion. According to her specialist and our doctor, Dr. Hauser, she has very minima limitation in her range of motion with that wrist, bpeciai damages in this case amount to $566.03. The complaint prayed for $30,000. In addition to the City of Columbus, the plaintiff also sued the owner of the property, the lessee of the property, the sublessee of the property and Palmer McNeil personally was joined as a third-party defendant. The lessee was dismissed out of the personal injury action as it was clear that there was no liability except perhaps a con­tractual liability on the part of the lessee. There was also little question that Palmer McNeil was not individually li­able on the claim. The owner and the sublessee, Palmer Haus Company, Inc., were willing to contribute to a settle­ment. On the morning of trial, the case was settled for a total of $6,000, each of the three participating defendants contrib­uting $2,000 apiece.

Maynard v. Waugh, et al., Case No. 82CV-11-6635, is a case in which false arrest and excessive use of force has been alleged against two City police officers. Plaintiff has re­quested damanges in the amount of $220,000. The case pres­ently is in the discovery stage.

Robert J. Rohrbach v. Frederick Byerley, et al, Case No. 81CV-07-3553. In this action plaintiff filed a malicious pros­ecution and false arrest complaint against the City of Co­lumbus, various Columbus police officers, and a private de­fendant. Plaintiff sought damages in the sum of $450,000. After depositions were taken it was clear that the private defendant had selected plaintiffs mug shot from an array of mug shots at the Columbus Police Department identifying plaintiff as a person who assaulted the private defendant and committed other criminal acts which eventually led to plaintiffs arrest. Subsequently, the private citizen had mis­givings and refused to go forward with these charges against the plaintiff. The plaintiff and the private citizen agreed to a settlement of $2,100; the City refused to pay any money in this case and was dismissed along with the Columbus police officers.

Hobert Lee Smith v. City of Columbus & Consolidated Railway Corp., Case No. 78CV-06-3020. This was a personal injury action that arose out of an incident July 24, 1977, when plaintiff, Hobert Lee Smith, allegedly fell through a hole on the High Street viaduct. The hole had been the re­sult of a CON-RAIL train carrying a high load striking the underside of the viaduct as the train passed underneath it. The train-bridge collision occurred in December of 1976 and because the viaduct was scheduled for destruction to make way for the new convention center and Hyatt Hotel in the vicinity, City officials decided to barricade the northbound lanes of the bridge where the hole was located. There was some suggestion that there continued to be pedestrian traf­fic across the bridge and in the vicinity of the hole. Con­struction in the area progressed more slowly than what the City anticipated and in July of 1977 the hole was still in the bridge when Hobert Lee Smith was found underneath the hole lying on the CON-RAIL tracks. There were no witness­es to the incident; presumably Smith fell through the hole as he was returning from a downtown bar to his apartment near the Ohio State University. Smith suffered severe head injuries which were complicated by a history of epileptic seizures and following this accident he was rendered inca­pable of taking care of himself or engaging in any employ­ment for the remainder of his life. The Probate Court of Crawford County had appointed his parents as his legal guardians. Plaintiff was unmarried and in his twenties and unemployed at the time of his accident. Melvin Belli appeard as plaintiffs attorney and initially made a demand of 1.2 million dollars on the City of Columbus for settlement purposes. A jury trial was commenced on May 24 1982 be­fore Judge Rader and on the second day of trial the parties

CgONdR&£ r S " 6 ^ the CUy P3id $ 1 ° 7 ' 5 0 0 and

Sosnin v. Wilson, et al, Case No. 82CV-01-514 Plaintiff was arrested by Columbus vice officers in the downtown Hyatt and charged with performing acts of prostitution She was subsequently found not guilty by a Municipal Court tifin nnn ^ereafter sued the two Columbus vice officers for $260,000 alleging false arrest and malicious prosecution The officers and the City refused to pay any sum in settlement and the case was prepared for trial. Plaintiff did not appear for her trial and her attorney was forced to dismiss her case Court costs were assessed against plaintiff.

Ujah v. Verne, et al., Case No. 82CV-08-4609, is a case filed

in the Court of Common Pleas alleging harm to reputation and invasion of privacy by a Columbus police officer. Dam­ages in the amount of $35,000 has been requested by the plaintiff. This case is currently in the discovery stage, c. Employment Practices—Discrimination.

Youla Brant, et al. v. City of Columbus, et al, United States District Court, Case No. C-2-75-425. This case was filed in 1975 as a class-action by women alleging discrimina­tion by the Civil Service Commission of the City in regard to entry-level testing for the position of police officer and against the City in general for establishing a discriminatory dual-classification system with regard to the positions of "policewoman and policeman." The suit was brought alleg­ing violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e)—Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1983—the Civil Rights Act.

Judgement was entered for the plaintiffs in 1978 and Judge Robert Duncan ordered various injunctive relief in­cluding, inter alia, an elimination of the discreminatory testing; a 5-year hiring goal for women and 25% per class; as well as compensatory damages, back-pay, and attorney fees. To date the City has paid $456,000 in compensatory relief, back pay and attorney fees. The claims of 52 class-members for back pay remain in litigation. The United States District Court has appointed a special master who is presently hold­ing back-pay hearings and making determinations. It is ex­pected that the back-pay portion of the litigation will ter­minate in the calendar year 1983.

Catalina v. City (several causes of action were filed in different courts). Former employee of Municipal Civil Ser­vice Commission is seeking reinstatement and damages for alleged deprivation of due process, race and sex discrimina­tion, age discrimination, and denial of equal pay and pro­motional opportunities. A State cause of action filed against two former Commission employees as individuals was dis­missed recently for failure to state a claim against the former administrators as individuals. This case has been partially dismissed on a summary judgment motion as a result of prior State judgments against the plaintiff.

Rose Mary Dauis, et al. v. City of Columbus, Case No. 82AP-639. This is one of several cases on appeal to the Franklin County Court of Appeals from decisions by the Court of Common Pleas upholding the determinations of the Civil Service Commission that it did not have jurisdic­tion to hear appeal of employees who were terminated from their CETA positions as a result of lack of funding. These cases involved numerous legal issues pertaining to civil ser­vice and federal funding. The Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the City of Columbus and no appeal has been taken from that decision.

Edwards v. City of Columbus, Case No. C-2-78-951. A for­mer wastewater operator filed a race discrimination com­plaint against the City as a result of his dismissal for failure to score high enough on a written examination for the oper­ator position. Plaintiff had been employed as an operator for three years prior to failing the written examination. Plaintiff alleges that the written examination discriminated against him on the basis of race and that City officials further discriminated against him by removing him from his job on the basis of the results of the examination. Plaintiff seeks $100,000 in back pay plus reinstatement to his former posi­tion. This matter has been set down for trial in federal court in 1983.

F.O.P. v. City of Columbus, Case No. 82CV-11-7141, is a case filed by the F.O.P. and eighteen female police officers, married to police officers, alleging a loss of benefits due to the manner in which the health insurance benefits are administered.

Barbara Grano v. Department of Development of the City of Columbus, et al, United States District Court, Case Nos. 78-3161 and 78-3162. This case involved allegations of a female employee of the Department of Development regard­ing sex-based discrimination in regard to promotion. Judg­ment for the plaintiff was granted by the District Court and the City appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which reversed and remanded the case to the trial court for further findings. After completion of the trial court's proceedings, the case was once again returned to the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals which issued a final judgment in favor of the City. The opinion of the Sixth Circuit was helpful in clarifying the burden of proof in dis­parate treatment cases.

Gilbert v. City of Columbus, Case No. 73082782(10413)0982, was filed with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission in Septem­ber of 1982, with the plaintiff alleging race discrimination against the City. The Commission dismissed the complaint finding that discriminatory practices did not exist.

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

Clyde Haynie, et al. v. Bernard T. Chupka, et al, Federal District Court, Case No. C-2-73-401. This case is a class ac­tion lawsuit brought by black applicants for the position of Columbus police officer alleging discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e)—Title VII and 42 U.S.C § 1983—The Civil Rights Act, in regard to the entry-level testing of the Civil Service Commission of the City. Judgment was issued in favor of plaintiffs by the District Court in 1978. Judge Robert Duncan ordered back pay and attorneys fees which the City has paid in the aggregate final amount of approx­imately $35,000. The court entered permanent mandatory injunction regarding the elimination of the discriminatory entry-level examination-of Civil Service, a hiring goal of 30% black officers per class to an overall departmental goal of 14.9% representation, and a validation of any selection de­vices in accordance with Equal Opportunity Guidelines. At the direction of the City Attorney's Office, Department of Public Safety, and Division of Police, the Civil Service Com­mission engaged in a 2'/2 year validation study of its present entry-level examination for the position of police officer cul­minating in a presentation of validation evidence to the Dis­trict Court on November 9, 1982. Presently, the decision of the District Court on that issue is pending.

Janson, et al. v. City of Columbus, Case No. 052-80-2078. Rejected applicants for the position of police officer filed administrative charges alleging handicap discrimination af­ter rejection by the Columbus Civil Service Commission for failure to meet the minimum uncorrected vision standard for the position of police officer. After a public hearing, the Hearing Examiner recommended that the Civil Rights Com­mission order the City to cease and desist further use of the uncorrected vision standard. This matter is currently pend­ing before the Civil Rights Commission for final determina­tion. The complainants seek jobs as police officers retroac­tive to 1981, back pay, seniority and other benefits.

Marshall v. Fadley, Case No. C-2-79-1006. A former A;sis-tant Fire Chief filed an action seeking damages and rein­statement as a result of an alleged constructive discharge as a result of certain First Amendment violations of plaintiffs' freedom of speech by high ranking administrators of the Division of Fire and Department of Public Safety. This case

• is set for jury trial in federal court in 1983. Plaintiff is seek­ing $500,000 damages and reinstatement.

P.O.E.R. v. City of Columbus, Case No. C-2-78-394. Class of . black police officers filed a race discrimination suit against i the City of Columbus alleging discriminatory personnel i practices in the Division of Police, including promotional

examinations. This case represents an across-the-board challenge to virtually all personnel practices, including dis­cipline, transfers, assignments, etc. in the Division of Police since 1972.

Walters, et al. v. City of Columbus, Case Nos. EEOC #052812488, OCRC #73010181(09374)0681. Four white

•'. female applicants for the position of firefighter filed charges with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission alleging that the

J examination process for firefighter discriminated against '! them as females and on the basis of their race. Complainants : seek jobs as firefighters retroactive to 1980, back pay, senior-i ity and other benefits.

!> d. City Contracts and Services. S&M Constructors v. City of Columbus (1982), 70 Ohio St.

: 2d 69, 434 N.E.2d 1349. The contractor sued the City for U $1,350,000 representing additional expenses necessitated by J3 subsurface conditions differing materially from those de-•rz scribed in subsurface reports prepared for the City and in made available to prospective bidders on a sewer tunneling

I project. The City disclaimed all subsurface investigation ./ work as incomplete, not part of the contract documents, and n not warranted to show the actual subsurface conditions, and 3 deleted the standard changed conditions clause, the com-

.,<i bined purpose of which was to allocate the risk of subsur-t.1 face soil conditions to the successful bidder-contractor. The J Ohio Supreme Court unanimously affirmed lower court j)i judgments in favor of the City and found that a municipality .nmay contractually disclaim its liability to a contractor of a <a sewer construction project for additional expenses necessi­t a t e d by conditions differing materially from those de­

scribed in subsurface reports prepared for the municipality .iand made available to prospective bidders.

• te. Constitutional and Statutory Interpretation. City of Columbus v. KFC Ntl Mgmt. Co., Case No. 78CV-

'(08-3819. This is an income tax case wherein the issue was the method by which KFC National Management Company must compute its City Income tax. § 361.20, C.C.C., provides i hat where the taxpayer does business both inside and out-

side the City of Columbus and where his books and records disclose with reasonable accuracy that portion of the in­come derived from business conducted within the City limits, he must use that basis to compute his City Income Taxes. If the books and records do not disclose with reason­able accuracy that portion of the income which is derived from business conducted within the City limits, then the taxpayer is entitled to use a three-part formula averaging the ratios of property in the City of Columbus to property every­where else, sales within the City to sales everywhere else, and payroll within the City of Columbus to payroll every­where else times the gross corporate income. Extensive dis­covery was pursued to ascertain how the books and records for KFC National Management Company were kept and to analyze whether or not these books and records did disclose with reasonable accuracy that portion of the income that could be attributed to the business conducted inside the City limits. An expert accountant was hired to assist this office in evaluating the accounting procedures of the defen­dant corporation. It was the City of Columbus' position that KFC National Management Company's books and records did disclose with reasonable accuracy that portion of the income which was attributable to the City of Columbus. For instance, in 1972, KFC National Management Company ori­ginally filed its City Income Tax return using separate accounting. Three years later it filed an amended return for 1972 using the allocation formula. By using the allocation formula, KFC National Management Company managed to reduce its tax liability by over $8,000. After intensive nego­tiations, a settlement agreement was reached whereby KFC National Management Company agreed to pay to the City of Columbus $71,175 as, and for, its income taxes for the years 1973, 1974, 1975 and 1976, plus interest, and the City of Col­umbus agreed to allow KFC National Management Com­pany to henceforth file its income tax returns using the allocation formula.

f. Regulatory Commissions. In 1982 the office participated in six proceedings regard­

ing utility rates affecting the citizens of Columbus. In those proceedings this office, in conjunction with the Department of Energy and Telecommunication, closely reviewed the utility requests before the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) to determine if the amounts requested were excessive or the proposed rate structures unreasonable. All totaled, the office spent nearly five and a half months in hearings before the PUCO in 1982.

The significant cases in 1982 involved general rate cases for the three major utilities serving Columbus, Ohio Bell Telephone, Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc., and Columbus and Southern Ohio Electric Company.

Ohio Bell Telephone. Two major rate cases for Ohio Bell Telephone were heard by the PUCO in 1982. Hearings in the first case were conducted during the month of February and a decision rendered in April. Hearings in the second case occupied the month of October with a decision issued by the PUCO in December. In both cases the City of Columbus was a member of a coalition comprising seventeen municipali­ties and one county. The coalition pooled their resources in order to hire an expert consultant and special legal counsel. This office contributed, as part of the City contribution, the services of an attorney as co-counsel in prosecution of both cases.

In the first Ohio Bell rate case the coalition undertook only issues related to rate design. As a direct result of the coalition's actions, $36,000,000 in revenue responsibility was shifted away from basic exchange customers.

In the second Ohio Bell rate case, the coalition advocated issues involving rate design which shifted $35,000,000 in re­venue away from basic exchange customers. In addition, two other positions solely advocated by the coalition re­sulted in a savings of $4,200,000 by all customers of Ohio Bell Telephone. The coalition has requested that the PUCO reconsider several issues in this case which total an addi­tional $32,000,00 in savings. A decision on the coalition's request is expected in early 1983.

Columbus and Southern Ohio Electric. In December 1981, C&SOE filed an application for an increase in the base rates for its Ohio customers. C&SOE sought an increase of $100 million. The hearings on C&SOE's application began in June of 1982 and continued until September 1982.

On November 5, 1982, the PUCO issued its order in the proceeding granting C&SOE only $40,000,00 out of a $100,000,000 request. The office successfully advocated positions which saved resident ial customers nearly $11,000,000. In addition, the office successfully argued to retain a low use load management rate which encourages

8 CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

energy conservation by offering a lower charge per k w h to all customers who keep their month ly usage below a set level. Retent ion of th is rate resul ted in substant ial savings to customers within Columbus since over half qualified for the rate.

LAND ACQUISITION DIVISION The City Attorney, th rough the Land Acquisit ion Divi­

sion, is responsible for the acquisi t ion of all real proper ty needed by City depar tments . This office is staffed by the Chief Real Estate Attorney and five (5) negotiators .

Whenever a City depa r tmen t reques ts that a certain parcel of land be acquired for a project, t he Land Acquisi t ion Divi­sion works closely with the depa r tmen t to insure that ac­quisition is performed in a m a n n e r designed to satisfy the needs of the project and minimize the inconvenience to the landowner. Before acquisit ion begins, independen t apprais­als are obtained for the purpose of de termining the fair mar­ket value of the desired property. Using these fair marke t value est imates, the negotiators contact the proper ty owners for the purpose of explaining the project and initiating the acquisition. Every a t t empt is m a d e to answer all of t h e land­owner ' s ques t ions abou t the compensa t i on due and the effect the project may have on t h e property. Where applic­able, the negotiator also informs landowners of their eligibil­ity for relocation benefits in addi t ion to the compensa t ion being paid for the property.

In the majority of s i tuat ions t h e City and l andowners are able to reach agreement and the purchase is comple ted in a manne r similar to a convent ional real es ta te t ransact ion. Where a purchase cannot b e negotiated, it may be com­pleted th rough t h e use of the City's eminen t domain power. The exercise of the eminent domain power mus t be autho­rized by City Council and involves the filing of an action in the Franklin County C o m m o n Pleas Court wherein a jury will be asked to de te rmine the fair marke t value of the prop­erty.

In addit ion to the acquisi t ion function, the Land Acquisi­tion Division and the Chief Real Estate Attorney provide the City technical and legal assis tance in regard to all real es tate ma t t e r s i nc lud ing t h e sale a n d leas ing of p roper ty , t h e estimation of proper ty values and the p lanning and imple­mentat ion of special deve lopmen t projects.

A further activity of the Land Acquisi t ion is the receipt of all property tax bills for City-owned land and thei r distr ibu­tion, when applicable, to the various divisions for payment . Applications are filed for exempt ion from taxat ion w h e n land is qualified, and if an applicat ion is chal lenged t h e Land Acquisi t ion Division represen ts t h e City before t h e Ohio State Board of Tax Equalization. In 1982, 37 of 43 ap­plications for real es tate tax exempt ion were granted, 1 was denied, and 5 were pend ing at the end of the year. Five hearings before the Ohio Sta te Board of Tax Equal izat ion were at tended. The Division of Sewerage and Drainage, the Depar tment of Development , the Ohio Center, and, on two occasions, the Division of Airpor ts , were r ep resen ted at these hearings.

During 1982 the Land Acquisi t ion Division par t ic ipated in the acquisit ion of the following parcels of proper ty and/or easements in connect ion wi th various City projects.

Division—Project

Division of Sewerage and Drainage Blacklick Creek Sani tary Trunk Intercepting Sewer #100034 East Central Area S to rm Relief and Sanitary Sewer #571037 Worthington-Galena— Park Rds. S torm Sewer & Ditch Improvemen t #572166 . . Upper Scioto, Eas t Branch, Slate Run Area #571008 Big Walnut Sani tary S u b t r u n k Sewer, E. of 270, S. of 161, #571116 Southerly Wastewater Trea tmen t Plant, #100331 Blacklick Sani tary S u b t r u n k Sewer, Chat ter ton Rd. Area #571165

Division of Water Hoover Reservoir Erosion Easements

Parcels Compen-Easements sation Acquired Paid

19

6

4

3

1

1

3

5

$123,734.00

$ 9,075.00

$ 7,441.00

$ 26,100.00

$ 18,000.00

$286,500.00

$ 9,105.00

$ 59,150.00

Noe-Bixby/Broad St ree t Connec t ion Project #982237 2 $ 3,885.00 Stygler Road 12" Water L ine 1 $ —0— Dublin Road 16" Water Main #590176 1 $ —0— Bethel Center P h a s e II 1 $ —0—

Division of Engineering and Construction 17th and Cleveland A v e n u e St ree t Widening and S idewalk Improvement 6 $ 25,690.00 FRA, West Hende r son R o a d Widening #260121 19 $ 60,040.00 FOA. 104-10.57 Frank/Refugee Expressway 1 $ 6,050.00

Department of Recreation and Parks Worthington Hills P a r k 1 $ —0— Olentangy River Po r t ages 3 $ —0—

Department of Development Olde Towne Eas t 6 $ 6,162.00 Reeb/Hosack Sca t te red S i t e Redeve lopment 3 $ 36,700.00

Division of Electricity Electric P o w e r L ine—Frank Road . . 1 $ —0— Electric P o w e r Line—Wall S t ree t . . . 1 $ —0— Refuse/Coal Fired P o w e r Plant #923100 _2 $ 23,000.00

TOTAL 90 $700,632.00

CLAIMS SECTION T h e Cla ims Sec t ion of t h e City At to rney ' s office is re­

sponsible for invest igat ing and resolving c la ims against the City prior to litigation. T h e office a lso ac ts in a subroga t ion capacity by collecting s u m s d u e t h e d e p a r t m e n t s and divi­sions for d a m a g e s caused to City p roper ty . Collect ions a re also m a d e by t h e office for con t rac tu ra l failures, City ser­vices, and o ther d i spu t ed i t ems s u c h as City I n c o m e Tax . These later collections are pr imar i ly the resul t of civil litiga­tion.

The Claims Sect ion inves t iga tes c la ims agains t t h e City for personal injury a n d p rope r ty d a m a g e as well as o the r losses alleged to have been caused by s o m e gove rnmen ta l action. These claims are p rocessed for denia l or se t t lement . All claims of $750 or less are p rocessed and sett led directly by the Claims Sect ion, whi le t h o s e in excess of $750 m u s t be approved by Counci l . Claims in excess of $2,500 requ i re approval by ord inance .

The figures con t a ined in th i s r epo r t reflect only those claims processed by t h e Cla ims Sect ion of the City Attor­ney's office. There is still no cen t ra l reposi tory for da ta on all claims against t h e City in a given year. This is also t rue for damage collections.

Two summar i e s are inc luded for 1982 cla ims paymen t s . T h e first l is ts by divis ion or d e p a r t m e n t t h e n u m b e r of claims processed (for denia l or se t t lement ) , t h e n u m b e r set­tled for p a y m e n t a n d t h e tota l s e t t l emen t a m o u n t s . Dollar amoun t s for six c la ims are no t inc luded ; t he se were small dollar c la ims for wh ich p a y m e n t w a s r e c o m m e n d e d . T h e final a m o u n t was d e t e r m i n e d by t h e Division. J u d g m e n t s against t h e City and se t t l emen t of civil l awsui t s are no t in­cluded in the first s u m m a r y .

There were 17 p a y m e n t s m a d e by t h e City as a resu l t of j u d g m e n t s a n d l a w s u i t s e t t l e m e n t s . T h e s e t o t a l l e d $207,615.00 in 1982 as c o m p a r e d w i th $1,044,110.80 in 1981. I n c l u d e d in t h e 1982 to t a l w e r e j u d g m e n t s f rom long­s tanding cases d i scussed earlier.

The second s u m m a r y lists t h e total p a y m e n t obl igat ion incurred by division or d e p a r t m e n t . T h e s e figures represen t the combina t ion of a m o u n t s from t h e first s u m m a r y wi th amoun t s due as a resul t of j u d g m e n t s and/or lawsui t set t le­ments .

Cur ren t figures ind ica te t h a t l awsu i t s aga ins t t h e City were filed on only 9 of the 92 c la ims den ied by the Claims Section. Tha t n u m b e r could change in t h e c o m i n g m o n t h s .

Claims processed by the Cla ims Sec t ion in 1982 decreased by 25% while the n u m b e r paid dec reased only 3%. Dollar paymen t totals dec reased by 12%. This does no t necessar i ly lead to the conclus ion tha t fewer c la ims were m a d e against the City. T h e d e c r e a s e d n u m b e r s a re d u e in pa r t to im­proved cla ims h a n d l i n g p r o c e d u r e s in va r ious d iv is ions . Many claims u n d e r $750 are n o w be ing p roces sed wi th in a given division ra ther than be ing forwarded to t h e Cla ims

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

Section. This office maintains regular contact with such di­visions and provides whatever advice or assistance may be needed.

While the above-noted "decentralization" has lessened the burden on the Claims Section, it has further clouded the true picture regarding total claims against the City.

Because recent court decisions have eliminated the de­fense of governmental immunity for Ohio municipalities, the establishment of a formal "risk management program" would appear to be beneficial to the long term financial health of the City. The Claims Section, at the direction of the City Attorney, has investigated and pursued the develop­ment of such a program which could help identify the risks of loss for Columbus and could reduce or eliminate that exposure.

The Claims Section strove throughout 1982 to update accounts reveivable, closing many accounts where it be­came apparent further efforts to collect would be futile. These kinds of accounts were either past statute, where the other party could not be located after repeated attempts, and/or where the claim appeared doubtful in the first place. This has allowed the various divisions and the claims office to concentrate on those accounts more likely to be paid.

Also, during 1982, at the suggestion of the Claims Section of the City Attorney's office, several divisions, most signifi­cantly the Division of Engineering and Construction, began preparing estimated bills rather than waiting for damage work to be completed before billing. This has led to a quick­er resolution of many accounts.

The Claims Section continues to lobby for a comprehen­sive drawing together of all computerized billings across divisions so that whenever a bill goes to a particular person or company, all outstanding damages can be collected at one time.

PROSECUTOR DIVISION SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES

During 1982, the Prosecutor Division represented the State of Ohio and City of Columbus in the prosecution of all misdemeanor cases, traffic and criminal, filed in the Frank­lin County, Ohio Municipal Court. Further, throughout the year, the Prosecutor Division rendered legal advice to the Columbus Police Department, various City divisions in­volved in enforcement activities, the Franklin County Sher­iffs Office, the Ohio State Highway Patrol, the Ohio State University Police Department, and the many other sub­urban and township law enforcement agencies within Franklin County, Ohio.

Also, pursuant to the contracts negotiated by the Co­lumbus City Attorney, authorized pursuant to ordinance of City Council, this Division represented the following sub­urbs in the Franklin County Municipal Court on traffic and criminal cases as well as Bureau of Motor Vehicle petitions under O.R.C. Sections 4507.40 and 4511.191:

Bexley, Darbydale, Dublin, Grandview Heights, Grove City, Groveport, Hilliard, Lockbourne, Marble Cliff, Minerva Park, New Rome, Obetz, Reynoldsburg, Riverlea, Upper Arlington, Urbancrest, Valleyview, Westerville, Whitehall, and Worthington.

A total of 149,677 new criminal and traffic charges were filed in the Franklin County Municipal Court in 1982. This total included 37,521 criminal charges and 112,156 traffic charges. This was an increase from 1981 of 746 criminal charges (+ 2%) and a decrease of 3,105 traffic charges ( - 2%).

Once again, the category of criminal cases which had the largest number of charges filed was disorderly conduct at 8,452, an increase from 7,850 in 1981. There were 1,657 mis­demeanor assault charges, an increase from 1,624 in 1981 and 1,713 in 1980. To put the number of assault charges in perspective in 1982, there were 333 domestic violence charges filed this year, up from 330 in 19C1. Domestic vio­lence is aimed, of course, at what its name denotes, violence in a domestic setting between either husband or wife. 4,069 petty theft charges were filed in 1982, as compared to 3,211 such charges in 1981, and 2,543 in 1980. Thus, the petty theft caseload in the Prosecutor's Division has increased 60% over a two year period. This increase can be attributed to the poor economic conditions existing for the past two years.

In 1982, 6,494 charges of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol and/or Drugs were filed. This represents a decrease of 114 charges or 1.7%. It should also be noted, that there were 4,782 OMVI charges in 1979, with the 1982 caseload representing a 35.8% increase in a three year period.

The Report of Juries for 1982 prepared by the jury com­mission for the court indicates a total of 199 criminal and traffic jury trials were conducted, with a conviction rate of 64.2% of those cases that went to verdict.

Due to computer capability, and prosecutor indexing of cases, figures are available for the first time for non-jury trials, and are included with the jury report. Those figures indicate that 935 non-jury trials were conducted, with 693 convictions (74.1%) and 242 acquittals (25.9%).

To accomplish the task of prosecuting the cases men­tioned above, as well as the ancillary work associated with such an undertaking, the Prosecutor Division includes a number of subdivisions:

Trial Staff, Appellate Section, Duty Prosecutor, In­take Section, Night Prosecutor Program, Witness Assistance Program, Police Agency Liaison, Adminis­trative Assistant to the City Prosecutor, First Assis­tant City Prosecutor, and Secretarial Staff.

The Trial Staff included 16 to 18 assistant prosecutors dur­ing 1982. Each prosecutor was assigned to arraignment courts, bench trials and jury trial courts, and duty prosecu­tor, dependent on the duties of the judge to whom they were assigned. The single assignment system, instituted in 1980, was continued in 1982, with several changes in assignment being made to provide professional development with dif­ferent judges. Also, three legal interns certified by the Ohio Supreme Court were utilized to handle traffic arraignment court and hearings regarding petitions filed against the Bureau of Motor Vehicles pursuant to the Implied Consent Law (Section 4511.191, O.R.C.) and the Driver's License Sus­pension for accumulation of twelve points within a two-year period (Section 4507.40, O.R.C).

The Appellate Section continued its efforts in 1982 where cases were briefed and argued in the Franklin County Court of Appeals, 10th Appellate District, and Ohio Supreme Court.

During its fourth year of existence, the position of Duty Prosecutor continued in its important role in the day-to-day operation of the Prosecutor's Division. Two trial prosecu­tors are assigned for portions of one week on a rotating basis as the Duty Prosecutor. The Duty Prosecutor's daily re­sponsibilities include:

Screening cases for criminal charges referred by the Intake Section, giving advice to police officers, screening charges to be filed by City departments, providing discovery, and the handling of numerous miscellaneous legal matters that arise and require the attention of a prosecutor.

The Intake Section of the Prosecutor's Division performs the function of interviewing all non-police complaints. As a result of the interview, the Intake Section may schedule a Night Prosecutor hearing, refer the complaint to another appropriate agency, or if a charge is to be filed, refer the facts to the Duty Prosecutor for evaluation. During 1982, the section conducted 19,403 intake interviews. Out of these in­terviews, 9,652 were scheduled for Night Prosecutor Pro­gram (interpersonal) hearings, 8,499 were referred else­where, were immediately resolved or other action was taken, and 1,252 resulted in formal charges. In addition, 410 of these were filed after Night Prosecutor Program hearings.

The Night Prosecutor Program, winner of an LEAA exem­plary project award in 1974, and recently the subject of an article in Time Magazine, continued to effectively divert to mediation hearings complaints which would have otherwise resulted in Municipal Court cases. During 1982, the program scheduled a total of 27,171 hearings. The hearings consisted of three basic categories:

Interpersonal, which are directed to those criminal misdemeanor complaints brought by private citizens; and administrative, which are directed to misde­meanor complaints brought by the Columbus Health Department, Bureau of Motor Vehicles, Columbus and Southern Ohio Electric Company, the Columbus Public Library, and Columbus Code Enforcement; and bad checks which are directed to misdemeanor bad check complaints.

The primary goal of the program is to reduce the Munici­pal Court case load by redirecting minor criminal disputes to a forum which will result in an acceptable resolution to the parties involved.

In 1982 the Night Prosecutor Program was utilized for the first time on Code Enforcement complaints. All Code En­forcement violations, which include building, housing, zon­ing, and litter complaints, were processed through the Pros­ecutor's Office before a charge was prosecuted. The proce­dure includes a warning letter from the Prosecutor's Office, if there has been no compliance with an order, a Night Pro­secutor hearing seeking compliance, and finally, duty pro­secutor review of the case if it has not been resolved and a charge is to be filed.

The innovative Witness Assistance Program continued its effective and valuable service to the City Attorney's Office,

10 CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

the court, and the community in 1982. The program s pur­pose is to assist witnesses to or victims of crimes in aeaung with the criminal justice system. A full-time coordinator su­pervises a group of community volunteers and part-time assistants together with student placements from local uni­versities to escort citizens to court and provide other ser­vices of an informational and supportive nature.

The Police Agency Liaison Program in 1982 included full-time assignments as follows:

Columbus Police Department—one sergeant and tour officers,

Ohio State Highway Patrol—one sergeant, and The Franklin County Sheriffs Office—one deputy.

The liaison officers provide services from their respective agencies that include appearances at all pre-trials, obtaining necessary facts for prosecutor's files for case preparation, coordination of officer court appearances, and arrange­ments of court appearances. The liaison program has hand­led a high volume of cases, has improved the prosecution efforts in those cases, and has been successful in saving many tax dollars.

In 1982, the Prosecutor's Division, with the help of a grant from the Ohio Highway Safety Department, initiated a "drunk driving task force" to concentrate efforts in more effectively prosecuting those cases. A separate report is in­cluded on that effort.

In 1980 the City Attorney's Office, Prosecutor's Division was awarded a grant by LEAA to provide a management information system for the City Prosecutor's Office. During 1981 there was much work done on grant variances, the bid­ding and selection process, and the final contract negotia­tions and a WANG 220 SVP system was purchased and soft­ware development and design began. It took many hours of concentrated research and brain-storming to evaluate what type of data needed to be included in an effective compute­rized system and what specific goals and objectives needed to be met in 1981. This continued in 1982 with the acquisi­tion of an updated WANG System with a grant from the Ohio Department of Highway Safety to collect figures on closed traffic and OMVI cases. The following three pro­grams which had been designed and tested in 1981 were implemented and operational in 1982:

1. Closed Case Location: The Prosecutor's Office closes approximately 2000 cases per month. Approximately 400 to 500 closed cases need to be retrieved on an annual basis, of these there had been only a 60% success ratio in locating the closed file. Retrieving a closed file took an average of three hours per retrieval. The computerized system enables us to retrieve closed case files in an average time of 15 minutes thus providing a great saving not only in sec­retarial time but also in man-hour costs.

2. Prosecutor Information System: This has been designed to provide an effective manage­ment tool relating to each prosecutor's overall perfor­mance and determining the various median guidelines for prosecution on cases. It covers such areas as the type of charge, the disposition, if plea bargaining was involved, and if so what determining factors may have been present in those cases that were plea bargained. These factors, together with other variables, provide a comparison basis for management to determine what occurs with each prosecutor in the courtroom setting. This program permitted the report and breakdown of terminated cases for the first time.

3. intake NPP Statistics: There had been little, if any, accurate data reflecting what type of cases or problems the Intake/Night Pros­ecutor Departments of this office diverted from the cri­minal court system. There has been concern within the judicial system of Franklin County regarding several areas which include jail overcrowding, the increase in the number of criminal charges filed, and the success or lack thereof of diversion programs. Even though a successful manual system was developed in 1980, due to volume it had been difficult to compile regular statis­tical reports. This data base incorporates specific types of complaints, variables regarding the types of persons making the complaints, and the resolutions of these complaints. The information collected provides accu­rate statistics and an effective management tool not only for use of this office but to benefit the entire crim­inal justice system.

The Chief Prosecutor in the Prosecutor's Division was named by the Governor of the State of Ohio to serve on the Governor s Study Group on alcohol-impaired driving in Ohio in 1981, which continued in 1982. This was especially

appropriate in light of the fact that this office prosecuted over 6,000 charges of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol in 1982. Legislation was introduced as a result of the findings of the Governor's Study Group, and the Chief Prosecutor represented this office by testify­ing at both House and Senate hearings on this bill, which was passed, and is effective 3-16-83.

During the Ohio State Fair, as in the past, in the summer of 1982, the Prosecutor's Division assigned individual pros­ecutors to work at the Ohio State Highway Patrol Headquar­ters at the fairgrounds for purposes of providing legal advice regarding criminal offenses that occurred on the midway during the course of the fair. This assignment was rotated, and felt beneficial by both the prosecutors assigned and the highway patrol.

Contained in the following pages are tables, summary of cases, number and type of charges, together with individual reports for various duties and functions of the Prosecutor's Division.

REPORT OF JURIES FOR YEAR 1982 PANELS CALLED TO BE AVAILABLE FOR

SERVICE 498

BREAKDOWN OF PANELS CALLED

TRAFFIC DIVISION Guilty 55 Not Guilty 25 Hung Jury 5 Mistrial 2 Waived, Tried to Court (Includes guilty pleas, jury

waived, and continuances) 102 Panels requested and sent to courtroom, with jury

waived upon their arrival 10 Jury impaneled but waived with plea or dismissed

without jury deliberation 12 Directed verdict by court 1 Case dismissed after commencement of trial 5

Total 217

CRIMINAL DIVISION Guilty 42 Not Guilty 29 Hung Jury 3 Mistrial 2 Waived, Tried to Court (includes guilty pleas, jury

waived, and continuances) 149 Panels requested and sent to courtroom, with jury

waived upon their arrival 13 Juries impaneled and sworn but settled with pleas or

otherwise disposed of without deliberation 14 Directed verdict by court 0 Cases dismissed after commencement of trial 4

Total 256

NON-JURY TRIALS FOR YEAR 1982 Guilty of Principal Charge 693 Not Guilty of Principal Charge _242

Total Court Trials 935

DRUNK DRIVING TASK FORCE—1982 In 1982, the Ohio Department of Highway Safety awarded

a two-part grant of National Traffic Safety Administration funds to the City Attorney's Office Prosecutor's Division for the prosecution of traffic charges. The first part of the grant was spent to purchase software changes in the management information system already in place and additional up­graded hardware. At the conclusion of the first part of the grant, the information gathered was analyzed. As a result of that analysis, three types of cases involving charges of oper­ating a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs were identified for enhanced prosecution: cases in­volving the use of drugs of abuse, cases involving an arrest­ee's refusal to give a chemical test, and cases involving arrestees whose chemical tests were in the range of .15 to .19% blood alcohol.

The second part of the grant was spent on the purchase of services of three special prosecutors and a "drunk-driving task force" technician. Working on the three types of cases previously noted, the special prosecutors under the direc­tion of a prosecutor already on staff handled almost 700 cases to conclusion between May 18 and September 30, 1982. At the conclusion of the second part of the grant and in order to insure even handedness of treatment, two prosecu-

CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

tors on staff were assigned to handle the case already screened by the task force but not then concluded. Another 264 cases were closed by this follow-up group between Octo­ber 1 and December 31, 1982.

The impact of the grant was substantial. Of the 900 + cases handled by the task force follow-up, convictions on the prin­cipal charge of operating a motor vehicle under the influ­ence were obtained in over 52% of those cases. The convic­tion rate for all OMVI cases handled by the Prosecutor's Division increased from the pre-task force level of 35.5% (January-March, 1982) to the level of 45.9% (July-September, 1982). Although the task force was not funded beyond September 30, its presence altered case disposition patterns after the conclusion of the task force. The conviction level between October and December, 1982 was 49.9%. This change in handling of operating motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol and/or drug charges between the first quarter of 1982 and the fourth quarter of 1982 clearly indi­cates that the presence of the task force changed how cases are resolved in Franklin County Municipal Court.

1982 ANNUAL REPORT OF APPELLATE ACTIVITY On January 1, 1982, the Appellate Section had nineteen

(19) cases pending and during the ensuing year a total of fifty (50) new cases were appealed. On December 31, 1982, there were thirty-one (31) cases pending in the Appellate Section.

During the year, forty-two (42) cases were pursued to argu­ment and thirty-eight (38) briefs were written, including six

I (6) successful Memorandums Contra (and one [1] unsuccess­ful Reply Brief) in the Supreme Court of Ohio.

Of Appellate Section cases in which decisions were ren­dered in the Court of Appeals, twenty-seven (27) cases were

> decided in favor of the prosecution, seven (7) against and error was confessed in one (1). The Supreme Court of Ohio

i overruled six (6) motions to certify convictions, but found Section 2315.08(B), Columbus City Code, to be unconstitu­tional. In City v. Caudill, 82AP-561 and 562, the City agreed and the Court of Appeals confirmed that a double sentence

i could not arise from convictions of resisting arrest and • assault under the facts of that case. The cases remaining - were dismissed for one reason or another at appellant's > costs, and all defense motions for reconsideration were ; answered and overruled.

The win/loss ratio (exclusive of rulings on interim motions i and motions to reconsider) is over eighty per cent (80%) t favorable.

The following issues were presented in some of the appeals: (1) The fact that a defendant was initially advised of im­plied consent requirements at the scene of his arrest does not render the subsequent giving of such requirements at the police station (per statutory dictate) a nullity, and his refusal to submit to an alcohol test both times results in a valid driver's rights suspension. (Damelio v. BMV, 82AP-61) (2) Officers who allow an OMVI arrestee more than one telephone call for advice in response to their demand that he take a chemical test must reiterate to the defendant a final demand to take the test following a reasonable period of cooperation before the submission of a "refusal" will be sustained. (King v. BMV, 82AP-92) (3) An appellant cannot, for the first time, raise the issue of denial of a speedy trial in the Court of Appeals. (Wor­thington v. Ogilby, 82AP-145) (4) Columbus ordinance penalizing failure to exercise "reasonable and ordinary control" over vehicle is an ordi­nance "relating to reckless operation" pursuant to Section 4507.34, Ohio Revised Code, and license suspension under latter (statute) is available as enhanced penalty for viola­tion of former (ordinance). (Columbus v. Jackson, 82AP-244) (5) Docketed notation of illness of assigned trial court constitutes valid reason for continuance of trial beyond statutory speedy trial time limit. (Columbus v. Browning, 82AP-293) (6) Failure to refrigerate urine samples immediately upon receipt therof to result in prejudice to a defendant (be­cause the resultant evaporation of alcoholic content from such sample could inure only to defendant's benefit on subsequent testing), as determined in Columbus v. Kilts, 81AP-222 and 223, was reiterated and affirmed in Co­lumbus i>. Hamilton, 82AP-675 and 676; State v. Davis, 81AP-767 (sample mailed to Highway Patrol headquarters over a weekend); and Ohio v. Bosworth, 82AP-392 and 393 (sample mailed by Highway Patrol). (7) The appearance and trial of a case by a member of a law firm other than that with which client spoke does not

constitute ineffective assistance of counsel per se. (Co­lumbus v. Breckenridge, 81AP-854 and 855) (8) Testimony of experienced Columbus Police officer as to excess speed of a defendant was found to be sufficient to support conviction even though the officer was un­familiar with the speedometer of his (newly assigned cruiser and no speed measuring devices were involved. (Columbus v. Taylor, 81AP-920) (9) Ohio's post conviction relief statute does not apply to convictions of violations of municipal ordinances. (Co­lumbus v. Fantozzi, 81AP-896, 897 and 898)

SUMMARY OF APPELLATE SECTION ACTIVITIES January 1, 1982 through December 31, 1982

I. Appellate Section: Won Lost

Court of Appeals 31 6 Supreme Court of Ohio 6 1

Court of Appeals & Supreme Court 37 7 II. Dismissed in Court of Appeals: 12

(Costs to Deft.)

III. Error Confessed in Court of Appeals: 1 IV. Briefs Filed: 38 Oral Agruments: 42 V. Pending:

Court of Appeals 30 Supreme Court of Ohio 1 U.S. Dist. and App. Cts _2

TOTAL PENDING APPEALS 33 VI. Total Cases Completed in 1982 and Pending

as of 1-1-83: 90

POLICE AGENCY LIAISON PROGRAM During 1982, the police liaison program completed its

third full year of operation. The main thrust of the program is to have an officer or team of officers appear at pre-trial conferences on behalf of all the complaining witnesses from a given police agency. In addition, the liaison officers are the primary point of contact for prosecutors who need more information on a particular case. The liaison officers also handle contacting regular officers for last minute con­tinuances in emergency situations requiring the appearance of an officer that was not subpoened earlier. The liaison officers coordinate the flow of subpoenaes to their agencies and represent the police agencies at unscheduled changes of plea.

The Columbus Police Department, the Ohio State High­way Patrol, and the Franklin County Sheriffs Office are the three agencies most involved and most experienced in the police liaison program. Many other law enforcement agen­cies participate on a part-time basis.

The following statistics provided by the respective agen­cies reflect the second full year of operation:

Columbus Police Department Liaison Statistics—1982 Pre-Trials worked and set for trial 6,145 Pre-Trials worked and terminated 7,712 Record & jury trials worked 1,776

Total 15,633 Average # of cases per day 62 Average # of cases per day,

liaison officer 15.5 Estimated Savings to the City $472,184.00 Additionally, the Columbus Police Department Liaison

Unit saved court appearances for officers who were sick, injured, on vacation, or for some other reason were unable to appear.

The Ohio Highway Patrol continued in its assignment of one trooper to serve as its liaison. In addition to represent­ing the Highway Patrol at pre-trials, the liaison officer pre­pares fact sheets for the Prosecutor's Office, files affidavits at the Clerk's Office for the Patrol, delivers subpoenaes to other troopers, and calibrates a breath testing machine for use in OMVI prosecutions.

Ohio State Highway Patrol Liaison Statistics—1982 Total Subpoenas Issued to Patrol 5,954 Total cases worked by liaison officer 3,702 Total OMVI cases completed 1,696 Estimated Savings to the State $125,000

The Franklin County Sheriffs Office continued its liaison program for 1982. The Deputy Sheriff assigned to the liaison unit performs his job in much the same way already de-

12 CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

scribed Additionally, he expedites the delivery of prisoners t o t t e various courtrooms in Franklin County Municipal Court.

Franklin County Sheriffs Office Statistics—1982 Pre-Trials Worked • 9 3 4

Appearances Handled for Deputies who were Unavailable — • vv,- i , , !

Estimated Savings to the County $41,ML.VO While the dollar amounts recited in the statistics are im­

pressive, the added value that the community receives by the better preparation of cases for prosecution cannot be measured in monetary terms. It is, without dispute, substan­tial.

WITNESS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM The City Attorney's office, Prosecutor's Division Witness

Assistance Program has become unique in many ways; some of which are (a) it is one of the only programs in the country dedicated to misdemeanors; (b) it has the potential of providing services and information to 150,000+ victims and witnesses annually; and, (c) it has developed one of the most effective and comprehensive agency referral networks in Franklin County.

SERVICES PROVIDED The Witness Assistance Program provides the following

services to witnesses: 1. Information regarding their case. 2. Escort service to court. 3. Subpoena information. 4. Emergency subpoena notification. 5. Assistance in understanding the court system. 6. Assistance in personal problems arising from being

called as a witness. 7. Information on State Compensation available to vic­

tims. 8. Crisis counseling. 9. Assistance to witnesses who are being intimidated.

10. Direct assistance to the Court in difficult witness situations.

11. Coordinate information and services between the In­take Department, Night Prosecutor's Program and Prosecutor's Office trial staff.

12. Coordinating information and services between other agencies both in the government and private sector relating to victims of crime.

13. Speaking to and educating community groups and agencies.

PROGRAM OVERVIEW Witnesses are referred to the program from numerous

sources (i.e.: Intake Department, prosecutors, police offic­ers, the court, and outside social service agencies). Many witnesses come into contact with the program through in­formational brochures, others call the prosecutor's office with questions and are referred to the program for assist­ance. A person who is a victim of and/or witness to a misde­meanor crime may be referred to the program at any point in the system from the time they file a charge through sentenc­ing.

In 1982 emphasis was placed on establishing a referral network to aid victims of crime with such problems as emergency housing, family counseling, divorce informa­tion, etc. A great deal of time was spent contacting social service, government and human resource agencies through­out Franklin County and establishing a good working raport with them. It is imperative, especially in family violence situations, that victims are exposed to as little bureaucratic "red tape" as possible. Establishing key contact persons in other agencies and documenting what specific services they provide has enabled us to reduce the chances of victims getting the "run-a-around", and therefore eliminate some of their frustration. By reducing the victim frustration we en­hance the probability of effective prosecution.

STAFF The Witness Assistance Program was staffed by a full-

time coordinator; one part-time assistant working a total of thirty hours per week; nine student placements from Ohio State, one from Capital University, and nine volunteers.

STATISTICS Cases Referred to the Witness Assistance Program 1 592 Arraignment Letters 143R Telephone Contacts 3'g3o Inter-office Contacts '31Q

Meancing 85 Interference w/cust 49 Endang. Children 2 Public indency 21 Telephone Han-ass 39 Unauthorize Use Veh . . . 49

Escorts to Court 536 Other Letters 1<» Referrals to other agencies 2 «> Speaking engagements 24 Subpoena Calls b b a

Types of Charges: Assault 556 Criminal Damaging 295 Aggravated Menacing.. 26 Domestic Violence 188 Criminal Trespass 153 Disorderly Conduct 114 Petty Theft 36

INTAKE SECTION The Intake Section is responsible for the initial screening

of all non-police complaints. Fifteen trained personnel are employed as Intake Counselors. The operation is supervised by a full-time coordinator, an attorney. The Intake Section is assisted in this acreening process by the Duty Prosecutor who is assigned on a rotating basis. In addition, Human Re­lations Counselors are available during all hours of intake to provide their expertise in the areas of social referrals and counseling. The Witness Assistance Program works closely with the Intake Section to provide support and assistance to individuals filing formal complaints.

INTAKE DUTIES The Intake Counselors interview the complainants in an

attempt to identify (1) the problem and (2) the most appropriate action to be taken. A wide range of possible solutions to a problem is available through the Intake Sec­tion.

1. A Night Prosecutor hearing; 2. A formal complaint; 3. A community referral; 4. Legal referrals; 5. Crisis Intervention counseling; 6. Referral to the Witness Assistance Program; 7. Immediate resolution; 8. Information.

INTAKE PROCEDURE When a complainant arrives at the City Prosecutor's

Office - Intake Section, he completes a statement of facts describing the problem. Once that statement of facts is com­pleted, an intake counselor privately interviews the com­plainant and determines the most appropriate action to be taken. Often the complainant has had prior contact with the Prosecutor's Office or the court system. This history is also explained so that the best solution to the complainant's problem may be selected.

If a formal charge is necessary, the Intake Counselor assists the complainant in completing a worksheet which is reviewed by the Duty Prosecutor. The Duty Prosecutor ev­aluates the complaint and determines whether a charge should be filed. The Intake Counselor then contacts the complainant and advises him of the Duty Prosecutor's re­commendations. If a formal charge is to be filed, the com­plainant is referred to the Witness Assistance Program for support.

An attorney is available during all hours of intake to re­view complaints. If an attorney is not in the office during evening or weekend hours, four (4) on-call telephone num­bers are available where an attorney may be reached. A pa­ger number is available so that the Duty Prosecutor could be reached when from his/her telephone.

The Intake Section has an indexing system to keep track of the massive number of criminal complaints. A separate card is maintained for each individual who registers a com­plaint. The system design allows quick retrieval of the his­tory and outcome of a particular complaint. Prior contact with the office, nature of the problem, prior Night Prosecu­tor hearings, any charges filed, and results are available at a glance. This allows better control of the screening process. Repeat problems can now be identified and options for re­solution more quickly narrowed.

The recording of all charges filed by the Prosecutor's Office provides information on defendant's name, case number, and disposition of formal charge. A complete re­cord of every charge filed is available.

With the establishment and success of the Witness Assist­ance Program, the Intake Section is now able to refer vic­tims directly to the Witness Assistance Program for assist­ance and guidance once a formal charge has been filed. This has significantly reduced the number of charges that are

CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 13

dropped and provides for specialized attention to victims of domestic violence.

Refinement of procedures have allowed for quicker and more efficient access of the Intake Section to police records and offense reports.

Central Ohio Psychiatric Hospital, Franklin County Chil­dren's Services, The Columbus Public Library, Franklin County Animal Control are just a few agencies who de­veloped close relationships with the Intake Division in 1982, resulting in more effective screening of cases.

TRAINING Continuous training of Intake Counselors occurs through

the use of staff meetings, bulletins, and training seminars. New statutes and procedures are related to the Intake Staff as they are effective. All Intake Counselors have gone through extensive crisis intervention training and legal training.

HUMAN RELATIONS COUNSELORS Frequently, human relations counselars will assist in the

Screening Process. They are available to deal with crisis situations and can provide short-term counseling and refer­rals to community agencies. One to four relations counse­lors are available during all hours of intake. Their duties include direct service to persons appearing at the Prosecu­tor's Division and coordination of the office's use of com­munity resources.

INTAKE STATISTICS 75 to 125 complainants appear at the City Prosecutor's

Office - Intake Section every day. Approximately 60% of these complaints are initially scheduled for a mediation hearing. The remaining complaints are either referred else­where for a more appropriate examination of the problem or a formal charge is filed. In many cases, the problem js re­solved completely at the initial interview.

1982 INTAKE STATISTICS Total 1982 Intake Cases 19,403

Intake Results: Night Prosecutor Hearings Scheduled... 9,652 Formal Cases Filed at Intake 1,252 Other Action/Referrals/Immediate Resolution

8,499

NIGHT PROSECUTOR PROGRAM INTRODUCTION

The Columbus Night Prosecutor's Program (NPP) is one of the most successful diversionary programs in existence. Over the past eleven years, over 190,000 cases have been scheduled for mediation resulting in a savings to the City of Columbus that can be measured in millions of dollars. The Night Prosecutor Program is divided in three (3) divisions: Interpersonal, Bad Check, and Administrative

During 1982, the Night Prosecutor Program was visited by law enforcement and social service individuals from throughout the United States and Canada. NPP provided special assistance to the states of Iowa, Oklahoma, and West Virginia in development of their new programs. Past em­ployees of NPP direct or work in similar programs in Bos­ton, Houston, Washington D.C., Cleveland, Connecticut, and Colorado Springs.

The NPP is based on the mediation concept. Mediation is a process in which a neutral third party (the hearing officer) aids the disputants to fashion a mutually acceptable solu­tion to the presenting problem.

The goals of this program are: to reduce the court case load by redirecting cases that are not appropriate for the adversarial process; to establish an efficient mechanism for resolving minor criminal disputes; to provide a public agen­cy forum for a working population during hours which would not interfere with their employment; and to remove the stigma of a criminal arrest record arising from minor personal disputes.

STAFFING AND TRAINING The NPP is under the direction of a full-time coordinator.

The coordinator is responsible for the administration of the program and supervision of the hearings.

The program is staffed by trained personel who function as hearing officers and clerks. Approximately forty (40) indi­viduals are employed on a part-time basis to maintain the seven-day-a-week operation. Before being hired, each em­ployee attends a twelve hour Crisis Intervention Conflict

Management Training Program which has been tailored for use with the NPP. An additional eight hours of individual on-the-job training and four hours of specific legal instruc­tion is provided to each employee. All employees must also attend six hours of "in-house" training which focuses on procedure of intake and mediation. A number of staff mem­bers have participated in cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training.

To assist the hearing officer in crisis intervention and re­ferrals, the NPP has a team of human relation counselors on staff. Social work and psychology students from the various universities within the area fulfill the critical need of alle­viating the immediate crisis situation and dealing with the difficulties caused by human relationships. Part-time hu­man relation counselors, who are professionals in social ser­vice and mental health fields, are also employed.

A complete network of contacts with referral agencies has been established permitting an immediate follow-up on all referrals. Often a criminal complaint is integrally connected with an individual's inability to deal with the difficulties of day-to-day living. The mental health counselor allows an immediate handling of these complex situations and pro­vides the City Prosecutor's Office with an important link to the mental health and social service community and its re­sources.

The NPP has a field hearing officer available. This posi­tion is designed primarily to serve the needs of those indi­viduals who have a need for the NPP, but are unable to use the services due to lack of transportation, age, or disability.

A daytime NPP representative was available to handle follow-up, questions, rescheduling, telephone calls and emergency hearings.

DIVISION I: Interpersonal Hearings

Of the types of hearings conducted by the NPP, interper­sonal hearings are the primary focus. These hearings are directed to those criminal misdemeanor complaints brought by private citizens and usually involves spouses, family members, neighbors, co-workers, or the people who know each other. A majority of these cases are referred to the Prosecutor's Office by Columbus municipal police.

The hearings are conducted in a private room in the Pro­secutor's Office. Present at the hearing are the hearing offi­cer, the complainant, the respondent, human relations coun­selor, attorney (which is rarely the case) and witnesses (if necessary). The hearing officer conducts the hearing in such a way that each party has an opportunity to tell his/her side of the story without interruption. Hearings are scheduled for thirty minute intervals and are held 7 days a week.

Total Scheduled 9,652

Charges Filed after NPP 410

DIVISION II: Bad Check Program

The Bad Check Division is an integral component of the NPP.

In 1980, Franklin County Municipal Court passed a new rule which resulted in all bad check complaints being chan­neled through the NPP as a first step in the criminal pro­cess.

The Prosecutor's Office is not a collection agency, but rather the last step before the filing of formal charges. The purpose of the hearing is to settle the dispute and to educate the respondent as to the possible ramifications of writing a check which subsequently "bounces." Issues relating to the physical identification of the checkwriter and the criminal intent necessary for a formal charge are of importance in a bad check charge. The NPP hearing and, if necessary, the subsequent evaluation for a criminal charge help clarify these issues before prosecution begins.

Many changes were incorporated into the bad check divi­sion effective January 1, 1982. These changes include cross-referencing of bad check complaints between merchants, more accurate I.D. and address information on bad check writers, elimination of unnecessary NPP hearings, empha­sis on multiple check writers, better evaluation procedures by use of bank records, and cross-referencing of cases, and regiscopes, and more accurate statistics.

These new procedures resulted in a recovery of over $180,000.00 to area merchants by the Bad Check Division in 1982.

Statistics prior to 1982 are not valid for comparison pur­poses in 1982 because of program changes that have oc­curred.

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

Bad Check Hearings Scheduled Cases filed after hearings 16,053' 3722

'Because of a new procedure in the Bad Check Division many hearings are now consolidated into one hearing in cases involving mult iple checkwri ters . The total number of checks handled in 1982 increased dramatically even though the number of hear ings scheduled decreased. In addit ion, because of better t racking of checkwri ters , many cases are not scheduled for hearings as was done prior to 1982. These unscheduled cases are submit ted directly for evaluation of criminal charges. , .

2Criminal charges were filed against 372 defendants . This significant decrease (2,249 charges in 1981) in the n u m b e r of defendants relates directly to new and improved me thods for evaluation of check complaints . Because of new proce­dures all bad checks from one checkwri ter are consolidated before evaluation for charges occurs. This results in better evidence for prosecution, more effective evaluation, con­solidations of all check charges from different merchan ts into one case. This consolidation results in large financial savings to the court system due to the e l imina t ion of mult i­ple cases against one defendant — all being p rosecu ted separately.

DIVISION III: Administrative Hearings

T h e Admin i s t r a t i ve Div is ion of t h e Nigh t P r o s e c u t o r Program underwen t a dramat ic increase in 1982 due to the addition of addit ional agencies. (1) Columbus Health Department

The Columbus Health Depar tmen t has been part of the Night Prosecutor 's P rogram for five years. After the heal th depar tment exhaus t s its resources to obtain compl iance with a health ordinance, a hearing is scheduled to m a k e one last a t tempt at compl iance before formal charges are filed.

Hearings Scheduled 70

Charges Filed 14

(2) Columbus and Southern Ohio Electric Company The Columbus and Southern Ohio Electric Company be­

gan its participation in N P P in December , 1979. After t h e Electric Company exhaus ts its resources in a t t empt ing to enforce the s ta tute concerning t amper ing and theft of ser­vices, a hearing is scheduled. This program has been qui te success fu l a n d h a s r e s u l t e d in t h e r e i m b u r s e m e n t of thousands of dollars worth of stolen electrical services due to tampering with electrical meter. Changes were m a d e in 1982 which further improved the operat ion and success of the program.

Hearings Scheduled 414

Charges Filed 0

(3) Noise Control Department The Noise Control Division of the Co lumbus Heal th De­

par tment coordinates noise compla in ts with the Prosecu­tor 's Division. The Prosecutor ' s Division a t t empts to abate noise problems by sending a letter to the person responsible for the noise. N P P hearings were scheduled for unaba ted noise complaints .

Total Noise Complaints Scheduled Hearings Charges Filed 9 1 ' 22 2

'69 were resolved by use of the letter; the addit ional 22 were scheduled for N P P .

(4) Columbus Public Library

The Columbus Police Library reques ted the services of

N P P in 1982 to he lp in t h e recovery of miss ing books , rec­ords and videotapes . T h e P rosecu to r ' s Division first s tep in handling these cases of unau thor i zed u s e of p roper ty is to send a let ter to the alleged defendant . If the let ter does not resolve the prob lem, an N P P hear ing is t h e n scheduled . The l i b r a ry h a s e s t i m a t e d t h e s e c o s t s a v i n g s i n e x c e s s of $7,300.00 due to the success of t h e Nigh t P rosecu to r Pro­gram.

Total Complaints Scheduled Hearings Charges Filed 7 1 ' 9 3

'62 were resolved and were in t h e process of be ing re­solved. The other 9 w e r e s chedu led for hear ings .

(5) Ohio Air National Guard The Ohio Air Nat ional G u a r d b e g a n its par t ic ipa t ion in

N P P in 1982 at the i r r eques t to resolve cases involving miss­ing property. Hear ings are he ld on a very i r regular basis .

Hearings Scheduled 5

Resolved 5

Charges Filed 0

(6) Ohio Department of Mental Retardation This d e p a r t m e n t r eques ted t h e ass i s tance of N P P in 1982

to resolve cases involving ove rc rowded g r o u p h o m e s for t h e mentally re tarded.

Hearings Scheduled Resolved 3

Charges Filed 0

(7) Code Enforcement for the City of Columbus In 1982 adminis t ra t ive policy was ins t i tu ted in t h e Pros­

ecutor 's Office which requ i red an N P P hear ing before the filing of any cr iminal charges involving code enforcement cases. ( E m e r g e n c y cases a n d c h r o n i c v io la tors w e r e ex­empted from this policy). As a resul t all hous ing , bui lding, zoning and l i t ter ing cases are n o w h a n d l e d by t h e Adminis ­trative Division of the Night P rosecu to r P r o g r a m . The first s tep is to send a let ter to the al leged violator. If t h e let ter is not successful in ach iev ing compl i ance wi th t h e appl icable statute, an N P P hear ing is t h e n s chedu led to a t t emp t to re­solve the problem. Cr imina l cha rges a re eva lua ted if t h e hearing does not resul t in compl i ance .

Total Complaints Hearings Scheduled Charges Filed 2,076' 9432 2473

'1,187 of these cases w e r e resolved by t h e Adminis t ra t ive Division of the office.

2Of the 943 cases s chedu led for N P P , 696 were resolved at the N P P level.

3Only 247 charges were filed in 1982 after Code Enforce­ment began us ing t h e Nigh t P r o s e c u t o r P r o g r a m in Apri l of 1982. This compares wi th 1,314 cha rges be ing filed in 1981.

1982 INTAKE/NPP TOTALS

Total Hearing Cases Filed Complaints Scheduled after NPP

Interpersonal 19,403 9,652 410' Bad Check 18.9032 16,053 372 Administrative 2,784 1,466 266

Totals 41,090 27.1713 1,048 'This inc ludes only t h e cha rges filed after N P P . Ano the r

1,250 charges were filed di rect ly a t t h e I n t a k e level. This total i nc ludes m a n y cases w i th mu l t i p l e checks .

Each mul t ip le check case is c o u n t e d as one compla in t . This figure reflects a r e d u c t i o n from 1981 b e c a u s e of

changes in the Bad Check Division not from a decrease in n u m b e r of cases.

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 15

FRANKLIN COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT ANNUAL REPORT—1982

HISTORY OF THE COURT The General Assembly of the State of Ohio created and

established Columbus Municipal Court in 1916. Prior to this time our Court operated under the Justice of Peace System. On July 5, 1955, the Columbus Municipal Court was given Countywide Jurisdiction. In 1968 the State Legislature changed the name of the court to FRANKLIN COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT. In 1979 the Court and Clerk of Courts Office moved into their new quarters, the Franklin County Municipal Court Building, at Fulton and High Streets, Columbus, Ohio.

The Franklin County Municipal Court operates under State Statute or State Law rather than under the City Char­ter. Under the present law the Municipal Court operates with thirteen (13) elected Judges and one (1) elected Clerk of Courts, each of whose term is for a period of six years.

There are a total of 28 Court Rooms plus a Duty Room in the new facility which are being used constantly. The new Court Building is equipped with two (2) Traffic Arraignment Courtrooms, four (4) Criminal Arraignment Courtrooms, two (2) Record Hearing Courtrooms, one (1) Duty Room and seventeen (17) Jury Courtrooms. The Clerk of Courts has provided a Drive-In Window where a parking ticket or a moving violations can be paid. Franklin County Municipal Court consists of five divisions; Civil, Traffic, Criminal, Trusteeship-Landlord Tenant and Small Claims. Within these five divisions we perform a wide variety of duties for the Court and the Public. The Clerk is the keeper of all court records as well as a bookkeeper, cashier and banker of court money.

FRANKLIN COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT DIVISIONS CIVIL DIVISION

This division handles all Civil cases involving money ac­tions which include cases representing account actions for money and property, actions at law based on tort of damage, on contract, and actions for restitution of property. In 1974 that State Legislature increased the court's limitation on ac­tion involving money to $10,000 in order to relieve the over­load in Common Pleas Court. All garnishments of wages and executions against personal property for collection of judgements are processed by this division.

CRIMINAL DIVISION The Municipal Court has jurisdiction of the violation of

any city ordinance and of any misdemeanor committed within the limits of Franklin County. The Court also holds preliminary hearings on all felony arrests in the county. All persons arrested in Franklin County by the Columbus Police, Highway Patrol, Franklin County Sheriffs, and other law enforcement agencies are processed through this divi-

TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS BUREAU This division keeps a record of all traffic citations issued

by the Columbus Police, Highway Patrol, Franklin County Sheriffs and other law enforcement agencies wherein no court appearance is required by law. Other functions are collecting all monies for traffic citations, issuing delinquent notices to violators, preparing copies of affidavits when court hearings are preferred.

TRUSTEESHIP — LANDLORD TENNANT DIVISION This division handles trusteeships of debtors who are

trying to pay off their creditors while at the same time re­lieve themselves of frequent garnishments. A percentage of their pay, each pay period, as paid into the Clerk's Office and is periodically prorated to their creditors.

A tenant having complaints in regard to housing condi­tions may make application to the Clerk's Office to put their rent in escrow until release is given by the tennant or ordered released by the Court.

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION The purpose of this division is to provide a forum where

parties may informally litigate disputed claims pursuant to an expeditious and inexpensive procedure. Civil Actions for money only up to $1,000.00 are filed in this division. Before a claim can be filed, a claimant must be interviewed and a possible conciliation hearing scheduled before going to court.

CIVIL DIVISION CASES

Month New Cases Ancillary Total January 2,799 5,047 7,846 February 3,048 4,620 7,668 March 3,499 5,720 9,219 April 3,127 4,890 8,017 May 2,908 4,681 7,589 June 2,930 6,190 9,120 July 2,858 4,997 7,855 August 3,077 5,297 8,374 September 3,271 4,333 7,604 October 2,830 4,412 7,242 November 2,189 4,589 7,507 December 3,379 4,289 7,668

Total 36,644 59,065 95,709 Total Garnishments in 1982 28,600* Total Evictions in 1982 7,269

*Included in above Ancillary figures

FINES AND COSTS COLLECTED BY FRANKLIN COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT AND PAID INTO GENERAL FUND FOR THE YEAR 1982

Civil Criminal Traffic Violation Month Division Division Bureau Interest Total January $ 42,385.17 175,710.49 187,147.06 22,799.45 428,042.17 February 130,145.51 199,520.36 205,936.88 7,411.11 543,013.86 March 171,104.31 229,276.47 247,608.81 49,324.43 697,314.02 April 146,161.92 305,736.18 211,098.00 16,158.23 679,154.33 May 95,051.44 302,004.75 215,331.69 7,326.81 619,714.69 June 72,291.09 293,974.51 227,239.19 60,013.75 653,518.54 July 76,315.06 280,854.73 197,502.81 25,859.58 580,532.18 August 56,375.06 300,443.97 206,394.93 10,390.26 573,604.22 September 38,219.33 270,156.63 226,230.56 52,037.49 586,644.01 October 37,031.61 290,400.63 226,369.00 35,567.23 589,368.47 November 125,035.22 250,693.92 216,868.44 10;489.24 611,086.82 December 73,608.17 243,669.90 196,944.75 41,014.60 555,234.42

Total 1,063,723.89 3,150,442.54 2,564,669.12 338,392.18

Tt TRUSTEESHIP DIVISION

otal Active Cases 1/1/82 ew Cases Filed In 1982

Cases Disposed Of During 1982 Dismissed (Non-Payment)

I'Paid In Full

269 218 487

159 35

7,117,227.73

Bankruptcy 2 Other (Applicant's request,

Attorney's request and Non-appearance) 58

254 Total Active Cases As Of 12/31/82 233 Total Receipts For 1982 $315,636.32 Total Disbursements 1982 322,269.73

RENT ESCROW 58 Applications Filed Dur ing 1982

Total Receipts For 1982 ? i l »n8 3 Total Disbursements 1982 14,2U8.W

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION Number of cases pending as of 1/1/82 495 AT 1 „ t ™ „ , filoJinlQH^ b lbD Number of cases filed in 1982

Total 6660 5923 Number of cases disposed of in 1982 »9ZJ

Number of cases pend ing as of 12/31/82 <»'

CRIMINAL AND TRAFFIC DIVISIONS RECEIPT SOURCE Traffic Violation Bureau

F n t e e s S . ( 2 3 6 : 4 9 5 ) $2,896,847.06 Costs

(a) 25% County Sheriff (b) 25% Townships (c) 25% Ohio State

University (d) 25% Ohio State P a t r o l . . (e) 25% Moving Violations . (f) 25% Park ing Violations.

26,801.25 58,907.50

323.75 86,481.44

336,163.75 235,116.25 743,793.94

$3,640,641.00

TRAFFIC COURT CONVICTIONS Cases (97,406) Costs 648,738.18 Fines 2,344,725.25

2,993,463.43

CRIMINAL COURT CONVICTIONS Cases (30,000) Costs Fines

307,658.90 592,406.66

Traffic Ticket Overcharge . Miscellaneous Fines

900,065.56 6,863.00

676,913.09

Total Receipts: $8,217,946.08

DISBURSEMENTS City Treasurer Cost $ 662,660.66 Fines 1,632,690.74 Bond Forfeitures 405,196.00

Traffic Tickets 25% County Sheriff . 25% Townships :

1) Blendon 2) Clinton 3) Frankl in 4) Hamilton 5) Harr isburg 6) Madison 7) Mifflin 8) Norwich 9) Perry

10) Plain 11) Prairie 12) Sharon 13) Washington 14) Riverlea

$2,700,547.40

Sub-Totals of T o w n s h i p s : . . 25% Ohio State Universi ty . . . 75% City Fines 45% Ohio State Patrol 100% Ohio State Patrol Costs 25% City Costs

26,801.25

5,245.00 10,066.25 7,846.25 2,000.00

25.00 5,350.00 5,487.50

548.75 5,180.00

30.00 1,533.75

15,210.00 378.75

6.25

58,907.50 323.75

1,713,840.00 111,169.12 82,347.50

571,280.00

Depar tment of Natural Resources D.ZDU.DU

$ 284,424.81 Expungemen t Fees 6,450.00 Reparat ion Fees :

1) Traffic Bureau Violat ions . 955,088.32 2) Criminal & Traffic

Court Violat ions 283,734.40

County Treasurer Regular Criminal Cour t F i n e s . 181,632.25 Uniform Traffic Cour t F ines . . 95,658.92 50% Townsh ip Fees 95,605.25 50% Liquor F ines , ! ' £ £ , , 10% Ohio State Pa t ro l F ines . . 35,655.31

Ju ry Fees 1il9Ar\ Sheriff Fees 594.00 Witness Fees 1.410-20

Dog & Kennel (animal control) E x p u n g e m e n t Fee s Traflic Bureau Violations 75% Frankl in County Sheriff . . 80,403.75 37'/2% Townsh ips 88,361.24 75% Ohio Sta te Univers i ty . . . . 971.25 10% Ohio S ta te Pa t ro l 24,704.29

Total

Traffic Ticket Refunds Townships 37'/2% Traffic Bureau Violat ions 88,361.26 50% Traffic Cour t Violat ions . . 95,605.25

State Statute 45% Ohio State Patrol

Court Fines 100% Cost on State Cases .

2,564,669.12

160,448.97 289,446.17

$5,715,111.66

State Treasurer 45% Ohio State Patrol Fines . . $160 448 94 45% Ohio State Patrol Tickets . 111,169.12 50% Liquor Fines 7 556 25

1,239,422.72

1,530,297.53

416,107.98

3,543.70 31,177.00

4,300.00

194,440.53

649,569.21

6,833.00

183,966.51

18

utf

Cities Bexley 1,420.00 Canal Winches ter 215.00 Darbydale 15.00 Dublin 1,569.00 Gahanna 5,151.00 Grandview Heights 2,263.00 Grove City 2,584.00 Groveport 255.00 Harr isburg 15.00 Hilliard 2,238.00 Minerva P a r k 370.00 New Albany 175.00 New R o m e 1,084.00 Obetz 637.00 Reynoldsburg 8,263.00 Riverlea 45.00 Upper Arl ington 7,226.50 Valleyview 50.00 Westerville 1,270.00 Whitehall 8,895.00 Worthington 5,883.00

49,623.50

Court of C o m m o n Pleas 152.67 Pha rmacy Board 18,974.00 Columbus Law Library 1) City 2,989.25 2) State 12,010.75

15,000.00 Other Refunds City 29,001.00

State 19,417.00

48,418.00

Total D i s b u r s e m e n t s $8,217,946.08

SUPERVISED COMMUNITY SERVICE UNIT Balance of Cases B r o u g h t F o r w a r d from 1981 . . . . *New Cases Received 855 Total Cases Superv i sed in 1982 943 Cases Comple ted in 1982 655 Non-Complet ion Cases in 1982 Total Active Cases as of J a n u a r y 1, 1983 226 Referred N u m b e r of H o u r s in 1982 44,446

on

EM

81-

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 17

Completed N u m b e r of Hours As of J anua ry 1,1983 31,480 •Effective May 25, 1982, a liability insurance p remium was approved requir ing the defendants to pay $11.00 before he/ she could be placed with a par t ic ipat ing agency. The above figures reflect only persons who have paid the fee. The actual n u m b e r of cases received is larger bu t shall be re­flected in the 1983 Statist ics.

Order-Ins Order-Ins Pend ing As of December 31, 1981 496 New Order-Ins Received in 1982 330

Total Order-Ins in 1982 826 Order-Ins Comple ted 288 Total Order-Ins Pend ing As of

January 1, 1983 538

INVESTIGATION UNIT Presentence Investigation Balance of Invest igat ions Brough t

Forward from 1981 48 New Invest igat ions Received in 1982 684 Total Invest igat ions in 1982 732 Total Invest igat ions Comple ted in 1982 680 Total Invest igat ions P e n d i n g

As of J anua ry 1, 1983 52

Expungement Investigations Balance of Invest igat ions Brough t

Forward from 1981 6 New Invest igat ions Received in 1982 187 Total Invest igat ions in 1982 193 Total Invest igat ions Comple ted in 1982 184 Total Invest igat ions P e n d i n g

As of J anua ry 1, 1983 9

• SUPERVISION UNIT

Probation Cases Balance of Cases Brough t

Forward from 1981 4,180 New Cases Received in 1982

From Presen tence Invest igat ions 359 Direct P lacement 2,458

' Total Cases Received 2,817

Total Cases Supervised in 1982 6,997 I Cases Completed in 1982 2,542 ' Total Supervis ion Cases As of

January 1, 1983 4,455 ' Total Non-Repor t ing Cases

As of J anua ry 1, 1983 3,111 Total Active Supervis ion Cases

As of J anua ry 1, 1983 1,344

i Additional Statistics ) Completed Probat ion Cases by Category

Expirat ions 1,693 Order-Ins Issued for P roba t ion Violat ions 330 Revocations 161 Terminat ions 358 Total Comple ted Proba t ion Cases in 1982 2,542

SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES OF COURT PSYCHOLOGIST 94 Compen tency to s tand trial evaluat ions

G 95 Mental s ta tus eva lua t ions I 189 total evaluat ions

203 counsel ing/ therapy sessions ( includes pe r sons on prob­ation, families of offenders, and Cour t personnel .

Interpret ing for the deaf in the Cour t Room Performed all necessary paper work for referrals to SW

H Forensic Psychia t ry Center , Central Ohio Psychia t r ic Hos-q pital, Moritz Forensic Unit , and P r o b a t e Court .

Designated affiant for t h e Municipal Cour t to file papers ii in P r o b a t e Cour t , a n d s u b s e q u e n t l y testify a t b o t h t h e

"probable cause" hear ing and the "full" hearing. Such hear-•1 ings are held a t t h e Centra l Ohio Psych ia t r i c Hospital .

Liaison be tween the Munic ipal Cour t (in t e rms of mental ­

ly ill offenders) and the Central Ohio Psychiatr ic Hospital . Responded to reques ts from families, a t torneys, Mental

Heal th Cente rs and o the r agencies in having individuals evaluated who had a his tory of menta l illness. Approval was sought from the J u d g e ass igned to the case.

Evaluations were conduc ted at the Frankl in County Muni­cipal C o u r t b u i l d i n g ; t h e F r a n k l i n C o u n t y Cor rec t ions Center; the County jail, Women ' s Annex ; and the County jail, Men's Annex .

Part ic ipated in meet ings with Sou thwes t Mental Health Center, Southeas t Mental Heal th Center, and County jail personnel.

Publ ic speaking engagemen t s At tended professional conferences

COST OF MAINTAINING THE FRANKLIN COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT

DEPARTMENT 25-01 — JUDGES Total of Pe r sonne l Services

Judges and Court Adminis t ra t ion $922,686.00 Ass ignment and J u r y Commiss ion 281,969.00 Service Bailiffs 347,304.00 Court Room Bailiffs 408,742.00 Court Repor ters 257,270.00 Probat ion Depa r tmen t 607,588.00 Small Claims 95,248.00

Office Suppl ies 28,207.00 J u r y Fees 70,642.00 Witness Fees 68,744.00 Transpor ta t ion 40,840.00 Telephone 83,907.00 Rental of E q u i p m e n t 13,268.00 Main tenance of E q u i p m e n t 10,372.00 Other Service Charges 227,770.00 Outlay of E q u i p m e n t 6,676.00

TOTAL $3,471,233.00

COST OF MAINTAINING THE FRANKLIN COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT

1982 DEPARTMENT 26-01 — CLERK Personnel Services $2,700,166.00 Office Suppl ies 6,952.00 Pr inted F o r m s 48,149.00 Rental of E q u i p m e n t 35,811.00 Telephone 22,374.00 Maintenance of E q u i p m e n t 18,876.00 Data Process ing Service 14,505.00 Other Service Charges 1,261.00 Outlay for E q u i p m e n t 267.00 Other Expenses for Opera t ions 1,980.00 Other Expenses — Miscel laneous 3,750.00

TOTAL $2,854,091.00

RECAPITULATION Total Cases Filed Criminal Court 30,000 Traffic Court 97,406 Civil Division (new) 36,920

(ancillary) 59,065 Traffic Violations Bureau 236,495

Total Cases Filed 459,886

Gross Amount Paid To City General Fund Civil Division $1,063,723.89 Criminal & Traffic Cour t 3,150,442.54 Traffic Violations Bureau 2,564,669.12 Interest 338,392.18

Total Paid To General F u n d $7,117,227.73

Expenses Depar tmen t 25-01, J u d g e s $3,471,233.00 Depar tment 26-01, Clerk 2,854,091.00

$6,325,324.00 Net A m o u n t Pa id To

General F u n d In 1982 $ 791,903.73

18 CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

CHARITABLE SOLICITATIONS BOARD ANNUAL REPORT—1982

The Charitable Solicitations Code of Columbus, Ohio was established by the Council of the City of Columbus,Ohio, on July 27, 1959. This ordinance was written to provide tor tne regulation of solicitation for charitable purposes. Ordinance No. 824-59 amends the Columbus City Codes 1959 as amended and enacts Section 525.01 through 525.21 to pro­vide for the registration of all public appeals or genera soli­citations organizations, provide for a Charitable Solicita­tions Board and provides penalties when not abided by.

During the year 1982, eight (8) Board meetings were held and ninety-four (94) applications to secure a license to solicit in the City of Columbus, Ohio were approved at $10.00 each; a total of Nine Hundred Forty Dollars. ($940)

The secretary, Francine C. Ryan, reports $4,558,967.50 has been collected and used for charitable purposes after ex­penses.

Of the seventy-one (71) groups that reported, before March 30, 1983, one (1) awarded scholarships; three (3) maintained their clubs; two (2) maintained hospitals; four (4) gave sup­port to veterans; eleven (11) gave aid to retarded, needy or crippled children; ten (10) gave aid to the blind; twenty-one

(21) gave aid to welfare and nineteen (19) provided for pa­tient aid, research, education and community services to

Two applications (Archie Griffin Little League Football and Russell Robinson Communication Service) were ex­empted during the year 1982.

Three applications (Youth Connection, Diocesan Child Guidance Center and Police Helicopter Fund) were with­drawn during the year 1982.

Two applications (Ohio Township Police Committee and Defense of Central High School) were rejected during the year of 1982.

The five (5) members of the Board in 1982 were: MIKE KARR, Chairman EDWARD HUGHES VICTOR KRUPMAN MRS. BARBARA OSWALT (resigned July, 1982) BREWSTER DAVIS (replaced Mrs. Oswalt August,

1982) MRS. BETTY STRAUSBAUGH

The members serve a five (5) year term with no enumera­tion.

COLUMBUS HEALTH DEPARTMENT 1982 ANNUAL REPORT

BOARD OF HEALTH Tom Moody, Mayor President Ex-Officio

Nancy A. Brunner, R.N., M.S. President Pro Tempore

Joseph S. Backiewicz, D.D.S. George L. Eckert, Jr., D.O.

Marvin G. Green, M.D. Jack W. Miles, M.D.

William C. Myers, M.S. Health Commissioner

FROM THE HEALTH COMMISSIONER: PUBLIC HEALTH: preventing disease and promoting positive health through organized community efforts. This straight forward definition is the basis for all the program information that follows in the Department's 1982 Annual Report. There is one key word in the definition that I believe is often overlooked—community. Local public health efforts are done with the community and not for or by the commu­nity. Programs and initiatives of your Columbus Health De­partment are illustrative of this definition. Contracts with neighborhood based organizations for weed and litter pro­grams and primary health care; using neighborhood facilities for health services and Department field offices thus estab­lishing an entry and contact point for residents and helping our staff develop a sense of belonging and accountability to that neighborhood; involving local residents as "block cap­tains", on advisory boards, or for reporting when nuisances have been resolved are examples of working with our com­munities. Further, public health's community extends equally to businesses, health providers, and other profes­sional sectors of society. Contracting for unique medical skills and interests; developing formal working relationships with hospitals, professional academies and associations; re­cruiting professional volunteers for direct care and for serv­ing in advisory capacities for review and evaluation of our programs are appropriate and necessary relationships for a health department.

A review of past and recent history will show that, from ^In1 n f ? n t we! f a re and milk stations of the early 1900's to 1982 when volunteer from all walks of life contributed in excess of $250,000 worth of service to the Health Depart­ment, the community/Health Department relationship works. Public health is community.

Every community, however, needs a leader and the Health Department should be expected to provide leadership to protect and promote the public's health. The Board of J£nc*K s t a t u

4t o r y authority to promulgate health regula­

tions, the existence of a highly skilled and motivated health staff, and the recogmtion that many of the Department's

programs, most notably in home care, sexually transmitted diseases, alcoholism and the environment are considered unequaled, provide a unique base for the Health Depart­ment's leadership role. There is a missing ingredient, however, an adequate financial base.

For the second straight year, the Department received deep cuts in its support from the City. The General Fund amount needed to provide services at the Department's 1980 level has been reduced by 22% or $1.3 million dollars over the past two years. As a result, the Department has lost 29 full-time positions (12 through lay-off in 1982) or a 10% re­duction in staff supported by City tax dollars. The nursing and environmental health programs have lost field staff; the health education program has been eliminated, and vacan­cies in key administrative and support positions throughout the Department have not been filled. These are but a few of the examples. Understandably, during this period of econo­mic turmoil in our society, the public's demand for Health Department services has increased.

Recognizing that the Department does not rank high on the priority list because it receives only 3.5% of the City's operating fund, an independent citizens' task force con­cluded that the Health Department was " . . . hard pressed to deliver services to the public due to austere budget(s)." The same task force concluded, however, that "The department is well run and is managing admirably under a severe strain because of a lack of adequate funding for staff, facilities, equipment and vehicles."

The Department's leadership and program potential is not being realized because of inadequate resources. While staff has extended themselves to perform extra services and work beyond reasonable work loads at times, this acceler­ated pace cannot be sustained indefinitely without profes­sional burnout, decreasing morale and higher staff turnover. The rubber band is stretched very thin.

In contrast to the budget situation there were many posi­tive changes and challenges that occurred throughout the year. Peter Parthum, M.D., M.P.H. left a public health career in Michigan and joined our staff as Medical Director. It is the first time since 1969 that the Department has had a full-time Medical Director and Dr. Parthum's expertise in areas like communicable disease control and his ability to effectively communicate with other health professionals outside the Department are gratefully welcomed.

The Department continued to provide public health ser­vices by contract to the City of Worthington.

The Department was made the lead agency by the Mayoi to coordinate the City's litter control efforts and receivec funding from the Ohio Department of Natural Resources The process was initiated to have Columbus designated as £ "Clean Community" under the Keep America Beautifu program. We expect to receive the designation in 1983.

CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 19

Contracts for weed cutting and solid waste clean-up were awarded to Alvis House and Gladden Community House in an effort to return dollars to communities and increase neighborhood pride by involving local residents. The efforts were so successful that a waiting list for other neighborhood organizations has evolved. Additionally, the process of de­centralizing environmental health staff to neighborhood facilities was begun.

The Nursing and Rehabilitation program developed a marketing strategy to inform the total community of the availability of home care services.

The Development Director and the Health Commissioner negotiated an agreement that ended duplication of effort between the two departments. Columbus residents may now call the Health Department on all exterior environmen­tal complaints and the Development Department for structural and interior environmental problems relating to housing.

Of increasing concern to the Department was the drama­tic increase in cases of Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever. The first dog quarantine, since the rabies outbreak in 1977, was imposed on a section of northeast Columbus in an effort to control the spread of the disease.

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIVISION The Division is responsible for all matters relating to fis­

cal, accounting, personnel, purchasing as well as vital statis­tics and maintenance operations. In addition to the monitor­ing and analytical functions performed, the Division serves as liaison for the Health Department with other city, state and federal agencies.

STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES

REVENUE BY SOURCE: 1) General Fund $ 4,804,177 44 02%

'. 2) Federal Revenue Sharing 1,779,575 1(5.30% ', 3) Fees and Charges For Service.. . . 1,228,603 11.25% !• 4) Medicare Trust Fund 1,355,000 12.41% : 5) Federal Grants 1,340,675 12.27% i 6) State Grants 313,561 2.87% 9 7) Other Grants 96,530 .88% j TOTAL REVENUES $10,918,121 100.00% I EXPENDITURES BY PROGRAM AREA:

1) Nursing Services $ 3,651,053 33.91% 2) Environmental Health 1,931,380 17.93% 3) Health Centers 1,764,575 16.38% 4) Administrative Services 862,944 8.01% 5) Women, Infants and Children... 758,717 7.04% 6) Venereal Disease 649,156 6.02% 7) Alcoholism 549,865 5.08%

! 8) Administration and Planning . . . 260,772 2.42% : 9) Dental Clinic 204,861 1.90% I 10) Laboratory 141,672 1.31%

T TOTAL EXPENDITURES $10,774,995 100.00%

H PER CAPITA EXPENDITURE: $18.59

VITAL STATISTICS In 1982, in Columbus and Franklin County, 16,948 births

f were recorded, 132 less than in 1981. Of these births, there .'.' were 229 sets of twins, 4 sets of triplets, 110 home births, and ;G 55 births to mothers under age 15. Registered stillbirths

,oJ totalled 137, or 22 less than 1981. Recorded deaths totalled 7,879, or 120 less than in 1981. A total of 40,611 certified copies of birth certificates were

J.i issued, along with 43,358 certified copies of death certifi-I cates; the increase in both categories over 1S81 equalled 830.

The sum of $196,646 was received from registration fees us and charges for certified copies of birth and death certifi-i;3 cates, and deposited in the city's General Revenue Fund.

VD HOTLINE The VD Hotline provides confidential information on sex-

uu ually transmitted diseases and referrals to area clinics. Our calls strongly support the fact that veneral disease is an epidemic in the Columbus area and a major concern to the

sq people of our community. In the past year we have received 'c 5700 calls requesting information, and there has been a 100% ni increase in calls on genital herpes since 1980.

In 1982 the Hotline expanded volunteer recruitment ,1; efforts and has been better able to serve the community

through expanded evening hours. Volunteers are vital to I our program and we currently have 24 active volunteers in­

volved in answering Hotline phones, speaking engagements in the community and public relations.

WOMEN. INFANTS. AND CHILDREN PROGRAM (WIC) WIC is a special supplemental food program for Women,

Infants, and Children. The program provided food supple­ments and nutrition education to low income pregnant, post-partum, and breastfeeding women; infants, and chil­dren up to the age of five (5). The program attempts to reach those individuals who because of inadequate nutritional sta­tus are "at-risk" of complications of pregnancy or poor growth and development.

The Columbus Health Department WIC Program had 11 clinic locations and four sub-contract locations where assessments were made to determine medical and financial eligibility. Infants and children were evaluated every six months. Women were certified to receive service during pre­gnancy.

Education and clinical experiences were provided for students in health professions at Ohio State University.

Supplemental foods rich in iron, calcium, vitamins A and C, plus nutrition education were provided for over 13,000 participants. There were a total of 27,000 visits for WIC ser­vices, an 51% increase over 1981.

MEDICAL SERVICES DIVISION The Division was involved in several notable public

health "events" in 1982. For several weeks in the summer, part of the city water supply had nitrate levels exceeding EPA guidelines. This division assisted the Division of Water in assessing the risk to the community, allaying excessive fear, and recommending prudent measures to reduce risk from this situation.

In early fall, the tragic drug contamination deaths in Chi­cago heightened concerns here. The division provided guidelines to the public and facilitated the testing of a num­ber of drug samples. None were found to be contaminated.

The other significant development this year has been in the establishment of the offices of the Medical Director and Epidemiology. The Medical Director's office is the central clearinghouse for information relative to the provision of medical services in the Department. A newly formed Medic­al Care Committee, consisting of the medical directors and head nurses of the six neighborhood health centers, will work to standardize and refine the health services offered.

The Epidemiology Office receives all disease reports in this city, and is responsible for disease surveillance and out­break control. A good working relationship has been engen­dered with hospital infection control practitioners, area physicians, and school health nurses. This has allowed for a free flow of information among these vital links in the chain of disease control and reporting.

Selected Disease Statistics (Franklin County)

1982+ 1983 + Chickenpox 654* 1542* Encephalitis

Arthropod-borne 0 5 Other Viral 3 1 Post-infection 1 1

Hepatitis Type A 39 35 TypeB 62 34

Influenza 235 394 Measles 0 0 Meningococcal Infs 9 14 Mumps 33 37 Pertussis (Whooping Cough) 5* 3* Rubella 0 1 Salmonellosis 56 63 Shigellosis 23 16 Streptococcal Infs 586* 624* + All data is provisional * Columbus City only

DENTAL SERVICES The Dental Clinic program provides dental services for

children of families who cannot afford the services of a pri­vate dentist. The clinic provides emergency treatment along with the usual dental procedures as well as dental health counseling.

SUMMARY PATIENT VISITS 7003 CASES COMPLETED 2580

20 CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

FLUORIDE TREATMENTS 29,86 ENDODONTIC TREATMENT Mi

EXTRACTIONS , g 7 Deciduous =2 Permanent

RESTORATIONS Deciduous Permanent

1075 3541

ALCOHOLISM SERVICES Established in 1958, as one of Ohio's first alcoholism pro­

grams, direct services are provided to approximately 4UU citizens each week through our clinic.

Alcohol Safety Program Funded in combination by client fees, the Ohio Depart­

ment of Health, and Columbus, services include interven­tion, education and evaluation of drinking drivers referred by courts and a 25-week outpatient alcoholism counseling program for those diagnosed as alcoholic or drug depen­dent. 945 persons completed the 5-week intervention-evaluation component and 63% continued into the 25-week outpatient component.

SOURCES OF COURT REFERRALS

1979 1980 1981 1982 Franklin County

Municipal Court Upper Arlington Court . Grove City Court Out of County Courts .. Other

628 119 115 99 127

654 97 107 234 100

714 94 86 219 109

693 100 105 295 71

Totals: 1,088 1,192 1,222 1,264

Prevention Coordination Designated by the Regional Council on Alcoholism and

funded by the Ohio Department of Health, this component coordinates alcoholism and alcohol abuse prevention activi­ties in Franklin County. Fetal Alcohol Syndrome and reduc­tion of risks to children of alcoholics have been designated priorities.

Public Inebriate Program Fully funded by the city, the program provides alterna­

tives to arrest for chronic public inebriates. High public in­toxication areas of the city are patrolled on foot and by car from 8:00 a.m. to midnight, Monday through Friday. THe Alcoholism Control Officers (ACO's), emergency interven­tion specialists, seek to interrupt these chronic drinking pat­terns and furnish transportation to community facilities or other places of safety.

Closing of the "Open Shelter" in August significantly in­creased the responsibility of and demands upon the Alco­holism Control Officers. During 1982, their emergency transportation runs were to or from as follows:

Regional Alcoholism Detox Center 286 Residences 350 Hospitals 204 Social Services Agencies I l l Mental Health Centers 52 Alcoholism Agencies 28 Other, miscellaneous 274 Holding Service (no other service available) 147 The public inebriates served were 7.6% female, 92.4%

male; of which 68.1% were white, 31.3% black, .2% Spanish and .4% indian.

Venereal Disease Control Clinic visits were essentially unchanged from 1981, with

28,499 patients seen (increase of 0.4%). The gonorrhea rate for 1982 decreased by 18.5%, the largest annual decrease in gonorrhea morbidity since the epidemic began in the mid-60s. The decrease was uniformly distributed across all ra­cial, sexual and sexual preference population sub-groups. In addition, an identical decrease was seen in all of the screen­ing sites throughout the city served by our program This decrease was one of the highest in the nation. It appears that our comprehensive approach to gonorrhea epidemiology is finally paying dividends.

During this same time interval there were increases in most of the other sexually transmitted diseases- non-, ? » c l f i ^ u r e t ! ? r ^ ' h e r P e s . scabies and early syphilis up 18%, 14%, 67% and 20% respectively. Vaginal trichomoniasis was down by 9% similar to a national trend in this infection

Selective culturmg of high risk patients for Chlamydia

trachomatis infection suggests that its prevalence exceeds that of gonorrhea. A four-week screening of all patients for this infection will be done in 1983 to establish its true preva­lence in our patient population. Major disease control incen­tives are needed in this area.

Gonorrhea interviewing and contact referral/tracing acti­vities performed on 4,070 infected patients resulted in the examination of 3,828 exposed individuals and 1,374 pre­viously unidentified infections brought to treatment. Simi­lar activities related to 162 syphilis cases resulted in the ex­amination of 624 individuals and 50 previously unidentified cases brought to treatment.

Gonorrhea screening of women in the public and private medical sector resulted in 95,694 women tested and 5,508 previously unidentified infections brought to treatment.

Intense epidemiological activities were conducted on 48 cases of PPNG (penicillin resistant gonorrhea) during the summer. The epidemic was successfully controlled with only sporadic cases identified during the last quarter of the year. , .

The reported VD clinic morbidity rates this year were calculated using a different denominator, thus the 1981 rate given would be different than that published for last year's report.

LABORATORY In 1982, the laboratory program expanded its involvement

in research and training. We maintained our support to com­municable disease diagnosis in the areas of sexually trans­mitted diseases, tuberculosis and enteric diseases; and in sanitary microbiology for food, milk, and water.

Laboratory activities in 1982 included: •participating in a pilot study to better characterize

herpes virus infections • continuing participation in a Trichomonas vaginalis

drug susceptibility study • evaluating Gonozmye'" (ELISA test) for accuracy in de­

tecting gonococcal infections • conducting training sessions for technologists from

Children's Hospital, Doctors North Hospital, and Mt. Carmel Medical Center in isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis

• participating in instituting a new food-poisoning inves­tigation progam

THE NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER PROGRAM Tbe Neighborhood Health Center Program consists of six

community-based health centers which provide primary medical and health care services to six designated target neighborhoods within the City of Columbus. The Columbus Health Department contracts with these six agencies to pro­vide these services. During 1982, the N.H.C. Program pro­vided 43,621 medical encounters. The patient Age, Race and Sex percentages were as follows:

Age Race Sex 0 - 14 - 23.5% Black - 34.9% Male - 31.6%

15 - 29 - 27.5% White - 59.8% Female - 68.4% 30 - 44 - 14.6% Other - 5.3% 45 - 59 - 14.6%

60 - Over - 19.8% In addition to the medical encounters, the program pro­

vided many other preventative health care services to neigh­borhood residents. These included nutrition and alcoholism counseling, nursing services, family planning, dentistry, so­cial work and patient t ransportat ion. These services accounted for an additional 67,000 visits to the health cen­ters.

Other activities included: • Revising the Fee Payment Schedule • Establishing a Medical Care Committee • Completing a Pharmacy Prescribing Guide • Developing a slide presentation • Working with the academy of Medicine to develop a

program to provide health care to unemployed individuals

TUBERCULOSIS CONTROL The Ben Franklin Tuberculosis Clinic is responsible for

the detection surveillance and containment of tuberculosis cases and their contacts in Columbus and Franklin County. Toward that goal, the statistical reports of our performance records are as follows:

• 2,476 new diagnostic examinations • 854 recheck examinations • 2,163 periodic treatment and consultation visits.

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 21

Year

1972 1977 1982

C O L U M B U S -

Estimated Population

540,497 554,128 567,759

-NEW CASES AND DEATHS P E R 100,000 POPULATION

ACTIVE TUBERCULOSIS CASES

Pulmonary

No. 67 55 38

Non Pulmonary

No. 8 3

13

Total New Cases

No. Rate 75 13.52 58 10.47 51 8.97

TB DEATHS

No. Rate

4 0.7 9 1.6 4 0.7

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION The 1982 budget for the Co lumbus Heal th Depa r tmen t

(CHD) was decreased which caused a reduct ion in 1981 staff. The effect on the Envi ronmenta l Heal th Division was a re­duction of n ine full-time posi t ions as well as four seasonal positions. These posi t ions have s ince been removed from the authorized s t rength for the division.

The first phase of the Sani ta t ion P rog ram Information Formulator (S.P.I.F.) P r o g r a m was s tar ted in Augus t by pre­paring the profiles for all of the Food Service Operat ions, Vending Commissar ies , and Vending Locat ions . S.P.I.F. is a low cost, au tomat ic da ta process ing sys tem des igned to pro­vide more t imely and meaningful data for all of our person­nel. In December , these profiles were entered in the compu­ter at the Data Center in City Hall.

District Operations Philip L. Amorose , R.S. — Chief of Distr ict Opera t ions J o h n C. Fet ters , R.S. — Field Supervisor Nickalos Malagreca, R.S. — Field Superv isor Mark A. McDonnel , M.S., R.S.— Field Superv isor J o h n Thomas , R.S. — Field Superv isor

Environmental Surveillance Services Special Program

A Pilot Dumps te r P rog ram was init iated wi th the coopera­tion of the Division of Sani ta t ion from April 19, 1982 to September 30, 1982.

The pilot area was b o u n d e d by E. H u d s o n St. on the nor th , the Conrail t racks on the east, E. Fifth Ave. on the south and the Olentangy River on the west.

The trial period e n d e d on October 1, 1982 and has since been implemented in all the dis tr icts and e x p a n d e d into the "Pilot Cooperat ive Inspec t ion P rog ram" .

We feel t h e p r o g r a m was a s u c c e s s for t h e fol lowing reasons:

• It demons t ra ted tha t two city agencies can effectively work together t h rough t h e compla in t referral process.

• In a period of a little m o r e than five m o n t h s , 423 d u m p s ­ter p rob lems were resolved.

• 423 potent ial citizens compla in t s were e l iminated. • Sanitat ion Division increased second collection efforts. • Increased verbal contac t wi th apa r tmen t owner /mana­

gers and distr ict sani tar ian resul ted. • Deve lopment of a sys tem whereby all referrals would be

addressed and disposi t ion logged.

Environmental Complaint Program* Total nuisance compla in ts 13,735 Total nu isance response inspect ions 31,537 Total nu isance response consul ta t ions 10,458 Total orders issued 6,617 Total orders aba ted 6,217 ' Inc ludes weed and solid was te p rogram statistics

Food Service Operations (FSO) and Vending Commissary and Location Programs

F.S.O.'s (Restaurants , etc.) approved and licensed, inc luding Worth ington 2,825

F.S.O.'s Inspec t ions conduc ted 9,557 F.S.O Food Vending Commissar ies approved for

licensing 52 F.S.O. Food Vending Machine Locat ions

approved for l icensing 1,439 F.S.O. Food Commissar ies and locat ions

inspect ions conduc ted 1,694 Instances of poss ible foodborne disease repor ted and

investigated with no conf i rmed cases developing . 153 Foreign objects in food submi t t ed for identification . 114

Food Establishment (F.E.) Program Retail Groceries, P rocess ing P lan t s and Warehouses

approved for l icensing including Worth ington 1,208

F.E. inspect ions conduc ted 2,579

Food Plan Review Program Plans for 107 new F.S.O.'s, 103 remodeled F.S.O.'s, 43 new

F.E.'s, 15 remolded F.E.'s were reviewed and approved. On site and final approved inspect ions were conduc ted by the Food Plan Review P.H. Sani tar ian II wi th the aid of the P H . Sanitarian I's in the distr icts pr ior to issuance of l icenses.

School Inspection Program

The following schools were inspected at least twice in 1982 by t h e Sani tar ian in Distr ict Opera t ions for a total of 446 inspect ions and 197 consul ta t ions .

• Co lumbus Publ ic Schools 152 • Co lumbus Parochia l Schools 36 • Worthington Pub l ic Schools 14 • Worthington Parochia l Schools 5

Mobile Home Park and Camp Inspection Program • Mobile H o m e Pa rks 28 • Mobile H o m e Pa rk Spaces 2588 • Mobile H o m e Pa rks Licensed in 1982 28 • Combined Pa rk -Camps Licensed in 1982 2 • Combined P a r k - C a m p Spaces 510 • Total Mobile H o m e Pa rk Inspec t ions 257 • Total Mobile H o m e P a r k Consul ta t ions 241 • Total Campground Inspec t ions 10 • Total C a m p g r o u n d Consul ta t ions 12

Special Programming Charles F. Pyle, R.S Chief of Special P r o g r a m m i n g Steven P. Binns , R.S Pol lut ion Coordinator Laura S. Bowers , R.S Chemical & Physical

Hazards Coordinator Gary D. Garver, R.S.M.P.A Enforcement &

Asses smen t Coordinator Dale L. Harmon, R.S Vector Coordinator J a m e s A. Veeley, R.S Educa t ion Coordinator

Chemical Hazards This p rogram is respons ib le for coordinat ing hazardous

subs tances invest igat ions in t h e home , publ ic , and occupa­tional sett ing. Nine homes were moni to red for urea formal­dehyde. At three homes and one school Asbes tos investiga­t ions were performed. Several inspec t ions were performed in the occupat ional set t ing in response to reques t s by con­cerned employers or employees .

Enforcement Program In 1982, the D e p a r t m e n t of Deve lopmen t and Heal th initi­

ated a coordinated enforcement program, des igned to opti­mize the efficient and effective use of the m a n p o w e r re­sources of both d e p a r t m e n t s t h rough the e l iminat ion of du­plication of efforts. The agreement s igned by t h e Heal th Commiss ioner and the Deve lopment Director des ignated areas of responsibi l i ty for bo th depa r tmen t s . Cases shown as referrals to Code Enforcement deal solely with exter ior litter violations.

Within the Heal th Depar tment , t h e approach to enforce­ment has involved the dual app roach of enforcement and assessment . This approach enables us to apply the mos t appropr ia te r emedy to any violation of the Heal th Code. Therefore , a tota l p i c tu re of e n f o r c e m e n t act ivi t ies con­ducted by the Env i ronmen ta l Heal th Division entails hear­ings and action conduc ted by Heal th D e p a r t m e n t person­nel, a s sessments , and hea r ings and ac t ion conduc ted by Code Enforcement .

Nuisance Compla in ts : Night Prosecu tor Hear ings conduc ted by CHD . . . 70 Charges filed by CHD 22 Convictions (or Dismissal for Costs) 14 Charges p e n d i n g 5 Aba tement by CHD 88

Food Program: Adminis t ra t ive Hear ings 10 Probat ionary s ta tus imposed 5

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

Board Hearings : Criminal charges filed * Convictions „ Abatements

Action by Code Enforcement on Referral By CHD; Referrals from CHD li* Night Prosecutor Hear ings ^° Prosecut ions j* Convictions „ , Abatements lU6

Maternity Hospital Inspection Program Columbus has six hospitals with materni ty units . All six

hospitals and thei r auxi l iary services (Laundry , Central Sterilization and Dietary) were inspected and reported to the Ohio Depar tment of Health for licensing. In addit ion one group home for pregnant w o m e n was inspected and approved.

Noise Control Program The noise uni t received 569 noise moni tor ing requests /

complaints that resulted in 1,414 investigations. 5,674 noise related consultat ions were made .

The coordinator held 22 night prosecutor hear ings and at t tended court for two trials involving communi ty noise.

There were 444 cases that were found in violation of the noise ordinance and were resolved. Invest igat ions of 125 cases found the cases not to be in violation of exist ing noise regulations.

Neighborhood Rat Control Program In seven (7) years of operation, activities are directed to­

ward envi ronmenta l improvements in South Linden and the Near Easts ide of t h e city. Progress in achieving environ­mental improvement cont inued by utilization of a compre­hensive approach consist ing of survey, clean-up, educat ion, enforcement and supplementa l bait ing on a systematic city block house to house basis. Dur ing 1982, we began program activities in a 193 city block area in the Near-South of the city. In 1982, w e designated 85 city b locks as environmental ­ly improved, represent ing approximately 9,350 residents .

Educat ion Educat ional Presen ta t ions 16 Evaluation People Reached 345 Outreach One to one family visi tat ions 1,012 Enforcement P remise Inspect ions 20,213 Activities Orders Written . . 5 9 1 Orders Abated 585

Enforcement letters sent 101 Complied .95 Pend ing . 6 Referral to Code Enforcement . 1 Compiled . 0 Pend ing . 1

Baiting Premises bai ted 468 Evaluation Bait ing visitations 2,495

Proper bait ing procedures and t echn iques successfully re­duced rat popula t ions and avoided t h e p rob lem of anti­coagulant bait resistance.

Live rat t rapping was conduc ted this year to de te rmine if Korean Hemorrhagic Fever exists in Columbus . One hun­dred rodent samples were collected with the Ohio Depart­ment of Health conduct ing the serosurvey forwarding this information to the Center for Disease Control . Resul ts of the study will be comple ted in 1983.

Training and Educational Program The unit conducted in-service t ra ining for all Sani tar ians

and 15'/2 h o u r s ' c r e d i t for c o n t i n u i n g e d u c a t i o n w a s approved by the Ohio Board of Sani tar ian Registrat ion.

The Food Protect ion Workshop was conduc ted for em­ployees below t h e supervisory level in the food service in­d u s t r y , w i t h 109 p r e s e n t a t i o n s a n d 1,758 c e r t i f i c a t e s awarded to those pass ing the course.

Two presenta t ions were m a d e in cooperat ion with Co­lumbus Technical Ins t i tu te ' s Food Managers Certification Course. Presenta t ions on envi ronmenta l issues were given to 428 a t tendees wi th in t h e school and c o m m u n i t y sett ing. Presentat ions included Commun i ty Heal th Nurse s tuden t s from Otterbein College and Capital Universi ty School of Nursing.

The uni t held seven t ra in ing classes for local swimming pool operators and main tenance personnel . Sess ions were also conducted at the Ohio Sta te Universi ty Beach and Pool Management classes.

The uni t appeared on th ree one-half hour "Your Hea l th" TV programs and two radio programs discussing environ­mental heal th issues.

The uni t worked at two "Exh ib i t s " and dis t r ibuted litera­ture concerning services available from the Envi ronmenta l Health Division of the Co lumbus Heal th Depa r tmen t

Vector Control Program 1982 was s ign i f ican t b e c a u s e of a s e r i o u s i n c r e a s e in

Rocky Mounta in Spo t t ed Fever (RMSF). The re were twelve confirmed h u m a n cases inc lud ing one dea th . As a result , a coordinated tick p rogram involving several governmenta l agencies was ini t iated. T ick survei l lance , educa t ion , and sDraving were carried out wi th t h e excel lent cooperat ion of the Vector Borne Disease Uni t (VBDU) of ODH. Of t h e 1,089 ticks collected and tes ted, 69 were found posi t ive for R M S F type organisms.

The 1982 mosqu i to season was fairly uneventful . There were only 111 compla in t s du r ing the year. Larvic iding was emphasized and 201 separa te m o s q u i t o b reed ing sites were larvicided routinely. In coopera t ion wi th the VBDU, over 8 500 mosqui toes were cap tu red and identified; also 2,347 birds were tes ted for St. Louis Encepha l i t i s ant ibody. There were no k n o w n h u m a n cases of m o s q u i t o b o r n e encephal i ­tis in Co lumbus or Wor th ing ton in 1982.

Water Protection Program This year, a survey was comple t ed of all k n o w n publ ic

spas, whirlpools , and hot t ubs in C o l u m b u s . Regula t ions have been proposed to l icense and inspec t these installa­tions. The Pol lut ion Control Unit , in coopera t ion wi th the Division of Water, also has t aken an act ive role in the pre­vent ion and invest igat ion of wa t e rbo rne diseases .

4 — Pr iva te water sys tem instal lat ion pe rmi t s i ssued 64 — Water samples t a k e n for labora tory analysis 40 — Private s w i m m i n g pool p lans rev iewed 54 — Pr iva te s w i m m i n g pools inspec t ions

2 — Publ ic s w i m m i n g pool p lans reviewed 300 — C o l u m b u s pub l ic s w i m m i n g pools inspec ted a to­

tal of 1704 t imes 10 — Worth ington publ ic s w i m m i n g pools inspec ted a

total of 53 t imes

Wastewater and Solid Waste Program 16 — Pr iva te sewage sys t em instal la t ion pe rmi t s i ssued 2 — Demol i t ion landfills i n spec t ed

Legal action init iated in regard to: 3 private sewage s y s t e m s 1 commerc ia l sewage sys tem

Weed/Solid Waste Abatement Program The Weed A b a t e m e n t P r o g r a m in t h e th i rd year exceeded

all expec ta t ions of pas t years . Serv ice is ini t ia ted by citizen complaints of overgrown, weedy p remises . Our cont rac tua l base was e x p a n d e d th i s year uti l izing services p rov ided by communi ty organizat ions (Alvis H o u s e and G ladden Com­muni ty House) a long wi th E n v i r o n m e n t a l Bl ight A b a t e m e n t crews (Development Depa r tmen t ) and pr iva te contractors . Also, as a resul t of a pilot p rog ram ini t iated in 1981, w e were able to imp lemen t the Solid Waste A b a t e m e n t P r o g r a m (Lit­ter Control) in May of 1982, t h r o u g h a g ran t from t h e Ohio Depar tmen t of Natura l Resources , Office of Li t ter Control . This service is also ini t iated by cit izen compla in t s of l i t tered premises . Both p rograms utilize t h e a s s e s s m e n t process as an al ternat ive to t h e t rad i t ional m e t h o d s of enforcement .

Weed Abatement Program * Total compla in t s received th i s year 3,937 Total compla in ts referred to p r o g r a m 3,062 Total compla in t s h a n d l e d t h r o u g h

al ternat ive act ion 233 Total compla in t s aba t ed by p r o g r a m 2,829

Abated after owner notif ication 2197 (77.7%); after con­t rac t ing service 632 (22.3%).

* Inc luded in Env i ronmen ta l Compla in t Stat is t ics

Solid Waste Abatement Program * Total compla in ts received th i s year 5,734 Total compla in t s referred t o p r o g r a m 397 Total compla in ts aba ted by p rog ram 397

Abated after o w n e r notif icat ion 269 (67.8%); after con­tract ing service 128 (32.2%).

* Inc luded in E n v i r o n m e n t a l Compla in t Sta t is t ics

Milk, Food & Rabies Program J o h n Schill, D.V.M Chief of Milk, Food & „ , .„ . Rabies P r o g r a m William M. Gesel , D.V.M., R .S Fie ld Superv i sor Jess Haynes Jr., R.S Superv i so r of F.S.O.,

F.E. & Vend ing t o w a r d Gassman , R.S P lan Review Coordina tor Jeff P a n n i n g Dai ry P l a n t Coord ina to r

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 23

Milk, Food and Rabies Program The milk program continued to show an increase in the

number of farms to be inspected in 1982. Great emphasis was placed on increasing the working potential of the milk inspection force. Steps were undertaken to increase the number of farms to be inspected by other health depart­ments on a reciprocal basis. This will be followed by a grad­ual expansion of this method all over the state with the sup­port of the Ohio Department of Health. The final goal will be the elimination of the presence of more than one milk in­spection agency in a given county. A state cost survey of our program was conducted in 1982.

Dairy farms inspected and licensed 1,188 Milk processing plants inspected and licensed .. 7 Frozen Dessert plants inspected and licensed . . . 6 Butter and margarine plants inspected

and licensed 2 Farms approved 28 Inspections conducted 5,013 Instrument examination in plants 40 Farms excluded from the market 106 Farms reinstated 98 Hearings 14 Farm plans reviewed and approved 41 Hauler inspected and licensed 105 Raw milk, water, retail milk, frozen dessert

tested in our lab 13,685 Condemned lbs. of milk 199,154 This section was involved in 84 possible food poisoning

investigations and in addition responded to 37 complaints about criminal tampering with food products by unknown individuals. The 37 cases were referred by the Columbus Police Department for evaluation.

Rabies Control Program Animal bites totaled 1,768 and 1,040 persons bitten re­

quired some type of medical treatment. There were no cases of rabies in Columbus but there were 80 cases in Ohio which included 2 dogs. For the first time nationally, rabid cats out­numbered rabid dogs.

There were 697 dogs immunized against rabies in the 12 vaccination clinics, which were conducted by our division and the Columbus Academy of Veterinary Medicine.

DIVISION OF NURSING AND REHABILITATION HOME VISITING SERVICES

Public health nurses, home health aides, physical thera­pists, occupational therapists and speech therapists pro­vided quality care to 3,134 patients and home care visits, totaling 60,838 included:

Therapeutic: Skilled care provided to patients or families who have the ability to become independent of services. (45.6%). Maintenance: Ongoing, long-term care which promotes an optimal level of functioning in the community. (48.3%) Health Promotion: Assessment, guidance, counseling and education for all ages. (5.8%) Communicable Disease: Nursing care, health teaching and referral of contracts. (.3%) • Home Care Health Services to Upper Arlington and

Worthington were furnished under contractural agree­ment

• The Management Information System contributed to­ward a more efficient billing process and supplied necessary statistical data

• Three reimbursement specialists relieved professional staff of the responsibility of assisting patients and fami­lies in the clarification of insurance coverage, medicare benefits and in setting fees for in-home services

• Referrals for rehabilitation services increased by 43% over 1981.

• Services were expanded to provide venipuncture, In­travenous Therapy, Hickman-Broving care, Total Parenteral Nutrition, and Enteral Therapy.

• A 22-member advisory board for the division's program met regularly. Committees of the Board on professional practice, community liaison and program evaluation were active during the year.

• Twenty-seven Home Health Aides provided personal care and other health related services. Priorities were established for making patient assignments as the num­ber of requests for services grew. A delayed start of care or reduced frequency of visits also occurred when ser­vice demands were greater.

• Emi Ogi, Public Health Nursing Supervisor, employed for over 30 years, retired March 26, 1983.

HOSPICE Sandy Stark, R.N., M.S., Program Director

Warren Wheeler, M.D., Medical Director Hospice is committed to relieving the pain and other

symptoms that may occur with terminal cancer, placing emphasis on the quality of remaining life.

Hospice care includes responding to the needs of the fami­ly and other significant relationships. A multidisciplinary team including nursing, counseling and volunteer services provides care in the home. Nursing services are available on a 24-hour, on-call basis.

The Advisory Board of Hospice met on a monthly basis during the year providing guidance and support to the pro­gram. This Advisory Board also evaluates the Hospice pro­gram and makes recommendations to the Board of Health.

Additional financial support for the program was received from the Franklin County Health Department, Riverside Hospital, various donations, gifts and grants.

Ninety-seven patient/families were admitted and received a total of 1,826 home visits. A bereavement caseload of 80-90 families per month were also served.

FRIENDLY VISITOR PROGRAM Alberta Davis, Coordinator

Twenty-three volunteers provided an average of 56 visits per year to individuals who no longer require the services of the professional staff but who benefit from the compan­ionship and services the volunteers provide through their home visits. Volunteer hours for this appreciated service averaged 1,384 hours per volunteer.

SENIOR CITIZEN NURSING CLINICS Two Senior Citizen Nursing Clinics provided services

which included: assessment of health status; guidance and counseling on nutrition, medication, preventive health measures; counseling on coping with and managing chronic health problems; and assistance with referrals to other com­munity agencies. At the Wesley Sawyer Towers Nursing Cli­nic, services are available 40 hours per week and provided by Dee Ann Martin, R.N. One hundred and fifty-four clients were admitted during 1982 and there were 2,162 visits to the clinic. Services are provided to the Worthington Senior Citizen Health Assessment Clinic six hours per week by Ruth Snider, R.N., a family nurse practitioner. Fifty-two cli­nic sessions were held with a total of 387 patient visits.

Flu immunizations were provided again at sites providing Senior Citizen activities. A total of 3,525 persons were im­munized. An additional 600 persons were immunized through the Home Visiting Program and the Neighborhood Health Centers.

PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION Baccalaureate or graduate nursing students form Ohio

State, Capital, Otterbein and Ohio Wesleyan Universities; nursing students from Mt. Carmel School fo Nursing; and, family practice residents from Grant Hospital received com­munity health experiences during the year.

PERINATAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAM The Perinatal Health Care Program available in five of the

Neighborhood Health Centers is federally funded through the Ohio Department of Health. Early and continued care thorughout the maternity cycle is provided. Educational classes as well as medical, nursing, nuturition (counseling and WIC Program) and social services are provided. Other services available through referral are Hospital Specialty and High Risk Clinics, Community Mental Health Centers, Childbirth and parenting classes and the Public Health Nurse Home Visiting Program.

• 532 perinatal patients served • 3333 visits for perinatal care • 278 patients delivered

MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH CARE SERVICES In 1982, MCH provided health care and related services to

children in the following settings: Well Child and Im­munization Clinics, Children and Youth Community Cli­nics, Head Start Program and West Side, South Side, North Side and Ohio Avenue Day Care Centers.

The three Well Child Clinics provided comprehensive health care to 1,257 children and had a total visit count of 2,386. Services included physical and developmental assess­ment, immunizations, speech and hearing screening, parent education and selected laborartory tests. These clinics serve low income families who otherwise would not have access to on-going health care. Two of the clinics serve children up

24 CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

to age 7 years and one serves children to age 18 years. The school immunization clinics held at various sites

throughout the city had a total of 2,574 patient visits and administered 4,710 doses of vaccine. These clinics serve children from 3 months to 18 years of age. MCH worked closely with Office of Migration and Refugee Resettlement Services to provide immunizations to the refugee popula­tion coming into Columbus.

In the Well Child Clinic and Immunization Clinics, a total of 6,550 doses of vaccine were given and 1,012 tuberculin tests and 1,099 hematocrits were done.

Two pediatric Nurse Practitioners made visits to the West Side, North Side, South Side and Ohio Avenue Day Care Centers to provide consultation regarding their health pro­gram, control of spread of communicable diseases, care of children with special needs and guidelines for first aid in case of injury. Each of these centers serves about 90 pre­school and school age children.

Two Public Health Nurses implemented the health and dental program for the CMACAO Head Start Program. There are 17 Head Start Centers in Columbus serving 1,360, 3- and 4-year-old children from low income families; and, 10% of the children served have some handicapped condi­

tion Speech therapy is available in all of the centers. Learning experiences for Ohio Wesleyan nursing students

were provided in two Well Child Clinics. Student nurse observations were arranged per request.

One full-time and five part-time public health nurses pro­vide nursing service in three of the Children and Youth Project pediatric clinics.

SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME (SIDS) PROGRAM Judy Wright, R. N., Team Coordinator

Of the 36 infant deaths referred to the SIDS nursing team, 33 were confirmed SIDS deaths. Information and counsel­ing were provided to these families by the five nurses that make up the SIDS team. In addition to home visits, the nurses also facilitated parent support group meetings, father-only support group meetings and monitor support group meetings. The fathers-only and the monitor support meetings were new to the Central Ohio area this year. The nurses also gave in-services to various groups including emergency medical technicians, nursing and psychology students, Lamaze mothers' groups and the Central Ohio Lung Association.

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES ANNUAL REPORT — 1982

Overview The primary purpose of the Department of Community

Services is: 1) to improve the economic status of individuals who are economically disadvantaged, unemployed, or underemployed; 2) to improve consumer education and pro­tection; 3) to reduce the incidence of consumer fraud; 4) and to employ appropriate strategies which will help meet the social, psychological and emotional needs of Columbus area residents. The department performs these functions by compiling, assembling, utilizing and providing data relative to human and social services; coordinating and operating the City's social and human services programs and by pro­viding the comprehensive planning and management for and the delivery of such services and programs.

During 1982, the department was notified of the passage of new employment and training legislation by the United States Congress to replace the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA). This legislation, the "Job Training Partnership Act" (JTPA), provides a one-year transition period before becoming fully effective October 1, 1983. Its primary objective is to teach people skills, thereby increas­ing their opportunity for gainful employment. Due to the complexity of the new law, our staff reviewed its provisions, attended a number of workshops regarding the transitional phase and studied its implications for the City of Columbus and Franklin County. Work began internally to consummate a smooth transition to a new, but continued business/gov­ernment partnership in the community.

The new legislative provides that funding be made avail­able to state governors who will appropriate the funds to local service delivery areas with a population of at least 200,000 persons. The Columbus/Franklin County area will automatically receive funds under this new Act. Additional­ly, the Mayor and the County Commissioners stated their intent to continue the County/City Partnership and will select a Private Industry Council (PIC), to oversee the plan­ning and operation of the new program.

The CETA/JTPA Program in Columbus and Franklin County served 5,606 persons in 1982. Of those persons 3,536 were enrolled in year-round programs and 2,070 were en­rolled in the Summer Youth Employment Program (SYEP) The Consortium received $8,875,013 during the year to pro­vide employment and training services. The average cost of service per person served was $1,583.

The department continued to serve Columbus area con­sumers by enforcing all weights and measures laws and pro­viding consumer education and protection to those request­ing such services.

The Youth Service Bureau of the department experienced a greater demand for its special support services such as the Friends Program, and counselling and tutorial services

Other human service needs continued to be met through the use of Federal Revenue Sharing funds. During 1982 with Columbus City Council's approval, the department ex­

pended $2,214,212 and contracted with thirty (30) local social service agencies to provide human services to 149,728 needy persons in the community.

As we approach 1983, we are determined to continue to meet the challenge of serving human needs with steadily decreasing funds. We continue to realize that our only real mission is to serve as completely and efficiently as possible the citizens of the City of Columbus, who are in need of, and eligible for such services.

Consumer Services The Office of Consumer Services protects consumers

from fraudulent practices. This is accomplished by testing the accuracy and correctness of weighing and measuring devices used in retail sales; verifying net weight as stated on labels; investigating consumer complaints; and taking cor­rective action when a violation has occurred.

During 1982, our inspectors made 2,592 visits to retail establishments and inspected more than 9,400 devices. Ran­dom inspections of more than 14,400 packages of meat, milk, produce, bread, frozen fish and cheese revealed a small percentage were short-weight.

In respect to violations, 67 citations were issued by inspec­tors for violations of the weights and measures laws; specifi­cally those laws regarding the use of accurate measuring and weighing equipment; lawful advertising and correct labeling. A significant number of the 67 citations were issued against various milk suppliers for short-weight milk in '/2 gallon cartons. As a result, over 1,700 half-gallon car­tons of milk were embargoed. The remainder of the citations issued were concerned with improper labeling of products; use of a non-sealed device; misleading ads at gas pumps, and failure to identify (label) products at the gasoline pumps. In many other cases of infractions, verbal warnings were given and the problems were rectified in compliance with City Code.

Throughout the year, inspectors participated in various panels and training demonstrations relative to the enforce­ment of weights and measures laws. Some of these were the Annual Conference of the Ohio Weights & Measures Asso­ciation; consumer education classes for senior citizens; National Consumer Conference at Edinboro College in Car­lisle, Pennsylvania; and a special educational program dur­ing National Consumer's Week. In addition, the Consumer Specialist testified at the Federal Energy Regulatory Com­mission on the "Decontrol of Natural Gas".

Also the Consumer Specialist conducted over 450 field investigations, held more than 220 office conferences, made eight court appearances and received 292 signed com­plaints. More than 400 complaints were successfully re­solved and 353 complaints were referred to agencies with other jurisdictions. As a result of successful arbitration, case refunds totalling approximately $38,000 were awarded to I

CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 25

many consumers . In addi t ion, 139 complain ts were resolved through in-kind services saving consumers approximate ly $307,650.

Type of Device Auto Pre-Package Computer Counter Platform Spring Track Dormant Truck Hopper Butcher Beam Tank Truck Meter Taxi Meter Linear Measure . . . Jeweler 's Sale Livestock Scales . . Fuel P u m p s

Gasoline Kerosene Diesel

Weights

Table 2 1982 Report of Inspections

Tested 368

1,125 244 410 73 8 73 110 41 6 49 881 61 22 5

5,000 12 100 883

Sealed 346

1,086 230 389 71 8 72 94 41 6 48 772 60 21 3

4,857 12 95

A statistical b reakdown of services performed dur ing the past year is shown in Table 2.

Correct

Total Devices

Violation Notices Issues: Commercial Calls: Total Mileage:

Package Inspection Meat Milk Produce Bread Ground Meats Cheese Pkg. Noodles Frozen

Totals

9.471 8.211

881

881

Condemned 22 39 14 21 2

1 16

1 109 1 1 2

143

5 2

Re-Inspected 109 227 14 25 5 1 4 48

3 397

3

2,213 3 37

379 3,089

67 2,592

29,615

Correct 7,987 1,722 2,209

592 16 30

9 20

12.585

Under 683 838 261

38 1

1.824

Over 30% Total 8,670 2,560 2,470

630 17 30 12 20

14,409

Consumer Complaint Investigations Field Invest igat ions: 459 Complaints Resolved: . Office Conferences: 225 Complaints Received: . Calls for Information 7,846 Cash Refund: Court Appearances : 8 Referrals: Total Signed Compla in ts : 292 Gas P u m p Complaints :

Other

Employment and Training Programs T h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e E m p l o y m e n t a n d T r a i n i n g Act

(CETA) was first enacted in 1973 and later a m e n d e d in 1978. Objectives of the Act place emphas i s on secur ing j obs with­in the private sector for pe r sons mos t in need of employ­ment and t raining services, especially minori t ies , women , youths, and veterans . Eligibility is based on income and em­ployment s ta tus .

The past year saw significant p rog rammat i c changes due primarily to funding cu tbacks and the p lanned t ransi t ion from CETA to t h e J o b Tra in ing P a r t n e r s h i p Act. These changes necessi ta ted a smal ler staff (less than 100 persons) that had to be carefully utilized in order to mainta in high quality services. Overall, i m p r o v e m e n t s were noted, espe­cially in the assesment , selection and referral processes .

The functions of several sub-uni ts involved in the admi­nistration of t h e Adul t and Y o u t h E m p l o y m e n t and Train­ing Services follow.

406 292

.$35,571.15 353

22 11

.ii Intake The In take sect ion of the d e p a r t m e n t de t e rmines client

is eligibility according to CETA laws a n d regulat ions . Dur ing t 1982, a total of 8,419 persons were seen by In take staff; 5,608 • were de te rmined eligible for CETA. Pe r sons who met the

HI eligibility cr i ter ia w e r e referred to t h e e m p l o y m e n t and . it training program. (Table 5 shows n u m b e r of n e w clients.)

) Counseling. Orientation. Testing and Support Services The counsel ing uni t is respons ib le for vocat ional assess-

n ment of individuals de t e rmined eligible for par t ic ipat ion in 0 our t ra in ing a n d e m p l o y m e n t se rv ices . T h e Counse lor ' s 1 p r i m a r y f u n c t i o n is t o d e v e l o p an i n d i v i d u a l i z e d Em-q ployability Deve lopmen t P lan which will eventual ly lead to .q placement in unsubs id ized emp loymen t .

The orientat ion p rogram is a imed at career prepara t ion and designed to provide j ob seeking skills, j ob re tent ion skills, and j o b search ass is tance to you th , 16 th rough 22 years of age, who are seeking employmen t . Individuals are instructed in a t t i tude and behavior awareness , communica ­tion skills, character is t ics of en t ry level jobs , interview tech­niques, complet ion of j ob appl icat ions , and r e sume writ ing. In addit ion, four days of actual j o b search ass is tance is pro­vided. In 1982, 231 persons enrolled in this program.

The Tes t ing Uni t , staffed by O B E S Tes t Techn ic i ans , adminis ters tests des igned to measu re apt i tude , proficiency and literacy levels. The tes ts used in this process are the Basic Occupat ional Li teracy Test (BOLT), the General Apti­tude Test Bat tery (GATB), and a clerical series consis t ing of typing, shor thand and spell ing. Test resul ts are used by the Counsel ing Unit as a vocat ional a s sessement tool prior to referring individuals for t ra in ing or e m p l o y m e n t services. In addi t ion, the clerical series is adminis te red to de te rmine skill levels for individuals interes ted in clerical t ra ining or employment in clerical fields.

Table 3 reflects t h e activities of t h e Tes t ing Unit dur ing 1982.

Table 3 Testing Activities

G A T B 1,006 BO L T 1,240 Clerical 299

TOTAL 2,545 The Nurs ing Unit, staffed by o n e Pub l i c Heal th Nurse , is

responsible for per forming pre-physical a s sessmen t s for all applicants prior to en te r ing c lassroom training. T h e purpose of this assessment is to identify any heal th-related p rob lems

26 CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

which would interfere wi th the appl icants successful parti­cipation in a training program. If heal th problems are identi­fied, the individual may be referred to other heal th care pro­viders for further assessment or t reatment .

During the year, a total of 783 pre-physical assessments were completed by the Nurs ing Unit.

PLACEMENT SERVICES The demand for job p lacement services increased in 1982

as a result of the declining economy and rising unemploy­ment. A greater number of people experienced prolonged periods of unemployment , the n u m b e r of persons eligible to be served also increased.

"Ready. Willing, and Able" Media Campaign Sponsored by the Private Indus t ry Council , this campaign

was par t of a job development effort contracted th rough t h e department . I ts purpose was to inform private sector em­ployers of the availability of t rained manpower .

On-the-job Training Program The purpose of this program is to secure product ive work

in the private sector for qualified persons , and to m a k e cer­tain that all par t ic ipants are provided with adequa te knowl­edge and skills essential to successful job performance. The employer may b e re imbursed for u p to 50 percent of the cost of training.

The d e p a r t m e n t cont rac ted wi th t h e C o l u m b u s Urban League to write and develop job training contracts with lo­cal businesses. In 1982, 125 contracts were developed tha t generated 154 job placements .

Youth Employment and Training Program Employment assis tance is offered to teenagers be tween 14

and 21 years of age th rough the Y E T P program. T h e two major components are in-school service coordinated with the local school sys tem to provide career emp loymen t ex­periences; and the Out of School Program, that provides out-of-school you ths wi th career oppor tuni t ies and skill training. The Out of School segment of the program pro­vides work exper ience in such fields as warehousing, cler­ical work, nursing, and automot ive t ra ining to n a m e a few.

The Summer Youth Employment Program SYEP was funded under CETA Title IV, and provided 14

to 21 year old persons wi th income from work exper ience during the s u m m e r mon ths ; encouragement to re turn to school after the summer period, and counsell ing about skills needed to enter the labor marke t . Par t ic ipants worked at private non-profit or governmenta l worksi tes for u p to 20 hours per week for n ine weeks (See Table 4).

SYEP Vocational Education Program This service provided high school s tuden t s with s u m m e r

vocational exploration. In the s u m m e r of 1982, 210 s tuden ts participated in 8 different career workshops , and gained an unde r s t and ing of var ious careers in s imula ted work en­vironments .

Table 4 SYEP Statistics

Total n u m b e r of par t ic ipants Enrolled 2,070 Total number of Worksites 372 Total n u m b e r of Agencies Par t ic ipat ing 167 Total number of Slots 2,006 Average n u m b e r of slots filled per day L800

Special Youth Support Programs Despite a reduct ion in staff of one caseworker , overall ser­

vices provided by the Youth Service Bureau exceeded that of the preceding year. It is a s sumed that local organizat ions and social service agency budge t reduct ions may have con­tr ibuted to the increase in referrals.

Individuals caseloads increased from 162 to 258 and total n " n l b e r , ° ! contacts relat ing to caseloads increased from 2,090 to 3,601. P rogrammat i c c o m p o n e n t s such as the Tuto­rial Program, College Awareness , Pa ren t Class, and the Chil-hcothe Correctional Inst i tut ion "Think S t ra igh t" P rog ram experienced major increases in youth part icipat ion. In addi­tion the 5th annua l meet ing with school adminis t ra tors had the largest a t tendance in the his tory of the event wi th 43 school officials in a t tendance .

P>e bureau staff con t inued to main ta in its contacts wi th school officials and other social agencies as a m e a n s of en­hancing its services to you th w h o are in school, and also to serve as a source of referral of you th to the bureau. Approx-',moaotely seventy-five percen t of the bureau ' s referrals dur ing 1982 were from social agencies .

Through the bureau admin i s t ra to r ' s var ious board mem­berships the bu reau has d i rec t con tac t w i th t h e Frankl in County Chi ldren ' s Services , Cathol ic Social Service, Center for P u b l i c E d u c a t i o n , Al l i ance for Coope ra t i ve Ju s t i c e , Youth Services Coord ina t ing Counci l , Ohio Juven i l e J u s ­tice Advisory Commit tee , Centra l Ohio Coalition for Chil­dren, and T h e Ohio S ta t e Univers i ty U p w a r d B o u n d Pro-

During 1982 the Chil l icothe Correct ional Ins t i tu t ion pris­on visitation p rogram "Th ink S t ra igh t" was filmed on video tape by the staff of the city 's D e p a r t m e n t of Energy and Telecommunicat ion. T h e film was te lecas t on cable channe l 3 and many viewers r eques ted t h e film b e shown to you th groups wi th w h o m they w e r e associa ted. T h e n u m b e r of youth a t t end ing t h e vis i ta t ion p r o g r a m at Chil l icothe in­creased from 163 in 1981 to 242 in 1982. Referrals from school officials and Frankl in County Chi ldren Services con­stituted sixty-six percen t of t h e par t ic ipants .

The Fr iends P r o g r a m is c o m p o s e d of ma le and female h igh s c h o o l s t u d e n t s w h o p r o v i d e c o m p a n i o n s h i p t o e lementary school s tuden t s . In 1982, t h e n u m b e r of you th par t ic ipa t ing in t h e F r i e n d s P r o g r a m dec rea sed , b u t an overall increase in t h e qual i ty of t h e p r o g r a m can b e seen as reflected in a n ine th pe rcen t increase in visits m a d e by Big Fr iends. The Big F r i ends vo lun tee r s were m o r e active in 1982 than in pas t years .

The Youth Service Bureau r e s p o n d e d to t h e increased de­mand for service du r ing 1982 by r ea s s ignmen t of staff re­sponsibilit ies and by a grea ter coopera t ive effort on t h e par t of staff to mee t t h e n e e d s of cl ients .

Table 6 lists the bu reau ' s p rog rams and t h e n u m b e r of clients served.

Table 6 Youth Service Bureau—Annual Report—1982

Individual Caseload (Counseling) Total Caseload 258

Counseling Services Offered Counsel ing Sess ions 1,317 School contac ts /meet ings 1,386 Court contac ts /hear ings 236 Communi ty con tac t s /mee t ings 662 Total contac ts 3,601

Parent Training Class Total par t ic ipants 94 Total contacts 311 N u m b e r of mee t ings (classes) 30

Friends Program Total par t ic ipants 224 Individual contac t s /vo lunteers 2,390 Group activities 25 Meetings 115

Tutorial Program # of tu tors (volunteers) 103 # of you th served 153 # of tutorial contac ts :

(avg. 10 you th per session) 790 # of activities 3

College Awareness Program # of youth served 142 # of college visi ts 14

Chillicothe Correctional Institution Trip # of youth served 242 # of t r ips 17

Summer Activities # of activities 19 # of you th 570

Office of Planning, Research and Program Development The Office of P lann ing , Resea rch and P r o g r a m Develop­

ment is chiefly respons ib le for t h e des ign and d e v e l o p m e n t of plans for h u m a n service p r o g r a m s and sys t ems funded th rough t h e D e p a r t m e n t of C o m m u n i t y Services . T h e office specifically p lans p r o g r a m s and services to m e e t individual , family and C o m m u n i t y n e e d s of t h e res iden t s of C o l u m b u s and Frankl in County .

After needs are identified, a l t e rna te so lu t ions are consid­ered and feasibility s tud ies are m a d e . Goals for fulfilling h u m a n needs are set and p r o g r a m s are deve loped . If fund­ing of t h e p rog ram is approved , t h e office he lps eva lua te the effectiveness of t h e p rog ram and r e c o m m e n d s changes if necessary.

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 27

In 1982, the office submitted plans for the expenditure of approximately $8 million for employment and training and over $2 million for social service programs. In order to achieve this, staff worked with local employment and social service agencies.

Employment and training programs, funded by CETA un­til October of 1982, were continued under terms of the Job Training Partnership Act. The programs required a large annual plan and four modifications for Fiscal Year 1982, and a preliminary and then final plan for Fiscal Year 1983. In that work, services were planned for over 5600 participants with activities in classroom training, on-the-job training, work experience and support service in Fiscal Year 1982. Included were services to nearly 2100 youths in summer employment from July through August of 1982. For 1983, plans have been developed for similar levels of service and for transition to terms of the new Job Training Partnership Act, to be completed by September 30, 1983.

Contracts for employment and training service were rec­ommended based on a large, competitive bid process man­aged by the Office. As part of that, the office organized labor market information and specified areas of training and job development most desired by the Columbus and Franklin County Consortium. In preparation for 1983, the office held hearings in conjunction with the Private Industry Council and Manpower Advisory Council to obtain advice from community members and interested persons. Also for 1983, plans were implemented which diminished work experi­ence and increased funding for on-the-job training and skill training in classrooms. Because fewer Federal dollars were available at the beginning of the 1983 Fiscal Year the office worked with others to reduce the rate of allowance pay­ments to trainees, in order to fund the highest number of participants possible. The office aided in shifting from a multi-title CETA program in 1982 to an administratively-simpler composite program for 1983, reducing administra­tive requirements for the program.

Reauthorization of CETA and passage of the Job Training Partnership Act presented staff with the need to secure leg­islative proposals, then later analyze implications of a new law for the Consortium. In that work, papers were prepared and preliminary meetings held to make a smooth transition to a new, but continued, business/government partnership in the community.

The Private Industry Council and its liaison were equal partners in work with the Office. For FY 1983, all plans were discussed with that council which provided large scale marketing efforts for the program during 1982 and plans were laid for "customized" training, involving a close link between employers, employment and training staff of the Department, and training contractors.

In the Summer Youth Employment Program, special work by Battelle Memorial Institute resulted in an explora­tory program for youth interested in training and careers in science and technology. The office also worked with the Employment and Education Commission and the National Alliance of Business in finding summer jobs in the private sector. Programs were offered by the Columbus Public Schools to provide exploration of vocational training offer­ings for in-school youth.

Using General Revenue-sharing funds allocated to the de­partment by the administration and City Council, the de­partment solicited proposals for calendar year 1982 social service programs in late 1981. During 1982, the Office assisted the Office of Contracting in implementing contracts for over $2 million in social services for 1982. Late in the summer of 1982, the office convened the Revenue-sharing Task Force, solicited proposals, and recommended funding of over $2.1 million. In 1982, the office felt that emphasis should be given to services which meet the emergency needs of people during the winter months, as well as those services which assist unempolyed or underemployed per­sons. Those positions have been supported by both the administration and City Council.

A number of efforts to coordinate the work of the Depart­ment with others were undertaken by the Office. Work with the Department of Development focused on enterprise zone policy and employment initiatives. Work with the Metropol­itan Human Services Commission dealt with contingency planning for alternate uses of local public and private fund­ing as Federal funds were reduced for service in our com­munity. Work with the Central Ohio Work and Learning Council linked city/county employment and training pro­grams with other programs in the county. The office pro­vided staff for the Operation Feed emergency food drive in 1982. The Office also worked with a variety of neighborhood groups and social service agency representatives in plan­ning summer youth activity in 1982.

Office of Contracting This office was reorganized in 1982 for purposes of nego­

tiation and construction of contracts and preparation of leg­islation authorizing such contracts. These responsibilities included working closely with other offices in the depart­ment in order to establish a departmental postition for nego­tiations on all proposals that were recommended for con­tracting.

The office was responsible for a wide range of activities: 1) presenting the department's position to subcontractors and negotiating terms that were acceptable to both parties; 2) developing contract packages and obtaining legal authoriza­tion for contracts; 3) insuring the implementation of all con­tract services, and lease agreements; 4) making necessary changes in all contracts; 5) making quarterly on-site visits to monitor contracts; 6) assisting the Office of Planning in con­ducting workshops for service providers; and 7) providing technical assistance.

During 1982 the office entered into and monitored 112 Revenue Sharing and CETA contracts with various agencies and organizations. At the direction of the U.S. Department of Labor, all CETA Title II-B and IV contracts were trans­ferred to CETA Title VII.

The Office of Contracting submitted 122 pieces of legisla­tion to City Council and all were approved. The office also finalized 112 contracts and conducted 132 negotiations for CETA as well as Revenue Sharing funded contracts. Work­shops were conducted offering technical assistance to repre­sentatives of agencies regarding consistent problems; those areas specifically dealing with contractural provisions and fiscal accountability.

The Contracting unit has a goal of quarterly on-site moni­toring of the contractor's day-to-day activities to ascertain compliance of agencies and organizations with contract re­quirements. During the past year the unit made 70 visits.

Thirty-four budget modifications were undertaken to account for expenditure of funds which would differ from original contracts.

Twenty-two agencies received CETA funds while thirty-four agencies received Revenue Sharing funds. Six newly contracted agencies were also awarded Revenue Sharing dollars.

Revenue Sharing funds served a variety of social needs in 1982 as can be seen in Table 8 which lists agencies con­tracted and the dollar amount awarded. Revenue Sharing funded contracts are listed by category in Table 7.

Table 7 1982 Programs

Amount Allocated, Number of Clients Served By Categories D _ . , Number of Program Funded ^ ^ c l i e n , s Category I Allocated Served 72% R.S. Dollars DayCare $496,903 1,077 Counseling 335,718 5,460 Temporary Material Assistance &

Disaster Relief 236,008 13,662 Food Distribution 94,582 4,525 Consumer Advice and Guidance 88,375 1,968 Juvenile Deliquency Prevention 118,593 625 Special Transportation 84,212 2,890 Home Chore 66,056 1,636 Collection and Distribution of

Donated Apparel 43,133 2,091 Protection from Neglect and Abuse 19,690 246 Total 1,583,270 34,180 Category II 15% R.S. Dollars Information and Referral 226,432 94,935 Social Development 92,016 1,640 Volunteerism 13,105 1,519 Total 331,553 98,094 Category HI 4% R.S. Dollars Recreation Programs 26,687 892 Resettlement 43,420 689 Employment Assistance 27,300 4,427 Total 97,407 6,008 Other 9% R.S Dollars Health Care 201,982 11,446 Total 201,982 11,446 Grand Total $2,214,212 149,728

mr

CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

Table 8 1982 Revenue Sharing Contracted Agencies

Contract Number Agency Name Amount of Clients

Action for Children Council for Franklin County 125,227 2,840

J. Ashburn, Jr . Youth Center, Inc 52,897 1,100 Bethune Center Governing Board, Inc. 8P,.™° \6* Boy's Club of Co lumbus 17.224 4b0 Central Buying Center of

Franklin County 32,500 600 Central Communi ty House of

Columbus 75,372 , 77 Central Ohio Reading Service, Inc 56,163 1,540 Columbus Day Care Center 115,432 80 Columbus Metropolitan Area

Communi ty Action Organization 194,020 8,4b0 Communi ty Information & Referral

Services, Inc. (CALL) 176,597 80,250 East Central Citizens' Organization

(Day Care Centers) 114,498 99 ECCO Family Heal th Center Inc 201,982 10,860 Goodwill Industr ies of

Central Ohio, Inc 51,000 800 Heritage House, Inc. Geriatric

Service Organization 80,362 1,580 Heritage House, Inc. Retired Senior

Volunteer P rogram 13,105 2,095 Hilltop Civic Council, Inc 60,118 232 Huckleberry House, Inc 63,525 600 Joint Organization for

Inner City Needs 16,250 880 Metropolitan Learning Communi ty 96,636 60 The Neighborhood House-Day C a r e . . . . 151,439 83 Northside Day Care 20,500 150 One to One 85,522 388 St. S tephen ' s Communi ty Service, Inc. 107,197 2,500 Volunteers of America 50,400 2,500

Total $2,038,034 118,369

New for 1982 Cambodian Mutual Assis tance

Association 62,696 700 Catholic Social Services 31,500 600 Choices for Victims of

Domest ic Violence 19,688 200 Columbus Urban League 34,734 5,226 National Society for

Autistic Children 7,560 20 Open Shelter 20,000 24,613

Total $176,178 31,354

Total Revenue Shar ing $2,214,212 149,728

Office of Monitoring and Compliance The Office of Monitoring and Compl iance is composed of

two units; The Independen t Monitor ing Uni t (IMU) and t h e Management Control Uni t (MCU). Each uni t serves as a managerial and performance review sys tem for its deisg-nated area of responsibil i ty. The moni tor ing function en­compasses services del ivered by the d e p a r t m e n t and its subcontractors, the adminis t ra t ion of those services, and the management of the funds which suppor t those services.

The CETA section of the IMU was created by the 1978 reauthorization of CETA and is charged with identifying potential areas of fraud and/or abuse in CETA funded activi­ties. Utilizing a prevent ive approach, the IMU moni tors all CETA—funded contracts , analyzes depar tmenta l monthly and quar ter ly repor t s , p lans and policies for compl iance with federal laws, CETA regulat ions, and appl icable Depar t ­ment of Labor grant managemen t policies. Any identified occurrence of noncompl iance is d o c u m e n t e d and repor ted to the director, who then initiates the necessary corrective action procedures .

™£Zing 1 9 8 2 ' t h e C E T A section of the IMU moni tored 30 CETA contracts , and conduc ted 7 per iodic reviews of t h e client eligibility de terminat ion system. A verification proce­dure to review eligibility de te rmina t ion was revised and a full-time staff person was ass igned to implemen t the new procedure.

The Revenue Shar ing sect ion of the IMU utilizes the s a m e basic review format and t e c h n i q u e s as the CETA section of the IMU; however , it also par t ic ipa tes in the p lanning and evaluation of R e v e n u e Sha r ing funded p r o g r a m s th rough the depar tmen t ' s R e v e n u e Shar ing Task Force . Dur ing 1982, this uni t moni tored 27 con t rac t s funded by R e v e n u e Shar­ing dollars.

T h e M a n a g e m e n t C o n t r o l U n i t (MCU), e s t a b l i s h e d in September , 1981, is an in ternal m a n a g e m e n t tool which acts a s t h e m e c h a n i s m for c o o r d i n a t i n g d e p a r t m e n t a l self-evaluation and on-going correct ive act ion. Cons tan t moni­toring of internal repor t s and act ivi t ies enab les t h e MCU to advise d e p a r t m e n t a d m i n i s t r a t o r s of potent ia l p r o b l e m s long before a critical s i tuat ion develops . T h e MCU also pro­cesses the various c o m p o n e n t s of t h e depa r tmen ta l correc­tive action p rocedure to a s su re t h e t imel iness a n d adequacy of at tent ion to identified concerns . In 1982 the MCU de­ve loped a u d i t fol low-up p r o c e d u r e s , c o n v e n e d m o n t h l y meetings to analyze pe r fo rmance and d e t e r m i n e correct ive action, facilitated the del ivery of t echnica l ass is tance to over twenty communi ty agencies , and ini t iated and moni to red 39 corrective act ions.

The Office of Moni tor ing and Compl i ance also developed and imp lemen ted an in te rna l rev iew s t ra tegy to p repa re both Depa r tmen t staff and subcon t r ac to r s for the Depar t ­m e n t of L a b o r a n n u a l a s s e s s m e n t . T h e r e s u l t s of t h a t strategy were d o c u m e n t e d by t h e MCU a n d t h e p rocess was an excellent internal correct ive tool wh ich con t r ibu ted to the award of t h e h ighes t ra t ing poss ib le by D O L to t h e local CETA program.

Office of Fiscal and Information Systems The Office of Fiscal and Informat ion S y s t e m s provides all

facets of m a n a g e m e n t of b o t h t h e funds and t h e stat ist ical data which suppor t d e p a r t m e n t a l opera t ions .

Mult iple-source funding h a s r equ i red a careful in tegrat ion of systems which is respons ive to bo th Federa l and city s tandards for p roper cont ro l of m o n i e s and all associated records. The au tomated accoun t ing by a compute r ized sys­t em for processing, r e ten t ion and retr ieval of p rog rammat i c data. This office develops and p repa res budge t s , month ly , quarterly, and annua l r epor t s ; and w o r k s closely wi th t h e offices of the City Audi tor , F inance Director , and P u r c h a s ­ing Adminis t ra tor , as well as w i th all d ivis ions of C o m m u ­nity Services.

During 1982, this office was respons ib le for genera t ion of the financial and stat ist ical da ta requ i red to close out several CETA funds and to t ransfer the D e p a r t m e n t ' s e m p l o y m e n t and training activities into the new federal J o b s Tra in ing Par tnersh ip Act P r o g r a m s . In addi t ion , each R e v e n u e Shar­ing and C E T A / J T P A f u n d e d a g e n c y is m o n i t o r e d on a monthly basis via fiscal repor t s and c l ient /program repor ts from direct cl ient service agencies .

Fiscal and Informat ion staff assists t h e P l a n n i n g and Con­tracting Offices by p rov id ing necessa ry data . In 1982, t h e unit par t ic ipated in t h e critical ana lyses of dozens of pro­gram proposals and con t rac t b u d g e t s .

The total al locat ions and d i s b u r s e m e n t for 1982 are shown in Table 9 and t h e n u m b e r of pa r t i c ipan t s served t h r o u g h CETA/JTPA funds is shown in Table 10.

Table 9 1982 Financial Statement

Allocations & Disbursements

CETA Funds Allocations Disbursements

Title II-B/C $ 3,846,009 $ 3,196,267 Title IV-SYEP 1,407,399 1,400,481 Title IV-YETP 884,384 673,739 Title VI-PSE — — Title V I I - P S I P 645,812 577,285 Adminis t ra t ive Pool 1,688,238 1,409,457

Total CETA $ 8,471,842 $ 7,257,229

E O P P _ — Revenue Shar ing 2,737,636 2,629,458 General F u n d 571,159 538,443 OYC 9,584 4,500

Total $11,790,221 $10,429,630

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 29

Table 10 Participants Served Through CETA

October 1. 1981 - September 30. 1982

CETA TITLES Total number served Male Female 14-15 16-19 20-21 22-24 45-54 55 Public Assis tance Black White Hispanic American Indian or Alaskan Native Asian or Pacific Is lands Veteran Handicapped Offender

IIB.C 2,562 1,386 1,176

34 588 356

1,457 98 29

729 1,592

913 5 0

52 119 113 228

rv YETP

935 485 450 138 667 127

3 0 0

377 690 238

1 2 4 5

38 40

TO 139 105 34

0 6 2

125 6 0

39 80 59 0 0 0

19 3

14

SYEP 2,070 1,103

967 829

1,122 119

0 0 0

1,153 1,683

363 6 5

13 0

117 57

Total 5,706 3,079 2,627 1,001 2,383

604 1,585

104 29

2,298 4,045 1,573

12 7

69 143 172 339

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND TELECOMMUNICATION ANNUAL REPORT—1982

INTRODUCTION The Depa r tmen t of Energy and Te lecommunica t ion con­

tinued progress on m a n y projects in 1982. In the energy area a very successful weather izat ion p rogram for low income res idents was deve loped and approx imate ly 3,000 house­holds served by the p rogram dur ing the winter season. We cont inued to look at city opera t ions to find energy and cost saving solut ions to p rob lems . A m i d - m a n a g e m e n t vehicle review commit tee was es tabl ished to m a k e r ecommenda­tions as to overall operat ion of our vehicle fleet. A s tudy of the feasibility of distr ict hea t ing was comple ted , the resul ts of which resul ted in s igning an ag reemen t with the Danish government for t h e m to provide a detai led feasibility and design analysis of district heat ing in Co lumbus . This is the first agreement en te red into with a foreign government by the City of Co lumbus .

Program deve lopmen t and expans ion cont inued on gov­e rnment cable channel 3. In addi t ion, progress cont inued on ut i l izing t e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n s for da t a t r a n s m i s s i o n a n d other non-video p r o g r a m m i n g uses . T h e Metropol i tan Tele­communica t ion Research Commi t t ee con t inued work to­ward a t e lecommunica t ion p lan for t h e City and develop­ment of the in terconnect of the four cable compan ies pro­ceeded with comple t ion scheduled for 1983. This cable in­terconnect will provide one possible t e l ecommunica t ions tool to mee t city and c o m m u n i t y needs in the years ahead.

Representa t ion of the City and its commerc ia l and res­idential cus tomers in utili ty cases cont inued. In addi t ion, review was c o m m e n c e d of the overall City Cent rex sys tem preparatory to design and implemen ta t ion of a new voice and data system. Work con t inued wi th individual agencies to reduce cur ren t t e l ephone costs .

ENERGY COMMUNITY E N E R G Y M A N A G E M E N T P R O G R A M S Energy Management Planning

Under an $84,000 grant from t h e Energy Task Force of the Urban Consor t ium, the D e p a r t m e n t carr ied out a s tudy of successful energy m a n a g e m e n t pract ices appl icable to Co­lumbus . At year 's end, a repor t on this s tudy was prepared for publ i sh ing , ent i t led " E l e m e n t s of Successful Energy Management : A Compara t ive S tudy of Six Local Govern­ments . "

The D e p a r t m e n t col labora ted wi th the Commun i ty In­volvement Task Force of the Energy Counci l to publicize the Co lumbus Energy P l an and to p re sen t major energy issues to the communi ty . Staff worked wi th the Govern­ment Te lecommunica t ion Center on the produc t ion of a 45 minute TV special, "Ene rgy and Ne ighborhoods : What are the Trade-Offs?" In connec t ion wi th this program, survey quest ions were pub l i shed in 12 local c o m m u n i t y newspa­pers with a combined circulat ion of more t h a n 180,000.

In an effort to imp lemen t major land-use strategies con­tained in the Co lumbus Energy Plan , staff carried out an

intensive survey of Co lumbus developers , bankers , and real­tors regarding the p rospec t s for large scale mixed-use de­velopment in Co lumbus . A repor t was presen ted to the De­par tment of Deve lopment in May.

Depa r tmen t staff suppor t ed t h e work of t h e Metropol i tan Te lecommunica t ion Research Commi t t ee (MTRC) in pre­paring a t e lecommunica t ion needs a s sessment survey for ci ty d e p a r t m e n t s and d iv is ions , a s wel l as for F r a n k l i n County agencies and other municipal i t ies within the coun­ty-

A research proposal was submi t t ed to t h e Energy Task Force of the Urban Consor t ium, and was accepted for 1983 funding. This proposal requi res an invest igat ion of energy managemen t aspects of t e l ecommunica t ion technologies as applied to city government services and operat ions .

District Heating Assessment The District Heat ing and Cooling Feasibil i ty S tudy initi­

ated in 1981 with funding from U.S. H U D was comple ted in September , 1982. The final repor t was well received by H U D sponsors and by other par t ic ipat ing cities and indus t ry rep­resentat ives. T h e Project Manager was a featured speaker a t the project wrap-up conference in St. Paul in late October . Al though s tudy resul ts indicated that capital in tensive DHC sys tems would not p rove to be economical ly compet i t ive in C o l u m b u s for t h e n e x t decade , a great deal of realiable objective da ta was gathered and analyzed. The Co lumbus effort was lauded for its f rankness and comprehens iveness . The Co lumbus repor t and presenta t ion led to an agreement with the Royal Danish Gove rnmen t by which Co lumbus was des ignated as a test city for the feasibility of lower-cost hot water DHC technology as utilized in wes tern Europe . The agreement , s igned on D e c e m b e r 3 by Mayor Moody and Danish Energy Minis ter K n u d Enggaa rd , calls for an 18 month , $500,000 effort by Dan i sh engineers , universi t ies , l a b o r a t o r i e s a n d c o n s u l t a n t s , i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h Brookhaven National Laboratory , U.S. lawyers, and staff of the Depa r tmen t of Energy and Te lecommunica t ion . Plan­ning for the project will begin in early 1983, wi th d e p a r t m e n t staff se rv ing as C o l u m b u s l iaison to t h e Dan i sh project team.

Utility Conservation Financing A year-long effort to s tudy financing of energy conserva­

tion measures by investor-owned-uti l i t ies na t ionwide cul­minated in a meet ing in November , 1982, hos ted by Mayor T o m Moody a n d a t t e n d e d by t o p level execu t ives from American Electric Power , Columbia Gas, and Co lumbus & S o u t h e r n Ohio Electr ic C o m p a n y . Mr. Mike Mertz, Vice P r e s i d e n t for c o n s e r v a t i o n a n d b o a r d m a n a g e m e n t for Pacific Gas and Electric Company , detai led his company ' s conservat ion efforts and their re la t ionship to offsetting sky­rocke t ing cos ts of new p lan t cons t ruc t ion and fuel pur­chases. The g roup resolved to mee t dur ing 1983 to explore ways in which local compan ies might similarly benefit from

30 CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

investing in conservation instead of plant capacity. The c ty hopes that any resulting plans will not only help financially strapped utilities, but will also identify sources of capital for conservation efforts in all energy consuming sectors of the Columbus economy.

CITY GOVERNMENT ENERGY MANAGEMENT PRO­GRAMS Fleets

In 1982, the department was instrumental in forming the Fleet Issues Group, composed of representatives from all city departments having major investments in and responsi­bility for vehicle fleet purchasing, use, and maintenance. The Fleet Issues Group developed an agenda calling for completion of a comprehensive set of fleet management and purchasing policies by summer of 1983. Several recom­mended policies were developed and approved by the Cabinet members during 1982, and completion of all re­maining work is expected to occur on schedule.

Buildings As presented in detail in the 1981 Annual Report, the de­

partment has participated in the Federal Energy Conserva­tion Program of audits of schools, hospitals, local govern­ment and public care buildings. The result of this program was engineering energy audits of 160 city buildings. These audits identified energy saving retrofits, called energy con­servation measures (ECMs), which in 1980 dollars and prices would cost the City approximately $800,000 and save appro­ximately $248,000, for a simple payback of 3.3 years. Of the $800,000 worth of ECMs, $560,000 funding for the ECMs for buildings in the divisions of Police, Fire, Engineering and Construction, Electricity, Traffic Engineering, and the Rec­reation and Parks Department, was approved in the voted bond package of November, 1981. This funding had been anticipated as being available in the spring of 1982; the de­partment was to then coordinate the implementation of the funded ECMs. However, the funding was not available in 1982, so the ECMs' could not be completed. Some funds are expected to be available for ECM implementation in 1983, at which time the department staff will coordinate the imple­mentation of the ECMs.

Energy Monitoring In order to monitor and forecast energy consumption and

conservation in city buildings, the department purchased an advanced Olivetti 16-bit microcomputer system with funds provided by the Urban Consortium grant. In addition to tracking energy conservation efforts in city facilities, the computer system will be utilized to increase staff productiv­ity in the areas of word processing and accounting.

EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM Low Cost Weafherization: Operation WeatherBeater In the latter part of 1981, the Weatherization Task Force appointed by the Mayor and City Council asked the Depart­ment of Energy and Telecommunication staff to develop and seek funding for a proposal to design and implement a community-based, self-help, low cost/no cost weatheriza­tion program as one means of assisting low income house­holds reduce home energy use and costs.

The proposal submitted by the Department in February, 1982, called for workshops for residents of 2,700 low income households , dur ing which res idents would obta in: (1) information re no cost energy-saving lifestyle measures (2) instruction and hands on experience in the use of a vari­ety of low cost weatherization materials such as plastic sheeting, rope and tube caulking, door weatherstrip and sweeps, electrical outlet sealers, shower water savers, etc., and (3) up to $50 (retail value) of low cost weatherization materials at no charge to install in their own homes. In addi­tion, for 300 low income households of persons too elderly or handicapped to install materials on their own, up to $50 (retail value) of free materials would be provided and instal­led at no charge by community volunteers.

In June, the Department was awarded $100,000 of CDBG funds to design and execute the proposal. Pilot workshops held during the summer, during which low-income partici­pants played a major role in workshop design and evalua­tion, resulted in the development of a successful workshop format tailored to low income needs and a detailed plan for implementation of the overall project. Major features of the plan included (1) use of community centers, settlement houses, churches, CMACAO centers predominantly located in low income areas of the city at which ten or more work­shops would be conducted; (2) recruitment of clients

through existing social service delivery networks, especially clients of the agencies providing workshop core sites; (3) pre-registration of workshop clients, limiting workshops to 15-25 participants; (4) three hour long workshops the for­mat of which would include illustrated lecture, demonstra­tions and most significantly, hands on experience; (5) use of two project-trained leaders per workshop; (6) use of a mix of part-time $5.00 per hour staff and community volun­teers to staff workshops and volunteers to do in home instal­lation- (7) self-selection of materials by clients at the end of workshops, based on their just concluded workshop experi­ence and knowledge of their homes' particular needs, rather than distribution of materials only in standardized, pre­packaged kits; (8) one day, large group "campaign" style approach to the in home installation assistance component of the project.

Operation WeatherBeater officially kicked off September 28. The original plan was to service 1,500 households by December and 1,500 more in the spring of 1983. Public re­sponse to the project and demand for its services were so great that the decision was made to try and reach the entire goal of 3,000 by the end of the year. The only thing that prevented complete realization of that ambitious goal was the necessity to hold off scheduling workshops for two and a half weeks in November because of the slow delivery of materials to replenish stocks depleted by the unexpectedly fast start of the project.

By December 31 Operation WeatherBeater provided 127 workshops for 2,316 households and direct installation assistance to 134 others, utilizing part-time staff, about 250 volunteers and support services from over 25 public and private agencies to do so. Operation WeatherBeater is one of the most successful projects of this type in the nation. Num­bered among the volunteers were approximately 180 em­ployees of Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Company who installed materials in the homes of 123 senior citizens and handicapped persons in one day. Other volunteers in­cluded 17 residents of the Wecare Health Facility who col­lectively contributed 250 hours to the project by packaging materials. The volunteer/community cooperation for Opera­tion WeatherBeater demonstrates the concern and support of the Columbus communtiy.

At the close of 1982, sufficient additional workshops and installation assistance cases had been scheduled to reach the 3,000 goal by the end of January 1983.

TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM Electric Vehicles

Delivery of the last of the EVs ordered by the City was completed in early 1982. Extensive graphics identification and deployment into regular city service of all 10 of the city's EVs were completed by mid-year. Extensive data col­lection regarding operation, preventive maintenance, and repair of the EVs instituted as required by USDOE was commenced and will continue throughout the city's formal participation in the project. Maintenance costs associated with the EVs have been higher than hoped for, though not higher than expected, especially when factors such as city mechanics' relative inexperience with electrical systems, the still experimental nature of such EV componentry, the limited availability of outside technical assistance and diffi­culties in obtaining spare parts quickly are considered.

The EVs have proven to be very fuel efficient, especially the subcompact-sized station wagons and sedans. It appears that they can be utilized in appropriate City missions for two-thirds to one-half the cost of fueling gasoline cars in similar missions.

In summary, by the end of 1982, the EVs logged 19,356 miles and the City staff working with them agreed that the three station wagons and four sedans were performing well enough to justify the continued experimentation with re­gard to City use even though they are not yet competitive with gasoline cars from a maintenance point of view. The three vans are far more problematical, and a final review of the feasibility for continued use of them in City service will be conducted in early 1983.

Public awareness activities associated with the EV project in 1982 included displays at the Ohio State Fair, the Franklin County Fair, the Farm Science Review, at the State House in connection with a carpooling promotion, and with the visit of the Ford Motor Company's World's Fair Alternative Fuels Fleet, and information talks and demonstration rides to meetings of several civic and professional groups including the Ohio Institute of Transportation Engineers and the Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission Transportation Task Force.

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 31

UTILITIES GENERAL

The Department serves as liaison for Columbus residents with various utility companies and processed over 130 in­quiries, complaints, and suggestions. This total is about 40% less than previous years due to the moratorium issued by the Governor which forbid the disconnection of utility ser­vice during the winter months. Most of these matters in­volved quality of service, suggestions and requests for ex­tension of time to pay utility bills.

The continuance of rising energy costs and the spiraling unemployment rate had many Columbus residents not only seeking extensions on their utility bills, but also seeking additional sources of funding to help pay their utility bills. Our department worked closely with Columbia Gas and Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Company to establish turn-off procedures and to educate consumers of the various programs available to assist them in paying their home heat­ing bills.

UTILITY CASES AND ISSUES Columbia Gas of Ohio. Inc.

The department continued its practice of checking the heating value content of natural gas supplied in Columbus by Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. Under the present ordinance, natural gas is required to have an average heating value of 1,000 British Thermal Units per cubic foot. Periodically, samples drawn from entry points for gas into the city are analyzed using the Ohio State University facilities.

The BTU content of gas supplied to Columbus customers was checked on May 25, 1982, at three stations located at Fishinger Road and Kioka Avenue, Arlington Marina and Westbelt Drive. Samples were analyzed by Michael B. Kukla of Ohio State University and the quality was found to be above Columbus ordinance requirements.

The gas cost recovery program (GCR), set by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, permits Columbia Gas of Ohio to pass on to consumers the increases or decreases in the cost of gas purchased from its suppliers. These adjust­ments were audited by this department as they occurred throughout the year. The following adjustments were made:

March 8, 1982 An increase of 36.640 per MCF. This increase resulted from higher pro­ducer and supplier rates paid by the company's suppliers. At least half of this was caused by the start of dereg­ulation.

June 7, 1982 An increase of 15.404 per MCF. This increase resulted from higher pro­ducer and supplier rates paid by the company's supplier.

September 10, 1982 An increase of 60.910 per MCF. This increase was caused by the quarterly GCR filing with the PUCO and re­flects an increase in retail gas rates.

December 10, 1982 An increase of 13.11* per MCF. This increase was caused by the continua­tion of deregulation and higher pro­ducer and supplier rates paid by the company's supplier.

The staff attended the hearing conducted by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to investigate the price in­crease by Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation includ­ing the 23% increase during the third quarter of 1981. Approximately 300 people attended the one day hearing and about 50 participants gave public testimony before the Com­mission. Among those testifying were Senator Metzenbaum, State Senator Schwarzwalder, Howard Petricoff of the Attorney General's staff and Representative Clarence Brown.

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation cut back pro­duction in their southwest wells because of reduction in sales of natural gas caused by the recession and continued conservation.

The department received the OPinion and Order from the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) in regard to the Columbia Gas case which the company filed August, 1981, requesting a $13.5 million increase, or 8.6 percent with a rate of return of 12.91 percent. The decision granted Columbia an increase in rates of $7 million. An average customer's bill (11 MCF) increased by $3.75 or 5.8 percent. Customer charges were increased to $3.55 per meter per month and 11.1740 per 100 cubic feet per meter per month for gas consumed.

On September 10, 1982, the company made known its in­tention to file for an additional rate increase of 4.39 percent.

The general service rates would have a customer charge of $5.25 per meter per month. If granted this would result in an increase of $2.98 to an average customer's bill.

The department will contract early next year, pending approval of legislation, with Scott Rothey of Rothey, Bell & Taub, Inc., for consultant services in opposing the rate in­crease by Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. The rate case hearing will be held during early summer 1983.

Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Company The Public Utility Commission of Ohio gave their Opinion

and Order regarding the $100 million rate increase re­quested by Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Company. The commission granted the company $41,580,000. The cus­tomer charge in this Opinion and Order was reduced from $5.00 to $4.00 per month. Monthly charges for customers who use no more than 600 kilowatt hours increased from $36.82 to $41.36. Over half of the customers in Columbus will fall in this category. Customers who use over 1,600 kilowatts a month increased from $83.46 to $87.73.

Evidence provided by the city's expert, Mr. Scott Rothey, retained by our department, resulted in residential custom­ers paying a smaller percentage of Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric's total revenue than was proposed by the com­pany. The PUCO denied Columbus & Southern Ohio Elec­tric's rate base because the Nuclear Regulatory Commission halted temporary safety related construction at the Zimmer Plant. The rehearing started on December 22, 1982, but was adjourned before any witnesses were examined. It has been rescheduled for the first of the year.

Ohio Bell Telephone Company On April 3,1981, Ohio Bell filed its Notice of Intent to seek

a $125 million increase in telephone rates. Case proceedings began in February, 1982. As a result, a consortium of 18 Ohio cities interested in pooling financial resources to hire con­sultants and legal counsel to assist the City of Columbus and the Ohio Bell Consortium in opposing the proposed rate increase was formed. Contributions totaled $44,394.00 with the City of Columbus contributing $8,000.00 in addition to one-half of the legal services and all administration of the Ohio Bell Consortium.

On April 21, 1982, the Public Utility Commission of Ohio rendered its Opinion and Order which granted Ohio Bell $102 million of the requested $125 million. The following is an outline of some of the important issues raised by the Consortium of Ohio cities including Columbus in the case together with an explanation of its treatment by the Com­mission.

1. Band Consolidation—Ohio Bell Telephone proposed to continue consolidation by including bands 5 and 6 with already consolidated bands 1-4. The Consortium advo­cated that progress toward further elimination of this "value of service" banding be continued and that a timetable for complete elimination be set by the Com­mission. Decision: The Commission approved Ohio Bell Tele­phone's proposal for partial consolidation and reaf­firmed the Commission's position of gradual progress toward complete consolidation.

2. Flat vs. Message Rates—Ohio Bell Telephone proposed to continue its de facto elimination of flat rate residen­tial service by providing significant increases for flat rate service with little or no increases in message rate service charges of additional message units—all with­out benefit of any cost of service support. Decision: The Commission accepted the Consortium's position that in light of the absence of cost of service data supporting Ohio Bell Telephone's proposal, any increase that is found appropriate for basic exchange service is to be spread evenly across all residential and most non-residential access lines. (The Commission also ordered, based on recommendations by the Con­sortium, Ohio Bell Telephone to conduct other cost of service studies.)

3. No Increase for Business Equipment Prices—Ohio Bell Telephone proposed little or no increases in minimum prices on business equipment. Decision: The Consortium was successful in convincing the Commission that more revenue responsibility should be assigned to terminal equipment.

4. Message Toll and Related Services—Ohio Bell Tele­phone proposed no increase for intrastate toll. Decision: The Consortium successfully argued that since Ohio Bell Telephone reduced intrastate rates to

32 CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

be at "parity" with interstate rates in the last case, the same reasoning should apply in interstate rates.

5. Coin Telephone—Ohio Bell Telephone proposed no in­crease for coin telephone service. Decision: Although the Commission rejected the Con­sortium's proposal of advocating increasing coin tele­phone rates to 250, they did order Ohio Bell Telephone to perform a cost of service study on coin service using guidelines suggest by the Consortium.

6. Cost of Service Studies—Ohio Bell has refused to pro­vide adequate cost of service data in its rate cases. Decision: In addition to the above-mentioned cost of service studies, the Consortium was successful in hav­ing the Commission order studies that would identify the incremental cost per call for the average residential and business call and identify the proper cost responsi­bility of inter- and intrastate message toll.

On March 17, 1982, Ohio Bell filed an additional rate re­quest seeking $187.5 million. Case proceedings began in Au­gust, 1982. The unused contributions from the first case plus additional contributions from the consortium ($37,488.00) was used to retain consultants and legal counsel to assist in opposing this rate increase.

The Commission rendered its Opinion and Order on De­cember 22, 1982, which granted Ohio Bell $103.6 million out of the requested $187.5 million. The increase was spread among the following services: basic exchange, private line, intrastate toll, and coin which was increased to 250.

With respect to residential rates in this case, the Commis­sion, due to arguments by the Coalition and the Office of Consumers' Council, rejected Ohio Bell's proposals which would have increased flat rate service by 64 percent, mea­sured rate by 20 percent and message rate by 47 percent.

The application filed by Ohio Bell Telephone Company with the PUCO to freeze the Centrax rates now in effect for a period of three years was approved.

A meeting was held on August 24, 1982, for all Com­munication Coordinators for the City of Columbus to dis­cuss conservative and innovative techniques of ways to save money and at the same time improve the quality of tele­phone service being given to the public. MCI and "Sprint" Communication Systems were suggested as a means of cost control for long distance calls.

The department has continued to coordinate training ses­sions held at Ohio Bell for the Telephone Counselors. The Ohio Bell Telephone Company personnel have provided the instructions and direction needed. These sessions proved beneficial and successful, and it is hoped that the time and effort involved and the procedure adopted will produce an efficient and cost conscious Centrex II telephone system which is now being used by the City of Columbus.

The staff concluded an investigation of the pay telephones located on the City right-of-way. Ohio Bell Telephone veri­fied the location of 120 out of 131 coin telephone locations. Eleven of the locations could not be verified by Ohio Bell. The staff looked at these 11 locations and 9 out of the 11 were found to be located on personal property. Two of them were questionable, but the staff did not feel that they should be moved.

Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) The department intervened in a public hearing held at the

PUCO office for the purpose of amending the rules, regula­tions, and practices governing the disconnection of gas and electric service to residential customers. Fifteen public wit­nesses were heard. Other organizations that intervened were the staff of the PUCO, the Welfare Rights Organization, and the City of Toledo. The major complaints of the above men­tioned intervenors were to require customers whose service was disconnected to notify the appropriate people at the Welfare Department; another suggestion was to extend the winter period to April 15 in the northern areas of the state. Medical certifications and tenants' rights were also dis­cussed. A decision has not been made as yet.

TELECOMMUNICATION CHANNEL 3 Government Telecommunication Center

The Government Telecommunication Center, or GTC 3 has been broadcasting programming on Columbus' four cable systems since Columbus Day, 1980. Its mission is to inform and educate the citizens of Columbus on gov­ernmental issues, activities, programs, and responsibilities

During calendar 1982, the Center continued to grow re­sponding to the need of the city government to inform'the citizens of Columbus. "Metroguide", a video bulletin which

provides a readily available format for all government agen­cies to tell the public about their services and/or public meetings, carried approximately 2,000 messages. This in­cludes the only complete listings of schedules for govern­ment and public access programs which air on Cable Chan-

The Center continued to televise each regularly scheduled City Council meeting, live and in its entirety. In conjunction with this program, the center also broadcast the City Coun­cil Administrative meetings in which the agenda for the next City Council meeting is agreed upon.

The process of informing the community about its gov­erning process was further enhanced by the live televising of nine meetings of the Columbus Area Cable Television Advisory Commission; two meetings of the Development Commission; two Building Commission meetings; two City Council Hearings on City Charter Revision; one meeting of the Columbus Area Commission Chairpeople; one Urban Homestead Lottery Drawing; two Historic Resources com­mittee meetings; two Public Hearings on Community De­velopment; four live press conferences; and one Graphic Commission meeting. During the month of December, 13 budget hearings were video-taped in their entirety for broadcast with two broadcast live.

Also, during the course of the year, six taped specials were broadcast, including a three hour conference on "Telecom­munications and the Future". Five program formats were regularly scheduled. "Connections", a twice-monthly call-in show on government issues and programs, continued throughout the year. "Bridging Disability", a call-in show on and for the disabled, was produced monthly from May through December. "People Serving People" is an informal interview/panel discussion series about city government services and special events. Seventeen new editions of this program were produced during the year. "For The Public Record" is produced from pre-recorded videotape programs supplied by local, state, and federal government depart­ments, agencies, boards, and commissions. Six new editions of this program were aired during the year. "Columbus In­sight" is a program that is based on a magazine format that allows the center to present information on city services and how the public can access them. The programs are prepared in the various locations where city employees carry out their daily duties. Seven new editions of "Columbus Insight" were produced during the year.

In order to aid various departments and divisions of the city government in their missions, nine training tapes were produced during 1982.

Public Access The Columbus Community Cable Access OCA), has en­

tered into the second year of contractual obligations with the City of Columbus to manage the programs for public access.

The mission statement for the Columbus Community Cable Access, Inc. is to facilitate uses of public access cable television channels for both viewers and any citizens and groups who wish to originate programs. Goals include pro­viding fair and equitable scheduling of public access cable television programs, free of charge; providing information, equipment, training and advice to organizations and indi­viduals interested in public access cable television produc­tion; promoting the knowledge, image, and use of public access cable television in the community; encouraging the broad exchange of public access cable television resources including program materials, equipment, education, tech­nical expertise, etc., with other public access cable televi­sion organizations and community institutions, wherever they exist; and establishing and maintaining a corporate structure that enables the accomplishment of previous goals efficiently and effectively.

In 1983, the construction of the cable interconnect will provide a separate public access channel, Cable Channel H (162-168-MHz), on a full-time basis.

CABLE INTERCONNECT NETWORK In November Columbus City Council authorized the

Director of Energy and Telecommunication to enter into a contract with Ernest O. Tunmann, President of Tele-Engineering Corporation, for engineering work to prepare plans and specifications for the cable communication ser­vice broadcast interconnect network which will connect City Hall with the four cable companies and facilitate video programming and voice and data transmission. The en­gineering work includes route survey and strand map up­date, distribution plant system design, terminal equipment configuration engineering, terminal equipment final en­gineering, preparation of bid requests, and bid evaluation

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982 33

assistance. Engineering is to be completed on or before April 8,1983 with completion of the construction in the sum­mer.

METROPOLITAN TELECOMMUNICATION RESEARCH COMMITTEE

The Metropolitan Telecommunication Research Commit­tee was appointed in 1981 to coordinate local government telecommunication use and develop a telecommunication plan for the city. In 1982 seminars exposed the members to new telecommunication technologies and provided the members with an opportunity to better understand the full scope of the charge of the MTRC. The next major goal for the members was to produce a seminar for both elected and appointed officials from all government agencies to ac­quaint government officials with new telecommunication technologies. The seminar, "Telecommunication and the Future: Improving Municipal Efficiency", was attended by 115 persons.

The next major goal was to develop a questionnaire on local government agencies, their present resources, present and future needs and how to provide these new services at minimal cost to the users. The questionnaire was prepared and over 165 were mailed to the metropolitan community. The people at the various agencies were asked to respond to the questionnaire. This work was completed in the late fall. A professional telecommunication consultant will be brought on line to lead the committee members in the eva­

luation of the returned questionnaire and to develop a final report and plan for implementation.

CABLE ADMINISTRATION AND REGULATION Private Cable Services

The four operators serving Columbus and the metropoli­tan area reached an important "bench mark" in 1982. The market place was penetrated to a level of 100,000 subscri­bers in Columbus and 150,000 subscribers in the metropoli­tan area. The operators are optimistic about the growth of the industry in 1983; however, the copyright tribunal issued an order in December that would substantially increase the fees for imported distant signals from independent stations. The net effect of this order, unless overturned by Congress, will be to force the operators to eliminate from their services several popular super stations such as: WGN, Chicago; WOR, New York and other independent stations from the west coast.

Approximately 750 cable complaints and service requests were received by the administrative staff. These complaints included requests for available cable communications ser­vices; requests for cable services in yet unserved areas; problems in billing; poor repair service; and the inadequacy of the operators' telephone systems, especially at billing time, to handle the communication needs of the subscribers. The operators have been cooperative with the staff in resolv­ing problems to residents' satisfaction.

The current levels of penetration and saturation for cable communication services are (as of 12/31/82):

Homes Passed Saturation Level I (Basic Service) Penetration (Level I) Level II (Expanded Service) Penetration (Level I—Level II) Level III (HBO-Movie Channel & Other Pay Services). Additional Outlets Level IV—Ancillary Services

Fire-Burglar-Medical, Etc

Rates at the end of 1982 for cable services were:

Columbus 244,074

99 + % 101,898

42% 68,680

67% 83,939 15,041

Metropolitan 338,194

98 + % 155,211

46% 100,642

65% 120,687

23,926

4,730

Ail-American Coaxial KBLE Warner Basic Service $8.95 $ 10.95 $ 8.50 $9.95 Additional Outlets (Basic) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Expanded Service1 12.45 12.90-15.90 13.50 15.50 Additional Outlets (Expanded) 4.00 5.00 Not Available 6.50 HBO 9.45 7.95 5.952 11.25 Movie Channel 9.452 6.00-6.50;* 11.252

Showtime 6.00-6.50' 11.252

Cinemax 10.952 6.00-6.50' Adult 6.00-7.003

'Includes basic service; number of additional channels varies by company, ^ h i s pay service is available only with expanded service. 3This pay service is available only with purchase of both expanded service and HBO; exact cost depends on total number of premium channels ordered.

Statewide Cable Organization Columbus was asked to develop an Ohio chapter of the

National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors. This was developed and is affiliated with the Ohio Municipal League. Its goals are to provide an organizational tool for the dissemination of information about the proper role of local cable regulation to our state decision makers and provide a coordinating mechanism to help cities and villages insure eventual interconnection of separate sys­tems. The members of a state NATOA chapter will serve to facilitate the sharing of community programming, both loc­al origination and access programming, and will serve as an important focal point for the pooling of resources to pro­duce programming of significant importance for our state. The members of a state NATOA chapter will play a signifi­

cant role in the ongoing efforts to improve the exchange of information regarding cable regulation, both within our state and between states. Columbus Cable Television Ad­ministrator Ralph Squires was elected president.

Federal Legislation Senator Goldwater introduced Senate Bill 2172 to amend

the Communications act of 1934 and asked that it be cited as the "Cable Telecommunications Service Act of 1982". S2172, as reported, provides for a significant shift of cable regulatory authority from local government to the FCC. The staff, the Columbus Cable Communication, the Ohio Chap­ter of the National Telecommunications Officers and Advi­sors and others were successful in delaying action on the Bill; however, it is expected to be reintroduced in 1983.

i B f l

•Sfi^l

34 CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

MUNICIPAL CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION AFFIRMATIVE ACTION ANNUAL REPORT—1982

PREFACE The Affirmative Action Office which is designed to assist

in eliminating employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age and handicap recog­nizes that no single factor sufficiently describes employ­ment discrimination and no single means will be adequate to eliminate it. .

In confronting the complaints, we examined elements ot our employment process, selection, recruitment, training opportunities, application of policies and procedures, prom­otion, etc. in an attempt to understand their impact on the Affirmative Action Plan and its success. Activity in this area also consis ted of des igning specific me thods and approaches to eliminate those aspects of employment dis­crimination which were previously identified. The Fire Divi­sion has responded to new charges of discrimination and plans are underway to bring about a resolution.

Litigation The City continues to comply responsibly with both

orders of the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division in connection with the Haynie and Brandt cases alleging racial and female discrimination in the Division of Police, respectively.

The Civil Action relating to "Dozier", alleging racial dis­crimination in the Fire Division remains constant.

The matter of Robert Murphy, et. al, vs. City of Columbus, et. al is pending in the U.S. District Court.

Program Authority and Plan Goals Ordinance 810-75 and Title Thirty-Nine, Article Three,

Section 3927.03, sets forth the affirmative action goals for minority representation in city government.

"The Affirmative Action Plan and Program shall be de­signed to bring about the goal of eighteen and five-tenths percent (18.5%) minority employment in all pay categories in the city and in each city agency, respec­tively, by January 1,1980. THEREAFTER, THE GOAL FOR THE PERCENTAGE OF MINORITY EMPLOY­MENT IN EACH PAY CATEGORY SHALL BE THE PERCENTAGE OF MINORITY POPULATION WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY AS DETERMINED BY EACH FEDERAL DECEN­NIAL CENSUS COMMENCING WITH THE CENSUS OF 1980."

The Black representation in the corporate limits of Col­umbus is 22.1%.

SMSA Representation BLACKS: 11.09% FEMALES: 51.5% WORKFORCE: 44.1% CITY AREA: (Same proportion assumed)

Source—1980 Census data Whereas, Title Thirty-Nine, Article Three does not set

forth specific percentage goals for females, Section 3925.02 sets forth authority to revise the plan as necessary and which " . . . SHALL PROVIDE TO ALL EMPLOYEES AND PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY WITHOUT RE­GARD FOR RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX OR NATIONAL ORIGIN." (The Equal Employment Policy was expanded to include age and handicap in 1976).

The 1980 Census Count relating to the total labor force which dilineates the representation by race and sex within the various job categories for the City of Columbus and Col­umbus Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA) has recently been released. A comparison of occupations or job categories reflects that within the city government structure there are eight job categories and they are represented in all occupations within the total labor force of Columbus and the SMSA except Sales and Private households. City Government (Job Categories) 1. Officials and

Administrators

2. Professionals 3. Technicians 4. Protective Service

City of Columbus & SMSA (Occupation)

Executive, Administrative and Managerial Professional Speciality Technicians and related support Protective Service

Paraprofessional Office and Clerical Skilled Craft

8. Service/Maintenance

Administrative Support, includ­ing Clerical Craft and Repair, Machine Operators, Assemblers and Inspectors Service, except protective, Transportation and Material Moving Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers

The Affirmative Action Program goal is to employ and promote minorities and women at a sufficient rate so that within certain time frames the minority employment per­centage in each major EEO Job Category of City govern­ment reasonably reflects the ratio of minorities to the total population of the City of Columbus and the female employ­ment percentage in each major EEO-4 Job Category of City government reasonably reflects the percentage of women in the labor force in the City of Columbus.

While the Affirmative Action Office recognizes that goals, intermediate targets and time frames are objectives to be pursued, Departments and Divisions must utilize all avail­able resources for good faith efforts in the pursuit.

I. STATEMENT OF PROGRESS Despite 1982 being plagued by budget cuts and lay-offs,

Affirmative Action continues to be a viable influence in the employment picture of the City. Females and minorities continue to embark upon new careers and upward mobility.

Through the outreach efforts of Affirmative Action, 1982 has seen an increase in the number of handicapped appli­cants. In order to allow a handicapped person to compete equitably in the examination process accommodations have been handled on an individual basis.

1982 represents a seven-year span in the successful place­ment of females in non-traditional female jobs such as fire­fighters and wastewater plant operators as well as their in­creased visibility on the Police force. Continued efforts to retain and attract females are pursued in these and other such fields.

Seven years ago, the beginning of the Affirmative Action Program, the major concern was the total integration of minorities at every level of city government, and increasing female participation significantly, thereby, reducing the underutilization of both groups. Today, the response is en­couraging. While there are areas of underutilization of females and minorities, a large number of Departments and Divisions show a significant representation of both groups.

The following is a result of conscious efforts to achieve the basic objectives of the Affirmative Action Program even though the Office realizes that equal employment opportun­ity progress is not limited to statistical data alone:

Total City Minority Representation at the End of 1982 Blacks—1531 or 24.8%; All Others—23 or .4%; Total—25.2% Blacks—Ranges 30 and above: Blacks—Non-Uniform Divisions: Blacks—Police Division (Sworn) Blacks—Fire Division (Uniform): Provisional Appointments

Promotions:

232 or 10.6% 1263 or 30.6% 137 or 11.3% 134 or 16.5%

Total—666, Blacks—231 or 35.3%

Total—795, Minorities—179 or 22.5%

Total City Female Representation at the End of 1982 Females represent: Ranges 30 and above: Non-Uniform Divisions: Police (Sworn): Fire (Uniform): Provisional Appointments

1352 or 22.0% 132 or 6.0%

29.9% 112 or 9.3%

2 or .2% Total—666, Females—184

or 27.6% Promotions: Total—795, Females—205

or 25.8% Females and minorities continue to hold key decision­

making positions. These positions are very significant to the growth and progress of both groups.

II. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION OFFICE ACTIVITIES 1. Meeting with Department Officials The Affirmative Action staff met with all City Department

CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 35

and Division Heads to review EEO statistical information for 1981 and to assist in t h e formulat ion of projections and plans to mee t Depar tmenta l needs in 1982. Assistance was provided many Depa r tmen t s in the complet ion of a self-evaluation designed to de te rmine compl iance with Sect ion 504 of the Federal Rehabi l i ta t ion Act of 1973. Specific in­formation on programat ic or facility accessibility for dis­abled people was provided to the following Depar tmen t s and Divisions: Health, Recreat ion and Parks , Communi ty Deve lopment , Bu i ld ing Serv ices , Eng inee r ing and Con­struction and Traffic Engineer ing and Park ing .

2. EEO In-Service Training The Affirmative Action staff cont inued to offer the in-

service t ra in ing p r o g r a m deve loped for superv isors and managers. Addit ional sessions were held for the Health De­par tment and the Traffic Engineer ing and Park ing Division. Many superv isors have c o m m e n t e d on the va lue of th is training p rogram as it has related direct ly to their du t ies over the past year. Specific E E O tra ining classes were held for Pol ice c o a c h e s and /o r s u p e r v i s o r s . I n t r o d u c t o r y in­formation about EEO was provided to Police and Fire re­cruits at pre-Academy Orientat ion sessions.

3. Maintaining the Disabled Persons Program During 1981 the value of consol idat ing this p rogram with

the exist ing Affirmative Action P rog ram was recognized. Continuity of pu rpose has been well served by this move. In recognition of the need to con t inue specific representa t ion of disabled persons wi th in City gove rnmen t the Affirmative Action Office developed and submi t t ed a cont inuat ion fund­ing p roposa l for C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t Block Gran t funds to the D e p a r t m e n t of Development . This proposal was funded. Another proposal is being developed which suggests the hir ing of a qualified in terpre ter to work city-wide on issues affecting t h e deaf communi ty .

4. Community Involvement—Special Presentations —Volunteered in the U N C F fund dr ive —Presented EEO information to res idents of Wesley Glen

Ret i rement Center —Conducted n u m e r o u s EEO semina r s with special in­

terest g roups —Provided informat ion and referral services to disabled

persons seeking specific social services —Participated in the Ohio Wheelchair Athlet ic Associa­

tion fund raising whee la thon held on a reserved city bike path.

5. Recruitment —Named Recrui ter of the Year by the Central Ohio Re­

habil i ta t ion Center , c o n d u c t e d m o c k interviews with program par t ic ipants and a t t ended the compu te r prog­ramming class gradua t ion

—Assisted individuals wi th special needs in r e sume de­velopment

—Met wi th clergy, cont rac tors and Minori ty Bus iness De­ve lopment representa t ives to recrui t for the new Elec­tricity Division P o w e r P lan t

—Participated in Annua l Minori ty J o b Fairs held by the Mt. Vernon Plaza Ne ighborhood Deve lopmen t Corpora­tion, Ohio S ta te and F rank l in Univers i t ies . Materials were provided to other j ob fairs w h e r e staff could not a t tend

—Worked specifically wi th staff of Divisions where clear underut i l izat ions were indicated to develop strategies to attract minori t ies , w o m e n and disabled appl icants

—Maintained con tac t wi th area agenc ies d i rec t ly con­cerned with the e m p l o y m e n t of women , minori t ies and disabled peop le

—Worked with CETA Adminis t ra t ion in the referral of j ob appl icants for e m p l o y m e n t

—Met with Police C o m m u n i t y Relat ions Office regarding the impac t of Civil Service tes t ing da tes and p rocedures on recru i tment of minor i ty appl icants

—Visited South , East, Mifflin and Eas tmoor High Schools to discuss wi th s tuden t s and counselors , the p roper pre­paration of today 's s tuden t s for tomor row ' s jobs

—Met with the Ohio Sta te Universi ty Depa r tmen t of En­gineering to recrui t engineers for par t ic ipat ion in the City's S u m m e r In te rne P rog ram. This project was done in conjunct ion wi th the City's Depu ty Service Director 's Office

—Continued month ly mee t ings with the In te rdenomina­tional Women ' s Alliance (IWA) to keep t h e m informed of upcoming j o b oppor tun i t i es

6. Retention Program The Affirmative Action Office cont inues to offer counsel­

ing services which are a imed at re tent ion of potential ly valu­able city employees . Par t ic ipants may be referred by super­visors or come on their own. S o m e unusua l examples of this program in action include:

— P r o v i d e d e d u c a t i o n on r e c r u i t r e t e n t i o n to Po l i ce Academy Officials

—Served as liaison be tween academical ly deficient Police Recruits and a c o m m u n i t y educat ional agency

7. Staff Development Major educa t i ona l o p p o r t u n i t i e s p r o v i d e d to staff in­

cluded: —International Pe r sonne l Managemen t Associat ion meet­

ings (IPMA) —Affirmative Action Workshop presen ted by a public sec­

tor commit tee —"Counseling the Alcoholic Empo lyee" seminar —504 Coord ina to r s Confe rence s p o n s o r e d by t h e U.S.

Conference of Mayors —Disabled People in the media conference

8. Complaints The Affirmative Action Office handles both formal and

informal compla in t s re la ted to d i sc r imina t ion . T h e vas t majori ty of all c o m p l a i n t s are reso lved informally. T h e Office works closely in this regard wi th all recognized en­forcement agencies and the City At torney 's Office. Com­plaint related activities are as follows:

—Provided input to the Commiss ion and the City Attor­ney when necessary and appropr ia te in mat te rs relating to discr iminat ion

—Held meet ings with all par t ies involved in discrimina­tion complain ts

—Researched and r e sponded to interrogatories in connec­tion wi th compla in t s filed agains t the City

—Conducted an extens ive invest igat ion into allegations of sex and race discr iminat ion within the Fire Division and m a d e r ecommenda t ions to address specific concerns

9. Reports and Compliance Reviews —Prepared and submi t ted Federa l and Sta te EEO Activ­

ity Repor ts pu r suan t to r equ i remen t s set forth by those Agencies

—Prepared and s u b m i t t e d EEO/AA A n n u a l R e p o r t in accordance wi th local r equ i remen t s

10. lob Bonk The J o b Bank of r e sumes main ta ined to assist City Agen­

cies in recru i tment has been regularly upda ted .

11. EEO Day The Affirmative Action Office coordinated and des igned

mater ial for t h e A n n u a l Equa l E m p l o y m e n t Oppor tun i ty Day, sponsored by the Co lumbus Urban League and the Call Post . This effort was a widespread m e a n s of dissemina­tion the City's equal e m p l o y m e n t oppor tun i ty policy.

12. Affirmative Action Office Personnel Tracking System The Affirmative Act ion Office cont inued to work with the

City Data Center in perfecting the collection and retrieval of EEO Data. A major inves tment of t ime was m a d e in de­veloping t h e sys tem and de te rmin ing our needs wi th offi­cials of Peat , Marwick and Mitchell.

13. Legislation The staff reviewed legislation and d i ssemina ted necessary

u p d a t e s to d e p a r t m e n t pe r sonne l . The H and i cap Affairs Task Force provided wri t ten c o m m e n t s on proposed rules for the following pieces of federal legislation: Sect ion 504 of the Rehabil i tat ion Act of 1973, P.L. 94-142, Legal Service Bureau Regulat ions.

14. National Year of Disabled Persons Projects s tar ted dur ing the Internat ional Year of Disabled

Persons (IYDP) were carr ied on t h rough the Nat ional Year of Disabled Pe r sons (NYDP). The major success of these efforts were seen in the recognit ion of "Br idging Disabil i ty" as the best TV series in Ohio represent ing disabled people. This award was p resen ted by the Ohio Publ ic Images Con­sort ium.

15. EEO Personnel Two meet ings were held involving all EEO Depa r tmen t

and Division representa t ives . These were des igned to pro­mote t h e d e v e l o p m e n t of ind iv idua l Affirmative Act ion Plans. Many individual contacts have been m a d e regarding concerns or p rob lems wi th in a certain Depar tmen t .

36 CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

16. EEO Certificates , Certificates are being prepared for those supervisors and

managers w h o c o m p l e t e d the E E O In-Service Tra in ing Program. 17. Employee Assistance Program ^nnnn

Linkages have been developed with Maryhaven, L.UKL.A, Talbott Hall, St. Ann 's , Riverside, Madison County Reha­bilitation Center and CALM to facilitate this program. The intent is to assure that all city employees who are experienc­ing problems with alcohol, drugs , personal relat ionships, fi­nances or stress have access to appropr ia te help. Extensive training and advert is ing for th is p rogram has gone on in t h e Fire and Sanitation Divisions. All other Depar tments have been notified of its ex is tence and addi t ional t raining re­quests are anticipated.

18. Accommodations To accommodate disabled persons in test ing si tuations or

on the job, the Disabled Persons P rog ram port ion of t h e Affirmative Action Office has kept current on up-to-date methods and legislation. Also, an on-going j ob descr ipt ion review is in place to identify unintent ional

— P r o v i d e d i n p u t to t h e I n t e n s i v e Office E d u c a t i o n P.R.I.D.E. Commit tee of the Co lumbus Publ ic Schools . The intent was to evaluate cur ren t p rograms and pro­vide ass is tance in t h e appl ica t ion of t he se p rograms among s tudents with special needs . Special recognit ion for this contr ibut ion was received.

—Worked with the Hand icap Employabil i ty Awareness Council in the deve lopment of an Employer Conference, Disabled Artists Craft Fair and Employer of t h e Year Awards.

— P r o d u c e d a n d d i r e c t e d " B r i d g i n g Di sab i l i t i e s " , a n award winning cable television series highlight ing dis­ability issues.

—Began work on a re-employment policy relat ing to dis­abled city workers in conjunct ion with the Ohio Indus­trial Commiss ion Rehabil i ta t ion Division.

—Assis ted in t h e d e v e l o p m e n t of Aff i rmat ive Act ion Plans with subgrantees to the City.

—Addressed the Council for Except ional Chi ldren at Ohio Dominican College.

—Served as a consumer m e m b e r of t h e Ohio Developmen­tal Disabilities P lann ing Council , Ohio Rehabil i tat ion Serv ices C o m m i s s i o n C o n s u m e r Adv i so ry Counc i l , Ohio Development Depa r tmen t s Weatherization Advi­sory Board, and the Mid-Ohio Regional P lann ing Com­mission Project Advisory Commit tee

—Staffed the Columbus Handicap Affairs Task Force. Six meetings were held wi th topics including c u r b ramping , building access, interpreter services, popula t ion demo­graphics, reserved parking and legislation.

—Continued work with t h e C o l u m b u s Apa r tmen t Asso­c ia t ion to d i s t r i b u t e in fo rmat ion a b o u t and fur ther promote marke t ra te accessible hous ing

—Presented information regarding service delivery and employment needs of disabled people to the following groups : Central Ohio M a n a g e m e n t Associat ion, Ohio Public Images Consor t ium, Ohio School for the Deaf, Trades and Indus t r ies P r o g r a m of t h e Co lumbus Publ ic Schools, Dodd Hall at O.S.U. Hospital , and the Newark Air Base.

—Assisted in t h e deve lopmen t of a j ob seeking skills semi­nar a t tended by over fifty disabled people at Frankl in University

—Contacted Ohio Bell to encourage the use of the wheel­chair access symbol in yellow pages ads for accessible businesses

discrimination. Dur ing the year a var iety of accommoda­tions have been provided. Also, to e n h a n c e communica t ion a Te lecommunica t ions Device for t h e Deaf h a s b e e n m a d e available to the Office.

19. Demographics Work is cont inuing wi th our D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t

and the Ohio D e p a r t m e n t of E c o n o m i c Deve lopmen t to gar­ner improved statistical informat ion as to the make -up of the Co lumbus communi ty . Th i s informat ion is essent ia l to the Affirmative Action Office opera t ion .

20. Public Relations A cable television series h ighl ight ing t h e activit ies of the

Civil Service C o m m i s s i o n was deve loped . An individual program appeared descr ib ing t h e activit ies of t h e Affirma­tive Action Office. Pub l i c Rela t ions informat ion was often prepared for inclusion in t h e Call & P o s t and other local newspapers .

•AGENCIES ABOVE 18.5% AGENCIES ABOVE AND BELOW 22.1% GOAL

across non-uniform Departments and Divisions (Less Part-time)

Agencies/Divisions Above City Attorney City Audi tor

Adminis t ra t ion Income Tax

City Clerk 27.8% Civil Service 50.0% Communi ty Services 62.8% Deve lopment

Adminis t ra t ion Bui lding Regula t ions Code Enforcement 27.7% Communi ty D e v e l o p m e n t 33.3% Plann ing /Economic

Energy & Te lecommunica t ions Finance 23.5%

Adminis t ra t ion Building Services 39.1% COSHA 25.0% Data Process ing Cente r Municipal Garage 22.1% Purchas ing

Health 25.6% Mayor Recreat ion and P a r k s 27.8% Publ ic Safety (Less Uniform)

Adminis t ra t ion Communica t ions Fire Police

Publ ic Service 35 .1% Adminis t ra t ion Airport 41.0% Construct ion Electricity Engineer ing & Cons t ruc t ion 38.0% Sanitat ion 84.0% Sewerage & Dra inage Traffic Water 22.0%

Treasurer 35.0%

Below 10.4% 10.3% 18.2%

5.6%

"21.5% 16.7% 10.5%

12.5%

10.0% 9.7%

18.4% 14.6%

—0—

14.0% 17.0%

*21.0% 11.0%

CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 37

CITY AUDITOR ANNUAL REPORT—1982

The City Auditor is the Chief Accounting Officer of the City and is responsible for the proper and legal accounting of all the receipts and disbursements of the City. He is also the Chief Fiscal Officer of the City and must keep an accu­rate and detailed record of the assets and liabilities of the City.

Regular monthly and cumulative accounting reports are prepared and distributed to the City Council and other City Officials each month and at the close of each Fiscal Year.

A separate report of all financial transactions of the City has been prepared by the City Auditor on forms prescribed by the State Auditor, and is on file in the City Auditor's Office, and will be published as required by law.

An independent audit of the City is currently in process and a comprehensive annual financial report will be issued on or about April 30, 1983.

It should be noted that the Division of Income Tax will be filing a separate annual report to City Council.

EXPENDITURES GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT 22-01, CITY AUDITOR'S OFFICE

Personal Service Material & Supplies .. Services Other Disbursements. Capital Outlay

Totals

1982 $ 712,804.53

4,608.04 1,028,865.30

34.08 654.00

$1,746,965.95

1981 $ 661,433.00

6,500.91 971,950.92

14,679.49

$1,654,564.32

1980 $ 625,488.98

5,620.65 791,950.26

418.07 20,317.18

$1,443,795.14

1979 $ 549,256.39

5,263.10 484,693.52

5,269.83 1,389.88

$1,045,872.72

1978 $ 510,878.47

5,431.32 448,490.88

15.98 3,368.64

$968,185.29

HOTEL-MOTEL TAX COLLECTIONS Chapter 371 of the City Code provides for the collection of

a 4% excise tax on transient lodging accommodations. The City Auditor is responsible for the administration of the tax. The following is a comparative statement showing the gross receipts from the source from 1973 to 1982. 1982 $2,226,404.48 1977 $933,999.87 1981 2,166,990.39 1976 835,267.11 1980 1,500,242.10 1975 722,001.91 1979 1,233,968.36 1974 648,97'*.24 1978 1,084,674.53 1973 611,853.42

MISCELLANEOUS DATA 1982 Regular Vouchers Paid 36,914 Receiving Warrants Written 7,362 Fund Administered: General

Special Revenue Trust & Agency Debt Service Intergovernmental Service. Special Assessment Capital Projects Enterprise

Total

1 50

100 2 6 4

79 15

257

INCOME TAX DIVISION ANNUAL REPORT—1982

The Columbus Income Tax Division is charged with the audit, collection and the enforcement of l'/2% tax, pursuant to Chapter 361 of Columbus City Code.

Financial data contained in this report reflects actual col­lections, refunds, etc., as recorded by the City of Columbus, Division of Income Tax. Such data will vary from that con­tained in the Auditor's official fund accounting records due to the normal time requirements for processing documents prior to their being recorded with the Auditor.

By contract this Division performs this same service for Upper Arlington, Reynoldsburg, Grandview Heights, Grove City, Worthington, Dublin, Hilliard, Groveport, Obetz, Canal Winchester, Bexley and Marble Cliff. For this administrative service, Columbus' General Fund received a collection fee of the gross income tax collected for these twelve communi­ties which amounted to $501,151.66 in 1982.

The funds collected from the tax are allocated for munici­pal purposes as set forth in Chapter 361.36 of Columbus City Codes.

The following is a report of Columbus income tax collec­tions for the year 1982.

Total Collections $94,708,956.87 Less: Refunds paid by Treasurer... 1,900,962.06

Less: Transfers to Other Cities . $92,807,994.81

836,400.13

NET TOTAL COLLECTION 1982.. NET TOTAL COLLECTION 1981..

$91,971,594.68 $87,735,086.46

NET INCREASE $ 4,236,508.22 The Columbus Income Tax ordinance provides for 16%%

of total collections of income tax be set aside for the pay­ment of principal and interest on bonds and notes issued by the City. The remainder provided approximately 51.25% of the General Fund Receipts.

The following is a report of Upper Arlington collections for 1982:

Total Collection $2,438,945.78 Less: Refunds _ 48,779.41 NET TOTAL COLLECTION 1982.. $2,390,166.37 NET TOTAL COLLECTION 1981.. $2,344,256.65 NET INCREASE $ 45,909.72

The following is a report of Reynoldsburg collections for 1982:

Total Collection $ 780,237.68 Less: Refunds 14,905.61 NET TOTAL COLLECTION 1982.. $ 765,332.07 NET TOTAL COLLECTION 1981.. $ 628,277.87 NET INCREASE $ 137,054.20

The following is a report of Grandview Heights collections for 1982:

Total Collection $1,258,430.47 Less: Refunds 25,306.62 NET TOTAL COLLECTION 1982.. $1,233,123.85 NET TOTAL COLLECTION 1981.. $1,224,170.33 NET INCREASE $ 8,953.52

The following is a report of Grove City collections for 1982: Total Collection $ 811,253.11 Less: Refunds 15,463.70 NET TOTAL COLLECTION 1982.. $ 795,789.41 NET TOTAL COLLECTION 1981.. $ 809,032.54 NET DECREASE $ (13,243.13)

38 CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

The following is a repor t of Worthington collections for 1982:

Total Collection $ 2 ' 6 ?? 'Z!!Mo Less: Refunds 55,215.88 NET TOTAL COLLECTION 1982.. $2,633,500.88 NET TOTAL COLLECTION 1981. . $2,549,124.56 NET INCREASE $ 84,376.32

The following is a report of Dublin collections for 1982: Total Collection $1,438,562.42 Less: Refunds 22,391.19 NET TOTAL COLLECTIONS 1982 NET TOTAL COLLECTIONS 1981

NET INCREASE

$1,416,171.23 $1,185,141.50

$ 231,029.73

The following is a report of Hilliard collections for 1982: Total Collection $1,136,362.11 Less: Refunds 44,602.75 NET TOTAL COLLECTIONS 1982 . $1,091,759.36 NET TOTAL COLLECTIONS 1981 . $1,059,524.56

NET INCREASE $ 32,234.80

The following is a report of Groveport collections for 1982: Total Collection Less: Refunds NET TOTAL COLLECTIONS 1982 NET TOTAL COLLECTIONS 1981 NET DECREASE

355,028.94 2,426.61

$ 352,602.33 $ 353,733.40

$ (1,131.07)

The following is a report of Obetz collections for 1982: Total Collection $ 401,258.57 Less: Refunds 11,016.50 NET COLLECTIONS 1982. NET COLLECTIONS 1981.

NET INCREASE

$ 390,242.07 $ 345,848.44

$ 44,393.63

The following is a repor t of Canal Winchester collections for 1982:

Total Collection $ 1 7 0 - } i H 2 Less: Refunds 1.127.09 NET C O L L E C T I O N S 1982 $ 168,987.24 NET C O L L E C T I O N S 1981 $ 162,929.29

N E T I N C R E A S E $ 6,057.95

The following is a repor t of Bexley collect ions for 1982: Total Collection $ 557,004.33 Less: Refunds 7,932.22 NET C O L L E C T I O N S 1982 $ 549,072.11 NET C O L L E C T I O N S 1981 $ 552,003.83

N E T D E C R E A S E $ (2,931.72)

The following is a repor t of Marble Cliff col lect ions for 1982:

Total Collection $ 247,663.08 Less: Refunds 880.02 NET C O L L E C T I O N S 1982 $ 246,783.06 NET C O L L E C T I O N S 1981 $ 217,702.37

NET I N C R E A S E $ 29,080.69

The total expend i tu re s to opera te t h e I n c o m e Tax Divi­sion were $1,160,682.40. This inc ludes salaries, income tax forms, new equ ipmen t , service, a d v a n c e d cour t costs and miscel laneous suppl ies inc luding pos tage . This represen ts adminis t ra t ive service for C o l u m b u s and twelve satellite communi t ies wi th a staff of 38 employees .

City Income T a x receipts p rocessed t h r o u g h the delin­quen t d e p a r t m e n t du r ing t h e year 1982 were $540,878.65. This a m o u n t inc luded $76,149.60 in pena l ty and interes t charges.

The Data Center has con t inued to suppo r t t h e I n c o m e Tax Division with new and e x p a n d e d p rog rams . It is ant ic ipated in the near future to change over from the cur ren t account system to full imp lemen ta t ion of social secur i ty and federal identification n u m b e r s .

Dur ing 1982, 172 civil su i t s were filed on behalf of the City in the amoun t of $169,828.05. This r epresen t s a 60% increase in n u m b e r of civil su i t s filed.

During 1982 this division p rocessed 12,573 refund war­rants in the total a m o u n t of $1,970,511.34. This c o m p a r e d to 11,313 refund war ran t s in 1981 a m o u n t i n g to $1,781,001.78.

DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND PARKS ANNUAL REPORT—1982

RECREATION AND PARKS COMMISSION Columbus City Charter Section 112-1 Recreation and Parks Commission; appointment and organiza­tion— "The construct ion and equ ipmen t and t h e custody, mainte­nance, control, operat ion and adminis t ra t ion of all t h e rec­reat ional facilities and pub l i c p a r k s of t h e city shall b e vested in a 'recreational and parks commission', which shall be composed of n ine (9) member s , a majority of w h o m shall consti tute a quorum.

Columbus City Charter Section 112-2 Powers and duties of the commission "The Commission shall have the power and it shall be its duty to equip , operate, direct and mainta in all exist ing rec­reational facilities and park facilities . . . and from t ime to t ime, to acquire, improve and cons t ruc t addi t ional facilities-. . . may receive donat ions and beques ts , of money or prop­

erty . . . for recreation and park purposes . . . " The Recreation and Parks Commiss ion holds a regular

month ly meet ing to review legislation being presen ted to Columbus City Council, park development , recreation pro­grams, services for the elderly, capital improvements , land acquisit ion and finances.

All in all, t he Recrea t ion a n d P a r k s C o m m i s s i o n was charged in 1982, with meet ing the chal lenge of a shr inking economy, c u t b a c k in staff and p r o g r a m m i n g whi le con­t inuing to offer the best in recreation, educat ion and cul ture for all m e m b e r s of the communi ty .

Election oi Officers The Nomina t ing C o m m i t t e e p re sen t ed its slate of officers

for the Recreat ion and P a r k s C o m m i s s i o n on Feb rua ry 24, 1982. By u n a n i m o u s v o t e , t h e fo l lowing off icers w e r e elected to serve for 1982:

Ca ther ine Gillie P re s iden t

S t e p h e n Gabay Vice-Pres iden t

Melvin B . D o d g e Secre ta ry

Other m e m b e r s of t h e Recrea t ion and P a r k s Commiss ion are:

F. M. B r o c k m e y e r Cleo L. D u m a r e e N o r m a n E. Fo lpe

H u g h H i n d m a n , J r . Michael B. Kan-Harry E. Rich te r

Aurea l ius T h o m a s

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS . . . CONSTRUCTION PROIECTS . . . PLANNING AND DESIGN

The following projects were ini t iated and/or comple ted during 1982: Bikeway Projects and Reports

—Reviewed 1-670 and S p r i n g / S a n d u s k y I n t e r c h a n g e re­ports for b ikeway routes .

— S t u d i e d p r o b l e m a r ea s , i n c l u d i n g H e n d e r s o n R o a d Bridge.

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 39

—Assis ted in t h e p r e p a r a t i o n of B i k e p a t h P l a n n i n g Guidelines.

—Alum Creek Bikeway s tudy began. Contract Drawings by Consultants—Reviewed by Recreation and Parks Staff

—Joyce Park —Battelle Riverfront Pa rk —Griggs Campsi te Showerhouse —Whetstone Boiler Renovat ion —Raymond Memorial Golf Course Improvemen t s —Glenwood Pool Bo t tom R e p l a c e m e n t and S u n s h i n e

F lumeway —Roof Renovations—Various Recreat ion Centers —Westgate Recreat ion Center Hand icap Renovat ions —Franklin Pa rk Conservatory Renovat ion —Zoo Giraffe House Renovat ion

Contact Documents by Recreation and Parks —Italian Village Pa rk —Clintonville Park —Riverside Green Pa rk —Greene Countr ie Pa rk —Griggs Reservoir Boat Docks —Bicentennial Pa rk Foun ta in Strainer Rep lacement Pro­

ject —Karns Park Improvemen t s —Karns Park Sidewalk —Griggs Camps i te Electrici ty —Tennis Court Light ing I m p r o v e m e n t s —Schiller Park P layground I m p r o v e m e n t s —Street Tree Improvemen t s : Olde Town East, Hungar ian

Village, North of Broad, Clintonville —Willow Creek P a r k Deve lopmen t —Westgate Park I m p r o v e m e n t s —Independence Village —Zoo Lake Erosion Control —Bicentennial Park Concre te Slab Repair —Columbus Zoo Pole Barn

Construction Supervision —Recreat ion Cen te r Rehab i l i t a t ion : S u n s h i n e , Beat ty ,

Blackburn, Barack (Carryover from 1981) —Joyce Park —Battelle Riverfront P a r k —Griggs Campsi te S h o w e r h o u s e —Whetstone Boiler Renovat ion —Raymond Golf Course I m p r o v e m e n t s —Glenwood Pool Bo t tom Replacement , Sunsh ine F lume-

way —Roof Renovat ions—Various Recreat ion Centers —Renovation Co lumbus Zoo Facili t ies —Westgate Center Hand icap Renovat ions —Franklin Pa rk Conservatory Renovat ion —Zoo Giraffe House Renovat ion —Dennison Place Street Trees —Wrexham Pa rk —McKinley Pa rk —Antrim Park Underpass Pav ing —Italian Village Pa rk —Clintonville Pa rk —Bicentennial P a r k Foun ta in St ra iner Rep lacement —Riverside Green Pa rk —Karns Park I m p r o v e m e n t s —Street Tree I m p r o v e m e n t s : H u n g a r i a n Village, Olde

Town East, Nor th of Broad, Clintonvil le —Zoo Lake Erosion Control —Willow Creek Pa rk —Westgate P a r k I m p r o v e m e n t s —Bicentennial Pa rk Concre te Slab Repai rs

Park Master Plans —Deaf School Site —Simson Blair P rope r ty —Madison Mills P a r k —Willow Creek P a r k —Independence Village P a r k —Parsons and Bryden —Huber Ridge P rope r ty —Schiller P a r k —Fourth and Oregon —Zoo Picnic G r o u n d s

Park Plans and Presentation Drawings —Raymond Memorial Golf Course P lan t ing P lan —Planting P lans : Ind ian Mound , Woodward Park , South-

view P a r k , G o o d a l e P a r k , Schi l le r P a r k , R i v e r b e n d Park, Sycamore Hills Pa rk and 17th and Cleveland

—Penquin H o u s e Ske tch —Zoo Classroom Facili t ies Ske tch —Gazebo Ske tch

—Rhodes Park —Deaf School Pa rk —Golf Course Star ter H u t —Gowdy Field —Goodale Park Pa rcourse —Olde Sawmill Pa rk —Conservatory En t rance Sign

Graphics, Presentations and Artwork —Recreation and Pa rks Annua l Repor t Cover —Zoo Annual Repor t Cover —Civil Service Annua l Repor t Cover —Agency on Aging Annua l Repor t Cover —1981 OPRA Awards Entr ies —Merit Certificates —Park Map and P layground Locat ions —P.O.R. Wedding Brochure Upda t e —10,000 Meter R u n Logos —Family Re-Creation Logo —Recreation and Pa rks Gifts Catalog —Golf Course Rate Signs —Arbor Day Certificates —Cultural Arts Center Exhibi t Sign —Zoo Banner —Music-in-the-Air Sign —Downtown Jogging Trail Map —Maintenance Cost Char ts —First Annual Herb Harvest Sign —Witches Walk Signs —Candlelight Tour Signs —Travel Ohio S h o w —Bikeday Exhibi t —Fourth of Ju ly Exhib i t —Ohio State Fair Exhib i t —Garden S h o w Exhibi t —Welcome Back Ohio Exhibi t —Winterfair Exhib i t —Signs for Nor th Market

Special Projects —Surveyed Lincoln Pa rk for dra inage swale —Laid out soccer field at McCoy Pa rk —Attended c o m m u n i t y civic meet ings —Reviewed plans from o ther city agencies —Canoe Por tages

Subdivision Plans —76 subdivis ion p lans and zoning plans were received

Land Acquisition —Assisted in the acquisi t ion of scenic easemen t s along

the Olentangy River (Canoe Portages) and Alum Creek —Negotiated for the acquis i t ion of several pa rks including

McComb and Riverside Green Sou th Sect ion #5 . Watercourse Plan for Columbus and Franklin County—This plan was presented t h roughou t the year.

NEW PARK DEVELOPMENT PROIECTS 17th and Joyce Park—Received a $139,590 ma tch ing grant award from the Bureau of Outdoor Recreat ion th rough the Ohio Depar tmen t of Natural Resources for the acquisi t ion of 25.38 ac res of l and . M a t c h i n g funds p rov ided by St . S tephen ' s Commui ty House ; and remain ing $733,334 was provided by CDA, P e r m a n e n t I m p r o v e m e n t and National Park Service F u n d s . Total cost of pa rk — $1,012,514. Battelle Riverfront Park—Groundbreaking held on May 17. Project financed by $500,000 gift from Battel le Founda t ion ; plan for a pedes t r ian wa lkway over Long Street to be fi­nanced by Amer ican Electric P o w e r (AEP) not to exceed $500,000; and $1.8 mill ion city funds. Total cost of pa rk — $1,877,455.

RECREATION PROGRAMS COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTERS

The communi ty recreat ion center operat ion provides rec­reation p rograms for all ages, in teres ts and needs within communi t ies . A recreat ion center director coordinates and supervises a staff of professional recreat ion leaders who c o n d u c t a var ie ty of y e a r - r o u n d rec rea t ion p r o g r a m s to serve a c o m m u n i t y in the best possible manner . The 25 com­muni ty recreat ion centers serve people within a radius of approximately two (2) miles and are open weekdays from 1:00 to 10:00 p.m. and on Sa tu rdays from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. T h e indoor season begins in S e p t e m b e r and cont inues t h r o u g h t h e s e c o n d w e e k of J u n e . D u r i n g t h e s u m m e r mon ths the recreat ion centers are opera ted as par t of the playground program.

In order to serve as many people as possible in the rec­reation centers , activities were geared to e lementa ry school

40 CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

age children on weekdays from 1:00 until 6:00 p.m. and on Saturdays from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. Teenagers and adults took part in activities during the evening hours from 600 to 10:00 p.m. with some adult activities being con­ducted in the early afternoon hours. Most centers offered a pre-school recreation program to the community trom l:uu to 3:00 p.m. . . . J »-

The recreation center programs included arts and cratts, physical activities, fine arts, clubs, drama, dance, music, special interest groups and numerous special events includ­ing holiday programs and celebrations.

Most centers conducted an in-school program in coopera­tion with area elementary schools. In this program, rec­reation leaders conducted a variety of physical educational recreation activities for the students visiting the centers as a class with their teachers during school hours.

ACTIVITIES. SPECIAL EVENTS AND SPECIAL PROGRAMS While each community recreation center offered many of

the same types of activities, there was a wide variety of pro­grams conducted at the centers. Following is a partial list of activities offered at some or all of the centers throughout the year: Arts and Crafts

Basketry Leather Crafts Cake Decorating Macrame Cooking Paper Crafts Drawing Sewing/Needlepoint Enameling Special Crafts Gimp Crafts Weaving Jewelry Woodcarving

Cultural Arts Dance Dramatics

Physical Activities Apparatus Play Badminton Baseball Basketball Baton Twirling Billiards Boxing Football Foul Shooting Games Gymnastics

Music Teenage Dances

Horseshoes Ice Skating Physical Fitness Shuffleboard Soccer Softball Table Tennis Track and Field Volleyball Weightlifting Wrestling

ADVISORY COUNCILS At each of the community recreation centers there is an

Advisory Council whose members are appointed by the Recreation and Parks Commission. Each Council is com­posed of 9-21 members representing a cross section of the community (parents, clergy, businessmen, civic leaders, etc.). These Advisory Councils hold regular meetings and serve as a liaison between the recreation centers and the community so that the programs offered to the community are in accord with the needs and interests of the people.

SPECIAL EVENTS Arts Festival—The annual Arts Festival was held at the State-house on June 4, 5 and 6 and included a variety of activities in which our department participated. Our leaders took part in conducting ballet, drama, drawing, jewelry, paper crafts, sidewalk drawing, special crafts and weaving. People learned about our department's programs while attending the Arts Festival. Total participation—63,808. Christmas Program—During the time schools were closed for the holidays, many special programs and Christmas activi­ties were conducted at our centers. Activities included: Christmas parties, craft contests, caroling, canned food dances, plays, basketball tournaments, gymnastics and dance reviews. Total participation—18,410. Community Arts Project—Through a grant provided by the Ohio Arts Council, the recreation centers benefitted by a number of arts participation workshops, concerts and dramatic presentations. Total participation—3,714. Easter Egg Hunts—On Saturday, April 1?, the annual com­munity-wide Easter Egg Hunts were conducted at our 25 recreation centers. The recreation center Advisory Councils and other sponsors, including service organizations and lo­cal merchants, provided the candy and hard boiled eggs which were hidden. Each of the hunts provided separate hunting areas for different age groups. Prize eggs were found and turned in for special awards. Total participation— 14,374.

Halloween Parties—On Saturday, October 30, all of our com­munity recreation centers conducted their annual Hallow­een parties for boys and girls, 12 years of age and under. The parties consisted of such activities as costume parades, ghost houses, games, movies and refreshments. Numerous service organizations, businesses, and recreation center Advisory Councils helped sponsor these activities. There were also a number of special events relating to Halloween, including the annual UNICEF collection which totalled $420.61. Total participation—9,000. Open House Program—All community recreation centers held open house programs during the spring. Program dem­onstrations, exhibits and special events were featured. Total participation—10,210. Traveling Art Van—The art van, in cooperation with the Co­lumbus College of Art and Design, visited all community recreation centers during the indoor season. This was a sup­plement to our ongoing arts and crafts programs at the cen­ters. Total participation—1,742.

TOURNAMENTS Badminton—The badminton program was conducted during the spring. The program included playing instruction, free play activity and tournaments. The sectional tournaments were conducted May 10 through May 19. Total participa­tion—760. Basketball—Basketball instruction and league play was con­ducted at all centers for boys and girls according to age groups. The girls' tournaments were held March 8 through 13, with the boys' tournaments held March 15 through 19. The four sectionals were played at various sites. The win­ners participated in the finals at Whetstone Recreation Cen­ter March 22 through 26. Total participation—41 girls teams (420 players); 55 boys' teams (580 players); and 4,330 specta­tors. Boxing—Programs were conducted at Barack, Beatty, Blackburn, Sawyer, Sunshine, Thompson and Windsor Ter­race Recreation Centers. A number of dual workout ses­sions were held between centers. Foul Shooting and Game Room Tournaments—Center and sec­tional tournaments were held the week of December 20 and 27. The game room tournaments included: backgammon, billiards, carom, checkers, chess, shuffleboard, table tennis and similar activities. Gymnastics—The city-wide inter-center gymnastics meet was held at Southview Athletic Complex on May 1 and 8. Competition was held for boys and girls in age groups of 6-8; 9-10; 11-12; 13-15 and 16-18. Track and Field—During the spring track and field programs were conducted at all centers. Center track meets were held May 25 and 26. Total participation—880. Volleyball—The center conducted fall volleyball programs which included instruction, free play and leagues. Sectional tournaments were held November 15 through 19. Partici­pants—2,119. Weightlifting—The annual city-wide Olympic weightlifting meet was held February 4. Competition was held in the snatch and clean and jerk events for different age groups and body weights. Total participation—265.

On April 1, a city-wide powerlifting meet was held. The two lifts in the meet were bench press and the deadlift. Total participation—336. Wrestling—The inter-center wrestling meet was held at Southview Athletic Complex on February 27. The boys competed in five age groups: 8 and under; 9-10; 11-12; 13-15; and 16-18; with complimentary body weights. Total partic­ipation—914.

AQUATICS PROGRAM The department's nine (9) outdoor and one (1) indoor

swimming pools serve three (3) major areas: — Recreational swim; — Learn-to-Swim and water safety; and — Competitive Programs Each pool offered a wide variety of supervised aquatic

activities to surrounding communities. 210 lifeguards, both full-time and seasonal, were em­

ployed to operate the ten (10) pools and the Riverfront Pad-dleboat Marina during the summer months. Prior to em­ployment, all lifeguards were required to take a civil service test which was divided into two (2) parts; 1) a written test on aquatic safety; and 2) a water demonstration to test pro­ficiency in lifesaving techniques. All lifeguards working at municipal swimming pools were required to hold certifica­tion in Advanced Lifesaving and/or Water Safety Instructor

'

CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 41

Training, cardio-pulmonary resuscitation and first aid. On June 12, our nine (9) outdoor swimming pools: Blackburn — 263 Carpenter Street Fairwood — 1392 Fairwood Avenue Glenwood — 1925 West Broad Street Lincoln — 1700 Ann Street Marion-Franklin — 2699 Lockbourne Road Maryland — 1380 Atcheson Street Sunshine — 545 Sullivant Avenue Tuttle — 240 West Oakland Park Windsor — 1300 Windsor Avenue

and our one (1) indoor facility, the Columbus Swim Center, 1160 Hunter Avenue, were opened to officailly start the sum­mer season.

All pools operated seven (7) days a week through August 29, with recreational swimming offered daily from 1:30 to 8:00 p.m. The Columbus Swim Center operated eleven (11) months of the year offering recreational swimming 23 hours throughout the week during the winter months.

Admission for recreational swimming at all pools was ten cents regardless of age. Through the summer months, 383,396 participants took advantage of this service. During this period 196 swimming rescues were recorded at all ten (10) sites. Individual attendance records were as follows:

Blackburn 18,518 Fairwood 25,511 Glenwood 25,089 Lincoln 76,502 Marion-Franklin 30,242 Maryland 30,522 Sunshine 50,914 Swim Center 41,699 (Summer) Tuttle 53,884 Windsor 30,515

SUMMER TOTAL 383,396 Swim Center 57,060 (Wint >r)

OVERALL PARTICIPATION 440,456 Outside groups (Not included in total) 15,556 Leam-to-Swim Program — Classes were offered at all pools during the summer from 11:30 to 12:30 and from 12:30 to 1:30 and year round at the Swim Center. All classes were offered free of charge, taught by certified Water Safety In­structors and sanctioned by the American Red Cross.

Classes were offered for beginner, advanced beginner, in­termediate, swimmer and advanced swimmer skill levels. Instruction was also given in advanced lifesaving and water safety instructor training and a special class for Adapted Aquatics was initiated at our Tuttle Pool for disabled swim­mers. During the winter months at our indoor swim center, there were 4,419 participants in the Learn-to-Swim classes (1,611 boys; 1,747 girls and 1,061 adults). During the summer months, the department sponsored five (5) separate sessions of free Learn-to-Swim classes at all pools. Each session pro­vided each student with ten (10) 60-minute periods of in­struction, involving, 5,210 participants. In addition, special classes were held on Saturdays and Sundays for adult, pre­school and handicapped swimming instruction. Daily participation counts for these classes over the summer months totalled 1,287.

Realizing the importance of promoting aquatic safety, the Recreation and Parks Department aligned its efforts with the American Red Cross in providing both personnel and facilities to conduct programs which best reflected the in­terest of both organizations and filled the needs of the com­munities they served. Through combined efforts, we effec­tively offered free learn-to-swim classes, trained water safe­ty instructors, held clinics to update swimming instructors in new teaching methods, certified instructors for handi­capped swimming, pool management clinics were held, trained lifeguards and offered numerous classes in first aid training. Competitive Swim Programs — Held at all pools during the summer months, this program was funded through a De­partment of Labor grant. Our department provided swim team practices at all pools from 10:30 to 11:30 a.m., Monday through Thursday with Friday being reserved for swimming meets. At the conclusion of the summer, all ten (10) pools met at Sunshine Pool to determine a city-wide champion. Continued support of this program was again evidenced by the increased number of participants and the enthusiastic support of parents at the meets. This year a record 775 con­testants represented all ten pools in the championships. Swimming preliminaries totalled 1,263 entries divided into 160 heats while the Diving Championship had a record 112 contestants; this total made the largest championship to

date. Over half the participants were products of our Learn-to-Swim Program.

During the winter months, the department worked closely with the Central Ohio Swimming Association to promote year-round competition in communities. We held local age group swim meets every third Saturday of the month at our indoor facility. In addition, the indoor facility was made available two (2) weekends during the winter season to con­duct larger meets — the New Year's Invitational and State Class "A" Championships, which drew swimmers from all over Ohio and surrounding states.

Over the years, age group swimming in the Columbus area has steadily grown and is credited by many to be the result of the "availability" of the department's indoor swim center which is not only used to hold age group swim meets, but is used extensively for area swim club practices.

Special arrangements were made for senior citizens to participate free of charge at Sunshine Pool, Monday through Thursday from 10:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. and at the Columbus Swim Center on Wednesday mornings from 9:30 to 10:30. Full-time recreation leaders were in charge of this program.

The department's swimming pools were made available during non-recreational hours on a rental basis to local age group swim teams, school groups and civic associations. Rental of these facilities was based on actual cost to the department for extension of services.

PEDAL BOAT MARINA The Marina was operated in conjunction with the down­

town Riverfront Amphitheater and floating bandshell. 16 pedal boats (previously donated in part by area business­men) were made available for use daily from 11:00 a.m. to 8:?0 p.m. at a nominal charge of 60 cents per person for half an hour.

As an added attraction, senior citizens, handicapped per­sons and other interested participants could ride the two (2) pontoon boats which were donated by McDonalds' Corpora­tion and the Downtown Kiwanis Club. These pontoons were used exclusively for hourly excursions along the river at which time points of interest and historical facts were pre­sented.

1982 Pedal Boats Revenues: 7,083 @ $ .60 $4,249.80

1,216 @ 1.20 1,459.20 49 @ 1.50 73.50 46 @ 1.80 82.80 28 @ Other 61.25

8,422 Riders $5,926.55 Pontoons

767 Riders $1,318.00

CULTURAL ARTS CENTER The Cultural Arts Center is a truly unique model of adap­

tive reuse that saved the life of a beautiful old building and allowed it to become home to a major community cultural institution. Art classes, exhibits, workshops, concerts, poet­ry readings and other artistic programs make the Cultural Arts Center a beehive of activity throughout the year. Main Gallery—The monthly exhibits are selected through a jury process by the visual arts committee of the center. The art forms consist of painting, indoor/outdoor sculpture, ceramics, fibre art, metal work and photography. 168 local and out of town artists were selected to exhibit in 1982.

The Gallery openings or artists' receptions take place the beginning of each month which provides an opportunity for the public to discuss the exhibits with the artists. Loft Gallery—This third floor exhibition space is offered to artists on a first come basis. Each artist is responsible for his own installation and the works are on display for one (1) month. This gallery is unique in Central Ohio. Concerts—Sunday concerts at the Cultural Arts Center have greatly enhanced the performing arts component of the program. Appearances by members of the Columbus Sym­phony Orchestra numbered 13 with 3 other concerts by local musicians' groups rounding out the series.

Courtyard Tuesdays, the summer concert series provided 13 noon concerts for the downtown lunch crowd.

Funding for these concerts was provided by the Ohio Arts Council and the Musicians' Performance Trust Fund. Classes—13 different art classes were offered by the Cultu­ral Arts Center this year. Each class session was 7 to 8 weeks in length. Cost per class was $15.00 for once-a-week and $30.00 for twice-a-week. 2,437 students enrolled in classes at the center. Following is a list of classes offered:

42 CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

Creative Arts Potpourri Contemporary Art Study Drawing Enameling Ceramics Jewelry Metal Techniques Painting Sculpture Weaving (Dye Method) Weaving (On Loom) Weaving (Off Loom) Yoga

Workshops—As a way of enhancing the program workshops were offered to the public. Eight (8) of these workshops were scheduled as follows:

Workshops Art Stop Pottery Art Therapy Puppetry Basketweaving Square Dancing Pattern Quilting Wood Inlay

These workshops were under the sponsorship of the Ohio Arts Council or the Ohio Humanities Council. Poetry—49 poets were scheduled to read their work at the once-a-month poetry series. In an effort to expand the pro­gram, an "open reading" segment was added in September which added another 24 poets to the roster. The audience size had an average of 50-70 people each month. The forma­tion of a Poetry Committee added a new dimension. Signage for the hearing impaired, refreshments and a printed pro­gram were added. Special Events—There were three (3) special events this year: The Wearable Art Show, the Folk Festival and the Commu­nity Arts Project. .

The Wearable Art Show was a one-day program held in the Main Gallery. The wearable art was displayed on models from the Noni Agency in a fashion show setting.

The Community Arts Project was coordinated through the Cultural Arts Center. It was an outreach type program whereby local professional artists presented workshops, demonstrations and performances to children and adults in community recreation and senior centers, and on play­grounds, from March through June 1982. 12 artists partici­pated at 24 sites with 1,463 in attendance.

The Folk Festival was held August 28 and 29. Folk crafts, music and dancing were all part of the festivities in both the Cultural Arts Center and Bicentennial Riverfront Park. Over 2,000 visitors participated in this event. Carrying through the folk theme, September was highlighted by folk-life concerts, lectures and workshops. Dr. Rosemary Joyce, noted folk humanities scholar, assisted with the develop­ment of the entire folk art and culture project. Coversations and Coffee—Each Thursday, a noon time group gathered in the Loft Gallery area to discuss contemporary art issues and exhibits. The speakers, who appeared free of charge, included exhibiting artists, mimes and community leaders. Films and slides added to the group discussions. Tours and Meetings—The Cultural Arts Center provided meeting space for a variety of civic and private organiza­tions.

Tours were conducted for 48 groups from all over Central Ohio.

SUMMER PLAYGROUND PROGRAMS On Wednesday, June 16, the city's 100 supervised play­

grounds opened for the season and ran through Friday, Au­gust 13. All of the 100 playgrounds were operated Monday through Friday from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. The playgrounds located at our 25 community centers were opened for ex­tended hours until 9:00 p.m. Of the 100 playgrounds, 57 were located on school grounds with the remainder at the recrea­tion centers and city parks.

A playground leadership training course was held at Schiller Recreation Center on June 15. The course consisted of workshops and sessions preparing the leaders to conduct playground activities. Playground personnel were men and women who had at least two (2) years of college and who qualified through a civil service examination. The majority of the leaders were college graduates who contributed to the positive development of the playground participants.

The purpose of the supervised playgrounds was: • To provide a safe and wholesome place for children to

play; • To learn new skills; • To make new friends; • To develop good personality/character traits; • To develop leadership ability;

• To experience success; • To develop a sense of fair play and sportsmanship while

having fun; • To develop positive attitudes; and • To take part in structured activities. Special events were conducted on the playgrounds on a

sectional or city-wide basis. The following events were high­lighted during the 1982 season: June 16 - Funathon 1982—Boys and girls were invited to take part in contests, games and exciting first day events. Total participation - 8,765. June 23 - Fishing Derby Highlight—The annual Fishing Derby, sponsored by Columbus Kiwanis Clubs, was highlighted by various contests at Big Walnut, Franklin, Goodale, Krumm, Linden, Schiller, Westgate and Whetstone Park lakes. The Derby was open to boys and girls, ages 12 and under, and ran from June 17 through August 9. Total participation - 339. June 30 - Bicycle Rodeo—Events held at each playground in­volved registration of bicycles, safety checks, and skill events. Total participation - 4,876. July 8 - Kickball Tournament—Playground participants, aged 6-10, competed in team play to determine kickball cham­pions. Total participation - 1,740. July 14 - Playday—Playground and sectional playdays were held involving boys and girls, parents and friends in various contests, tournaments and picnics. Total participation -4,730. July 16 - Talent /Variety Show—At each playground boys and girls performed for parents and friends. Total participation -2,252. July 21 - Sectional Horseshoe Tournament—Boys and girls competed in single elimination tournament play at sectional sites. Total participation - 684. July 23 - Sectional Drama Festival—Playground drama skits were staged by boys and girls involved in the drama pro­gram at sectional sites. Total participation - 4,100. July 28 - Sectional Co-Ed Volleyball Tournaments—Co-ed com­petition was held; and modified rules were established for play. Some playgrounds considered this a teenage event while others involved the entire family. Total participation -3,360. City-Wide Open Track and Field Meet July 29 - Boys; July 30 -Girls—Boys and girls, aged 6-15 participated in track and field events. Total participation - 1,430. August 2-7 - Sectional Softball Tournaments—Held at all play­grounds for interested boys and girls. August 9-12 - City Softball Finals—Single elimination softball tournaments were held as a culminating activity for the league play that took place in each of 13 playground dis­tricts. Play was conducted in the Junior Division (aged 12 and under); and Intermediates (13-15). Championship teams were determined for both boys and girls. Total participation - 5,300. August 11 - Festival Day—The Festival Day on all play­grounds was the final special event of the season and in­cluded: arts and crafts displays, clown contests, face paint­ing, carnival games, parades and refreshments. Total parti­cipation - 6,200.

SPECIAL PROGRAMS Art Van

In addition to the daily arts and crafts programs, 77 of our sites were visited by the art van. The Columbus College of Art and Design provided two (2) instructors and the supplies for this enrichment program. Total participation - 2,664. Basketball Clinic

Basketball clinics were made possible through the Dis­patch Charities and were presented at the recreation cen­ters. Total participation - 4,467. Community Arts Project

Arts participation workshops and concerts were provided by local artists. The program was funded by a grant from the Ohio Arts Council. Total participation - 494. Tennis

Each recreation center with tennis facilities provided free tennis lessons during the spring and early fall. Tennis courts were available to the public year-round, and those with lights were lighted April through September for night play. There was no charge to use the tennis courts and play was limited to one (1) hour when others were waiting. The Great­er Columbus Tennis Association provided our playground program with used tennis balls and rackets. Our leaders taught beginning tennis as part of the playground program at those sites with courts.

CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 43

The annual Gold Circle Central Ohio Tennis Tournament, sponsored by Gold Circle for the ninth year, and conducted by our department, was held from July 26 through August 22. There were 902 entries in 17 different events and age classifications.

Traveling Zoo Each playground was visited by our Traveling Zoo, a spe­

cially designed bus with ten (10) air conditioned cages to carry small animals. The animals were provided by the Col­umbus Zoo. Total participation - 3,915.

1982 PLAYGROUND LOCATIONS All of the 100 playgrounds listed below were operated Monday through Friday from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. The 25

community recreation centers (underscored), were operated Monday through Friday from 10:00 a.m. until 9:00 p.m.

10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73.

ALPINE SCHOOL — 1590 Alphine Drive (29) AMERICAN LEGION — 3299 Riverside Drive (02) ARLINGTON PARK SCHOOL — 2400 Mock Road (19) AUDUBON — 2779 Audubon Road (11) AVALON SCHOOL — 5220 Avalon Place (19) AVONDALE SCHOOL — 156 Avondale Avenue (22) BARACK RECREATION CENTER — 580 Woodrow Avenue (07) BARNETT RECREATION CENTER — 1184 Barnett Road (27) BEATTY RECREATION CENTER — 247 North Ohio Avenue (03) BEAUMONT SCHOOL — 2155 Fenton Street (24) BERWICK SCHOOL — 2595 Scottwood Road (09) BINNS SCHOOL — 1080 Binns Boulevard (04) BLACKBURN RECREATION CENTER — 263 Carpenter Street (05) BRENTNELL RECREATION CENTER — 1280 Brentnell Avenue (19) BREVOORT — 3545 Indianola Avenue (14) BURROUGHS SCHOOL — 2585 Sullivant Avenue (04) CASSADY SCHOOL — 2500 North Cassady Avenue (19) CEDARWOOD SCHOOL — 775 Bartfield Drive (07) CLINTON SCHOOL — 10 Clinton Heights Avenue (02) COOKE RECREATION CENTER — 3911 Dresden Avenue (24) CRANBROOK SCHOOL — 908 Bricker Boulevard (21) DESHLER SCHOOL — 1234 Deshler Avenue (06) DEVONSHIRE SCHOOL — 6286 Ambleside Drive (29) DRIVING PARK RECREATION CENTER,— 1100 Rhoads Avenue (05) DUXBERRY SCHOOL — 1779 East Maynard Avenue (19) EASTGATE SCHOOL — 1939 Stratford Way (19) EASTHAVEN SCHOOL — 2360 Garnet Place (27) EAST LINDEN SCHOOL — 2500 Perdue Avenue (11) ELEVENTH AVENUE SCHOOL — 880 East Eleventh Avenue (11) FAIRMOOR SCHOOL — 3281 Mayfair Park Place (13) FAIRWOOD SCHOOL — 726 Fairwood Avenue (05) FAR EAST RECREATION CENTER — 1826 Lattimer Drive (27) FRANKLIN PARK — 1826 Franklin Park South (05) GEORGIAN HEIGHTS SCHOOL — 784 Georgian Heights (04) GLADSTONE SCHOOL — 1965 Gladstone Avenue (11) GLEN ECHO — 2795 Glen Echo Drive (02) GLENWOOD RECREATION CENTER — 1925 West Broad Street (23) GODMAN GUILD — 321 West Second Avenue (01) GOODALE — 120 West Goodale Boulevard (15) HAUNTZ — 480 Columbian Avenue (23) HEYL SCHOOL — 760 Reinhard Avenue (06) HIGHLAND SCHOOL — 40 South Highland Avenue (04) HOLTON RECREATION CENTER — 303 North Eureka Avenue (04) HUY SCHOOL — 1545 Huy Road (24) INDIAN MOUND RECREATION CENTER — 3901 Parsons Avenue (07) INDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL — 50 East Henderson Road (14) INNIS SCHOOL — 3399 Kohr Place (11) JOAN — 1927 Myrtle Avenue (11) KARNS — 1295 South Champion Avenue (06) KENLAWN — 1679 Brighton Road (11) KENT SCHOOL — 1414 Gault Street (05) KENWOOD SCHOOL — 3770 Shattuck Avenue (21) KRUMM RECREATION CENTER — 854 Alton Avenue (19) LEA WOOD SCHOOL — 1677 Hamilton Road (27) LIBERTY SCHOOL — 2949 Whitlow Road (27) LINDBERGH SCHOOL — 2541 Lindbergh Drive (23) LINDEN RECREATION CENTER — 1254 Briarwood Avenue (11) LINDEN SCHOOL — 2626 Cleveland Avenue (11) LIVINGSTON — 760 Livingston Avenue (05) MAIN SCHOOL — 1469 East Main Street (05) MAIZE SCHOOL — 4360 Maize Road (24) MARION-FRANKLIN RECREATION CENTER — 281 Lockbourne Road (07) MARYLAND — Atcheson Street and Fairfield (03) MAYBURY SCHOOL — 2633 Maybury Road (27) McKINLEY — 1453 McKinley Avenue (22) MEDARY SCHOOL — 2500 Medary Avenue (02) MILO-GROGAN RECREATION CENTER — 862 East Second Avenue (01) MOLER SCHOOL — 1560 Moler Road (07) NORTHGATE SCHOOL — 6655 Sharon Woods Boulevard (29) NORTHTOWNE SCHOOL — 4767 Northtowne Boulevard (29) OAKMONT SCHOOL — 5666 Oakmont Drive (27) OHIO SCHOOL — 505 South Ohio Avenue (05) PARKMOOR SCHOOL — 1711 Penworth Drive (29)

44 CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

74 75 76 77 78 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. 84. 85. 86. 87.

90. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. 97.

99. 100.

PINECREST SCHOOL — 4025 East Astor Avenue (27) PONTIAC — 3146 Maize Road (11) RIVERBEND — 1609 Bluhm Road (23) SALEM SCHOOL — 1040 Garvey Road (29) SAWYER RECREATION CENTER — 1056 Atcheson Street (03) SCHILLER RECREATION CENTER — 1069 Jaeger Street (06) SCIOTO TRAIL SCHOOL — 2941 South High Street (07) SCOTTWOOD SCHOOL — 3392 Scottwood Road (27) SHADY LANE SCHOOL — 1488 South Shady Lane Road (27) SHARON SCHOOL — 5400 Foster Street (14) SHEPARD SCHOOL — 873 Walcutt Avenue (19) SMITH ROAD SCHOOL — 1249 Smith Road (07) SOUTHEAST LIONS — 185 Barthman Avenue (06) STOCKBRIDGE SCHOOL — 3550 South Champion Avenue (07) SULLIVANT GARDENS RECREATION CENTER — 755 Renick Street (23) SUNSHINE RECREATION CENTER — 667 Sullivant Avenue (15) THOMPSON RECREATION CENTER — 1189 Dennison Avenue (01) TUTTLE RECREATION CENTER — 240 West Oakland Avenue (01) WALDEN SCHOOL — 1860 Walden Drive (29) WEINLAND SCHOOL — 1280 Summit Street (01) WEST BROAD SCHOOL — 2744 West Broad Street (04) WESTGATE RECREATION CENTER — 455 South Westgate Avenue (04) WEST MOUND SCHOOL — 2051 West Mound Street (23) WHETSTONE RECREATION CENTER — 3923 North High Street (14) WINDSOR TERRACE RECREATION CENTER — 1424 Brooks Avenue (11) WINTERSET SCHOOL — 4776 Winterset Drive (21) WOODWARD PARK RECREATION CENTER — 5147 Karl Road (29)

GOLF COURSES w i t h 1 2 to 20 players each. The Columbus Public High FORE! Golfing enthusiasts abound on the five (5) municipal School leagues also played on our courses. Golf tourna-golf courses operated by the Columbus Recreation and ments were extremely popular. Church groups, fraternities Parks Department. Courses and golf pros for 1982 were: and sororities, charitable organizations and company spon-

AIRPORT—900 North Hamilton Road sored golf leagues booked outings from early sprint into late Nick Scarpitti, Golf Pro fall. During the months from April through October, the BOLTON FIELD—6005 Alkire Road department scheduled 74 outings with approximately 4,150 Guy Amicon, Golf Pro players. RAYMOND MEMORIAL Senior Citizens' Golf Tournament—The 6th Annuar Senior 3860 Trabue Road Citizens' Golf Tournament for those 60 years of age and old-Bill Rosemond, Golf Pro e r ' attracted 172 players, both male and female, was held at WALNUT HILL (9 Hole) Bolton Field on September 20 and Airport on September 21. 6001 East Livingston Avenue Refreshments and prizes were donated by local businesses. Billy Collins, Golf Pro Memberships—For the dedicated golfer, the department WILSON ROAD (9 Hole) offered memberships at its' 18-hole courses. In addition to 1900 Wilson Road a n i n d l v l d u a l membership, one could be purchased for Greg Poston Golf Pro Juniors (ages 13-18); Senior Citizens (60 + ), husband and

-,„ , ' ,„, , wife, or a three-way. Each course was open seven (7) days a week, vear-round ^_w T_ . i-> .u

weather permitting; operated under the guidance of a golf i 8 r u C u ° u : 7 ? u ^ m g t h t w l n t e r m o n t h s ' w h e n s e v e r e

professional and offered a fully outfitted pro shop wlfer" ^ f f ^ ^ ' ^ 1 ^ ° n , r h e C ? u r ¥ S l m £ m b e r s °lour g ° l f

golfers purchased golf balls, clubs, tees sweaters e t c T h e offered free, basic golf instruction. The one-hour ses-clubhouses contained concession facilities s l o n pl°^de^}alses f° r a

c ,du l t s ' children and teenagers and Leagues and Toumaments-The three 18-hole courses and ^ C ^ W ^ K / w h ^ t S e i ^ o ^ i S ? -

raguefandtouTnamenrin^ TJ? '" de7

I?an?f,°r g° l f

l nS i n a n C l a l teX&Sutlto^^Z^McwSoT leagues and tournaments. In 1982, there were 75 golf leagues 1982 appear on the following pages.

GREEN FEES AIRPORT GOLF COURSE 17,232 18-hole Weekday ($4.75) « S 1 s„ n n

66 18-hole Weekday ($4.50)-1981 Rate YYYYYYYYY * 29700 13,037 18-hole Weekend ($5.75) 74 QRP 7S , Ani \*o\t°\e W e e k e n d ($5,251-1981 Rate '...Y.YY.Y. 2100 1,425 18-hole Weekend after 4:00 p.m. ($4.25) 6 05625 4,802 Leagues ($4.00) lqpnRnn 4,744 Senior Citizens/Weekday ($3.50) Y.YY.Y 16 604 00 l vw l e n i ° r Cozens/Weekday ({3.25)—1981 Rate ..Y.Y.Y.Y" 1950 1,332 Senior Citizens/Weekend ($4.00) , , i j ' « „

26 RaincheckMilitary Weekday ($2.50) ........Y.Y.Y.Y 65 00 37 Raincheck/Military Weekend ($3.00) . u i n n

42,711 i i i ^H $204,524.50

CART RENTALS 2,030 9-hole($ 6.16) .

.4,365 18-hole ($10.90) ......Y.YY. $ 12.504.80 6,395 - 47,578.50

$ 60,083.30 MEMBERSHIPS

11 Adult Members ($275.00) , , „ , , „ . 5 Adult Members (3-way) ($325.00) ..Y.YY '. * i f i ^ n n 2 Husband and Wife ($375.00) ' ^ n n n

40 Senior Citizens ($130.00) - /.J0,'00

14 Senior Citizens (3-way) ($160.00)' Y.YY.Y. 9 vinnn 2 Juniors ($130.00) 2,240.00 1 Junior (3-way) ($160.00) Y.YY. ?S2'22

-r lbO.OO $ 13,260.00

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982 45

MISCELLANEOUS Apartment Rental $ 1,035.00 Food Commission 8,248.97 Golf Ball Retrieval 900.00 Locker Rental 130.00 Telephone Commission 71.32

$ 10,385.29

TOTAL REVENUE AIRPORT GOLF COURSE $288,253.09

BOLTON FIELD GOLF COURSE GREEN FEES

15,410 18-hole Weekday ($4.75) $ 73,197.50 8 18-hole Weekday ($4.50>—1981 Rate 36.00

11,894 18-hole Weekend ($5.75) 68,390.50 1,341 18-hole Weekend after 4:00 p.m. ($4.25) 5,699.25 4,678 Leagues ($4.00) 18,712.00

56 Leagues extra holes ($.75) 42.00 3,640 Senior Citizens/Weekday ($3.50) 12,740.00

975 Senior Citizens/Weekend ($4.00) 3,900.00 34 Raincheck/Military Weekday ($2.50) 85.00 33 Raincheck/Military Weekend ($3.00) 99.00 5 Raincheck/Senior Weekday ($1.75) 8.75 3 Raincheck/Senior Weekend ($2.00) 6JX)

38,077 $182,916.00

CART RENTALS 1,895 9-hole ($ 6.16) $ 11,673.20 4,828 18-hole ($10.90) 52.625.20 6,723 $ 64,298.40

MEMBERSHIPS 49 Adult Members ($275.00) $ 13,475.00 9 Adult Members (3-way) ($325.00) 2,925.00 8 Husband and Wife ($375.00) 3,000.00

60 Senior Citizens ($130.00) 7,800.00 39 Senior Citizens (3-way) ($160.00) 6,240.00 8 Juniors ($130.00) 1,040.00 3 Juniors (3-way) ($160.00) 480.00

176 $ 34,960.00

MISCELLANEOUS Apartment Rental $ 1,035.00 Food Commission 16,101.74 Golf Ball Retrieval 600.00 Locker Rental 280.00 Telephone Commission 78.08

$ 18,094.82

TOTAL REVENUE BOLTON FIELD GOLF COURSE $300,269.22

RAYMOND MEMORIAL GOLF COURSE GREEN FEES

18,169 18-hole Weekday ($4.75) $ 86,302.75 13 18-hole Weekday ($4.50)—1981 Rate 58.50

11,287 18-hole Weekend ($5.75) 64,900.25 19 18-hole Weekend ($5.25)—1981 Rate 99.75

1,313 18-hole Weekend after 4:00 p.m. ($4.25) 5,580.25 3,965 Leagues ($4.00) 15,860.00

8 Leagues extra holes ($.75) 6.00 4,831 Senior Citizens/Weekday ($3.50) 16,908.50

7 Senior Citizens/Weekday ($3.25)—1981 Rate 22.75 1,933 Senior Citizens/Weekend ($4.00) 7,732.00

4 Senior Citizens/Weekend ($3.75)—1981 Rate 15.00 6 Raincheck/Military Weekday ($2.50) 15.00 8 Raincheck/Military Weekend ($3.00) 24.00

41,563 $197,524.75

CART RENTALS 1,731 9-hole ($ 6.16) $ 10,662.96 3,956 18-hole ($10.90) 43,120.40 5,687 $ 53,783.36

MEMBERSHIPS 26 Adult Members ($275.00) $ 7,150.00 7 Adult Members (3-way) ($325.00) 2,275.00 1 Husband and Wife ($375.00) 375.00 1 Husband and Wife (3-way) $475.00) 475.00

63 Senior Citizens ($130.00) 8,190.00 20 Senior Citizens (3-way) ($160.00) 3,200.00 17 Junior Members ($130.00) 2,210.00 2 Junior Members (3-way) ($160.00) 320.00

137 $ 24,195.00

46 CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

'

MISCELLANEOUS . . . $ 1,200.00 Apartment Rental 8,319.34 Food Commission 330.00 Locker Rental • 51.73 Telephone Commission $ 9 , 9 0 1 , 0 7

TOTAL REVENUE RAYMOND MEMORIAL GOLF COURSE $285,404.18

WALNUT HILL GOLF COURSE GREEN FEES $ 32,690.00

9,340 9-hole Weekday ($3.50) . . . . . . . . . . * i q u 6 9-hole Weekday ($3.25)—1981 Rate £ J ° "

6,686 9-hole Weekend ($4.00) 162425 763 18-hole Weekday ($4.75) • 640550

1,114 18-hole Weekend ($5.75) 492 50 394 Extra holes ($1.25) ^S'oo 516 Extra holes ($1.75) ••••••• ™ ^ 136 18-hole Weekday/Senior Citizens ($3.50) *fs.uu 19 18-hole Weekend/Senior Citizens ($4.00) >°)>v

3,665 Leagues ($4.00) 14,ob0.uu

iwS $ 86'090-75

CART RENTALS «i4nri7 84 2,274 9-hole($ 6.16) * 562440

516 18-hole ($10.90) 5,b24.40 -J^ $ 19,632.24

MISCELLANEOUS t „.,- n n

Apartment Rental $ °45.00 Food Commission £0/91 Telephone Commission 39.Z1

$ 12,835.43 TOTAL REVENUE WALNUT HILL GOLF COURSE $118,558.42

WILSON ROAD GOLF COURSE GRFFN FFFS

10,885 9-hole Weekday ($3.25) $ 35,376.25 3 9-hole Weekday ($3.00)—1981 Rate 9-00

8,607 9-hole Weekend ($3.50) 30,124.50 3,222 18-hole Weekday ($4.25) 13,693.50 3,318 Leagues ($3.50) 11.613.00 2,254 18-hole Weekday ($5.25) 11,833.50 5,302 Senior Citizens/Weekday ($3.00) 15,906.00

74 Senior Citizens/Weekend ($3.50) 259.00 33,665 $118,814.75

CART RENTALS 479 9-hole ($ 6.16) $ 2,950.64 48 18-hole ($10.90) 523.20

527 $ 3,473.84

MISCELLANEOUS Food Commission $ 1,016.90 Golf Ball Retreival 300.00 Telephone Commission 24.10

$ 1,341.00

TOTAL REVENUE WILSON ROAD GOLF COURSE $123,629.59

SENIOR CITIZENS CENTRAL OHIO AREA AGENCY ON AGING

This division was created by the Ohio Commission on Ag­ing in 1973 to plan, implement and administer various feder­ally-funded programs for elderly persons. The service areas include the following counties: Delaware Franklin Pickaway Fairfield Licking Union Fayette Madison Administration—The Area Agency consists of twelve (12) staff persons. Their responsibility is the development and administration of an Area Plan for services and the coor­dination of new and existing services for the elderly. Federal grant expenditures for the Area Agency in 1982 totaled $150,311 and State Subsidy funds in the amount of $31,750. The Area Agency has a 24-member Advisory Council. Assistance for Independent Living—The Ohio Commission on Aging awarded a grant to the Area Agency on Aging to be used as matching funds for Title XX of the Social Security Act. These funds were used in the following program areas:

Homemaker Services Home Health Aide Services

Home-Delivered Meals Chore Services Information and Referral Services Total A.I.L. expenditures for Central Ohio was $205,190.

Elderly Nutrition Program—Title III-C of the Older Amer­icans' Act is designed to provide older persons, particularly those with low income, with low cost, nutritionally sound meals served in strategically located centers where persons can obtain other social and rehabilitative services. Besides promoting better health among the older segment of the population, the program is aimed at reducing the isolation of old age.

Following is a summary of the program for Central Ohio in 1982:

Congregate Meals 420,000 Home-Delivered Meals 260,000

680,000 Total Grant $1,698,479 Total Sites Operated 49 Total Persons Served 12,000

Social Services—Title III-B of the Older American's Act con­tributed financial assistance to provide services necessary

CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982 47

to help elderly persons secure and mainta in their indepen­dence in a h o m e env i ronment and to remove individual and social bar r iers to e c o n o m i c and persona l i ndependence . Total grants for this program—$1,269,227.

The primary services provided and the n u m b e r of persons receiving these services follows:

Service Recipient Home Maintenance 300 Escort 1,300 Health Services 2,000 Homemaker 2,300 Information/Referral 1,000 Legal Services 900 Outreach 6,400 Recreation 1,300 Transporta t ion 3,500 Nursing Home O m b u d s m a n 400

Total 19,400 Title IV-A Training Grant—The purpose of this grant was to improve the qual i ty of service and to he lp mee t critical shortages of adequate ly t ra ined personnel for p rograms in t h e field of ag ing . D u r i n g 1982, t h e Area A g e n c y w a s awarded $7,500 for the following training events:

1) Growing P r o b l e m s of t h e Elder ly : Alcohol ism, De­pression and Stress

2) Time Management Workshop 3) A Con t inuum of Growth and Under s t and ing 4) Senior Center Directors ' Workshop

County Allocation—502 Subsidy—The purpose of the County Al locat ion fund is to in i t i a t e major s u p p o r t for mul t i ­purpose senior centers . Use of these funds included the em­p loyment of a M P S C Coordinator . T h e Area Agency re­ceived $22,000 dur ing 1982. Mul t i -Purpose Senior C e n t e r s — T h e A r e a A g e n c y w a s awarded a state grant enti t led House Bill 1084 and a Federal G r a n t en t i t l ed E.D.A. to b e u s e d for t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n , renovat ion or a l terat ion of mul t i -purpose senior centers . Projects funded dur ing 1982 were :

H.B. 1084 E.D.A. Fayette Co.

Commiss ioners 48,756 146,170 City of Granview 39,700 Village of Canal

Winchester 16,912 50,738 City of Grove City 83,697 Columbus Recreat ion

and Pa rks Dept 5,000 City of Westerville 70,008 67,796 JEwish Center 50,000

Totals 314,073 264,804 Home Energy Assistance Program (HEAP)—The Ohio Commis­sion on Aging awarded a H E A P grant to the Area Agency in the amount of $15,988 to assist eligible older persons in ap­plying for an energy credit based on their income level and size of household .

Total Applicat ions Dis t r ibuted 52,933 Total Personal Contrac ts 4,252

SENIOR CITIZENS' RECREATION CENTERS/FACILITIES The Depar tmen t of Recreat ion and Pa rks operates eight

) (8) senior cit izens' recreat ion centers at the following sites J th roughout the city:

BARBER R O S E L E A C E N T E R 4048 Roselea Place J u d y Backst rom, Center Director 1100 EAST BROAD R E C R E A T I O N C E N T E R 1100 East Broad St ree t Kay Barnhouse , Center Director LINTON G A R D E N S ' RECREATION CENTER 2385 Mock Road Judy the Dodson, Center Director MARION SQUARE RECREATION CENTER 1316 Marion Road Linda Schuler , Center Director MARTIN J A N I S M U L T I - P U R P O S E CENTER 600 11th Avenue Ardath Lynch, Center Director MCDOWELL RECREATION CENTER 275 McDowell S t ree t Lois Gordon, Center Director SAWYER TOWERS RECREATION CENTER 975 Caldwell P lace Queen Mitchell. Center Director

SECOND AND SUMMIT RECREATION CENTER 95 East Second Avenue Sue Ulrich, Center Director Combined, these centers provided the following programs

for residents of Frankl in County, 60 years of age or older:

ARTS Basketry Beadwork Cake Decorat ing Candlemaking Canning Ceramics China Paint ing Cooking Copper Enamel ing Crochet Decoupage Flower Arranging Flower Making (Silk) Furni ture Refinishing Glass Etching Hort icul ture

AND CRAFTS Kni t t ing Leathercraft Macrame ' Pa in t ing Pot te ry Quilt ing Rug Hooking Scu lp tu re Sewing Stained Glass Tinsel Art Tole Pa in t ing Weaving Wood Carving Wood S h o p

EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES Ant ique Class Italian Class

Nutr i t ion P iano Sign Language Small H o m e Repairs Speech/Hear ing Lessons Relaxat ion and Stress S t roke Rehabil i ta t ion Travelogues Writing

Book Reviews Current Events Diet Class French Class German Class Guitar Health Screening Humani t ies Income Tax Infor­

mation/Assistance (In addit ion to these activities, n u m e r o u s programs of an

educational and enter ta in ing na ture were provided.)

PERFORMING GROUPS Barbershop Chorus Drill Team Choral Ensemble Orchestra Choral Reading P u p p e t s Drama R h y t h m Band

PHYSICAL ACTIVITIES Aerobic Dance Ballroom Dance Lessons and Dances Billiards Bowling Dancercize Dart Ball Hiking Pat tern Dance Lessons Physical Fi tness Ping Pong Round Dance Lessons and Dances Shuffleboard Square Dance Lessons and Dances Tap Dance Warm Water ExErc ises Yoga

SOCIAL ACTIVITIES Backgammon Model RR Club Card Lessons/Par t ies Model Yacht Club Couples, Club Po-Ke-No Cribbage Spor t s F o r u m Ladies ' G r o u p Tr ips Men's Group In addit ion we have g roups in each center which meet to

perform some special service for the communi ty , such as making lap robes for ve te rans ' hospi tals , or for the special chi ldren 's centers ; stuffing enve lopes for var ious c o m m u n ­ity organizations; helping wi th the Secret Santa replies, etc.

SPECIAL EVENTS Antique Sale

October 5, 1982 the 14th Annual Ant ique Sale was held at the Martin J an i s Center. 71 senior citizens b rought i tems for sale. Sales totalled $8,505.03. An auct ion was held at the end of the event. Arbor Day

Senior cit izens pu t 15,000 t ree seedl ings in bags to be given to the school chi ldren for plant ing on Arbor Day. Billiards Tournament

87 senior citizens par t ic ipated in the first annua l County-Wide Eight-Ball Billiards T o u r n a m e n t held on October 14.

48 CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

Bowling Tournament , , , The centers ' annual city-wide tournament was held on

Monday, J u n e 14 at Big Western Lanes. We had a total ot 19b participants. Eight (8) t rophies were donated by the lanes. This handicapped match offered a competi t ive event for en­thusiastic bowlers. Golden Age Hobby Show ,.

1 715 items made by Central Ohio senior citizens were dis­played at the 34th Annual Golden Hobby Show.

T h e s h o w w a s s p o n s o r e d by t h e C o l u m b u s Cit izen-Journal and conducted by the Columbus Recreat ion and Parks Department .

Admission to the show and parking at the Jan i s Center were free to the public.

It is est imated that over 5,000 people viewed the exhibi ts which ran from May 7th th rough May 14th. 705 seniors en­tered the show (145 men and 560 women). The oldest partici­pant was 94 years of age.

Judges for the show awarded 1st, 2nd, 3rd and honorable mention r ibbons. First prize winners were j udged in 28 ma­jor categories , wi th gold, si lver and b ronze meda l l ions awarded. A separate category of judges then chose four (4) Grand Prize winners from the gold medal winners . P laques were presented to these winners .

Highlights of the show included t h e Grand Ball; s tage shows, craft demonstra t ions and workshops . The Greater Columbus Arts Festival

This event was staged in the downtown area dur ing the first week in June .

Two and three dimensional displays, the work of seniors, were installed in the Sta tehouse Rotunda .

Members from our centers conducted demons t ra t ions in weaving, macrame ' , painting, rug hooking, s tained glass, woodcarving, pr int making and basketry. Golf Tournament

172 senior citizens took pa r t in t h e 6th Annual Senior Citizens' Golf Tournament . The event was held on the 19th and 20th of Sep tember at Bolton and Airport Golf Courses. Prizes were donated by many area bus inessmen.

SPECIAL PROGRAMS Stroke Rehabilitation Day Care

A graduate program in S t roke Rehabil i tat ion Day Care Treatment was operated by Riverside Methodis t Hospital as a component of the Barber Roselea Center and was the only one of it 's k ind in this country . It endeavored to re turn stroke victims to their homes , communi t i e s and work activi­ties through individualized occupat ional and speech ther­apy-

GOLDEN HOBBY SHOP The Golden Hobby Shop is a year-round non-profit con­

signment shop featuring the handicrafts of Frankl in County senior citizens. 1982 marked the shop 's first full year in the new headquar ters at the former Third Street School at 630 South Third Street in German Village.

Net sales for the year totalled $126,711.50, an increase of $45,000 over the previous year. 162 new consignors jo ined the shop, bringing the n u m b e r of active accounts to 2,064. Payment checks to these individual senior citizens, nurs ing homes and/or other senior ci t izens ' g roups were mai led monthly. The acquisi t ion of an outs ide compu te r service eased intake and sales bookkeeping .

The Golden Hobby Shop ' s two (2) recreation personnel worked with a Board of Trus tees and 120 communi ty volun­teers who served as daily managers , bookkeepers , hosts and hostesses, craft leaders and as intake, display and sales staff. Volunteer hours cont r ibuted to the shop in 1982 exceeded 11,000 hours.

Two (2) series of free workshops in bo th the spr ing and summer provided educat ional oppor tuni t ies for people of all ages in such areas as coun ted cross stitch, soft sculpture crochet, needlepoin t , baske t s , comfor te rs , b ra ided rugs favors a n d sewing ideas. Quil t ing Bees con t inued every Tuesday th roughout the year with both informal instruct ion a n d p l a n n e d w o r k s h o p s . A " W o o d S h o w " h e l d Apr i l through July featured all the senior craftsmen working in wood with special displays and demons t ra t ions .

The shop regularly hosted bus tours traveling th roughou t the Un i t ed S t a t e s inc lud ing n u m e r o u s g roups wi th t h e H o m e E x t e n s i o n Clubs ' na t iona l conven t ion . E n g l a n d ' s Princess Michael of Kent was the mos t memorab le indi­vidual guest .

Shop activities included month ly displays at the Bexley and Upper Arlington libraries cont r ibut ing a decorated t ree

to Children 's Hospital Fest ival of Trees , handl ing the book­keeping for t h e Go lden Age H o b b y Show, and providing selling displays at t h e Ohio S ta te Fair and Ohio Retired Teachers ' S ta te Convent ion.

ADULT SPORTS Providing an oppor tun i ty for adul t s to par t ic ipate in orga­

nized supervised spor ts p rog rams was the pr imary function of the Adult Spor t s Sect ion.

P rograms were available in the following spor ts : basket­ball, touch football, soccer, softball and volleyball .

Adult Spor t s also assis ted n u m e r o u s in t ramura l league programs for adul t s and y o u t h s in these activities.

INDOOR PROGRAMS (September-April) Basketball—The adu l t b a s k e t b a l l p r o g r a m c o m p r i s e d 36 leagues total l ing 290 t e a m s and m o r e t h a n 4,300 part ic i­pants—all of which were organized and superv ised by the Sports Sect ion. A b r e a k d o w n follows: Men's Open Division

16 leagues 128 t e a m s Men's Industr ia l Division

12 leagues 96 t eams Men's Tom T h u m b Division

7 leagues 56 t e a m s Women's Division

1 league 10 t eams Also, 3 city invitat ional t o u r n a m e n t s and 5 city elimina­

tion t ou rnamen t s were c o n d u c t e d for 67 t eams . Ano the r 21 intramural adul t leagues , involving 157 t eams and approx­imately 1,700 pa r t i c ipan t s , w e r e r e n d e r e d a s s i s t ance by be ing p r o v i d e d w i t h g y m n a s i u m s p a c e and /o r officials. Other groups assisted in a s imilar m a n n e r were : Knigh t s of C o l u m b u s S t a t e T o u r n a m e n t , B l i s s Col lege , C o l u m b u s Business Universi ty, F rank l in Univers i ty and t h e Ohio In­sti tute of Technology in t r amura l and inter-scholast ic pro­grams , Ohio Whee l cha i r A s s o c i a t i o n l e ague g a m e s , Co­lumbus Associat ion of t h e Deaf Regional T o u r n a m e n t and the Nazarene Church District T o u r n a m e n t . Volleyball—The a d u l t vo l l eyba l l p r o g r a m c o m p r i s e d 26 leagues total l ing 222 t e a m s and m o r e t h a n 2,180 partici­pants . A b reakdown follows: Men's Division

6 leagues 46 t eams Women 's Division

6 leagues 54 t eams Co-Rec Division

14 leagues 122 t eams The 8th Annua l Volleyball T o u r n a m e n t a t t rac ted 49 t eams

(21 co-rec, 14 men ' s and 14 w o m e n ' s involving approx imate ­ly 490 par t ic ipants .

Other g roups prov ided g y m n a s i u m space and/or officials were : 8 i n t r amura l adu l t vol leybal l l eagues involving 64 teams.

Two volleyball clinics were sponso red by the Spor t s Sec­t ion. 15 ins t ruc to rs ass i s ted 288 p a r t i c i p a n t s in the i r en­deavor to learn t h e fundamenta l s of t h e game . Jogging—The "P lace Yourse l f for Li fe" P r o g r a m al lowed jogging en thus ias t s to run six (6) days a week in various athletic complexes . This was the four th year for th i s pro­gram and 790 par t ic ipants were regis tered.

The following s ta t is t ics reflect the scope of the indoor programs:

1) Permits Issued 15,210 (daily, week ly a n d seasonal)

2) Games Scheduled Basketball—2,580 g a m e s involving 2,511 referees, 597

scorers, 523 a t t e n d a n t s Volleyball—4,028 players (1,343 matches) , involving 352

officials and 226 a t t e n d a n t s OUTDOOR PROGRAM (April-November) Baseball—Baseball o rgan iza t ions rece ived a grea t deal of assistance and coopera t ion inc luded : 7 c o m m u n i t y Litt le League p rograms involving 200 t eams , 2 C o l u m b u s Publ ic and 9 parochial school t e ams , 2 adul t t e ams , 1 American Legion t eam and the C o l u m b u s a n d Cent ra l Ohio Amateur Baseball Federa t ion . Football—14 fields w e r e cons t ruc t ed , ma in t a ined and re­served on a week ly bas is t o a c c o m m o d a t e t h e schedul ing of 4 depa r tmen t - sponso red t o u c h football leagues involving Ohio Ins t i tu te of Techno logy leagues wi th 24 t e a m s and 300 part icipants; 1 w o m e n ' s professional t eam; m o r e t h a n 50 Little League t e a m s r ep re sen t i ng 10 c o m m u n i t y organiza­tions and 2 Adul t T o u c h Invi ta t ional T o u r n a m e n t s , involv­ing 24 t eams .

CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 49

Soccer—Adult l eagues o rgan ized by t h e S p o r t s Sec t ion totalled 5 (1 men's—5 teams; 4 co-rec—29 teams). 15 fields were constructed, mainta ined and reserved to accommo­date the schedul ing of matches for 32 adul t and 6 school soccer teams. These facilities also served 1 men ' s rugby team, 1 school girl 's field hockey team and 5 communi ty soccer organizations involving 230 teams. Softball—On 114 d iamonds , the Spor t s Sect ion organized 177 leagues, involving 1,442 t eams and approximate ly 26,000 participants. Eleven end of the season tou rnamen t s were conducted with 250 t eams compet ing for city championsh ip honors. Overall, there was an increase of 7 leagues, involv­ing 63 addit ional teams. Fol lowing is a b reakdown in the classification of leagues: Men's Open and Indust r ia l Slow P i t ch

111 leagues 902 teams Women's Slow Pi tch

35 leagues 276 teams Church Slow Pi tch

7 leagues 67 t eams Men's Fast Pi tch

1 league 5 teams Co-Rec Slow Pi tch

24 leagues 192 t eams Additionally, facilities and/or ass is tance was rendered in

the operat ion of 26 in t ramura l men ' s , boy', w o m e n ' s and girl's leagues involving 320 t eams and approximate ly 5,000 par t i c ipan t s ; 76 inv i ta t iona l t o u r n a m e n t s i n c l u d i n g t h e A.S.A. District Championsh ip s , 2 Hospital State Tourna­ments , the Knights of Co lumbus District Tournament , the Ohio Special Olympics , the Sta te Firefighters ' Tournament , Regional A.S.A. Industr ia l and church tou rnamen t s . In all tournaments , 1,500 t eams competed . Nine c o m m u n i t y orga­nizations (65 teams), 45 publ ic and parochial school teams, 2

: fast pitch, 16 special reques t s and the High School Girls ' i Central District T o u r n a m e n t reserved facilities for games ; and league play.

'. Summer Basketball—8 leagues were played at 2 athletic com-[ plexes involving 60 t eams with more than 800 adul t and i senior high school par t ic ipants . A 16 t e am championsh ip t tournament conc luded the s u m m e r season, i Summer Volleyball—4 leagues (2 men's—2 co-rec) were orga­

nized involving 33 t eams with more than 320 par t ic ipants . A triples outdoor volleyball t o u r n a m e n t was init iated in-

/ volving 8 men ' s and 6 co-rec t eams wi th 50 par t ic ipants . The following statistics reflect the scope of the outdoor

j program:

1) Permits Issued Softball-baseball-soccer-football 17,425

2) Games Scheduled Football—132 involving 308 officials Soccer—126 involving 102 officials Softball—11,151 involving 5,913 umpi res Basketball—237 involving 227 referees, 71 scorers and

71 a t tendants Volleyball—372 (124 matches) involving 38 officials and

38 a t tendants

SPECIAL EVENT 10.000 Meter Run

In an event co-sponsored by the Columbus Citizen Jour­nal, some 2,743 par t ic ipants took par t in the 10,000 Meter Run held Sunday , J u n e 6. Over 250 depa r tmen t personnel , city employees, communi ty volunteers and personnel from the Citizen-Journal assisted in the operat ion of the event. 118 awards were presented .

To effectively p romote all of the programs, the Spor ts Sec­tion employed 475 full-time and part- t ime people.

PARTICIPATION REPORTS Gymnasium Participation Report—In order to accommoda te league play and pract ice sessions for basketbal l and vol­leyball, t h e following facilities were used : 3 j u n i o r high schools, 22 communi ty center gymnas iums and 5 athletic complexes with 20 gymnas iums .

School Adults Spectators Totals Eastmoor 450 50 500 Everett 2,500 1,000 3,500 Johnson Park 600 100 700

Totals 3,550 1,150 4,700

Community Recreation Centers (21)—Participation report in­cluded in communi ty centers ' part icipat ion count .

Athletic Complex Participation Report

Complex Adults Spectators Totals Big R u n 35,000 15,000 50,000 Franklin Park 41,000 17,000 58,000 Mock Road 32,000 13,000 45,000 Olentangy 52,000 34,000 86,000 Southview 48,000 33,000 81,000

Totals 208,000 112,000 320,000 The Playfield Par t ic ipa t ion Repor t is on the following

page.

Playfield Participation Report

1 Playfield \ Alum Creek \ American Legion \ Antrim \ Audubon I Barnet t I Deshler J Driving Park 3 Franklin Hi Hayden i Hilltonia L Johnson Park . . . . >I Krumm 1 Lindbergh J Lincoln J Linden A Marion-Franklin . A Maryland A McCoy

n McKinley A Northcrest 1 Pont iac H Rhodes Park 3 Southview >2Southwood iH Stockbridge .2 Sunshine I T u t t l e / /Walnut Ridge . . . .

•//Westgate •'flWestmoor WWhetstone •'/JWolfe •'* Woodward

I Totals

Boys 2,500 2,000 3,000 3,500 2,000

200 500

1,000 200

3,000 6,500 1,600 3,000 1,500 1,800

800 2,200 1,200 1,300

3,000 1,500 6,500 6,000 2,000 2,500 1,000

11,000 3,200 1,500

15,000 3,500

20,000

114,500

Girls

500 500

200 300

1,000

800 1,200

500

500

300 1,000 6,000 1,500 1,500

800 500

1,000 400

4,200 1,300

24,000

Adults 1,000

400 5,000 1,500 1,800

15,000 2,000 1,200 1,000 2,700

800 6,000

400 1,500

18,000 1,000 8,500

11,000 3,000 6,000 1,000

45,000 145,000

6,000 3,000 7,500

19,000 4,000

12,000 1,200

20,000 18,000 7,000

376,500

Spectators 2,500 2,000 5,000 9,000 2,500 8,000 1,000

300 100

4,000 5,000 4,500 7,000

800 14,000 2,500

10,000 12,500 3,000 5,000 4,000

45,000 245,000

7,000 3,500 8,000

14,000 12,000 14,000

2,000 46,000 21,000 20,000

540,200

Totals 6,000 4,900

13,500 14,000

6,300 23,200

3,700 2,800 1,300 9,700

13,300 12,100 10,400 3,800

34,600 5,500

21,200 24,700

7,800 11,000 8,300

92,500 402,500

20,500 10,000 18,800 34,500 27,000 30,200

5,100 85,200 43,800 47,000

1,055,200

50 CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

BUILDING MAINTENANCE This section is composed of laborers, storekeepers, pain­

ters, carpenters, custodians, heavy equipment operators, building maintenance personnel and Work Program work­ers. As the name implies, the upkeep of department facili­ties is the main responsibility of this section which included maintenance and improvements to the following sites:

Administrative Offices Columbus Indoor Swim Center Conservatory/Garden Center Golf Courses Golden Hobby Shop Gymnasium Facilities Indian Village Camp Lighting in parks (along rivers/reservoirs) Miscellaneous Facilities Recreation Centers Rental Properties Senior Citizens' Centers Shelterhouses Tree Nursery Zone Headquarters

Seasonal maintenance was provided for: Fieldhouses Football Fields Parks Facilities Pedal Boats Pools Soccer Fields Tennis Courts Westbank Walkway

Special equipment for departmental and civic events was provided as follows:

Boxing Ring Double-Decker English Bus Portable Bleachers Portable Stages Showmobile Annual services provided included: Antique Show Arts Festival Dedications Golden Age Hobby Show Golden Age Rally Swim Meets Track and Field Meets 10,000 Meter Run

The following services were rendered during 1982: Occasions/

Service Site Lighting replacement 689 Door and lock repair/replacement 401 Plumbing repairs 739 Electrical repairs/improvements 447 Carpentry repair/construction 398 Painting, sandblasting and welding 235 Equipment use (pick up/delivery) 438 Glass replacement 122 Fences repaired 78 Air conditioning repairs 42 Heating systems repaired 249 Floor, roof and ceiling repairs 124 Installing and repairing tennis nets 54 Moved Golden Hobby Shop from 906 East Broad to Third

Street School site

PARK MAINTENANCE This section is divided geographically into 16 zones, 3 sup­

port units and 3 reservoir areas, and has the responsibility for keeping clean, safe, well-maintained and attractive, all major parklands and street parks, totaling 11,532 acres of land and water.

The following services were provided during 1982: —Operated three (3) packer routes on a regular schedule. —Checked and made repairs to boat docks, boat stakes

and dam safety cables on a daily basis. —Cleaned and inspected bike paths daily. —Operated water treatment plants at Walnut Bluff. —Cleaned park lakes and treated for vegetation growth. —Mowed, trimmed and policed 138 park sites. —Maintained 138 parks and 139 street islands and ease­

ments. —Installed bollards, curb stops. —Installed screening around picnic tables. —Performed daily and preventive maintenance on operat­

ing equipment.

—Conducted ice safety checks and maintained surface of 8 park lakes for skating.

—Cleaned and set up rented shelterhouse facilities on a 7-day basis throughout the year.

—Maintained/operated two (2) campgrounds. —Performed maintenance on and maintained 150 ball di­

amonds , 254 boat s t akes , 366 boat docks and Amphitheatre stage.

—Repaired and painted portable picnic tables. —Cleaned and painted trash drums. —Mulched, raked and picked up leaves from all parks. —Maintained grounds of Avenue of Flags and City Hall

complex. —Removed snow from sidewalks, parking lots, roadways

and ponds. —Checked and repaired all softball backstops and play

equipment. —Performed daily inspection of playground equipment. —Policed Lynn and Pearl Alleys on a two-times per day

schedule. —Maintained all open shelterhouses and restrooms in city

parks. —Initiated In-Service Training Program for park mainte­

nance employees. —Pruned and trimmed shrubs in various parks. —Provided supervision, transportation and utilized ser­

vices of: General Relief Work Program; Y.E.A.R. Program; Community Service Program.

—Painted North Market, Griggs residence, Griggs Zone headquarters.

—Cleared vistas at Griggs residence. —Installed and maintained snow fence in season. —Assisted Forestry Section in storm damage removal. —Assisted Columbus Zoo in maintenance areas. —Planted trees at Independence, Olde Sawmill, Hoover,

Worthington Hills and other parks. —Conducted Anti-Litter Program

Construction —Installed and removed boat docks during season. —Assisted in snow removal. —Performed maintenance. —Assisted in set up of Garden Show at Fairgrounds. —Performed maintenance on all ball diamonds. —Assisted in planting of shrubs. —Assisted in removing fountain from Franklin Park Con­

servatory. —Graded entrance roads and parking lots. —Moved brush. —Attended CPR Training Class. —Assisted in excavation of fuel tank. —Performed grading. —Buried storm debris and trash. —Pushed stumps, leveled and performed clean up. —Performed maintenance on water line. —Assis ted wi th r e m o v a l a n d w i n t e r s t o r a g e of

Amphitheater. —Assisted in concrete work. —Graded swale and loaded soil. —Stacked chips. —Constructed ball diamonds. —Cleaned oil shed and installed new drum racks. —Assisted in painting of North Market. —Assisted in building, setting up and dismantling of dis­

plays for: Garden Show; Golden Hobby Show; State Fair; Easter Show; Winter Fair; Arts Festival and Fourth of July.

—Removed and installed fencing. —Assisted in set up and take down of equipment for

10,000 Meter Run. —Installed plaques. —Installed Goodale Park "Parcourse" fitness cluster. —Performed routine maintenance on equipment. —Removed and replaced concrete steps. —Installed posts at Raymond and Wilson Golf Courses. —Constructed dump beds. —Repaired floors. —Constructed and installed counter. —Picked up lumber. —Constructed flower and plant carts for Franklin Park

Conservatory/Garden Center. —Operated two (2) ball diamond dragging crews. —Constructed and installed park signs. —Picked up building and construction materials from va­

rious suppliers. —Constructed tool boxes for Y.E.A.R. Program. —Painted offices. —Repaired parking lots.

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 51

—Constructed and installed screen doors. —Installed security system. —Repaired and painted gazebo. —Checked and repaired water lines. —Rerouted drainage. —Winterized facilities.

FORESTRY SECTION Maintaining the health, natural beauty and safety of the

city trees is the 24-hour responsibil i ty of the Forestry Divi­sion. Throughout 1,800 miles of p lanted streets and alley­ways and within the city park system, 2,040,000 trees are continually in need of t r imming , removal, pruning, staking, fertilizing or general main tenance .

New street t ree plant ings are an impor tan t aspect of our operation, meet ing the need for t rees for future generat ions. With the growing public concern for cleaner air and the need to conserve energy, our plant ing p rogram is in great demand.

Other activities within the Forest ry Division were fire­wood sales, c lear ing p a r k l a n d s for future deve lopmen t , growing landscape materials at the Municipal Nursery, con­tinued main tenance of the Richardson Road Tree Farm, re­sponding to bee and horne t nest calls and the rapidly ex­panding Arbor Day Program.

Activities for 1982 included: Removal work orders wri t ten 483 Trim work orders wri t ten 607 No action compla in ts 271 Storm damage compla in ts 942 Permit requests 378

Tree calls received and inspec ted 2,681 Trees removed (from work orders) 523 Trees removed (as result of s torm) 231 Trees removed (special projects /emergencies) . . . . J63 Trees removed by permi ts to individuals 28

' Total trees removed from city right-of-way 1,045

Trees t r immed (from work orders) 501 ' Trees t r immed (as resul t of s torm) 711 I Trees t r immed (special projects /emergencies) 205 I Trees t r immed by permi t s 18

!" Trees t r immed on city right-of-way 1,435 I Street trees (bareroot) p lanted 1,495 i Street t rees (B&B) p lan ted 51 1 Park trees (bareroot) p lanted 277 I Parks trees (B&B) planted 24 1 Arbor Day trees p lan ted 38 f Trees dis tr ibuted to parks/golf courses 293 r Trees planted by permi ts to individuals 332 2 Street t rees planted by contract (B&B) 450

I" Total trees planted on city right-of-way 2,960

3 Seedlings lined out 1,000 2 Seedlings d is t r ibuted 15,000 I" Trees lined out in Nursery 2,250 T Trees received Nursery 3,100 3 Shrubs planted 149 3 Shrubs dis t r ibuted 80 T Trees balled and bur l apped 80 3. Days spent clearing b rush 41 3 Equ ipmen t ma in tenance E Responded to bee /horne t calls 32 d Damaged tree repor ts processed 17 3 Delivered chips to var ious parks/s i tes

and Zoo (number of loads) 156 3 Days mainta ining trees in Conservatory 3 A Arbor Day

1982 Arbor Day activities e n c o m p a s s e d t h e ent i re week of , A April 26-30. With the aid of dedica ted senior citizens and our ta staff, we were ab le to p r e s e n t 32 c lassroom discuss ions 51 reaching a total of 1,474 e lementary school s tudents . A total toof 7,000 seedlings were d is t r ibu ted to school chi ldren for l : their own p l a n t i n g s . With t h e h e l p of v o l u n t e e r sen ior

citizens, all t he t ree seedl ings d i s t r ibu ted to the schools •A were bagged and tied wi th ins t ruc t ions for care.

The Arbor Day ce remony was held in Schiller Park on AApril 30 with n u m e r o u s city, s ta te and U.S. representa t ives

.uand 200 spectators in a t t endance . A total of 38 trees were Icplanted in the park in honor of th is yearly celebrat ion.

As a result of con t inued efforts and suppor t of Arbor Day, d t h e depa r tmen t received a "Tree City U S A " award for the ri third consecut ive year.

Firewood Wood obtained from the removal and t r imming of city

trees was taken to the Service Complex where crews cut, sp l i t a n d s t a c k e d for sa le to t h e p u b l i c f rom J a n u a r y through April and October th rough December . During 1982, sales from this p rogram ne t ted $12,895.55 which was re­turned to the Tree Replacement F u n d for future tree plant­ing purchases . A por t ion of t h e wood was also used by t h e zones at the skat ing p o n d s and sledding hills. Municipal Nursery and Planting Crew

The 67 acre Nursery is the site where most of the woody plant material used by the city is grown. Its ' p r imary func­tion is to grow shade and ornamenta l t rees for use in the street planting program. The plant ing crew is responsible for the plant ing and ma in tenance of t rees along city s treets and parks. In addit ion, the Nursery grows and dis tr ibutes most of the trees, sh rubs and c h r y s a n t h e m u m s used in the l a n d s c a p i n g of c i ty off ices, b u i l d i n g s , p a r k s a n d golf courses. At the presen t t ime, t h e Nursery crew mainta ins over 6,000 trees and 5,000 seedlings. They are pruned, wa­tered and cared for to assure their survival once they are t ransplanted to city s treets and parks .

Other dut ies of the Nursery included balling and burlap-ping large trees for plant ing, month ly spraying for pest and disease control, applying herbicide applicat ions and year round pruning of all t rees in t h e Nursery.

During the s u m m e r m o n t h s , the crews moved irrigation lines daily for water ing and mainta ined a regular mowing schedule of the ent i re Nursery.

HORTICULTURE DIVISION The Hort icul ture Division is responsible for the operat ion

and main tenance of the Frankl in Pa rk Conservatory and Garden Center, the Pa rk of Roses and flower plant ings in city parks and at City Hall.

CONSERVATORY The Conservatory and related showhouse cont inued to

provide beautiful and ever-changing plant exhibi t ions for the public. The Conservatory and special display area boasts over 1,900 plants unde r 12,500 square feet of glass. These areas i nc lude a w i d e r ange of p lan t ma te r i a l inc lud ing tropical, cacti, bonsai , orchids, African violets and others .

The Conservatory and Garden Center were open to the public 365 days in 1982, 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and hosted more than 140,000 visitors. Both facilities are completely ac­cessible for the hand icapped . Conservatory Use Summary Special Events/Activi t ies At tendance 130 Weddings 7,474 Easter Sunday 2,800 Witches' Walk 1,800 Candlelite Tour 8,000

Special Events Three (3) major special shows were p roduced by staff and

volunteers in 1982: Easter Sunday (10:00-4:00 p.m.)—A cross of 500 lilies was fea­tured as well as other special decorat ions and live music . Witches' Walk (October 31. 6:00-8:00 p.m.)—Produced almost entirely by the Frankl in Pa rk Volunteers , this first annual "haun ted" Conservatory a t t rac ted over 1,800 chi ldren and parents. The Conservatory, showhouse and basement areas were t ransformed into various Hal loween scenes with many props, lights and accompanying witches. Candlelight Tour (December 10 and 11, 6:00-9:00 p.m.)—The fourth annual Candlel ight Tour was ex tended by one hour each night this year. The Conservatory, showroom, drives and walkways were all l ighted wi th more t h a n 200 candles. Various musical g roups played in the Conservatory, show­room and audi tor ium on both nights . A floral display was exhibi ted in the audi tor ium, sponsored by the Central Ohio Council of Garden Clubs.

Showhouse The showhouse featured six (6) seasonal plant and floral

displays th roughou t the year wi th over 15,000 plants exhi­bited dur ing these shows.

1) Spring Blub Show (February) 2) Orchid S h o w (March) 3) Easter Lily Show (April) 4) S u m m e r Garden Show (May-September) 5) Fall M u m Show (September-November) 6) Poinset t ia S h o w (December-January) The Cactus House , Bonsai Room and Orchid Room are

cont inguous to the Show r oom and provide addit ional plant exhib i t s t h r o u g h o u t year. New plan ts and s ignage were

52 CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

added to the Bonsai Room while new plants, stones and gravel were added to the Cactus House. GARDEN CENTER f ...

The Garden Center contains an auditorium, kitchen taciii-ties, administrative and educational offices, library, small meeting room, gift shop and lobby area with entrance to conservatory. The purpose of the Garden Center is to pro­vide facilities and educational programs of horticulture in­terest to the general public at little or no cost. Many garden clubs and plant societies use the Garden Center tor their meetings and shows. In addition, the auditorium is used regularly for other meetings, workshops, receptions and special shows by the public. Garden Center Use Summary

Activity Attendance 38 Receptions/parties A'aw

257 Meetings, gatherings 2'ono 32 Adult Education Workshops 2,2i)8

211 Student Education Workshops 6,785 Education Section

The Education Program at the Garden Center provided various activities for all ages including tours, workshops, seminars, publication, horticulture information line, and a library. Information of plants was provided on a regular basis to local newspaper for publication. Television and radio coverage included participation in a weekly radio show and taping of plant care sessions for airing, as well as other radio, television and cable programs.

The Education Section is composed of three areas of activ­ity: 1) Adult Programs; 2) Student Programs; and 3) Horti­culture Information. A breakdown follows: Adult Programs—Provided 32 workshops to the general pub­lic. These workshops were held on Saturdays and in the evenings on Tuesdays and Wednesdays. The programs were co-sponsored by the Franklin County Cooperative Exten­sion Service and covered various topics:

Annuals House Plants Bonsai Landscaping Beekeeping Orchids Cacti and Succulents Perennials Christmas Decor. Plant Propagation Fruit Crops Roses Herbs Vegetables Hobby Greenhouses Wildflowers

Two (2) Horticultural Fairs were held: —Annual Plant Society Fair —First Annual Herb Harvest Festival

Student Programs—Programs were provided to teach school-age children, grades K-12, the fundamentals of plant prop­agation, care and identification.

In 19—2, 6,144 students registered for 211 classes at the Garden Center. Elementary school groups accounted for 163 classes, middle school (20); and high school (28). In all, 14 school districts brought students to the facility. Many other school groups toured the Conservatory.

A traveling greenhouse provided by the Franklin Park Conservatory and Garden Center operated during the school year reaching 577 first graders. Horticulture Information—Information was provided to the general public by telephone, personal consultation, printed matter and library facilities.

The Horticulture Information Line received 4,508 calls in 1982.

156 plants were received at the Garden Center for diagno­sis, and 35,000 landscape fact sheets were distributed.

The library now contains more than 300 books which were all donated or purchased with donated funds.

The Education Department prepared 42 articles for the Columbus Dispatch, "Plant of the Week", column.

A series of slide programs on various horticulture subjects were purchased and used for presentations by our staff. VOLUNTEERS

Considerable time, talent and support was contributed to the Conservatory and Garden Center by the Franklin Park Volunteers, Inc. 85 volunteers gave a minimum of six (6) hours per month in several areas: gift shop sales; Education Programs; tour guides; greenhouse helpers and special program assistance.

The Gift Shop grossed $105,411.89 in 1982, returning $5,000 to the Conservatory and Garden Center. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SECTION

A specialized work force was responsible for landscape maintenance of many city facilities, gardens, planting beds

and park areas. Work in these areas included preparing, maintaining pruning, watering flower beds, planting bulbs and annuals.

Over 5,000 mums were field grown and 3,000 canna lilies cultivated for use in parks and mum shows.

In addition to outside landscape maintenance, the crews planted and maintained plants and flowers at the Home and Garden Show, Golden Age Hobby Show, installed seven (7) annual showroom exhibits and a display at the Ohio State Fair. GREENHOUSE OPERATIONS

The greenhouse provided plants and flowers primarily for the Conservatory, Garden Center Education Programs, showhouse, city parks and other city areas and events.

In 1982, the greenhouse operation propagated and main­tained a total of 32,300 flowers.

PARK OF ROSES The Park of Roses is located in Whetstone Park (3923

North High Street), and continues to be a significant tourist attraction providing a magnificent display of flowers from early spring through fall. Approximately 7,200 rose bushes representing 200 varieties bloom annually in the 13-acre park. More than 16,000 persons visited the Park of Roses in 1982.

The landscape crew provided the maintenance for this park, such as mowing, pruning, mulching, spraying and other required maintenance activities.

The Park of Roses with its Gazebo, fountain, lawn areas and shelterhouse provided the setting for numerous wed­dings and programs. The Park of Roses was also used to host Sunday evening Music-in-the-Air, and Thursday Morn-ings-in-the-Park programs and other cultural events.

PARK PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES BOAT DOCKS

The Columbus Recreation and Parks Department offered public and private boat docking facilities at its' three (3) city reservoirs:

Griggs—2933 Riverside Drive Hoover—8111 Schott Road O'Shaughnessy—Delaware, Ohio

The season commenced May 1 and ended October 31, 1982. Any person wanting to leave a boat on a city reservoir during this time reserved a dock or stake. A breakdown of boat dock/stake rentals for the 1982 season follows: Griggs Reservoir 144 Public Docks

(121 Columbus taxpayers) $12,100 1 Public Dock (Non-Columbus) 120

50 Private Docks 2,500 3 Private Boat Stakes 60

$14,780 Hoover Reservoir 82 Public Docks

(68 Columbus Taxpayers) $ 6,800 14 Public Docks (Non-Columbus) 1,680 19 Private Docks 1,200

251 Public Boat Stakes 5,020 20 Moorings 400 86 Private Stakes 1,720

$16,820 O'Shaughnessy Reservoir 123 Public Docks

(119 Columbus Taxpayers) $11,900 2 Public Docks (Non-Columbus) 240

23 Private Docks 1,200 10 Private Stakes 200 2 Public Stakes 40

$13,580 Boat Dock and Stake Revenues $45,780 Private Boat Clubs on City Reservoirs

Lease Agreements entered into for 1982: —Bellpoint Youth Athletic Association —City Club —Columbus Aqua Ski Club —East Shore Yacht Club, Inc. —Hoover Yacht Club, Inc. —Jewish Center —Leatherlips Yacht Club —Marshall Sailing Specialists, Inc. —Scioto Boat Club —Walnut Valley Boat Club

CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 S3

CAMPGROUNDS There are two (2) campgrounds owned and operated by

the Columbus Recreation and Parks Department: Griggs Dam—2933 Riverside Drive—This campsite is located on the northwest side of Columbus, one mile north of Lane Avenue and four miles from downtown Columbus. There are a total of 71 campsites (27 with electrical hookups and 44 without). Walnut Bluffs Campsite—8111 Schott Road—Westerville, Ohio—This campsite is located on the east side of Hoover Reservoir. There are a total of 150 campsites (all with elec­trical hookups).

Both campsites offer electricity, restroom facilities, drink­ing water, dump station and are patrolled 24-hours. Revenues for 1982:

Griggs Dam $19,469 Walnut Bluffs 18,127 Total $37,596

ENCROACHMENT PROGRAM There were 125 encroachment problems processed in

1982. The situations varied (fence, permanent parking in city parks, buildings constructed, etc.). GARDENING PROGRAM

For the past seven (7) years, the department, in conjunc­tion with the Franklin County Cooperative Extension Ser­vice, has provided garden plots and an educational program for all interested persons at the following sites: Olentangy Parkway—Situated at the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Olentangy River Road and the extension of Bethel Road to the Olentangy freeway. West Broad Street—Located near the corner of Central Ave­nue and West Broad Street bounded by the freeway right-of-way on the west and the fence behind Worley Terrace on the east.

The Education Program consisted of: —Monthly newsletters from June through September; —An educational experience for everyone—aimed at re­

vealing an understanding of man to his nature en­vironment;

—On-site consultation and instruction; and —Horiculture Hotline to answer gardening questions. There were 668 gardens in the Community Gardening

Program and 1,537 plots used by participants.

ICE SKATING Ice skating opportunities were made available to the pub­

lic at eight (8) park ponds whenever the ice appeared to be safe on weekdays from 4:00-9:00 p.m. and on weekends and school holidays from 1:30-9:00 p.m.

Numbers of participants and locations can be found in the Participation Summary. "MUSIC-IN-THE-AIR"

"Music-in-the-Air", in its' tenth season, presented 163 free outdoor concerts June through September in nine (9) city parks. Audience attendance was 162,055. Concert sites in­cluded five (5) downtown locations:

—Riverfront Amphitheater —Statehouse lawn —Bicentennial Riverfront Park —Cultural Arts Center —Sensenbrenner Park

and four (4) neighborhood parks: —Franklin Park (east) —Park of Roses (north) —Schiller Park (south) —Westgate Park (west)

"Music-in-the-Air" annually offers a wide variety of per­formances for every taste including jazz, popular, bluegrass, classical, folk, country rock, ethnic, gospel, big band, dance, poetry, mime and more.

Four (4) special series were offered under the program umbrella: "Thursday Mornings-in-the-Park"—presenting educational entertainment for children each Thursday at the Park of Roses gazebo. "Poetry in the Park"—Readings by local and Ohio poets at the Park of Roses gazebo. Gold Circle Bluegrass Series—Ten (10) country/bluegrass concerts presented at Bicentennial Riverfront Park, Amphitheater and Statehouse lawn. "Sohio Presents"—A series often (10) variety offerings.

"Music-in-the-Air" special events included the second

annual July 4th fireworks concert at the Amphitheater; the third annual three day Wendy's Jazz 104 Festival; and the first Columbus Folk Festival. Over 10,000 people filled the Amphitheater and adjacent riverbank for the July 4th con­cert and thousands more crowded the streets, bridges and steps of public buildings for the fireworks display.

Wendy's Jazz-104 Festival at the Amphitheater drew an audience of almost 7,500 people for each of its' three days. Kroger's Columbus Folk Festival attracted 6,300 partici­pants.

Franklin Park was featured exclusively as a jazz site; Schiller and Westgate Parks specialized in "big band" music of the swing era.

The 1982 "Music-in-the-Air" poster was again featured in the Columbus Society for the Communicating Arts annual juried art show; and 365,000 season opening announcements were mailed to Columbus and Southern Ohio Electric Com­pany customers with their June billings.

Almost one-half of the total cost of the "Music-in-the-Air" program including all performers' fees, was paid through outside contributions. Funding in 1982 was received from the Greater Columbus Arts Council, the Musicians' Per­formance Trust Fund, the Ohio Arts Council, Gold Circle Stores, Sohio, Wendy's International, Kroger Stores, Bud-weiser, Lazarus, B. Dalton Booksellers, Harry's Mobile Hot-dogs and Central Ohio Employee Services and Recreation Association.

Attendance for each concert site for the summer was as follows: Site Attendance Amphitheater 80,300 Bicentennial Riverfront Park 5,521 Cultural Arts Center 1,621 Franklin Park 1,460 Park of Roses 8,400 Schiller Park 3,925 Sensenbrenner Park 9,500 Statehouse Lawn 40,000 Westgate Park 1,968 "Thursday Mornings-in-the-Park" 3,500 "Poetry in the Park" 1,160 "Shakespeare in the Park" 4,700 Total Concert Attendance 162,055 NORTH MARKET (Special Project)

The North Market has operated continuously on the same site since 1892. The original building was destroyed by fire in 1946 and the present building was completed in 1947.

In April 1982, the Department of Agriculture granted the North Market Association $45,000 to develop the Columbus Farmers' Market. The monies were provided by a U.S.D.A. Direct Marketing Grant and a grant from the Ohio Rural Rehabilitation Fund.

The Department of Agriculture worked with the City of Columbus, Department of Recreation and Parks and the North Market Association to develop the Farmers' Market.

The Department of Recreation and Parks participated in the renovation of the North Market (Farmers' Market). This work consisted of window repairs, exterior painting, sign construction and installation, curb stops installed, sidewalk stripping for outside market stalls and parking lot cleanup.

The present North Market consists of three (3) sections: North Market Proper Farmers' Market Restaurant

SPECIAL ACTIVITIES/PROGRAMS Outdoor areas in city parks can be reserved by private

groups or individuals for various events. Some of the most common uses are family reunions and picnics, school field days, church socials, outdoor weddings and fitness runs.

The three (3) reservoirs: Griggs, Hoover and O'Shaughnes­sy, are sites for weekend boat races and sailboat regattas from April through October.

The Siberian Husky Club of Central Ohio uses Hoover Reservoir parklands for dog sled races from November to March.

1982 was the first year for the Ohio State Crew Club's "All-American City Regatta" held in November at Griggs Reservoir.

Special activities/programs held during this past year were: Event Occasions Easter Egg Hunt 8 Community Gatherings/Festivals 52 Church Events (socials/Sunrise Services/

Baptisms, etc.) 26

54 CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

Family Reunions/Picnics 3 ° Fishing Tournaments * Foot Races/Fun Runs „° Athletic Events "i Soap Box Derby Races £ School Field Days l" Weddings (Park of Roses) <>•> Weddings (other parks) a ° Canoeing/Boating Safety Classes ' Scouting Events s

1982 Shelterhouse Permit Summary Facility No. Permits Participants Antrim 130 9,049 BigRun 73 7359 BigWalnut 48 5,575 Goodale 16 W30 Southview 38 8,83^ Westgate 59 5,485 Whetstone 121 10,736 Indian Village Camp _24 1,981 Total 509 50,347

SAFETY PROGRAM The Safety Program continued to emphasize a safe and

healthy environment for both participants and employees of the Recreation and Parks Department. Through continued training and education, an inspection and investigation program, the department strived to reduce both personal injuries and unnecessary costs due to accident frequency and serverity.

During 1982, increased efforts were made to lower the number of injuries sustained by Recreation and Parks per­

sonnel. With the increased emphasis of job safety and acci­dent prevention that has come as a result of training and inspection during the last few years, injuries were reduced by 48% over the previous twelve month period. These pro­grams will be continued in our on-going effort to eliminate accidents and injuries.

Employees were given the opportunity for instruction in cardio-pulmonary resuscitation and for those employees most needing it, first-aid training. These courses were taught by instructors certified by the Red Cross and Heart Association. .

Supervisors continue to monitor the work station for both physical and environmental hazards through the use of the supervisors' checklist. Inspections were made on a periodic basis and corrective action was taken as needed.

Hearings were held for all vehicle accidents. These hear­ings not only allowed us to maintain training and safety equipment needs, but also were responsible, in part, for the substantial reduction of vehicular accidents in 1982.

The Safety Division administers all Workers' Compensa­tion claims for the department and the Employee Services Program. During the past year, the record keeping for these programs was added to the computerized payroll/personnel system. This system will allow for more in-depth review of the statistical patterns involved in accidents and injuries and will provide for more timely processing of claims.

Over the past several years, the Safety Program has en­deavored to provide a safe and healthy environment for em­ployees and participants of the Recreation and Parks De­partment. As employees continue to increase their aware­ness of safety practices and procedures, and display a safety mindedness attitude, we continue to reduce both personal and property accidents and develop a quality environment for employees to work and participants to enjoy recreational activities.

PARKLAND LOCATIONS AND ACREAGE

Parkland Location Acreage Academy Park 276 South Nelson Road 15.5 Airport Golf Course 900 North Hamilton Road 140.2 Aldrich Aldrich Road and Aldrich Place 0.50 Ambleside Amleside Drive and Route 161 0.50 Amphitheater Washington Boulevard and West Broad Street 0.50 Antrim Park 5800 Olentangy River Road 119.8 Arch Park 100 West Hickory Street 0.5 Arkwood Arkwood Avenue and Arkwood Court 0.10 Argus Park 1542 Argus Road 1.7 Audubon Park 2779 Audubon Road 8.7 Avalon Park 633 North Nelson Road 1.8 Avenue of Flags Between West Broad and Town Streets

on Marconi Blvd 0.20 Barnett Recreation Center 1184 Barnett Road 6.0 Battelle Riverfront Park 25 Marconi Boulevard 4.1 Beatty Park Recreation 247 North Ohio Avenue 4.6 Beck Square 228 East Beck Street 0.2 Beechcroft Park 5950 Beechcroft Road 4.6 Beechwold Park 4840 North High Street 8.8 Beechwold and Hollow Jeffrey Place and North High Street 8.77 Berwick Park 2975 Wessex Court 4.1 Berwick Dover Road and Berwick Boulevard 0.25 Betsy Betsy Drive and Jed Court 0.10 Bicentennial Riverfront Park . . . . 233 Civic Center Drive . 4.7 Bide-A-Wee-Park Fairwood Avenue and Bide-A-Wee Park 0.92 Big Run Park 4201 Clime Road 247.7 Big Walnut Park 5000 East Livingston Avenue 142.8 g'Uy Billy Drive and McAllister Avenue 0.10 §Jnn,s, • Binns Boulevard and Sullivant Avenue Blackburn Recreation Center . . . . 263 Carpenter Street Bolton Field Golf Course 6005 Alkire Road . Brentnell Recreation Center 1280 Brentnell Avenue Brevoort Park 3545 Indianola Avenue . . . . Broad Street Strips Broad Street and Kellner Avenue Broadmeadows Park 5550 Riverside Drive Brookside Main Street and Brookside Avenue . . ' . " Brownlee Kenwick Road and Brownlee g u l e n BEtween Mound and Whittier Streets Burgess Between Freemont and Olive Avenues Canyon . Between Colerain and Sharon Avenues Cassady Park 741 Parkview Boulevard

0.44 2.9

166.3 2.3 2.8 3.00

38.6 0.75 5.00 1.51 1.48 0.08 3.2

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 55

o.

CU

X X X

X X

X X

X X

X X X

X

X

X X

X X

X X

X X

X X X

X X

X

X

X

X X X

X X

X

X

X X X

X X X

X X

X X

X X

X X

X X

X

X

X

X

X

X X

PARKLAND LOCATIONS AND ACREAGE

Location Parkland Casto Pa rk 5500 Westerville Park Chase land Pa rk 959 East Lincoln Avenue Cher rybo t tom Pa rk 5301 Cherrybot tom Road Clarfield Groveport P ike and Clarfield Clay Court Kent and Clay Avenues Cleveland 3-C Highway and Cleveland Avenue Clifton Between Woodland and Brunson Avenues . Clinton Between Calumet and Walhalla Cl in ton/Como Pa rk 301 West Pacemont Avenue Clintonville Pa rk 2730 North High Street Colerain Torrence Avenue and Oakland Pa rk Connie Connie Court and Teddy Avenue Cooke Olentangy Boulevard and Cooke Road Cooke Recreat ion Center 3911 Dresden Avenue Cooper Pa rk 5470 Cooper Road Crescent B inns and Crescent Avenues Crestwood Crestwood and Livingston Avenues Dakota Dakota Avenue and Town Street Dale Dale and Brookside Avenues Delawanda Pa rk 5201 Delawanda Avenue Deshler Pa rk 1368 Eas t Deshler Avenue Devonshi re Pa rk 6324 Ambles ide Drive Dort Dort and Arkwood Dover Dover and Kingslea Dresden Dresden and Waldon Avenues Driving Pa rk 1100 Rhoads Avenue D u n d e e D u n d e e Court and Dundee Avenue Eas thaven Pa rk 2360 Garnet Place Eas tmoor Elbern and Eas tmoor Avenues Eas tmore land Sou th Kellner and Eas tmore land Avenues Efner Folger and Efner Avenues Eisenhower Freeway Drive and Eisenhower Elbern Eas tmoor and Elbern Avenues Eldon Eldon and Ridge Avenues

1044 Elwood (Cherry) English Pa rk 1277-1287 Bryden Road Fairwood Pa rk 1372 Fairwood Avenue Fifteenth 4th Street and 15th Avenue Floral Floral and Lechner Avenues Fly town West Goodale and Spruce Avenue Fores t Pa rk East P a r k 1711 Penwor th Drive Four th Hudson and Four th Streets

1290-1298 Frankl in Avenue Frankl in P a r k 100 Frankl in Pa rk West Frankl in ton Cemetery 774 River Street Ful ton Ful ton and 18th Streets Ganson Ganson and Coronet Drive Geers Berkley and Lilley Avenues Georgian Heights P a r k 925 Holly Hill Drive Glen Echo P a r k 510 Cliffside Drive G lenmawr Arcadia Avenue and Glenmawr Glenwood Pa rk 1925 West Broad Street Gooda le P a r k 120 West Goodale Boulevard G o w d y Field 711 West Third Street Grandon Richards and Grandon Avenues Granvil le Pa rk 5468 Aqua Street Grasmere North of Oakland Avenue Greene Count r ie P a r k 460 Brand ing Iron Drive Green lawn P a r k 170 Greenlawn Avenue Greenway Nor th North Nelson Road and Greenway Nor th . . Greenway Sou th North Nelson Road and Greenway South . Greenwich Melrose and Greenwich Avenues Guilford Guilford and West Broad Streets Haddon Tudor and Haddon Avenues Hamil ton Avenue Hamil ton Avenue and East Broad Street .. Hamil ton St r ips Livingston and Hamil ton Road Hanford Village P a r k 784 Alum Creek Drive Hard ing Eas tmoor and Harding Avenues Harold Joyce and Harold Avenues Harr ison House 570 West Broad Street Hauntz Pa rk 480 Columbian Avenue H a w t h o r n e Woodland and Hawtho rne Avenues Hayden P a r k 644 Hayden Park Drive Helsel Pa rk 3205 South Hamil ton Road Highland Pegg Avenue and Highland Drive Hilltonia P a r k 2345 West Mound Street Holly Hill Sull ivant Avenue and Holly Hill Hol ton Pa rk 303 North Eureka Avenue Hoover /Cubbage Cubbage Road

Acreage 34

3. 86.

0. 0. 0 0. 0.

19 0 1. 0. 0 9

33. 0. 0. 1. 0.

27. 11.

5. 0. 0. 0.

21. 0 5 0 0 0. 0 0 0.

o' 26

0 0 1 4 0

100. 1 0. 0 0

10 4 0

15 32. 33

0 5 0

17 6 0 0 0 0 0 0

15 1 0 0 0 5 0 1

43 0

11 0

11 34

3 7 8 50 10 50 11 50 5 1 00 10 40 .4 2 10 25 06 50 0 0 7 10 10 50 9 10 3 25 25 10 50 50 10 07 6 .5 .50 .30 .00 .0 .40 .13 0 .6 50 25 87 .7 .2 75 7 7 .3 20 .1 25 1 1

20 30 .25 76 10 40 00

.8 10 10 2 7 49 3 1 25 5 30 8 .0

56 CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

a. •c

Q.

O

a.

PARKLAND LOCATIONS AND ACREAGE

Parkland Huxley

X Huy Road Park X Independence Park X Indian Mound Recreation Center.

Indianola X Innis Park X Italian Village Park X Iuka Park

Jefferson X Jeffrey

Joan Park X Joan Place

X Johnson Memorial Park X Joyce Park X Karns Park

X Keller X Kellner Circle X Kellner Road

X Kelso Kenlawn Park Kimberly Kirkwood Park Kraner Park Krumm Park Lenappe Lincoln Park Lindberg Park Linden Park

X Linfield Livingston Park Livingston Strips Lockwood Lower Scioto Park Main Street Main/Alum Park

X Mansfield X Marble X Marconi

Marion-Franklin Recreation Center

Martin Maryland Park Maybury School Park Maynard and Summit Park McKinley Park Meadowbrook Melrose Merryhill Midgard Millbrook Millbrook Park Milo-Grogan Recreation Center... Mock Road Park Myrtle Nafzger Park Napoleon Nelson Park Nelson Park Extension New York Northcrest Park Northgate Park Northmoor Park Northtowne Park

X Northwest Boulevard X Ohio

X Olde Sawmill Park X Olentangy Parkway

Olentangy River Canoe Portage #3 X Osceola X Overbrook

Palmetto X Palsgrove Park X Parkridge Park

X Petzinger X Pontiac Village Park

X Post Office Pride Park Rainbow

X X X

X X X

X

X

X X X X

X X X

X X

X X X X

X X X X X

X

X

Location Acreage Huxley Court and Huxley Drive 0.10 1385 Piedmont Road 8.3 3075 Arrowsmith Drive 10.1 3901 Parsons Avenue 21.5 Indianola and 16th Avenues 0.10 3000 Innis Road 93.0 55 Hubbard Avenue 0.8 2057 Iuka Avenue 4.0 East Broad Street and Jefferson Avenue 0.69 West of High Street on Jeffrey Place 0.69 1927 Myrtle Avenue 3.6 West of Joyce on Joan Avenue 0.10 1175 Barnett Road 11.4 1701 Joyce Avenue 25.4 1295 South Champion Avenue 2.1 Greenlawn and Front Streets 0.90 Kellner and Mound Streets 0.04 North of East Main Street on Kellner 0.25 South of Kelso on Findlay 0.25 1679 Brighton Road 4.6 North of Oakland Park on Kimberly 0.10 3695 Kirkwood Avenue 2.7 Noe-Bixby Road 7.8 854 Alton Avenue 28.2 Overbrook Drive and Lenappe Avenue 0.10 580 Woodrow Avenue 16.4 2634 Briggs Road 8.8 1254 Briarwood Avenue 19.7 Off Greenway South on Linfield Avenue 0.25 760 East Livingston Avenue 9.3 East Livingston East of Dalewood Avenue 20.00 McAllister and Lockwood Avenues 0.10 301 West Whittier Street 57.0 Marconi and West Main Streets 0.30 2081 East Main Street 1.2 Barbara Court and Mansfield Avenue 0.10 Boyington and Marble Avenues 0.10 Long Street and Marconi Boulevard 0.25

2801 Lockbourne Road 24.0 Martin Avenue and Town Street 0.40 3180 Atcheson Street 14.3 5026 Lindora Drive 5.2 2327 Summit Street 0.3 1453 McKinley Avenue 7.0 South of King Avenue on Meadowbrook 0.75 Milford and Melrose Avenues 0.25 Sherbourne Avenue and Chauncery Way 0.25 North of Weber Road 0.40 North Nelson Road and Millbrook Way 0.17 1691 Smith Road 1.4 862 East Second Avenue 1.0 2520 Mock Road 102.2 West of Joyce on Myrtle Avenue 0.10 2845 Noe-Bixby Road 61.3 140 Napoleon Avenue 4.82 430 North Nelson Road 23.2 430 North Nelson Road 5.9 New York and 1-71 1.00 5095 Northcrest Road 18.3 6582 Lisa Marie Boulevard 5.4 3601 Olentangy Boulevard 9.3 4778 Heatherton Drive 3.6 Third and Northwest Boulevard 2.50 Ohio and East Broad Street 0.40 2500 Sutter Parkway 8.7 4957 Olentangy River Road 94.7 West North Broadway and Olentangy River 16 Piedmont Road and Osceola Avenue 0.50 High Street and Overbrook Drive 10.78 Palmetto, Huron and Guernsey Avenues 0.07 1415 Kent Street 0.9 3460 Morse Road 43.3 Courtright and Petzinger Roads 0.10 3146 Maize Road 6.7 Marconi Boulevard, front of Post Office 0.50 2511 Cleveland Avenue 0.1 Bulen and Rainbow Park 0.50

CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 57

a.

x

X X

X

X

X X

X X X X X X

X X X

X

X

X

X X X X X

X

X

X

X

X X X

X X X

X X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X X

X

X

X X

PARKLAND LOCATIONS AND ACREAGE

Parkland R a y m o n d Memorial Golf Course . Redick Pa rk Rich Street (Pedest r ian Mall) Richardson Park Road Rickenbacker P a r k Riverbend Pa rk Riverside (Dedications) Riverside Green P a r k Riverside Green Park—South

Sect ion # 5 Rosemary Royal Fores t Roys Avenue Roys Circle Sater P a r k St. J o s e p h Sanda lwood Schiller P a r k S c h m i d t Park , J a c k Sensenb renne r Pa rk Seven th Shadevil le Nursery Shady S h a d y Lane Pa rk Sharon Shepha rd Pa rk

(5th Ave. and Nelson) S ix th Six th Street Southeas t Lions Pa rk Sou the rn P ines P a r k Sou thga te Pa rk Southview P a r k Sou thwood Pa rk State Steel ton S t ephens Drive Pa rk Stewart Stockbr idge Pa rk Striebel S u n b u r y Sunsh ine Pa rk Sur rey Sycamore Hills Pa rk

fayior Teaford (Cooper Park) Thi rd St ree t School P a r k T h o m p s o n Recreat ion Center and

Co lumbus Swim Center Th ree Rivers P a r k Torrence Traymore Tut t le P a r k

Vaughn Vermon t Virginia Lee Waldeck Walden Pa rk Walnut Bluffs Camps i t e Walnut Hill Golf Course Warren Washington Webster Pa rk Weinland Pa rk Wellington Westbank Walkway West Dominion Westgate Pa rk Westmoor Westmoor Pa rk West North Broadway West P a r k Wheeler Memorial Pa rk Wheeler Street Pa rk Whets tone P a r k White S u l p h u r Quarry Wicklow

Location Acreage 3860 Trabue Road 190.0 1301 North Hague Avenue 24.0 Rich and 5th Streets 0.44 6767 Richardson Road 246.8 240 Nor th Sandusky Street 5.9 1601 B luhm Road 4.5 Various Locations along the River 65.2 6650 Canaan Drive 5.6

6335 Bannister Drive 1.4 Nor th of Henderson Road on Rosemary 0.50 High Street and Royal Forest Boulevard 0.50 Crescent and Roys Avenues 0.32 Ridge and Powell Avenues 0.40 117 Price Avenue 0.8 Richardson and St. Joseph 0.10 Karl Road and Sandalwood 0.25 1069 Jaeger Street 23.4 Westerville Road south of P l u m b Road 9.1 300 North High Street 0.9 7th and Michigan Avenues 0.35 6993 South High Street 66.3 Shadyland and Shadyland Court 0.10 1291 Marble Drive 4.8 Lincoln and Sharon Avenues 0.58

800 North Nelson Road 7.9 uth and Michigan Avenues 6th Street and 5th to 8th Avenues 0.50 185 Ba r thman Avenue 1.2 723 Bartfield Avenue 6.3 940 Parsons Avenue 3.6 325 Greenlawn Avenue 220.0 181 Southwood Avenue 1.3 East State and Third Streets 0.25 Between Wager and Marion Avenues 0.50 915 S tephens Drive, WEst 0.9 S tewar t and Fron t Streets 0.20 3350 South Champion Avenue 12.7 Vilardo Lane and Striebel Avenue 0.10 Leonard and S u n b u r y Road 0.75 667 Sullivant Avenue 11.1 Surrey and Greenway 0.10 5540 Rockpor t Drive 7.8 215 Ta lmadge Street .14 Taylor East of Delbert Avenue 0.10 Cooper Road and Inters ta te 1-270 7.7 630 Sou th Third Street 0.5 1189 Dennison Avenue 1160 Hunte r Avenue 4.4 3860 Bixby Road 410.6 Be tween Grandon and Colerain Avenues 0.40 South on Republ ic on Traymore Avenue 0.10 240 West Oakland Avenue 23.4 282 North 20th Street .11 Vaughn and Mound Streets 0.50 Between Perry and Michigan Avenues 0.40 Sou th of Broad Street on Virginia Lee 5.00 Iuka and Waldeck Avenues 0.10 1935 Brookfield Road 5.2 8111 Schot t Road 219.9 6001 East Livingston Avenue 70.1 Between High and S u m m i t Streets 0.40 Main and River St ree ts 0.90 230 Webster Park 1-4 1280 S u m m i t Street 3.9 Wellington Boulevard and Leonard Avenue 0.50 313 Rich Street 6.0 Rosemont and West Dominion Avenues 0.20 455 Sou th Westgate Avenue 46.3 Crescent Drive and Westmoor Avenue 0.50 3015 Valleyview Drive 17.0 Olentangy and West North Broadway 0.50 Sull ivant Avenue and West Pa rk 3.77 725 Thurbe r Drive, West 4.0 Thurbe r Drive, East 0.50 3923 North High Street 152.1 Route 257, Sou th of Route 36 112.3 Wicklow Road and Roys Avenue 0.45

58 CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

a V e/5

n *TJ

£

X

X

X

•o a a

-M

& X X

X X X X X

X X X

X X

X X

a

H CO 0 u 111 9 u5

• n

a

X

X

a. •e tn

CD

y

a >

PARKLAND LOCATIONS AND ACREAGE

Parkland Wildwood Willis Park Willow Creek Park Wilson Wilson Avenue Park Wilson Road Golf Course Windsor Pool Wolfe Park Wonderland Park Woodbury Woodward Memorial Park Woodward Park Recreation Center Worthington Hills Park

Wrexham Park Xerox Property (Fairwood/Driving

Park Connector) Yaronia Zeller Zoo Zoo Amusement Park

Location Leonard and Wildwood Avenues 4977 Teddy Drive 2285 Hardy Parkway Street Livingston and Wilson Avenues 368 Wilson Avenue 1900 Wilson Road 1300 Windsor Avenue 105 Park Drive 4685 Wonderland Boulevard Woodbury and Springmont Avenues . 5175 Fahlander Drive, North 5147 Karl Road Former Worthington Sewerage

Treatment Plant Site 160 Wrexham Avenue

East side of Xerox Corporation Overbrook Drive and Yaronia Avenue North of Henderson on Zeller Avenue 9990 Riverside Drive 10101 Riverside Drive

Acreage 0.10 2.7 7.9 2.25 0.1

29.6 4.2

42.5 10.3 0.10

48.9 1.1

3.2 1.1 1.1 0.10 0.50

82.6 33.8

RESERVOIR ACREAGE Name Griggs Dam Hoover Dam . . . O'Shaughnessy.

Land 196.7 963.8 314.4

Water 363.0

3,843.0 829.0

Totals 559.7

4,806.8 1,143.4

RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR PUBLIC BIKEWAYS Sawmill Corridor area between Case and Martin Roads

ON LEASE. EASEMENT, PERMIT OR Amvet Village Park National Guard Arsenal

(Cultural Arts Center) Olentangy Parkway (Scenic) Rhodes Park Riverside Easements Scioto Trail School Smith Road School Somerset Park Vest Pocket Park Worley Terrace Garden Plots

North side of Alum Creek, west of Route 3 . . . Mason Tract—Olentangy Corridor Bike Path .

AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY Argyle and Vendome Drive

130 West Main Street Bethel Road and Route 315 West Broad Street opposite Glenwood Park.

2951 South High Street 1249 Smith Road Gatewood and Bodman Avenues. 906-910 Avon Place Rear of 79 South Central Avenue.

OWNED BY CITY AND LEASED Boys' Club—Milo 1012 Cleveland Avenue. Boys' Club—West Market 115 South Gift Street. . .

PARKLANDS SOLD IN 1982 Noe-Bixby/I-270/Big Walnut Creek 1845 Noe-Bixby Road

PARKLANDS ACQUIRED IN 1982 Olentangy River Canoe Portage .. West North Broadway and Olentangy River . Riverside Green Park—South

Sec. #5 6335 Bannister Drive Worthington Hills Park Former Worthington Sewerage

Treatment Plant Site

0.046 0.305 0.356 0.309 0.312 0.186 0.574 2.932

2.600

0.670 120.278 51.707 71,483 7.391 6.472

19.071 0.140 3.000

0.36 1.05

9.610

1.58

1.392

3.159

CITY-OWNED RECREATION AND PARKS LANDS 154 Recreation and Parks Lands 4,607.9

4 Vest Pocket Parks 5 8 Right-of-Ways for Public Bikeways 5.0

CITY LANDS MAINTAINED 77 Street Islands 41.8 11 Street Easements 52.1 9 Lots 4.3

10 Parklands on Lease, Easement, Permit/Agreement 282.8

TOTAL LAND ACREAGE 6 497 4 TOTAL WATER ACREAGE S^QSS'.O GRAND TOTAL .11.532.4

CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 59

COLUMBUS ZOO

In 1976, City Council passed an ordinance which transfer­red the responsibili ty of adminis te r ing the contract be tween the City and the Co lumbus Zoological Association to the Department of Recreat ion and Parks .

During this adminis t ra t ion, the Recreat ion and Pa rks staff has cont inued to give assis tance wi th the member sh ip drive, capital improvements , promot ional projects, personnel and accounting adminis t ra t ion.

The Columbus Zoo has cont inued its ' s teady growth as a nationally recognized zoological inst i tut ion. This recogni­tion was vividly demons t r a t ed in April when t h e Zoo hos ted the largest regional conference in the history of the Amer­ican Association of Zoological Pa rks and Aquar iums (AAZ-PA). Fur ther peer acceptance came in Sep tember when the Columbus Zoo was awarded the National Conference for 1985.

Gate a t tendance cont inued to c l imb — reaching 575,407 visitors in 1982. Our g roup sales d e p a r t m e n t b rough t in 120,000 visitors for company picnics and other special out­ings. This growth and the visibility of the zoo in the com­munity can be a t t r ibuted to several factors.

Efforts by Zoo staff to p r o m o t e t h e Zoo th rough publ ic appearances and marke t ing activities;

Cooperation by local radio, television and print media in promot ing and cover ing zoo bir ths , special events and other activities; and

Cont inued upgrad ing of t h e an imal collection, facilities and programs. The zoo cont inued the ongoing rehabil i tat ion of old build­

ings into "new" such as: — Completion of remodel ing the amphib ian bui lding with

an addit ion that provides year round hous ing and view­ing of the Aldabra tortoises;

— Creating a h o m e for the blackfooted penqu ins from the old seal exhibit ;

— Remodel ing the old giraffe house into an explorat ion center for educat ional p rograms; and

— Stuccoing t h e a q u a r i u m a n d several o the r facilities; cont inuing the insulat ion and general repair program throughout the g rounds .

New installations included a second cheetah yard and a new diet ki tchen. The Horticulture Department and g round crews cont inued to outdo themselves: S o m e 40,000 plants b loomed th roughout the warm months . Trees and other p lant ings were added, and the g rounds were spotless. The Education Department offered increasingly popular chil­dren and adu l t c lasses a n d a gues t l ec ture series. These p rograms were e n h a n c e d by mul t i -med ia p re sen ta t i ons photographed and created by zoo staff and volunteers .

The zoo's bir th rate was impress ive: — Polar bear, Icee, was successfully reared by her mother

and found a new h o m e in Detroit th is pas t fall; — The bald eagles laid two eggs; — Duma, our first male chee tah to survive, was hand-

ra i sed by R e c r e a t i o n a n d P a r k s D i r ec to r , Me lv in Dodge;

— A baby zebra explosion, black bears , camel , kangaroos , gibbon, gemsbok, and many o ther infants a d d e d to the collection; and

— Lowland gorillas, Zura and OJ, born in 1982, found a new h o m e at the San Francisco Zoo.

Volunteers cont inued to cont r ibu te to the zoo's growth. Our Docents , w h o by yea r ' s e n d n u m b e r e d 152, r ece ived a Mayor 's A w a r d for V o l u n t a r y Se rv i ce and logged over 18,000 hours of tours , ta lks , an imal watch and special event duties. A record 240 ZooAides, the teen crew, supp lemen ted staff efforts in many areas whi le pho tographers , art ists and others gave their t ime and talents . Zoofari and WAZOO also had a record year.

Community suppor t also cont inued: — Big Bear sponsored the 1982 Zoo calendar: — Schmidt Nursery dona ted p layground equ ipment ; and — The en t rance lake fountain was courtesy of J . T. Ed­

wards Company. Development Director — A grant was received from the Co­lumbus Founda t ion and the posi t ion of Deve lopment Direc­tor was created to m a n a g e grant wri t ing and fund raising efforts.

The progress m a d e dur ing 1982 is, in great part, a result of the cooperation be tween the C o l u m b u s Zoo staff, Co lumbus Zoological Association, the City of Co lumbus , Recreat ion and Parks Depar tment , and m a n y o ther public and private agencies/organizations.

CONCESSIONS 1982 was a year of cont inued improvement in concession

areas and policies. Some addi t ions/ improvements included: — New concess ion s t and nea r en t r ance to P a c h y d e r m

Building; — Colorful portable fruit dr ink s tands added; — Soft ice cream, mi lkshakes , sundaes and banana splits

added to dairy menu; and — Numerous i tems added th roughout concessions.

Riverview Restaurant With the increasing useage d e m a n d by private groups for

the Riverview Restaurant , new equ ipmen t was added. In addi t ion to t h e p r iva te pa r t i e s , local civic g roups were accommodated weekly, and a s t rong effort is being m a d e to have this facility in use every night of the week.

Quality Food Service The year of 1983 will be devoted to cont inued improve­

ments in the quality of the food and beverages served at the Zoo. Under the supervis ion of the Concession Commit tee Chai rman, qual i ty food and beverage tes t s will be con­ducted th roughout the year to assure visitors that they will receive quali ty p roduc t s , at fair prices, served by clean, courteous employees .

Other notable improvements included the food and bever­age ga rden (Chi ldren ' s Zoo), add i t iona l umbre l l a t ab les throughout the g rounds for visitors ' comfort, and new signs.

Amusement Park Concessions by Cox will also operate the Zoo A m u s e m e n t

Park for the third year, and 1983 will cont inue to show major i m p r o v e m e n t s a t t h e pa rk . I m p r o v e m e n t s will i nc lude beautification, new rides, new games of chance, and im­proved food and beverage services.

Company Outings Increased efforts are being m a d e to book company em­

ployee out ings at the Park with an emphas i s on visiting the Zoo. The Park and Zoo combinat ion provides an ideal edu­cational and recreational package.

The A m u s e m e n t Pa rk in 1983 will also feature, each Fri­day, Saturday and Sunday , the Zoo Pa rk Bazaar.

AQUARIUM The census for the Ar thur C. J o h n s o n Aquar ium for the

calendar year 1982 contained 14 orders , 51 families, 251 spe­cies and 5,846 spec imens .

Maintenance and improvements to the aquar ium bui lding and facilities as follows:

— Racks built; — Tanks repaired and installed; — Roof replacement ; — Doors replaced; and — Insulat ion to various facilities. T h e staff w o r k e d c o n t i n u o u s l y w i t h o r g a n i z a t i o n s ,

groups, Aquar ium Societies and volunteers to educa te the public and worked to expand the Breeding Program.

Some examples of their activities included: — Classes and lectures given to Boy Scouts of America; — Assisted PM Magazine (filming segment on the Nurse

Shark); — Display set at H o m e and Garden and Spor t s Shows at

S ta te Fa i rgrounds ; — Tra in ing P r o g r a m for s t u d e n t s from t h e N o r t h w e s t

Career Center held; — Dayton Aquar ium Society given tour of facility; and — Central Ohio Aquar ium Society held week long show in

the Educat ion Bui lding. Spec ies w e r e a c q u i r e d t h r o u g h b i r ths , ha t ch ings and

breeding loans. The exterior of the facility was s tuccoed, which added to

the appearance of the facility and improved cooling and heating.

BIRDS The Bird Depa r tmen t ended 1982 wi th an inventory of 320

s p e c i m e n s r e p r e s e n t i n g 101 spec ies , 38 families and 20 orders.

Several needed spec imens were purchased for the collec­tion as follows:

— Male sarus crane and male demoisel le crane for lone females;

60 CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

— Four greater African flamingos (waiting for permit to acquire six American flamingos as a gift from Hialeah Racetrack in Florida)

Among the hundred or so hatchings this year, the most unique was the Rothschild or Bali mynahs. This species is on the endangered list with only about 200 still existing in their native habitat, the Island of Bali.

A pair of our East African crown cranes were moved to an area to enhance propagation. The move was successful. Though the eggs were infertile, this is the first time the Co­lumbus Zoo has had any species of crane lay eggs.

Many lectures and tours were presented to groups by the staff. New Penquin Exhibit

This exhibit, opened to the public in the spring, was real­ized when the old sea lion area was renovated with simu­lated rock work, waterfalls and a viewing area.

A benefit was held in September 1981 to help purchase a colony of penquins for the zoo. We now have ten (10) black-foot penquins on exhibit purchased from the Detroit and Baltimore Zoos. These penquins are native to the southern coastal region of Africa.

DEVELOPMENT In October 1982 the Development Department was estab­

lished with the appointment of a Director of Development. The director's position was made possible by a grant from the Columbus Foundation. This department is responsible for the coordination of membership, Adopt-an-Animal, foundation and corporate grants as well as all donations and gifts.

Membership increased during 1982 from approximately 3,200 to 4,335. We are very proud of the fact that our mem­bership renewal rate is approximately 65%. Members' Day brought in over 3,500 individuals for a fun-filled day.

The Adopt-an-Animal Program saw an increase in the number of guardians and benefactors (formerly called pa­rents and cousins) who contributed to the feeding of zoo animals for a year. In 1981 we had 125 contributors who gave $20,965 for the feeding of 148 animals. That number doubled in 1982 to 252 individuals who gave $30,342 for 320 animals.

We attribute part of the increase in both membership and Adopt-an-Animal to a December holiday promotion en­couraging people to consider gifts of Zoo memberships and the Adopt-an-Animal package.

EDUCATION Phenomenal expansion in programs and facilities is

perhaps the best description of the Education Department for 1982.

Summer day camp, children and adult programs, and the ZooAide Program were all expanded to accommodate the increasing demand for quality and experiental education for all participants.

These programs were complemented by a new "Camp-in" program. This weekend program provided an extremely unique adventure for school groups, scout troops and other youth organizations.

Program expansion was supported and enhanced by our Docents and the development of a second education facility — the Exploration Center (formerly the old giraffe house). This facility offers strong interaction for everyone. The pub­lic walk-through has been designed to provide challenging graphics focused on ecological themes. Zoo visitors have an opportunity to interact with live specimens and other bio­logical material in the living lab. Other features in this renovated facility include staff offices and two large clas­srooms to accommodate the expanded educational prog­rams for 1983.

Cost Effective Programs Revenue Summer Experience $12,500 Adult Programs 2,100 Children's Programs 1000 Camp-Ins 3',Ooo ZooAides 8,000 Service Programs

— Accepted internship students from local schools and universities.

— Assisted in writing copy for signage, zoo publications and the zoo calendar.

— Cared for animals used in educational presentations. — Carried out signage program; continued work of out­

door signage, development of indoor signs, and graphics.

— Offered education workshops through OSU, COTA and Diocesan Day.

— Gave off-site presentations using multi-image slide shows and animals to service organizations, church groups, senior citizens, charities and hospitals.

MAMMALS The Mammals Department ended 1982 with 232 speci­

mens representing 58 forms. The responsibility for the care of these animals belongs to the personnel in five areas:

— Apes, Bears, Cheetahs and South American Grotto; — Children's Zoo; — Diet Kitchen; — Herbivore/Carnivore Display; and — Pachyderms During the past year there was much activity in all five

sections: Apes, Cheetahs. Etc.

The apes, cheetahs, etc., recorded these breedings for 1982: cheetah, gorilla, chimp and coatimundi. The chimp breeding was the first for our pair and ended in a miscar­riage at an early stage. Last year's black bear and polar bear cubs were sold and we are now preparing for rebreeding of the females in the spring of 1983.

In the summer of 1982 we received a female gorilla on breeding loan from the St. Louis Zoo and we are looking forward to successfully introducing her to our breeding male. An unsuccessful attempt was made to artificially in­seminate our gorilla, Toni. A second effort will be made in 1983.

Construction in this section included: — New cheetah yard east of pachyderm building; — Facelift for the ape house playroom and public aisles;

and — New graphics in the old ape house.

Children's Zoo This area cared for two gorillas born last year until they

were shipped to a new home. The Children's Zoo recorded births of Japanese maca­

ques, pygmy goats, Barbados sheep, fallow deer and a don­key. A panda was traded to the Portland Oregon Zoo to prepare for the breeding season in early 1983.

In the spring, a representative from Metroparks — Slate Run Living Historical Farm, presented a sheep shearing demonstration. Diet Kitchen

In addition to daily preparation of all the diets in the Zoo, workload this year included the aftermath of probably the largest Christmas Party for the Animals food donation ever. Herbivore/Carnivore

This section recorded a variety of births: Thomson's gazel­le, blackbuck antelope, gemsbok, llamas, cavies, sika deer, nilgai, dromedary camel and both Damara and Grant's zebra.

We received a pair of snow leopards and a male white Bengal tiger. With these additions, we should again be in the business of breeding large cats. Pachyderm

Birth of a South American Tapir was recorded. No elephant birth. Keepers are still proceeding with work

on semen collection and preservation in the black rhino and hormone fluctuation in elephants. A camel training program was initiated.

Currently, we possess the only individual subspecies of the forest elephant in the Western Hemisphere. We have been negotiating with the West African nations about the possibility of obtaining a small group of forest elephants and are hopeful that this project will be undertaken in 1983.

Thanks to the combined efforts of staff members, a dedi­cated group of summer help and volunteers, the Mammals Department has enjoyed another fine year and we are look­ing forward to an exciting 1983.

MEDIA PRODUCTIONS This department has the responsibility of visually present­

ing the Columbus Zoo to groups, organizations, corpora­tions, agencies, members and supporters.

Throughout 1982, a variety of techniques were used to generate interest in the Zoo among the general public—from photography and printed material to video tape.

The Columbus Zoo Volunteer Photography Club pro­vided the Zoo with photo needs in the following areas:

—Adopt-an-Animal Program (black and white and color prints);

—Marketing Department, Development Department (slides, black and white and color prints);

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 61

—Education Department (slides); —Docent Association (slides and prints); —Research Department (slides and black and white

prints); —Magazines and Newspapers (slides, black and white and

color prints); and —Zoo Calendar (slides). Multi-image slide presentations (with the use of a multiple

number of projectors synchronized with a soundtrack) have played an important role in Zoo promotion and education. The following shows were produced in-house during the year: with two exceptions, WNCI recorded all soundtracks with studio time and talent donated; and WLVQ donated studio time and talent for two shows:

"India . . . In Search of a White Tiger" (Four-projector show about Zoo Director's expedition)

"Multi-Media Productions at your Zoo" (Four-projector presentation for the 1982 AAZPA Great Lakes Regional Conference)

"Zoo Conference I") (Four-projector show about activity during the three-day

AAZPA Regional Conference and presented at the closing banquet)

"Africa" (Two-projector presentation on the June 1982 Zoo-sponsored safari to Kenya, Africa)

"Zoo Conference Show II" (Four-projector show presented at the 1982 AAZPA National Conference—Columbus Zoo's bid for the 1985 National Conference)

"Build A Gorilla A Villa" (Four-projector presentation to act as a fund raising tool in the Zoo's plan to construct a new outdoor gorilla habitat)

Three other multi-imate shows were produced, one b> an audio-visual company and two by students from Ohio State University:

"Columbus Zoo" (Two-projector promotion show produced by MC3, a Columbus-based production company)

"What's All Happening at the Zoo?" (Two-projector educational show for elementary levels produced by students from the Journalism Department of OSU)

"History of the Columbus Zoo" (Six-projector show tracing the Zoo's history since its inception in 1927 produced by a group of students from the Industrial Design Department of Ohio State Uni­versity)

Video tape has proven to be an invaluable resource, espe-) cially in the areas of research and education. Video tapings i included:

—A closed circuit video system was focused on Bomba, a female Asian elephant, to monitor her activities;

—Ultrasound procedure performed on Bomba to check for pregnancy;

—Cheetah introduction; —Necropsies performed on a Nile hippo and a black

rhino; —Japanese macaque behavior project; —Polar bear and cub on their emergence from the winter

den; and —A variety of additions to the collection. Although all video taping was done in-house, editing had

il to be done with outside service. Another visual technique used to reach the public was

It through printed material: —Concepts of a full-color promotional brochure were con­

ceived, and production will begin in 1983. —The 1983 "Limited Edition" Columbus Zoo Calendar

went on sale at Kroger Stores, with all proceeds being given to the Zoo. The Kroger Company made the pro­duction of this exquisite calendar possible.

—An honor was bestowed on the Columbus Zoo when it was asked to provide the photography for the AAZPA Membership Brochure. This brochure will be distri­buted by AAZPA and its' member institutions across the country.

The Media Production Department also worked on a num-id ber of special projects:

—Early in 1982, administered the College Intern Program and worked with photography interns throughout the year.

—Coordinated the Education Program and sessions for the 1982 AAZPA Great Lakes Conference.

—Coordinated the administration of grant funds amount­ing to $35,000 from the Institute of Museum Services.

—Aided in the initial design of the proposed outdoor goril­la exhibit; and

—Aided in the organization of the Columbus Zoo's Annual Wildlife Art Show.

REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS The year 1982 saw the completion of the last phase of ma­

jor work involved in converting the old Small Mammals Building into an Amphibian Building. The facility was par­tially converted to amphibian displays in 1980, with the re­mainder of the displays completed in 1981. Construction in 1982 has been a matter of completion of renovation of the service areas and service systems to allow for the close con­trol and manipulation of environments that is required by these animals.

Additionally, an annex was constructed to the Amphibian Building to house the giant Aldabra Tortoises during the winter. This facility was designed to be more than a holding cage and incorporated several aspects of construction that served a variety of purposes for the turtles, as well as provid­ing an attractive year-round display.

To complete the project, the building and annex were covered with cedar siding, which made a significant im­provement in the appearance of that area of the grounds.

The animal collection has shown growth in conjunction with the opening of new facilities. The present inventory (876 specimens, with 66 specimens in on breeding loans and 41 specimens out on breeding loans; and a total of 901 speci­mens on hand) is the largest in the history of the zoo, and possibly in the country. These numbers do not, however, reflect a desire to simply accumulate all of the specimens that can be accumulated. A large part of the increase (from 765 specimens on hand at the end of 1981) reflects the en­largement of our amphibian collection and a subsequent enlargment of the lizard collection; this latter due to availa­bility of cage space in the Reptile Building.

Many of the specimens on hand reflect groups of progeny from the collection which are being retained in the collec­tion for a variety of reasons. Overall, the increase reflects success in a department program to maintain breeding groups of many forms as opposed to single specimens or pairs.

Breeding results for the year in terms of numbers are the best that the collection has had.

A total of 194 progeny were produced representing 27 forms. A completely new and unique experience was the occurrence of births or hatchings in every month of the year.

Noteworthy births and hatchings were: —A first captive breeding of South American toad-headed

turtles (Batrachemys nasuta); the hatching of third-generation Costa Rican ground turtles Rhinoclemmys pulchirrima manni), the parents of these were hatched here in 1979 as a result of captive breeding; the birth of three litters of Madagascan ground boas (Acrantophis dumerillii), two of which were bred by animals raised in the collection which were the result of a breeding loan.

—With the birth of a litter of cantils (Agfcistrodon b. bilineatus), as a result of a breeding loan, to one of the females born here in 1977, a total of 5 forms have been maintained in the collection through four successive generations. A total of 18 forms has now been main­tained through three or more successive generations. At present, 343 specimens in the collection are captive bred (39% of the total).

—Two additional forms bred while out on breeding loan, and progeny were received by the collection.

—As is typical, however, success in some forms was mar­red by failure or near misses in others. The adult pair which produced the hatchling toad headed turtles both died as a result of chemical contamination of their tank; and 4 of 7 Costa Rican ground turtles, raised here since 1979, which produced young this year died from unde­termined causes. Breeding was not fully successful in alligator snapping turtles (Macroclemmys temmincki); although three living young were hatched, none sur­vived until the end of the year. Although this form has bred in captivity in several collections, this was the first captive breeding to have occurred with the animals maintained under artificial conditions indoors through­out the year. Viable eggs which incubated to full term, but did not hatch, were produced by greater plated lizards (Gerrhosaurus major grandis) and yellow spot­ted sideneck turtles (Podocnemis unifilis).

The past twelve months have been a series of ups and downs for the Research Department of the Columbus Zoo,

with fortunately, more ups than downs. However, two im­portant reproductive physiology projects (black rhino and Asian elephant) came to an unavoidable, and less than satis­factory, close during 1982. Black Rhino Artificial Breeding Project

The first major disappointment occurred when much of the Black Rhino Artificial Breeding Project was terminated with the sudden demise of "Bonnie", our female black rhi­no. Bonnie's death came as the result of a hemolytic anemia of unknown etiology. This rapidly progressing and almost always fatal disease process seems to occur with distressing frequency among captive black rhinos. All of the informa­tion obtained during the five-day duration (normally a 48 to 72 hour process) of Bonnie's condition was provided to Dr. Eric Miller of the St. Louis Zoo, who is currently investigat­ing this phenomena.

On a positive note, one aspect of the project continued with the collection of semen from our male, "Clyde". In Au­gust, the Greater Cincinnati Wildlife Research Foundation, which functions under the direction of Dr. Betsy Dresser as a joint venture of the Cincinnati Zoo, King's Island Wild Animal Safari, and the University of Cincinnati, became a participant in studies of the preservation of black rhino se­men. Semen was collected from Clyde and taken to Cincin­nati, where investigation into maximum efficiency of va­rious extenders was conducted. With the departure of an intern involved in this project, the cooperative efforts were temporarily discontinued in December. It is anticipated that delivery of semen to Cincinnati will resume in 1983.

Bomba. Female Asian Elephant Another disappointment arose in 1982 when it eventually

became apparent that Bomba, one of two female Asian elephants housed at the Zoo, would not be giving birth re­latively soon after all. This has been a particularly "myste­rious" situation, since the assumption of Bomba's pregnan­cy was based on the results of numerous intra-pelvic ex­aminations via ultrasound, serum assays for progesterone, and even electrocardiograms, all of which seemed to indi­cate pregnancy (as did progressive changes in Bomba's appearance!). There remains, perhaps, a remote possibility that Bomba was suffering from some reproductive disorder, although this would be difficult to verify. At any rate, back to the drawing board for Bomba and Coco. Lowland Gorilla Artificial Insemination

One of the more exciting endeavors in 1982 was the artifi­cial insemination of Toni, an 11-year-old lowland gorilla. Af­ter several months of urine collection, assay, and synchro­nization of ovulation via an antiestrogenic non-steroid, Toni was inseminated on 12 December 1982 with semen provided by the Milwaukee County Zoo. As of 31 DEcember 1982, it was difficult to determine, with certainty, whether concep­tion had indeed taken place. Due to unexpected problems encountered with semen quality upon thawing, however, it is highly unlikely that the attempt will have proven to be successful. Based upon the appearance of the cervix and the location via ultrasound of an encouraging structure on the ovary, the effort at regulating the time of ovulation appeared to be successful. If indeed Toni is not pregnant, the proce­dure will be repeated in the first half of 1983.

A project of this sort is a major undertaking, involving a number of individuals from several facilities. In addition to several members of the Research Advisory Council (recog­nized later in this report) and numerous Zoo employees (particularly the keepers in the Ape House), the following persons and facilities must be recognized for their contribu­tions: Dr. Ken Gould, Yerkes Primate research Ctr. Dr. Gil Boese, Dr. Bruce Beehler and Ken Kawata, Mil­

waukee County Zoo Dr. James Geyer, Bill Chestnut, Glen Landis, Kay Wheeler

and others of Biomedical Reference Labs, a division of LaRoche Biomedical Labs

Dr. Larry Stempel Merrill Research Center

Several persons either affiliated with the Research Advis­ory Council or conducting research at the Zoo were partici­pants in the AAZPA Great Lakes Regional Conference held here in April. These participants and their presentations were as follows: Dr. Harley Blank—"Slide Presentation of the Application of Ultra-Sound Technology in Zoos" Dr. Richard McClead—"Neonatal Care in Gorillas"

Mark Stanley—"Time Budget Analysis of Exotic Ungulates in Relation to Predator Behaviour in a Zoological Garden" Anna Bellisari and Paul W. Sciulli—"Application of Growth Standards to the Early Growth of Captive Gorillas"

Additionally, an informal session dealing with gorillas in captivity was coordinated by the Research Director.

Internship Program and Graduate Students A numbef of students from surrounding colleges and uni­

versities undertook research projects at the Zoo. Most of the students participated in the Zoo's Internship Program, now fully coordinated by the Education Department. A graduate student at Ohio State University began work on his doctor­ate in 1982 and his project is scheduled for completion in 1985. His project is an investigation into hormonal and be­havioral correlates of infertility in captive gorillas. The proj­ect has already involved cooperation from a number of in­stitutions maintaining gorillas, indicating recognition of the potential in the proposal to significantly affect the captive propagation of gorillas.

Research Advisory Council The Research Advisory Council was again an important

part of the Zoo's research efforts in 1982. All of the projects previously mentioned, as well as other work undertaken in the past year, involved members of the council. Most of the members went to great extents in assisting the Columbus Zoo and other institutions in their efforts. As an example: Dr. Walter Threlfall and the Research Director traveled to Benson's Wild Animal Park in New Hampshire to collect semen and blood serum from a male gorilla previously clas­sified as non-spermatogenic. Dr. Margaret Snyder, formerly of the Ohio State Research Foundation and a member of the Research Advisory Coun­cil, joined the Zoo staff in October as Development Director. 1982 Research Advisory Council: Joseph Cross, M.D. (Chairperson) Internal Medicine—Millhon Clinic, Inc. James N. Baird, M.D. OB-GYN—3545 Olentangy River Road Marilyn Coleman, Ph.D. Poultry Science, MAC Associates David Culver, Ph.D. Inverterbrate Zoology, Ohio State University John P. Donahoe, D.V.M., Ph.D. Avian Disease, Virology, immunology, OSU Paul Fuerst, Ph.D. Genetics, Ohio State University Harrison Gardner, D.V.M. Exotic Animal Medicine, Ohio State University Robert Hamlin, D.V.M. Veterinary Cardiology, Ohio State University Richard McClead, M.D. Neonatology, Children's Hospital Arveta McKim Organic/Biochemistry, Chemical Abstracts Service Deborah Near-Morales Marine Chemistry, Chemical Abstract Services Frank Poirier, Ph.D. Anthropology, Ohio State University Mary Seanlon, Ph.D. Organic Chemistry, Chemical Abstract Services Thomas Stockdale OSU School of Natural Resources (Wildlife) Walter Threlfall, D.V.M. Theriogenology and Veterinary Medicine, OSU Charles Tweel, M.D. General Practice—1555 Bethel Road William Tyznik, Ph.D. Animal Nutrition, Ohio State University Milton Wyman, D.V.M. Veterinary Ophthalmology, Ohio State University Steve Weisbrode, D.V.M. Veterinary Pathology, Ohio State University Mike July, General Curator Columbus Zoo Harry Peachey, Research Director Columbus Zoo Margaret Duber Snyder, Ph.D. Development Director, Columbus Zoo

It should be noted that without the assistance and coop eration of the Columbus Zoo staff, supervisors and keeper: in particular, none of the previously mentioned project: would have been possible.

CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 63

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLUMBUS ANNUAL REPORT—1982

Section 3 of the Charter of the City of Columbus directs "the legislative power of the city, except as reserved to the people by this Charter, shall be vested in a Council, consist­ing of seven members, elected at large."

As of January 1, 1982, members of Council were: M. D. Portman, President, M. Stephen Boley, Ben Espy, Jerry Hammond, President Pro Tern, David E. Cain, Charles A. Mentel and Dorothy S. Teater.

Pursuant to the Rules of Council, members were appointed to committees in Finance; Service; Safety; Zoning; Judiciary; Airport; Development, Health and Com­munity Services; Energy and Telecommunication, and

Rules and Reference. Fifty (50) regular meetings were convened in 1982. During

the year 1982, there were 2,498 ordinances and 256 resolu­tions considered and acted upon, including 113 rezoning ap­plications and 101 variances.

In addition to these responsibilities on standing commit­tees, Council members were represented on commissions, boards and funds throughout the City's administrative com­plex. Among these were Police Subsidiary and Hare Charity Trust Funds; the Parks and Recreation, and Traffic and Transportation Commissions; Taxicab and Welfare Boards, and the Airport and Board of Health Commissions.

OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK ANNUAL REPORT—1982

The City Clerk is appointed by City Council and is re­sponsible for keeping all records of that body. She performs other duties as directed by the City Charter, and as required by members of Council.

The City Clerk also serves as secretary of the Board of Hare Charity Trust Fund, the Records Commission, the Charitable Solicitations Board and serves on the Informa­tion Services Commission. Further the Clerk is responsible for the custody of all laws and ordinances of the City and their proper recording. She serves as Editor of the City Bul­letin, the official publication of the City, which is published weekly by the City Clerk's Office, and contains the official report of the proceedings of Council, legislation acted upon, legal notices and advertisements for bids by various depart­ments and divisions.

As the codifier of the general ordinances of the City, the Clerk maintains current supplements which are updated and distributed as required. Several of the pertinent code series are published in book form and made available at

minimal charge. Among them are: the Traffic Code, General Offense, Zoning and Building Codes. Copies of the City Charter and the Public Information Booklet, "Columbus Ohio" also can be obtained from the Clerk's Office.

In the capacity of Clerk to the Standing Committees of Council, the staff serves 50 regular meetings, when a total of 2,498 ordinances and 256 resolutions were considered and acted upon, including 113 rezoning applications and 101 variances. A regular and correct Journal of the Proceedings of each meeting was maticulously maintained. In-person and telephone inquiries, in addition to the voluminous cor­respondence received regarding the infinite variety of coun­cilmanie responsibilities, were courteously, promptly and efficiently handled.

From the receipt of proposed legislation and the prepara­tion of the agenda, with all attendant myriad details, to final floor action, unusual challenges were consistently met with the professional competence characteristic of her dedicated staff personnel.

HARE CHARITY TRUST FUND ANNUAL REPORT—1982

This is a report of the Hare Charity Trust Fund for the Year 1982. It includes a statement of general expenditures and revenues, assets and liabilities, and an analysis of the sources of income for the Fund.

The general purpose of this Annual Report is to describe the functioning of the Fund through the year 1982. A state­ment of investment transactions is included in this report to show all the holdings of the Hare Charity Trust Fund.

The securities held by the Trust Fund are analyzed cur­rently in terms of the percentage of return on investment in order to evaluate their performance. These calculations are based upon income received in the City Clerk's Office dur­ing the year 1982.

HARE CHARITY TRUST FUND BALANCE SHEET

At December 31. 1982 ASSETS Cash with City Treasurer Investments—Securities Investments—Real Estate

$ 5,268.31 240,089.10 100,290.00

HARE ORPHANS HOME Land—Improvements

(Prev. Y.T.D.) Building—Maint. & Repairs

(Prev. Y.T.D.) Furniture & Equipment

(Prev. Y.T.D.)

$ 2,545.00

40,675.67

333.95 $ 43,554.62

TOTAL ASSETS $389,202.03

LIABILITIES Reserve for Encumbrances Capital Invested in Securities & Real Estate . Capital Invested in Hare Orphans Home

I Unappropriated Revenues ' TOTAL LIABILITIES

$ 503.65 340,379.10 43,554.62

$ 4,764.66 $389,202.03

STATEMENT OF RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES 1982

Cash Balance January 1, 1982 $ 12,449.53

RECEIPTS Interest from Securities $ 23,075.94 Rent 1,651.00 Refund 15.00

TOTAL RECEIPTS $ 24,741.94 TOTAL, BALANCE & RECEIPTS $ 37,191.47

EXPENDITURES Utilities $ 3,166.01 Custodial Services 7,200.00 Boiler, Fire Insurance & Insp. Fees 345.00 Support of Community Agencies 14,500.00 Trust Fund Federal Excise Tax—IRS 286.00 Newspaper Ad—Trust Report 28.75 Land & Building Improvements 3,531.00 Investment Securities 9,827.10

TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 38,883.86

Cash Balance December 31, 1982 $ 5,268.31 Outstanding Encumbrances December 31, 1982 $ 503.65 Unencumbered Cash Balance December 31, 1982 $ 4,764.66

64 CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

ADDRESS 251-255 S. High St., Cols., O.

2104 Tuller St., Cols., O. (Hare Orphans Home)

HARE CHARITY RENTAL PROPERTY

Parcel No. Lessee

30102 Mrs. Chloe A. F r e shman

Assessed Tax Value of Property

$ 41,160.00* 8,620.00**

66784 Big Brothers/Big Sisters $12,080.00* Association 38,430.00**

T O T A L $100,290.00

*Land Value (As listed on Tax Duplicate—County Treasurer & County Audi tor^ ** Building Value (AS listed on Tax Duplicate—County Treasurer & County Auditor)

REAL ESTATE INCOME

DESCRIPTION: 251-255 South High Street, Cols., O 2104 Tuller Street, Cols., O. (Hare Orphans H o m e ) .

TOTAL INCOME—REAL ESTATE •Leased Annually to Big Brothers/Big Sisters Assn.

Appraised True Value of Property $117,600.00

24,628.00

$142,228.00 $334,514.00

109,800.00 $144,314.00 $286,542.00

Rental Per Quarter $412.50

Amount Received

$1,650.00 1.00*

$1,651.00

HARE CHARITY TRUST FUND STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31. 1982

BALANCE 12-31-81

No. Description of Stocks: Shs. American Electric Power 460 American Telephone & Telegraph 100 Cincinnati Gas & Electric 100 Cols. & Sou. Ohio Electric (15.25 S e r i e s ) . . . . 126 Commonweal th Edison Company First Banc Group of Ohio, Inc 322 General Electric 100 Gen. Telephone of Sou thwes t (Pfd 5.1) 300 International Te lephone & Telegraph 100 National Securit ies (Pfd Stock Series) 1720 Pacific Power & Light. 200 P u t n a m Income F u n d , Inc 954 Tenneco 200 United Telephone of Ohio (Pfd 8.40) 100 United Utilities (United Telecommun.) 400

TOTAL STOCKS.

Description — Bonds: Cinic. & Sub. Telephone 83/s Cols. & Sou. Ohio Elect 75/8 New York Te lephone 8.00 Ohio Bell Te lephone 83/. Ohio Edison Company 4'/2 Sears, Roebuck & Co 85/8 Huntington Nat'l . Bank 16.00 Hunt ington Nat ' l . Bank 8.518 Dollar Savings 14.48 Hunt ington Nat ' l . Bank 11.27

Rate Maturity Shares 10-01-09 5M 5-01-99 7M 7-15-08 10M 11-01-10 10M 4-01-89 20M 10-01-95 5M 9-30-83 10M 6-22-83 59M 1-15-82 10M 2-10-83

TOTAL BONDS TOTAL INVESTMENTS HELD BY

TRUST FUND

ADDITIONS DISPOSALS

Cost $ 10,380.45

4,350.00 2,437.50 9,775.00

7,111.20 5,462.50 6,375.00 5,487.50

14,738.40 4,650.00 9,143.48 5,000.00 9,950.00 6,550.00

$101,411.03

Cost 5,500.00 6,780.00

10,119.30 10,850.00 20,231.00

5,575.00 10,116.25 59,000.00 10,000.00

No. Shs.

$138,171.55

$239,582.50

400 177

No. Cost Shs.

$ 9,650.00

Cost

954 $ 9,143.48

BALANCE 12-31-82

No. Shs. 460 100 100 126 400 499 100 300 100

1720 200

$ 9,650.00 $ 9,143.48

10M $ 10,000.00

$ 10,000.00

200 100 400

Cost $ 10,380.45

4,350.00 2,437.50 9,775.00 9,650.00 7,111.20 5,462.50 6,375.00 5,487.50

14,738.40 4,650.00

5,000.00 9,950.00 6,550.00

$101,917.55

10M $ 10,000.00

5M 7M

10M 10M 20M

5M 10M 59M

10M

10,000.00

5,500.00 6,780.00

10,119.30 10,850.00 20,231.00

5,575.00 10,116.25 59,000.00

10,000.00

$138,171.55

$240,089.10

DETAILED ACCOUNT OF Interest

Description — Stocks: Received American Electric Power $ 1,039.60 American Telephone & Telegraph 540.00 Cincinnati Gas & Electric 211.50 Cols. & Sou. Ohio Electric (15.25 Ser.) 533.76 First Banc Group of Ohio (Banc One Corp . ) . . 643.65 General Electric 330.00 Gen. Telephone of Sou thwes t (Pfd 5.1) 306.00 International Te lephone & Telegraph 268.00 National Securi t ies (Pfd S tock Series) 1,221.20 Pacific Power & Light 324.00 P u t n a m Income Fund , Inc 724.50 Tenneco 526.00 United Telephone of Ohio (Pfd 8.40) 840.00 United Utilities (United Te lecommunica t ions) 680.00

TOTAL I N T E R E S T RECEIVED—1982 . . $ 8,188.25

SECURITIES INCOME

Description — Bonds: Cincinnati & S u b . T e l e p h o n e (Cinci, Bel l ) . . Cols. & Sou. Ohio Electr ic New York Te lephone Ohio Bell Te lephone Ohio Edison C o m p a n y Sears, Roebuck & Co Hunt ing ton Nat ' l . B a n k — CD's Dollar Savings

TOTAL I N T E R E S T RECEIVED—1982 TOTAL S E C U R I T I E S INCOME—1982.

418.76 1,921.52

800.00 875.00 900.00 431.26

8,1?0.61 1,440.54

U'1

OH. 00 a.". i;<

•, $14,887.69 G(. $23,075.94 )M! =

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 65

DETAILED ACCOUNT OF SECURITIES GAINS

Description — Stocks: American Electric Power American Telephone &

Telegraph Cincinnati Gas & Electric Cols. & Sou. Ohio Electric

(15.25 Series) #POM Commonwealth

Edison Company First Banc Group of Ohio,

Inc. (Banc One Corp.) General Electric Gen. Telephone of Southwest

(Pfd 5.1) INternational Telephone &

Telegraph National Securities

(Pfd Stock Series) Pacific Power & Light Tenneco United Telephone of Ohio

(Pfd 8.40) United Utilities (United

Telecommunications) TOTAL STOCKS

Cost* $ 10,380.45

4,350.00 2,437.50

9,775.00

9,650.00

7,111.20 5,462.50

6,375.00

5,487.50

14,738.40 4,650.00 5,000.00

9,950.00

6,550.00

$101,411.03

Approx. Market

V a l u e " $ 8,165.00

5,937.50 1,862.50

13,324.50

10,100.00

19,211.50 9,487.50

11,325.00

3,125.00

11,713.20 4,225.00 6,475.00

6,200.00

8,350.00

$119,501.70

Description — Bonds: Cinci. & Sub. Telephone

(Cincinnati Bell, Inc.) $ 5,500.00 $ 3,550.00 Cols. & Sou. Ohio Electric 6,780.00 4,270.00 New York Telephone 10,119.30 6,975.00 Ohio Bell Telephone 10,850.00 7,300.00 Ohio Edison Company 20,231.00 12,775.00 Sears, Roebuck & Company 5,575.00 4,043.75 Huntington Nat'l. Bank—CD's.. 79,116.25 79,000.00

TOTAL BONDS $138,171.55 $11.7,913.75 GRAND TOTAL — SECURITIES

HELD BY TRUST FUND . . . . $239,582.50 $237,415.45

* Original price paid for securities. ** Value of securities ending December 31, 1982.

NOTE During 1982, the Hare Charity Trust Fund Committee of

City Council, through its Chairman, Council President, M. D. Portman, recommended to the Trustees (Columbus City Council) that the following awards be granted:

$10,000.00 Big Brothers/Big Sisters Assn. 2,500.00 Operation Feed (Hunger Task Force) 2,000.00 Columbus Youth Corps

Interest from securities, and rental of property held by the Trust Fund provided sufficient monies to meet the above obligations.

DEPARTMENT OF CITY TREASURER ANNUAL REPORT—1982

Section 88 of the Columbus City Charter states in part: The Treasurer shall be the custodian of all money belong-

n ing to the City and, subject to the provisions of any specific il trust, of all money held in trust by it." Section 92 of the 0 Columbus City Charter states: "The Treasurer shall keep an n; accurate, systematized and detailed account of all money 1 received and disbursed by him."

The financial schedules and comments contained in this •)i report present the transactions of 1982 and the financial •q position at December 31, 1982. The following comments on dl the Schedules are made in order to clarify and expand cer-m tain data. 'E SCHEDULE I indicates cash receipts and disbursements each n in excess of three billion, 415 million dollars during the year '!11982. This Schedule represents the cash flow through the 1 Treasurer's Office, whether it be normal collections or a re-i suit of investment activity.

A SCHEDULE II indicates the composition of the year-end bal-IL ance of assets and liabilities for which the Treasurer was >i accountable, including Treasury Investments. I: SCHEDULE III presents the year-end reconciliation of active I checking accounts of the City of Columbus. I SCHEDULE IV shows where the City of Columbus bank > accounts are maintained and the balances and the amount i of collateral pledged to the City of Columbus at December t 31, 1982. Taxpayers' funds are protected by Section 135.18, >:-iRevised Code of Ohio, and Section 321.08, Columbus City i Codes, which require collateral for City funds. Considering ir the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance of

$100,000.00, all banks exceed the minimum collateral re-.Jiquirement.

SCHEDULE V shows comparative earnings from Treasury In->9 vestment for the years 1971 through 1982.

I wish to acknowledge the assistance and cooperation : accorded to myself by Mr. Hugh J. Dorrian, City Auditor

and Mr. Harmon Beyer, Finance Director along with their

staffs, together with the personnel of the banks and finan­cial institutions involved in making these earnings possible. I would also like to acknowledge the staff of the Treasurer's Office for their competent and diligent help in continuing the improvement of the treasury investment earnings. SCHEDULE VI shows each investment transaction and the earnings thereon. During 1982 the Treasury Investment Board (City Treasurer, Chairman) continued the policy adopted in 1966 of investing every available dollar in approved investments. Such investments are approved by Section 325.01 of the Columbus City Codes. (These funds were invested for periods varying from 24 hours, weekends and up to one year.) SCHEDULE VII shows historical data regarding collections for parking meters. SCHEDULE VHI The Hare Charity Fund is administered by the City Clerk at the direction of City Council. The City Treasurer acts solely as custodian of the investments owned by the Fund. Such investments are shown in Schedule VIII of this report. SCHEDULE LX The Columbus Police Department maintains a pension fund known as the 'Police Relief Fund'. This Fund is strictly private moneys of the members and is adminis­tered by the Board of Trustees of the Fund. Again, the City Treasurer acts solely as the custodian of certain assets of the fund. The cash position as held by the custodian of the fund is set forth in Schedule I. The portion of investments owned by the Police Relief Fund and held by the custodian are shown in Schedule IX. SCHEDULE X The City Treasurer is the custodian of certain collateral deposited by taxi cab companies in lieu of insur­ance as provided by Sections 587.06 through 587.09, Co­lumbus, Ohio City Codes. Schedule X shows the companies and the related collateral. Schedule X also shows collateral deposited by others in accordance with contracts negotiated by various departments and/or divisions of the City.

66 CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

CITY OF COLUMBUS. OHIO SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31. 1982

Fund Description City Funds Sinking Fund Police Relief F u n d

Sub Total Add: Investments Advance Receipts

Total

(1) Investments purchased (2) Investments sold or matured. Brackets 0 denote deduct ions.

Balance 12-31-81

$(1,131,622.91) 1,045,510.65

7,786.37

(78,325.89)

193,362,199.74 1,192,838.11

Receipts $1,436,893,564.48

794,147,769.70 94,691.12

$2,231,136,025.30 (1)

977,567,480.84 206,605,628.86

Disbursements $1,436,550,647.77

794,656,146.11 89,651.54

$2,231,296,445.42 (2)

1,017,126,284.74 206,756,725.38

SCHEDU'

Balance 12-31-82

$(788,70610 537,134-

12,825:::'

i (238,746)!-

153,803.395 1,041,741: J-7

$194,476,711.96 $3,415,309,135.00 $3,455,179,455.54 $154,606,3916;

ASSETS AT YEAR END 12-31-82

Cash in Banks Cash on Hand Deposit in Transit Internal Collection I tems Due from Sinking F u n d Rebates Paid Returned Checks

Sub Total

Investments

Total

LIABILITIES AT YEAR-END 12-31-82 Fund Balances per Auditor Police Relief Fund Auditors warrants payable Advance Receipts

Payroll Total

scHEDunr $ 5^

267t.

2i,ia,i-395,6:

99,4*te(! 18,56.8 •

802,9:. ill

153,80.:

$154,60ti

$145,267,4 , 12,8.£i

7,885 1,041,

$154,60(3

BANK RECONCILIATIONS DECEMBER 31, 1982

BancOhio Huntington Bank One National National of

D , Bank Bank Columbus. NA

P l u s D e p o S t ! ?n T h E S S T ? ^ J * ™ 7 ' 9 5 » ^ « Less: u

Bills Collected by Banks in 1982; Adjuletmerntsd i n C U y ^ " ^ l n 1 9 8 3 " (56,348.75) (143,869.17) (18,855.07)

Errors Corrected in J anua ry 1983 . 374 74 m q s n _ n _ Outstanding Checks - 0 - (5,088 75) ( 8 , 6 ^ 8 7 )

Balance per Books $ 305.27 $ 20.72 $ 248.53

(2) S c t o S s I I ° a f „ 1 1 v r e C O n C i l i n g i t 6 m S °" file i n C i t y T r e a s u r e r ' s Office. Brackets ( ) denote deduct ions .

SCHEDl

Payroll Account

Bank One $101,265.72

—0—

677.52 (101,943.24)

$ —0—

Totals alnloT $334,413.4

—0—

(219,072.!

962.: (115,728

$ 574.r •;

CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 67

CASH IN BANK DEPOSITORIES SCHEDULE IV AND RELATED COLLATERAL PLEDGED

DECEMBER 31 . 1982

C o l l a t e r a l C h e c k i n g & F .D. I .C .

Depository A c c o u n t I n s u r a n c e BancOhio N a t i o n a l B a n k . . $305 .27 $ P o o l e d

C o l l a t e r a l ** Bank O n e of C o l u m b u s ,

N A 2 0 - 7 2 24 ,397,687.37* Hun t ing ton N a t i o n a l B a n k . 248 .53 48 ,024 ,247 .85* A m e n t m s t - 0 - 200,000.00* Buckeye F e d e r a l — 0 — — 0 — Dollar F e d e r a l - 0 - 2 ,000,000.00* Ohio S t a t e B a n k - 0 - 800,000.00* Society B a n k — 0 — — 0 — State S a v i n g s — 0 — 3,000,000.00* F reedom F e d e r a l - 0 - 2 ,640,000.00*

T o t a l $574.52(1) $81,061,935.22

(1) S c h e d u l e I I I * F.D.I.C. I n s u r a n c e of $100 ,000 .00 a d d e d . ** P o o l of S e c u r i t i e s i s m a i n t a i n e d a t M a n u f a c t u r e r s

H a n o v e r T r u s t C o . , N e w Y o r k , N . Y . , Q u a r t e r l e y s t a t e ­m e n t s a v a i l a b l e u p o n r e q u e s t .

STATEMENT OF TREASURY SCHEDULE V INVESTMENT EARNINGS

COMPARATIVE FIGURES 1971 thru 1982

TOTAL INVESTMENT

YEAR EARNINGS 1971 $ 4,813,178.59 1972 4,849,967.82 1973 8,615,690.14 1974 10,819,601.96 1975 6,598,704.32 1976 6,227,702.71 1977 6,656,547.71 1978 8,096,045.44 1979 25,886,248.57 1980 34,020,191.28 1981 38,178,141.30 1982 24,487,392.69

T O T A L $179,249,412.53 (1) (1) $8,183,891.48 of t h e s e I n v e s t m e n t E a r n i n g s r e p r e s e n t

e a r n i n g s o n R E p u r c h a s e A g r e e m e n t s i n a u g u r a t e d on J a n u a r y 29, 1971. T h i s t y p e of i n v e s t m e n t e n a b l e s t h e T r e a s u r e r t o m a i n t a i n m i n i m a l b a n k b a l a n c e s wh i l e hav­i n g suf f ic ien t f u n d s a v a i l a b l e to m e e t all ob l iga t ions .

TREASURY INVESTMENT FUND INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1982 COBI 11)

Purchase Maturity Description Date Yield Date C.D.-BancOhio 10-13-81 14.90 1-04-82; C.D.-BancOhio 10-16-81 15.15 1-04-82

' C.D.-BancOhio 10-14-81 15.00 1-04-82 REPO-BancOhio . . . . 12-28-81 11.50 1-04-82 REPO-BancOhio . . . . 12-28-81 11.50 1-04-82 CD-BancOhio 10-20-81 15.15 1-05-82 C.D.-BankOne 10-21-81 15.13 1-06-82 C.D.-Huntington . . . . 10-23-81 14.90 1-07-82 CD-Bank One 10-23-81 14.90 1-07-82 C.D.-BancOhio 10-23-81 15.125 1-08-82 C.D.-Bank One 10-27-81 14.90 1-11-82 C.D.-Bank One 10-28-81 14.80 1-12-82

, REPO-BancOhio . . . . 12-30-81 11.50 1-12-82 " REPO/BancOhio . . . . 12-30-81 11.50 1-12-82

C.D.-BancOhio 10-30-81 14.625 1-13-82 FNMA Disc. Notes-BancOhio 9-24-81 15.51 1-14-82 C.D.-BankOne 11-02-81 14.50 1-18-82 REPO-BancOhio . . . . 1-07-82 11.50 1-18-82 CD-Bank One 11-02-81 14.50 1-19-82 C.D.-Bank One 11-02-81 14.50 1-20-82 CD-Bank One 11-02-81 14.50 1-21-82 REPO-BancOhio . . . . 1-13-82 11.50 1-21-82 REPO-BancOhio . . . . 1-11-82 11.50 1-21-82 REPO-BancOhio . . . . 1-11-82 11.50 1-21-82 CD-BancOhio 11-03-81 14.10 1-22-82 C.D.-Huntington . . . . 11-04-81 14.13 1-25-82 C.D.-Huntington . . . . 11-05-81 13.90 1-26-82 C.D.-Huntington . . . . 11-05-81 13.90 1-27-82 FNMA Disc. Notes-BancOhio 9-24-81 15.60 1-28-82 C.D.-BancOhio 11-05-81 13.95 1-28-82 FHLB Notes-5 a ' r d „ & Company . . INTEREST ONLY (These ^IJ.-BancOhio 11-06-81 - - - - -KEPO-BancOhio . . . . 1-28-82 S R -gancOhio 11-06-81 CD-Bank One 11-09-81 £PJ?a„nk 0 n e 11-10-81 S™°.-§ a n c 0 n i° •••• 1-28-82 gfPO-BankOhio . . . . 1-26-82 REPO-BancOhio . . . . 1-25-82 kPpB^One 11-10-81 BrES"§anc0hl° • • - 2-03-82 SpDX"lancShio • • • • 2-02-82 REPO-BancOhio . . . . 1-28-82 CD.-Huntington . . . . 11-16-81 oPp-BmcOhio 11-18-81 S BancOhio . . . . 2-08-82 KEPO-BancOhio . . . . 2-08-82 n<jT'2u ,! l t lS? t o n • • - H-18-81 UbT Bills-Disc -r n a D C ° h i ? 11-02-81 R r D n r ? c 0 h l 0 11-19-81 S^PO-BancOhio . . . . 2-08-82 S?p Bank One 11-20-81 REPO-BancOhio . . . . 2-08-82 -u.-BaneOhio 11-23-81

1365 12.375 13.65 12.73 12.63 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.63 12.00 12.00 12.00 11.50 12.00 13.00 13.00 11.50

13.52 11.50 13.00 11.92 13.00 11.30

2-01-82 2-01-82 2-02-82 2-03-82 2-04-82 2-04-82 2-04-82 2-04-82 2-05-82 2-05-82 2-05-82 2-05-82 2-08-82 2-09-82 2-09-82 2-09-82 2-10-82

2-11-82 2-12-82 2-12-82 2-16-82 2-16-82 2-17-82

Face Value 2,500,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 3,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00

4,772,888.89 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

4,744,500.00 4,000,000.00

Notes ma tu re on 7 2,500,000.00 5,000,000.00 2,500.000.00 2,000,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00

4,819,743.06 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 3,000,000.00

500,000.00 3,000,000.00

Balance 12-31-81 2,500,000.00 < 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 3,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00

4,772,888.89 2,000,000.00

2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

4,744,500.00 4,000,000.00

26-82, this is a 2,500,000.00

2,500,000.00 2 000,000.00 1,500,000.00

1,500,000.00

2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00

2,000,000.00

4,819,743.06 2,000,000.00

3,000,000.00

3,000,000.00

500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

partial interest

5,000,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00

500,000.00

500,000.00

Matured or Sold 2,500,000.00 $ 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 3,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00

4,772,888.89 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 2.000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2 000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

4,744,500.00 4,000.000.00

payment.) 2,500,000.00 5,000,000.00 2.500,000.00 2 000,000.00 1,500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 2 500.000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00

4,819,743.06 2,000.000.00

500,000.00 3,000,000.00

500,000.00 3 000,000.00

Balance 12-31-82

Earnings Received

$ 85,881.94 33,666.67 34,166.67

1,118.06 1,118.06

48,606.25 97,084.17 31,455.56 31,455.56 64,701.39 78,638.89 78,111.11

2,076.39 2,076.39

60,937.50

227,111.11 62,027.78

1,756.94 62,833.33 63,638.89 64,444.44

1,277.78 1,597.22 1,597.22

62,666.67 64,370.00 79.152.78 80,118.06

255,500.00 131.750.00

158,116.67 82,468.75 6,875.00

83,416.67 60,821.11 45,257.50

1,166.67 1,500.00 1,666.67

45.783.75 333.33 500.00

1,333.33 53,666.67 70,000.00

180.56 180.56

53,666.67

180,256.94 54,305.56

722.22 87.413.33

1,444.44 80,983.33

l l

68 CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

TREASURY INVESTMENT FUND INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31. 1982 Cost (1)

Description FNMA Notes-Disc-

REPO-BancOhio . . C.D.-Huntington . . REPO-BancOhio . . REPO-BancOhio . . REPO-BancOhio . . C.D.-Huntington . . C.D.-Bank One REPO-BancOhio . . C.D.-Bank One CD.-BankOhio C.D.-BancOhio FFCB Bonds-

C.D.-BancOhio C.D.-BancOhio REPO-BancOhio . . REPO-BancOhio . . REPO-BancOhio . . UST BUls-Disc-

C.D.-Bank One C.D.-BancOhio . . . . C.D.-BancOhio CD. -BankOhio C.D.-Bank One . . . . REPO-BancOhio . . REPO-BancOhio . . C.D.-Huntington . . C.D.-Huntington . . C.D.-Huntington . . C.D.-Bank One REPO-BancOhio . . REPO-BancOhio . . REPO-BancOhio . . C.D.-Huntington . . UST Bills-Disc-

BancOhio . . C.D.-Huntington . . C.D.-Bank One . . . . C.D.-Huntington . . C.D.-Huntington . . REPO-BancOhio . . C.D.-Huntington . . C.D.-BancOhio UST Bills-Disc. -

BancOhio C.D.-Huntington . . C.D.-Dollar Fed C.D.-BancOhio . . . . C.D.-BancOhio . . . . REPO-BancOhio . . REPO-BancOhio . . REPO-BancOhio . . REPO-BancOhio . . REPO-BancOhio . . REPO-BancOhio . . REPO-BancOhio . . REPO-BancOhio . . REPO-BancOhio . . REPO-BancOhio C.D.-BancOhio C.D.-Huntington . . C.D.-Bank One C.D.-BancOhio C.D.-BancOhio UST Bills-Disc-

McDonald & Co. C.D.-Huntington . . C.D.-Huntington . . C.D.-BancOne REPO-BancOhio . . REPO-BancOhio . . REPO-BancOhio . . C.D.-Huntington . . REPO-BancOhio . . C.D.-Bank One REPO-BancOhio . . REPO-BancOhio . . REPO-BancOhio . . REPO-BancOhio . . REPO-BancOhio . . C.D.-Huntington . . C.D.-Bank One C.D.-BancOhio C.D.-Huntington . . C.D.-Bank One REPO-BancOhio . . C.D.-Bank One C.D.-Bank One F H L B Bonds-

Purchase Date

9-17-81 . . 2-08-82 . . 11-24-81

2-08-82 2-08-82

. . 2-17-82

. . 11-24-81 11-27-81 2-22-82

11-30-81 . . 12-02-81

12-03-81

9-01-81 . . 12-03-81

12-03-81 2-22-82

. 2-25-82

. 2-26-82

12-03-81 12-04-81

. 12-04-81 12-04-81 12-04-81

. 12-07-81 3-01-82 3-03-82

. 12-08-81

. 12-08-81

. 12-11-81 12-14-81 3-09-82 3-08-82 3-04-82

. 12-15-81

2-18-82 . 12-16-81 . 12-17-81 . 12-18-81 . 12-21-81

3-15-82 . 12-22-81

12-23-81

12-24-81 . 12-24-81

12-31-81 1-05-82 1-06-82 3-17-82 3-22-82 3-29-82 3-29-82 3-29-82 3-29-82 3-30-82 3-31-82 3-31-82 3-31-82 1-06-82 1-08-82 1-08-82 1-11-82 1-11-82

. 10-08-81 1-12-82 1-12-82 1-13-82 4-05-82 4-05-82 4-05-82 1-19-82 4-05-82 1-20-82 4-06-82 4-06-82 4-06-82 4-05-82 4-06-82 1-22-82 1-21-82 1-25-82 1-26-82 1-27-82 4-06-82 1-29-82 1-29-82

5-26-81

Yield

15.40 13.00 11.27 13.00 13.00 13.00 11.27 11.13 13.00 11.17 11.625 11.75

17.85 11.75 11.75 13.00 13.00 12.00

10.81 11.44 11.00 11.00 11.70 11.36 12.00 12.00 11.30 11.40 12.02 12.41 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.18

15.51 11.70 12.31 12.27 12.52 13.00 12.48 12.25

11.49 12.48 13 13 12.75 12.70 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 12.70 12.67 12.73 12.75 12.80

15.24 13.03 13.07 13.02 13.75 13.75 13.75 13.13 13.75 13.32 13.75 13.75 13.75 13.75 13.75 13.57 13.32 14.125 14.27 14.03 13.75 13.86 13.89

17.05

Maturity Date

2-18-82 $ 2-18-82 2-19-82 2-19-82 2-19-82 2-19-82 2-19-82 2-23-82 2-23-82 2-24-82 2-25-82 2-26-82

3-01-82 3-02-82 3-03-82 3-03-82 3-03-82 3-03-82

3-04-82 3-05-82 3-08-82 3-08-82 3-09-82 3-10-82 3-10-82 3-10-82 3-11-82 3-12-82 3-15-82 3-16-82 3-16-82 3-16-82 3-16-82 3-17-82

3-17-82 3-18-82 3-19-82 3-22-82 3-23-82 3-23-82 3-24-82 3-25-82

3-25-82 3-26-82 3-29-82 3-30-82 3-31-82 4-01-82 4-01-82 4-01-82 4-01-82 4-01-82 4-01-82 4-01-82 4-01-82 4-01-82 4-01-82 4-01-82 4-02-82 4-05-82 4-06-82 4-07-82

4-08-82 4-09-82 4-12-82 4-13-82 4-13-82 4-13-82 4-13-82 4-14-82 4-14-82 4-15-82 4-15-82 4-15-82 4-15-82 4-15-82 4-15-82 4-16-82 4-16-82 4-19-82 4-20-82 4-21-82 4-21-82 4-22-82 4-23-82

4-26-82

Face Value

5,604,733.33 $ 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

8,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

4,868,681.95 2,500,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,400,000.00 2,500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00

3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00

2,888,297.50 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

500,000.00 2,500,000.00 1,000,000.00

4,860,719.45 2,500,000.00 2.000,000.00 2,500,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 2.500,000.00 2,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00

2,323,434.72 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

3,000,000.00 500,000.00

2,500,000.00 300,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 1,750,000.00 1,750,000.00

5,000,000.00

Balance 12-31-81

5,604,733.33 $

2,000,000.00

2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00

2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

8,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

4,868,681.95 2,500,000.00 1,000.000.00 2,000,000.00 2,400,000.00 2,500,000.00

3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

2,000,000.00

2,500,000.00 2,000.000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

2,500,000.00 1,000,000.00

4,860,719.45 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00

2,323,434.72

5,000,000.00

Purchases

$ 500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,888,297.50

500,000.00

2,500,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1.500,000.00

2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

3,000,000.00 500,000.00

2,500,000.00 300,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 1.000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 1,750,000.00 1,750,000.00

Matured or Sold

5,604,733.33 $ 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

8,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

4,868,681.95 2,500,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,400,000.00 2,500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00

3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000.000.00

500.000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00

2,888,297.50 2.500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

500,000.00 2,500,000.00 1,000,000.00

4,860,719.45 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,00000 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1.500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000 00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00

2,323,434.72 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

3,000,000.00 500,000.00

2,500,000.00 300,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 1,750,000.00 1,750,000.00

5,000,000.00

Balance 12-31-82

Earnings Received

395,266.67 f 1,805.56)'.

54.471.67,-. 1,986.11 1,986.11

371.531C.] 70,437.50). 54,413.33|t

180.56>." 53,367.78 54,895.83: 55,486.11

714,000.0011 58,097.2*C., 58,750.00

1,625.00)0.1 l,083.33!i,.t

833.33E.t, t

131,318.051. 72,294.444 : 28.722.22:. 57.444.441 74,100.000 73.36667 '

1.501) Ui 1,166.67

87 .575 .M. ; 88,350.01! 62,711.11 63,428.8?

1,166.67 1,333 2.001):

62,253.3f.': :

43,169.1 | . i ; 74,750.011 -' 62.917.7IT ~ 80,095.8c 79,988.8!.

1,444.4*1" 79,733.S. ' 31.305.5C •-

139,280.58." 79.733.3Cfi 64,191.1 74,375.0 44,450.0, n

2,708.3!.*' 1.805.K.C

541.1 541.6 541.8.-: 541.i 361.1 180.: 180.: 180.5

44,979.1 73,908.3 76,910.4" 45.156.J 45,866.t

176.565.1 62.978J.8, 65.350.1 65.100.1

1 , 5 2 V . . 1 1 , 5 2 * £ : 1 l , 5 2 M £ r I

93.004.1-1,718.18

78.625.fc; >., 1 . 0 3 H " ; 1 . 7 1 8 M ; , l ,718MiV. 1 .909 .P ' , . 1.718HV.I

4 7 , 4 9 5 * 1 ;>. 31,4508c 8 2 . 3 9 5 K . S 8 8 3 . 2 4 1 * ! : :i 49.105.BOi N-

2 , 8 6 » ! : • 55,92lBti,Cc 56,711». : i f !

426,250

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. O H IO 1982 69

TREASURY INVESTMENT FUND INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31. 1982 Cost (1)

Purchase .-(Description Date

CD. -BancOhio 2-01-82 . . C D - B a n k One 2-02-82 . C D - B a n k One 2-02-82 •::SEPO-Bank One . . . . 4-13-82 H E P O - B a n c O h i o 4-09-82 •UEPO-BancOhio 4-19-82 l ; .D.-Bank One 2-02-82 i. ; .D.-Huntington 2-05-82 • T T C B Notes-„3ancOhio 11-02-81 I.;.D.-BancOhio 2-09-82 l.:.D.-County Sav 2-09-82 l.;.D.-Bank One 2-10-82 1 tEPO-BancOhio 4-19-82

3REPO-BancOhio 4-19-82 ai lEPO-BancOhio 4-19-82 l.:.D.-Bank One 2-11-82 I.:.D.-BancOhio 2-10-82 J.:.D.-Bank One 2-11-82 l.:.D.-Bank One 2-12-82 3tEPO-BancOhio 4-20-82 J l .D. -BancOne 2-16-82 :3iEPO-BancOhio 4-22-82 OCD-Hunt ing ton 2-17-82 ISkEPO-BancOhio 4-30-82 UD.D.-Bank One 2-19-82 I31EP0-Bank One . . . . 5-07-82 X .D.-Bank One 2-19-82 1 .D.-State Sav 2-22-82 ! .D.-Bank One 2-23-82

•J .D.-Bank One 2-24-82 iSEPO-BancOhio 5-13-82 i3EPO-BancOhio 5-13-82 ? EPO-BancOhio 5-07-82

NMA Disc. Notes-uancOhio 3-17-82 •XD.-Huntington 2-25-82 .•EPO-BancOhio 5-18-82 jEPO-BancOhio 5-17-82 I D . - H u n t i n g t o n 2-26-82 JEPO-BaneOhio 5-21-82 "EPO-BancOhio 5-21-82 :EPO-BancOhio 5-21-82 :-£PO-BancOhio 5-21-82

D BancOhio 3-02-82 D-BancOhio 3-03-82

" E P O - B a n c O h i o 5-25-82 •.'B3T Bil ls-Disc-

untington 12-01-81 D Hunt ing ton 3-04-82 D - B a n k One 3-05-82

' D.-Huntington 3-08-82 MST Bil ls-Disc-

ank One 12-03-81 CD.-Huntington 3-08-82 CD.-Freedom Fed. . . 3-09-82 IlEPO-BancOhio 6-03-82 CD.-BancOhio 3-10-82 CD-Bank One 3-10-82 lEPO-BancOhio 6-07-82 )EPO-BancOhio 6-07-82 USPO-BancOhio 6-04-82 1 EPO-BancOhio 6-04-82 1 EPO-BancOhio 6-03-82 -ffiPO-BancOhio 6-01-82

EPO-BancOhio 5-27-82 D.-Huntington 3-11-82

.CD.-Huntington 3-11-82 lEPO-BancOhio 6-07-82 ID.-BancOhio 3-12-82 D-BancOhio 3-16-82 D-BancOhio 3-16-82

•EPO-BancOhio 6-11-82 D-Bank One 3-17-82

. tD.-BankOne 3-17-82 T5T Bills D i s c -dcDonald & Co 12-24-81 T3T Bills D i s c -irineOhio 6-03-82 "BPO-BancOhio 6-14-82 'UPO-BancOhio 6-14-82 •EPO-BancOhio 6-14-82 •EPO-BancOhio 6-16-82 - O.-BancOhio 3-19-82

3 -BancOhio 3-22-82 - O.-BancOhio 3-23-82 -.D.-BancOhio 3-23-82 T.T Bills D i s c -AlcOhio 3-25-82 i c :PO-BancOhio 6-17-82 ' :PO-BancOhio 6-17-82 ' -PO-BancOhio 6-17-82 -O.-BancOhio 3-24-82

Yield 14.40 14.49 14.51 14.00 13.75 13.75 14.53 14.65

15.00 15.125 15.15 15.26 13.75 13.75 13.75 15.33 15.25 15.33 15.33 13.75 15.50 13.75 15.63 13.75 14.88 13.625 14.88 14.25 13.65 13.65 13.75 13.75 13.75

13.85 13.61 13.75 13.75 13.57 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.625 13.70 12.50

11.32 13.73 13.71 13.38

11.34 13.38 13.75 12.75 13.65 13.79 12.50 12.50 12 50 12.50 12.50 12 50 12 50 13 73 13.73 12.50 13 75 14.25 14.25 12.75 14.04 14.04

12.54

12.49 12.75 12.75 12.75 12.75 14.125 13.90 13.85 13.85

13.11 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.80

claturity Date 4-27-82 $ 4-28-82 4-29-82 4-29-82 4-29-82 4-29-82 4-30-82 5-03-82

5-03-82 5-04-82 5-04-82 5-05-82 5-05-82 5-05-82 5-05-82 5-06-82 5-06-82 5-07-82 5-10-82 5-10-82 5-11-82 5-11-82 5-12-82 5-12-82 5-13-82 5-13-82 5-14-82 5-17-82 5-18-82 5-19-82 5-19-82 5-19-82 5-19-82

5-20-82 5-21-82 5-21-82 5-21-82 5-24-82 5-24-82 5-24-82 5-24-82 5-24-82 5-25-82 5-26-82 5-26-82

5-27-82 5-28-82 6-01-82 6-02-82

6-03-82 6-03-82 6-04-82 6-04-82 6-07-82 6-08-82 6-08-82 6-08-82 6-08-82 6-08-82 6-08-82 6-08-82 6-08-82 6-09-82 6-10-82 6-10-82 6-11-82 6-14-82 6-15-82 6-15-82 6-16-82 6-17-82

6-17-82

6-17-82 6-17-82 6-17-82 6-17-82 6-17-82 6-18-82 6-21-82 6-22-82 6-23-82

6-24-82 6-24-82 6-24-82 6-24-82 6-25-82

Face Value 2.500,000.00 $ 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,000,000.00 500,000.00 200,000.00

1,500,000.00 1,000,000.00

10,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,850,000.00 2,500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,926,133.33 2,000,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 500,000.00

5,690,840.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

4,732,308.34 2,000,000.00 2,400,000.00

40,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000.000.00 2,000,000.00 500.000.00

2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 500.000.00

2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00

1,886,541.67

24,880,750.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 3,000,000.00 1,500.000.00 1,500,000.00

2,904,980.83 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,500,000.00

Balance 12-31-81 Purchases

$ 2,500,000.00 $ 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,000.000.00 500,000.00 200,000.00

1,500,000.00 1,000,000.00

10,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,850,000.00 2,500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,926,133.33 2,000,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 500,000.00

5,690,840.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

4,732,308.34 2,000,000.00 2,400,000.00

40,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500.000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 500,000.00

2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00

1,886,541.67

24,880,750.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 3,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00

2,904,980.83 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,500,000.00

Matured Balance Earnings or Sold 12-31-82 Received 2,500,000.00 $ 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,000,000.00 500,000.00 200,000.00

1,500,000.00 1,000,000.00

10,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,850,000.00 2,500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1.000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,926,133.33 2,000,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1.500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 2.000,000.00 500,000.00

5,690,840.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

4,732,308.34 2,000,000.00 2,400,000.00

40,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 500,000.00

2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2.000,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 1.000,000.00

1,886,541.67

24,880,750.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500.000.00

1,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00

2,904,980.83 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,500,000.00

$ 85,000.00 51,318.75 51,994.17 6,222.22 3,819.44 763.89

52,671.25 35,404.17

754,166.67 35,291.67 65,397.50 89,016.67 3,055.56 3,055.56 3,055.56

35,770.00 36,006.94 72,405.83 74,095.00 3,819.44

72,333.33 3,628.47

72,940.00 2,291.67 68,613.33 4,541.67

52,080.00 83,124.72 79,625.00 47,775.00 1,145.83 1,145.83 2,291.67

73,866.67 64,269.44

572.92 763.89

49,191.25 541.67 541.67 541.67 541.67

63,583.33 63,933.33

173.61

309,160.00 64,836.11 67,026.67 63,926.67

267,691.66

79,750.00

173.61 173.61

868.06 1,215.28

69,412.78 520.83

86,892.36 71,250.00 72,041.67

708.33 70,980.00 35,880.00

113,458.33

119,250.00 531.25 531.25 531.25 177.08

53,557.29 105,408.33 52,514.58 53,091.67

95,019.17 1,263.89 1,263.89 1,263.89

89,125.00

70 CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

TREASURY INVESTMENT FUND INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31. 1982 Cost (1)

Description C.D.-BancOhio C.D.-BancOhio C.D.-Huntington... REPO-BancOhio... REPO-BancOhio... REPO-BancOhio... REPO-BancOhio... REPO-BancOhio... REPO-BancOhio... REPO-BancOhio... REPO-BancOhio... REPO-BancOhio... REPO-BancOhio... C.D.-Huntington... C.D.-DoUar Fed. . . . C.D.-Huntington... C.D.-Huntington... C.D.-Bank One . . . . C.D.-BancOhio C.D.-Bank One . . . . C.D.-BancOhio C.D.-BancOhio UST Bills Disc-Bache & Co REPO-BancOhio... REPO-BancOhio... REPO-BancOhio... REPO-BancOhio... REPO-BancOhio... REPO-BancOhio... REPO-BancOhio... C.D.-Bank One . . . . C.D.-Huntington... C.D.-Bank One . . . . C.D.-Bank One . . . . REPO-BancOhio... C. D.-BancOhio . . . REPO-BancOhio.. C.D.-Huntington .. REPO-BancOhio .. C.D.-BancOhio.... C.D.-Bank One. . . . FHLB Notes-Baird & Company

C.D.-Bank One.. C.D.-Bank One .. . C.D.-BancOhio .. . REPO-BancOhio. REPO-BancOhio . C.D.-Bank One. . . REPO-BancOhio . FFCB Bonds-BancOhio

C.D.-BancOhio C.D.-BancOhio C.D.-BancOhio CD.-BancOhio C.D.-Bank One C.D.-BancOhio.... FNMA Notes-Bache & Company C.D.-BankOne.. REPO-BancOhio C.D.-Bank One C.D.-Huntington C.D.-Huntington REPO-BancOhio REPO-BancOhio REPO-BancOhio REPO-BancOhio REPO-BancOhio REPO-BancOhio C.D.-Huntington C.D.-Bank One.. REPO-BancOhio REPO-BancOhio REPO-BancOhio REPO-BancOhio C.D.-BankOne.. REPO-BancOhio UST Bills-Disc-BancOhio C.D.-BancOhio .. REPO-BancOhio C.D.-Bank One.. C.D.-Bank One.. REPO-BancOhio REPO-BancOhio REPO-BancOhio REPO-BancOhio C.D.-Huntington

Purchase Date 3-25-82 3-25-82 3-26-82 6-18-82 6-17-82 6-17-82 6-17-82 6-17-82 6-29-82 6-25-82 6-23-82 6-28-82 6-21-82 3-30-82 4-07-82 4-08-82 4-08-82 4-09-82 4-12-82 4-13-82 4-14-82 4-14-82

1-14-82 7-12-82 7-09-82 7-09-82 7-09-82 7-08-82 7-07-82 7-06-82 4-16-82 4-16-82 4-19-82 4-20-82 7-19-82 4-21-82 7-20-82 4-23-82 7-21-82 7-23-82 4-26-82

12-04-81

Yield 14.00 14.00 13.91 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 14.12 14.34 14.37 14.37 14.27 14.27 14.23 14.35 14.35

13.85 12.25 12.25 12.25 12.25 13.00 13.00 13.00 14.50 14.38 14.26 14.13 11.375 14.10 10.75 13.73 9.50

14.00 14.13

Maturity Date 6-28-82 6-29-82 6-30-82 6-30-82 6-30-82 6-30-82 6-30-82 6-30-82 7-01-82 7-01-82 7-01-82 7-01-82 7-01-82 7-01-82 7-02-82 7-06-82 7-07-82 7-08-82 7-09-82 7-12-82 7-13-82 7-14-82

7-15-82 7-15-82 7-15-82 7-15-82 7-15-82 7-15-82 7-15-82 7-15-82 7-16-82 7-16-82 7-19-82 7-20-82 7-20-82 7-21-82 7-21-82 7-22-82 7-22-82 7-23-82 7-26-82

Face Value 1,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00

500,000.00 1,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

1,870,780.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 3,000,000.00

500,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 2,500,000.00

500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

Balance 12-31-81 Purchases

1,500,000.00 ! 2,000,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00

500,000.00 1,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

1,870,780.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 3,000,000.00

500,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 2,500,000.00

500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500.000.00

15.90 7-26-82 (Interest in the amount of $158,116.67 was paid to us

4-26-82 14.13 7-27-82 4-26-82 14.13 7-28-82 4-27-82 14.00 7-29-82 7-26-82 9.75 7-29-82 7-26-82 9.75 7-29-82 4-28-82 14.09 7-30-82 7-27-82 9.75 7-30-82

2-01-82 14.30 8-02-82

4-29-82 5-04-82 5-03-82 5-03-82 5-04-82 5-05-82

2-11-82 5-06-82 8-02-82 5-10-82 5-11-82 5-12-82 8-12-82 8-09-82 8-09-82 8-03-82 8-05-82 8-03-82 5-18-82 5-19-82 8-17-82 8-16-82 8-16-82 8-16-82 5-20-82 8-18-82

8-19-82 5-24-82 8-16-82 5-24-82 5-25-82 8-19-82 8-16-82 8-16-82 8-16-82 5-26-82

14.20 14.25 14.18 14.18 14.26 14.125

15.50 14.13 9.50

13.68 13.72 13.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50

13.78 13.875 9.00 8.50 8.50 8.50

13.77 8.50

10.16 13.25 8.50

13.26 13.38 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50

13.13

8-03-82 8-03-82 8-04-82 8-05-82 8-06-82 8-09-82

8-10-82 8-11-82 8-11-82 8-12-82 8-13-82 8-16-82 8-16-82 8-16-82 8-16-82 8-16-82 8-16-82 8-16-82 8-17-82 8-18-82 8-18-82 8-18-82 8-18-82 8-18-82 8-19-82 8-19-82

8-19-82 8-20-82 8-20-82 8-23-82 8-24-82 8-24-82 8-24-82 8-24-82 8-24-82 8-25-82

2,157,808.33 2,157,808.33 for the above FHLB-Baird & Co., on 1-28-82)

2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 500.000.00 500,000.00

5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00

2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00

2,000,861.11 3,000,000.00

500,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

300,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

3,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

110,000,000.00 500,000.00 300,000.00 500,000.00

3,000,000.00 5,000,000.00

4,876,391.67 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00

2,000,861.11 3,000.000.00

500,000.00 3.000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

300,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

3,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

110,000,000.00 500,000.00 300,000.00 500,000.00

3,000,000.00 5,000,000.00

4,876,391.67 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500.000.00

2,000,000.00

Matured or Sold 1,500,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00

500,000.00 1,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

1,870,780.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 3,000,000.00

500,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 2,500,000.00

500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2.500,000.00

2,157,808.33

2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 500,000.00

5,000,000.00

2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00

2,000,861.11 3,000,000.00

500,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

300,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,00000 500,000.00 500,000.00

3,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

110,000,000.00 500,000.00 300,000.00 500,000.00

3,000,000.00 5,000,000.00

4,876,391.67 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00

Balance 12-31-82

Earnings Received

$ 55,416.671 74,666.6' 55,640.0(0

2,1666-2,34', 2,347.2: 2,347.2: 2,347.2: 1,083.3! 3,250.00.,'t 2,888.88. Cc 1,083.3: 1,805.51

54,715.00.C. 68,5133-71,051 6 89,812.5e.l 71,350.00.: 69,666.6' 71,150.00. 71,750.00. 72 ,547 .3 . ' .

pnirrroi

129,220.00.": 510.4V"

i,020.s.e:. 1,020.8 1.020.&-1,263.8.-1.444.4., l,625.0.r

36,652.7.! 36,349.4 90.115.2.C-

107,152.5: 157."

53,462.5 ! 149.3.0

85.812.JU-131.$!'

85,555.!$?"-89,293.7.1

1.191.V"

359,486

CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 71

TREASURY INVESTMENT FUND INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31. 1982 Cost (1)

.'Description , '?HLB Notes-Disc

t F H L B Notes-Disc

•T7NMA Notes-Dis

. ID . -BancOhio CSEPO-BancOhio I.: .D.-BancOhio U E P O - B a n c O h i o •WEPO-BancOhio K E P O - B a n c O h i o • p . -Hunt ington I l E P O - B a n c O h i o l l E P O - B a n c O h i o C D . - H u n t i n g t o n >TFCB Bonds-

>TFCB Bonds-

3;EPO-BancOhio : i : .D . -BankOne UD.-BancOhio

J .D.-BancOhio I .D. -BancOhio J .D.-BancOhio SiEPO-BancOhio 1 ,D.-BancOhio J .D.-BancOhio 2 EPO-BancOhio l.D. -Hunt ington l . D - B a n c O h i o . .

J .D.-Bank One 15'EPO-BancOhio l or the above RE CEPO-Banc-Ohio -ior the above RE C D.-Bank One uEPO-BancOhio CD.-Huntington CD.-Huntington CD.-BancOhio i :EPO-BancOhio 1 EPO-BancOhio CD.-BancOhio 1 EPO-BancOhio ;'*TMA Notes-Dis ' rancOhio CD.-BancOhio .

5PO-BancOhio CD.-BancOhio ;D.-BancOhio SPO-BancOhio D.-Dollar Fed

(D.-BancOhio ISPO-BancOhio ISPO-BancOhio l i P O - B a n c O h i o ISPO-BancOhio

^ P O - B a n c O h i o aHMA Disc. Not< -i m t ing ton

D.-Bank O n e D.-Freedom Fe

YIMA Disc. Note CfcDonald &

C o m p a O.-BancOhio

' I P O - B a n c O h i o -O.-Huntington

O.-BancOhio.. • IPO-BancOhio i3PO-BancOhio

)PO BancOhio .O.-BancOhio.. - 0.-Huntington - O.-Bank One -O.-Bank One . ' ' .PO-BancOhio ' 'PO-BancOhio

^.-Huntington -O.-Bank One

X-BancOhio. . .- ).-BancOhio ( l) . -Huntington )t t>0-BancOhio ) lPO-BancOhio l# . -Hunt ington JMA Disc. Not * c O h i o l^.-Bank One 1 J - B a n k One Iy.-BancOhio 'PO-BancOhio

Purchase Date

8-18-82

8-18-82

8-02-82 5-27-82

. . . 8-23-82 5-28-82

. . . 8-23-82

. . . 8-25-82

. . . 8-25-82

. . . 6-02-82

. . . 8-25-82

. . . 8-25-82

. . . 6-03-82

3-01-82

3-01-82 . . . 9-01-82

6-03-82 6-03-82 6-03-82 6-04-82 6-04-82

. . . 9-03-82 6-16-82 6-07-82

. . . 9-03-82

. . . 6-09-82

. . . 6-11-82 6-14-82

. . . 9-03-82

Yield

10.66

10.52

12.06 13.10

7.50 13.10 7.50 7.50 7.50

13.33 7.50 7.50

13.30

13.90

13.90 8.25

13.375 13.45 13.45 13.45 13.45 8.00

13.90 13.55

8.00 13.67 13.75 14.00

Maturity Date

8-25-82 $

8-25-82

8-25-82 8-26-82 8-27-82 8-27-82 8-27-82 8-27-82 8-27-82 8-30-82 8-30-82 8-30-82 8-31-82

9-01-82

9-01-82 9-02-82 9-02-82 9-03-82 9-07-82 9-08-82 9-09-82 9-09-82 9-10-82 9-10-82 9-10-82 9-13-82 9-14-82 9-15-82 9-15-82

PO- 1 Day Cu 8.50% and 11 Days (S 9-07-82 9-15-82

PO- 1 Day (u 8.50% a n d 7 Days (a 6-17-82 9-13-82

. . . 6-18-82

. . . 6-21-82 6-22-82

. . . 9-17-82

. . . 9-15-82 6-25-82

. . . 9-20-82 c-

6-17-82 6-29-82 9-20-82 6-30-82 6-30-82 9-23-82 7-07-82 7-08-82

. . . . 9-23-82 9-29-82 9-29-82 9-29-82

. . . . 9-29-82 ' S -

7-01-82 7-12-82

rJ'l.. 7-13-82 • s -

n y . . 6-24-82 7-14-82

10-07-82 7-15-82

. . . . 7-19-82 10-04-82 10-04-82

. . . . 10-07-82

. . . . 7-19-82 7-20-82 7-20-82

. . . . 7-02-82 10-12-82 10-12-82

7-21-82 7-23-82

. . . . 7-26-82 7-26-82 7-27-82

10-18-82 10-18-82

. . . . 7-27-82

7-27-82 7-28-82 7-28-82 7-29-82

10-22-82

14.51 8.50

14.52 14.76 14.55

8.50 8.50

14.75 8.50

13.45 14.80 8.50

14.50 14.50 8.50

14.86 14.625 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50

14.60 13.26 13.625

13.65 13.375 9.00

13.39 13.15 9.00 9.00 9.00

13.15 12.26 12.26 12.27 8.00 8.00

11.80 11.625 11.55 11.55 11.63 8.00 8.00

11.63

12.05 12.01 12.01 11.90

8.00

9-16-82 9-16-82 9-17-82 9-20-82 9-21-82 9-21-82 9-21-82 9-22-82 9-22-82

9-23-82 9-24-82 9-24-82 9-27-82 9-28-82 9-28-82 9-29-82 9-30-82

10-01-82 10-01-82 10-01-82 10-01-82 10-01-82

10-01-82 10-04-82 10-05-82

10-06-82 10-07-82 10-08-82 10-07-82 10-12-82 10-12-82 10-12-82 10-12-82 10-13-82 10-14-82 10-14-82 10-15-82 10-15-82 10-15-82 10-18-82 10-19-82 10-19-82 10-20-82 10-21-82 10-21-82 10-21-82 10-22-82

10-25-82 10-26-82 10-27-82 10-28-82 10-28-82

Face Balance Value 12-31-81 Purchases

9,746,597.22 $

24,326,666.67

3,915,861.11 3.000,000.00

500,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00

2,000,000.00

3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 8.00%

500,000.00 8.00%

2,500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500.000.00 500,000.00

24,084,652.78 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

3,856,071.11 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00

2,401.416.67 1,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,500,000.00

500.000.00 500,000.00

2,500,000.00 1,000,000.00 1.000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00

5,826,750.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00

$ 9,746,597.22 $

24,326,666.67

3 915,861.11 3,000,000.00

500,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00

2,000,000.00

3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00

500,000.00

2,500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 500,000.00

24,084,652.78 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2.000,000.00

500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

3,856,071.11 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00

2,401,416.67 1,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00

2,500,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00

5,826,740.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00

Matured Balance or Sold 12-31-82

9,746,597.22 $

24,326,666.67

3 915,861 11 3,000,000.00

500,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2.000,000.00

2,000,000.00

3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00

500,000.00

2,500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00

500,000.00 500.000.00

1,500,000.00 500,000.00

24,084,652.78 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

3,856,071.11 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00

2,401,416.67 1,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

1,500,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00

2,500,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00

5,826.750.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

500,000.00

Earnings Received

70,041.67

169,618.06

44,705.56 99,341.67

312.50 49,670.83

416.67 208.33 208.33

49,432.08 520.83 520.83

65,761.11

139,000.00

208,500.00 687.50

67,618.06 68,744.44 71,733.33 71,733.33 72,480.56

666.67 33,205.56 53,635.42

777.78 72,906.67 90,711.81 72,333.33 1,340.28

895.84

91,695.14 354.17

73,406.67 74,620.00 91,947.92

472.22 708.33

54,697.92 236.11

915,347.22 53,650.00

472.22 89,618.06 72,500.00

590.28 69,346.67 68,250.00

944.44 236.11 236.11 236.11 236.11

143,927.89 77,350.00 63,583.33

98,583.33 47,369.79

625.00 63,230.56 46,572.92 1,000.00 1,000.00 625.00

47,120.83 29,287.78 29,287.78 44,478.75

333.33 333.33

72,930.56 28,416.67 27,270.83 68.979.17 55,565.56

333.33 333.33

56,211.67

173,250.00 60,050.00 60,717.22 60,161.11

666.67

72 CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

TREASURY INVESTMENT FUND INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31. 1982 Cost (1)

Purchase Description Date C.D.-Huntington 7-30-82 REPO-BancOhio 10-29-82 FFCB Bonds-BancOhio 5-03-82 FFCB Bonds-BAncOhio 8-18-82 C.D.-Bank One 8-03-82 C.D.-Bank One 8-04-82 C.D.-BancOhio 8-06-82 FNMA Disc Notes-BancOhio 8-18-82 C.D.-BancOhio 8-06-82 C.D.-Bank One 8-09-82 C.D.-Bank One 8-10-82 C.D.-Huntington 8-11-82 FNMA Disc. Notes-BancOhio 8-18-82 FNMA Disc. Notes-BancOhio 8-19-82 C.D.-Huntington 8-12-82 REPO-BancOhio 11-03-82 REPO-BancOhio 11-03-82 REPO-BancOhio 11-04-82 C.D.-Bank One 8-13-82 FNMA Disc. Notes-BancOhio 8-18-82 C.D.-Bank One 8-16-82 C.D.-Huntington 8-17-82 C.D.-Huntington 8-18-82 C.D.-Bank One 8-25-82 C.D.-Bank One 8-26-82 C.D.-BancOhio 8-26-82 C.D.-BancOhio 8-27-82 REPO-Hunt ington . . . 11-10-82 REPO-BancOhio 11-17-82 REPO-BancOhio 11-16-82 REPO-BancOhio 11-08-82 REPO-BancOhio 11-08-82 REPO-BancOhio 11-15-82 C.D.-Bank One 8-20-82 C.D.-Bank One 8-30-82 C.D.-Bank One 8-23-82 C.D.-Bank One 8-24-82 FHLB Bonds-BancOhio 8-18-82 C.D.-BancOhio 8-24-82 C.D.-BancOhio 8-31-82 C.D.-BancOhio 9-01-82 C.D.-Huntington 9-01-82 REPO-BancOhio 11-22-82 REPO-BancOhio 12-01-82 C.D.-BancOhio 9-02-82 C.D.-BancOhio 9-08-82 C.D.-BancOhio 9-09-82 C.D.-BancOhio 9-10-82 REPO-BancOhio 12-02-82 REPO-BancOhio 12-02-82 C.D.-BancOhio 9-13-82 C.D.-Huntington 9-14-82 C.D.-BancOhio 9-15-82 C D.-Huntington 9-17-82 C.D.-BancOhio 9-21-82 REPO-BancOhio 12-06-82 C.D.-BancOhio 9-22-82 C.D.-Huntington 9-24-82 C.D.-BancOhio 9-27-82 REPO-BancOhio 12-15-82 REPO-BancOhio 12-16-82 C.D.-BancOhio 9-28-82 FNMA Disc. Notes-BancOhio 9-23-82 FNMA Disc. Notes-BancOhio 9-23-82 FNMA Disc. Notes-BancOhio 9-23-82 C.D.-Dollar Fed ' l 10-05-82 C.D.-BancOhio 10-06-82 C.D.-Bank One 10-06-82 C.D.-Bank One 10-07-82 C.D.-BancOhio 10-07-82 REPO-BancOhio 12-23-82 C.D.-Huntington 10-08-82 FNMA Disc. Notes-BancOhio 9-23-82 REPO-BancOhio 12-31-82 C.D.-Huntington 10-12-82 C.D.-BancOhio 10-13-82 C.D.-BancOhio 10-12-82 C.D.-Huntington 10-13-82 C.D.-Bank One 10-15-82 C.D.-BancOhio 10-18-82 C.D.-Huntington 10-19-82 C.D.-BancOhio 10-21-82

Maturity Yield Date 11.77 10-29-82! 8.00 11-01-82

13.65 11-01-82

13.65 11.26 11.26 11.45

9.55 11.45 11.53 11.40 11.46

9.85 11.56 8.00 8.00 8.00

11.05

10.13 10.15 10.02 9.02 9.38 9.65 9.60 9.65 8.65 9.00 9.125 8.00 8.00 8.00 9.51 10.06 9.50 9.50

8.25 9.45 10.125 10.25 10.02 8.00 8.00 10.20 10.50 10.55 10.60 8.25 8.25 10.80 10.80 10.75 10.68 10.75 8.25 10.35 10.38 10.30 8.00 8.00 10.25

10.05

10.06

10.07 10.37 10.31 10.20 9.71 9.80 8.00 9.50

10.09 8.75 8.53 8.75 8.75 9.00 8.75 8.625 8.53 8.75

11-01-82 11-02-82 11-03-82 11-04-82

11-04-82 11-05-82 11-08-82 11-09-82 11-10-82

11-10-82

11-10-82 11-12-82 11-12-82 11-12-82 11-12-82 11-15-82

11-16-82 11-16-82 11-17-82 11-18-82 11-18-82 11-18-82 11-18-82 11-18-82 11-18-82 11-18-82 11-18-82 11-18-82 11-18-82 11-19-82 11-19-82 11-22-82 11-23-82 11-24-82

11-26-82 11-26-82 11-29-82 11-30-82 12-01-82 12-01-82 12-01-82 12-02-82 12-03-82 12-06-82 12-07-82 12-07-82 12-07-82 12-08-82 12-09-82 12-10-82 12-13-82 12-14-82 12-14-82 12-15-82 12-16-82 12.17-82 12-17-82 12-17-82 12-20-82

12-21-82

12-22-82

12-23-82 12-27-82 12-28-82 12-28-82 12-29-82 12-29-82 12-29-82 12-30-82

12-31-82 1-03-83 1-03-83 1-03-83 1-03-83 1-04-83 1-05-83 1-06-83 1-07-83 1-10-83

Face Value 1,500,000.00 $ 500,000.00

3.000,000.00

5,228,750.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00

1,958,616.67 2,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 3,000,000.00

1,955,200.00

4,890,947.22 3,000,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

3,000,000.00

1,951,250.00 2,500,000.00 3,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 2,500.000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 15,000,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

1,517,875.00 1,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,500,000.00

9,768,847.22

4,883,125.00

4,881,826.39 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 500,000.00

2,500,000.00

4,871,437.50 5,330,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,250,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

Balance 12-31-81 Purchases

1,500,000.00 ! 500,000.00

3,000,000.00

5,228,750.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00

1,958,616.67 2,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 3,000,000.00

1,955,200.00

4,890,947.22 3,000,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

3,000,000.00

1,951,250.00 2,500,000.00 3,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,000.000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 15,000,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

1,517,875.00 1,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,500,000.00

9,768,847.22

4,883,125.00

Matured or Sold 1,500,000.00 $ 500,000.00

3,000,000.00

5,228,750.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00

1,958,616.67 2,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 3,000,000.00

1,955,200.00

4,890,947.22 3,000,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

3,000,000.00

1.951,250.00 2.500,000.00 3,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,000.000.00 2.000,000.00 2,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 15,000,000.00

500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

1,517,875.00 1,500,000.00 2.500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2.000,000.00 1.500,000.00 1.500,000.00 2,500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 500,000.00

2,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00

2,500,000.00

9,768,847.22

4,883,125.00

Balance 12-31-82

Earnings Received ,j

44,627.93! 333.3J:.:

202,475.01

108,708.3: 71,156.9< 71,156.9*. 57,250.01

41.383.3S , 57,886.11 ' 87,435.83 • 72,041 6' 86,905 0'

44,800.00.'

109,052.7 88.626.6 1.000 1,000.1 888.8s,P"

86.558.3

48.750.O" 64.847.2.-76.820.0.11 • 34,576.6.1" 55.368.0C 45,033.3.1:: 44.800.0 Ii • 44,497.2.1" 5,766.6 ii ' 750.00 •

7,604.Hi 1,111.1.11 1,111.11. 444.41.

48.078.16; 46,946.(6: 60.694.4*-60.694.4*'.-

44,000.(0 37.012.iS' 63,281.!I" 51,250.10, 50,656.13. 1,000.10" 555.

51,566.16. 37,625.1c. 38,683.:£. 64.777.T

572 572

64,500.01 51,026.?!. 51.361.il. 51,620.)!. 50,166. Ii.

916.11 48,300.1( 59,829.!!. 34,762.:;

222 111

59.079.-1V

231,15

116,87

4,881,826.39 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,500,00000 1,000,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 2,500,000.00

4,871,437.50 5,330.000.00 1,000,000.00 1,250,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

4,881,826.39 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,500,000.00

500,000.00 2,500,000.00

4,871,437.50 5,330,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,250,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

118,173-t 47,817-"! 23.770JT 35,275- -22,386)8 33,8918

t.ee 54,75rW

128,5623

CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 73

TREASURY INVESTMENT FUND INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31. 1982 Cost 11)

Purchase Maturity Face Balance Matured Balance Earnings description Date Yield Date Value 12-31-81 Purchases or Sold 12-31-82 Received :.D.-Bank One 10-22-82 8.50 1-11-83$ 1,500,000.00$ $ 1,500,000.00$ $ 1,500,000.00$ :.D.-State Savings... 10-25-82 8.55 1-12-83 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 ;.D.-Bank One 10-26-82 8.75 1-13-83 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

- :.D.-Bank One 10-27-82 8.60 1-17-83 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 'TTNMA Disc. Notes-,.i.3ancOhio 10-20-82 8.33 1-17-83 2,391,145.83 2,391,145.83 2,391,145.83 • ;.D-Huntington 10-29-82 8.51 1-18-83 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 • ;.D.-Huntington 11-01-82 8.50 1-19-83 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 I ; D-Huntington 11-01-82 8.50 1-20-83 1.500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 • ;D-BankOne 11-02-82 8.52 1-21-83 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00

: D -Huntington 11-04-82 8.38 1-24-83 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 ' ;D-Bank One 11-04-82 8.51 1-24-83 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 II D -Freedom Fed'l. . 11-05-82 8.75 1-25-83 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 ' : D-Bank One 11-08-82 8.40 1-26-83 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 > ; D-Bank One 11-08-82 8.40 1-27-83 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 '.;.D.-Huntington 11-09-82 8.75 1-28-83 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 fNMA Disc. Notes-sJancOhio 11-10-82 8.63 1-31-83 6,866,863.89 6,866,863.89 6,866,863.89 I : D -Huntington 11-12-82 8.75 2-01-83 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2.000,000.00 I : D-Huntington 11-12-82 8.75 2-02-83 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1! D-Huntington 11-15-82 8.76 2-03-83 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 I : D-Huntington 11-16-82 8.875 2-04-83 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1'D-Huntington . . . 11-16-82 8.875 2-07-83 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 r D -Huntington 11-17-82 8.875 2-08-83 2,000,000.00 2.000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1 ' D -Huntington 11-18-82 8.90 2-09-83 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 I'D-Huntington . . . 11-19-82 8.90 2-10-83 2.000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1 ' D-Huntington . . . . 11-22-82 8.50 2-11-83 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 i •D-Bank One 11-23-82 8.57 2-14-83 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

'D-Bank One . . . 11-26-82 8.30 2-15-83 1,750,000.00 1,750,000.00 1,750,000.00 I 'D-Bank One 11-26-82 8.30 2-16-83 1,750,000.00 1,750,000.00 1,750,000.00

'D-State Savings... 11-29-82 8.65 2-17-83 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 ID-Huntington 11-30-82 8.40 2-18-83 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 •1 D-Huntington 12-03-82 8.38 2-22-83 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1 D-Huntington . 12-06-82 8.28 2-23-83 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 J D-Bank One 12-07-82 8.125 2-24-83 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1 D-Bank One 12-07-82 8.125 2-25-83 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2.000,000.00 ID-BancOhio 12-08-82 8.15 2-28-83 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1 D-BancOhio 12-10-82 8.20 3-01-83 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 ID-Bank One 12-13-82 8.375 3-02-83 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 ID-BancOhio 12-14-82 8.10 3-03-83 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 dD-BancOhio 12-14-82 8.10 3-04-83 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 a D -BancOhio 12-16-82 8.15 3-07-83 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 a.D.-BancOhio 9-07-82 11.125 3-07-83 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2.500,000.00 a.D.-Huntington 12-16-82 8.40 3-08-83 2,500.000.00 2,500,000.00 2.500,000.00 3.D-BancOhio 9-08-82 11.00 3-08-83 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 (XD.-BancOhio 9-09-82 11.125 3-09-83 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 O.D-BancOhio 9-20-82 11.375 3-10-83 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 J.D.-BancOhio 12-20-82 8.15 3-11-83 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

d.D.-BancOhio 12-23-82 8.10 3-14-83 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 a.D.-BancOhio 12-23-82 8.10 3-15-83 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 HS 'nnnnS CLD.-BancOhio 12-27-82 8.15 3-16-83 2,500,000.00 2-fS2-2SS 2S fsnn'nnn'™ ID.-Huntington 12-27-82 8.40 3-17-83 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 ,500,000.00 ID-BancOhio 12-28-82 8.20 3-18-83 1,000,000.00 i'0.0,0,'0"™0, J'onn'nnnnn d.D.-Dollar Fed'l 62-28-82 8.53 3-18-83 2,000,000.00 ?'2S„'S„„nn ^nnnnnnn O-D.-BancOhio 12-29-82 8.20 3-21-83 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 iflNMA Disc. Notes- , „,.„ „„ft nn . OKO A(-A n« lancOhio 12-21-82 8.38 3-22-83 1.959.050.00 1,959,050.00 1,959,050.00 1'iNMA Disc. Notes- r „_„ „„, „_ . onti „01 c -nancOhio 12-21-83 8.43 3-22-83 5,876,391.67 5,876,391.67 5,876,391.67 INMA Disc. Notes- „ nnn „_,. nn o ooo OKA on nancOhio 12-22-82 8.38 3-22-83 2,939,250.00 ? S S „ n i S n n o n n LD.-BancOhio 12-30-82 8.25 3-23-83 1,500,000.00 i ' ^ ' S n S ™ J'snnnmnn C.D.-Huntington 12-30-82 8.38 3-24-83 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 1NMA Disc. Notes- . . . , , . , „ •,•),! I-n;i i i

nancOhio 10-08-82 9.78 4-07-83 2,384,361.11 2,384,361.11 2,384,361.11

nan^h I?oS C ' .N O t e S : . . 10-25-82 8.75 4-11-83 4,806,333.34 2.384.361.11 2,384,361.11

nancOhio"^: 11-01-82 9.00 5-02-83 5.000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00

fUnUn^t°onnS: 12-01-82 8.70 6-01-83 2,000,000.00 2.000.000.00 2 ' 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0

nlnveSmlnU $1,170,929,680.58 $193,362,199.74 $977,567,480.84 $1.017.126,284.74 $153,803,395.84$24^82;392:69(2) I ) Includes accrued interest purchased and premium where applicable. « ,„„„! , K „ Pnrrhaso Agreements

I $255,035.79 of the Total Investment Earnings shown were realized from Investment of active funds through Re-Purchase Agreements j over weekends and for periods of one day to thirty days.

74 CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

PARKING METER COLLECTIONS SCHEDULE VU Revenue from Parking Meter Collections under the direc­

tion of the City Treasurer is shown in the following schedule with comparative figures for the preceding years to 1971:

Year Amount 1982 $870,111.30 1981 661,692.59 1980 618,887.39 1979 566,522.44 1978 553,568.16 1977 534,460.50

Year 1976. 1975. 1974. 1973. 1972. 1971.

Amount $374,508.30

338,357.75 334,201.26 364,515.30 375,449.90 345,196.80

HARE CHARITY TRUST FUND STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1982

DESCRIPTION OF STOCKS;

Cols. & Sou. Ohio Electric

Commonweal th Edison C o m p a n y . . .

Gen. Te lephone of Sou thwes t (Pfd 5.1 International Te lephone & Telegraph National Securi t ies (Pfd S tock Series

Pu tnam Income Fund , Inc Tenneco United Te lephone of Ohio (P United UtUities (United Tele

DESCRIPTION OF BONDS: Cinci. & S u b . Te lephone Cols., Sou. Ohio Elect New York Te lephone Ohio Bell Te lephone

Sears, Roebuck & Co Hunt ington National B a n k . Hunt ington National Bank .

Hunt ington National B a n k .

TOTAL B O N D S

fd 8.40) r o m m u n

Rate 8.% 7.5/e 8.00 8.% 4.'/2 8.s/e

16.00 8.518 14.48 11.27

TOTAL I N V E S T M E N T S H E L D BY T R U S T F U N D

)

)

Maturity 10-01-09 5-01-99 7-15-08

11-01-10 4-01-89

10-01-95 9-30-83 6-22-83 1-15-82 2-10-83

BALANCE 12-31-81

No. Shs 460 100 100

126

322 100 300 100

1720 200 954 200 100 400

Shares 5M 7M

10M 10M 20M

5M 10M 59M 10M

Cost $ 10,380.45

4,350.00 2,437.50

9,775.00

7,111.20 5,462.50 6,375.00 5,487.50

14,738.40 4,650.00 9,143.48 5,000.00 9,950.'0 6,550.00

$101,411.03

Cost $ 5,500.00

6,780.00 10,119.30 10,850.00 20,231.00

5,575.00 10,116.25 59,000.00 10,000.00

$138,171.55

$239,582.50

ADDITIONS

No. Shs. Cost

400 $ 9,650.00 210

$ 9,650.00

10M $ 10,000.00

$ 10,000.00

DISPOSALS

No. Shs. Cost

954 $ 9,143.48

$ 9,143.48

10M $ 10,000.00

$ 10,000.00

BALANCE 12-31-82

No. Shs 460 100 100

126 400 532 100 300 100

1720 200

200 100 400

5M 7M

10M 10M 20M

5M 10M 59M

10M

Cost $ 10,380.45

4,350.00 2,437.50

9,775.00 9,650.00 7,111.20 5,462.50 6,375.00 5,487.50

14,738.40 4,650.00

5,000.00 9,950.00 6,550.00

$101,917.55

$ 5,500.00 6,780.00

10,119.30 10,850.00 20,231.00

5,575.00 10,116.25 59,000.00

10,000.00

$138,171.55

$240,089.10

INVESTMENTS HELD FOR POLICE SUB-RELIEF FUND SCHEDULE LX A BONDS: Number Rate Amount Due Cost

Tennessee Valley Authority BR1394 63/e% $ 12,000 11-01-92 $ 12,000.00 Philadelphia Electric Co L1155 6'/2 50,000 3-01-93

X4127 6'/2 10,000 3-01-93 V2690 6>/2 5,000 3-01-93 65,000.00

Illinois Bell R132-408 6 45,000 7-01-98 45,618.75(1) American Telephone & Telegraph RC12-136 6 10,000 8-01-2000 10.000.00 Northwestern Bell Telephone R19-350 61/.. 22,000 1-01-2007 21,450.00(2) Pacific N. W. Bell R7-479 6% 25,000 12-01-2007 25,348.25(3) New England Telephone & Telegraph RY-02594 6Vs 25,000 9-01-2009 25,000.00

Total Bonds: $204,000 $204,417.00

B. STOCKS: Shares Investors Corporate Income Trust 042915 50 $ 50,372.50

C. C.D.8 Columbus Municipal Employees

Federal Credit Union 2993 3-31-83 $ 50,000.00 Columbus Municipal Employees

Federal Credit Union 3068 4-18-83 50,000.00 County Savings Association

Neward, Ohio 9.6.009167 6-02-83 100,000.00 Total C.D.'s $200,000.00 GRAND TOTAL $454,789.50

(1) Includes Premium of $618.75 (2) Includes Discount of $550.00 (3) Includes Premium of $348.25

Categories A, B, and C as shown in the above schedule, represent the inves tment securi t ies tha t are physically held in safekeeping by the City Treasurer.

We hold in our possession the National Investors Life Insurance Company Deferred Annui ty Certificate. Dated August 17, 1981, Certificate Number 25282.

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 75

INVESTMENTS HELD FOR OTHERS DECEMBER 31. 1982

Collateral Number AeroMech Airlines: Certificate of Deposit: Lowndes Bank, Clerksburg, West Virginia A30668

Air Centers Enterprises: U. S. Treasury Bond 74973C

Armco, Inc.: Seaboard Surety Co., Bond

Capital Tunneling Co.: Ohio Farmers Insurance Co., Bond

Corel Cadot dba Aerographics Aeral Div.: U. S. Treasury Bond 2230

City Cab & Storage Co.. Inc. dba Safety Cas.. Co.: Pledged Real Es ta te

Comair. Inc. (Div.. of Airports): C. D.-Boon State Bank of Florence, Kentucky 300100

East Side Cab Co., Inc.: Pledged Real Estate

Fisher Controls Co.: A. E. Ehrke & Co.. (Div. of Electricity) Certified Check Central Bank of Mayfield Heights , Ohio 28831

Lane Aviation Corp.: C. D.-BancOhio National Bank 01244

Metalgraphics. Inc.: U.S. Treasury Note 3573 U.S. Treasury Note 3588 U.S. Treasury Note 3589

Midwest Air Traffic Control Service, Inc.: C. D.-Patrons State Bank & Trust Co. Olathe, Kansas 7707

Northway Taxicab Co.: The Twelve Federal L a n d Bank B o n d s 376 The Twelve Federal Land Bank Bonds 439 The Twelve Federal Land Bank Bonds 440

Transport Media Co.: U. S. Treasury Notes 12454 U. S. Treasury Notes 12455 U. S. Treasury Notes 10439

United Transportation Co.. Inc., dba Green Cab & Storage: Pledged Real Es ta te

Whiteco Metrocom. Inc.: Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Maryland-Bond 9475831

Interest Rate

15.30%

3'/4%

4'/s%

10.50%

Due

lb. Comp Int. on CD each

3 months

6-15-83

9-28-82

8-26-82

11-15-73

4-14-85

SCHEDULE X

Amount

$ 2,000.00

$ 1,000.00

$25,000.00

$ 8,500.00

$ 1,000.00

$20,000.00

$ 2,000.00

$25,000.00

9.291%

6'/4% 6'/-> 6'/4

9.25%

7.35% 7.35 7.35

9.00% 9.00 9.00

$ 8,425.55

5-23-79

11-15-76 11-15-76 11-15-76

1-25-83

1-20-97 1-20-97 1-20-97

2-15-87 2-15-87 2-15-87

10-20-82

$10,000.00

$ 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00

$ 3,000.00

$ 7,500.00

$ 5,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00

$25,000.00

$ 1,000.00 1,000.00 5,000.00

$ 7,000.00

$25,990.00

$10,000.00

76 CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE ANNUAL REPORT—1982

INTRODUCTION The Depar tment of Finance plays a major role in the plan­

ning and control of the City's finances. It also provides coor­dination for major intergovernmental service divisions. The Department is organized into three major functional areas: Fiscal Management, Administrat ive Services and Purchas­ing. The first two areas are headed by a Deputy Finance Director, the third by the Purchas ing Adminis t ra tor .

The Fiscal Management area consists of the Budget , Debt Management, Office Services and Employee Relations sec­tions. The Columbus Occupational Safety and Health Ad­ministration also reports to the Deputy Finance D i r e c t o r -Fiscal Management.

The Administrat ive Services Deputy Director is responsi­ble for the operations of the Municipal Garage, Building Services and, by virtue of the City Finance Director 's role as Chairman of the Information Services Commission, the Di­vision of Data Processing. The Management Training Sec­tion of the Depar tment of F inance and the Office of Contract Compliance also fall within this area of responsibili ty.

The Purchasing Adminis t ra tor reports directly to the Fi­nance Director.

I. BUDGET AND FISCAL MANAGEMENT A. OPERATING B U D G E T

In 1982, the Finance Depar tmen t cont inued to use and refine the weighted criteria operat ing budget system that was introduced in 1981. The 1983 Oper­ating Budget was developed through a process in which City divisions first prepared an "Equivalent Budget" showing what services would be provided at a fixed level of personnel and dollar resources. Divisions then prepared prioritized a series of "ex­pansion" and " reduct ion" proposals identifying the services to be added or reduced at higher or lower funding levels. The Mayor's Office and the Finance Depar tment reviewed these budget proposals and held hearings and discussions with depa r tmen t and division heads before establishing priorities for the recommended budget .

One key feature of the 1983 budget process was that it called for financial and personnel informa­tion to be presented at a m u c h finer level of organi­zational detail than before. Divisions b roke their op­erations down into small g roups of related services called "Cost Centers" and provided detailed pro­gram and funding r eques t informat ion for each

Cost CEnter . P resen ta t ion of th is information in the b u d g e t d o c u m e n t e n a b l e d t h e A d m i n i s t r a t i o n , Council and, mos t impor tan t ly , the general public to par t ic ipate in and m o r e clearly unde r s t and what the budge t m e a n s in t e rms of service delivery.

The use of this dec i s ion-making t echn ique per­mit ted each expans ion and reduc t ion proposal to be evaluated m o r e object ively a n d equi tably . CAPITAL I M P R O V E M E N T S B U D G E T

1. Definition The F inance D e p a r t m e n t in coopera t ion with

t h e D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t , p r e p a r e d t h e City's 1983 Capital I m p r o v e m e n t s Budge t (CIB) and 1983-1988 Capital I m p r o v e m e n t s P rog ram (CIP). The annua l CIB represen t s the City's p lan of expend i t u r e for capital projects for the com­ing year. T h e C I P represen t s a long-range plan for City d e v e l o p m e n t , facility renova t ion and capital expans ion . T h e C I B is no t an authoriza­t ion to m a k e e x p e n d i t u r e s in the m a n n e r of the a n n u a l Ope ra t ing Budge t , bu t r a the r the pro­posed plan of e x p e n d i t u r e shou ld funds become avai lable t h r o u g h car ryovers , i s suance of new deb t or grants .

2. Finance Role a. N e w Projects :

City d iv is ions s u b m i t t e d p lans in Augus t for 1983 c a p i t a l p r o g r a m s r e q u i r i n g n e w financing. We reviewed the se r eques t s to de­t e rmine if addi t iona l author iza t ion would be r equ i r ed . P ro jec t s to b e f inanced wi th the C i t y ' s i n c o m e t a x r e v e n u e (one - four th of which goes to service voted debt) received special a t tent ion . In 1981, voters approved a $42.8 mil l ion b o n d p a c k a g e for capi tal im­p r o v e m e n t s for n o n - e n t e r p r i s e a g e n c i e s , $5,605,000 of which was issued in 1982. Since i n c o m e r e v e n u e s are l imi ted u n d e r current t ax ra tes a n d o u t s t a n d i n g d e b t serv ice re­qu i r emen t s , w e m a d e project ions of future re­sources u n d e r several a s sumpt ions . This in­format ion w a s u s e d in Cab ine t d i scuss ions with the Mayor to es tabl ish a $9,453 million capital i m p r o v e m e n t s plan for 1983.

The s ta tus of the app roved 1981 bond package as of D e c e m b e r 31, 1982 is as follows (000's omit­ted):

Out- 1983 1984-1986 Amount Standing Notes To Notes To

Purpose Authorized Bonded Notes Be Issued Be Issued Street Construction, Maintenance & Repair—

street improvements and engineer ing $13,670 $1,000 $ $2,376 $10,294 Electricity—street lighting 7,150 600 1424 5,126 i ire—apparatus replacement and station

renovation and constr 6,370 2,005 1,871 2,494 Parks, Recreation & Zoo—Parks improvements

and development; zoo facilities expansion 6,240 1240 110 1414 3 476 Sewerage and Drainage—storm sewers, di tch

improvements and erosion 3 870 200 391 3 279 Traffic Engineering—signal and sign installation 3^500 200 609 2691 Police—Academy renovation and

substation construct ion 2,000 100 150 1,368 382 $42,800 $5,345 $260 $9,453 $27,742

^ J 1 6 / * 3 ^ 3 . 1 » m P r o v e m e n t s budge t was sub- a m e n d m e n t o rd inances . These a m e n d m e n t s mit ted to City Council in December and pub- were des igned to give Counci l information on he hear ings were scheduled for early 1983. the c o n s e q u e n c e s of b u d g e t changes and on i n e u e v e l o p m e n t Commission, an advisory the progress toward project comple t ion . The group appointed by the Mayor, held public Ci ty ' s d e b t can b e m a n a g e d be t t e r if it is n J ^ ' r t ™ '"» N ? y , e m b e r and December . The k n o w n how m u c h addi t iona l d e b t is antici-Depar tmen t s of F inance and Development , as pated well as other City divisions, were present to answer ques t ions about the budget process H. DEBT MANAGEMENT and specific projects. A DEFINITION

T h l ^ n ^ f n S : - 4 , T h e C i t Y i n c u r s d e b t to buy capital assets . The h lP fn rmnn^nr l i cP tKToTo ^ a i a l s o / £ s p o n s i - C i t v borrows from investors in the open market, «nendT.?.inr^ promises to return the money in future install-2 " 3 r ^ ' n j a n c e s were reviewed by Fi- men t s , and uses t h e m o n e y to improve its capital m i n e d tn r f t v T b ^ d g

fe t wer% ~ u b - b a s e - S i n c e t h e c o s t o f c a P i t a l Projects is appor-

mi t ted to City Counci l in the form of CIB t ioned over the useful life of the pu rchased assets,

V

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 77

future beneficiaries share in project costs as their tax dollars cont r ibute to servicing the debt.

B. FINANCE ROLE The depa r tmen t manages the City's debt program

by coordinat ing the issuance of authorized notes a n d b o n d s . Ci ty m a n a g e m e n t m u s t r ea sonab ly assure that it will not incur debt in excess of the ability to repay.

Notes, which originally require only interest pay­ments , are generally issued to provide financing for projects unt i l they are completed and it is deter­mined that adequa te funds are available to make principal as well as interest payments . At that t ime, t h e n o t e s are gene ra l ly c o n v e r t e d to long- term b o n d e d d e b t . B o t h n e w and r e n e w a l no te s are issued dur ing the year. If the amoun t of notes to be issued or renewed is significant, the City holds a national sale to at tract many bidders and, hopefully, a favorable interest rate. Small note offerings are ususally sold locally.

C. DEBT ACTIVITY 1. Bond and Note Sales

Two nat ional and eleven local note sales were held dur ing 1982. Both of the national sales were competi t ively bid. In teres t rates obtained in the national sales ranged from 8.57c to 8.75%.

New debt issued dur ing 1982 included the fol­lowing:

Division/Purpose Security Amount Sewerage Sys tem Unl imi ted Tax Notes $ 5,250,000 Fire Station and

Fire Appara tus Unl imi ted Tax Bonds 855,000 Police Facilities Unl imi ted Tax Bonds 250,000 Expressway and Street

Improvement Unl imi ted Tax Bonds 1,200,000 Street Lighting Unl imi ted Tax Bonds 600,000 Storm Sewerage Unl imi ted Tax Bonds 200,000 Parks, Recreation &

Zoo Unlimited Tax Bonds 350,000 Waterworks Sys tem . . . Limi ted Tax Notes 12,900,000 Refuse/Coal Power

Plant Limi ted Tax Notes 10,000,000 Refuse/Coal Power

Plant Limi ted Tax Notes 6,300,000 Zoo Amusemen t Park . Limited Tax Notes 40,000 Riverfront Park

Improvement Limited Tax Notes 1,365,000 Final J u d g m e n t Limited Tax Notes 107,500 Street Improvemen t

(Assessments) Limi ted Tax Notes 73,106 Municipal Garage

Renovation Limited Tax Notes 250,000 Capitol South Limited Tax Notes 175,000 Municipal Garage

Computer Sys tem . . Limi ted Tax Notes 270,000

TOTAL NEW D E B T $40,185,606

Inc luded in new deb t issued dur ing the year was an addi t ional $16.3 million for the Refuse/ Coal Fired Power Plant , br inging the City's total obligation th rough year-end for the Power Plant to $160.7 million. T h e final $350,000 of outstand­ing notes for the Por t Co lumbus Airport renova­tion and expans ion project were converted to bonded debt . The City's total obligation for this project is $65.2 million.

The City had two bond sales in 1982. A total of $82.4 mi l l ion of v a r i o u s p u r p o s e no te s were b o n d e d . In te res t ra tes on b o n d s ranged from 12% to 12.375%.

Our deb t m a n a g e m e n t mas ter p rogram pro­vides for the per iodic reduct ion of short-term debt. The Depa r tmen t works diligently to mini­mize the possibility of eve. requir ing property taxes to service the ou ts tand ing debt . All of the City 's d e b t is b a c k e d by t h e p romise to levy proper ty taxes to repay the loans if exist ing in­come tax or o ther funds are insufficient. Since short- term debt requi res frequent note renewal sales there is a greater chance that the City might be forced to accept a high interest rate if market condi t ions were unfavorable at the t ime of sale. T h e City 's shor t - te rm deb t was reduced from $196 million to $152 million in 1982. Outs tanding bonds totaled $543 million at year-end.

Commercial Paper Program The City cont inued to use its Commercial Pa­

per Program to reduce short term note interest cost . In 1982, o u t s t a n d i n g commerc ia l paper offerings ranged from $38.3 million to $75 mil­lion. This program is a better money market in­s t rumen t for meet ing short-term financing re­qu i remen t s than tradit ional bond anticipation no tes and offers four significant advantages : substantial interest cost savings, greater flexibil­ity, more immed ia t e and cont inued access to funds, and increased market penetration.

Lower interest rates are generally charged by an investor of our commerc ia l paper for two reasons. First, the investor is guaranteed that his loan will be repaid, if not by the City, then by a g roup of b a n k s tha t have " i n s u r e d " the City a g a i n s t de fau l t ; a n d s e c o n d , t h e i n v e s t o r ' s money is commit ted for a relatively short t ime period. Commercial paper maturi t ies average ab­out one mon th as compared to one year for tradi­tional bond anticipation notes. During the year ended J u n e 2, 1982, the commercial paper prog­ram saved the City an est imated $700,000 in debt service cost over and above $143,000 in start-up costs. Ratings

Each year the City applies to the national rat­ing agencies for an appraisal of its capacity to handle deb t already issued and to be issued. The City's ratings for 1982 were as follows:

Agency Moodys Investor Service: . Standard & Poors Corp: . .

RATINGS

Bonds Notes Al MIG 1 AA AA

Commeriai Paper

Pr ime 1 A - 1 +

T h e bond ra t ings are the second and third highest offered by the agencies. The note and commercial paper ratings are the highest offered by the agencies. Moody's reduced its bond rating from Aa in 1982 to reflect three concerns: the operating losses of normally self-supporting en­terprises of the City, the large amount of out­s tanding short-term debt, and the pressure on the City's General Fund caused by national eco­nomic condit ions.

Since the downgrade by Moodys, the City has increased its income tax by one-fourth and insti­tuted a three-year program to divest the General Fund of inves tment income earned on funds bor­rowed to finance capital programs within self-suppor t ing enterpr ises . In addition, intentions are to reduce outs tanding short-term debt dur­ing 1983 by approximately one-third. Such mea­sures are evidence of the City's effort to regain its Aa status.

III. EMPLOYEE RELATIONS A. LABOR RELATIONS

In 1982, the Administrat ion entered into negotia­tions with all unions. The American Federat ion of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) and Ohio Nursing Association (ONA) agreed to a 10 month extension to Ju ly 31, 1983 on economic mat­ters. The Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) and Inter­national Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) did not reach a similar proposed agreement with the Admi­nistration. Following a j ob action early in 1983, F O P and IAFF settled with City Council on a two year agreement with an increase in wages of 5% in both years. Many working condit ion issues were negoti­ated and resolved with all unions.

B. SALARY ORDINANCE ADMINISTRATION Dur ing 1982, salary range requests for exist ing

and new classifications were received and evalu­ated. Throughout the year we responded to various questions concerning the proper adminis trat ion of the salary ordinances.

C. INSURANCE B E N E F I T S The Depa r tmen t answers employees ' quest ions

about insurances and assists employees with insur­ance problems. Employee benefit sessions are con­ducted to inform City employees about their benefit programs.

78 CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

In 1982, the City implemented self-insurance programs in the health, dental, vision and life insur­ance benefits. This allowed the City to pay on an actual claims basis plus administrative fees.

Analysis was completed to adopt an "Administra­tive Services Only" program for all City employees health benefits. Under this arrangement, the car­riers administered the claims for the City and no stop loss coverage is provided. The City will fund for expected paid claims and administrative costs. The actual claims and funding levels will be moni­tored monthly. These funding changes will occur in January, 1983. ,

Various cost containment approaches tor the City's health benefit packages were investigated. It is anticipated that several of the cost containment changes will be made in 1983.

D COLUMBUS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (COSHA)

During the year, the Division reviewed and de­cided upon the validity of 1,237 workers' compensa­tion claims of City employees. There were 807 in­jury leave requests reviewed and processed.

A new program was imp lemen ted which arranged medical examinations for terminated em­ployees who are receiving workers' compensation benefits at the time of termination. This program should minimize the future benefit costs charged to the City. The cross-checking of worker' compensa­tion claims with employee health insurance claims which began in 1982 should eliminate duplicate fil­ings.

A final report of the Workers' Compensation Re­view Committee was submitted to the Director of Finance. The report made several recommenda­tions regarding the processing of workers' com­pensation claims.

Final stages of development occurred for an on­line computer inquiry of work related injuries, their costs, and the hours of lost productivity.

IV SPECIAL PROJECTS A. CAPITOL SOUTH

The City and the Capitol South Urban Redevelop­ment Corporation (CURC), a private redevelopment corporation, are jointly developing the three square block area immediately south of the State Capitol.

Ground breaking for a luxury hotel and office space at Third and State Streets took place in Janu­ary 1982, representing a significant step forward in the project development. The hotel will contain more than 400 rooms while the office complex will supply 600,000 square feet of space. The entire proj­ect will cost approximately $90 million. This project is scheduled for completion in November 1983.

The City has received $19,925,000 in Urban De­velopment Action Grant (UDAG) funds for use in the Capitol South project, including a $2 million grant for the Ohio Theatre. Official ground breaking for the Theatre expansion occurred in February 1982, bringing together public and private re­sources for cultural progress in Columbus. The $9.7 million expansion costs will include the UDAG funding and a $2 million Economic Development Administration (EDA) grant, with the remainder coming from private sources.

B. MOUNT VERNON SOUTH The City maintains an administrative contract

with Neighborhood Development Corporation (NDC) to support redevelopment in the Mount Ver­non project area. A grocery supermarket as a retail anchor for Mt. Vernon Plaza is under construction. The primary funding source for the project is under construction. The primary funding for the project is an EDA grant.

V. MANAGEMENT SERVICES During 1982, the Management Services Section of the

Department of Finance was responsible for the follow­ing achievements: A. COMPANY OFFICER TRAINING PROGRAM

At the request of Fire Chief Raymond Fadley the Management Services Section designed and con­ducted a supervisory skills training program for the 140 captains and lieutenants in the Division of Fire

Beginning in June, Management Services person­nel met with groups of firefighters, company offi­

cers, battalion chiefs, and assistant chiefs to define the role of the company officer and to identify the unique set of problems that fire officers must han­dle.

Having analyzed this information, Management Services designed a comprehensive, 40-hour train­ing program that included the following topics: 1. the basics of supervision and leadership, 2. communication skills, 3. conflict management, 4. employee motivation 5. training the trainer 6. managing the unsatisfactory performer.

Management Services conducted the first Com­pany Officer Training Program for 20 Fire Lieu­tenants in October. An additional 7 groups of offic­ers will be trained.

In addition, Management Services has begun to analyze and address the training needs of upper-level Fire Division management. Battalion chiefs and assistant chiefs were given a summary of the entire training program, emphasizing their critical role in supporting the company officers' attempts to improve their supervisory styles. CITY-WIDE SUGGESTION SYSTEM

During 1982, the Suggestion System Design Team completed a three-year effort of designing a suggestion system that will encourage City em­ployees to offer ideas that will improve productivity and reduce the cost of providing service to the citizens of Columbus.

At the end of 1982, the Design Team was prepar­ing to implement the Suggestion System by de­veloping a training program to orient City em­ployees to the details of the new system. Given that our suggestion system proved its cost effectiveness when it was implemented on a trial basis, and that significant savings have been realized by municipal systems throughout the county, we hope to imple­ment the Suggestion System in Columbus some­time in 1983. CITY-WIDE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

With the help of a grant from the Intergovernmen­tal Personnel Administration (IPA), Management Services personnel led a labor-management effort to design and implement a city-wide performance appraisal system.

After three years of research and design work, the performance appraisal system was completed in January, 1982, and a trial implementation program was initiated in the Division of Recreation and Traf­fic Engineering. Management Services conducted a 32-hour training program for the supervisors in these two divisions, monitored the first 3-month appraisal periods, and provided refresher training for those supervisors who requested it.

At the end of the year, Management Services was preparing to expand the performance appraisal sys­tem to other City agencies if and when funds were made available. PROBLEM-SOLVING: DIVISION OF HEALTH

Throughout 1982 Management Services led two group problem-solving efforts in an attempt to im­prove the effectiveness of the clerical staff and the supervisory staff of the Division of Environmental Health.

The clerical group has designed a new system to log the environmental complaints received from citizens. This system should streamline the current complaint tracking system while preventing com­plaints from being lost or delayed.

The Environmental Health Management prob­lem-solving group completed the design and imple­mentation of a cross-training program for sanitar­ians. In addition, Management Services led this group through the development of a "management responsibility guide" which outlines the responsibi­lities of each supervisor as well as the specific re­porting relationships among Division supervisors. CITY EMPLOYEES' LITERACY PROGRAM

In response to a request from the Building Ser­vices Division, Management Services is coordinat­ing a pilot program to help City employees who need to improve their reading skills. With the help of the Columbus Literacy Council and the Co­lumbus Volunteer Corporation, approximately 25 volunteer tutors will be trained to respond to re-

1 I

_sln- j

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

quests for help from employees of Building Ser­vices and the Municipal Garage. If the pilot pro­gram is successful, Management Services plans to encourage t h e vo lun t ee r efforts and e x p a n d the literacy program to other City employees who need help with their reading skills.

F. G R O U P FACILITATION TRAINING: DIVISION OF FIRE

Working with a group of seven firefighters from different ranks , M a n a g e m e n t Services is helping the Chief ach ieve t h e goal of es tab l i sh ing small problem-solving groups th roughout the Division of Fire.

Throughout 1982, the section analyzed the prob­lem of the growing use of sick leave in the Fire Divi­sion. A comprehens ive set of solut ions were de­veloped to address this issue.

G. GARAGE-SANITATION COMMITTEE Management Services cont inued to provide lead­

ership and g roup facilitation for meet ings between the managers of the Division of Sani tat ion and the Municipal Garage. These managers meet twice each quar ter to discuss and resolve issues concerning the Sanitat ion vehicle fleet. Dur ing 1982, the Garage-Sanitat ion commi t t ee worked on problems such as: 1. r educ ing the backlog of high-priori ty vehicles

wait ing to be repaired; 2. i m p r o v i n g w o r k i n g c o n d i t i o n s a t t h e s u b ­

stations, 3. providing improved securi ty at the stat ions.

Managemen t Services conduc ts these meet ings and prov ides necessa ry follow-up to insure that progress is m a d e toward resolving each issue.

H. P R O F E S S I O N A L RECOGNITION M a n a g e m e n t Serv ices pe r sonne l m a d e profes­

s ional c o n t r i b u t i o n to the field of publ ic sector t r a in ing and organiza t ional d e v e l o p m e n t du r ing 1982 by giving presenta t ions at the following con­ferences:

—"Group Prob lem-so lv ing in Pub l i c Organiza­t ions," 1982 National Conference of the Amer­ican Society for Pub l i c Adminis t ra t ion.

—"Corpo ra t e T ra in ing P r o g r a m s : P rocess and Evaluat ion," Speech Communica t ion Associa­tion of Ohio, 1982 Convent ion.

VI. OFFICE OF CONTRACT COMPLIANCE A. INTRODUCTION

T h e Office of Con t rac t Compl iance was estab­lished for the purpose of adminis te r ing the provi­sions of Article I, Title 39, commonly referred to as the Contract Compl iance Code. The major responsi­bilities of this office are to increase the participation of minori ty and female bus inesses in City of Co­l u m b u s contrac ts and to enhance the inclusion of minori t ies and females into non-tradi t ional jobs in the workforce of those companies contract ing with the City. In addi t ion, it is the responsibil i ty of the office to assure tha t all City agencies are complying with all state and federal contract compl iance re­lated requ i rements . The Contract Compl iance staff consists of an adminis t ra tor , an officer, an investi­gator, and a clerical suppor t person.

B. I M P L E M E N T A T I O N O F P R O G R A M S NUMER­ICAL G O A L S

The Contract Compl iance Code establ ished goals which serve as numer ica l b e n c h m a r k s of the City's success in achieving its objective of including all segments of the c o m m u n i t y in the areas economy. These goals can be generally g rouped into the fol­lowing areas: 1. The percentage of minority and female persons em­

ployed by those companies contracting with the City and the overall employment practices of such companies.

To ensure compl iance with the Code's employ­m e n t goals, compan ies are required to submi t in­formation regard ing their emp loymen t practices and e m p l o y m e n t profile. Companies deemed to be in compl iance wi th the goals and/or the over­all intent and spirit of the code are issued a con­t r a c t c o m p l i a n c e ce r t i f i ca t ion n u m b e r . Only companies holding such a n u m b e r may be issued a City contract . Dur ing 1982, a total of 1,788 com­panies were issued certification number s .

Due to the na ture of the industry , construct ion cont rac tors work ing on City projects must , in addit ion to the initial review, submi t monthly re-

79

ports del ineat ing their workforce. In 1982, the Office of Contract Compliance reviewed month­ly contractors for 114 projects. Also included in the month ly review procedure were 68 on-site visits to construction projects.

2. In City construction contracts the goal for the parti­cipation of minority business enterprises (MBE) is 10% and 2% for female business enterprises (FBE).

In 1982, this office reviewed 114 construction projects valued at $46,112,108.78. A total of 52 minority and female business enterprises partici­pated in these projects. The MBE participation was 9.7% ($4,492,413.85), while the FBE was 1.9% ($894,902.00).

In add i t i on , t h e C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t H o m e R e h a b i l i t a t i o n P r o g r a m e x p e n d e d $5,678,532.00 of which minori ty companies re­ceived $1,070,915.00 (18.86%).

To assure that only truly minority and female companies, as defined by the Code, are desig­nated as such, the Office of Contract Compliance made 142 on-site visits to minority and female designated companies .

3. City agencies are to utilize minority business enter­prises for 10% and female business enterprises for 2% of the total dollars expended on contracts other than construction.

In J a n u a r y of 1982, a p r o c e d u r e w a s im­plemented which allowed this office to monitor City agencies ' professional services contracting.

In 1982, there were 83 professional service con­tracts reported at a value of $10,828,653.00. The MBE par t ic ipat ion was 6.8% ($733,617.00) and FBE participation was 5.3% ($574,108.00).

Vendor contracts consti tute another segment of agency contract ing. For the purpose of im­plement ing the Contract Compliance Code, ven­dor contracts have been defined as those purch­ases m a d e by t h e Division of P u r c h a s i n g for material, supplies, and equipment . Unless spe­cial c i r c u m s t a n c e s prevai l , t he City Code re­quires that vendor contracts be awarded to the lowest and best bidder. Therefore, it was agreed tha t given t h e staffing l imita t ion of Contract Compliance, the Division of Purchas ing would assume the responsibili ty of notifying appropri­ate minori ty and female businesses of potential bidding opportunit ies . As of this writing, figures are not available regarding the participation of MBE's and FBE's . The participation of minority and female businesses in vendor contract ing will be a priority item for 1983.

C. PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT Major strides were made by the City in obtaining

its goal of including all segments of the citizenry in its economic growth . It has been suggested that minor i ty and female bus inesses might be bet ter served if the City were to consolidate it's Office of Minority Business Development and the Office of Contract Compliance. Since J u n e 1982, a substan­tial n u m b e r of workhours have been devoted to evaluating this suggestion, and to whether any such consolidation should be under the aegis of the De­par tment of Finance or the Depar tment of Develop­ment.

Being aware that current information is essential if a program is going to properly fulfill its mission, this office held a conference for administrators of c o n t r a c t c o m p l i a n c e p r o g r a m s t h r o u g h o u t t h e State of Ohio. The purpose of the conference was to open the lines of communica t ion with other cities. T h e Ohio A s s o c i a t i o n of C o n t r a c t C o m p l i a n c e Adminis t ra tors has been incorporated as a result of this conference.

DIVISION OF BUILDING SERVICES INTRODUCTION

The Division of Building Services is an internal admi­nistrative suppor t service report ing to the City Finance Director Its responsibili t ies include maintenance and housekeeping duties at City Hall, Central Police Station, the police subs ta t ions , and the Beacon and Marconi Buildings. The Division adminis ters a contract to have these and other services provided at the municipal court building by a private main tenance firm. Other major functions involve building, garage, parking r amp secur­ity centralized duplicating, te lephone switchboard ser-

80 CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

vices, and in terdepar tmenta l mail. The Division pays the utility bills for the buildings for which it has responsibil­ity. 1. Administrative Section .

The administrat ive section directs the overall Divi­sion operat ions, main ta ins Division personnel and payroll records, requisi t ions equ ipment and supplies, and prepares Division budgets , financial reviews, re­ports, contracts, and legislation. This Section is re­sponsible for negotiating leases and paying the rent for some City agencies housed in private office space. A building manager is assigned to each of the four major facilities. These managers have responsibili ty for all Division activities occurr ing within their build­ing and all Division personnel permanent ly assigned there.

2. Maintenance Section The main tenance section consists of the building

t rades personnel . These employees repai r and re­model the physical plant. The staff is supervised by the building main tenance manager and works in all facilities on an as-needed basis.

3. Custodial Section The custodial section performs janitorial services

for the bui ld ings the Division serves. A custodial training instructor guides custodial personnel in us­ing correct techniques and appropr ia te suppl ies and equipment .

4. Mailroom Mail for City agencies is picked u p at the main post

office, sorted at City Hall, and dis t r ibuted twice daily to most City agencies. Outgoing U.S. Mail is metered. Se l f - sus ta in ing agenc i e s a re bi l led the i r p o s t a g e costs.

5. Copy Center A m u l t i - c a p a b i l i t y copy m a c h i n e , o p e r a t e d by

trained operators, is available to all City depa r tmen t s and the general public. It is located in the basemen t of City Hall.

6. Telephone Switchboard The central switchboard te lephone operators t rans­

fer calls to the appropr ia te City agency which are re­ceived on the general information line. Information is provided to the public by these operators .

7. Security Section Security is provided at City buildings, garage and

parking areas. ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES 1. Property Management

Lease ex tens ions were negotiated and processed for the following propert ies for which City agencies are tenants : Kilgallen Hall, Saint Anthony ' s Hospital , Police Sub­station 6, Bolton Field, Police Substa t ion 10, AMTRAK Police Substa t ion, Police Intelligence/Organized Crime Bureaus , Don Scott Field, The Ohio State University, Fire Sta­tion 11

The Division also served as landlord in the fol­lowing situations where leases were renewed:

* Communi ty Services Depar tmen t offices in the Beacon Building

* Communi ty Development Division offices in the Marconi Building

* P u b l i c Ut i l i t ies C o m m i s s i o n of Ohio (PUCO) offices in the Municipal Court Building

* North Market facility, 29 Spruce Street The Pub l i c Uti l i t ies C o m m i s s i o n occup ied an

additional 5,200 square feet of leased space within the Municipal Cour t Bui lding. This area consists of two cour t rooms and their a t tending areas. The con­sent of the court judges was received for this expan­sion.

2. General The 1981 indirect cost allocation plan was upda ted

by a consul tant hired by the F inance Depa r tmen t I he Division provided the consul tan t with data on space utilization, postage, and copying costs. XT i l u » ? a s e a g r e e m e n t b e t w e e n t h e City and t h e North Market Association was ex tended ano ther five years Administrat ive responsibil i ty for the lease was transferred from this Division to the Depa r tmen t of Recreation and Parks .

Standardization of l ighting fixtures and bu lbs was

unde r t aken to r educe the n u m b e r of different types requi red to be car r ied in the Division 's inventory. Cost savings should result .

Significant changes were imp lemen ted wi th in the City Hall mai l room. Phys ica l a l terat ions inc luded ex­pansion of the room into the former copy room nex t door and insta l la t ion of cei l ing tile. An elect ronic mailing sys tem was ren ted ; th is inc luded an auto­mated postal accoun t ing sys tem, scale, and Uni ted Parcel Service (UPS) meter . P rocedura l changes in­cluded util ization of Uni ted Parce l Service in lieu of the postal service for send ing certain packages , and for i n - h o u s e s o r t i n g of f i rs t c l a s s p r e s o r t mai l . Formerly , an outs ide cont rac tor presor ted the first class mail by zip code. The City's ne t savings was $.012 per piece. Now, the cont rac tor sorts mail only when the Division does not have enough pieces in a part icular zip code to qualify s end ing at the first class p resor t ra te . Our ne t sav ings per p iece for p ieces sor ted in -house is $.03. T h e e lec t ronic e q u i p m e n t allows the Division to presor t by v i r tue of its t ime-saving capabil i t ies .

PHYSICAL P L A N T I M P R O V E M E N T S

1. City Hall After the west s t eps were r emoved the area was

l andscaped . Roof repa i r s w e r e m a d e over several stairwells and a doorway leading from the garage into the data process ing cen te r was sealed off to prevent infiltration of dir t and mois tu re . A hand icapped bar­rier removal project c o m m e n c e d in City Hall and the City Heal th D e p a r t m e n t ' s bui ld ing. In City Hall, one men ' s and one w o m e n ' s res t room are being m a d e ac­cessible to t h e h a n d i c a p p e d . Th ree d r ink ing foun­tains are be ing instal led tha t will be accessible to per­sons in whee lcha i r s . T h e federally-funded work at both sites totals $17,861.00.

2. Police Facilities Two res t rooms w e r e m a d e access ib le for handicap­

ped pe r sons wi th in the Central Pol ice Stat ion. The Division will a s s u m e p a y m e n t of all police facility utility invoices (except te lephone) in 1983 as a result of d iscuss ions c o n d u c t e d in 1982. Remode l ing and renova t ion w o r k c o m m e n c e d at t h e Ne l son Road Police Academy. A subs ta t ion was also es tabl ished at th is site.

3. Beacon Building Remode l ing work con t inued in var ious areas of the

Beacon Bui ld ing as a resul t of ad jus tmen t s m a d e in t enan t s ' space . The Division of Traffic Engineer ing and the D e p a r t m e n t of E n e r g y and Te lecommunica­tion occupied por t ions of t h e area formerly belonging to the D e p a r t m e n t of C o m m u n i t y Services .

4. Marconi Building T h e n e w word p roces s ing center , located in the

eighth floor, w e n t on-line. Signif icant water leakage and air c irculat ion p rob lems were exper ienced and subsequen t ly resolved in t h e Marconi Bui lding. In the lat ter case, h o o d s wi th e x h a u s t fans were placed over p r in t ing and p h o t o g r a p h i c e q u i p m e n t on the seventh floor to e l imina te n a u s e o u s odors . Defective electrical boxes in the bui ld ing were replaced by the manufac ture r at no cost to t h e City of Co lumbus .

5. Municipal Court Building S o m e utili ty savings were realized as a resul t of

work comple t ed earl ier on this bui ld ing ' s heating, vent i la t ing, and air cond i t ion ing sys tems. In April 1982, the City was notified by Frank l in County that it was liable for eighty-five pe rcen t of all pas t and fu­ture bill ings from the City Division of Electricity for s t andby /emergency electr ical power suppl ied to the b u i l d i n g . T h i s b i l l i n g a m o u n t s t o $8,750.00 per month . Working wi th our bu i ld ing m a n a g e m e n t firm, an exhaus t ive effort was m a d e to r e d u c e or el iminate these bil l ings. T h e u l t imate solut ion appears to be installation of a swi tch at the bui ld ing that will direct a por t ion of t h e facility's regular electrical load from the presen t supplier , C o l u m b u s and Sou the rn Ohio Electric Company , to t h e Division of Electricity, thus reduc ing the former 's billing. T h e swi tch is on order and is not yet instal led. Yet to be resolved is the City's liability to t h e Coun ty and the Divis ion 's liability to the Division of Electrici ty.

DATA PROCESSING DIVISION INTRODUCTION 1. The Data P rocess ing Division was es tabl ished under

CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982 81

Chapter 153 of the Columbus City Code. The In­formation Services Commission (established under the same Chapter) serves as the Division's governing body. a. The Chairman of the Information Services Com­

mission is the Division's appointing authority. The Director of Finance serves as Commission Chairman.

b. The Commission has responsibility to: 1) Review areas of City Government that would

benefit from implementing data processing systems.

2) Review and make recommendations to Council on purchases or rental of data processing equipment and/or services.

2. The Data Processing Division is composed of four functional areas: Administration, Systems and Pro­gramming, Computer Operations and Technical Services. a. Administration has responsibility for general

management of the Data Processing Division. Re­sponsibilities include fiscal management, person­nel management, and planning.

b. Systems and Programming consists of Analyst/ Programmers who maintain and enhance existing user application systems. They also design and de­velop new application systems.

c. Computer Operations runs a seven day, 24 hour computer center. Services include: processing time, data storage, data quality control, source document microfilming, microfiche, and support of various peripheral hardware systems or equip­ment.

d. Technical Services manages the Data Com­munications Network which allows constant com­munication with the Data Processing Division. The staff also provides support to all system soft­ware, provides training, and evaluates proposed equipment changes.

B. ADMINISTRATION—1982 ACCOMPLISHMENTS 1. During 1982, administrative personnel evaluated

several requests from City agencies to purchase iata processing equipment/services. All requests received favorable recommendations to the Information Ser­vices Commission. Those requests which were autho­rized are as follows: a. Department of Community Services—request to

purchase "Plato" system from Control Data (esti­mated cost $170,000).

b. Department of Energy and Telecommunica­tions—request to purchase a microcomputer for energy analysis applications (estimated cost $9,800).

c. Department of Development, Division of Plan­ning, Division of Code Enforcement—requests to renew Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission (MORPC) contracts (estimated cost $13,700 and $24,000).

d. Department of Finance, Municipal Garage Divi­sion—request to purchase hardware and software for a Vehicle Management Information System (estimated cost $309,500).

e. Department of Public Service, Division of Water— request to purchase a microcomputer for en­gineering applications (estimated cost $14,000).

C. SYSTEMS AND PROGRAMMING —1982 ACCOM­PLISHMENTS 1. Systems and Programming assisted Computer Op­

erations in the development of new Operations Docu­mentation standards. Operations Documentation de­fines step-by-step operation procedures for an ap­plication system.

2. Staff training was increased during 1982. Primary focus fell into two categories: a. A Data Base Management (DMS II) course was

conducted by in-house personnel. The course was taken by all programming staff using DMS II. The course was designed to improve knowledge in efficiency usage, problem solving, and program design techniques.

b. In 1982, the City Data Center contracted with Del-tak, Inc. to provide audio-visual self-training courses to be used by our programming staff. Dur­ing 1982, Systems and Programming completed "Effective Manager" and "Project Management" courses.

3. The following accomplishments identify enhance­

ments, new developments or highlights of user ap­plications systems: a. Payroll System—(Auditor)

1) By July of 1982, all City employees were suc­cessfully converted to the new Payroll/Person­nel System, thus completely eliminating the old Payroll System.

2) Documentation defining the processing proce­dures was completed and turned over to Opera­tions.

3) Unemployment Compensation subsystem was developed and turned over to the Finance De­partment for testing.

b. FAMIS—Financial Accounting Management In­formation System—(Auditor) 1) Upgraded FAMIS to accept an automatic inter­

face from Payroll/Personnel, and the Water and Sewer Billing System. The interface eliminated the manual coding and entering of this data via online terminals.

2) Developed Online Data Entry which replaced the outdated Burroughs (L-8000) key tape sys­tem. The Auditor's office now enters data directly from online terminals.

3) Assisted the Auditor's office with an external audit by independent certified public accoun­tants

c. Inventory System (Auditor) 1) The inventory system was converted from the

old Department/Division numbering system to the new structure defined in the Financial Accounting System (FAMIS). This upgrade provides compatibility between FAMIS and In­ventory.

d. City Income Tax System (Division of Income Tax) 1) Developed procedures and programs to purge

historical data. Purging of this data will occur during the first quarter of 1983.

2) The Tax System was upgraded to provide capa­bility for additional tax returns and Wl docu­ment types. This expanded capability simpli­fies the input process for tax returns and Wl documents. A major upgrade of the Tax Online Mainte­nance program was accomplished. Data entry screens were redesigned providing improved methods of user input. Additional edit checks were added to reduce user corrections.

Budget Preparation System (Finance) 1) Developed an Online Data Entry Scheduler

allowing the Finance Department to enter re­port request and control information directly from online terminals.

Health (Department of Health) 1) The Data Center assisted in the implementa­

tion of a new Sanitation Program Information Formulator (SPIF) System. SPIF is designed to provide more timely and meaningful data for the program manager. The sanitarian will find it useful in planning and executing daily in­spectional activities.

2) Supported the Health Department in initial loading of the Master Files

Applicant Tracking (Civil Service) 1) Implemented the new Applicant Tracking Sys­

tem in April, 1982. The new system allows Civil Service to record and track sufficient work force information to: a) Selectively hire qualified applicants, b) Track an employee's position movements, c) Provide support information and reports to

external regulatory and other organizations. Documentation defining the processing was completed and turned over to Operations,

h. Water/Sewer 1) Implemented FAMIS (Financial Accounting

Management Information System) interface between the Water and Sewers Divisions' re­venue processing and the Auditor's Office. This eliminated the manual process of entering the data on-line and facilitated quicker posting of cash. This reduced lag time in posting from one month at the end of 1981 to two days at the end of 1982.

2) Implemented an on-line billing simulation fea­ture which allows Water & Sewer to test the effect of new rate structures. It also improves response to consumer questions.

3)

2)

82 CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

3) Implemented a rebill process allowing repro­duction of bills upon request, rather than hav­ing them reproduced manually.

4) Improved the sewer certification process which includes prior notification of pending certifications to property owners. This im­provement replaced much of the manual proc­ess required by user personnel.

5) Implemented a rate modification procedure which allows the users to modify Water and Sewer rates without the intervention of the Data Center.

i. Police System (Division of Police) 1) The new Offense Reporting and Crime Analy­

sis System was put into production in July. The 1st half of 1982 was devoted to implementing the system and the last half of 1982 was spent on refinements. The system allows the Police Department to enter Offense related data faster and more accurately, and allows them to quick­ly obtain crime statistics. Statistics are trans­mitted to the FBI via Uniform Crime Reports.

j . Courts (Municipal and Common Pleas) 1) Reorganized the data base of the Justice In­

formation system (JIS). 2) Implemented a Civil Indexing System for

Common Pleas Court. This replaces a cumber­some manual process and replaces a bulky fil­ing system with microfiche.

k. Fire (Division of Fire) 1) Developed the Columbus Fire Incident Report­

ing System (CFIRS). Among other accomplish­ments were the definition and compilation of the data base, the writing and testing of the data collect on lines, the incorporation of Ohio Fire Incident and National Fire Incident edit procedures, and the testing and training of Fire personnel.

COMPUTER OPERATION—1982 ACCOMPLISH­MENTS 1. Three Burroughs' 3955 processors were successfully

installed and operational during 1982. a) This hardware increases the memory resource

from three megabytes of memory to a maximum of 15 megabytes.

b) Significant savings will result from reduced re­quirements of electricity and air-conditioning.

c) There will be an approximate 75% reduction in floor space requirement.

2. A Digital VAX processor and related equipment were delivered for the new Vehicle Management Informa­tion System for the Municipal Garage. The equip­ment will be housed in the Data Center and operated by Computer Operations staff, while data entry and various report generation will be operated from user worksites.

3. Significant organizational changes occurred in Com­puter Operations: a) The Data Entry section was eliminated as the ter­

minal/data communications network expanded. Users use this network for input and control of their own data. From 1981 to 1982 the budgeted staff level was reduced from 24 to 19.

b) Operations' classifications were upgraded and re­vised to reflect assignment of computer room con­trol and to offer well-defined career paths.

c) A remote temperature sensing system and a water detection system were installed. These systems protect the City's investment of over $3 million in data processing equipment.

TECHNICAL S E R V I C E S - 1 9 8 2 ACCOMPLISH­MENTS 1. Designed, developed and installed the following soft­

ware systems: a. Compile Scheduling and Reporting System, b. Print Management and Paper Stock Inventory

System, c. Terminal Programmable Function Key Library

System (for SR100 CRT's), d. Remote Printing and Programming System, e. Data Communications Inventory and Property

System, f. Data Communications Maintenance Report Sys­

tem. 2. All terminals (CRTs and printers) were installed for

the Offense Reporting/Crime Analysis System in the Division of Police.

3. An in-house maintenance program was implemented on an experimental basis. The Technical Services' staff maintained 141 terminals. All in-house costs were offset by the eliminating the cost of vendor maintenance in the first year. During 1982, the Divi­sion expects to save approximately $40,000.

4. Training was provided to the following personnel: a. All Computer Operators were trained in the opera­

tions of the new Burroughs 3955 processors. b. Common Pleas and Municipal Court Security

Managers were trained in the use of their data security systems. This training has eliminated confusion among system users and has added greater system efficiency. User satisfaction has in­creased which should improve efficiency.

c. Over 100 users were trained in the operation of CRT's and printers.

5. Assisted the Municipal Garage in evaluating and im­plementing the Vehicle Management Information System.

DIVISION OF MUNICIPAL GARAGE A. INTRODUCTION

The Division of Municipal Garage is responsible for the maintenance and repair of City vehicles. The pri­mary goals of the Division are: 1) to provide competitive professional service to the user agencies; 2) to cooperate with the user agencies in solving their vehicle-related problems; 3) to regularly seek new and cost-effective methods of providing services; and 4) to provide a clean, healthy, safe, work environment.

The Division is an internal intragovernmental break­even service agency which generates revenues by billing user City agencies an hourly labor rate and cost plus a handling charge for parts, outside commercial work, and fuel.

The Municipal Garage consists of an auto reapir cen­ter, a truck repair center, a body and paint shop, a tire shop, a parts department, a motorcycle shop, a service station, three satellite garages at the Division of Sanita­tion pulverizer stations, a satellite garage for the Depart­ment of Recreation and Parks, a carpentry and mainte­nance shop, and an administrative section.

B. ADMINISTRATION The administrative section is responsible for the bill­

ing and management information systems, planning and fiscal management, payroll and personnel, vehicle in­ventory, titles and licensing, vehicle disposal, contract- i ing for parts and fuel, review of proposed vehicle speci­fications, capital improvements, and employee safety.

C. OPERATIONS 48,841 work orders were prepared showing 109,026

direct labor hours for 24,843 vehicle repairs. 1. The auto shop maintains most of the City's sedans,

primarily police cruisers. 4.179 repairs were made. 2. The body shop provides body repair, primarily for

police cruisers. Vehicles are painted and decals are applied. All accident claims concerning city vehicles are coordinated through the body shop.

3. The tire shop provides tire repair and replacement service to all City agencies. The tire trucks make road calls during business hours and when the Division of Sanitation works overtime.

4. The parts department maintains a large inventory of necessary parts, supplies, tires and tubes, batteries, and oils and greases. City agencies purchase their parts and fuel through the Municipal Garage. The parts department year-end inventory was valued at $399,737.

5. The motorcycle shop provides maintenance on police three-wheel motorcycles.

6. The service station provides fuel for City vehicles. 1,015,905 gallons of lead free gasoline were pumped. Minor repairs and vehicle lubrications were also done at the service station.

The City's 31 fueling locations dispensed 1,732,311 gallons of gasoline and 525,473 gallons of diesel fuel. An additional 484,720 gallons of gasoline were pur­chased through retail credit cards.

7. The truck repair center is responsible for major re­pairs on heavy trucks. The main user of this service is the Division of Sanitation.

8. Satellite garages are maintained at Alum Creek Drive, Morse Road, and Georgesville Road for the Di­vision of Sanitation. Comprehensive preventive maintenance is performed to reduce downtime and i major repairs. 2,774 repairs were made at the three :

'

CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 83

garages. A small satellite garage is maintained at the Department of Recreation and Parks' Whittier Street warehouse.

9. The Municipal Garage carpentry and maintenance shop provides carpentry services and building maintenance services for the Municipal Garage com­plex.

D. NEW PROGRAMS The K-Squared Fleet Maintenance Management In­

formation System, purchased in December 1982, is sche­duled to be operation in early 1983. This automated on­line information system will provide improved efficien­cies in processing and providing parts, fuel and labor transactions; complete equipment, vehicle, and parts in­ventory maintenance information; and management re­porting with same or next day turnaround of informa­tion.

DIVISION OF PURCHASING A. INTRODUCTION

The Division of Purchasing is responsible for the purchase and rental of materials, supplies, and equip­ment, and sales of real and personal property. The goal of the Division is to support the delivery of City services by insuring that necessary materials, supplies, and equipment are of proper quality, are available when needed, and are purchased at the lowest cost to the City. The Division operates four sections: Administration, Services, Stores, and Buying/Analytical.

B. ADMINISTRATION The Administration Section is responsible for activi­

ties such as: executing contracts for the purchase and rental of materials, supplies, and equipment; executing sales of real and personal property; supervision person­nel, budgeting, and accounting functions of the Di­vision; developing methods of planning, forecasting, and research; developing price analysis, cost analysis, value analysis, and negotiation techniques; contributing to minority business development.

C. SERVICES The Services Section is responsible for activities such

as: processing requisitions, quotation requests, quota­tions, purchase orders, and formal contracts.

D. STORES OPERATION The Stores Section is responsible for activities such

as: providing office supplies and related items at cost to all City agencies; evaluating the quality and variety of available items; evaluating present warehouse techni­ques and facilities; implementing quality control and materials management techniques.

E. BUYING The Buying/Analytical Section is responsible for acti­

vities such as: developing procedures for determination, description, and assurance of the quality of purchased items: developing procedures for vendor selection and relations; utilizing price, cost, and value analysis techni­ques: analyzing and updating purchasing procedures; systematizing and integrating vendor information; re­searching cost effective procedures and developing techniques to implement such procedures; analyzing product specifications and needs.

F. SIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES IN 1982 ARE SUMMAR­IZED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Established two new city-wide contracts for lumber

and paint. Because of the consolidation of the City's annual needs into these type of contracts, prices paid for lumber average 3% lower than the City paid in the previous year; prices for paint are approximately 8% lower.

2. Executed the sale of surplus real estate owned by the City. These properties were no longer needed for public use and their sale resulted in revenues of $153,000.00 for three divisions.

3. Continued involvement in cooperative purchasing in Central Ohio by coordinating the purchasing efforts of municipalities and townships.

4. Conducted conferences on purchasing procedures for divisions within the Public Service Department.

5. Continued developing and improving relations with minority and female business enterprises, resulting in an increase of 26% in the number of registered ven­dors. In cooperation with the Office of Contract Com­pliance, an aggressive policy was pursued to register and insure that vendors are in compliance with the City of Columbus' Affirmative Action Code. Over 1,200 vendors have been certified and are on file in the Division of Purchasing.

6. Generated the Columbus Municipal Price Index, a report designed to serve City agencies as a useful price tracking and budgetary tool. This year's report shows that the increase of commodity prices is only .6%.

COLUMBUS DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT—1982

The Columbus Development Department is principally responsible for serving citizens by coordinating plans for public and private development and by enforcing minimum standards for buildings, housing, and land use within the City of Columbus. This responsibility is based on the au­thority of the Development Director as assigned by Chapter 3101.04 of the Columbus City Codes.

The overall goal of the Development Department is to facilitate the orderly growth of Columbus, and to improve its economic, physical and social quality of life.

The Development Department is comprised of four oper­ating Divisions including: Planning and Economic Develop­ment, Community Development, Building Regulations, and Code Enforcement. In addition, the Department maintains an Administrative Section to provide centralized com­munications, fiscal, personnel and facilities management services to the operating divisions. It also provides funding and staff support to the Columbus Countywide Develop­ment Corporation which was established in 1982.

Based on the combined authority of the Development Director and the four Division Administrators, the Co­lumbus Development Department is responsible for admi­nistering the Ohio Basic Building Code and the following

I Columbus City Codes:

Title 23: General Offenses Code (Portions) Title 31: Planning and Platting Code Title 33: Zoning Code (Including Graphics) Title 35: Urban Renewal/Community Development Code Title 41: Building Code, Part I Title 43: Building Code, Part II Title 45: Housing Code Title 47: Nuisance Abatement Code

The Columbus Development Department carries out these responsibilities in a coordinated manner through the four operating Divisions. They have the following basic re­sponsibilities: DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION SECTION

The Development Director's office contains the Adminis­trative Section and the newly formed Columbus County-wide Development Corporation staff. The Administrative Section services the four operating Divisions of the Depart­ment of Development with Accounting, Fiscal Analysis, Personnel, Purchasing and other Department-wide support functions. This Section also maintains and revises the City's zoning annexation and planning maps and provides graphics, audiovisual, printing, photography and drafting services to the Department and to other City agencies.

The Administrative Section is funded by the General Fund and by the Community Development Act funds. Acti­vities of the Administrative Section support these and spe­cial funding source programs. Following is a summary of 1982 activities by program area cost center: SUPPORT SERVICES

1. Implemented a joint Department of Finance/Depart­ment of Development Word Processing Center.

2. Analyzed Department telephone services and reduced annual costs more than $10,000.

3 Prepared Equal Opportunity Compliance reports for City, State and Federal agencies including a five (5) year EEO analysis for U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

4 Staff participated in the Management analysis of the Union Contract which preceded AFSCME negotia­tions.

84 CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

5. Staff participated in the City-Wide Fleet Use/Fleet Poli­cy Coordinating Committee.

6. Staff served on the Evaluation Team for the Assistant Fire Chief Civil Service examination.

7 Department and Division reductions in staff were processed through the Personnel Section and assist­ance was given to all Divisions in organizing functions with reduced staff.

8. The computerized payroll/personnel system was suc­cessfully put in place with the Department of Develop­ment receiving praise for accuracy and for timely input of data.

9. Staff made significant contributions toward the solu­tion of air quality problems in the Marconi Building.

FISCAL SERVICES 1. A "Community Development Act Fund was created

out of unspent CDA funds to provide leveraging monies for rehabilitation and expansion of the Ohio Theater. This fund is managed in the Fiscal Section and its dollar amount varies according to the amount of CD funds available.

2. All Community Development Rehabilitation Loan and Grant escrow accounts for years prior to 1981 were rec­onciled during this year. This is a major effort towards finally closing these old cases.

3. The Department and the Civil Service Commission ini­tiated several formal job audits during the year. While none of these were concluded several received signifi­cant attention including: Rehab Tech I, II and III, the proposed Historic Preservationist classification, and the Development Project Assistant series of jobs.

4. Staff assisted in the procedural formation of and the budgeting for the Columbus Countywide Development Corporation. Analysis and accounting services are cur­rently provided for this ongoing activity.

5. The budget process of the General Fund and the Com­munity Development Act were difficult tasks success­fully completed this year. Both budgets are in a reduc­tion mode and in general, ability to deliver services re­mains at December 1981 levels.

6. At year's end a Departmental revision of a complex cost allocation formula was near completion.

VISUAL COMMUNICATION SERVICES 1. Staff assisted operating Divisions of the Department of

Development in several major projects including: Mi­crofiche Center (Planning), INFORMAFAIR (Minority Business), Word Processing (Administration), and the Innovative Grant Program Awards submission (Com­munity Development).

2. Staff assisted other Departments of the City with tech­nical support and project support. Major Departments or activities were: Electric Vehicle Program, City-wide Telephone Directory, planning for future typesetting/ word processing interface, set up memo form for uni­versal use, Visual Communications support for Mayor's Office, advice on printing and associated supplies.

3. Prepared, staffed and implemented the Ohio State Fair City exhibit. Also completed several promotional proj­ects including slide shows, exhibits, brochures and Columbus Fact Pack.

4. Provided public assistance with map information, photo images, and graphics.

COLUMBUS COUNTYWIDE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Columbus Countywide Development Corporation is a

non-profit corporation, incorporated in the fall of 1981. CCDC has 35 corporate members, composed of executive officers of banks, savings and loans, investment companies, development related businesses and community organiza­tions. Its operations are managed by a nine-member Board of Trustees, five (5) officers and a five (5) person staff.

CCDC was created to help small businesses obtain financ­ing needed for job-creating business expansions. Its pri­mary vehicle is the 503 Loan Program. CCDC is certified to issue debentures, guaranteed by the Small Business Ad­ministration, and sold through the Federal Finance Bank Th

T?, p r o , S ? ^ s a r e then lent to expanding small businesses. h e u L o a n Program can finance 40 percent of

land, building and equipment costs for a small business's expansion Terms are 15, 20 or 25 years, with an interest rate fixed at %% above long-term U.S. treasury bond rates Fifty percent of the remaining costs must come from non-federal sources, which includes conventional financing and/or financing through city or state programs. The remaining portion must be provided by the company in the form of an equity injection.

In February of 1982, CCDC was licensed by the U.S. Small Business Administration, to operate the Small Business

Administration (SBA) 503 Loan Program, a new fixed asset loan program for small businesses. CCDC underwrites and processes these loans for business expansions. It also pack­ages loans through a variety of other public programs, at the state, local and federal levels.

Since February, 1982, CCDC has assisted in the financing for projects costing $14,163.00 in 34 company expansions, through the SBA 503 Loan Program. These projects are ex­pected to result in the creation of 793 permanent jobs during the next one (1) to three (3) years, while retaining 1,764 ex­isting jobs.

These companies are wide-ranging in size and type, in­cluding machine shops, other manufacturers, restaurants, an accounting firm, a vocational school, distribution facili­ties and a variety of other businesses. Several of these loans have been in Columbus' targeted revitalization areas.

Also this year, CCDC expanded its area of operations to cover Franklin County, as well as the City with execution of a SBA 503 Services Contract with Franklin County. CCDC plans to continue its aggressive efforts in business financing during 1983. BUILDING REGULATION DIVISION

This Division is responsible for administering the Ohio Basic Building Code and the Columbus Building Code as assigned by Chapter 4102 of the Columbus City Codes. Both building codes provide minimum standards for the con­struction, arrangement and alteration of all buildings or their parts within the City of Columbus. These responsibili­ties are principally carried out through two (2) operating programs entitled Plan Examination and Building Inspec­tion.

The Division's goal is to facilitate construction that pre­serves the health, safety, and general well-being of the City.

The year 1982 saw significant developments in the Divi­sion of Building Regulation in an effort to improve the deliv­ery of building safety services to the public. Many of the improvements and programs begun in 1982 are expected to have an impact in 1983. The most noteworthy of these are the transfer of Home Improvement Licenses to the Division of Building Regulation from the Department of Safety, and also the consolidation of street and sidewalk occupancy per­mits so the public only has to come to one office to obtain this permit. In compliance with the revised OBBC, Building Permits for signs are now being issued by the Division of Building Regulation along with our new fireplace and woodburning stove permits. The review of plans for fire suppression and detection systems has also been instituted per the revised State Code.

1982 has been a year of transition for the Division of Build­ing Regulation, which is the State of Ohio's Certified Build­ing Department for the City of Columbus. It has been a year of declining permits for the first nine (9) months, but the strongest November and December of the last three (3) years. It has been a year of declining number of personnel due to cutbacks through attrition, but an attitude of dedica­tion and determination to persevere into a bustling 1983. In 1982, the Division lost four (4) inspectors and one (1) plan examiner. This totaled to approximately 175 years of experi­ence, and was a great loss to our Division. BUILDING INSPECTION PROGRAM

The front line of any building department is its inspection staff which must make field inspections to assure strict compliance with the City's codes and minimum standards. An effective enforcement of a City's building safety codes and standards cannot take place unless the City has a cap­able and dedicated inspection force willing to go beyond the "call of duty", to provide the public with safety assurances.

Columbus is fortunate to have that kind of inspection, capable, dedicated and uncompromising, that does a note­worthy job in securing adherence to the City's safety codes for buildings. Considering the number of buildings in the city (over 350,000) and the other mandatory inspections, the Division has been able to maintain a high level of perform­ance in spite of the reduction in staff. PLAN EXAMINATION PROGRAM

One of the most vital needs of the City is to grow and renew itself. The Division's plan examination role is vital to this process. Under the City and State Building Codes, all plans for new buildings, alterations, etc., are reviewed for compliance, after which a permit is issued. Delay in the re­view process can have an adverse impact on both the build­ing industry and the general public that benefits from con­struction. Being acutely aware of this and endeavoring con­stantly to improve the delivery of this service, the Division instituted several internal operations policies to provide the Plan Examiners uninterrupted periods of time during which they can examine plans. The Plan Examiners have to

CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

spend t ime answer ing rou t ine ques t ions , and at p resen t approximately one third of their t ime is spent with this ser­vice and away from plan examinat ion. To facilitate the con­struction process, the Division offers an extensive prelimin­ary review program encompass ing both code and plan re­view for compliance with City Codes. Plan Examiners make mandatory inspect ions for places of assembly as well as others to comply wi th S ta te and City l icensing require­ments. They also conduct inspect ions for buildings under­going a change of use. DIVISION SUPPORT SERVICES

The Division of Bui lding Regulat ion could not function without its suppor t personnel . Their jobs require a variety of skills including cashiering, issuing permits , typing, keeping permanent records of permits issued, orders and fire run responses . The Division has had an increase of approx­imately 30% in the n u m b e r of dance hall, arcade, mechanical amusement devices, billiard parlor and massage parlor plan review. Six (6) new t e l ephone answer ing machines have been installed to give staff the ability and flexibility of serv­ing the public 24 hours a day.

The Division provides staff suppor t to six (6), seven (7) member Boards of Examine r s as well as the Building Com­miss ion . T h e B u i l d i n g C o m m i s s i o n ' s work load has in­creased 25% in 1982 with a record n u m b e r of 118 appeals being p r e s e n t e d to e i the r t h e Commiss ion or the Sta te Board of Building Appeals .

In 1976, t h e D iv i s ion of B u i l d i n g R e g u l a t i o n b e g a n document ing whe the r or no t an inspect ion was a revenue producing inspection or a publ ic service inspection. In 1982 there were 6,385 service inspect ions, while there were 72,115 revenue producing inspect ions . This is a total of 78,490 in­spections for the year.

CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION The Code Enforcement Division is responsible for admin­

istering the Housing, Nuisance Abatement , and port ions of the General Offenses Codes within Co lumbus as assigned by Chapter 4503 of the Co lumbus City Codes. These Codes provide m i n i m u m s t anda rds for ma in tenance of exist ing housing and proper ty in order to prevent deterioration of bui ldings and n e i g h b o r h o o d s . These responsibi l i t ies are pr incipal ly carr ied out t h r o u g h the following opera t .ng programs: Housing and Proper ty Inspect ion, Code Enforce­ment, and Envi ronmenta l Blight Abatement .

The Division's goal is to preserve hous ing and neighbor­hoods , e l imina te p u b l i c h a z a r d s and n u i s a n c e s , and to promote a safe, sanitary and aesthetically pleasing commu­nity development . HOUSING AND PROPERTY INSPECTION PROGRAM

Twenty one thousand and one h u n d r e d fifty-eight (21,158) inspections were c o n d u c t e d in the field dur ing 1982. Of these total s t ructure inspect ions involving both the interior and exterior of the s t ruc ture n u m b e r e d 6,406. Of these 3,009 were one (1) family dwel l ings , 1,567 were two (2) family dwellings, 68 were three (3) family dwell ings, and 960 were multi-family dwell ings. Exter ior only inspect ions on struc­tures numbered 6,296, interior only inspect ions numbered 2,415,675 inspect ions were m a d e on dwell ing uni ts sharing a bath and rooming houses .

Notices issued totaled 16,683 with 2,504 of these issued on one (1) family dwell ings, 1,633 two (2) family dwellings, 72 on three (3) family dwell ings, 982 on multi-family dwellings, 462 on rooming nouses and dwell ing uni ts shar ing a bath, 4,522 exterior only inspect ions , and 1,414 on interior only inspections. Total notices compl ied n u m b e r e d 15,735. Total reinspections on all inspec t ions n u m b e r e d 29,870.

Envi ronmenta l inspec t ions n u m b e r e d 6,141, with 5,022 notices issued, and 3,824 complied. There were 7,706 service requests, 953 emergency orders , 639 condemna t ions with 55 structures rehabed and 242 razed. Carbon Monoxide inspec­tions numbered 1,886 dur ing the annua l campaign with 72 notices issued.

Three thousand five h u n d r e d and fifty-two (3,552) aban­doned vehicles were removed dur ing 1982. Of these, 1,427 were referred to the Police Depa r tmen t for removal and 2,057 were removed or o therwise d isposed of by the owners .

In 1982 the Division conduc ted 5,302 inspect ions of the Zoning Code. Of these , 1,933 were for Zoning Clearances, and 3,369 envi ronmenta l . Two thousand two hundred and seventy-one (2,271) o rders were issued, and 1,579 orders complied by the end of the year. Total Zoning Code Rein­spections n u m b e r e d 4,046.

One thousand seven h u n d r e d ninety-one (1,791) inspec­tions of the Graphics Code were conduc ted in 1982. Of these, 75 were env i ronmenta l inspec t ions , and 1,718 structural . One thousand one h u n d r e d and sixty-four (1,164) orders were issued and 874 complied. Total Graphic Code Rein-

85

spections numbered 1,157. A total of 1,278 site inspections were conducted on application for permit.

Of 205 downtown bui ldings inspected, 177 received 90 orders of which 48 have been complied by the end of the year.

The Division conducted 317 lead paint inspections in 1982. CODE ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM

In 1982, 3,805 cases were resolved by the Code Enforce­ment Section with 206 cases pending and 514 affidavits filed during the year. Of cases referred 1,796 were Housing, 250 Zoning, 230 Building, 7 Graphics, and 1,307 Environmental .

Six hundred and thirty-eight (638) s tructures were conde­mned by the Division, 55 rehabili tated and 242 demolished during 1981.

Four hundred and thir teen (413) emergencies involving utility shut-offs, dangerous structural conditions, CO emis­sion, gas leaks, and wiring problems were handled during the year. One hundred and forty-eight (148) of these were resolved after business hours . One hundred and thirty-two (132) emergency repairs were conducted in 1982, at a cost of $71,489.

The Division processed 163 cases of the Board of Nui­sance Aba tement in 1982. Of these , 119 declared public nuisances, 74 were razed, and 13 were rehabilitated by the owner. ENVIRONMENTAL BLIGHT ABATEMENT PROGRAM

Under the EBA Program, 513 vacant lots were cleared of trash, 510 lots mowed, 50 s t ruc tures boarded up and 93 s t ruc tures razed. Money received th rough EBA consent a g r e e m e n t s w a s $10,844. J o b s c o n t r a c t e d t h r o u g h t h e Health Depar tment tax assessment program total $24,425. SERVICE REQUESTS FROM THE PUBLIC

Requests for inspection by the public numbered 9,589 in 1982. This includes 7,706 general inspection requests , 863 special reports (FHA, VA) and request for license inspec­tions on 549 Dwell ing Units Shar ing Bath and Rooming Houses, and 58 j u n k yards. Requests for emergency service numbered 413. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

The Communi ty Development Division is responsible for preparing and managing implementa t ion of renewal and communi ty development programs and projects within the City of Columbus. As assigned in Chapter 3503 of the Co­l u m b u s City Codes, th is inc ludes admin is t ra t ion of the Urban Renewal /Communi ty Deve lopment Code and the Federal Housing and Communi ty Development Act of 1974, as amended. These responsibili t ies are principally carried out t h rough the following opera t ing p rograms : Federa l Communi ty Development Block Grant Management , Proj­ects Management , Neighborhood Commercia l Revitaliza-tion, Residential Rehabilitation, Urban Homesteading, Re­location, and Self-Help.

The Division's goal is to facilitate housing, neighborhood and economic deve lopment that enhances the economic and physical well-being of Columbus .

DIVISION SUPPORT SERVICES During 1982, the Communi ty Development Division com­

pleted the Seventh-Year Communi ty Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) and initiated Eighth-Year activities with the preparat ion of the FY 1982 CDBG application for $8,259,000. Other accompl ishments include the administra­tion of contracts with the Columbus Urban League for fair housing services; Co lumbus Neighborhood Housing Ser­vices, Co lumbus Office of Contract Compl iance and Co­lumbus Depar tment of Energy and Telecommunicat ion for imp lemen ta t i on of the Low-Cost /No-Cost Winter izat ion Program. In addition, program management staff success­fully coordinated several H U D monitor ing visits.

In 1982, t h e D i v i s i o n of C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t assumed responsibili ty for Labor S tandards Enforcement on all CDBG-funded construct ion projects. This responsi­bility had previously been carried out by the City's Prevail­ing Wage Coordinator.

Urban Renewal accompl i shments included the construc­tion of eight (8) uni ts of new housing by Charleston, In­corporated in the Dennison Avenue Conservation Area and complet ions of the Publ ic Employee Ret i rement System Expans ion Project , and the Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission Building in the Market-Mohawk Area. RELOCATION AND REAL ESTATE MANAGMENT PROGRAM

During 1982, the Division of Communi ty Development merged the Relocation Assis tance and Area Coordinator Sections to form a new Relocation and Real Estate Manage­ment Program to coordinate all property acquisition, prop­erty management and relocation activities of the Division.

Relocation activities included assistance to more than 450

86 CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

families, individuals and business concerns and start-up preparations for the 1-670 Extension Project, including com­pletion of the Pre-Acquisition Survey.

Various capital improvements were completed during 1982 including the 17th/Cleveland Avenue Intersection Im­provement Project, Mt. Vernon Plaza Graphics, Clintonville Portal Park, Italian Village Park, the Open Door Clinic and St. Vincent's Children's Center Rehabilitation Projects, Reeb-Hosack Street Reconstruction: Phase I, Lilley Avenue Park, McKinley Avenue Park Improvements and Unity Street Resurfacing.

Projects which were initiated during 1982 include St Stephen's Family Service Center, South Linden Park, street tree plantings for the north of Broad and Olde Towne East Target Areas and the Hungarian Village, Unity and North High Street-Arcadia to Weber, and Handicapped Barrier Re­moval Projects at City Hall and the Columbus Health De­partment. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL REVTTALIZATION PROGRAM

During 1982, the Neighborhood Commercial Revitaliza-tion Program generated nearly $1.5 million in construction activity through the Commercial Improvement Loan Fund, with 17 projects at $644,000, and the NCR Investment Fund, with five (5) projects at $824,000. Additionally, 11 projects were undertaken in the NCR districts without City loan par­ticipation, valued at over $4.5 million.

Several capital improvement projects were completed in NCR areas during 1982, including: Cleveland Avenue Side­walk Improvements and Olde Towne Quarter Street-scape Improvements (Phase II), which provided new curb side­walks, pedestrian-scale street lighting, street trees and an entrance park on Parsons Avenue from Bryden Road to Oak Street.

In addition to the investment activity in each commercial district, the NCR Program renegotiated the CILP Agree­ment with Ameritrust to provide for interest income on the City's deposit of funds. A "CD Float" Loan was provided to the Columbus Association for the Performing Arts. Inc. for the renovation of the Ohio Theatre, and staff assisted in the establishment of the Columbus Neighborhood Design Assistance Center. RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM

During 1982, a computer-assisted rehabilitation specifica­tion writing system (RESPEC) was installed for use by Res­idential Rehabilitation Program staff. Over 300 loans and grants were closed, representing over $5.5 million in CDBG and Section 312 rehabilitation assistance.

New program directions were launched in 1982 with the distribution of a Request of Proposals (RFP) for private len­der participation in the Residential Rehabilitation Program and the generation of interest income on City deposits. Additionally, the City was selected to participate in the HUD Rental Rehabilitation Demonstration Program. Con­struction activity was initiated on 33 units in the Section 8 Substantial Rehabilitation NSA Area. URBAN HOMESTEADING/SELF-HELP PROGRAMS

During 1982, the Urban Homesteading Program awarded 62 properties to families and individuals who agreed to reha­bilitate the properties and occupy the structures for four (4) years. The Chores Program provided 807 service visits to perform maintenance on the homes of the elderly, while the Mobile Tool Library completed 3,633 tool loans for private home repairs and the Paint-Up Program offered 1,608 loans of interior and exterior painting equipment. INNOVATIVE GRANT AWARD

In 1982, the Division of Community Development sub­stantially completed its involvement in the Innovative Grant Program, a homeownership and neighborhood revita-lization project in the City's near north side. This project brought together a successful partnership of the City, Bat­telle Memorial Institute and the neighborhood and was rec­ognized by President Reagan for excellence in the use of Community Development Block Grant funds. Columbus was one of only 11 cities nationwide to receive this presti­gious award. PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

This Division is responsible for comprehensive planning and facilitating the orderly economic and physical develop­ment of the City of Columbus. As assigned by Chapter 3107 of the Columbus City Codes, this includes administration of t" e Zoning Code and most of the Planning and Platting Code. These responsibilities are principally carried out through the following operating programs: Development Information, Comprehensive Planning, Area Planning Eco­nomic Development, and Land Use Controls.

The Division's goal is to provide objective information to

government and the community as necessary to plan, coor­dinate, and facilitate orderly growth in Columbus in accord­ance with development objectives, strategies, and policies. PLANNING INFORMATION PROGRAM

the Development Department's Library and Information Center has continued to acquire, catalogue, and make avail­able to users periodicals, documents, and articles that are used by the Department staff, other City departments and divisions, and the public. The Library now contains approx­imately 7,000 volumes and is open to the public from 8:00 to 5:00 P.M. Moneay through Friday.

Requests for information are received by telephone, letter and personal contact. During 1982, 2,515 members of the public, excluding city staff, came to the Information Center, and 11,762 telephone calls were recorded. Eighty-one (81) letters providing zoning information were mailed. In 1981 the City License Section of the Department of Public Safety began routing new and renewal applications for licenses to the Information Center for Zoning District review and veri­fication. This has grown into a substantial volume of activity with 553 applications, including State of Ohio Liquor Per­mit applications, processed in 1982.

Two (2) new services initiated in 1982 are the Local Gov­ernment Information Network (LOGIN) and the Product In­formation Network (PIN). LOGIN is a computerized data base which consists of approximately 13,000 units on topics related to local government activity. PIN, published by McGraw-Hill, is a system of reports on products used by governmental units.

Four (4) data indexes covering Variances, Zoning Clear­ances, Rezonings and Residential Care Facilities are main­tained in the Information Center. All of these reports are in street address order and are geo-coded by census tract and block. The monthly variance report consists of 88 pages con­taining data on over 4,775 variances for the period of 1966 through 1982. The Zoning Clearance and Rezoning Reports start with 1981 activity and are updated and distributed quarterly. The Residential Care Facility Report indexes all known facilities and is printed monthly in both street and Census Tract order.

Staff performed a series of statistical analyses in support of the Columbus Displacement Study completed by consul­tants in 1982. Five (5) separate cross-tabulations were per­formed using data supplied by the consultant on tape and an SPSS (Statistical Program for Social Services) command file prepared by staff.

Recent acquisitions from the Ohio Data Users Center con­sisting of detailed population and housing data on micro­fiche, nine (9) computer print-out target reports on socio­economic factors, and the Columbus SMSA Block Statistics on microfiche. The target reports cover income, occupation, education, labor-force, poverty status by age and race, rent burden, home ownership burden, and place of work. The nine (9) target reports and the SMAS Block Statistics have been reprinted and are available at the Information Center.

Significant effort was put forth during the year in building data bases which will be the subject of future analysis and the source of statistical information. Building Permit data for 1980 and 1982 were entered, proofread, corrected, and geo-coded in one (1) month lots. This data base now contains information on over 5,070 Building Permits for 1982 and 5,700 for 1980.

Comprehensive Planning staff entered data for over 8,800 residential deed transfers which occurred in Franklin Coun­ty in the first eleven month of 1982. This data base is in the process of being geo-coded.

The Division entered into a contract for time-sharing com­puter services with the Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Com­mission in 1981. At the start of 1982 service under this con­tract consisted of one (1) port and terminal with five (5) mil­lion (5,000,000) characters of disk storage. Actual average disk storage in December 1981 was 2,793,984 characters. Starting with April 1982, a second port and terminal was added to the system providing a total disk storage of ten million (10,000,000) characters. In November the total aver­age storage reached 11,475,456 characters.

The program for managing mailing lists, which is part of 1 the MORPC computer contract has proven to be a valuable s>'< tool for managing mailing address programs. Two (2) ( address data bases are maintained. One, primarily used for mi mailing agendas and meet ing not ices , averages 790 0<: addresses; the second, which is maintained by Economic o;i Development staff, contains 3,088 addresses used primarily \ for mailing The Exchange newsletter and the Columbus Eco- -c nomic Review.

Early in 1982 the long standing problem of maintaining g'i large quantities of paper files, fifty-five file cabinets in Plan-

h j L

- I , .

K

ning alone, resulted in initiating a s tudy of micrographics systems. The result of the s tudy was the selection of a step and repeat copy camera which automatically formats orig­inal documents on a microfiche master at a rate of up to 3,000 sheets of paper per hour. This equ ipment was placed in service in early 1983. AREA PLANNING PROGRAM

The Area P lanning Sect ion cont inued to work with Co­l u m b u s n e i g h b o r h o o d s , offering ass i s tance to establ ish neighborhood organizat ions and newly-formed neighbor­hood commissions and projects. The staff worked closely with the Hilltop Area Commiss ion in developing the Hilltop U.S.A. Residential Design Initiative. The Depar tment of De­velopment successfully applied for grant funds from six (6) different sources, raising $41,000 for this project in 1982. The Design Initiative will assist in the resoration and rehabilita­tion of residential s t ructures in this neighborhood. A history of the Hilltop and its physical deve lopment will also be pre­pared.

Staff were extensively involved in the creation of a suc­cessful plan for the Nor th Market , inc luding obtaining grant monies for the expans ion of the North Market itself. Area Planning has contr ibuted to the p lanning needs of commer­cial development in other areas as well, notable through the preparation of Land Use Repor ts to assist the efforts of the De pa r tmen t ' s N e i g h b o r h o o d Commerc i a l Revital izat ion Program.

Other areas in which the area coordinators have partici­pated are the Capitol Square s idewalk design; the Red Cross expansion and residential relocation agreement with Olde Towne East; the Co lumbus Metropol i tan Housing Associa­tion (CMHA) hous ing project in Reeb-Hosack; neighbor­hood studies in the nor thwes t and southwest ; North High Street off-street park ing data in cooperat ion with the Neigh­borhood Commercial Revitalization staff and the Traffic En­gineering Division; and the OSU High Tech Industr ial Park Land Analysis Study.

In recognition of the increasing impor tance of the neigh­borhood in t h e p lanning and deve lopmen t process, section staff has been actively involved in coordinat ing the activi­ties of exist ing area commiss ions . Assistance has ranged

1 from issuing the Certificates of Appropr ia teness deemed to critical to the main tenance of the character of Victorian and German Villages, to the reorganization of commission re­cords. Area commiss ions are notified of Rezoning, Variance and Demolit ion Permi t appl icat ions that affect their areas. In addition, the section has given assis tance to two (2) other neighborhood groups in organizing their own area commis­sions for the Northeas t Area and South Linden. These com­missions are organized into an advisory body called the Area Commission Chairmen, which has provided a forum for various m e m b e r s of the City adminis t ra t ion, including the Mayor, to discuss city services and plans with neighbor­hood representat ives. Area p lann ing has also helped com­munities prepare Rezoning appl icat ions in eight (8) different areas, including the Cleveland A v e n u e Nieghborhood Re­vitalization area and Frankl in ton.

Land Use Control staff received design review assistance from Area P lann ing staff on abou t 30 deve lopment propos­als involving about 680 acres. About 30 review of develop­ment plans for the Capitol Squa re area were reviewed, and the section assisted in reviewing and amend ing the City Code on t h e t o w n h o u s e d i s t r i c t a n d C a p i t o l S q u a r e graphics.

Area Planning staff also comple ted five (5) area studies during the year, ranging in scale from the small neighbor­hood (the NECKO study), to the City's Nor theas t Quadrant , (growth pat terns and potent ial in the I-670/Northeast Corri­dor). The section mainta ined the Downtown model and up­dated the status of var ious bui ldings and propert ies . LAND USE CONTROLS PROGRAM

During 1982, 119 a p p l i c a t i o n s for Rezonings were re­ceived. There w e r e 111 appl ica t ions processed and sche­duled to be heard by the Deve lopment Commiss ion within

> ' the 1982 calendar year. Of these appl icat ions, 72 were passed by City Council with a total acreage of approximate ly 945 acres. The others were wi thdrawn, defeated, converted to Council Variances, or are still in the Rezoning process.

Staff assisted the Rezonings of a significant 196 acre tract across from the J o s e p h i n u m Complex at Route 23 and 1-270 North which es tabl i shed a very major retail , light ware­house, and office node in the nor th par t of the city. The staff spent many hours working with the appl icant to establish a CPD which will insure a very high quali ty deve lopment that is also compat ible with the su r round ing propert ies . Also, the significant Rezon ings of a 140.5 acre t rac t no r th of Hayden Run and West of Dubl in Road will set the develop-

CITY DEPARTMENTS, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982 87

ment t rends for the nor thwest sector of the City. Again, staff worked closely with the applicant to establish a combina­tion of zonings which will be an asset to the area.

Staff presented 99 Council Variances to the City Council. Of significant importance was Council 's action of reversing the action of the Graphics Commiss ion in regards to a painted graphic along 1-71 and the Board of Zoning Adjust­ment (BZA) in the granting of a special permit for the use of a temporary s tructure in the downtown area. In both of the above cases the applicants c i rcumvented the established process by filing Council Variance.

In 1982, the public filed 211 applications for consideration by the Board of Zoning Adjustment. During 1982, the Board took action on 121 Variance applications, 96 Special Permit applications and two (2) appeals. These figures include re­consideration i tems and carry-over applications from 1981. In addition, 12 applications were withdrawn by applicants. Division staff represented the Depar tment of Development on each case reviewed by the Board. Of special interest, applications for special permits to establish 24 residential care facilities and 47 amusemen t arcades were presented to the Board. Transcripts were provided by the staff for six (6) cases appealed in the Court of Common Pleas.

The Division of P lanning and Economic Development emphasizes problem solving in its work with applicants and the Board of Zoning Adjustment . A recent example involves an a p p l i c a t i o n for a spec ia l p e r m i t to e x p a n d a non­conforming restaurant located at 4542 Celveland Avenue. The Division noted an ongoing policy to discourage retail commercial uses along Cleveland Avenue except at major intersections. However, because there was no curb along Cleveland Avenue and inadequate maneuver ing area, the potential existed for conflicts between automobiles using the perpendicular spaces in advance of the restaurant and autos on Cleveland Avenue. As a result of the applicant 's willingness to work with the Division of Traffic Engineering and Parking to solve the problem, the Division of Planning and Economic Development recommended that the special permit, if granted, be condit ioned on the applicant 's site plan. That site plan indicated the removal of pavement and parking in advance of the restaurant , the provision of curb­ing, landscaping and one (1) curb cut into Cleveland Ave­nue . The Special P e r m i t to e x p a n d t h e r e s t au ran t was granted subjected to implementa t ion of the site plan as approved by the Board.

The Planning and Economic Development Division's In­volvement with Historic Resources Commission (HRC) re­flects the Development Depar tment ' s commi tment to the maintenance of sound preservation principles. During the Commission's first full year of activity, the nomination of buildings, s t ructures, objects and districts to the Columbus Register of Historic Propert ies was its main priority. Of the 15 listings recommended for approval by the Commission to City Council in 1982, 10 were initiated by the HRC and five (5) by the owners. All had signed owner consent with the exception of Central High School.

In addition, the Commission worked to increase its visibil­ity in 1982. A brochure detailing the constructive functions of the Historic Resources Commiss ion, and a public in­formation p rog ram on C o m m i s s i o n activities were pre­pared. Other projects for the year included formulation of more specific rehabilitation s tandards and investigation of ways to limit the impact of spot demolit ion.

A total of 59 applications for consideration by the City Graphics Commission were porcessed by staff during 1982. Of those, 49 were Variance cases, eight (8) were Special Per­mits, and two (2) were appeals.

Certificates of Zoning Clearance were issued for 540 site plans, including 93 industrial uses, 151 commercial uses, and 65 apar tment projects, total ing 1,195 dwelling units. There were 904 Graphics Permi ts issued and there were 41 Subdivision Plats reviewed consist ing of 700 acres, includ­ing 450 acres for residential uses.

COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING PROGRAM The Neighborhood Change Report was published in 1982.

It presents a general theory to explain neighborhood life-cycle changes and a system for monitor ing and evaluating a neighborhood in relation to its changing competi t ive posi­tion in the Columbus housing market . One objective in pre­senting and testing this system is to develop a means of detecting neighborhood change at an early date so that pub­lic intervention strategies can be both timely and sensitive to the impacts of populat ion shifts. It is assumed that while the costs associated with housing and communi ty improve­ment are a function of current condit ions, the private incen-tivies and public payoffs for improvement stem from the strength of the demand for housing in an area and the im-

88 CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

plied changes in neighborhood housing values. For the past two (2) years staff have been developing and

refining a data collection system to monitor changes in the competitive position of residential areas. The key indicator used in that system is deed transfer data as reported in the Daily Reporter.

The maintenance and upgrading of this data collection system is the most important activity in the Comprehensive Planning Section. If it is to be meaningful it must be main­tained and expanded on a daily basis. At present all compu­ter input, geo-coding and clearing of project files are han­dled by the Comprehensive Planning staff. A procedures manual has been prepared to detail the process of inputing and editing project files.

In October 1982 the Growth Potential report was pub­lished. The purpose of the report is to provide an objective and realistic appraisal of the potential for overall population growth and its possible impact on the construction and dis­tribution of housing in the county. The characteristics of growth examined in the report provide an informative base for functional planning activities such as sewer, water, parks and transportation. In addition, the analysis of growth will assist in evaluating the relative dispersal and location of Capital Improvements.

Highlights of the Growth Potential Report include an ex­tensive analysis of the spatial distribution of single-family subdivision patterns and an overview of the Columbus eco­nomy.

After the completion of the Columbus Displacement Study by the Decision Research Corporation as consultants to the Development Department in January of 1982, staff began a series of meetings with a group of near northside citizens who earlier had voiced their concern for displacement at meetings of the Housing Advisory Committee. Working together the staff and the volunteers completed a Prelimin-ary Displacement Report dated 20 April 1982. Some time later the citizen task force volunteered to prepare a final draft. After both documents were reviewed by the task force it was decided that both the task force and the staff could still work together to produce one (1) report acceptable to both parties. Since August staff has continued to meet with the task force to assist in the preparation of a final report. That document will be presented at a Housing Advisory Committee meeting in January 1983 for their analysis and recommendations.

Staff has begun to update the housing condition and needs tables of the Columbus Housing Assistance Plan. HUD requirements were delivered to the city in November and a workshop was held to assist the city with the new forms.

Staff also completed data gathering and analysis of the municipal costs and revenues associated with the proposed deannexation of Olentangy Highlands.

During the first quarter of 1982 the staff prepared and reviewed both the list of possible code amendments and the process of preparing and reviewing amendments with the Division's management team. After extensive discussion a priority list of amendments was established. That list, with only a couple of exceptions, has determined the code revi­sion work program. A folder for each request was prepared with background information inserted. A form of r requests was devised and distributed to the Division.

The 1982 Columbus Physical Improvement Needs Survey was published in October. The document was updated from 1981 with considerable assistance from City Service Divi­sions and neighborhood organizations. The needs survey was utilized as input to the City's 1983-88 Capital Improve­ment Program.

The actual 1983-1988 Capital Improvements Program was completed as scheduled as a guide to the 1983 Capital Im­provement Budget (CIB) with a resolution for its approval submitted to City Council. A draft of the budget was printed for city administrators and was reviewed by the Develop­ment Commission on December 9. The Finance Department completed work on the 1983 CIB and a final Capital Im­provement document was prepared by staff for publication in early 1983.

A total of 22 annexation petitions were processed by staff in 1982 and a total of 240.76 acres added to the City of Co­lumbus.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Initial research and planning for the potential of enter­

prise zones in Columbus was completed including detailed analyses of the enterprise zone concept, research on salient features of proposed Federal and existing State legislation and statistical mapping of Columbus census tracts that would qualify for inclusion in an enterprise zone. In the near

future, the Columbus City Council will consider an enter­prise zone program for Columbus based upon the recom­mendations of the Enterprise Zone Task Force and the Mayor's Economic Development Council.

Staff prepared applications for extensions of the Depart­ment of Development EDA 302(a) Planning Grant. An addi­tional $81,000 was awarded to the Department under this program during 1982, and an additional $13,500 is expected for the first quarter of 1983.

The Columbus Economic Review (CER) was published quarterly in 1982. Its focus was broadened to include plan­ning development issues, such as an article on the 1-670/ Northeast Corridor Growth Report. The CER is mailed to 800 members of the financial, business, government and academic community and has proved to be a useful vehicle for updates on the statistical and analytic trends affecting the Columbus economic community.

The Economic Development Section continued to pro­vide staff support for the activities of Mayor's Economic Development Council, as well as their Enterprise Zone and Research and Development Task Forces.

Staff also provides information and technical assistance to private entities seeking to maintain or expand physical faci­lities and jobs in Columbus. As a result of one such inquiry, by a Dayton robotics firm interested in expansion in Co­lumbus, a tour of The Ohio State University's research facili­ties was arranged for ranking company officials.

Other special projects include research on the business incubator concept similar to the Toledo, Ohio model and staff participation in the Research and Development Task Force of the Mayor's Economic Development Council.

1982 was a product year for the City's utilization of the Federal Urban Development Action Grant (UDAG) pro­gram, with the City drawing down and putting to use some $3,740,000 in UDAG funds, and receiving an additional award of $500,000. The City executed its first UDAG loan in August, making $315,000 in UDAG funds available to the Copco Paper Company. The $315,000 UDAG loan leveraged an additional $5,485,000 into the project, which will create 32 new permanent jobs for Columbus, while retaining an addi­tional 276.

The City's second UDAG drawdown involved the $1,925,000 UDAG grant awarded to the City to defray its investment costs in the Hyatt Hotel development site in Capitol South. Receipt of the $1,925,000 UDAG award is leveraging over $40,000,000 in investment into the Hyatt project. A $50,000 Galbreath office building is under con­struction adjacent to the hotel.

The Ohio Theatre project was given a considerable boost this past year by both drawdown of its initial $1,500,000 UDAG loan, and the award of an additional $500,000 in UDAG funds. The initial UDAG award is leveraging more than $6,000,000 of investment into CAPA's project, while helping in the creation of some 119 new jobs. The second UDAG award will bring an additional $1,700,000 in invest­ment and 58 new jobs.

Overall in 1982, the City was able to leverage $51,000,000 in private investment through the drawdown of $3,740,000 in UDAG funds. These projects will create 576 new job oppor­tunities for Columbus. An additional $500,000 UDAG was awarded for the Ohio Theatre. These figures represent both a significant accomplishment and a formidable challenge for better performance in 1983.

The primary goal of the Division's services to Minority Businesses is to stimulate the overall economic vitality of" Columbus through increased participation of minority businesses in all respects of our local economy. During 1982, staff have responded to 793 requests for technical and man- -agement skill deve lopment , and has helped secure at $4,280,698 in contracts for 32 local minority entrepreneurs. 3ijj9n9rq9-The Division also publishes The Exchange six (6) times year- -TCLIV aamit ly. This minority business newsletter has a circulation of Io noilEiuo over 2,200 both in and out of Ohio.

A new local effort began in 1982 with the planning and I execution of the first MINI-FAIR, held in conjunction with: the Columbus Regional Minority Supplier Development!, Council (CRMSDC) in July. INFORMAFAIR places the > largest possible number of purchasing representatives in i one place at one time, and then, at little or no cost to minor­ity vendors, allows them to make "a month's worth of sales-calls in a single afternoon."

Division staff are researching a Working Capital Loam, Program, which would be financed through contributions:! in the form of long-term, fixed interest loans to the program i from the local business community. Staff also structured <9 and researched a survey of minority business activity in Co- •' lumbus and Central Ohio. The survey is currently being con-no ducted for the Development Department by a private con-jnbo 9Jsvhti sultant.

ANNUAL REPORT — 1982

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY INDEX

General Administration 2

Division of Fire 3

Division of Police (Activities Summary) 9

Division of Communications 13

THE CITY BULLETIN Official Publication of the City of Columbus

Published weekly under authority of the City Charter and direction of the City Clerk. Contains official report of proceedings of council, ordinances passed and resolutions adopted; civil service notes and announcements of examinations; advertisements for bids; details pertaining to official actions of all city departments.

Subscriptions by mail, $15.00 a Year in advance. Second-Class Postage Paid at Columbus, Ohio

FRANCINE C. RYAN City Clerk (614 222-7316)

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

SAFETY ADMINISTRATION Annual Report — 1982

During 1982, The Department of Public Safety was com­prised of the following Divisions: Administration, Com­munications, Fire, and Police.

The Administrative Staff included a Director, Assistant Director, Administrative Secretary, Receptionist/Secretary, Stenographer Clerk, an Administrative Analyst, and a part-time Personnel Analyst. The Receptionist/Secretary re­signed and was not replaced due to budgetary constraints.

The License Section, which is a part of the Safety Direc­tor's Office, was staffed by a License Supervisor, two License Officers, a Typist-Clerk, and a Data Entry Operator. During the year, the Data Entry Operator resigned and an additional Typist-Clerk was hired.

The License Appeals Board is designed for the purpose of hearing citizen appeals to City licensing decisions. There were five license appeals during 1982. One appeal dealing with Mechanical Musical Instrument and Mechanical Amusement Device was dismissed. The License Section de­cisions were upheld in the other appeals which included a Mechanical Amusement Device, two Tow Truck Owner/ Operators and one Taxicab Owner. The appeals were made because of denials or revocations of licenses.

Character Nos. 01 02 03 05

Total Expenditures for 1982

Description Amount Personnel Services $373,854.93 Operating Expenses—Supplies 3,651.31 Operating Expenses—Services 83,833.79 Other Disbursements 37.00

Total $461,377.03

The Character 01 amount included $18,870.00 in un-empolyment compensation expense. This expense was for former Division of Workhouse employees. The Division of Workhouse was formerly under the Safety Department and was transferred to Franklin County in 1981. In addition to unemployment compensation expense, the 1982 Safety Director's Budget also included Workhouse Worker's Com­pensation charges based on 1981 wages.

The Safety Director contracted with Emergency Medical Associates, Inc. for the services of Police-Fire Surgeon. This contract accounted for $45,000 of the Character 03 expendi­ture. The Police-Fire Surgeon provides medical health care to uniformed Police and Fire employees and civilian Public Safety Officers. Other services include the administration of physical examinations to applicants and sworn members and Public Safety Officers on a regular basis.

During 1982, the Safety Director implemented height/

weight standards for Police Officers and Firefighters. The standards were developed and are monitored by the Police-Fire Surgeon.

During 1982, there was one Police recruit class with 23 graduates and one Fire recruit class with 35 graduates.

The new structure for Fire Station #1 was completed and the station became operational. The former location of Sta­tion #1 was 260 N. Fourth Street. The City retained title to former Station #1 and the adjacent warehouse at that loca­tion.

The Safety Director negotiated the conveyance of land for a new Fire Station near the Little Turtle development. The land was obtained without direct cost to the City. Certain restrictive covenants were agreed to by both parties.

On September 30, 1982, the Police, Fire, and civilian em­ployee union agreements expired. The Safety Department provided direct input in the negotiation process for Police and Fire. The Administrative Analyst served as a member of the Administration Team for Police negotiations and the Business Manager from the Division of Fire served as a member of the Administration Team for Fire negotiations.

The civilian employee's union settled for a ten-month ex­tension with no increase in pay. The Police and Fire Unions did not settle during 1982. Various members of the Police union staged a brief "sickout" which ended after City Coun­cil promised to identify funds for pay raises for safety forces.

The Safety Director conducted negotiations with the Mayor of Bexley for a fire protection contract which expired December 31, 1982.

During 1982, the Safety Director's Office was involved in reviewing various fees charged by the Department. As a re­sult of this review, a number of fees were increased such as charges for copies of Police and Fire Reports, Crime Lab Fees, and various licenses and permits. The Safety Director also entered into contracts which provide the services of our Police Crime Scene Search Unit to other law enforcement agencies.

In addition to the administrative responsibilities relating to the Safety Department, the Safety Director and/or Assis­tant Safety Director served on the many and varied boards and commissions.

The License Section, under the direction of the Director of Public Safety, is responsible for the issuance, fee collection, investigation, and enforcement of approximately fifty var­ious licenses and permits. The section also reviews and pro­cesses applications for indigent burials.

During 1982, the computerized licensing operation was discontinued and the section reverted back to a manual sys­tem of license issuance. The computerized operation was determined to be non-cost effective and was discontinued in order to alleviate other budgetary restraints.

License Section Activities — 1982 THE FOLLOWING FEES AND LICENSES WERE COLLECTED AND ISSUED IN 1982: Type of License No. License Arcade License Annual 92 (21 new 71 renewal) Arcade License Semi Annual 20 (15 new 5 renewal) Astrologer License 9 Boxing and Wrestling Exhibition 17 Carnival Circus and Show No Add 6 Close Out Sale 11 Close Out Sale Extension 8 Coal Dealer, Major 1 Coal Dealer, Supplemental 1 Dance Hall Small 123 (22 new 101 renewal) Dance Hall Large 13 ( 5 new 8 renewal) Dangerous Ordinance, Annual 6 ( 2 new 4 renewal) Deadly Weapons Sales 35 ( 9 new 26 renewal) Firearms Purchase 287 (243 fee 44 exempt) Itinerant Vendor 26 Mechanical Amusement Device 707 (6871 games) Mechanical Musical Instrument 43 (66 jukeboxes) Peddler — A 2 Peddler — B 405 (351 new 54 renewal) Peddler — Veteran 74 ( 49 new 25 renewal) Pool and Billiard 13 (renewal) Pool and Billiard Supplemental 6 Pool and Billiard Worker 20 ( 15 new 5 renewal) Push Cart Owner 62 ( 46 new 16 renewal) Push Cart Operator 157 (H9 new 8 renewal) Refuse Hauler 97 ( 25 new 72 renewal) Registered Producer 14 ( 9 n e w 5 renewal)

Fee 132,500.00 2,000.00 225.00 38.00

205.00 31,582.21

200.00 40.00 2.00

13,380.00 910.00 300.00 175.00

1,215.00 3,100.00

78,895.00 1,180.00 100.00

6,955.00 228.00 760.00 305.00 105.00 620.00 785.00

1,455.00 70.00

0

1

•

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

Taxi Driver Taxi Owner Taxi Owner, Spare Tow Truck Operator Tow Truck Owner Tow Truck Owner S u p p l e m e n t a l . Wholesale P roduce Dealer Duplicate Permi t Duplicate License Duplicate ID Card Duplicate Decal License Appeal*** License Transfer Amusement Transfer Refund Witness Fee Occupancy Permi t Parade Permi t Massage Es tab l i shment License . . Massage Technicians License

Twenty-three (23) Ind igent Burial Applicat ions were paid None Denied

$5,359.01

*** 5 Hearings

1,226 849

10 537 174 180

9 1

25 94 30

5 4

194 1

1531 56

1 1

(508 new 718 renewal) ( 50 new 799 renewal) ( 5 new 5 renewal) (219 new 318 renewal) ( 37 new 137 renewal) ( 32 new 148 renewal) ( 2 new 7 renewal)

(60 decals)

(578 games)

(1454 fee 77 exempt) ( 21 fee 35 exempt) (renewal) (renewal)

7195

DIVISION O F FIRE

A n n u a l Repor t—1982

7,272.00 62,100.00

142.50 2,207.00 4,160.00 882.50 225.00

2.00 98.00

290.00 225.00 125.00 20.00

1,156.00 6.00

2,908.00 525.00 100.00 50.00

$259,889.21

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF The f u n d a m e n t a l o b j e c t i v e of t h e O F F I C E OF T H E

CHIEF is to assure the o p t i m u m use of the Division's re­sources in order to deliver the best possible fire safety and related services to the citizens of Columbus .

In accomplishing this , the Fire Chief directs the adminis­tration of all the Division's activities th rough the various Bureaus and Offices which compr ise the ent i re organization of the Division of Fire.

The Execut ive Officer ass is ts t h e Chief in the overall man­aging of the Division by providing adminis t ra t ive oversight in t h e a r e a s of O P E R A T I O N S a n d O P E R A T I O N S -SUPPORT. This broad division of superv isory tasks be­tween the Chief and the Execut ive Officer is organized in the following manner :

• T h e a d m i n i s t r a t i v e h e a d s of t w o B u r e a u s a n d t w o Offices report directly to the Fire Chief, these are the E x e c u t i v e Off icer ; a n d Off ice of R e s e a r c h & De­v e l o p m e n t ; t h e B u r e a u of A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ; and t h e Bureau of Fire Prevent ion .

• The heads of the remain ing functions report to the Ex­ecutive Officer, these are the Bureau of Training; the Bureau of Emergency Services; the Bureau of Mainte­nance; and the Fire Alarm Office.

In addit ion to the above, the Execut ive Officer, with the assistance of his office staff, provides a wide range of admin­istrative and clerical needs in suppor t of the operat ion of the Division. Activities of this na tu re include the vacation sche­duling for opera t ions personnel ; the securi ty and maintain­ing of all p e r s o n n e l r e c o r d s ; d i s c i p l i n a r y a c t i o n s ; and t imekeeping.

BUREAU OF ADMINISTRATION The Bureau of Adminis t ra t ion provides a wide variety of

support functions for the various bureaus within the Divi­sion of Fire:

• It submits , moni tors , and controls the annual General Fund, the CIP , and Revenue Shar ing budge ts . It main­tains a sys tem of accoun ts receivable and accounts pay­able and provides m a n a g e m e n t information reports as needed.

• It adminis ters the payroll and personnel sys tems as well as the Workers ' Compensa t ion repor t ing system.

• It moni tors and main ta ins financial and managemen t in­formation sys tems (FAMIS) repor ts , initiates and moni­tors legislation for the Division and moni tors contract requi rements .

• It provides supervis ion of the bui lding env i ronment as it relates to custodial dut ies and g roundskeep ing .

The Bureau of Adminis t ra t ion is divided into four basic areas that are very closely related to one another; these areas are:

1. Accounts Receivable 2. Accounts Payab le 3. Bookkeeping 4. Payroll

Collection Activities In 1982, the Division of Fire was responsible for the collec­

tion of $1,318,224 which was depos i ted into the General Fund. These funds are collected for fire service contracts with the City of Bexley, the Village of Minerva Park, and the Division of Airports. F u n d s are also collected from damage claims, fire and squad reports , and other related services which are provided by the Division.

Operating Budget The Division's operat ing budget for the 1982 fiscal year

was $29,590,915. Unexpended monies at the conclusion of fiscal 1982 amounted to $2,861 and were re turned to the General Fund .

The initial operating budget had no funds identified for capital outlay expendi tures . F u n d s were, however, t rans­ferred during the year to provide for emergency purchase of:

• Gas analyzer and combus t ion test ing kit • Mainframe protector—Fire Alarm Office • Chemical Recovery D r u m E q u i p m e n t • Adult and Infant In tubat ion Manikins • Eye Wash Founta in • Miscellaneous Maintenance Tools and Other Equ ipmen t

Capital Improvements Program Budget This was the first year of the 1981 voter-approved bond

issue totaling $6,370,000. The funds available dur ing 1982 amounted to $2,005,000 and included $1,150,000 to retire the temporary and more expens ive financing used for relocat­ing Fire Station No. 1. The remaining funds, $855,000, were used for fire appara tus rep lacement and fire facility renova­tions.

Available Project Title Funding Fire Appara tus

Replacement 3,324 K

Current Year Project Funding Balance

1,006 K 660 K 180 K

50 K 1,150 K

2,659 K 926 K 550 K 180 K

50 K —0—

2,005 K 4,365 K

Fire Station Northeast Fire Facility Renovat ions Energy Conservation . . . Specialized and Comple­

mentary Equ ipmen t Fire Station No. 1 1,150 K

TOTAL 6,370 K

The most critical funding need for the Division of Fire is in the area of emergency fire appara tus and non-emergency vehicle replacement . The $665,000 available unde r the 1982 CIP budget allowed the Division to purchase the following:

One Telescopic Aerial Platform One 65' Water Tower Appara tus One Heavy Rescue Vehicle The Divis ion also p r o c e e d e d as p l anned with miscel­

laneous fire facility renovat ions for the 1982 fiscal year. Funding was also provided for land acquisit ion cost and associated expenses for Fire Stat ion No. 29, construct ion is est imated to be completed in the fall of 1983.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

COLUMBUS FIRE PROTECTION EXPENSE

Office of the Chief Chief & Staff Executive Officer & Staff Research & Development Print Shop Photo Lab

Bureau of Administration . . . .

87,725 88,724

107,174 44,680 22,305

$ 824,451

Total

Total

$ 350,608

$ 824,451

Bureau of Emergency Services Assistant Chiefs Firefighting Emergency Medical Services Fire Alarm Office Airport Fire Service

147,216 20,046,926 3,942,339

525,601 871,623

Total $25,533,705

Bureau of Fire Prevention Bureau Chief & Staff Arson Investigation Hydrant Liaison Public Information/Education

664,982 237,688

(a) 17,510

Total 920,180

Bureau of Maintenance Fire Maintenance Manager & Staff ,|>1.098 Supply "4.531 Mask Repair »?«'en? Building Maintenance iba'aiL Apparatus Maintenance 789,815

Total

Bureau of Training 325,862 Total

Communications (b) 15,875 Total

DIVISION OF FIRE TORAL

(a) Expenditures are included in those figures for Bureau Chief & Staff (b) This expenditure represents utilities paid for the Division of Communications by the Division of Fire (c) Does not include outstanding encumbrances and unexpended monies in the amount of $225,257

1,394,977

325,862

15,875 $29,365,658(0

FIRE ALARM OFFICE The primary function of the Fire Alarm Office is to receive

emergency calls from the public and dispatch the necessary equipment.

The Fire Alarm Office also answers and transfers Fire De­partment business calls, receives and processes new annexations, and records the status of streets and hydrants.

In 1982, the Fire Alarm Office handled an average of 25,000 calls per month. There were 40,502 emergency medical ser­vice alarms received to which a total of *49,501 vehicles were dispatched. A total of 10,785 fire alarms were received. The fires included 475 working fires, 18 second alarm fires and 2 third alarm fires.

The City Engineering Division surveyed 22 annexations, adding 240 acres to the City in 1982. The total number of square miles within the corporate limits of the City of Co­lumbus as of January 1, 1983 is 184.3.

Total miles of streets and roads in the City as of January 1, 1983 is 1574, an increase of 4 miles. There were 10 sub­divisions and 6 apartment complexes added to the City.

There were 30 streets added to the Fire Alarm Index in 1982 bringing the index to approximately 6,430 streets. *Note: Figure includes runs made by squads, medics and

rescues; figure does not include medical runs made by engine or ladder companies.

• Water way cards were changed to have two Zodiacs re­spond to low head dam emergencies.

• Instigated new log forms for dispatching. • Street and dispatching cards were changed due to the

moving of Engine 9 to new Station #1. • Run cards were changed due to the moving of Ladder 14

to Station #22.

• Run cards were changed due to the relocation of squads, medics and rescues.

• Madison Township and Westerville started automatic re­sponse with Columbus Fire in May 1982.

• Communications provided new direct phone lines to Westerville and Whitehall.

BUREAU OF EMERGENCY SERVICES

The mission of the Bureau of Emergency Services is to provide a total fire and emergency medical delivery system for the citizens of the City of Columbus. The elements of this system are as follows:

1. The provision of emergency fire suppression forces in­cluding Crash Fire Rescue and Bomb Squad.

2. The provision of comprehensive Emergency Medical Rescue and Care.

3. The provision of Fire Prevention Inspections to meet the requirements of a growing city.

4. The provision of a Public Education Program available upon request of the various publics.

The Bureau of Emergency Services is divided into three (3) units, working 24 hour shifts. Each of these units is com­manded by an Assistant Chief. Each unit is further broken down into six (6) battalions.

The Battalion Chiefs are responsible for the administra­tion and direction of all activities in their battalions.

In 1982 Emergency Services dispatched a total of 96,613 units. In summary form these were as follows:

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

Fire Runs Engine and ladder companies . . . 32,561 Rescue 5,660 Squads and medics 2,629

Total Units Dispatched

Emergency Medical Runs Engine and ladder companies . . . 4,370 Rescue 1,902 Squads and medics 47,599

Total Units Dispatched

Service Runs All types appara tus total uni ts

dispatched Grand Total

40,850

53,871

1,892 96,613

During the course of the year there were a total of 475 working fires of which 18 were second alarm and 2 were third alarm.

In order to assure the quality and cont inuous improve­ment of firefighting operat ions, Emergency Services per­sonnel engaged in n u m e r o u s activities geared to accomplish that objective:

• All fires were inves t iga ted to de t e rmine their cause. C o u r t h e a r i n g s w e r e a t t e n d e d in cases of a r son or carelessly set fires.

• All working fires and other significant emergencies were cr i t iqued for m a x i m u m t ra in ing value; 336 investiga­t ions were conduc ted by Battal ion Chiefs or their alter­nates.

• Pre-fire p lanning for selected target hazards was accom­pl i shed by Ba t ta l ion Chiefs, officers and thei r com­panies.

• Battalion Chiefs performed 460 bui lding acquain tance and 90 public assembly inspect ions .

• A daily check of new construct ion, new streets and hy­drants (private as well as public) was made .

• All City fire hydran ts were p u m p e d and flushed in the spring and s u m m e r of the year, followed by a weekly check in the winter , keep ing the hydran ts free of water. This check involved approximate ly 16,580 hydrants . The Bureau of Emergency Services cont inued its priority system with the Division of Water for replacement and repair of fire hydran ts .

Fire Prevention Activities An ever increasing emphas i s was placed upon the quality

and quant i ty of bui ld ing and high rise safety inspections (see Bureau of Fire Prevent ion Report) .

The Bureau of Emergency Services recorded 19,565 hours on building inspect ions. The High Rise Officers and their alternates recorded 1,264 hours on the High Rise Program.

Bureau of Emergency Services personnel were involved in the p lanning and carrying out of a successful Fire Preven­tion Week Campaign. Dur ing tha t week fire companies were scheduled into publ ic and parochia l e lementary schools. Open House was held at all fire s tat ions. Various fire and emergency medica l c o m p a n i e s s u p p o r t e d the s t a t ewide "Kick O f f activities and appropr ia te Fire Prevent ion Week demonstrat ions t h roughou t the down town area. The follow­ing week exit drills were held for all schools.

Training • In-service c o m p a n y training cont inued (see Bureau of

Training Report) . • E m e r g e n c y Vic t im Care and in-hospi ta l t ra in ing for

EMT-A as well as EMT-P t ra ining was conducted . • Low head d a m rescue and extr icat ion instructors were

trained from the rescue cadre by the State of Ohio Divi­sion of Natural Resources .

• An effort cont inued to provide more comprehens ive res­cue training for cadre as well as potential rescue person­nel.

• D o w n t o w n fire c o m p a n i e s c o n t i n u e d to t r a in a n d address themselves to the prob lem of high rise firefight­ing t h rough : pre-fire p lann ing ; research into the de­velopment of high rise hose kits; and other solutions to the logistical p rob lems presen ted by this type s t ructure . The high rise firefighting tactical plan is undergoing re­finement.

During 1982 the Bureau of Emergency Services provided support to the Bureau of Tra in ing as follows:

Project Number of Personnel Total Hours Recruit Training 72 900 Apprentice Testing 6 100 Background Investigators 5 2000 Oral Boards 12 390

Public Education The increase in public requests for fire safety programs

during 1982 was significant. Programs presented in October alone totaled 112, and presentat ions throughout the year by Emergency Services Personnel averaged 29 programs per month. Of the total, an average of 15 programs per month were school presentat ions, not including the special Fire Prevent ion Week Engine and Ladde r Company visits to schools.

In J u n e 1982 a new speakers ' program was announced. The new program (per Bulletin 82-36) required all Fire Divi­sion employees to present fire prevention, fire safety and fire information programs when called upon.

Rescue Squads averaged six Fire Ext inguisher Demon­strations per month . The remaining 276 documented fire safety presentat ions incorporated 194 slide programs as fol­lows:

Times Presented

"Frankie the Fire Hydran t " 91 "Your Home Fire Escape P lan" (was not

available until late summer) 59 "Your Fire Safe H o m e " 40 "Facts of Fi re" 4

Other types of programs frequently presented included: Firefighting as a Vocation and Career 32 Evacuation Planning and Training 14

Firefighters used much initiative in fulfilling requests for these and numerous other fire safety programs. Included were discussions on fire safety for offices, public buildings, apa r tmen t s , high rises, cons t ruc t ion sites and k i t chens . Also, fire safety while babysi t t ing and camping were ad­dressed. Discussions with very young chi ldren often in­cluded a demonstra t ion of the fire gear with the hope of eliminating apprehension in case a rescue by a firefighter ever became necessary for them.

Many thousands of persons were provided fire safety in­formation by Emergency Services personnel dur ing 1982. Three live call-in radio broadcast programs on fire safety using Division of Fire personnel as guests reached wide cen­tral Ohio audiences . Emergency Services personnel also par t ic ipa ted in n u m e r o u s TV p rog rams and in terviews. Other fire safety programs were presented to persons rang­ing in age from pre-schoolers to res idents of senior citizen complexes.

New Resources Thirty-six (36) firefighters were t rained and added to the

Division on August 6, 1982. During 1982 the Emergency Services Bureau received and

placed into service the following major i tems: • Five (5) fire p u m p e r s • One (1) aerial platform In addition, dedication ceremonies were held October 3,

1982 for new Fire Station #1 to be located at Naghten and Fourth Streets.

Emergency Services 1983 Goals To c o n t i n u e t h e e v a l u a t i o n of t h e c o n c e p t of " p r e -

connected 2lh inch l ine" on selected engines for the purpose of providing increased flow quickly in a variety of fire situa­tions.

To help s t rengthen the Emergency Medical Services by t raining addit ional people to provide in-station/battalion support to Emergency Medical Service companies .

To develop addit ional back-up Fire Alarm Operators . To refine the Fire Stat ion/Apparatus/Personnel inspect ion

program to maintain/ improve quality s tandards . To cont inue effort in the High Rise program and to refine

information now available into a documen t useful to "on scene" fire personnel . Note: The remaining pages of the Bureau of Emergency Ser­

vices Annual Repor t are dedicated toward describing the specialized activities of the BOMB SQUAD and EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

BOMB SQUAD Personnel

3 Lieutenants 5 Technicians 2 Trainees 1 Technician Investigator 2 Technicians—Deputy Sheriffs The Columbus Division of Fire B o m b Squad is composed

of 8 Trained Technicians, 2 Trainees, 2 Supervisors and 1 Coordinator. Ten personnel are stat ioned at Fire Station 2. They respond to all bombing incidents in addit ion to regular response assignment; one Technician is assigned to Fire In­vestigations and two Technic ians are available from the Franklin County Sher i f fs Depar tment .

In January, 2 Technicians graduated from Basic Hazard­ous Device School and 7 Technicians a t tended Hazardous Devices Refresher Course at Reds tone Arsenal.

During 1982, the Columbus Division of Fire B o m b Dispos­al Squad was involved in a total of 102 incidents . Of the 102 incidents, there were recoveries of:

• 250 lbs. of explosives • 65 lbs. of small a rms ammuni t ion • 140 military i tems

Breakdown of Incidents Actual Bombings (explosives involved) 8 Actual Bombing (fire bombs) 35 Suspected Devices 11 Hoax Devices 6 Military Munitions Recovery:

Anti Tank Rockets 3 Land Mines 6 Hand Grenades 10 Military Simulators 4 Demolition Charges (C-4) 2 Artillery Rounds 10 Mortar Rounds 5

In addition, the Columbus B o m b Squad responded to sever­al auto searches where an explosive device was suspected. The Bomb Squad also assisted several securi ty searches and stand-by duties for visiting V.I.P at the reques t of the agen­cies involved.

EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES Emergency Medical Services has the responsibil i ty of pro­

viding a variety of emergency medical care, rescue and transportation for those involved in accidents or afflicted by sudden illness.

The EMS Office is unde r the general direction of the Ex­ecutive Officer with the assis tance of an Office Supervisor .

Field R e p r e s e n t a t i o n for t h e E M S Office cons i s t s of squad, medics and rescues that are functionally supervised by two Squad Coordinators per uni t and a Registered Nurse (Coordinator).

Training of squads and rescues is handled th rough Squad Coordinators: EMS #3 and EMS #4. EMS #3 is responsible for the training and evaluation of squad personnel . EMS #4 is primarily responsible for rescue t raining and somet imes assists with squad evaluations. The RN is the Medic Train­ing Coordinator and is pr imari ly concerned wi th t h e train­ing of the Paramedics (EMT-P) for the medic units .

The three (3) areas of service provided by the EMS Office are categorized according to the type of work performed:

1) The more basic and mos t frequently used service is that involving squads . The function of the squad is pri­marily to t reat and t ranspor t , if needed, those vict ims of a less serious illness or injury.

2) The more serious s i tuat ions are hand led by medics with squads assisting. Because of their more advanced training, Paramedics are capable of handl ing those vic­tims requir ing a specialized type of t rea tment .

3) The rescue uni ts assigned to EMS are highly versatile and provide a wide range of services. Their specialized equipment and knowledge are called upon in a variety °f emergency and fireground si tuat ions.

The level of qualifications achieved de te rmines the ex ten t to which a person can perform dut ies within t h e Emergency Medical Service. An EMT-A is limited to basic squad work wh i l e EMT-A A d v a n c e d can g ive I .V. 's . E M T - P (Para­medics) in addit ion to being able to perform all of the EMT-A functions, can defibrillate, in tuba te , adminis te r drugs and give electrocardiograms.

• Emergency Medical Services t raveled 348,687 miles dur­ing 1982, while mak ing 57,790 emergency responses of which 7,313 were C a r d i o p u l m o n a r y or High- t rauma in nature.

• T h e C o l u m b u s E m e r g e n c y Care a n d R e s c u e T e a m

achieved Six th (6) place honors in the I.R.E.C.A. Confer­ence held in Bal t imore , Md. in August , 1982. They have consis tent ly placed in t h e t o p 10 d u r i n g the last 16 years ; three (3) of which were Firs t Place.

• S o r o p t o m i s t I n t e r n a t i o n a l of C o l u m b u s p r e s e n t e d a 35mm sound-sl ide projector for use in the EMS Class­room at the Medical Training Center .

• Physic ians and Nurses conduc ted weekly classes in con­t i n u i n g e d u c a t i o n for r e ce r t i f i c a t i on r e q u i r e m e n t s . These classes provided t h e type of t ra ining essential to mainta in a high level of care for t h e sick and injured, requir ing Para-Medical a t tent ion.

• An EMT-A Refresher Course was given to the remain ing half of the ass igned EMS personnel as well as fire com­pany personnel in t h e early par t of 1982.

• Twenty- three (23) pe r sons received Pa r amed ic training, with another e ight (8) to comple te t ra in ing in February , 1983.

• The EMS office conduc ted Basic Courses for all uni ts in 1982. This requi red the t ra in ing of two (2) addi t ional in­s t ructors and a c o m m i t m e n t from all fire personnel to c o n t i n u e to m a i n t a i n a h igh level of se rv ice to t h e citizens of Co lumbus .

• EMS personnel a t t ended var ious seminars , lec tures and workshops dur ing the year to e n h a n c e their knowledge and exper t i se in e m e r g e n c y medica l service.

• E M S p e r s o n n e l w e r e invo lved in m a n y c o m m u n i t y programs such as t h e Amer ican Hear t Associat ion; Gov­ernor ' s Council on EMS; Ohio Board of Regents ; Para­medic Advisory Board; Chi ldren ' s Hospi ta l ; B u r n Semi­nar; Depa r tmen t of Heal th ; O S U S tudy Group ; Amer­ican Red Cross a n d m a n y o the r such p rog rams .

• Several talks were p resen ted by EMS personnel con­cerning life saving m e t h o d s and t e chn iques to use on e m e r g e n c y v i c t i m s w h i l e w a i t i n g for t h e a r r iva l of Emergency Medical Services .

• Dur ing the year, p lans and prepara t ions were m a d e to effect a reorganizat ion of t h e E m e r g e n c y Medical Ser­v i ces ; a n d ea r ly 1983 a r e o r g a n i z e d v e r s i o n of t h e Emergency Medical Services will be opera t ing at the new Medical Tra in ing Cente r located at t h e Division's former Fire Sta t ion #9 .

The Division of Fire recognizes the ever growing need for i m m e d i a t e E m e r g e n c y Medica l Se rv i ces t h r o u g h o u t t h e communi ty . In r e sponse to this g rowing need, the Division has establ ished a t ra in ing object ive tha t will have all the uniformed m e m b e r s of t h e Divis ion t ra ined to mee t the s tandards required for an EMT-A.

In closing its A n n u a l Repor t , t h e office of Emergency Medical Se rv ices would l ike to t ake this oppo r tun i t y to acknowledge the loss of Mrs. Hes te r F. Dysart . The ent i re Central Ohio c o m m u n i t y was deep ly s a d d e n e d by the un­timely death of Mrs. Dysar t on May 20, 1982. Her dea th had an even greater impac t on the C o l u m b u s Fire Depa r tmen t due to her frequent a n d gene rous gifts a n d dona t ions to t h e Emergency Medical Services in recen t years :

• In 1978, Mrs. Dysar t dona ted ten (10) walkie-talkies with chargers to t h e Division for u s e by personne l ass igned to squads and medic vehicles .

• In 1979, she init iated and con t r ibu ted to the establish­m e n t of a P a r a m e d i c Library . D u r i n g tha t s a m e year, Mrs. Dysart p resen ted the Division wi th a substant ia l g ran t for t h e e s t a b l i s h m e n t of t h e "Hes t e r F. Dysar t Pa ramedic Con t inu ing Educa t ion Trus t F u n d " for the con t inu ing e d u c a t i o n and t r a in ing of all E m e r g e n c y Medical Services personne l .

• In 1980, Mrs. Dysar t p resen ted the Division wi th a com­plete Sony video record ing sys tem inc lud ing camera , re­corders , television sets , and accessor ies for use by the EMS office as a t ra in ing tool.

• In 1981, Mrs. Dysar t d o n a t e d a fully equ ipped Zodiac Inf la table R o u g h Water R e s c u e Craft c o m p l e t e wi th motor, trailer and accessor ies to t h e Division for use by the Rescue uni ts .

• Mos t r e c e n t l y , M r s . D y s a r t m a d e a b e q u e s t in t h e a m o u n t of $100,000.00 to the "Hes te r F. Dysar t Para­medic Con t inu ing Educa t ion Trus t F u n d " which she ini­t iated before he r dea th .

During her re la t ionship wi th t h e C o l u m b u s Fire Depart­ment , Mrs. Dysar t gave unself ishly of her t ime and suppor t to the improvemen t of the vital services which the Division of Fire provides to the ci t izens of t h e City of C o l u m b u s and the Central Ohio c o m m u n i t y . Mrs. Dysar t ' s many outs tand­ing cont r ibu t ions enab led t h e E m e r g e n c y Medical Services office to perform those vital services at a level of efficiency which would have o the rwise been imposs ib le to attain.

Mrs. Hes ter F. Dysar t will be missed by her friends in the Columbus Fire Depa r tmen t .

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

BUREAU OF TRAINING

The general purpose of the Bureau of Training is to assist, as necesary, in a t ta in ing the desired qualifications of all members of the Division of Fire; and to provide a formal academic a tmosphere as a means of assuring that the neces­sary technical skills, knowledge and s tandard procedures requi red of un i fo rmed p e r s o n n e l are admin i s t e r ed and achieved.

The pr imary responsibil i t ies and dut ies of the Bureau are: • To develop, revise, and dis t r ibute Training Manual Sec­

tions. • To develop, revise, and dis t r ibute In-Service Training

Lesson Plans . • To develop, revise, and dis t r ibute the Crash-Fire-Rescue

Handbook. • To develop, revise, and dis t r ibute the Manual of Rescue

Procedures . • To conduct a 17-week recrui t t raining course. • To adminis ter the wri t ten and performance tests for the

IAFC/IAFF Appren t icesh ip Program. • To conduc t per iodic specilized t ra ining sessions. • To conduct background investigations and oral board

reviews for prospect ive employees . • To requ is i t ion mate r i a l for t h e s ta t ion l ibraries and

maintain a Central Division Library. • To respond to mult iple a larm si tuations. • To implement the National Fire Academy ' s course on

Fire/Arson Detection within the Division. • To conduct Fire Safety Inspectors certification courses. • To conduct supervis ion courses for company officers. • To conduct a p rogram to recruit qualified individuals for

the Division. • To provide physical facilities for other Division related

training activities.

Organization The Bureau of Training operates unde r the direction of a

Battalion Chief and is devided into six offices. Apprent iceship Training and Test ing Office is responsible

for a d m i n i s t e r i n g wr i t t en and p e r f o r m a n c e tes t s to all apprentice firefighters, conduc t ing special t raining classes for app ren t i c e f i ref ighters , r ev i s ing t h e Appren t i c e sh ip Manual under direction of the JATC, and adminis ter ing the National Fire Academy ' s p rogram on Fire/Arson Detection.

The Recrui t Tra in ing Office is r e spons ib l e for recrui t training, fire auxiliary training, inventory control, and the Bureau library. In addi t ion, this office records and main­tains an account ing of all mater ia ls issued to the other Divi­sion of Fire libraries.

The Officer and Ins t ruc tor Training Office is responsible for developing and del ivering a program to assist division personnel to m a k e the t ransi t ion from firefighter to super­visor. It is also responsible for conduc t ing a program to train instructors for the Division, for adminis ter ing the Fire Safe­ty Inspector Certification program, and revising exist ing In-Service Lesson P lans , and issuing new lesson plans on addi­tional subjects.

The Manual Revision Office is responsible for researching the need to revise or add chapters to the Division Training Manual and coordinat ing the writ ing, pr int ing, and distribu­tion of these chapters .

The Recru i tment and EEO Office is responsible for re­cruiting people to t ake the Civil Service en t rance test, con­ducting a backg round invest igat ion of all those who are being considered for employment , and to implemen t within the provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

The Air Crash and Rescue Office is responsible for re­searching and deve lop ing the C.F.R. H a n d b o o k and the Manual of Rescue P rocedures and evaluat ing the present rescue tools used by the Division and making recommenda­tions on purchas ing new rescue tools and vehicles.

During 1982 the Appren t icesh ip Office conducted semi­nars for all c o m p a n y officers in charge of the companies where recruit firefighters are assigned. These seminars ex­plained the app ren t i ce sh ip program and how the offices could assist the appren t ice in meet ing these requi rements . The Apprent iceship Office also conduc ted wri t ten and per­formance tests for all of the firefighters in the various steps of the program. In addi t ion where these tests showed that an individual needed addi t ional s tudy or pract ice to be able to meet the s tandards , this office set u p and conducted these classes.

The Apprent icesh ip Office also took on the responsibil i ty of adminis te r ing t h e Nat ional Fire Acadamy 's course on Fire/Arson Detection. Dur ing 1982 the ins t ructors for this program were t ra ined and they will conduc t classes for other Division personnel dur ing 1983.

The Recruit Training Office graduated a class of 36 recruit apprentice firefighters dur ing 1982. Prior to the start of this class all course outlines in the recruit program were revised and course objectives defined. In addition all the i tems used to test the knowledge of the recruit and the effectiveness of the training program were reviewed and many were revised.

There was a training workshop held for all battalion chiefs and rescue company personnel on how to handle emergen­cies in building elevators. This workshop was conducted by personnel of the Dover Elevator Company.

The Aircrash and Rescue Office completed the first draft of the Crash-Fire-Rescue Handbook during 1982; this draft was submit ted to Emergency Services Bureau personnel for their review in October. There were a few minor changes made as a result on this review and the Handbook will be ready to be pr inted in Janua ry of 1983. In addit ion the first draft of the Manual of Rescue Procedures was submit ted to Emergency Services Personnel for their input in December .

The Officer and Instructor Training Office conducted the following courses during 1982:

• 40 hour classes on instructional methodology for those members who wish to instruct at the division training facilities. This class focused on how to write training objectives, prepare teaching outlines, and prepare objec­tive test quest ions.

• The state 40 hour Fire Safety Inspectors certification class.

• Company Officer Development course. This course cov­ered such topics as e lements of supervision and lead­ership, communicat ion skills, t ime management , con­flict m a n a g e m e n t , e m p l o y e e mot iva t ion , and m a n y others.

The Manual Revision Office has revised all the sect ions of the Training Manual which cover ground ladders and their uses. This office also worked extensively with a team from Ohio State University to evaluate the impact of some of our evolutions on female firefighters. In addit ion the following sections of the Training Manual are in the process of being revised: Portable Fire Ext inguishers , Communicat ions , Self Contained Breathing Appara tus .

The Recrui tment of EEO Office assisted Civil Service per­sonnel in conduct ing the cardiovascular stress tests, sched­uling medical examinat ions at Grant Hospital , and conduct­ing background investigations for all firefighter applicants. This office also investigated all alleged violations of Equal Employmen t Oppor tun i ty Laws and Regula t ions which occurred within the Division.

In addi t ion to the p r o g r a m s c o n d u c t e d , the Tra in ing Bureau also provided facilities for the following activities:

• Ohio State University problem solving team. • JATC meetings. • EMS demonstra t ions and graduat ions. • Division of Police SWAT team training. • Accident Investigation commit tee meet ings. • Fire ext inguisher demonstra t ions . • Columbus Fire Auxiliary training. • Deferred compensa t ion program group presenta t ions

and individual conferences. • United Way campaign. • A.C.L.S. course for EMS personnel . • Eastland Vocational School 's class on rappelling. • High Rise Seminar. • Civil Service entrance test. • Ohio Association of Publ ic Safety Directors meeting,

and training. • Grant Hospital Emergency Rescue by helicopter. During 1982 the Bureau of Training met most all of its

goals either totally or in part . These goals were: • To conduct a course on H u m a n Resource Development

for all company officers. • To revise the s tudy reference for the performance objec­

tives contained in the Apprent iceship Program and to develop self-study aids for personnel in the program.

• To develop a program to evaluate t h e efficiency of t h e various evolutions used by the Division.

• To revise selected sections and develop addit ional sec­tions of the Training Manual.

• To cont inue a validation s tudy of the recruit t raining program.

• To develop a program for t raining and evaluat ing rescue and air crash company personnel .

• To conduct a course on Instruct ional Methodology for all personnel who teach at the Academy.

• To u p d a t e the mater ia ls ass igned to the Division li­braries.

The only goal that was not addressed at all dur ing 1982 was to develop a recruiting program. This was in part due to the fact that the Civil Service ent rance list was ex tended to

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

September 1983. Since there would not be an ent rance test during 1982, it was felt that a recruiting drive would not be productive.

Goals for 1983 D u r i n g J a n u a r y of 1983 the Tra in ing Bureau will be

assigned the responsibili ty for all Emergency Medical Tech­nician training. In order to carry out these addit ional duties the Medical Training Office of the Training Bureau is being created. It will be located in the Medical Training Center which is at 739 W. Third Avenue.

This addition will greatly increase the scope of the Train­ing Bureau 's mission and we have set the following as our goals for 1983. „ „ . „ ,

1 To complete the first phase of the Office Development course and start the second phase of this course.

2. To work on a recrui t ing program designed to at tract qualified members of the protected classes.

- 3. To certify 70% of the firefighters in the Division as EMT-A's.

4. To revise selected sections and develop addit ional sec­tions of the Training Manual .

5. To continue a validation s tudy of the recruit t raining program.

6. To conduct 2 classes to certify selected m e m b e r s of the Division as EMT-P's.

7. To upda te the materials assigned to the Division li­braries.

8. To develop a program for evaluat ing emergency squad and medic personnel .

9.. To implement a program for t raining and evaluat ing rescue and air crash company personnel .

BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION The basic purpose of the Bureau of Fire Prevent ion is to

engage its assigned personnel and other available resources in a manner which will keep to a m i n i m u m the occurrence of fire and the resul tant loss of life and proper ty within the City of C o l u m b u s . In a c c o m p l i s h i n g th i s p u r p o s e t h e Bureau conducts is operat ions and maintains records for the Division within the m a n n e r prescr ibed to by law and has its activities primarily focused on accomplishing such essential objectives as:

• Providing for an effective fire prevent ion inspect ions program.

• Providing for the investigation of suspicious fires. • Providing assistance with the enforcement of the City's

fire safety and fire related building codes. • Providing an effective public relations program address­

ing Public Educat ion on fire safety and general informa­tion on Division activities.

The Bureau of F i re P r e v e n t i o n is d iv ided in to t h r e e offices.

FIRE INVESTIGATIONS AND RECORDS OFFICE This office is comprised of one captain, one l ieutenant ,

seven firefighters and five civilians. The office is compr ised of three primary areas of activity, these are: Records: This activity is the immedia te responsibil i ty of the captain who is assistant to the chief of the Fire Prevent ion Bureau, and is charged wi th the responsibi l i ty of recording and tabulating statistical data from the fire reports submit­ted by Emergency Services personnel and recording the in­formation from the various inspect ion activities of both op­erations and bureau personnel . This area of activity also in­cludes maintaining approximate ly 14,000 inspect ion cards plus a variety of records necessary for m a n a g e m e n t decision making. One s tenographer and three typist clerks collect and maintain all the aforement ioned files. Fire Investigations: This area is headed by a l ieutenant and includes six firefighters serving as invest igators and has a Stenographer II assigned to it.

Members assigned conduc t invest igat ions into t h e cause of various fires including those of a suspicious, incendiary or undetermined na ture and all fires involving loss of life or large dollar losses. In addit ion, assigned personnel investi­gate incidents involving bombs , fire b o m b s and explosives and also provide follow-up to invest igat ions initiated bv company officers.

Investigations personnel also conduc t a Juveni le Counsel­ing Program, provide Fire Invest igat ion Training P rog rams for law enforcement agencies, in-service t raining in coopera­tion with other fire d e p a r t m e n t s in the Frankl in County area, and conduct internal affairs investigations.

£ '£r ii!; l ,

A 8 8 e mub l i e s ^ " P f C i o n : This activity is assigned to a firefighter who works directly unde r the Records and Inves­

t igat ions Capta in . H e regular ly i n spec t s p laces of publ ic a s sembly d u r i n g w h a t is e x p e c t e d to be p e a k bus ine s s periods (late evening and early m o r n i n g hours). His pr imary concern is that of enforcing those areas of the codes dealing with overcrowding and the m a i n t e n a n c e of exi t sys tems. He is also available to perform specialized inspect ions required to be m a d e at i r regular hours .

FIRE INSPECTIONS AND HIGH RISE OFFICE This office is compr i sed of one capta in , four l ieutenants ,

eight firefighters and one civilian. The captain ass igned to this office is both supervisor of

inspect ions as well as High Rise Coord ina tor for t h e Divi­sion.

The four l ieutenants in the office are ass igned as Fire Pre­vention Liaison Superv isors ; wi th their personnel they are responsible for assur ing tha t bu i ld ing s t ruc tu res and o ther installations in t h e City mee t Fire Preven t ion Codes . Pri­mary areas of activity for th is office are ass igned as follows: Plans Examiner: A l i e u t e n a n t s e rves as l iaison wi th the Building D e p a r t m e n t and w o r k s closely wi th t h e m in re­viewing bui lding p lans with regard to fire safety features and fire protect ion and suppress ion sys tems. He mee t s with architects and cont rac tors in resolving des ign p rob lems re­lated to all aspec ts of fire protect ion. School Coordinator: A l ieutenant ma in ta ins statistical files on primary and secondary schools . He has specialized inspec­tion dut ies and is liaison to these schools relative to any problem of a fire pro tec t ion or fire p revent ive na tu re . Day Care Coordinator: As a result of the u n i q u e fire protec­tion prob lems exis t ing in day care and g roup h o m e type occupancies, a l ieutenant coord ina tes the inspect ion activi­ties of such places. T h e Licens ing and P e r m i t s Sect ions of State and Local Codes regard ing these facilities also c o m e under his purview.

Tank, Flammable Liquids and Flammable Gas Coordinator: This area of inspec t ion is in charge of seeing that all above and be low g r o u n d t a n k ins ta l l a t ions a re in accord with National, S ta te and Local Codes . F l a m m a b l e and combus t i ­ble l iquids p rob lems are also addressed . A l ieutenant acts as coordinator and is ass igned one fire safety inspec tor whose primary dut ies deal wi th t ank instal la t ions of flammable gas and flammable l iquids . Hydrant Coordinator: A Civil Eng inee r Associate I is liaison with the Division of Water, S t ree t and Engineer ing Depart­ment , on ma t t e r s conce rn ing repair , p l acemen t , replace­ment, and accep tance of fire h y d r a n t s for use by the Divi­sion of Fire. The School Coord ina tor is h is immed ia t e super­visor.

Battalion Liaison Officer: A Ba t t a l i on L ia i son Officer is assigned to each of the fire bat ta l ions and assists opera t ions personnel wi th t h e technica l a spec t s of fire safety inspec­tions. Training is also c o n d u c t e d as necessary .

In order to a s su re t h e qua l i ty of the Bat ta l ion Liaison Program, a P r o g r a m Coord ina tor is ass igned to provide the Liaison Officer with an i m m e d i a t e source of adminis t ra t ive suppor t which will ma in ta in t h e cont inui ty and uniformity of the Battal ion Liaison P r o g r a m s .

OFFICE OF COMMUNITY RELATIONS The office of C o m m u n i t y Rela t ions is staffed by a Typist

Clerk. It functions u n d e r the d i rec t ion of t h e Fire Preven­tion Bureau Chief.

Responsibi l i t ies of t h e office i nc lude provid ing an effec­tive public relat ions p rog ram wh ich addresses publ ic educa­tion on fire safety and genera l i n fo rma t ion on Division activities.

In mee t ing t h e above responsibi l i t ies , typical activities of the office are: developing, revis ing and evaluat ing educa­tional slide p rog rams and mater ia ls ; p repa r ing publ ic ser­vice messages ; p repa r ing and d i s semina t ing news releases; coordinat ing television and rad io in terv iews involving Divi­sion personnel ; p rocess ing and coord ina t ing reques t s for fire safety educat iona l p r o g r a m s ; sor t ing and dis t r ibut ing fire safety pamph le t s and r e s p o n d i n g to publ ic inquir ies re­garding daily Division opera t ions .

The year 1982 m a r k e d an increase in fire p revent ion and fire safety p rogram reques t s over previous years . The mon th of October showed the greates t activity w h e n 112 program reques t s were fulfilled. P r o g r a m s p r e s e n t e d by Division personnel for the ent i re year tota led 349; of tha t number , 176 were fire safety p rog rams in schools . At least 18,326 persons , including chi ldren and adul t s , we re in a t t endance at these programs. In addi t ion , t he re w e r e t h r e e live call-in radio programs on fire safety featur ing Division of Fire personnel as special guests . T h e "L ime l igh t " p rogram which aired on

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

the Central Ohio Reading Service Station was estimated to have reached approximately 20,000 persons having a form of vision handicap.

Other major events and activities of the Office of Com­munity Relations dur ing 1982 included:

• Assisted in the Awards Program • Arranged a live he l icopter demons t ra t ion s imulat ing

high rise rescue for the Ohio Safety Directors ' Associa­tion

• Issued 50 News Releases • Coordinated Fire Prevent ion Week activities • Distr ibuted approximate ly 77,000 pamphle ts , of which

50,000 " F r a n k i e ' s F i re E s c a p e P lan For My H o m e " b r o c h u r e s were prov ided direct ly to the e lementary schools in the City of Co lumbus

• Coordinated the dis t r ibut ion of fire safety posters by Emergency Services to most Co lumbus area businesses during Fire Prevent ion Week

• Arranged the Firefighters ' Memorial Service • Arranged the Dedicat ion Ceremony for new Fire Station

No. 1 • Assisted with several exhibi ts and displays; i.e., Lazarus,

Ohio State Fair, Nat ionwide, Ohio Center, etc. One of the outs tanding accompl i shments of the Office of

Community Relat ions dur ing 1982 was the complet ion and promotion of the sl ide p rogram titled "Your Home Fire Escape Plan". The program was designed to instill good fire safety and prevent ion habi ts , especial ly dur ing develop­mental years and was offered to all parochial, private and public e lementary schools wi th in the City of Columbus . This p r o g r a m , a long wi th t h e s u p p l e m e n t a l b r o c h u r e , "Frankie 's Fire Escape Plan For My Home" , was developed and printed in cooperat ion with the Columbus Advert ising Federat ion and was awarded first place nationally for a program of its type.

1982 saw several major changes within the Bureau of Fire Prevention. Among these were the pilot t raining and inspec­tion programs involving the High Rise Life Safety Evalua­tion System. These represented the final phase toward im­plementing a program for improving life safety in high rise buildings as directed by the Mayor 's Task Force establ :shed in 1981.

The Basic Inc ident Repor t ing Sys tem (902 F & G) com­puterization project moved into its final phase with the de­velopment of the p rogram and training of the clerical staff regarding C.R.T. Data Entry . M a n a g e m e n t Repor ts were studied and data en t ry will soon follow.

Information was gathered on the operat ions fire safety in­spection districts. This data will be used in redistr ibut ing the hours of inspect ion t ime within the 114 inspection dis­tricts.

The Fire Prevent ion Bureau Directive was developed. Its development will hopefully fill the need for providing clar­ity, information, and direction regarding the fire code and

other areas within the framework of the Bureau. It is felt the directives will be of value not only to Operations Inspectors but to Bureau of Fire Prevent ion personnel as well.

Finally, the Bureau saw a change in its base of operations moving from the Administrat ive Offices at 200 Greenlawn Avenue to Fire Station #1 Complex at 300 N. Four th Street. This change provided needed addit ional facilities for all offices of the Bureau of Fire Prevention.

TECHNICAL PLANNING OFFICE The primary function of the Technical Planning Office is

to implement and oversee the renovation port ion of the Di­vision's Capital Improvements Program. As part of this re­sponsibility, this office participated in the planning, cost estimation, and compilation of the planning list of renova­tions for staff review and approval.

There were 15 major projects planned and approved dur­ing 1982. These projects had a combined cost est imate of $110,000.00. Due to economic constraints, the 1982 C.I.P. renovation budget was reduced to $55,000.00 and was avail­able for use during August .

Some of the major projects implemented under the 1982 C.I.P. were:

a. Overhead door controls Fire Station No. 8 b. Automatic Door Closers Fire Station No. 15 c. Pave Front and Side Fire Station No. 18 d. Exterior site renovation Fire Station No. 15 e. Renovation of Facility into offices

& classrooms Fire Station No. 9 g. New energy efficient insulated

overhead doors Fire Station No. 13 The most significant project this office was involved in

during the past year was the construct ion and complet ion of Fire Station No. 1 at 300 North Four th Street.

The design elements of Fire Station No. 1 included precast conc re t e for bo th t h e f raming and ex te r io r skin . This method permit ted construct ion to proceed throughout the winter months , which was ins t rumental toward the comple­tion of this project on t ime and within the constraints of the programmed budget .

Details on Fire Station No. 1 are as follows: Floor Area 35,023 S.F. Total Building Cost $2,265,304.00 Cost/S.F. Building Area $64.68 Start Date August 1981 Completion Date August 1982 The Division of Fire also plans to construct ion (new) Fire

Station No. 29 for added protect ion to the far nor theast quadrant of the City. The station will be located on Little Turtle Way just north of Rt. 161.

Progress on this new station includes selection of the architect, the approval of the prel iminary floor plan, site plan, and external configuration. The schedule calls for a bid release date of February 14, 1983.

A N N U A L REPORT—1982

D i v i s i o n of P o l i c e lames L. Rutter—Acting Chief of Police

The Division of Police, Depa r tmen t of Publ ic Safety, Co­lumbus, Ohio is organized u n d e r Sect ions 97-102 of the City Charter. Pr imary author i ty over the operat ions of the Divi­sion and the d ischarge of its responsibil i t ies rests with the Police Chief. Unde r the direct ion of the Police Chief, the Division is responsible for enforcing all laws and ordinances within its legal jur isdic t ion and execut ing proper orders and processes issued by compe ten t cour ts .

The Chief of Police supervises all Division personnel and manages the organizational s t ruc ture of the Division. The executive Subdivis ion is directly c o m m a n d e d by the Chief of Police. This subdivis ion conta ins the Legal Bureau, the Inspection Bureau, and the Internal Affairs Bureau.

During 1982, the daily activities of the Chief of Police in­cluded meet ing with the following: Director of Publ ic Safe­ty; Division personnel ; cit izens of the communi ty ; other city officials; F.O.P. officials; m e m b e r s of the Columbus Auxil­iary Police; and o ther Law enforcement agency personnel .

The Chief of Police also a t tended the following type func­tions during 1982: Awards ceremonies ; promot ions ; ground-breakings; funerals ; I .A.C.P. confe rences ; O.A.C.P. con­ference; news conferences; and City Council meet ings .

The following are summar i e s of the Bureau ' s activities within this Division.

EXECUTIVE SUBDIVISION

Internal Affairs Bureau This Bureau serves in a staff capacity, coordinates and

exercises staff supervision over the investigation of com­plaints or allegations of misconduct against Division per­sonnel.

In 1982, the Internal Affairs Bureau investigated 146 cases involving citizen complaints and internal investigations.

The investigations and related typing of s ta tements re­quired aporoximately 532 hours of overt ime by the assigned personnel.

Our main goal is the same as always, to provide a vehicle whereby the citizens of Columbus and the member s of the Division of Police are assured that they will have a prompt , fair, impartial and factual internal investigation conducted on all matters alleging misconduct by member s of the Divi­sion.

Inspections Bureau The Bureau personnel serve in a staff capacity to the Chief

of Police. The assigned personnel have a primary responsi­bility to inspect specific aspects of various police opera­tions. In addit ion to this responsibility, Bureau personnel

10 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

also research and respond to quest ions about police opera­tions and procedures that are asked by persons both within and outside of the Division of Police.

During 1982, the Bureau conducted six inspections of var­ious police operations, including reviewing the manner in which complaint statistics are reported and the t rends that they show.

Bureau pe r sonne l also c o m p l e t e d 37 research assign­ments, including a s tudy of the Nelson Road building com­plex as a proposed police physical fitness center.

Legal Bureau This Buraus provides legal counsel for the Chief and Divi­

sion personnel regarding any legal problem connected with assignments.

During 1982, this office was engaged in defending munic­ipal officers in civil act ions filed against them. The Legal Bureau also processes claims by divisional employees for damages sustained to personal property while on duty.

This office also handled in-service, recruit and auxiliary training in such areas as arrest, search and seizure, federal and civil liability, use of deadly force an duse of legal forms. The Legal Bureau is also called upon by all subdivis ions for legal opinions, both verbal and writ ten, concerning their area of operations

We have also answered and assisted other local munici­palities in preparing training programs and information on such things as search warrants and use of legal forms.

ADMINISTRATIVE SUBDIVISION

Community Relations Bureau This Bureau is responsible for the Division's public rela­

tion projects, recruiting of new police appl icants , and con­trols the Police Athletic League. Recruiting: One thousand and thirty-seven (1,037) candida tes successfully comple ted the Civil Serv ice test for Police Officer from May through September , 1982. These candi­dates will be eligible for appo in tmen t until November , 1983. The Recru i t ing Unit a t t ended t h e Second Annua l Ohio Women's Career Convention, and the Ninth Annual Minor­ity Affairs J o b Fair at Ohio State University. Crime Prevention Unit: Dur ing 1982, the Crime Prevent ion Unit presented a total of 1,260 programs, 349 were in the schools. In addit ion to these programs, officers in the unit held over 200 Jun io r Police and Explorer meet ings . News Media: Wrote numerous news release and m a d e tele­phone calls on non-publ ished news releases. Handled the daily needs of the various news outlets in the City both in the office and at home. P romoted and received free public­ity for police auctions.

Research and Development Bureau This Bureau is responsible for reviewing cur rent proce­

dures, developing improved me thods , planning, developing programs, and supplying information as reques ted .

During 1982, the bureau developed or revised 43 Division publications.

Other projects for the year included: • U p d a t i n g of t h e Al loca t ion of P o l i c e R e s o u r c e s as

needed. • Conducted a s tudy to analyze the effectiveness of Offi­

cers tes t imony in court. • Coordinated the implementa t ion of the S P R I N T phone

system. • C o n d u c t e d a s ta f f s t u d y o n t h e f ea s ib i l i t y of im­

plementing a Crime Analysis Unit. • Developed a new Transfer Sys tem for the Division of

Police. • Developed a plan for a reduct ion of two-officer cars.

Business and Personnel Bureau This Bureau is responsible for the police budget , payroll,

property safekeeping, the police s tockroom and all federal and state funding programs. It is also responsible for all matters pertaining to personnel adminis t ra t ion, the medical unit and background investigation.

The re-organizat ion of the Fiscal Opera t ions Uni t was completed in 1982. A team-cross-training operat ion was be­gun. A full-time Inventory Control Sect ion was establ ished and an Insurance Section was added. A more comprehen­sive system for contract control and process ing was under­taken resulting in a more accura te and cost-effective per­formance level. c/TJ1?.!! '3 0 3 1 0 P e r a t i o n s Uni t processed 26 regular and 22 bCAMP payrolls as well as service credit, sick reciprocity

and clothing payrolls totall ing $45,670,636.73 in 1982. These operat ions were accompl i shed successfully in conjunct ion with the stream-lining and adap t ing of the new computer ­ized payroll sys tem.

The Proper ty Room wen t to a 24-hour, 7-day a week oper­ation. This gives us exclus ive control of p roper ty and evi­dence, t hus s t reng then ing t h e chain of cus tody .

Training Bureau This Bureau is respons ib le for p rovid ing comprehens ive

police recruit and in-service t ra ining p rograms , and main­taining and issuing o rdnance suppl ies .

This B u r e a u c o n d u c t e d a 31 w e e k F i r e a r m s Tra in ing Program for all sworn Division personnel .

Manufactured over 800,000 of .38 special ammun i t i on for training purposes . Also, w e reloaded over 8,000 rounds of .12 gauge shotgun shells for t ra in ing purposes .

Trained and g radua ted 24 recrui t officers who were mem­bers of the 63rd Recrui t Class.

The entire staff cons t ruc ted , coord ina ted and taught elec­tive course inservice p rog rams as follows:

A. Identification—105 officers B. Survival 1—82 officers C. Stress Management—92 officers and civilians

INVESTIGATIVE SUBDIVISION

Detective Bureau T h e De tec t ive B u r e a u is r e s p o n s i b l e for inves t iga t ing

criminal offenses, a p p r e h e n d i n g violators, recover ing stolen proper ty , and p repa r ing case folders for p resen ta t ion in court by prosecutors to obta in convict ion of violators.

T h e Cr ime S c e n e S e a r c h U n i t p r o c e s s e d 2,406 c r i m e scenes; obtained 8,900 pr ints , and was able to ma tch pr ints from 365 scenes to s u s p e c t s . In add i t ion , t h e Uni t took 10,159 photos .

The Burglary S q u a d improved c o m m u n i c a t i o n s with the Frankl in County Jai l so that w h e n felons are arres ted and slated by s u b u r b a n police agencies , pe r sonne l at the County Jail will contac t our detect ives to ascer ta in w h e t h e r the re is a need for our d e p a r t m e n t to in terv iew these suspec ts .

The Burglary Squad , Z o n e 2, is par t ic ipa t ing in a p rogram designed to place total control of the invest igat ion from tak­ing the repor t to t h e final d isposi t ion .

The Check S q u a d showed a 17 pe rcen t reduc t ion in check related offenses.

Narcotics Bureau This Bureau is respons ib le for the enforcement of laws

pertaining to narcot ics . During 1982, the Bureau began work ing closely wi th the

FBI and I R S on d r u g trafficking cases . Twelve pat ro l officers c o m p l e t e d six m o n t h s in-depth

training in the Narcot ics enforcement field. A total of 897 pe r sons were a r res ted for offenses ranging

from drug and narcot ics possess ions to carrying concealed weapons.

The Narcotics Bureau spen t approx ima te ly $59,808 for the purchase of con t r aband , in formant fees, opera t ing and o ther expenses .

Drugs , naroct ics and cash conf iscated d u r i n g searches and seizures totaled approx ima te ly $2,224,001, du r ing 1982.

Organized Crime Bureau This Bureau is r e spons ib l e for inves t iga t ing organized

criminal activity and for collecting, analyzing, and forward­ing information conce rn ing c o m m u n i t y condi t ions , poten­tial p roblems and cr iminal activity.

Officers of the Organized Cr ime Bureau spen t 1,835 hours part icipating in in-service t ra in ing du r ing the year, or an individual average of 63.3 hou r s for t h ree percen t of avail­able t ime.

In 1982, the Organized Cr ime Bureau researched the area of carnival games . As a resul t of th is effort, t he bureau pub­lished an 80 page repor t ent i t led "An Enforcement Gu ide to Carnival Games , Gambl ing and F r a u d s . " Reques t s for this repor t have been rece ived from all p a r t s of t h e Uni ted States.

The Organized Cr ime Bureau invest igated the a m u s e m e n t device indus t ry in 1982. This research resul ted in a 60 page r e p o r t t i t l ed " R e p o r t on L i c e n s i n g a n d R e g u l a t i n g of A m u s e m e n t D e v i c e s , M e c h a n i c a l M u s i c a l I n s t r u m e n t s , A m u s e m e n t Arcades and Adul t Books to res . " Information from this repor t is be ing used as a basis to a m e n d and revise Columbus City Ord inances relat ing to l icensing of amuse­ment devices , a m u s e m e n t a rcades , adul t books tores and dis tr ibutors of a m u s e m e n t devices .

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

Forensic Science Bureau This Bureau is responsible for processing evidence by sci­

entific me thods for presenta t ion in court . During 1982, the Forensic Sciences Bureau examined and

analyzed evidence involved in 5,031 cases; handl ing 16,773 pieces of evidence which required 25,759 analyses.

Personnel from the bureau hosted 392 visitors touring this facility, and took part in 51 lecture appearances within and outside the Division of Police.

176 court appearances were m a d e by personnel of this bureau.

Vice Bureau The Vice Bureau ' s basic responsibil i t ies lie in the inves­

tigation of illegal gambling, prost i tut ion, pornography, and illegal l iquor sales both from licensed and unlicensed estab­lishments.

During 1982, this bureau was involved in the investigation and arrest of persons engaged in gambling, male and female solicitors and prost i tutes , escort services, adult bookstores, massage parlors, illegal l iquor es tabl i shments and n u m b e r s operations.

Juvenile Bureau This Bureau is responsible for specialized police functions

regarding children and adul ts in the area of Administrat ion, Records Control, and Court Liaison, Intake, Referral and/or Dispos i t ion of J u v e n i l e s and I n q u i r i e s , P r e c i n c t s and School Liaison, Missing Persons , Bicycle Thefts and Child Abuse and Neglect.

Dur ing 1982, we p roces sed a total of 5,101 charges of which 3,891 were sent to cour t and 1,210 were handled by office level interviews.

2,134 Missing Person Repor ts and 842 Abuse Repor ts were taken over the te lephone .

842 complaints of Child A b u s e and Neglect were investi­gated.

Officers of the Juven i l e Bureau, along with staff m e m b e r s of Children's Hospital and Frankl in County Children 's Ser­vices made u p an Inter-Agency Abuse Team whose objec­tives are the coord ina t ion of in ter -agency activities and programs, communi ty educat ion, and providing technical assistance to the cour t and consul t ive advice on t rea tment to referral agencies.

1,898 reported bicycle thefts were investigated with a re­ported loss of $306,897.10. Division personnel recovered bicycles with a value of $105,398.14.

SERVICE SUBDIVISION

Communications Bureau This Bureau is responsible for mainta ining police com­

municat ions and coordinat ion of the police vehicle fleet. The Radio R o o m exper ienced an increase in the total de­

mands for service in 1982. Total d ispatched runs for 1982 was 542,186.

Although short of personnel , the Garage Sect ion handled its responsibi l i t ies very well in main ta in ing 509 vehicles which were dr iven a total of 10,083,352 miles. In 1982, we purchased thir ty-nine (39) cruisers, six (6) Patrol Transpor t Vehicles and five (5) motorcycles . Our goal for 1983 is to upgrade the fleet by purchas ing eighty-eight (88) cruisers, eight (8) Patrol Transpor t Vehicles and five (5) motorcycles.

Technical Services Bureau This Bureau is responsible for the recording and storing of

all records, the process ing of identification files, data pro­cessing and pr int ing or dupl ica t ing division material .

During the year of 1982, the Identification Sect ion proces­sed a total of 10,328 pr isoners , 417 more than the 9,911 pro­cessed in 1981.

During 1982, the Pho to Lab processed 2,346 rolls of film plus 228 feet of 70 m m film, p roduc ing 51,328 prints .

The Records Sect ion processed 73,571 offense repor ts and 31,760 accident repor ts for the year. The Telephone Report­ing Unit received 24,313 calls and from these calls, took 20,499 repor ts , a l lowing addi t iona l patrol t ime for patrol units.

PATROL SUBDIVISION Patrol operat ions ' pr imary objective is the prevent ion and

suppression of cr iminal activity th rough cont inuous visible patrol and impartial enforcement of all city and state laws. It is organized into th ree bu reaus des ignated as A, B and C Companies.

"A" Company Officers were used in undercover assignments in the in­

vestigation of rapes, burglaries, robberies, a rash of pocket-picking offenses in the downtown area and sex crimes on the west side.

One-hundred and ninety-one police officers and super­visors received 40 hours of classroom instructions in a varie­ty of police-related subjects.

Personnel on "A" Company received a total of 160 com­mendations and awards dur ing the year of 1982.

Of the complaints filed against "A" Company personnel, only 11.6% were sustained.

"B" Company " B " Company personnel responded to 193,560 Demands

for Service and picked up 210,969 demands for the year. During these runs , 64,380 arrests were made for various offenses.

" B " Company personnel were involved in excess of 7,500 hours of in-service training in a variety of police-related sub­jects.

Of the complaints filed against " B " Company personnel, only 10% were sustained. There was a 26% reduction of com­plaints filed in 1982 compared to 1981.

"C" Company "C" Company personnel responded to 159,328 Demands

for Service and picked up 195,435 demands for the year. During these runs , 47,969 arrests were made for various offenses.

"C" Company personnel were involved in excess of 5,000 hours of in-service training in a variety of police-related sub­jects.

Of the complaints filed against " C " Company personnel, less than 1% were sustained.

SPECIAL OPERATIONS SUBDIVISION

Special Forces Bureau The Special Forces Bureau controls the Helicopter Sec­

tion and the Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) Platoon.

Helicopter Section Due to budget restraints, the Helicopter Section flying

time was cut by 50% in 1982, normally flying only 8 hours per day.

The Helicopter Section is running the most efficient, cost conscious and safe police helicopter operation in the United States today.

The goal for 1983 is to res t ructure back to a 16-hour a day shift schedule and cont inue the rotation of at least two new helicopters for the section.

Special Weapons and Tactical (SWAT) SWAT arrested 474 persons on over a thousand felony

charges during 1982. Four SWAT officers were awarded the Medal of Valor, the

Divis ion ' s h ighes t deco ra t i on , for knowing ly expos ing themselves to shotgun fire from a robbery suspect.

SWAT handled nine hostage-barricaded situations and re­solved all these situations without death or injury to those involved.

Public Safety Bureau This Bureau is responsible for the Airport Police Section,

Marine-Park Police Section and the Zoo Park Police Sec­tion.

This Bureau received 40 hours of in-service training on a variety of police-related subjects.

The Airport Section showed a 50% reduction of citizen complaints dur ing the year.

Because of the failure of Airport officials to fund the hir­ing of additional Publ ic Safety Officers, officers are averag­ing 20-30 hours of overt ime per officer per week.

In the Marine Park Section, it was necessary to transfer all officers from the 11:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. shift to first or second watch ass ignments to provide a min imum number of officers to handle the large crowds of people that came into the Hoover, Griggs and O 'Shanghnessy Dam areas. Four officers were temporar i ly assigned from the sworn ranks and the Marine Park went back to 24-hours a day coverage.

The Marine Park had two officers resign and accept posi­tions with other police agencies dur ing the year.

The Zoo Park Police Section went through the year with­out one incident of use of force. Several commendat ions

12 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

were received for performing their ass ignment in an exem­plary manner.

Traffic Bureau The Traffic Bureau is responsible for the safe movement

of traffic over Columbus ' network of streets and freeways, and the operation of police wreckers and impounded vehi­cles.

The Traffic Bureau, during 1982, cont inued on aggressive pace of traffic enforcement on moving violations, OMVI arrests, and park ing violations. Dur ing 1982, the Traffic Bureau issued 34,874 moving violations, a 38% increase in this area.

The Traffic Bureau assis ted patrol by r e spond ing to 7,321 runs.

The freeway patrol e i ther i m p o u n d e d or took o ther action on 10,182 abandoned vehicles . This r epresen t s an 18% in­crease after 1981.

Additionally on the freeway sys tem, the re was a 13% drop in the n u m b e r of traffic fatalities. There were 13 fatalities in 1982 compared to 15 in 1981. Overall, t he fatalities in the City of Co lumbus d ropped 14% as compared with 1981.

During 1982, the I m p o u n d i n g Sect ion was transferred to the Traffic Bureau . T h e Traffic Bu reau processed 15,307 im­pounded vehicles in 1982 and 1,134 j u n k vehicles were re­moved from the street and sc rapped .

FINANCIAL STATEMENT GENERAL FUND 01-100—DIVISION OF POLICE

Code Explanation Expenditures Activity 10—Administration

100 Personal Services 200-600 Other Disbursements

Total Expenditures—10 Activity 20—Investigative

100 Personal Services 200-600 Other Disbursements

Total Expenditures—20 Activity 30—Field Operat ions

100 Personal Services 200-600 Other Disbursements

Total Expenditures—30 Activity 40—Service

100 Personal Services 200-600 Other Disbrusements

Total Expenditures—40 Activity 50—Executive

100 Personal Services 200-600 Other Disbursements

Total Expenditures—50 Activity 60—Special Operat ions

100 Personal Services 200-600 Other Disbursements

Total Expenditures—60 Division of Police Total

100 Personal Services 200-600 Other Disbursements

Total Division Expend i tu res Outs tanding Orders Total Disbursements

General Fund Total Appropr ia t ions & Carryover General Fund Total Disbursements

Balance Returned to General Fund

1981 1982

5,110,947 2,642,618 7,753,565

8,944,561 607,005

9,551,566

18,340,878 2,137,104

20,477,982

4,532,770 1,521,305 6,054,075

700,648 34,861

735,509

5,784,286 1,126,567 6,910,853

43,414,090 8,069,460

51,483,550 723,776

52,207,326

52,261,935 52,207,326

54,609

4,198,295 3,864,001 8,062,296

9,955,423 610,401

10,565,824

20,373,407 721,893

21,095,300

4,791,443 342,910

5,134,353

722,174 39,695

761,869

5,630,414 626,577

6,256,991

45,671,156 6,205,477

51,876,633 778,755

52,655,388

53,273,664 52,655,388

618,276

FINANCIAL STATEMENT REVENUE SHARING FUND 02-172—DIVISION OF POLICE

Code Explanation Activity 10—Administration

200-600 Other Disbursements Activity 20—Investigative

200-600 Other Disbursement s Activity 30—Field Operat ions

200-600 Other Disbursements Activity 60—Special Operat ions

200-600 Other Disbursement s Division of Police Total

200-600 Other Disbursement s Total Expendi tures—Divis ion Outs tanding Orders 'Y.YY. Total Disbursements—Divis ion

Revenue Sharing Fund Total Appropr ia t ion & Carryover . Revenue Sharing Fund Total Di sbursement s

Balance Returned to F u n d '..'.'.'.'.'.

Capital Improvemen t F u n d s N.W. Wing of Headquar te r s Renovat ion of Headquar te r s Hoover Reservoir Expans ion Powder Storage Bui ld ing Mult i -Purpose Bui ld ing

1981

65,000

42,987

83,849

191,836 191,836 305,342 497,179

497,272 497,178

94

393 11,474 2,003 462

1982

37,050

22,466

296,778

29,996

386,290 386,290 359,561 745,851

745,852 745,851

1

35

2,797 20,000

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

Receipts Turned Into General Fund 100: Telephone Commiss ion State Marine Patrol Subs idy Grant-Police Traffic Adminis t ra t ion ODHS Grant-Scamp-Selective Enforcement Program Sale of Unclaimed Property-Pol ice Sale of Junk-Pol ice Sale of Impounded Cars-Police Charge for Pho to Copies Charge for Fingerpr int Cards Charge for Record Checks Auto Impounding Fees-Contract Auto Impound ing Fees-Service Auto Impound ing Fees-Storage Contract Sales-Junk Cars-Police Witness Fees-Police Charges for Police Service Rent-Police Helicopter Rent-Other Police E q u i p m e n t Charges for Crime Lab Service Misc. Charges for Service-Police Charges for Police Service-Airport Charges for Police Service-Zoo State Boat Licenses-City Share Rewards-Police Dept Unclaimed Money Confiscated Money Project Crysta l -Humane Society USA Contr ibut ion Refunds-Police Refund-Helicopter Main tenance Agreement Refund for Leather Goods Reimbursement for Gas-Traffic Division Payment for Damages

1981 145.34

10,000.00 7,417.65

161,196.22 34,902.90

2,009.17 231,034.26

89,203.00 5,009.50

20,092.68 255,460.00 119,246.00 69,330.00 78,661.15 79,976.25

1,192.12 2,317.07

24,158.17 15,992.10 17,808.00

871,833.21 117,633.36 29,371.00

25.00 2,774.01 9,453.43

235.00 9,818.81

245,119.30 2,255.90

372.75 60,002.11

2,574,045.46

1982 139.35

10,000.00

28,813.69 1,392.82

206,332.51 96,047.85

5,030.00 25,305.50

208,792.00 128,770.00 75,892.00 79,595.70 70,141.90

110.95 1,807.39

19,982.60 13,472.00 1,294.22

258,621.49 137,932.67 29,371.00

150.00 2,687.79 6,506.64

8,992.99

52,623.25

1,470,058.02

ANNUAL REPORT—1982 DIVISION OF COMMUNICATIONS

A major project developed short ly after the start of 1982 when it was discovered that a major communica t ions cable ran through the Capital Sou th deve lopment area and had to be moved. The urgency of the si tuation was such that all routine work for the Te lephone section was halted and all resources directed towards the relocation of this cable (600 pair). The move was comple ted ahead of schedule .

The first two l inks for the proposed City-wide microwave system were received and installed. They are now operation­al and have resul ted in m u c h quieter and more reliable com­munications from the two Police voter sites involved.

A 200 line electronic private au tomat ic branch exchange (EPABX) was installed and modified to cus tomer specifica­tions at the new Fire House # 1 for the Fire Prevent ion area. A key system was installed in the remainder of the stations to provide communica t ions identical to other stations in the system. This resul ts in all s ta t ions in the system having the same type of internal communica t ions sys tem installed, a distinct advantage when personnel are transferred.

The installation of the cable at Capital South , when com­bined wi th c a b l e i n s t a l l a t i o n s at Ulry Road , M O R P C , Marion Road, and other areas approached 100,000 feet of cable being installed. Par t of this was an extension of a 400 pair cable be tween the main Police Headquar te r s building and City Hall, resul t ing in a m u c h improved communica­tions capability.

The E P A B X at the Data Center was moved to a more favorable envi ronmenta l area. This has resulted in a drama­tic decrease in the total n u m b e r of Service Reques ts for maintenance related to this equ ipmen t .

The preventive ma in tenance program has been expanded to cover all Divisions with emphas i s on the Police and Fire Divisions. On site ma in t enance and repair at the main trans­mitter sites has been comple ted .

ANNUAL EXTERNAL BILLING DATA FOR 1982 Port Columbus Airport $ 839.33 Bolton Field Airport 1,488.63 Building Regulat ions 82.20 Building Services 85.00 Code Enforcement 222.35 Community Deve lopment 122.67 Construction 224.06 Data Processing 4,975.00 Development 277.50 Electric 1,538.16 Engineering & Const ruct ion 2,402.10

Health Depar tment 15.00 Municipal Garage 447.98 Recreation & Parks 2,063.00 Sanitation 5,167.99 Sewers & Drains 7,370.96 Traffic 1,890.39 Water 4,778.95 Zoo 2,025.00

City Departments/Division Total: $36,016.27

Disaster Services Agency $13,951.28 Franklin County Sheriff 16,794.08 Miscellaneous 3,927.32

Non-City Department/Division Total: $34,672.68 TOTAL BILLINGS FOR 1982 $70,688.95

CITY DEPARTMENTS/DIVISION SERVICED Airports Building Regulation Building Services City Council Clerk of Courts Code Enforcement Communicat ions Community Development Construction Inspection Data Processing Center Electricity Engineering & Construct ion Fire Garage, Municipal Division Health Depar tment Mayor's Office Police Recreation & Parks Public Safety Sanitation Sewerage & Drainage Traffic Engineering & Parking Division Treasurer, City Water Division Zoo

Non-City Departments/Division Serviced Disaster Services Agency Franklin County Sheriff NOAA

14 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

DIVISION OF COMMUNICATIONS FINANCIAL STATEMENT

1982 ANNUAL REPORT

Code 100 200 300 TOTALS

Appropriations 817,194.00

79,387.00 98,094.00

994,675.00

Transfer In

10,000.00 14,500.00 24,500.00

Transfer Out

35,081.00

35,081.00

Expenditures 773,788.28

76,329.76 99,250.33

949,368.37

RADIO SECTION 1982 ANNUAL REPORT

STATISTICAL DATA

Mobile Equipment (Maintenance & Repairs) Radio Units Serviced Handie Talkies Vehicle Accessories Sirens Beacons/Lightbars Recall/Reporter II

TOTAL

Number of Vehicles Serviced Radar/Vascar Equipment Removals Equipment Installs Preventive Maintenance Miscellaneous Repairs

Fixed Equipment - (Maintenance & Repairs) Transmitters/Receivers Public Address Sys tems Consoles/Control Equ ipmen t Intercom Systems Recorders Monitors Miscellaneous Repairs

TOTAL

Encumbered 3,122.54

12,962.15 13,343.67 29,428.36

Total 776,910.82

89,291.91 112.594.00 978,796.73

Balance 5,202.18

95.09 .00

5,297.27

Police 1,432 1,049 1,005 159 38 86

3,769

3,127 54 109 151 42 620

988 7

131 11 296 1

80 1,514

Fire 172 183 62 52 0 0

469

274 0 5 19 3 6

66 55 3 10 4 0 4

142

Other City 648 132 191 0 0 0

971

994 0 35 91 8 81

218 22 52 3 2 33 47 377

Non-City 189 169 98 0 0 0

456

313 0 2 16 6 1

128 0 41 1 0 0 1

171

Total 2,441 1,533 1,356 211 38 86

5,665

4,708 54 151 277 59 708

1,400 84 227 25 302 34 132

2,204

InioT

TELEPHONE SECTION 1982 ANNUAL REPORT

STATISTICAL DATA

Outside Plant New line construction Line maintenance Cable splicing Terminal installation Association equ ipment installation .. Pair testing, rout ing Messenger installation Cable maintenance Cable installation Outdoor, emergency phone install . . Outdoor emergency phone maint . . . . Siren maintenance Preventive maintenance Miscellaneous

TOTAL

Inside Plant New phone installation Telephone moves Switches, keys cleaning & adjusting Pair testing, routing Telephone repair Trouble shooting Cable, wire installation Associated equ ipmen t installation .. Engineering and planning repor ts .. CCTV and tape recorders Associated equ ipment repair Preventive maintenance Miscellaneous

TOTAL

'olice 256 109 328 261 121 478 79 165 257 0 0 0

125 136

2,315

62 50 126 290 193 189 302 122 141 406 132 166 175

2,354

Fire 331 174 216 261 160

1,047 93 147 115 6

510 0 87 78

3,225

167 105 298 321 261 261 375 126 183 458 137 340 198

3,230

Other City 319 82 111 54 73 171 51 132 74 0 0 0

104 128

1,299

28 41 48 145 104 100 84 101 153 82 127 70 147

1,230

Non-City

7 0 41 1 8 61 5 5 59 0 0

419 21 15 642

7 4 0 17 6 6 6 10 42 29 18 4 29 178

Total 913 365 696 577 362

1,757 228 449 505 6

510 419 337 357

7,481

264 < 200 472 773 364 556 767 359 519 975 414 580 549

6,992

1

1 ,d\ 1 Urit 1 QIc

ANNUAL REPORTS, 1982

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE INDEX

General Administration 2

Division of Airports 4

Engineering and Construction 7

Division of Construction 11

Division of Sanitation 18

Sewerage and Drainage 19

Division of Electricity 32

Traffic Engineering 34

Qwmus, OHIO

THE CITY BULLETIN Official Publication of the City of Columbus

Published weekly under authority of the City Charter and direction of the City Clerk. Contains official report of proceedings of council, ordi­nances passed and resolutions adopted; civil service notes and announce­ments of examinations; advertisements for bids; details pertaining to offi­cial actions of all city departments.

Subscriptions by mail, $15.00 a Year in advance. Second-Class Postage Paid at Columbus, Ohio

FRANCINE C. RYAN City Clerk (614 222-7316)

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

The Division of Service Administration is responsible for coordinating and directing the Administrative, Financial, Engineering, Personnel and Organizational Development activities of all the divisions within the Department of Pub­lic Service to assure the quality of services provided meets the expectations of the citizens of Columbus. In response to public demands for improved services, the departmental staff has concentrated their efforts on enhancing managerial planning and performance and on improvements in overall service delivery through technological advances.

The Organizational Development Section continues to make strides in improving management training opportuni­ties and developing specialized programs to meet the man­agement challenges faced by all supervisory levels within the organization.

The Columbus Public Service Chapter of the National Management Association chartered in 1981 entered its second year as a major contributing factor to the enhanced managerial perspective that exists within the Department. The Financial Management Section worked closely with the various divisions to coordinate budget preparation, stream­line financial monitoring and eliminate the need for sup­plemental budget appropriations. The Administrative Sec­tion monitored progress toward achieving various depart­mental goals and worked to improve public awareness and understanding of services provided by the Department. The Engineering Section continued to work with Division of Sanitation personnel in the design and construction of ma­jor safety improvements to the City's pulverizer facilities. Improvements were also made in the area of plans review and onsite work inspections due to the use of a part-time engineering student. The Personnel Section continued their efforts to develop effective personnel procedures in order to reduce lengthy delays in filling critical vacancies. The Per­sonnel Section coordinated the evaluation of Departmental Hiring Review Forms and monitored efforts in hiring only essential personnel who terminated.

The Service Department is organized into nine divisions, including Service Administration. Two divisions are fi­nanced primarily from the tax supported General Fund. Seven divisions are classified as self-supporting and derive the majority of their funding from the sale of services to the public and private sectors. The divisions in the Service De­partment are:

GENERAL FUND DIVISIONS SERVICE ADMINISTRATION — Discussed further on page 3. SANITATION — The Division of Sanitation is responsible

for the collection and disposal of solid wastes for the citizens of Columbus. The service includes weekly household refuse collection, pulverization and transportation to sanitary land­fills.

SELF-SUPPORTING DIVISIONS STREET MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR — The Division of

Street Maintenance and Repair is responsible for cleaning and maintaining all streets and alleys within the City. This task encompasses design and construction of new streets, bridges and expressways; patching and resurfacing; snow and ice removal; right-of-way maintenance and leaf pick-up. The Division also supervises the mapping of annexations and issues house numbers for all subdivisions and apart­ment complexes in the City.

AIRPORT — The Division of Airports is responsible for the operation of both Port Columbus International and Bolton Field.

CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION — The Division of Construe-tion Inspection provides inspection services for public con­struction projects in accordance with the Construction and Material Specifications Manual of the City. The Division in­spects projects of the Service Department Divisions of Sewerage and Drainage, Water, Street Maintenance and Re­pair, Electricity and any other divisions requesting its assist­ance. The Division also inspects construction of private roads, sewer and water lines.

ELECTRICITY — The Division of Electricity is a City-owned utility serving residential and commercial customers in the downtown and central city area. All citizens of Co­lumbus benefit from the street lighting services provided at no charge, by the division.

SERVICE ADMINISTRATION ANNUAL REPORT—1982

SEWERAGE AND DRAINAGE — The Division of Sewerage and Drainage is responsible for the collection and treatment of all sanitary waste discharged in the City of Columbus and surrounding suburbs. The Division plans, constructs, main­tains and monitors the good working order of all storm and sanitary sewers and the two treatment plants in the City.

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND PARKING — The Division of Traffic Engineering and Parking is responsible for the con­struction, operation and maintenance of the traffic control facilities within the City.

WATER — The Division of Water operates two water treat­ment plants which supply virtually the entire Columbus Metropolitan Area with potable water. The Division main­tains a standby treatment facility at Nelson Road which can be utilized in case of emergencies or peak demand periods. The Division maintains the water distribution network, all water meters, taps and fire hydrants in the City.

DIVISION OF SERVICE ADMINISTRATION As previously noted, the Division of Service Administra­

tion is responsible for overall management and administra­tion of the Department of Public Service. The Department staff provided managerial input into the implementation of the new utility billing and accounts receivable system for the Divisions of Water and Sewerage and Drainage. Evalua­tion of the mechanical lift system of refuse collection with the Division of Sanitation, construction of the Airport ex­pansion project and the Coal/Refuse Fired Power Plant and planning for alternative forms of financing for various pub­lic services.

The Department staff assisted the Division of Water in its presentation of rate review materials to the Sewer and Water Advisory Board. A new cost of service rate structure was approved for implementation over a multi-year schedule. The new structure will more equitably distribute water sys­tem costs to the causers of those costs.

The ADMINISTRATION SECTION of the Department is comprised of the Service Director, who has the task of plan­ning, coordinating and administering the tremendous pub­lic works program developed by the City; and the Depart­mental Fiscal Management Officer who supervises the de­partmental staff and coordinates the fiscal and organization­al development activities throughout the Department.

The Director, as chief policymaker for the Department with respect to developing new programs to accomplish the public goals of the Mayor and Council, is charged with the responsibility of scheduling the Operating and Capital Im­provements Program to meet the needs of the citizens of Columbus. Services are provided utilizing the latest tech­nological advances which are designed to reduce the finan­cial burden upon the City.

Robert C. Parkinson is currently the Service Director and has served in that capacity since January 1, 1975.

The Service Director is a member of several commissions and committees including the Development Commission, Mass Transit Study Committee, the Sewer and Water Advis­ory Board, Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission, In­formation Services Commission and Columbus Area Growth Foundation.

The 1982 fiscal year was extremely difficult from a finan­cial position. All of the divisions were required to uphold a high level of service with reduced numbers of personnel and in some cases, less real dollars than were available in 1981. It is hoped that the passage of the City income tax increase of .5% that sufficient funding will be available in 1983 to main­tain the current level of services. The Division of Sanitation, in particular, was adversely affected by the budget con­straints of fiscal year 1982. It is the intent of the Department to concentrate on improving service delivery in the Division of Sanitation through the implementation of the mechanical lift system during 1983. The Division of Water made signifi­cant progress toward implementation of a cost-of-service rate structure. The Sewer and Water Advisory Board approved division plans for a phased implementation of the new structure over the next several years. The Division of Electricity has made substantial progress toward comple­tion of the Coal/Refuse Fired Power Plant and is planning to generate electricity by the Summer of 1983. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT — The Financial Management Section throughout the fiscal year 1982 worked very closely with the Service Divisions in the areas of financial planning and administration.

tft..

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

This section has the pr imary responsibili ty for preparing, administering and moni tor ing the budget for Service Ad­ministration. All quarter ly reviews, special and annual re­ports are prepared by this section.

The Financial Management Section, adminis tered by an Administrative Analyst II, moni tors the financial condit ions of the eight (8) Service divisions. These efforts include leg­islative review, fund ba l ances and t ransfers , pe r sonne l levels and expendi tures , as well as quarterly and annual re­ports.

As the City's financial d e m a n d s cont inue to grow, more and more t ime is expended in the areas of budget analysis and preparation. In 1983 more programs and services were critically analysed and evaluated as financial resources were estimated at a level equal to that of 1981. All eight (8) divi­sions performed within the funding levels available for 1982.

Several divisions th rough bet ter fiscal managemen t were able to carry funds over to aid them in 1983.

ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT — The Organizat ion De­velopment Section is charged by the Director with the re­sponsibility for p romot ing greater efficiency and effective­ness in the provision of services to the public. The efforts to d a t e h a v e b e e n f o c u s e d in f o u r m a j o r d i r e c t i o n s : 1) coordinating m a n a g e m e n t t raining and development in c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h a n i n t e r d i v i s i o n a l c o m m i t t e e , 2) e s t a b l i s h i n g a da t a b a s e d dec i s i on s u p p o r t sy s t em, 3) establ ishing a h u m a n resource m a n a g e m e n t program, and 4) providing internal consul t ing on personal and orga­nization development issues.

The Options I P rogram provided over 12,000 part icipant hours of managemen t deve lopment courses for the Depart­ment 's 350 managers and supervisors .

Eighty-one new supervisors comple ted the introductory course. "Pr inciples of Managing."

Eighteen managers from within the Depar tmen t partici­pated as ins t ructors in the Opt ions Program.

The schedul ing, r ecordkeep ing and a t tendance compo­n e n t s of t h e O p t i o n s P r o g r a m w e r e s u c c e s s f u l l y im-

i plemented in a computer ized system. Semi-annual trans­cripts were sent to each part ic ipant , to their supervisor and to their personnel office, l isting all the courses completed

I during the previous six mon ths . T h r o u g h t h e N a t i o n a l M a n a g e m e n t Assoc i a t i on , t h e

courses in the Opt ions P rog ram were approved for Con­tinuing Educat ion Uni t (CEU) credit.

The pilot Management Deve lopment Program, Options II, / was completed. The resul ts showed that the savings realized

th rough the increased efficiency by the par t ic ipants re­turned $3.40 for every dollar spen t on the program.

The E m p l o y e e Sa t i s fac t ion M e a s u r e m e n t project was completed in the Spr ing of 1982. Nearly 1,000 employees in eight of the n ine Service divisions were surveyed. The re­sults were analyzed and repor ted back to the divisions.

T h e S e r v i c e De l i ve ry M e a s u r e m e n t p ro j ec t w a s im­plemented in three areas of the Depar tment . Both short- and long-term performance measures were es tabl ished and pro­ductivity improvemen t activities were inst i tuted.

Efforts were m a d e to work with the Civil Service system in terms of classification upda t ing . Significant progress was

.i made in the revision of the Civil Engineer IV classification. The Depar tmen t was involved in the cont inuing imple-

i mentation of the City-wide Per fo rmance Appraisal System ; and in the design of the City-wide Suggest ion Program.

The Depar tmen t had representa t ion on the City negotiat-i ing team for contract talks wi th AFSCME 1632. A formalized [ process was e s t ab l i shed to ga the r i npu t from managers I throughout the Depar tment .

PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION — The Personne l Sect ion of the Service Depa r tmen t is d i rected by the Deputy Service Director, Ronald J . Rotaru. In addi t ion to Personnel Direc­tor, the Deputy Service Director also acts as the Labor Rela­tions Administrator . As t h e Labor Relat ions Administrator ,

II he is in charge of conduc t ing gr ievance hearings for all divi­sions and depa r tmen t s in the thi rd s tep grievance level.

The Deputy Service Director manages personnel activi­ties for the Service Depa r tmen t and serves as liaison be­tween the Adminis t ra t ion, City Council , Civil Service and Depar tment Directors. Much of his t ime is spent handl ing special m a n a g e m e n t p rob lems for the Mayor and Depart-

i ment Directors.

The primary function of the Personnel Administrat ion Section is to coordinate the personnel needs of the various divisions and depar tments with the Civil Service Commis­sion. This includes the determinat ion of personnel require­ments, appointments , terminat ions, job counseling for pre­sent and prospective employees, and daily personnel prob­lems, such as sick leave and disciplinary hearing and work­ing with the Civil Service Commission in areas of job classi­fication and work requirements .

The City's Employee Identification Program is adminis­tered by this section. Each employee is photographed and given an identification card. In 1983 the Depar tment of Safe­ty started utilizing this section to photograph those applying for special license and permits .

ENGINEERING SECTION — The Engineering Section of the Service Administrat ion Division is directed by the Assistant Service Director. This section assists the various other divi­sions in engineer ing rela ted mat te r s which requires the Assistant Service Director to be a Registered Professional Engineer. The Engineering Section also performs, when re­quested, complete contract administrat ion from plan prepa­rations to construct ion complet ion, for other City depart­ments . The Assistant Service Director reviews and approves contracts and construct ion drawings and a t tends various meetings in the absence of the Director such as City Council and Development Commission, sits on various task forces and commit tees as appointed by the Director.

SERVICE ADMINISTRATION FINANCIAL DATA

Expenditures by Character: 1979 1980 1981 1982

Personnel $269,336 $329,886 $377,120 $387,309 Materials and Suppl ies . 2,812 4,124 4,332 2,465 Service for Opera t ion . . 25,617 41,455 38,007 33,224 Other D i sbur semen t s . . 2,808 69 9,000 0 Capital Outlay 1,874 3,759 - 594

$302,447 $379,293 $428,459 $423,592

Expenditures by Section: Administrat ion $118,464 $137,931 $172,065 $169,391 Fiscal Office 96,592 104,864 27,178 28,978 Personnel 87,392 107,523 115,225 118,727 Engineering - - 53,113 50,312 Organization Devel. . . . 0 28,975 60,878 56,184

$302,447 $379,293 $428,459 $423,592

1983 PRIORITIES The Division of Service Administrat ion, as in the past, has

identified specific areas of impor tance for the fiscal year 1983. Several priorities have been established.

In taking a slightly different approach in 1983, Service Administrat ion's efforts will be more project oriented, at the same t ime cont inuing to provide overall assistance and sup­port to the Service Divisions.

Some specific areas identified are as follows: As the Division of Sanitat ion under takes the Mechanized

Collection Sys tem, Service Admin i s t r a t ion will p rovide assistance in the areas project adminis trat ion in identifying funding sources, as well as, assis tance in organizational res­tructuring to maximize the use of available personnel .

In early 1983 the Municipal Electric Plant will begin op­eration which will require assistance in coordinat ing activi­ties between Electricity, the County, the Division of Sanita­tion and private refuse collectors.

In the area of traffic control, t he Depar tment will cont inue to s tudy the feasibility of expanding the Computer ized Sig­nal Program possibly into the other municipali t ies.

In the area of street maintenance , Service Administrat ion will aid the Division of Engineer ing and Construct ion in their cont inuing effort to improve the overall quali ty of arte­rial streets. As a result of a mild winter, street main tenance crews were able to do more patching dur ing this period. Less damage occurred to the streets from the mild winter allowing street main tenance crews to make progress toward their goal.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

DIVISION OF AIRPORTS ANNUAL REPORT — 1982

The differences between 1981 and 1982 at Port Columbus International Airport were satisfying, significant, and en­couraging. , , .

Mr. Webster defines the word "fruition as, pleasurable use ot possession: ENJOYMENT . . . REALIZATION, ACCOMPLISHMENT . . ." . Based on this, we, at Port Co­lumbus, feel that we have reached the state of fruition for a number of reasons. One of the primary reasons is the virtual­ly total completion of the $72,000,000 reconstruction project. It is enjoyable to see a project such as this become a reality, and it is pleasurable to see travelers, visitors, and em­ployees, smile and comment on the vastly improved appear­ance and usefulness of the facilities. The depressed drive which was designed into the project to facilitate commercial vehicle operations, is the only major item remaining to be completed, and it is expected to become operational in early 1983. Unless Columbus encounters a totally unanticipated period of extreme growth, this drive, and the existing road system should be very capable of handling vehicular traffic into the 21st century.

The realization that the cautious optimism expressed in the 1981 message, that a modest increase would be experi­enced in the passenger volume in 1982, has become an accomplishment which exceeded expectations. Although the economy, in general, remained somewhat sluggish, the final tally of passengers made 1982 the second busiest year in the history of Port Columbus. With deregulation con­tinuing toward sunset, and the apparent internal conflict between the major oil producing nations indicating further reductions in oil prices, we are again cautiously optimistic that the economy will improve, to the point that 1983 will be a near record year for Port Columbus.

The only reversal which was encountered during 1982 was in the reduction of aircraft operations at Bolton Field Air­port, which was caused by the loss of the night time air freight operations which began at Bolton Field in 1981. Although the reduction is significant to the operators at Bol­ton Field, the operations were retained within the overall Airport system because of a relocation to Port Columbus.

The achievements presented in this report are not the product of any one individual, but are the accomplishment of teamwork in a unified manner. This has made my job much easier and more pleasant, and I wish to acknowlege the efforts of the City Administration, the Columbus Metro­politan Airport and Aviation Commission, the conces­sionaires, airlines, airport tenants, and the entire staff of the airport who really make it run on a daily basis.

PARKING FACILITY The Port Columbus Parking Facility entered 1982 begin­

ning a new era of service to the traveling public. It was the year we entered the electronic age with the installation of electronic fee computers, electronic counters, ticket valida­tors and related equipment to replace the mechanical cash registers which have become victims of age. It was the year of transition we had forecast the previous year as the old Port Columbus gave way to the new Port Columbus and a new chapter of airport history was begun.

The new electronic equipment installed in the exit booths have greatly enhanced the efficiency of our attendants to process customer traffic. With the old equipment we had to manually time stamp tickets, compute fees, key in the fee on the register and take that ticket by hand and place it in a storage bin. Now, with the fee computers, the attendants read the time stamp from the parking ticket, key in that time on the keyboard and the computer will compute the fee display the fee on an indicator located on the side of the booth for the customer to see, validates the ticket and drops it into a collection box. It also stores all information in a memory bank so we may retrieve it at a later date. This system eliminates the time consumed processing a ticket and allows us to attend to customer needs. The computers will provide us with printout, upon demand, of customers exiting on particular fee increments, the total fee collected tor the increments and a total summary of transactions for each computer.

«9T9«9 « o e ^ U e f l e e t e d by the parking facility for 1982 was $2 282 388.75 which was $632,861.90 more than the revenue collected in 1981. This is the best year the parking facility tfSQ^Xr?nennn"-ed S , n C e 1 9J .8 w h e n w e collected more than i i QfiS non 'nruVen

cu

0e- J h e t o t a l t i c k e t s collected for 1982

was 968,020 which is 56,561 more than 1981. The increase in

revenue can be attributed to the parking fee rate increase which went into effect on August 1,1982. The small increase in customer traffic can be attributed to the economic situa­tion of the country and the drop in airline customer traffic. Yet, the parking facility performed well in 1982 and there is optimism for the future of our business; because, as Co­lumbus grows, Port Columbus will prosper as the avenue of travel to that growth.

THE NEW PORT COLUMBUS — YEAR ONE The new $72 million Port Columbus expansion passed the

acceptance test with flying colors. With the October 4, 1981, dedication, 1982 became the first completed year of opera­tion for the new "front door" to Columbus. In 1982,2,657,470 passengers passed through the new facility, resulting in a substantial 9.2% passenger increase, reviving optimism that the total passengers at Port Columbus in 1983 will pass the record year of the 2,800,008 figure set in 1979, bringing the beginning of a protracted era of economic growth and stabil­ity.

Airport officials are pleased to show off the new facility and do so by encouraging guided tours of the terminal daily. Tours are arranged by the airport staff and are conducted by the Airport Ambassadors, a group of volunteers who give tours of the terminal facility to children and adults. At the present time, we have 25 daytime volunteers and approx­imately 15 evening volunteers. The Airport Ambassadors are very enthusiastic about telling senior citizens and chil­dren about the services and facilities Port Columbus offers. During the year of 1982, 25 Airport Ambassadors gave a total of 378 tours through Port Columbus. On these tours, there were 7,202 children and adults. The volunteer hours given to the airport for this project for the year 1982 were 756. During our open houses in October and November, 55 volunteers worked and 523 children and adults toured the airport. The volunteer hours given to the airport for these events were 165.

On July 22nd, Mayor Moody, Superintendent Daniel F. Ginty, and the Port Columbus Airport Commission opened a small copper time capsule, lifted from the 1929 corner­stone. This was only the second time in 53 years the capsule had been opened, the other time being at the 1958 airport expansion, the original dedication of the structure that be­came the base of the present $72 million expansion. The capsule contained such information as, in 1929 milk was 12 cents a quart, gasoline sold for 27 cents a gallon, and the sticker price on Ford automobiles was $600. James J. Tho­mas was Mayor, the population of Columbus was 300,000 and the City measured 768 acres. Today, Tom Moody is Mayor, Columbus has more than 600,000 people and covers 1,800 acres.

On December 7,1982, the cornerstone was laid, sealing the commemorate completion of the $72 million project. In­cluded in the cornerstone were letters written by Tom Moody, Mayor of City of Columbus; M. D. Portman, Presi­dent of City Council; Robert C. Parkinson, Director of Pub­lic Service; George W. Byers II, Chairman, Airport and Avia­tion Commission; and Daniel F. Ginty, Superintendent of Airports.

The Airport Commission sponsored an Essay Contest for the students of the Columbus Public School, grades 4-10 on the topic "Aviation In The Year 2030." In each intermediate, middle and high school, one winner was selected. These school winners received a Dedication Print of the Airport and were entered in system-wide competition. System-wide winners, one intermediate, one middle, and one high school were awarded a medallion and their essays were placed in­side the cornerstone at Port Columbus.

Also, placed in the cornerstone for future openings were a short history of Port Columbus by Kline L. Roberts, Jr.; a cassette tape of dedication ceremony — 1981; a 1979 annual report; two autographed programs from Dedication — 1981; a color photograph of the new airport pictured in Sunday, January 24, 1982 Columbus Dispatch; pictures of each of the three sculptures due to be erected at Port Columbus; a Co­lumbus Citizen Journal morning newspaper; a Columbus Dispatch evening newspaper; and other assorted parapher­nalia.

The new Port Columbus — Year One, 1982, where over 2,650,000 passengers passed, expressing acceptance of a new facility; the realization of a dream that began in 1929 with just over 11,000 passengers passing through the "front door" of Columbus, Ohio.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

BUILDING MAINTENANCE The construct ion ending, t h e 485,000 square feet terminal

building completed it's first shakedown year with very few problems.

January of 1982 contained some very cold weather caus­ing frozen water and spr inkler sys tem lines. A main water line break resulted in a flash flooding of the basement level.

The cold wind blew into the terminal causing a tempera­ture drop that immediate ly m a d e all concerned aware of the need of a temporary wind-break at the four entrance areas. Permanent adjustable wind-breaks were installed by the fall of 1982.

The main tenance sect ion processed 5,684 t rouble calls in 1982 which included not only te rminal main tenance but answered to the main tenance of fifteen outlying buildings including two cargo buildings, airfield main tenance build­ing, General Aviation bui lding, and one fire house.

Major projects at these outlying areas for 1982 included installing new sewer ejector p u m p s at the 17th Avenue sta­tion, moving and ins ta l l ing several r a m p and fuel farm gates, a new roof on the U.S. Army Special Forces buiding, and numerous small electrical and te lephone installations.

The main tenance section is also responsible for maintain­ing the grass, t rees and plants along the 17th Avenue entr­ance, the cour tyards and a round all parking areas. These outside areas contain several t housand trees and plants with the maintenance area being also responsible for maintaining and watering 50 indoor plants .

The B u i l d i n g A u t o m a t i o n S y s t e m C o m p u t e r , used in monitoring all exist ing day to day main tenance functions as well as a much needed prevent ive main tenance system, was vital to all main tenance operat ions .

The environmenta l compu te r is totally hooked up. It is successful ly r u n n i n g t h e m e c h a n i c a l e q u i p m e n t in t h e building, the fire a larms and the securi ty doors.

The wide light compu te r used to br ighten and dim lights, turn on and off is in the final s tages of being programmed.

The Maintenance Manager compu te r is also in the final stages of being r ep rogrammed and should be a useful tool for the future.

AIRFIELD MAINTENANCE In 1982, several major improvemen t s on the airfield area

were completed to upgrade the airfield lighting and pave­ments for a safer more efficient airport .

Airfield lighting, approximate ly 6 miles of #6 wire in duct and direct burial and 134 new hi-intensity quartz runway lights were installed to u p g r a d e runway 10R-28L. The new lights use less power and are br ighter than the old lights which were replaced. T h e n e w lights use 115 to 175 wat ts each replacing the old lights of 204 wat ts .

Airfield paving was upgraded on taxiways "A", " B " , han­gar line and a new park ing apron was built on taxiway "A" for the fixed base opera tor and for the use of small private planes to relieve the congest ion at taxiways "A" and " F " . Approximately 30,000 tons of hot mix asphal t were used to upgrade the east field area.

Airfield Main tenance supervis ion a t tended several very informative meet ings and an exchange of ideas concerning maintenance opera t ions of other a i rpor ts at the Internat ion­al Aviation S n o w S y m p o s i u m at Allentown, Pennsylvania in April , 1982. T h e S n o w S y m p o s i u m is affiliated wi th American Association of Airport Execut ives .

Management t ra in ing school was started in 1981 to in­crease the knowledge of City opera t ions with other City Di­visions and personnel . Month ly mee t ings in 1982 are a good source of information where an exchange of ideas and prob­lems can be discussed. A different speaker each mon th is very informative.

Demonst ra t ions were conduc ted on new equ ipmen t and new main tenance p roduc t s t h roughou t the year. A new type of crack sealer with a rubbe r base and applied hot, shows some promise in preventa t ive ma in tenance on pavements .

Field ma in tenance is based at Por t Co lumbus but also does main tenance work at Bolton Field Airport which is a reliever airport in S.W. par t of Frankl in County. Paint ing markings on runways , tax iways and r a m p s at bo th airports were applied, us ing 1700 gallons of paint in 1982. Sweeping and cleaning airfield pavemen t s is a much larger job be­cause of our expanded facility at Por t Columbus . Sweeping and cleaning airfield pavemen t s he lps el iminate damage to aircraft engines and for t h e publ ic ' s safety at Por t Co lumbus and Bolton Field.

Equ ipment opera tors m o w approximate ly 1500 acres of grassy fields as n e e d e d and also m o w grass di tches and waterways to keep down trees and brush and lessen the

chance of large grass fires. Also mowing helps to keep anim­al and bird populat ions from becoming a hazard to aircraft close to runways and taxiways.

Snow removal dur ing the winter season of 1981 and 1982 kept snow crews busy plowing a total of 35.1 inches of snow for the season.

Repairing and servicing motorized equ ipment is a con­stant operation in keeping 8 buses running, 24 hours a day, to provide shutt le service for parkers as well as keeping 167 other motor vehicles, used in airport maintenance and op­erations, in good working order.

BOLTON FIELD

The modest increase in total aircraft operations reported for Bolton Field, in the 1981 annual report, was severely impacted by the deteriorating economy, and the loss of the night t ime commercial operat ions activity dur ing 1982.

As previously reported, the night operat ions began in Au­gust, 1980 and grew to the extent of requir ing 24 hour con­trol tower operation, for five days of the week by July, 1981. Because of the need for addit ional facilities in early 1982, the commercial operator relocated his operat ions to Por t Co­lumbus. It soon became apparent that there was no early prospect for a comparable operat ion to begin replacement service at Bolton Field, and the additional control tower operator position was terminated on April 30, 1982 as a cost reduction measure .

The following comparison will graphically portray how drastic and severe the operational reduct ions were:

Total Total Total Air Taxi Itinerant Local Operations

1981 9,377 38,901 45,947 84,786 1982 1,489 27,335 30,083 57,436 % Change -84% -29.7% -34.5% -32.3%

Despite these spirit dampen ing figures it should b e noted that in early to mid spring of 1983 the one millionth aircraft operation will occur at Bolton Field. This milestone should serve as an impetus to encourage the promotion of the use of Bolton Field to more fully serve its t rue functions as a reliev­er airport for Por t Columbus .

POLICE SUPPORT

The year of 1982, had the police section at the airport as busy as any in the City.

In early 1982, the Airpor t was plagued with a rash of armed robberies and hubcap thefts in the parking area. In February, a hubcap theft ring was broken up by the arrest of three individuals in the possession of twenty-seven hubcaps and tools for their removal.

A strike in July by drivers of an air freight company based at the airport caused some concern dur ing the rest of the year bu t was handled with very little problem to the Airport Police Section.

In August, the driver of a vehicle a t tempt ing to park his car on the second level front drive lost control of the vehicle when his accelerator stuck. When he hit a concrete wall 120 yards away, he had severely damaged two cars, moderately damaged three cars, slightly damaged a parked Police car and sent two adul ts and one infant to a local hospital .

During 1982, s ixteen (16) V.I.P. details were formed for the protection of celebrities, heads of State and Airport proper­ty. Most noticeably was the details arranged for Vice Presi­dent Bush in February, former Pres ident Gerald Ford in August, Pres ident Ronald Reagan in October and former First Lady Betty Ford in October.

During 1982, one of the goals for the Airport Section was met early in the year when all officers were given forty (40) hours of In-Service training. Throughou t the year various roll call t raining classes were held to improve the profes­sional training of Airport officers.

During 1982, weapons detect ion at the screening check­point increased over 1981 by 23% with 53 incidents com­pared wi th 43 in 1981. Addit ionally, 194 knives and 714 flammables were detected at the checkpoint .

The police section were involved in the traffic control area with 7,469 traffic warnings, 5,596 park ing citations, 514 mov­ing vehicle citations, and 41 cars impounded .

The busy 1982 also conta ined 575 runway inspect ions, 17,401 buildings and area checks , and 3,574 open doors and gates checks.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

FIRE SUPPORT The Department of Public Safety supplies the Division of

Airports with a Firefighting and Rescue Unit based at Port Columbus. The costs of maintaining this unit is paid by the Division of Airports Operating Fund.

The Airport Fire Unit manpower consists of 1 Fire Lap-tain, 8 Lieutenants, and 30 Firefighters. The maintained sup­port equipment consists of 2 Walters Crash Trucks with wa­ter capacity of 1,500 gallons and 165 gallons of foam agent per truck, 2 Walters Crash Trucks with 1,000 gallon water capacity for reserve, 1 International Runway Foamer with 5,000 gallon water and 500 gallon Protein Foam capacity, 1 Sutphen 500 gallon standard pumper and a Dodge Aircraft Fire and Rescue Truck. All vehicles are stored in an eight bay firehouse and are each equipped with two-way Fire De­partment and Ground Control Radios.

All personnel assigned at the Airport Unit aside from being experienced and trained Firefighters are specially trained in crash/fire/rescue services and identifying types of aircraft, commercial and private, and each man has attended Pit Fire Training at Port Columbus. Additionally, all men are trained in Flammable Liquid Firefighting.

The Airport Fire Unit responded to 104 alerts, set-ups or fuel spills at Port Columbus in the year of 1982.

SCHEDULED AIRLINE SERVICE

Although much has been written on the continuing de­cline of the national economy, employment, and corporate profits, very little has been published concerning the rela­tionship of scheduled airline passengers as an indicator of things to come. In retrospect, a summary review of past statistical data, relative to airline passengers and aircraft op­erations, indicated a trend toward an improving economy.

As an example of how rapidly changes now come about in the airline industry, the Airline Traffic Reports for Port Co­lumbus reflect that in December, 1982, there were 15 air carriers operating at Port Columbus versus a total of 13 in December, 1981; however, this still does not portray the en­tire picture without some further footnotes:

1. Air Virginia initiated service on April 25 to Charlotte, N.C.; and Richmond and Roanoke, Va.

2. Christman Air System initiated service on August 1 to Charleston, WV; Buffalo, NY; Baltimore, MD; and Dul­les Airport in Washington D.C. However, because of the continuing non-availability of air traffic control slots caused by the air traffic controllers strike in 1981, Christman attempted to add service to Indianapolis, IN., but found that the entire operation was not feasible and suspended all Columbus Service on September 30.

3. Frontier Airlines initiated new service on December 15 to Indianapolis, IN; and Denver, CO.

4. Filing were submitted to the Civil Aviation Board (C.A.B.) in August by Jet USA Airlines to initiate ser­vice between Columbus, and Orlando, FL with a pro­posed start-up of late November to early December. Again, because of the rapidly changing conditions in the airline industry, the company, in December, changed its named to Zenith International Airlines and dropped the Columbus-Orlando route and instituted a proposal to fly between San Jose, CA-Chicago, IL-and Rochester, NY.

A rather hasty look at passenger data for the periods of 1973-1976 and 1978-82 show similar reactions to the eco­nomy:

Year 1973 1974 1975 1976 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982

The oil crisis which began in 1973 and again became a factor in 1978-79 is a great determinant in the aviation and airline industries, and seems to be reflected in the periods following the crisis periods of 1975, and 1980-81. This report, last year, indicated a reduction in the rate of decline of pas­sengers, and now, the subsequent increase for 1982 has re­vived optimism that the total passengers at Port Columbus in 1983 will pass the record year of 1979 and be the begin­ning of a protracted era of economic growth and stability.

FINANCIAL COMMENTARY The Division of Airports continued to be self-supporting

during 1982. No General Fund monies were received and all operating expenses as well as debt service requirements were paid from Airport receipts.

The following Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Other Charges is prepared using the accrual method of accouting except that assets acquired with operating funds are charged to cost centers during the year purchased, and debt retirement is charged to cost centers in lieu of deprecia­tion for assets acquired with capital project funds. Charges to cost centers for the major portion of note interest paid in 1981 associated with the expansion and rebuilding project were deferred until 1982.

Passengers 1,968,089 2,039,846 1,937,886 2,093,872 2,611,065 2,800,088 2,540,570 2,433,570 2,657,470

%Change N/A

+ 3.65 - 5 . 0 0 + 8.05 N/A

+ 7.24 -9 .27 - 4 . 2 0 + 9.20

DIVISION OF AIRPORTS STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND OTHER CHARGES

YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31. 1982 (NO. ARE IN THOUSANDS)

Terminal Airfield Building Parking Bolton

Area Area Area Other (1) Field Total R e v e n u e s $3,737 $5,787 $2,318 $2,382 $127 $14,351 Expenses

G ^ ' a n d Administrative Y.YY.Y. Y.Y.Y.Y. 'HI I J T 4 4 8 269 '§? Ifsl T " « . T '<.••••;•*"••• ?88 3,555 901 1,109 87 6 440 Less: Interest Earnings 0 (52) (52) 0 Q _ J 1 0 4 )

Total Expenses $3,215 $7,588 $2,562 $1,901 $436 $15,702 Other Charges

Debt Retirement I M n i , , „„ , „ . ,--„ Purchases nf A c o t e J™ lLl J 1 82 184 558 r-urcnases ot Assets 160 _ J ) __29 0 20 209

Total Other Charges $ 3 1 0 $ m $ 6Q p ^ ^ — — Total Expenses and Other Charges $^525 |7J99 $^622 $L983 _$640 $16,469 Excess (Deficit) of Revenues over

Expenses and Other Charges $ 212 $,1,912) $(304) $ 399 $(513) $(2,118) " men 's" 6 5 m C l U d e $ U 1 5 f ° r A i r I i n e T e n a n t Improvements, and Expenses include $1,117 for Airline Tenant Improv

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION Mr. Robert C. Park inson, P.E. Director of Publ ic Service 90 West Broad Street, Room 216 Columbus, Ohio 43215

Dear Director Park inson:

Attached hereto is the Annual Repor t of the activities of this Division for 1982, in accordance with Section 231 of the City Charter.

Trends of the last several years cont inued dur ing 1982. Each year th is Division has faced dwindl ing resources, esca­lating costs and increasing d e m a n d s for services.

We have responded by reducing our personnel , placing greater emphas is on performance, especially by our mana­gers, and cont inuing to refine our managemen t information systems, particularly in the areas of vehicle maintenance , damage claims and acc iden t investigations. Many of our managers are part icipat ing in the Options training program and some have become m e m b e r s of the Columbus Public Service Chapter of the National Management Association. These activities should all con t r ibu te to increased efficiency and effectiveness in the future.

For a good many years , one of our priority goals has been completion of the freeway system. Major progress was m a d e on three projects in 1982. Design work began in earnest on 1-670, the Envi ronmenta l Impac t S ta tement was approved for the Spr ing-Sandusky In te rchange and funding negotia­tions resulted in the schedul ing of bids for a port ion of SR 104 in 1983.

Another major concern of this Division is the general con­dition of the exist ing system. In 1982 we completed a num­ber of projects in tended to protect our inves tment as well as to i m p r o v e its abi l i ty to serve t h e n e e d s of t h e publ ic . Through a combina t ion of city, s ta te and federal funds, 36.6 miles of s treets were resurfaced, 42.9 miles were surface treated and 3.3 miles were sealed with slurry. We also began construct ion on a major widen ing of West Henderson Road.

A relatively mild winter snow season relieved some strain on our operat ing budge t and allowed rout ine maintenance activities to p rogress smoothly. This was one of the few years in which we were able to comple te the entire leaf pick­up schedule. More streets were swept than normal and a major program of catch basin cleaning was completed on the freeway network.

Cont inued depression of the housing industry reduced our office workload once again. The volume of plan reviews, permits, and house numbers issued were all down from pre­vious years. This allowed our staff to do a more thorough review yet spend more t ime on design of city projects.

It is apparent that the success of this Division in the future depends upon the imagination and skills of its employees. The challenges will become tougher, resources more com­petitive, and change more frequent. Nevertheless, I am con­fident that we will survive and that Columbus will cont inue to have the finest t ransporta t ion ne twork in the state.

STATISTICAL SUMMARY December 31. 1982

Street System Statistics Street Mileage 1573.42

Added in 1982 3.37 Interstate Mileage 57.66

Centerline Miles 37.00 Lane Miles 277.02

Alley Mileage 300.44 Number of Bridges 597 Street Mileage Resurfaced 36.59

By City Forces 0 By City Contract 19.89 By State Contract 16.70

Permits Issued Sidewalk Permi ts 2,151 Driveway Permi ts 1,341 Sidewalk Occupancy Permi t s 71 Street Opening Permi ts 2,570 Heavy Hauling Permi t s 139 House Numbers Assigned 1,455 Street Occupancy Permi t s 222

Miscellaneous Statistics Incorporated Area 184.298 sq. mi.

Area Added in 1982 0.380 sq. mi. Average Rainfall 37.01 in.

Rainfall in 1982 39.32 in. Average Snowfall 28.6 in.

Snowfall in 1982 24.9 in.

SUMMARY REPORT CITY-STATE RESURFACING PROJECTS COMPLETED DURING 1982

Construction Cost

Street Bid Contractor Date

BROAD STREET-HAMILTON ROAD Rite Paving Co 6/15/82

MAIN STREET Heffner Const ruct ion Co 6/15/82

SCHROCK ROAD 0 „ Columbus Asphal t Paving Co 6/15/82

SUMMARY REPORT FEDERAL-CITY 3R PROJECTS COMPLETED DURING 1982

Street B i d Construction Contractor Date Cost

NORTH HIGH S T R E E T t

Greensboro Corpora t ion °/3/82 »848,U0/ INDIANOLA AVENUE «iq3 713

Columbus Asphal t Paving Co 6/15/82 $193,/13 KING AVENUE , . , „ , „,,.

Co lumbus Asphal t Pav ing Co 4/20/82 $323,891 LEONARD A V E N U E „ , , . „

United Construct ion/Ritz Paving 6/15/82 »doa,8t)0

City's Share

Miles Length

$209,826

$172,876

$140,235

50%

50%

50%

4.0

2.7

1.6

City's Share

Miles Length

25%

25%

25%

25%

3.2

1.2

2.6

1.4

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

Cip No.

007

034

104

108 119 105 129

130

141

146

147 148 152

153

STATUS OF CITY-STATE-FEDERAL PROJECTS IN TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

Development Phase Progress During Year

Project Description = , . , . Z ~. C D ind r v t a i l Design Negotiat ions with ODOT comple ted to fund a por t ion

Frank-Refugee Expressway, SR 104 u e w u i ^ i e ^ p r o j e c t . P lans be ing revised to provide for two con­struction sect ions.

, T . , „ Prel iminarv Final Envi ronmenta l Impac t S t a t emen t approved by Spr ing-Sundusky In te rchange Development FHWA. Negot ia t ions begun for consu l t an t cont rac ts

for final design. , T x .• Detail Desien FHWA. Negotiat ions begun for consul tan t contrac ts

Mound-Central Intersect ion Detail Liesign r n ^ ^ ^ s . ^

SKSSESS?toIR"70:::::::SSSSS ffiSESL***-—*- «—• Airport Connector GeTtysTurg R d ^ ' . ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ * Construct ion Const ruci ton begun, 30% comple te .

r w f „ H R A v ™ e ' 1 0 ' I R " ? 1 t 0 Detail Design Detail design phase s tar ted; line, g rade and typical c ieve iana a v e n u e section approved. Hayden Run Bridge Detail Design Plan preparat ion comple ted . Right-of-way acquis i t ion

Q=™™,11 Rnprt • • • • Pre l iminary P r e l i m i n a r y d e v e l o p m e n t c o m p l e t e d . P ro jec t sus-Sawmill Road Development pended . C n l W e Refueee In te rchange Detail Design Plan preparat ion cont inued . S c h r o c k ^ ! X I r S ^ o n Detail Design Contract plan prepara t ion comple ted by Worthington.

Alum Creek Bikeway g S p m m t Consul tan t proposal u n d e r review.

Cleveland-Weber Intersect ion Detail Design Plan prepara t ion comple ted and right-of-way acquisi­tion begun .

BRIDGE SECTION SUMMARY December 31. 1982

A bridge is defined as any s t ruc ture of ten feet or more clear span above or below a highway. As of December 31, 1982, records indicate the following n u m b e r of br idges with­in the municipal limits:

Bridge Route Designation 203 Bridges on Inters ta te Routes 119 Bridges on Sta te Routes and U.S. Routes 275 Bridges on City Streets

597 Total Bridges

MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION RESPONSIBILITY

Changes Inspection Maintenance During 1982 Quantity State State + 2 241 State County + 3 28 State City 0 34

State Pr ivate/ Combina t ion 0 to

County Coun ty + 2 51 County Private/

Combina t ion 0 a City City - 1 H " City Pr iva te /

Combina t ion + 1 100 Totals: (590 in 1982) +7 = 597

ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY THE BRIDGE SECTION IN 1981

• 15 Bridges pa in ted • Completed Annua l In spec t ion of City Br idges • Issued 139 Heavy Haul ing P e r m i t s • 20 Br idge compla in t s invest igated • Blackwal l repa i r to F R A 71-18.54 (Street M a i n t e n a n c e

funds) • Deck Repair to Gooda le St ree t over 1-670 • Replaced cu lver t u n d e r H a r d Road West of L inwor th

(County) • Plan prepara t ion for repai rs to H u d s o n Street over 1-/1

SUMMARY OF 1982 COMPLETED STREET AND ALLEY PAVING PROJECTS EXCLUDING INTERSTATE

Length Type of Contract Ft.

City 1,060 Street Resurfacing 187,093

Private 36,133

TOTALS 224,286

42,478 mi.

Area Sq. Yds.

C O S T D I S T R I B U T I O N

City Federal & State Total

10,247 742,374

131,245 883,866

$1,035,699.21 $1,316,379.97

$2,352,079.18

S $ 359,650.00 F $1,209,814.62

S $ 359,650.00 F $1,209,814.62 P $5,005,120.00

$1,035,699.21 $2,885,844.53

$5,005,120.00 $8,926,663.80

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

CLASSIFICATION AND ALL TYPES PAVING EXCLUDING INTERSTATE 1982

Contracts AVERAGE COST j ^ J Types of Pavement Length Area Cost

CITY CONTRACTS Asphaltic Concrete, Por t land Cement

Base (including curb & gutter) 1,060 7,601 $ 933 068 22 Asphaltic Concrete, Aggregate Base — 2 646 $ 102'631 19 Asphaltic Concrete, Resurfacing 169,665 687^934 $2 840887 59 Slurry Sealing 17,428 54,440 $ 44J957.00

CITY TOTALS 188,153 752,621 $3,921,543.80

PRIVATE CONTRACTS Asphaltic Concrete, Por t land Cement

Base (including curb & gutter) 26,672 90,352 $3,848,060.00 Asphaltic Concrete , Aggregate Base 4,337 19,074 $ 485,990.00 Port land Cement Concrete P a v e m e n t

with Integral Cu rb & Gu t t e r 5,124 21,819 $ 671,070.00 PRIVATE TOTALS 36,133 131,245 $5,005,120.00 ALL T Y P E S PAVEMENT TOTALS 224,286 883,866 $8,926,663.80

Lin. Ft.

144.27 112.06

130.97

Sq. Yds.

80.25

— 16.74 2.58

122.76 38.79

4.13 0.83

42.59 25.48

30.76

OTHER DIVISION EXPENSES MAINTENANCE OR CLEANING RELATED

COSTS FOR 1982 Oiling Streets and Alleys 65,344.00 Snow & Ice Control (Frankl in County) 64,342.00 Storm Sewer Maint. (Division of Sewerage

and Drainage 500,000.00 Storm Sewer Maint. — Inters ta te

(Div. of Sewer. & Drainage) 47,782.04 Power for S u m p P u m p s — Inters ta te Light ing

Maint. (Division of Electricity) 130,752.16 Municipal Garage Services 791,833.79 Donation to General F u n d 376,395.00

Utilities 78,297.76 Telephone Service 28,192.77 Radio Maintenance 2,402.10 Weather Forecasting 2,000.00 Equipment Purchases 26,946.94 P.E.R.S 540,226.07 Workers' Compensat ion 181,934.79 Insurances 310,108.46 Sick Leave Reciprocity, Service

Credit Bonuses 66,297.00 Payments for Damage Claims 26,638.55 Guardrail Sterilant 6,811.20

INTERSTATE ACTIVITIES Street Maintenance and Street Cleaning

Number Description Labor Material 101 Pat ro l Pa tch ing $ 56,108.81 $ 23,615.23 221 Mowing 23,322.04 441 Guardrai l Maint 6,036.92 3,739.20 442 Fence Repair 3,667.16 4,140.00 550 S n o w & Ice 10,566.93 28,646.29 551 S n o w & Ice (O.T.) 17,935.44 31,208.89 770 Br idge Repair 128.84 172.50 800's Suppor t* 141,311.53 4,660.88

Sub-Totals $ 275,318.87 $ 97,878.51

225 C.B. Clng. Mech 3,696.86 227 Lit ter Pa t ro l 35,788.91 550 S n o w & Ice 17,681.09 47,512.08 551 S n o w & Ice (O.T.) 9,858.21 20,471.64 661 Sweeping 27,417.46 663 P i c k u p Sweep ings 8,759.89 -771 Other Main tenance 9,831.34 725.40 800's Suppor t* 99,860.47 3,435.46

Sub-Totals 212,894.23 72,144.58 TOTALS $488,213.10 $ 170,023.09

•Field Supervision, Bui ld ing /Grounds Maintenance, Stock/Clerical, Vacation and Sick

TOTAL INTERSTATE COST: $1,188,537.20 Street Maint. & Street Clean. Activities — $981,820.42 Storm Sewer Main tenance — $48,883.84 Division of Electricity —$85,005.04 Division of Traffic Engineer ing — $72,827.90

Equipment $ 36,183.78

24,707.50 2,558.50

667.50 12,046.00 11,607.25

14.00 63,198.62

$ 154,233.65

6,252.00 21,049.00 13,636.87 4,805.25

73,996.00 17,329.75 7,787.72

24,493.99 169,350.58

$ 323,584.23 Leave, etc.

Total $ 115,907.82

48,029.54 12,334.62

8,474.66 51,259.22 60,751.58

315.34 209,171.03

$ 527,431.03

9,948.86 56,837.91 78,830.04 35,135.10

101,413.46 26,089.64 18,344.46

127,789.92 454,389.39

$ 981,820.42

10 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

ARTERIAL ACTIVITIES Street Maintenance and Street Cleaning

Number Description Labor Material Equipment 101 Patrol Pa tching 162,822.98 118,429.89 79,608.25 02 404 Cutout g 39,986.15 44,768.25 63,458.37

103 Planer Cutout 7,314.12 2,840.80 5,594.50 105 Crack Sealing YYY. 8,956.09 1,851.10 4,117.00 106 Exp. B u m p Removal 2,824.02 51.77 3,975.00 107 404 Resurfacing 11,521.11 27,739.81 14,087.12 108 Surface Treating 1,758.85 3,594.32 3,299.00 110 Resurface Prep 6,372.31 8,983.68 7,594.50 112 Shape/Stone Berms 24,795.31 19,480.11 32,432.50 221 Mowing 21,916.17 - 22,829.00 223 S t u m p Removal 730.73 - 725.70 226 Curb Repair 3,039.12 541.49 1,339.00 440 Street Name Sign 17,294.87 21,639.75 2,859.50 441 Guardrail Maint 11,748.30 7,009.62 4,926.00 442 Fence Repair 1,235.16 1,098.63 251.00 550 Snow & Ice 23,067.23 59,723.20 34,775.50 551 Snow & Ice (O.T.) 44,888.40 117,348.22 29,978.75 553 Snow & Ice Cleanup 13,441.51 3,959.46 16,390.00 554 Snow Fence Erect /Remov 6,048.18 10,975.88 4,946.00 770 Bridge Repair 4,246.05 940.84 2,084.50 771 Other Maintenance 9,677.90 1,082.32 7,034.00 800's Support* 446,777.86 22,602.96 237,559.80

Sub-Totals $ 870,462.42 $ 474,662.10 $ 579,864.99

101 Patrol Pa tch ing 28,803.81 13.185.05 18,750.05 110 Resurface P rep 1,044.87 — 868.00 225 C.B. Clng.-Mech 1,242.56 - 3,214.00 227 Lit ter Patrol 7,218.00 — 5,304.50 550 Snow & Ice 18,546.72 53,295.65 14,812.12 551 Snow & Ice (O.T.) 12,456.42 25,302.43 5,351.87 553 Snow & Ice Cleanup 16,770.47 4,499.20 18,814.00 660 Post for Sweeping 1,623.04 — 2,050.00 661 Sweeping 69,779.87 — 154,416.00 663 P i ckup Sweepings 20,224.72 — 31584 25 665 White Wing 26,464.80 — 3896 00 668 Underpass Cleaning 8,255.88 — 5 243 00 771 Other Maintenance 12,531.73 659.13 11958 50 800's Support* 194,547.11 4,847.07 46,688.32

Sub-Totals $ 419,510.00 $ 101,788.53 $ 322,950.56 TOTALS 1,289.972.42 576,450.63 902,815.55

'Field Supervision, Bui ld ing/Grounds Maintenance, Stock/Clerical, Vacation and Sick Leave, etc .

Total 360,861.12 148,212.77

15,749.42 14,924.19 6,850.79

53,348.04 8,652.17

22,950.49 76,707.92 44,745.17

1,456.43 4,916.61

41,794.12 23,683.92

2,584.79 117,565.93 192,215.37 33,790.97 21,970.06

7,271.39 17,794.22

706,940.62

$1,924,989.51

60,738.86 1,912.87 4,456.56

12,522.50 86,654.49 40,110.72 40,083.67

3,673.04 224,195.87

51,808.97 30,360.80 13,498.88 25,149.36

246,082.50

$ 844,249.09 2,769,238.60

Number 101 102 104 106 107 108 110 112 113 114 221 223 226 440 441 550 666 667 770 771 800's

RESIDENTIAL ACTIVITIES Street Maintenance and Street Cleaning

Description Labor Patrol Pa tch ing 174,163.99 404 Cutout 5,421,04 Concrete Cutout 6,810.81 Exp. B u m p Removal 16,952.11 404 Resurfacing 1,019.54 Surface Treat ing 49,115.21 Resurface P r e p 3,061.81 Shape/Stone Be rms 9,863.57 Shape/Sone Alleys 14,362.94 Cutdown Alleys 8,451.82 Mowing 1,577.46 S t u m p Removal 14,389.39 Curb Repair 5,286.12 Street Name Sign 18,827.11 Guardrai l Maint 5,739.92 Snow & Ice 962.66 Leaf P u s h i n g 49,129.09 Leaf Vacuum 14,507.82 Bridge Repair 602.34 Other Maintenance 11,584.27 Suppor t* 434,276.02

Sub-Totals $ 846,104.94

Material 135,941.70

5,559.30 4,953.83 — 5,044.53

164,635.63 265.20

5,532.15 3,029.05 3,188.02 — —

552.38 28,096.50 2,437.65 2,898.00 — — — 3,167.70

18,265.08 $ 383,566.72

Equipment 92,228.50 8,107.25 6,252.00

21,078.75 693.75

92,523.00 4,764.00

13,946.00 26,629.00 11,390.00 1,131.20

12,533.60 2,418.50 3,507.00 1,926.50 1.866.00

74,442.00 12,069.00

184.00 11.093.50

276,756.13

$ 675,540.18

Total 402,334.19

19,087.59 18,016.64 38,030.86 6,757.82

306,273.84 8,091.01

29,341.72 44,020.99 23,029.84

2,708.66 26,922.99 8,257.00

50,430.61 10,104.07 5,726.66

123,571.09 26,577.32

786.24 25,845.47

729,297.23

$1,905,211.84

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

101 Patrol Pa tch ing 131.52 110 Resurface P rep 1 404 40 225 C.B. Clng./Mech '256.48 550 Snow & Ice 2 394 72 551 Snow & Ice (O.T.) 180.24 555 Salt Barrels 4,953.53 660 Post for Sweeping 17,890 29 661 Sweeping 64,339.19 663 P i ckup Sweepings 20,413 62 666 Leaf Push ing 36,798.94 669 Leaf Vac-all 6,423.55 771 Other Main tenance 6,161 44 800's Suppor t* 139,533.11

Sub-Totals $ 300,881.03 TOTALS $1,146,985.97

'Fie ld Supervision, Bui ld ing/Grounds Maintenance, Stock/Clerical

25.90

— — 5,323.78 288.54 173.69

— 218.80

— — —

84.00 305.74

100.05 3,442.00 692.00

4,204.00 422.00

4,250.00 17,037.50

181,954.00 30,628.75 92,590.50 16,371.00 9,278.00

61,064.73

257.42 4,846.40 948.48

11,922.50 890.78

9,377.22 34,927.79

246,511.99 51,042.37 129,389.44 22,794.55 15,523.44

200,903.58

i 6,420.45 $ 422,394.48 $ 729,695.96 i 389,987.17 $1,097,934.66 $2,634,907.80 Vacation and Sick Leave, etc.

DIVISION OF CONSTRUCTION ANNUAL REPORT — 1982

The Division of Const ruct ion submi t s herewith its Annual Report for the Year 1982, in compl iance with Section 231 of the City Charter.

It is reiterated here that " the dut ies and responsibili t ies of the Division are to coordinate , supervise , inspect , and direct the work performed on Pr iva te and Captial Improvement contracts for the cons t ruc t ion of streets , h ighways, bridges, sewers, waterl ines, street lights, and any other City-owned or operated facility".

The sput ter ing economy had a direct negative impact on the amount of Pr ivate I m p r o v e m e n t work a t t empted during the year. With interest on h o m e loans near the mid-teens and the pr ime rate even higher, activity in the Pr ivate Section dropped drastically from 411 projects in 1981 to 300 in 1982. This Section performed ext remely well th roughout the vear as evidenced by a minimal n u m b e r of problems. The lift station and river crossing at Shire Cove is a good example of how this section can manage the work on more complicated projects.

Work on t h e Capi tal I m p r o v e m e n t P rog ram remained very active th roughou t the year and the CIP Section re­mained firmly engaged d u e to the City's ambi t ious program. 37 CIP projects were s tar ted dur ing the year. The ill effects of the weary economy had little effect on the business of this Section.

During the year, this Sect ion control led the work of 62 projects having a total es t imated value of 71 million dollars. 33 Projects totaling 28 million dollars were completed, thus leaving a carry-over of 29 projects into 1983.

It is interest ing to poin t ou t tha t 35 p r ime contractors were engaged by the City to perform the work on the 62 projects. The names and projects are listed in the statistical port ion of this report.

It is also no tewor thy tha t the total dollars paid on Final E s t i m a t e s for c o m p l e t e d p r o j e c t s w e r e a p p r o x i m a t e l y

$220,000 fewer than the total bid. The b reakdown shows that the total contract amoun t s were reduced by $50,000 (Water), $70,000 (Sewers and Drains) and $100,000 (Engineering).

279 Estimates were prepared and processed dur ing the year of which 39 were Finals. The average monthly pay-out on CIP projects was approximately 2.1 million dollars.

Internal audi ts were conduc ted intermit tent ly to ensure complaince of documenta t ion with Federal and State Re­quirements .

It is appropriate to report specifically on one operation being performed which has made great use of our nuclear density gauges. It is amazing to note that 4,381 soil density-moisture tests were taken th roughout the year. It is t ruly gratifying to have this capability which has been increased by at least 1500 per cent due to this equipment . It has had t remendous impact on the end results of compact ive efforts throughout the City.

In June , one survey crew was added to our forces in order to handle increased layout responsibil t ies and to perform final inspections and measurement s on 259 private sewer projects.

As has always been the case, the Adminis t ra t ive Section has performed with obvious skill. The knowledge, ability, and at t i tude of the personnel in this Section enables the Division to maintain operational efficiency and stability.

Every supervisor in the Division is part icipating in the Depar tment ' s managemen t training. The group is aware of — and exhibits an appreciat ion for — the t r emendous oppor­tuni ty being m a d e available to the City's managers . The program spotlights the City's concerns in further develop­ing its human resources.

Attached is our Table of Organization, Data Sheets for projects under our jurisdiction, and our Financial S ta tement for 1982.

1982 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT SUMMARY

Completed Completed Incomplete Division Number Amount Number

Division of Water Contracts 11 Division of Sewerage & Dra inage Contracts 14 Division of Engineer ing and Cons t ruc t i on . . Contracts Division of Electricity Contracts 0

State of Ohio Contracts 0 Division of Sani tat ion °

33 $27,748,895.20 29 Total Monies Paid Out on Comple te and

Incomple te Projects 1982 $10,58 / ,582.8.2 Total Monies for Comple te and Incomple te _ , . . - _

Projects Paid 1982 $22,379,510.13

$ 6,084,694.97 19,624,661.96 2,039,538.27

0 0 0

9 15 5 0 0 0

Incomplete Amount

$13,117,767.72 28,467,140.81

1,880,787.84 0 0 0

$43,465,696.37

$11,791,927.31

12 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

Contractors

Allan George & Associates Armco, Inc R. A. Bores, Inc Butt & Head Co Capital City Excavat ing Co Columbus Asphalt Paving Complete General Construct ion Co. Concrete Construction Co Conie, Jack & Sons Coover Construction Contractor Services Co Davis-McKee, Inc Dugan & Meyers Durango Construct ion John Eramo & Sons G & C Cement Contractors Gaddis & Sons George J. Igel Co Hall, F. C. Construction Co J . A . G u y J. & L. Construct ion Kokosing Construct ion Co R. J . Mason, Inc Mid-Ohio Utilities Miller Construct ion Co Neer Industries Ohio Casualty Co. (Davis-McKee). . . Peterson Construct ion Co Pit tsburgh-DesMoines Reacon Structures Righter Co Ritz Paving Co Savko, Nicholas & Sons Tata Excavating, Inc Travelers (Craft)

Completed Number

1 1 0 1 1 0 6 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 3 1

Completed Amount

Incomplete Number

Incomplete Amount

33

$ 535,678.71 2,631,212.92

0 3,186,248.50

174,694.86 0

7,127,793.60 0

1,788,159.35 0 0

2,511,367.64 0

55,091.46 605,777.05 112,757.85 30,198.22

193,985.92 207,938.51

0 107,958.41

2,179,360.41 1,557,785.28

0 378,461.10

0 0 0 0 0 0

216,689.07 155,076.03

2,255,466.50 1,737,193.81

$27,748,895.20

0 1 1 0 1 0 5 1 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

27

0 $ 48,896.34

133,001.00 0

369,655.00 1,402,826.67 7,991,908.15 1,519,317.50 2,902.281.45

30,600.00 2,989,455.52

0 13,389,990.00

0 0

177,379.20 181,103.97

0 0

165,000.00 0 0

715,999.95 223,697.00

0 52,285.00

2,222,812,22 6,910,000.00 1,615,000.00

233,009.40 119,478.00

0 0 0 0

$43,465,696.37

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED 1982 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION

Plan Number

1343 DR A

1312 DR E

3112 D R D

1324 DR E

1323 DR A

CC 3724

3078 DR D

3153 DR D

3126 DR D

265-128

Auditors' Number

CTO 3593

CTO 3472

CTO 3486

CTO 3634

CTO 2638

CTO 30206

CTO 3261

CTO 4157

CTO 4007

CTO 4018

Project Title and Contractor

Fifth to King Target Area Gaddis & Son

Cleveland & 17th Avenues G & G Cement Contractors

Perry Street Relocated (Battelle Boulevard) Complete General Construction Co.

Taylor Ave. Widening & Resurfac­ing Broad Street to Hawthorne Ave. Capital City Excavating Co.

Milo-Grogan Resurfacing Ritz Paving, Inc.

Capitol South Phase II Complete General Construction Co.

Widening—South Side of Bethel Rd. at Olentangy River Rd. Ritz Paving, Inc.

Basswood Rd. Storm Sewer Tata Excavating

Alley East of Yale Columbus Aspahlt Paving

Henderson Road Widening

Engineer 's -Estimate Amount

$ 47,250.00

135,081.00

589,709.24

204,950.00

147,272.50

1,077,600.00

124,629.00

80,764.25

78,953.00

Orig. Contract (A)

Amount With Modification (B)

$ 29.751.00(A) $ 30,198.22 (B)

129,242.25 (A) 139,413.17 (B)

426.281.60(A)

172.461.00(A) 174,694.86 (B)

144.135.00(A)

1,064,641.00 (A)

101.085.50(A) 124,629.00 (B)

69,025.52 (A) 72,235.47 (B)

59,920.56 (A)

1.342.906.11 (A)

Amount Complete To Date

December 31. 1982

$ 30,198.22

112,757.85

426,281.60

174,694.86

114,057.88

1,004,755.57

102,631.19

74,161.10

59,319.31

% Com­plete 1982

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

99%

Amount of Work Com­

plete In 1982

$ 9,419.07

112,757.85

51,213.65

174,694.86

1.190.38

123,131.69

6,272.00

74,161.10

59,319.31

Columbus Asphalt Paving 1.550,000.00 331,634.96 29% 3135 DR D CTO 4063 Hinkle Ave. Improvement

G & G Cement Contractors 209,957.75 177,379.20 (A)

143,994.69 96% 3098 DR D CTO 4138 Cleveland Ave. Sidewalks

Gaddis & Sons 254,741.00 181,103.97 (A)

156,408.69 1330 DR E CTO 4263 Parsons Ave. Sidewalks

Righter Company 174,604.50 119.478.00(A)

65,728.82 63%

331,634.96

143,994.69

156,408.69

65,728.82

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 13

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED 1982 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

DIVISION OF WATER

C.I.P. Number

Auditors' Number Project Title and Contractor

Engineer's Estimate Amount

900 224 C-629 24" Watermain—Lockbourne Rd Rathmell to Obetz Miller Construction Co.

Orig. Contract (A)

Amount With Modification (B)

Amount Complete To Date

December 31, 1982

% Com­plete 1982

Amount of Work Com­plete In 1982

$ 371,091.00 369,331.80 (A) 378,461.10 (B) $ 378,461.10 100% $ 19,076.61

900 219 C-616 Parsons Ave. 42" Watermain Rath-CTO 3195 mell to Williams Rds.

Tata Excavating 1,265,360.00 1,127,787.55 (A) 1,128,877.64 (B)

982 107 C-602 Hamilton Rd. Watermain Livingston CTO 3445 Ave. to Broad St.

Kokosing Construction Co.

100%

1,591.085.00 1.231,513.85 (A) 1,229,269.29

11,848.64

601.54 982 184

982 185

590 255

900 266

590 257

900 041

900 176

900 107

C-555 CTO 3564

C-572 CTO 3572

C-637 CTO 3587

C-506 CTO 3833

C-639 CTO 3282

C-625 CTO 3831

C-626 CTO 3856

C-603 CTO 3837

16" Wate rmain Winches ter P k , Pa r t I, S h a n n o n to Noe-Bixby Rds . J . E r a m o & S o n s

16" Wate rmain in Winchester Pk. , S h a n n o n to Brice Rds . Conie & S o n s

N. High St. Waterl ine—Flint Rd. to Delaware Coun ty Line F. C. Hall, Inc.

Hami l ton Rd. 36" Waterl ine Wil­l i ams Rd. to Winches te r P k . J . E r a m o & S o n s

S u n b u r y Rd. 12" Watermain Nickolas Savko & Son, Inc.

Cassady Ave. 12" Waterl ine 17th to H u d s o n J & L Cons t ruc t ion

Hende r son -Dub l in Rds . Waterl ine Kokos ing Cons t ruc t ion Co.

Hami l ton Rd. 30" Waterl ine Liv ings ton to Refugee Rd. Tata Excava t ing

126,984.00

352,138.00

221,900.00

612,361.70

106,390.00

143,505.00

1,242,635.00

1,430,000.00

126,966.71 (A)

331,068.00 (A)

214,631.39 (A) 216,154.31 (B)

482,747.75 (A)

99,937.00 (A)

111,983.15 (A) 118.824.79(B)

961,332.00 (A) 974,547.54 (B)

1,075,407.70 (A)

126,569.45

327,071.00

207,938.51

479,207.60

96,823.09

107,958.41

950,091.12

1,052,427.76

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

2,689.08

145,795.20

186,026.89

479,207.60

3,376.25

107,958.41

950,091.12

1,052,427.76

CONSTRUCTION INCOMPLETE 1982 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

C.I.P. Number

590 086

900 128

982 233

900 256

900 237

590 274

900 227

982 209

982 245

Auditors' Number

C-541 CTO 1567

C-611 CTO 2931

C-647 CTO 3546

C-638 CTO 3897

C-632 CTO 4082

C-658 CTO 4137

C-631 CTO 4148

C-627 CTO 4322

C-653 CTO 4334

DIVISION OF WATER

Project Title and Contractor

Hami l ton Road 48" Waterl ine Davis-McKee (Ohio Casual ty Co.) $

Eas t Broad S t ree t 2 MG Tank P i t t sbu rgh -DeMoines

P a i n t i n g of 10 MG T a n k at Morse and Hami l ton R o a d s Neer En te rp r i se s

Case Road Water l ine — Rivers ide Dr ive to Sawmi l l Road R. A. Bores . Inc .

Noe-Bixby-Broad S t ree t Connec to r Mid-Ohio Utili t ies, Inc.

Stygler Road Waterl ine Mid-Ohio Util i t ies, Inc.

Grovepor t -B ixby Roads 42" Water l ine Conc re t e Cons t ruc t ion Co.

Dubl in Road Water Dis t r ibu­t ion Cente r P e t e r s o n Cons t ruc t ion C o m p a n y

24" Wate rma in in Hami l ton Road — Winches te r P i k e to Refugee Road Capi ta l City Excava t ing Co.

Engineer's -Estimate Amount

2,433,510.00

1,615,000.00

75,000.00

143,104.00

153,330.00

124,142.50

1,728,485.00

7,446,650.00

419,215.00

Orig. Contract (A)

Amount With Modification (B)

$ 2.198.300.00(A) $ 2,222,812,22 (B)

1,615,000.00 (A)

52,285.00 (A)

133.001.00(A)

135,295.00 (A)

88,402.00 (A)

1,591,317.50 (A)

6.910.000.00(A)

369,655.00 (A)

Amount Complete To Date

December 31. 1982

$ 2,235,479.41

1,579,266.57

45.830.09

132,402.61

114,938.65

76,751.07

1,450,380.84

0

118,565.15

% Com­plete 1982

99%

98%

92%

99%

85%

92%

90%

0

36%

Amount of Work Com­

plete In 1982

$ 24,272.51

133,719.82

45,830.09

132,402.61

114,938.65

76,751.07

1,450,380.84

0

118,565.15

14 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

CONSTRUCTION INCOMPLETED 1982 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

DIVISION OF SEWERAGE AND DRAINAGE

C.I.P. Number

Auditors' Number Project Title and Contractor

Orig. Contract (A) Engineer's Amount Complete % Com- Amount of Estimate Amount With To Date plete Work Corn-Amount Modification (B) December 31. 1982 1982 plete In 1982

710 037 CTO 1256 East-Central Relief Sewer, District 8 and 9, Contract A Davis-McKee, Inc.

710 138 CC 3029

$ 2.398.554.50(A) 2,760,000.00 $ 2,542,267.95 (B) $ 2,511,367.64 100% $ 16,857.09

Blacklick Creek SSTS Brice-Wright Roads (Travelers Insurance) 1,711,000.00 1.644.833.00(A) 1,737,193.81 100%

CTO 3470 Southwesterly Composting, Phase I, Contract 3, Curing and Storage Complete General Construction Co. 1,088,031.50 1,485,996.00 (A) 1,485,992.09

3608-82 SMY Alley East of Avondale 3608-82 Emergency Sewer

Durango Construction 49.607.00 (A)

0 55.091.46(B) 55,091.46 571-157 CTO 3196 Central Relief Sewer, CC 3738 Naghten-4th to 5th Streets

Igel Co 190.382.80(A) 193,985.92 100% 710 201 306-157 Jackson Pike Incinerator

Off-Gas Scrubbing Facilities, Contract 154 Butt and Head

710 120 CTO 3440 Primary Sludge Withdrawal Facilities, Jackson Pike C-160 J. R. Mason, Inc.

3,166,172.00 (A) 4,490,500.00 3,251,274.1KB) 3,186,248.50 100%

1,964,400.00 1,594,681.40 (A) 1,557,785.28 100%

211,705.67

CC 3363

710 037 CC 3683

710 037 CC 3683

CTO 2519

CTO 3495

CTO 3503

Big Run Erosion Control Allan George & Associates

East-Central Storm and Sanitary Sewers, District 6, Section A Complete General Construction

East-Central Storm and Sanitary Sewers, District 6, Section B Armco, Inc.

467,105.00

3,208,537.00

3,422,337.00

383.431.00(A) 636.952.80(B)

2,527,803.15 (A)

2,628,913.75 (A)

535,678.71

2,456,086.36

2,631,212.92

1007c

100%

100%

351.493.95

1,182,363.24

1,762,082.40

211,861.89 710 037 CC 3651

710 170 CC 3689

710 031

710 031 CC 3453

CTO 3807

CTO 3789

CTO 3811

CTO 3878

East-Central Storm and Sanitary Sewers, District 5 — Complete General Construction Co.

Upper-Scioto East SSTS, Case Road Vicinity Savko & Sons, Inc.

Milo-Grogan Sewer Separation, District 6-B, Phase II Complete General Construction

Milo-Grogan District I Jack Conie & Sons

1,580.566.90

156,012.00

608,655.10

1.698,169.86

1,167,558.30 (A) 1,580,566.90 (B)

57.590.10(A)

650,334.40 (A)

1,500,640.50 (A)

1,077,448.65

58.252.95

677,229.33

1,461,088.35

100%

100%

100%.

100%

1,077,448.65

58,252.94

677,229.33

1,461,088.35

55,091.46

10,168.15

1,234,237.03

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 15

CONSTRUCTION INCOMPLETE 1982 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

DIVISION OF SEWERAGE AND DRAINAGE

Engineer's Orig. Contract (A)

Amount Complete % Com- Amount of C.I.P.

Number

710 012

571 207

710 031 CC 3481

710 034 CC2181

710 034 CC 2287

710 034 CC 2182

100 314

100 211

571 208

100 309

710 116 CC 2244

Auditors' Number

307-427 !

CTO 3892

CTO 3879

CTO 4006

CTO 4005

CTO 4012

CTO 4020

CTO 4041

CTO 4213

SMY 3428-82

CTO 4344

Project Title and Contractor

Sou ther ly Sewer , Pa r t I, T r e a t m e n t Plant , Cont rac t 12, S ludge Dewate r ing Facilities E.C.I. Co.

Rehabi l i ta t ion Renick Run J. R. Mason C-171

Milo-Grogan Distr ict II J a c k Conie & Sons

Blackl ick Creek S S T S P h a s e 3-A — Comple te Genera l Cons t ruc t ion

Blackl ick Creek S S T S P h a s e 4 — Comple t e Genera l Cans t ruc t ion Co.

Blackl ick Creek S S T S P h a s e 3B Cont rac tor Services Co.

Sou thwes te r ly Compos t i ng Facili ty, Cont rac t 4 — Comple te Genera l Cons t ruc t ion Co.

J a c k s o n P i k e Addi t ional Bar Sc reen Facil i t ies, Cont rac t 167 Reacon S t ruc tu re s

Estimate Amount

$12,700,000.00

678,787.00

2,171,748.00

2,008.550.00

3,308,150.00

3,667,491.00

3,463,000.00

233,009.40

J a c k s o n P ike WWTP Water Supp ly I m p r o v e m e n t , Cont rac t 172 J . R. Mason, Inc. 125,409.95

Sou the r ly Wastewater T rea tmen t P lan t , Sc reen Room Heat ing and Vent i la t ing C-16 J . A. Guy, Inc. 165,000.00

Amount With Modification (B)

$13,389,990.00 (A)

590,597.00 (A)

1,530,539.45 (A)

1,709,235.00 (A)

2,603,000.00 (A)

2,989,455.52 (A)

3,299,862.25 (A)

233,009.40 (A)

125,402.95 (A)

165,000.00 (A)

To Date December 31, 1982

$13,577,165.83

218.811.06

1,146,702.36

558,873.78

1,752,232.34

1,885,299.78

2,877,831.06

93,159.89

112,042.80

4,725.00

plete 1982

98%

26%

77%

36%

67%

60%

90%

44%

88%

3%

Work Com­plete In 1982

$ 611,849.88

218,811.06

1,146,702.36

558,873.78

1,752,232.74

1,885,299.78

2,877,831.06

93,159.89

112,042.80

4,725.00

Capital City P r o d u c t s C o m p a n y E m e r g e n c y Sewer 48,896.34 Armco , Inc. TO BE PAID BY SEWERS AND DRAINS U P O N COMPLETION OF WORK

Big Walnut Sani ta ry S u b t r u n k S e w e r East of 1-270 S o u t h of S.R. 161 — Comple te Genera l Cons t ruc t ion 318,025.00 182,236.00

710 041 CC 2040

710 037 CC 3807

100-156 CC 3468

Olentangy Subtrunk Sewer Worthington N & E to High Street, Phase 3-B and 4 Complete General Construction Co. 540,863.00 267,574.90

CTO 4310 East-Central District 8-N Jack Conie & Sons 2,640,000.00 1,371,742.00

CTO 4371 Surveillance Storage Maintenance Facility Coover Construction 30,600.00

Sewer Regulator Structure Rehabilitation Durango Construction Company 440,000.00 214,544.80

$10,288,858.96

16 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

1982 PRIVATE PAVING PROJECTS—ALL COST PAID BY DEVELOPER

Area Square Contract Completed Incompleted

Length Yards Value Value to Date Value

Streets Comple ted-Unaccepted . 7,259 Miles = 1.4

Streets Accepted 36,133 Miles = 6.8

Streets Under Construct ion 9,543 Miles = 1.8

Streets Under Agreement Not Under Construct ion 4,327

Miles = -8

Completed Value — 1982

24,078

131,245

26,639

15,980

581,762.00

5,005,120.00

853,116.00

469,882.00

581,762.00

5,005,120.00

454,014.00

-0-

-0-

399,102.00

469,882.00

27,159.00

1,626,644.00

168,002.00

-0-

1982

Addition Brentwood Rd. & Canterbury Way Brookside Colony Ph. 1, Pt. 2 Case Rd. & Service Rd Cherrybottom Village Sec. 4

Corporate Center Drive Donahue Subdivision Fountain Square Part 2 Hayden Meadows. Section 1 Independence Village East. Sec. 5,

Ph. 2, Part 2 Lehnert Farms Section 3, Phase 2 Lehnert Green Apartments Misty Meadows Section 3. Phase 2 Northeast Business Campus Oak Creek Drive O'Brien Rd. Extension, Pt. 3, Ph. 2 Roberts Rd. Corp. Park. Section 2 Smoky Ridge Ests. Sec. 3, Pt. of Res. "A'

Snouffer Rd. & Caine Rd. Part 1 Value Way Walters Street

Western Hills Part 5 Willow Creek Sec. 5. Part 2

— PRIVATE PAVING PROJECTS — ALL COSTS PAID BY DEVELOPER Contract Length Width Area Sq. Contract Completed Completed Carry-Over Number Developer Feet Feet Yard Value Cost to Date In 1982 Cost in 1982

202 Fairfield Homes 142 26 411 20,451 20,451 0 0 251 Edwards Land Co 1242 26-36 4890 180.103 0 0 180.103 255 Geo. WimpeyofOhio 415 16 738 27.159 27,159 27.159 0 129 Cherrybottom-

Broadview Devi. Co 540 26 2025 36,232 32,509 0 3.623 900 Distribution Center 981 24 2760 43,745 43,745 0 0 168 Sherlock Homes. Inc 383 26 1392 33,343 33,343 0 0 644 Deffet Rentals Inc 1186 32 5000 47,625 47,625 0 0 259 Raven Development 598 16-32 1730 86,072 68,858 68,858 17.214

250 Geo. Wimpey of Ohio 346 26 1315 17,783 0 0 17.783 253 Homewood Corp 387 36 1452 33,824 0 0 33,824 252 Northland Park Homes 980 26 2800 80,526 0 0 80.526 257 Homewood Corp 959 26 2965 104,763 20,953 20,953 83.810 173 Vantage Company 1398 36 5679 266.621 266.621 0 0 948 Oak Creek Company 605 26 2135 30,641 30,641 0 0 171 Vantage Company 1813 24 4807 80.033 80,033 0 0 229 The Setterlin Co 1372 36 5523 157.646 0 0 157.646 237 Michael A. Dehlendort

& Company 202 26 880 25.769 25.769 0 0 232 Prematic Serv. Corp 1986 4-13 1930 83.800 25.170 0 58,730 236 Amalgamated Realty 1650 36 6765 280.268 168.161 0 112,107 147 McDonald System of

Ohio, Inc 134 13 276 6,375 6,375 0 0 258 Beasley Industries 1156 26-36 3415 111,701 78.191 78,191 33,510 49 Deagle-Yoakam Devel. Co 2654 26 7809 150,180 60,072 0 90.108

SUMMARY OF PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERLINE CONSTRUCTION 1982

Sanitary Storm Service Storm Dedicated . Street Water

Total

Projects Finaled

45 82 18 29 16

Complete Not Finaled

7 44 15 10 1

Partial Carried Over

2 12 7

12 1

Structures Total Footage. Miles

Sanitary 149

36,783 6.97

Storm Service 472

48,476 9.18

Storm Dedicated 174

16,427 3.11

Sewer Total Footage and Pr ivate S to rm Only = 85,259 Feet = 16.15 Miles Water Total Footage = 16,569 Feet = 3.1 Miles Street Total Footage and Value (See Street Agreemen t Summary )

Total Projects Worked

54 138 40 51 17

300

Fire Hydrants 44

Value $4,688,530

350,479

bs:

Estimated Cost Finaled Completed Not Finaled.

Total

Sanitary $ 607,698

322,931

$ 930,629

Storm Service $ 4,080,832

680,081

$4,760,913

Storm Dedicated

afrrom

Total Sewers (Sanitary and Pr iva te S to rm Only) $5 691 542 Total water Y.Y.Y.Y.Y.Y.Y.Y.Y.Y.Y.Y.Y.Y.Y.Y.Y.Y.Y. '350I479

Grand Total (300 Projects) $6,042,021 *See Street Agreement S u m m a r y for Total and Value

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982 17

CID

PRIVATE STORM SEWER PROJECTS COMPLETE — FINALED

Number Project 948

1031 1041 1050 1077 1143 1146 1188 1215 1225 1227 1247 1281 1288 1293 1310 1311 1312 1314 1316 1339 1340 1347 1349 1350 1352 1355 1357 1359 1360 1361 1364 1367 1369 1370 1377 1381 1388 1390 1392 1396 1398 1400 1402 1403 1405 1407 1408 1410 1411 1412 1413 1414 1416 1417 1420 1425 1429 1433 1434 1435 1441 1443 1446 1448 1454 1455 1459 1460 1466 1472 1477 1478 1482 1490 1494 1495 1510 1518 540 625 648

Swiss Chalet Americana Pa rkway Building Montrose Square Apts . Columbus Northeas t Village Apts. Woodbridge Reserve #3 Newtown C o m m o n s Plast icorp Pipers Meadow Condos Kroger (Main St.) Mid-Ohio Heal th Care Center Bob Evans Res taurant Bethel Center Windsor Park The Meadowlands McNaughten Plaza Chemlawn Corp. Center White Castle #20 North Central Communi ty Mental Health Center Heinzerling Deve lopment Center WBNS-TV — Twin Rivers Dr. Busch Corp. Center Veteran 's Memorial Ph . II Ed inborough C o m m o n s #2 Laurelwood Condo H o m e s Olde Sawmil l Squa re Super-X Long J o h n Silver Camellia Court Apts . Northeast Co. Tract Frito-Lay, Inc . St. Vincent ' s Children Center Showbiz Pizza Place NTW Store Grandy 's Chicken Cedar Square Bus Main tenance & Storage Center Diamond Savings Goal Sys tems Pizzeria Uno Cardinal Congregate I Cranston C o m m o n s Humdeco , Inc . Germain Toyota Color Tile Karl Court Plaza P.E.R.S. Clintonville Park Stratford Abbey Condos Big Bite High & Gay St. Shell Oil Co. 84 L u m b e r Co. Wendy ' s -Hudson Self-Serv Coin Car Wash Sawbury C o m m o n s Red Roof Inn Hun te r Savings Assn. She rman R. Smoo t Sou thpo in te Village Battelle Memorial Albert L. Coughl in Hard Rd. — Sou th S ide S u m m e r w o o d Sec. 2 Federal Expres s W. Town St. @ Pla to PI. Bethel & Olentangy (Sohio) Bethel & Olentangy (Sohio) Mandy 's Inves tmen t Inc . S tonebrook Village Sister 's Chicken & Biscui ts Sal tergate Village E. Co lumbus E lementa ry School Suther land L u m b e r 1919 6th Street College of Art & Design Harold Hardin — 1115 Bethel Uppe r Arl ington S w i m & Racque t Redeemer ' s Christ ian School Brown Derby Res tauran t — Morse Rd. Willowick P h a s e 3 Busy Beaver S tore Tower Esta tes Offsite

CID Number 965

1241 1419 1421 1427 1432 1442 1444 1451 1452 1457 1461 1463 1468 1475 1476 1483 1484 1486 1488 1489 1491 1493 1496 1498 1500 1505 1507 1508 1511 1512 1513 1514 1516 1522 1523 1526 1528 1529 1530 1531 1315 1321 1325 1346 1358 1365 1376 1393 1394 1395 1397 1399 1404 1406 1409 1415 1418 1422 1424 1426 1428 1431 1437 1440 1447 1449 1453 1456 1458 1462 1465 1469 1474 1480 1481 1487 1492 1501 1503 1504 1509 1515 1517 1521

Project Brookside Colony Ret. Basin Ph. 1 Frank 's Nursery Berwick Steel Co. Kobacker Stores Springwood Apts. Buckeye Pr int ing Ink Co. Larkspur Apts . Patio Shops Barnet t Plaza Long J o h n Silver 's We Store U-Lock Tire America Payless Cashways Inc. Bob Evans City Loan & Savings Christian Meeting Room Riverside Green Park St. S tephen ' s Family Comm. Center Payless Cashways, Inc. United States Pos t Office Showbiz Pizza Place Hayden Run Case Rd. COTA Park-N-Ride Broadland Place Apts. Franklin Chemical Industr ies P lumwood Apts. Phase III Mt. Vernon South Bob Evans Restaurant Lehner t Green Apts. Skylight Inn-Columbus Smokey Row Brethren Church Scioto Valley Mortage Co. Winterset Apts . Coseco Control Sys tems Columbus Square Phase II Pizza Hut — 3420 N. High Saltergate Village Robert A. Cassidy Manor Ackerman/315 Office Bldg. Son's Wholesale, Inc. East Main & McNaughten Rd. Summerwood 2 Reserve " C " Hi-State Beverage Co. Columbus Turnkey Olde Sawmille # 8 Northeas t Co. Tract Westerville Rd. Warehouse Creekwood Village II Cardinal Congregate I Macsway & Kimberly Pa rkway Cranston Commons Pizzeria Uno Sheffield Reserve "A" Smokey Ridge Estates Wendy's — Hudson Stratford Abbey Condos Riding Club & Founta in Lane Sawbury Commons Ph . 2 Disabled-Kimberly Parkway Olentangy Highbluffs Spr ingwood Apts. Red Roof Inn Southpoint Village Squirrel Hill Sec. 2 Larkspur Apts . Patio Area — Morse Rd. Payless Cashways Wendy's Sister 's Chicken Stonebrook Village Kimberly Parkway East Sawbury Commons II Ph. 3 Mt. Carmel East St. George Greek Orthodox Service Rd. " B " @ 270 Great Southern Shopping Center Bob Evans Fa rms — Office Marchi Rd. Ext. P lumwood Apt. # 3 Riverside Green South Sec. 5 & 8 Riverside Green S. Sec. 6 Winterset Apts . State Savings — Morse Rd. Sawbury C o m m o n s II Ph. 1 Woodgate Village Rev. 2

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER PROJECTS COMPLETE (NOT FINALED)

1982 CID

Number Project 680 Fenway Road Pump Station

1438 University City Shopping Center 1479 Case Rd. Sanitary 1485 Payless Cashways 1519 Bethel Center Phase II 1524 Hayden Meadows Sec. 1 1533 Columbus Square Phase 2

CID Number Project 1423 Eastland Amusement Center 1439 Battelle Riverfront Park 1445 American Red Cross 1450 Payless Cashways, Inc. 1467 Olde Sawmill Square 1471 Farmer's Insurance (Sawmill Rd. Office Park) 1473 St. George Greek Orthodox Foundation 1499 Grace Brethren Church 1506 Farms Ca Worthington Woods 1525 Kobacker Stores, Inc.

PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER PROJECTS INCOMPLETE

1458 Stonebrooke Village 1464 Shire Cove Lift Station

PRIVATE STORM SEWERS PROJECTS INCOMPLETE

1982 1280 Jewish Center 1301 Lebanon Station Townhouses

CODE 100 200

300

500 600

1982 FINANCIAL STATEMENT

Personal Services $1,862,017.25 Supplies for Maintenance

and Operation 10,065.49 Services for Maintenance

and Operation 185,401.86 Other Disbursements -0-Outlay for Fixed Assets 41,658.79

Total $2,099,143.39

DIVISION OF SANITATION ANNUAL REPORT — 1982

The Division of Sanitation is a General Fund agency re­sponsible for the collection and disposal of garbage and refuse for the City of Columbus. Three (3) transfer station facilities are involved in these operations.

COLLECTION OPERATIONS: 1. Regularly scheduled weekly collection of solid waste

from all residential dwellings. 2. Scheduled bulk collection service. 3. Special collections:

a. Dead animals from streets, alleys and private prop­erty.

b. Litter receptacles on public right-of-way. c. Emergency and special collections, as warranted.

4. Front and rear loading box container collection from multiple unit dwellings.

DISPOSAL OPERATIONS: 1. The operation of three (3) Transfer Station facilities to

process refuse brought in from the collection routes. 2. The disposal of processed refuse at a sanitary landfill.

OTHER SANITATION ACTIVITIES: 1. Inspection of private refuse haulers equipment to see if it

conforms to city specifications before issuance or remov­al of a city license.

2. Involvement in clean-up campaigns in cooperation with various neighborhood organizations.

3. The issuance of permits to contractors for dumping privileges at the three (3) transfers station facilities.

4. Collection of fees from contract and commercial haulers using transfer station facilities.

I. MISSION STATEMENT The Division of Sanitation seeks to promote the pub­

lic health and safety by providing refuse collection and disposal services to the citizens of Columbus.

II. SERVICE DESCRIPTION The Division of Sanitation provides the following ser­

vices to the citizens of Columbus: weekly collections of refuse from residential dwellings; regularly scheduled bulk collections; collection of dead animals from streets, alleys, private property; collection of refuse from approved litter receptacles on public rights-of-way; emergency and special collections (i.e., clean-up from wind and storm damage, and participates in neighborhood clean-up campaigns with various civic and club organizations).

III. LOCATION OF PLANTS & FACILITIES 1. Administration building

2080 Alum Creek Drive

2. Alum Creek Transfer/Pulverizer Station 2080 Alum Creek Drive

3. Georgesville Road Transfer/Pulverizer Station 1550 Georgesville Road

4. Morse Road Transfer/Pulverizer Station 4260 Morse Road

5. Fairwood Avenue Water Tower 2082 Fairwood Avenue Storage Facility

IV. SIGNIFICANT DATA A. Number of Households

The Division services approximately 235,495 households throughout the City. It has been deter­mined: 1. 81,197 households receive curbside service. 2. 82,557 households receive alley service. 3. 71,741 households receive box service.

DAILY AVERAGE TONS PULVERIZED During 1982 the pulverizer operations continued to ex­

perience an inordinate amount of downtime. This downtime was attributable to various plant modifications and im­provements, and the repair of the weighscales at each Pul­verizer/Transfer Station.

Based on the best available data, the average daily ton­nage for 1982 is as follows:

Alum Creek

369

Georgesville Road 306

Morse Road 279 984 tons/day

EQUIPMENT The task of refuse collection requires the use of large

amounts of equipment to service the approximately 235,446 households within the City of Columbus.

The equipment used by the Division of Sanitation con­sists primarily of packer trucks, which are used on assigned routes each day of the week (Monday thru Friday) and trans­fer trailers, which are used to transport refuse which has been brought in by the packer trucks and pulverized, to a disposal site.

Since adequate equipment is a prerequisite to the accom­plishment of the assigned task of the Division of Sanitation, an equipment replacement program is being developed with the aid of the City of Columbus, Municipal Garage, to insure a reliable fleet.

Following is a listing of equipment necessary to provide our services:

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 19

TYPe Amount Car 36 Van 7 Packer, Rear Loading 93 Flatbed 9 Dog Wagon 4 Front-End Loader, art iculat ing 7 Tractor-Truck 15 Bulk 9 Trailer, Transfer 16 Loader, Front End 9 Shu-Pac 16

TOTAL 221* •There are forty-one (41) addi t ional pieces of equ ipment consisting of auxiliary engines, dragline, dozers, pumps , etc.

COST CENTER DESCRIPTIONS COST CENTER 01 — Adminis t ra t ion (Management)

Description: Division Management plans, directs, con­trols, staffs, and evaluates refuse collection and dispos­al services.

Admin i s t r a t ion pe r sonne l inc lude the Super in ten­dent and Assis tant Super in tenden t .

COST CENTER 02 — General Adminis t ra t ion (Office) Description: General adminis t ra t ion personnel provide staff functions (i.e., budgetary , purchas ing, financial, data processing, personnel , payroll, etc.) and clerical services for the Division.

General adminis t ra t ive personnel include the follow­ing classifications: Bus iness Manager, Account Clerk I, Accountant I, Clerk I, Clerk II, Clerk III, Data Process­ing Analys t /Programmer II, Organization & Employ­ment Deve lopmen t Special is t I and Typis t Clerk II. PART-TIME - Steno-Clerk III, S tuden t Intern I, Stu­dent In tern II, and Typis t Clerk II.

COST CENTERS 03. 04, AND 05 — Alum Creek, Georgesville Road, and Morse Road Pulver izer /Transfer Sta t ions (Operations) Description: These opera t iona l pe rsonne l provide for the systematic , speedy, and efficient daily collection of refuse from the publ ic in the area serviced by each Pul­verizer/Transfer station.

Pulverizer/Transfer Sta t ion personnel include the fol­lowing classifications: Dist r ic t Supervisor , Assis tant District Supervisor , Refuse Collection Supervisor IPs, Refuse Collection Superv isor I's, Refuse Collector & Packer Operators , Refuse Collectors, Radio Dispatcher and Weighmaster .

COST CENTER 06 — Safety Description: To advise m a n a g e m e n t in the formulation of safety policy. Develops and implements safety pro­grams and training; main ta ins accident report ing and record ing sys tem; p roces se s w o r k e r s c o m p e n s a t i o n claims and injury leave; main ta ins safe working condi­tions th rough inspect ions and investigations; provides medical and first-aid t raining; and processes property and vehicular damage claims.

Safety p e r s o n n e l i n c l u d e t h e following classifica­tions: Safety Manager and Safety P rog ram Technicians .

COST CENTER 07 — Plant Pulverizer Operations & Mainte­nance Description: Plant pulverizer operations personnel pro­vide for the systematic, speedy, and efficient pulveriz­ing, transferring and disposal of refuse from daily col­lec t ion o p e r a t i o n s t h e p u b l i c and p r iva te hau le r s . Maintenance personnel provide routine services and maintenance of the pulverizer plants .

Plant pulverizer operat ions and maintenance person­nel include the following classifications: Plant Mainte­nance Manager, Plant Maintenance Supervisor I, Plant M a i n t e n a n c e M e c h a n i c s , E q u i p m e n t Opera tor IPs , Plant Pulverizer Operators, and Laborers.

DIVISION OF SANITATION SUMMARY OF TOTAL

EMPLOYEES/OVERTIME/EXPENDITURES/TONS COLLECTED

Total Total Total Total Tons Year Employees Overtime Expenditures Collected 1978 420 $737,053 $11,614,257 228,475 tons/yr 1979 452 855,775 12,625,468 229,220 tons/yr 1980 410 650,434 14,157,438 * 1981 388 749,773 15,492,295 230,145 tons/yr 1982 371 510,688 11,279,446** 235,810 tons/yr

*Due to an explosion and fire in the pulverizers and also major repair work for the scale systems, total tonnage figures are not available for the year 1980.

**Total e x p e n d i t u r e s — 1982: This is t h e ac tua l dol lar amount expended from funds allocated to the Division of Sanitation. However, Municipal Garage debts , which had previously been paid from Sanitat ion Funds , were not in 1982. That dollar amount totalled $3,402,817. An addition­al $500,000.00 was paid of Revenue Shar ing F u n d s to meet t h e Div i s ion of S a n i t a t i o n ' s landfi l l cos t s . T h e to ta l amount therefore expended in 1982 for the Division of Sanitation operat ions was: $15,182,263.

STATEMENT OF EARNED REVENUE — 1982 The Division of Sani tat ion is a General F u n d Agency.

However, the Division earns monies from the following op­erations: 1. The collection of cubic yard refuse containers. 2. The collection of monies from private haulers using the

three transfer stations. 3. The collection of dead anumals from veterinarians and

laboratories. These monies are deposi ted in the General Fund .

1981-1982 EARNED REVENUE COMPARISON

1981 1982 Collections from private haulers

(Dumping Fees) $61,083.00 $134,283.00 Collections from cubic yard

containers 6,600.00 420.00* Collections from veterinarians

and laboratories 3,684.00 448.00**

TOTALS $71,367.00 $135,151.00 *The Division discont inued collection of cubic yard con­tainers from private businesses effective 1/1/82.

**The Division d i scon t inued col lect ion of dead animals from veterinarians and laboratories effective 1/1/82.

The A n n u a l R e p o r t of t h e Div i s ion of S e w e r a g e and Drainage is t r ansmi t t ed herewi th as a s u m m a r y of the opera­tion and activities for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1982. This report conta ins const ruct ion, p lanning, statistical and operat ional da ta and financial information.

Administrat ion, Compost ing , Design and Survey, Jack­son Pike Wastewater T rea tmen t Plant , Maintenance, Per­mits, Souther ly Wastewater T rea tmen t Plant , Surveil lance and Technical Suppo r t are the nine operat ing sections that composed the Division for 1982.

Planning, design and process ing of special projects was done on a limited basis by Division personnel . The policy of contracting with pr ivate firms for reports , special projects and the Design of Capital I m p r o v e m e n t Projects cont inued through 1982. Employ ing the services of these firms results in a practical solut ion to the many and varied objectives of

DIVISION OF SEWERAGE & DRAINAGE ANNUAL REPORT—1982

the Division and it is r e commended that this policy be con­tinued.

Over twenty-four miles of sewers were added to the sew­age system and the Division cont inued to operate and main­tain these sanitary, s torm and combined sewers dur ing the year. This system of sewers t ranspor ted a daily average of 134.5 million gallons of sewage to the two sewage t rea tment plants. A total of twenty- three p u m p stations, eight sanitary and fifteen storm, were necessary to keep the system operat­ing and functional. In addit ion to providing sewage service to our own expanding corporate limits, Co lumbus has also contracted to t ranspor t and treat the sewage from thirty-three satellite districts. Uppe r Arlington remains as the only satellite district charging for sewage t r unk benefit on an acreage basis. At tached is a listing of contract entit ies and a map displaying the areas covered by these contracts .

20 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

Total revenues grew by 18.6 percent or $44.8 million while expendi tures grew by a modes t 3.5 percent or $39.5 million, 1982 revenues exceeded expendi tures by $5.3 million. The Division f inished t h e yea r $3.9 mil l ion or e ight pe rcen t under budge t caus ing a significant improvemen t in our financial position. » . „ „

The ending cash balance for 1982 rose to $16.2 million as compared with 1981's year end balance of $10.9 million. T h e unencumbered year end balance for 1982 was $11.4 million versus $5.1 million at the end of 1981, a $6.3 million increase. This large increase can be at t r ibuted to three factors: The $3.9 million budget under run ; the 18 percent growth in re­venues; and a $.9 million dollar reduct ion in year-end en­cumbrances. The large growth in revenues was due in part to the elimination of the backlog of billings created in 1981 during conversion to the new water/sewer utility billing sys­tem.

A total of $24.5 million* was expended on the Division s capital improvements program involving over fifty projects. New contracts, change orders and other agreements entered into during the year totalled $18.5 million involving 30 proj­ects. $20.8 million remained encumbered at the end of the year. Major construct ion contracts awarded dur ing the year included $7.7 million for the Blacklick Creek In terceptor Sewer; $3.3 mil l ion for con t r ac t 4, solar drying, South­westerly Compost ing Facility; and $1.6 million for east Cen­tral Relief s torm and sani tary sewers . In addi t ion, b ids were received on several construct ion projects late in the year bu t were not awarded due to bid protests or other delays. These projects totalled $29.1 million. Approximate ly $21 million of the amount will be provided by the federal government .

The Division's total long-term debt for its capital improve­ments program s tands at $146.1 million. Pr incipal paymen t s during the year totalled $4.5 million and $5.25 million in notes were issued dur ing 1982 resul t ing in only a modes t increase in the Division's total long te rm debt dur ing the year. At year end, the Division had a total of $19.0 million in

unencumbered cash p lus un i ssued bond author i ty for sani­tary sewerage sys tem i m p r o v e m e n t s . Ant ic ipated federal grants br ings the total available author i ty to $28.5 million. An addi t ional $5.5 mill ion in avai lable au thor i ty exis ts for storm sewer projects .

Beginning in 1982 all acc ident and injury leave data were entered into the payroll pe r sonne l c o m p u t e r sys tem. That system along wi th o the r p rocedura l changes has reduced claim process ing t ime. Dur ing 1982 there were 122 new in­juries 68 of which involved lost t ime . Significant accom­pl ishments dur ing the year also inc luded formation of a Sur­veillance crew safety commi t t ee , b roaden ing t h e representa­tion at the Souther ly safety commi t t ee and inspect ion on cranes in the Division.

The total author ized s t rengh for the Divison is 501 posi­tions. At the close of 1982 t h e actual s t rength for the Divi­sion was 435 full-time employees and par t - t ime employees . There was a gradual decrease in the n u m b e r of employees within the Division as a resul t of t h e hir ing freeze. Dur ing 1982 we had 12 employees retire. O n e employee had over 40 years t enure with the City; 5 of the ret i reees had 20 or more years of service; and 4 of the ret i reees had 15 or m o r e years of service. These re t i r ements r ep resen t significant changes within the Division d u e to t h e years exper iences that these employees had given t h e Division. Many were in high level adminis tat ive posi t ions or superv isory posi t ions, which also m a d e a major impac t on t h e opera t ions of t h e Division. We do wish them all well in their re t i rement years .

Without the suppor t and coopera t ion of each and every employee of this Division and all o ther D e p a r t m e n t s and Divisions of t h e City, a n y a c c o m p l i s h m e n t s achieved would certainly have fallen far shor t of the service level to which the Divis ion con t inua l ly asp i res to prov ide and a hardy thanks and apprecia t ion goes out to all t hose people who have devoted thei r t i m e a n d efforts to t h e Division.

*See Note B to Financia l S t a t e m e n t s

CITY OF COLUMBUS, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE

DIVISION OF SEWERAGE AND DRAINAGE SEWERAGE SERVICE CONTRACT—1982

Benefit Contract Entity Effective Date Expiration Date Charge Bexley May 3, 1971 May 2, 1996 SCC Brice Date of Connect ion 20 Years SCC Dublin December 1, 1971 December 31, 1996 SCC Gahanna S e p t e m b e r 27, 1967 S e p t e m b e r 26, 1997 SCC Grandview Heights April 1, 1967 December 31, 1991 SCC Grove City May 2, 1977 May 1, 1997 SCC Groveport S e p t e m b e r 1, 1971 Augus t 31, 1996 SCC Hilliard October 11, 1967 October 10, 1992 SCC Marble Cliff April 23, 1973 December 31, 1993 SCC Minerva Park Date of Connect ion 20 Years SCC Obetz J a n u a r y 1, 1979 December 31, 2018 SCC Reynoldsburg December 16, 1974 D e c e m b e r 31, 1993 SCC Riverlea. j u l y n , 1974 J u l y n 1994 s c c Upper Arlington S e p t e m b e r 1, 1960 Augus t 31, 1990 AC—300 Urbancrest October 10, 1977 October 9, 1997 SCC Valleyview J u n e 7, 1968 J u n e 6, 1988 SCC Westerville October 1, 1968 S e p t e m b e r 30, 1993 SCC ™ i!fhail J u ' y 1 2 ' 1 9 8 1 July 11. 2001 s c c Worthington . . . . . . March 31, 1979 March 30, 1998 SCC Defense Construct ion Supp ly Center Yearly Renewal

Franklin County Commissioners for Sewer Districts Briarbank Subdivis ion November 5, 1980 N o v e m b e r 4, 2010 SCC r w ™ ' d e Estates April 27, 1973 D e c e m b e r 3 i , 1994 SCC r E l i November 9, 1921 Indefinite SCC F r a n k H r , i t November 26, 1948 Indefinite SCC Frank n A A ™ "y A November 8, 1922 Indefini te SCC K ' V u f e n d e d J a n u a r y 30, 1953 J a n u a r y 29, 1993 SCC M?ffl n i i M e a d o w s N o v e m b e r 5, 1969 November 5, 1999 SCC ^ l t n i n . # 1 • • August 9, 1930 Indefinite SCC Frank i n " S S S S e W 6 r S December 4, 1980 D e c e m b e r 3, 2010 NA Trum #1 l b a " y A p n l 2 5 ' 1 9 7 3 December 31, 1994 SCC WortninltnnitiVu September 17, 1930 Indefinite S g M i r ForceBase YY.Y.YY.YYY. Date' M i c t i o n 2 V K 2°°9 tCC

Timberbrook Subdivis ion D a t e of Connect ion 20 Years SCC

Pending Contracts: Measurement Method:

S n a w i e e HUls S S u b d i v i s i o n 1 - M a s t e r Meter: Water C o n s u m p t i o n Ridgewood Subdivis ion 2 - M a s t e r Meter: Sewage Flow Picker ington u u l v l b l o n 3—Aggregate Accoun ts : Water C o n s u m p t i o n

4—Individual Accoun ts : Water C o n s u m p t i o n

Measurement Method

1 4 4 1 4 4 2 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 1 4 4

4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4

NA 3

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 21

COMBINED OPERATING & DEBT SERVICE FUNDS STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES

Year Ended December 31, 1982 (Unaudited)

Operating Debt Replacement Fund Service Fund Fund

Revenues (80-371) (80-372) (80-373) Sewer Service Charges $28,232,143 $11,696,121 $403,369 Extra St rength Charges 800,007 338,357 11,491 Waste Hauler Discharge and Permi t Fees 104,114 Sewer Permi t s 34^000 Sewer Taps 8^520 System Capacity Charges 1,166,968 Labor & Material Re imbursemen t 726,090 Construct ion Inspect ion Re imbursemen t 862^889 Refunds 36317 Surveillance Lab Analysis Charge 14,579 Miscellaneous Sales 11,209 Other 9J286 399,609

Total Revenues $30,839,154 $13,601,055 $414,860

Expenditures 100 Personnel Services $10 934,037 200 Suppl ies & Materials 3,112,029 $107 145 300 Services 9,917,193 $ 583,466 14,866 400 Debt Ret i rement 14 248 185 500 Other 35,559 ' 2^055 71 600 E q u i p m e n t 569,160 _ _ ^ _

Total Expendi tu res $24,567,978 $14,833,706 $122,082 Revenues Over

(Under) Expend i tu res $ 6,271,176 $(1,232,651) $292,778

Total $40,331,633

1,149,855 104,114 34,000

8,520 1,166,968

726,090 862,889

36,317 14,579 11,209

408,895 $44,855,069

5,934,037 3,219,174

10,515,525 14,248,185

37,685 569,160

$39,523,766

$ 5,331,303

COMBINED OPERATING & DEBT SERVICE FUNDS COMPARISON OF 1981 &ND 1982 REVENUES & EXPENDITURES

Fund 80-371. 80-372 and 80-373 (Unaudited)

Revenues 1981 Sewer Service Charges* $31,936,945 Extra S t rength Charges* 3,065,577 Waste Hauler Discharge and Permi t Fees 103,560 Sewer Permi t 36,325 Sewer Taps 23,054 Sys tem Capacity Charges 1,328,196 Labor & Material R e i m b u r s e m e n t 535,418 Construct ion Inspect ion Re imbur semen t 777,853 Refunds 1.011 Oil Ent i t lement Proceeds 6,273 Surveil lance Lab Analysis Charge 5,051 Miscellaneous Sales 5,554 Other 6.096

Total Revenues $37,830,913 Expenditures

100 Personnel Services $ 1 0 ' ? i ? 'S$ ! 200 Suppl ies & Materials ^ISi 'RiR 300 Services ,§ '£nn'^K 400 Debt Ret i rement 13 '60S-229 500 Other 40,776 600 E q u i p m e n t 379,107

Total Expendi tu res $38,188,433 Revenues Over

(Under) Expend i tu re s $ (357,520)

•See Note A

1982 $37,432,990

4,048,498 104,114 34,000

8,520 1,166,968

726,090 862,889

36,317 —

14,579 11,209

408,895 $44,855,069

$10,934,037 3,219,174

10,515,525 14,248,185

37,685 569,160

$39,523,766

$ 5,331,303

Increase/ (Decrease) $5,496,045

982,921 554

(2,325) (14,534)

(161,228) 190,672 85,036 35,306 (6,273) 9,528 5,655

402,799 $7,024,156

$613,398 (932,351) 819,475 647,849

(3,091) 190,053

$1,335,333

$5,688,823

Percent Change

17.2% 32.1%

.5% (6.4%)

(63.0%) (12.1%) 36.5% 10.9%

3492% (100.0%) 188.6% 101.8% 6608% 18.6%

5.9% (22.5%)

8.5% 4.8%

(7.6%) 50.1%

3.5%

1591%

22 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

COMBINED OPERATING & DEBT SERVICE FUNDS STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES

Year Ended December 31, 1982 (Unaudited)

Beginning Balances 1/1/82 Unencumbered Cash Balance Outstanding Encumbrances .

Beginning Cash Balance

Plus Revenues

Total Cash Available 1982

Less Expendi tures

Ending Balance 12/31/82 Ending Cash Balance Less Ending Encumbrances ..

Unencumbered Cash Balance

Operating Fund

(80-371)

$ 349,220 5,574,558

5,923,778

30,839,154

36,762,932

24,567,978

12,194,954 4,446,050

$ 7,748,904

Debt Service Fund

(80-372)

$ 4,215,489 131,199

4,346,688

13,601,056

17,947,744

14,833,706

3,114,038 106,163

$ 3,007,875

Replacement Fund

(80-373)

$558,818 69,508

628,326

414,860

1,043,186

122,082

921,104 281,780

$639,324

Total

$ 5,123,527 5,775,265

10,898,792

44,855,070

55,753,862

39,523,766

16,230,096 4,833,993

$11,396,103

COMBINED OPERATING & DEBT SERVICE FUNDS COMPARISON OF 1981 AND 1982 FUND BALANCES

Funds 80-371. 80-372 and 80-373 (Unaudited)

1981 Beginning Balances Jan . 1

Unencumbered Cash Balance $ 7,961,628 Outstanding Encumbrances 3,294,684

Beginning Cash Balance $11,256,312

Plus Revenues 37,830,913

Total Cash Available $49,087,225

Less Expendi tures 38,188,433

Ending Balances Dec. 31 Ending Cash Balance $10,898,792 Less Ending Encumbrances 5,775,265

Unencumbered Cash Balance $ 5,123,527

1982

$ 5,123,527 5,775,265

$10,898,792

44,855,070

$55,753,862

39,523,766

$16,230,096 4,833,993

$11,396,103

Increase/ (Decrease)

$(2,838,101) 2,480,581

$ (357,520)

7,024,157

$ 6,666,637

1,335,333

$ 5,331,304 (941,272)

$ 6,272,576

Percent Change

(35.6%) 75.0%

(3.2%)

18.6%

13.6%

3.5%

49.0% (16.3%)

122.4%

COMBINED OPERATING & DEBT SERVICE FUNDS RECONCILIATION OF EXPENDITURES WITH BUDGET AUTHORITY

Year Ended December 31. 1982 (Unaudited)

Total Budget Ending

Operating Fund 80-371 Authority Expenditures Encumbrances 100 Personnel Services $11,000,645 $10,934,038 $ 2,418 200 Materials & Suppl ies 6,803,160 3,112,029 1,573,497 300 Services 13,371,684 9,917,194 2,457,121 500 Other Disbursements 65,541 35,558 41 600 Equ ipment 1,163,885 569,159 412,973

Total Fund 80-371 $32,404,915 $24,567,978 $4,446,050

Debt Service Fund 80-372 300 Services $ 735,680 $ 583,466 $ 84,268 rXX Xfubt Ret i rement 14,663,761 14,248,185 — 500 Other Disbursements 12,500 2,055 21,895

Total Fund 80-372 $15,411,941 $14,833,706 $ 106,163

Replacement Fund 80-373 200 Materials & Suppl ies $ 391,350 $ 107,145 $ 278,787

Son £?r"C?f- L 49.300 14,866 2,993 500 Other Disbursements 1000 71

Total Fund 80-373 $ 441,650 $ 122,082 $ 281,780

Total All F u n d s $48,258,506 $39,523,766 $4,833,993

Lapsed Budget

Authority $ 64,189

2,117,634 997,369

29,942 181,753

$3,390,887

$ 67,946 415,576 (11,450)

$ 472,072

$ 5,418 31,441

929

bfwq

vthor

V88.0e£.

(oeiui) svo,sn>

$ 37,788

$3,900,747

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 23

SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS AND TRUST FUNDS STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES

Year Ending December 31. 1982 (Unaudited)

Sanitary Improvement Bond Funds 80-795 Voted 1960 U n l t d

Tax Notes 80-800 1965 L imi ted T a x N o t e s . . 80-571 Voted 1975 Unl td

Tax N o t e s

Beginning Cash

Balance

$ 25,994 504.380

Revenues and

Transfer

Notes Issued

Tolal Funds

Available

$ 25.994 504.380

Ending 1982 Ending Unencumbered

Expenditures Encumbrances Balance

Unissued Bond

Authority

13.599.867 $12,500,000' $5,250,000 31.349,867

$ 10.245

22,327.726*

$ 160.028

6,207,977

$ 25.994 334.107

Total Available Authority

$ 25,994 334.107

2.814,165 $17,715,000 20.529.164

Total San i t a ry I m p r o v e m e n t B o n d F u n d s $14,130,241 $12,500,000 $5,250,000 $31,880,241 $22,337,971 $ 6,368.005 $ 3.174.265 $17,715,000 $20,889,265

Sanitary Special Improvement 8c Trust Funds 671 E s c r o w a n d T rus t D e p o s i t s . 840 H o u s e Connec t i on D e p o s i t s 100 E P A S e w e r a g e S y s t e m m p r o v e m e n t 710 G r a n t R e i m b u r s e m e n t &

Refund

Total San i ta ry Spec ia l F u n d s .

Total San i ta ry I m p r o v e m e n t and T rus t F u n d s

575 52,492

17,428.923

1.460.279

$18,942,269

$33,072,510

$ 31,970

7,583,558"

805

$ 7,616.333

$20,116,333

N/A N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

$5,250,000

$ 575

84,462

25.012,481

1.416.084 $26,558,602

$58,438,843

$ 21,325

14.069.389

192,813

$14,283,527

$36,621,498'

See No te B Federa l G r a n t r e i m b u r s e m e n t s rece ived d u r i n g 1982 from t h e U S E P A a m o u n t e d to $5,564,740 See No te C

$ 1,550

13,644.105

425.966

$14,071,620

$20,439,625

$ 575

61,587

(2,701.013)#

842.306 $(1,796,545)

$1,377.720#

N/A N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

$17,715,000

N/A N/A

$(2,701.013)#

842.306

$(1,858,707)

$19,030,558*

STORM SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUNDS STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES

Year Ending December 31, 1982 (Unaudited)

Beginning Storm Sewer C a s h Improvement Bond Funds Balance 07-801 Voted 1960 & 64

Unltd T x N t $ 129,621 07-802 Voted 1967 Unl td

Tax Notes 12,463 07-713 Voted 1971 Unl td

T a x N o t e s 52,876 07-572 Voted 1975 Unl td

Tax Notes 1.691.919 07-133 Voted 1981 Unl td

Tax Notes 0

Total S t o r m S e w e r Bond F u n d s $ 1,886,879

Storm Sewer Special Funds 02-261 S t o r m S e w e r

M a i n t e n a n c e $ 5.493 07-270 1979 S t o r m S e w e r

& St. I m p r 32,117 07-804 Cap . S o .

Util i t ies Re loca tn 419,541

Total S t o r m S e w e r Special F u n d s $ 457,151

Total S t o r m S e w e r I m p r o v e m e n t s $ 2,344,030

Total San i t a ry a n d S to rm S y s t e m $35.416.540

• See No te B # See Note C

Revenues a n d

Transfers

$ 0

$ 21,532

$ 21,532

$ 21,532

$20,127,865

Notes Issued

1992

$ 200,000

$ 200,000

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

$ 200,000

$ 5.450,000

Total Funds

Available

$ 129,621

12,463

52,876

1.691.919

200.000

$ 2,086.879

$ 27.025

32,117

419,541

$ 478,683

$ 2,565.562

$61,004,405

1982 Expenditures

$

$

$

$

$

5,260

0

10,905

52,551

69.352

138,068

27.025

32,117

158,090

217,232

355,300

$36,976,798'

Ending Ending Unencumbered

Encumbrances Balance

$

$

$

$

$

80.059

10.000

0

125,066

15,648

230,773

0

0

172,465

172,465

403,238

$20,842,863

$ 44,302

2,463

41,971

1,514,302

115.000

$ 1,718.038

$ 0

0

88.986

$ 88.986

$ 1,807,024

$ 3.184.744*

Unissued Bond

Authority

$ 0

0

0

0

3,670.000

$ 3.670,000

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Total Available Authority

$ 44,302

2,463

41,971

1.514,302

3.785,000

$ 5.388,038

NA

N/A

$ 88.986

$ 88,986

$3,670,000 $ 5,477,024

$21,385,000 $24,507,582*

24 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

Limited (Unvoted) Bonds Extension #1 Extension #2 Improvement #561 Improvement #323 Improvement #7 Improvement #8 Improvement #9 Improvement #10 Improvement #11 Improvement #12 Improvement #13 Improvement #14 Improvement #15 Improvement #16 Improvement #17

Total Limited Bond Issues . .

Unlimited (Voted) Bond Issues Improvement #18 Improvement #19 Improvement #20 Improvement #21 Improvement #22

Total Unlimited Issues

Note Issues—Unlimited* 1979 Note Issue 1980 Note Issue 1980 Note Issue 1981 Note Issue 1982 Note Issue

Total Note Issues

SUMMARY OF OUTSTANDING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS DEBT ISSUES Year Ended December 31, 1982

(Unaudited)

Date

07-01-57

11-01-77

11-15-78 08-15-80 08-15-81 06-01-82 08-15-82

12-27-79 08-06-80 11-19-80 11-18-81 05-07-82

Maturity

04-01-97

02-01-96

07-15-97 06-15-97 05-15-98 06-15-98 09-15-98 05-15-02 10-15-02 08-01-03 08-01-02

10-01-09 05-01-07 07-15-08 05-15-07 02-15-09

06-04-82 06-08-82 08-18-82 11-18-82 06-03-83

(Percent) 3.000 3.500 3.500 3.000 6.375 6.750 6.250 4.750 4.625 5.000 5.125 6.125 5.125 5.125 5.125

5.750 8.125

12.000 12.000 12.375

8.000 5.470 9.250 8.850 8.500

Original Issue

$ 5.000,000 5.000.000 3,000,000 5.200,000 4,510,000

15,000,000 10,000,000 8,600,000 9,000,000 4,000.000 4,500.000 1,000,000 8.500,000 1,600,600 1,500.000

$ 86.410.600

$ 17,710,000 21,200,000

3,625.000 0 0

$ 42.535.000

$ 4,000.000 6,500,000

10,300,000 12,500.000 5,250,000

$ 38.550,000

$167,495,600

Beginning Balance 01-01-82 $ 200.000

400.000 1,360,000 1,465,000 2,700,000 9,000,000 6,400,000 5,520.000 6,120.000 2,720.000 3,060.000

840,000 7,140,000 1,425,000 1,380,000

$ 49.730,000

$ 16.520.000 21,200,000

3,625.000 0 0

$ 41,345,000

$ 4.000.000 6.500,000

10.300.000 12.500.000

0

$ 33.300.000

$124,375,000

1982 Principal Payments

$

,

$

S

$

s s

200.000 200,000

85.000 205.000 180.000 600.000 400,000 345,000 360,000 160.000 180,000 40.000

340.000 65.000 60.000

3,420,000

590,000 0 0 0 0

590.000

0 0 0 0 0

0

4.010.000

New Issues or Note

Conversion

$ 10,500,000* 22 ,800 ,000"

$ 33,300,000

Ending Balance 12-31-82

$ 0 200,000

1,275,000 1,260.000 2.520.000 8,400,000 6,000,000 5,175,000 5,760,000 2,560,000 2,880,000

800,000 6.800.000 1.360,000 1.320.000

$ 46,310,000

$ 15,930,000 21,200,000

3.625,000 10,500,000 22,800.000

$ 74,055,000

$ (4,000,000)* $ 0 (6,500,000)*

(10.300,000)' (12,400,000)*

5,250,000

$(28,050,000)

$ 5,250,000

0 0 0

5,250,000

$ 5.250.000

$125,615,000

1982 Interest

Paid or Due

$

S

$

t

$

5

$

3,000 14,000 46,113 43,950

166.387 587,250 400,000 254,006 274,725 132,000 156.825 50,225

365.925 73,031 70,725

2,638.162

949.900 1,722,500

398,750 573,993

0

3.645.143

254.632 413,778 687.525

1,106.250 0

2,462,185

8,745,490 Total Debt Issues * Issue dates and interest rates on notes are for original issue if notes were rolled over. # Conversion of 1979 and 8/6/80 Notes to Bond issue #21. ** Conversion of 11/19/80 and 1981 Notes to Bond issue #22.

SUMMARY OF OHIO WATER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY INDEBTEDNESS Year Ended December 31, 1982

(Unaudited)

Account/Project SO WWTP Contract 12 SO WWTP Contract C-8 Big Walnut Truck Sewer Sec. D . SO WWTP Contract C-9 SO WWTP Contract C-10 Upper Scioto East Branch Blacklick Crk. Intrcptr. Sec I Big Walnut Trunk Sewer Sec. E . Interconnect Sewer Part II-I Big Walnut—Morse Rd. & East . . Blacklick Crk. Intrcptr Sec II . . . . SO WWTP Contract C-ll In terconnect Sewer Pump Sta. Interconnects Sewr Pt II C 3&4 . Interconnectr Sewer Force Main .

Subtotal—Closed Projects

Interceptor Part III C-5, 6 & 7 (Note D)

Total All OWDA Projects

Bond and Note Debt

Total Indebtedness

OWDA Agreement

Dote 03-08-71 03-08-71 03-08-71 08-06-71 10-11-71 10-11-71 12-16-71 01-15-73 04-13-73 08-12-73 11-19-73 11-19-73 01-14-74 05-10-74 05-10-74

12-20-74

Final Payment

Date 01-01-02 07-01-02 01-01-03 01-01-04 01-01-04 07-01-04 07-01-03 01-01-04 07-01-04 07-01-04 01-01-05 01-01-06 01-02-06 07-01-04 01-01-05

N/A

Interest Rate

(Percent) 5.750 5.750 5.750 6.250 5.250 5.250 5.250 5.250 5.250 5.250 5 2 5 0 5.250 5.250 5.750 5.750

6.750

Amount Financed

$ 955.493 1,984.407

810.338 6.805.236

632.282 755.510 767,122 619.684 620,284

98.849 1,171,149 4,899,817

736,652 824.567 118.538

$ 21.799.928

$ 2,199,140

1982 Beginning

Balance

$

$

$

791.064 1,664.593

688.594 5.982.896

544,496 658.404 652,292 533,647 540.558

86.580 1,032,693 4,416,528

663.992 749,065 105,494

19.110.896

2,109,135

1982 Principal Payment s

$

$

$

22,076 44,603 17,704

133,740 13,720 15.985 17,083 13.446 13.124 2.039

24.146 95.980 14.430 15,234 2,316

445.626

16,766

1982 Ending Balance

$ 768,988 1,619,990

670,889 5,849,156

530.776 642.418 635.209 520.200 527,434

84,541 1,008,548 4.320,549

649,563 733,831 103,178

$ 18,665.270

$ 1.846.642

1982 n te res t

Payments

J

$

$

45.486 95.714 39,594

373.931 28.586 34,567 34,245 28,016 28,380

4,762 54,216

231,868 34,860 43,072

6,066

1,083,363

87.329

$ 23,999,068 $ 21,220,031 $ 462,392

167,495,600 124,375,000 4,010,000

$191,494,668 $145,595,031 $ 4,472,392

$ 20,511,912 $ 1,170,692

125,615,000 8,745,490

$146,126,912 $ 9,916.182

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 25

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTS AWARDED Year Ending December 31. 1982

Sanitary Sewer Projects Olentangy Trunk N Worth. East of High, Phase III-A Upper Scioto W. S u b t r u n k S. of Hayden Run East Central Relief Storm/Sanitary—Dist 8N " Sewer Regulator S t ruc ture Rehabil i tat ion \ Olentangy Sub t runk Sewer—Phase 3B & 4 East Central Area Relief Storm/Sanitary—Dist 5 Milo Grogan Area Sewer Separat ion Dist 1 Milo Grogan Area Sewer Separat ion Dist 2 Blacklick Creek Area In tercept ing San. Sewer, Sec. 4 Blacklick Creek Area In tercept ing San. Sewer, Sec. 3A . . . Blacklick Creek Area In tercept ing San. Sewer, Sec. 3B . . . Blenkner Street Sani tary Trunk Sewer Rehab, of Renick Run P u m p Station, Contract 171 . Big Walnut Sani tary S u b t r u n k Sewer E 1-270, S of SR 161

Total Sanitary Sewer Projects

Sewage Treatment Projects Jackson Pike Bar Screen Facilities, Contract 167 SW Compost ing Facility P h a s e II, Contract 4

Passive Solar Drying Facility Jackson P ike Water Supp ly Imp. , Contract 172 Southerly Wastewater Trea tment , Contract 16

Screen Room Heat ing & Venti lat ion 201 Facilities Plan Amend . 11, Segment 3, Wet St ream . . . . Program Mgt. Office, Task No. 3, Amend . 26 Jackson Pike Wastewater, Cont. 170, Odor Control Fac. . . .

Total Sewage Trea tmen t Projects

Total Sanitary Sewerage Sys tem Projects

Storm Sewer Projects Basswood Storm Sewer

Total Capital Improvemen t s Contracts Awarded 198?

Construction Contracts

$ 58,880

1,371,742 214,545 267,575

1,167,558 1,500,640 1,530,539 2,603,000 1,709,235 2,989,456

84,302 590,597 182,236

$14,270,305

Engineering Contracts

$ 40,000

54,300

$ 94,300

$ 233,009

3,229,862 125,403

165,000

269,900

$ 4,023,174

$18,293,479

$ 69,026

$18,362,505

$ 24,500

102,352 1,159,300

$1,286,152

$1,380,452

$1,380,452

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS A. Due to a miscoding of the Water/Sewer Utility Billing

System, $26,634 in ext ra s t rength revenues were credited to the wrong account , sewer service charges, in 1981. The 1981 amoun t s were not corrected in the 1981 annual re­port bu t have been adjusted in the 1982 report to show t h e co r r ec t a m o u n t s . To t a l 1981 r e v e n u e s w e r e no t affected by this adjus tment .

B. 1982 t ransfers and e x p e n d i t u r e s in fund 80-571 (1975 voted bond issue) inc lude $12.5 million transferred into the fund from the proceeds of the Augus t 15, 1982 $22.8 million bond sale ( improvement #22). The monies were t r a n s f e r r e d in to t h e fund to r e t i r e n o t e s i s sued on November 18, 1981 and matur ing on November 18, 1982. Since 95 days elapsed from issuance of the bonds until the notes matured , the proceeds of the bond sale were held in fund 80-571 until t he notes were retired. Expendi­tures from fund 80-571 therefore include the $12.5 mil­lion used to retire the notes . The conversion of notes to bonds does not normal ly appear as an expend i tu re in a capital improvemen t s bond fund since usually only a few days e lapse be tween a bond sale and re t i rement of notes. The proceeds of a bond sale are generally not de­posi ted into a i m p r o v e m e n t s fund. Ret i rement of the notes from fund 80-571 caused expend i tu res in the fund to be overstated by $12.5 million as summarized in the following table:

of the anticipated federal revenues raised the unencum­bered end ing ba lance in the fund to $6.8 million as shown below:

Capital Improvements Expenditures With Note Retirement

Expenditures $22,327,726 36,621,498

W/O Note Retirement

Expenditures $ 9,827,726 24,121,498

24,476,798

Fund 80-571 (1975 Voted Bonds) . . . Total Sanitary Improvement Funds Total Sanitary &

Storm Imprv. Funds 36,976,798

C. E n d i n g e n c u m b r a n c e s in fund 80-100 E P A Sewerage System I m p r o v e m e n t s inc lude approximate ly $9.5 mil­lion in e n c u m b r a n c e s against approved federal grants not yet received. As a result, the u n e n c u m b e r e d balance in fund 80-100 is less than zero ($-2.7 million). Inclusion

Fund 80-100 EPA Sewerage Sys. Impr.

Total Sanitary Improvement Funds

Total Sanitary & Storm Impr. Funds

* In millions of dollars

Without Anticipated Federal Grants*

Unencmbrd. Total Balance Authority

($2.7) ($ 2.7)

$1.4 $19.0

$3.2 $24.5

With Anticipated Federal Grants'

Unencmbrd. Total Balance Authority

$ 6.8 $ 6.8

$10.9 $28.5

$12.7 $34.0

Until OWDA projects are closed, beginning and ending principal balances and principal and interest payments are est imates based on the est imated project cost and the ant icipated federal funding. Once the project is com­pleted and the actual cost is known, the interest and principal p a y m e n t s are adjusted to reflect the actual a m o u n t f inanced. The In t e r cep to r project is not yet closed; therefore, the balances and payments shown on the Summary of OWDA Indebtedness are estimates.

DESIGN SECTION Responsibility

The functional responsibili ty of this depar tment is to plan and design the hardware and ancilliary operational facilities associated with the sanitary, combined and storm collection and t ranspor t ing sewer systems. This involves: technical a n d e n g i n e e r i n g p l a n n i n g ; a d m i n i s t r a t i v e a n d lega l documentat ion; schedul ing programs to minimize capital, opera t ing and m a i n t e n a n c e f inancial r e source commit ­ments ; manag ing easemen t and right-of-way acquisi t ion and release; field survey and location activities; maintaining wri t ten and graph ic records and mapp ing of our utility lines; all for the purpose of updat ing, ex tending and rehabi­litating the three sewer systems.

26 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

Organization The responsibil i ty of the depa r tmen t is carried out by

organizing the personnel into two sections. The Contract Section administers the planning, financial, contract, reg­ulatory, outside agency and utility permits , technical stan­dards, survey and right-of-way activities. The Plans Section administers the detail engineering reviews of public and pri­vate plans, construct ion s tandards , temporary right-of-way, agreements, record plans and mapping activities.

Stalling The personnel of this depar tment mus t have the profes­

sional, t echnica l , a d m i n i s t r a t i v e a n d e x p e r i e n c e back­grounds to carry out the legal, regulatory, legislative, finan­cial, technological and h u m a n resource p rocedures n o w being used to obtain the cur ren t level of efforts needed to accomplish depar tment and overall division goals and re­sponsibilities.

Because of the increased n u m b e r of federal and state laws and regulations promulgated over the past five years and the resultant increased liason and cooperat ion with other governmental agencies, private corporat ions and associa­tions and both private and public bodies and groups , our budge t submis s ions have cons is ten t ly r eques t ed a d d e d position and staffing al locations. An examina t ion of the accompanying organization char t will reveal the cur ren t positions and inter-relationship within the depar tment .

Projects The d e p a r t m e n t a w a r d e d 12 City pro jec ts for a tota l

amount of $14.1 million dollars of which 5 were separat ion projects for $6.2 million dollars and 7 were sanitary projects for $7.9 million dollars worth of construct ion.

Grants The 7.5 mile long 78 to 48-inch d iameter Blacklick Creek

Interceptor was approved by the United States Environ­mental Protect ion Agency for par t ic ipat ion funding of a Step 3 construction grant and the project was placed unde r construction during the second quar te r of the year. Because of varying eligibility factors the grant amoun ted to 47.5% of its total $7.3 million cost.

The Alum Creek-Minerva Park In terceptor received a 75% USEPA Step 3 funding approval and the $435,000 project was bid in November with construct ion to start in the first quarter of the new year.

Engineering Approvals D u r i n g t h e y e a r 176 s e w e r e n g i n e e r i n g p l a n s w e r e

approved with 102 being s torm plans and 74 being sanitary plans. The total 41.84 miles of new lines was composed of 11.66 new miles of storm sewers and 30.17 new miles of sanitary sewers. These were sewer plans submi t t ed from private architects and engineers , developers , proper ty own­ers, contractors and suburban sewerage service contract en­tities.

Various other City and governmenta l agencies submi t ted 58 plans requiring engineering review of their utility and facilities improvements .

Engineering Permits Street opening permits were approved for 28 various util­

ity overhead and underg round engineered installat ions.

Right-oi-Way and Easments Granted and platted easements and rights-of-way for new

construction were obta ined prior to authorizing the new sanitary and s torm sewers to proceed to construct ion.

There were 25 reques ts for part ial or comple te release or vacation of dedicated rights of City proper ty associated with division sewer lines. Where possible and appropr ia te we at tempted to relieve property owners of encumberances on their land titles where a sewer was no longer needed.

Mapping A major por t ion of d ra f t ing a c t i v i t i e s th i s yea r was

directed towards correcting, expand ing , and upda t ing t h e Columbus Sewer Atlas Map System. The area of coverage was expanded by 10 square miles with 14 new maps , which increased the total n u m b e r of Atlas Maps to 336. The total length of sewers added to the Atlas Maps in 1982 was 275 miles (600 plans), which is 9.6% of the length of the ent i re system. In addition, right-of-way dra inage was added along 7.53 miles of state expressways . The ex tens ive work on the Atlas Maps was performed in order to provide Division of Sewerage and Drainage field personnel and o ther City agen-

. cies with more accurate and u p to date data on the sewerage system. In December , 90 reduced-scale Atlas books were

produced by the p lann ing sect ion records personnel to re­place books p roduced two years previous .

Records Record plans were m a d e for 7.20 miles of pr ivate and pub­

lic sewers, increasing the total n u m b e r of record p lans by 44 s h e e t s . M a n h o l e t o m a n h o l e d i s t a n c e m e a s u r e m e n t s obtained by Design D e p a r t m e n t survey c rews for 5.47 miles of private sani tary sewers were a d d e d to 73 exis t ing record plans. Const ruct ion inspect ion notes were used to add wye location information to 38 pr ivate sani tary sewer const ruc­tion plans.

Summary oi Sewers Dur ing the year e n d i n g D e c e m b e r 31, 1982 the length of all

sewers c o n s t r u c t e d for p e r m a n e n t r e co rd ing in t h e Co­lumbus sewerage sys tem totaled 24.243 miles . Of tha t total, 14.360 miles are s torm sewers and 9.883 miles are sanitary sewers . T h e a d d i t i o n of t h e s e s e w e r s to t h e C o l u m b u s sewerage sys tem increases t h e total l ength of the sys tem to 2648.320 miles of which 1594.065 miles are sani tary sewers , 813.687 miles are s torm sewers and 240,568 miles are com­bined sewers .

SEWER MAINTENANCE YARD

MAINTENANCE. REPAIR AND OPERATION 24.0 miles of sewers were c leaned by dragging 46.0 miles of sewers were c leaned by power rodder

110.0 miles of sewers were c leaned by je t f lusher 138.0 miles of sewers were c leaned by vactors

318.0 total miles of sewers were c leaned

6880 compla in ts were received by t h e Main tenance Yard 10.3 miles of sewers were inspec ted by TVing at 144 loca­

t ions 248.1 m i l e s of s e w e r s w e r e i n s p e c t e d for p r e v e n t a t i v e

ma in t enance 9.0 miles of sewers were foamed wi th chemicals for kill­

ing roots

Miscel laneous act ivi t ies inc luded repa i r s t o 590 exis t ing sewers and 1012 s t ruc tures , c leaning dra inage di tches , and upgrading sani tary and s to rm p u m p s ta t ions .

FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION SECTION The pr imary responsibi l i ty of t h e Financia l Adminis t ra­

tion Section is coord ina t ing t h e acquis i t ion of the resources , including funding, r equ i red to ope ra t e t h e Sewer Division. This inc ludes coord ina t ing t h e p u r c h a s e of suppl ies , mate­rials and services and process ing p a y m e n t for same; proces­sing the execut ion and p a y m e n t of capital i m p r o v e m e n t s contracts ; coordina t ing c u s t o m e r billing and accoun ts re­ceivable; de l inquen t a ccoun t collection; and financial plan­ning and budge t ing .

Other functions per formed in this sect ion inc lude opera­tion of the Division 's supp ly /cop ie r /mai l room located in City Hall, E P A gran t accoun t ing , m a i n t e n a n c e of t h e asset inventory sys t em, gene ra l a c c o u n t i n g and bookkeep ing , and coordinat ion of the annua l suppl ies and mater ials in­ventory. The sect ion acts as chief liaison wi th the Division of Water regarding bill ings for sewer services and with the City Auditor 's Office and the D e p a r t m e n t of F inance regard ing financial mat te rs . Finally, t h e sect ion is respons ib le for de­veloping annua l b u d g e t and sewer ra te proposals and for present ing the proposa ls to t h e Sewer and Water Advisory Board and City Counci l for approval .

Dur ing 1982, the sect ion opera ted wi th a staff of twelve, nine full-time e m p l o y e e s and th ree par t - t ime employees . Major accompl i shmen t s du r ing 1982 inc luded the following:

—4,678 accoun ts were certified to the Coun ty Treasurer ' s Office for collection wi th 1982 p roper ty tax bills. A total of $416,394 was certified inc lud ing $37,857 in penal ty.

—Due to au tomat ion of t h e certification process u n d e r the new Water /Sewer Utility Bill ing sys tem, significant re­duct ions were m a d e in the a m o u n t of t ime requi red to comple te t h e project. An es t imated 1,000 man-hours of work were e l iminated in t h e sect ion. (The Division of Water saved an es t imated 1,200 man-hour s of over t ime as a result of the a u t o m a t e d process) .

—In July, a let ter was sen t to notify p roper ty owners of p e n d i n g cer t i f icat ion. T h e le t te r resu l ted in approx­imately $75,000 in p a y m e n t s prior to certification. This is the first t i m e such a not ice h a s been sent and was only possible as a resul t of au tomat ion of the certification process.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 27

—Also in July, the Division began assessing a 10 percent service charge for late paymen t of sewer bills. This generated $126,400 in addit ional income dur ing the year and has encouraged p rompte r payment of sewer bills.

—In May, a new policy, turn-off of water service for non­payment of sewer bills, was implemented . It is esti­mated that this policy reduced the 1982 certification list by $500,000. As a result, t he Division received these re­venues at least one year sooner than it would have had the bills been certified.

—During 1982 the Division collected over $275,000 in dis­p u t e d , and d e l i n q u e n t , e x t r a s t r e n g t h bil ls . Ex t r a strength bills more than six mon ths del inquent have been virtually el iminated.

—Several types of billings that were previously billed or aged (de l inquen t not ices sent) manua l ly were auto­mated on the Water /Sewer Billing system during 1982. This has el iminated several manua l procedures and im­proved t h e efficiency of the bil l ing and de l inquen t notice process.

—In October 1982, the section began backbill ing county customers whose sewer lines are maintained by the City bu t w h o were n e v e r bi l led for t h e s e serv ices . The amount backbil led totalled $47,535 by year end. In addi­tion, those accounts backbil led have been recoded on the billing sys tem so they will be properly billed in the future.

—A new sewer charge sys tem for industrial customers was implemented in 1982. The new system, which re­quired extensive recoding of the Water/Sewer Billing System, provides a more equi table charge s t ructure for industrial surveil lance cus tomers .

—The Division received condit ional approval from the USEPA for its indirect cost proposals for 1972 through 1981. Final approval will permi t grant projects involv­ing these years to be finaled, and will allow the Division to satisfy three audi t repor ts that ruled against the Divi­sion due to lack of an approved indirect cost proposal.

—The section installed a word processing system dur ing the year. Use of the sys tem has greatly reduced the turn­a round t ime requ i red for o rd inances , con t rac t s and other document s .

—The section part icipated in the development of an auto­mated inventory sys tem for federally funded property.

—During 1982, the section cont inued to develop and re­fine financial analysis t echn iques on its microcompu­ter. A new rate model was developed that allows alter­nate rate proposals to be calculated in less than an hour. Manual calculation of a l ternate proposals took up to a week. Other sys tems developed dur ing the year have enhanced operat ing and capital improvements budget development , the quar ter ly budge t review process, and note sale r equ i rements analysis.

—The 1983 sewer rate increase for residential inside-city

cus tomer was held to only 2.4 percent . During 1983, a major goal of the Financial Administrat ion

Section will be the deve lopmen t of policy and procedural manuals for purchas ing and accounts receivable. Another important goal will be the cont inued deve lopment and re­finement of account ing and financial managemen t proce­dures and capabili t ies including improved documenta t ion and record keeping and e n h a n c e m e n t of the transfer and coordination of financial data be tween the Financial Ad­ministration Sect ion and the rest of the Division. A final goal will be to keep the 1983 sewer rate increase below the rate of inflation.

SEWER PERMIT OFFICE The Pe rmi t Sec t ion was sepa ra t ed as an i ndependen t

operating section of the Division in mid-1979. The Pr imary responsibilities of the Pe rmi t Sect ion are the issuance of permits for; connect ion of new sewers to the exist ing sewer system, the repairs necessary to k e e p the system operation­al, the inspection of this sewer const ruct ion to insure com­pliance with City Codes and Specifications and the collec­tion and account ing of the various fees and charges due the City relating to this type of work. The Permi t Section also administers all subu rban contrac tura l agreements for the use of the City's sewer system.

A total of 1412 permits were issued for construct ion and repair of sewer services, 143 Construct ion Inspect ion De­posits were received for s t andby inspect ion of private storm and sani tary sewers . T h e tota l a m o u n t received by this office dur ing 1982 was $1,253,343.55 for the various fees due on the permits issued, in addi t ion $277,338.00 was received and deposi ted to the Division of Const ruct ion 's s t andby in­spection fund.

Oi the 1412 permits issued by this office there were: 56 for repairs to existing sewers, a 364% increase; 1186 for residen­tial connections, a 41% decrease; and, 137 for commercial and industrial connections, a 4% decrease, all as related to an average year. The 364% increase for permits issued for repairs is again due to the fact that more repair work is done under permit.

During 1982 the Permit Section Accomplished the Following Goals:

—Completed inspection and work with private contractor on the first group of catch basin cleaning contracts.

—Implemented second year of catch basin cleaning con­tracts, reorganized the areas to be cleaned and trained Construction Division personnel in inspection proce­dures for the projects.

—Considerable t ime and effort was expended working with the Division of Bui lding Regulations to reduce sewer back-up problem areas and the development of new inspection techniques to reduce s tormwater inlets into the sanitary sewer system.

—Investigated possible applications for Data Processing, Word Processing and Microfilming for use in the Sec­tion's activities.

—Developed new procedures in conjunct ion with the Sewer Charge Office to verify billing of monthly rental at correct rates.

—Developed new accessing system by job code for files kept in storage to make use of these records easier and quicker.

The following graph indicates the relationship of permits issued to the passage of t ime for three areas. First a 10-year average curve, second the curve reflecting 1981 permits issued and finally a curve for 1982.

TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION During 1982, the staff of the Technical Suppor t Section

consisted of two Professional Engineers, one Engineer-in-Training, a Plant Operation and Maintenance Training Coor­dinator , a Wastewater Soil Appl ica t ions Coordina tor , a Clerk and a Steno-Clerk.

The primary areas of responsibili t ies lie within the areas of p repara t ion of Opera t ion and Main tenance Manuals , operator training, coordination of the City's Land Applica­tion Program, and the coordination of the planning, design and construction of the wastewater t rea tment and compost­ing facilities. Routine, daily, specific areas of responsibili­ties of the staff cont inued to be to receive, review and evalu­ate wastewater t reatment plant, composting, and land ap­plication data and insure the EPA monitor ing requirements were complied with.

Operation and Maintenance (O & M) Manuals and Training The following activities were either completed or initiated

by the Technical Suppor t staff dur ing 1982. A. Jackson Pike

1. Contract 160 — Primary Sludge Withdrawal Facilities a) Coordinated vendor training for equ ipment in con­

tract. b) Video taped vendor training. c) Observed star t-up of s ludge withdrawal facilities

for compliance with proper start-up guidelines. d) Wrote p r e l i m i n a r y o p e r a t i o n and m a i n t e n a n c e

manual and prepared Final Plan of Operation. 2. Plant Preventat ive Maintenance

a) Identified preventat ive maintenance tasks for cen­trifuges.

b) Began identification of preventat ive maintenance tasks for other operat ing sections within the plant.

3. Operation & Maintenance Manuals a) Cont inued prepara t ion of operat ing manuals for

centr i fuges, d iges ters , inc inera tors and flushing water sys tem.

B. Southerly 1. Plant Preventat ive Maintenance

a) Reviewed preventat ive maintenance program and identified methods for improvement .

b) P r e p a r e d o u t l i n e of p r e v e n t a t i v e m a i n t e n a n c e tasks for centrifuges.

2. Operation & Maintenance Manuals a) Wrote P r i m a r y T r e a t m e n t Opera t ion & Mainte­

nance Manual. b) Prepared Operation & Maintenance Manual for the

Hauck Burners on the incinerators. 3. Training

a) Provided review training on incineration.

28 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

b) Provided adjunct training on Hauck Burners (in­cinerators).

c) Video taped chlorine training. d) Began prepara t ion of ma in t enance t ra ining pro­

gram. 4. Other Activities

a) Prepared drawings and a scope of work summary for relocation of raw sewage samplers .

b) Investigated water drainage problem on centrifuge swing conveyors.

Design and Construction Management The Technical S u p p o r t Staff was actively involved in

coordination of the planning, design and/or construct ion activities on the following projects dur ing 1982:

Southwesterly Composting Facility 1. Contract 4—Passive Solar Drying 2. Contract 5—Active Solar Drying 3. Farm Structures Demolit ion

Southerly Wastewater Treatment Plant 1. Contract 12-2—Incinerator Facilities 2. Contract 15—Truck Loading Facilities 3. Contract 16—Screen Room Heat ing and Ventilat ing 4. Contract 17—Digester Modifications 5. Contract 18—Incinerator Modifications 6. Contract 19—Waste Activated S ludge Concent ra t ion

Facilities 7. Plant Security System

Jackson Pike Wastewater Treatment Plant 1. Contract 160—Primary Sludge Withdrawal 2. Contract 167—Additional Bar Screen Facilities 3. Contract 168—Parts Storage Facilities 4. Contract 169—Additional Truck Loading Facilities 5. Contract 170—Odor Control Facilities 6. Contract 171—Rehabilitation of Renick Run P u m p Sta­

tion 7. Contract 172—Emergency Waterline Improvemen t s 8. Plant Security Sys tem 9. Waste Activated Sludge Centrifuge Installation

Surveillance Laboratory 1. Surveillance Sect ion Storage Facility Activities on these projects included review of all con­

struction plans and specifications by staff and t h e t r ea tmen t facility involved; coordinat ion of the b idding process, re­view by Contract Compl iance Office, Ohio Envi ronmenta l Protection Agency and the Corps of Engineers , a t tending all progress meetings on active const ruct ion projects and re­view and resolution of all ques t ions that arise dur ing con­struction.

In addition to the various activities on these projects, the Technical Suppor t staff has worked wi th consul t ing en­gineers to develop the following, which are being used on design and construct ion projects at the was tewater treat­ment plants and compost ing facility.

1) general specifications, 2) s tandard engineering agreements , 3) definition of responsibil i t ies of consul tants , Sewerage

and Drainage, and inspect ion dur ing design and con­struction,

4) scheduling of design and construct ion projects, 5) guidelines for providing s tar t-up services, and 6) procedure for change orders on construct ion projects. The Technical Suppor t staff has also par t ic ipated in va­

rious in-house studies, one of which conduc ted and ana­lyzed pressure tests on a six inch cast iron pipe p u m p i n g (via Moyno P u m p ) raw and anaerobically digested s ludge cake at the Jackson P ike Wastewater Trea tmen t Plant .

Land Application Program Bio-Rich (digested sewage sludge) has been recycled to

cropland as a fertilizer since April, 1979. The program was initiated by the City when it was recognized that land ap­plication of sewage s ludge is an envi ronmenta l ly acceptable and cost effective method of operat ion. In addit ion, direc­tives issued by the United States Envi ronmenta l Protect ion Agency in an Env i ronmen ta l I m p a c t S t a t e m e n t in Ju ly 1979, stressed that the City rely 100% on land applicat ion and compost ing of sewage as an ul t imate disposal me thod

During the last three (3) years , the City of Co lumbus has been cooperat ing with The Ohio Farm Bureau Deve lopment Corporation (OFBDC) in a demons t ra t ion project funded by the United Sta tes Env i ronmen ta l Pro tec t ion Ageny. The City of Co lumbus funded the haul ing and spreading of Bio-Rich as their part in the program.

The Ohio F a r m Bureau has been the legislature a rm of the Ohio farmer for many years . This a t t r ibu te has allowed Co­lumbus the oppor tun i ty to deve lop a rappor t with the local farm c o m m u n i t y and to es tabl ish a land appl icat ion pro­gram which is accep tab le to the publ ic . Over 50 farm fami­lies pa r t i c ipa t ed in t h e d e m o n s t r a c t i o n projec t , half as s ludge receiving farms and half as control farms (non-sludge receiving). H u m a n s and an imals were sampled regularly for blood and stool samples ; an imals were s laughtered for test­ing of muscle , liver, k idney and blood meta l levels; soils and crops were sampled and tes ted for meta l and P C B up take and yield. All repor t s to da te indicate no difference in all results t aken from control farms (non-sludge receiving) and sludge receiving farms. T h e final r epor t should be com­pleted by the Fall of 1983. Detai ls of the s tudies are available from the Technical S u p p o r t staff.

During the past th ree (3) years , Bio-Rich was land applied in four local count ies ; F rank l in , P ickaway , Madison and Fairfield. A total of 96,115 wet tons of Bio-Rich was spread over 3,746 acres in th is t h ree year period, at an es t imated first year value of $30 per acre. Actual hau l ing and spreading costs to the City a m o u n t e d to approx ima te ly $430 per acre.

The contract wi th S an L Fertilizer expi red in November , 1982. Bids for a two year cont rac t were t aken in December and it is ant ic ipated that t h e new p rogram will be init iated in early 1983. The City's object ives in future land appl icat ion programs are:

1. To imp lemen t a p rogram to utilize Bio-Rich as a ferti­lizer on farmland,

2. To insure that a con t inuous land appl ica t ion p rogram is envi ronmenta l ly acceptable , and

3. To p r o v i d e t h e Ci ty w i th a cos t effect ive d i sposa l al ternat ive which is publ ic ly acceptable .

Monitoring and Report The Techn ica l S u p p o r t c ler ical staff h a s con t inued to

monitor and log t h e daily opera t ions of both was tewater t rea tment p lants and the compos t ing facility. The month ly N P D E S moni tor ing repor t s from each p lant are reviewed each m o n t h for cons is tency and submi t t ed to OPEA. Week­ly reports are also p repa red for the L a n d Appl icat ion Pro­g ram and a re gene ra l ly s u b m i t t e d to O E P A eve ry t w o weeks . A m o n t h l y r e p o r t is p r e p a r e d and s u b m i t t e d to OEPA by staff for the compos t i ng facility.

SOUTHWESTERLY COMPOST FACILITY 1982 was a good year for the C o l u m b u s Compos t Facility,

it was a year which saw the s tar t -up of our marke t ing pro­gram for our final p roduc t . It was a year which saw the hiring of addi t ional pe rsonne l and con t inued const ruct ion, both geared toward m a k i n g the C o l u m b u s Compos t Facility one of the finest in the count ry . Dur ing 1982, over 300 visi­tors toured this facility, school g roups , vocat ional schools , conservation groups , local ci t izens and cit izens from India, Canada, China and J a p a n . All found compos t ing to be an effective and a t t rac t ive m e a n s of w a s t e w a t e r s ludge dis­posal.

I would like to h ighl ight s o m e of the significant events that directly relate to t h e overall success of the compos t ing operation in 1982:

1. Hiring eight (8) addi t ional opera tors and one (1) me­chanic.

2. Receiving six (6) Trojan F r o n t e n d loaders in J anua ry . 3. Comple t ion of Cont rac t # 3 . 4. Star t -up and 95% comple t ion of Cont rac t #4 . 5. City personnel a t t end ing t h e Nat ional Conference on

the Compos t ing of Munic ipal and Indus t r ia l S ludges held in Washington, D.C.

6. Star t -up of marke t ing p rogram and pass ing out sam­ples of COM-TILL at the Ohio S ta te Fair.

7. Approval of Cont rac t # 5 by the E P A to comple te the facility.

8. Overall good publ ic re la t ions wi th the local c o m m u n ­ity.

With the hir ing of addi t iona l pe rsonne l , giant s t r ides were taken in moving toward a comple t e well- trained facility. The addit ion of n e w e q u i p m e n t such as front-end loaders , stack­ing conveyors combined wi th t h e new paved areas for stor­age and dry ing of mater ia l w e r e also con t r ibu t ing factors. At the Compos t Conven t ion in Washington , D . C , new ideas were d iscussed and in tour ing o the r c o m p o s t opera t ions it was proven tha t the C o l u m b u s C o m p o s t Facil i ty is on the r ight t r ack . Ci ty p e r s o n n e l p r e s e n t e d a p a p e r on Cold Weather Compos t ing wh ich was very well received. Numer­ous and f requent inqui r ies are cons tan t ly being received for information from eng ineer ing firms conce rn ing compos t ing

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 29

from all over the country. In shar ing our experiences, we are greatly aiding the development of this field in other parts of the country.

The Columbus Compost ing Facility has generally been accepted in the local communi ty . Very few complaints con­cerning this operation have been received since start-up and we are constantly seeking self-improvement in our opera­tion. News coverage in media both electronic and printed has generally been positive. The public response to our film on compost ing and the passing out of samples at the Ohio State Fair was ext remely well received. A slide presentat ion and talk on compos t ing by Bob Smith and myself was very warmly received by t h e C o l u m b u s Chapte r of t h e Rose Growers Society, the overall resul t s indicate that many citizens are interested in using our final product . The City of Columbus working in conjunct ion with the Ohio and Feder­al EPA is developing a produc t un ique to this part of the country. A product useful in soil condi t ioning and landscap­ing, a product rich in mirco-nutr iants , a product which helps conserve energy, not deple te energy.

Coordination of this operat ion and the on-going construc­tion since initial s tart-up in Ju ly of 1980 would have been impossible wi thout the cooperat ion of all parties concerned. Complete General Construct ion Company, Malcom Pirnie and Burgess & Niple Ltd., our consul t ing engineers and the Technical Suppor t Sect ion played major roles in the con­tinued deve lopment of th is facility. I would also like to thank the managemen t and staffs of the Super in tendent ' s Office, Souther ly Wastewater Plant , Jackson P ike Wastewa­ter Plant , Sewer Ma in t enance , Surve i l l ance Sect ion, Fi­nance Section and Business Office, all of which played key roles in the overall success of this operation.

At any work site the implementa t ion of policy and utiliza­tion of procedures would be useless wi thout the positive support and close at tent ion to detail tha t comes from work­ing with good men and women . They are the ones who make this operation a success or failure, they provide the flexibil­ity to change and adapt to the si tuation. In that vein, I owe a debt of grat i tude to my clerk, my operators and my me­chanics who provided 365 opera t ing days for this facility in 1982.

Southwesterly Compost Facility 1982 Operating Data

Month January February March April May J u n e July August Sep tember October November December

Incoming Sludge (Wet Tons) 3,228 3,580 4.463 4,536 4,559 3,421 4,092 3,393 3,300 3,301 3,117 3,184

44,174

Average wet tons per day: 121 % Solids Incoming Sludge: 18.0

Total tons processed since Ju ly 1, 1980

Year Tons 1980 27,903 1981 50,591 1982 44,174

122,668

1982 Equipment Data

Quantity Type oi Equipment 2 Trojan 5500 Fron tend Loader with 10 yd. bucket 4 Trojan 2500 Fron tend Loader with 7 yd. bucket 2 Ford A-64 F ron tend Loader with 4 yd. bucke t 1 Ford 4600 Utility Tractor with mower , broom,

har row cult ivator, disc 2 GMC Semi- t ruck with pushou t trailer 2 Cobey Compos te r s 3 Kohlberg S tack ing Conveyors 1 Li-Well Screen with %" screen openings 1 Royer Screen with "A" screen openings 1 Ford 4-wheel Drive P i c k u p Truck with insect

control e q u i p m e n t 1 Chevrolet Crew-cab P i c k u p

1 International Scout 4-wheel Drive 2 Peerless Trailer Tipper 1 Ford Riding Lawnmower 1 Street-flusher Truck

SURVEILLANCE SECTION The primary function of the Surveillance Section is to

monitor the sewerage system and its contributors for the purpose of protecting the system, the t reatment works, and ultimately the receiving stream. The section accomplishes this responsibi l i ty th rough a field sampl ing group , and analytical laboratory, a sewer charge office, and an adminis­trative staff. The administrat ive staff bears the additional responsibility for assuring that the Division is aware of ap­plicable federal and state programs. Among these are feder­ally mandated extra-s trength charges and industrial pre-treatment regulations.

The section was established in 1976 and has grown as needs developed and facilities became available. The sec­tion moved into its new facility in May of 1980 and currently employs 25 people, 4 of whom are located at the sewer charge office. This new operations base has provided the section with a consolidated and more convenient location, greatly needed operations space, and freedom from reliance on commercial laboratories.

FIELD SAMPLING GROUP The field sampling group's activities for 1982 included col­

lecting of industr ial wastes samples from about 40 com­panies on a regular basis for re-evaluation of their extra-s t r e n g t h cha rges . Ex t r a s t r e n g t h cha rges are a ssessed against non-residential dischargers whose waste costs the Division more to treat than a waste from the "average" re­sidential user. This is t h e "user charge" system and is a federal mandate . Rout ine re-evaluation of each company is necessary due to fluctuation in characteristics of discharges.

Additional field activity involved collection of samples from industries that have the potential to violate Columbus ' sewer use ordinance. These samples are a policing measure to help insure no one discharges substances which could be harmful to the system. About 80 companies are evaluated on a routine basis for extra strength, sewer use, or for both needs. Field operations also include collection of sewerage system samples to help pinpoint unidentified sources of pol­lutants (e.g., cadmium) including those that might be de­trimental to the City's s ludge disposal program.

LABORATORY The labora tory work load , on the basis of pa r ame te r s

analyzed, increased 24% over 1981 levels. The laboratory analyzed 6413 samples for 37,940 parameters in 1982. These samples were 40% industrially related, 28% routine treat­ment plant analyses, 21% general Division testing such as river runs, compost and technical suppor t generated sam­ples, and 11% from miscellaneous sources.

Other major 1982 accompl ishments included: Developing and implement ing an analytical procedure for

PCB's (polychlorinated biphenyls) in sludges. Analyzing samples from a system wide survey to deter­

mine point source discharges of cadmium. Developing and implement ing an analytical technique for

Salmonella in sludges as an indicator of compost ing effi­ciency.

Analyzing samples from a survey to determine levels of phenols on our collection system, t rea tment plants , and

Implement ing rout ine TOC (total organic carbon) analy­ses as a confirmation of other sewage s t rength analyses, and partial replacement for COD.

Analyzing samples from a large scale nitrification study at the Southerly Wastewater Trea tment Plant.

SEWER CHARGE OFFICE During 1982 some of the major accompl ishments of this

office were: 1. Began checking all water only accounts in Columbus

water system, including suburbs , to verify they are cor­rectly coded as sewer-exempt accounts .

2. Reviewed billing registers to de termine that accounts coded for sewer were assessed proper sewer charges.

3. Remodeled offices to achieve a better working environ­ment and promote office efficiency.

4. Assumed full responsibili ty for billings for scavenger was te hau le r p rogram (previously held by F inance Office.)

5 Established clearer lines of communicat ion with Sur­veillance Section, Sewer Permi t Office, and Finance

30 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

Office in order to process workload in a cooperative manner. . . „ T

6 Cont inued to perform daily funct ions of office. In­cluded in this were the following activities:

ACTIVITY NUMBER Field Investigations-Aux. Mtrs., Wells,

Commercial/ industrial invest, etc 11'» Customer serv/office functions:

A. Telephone Reques ts l"o< B. Serv. req. sent to Water Div 4b9 C. Water and Sewer Accts. checked 1702

Scavenger Water Hauler P rogram Recap A. Number of loads 5188 B. Revenue billed to haulers $11 /,b83.8l

Goals for 1983 1. Completion of billing register review for sewer billing

accuracy. 2. I m p l e m e n t a t i o n of be t t e r s a m p l i n g / m e a s u r i n g pro­

gram for scavenger waste haulers . 3. Continuation of code #1 (water only accts) program

with complet ion of as many accounts as possible. 4. Total re-organization of card catalog/filing system.

PRETREATMENT PROGRAM Federal requirements for the deve lopment of a pretreat-

ment program to regulate industrial d ischarges has been under development by a contractor with 75% payment by Federal Grant. The contractor has worked on this program during 1981 and 1982. Reports have been submi t ted to the Ohio EPA for review on discharger inventory, technical in­formation, and monitor ing and enforcement . It is expec ted that Columbus will probably b e des ignated as a "control Authority" for the regulation of U S E P A pre t rea tment pro­gram in 1983. It does not appear at this t ime that the "control authority" designation will require major changes in Co­lumbus operational requi rements .

The Federal program regulatory p re t r ea tmen t did pro­gress in 1982 by promulgat ion of a n u m b e r of categorial indus t ry p r e t r e a t m e n t s t a n d a r d s . C o l u m b u s i n d u s t r i e s affected are primari ly e lect roplaters and metal finishers. Electroplaters not presently in compl iance are being moni­tored to a t tempt to obtain compliance by their April 1984 deadl ine . Other i n d u s t r i e s in C o l u m b u s a re e i t he r no t affected by categorical p re t rea tment l imits or the affect has not yet been fully determined.

JACKSON PIKE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT D u r i n g 1982 t h e a v e r a g e p r e c i p i t a t i o n i n c r e a s e d by

approximately 4% as compared to that which occurred in 1981. The average daily flow increased approximate ly 5% due primarily to the increased rainfall. The BOD 5 concentra­tion decreased approximately 4%; whereas , the suspended solids concentrat ion decreased approximate ly 11 percent . The overall efficiency of the plant, in t e rms of B O D 5 and suspended solids removal, remained essentially the same as that experienced in 1981. The total populat ion equivalent of the treated sewage remained approximate ly the same as that experienced dur ing 1981. The operat ing and mainte­nance personnel allocations were identical to that of 1981.

Of primary impor tance dur ing 1982 was the energy situa­tion within the plant. New measures were t aken to assure that all available digester gas was used and a m i n i m u m of gas was wasted. Due to the previously establ ished goals of reducing the fuel oil consumpt ion in the plant, the fuel oil consumpt ion d ropped by approx ima te ly 32% in 1982 as compared to 1981. The use of na tura l gas increased d u e to the fact that sufficient sewer gas was not always available to operate the incinerators. It is hoped that when the present digester and gas s torage facilities design and const ruct ion is completed that the total a m o u n t of sewer gas p roduced will increase and the dependency upon fuel oil and natural gas will be decreased.

All cons t ruc t ion work assoc ia ted wi th Con t rac t 160— Primary Sludge Withdrawal Facilities was comple ted dur­ing 1982. C o n s t r u c t i o n w o r k w a s in i t i a t ed on t h e Ba r Screens Rehabili tat ion and Water Supp ly Improvemen t s . At the t ime of this writing, the Water Supp ly I m p r o v e m e n t s have been completed and the Bar Screens Facility s tands at approximately 30% complet ion.

During 1982 extensive design work cont inued on a new Concentrated Waste Activated S ludge Centrifuge Facility improvements to the Plant High Voltage Electrical Sys tem ' Rehabilitation of the P lan t Well Water and the City Water System, improvements to the P lan t Communica t ions Sys­

tem, Rehabil i ta t ion of the Engine Genera to r Stat ion and im­provements to t h e Anaerobic Digest ion Sys tem and Gas Storage Sys tem. It is hoped that the design work with re­spect to these above projects can be comple ted dur ing 1983 and that necessary funding will be available to carry out these sorely needed improvemen t s .

Once again, s t rong suppor t was given to the p lant from the various suppor t sect ions wi th in the Division of Sewerage and Drainage. In part icular , the Bus iness Office, Technical Support , and the F inance Sect ion have been very efficient and suppor t ive . T h e S u p e r i n t e n d e n t ' s Office, as has been the case in the past , has been very suppor t ive and has many t imes gone to great ex t r emes to see tha t the necessi t ies at the plant are provided for. As is a lways t h e case, and espe­cially dur ing the last year, the efficiency exper ienced at the plant was due pr imari ly to the individual employees in each section within the plant . Wi thout t he se people the operat ion and successful t r ea tmen t of was tewa te r at the 40 year old Jackson P ike Wastewater T r e a t m e n t P lan t would be im­possible. The opera t ions , m a i n t e n a n c e and adminis t ra t ive personnel at J a c k s o n P i k e have p roven themse lves to be professional and dedica ted employees in every sense. The employees I deal wi th on a daily basis have been ex t remely support ive and have carr ied out the i r du t ies in an except ion­al manner , even w h e n compared to the i r past high stan­dards .

JACKSON PIKE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 1982 OPERATING DATA SUMMARY

PRECIPITATION: Annual Total—Inches at

Port Columbus

RAW SEWAGE: Daily Average Flow Treated—MGD BOD5, mg/1 Suspended Solids, mg/1 Grit Removal, CF/MG Population Equivalent—Treated

PRIMARY TREATMENT: BOD5 in Effluent, mg/1 % BOD5 Removal, Raw to Settled Suspended Solids in Effluent, mg/1 % S.S. Removal, Raw to Settled % Total Solids in Primary Sludge % Volatile Solids in

Primary Sludge

SECONDARY TREATMENT: BOD5 in Final Effluent, mg/1 % BOD5 Removal, Raw to Final BOD5 Removal, Raw to Final, lb/day Suspended Solids in

Final Effluent, mg/1 % S.S. Removal, Raw to Final Dissolved Oxygen, mg/1

Aeration Tanks Final Effluent Channel

Air Applied, CF/gal. Aeration Tank Loading, lb

BODs/day/1000 CF Tank Capacity Air Applied, CF/lb BOD5 Removed

SLUDGE HANDLING SLUDGE DIGESTION: % Total Solids to Digesters % Volatile Solids to Digesters % Total Solids from Digesters % Volatile Solids from Digesters Raw & Thickened W.A.S. to

Digesters, gal./day Gas Produced, CF/day Gas Produced, CF/lb Volatile

Solids Applied Bicarbonate Alkalinity, mg/1

as Calcium Carbonate Volatile Acids, mg/1 as

Acetic Acid pH Temperature, °F

WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE THICKENING: Total Flow Processed, gal./day Feed Suspended Solids, mg/1 Centrate Suspended Solids, mg/1 Cake, % Total Solids Cake, % Volatile Solids % Recovery, Average/Year

1981

37.78 39.32

76 160 176 2.22

600,480

97 39.8 83 52.6 4.0

65.6

14 91.3

93,665

8 95.4

4.7 5.3 1.26

17.6 1,815

80 153 156

1.89 602,360

106 30.7 ;

109 30.1 3.3

66.2

15 90.2

92,074

9 94.1

3.7

L22t

20.2 1,604

3.6 63.5 2.9 51.8

478,000 570,734

6.3

2,290

100 7.6

87

965,000 6,049 1,656

6.9 71.7 67.4

33 65.6 2.8

53 4

431,417 1 516,000 J

6.6 .

2,390

80 7.6

86

856,000 6,846 2,342

6.4 71.6 e 69.2 £

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 31

HEAT-PRESSURE TREATMENT OF SLUDGE (ZIMPRO): Total Hours Operated 6 159 1 025 Average Reactor Pressure '390psi 387psi Average Reactor Temperature 381°F 381T1

HEAT-TREATED SLUDGE (ZIMPRO)—REMOVED: Dry Cake, Dry Tons/Day to

Incinerator 24 7 4 ? % Total Solids in Feed to

Centrifuge % Total Solids in Cake % Total Solids in Centrate % Recovery, Average/Year

DIGESTED SLUDGE TO LAND APPLICATION: Feed to Centrifuge,

% Total Solids Centrate, % Total Solids Cake, % Total Solids % Recovery. Average/Year Dry Tons/Day Centrifuged to Farm

Bureau Program 14.5

SLUDGE SUMMARY: Dry Solids, Dry Tons/Day 39.8 Dry Tons/Day Digested Centrifuge

to Farm Bureau 14.5 Dry Tons/Day Zimpro to Incinerator 24.7 Dry Tons/Day Raw to Incinerator 0.6 Dry Tons/Day Digested to

Incinerator

OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL ALLOCATION: Pretreatment 14.5% Primary 21.2% Secondary and Effluent 17.5% Sludge Handling 46.8%

11.0 33.4

1.0 94.0

2.9 0.6

17.5 82.1

9.7 32.2

2.3 82.2

2.9 0.6

15.7 82.5

12.6

44.7

12.6 4.3

23.7

14.5% 21.2% 17.5% 46.8%

SOUTHERLY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

During 1982 the average daily flow and loadings to the plant were similar to 1981. There was an average daily in­crease in flow of 2.5 million gallons per day. The BOD 5 and suspended solids concen t ra t ion remained essentially the same as 1981. The BOD and suspended solids removal effi­ciency remained at a high 96% for BOD and 96.2% for sus­pended solids.

D u r i n g 1982 we w e r e ab l e to p r o c e s s a p p r o x i m a t e l y 12,200,000 gals, of backlogged waste activated sludge along with our daily product ion of waste activated sludge, which was accompl i shed in pa r t by increased s ludge handl ing facilities, par t icular ly centr i fuges and compos t facilities. S ludge cake d rynes s from t h e centrifuges was increased from an average of 14-16% to 18-20% range.

A follow-up training session for incinerator operators was conducted in March, th is along with main tenance training on burner repair and ad jus tment has improved incinerator efficiency and run t ime. Fuel oil used in gals, per t ib if wet caje vyrbed was reduced by 36%.

The north ash lagoon was cleaned by the George Igel, Co. and returned to service.

The operat ing s tems were installed on the six (6) raw sew­age p u m p inlet sluice gates by Davis McKee, contractors . The installation of a new centrifugal blower was completed and put into service at cen te r aeration control center. A chlorine container, hand l ing and leak repair seminar was conducted by a P .B.&S. chemical co. representat ive dur ing the year. A s tudy was initiated to reduce the ammonia nit­rogen concentrat ion in the effluent to less than 1.0 mg/1 by Will iam B a k e r of B r u n d a g e , B a k e r a n d S tauf fe r L td . consulting firm.

Contract #16, Screen room heat ing and venti lat ion mod­ification was bid and awarded to J. A. Guy, Inc. of Dublin, Ohio. The emergency genera tors that operate the inlet sluice gates at the inlet sewer, were relocated west of the screen room in a new shelter. The design, construct ion and reloca­tion was performed by in-house personnel at a substantial monetary savings to the city.

During 1982 there was a 7% reduct ion in K.W.H. of elec­tricity used.

A high level of efficiency was once again mainta ined dur­ing the year 1982.

I am grateful for the valuable guidance and assistance I received from the Super in tendent ' s office, Business office, F inance Sec t ion , Techn ica l S u p p o r t , Surve i l l ance and Southwesterly Compost sections.

I deeply appreciate the suppor t and cooperation I have received from all office, Laboratory, Operations and Mainte­nance personnel of the Souther ly Wastewater Treatment Plant, without their help this could not have been accom­plished.

SOUTHERLY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 1982 OPERATING DATA SUMMARY

PRECIPITATION 1981 1982 Annual total at Port Columbus 37.78 39.32 RAW SEWAGE Daily average flow treated (MGD) 52.0 54.5 Average BOD (mg/1) 214 200 Average suspended solids (mg/1) 185 185 Grit removal average (cu. ft./day) 24.9 32.0 Organic population equivalent

treated day 525,884 534,731 Operating personnel allocation (%) 9 9

PRIMARY TREATMENT Average BOD in effluent (mg/1) 160'" 138'2' % removal raw to primary 13.5 31.0 Suspended solids in effluent (mg/1) 146 112'2' % removal raw to primary 21.1 39.5 Primary sludge collected (gpd) 145,000 181,071 % total solids 3.8 4.4 % volatile solids 74.4 73.9 Total solids (T./day) 23.0 33.2 Operating personnel allocation (%) 9 9

SECONDARY TREATMENT (Effluent) BOD in final effluent (mg/1) 7 8 % removal raw to final 96.7 96.0 BOD removal raw to final (lb./day) 89,740 87,280 Suspended solids in final

effluent (mg/1) 7 7 % removal raw to final 96.2 96.2 Aeration tank loading,

Qb. BOD/day/1000 cu. ft. capacity) 38.5 33.2 Air applied,

—cu. ft./gal 2.1 Not available —cu. ft./lb. BOD removed 1,105 Not available

Excess sludge solids (D.T./day) 66.5 29.2 Operating personnel allocation (%) 36 36

SLUDGE CONCENTRATION Total dry tons of solids processed 24,258 10,658 Polymer cost per lb. wet wt $0.0771 N/A Pounds of polymer used 305,746 0 Operation personnel allocation (%) 9 9

SLUDGE INCINERATION Wet sludge cake incinerated

(T./day, est.) 156.0 145.8 % solids in wet cake 15.8 19.0 % volatile solids in centrifuge cake 73.7 74.2 Fuel oil used, gal/T, of wet cake 16.3 10.5 Sewage gas used, cu. ft./T. wet cake N/A N/A Natural gas used, cu. ft./T. wet cake 0 0 Operating personnel allocation (%) 18 18

CENTRIFUGE DEWATERING Polymer cost (per lb. wet wt.) $.0745 $.0842 Pounds bulk polymer used 4,514,909 4,273,831 Pounds bulk polymer/dry ton cake 285 270 Primary sludge dewatered (gpd) 145,000 181,000 Mixed sludge dewatered (gpd) 184,000 358,000 Wet centrifuge cake (T./day) 273.7 227.4 Average % solids in centrifuge cake 15.8 19.0 Dry solids in centrifuge cake (T./day) — 43.4 43.3 Operating personnel allocation (%) 18 18

SLUDGE TRUCKED TO COMPOST FACILITY Total Wet Tons— 50,591 44,174 Ave. Wet Tons Per day 139'3' 121'3' (1) BOD5 was run on primary effluent from 1-1-81 through 4-16-81 (2) Includes plant recycle (3) The total wet tons produced per day and the wet tons hauled per

day are estimated. The discrepancy between tons produced and tons disposed of is due to these estimations.

32 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

DIVISION OF ELECTRICITY ANNUAL REPORT—1982

REFUSE/COAL-FIRED MUNICIPAL ELECTRIC PLANT

With the excep t ion of some landscaping, the ou tward appearance of the Refuse/Coal-Fired Munic ipal Electr ic Plant (R/CFMEP) was essentially completed by the close of 1982.

The plant office area was completed and occupied, and the Division staffing was expanded by approximately 40 new Power Plant employees. By the year 's end, all major plant equipment had been installed, and much of this equip­ment had also been turned over to the Power P lan t staff for operation and maintenance.

The first fire was lighted in "Boiler A" on December 16, by Mayor Tom Moody, Service Director Rober t Park inson, Su­pe r in tenden t Henry Bell, and a host of ass i s tan ts . This accomplishment designated the first real s tep in the pro­gression of "star t ing" the Plant .

The on-site Shredder Station was also comple ted in 1982. An initial trail of the shredders on approximate ly 30 tons of refuse was successfully completed, with a "full load" test scheduled in early 1983. The Coal Receiving Stat ion was completed, and over 12,000 tons of coal had been delivered by the year's end.

With the const ruct ion nearly complete , the only major work to be cont inuing was in the control wiring and the piping systems.

ENGINEERING The Engineering Staff Worked on a variety of projects

dur ing 1982. These projects varied from resident ia l cus­tomer services to ass is t ing wi th the cons t ruc t ion of the 138KV Transmission Line. The following is a partial list of customer services that were engineered in 1982.

American Aggregates Arby's Restaurant San Fillipo Bros.

Produce Co. K-Pac Building St. S tephen ' s Communi ty

Center Union Fork & Hoe Pic-Way Shoe Mart Battelle Riverfront Park G. D. Ritzy's Division of

Sewers & Drains Ohio Transmission &

P u m p Sheram Puppe t s Inc. Southerly Compost ing

Facility Division of Water—

Business Telephone Inc. 35 E. Livingston Ave.

Longs Book Store Pota to Process ing

Internat ional Co t tman Transmiss ion Co. Arco P roduc t s Jo seph Mercurio P roduce

Corp. Multi-Press Inc. Co lumbus Sign Co. 8—OBT P h o n e Booths 51—Residential Services 39—Area Lights North Market Police I m p o u n d i n g Lot

Dublin Rd. The Engineering Staff was also involved in various other

projects during 1982. Below is a list of some of these other projects with a brief descript ion of each one.

PCB PROGRAM—Prepare a P C B Manual covering the hazards, handling, test ing for the storage of PCB's . Design and build an area for con ta inment of PCB ' s to conform with federal guidelines.

INFRARED SURVEY—Inspect ion of t ransmiss ion, dis­tribution and substa t ion facilities with infrared equ ipmen t to detect potential problem areas before a failure occurs .

VOLTAGE IMPROVEMENTS— Convers ion of the 2400V system in the Downtown and Near West Side Areas to im­prove cus tomer voltages and to reduce ma in tenance and system operating costs.

The Engineering Staff will strive to cont inue to investi­gate ways to increase reliability of our service as well as a t tempt to decrease costs dur ing the coming year.

TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION In 1982, the Transmiss ion and Distr ibut ion Sect ion con­

structed a variety of projects while main ta in ing the present street lighting, substa t ions , t ransmiss ion, dis t r ibut ion and V^i^S facilities. Const ruct ion cont inued th rough 1982 on the 138K.V and 69KV Transmiss ion Lines from the Refuse/ Coal-Fired Municipal Electric P lan t to Dubl in Ave Substa­tion.

The following represents a statistical s u m m a r y of those activities:

STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE Interstate Maintenance (1-70. 1-71 and 1-670)

152—Standard or Frangib le Bases replaced 11—700W Mercury Vapor Lumina i r e s replaced

183—400W Mercury Vapor Lumina i res replaced 95—310W H i g h P r e s s u r e S o d i u m L u m i n a i r e s re­

placed 50—250W H i g h P r e s s u r e S o d i u m L u m i n a i r e s re­

placed 350—200W H i g h P r e s s u r e S o d i u m L u m i n a i r e s re­

placed Residential and Major Thoroughfare

241—100W H i g h P r e s s u r e S o d i u m L u m i n a i r e s re­placed

141—150W H i g h P r e s s u r e S o d i u m L u m i n a i r e s re­placed

6—400W H i g h P r e s s u r e S o d i u m L u m i n a i r e s re­placed

111—175W Mercury Vapor Lumina i r e s replaced 114—250W Mercury Vapor Lumina i r e s replaced

TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION MAINTENANCE Cable or Conductor Installed

15,305 ft.—15KV Cable 45,682 ft.— 5KV Cable

3,500 ft.—600V Cable 188,105 ft.—Bare C o n d u c t o r 48,409 ft .—Secondary Conduc to r 18,667 ft.—#12 or #10 Meter Control Wire

103—Transformers Instal led or Replaced 327—Poles were Insta l led or Replaced

7,244 f t .—Underground Condu i t Instal led 698—Man Hours for P u m p i n g Vaul ts

METERING INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE 2,075—Service Calls for r e v a m p services, H.W.H. con­

s u m p t i o n (high or low), b r o k e n meter equip­m e n t and vol tage and load checks .

116—New accoun t s were a d d e d T h e Me te r ing D e p a r t m e n t is r e s p o n s i b l e for_monthly

readings for 41 accoun t s which inc lude 16 tape meter ing accounts .

With the acquis i t ion of the Gas Chromatograph , a P C B Program was imp lemen ted . Tes t ing was comple ted on 317 t ransformers in stock, 66 subs ta t ion t ransformers and va­rious t ransformers in service. Cons t ruc t ion was comple ted on the t empora ry P C B S torage Facili ty. Emergency clean­up equ ipmen t was pu rchased for P C B spills.

At the Dis t r ibut ion facility on Dubl in Road, addi t ional flooring was installed for s torage. T h e Dis t r ibut ion Mana­gers ' offices were r emode led and a conference room added for meet ings .

T h e D i s t r i b u t i o n p e r s o n n e l p a r t i c i p a t e d in n u m e r o u s training classes deal ing wi th first-aid to j ob safety.

STREET LIGHTING C.I.P. funds enab led the Division of Electrici ty to install

new street l ights du r ing 1982. Division crews c o m b i n e d to install 90 n e w high-intensi ty,

power-efficient s t reet l ights a long 6 miles of City s treets . Recent i m p r o v e m e n t s in t h e life of the l a m p have permi t ted the use of energy-efficient h igh p res su re sod ium as a light source in the new st reet l ight ing sys t ems . I ts u s e will resul t in subs tan t ia l ene rgy sav ings over ex is t ing incandescen t and mercury vapor l ight ing sys tems , whi le providing bet ter i l lumination of the roadways .

T h e power-eff ic ient s o d i u m s t r ee t l igh t ing n o w tota ls 6,110 uni ts . The mercu ry vapor l ight ing d r o p p e d to below 10,100 uni ts , whi le the in-efficient incandescen t sys tem re­mained the s a m e wi th a total of 5,740 uni ts .

In 1983, the Division of Electr ici ty p lans to con t inue to expand its s treet l ight ing sys tem into unl ighted areas of the City, as well as to replace de ter iora t ing incandescen t street lighting sys tems in res ident ia l areas, as pet i t ioned by the citizens of Co lumbus .

The street l ighting i m p r o v e m e n t s comple ted in 1982 were: 1. B a r t h a m Ave. a n d Hosack St . 2. Acton Rd., Walmar Dr. and Faye t te Dr. 3. G r u b b St. and McDowel l St.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 33

CUSTOMER ACCOUNTING During 1982, an Appl icant Data Base was established to

facilitate the hiring process of the Trash Burning Power Plant.

90,170 energy cus tomer bills were produced and 3,816 new c o n t r a c t s w e r e p r o c e s s e d , r e p l a c i n g 3,589 f ina l ized accounts, and 256 Senior Citizen 10% discounts were issued

We implemented a new version of the inventory and fi­nance Data Base. This allowed for input of s tandard mod­ules to aid Engineer ing in es t imat ing new construction and

street lighting projects. Many new reports were produced to aid the users and management in making decisions. The new e n h a n c e m e n t s allow appropr ia t ions to be input in order that we may keep a running total of expendi tures and balances. The system supports the City's financial account­ing structure. Programs are constantly being improved as Division needs are identified.

Set forth below is a tabulat ion of the more important items for the year 1982 together with a comparison for the year 1981.

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

(e)

(f) (g)

(h)

(i) (j)

Purchased Power KWH Peak Load KW Date: Time: System Load Factor, % Cash Balance on Hand (January 1st) Operat ing Revenues-Electr ic Operating Revenues-Miscel laneous Total Operat ing Revenues Loan Total Revenues & Cash Cash Disbursements : Purchased Power Operating & Capital Expend i tu res . Debt Service Cost Total Cash Dispursed Cash on Hand (December 31st) Contribution in Lieu of Taxes Street Light ing Services General Fund Contr ibut ion for Administrat ive Pro-Rata Annual Payrol l Number of Employees , Average . . .

Mon

1981 374,876,239

60,084 L, J u l y 13th

1:00 P.M. 72.367

$ 710,768 16,142,878

858,940 17,001,818

17,712,496

12,156,759 4,922,162

194,203 17,273,124

439,372

2,267,331

671,995 2,834,184

118

1982 397,956,000

61,031 Tues., J u ly 27th

1:30 P.M. 74.435

$ 439,372 17,759,931

851,175 18,611,106

1,000,000 20,050,478

13,466,537 5,677,964

214,506 19,359,007

691,471

2,218,072

825,211 3,209,900

126

PERCENTAGE CHANGE (%)

6.2

(38.2) 10.0

( .9 9.5

13.2

10.8 15.4 10.5 12.3 57.3

( 2.17)

22.8 6.9

DIVISION OF ELECTRICITY OPERATING STATEMENT

FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1982 Operating Revenues :

Cash on Hand— January 1, 1982 .

Sales of Electricity Transfer to

Operat ing F u n d . Miscellaneous

$ 439,372 17,759,931

1,000,000 851,175

Total Cash In-Flow $20,050,478

Operating Deduct ions : Operat ing Expenses . . 18,130,076 Capital Outlay* 1,014,425 Interest on Bonded

Debt 89,506 Retirement of B o n d s . 125,000

Total Operat ing Deduc t ions $19,359,007

Net Operat ing Balance $691,471

Cash on Hand— December 31, 1982 . . . $ 691,471

*See separate schedule for Capital Outlay

CITY OF COLUMBUS DIVISION OF ELECTRICITY

SCHEDULE—FIXED ASSET EXPENDITURES DURING THE YEAR OF 1982

Office Furni ture and Equ ipmen t $ 1,009.92 Communicat ion Equipment :

Mobile Radios & Charger $ 1,512.00 Automotive Equipment :

Bucket Truck $ 68,276.00 Line Truck 39,412.89

$107,688.89 Other Equipment :

Transformers $473,969.02 Wire and Cable 135,351.51 Poles and Crossarms . . . 18,010.75 Luminaires 52,504.52 Tree Tr imming 2,355.00 Lamps 1,311.24 Transformer Bases 36,096.00 Lighting Brackets 679.50 Arresters 1,885.21 Manhole Frames and Vaults 56,481.44 Capacitor Bank 6,393.00 Switches and Relays . . . 23,532.00 Insulators 4,795.19 Gas Chromatograph . . . 28,879.38 Metering Equ ipment . . . 23,922.42 Other Machinery & Equipment 38,048.01

$ 904,214.19

$1,014,425.00

34 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

Long Term Serial Bonds:

Electric Plant & System Improvements #1 Municipal Electric Plant Improvement Bond No. 1 Municipal Electric Plant Improvement Bond No. 2 LONG TERM D EB T

LONG TERM DEBT FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31. 1982

Issue Date of Principal Amount End of Nominal Date Maturity Authorized First of Year Retirement Year Rate

Interest Amount

5-01-66

11-15-71

8-15-80

7-01-90 $1,510,000 $ 585,000 $ 65,000 $ 520,000 3Vi% $20,475.00

5-15-95 550,000 350,000 25,000 325,000 45/s% $15,609.40

5-01-01 675,000 675,000 35,000 640,000 8.125% $53,421.60 $2,735^000 $1,610,000 $125,000 $1,485,000 $89,506.00

ELECTRIC OPERATING REVENUES YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31. 1982

Average Kilowatt Revenue Number Hours Amount

Customers Total Total

S A L Re S s ide F n t l a l E C T R I C 5,466 25,672,278 $1,630,422 SmaU Commercial 1,788 39,431,486 2,755,902 LTrge Commercial/Industrial _ J 2 2 ^ 262,503.162 12,783.457

Sub-Total 7,476 327,606,926 $17,169,781 STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM

st ree t T.iphts 22,boy.buy Expressway : : : : : : : : : : : : : 4,701,370 590.150

Sub-Total 27,390,879 $ 590,150 MISCELLANEOUS $ 1,851,175 TOTAL OPERATING R E V E N U E S $19,611,106 TOTAL GROSS KWH 397,956,000

Company Use (169,846) Station Use (840,300) Transmission and Distr ibut ion

Losses and Unaccounted (41,948,049)

NET KWH 354,997,805

Revenue Per KWH (Cents)

4.6 6.9 4.9

5.2

DIVISION OF TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND PARKING ANNUAL REPORT—1982

The Division of Traffic Engineer ing and Parking , Depart­ment of Public Service, submits herewith its Annual Repor t for the year ending December 31, 1982.

Faced with ever-increasing costs of material and labor as well as increased demands for addi t ional services from the public which we serve, this Division is meet ing the chal­lenge. A highly-skilled managerial staff is constant ly seek­ing further self-improvement through part icipat ion in the Columbus Publ ic Service Chapter of t h e Nat ional Manage­ment Associa t ion . Re f inemen t s r esu l t ing theref rom are apparent in our day-to-day progress.

During 1982, a detailed analysis of the congest ion and de­lay problems in the area of 1-71 and S.R. 161 was under t aken by our staff. Presenta t ion of the resul ts and al ternat ives was made to other agencies late in the year and implementa t ion is hoped for in 1983.

The Division coordinated two consul tant s tudies of traffic access du r ing 1982. T h e Mt. Vernon Plaza Area Traffic Study recommended several ways of increasing access into this area. The North High Street (U.S. 23) s tudy of access controls developed a plan for allowing safe access to land being developed adjacent to this highway.

Field installation of the Arterial Coordinat ion Project for Henderson Road, Hamil ton Road and Refugee Road was completed in 1982. F ine tun ing of the sys tem began in the later part of the year and will cont inue th rough 1983. The flexibility of the system resul ted in a considerably smoother flow of traffic a round the East land S h o p p i n g Center du r ing the busy Chris tmas season that was not iced by many shop­pers and merchants .

Residential Permi t Park ing , as inst i tuted both in the Ger­man Village area and the NECKO area jus t south of the Ohio State University, cont inues to work qui te well and is solving the problems which it sought to solve. In 1982, the NECKO Area was expanded and a third area has pet i t ioned to be designated as a Residential Pe rmi t Pa rk ing Area.

An inc rease in t h e n u m b e r of pa rk ing me te r s on t h e streets, in addit ion to a modification of t h e ra te scale re­

sulted in revenues from tha t source increas ing nearly 31% over 1981.

I believe the Staff of the Division of Traffic Engineer ing and Park ing has the exper t i se , the capabil i ty and the desire to carry on the process we have been mak ing . We stand ready to meet t h e chal lenge of 1983 firm in our c o m m i t t m e n t to improve the lot of t h e moto r ing publ ic and p ledge our cont inued coopera t ion and suppo r t for the year ahead.

MISSION STATEMENT The mission of t h e Division of Traffic Engineer ing and

Parking is to plan and provide for t h e safe, efficient and economic m o v e m e n t of peop le and goods t h roughou t the City of Co lumbus . The Divis ion 's p r imary cus tomer s are the citizens of C o l u m b u s inc lud ing motor is ts , pedes t r ians , de­velopers and cont rac tors .

Areas of significant c h a n g e in the last 5 to 10 years include more sophis t ica ted technology , especial ly in traffic signal control and p a v e m e n t mark ing areas , increased awareness of legal l iabil i ty, m o r e e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n c e r n s and im­p r o v e m e n t s r ega rd ing e m p l o y e e s ' m a n a g e m e n t capabili­ties. Areas of change for t h e n e x t 5 to 10 years likely will involve inc reased financial accountab i l i ty , add i t iona l in­creases in the level of t echnology and decrease in levels of funding. Pr inc ipa l economic conce rns involve the possible reduct ion of funds c o m b i n e d wi th increas ing costs . The crit­ical issues are t h e mos t efficient uti l ization of resources and the effective u s e of t h e cost cen te r concep t .

GENERAL ORGANIZATION The Division is compr i sed of s ix major sect ions; Sys tems

Engineer ing, Opera t ions , P lann ing , Pa rk ing , Bus iness and Maintenance. The S y s t e m s Eng inee r ing Sect ion is responsi­ble for the design and opera t ion for all signalized intersec­tions, all e lectronic traffic control devices ( including a cen­tral compu te r sys tem) and the traffic opera t ion of freeway system. T h e Opera t ions Sec t ion is r espons ib le for t h e design

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

and p lacement of all traffic control signs and pavement markings th roughout the City. The Planning Section is re­sponsible for reviewing and coordinat ing the review of all types of construct ion plans and land development projects to ensure that the proper movemen t of traffic is provided. This Section also is in charge of the Division's special acci­dent and safety programs. The Park ing Section administers the Division's on and off-street parking programs. These in­clude Residential Pe rmi t Parking , Loading Zones, Parking Meters and Park ing Lots . The Business Section is responsi­ble for the Division's bus iness affairs including personnel and payroll, record keeping , account ing and purchasing. The Maintenance Section is in charge of the installation and maintenance of all traffic control devices including Signs, Signals, Pavemen t Markings and Park ing Meters.

Number and Location of Plants • Engineering Offices—50 West Gay Street, Room 200 • Central Traffic Control Computer—50 West Gay Street,

Room 300 • Northland Signal Sys tem Computer—Karl and Morse

Roads (Police Sub-stat ion) • Hamilton Road Signal Sys tem Master—Hamilton Road

and Kimberly Pa rkway • Refugee Road Signal System Master—Hamilton Road

and Refugee Road • Hende r son Road S igna l S y s t e m Master—Henderson

and Kenny Roads (north) • Maintenance Shop Facility—515 Shor t Street • Childrens Hospital Pa rk ing Lot—Ann Street and Chil-

drens Drive, N.E. Corner • M o u n d and Th i rd P a r k i n g L o t — M o u n d and Th i rd

Streets , N.E. Corner

Statistical Data • Total Signalized Intersect ions 750 • Total Traffic Control Signs (estimated) 80,000 • Total Lane Miles of P a v e m e n t Markings

(estimated) 1,400 • Total Pa rk ing Meters in Service 2,500

I. SYSTEMS ENGINEERING Cost Center 600411 — Systems Engineering

Cost Center Descr ipt ion — T h e Sys t ems Engineer ing Sec­tion is responsible for all traffic signals within the City of Columbus. This responsibi l i ty inc ludes prepar ing equip­ment specifications, order ing of equ ipmen t and allocation to new signal installat ions. This section is responsible for determining the location of future traffic signals as well as justification of exis t ing signals. This work is done in con­formance with the Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control De­vices as required. The section is also responsible for the op­eration of the signals once they are installed and insurance that they conform with the cur ren t manua l requirements . The section is responsible for the design installation and operat ion of several c o m p u t e r s y s t e m s wi th in the City. Approximately 165 of the 750 traffic signals are under com­puter control at this t ime. The long-range plan is to add most of the remaining signals to the compu te r sys tem over the next 7 to 10 years. Sys t ems Engineer ing is also responsible for the installation and ma in tenance of signing, sign lighting and pavement mark ings on approximate ly 43 miles of free­way within the City.

Cost Center 600650 — Data Processing Cost Center Descr ipt ion — T h e Data Process ing Unit is

responsible for supply ing Data process ing services to the Division. These services inc lude analysis of data processing needs, program coding and data entry as needed. Programs involve all p h a s e s of Div i s ion ' s act ivi t ies inc lud ing en­gineering analysis, work schedules , invoicing and inventory control.

Cost Center 600668 — Signal Installation Cost Center Descr ipt ion — This unit is responsible for all

construction work regarding the installation, removal and heavy main tenance of traffic signal installations. All work from pouring foundat ions for the signal poles to final wiring for the signal heads is performed by this unit. The installa­tion and main tenance of the large overhead signs on the freeway system within the City is ano ther responsibil i ty of this unit. Many of the s igns are furnished by the State for installation by our crews. The area of responsibil i ty is appro­ximately 43 miles of freeway system.

Cost Center 6000684 — Electronic Repair Cost Center Descr ipt ion — This uni t is responsible for the

preparation, installation and ma in tenance of all electronic

35

traffic control equ ipment within the City. The responsibility includes initial wiring of traffic signal cabinets, installation of the e lec t ronic c o m p o n e n t s in t h e field cabinets and maintenance of the entire control cabinet once the signal is in operation. This unit operates a seven-day week twenty-four-a-day emergency maintenance vehicle so that any mal­functions or failures can be responded to immediately. The Electronic Repair unit is responsible for the 750 signalized intersections within the City of Columbus .

II. OPERATIONS Cost Center 600429 — Operations Investigation

Cost Center Description — Traffic Operations Office func­tions of this Section include traffic counts , construction in­spection, school liaison, complaint response, sign design and pavement marking design (including pre-marking on-street).

Cost Center 600783 — Street Markings Cost Center Description — The Pavement Marking Unit

includes installation, removal, and maintenance of all mark­ing, both paint and thermoplast ic , including centerlines, lane lines, edgelines, crosswalks, arrows and words. The functions involve the use of three expensive and highly complex t ruck-mounted stripers to apply markings.

Cost Center 600692 — Sign Installation Cost Center Description — The sign installation function

includes conduct ing all installations, removals, repair and replacement of signs.

Cost Center 600775 — Sign Fabrication Cost Center Description — The sign fabrication function

includes manufacturing all signs for Traffic Division, as well as requests from other government agencies.

m. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING Cost Center 600437 — Transportation Planning

Cost Center Description — The Planning Section studies and recommends actions to minimize traffic impacts of all new land development; processes applications for all drive­ways and parking lots in conformance with adopted rules and regulations; identifies, analyzes and recommends solu­tions to traffic safety problems; coordinates street network planning activities with many agencies; and conducts traffic planning for large-scale projects such as High Street, down­town, Ohio Center and Capitol South. The six employees in this Cost Center have extensive contact with the public, de­velopers , con t rac to r s , a rch i tec t s and o the r g o v e r n m e n t agencies.

IV. PARKING Cost Center 601658 — On-Street Parking

Cost Center Description — Parking Meter Program — The Parking Section is responsible for selecting locations for installing and maintaining parking meters . In 1982 there were 2500 meters in service which generated $866,366 for the General Fund. Loading Zones — The Sect ion adminis ters Loading Zone accounts . Each year new loading zones are es tabl ished whereas those zones no longer needed are removed. Under the rate schedule specified by City Ordinance, all accounts are invoiced and the fees deposi ted to the General Fund. 1982 fees totaled $36,516.00. Residential Permit Parking — At the request of local residents with specific parking problems, a residential parking dis­trict may be established by the Service Director. Through the use of a parking sticker, only the residents, non-resident property owners and employees of the area may park in the district. The Division issued 636 such stickers in two park­ing districts in 1982 and deposi ted $5,415.00 in the General Fund.

Cost Center 601666 — Parking Lot Operation Cost Center Description — Children's Hospital Lot — The

Parking Section operates a 108-space parking lot near Chil­dren's Hospital where an a t tendant is present during day­l ight h o u r s to col lec t h o u r l y fees. After h o u r s a coin-operated gate is used. In 1982, 86,036 customers paid park­ing fees to ta l ing $63,237 wh ich was depos i t ed into the General Fund. , . '

Mound and Third Lot — A 123-space parking lot is man­aged by the Division at the intersection of Mound Street and Third Street. Most of the spaces are leased on a monthly basis while the remainder are rented on a day-to-day basis. In 1982 monthly cus tomers paid $29,850 and daily parkers

36 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

paid $11,730 in parking fees for a total of $41,580 which was deposited into the General Fund .

V. ADMINISTRATION Cost Center 600403 — Administration

Cost Center Description — The Administrat ion Section provides overall management , direction and adminis trat ion of all Division activities, including, bu t not limited to, pur­chasing, contract services, account ing, payroll, personnel management and budget ing.

THE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SECTION The Systems Engineering Sect ion directs its efforts to­

ward making travel quicker, safer and more efficient for the 634,000 motorists who use the street system of the City of Columbus each day and 221,000 daily freeway users . These motorists travel an est imated 8.1 million miles daily. The 20 office employees of this Sect ion a s sume four major areas of responsibility; signal systems, freeway operat ions, data pro­cessing and computerized systems.

Signal Systems The Signal System Group de termines the desirability of

and designs new traffic signal installations, rehabil i tates ex­isting installations, de termines if exist ing signals are still warranted and maintains signal t iming and coordinat ion of 750 traffic signals in the City of Columbus . A schedule of 1982 accomplishments and expendi tu res of the Group are detailed in Exhibi t "A". In addit ion to the numerous signal removals and ins ta l la t ions a c c o m p l i s h e d last year, th is group completed the replacement of two major controller equipment lines that were obsolete and creat ing mainte­nance headaches. The new equ ipmen t is among the most up-to-date and reliable high-tech equ ipmen t available utiliz­ing the microprocessor. This equ ipmen t allows for a more efficient and cost effective operation.

Freeway Operations The Freeway Operat ions Group is responsible for main­

taining a high level of operational efficiency on 43 miles of high type roadway. They are also responsible for the mainte­nance of all signs, sign lighting and pavement mark ings on the freeway system. In 1982 major projects included: I) A major revision in lane ass ignments , s igning and mark ing at the 1-670 and S.R. 315 interchange; 2) Prepared plans and specifications for three addit ional r a m p meter ing control­lers.

Data Processing The Data Processing Group main ta ins the Division's com­

puterized records and provides a data analysis service to all Sections. In addition, they are responsible for the Division's invoicing, inventory control, and assist in statistical analysis as needed. In 1982 major projects included: 1) Deve lopment of electrical use analysis for all 750 signalized intersect ions; 2) Developed an inventory program for large freeway signs; 3) Developed a work schedul ing p rogram for shop work.

Computerized Systems The Computerized Sys tems Group is responsible for oper­

ating 136 signalized intersect ions which are unde r the con­trol of two i n d e p e n d e n t traffic c o m p u t e r s . They are re­sponsible for mainta ining a high level of traffic control in the Downtown and Nor th land areas, and will be responsible for the design, construct ion and operat ion of all expans ions of the existing systems.

THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SECTION The Transportat ion P lann ing Sect ion in 1982 cont inued

its sys temat ic review, s t u d y and p lann ing of the pub l ic street network in Columbus . This work is divided into two areas of responsibili ty. First, t he exis t ing street sys tem is cont inuous ly reviewed for concen t r a t i on of traffic acci­dents, and studied to de te rmine the effect of increased ac­cess and traffic volumes from adjacent land deve lopmen t becond , the future r eq u i r emen t s of s t reets , pa rk ing and other surface t ranspor ta t ion sys tems are cont inuous ly being reviewed with many publ ic agencies and private develop-

Special Projects L C o ^ d i n a t e d consul tant traffic s tudy of access into the

Mt. Vernon Plaza area and began work towards imple­mentat ion.

2. Part icipated in CBD Action Task Force and developed scope of consu l t an t serv ices n e e d e d for d o w n t o w n High Street corr idor s tudy to be done in 1983

3. Completed s tudy and p resen ted r ecommenda t i ons to solve congest ion and delay p rob lems in the area of S.R. 161 and 1-71.

4 Par t ic ipated in Univers i ty District Pa rk ing Commit tee , MORPC Year 2000 Plan , DOD Zoning Code Revision Commit tee .

5. Conducted O.D. Survey of Starre t t -Weisheimer area to identify poss ib le so lu t ions to n e i g h b o r h o o d conges­tion.

6. Ini t iated street i m p r o v e m e n t projects for access into land deve lopmen t s at Nor thwes t Boulevard and Cham­bers Road, Cooper Road sou th of 1-270, Refugee Road at Hamil ton Road, Nor th High St ree t at 1-270, K e n n y Road at Old Hender son , L o n g St ree t for A E P bui ld ing and Mt. Vernon A v e n u e at 20th Street .

7. Coordinated a consu l tan t s tudy of access controls on Nor th High S t ree t (U.S. 23) from 1-270 to De laware County to pe rmi t the safe d e v e l o p m e n t of land along this h ighway.

Accident Reduction Programs During 1982, the P l a n n i n g Sect ion con t inued its traffic

safety p rograms as follows: 1. In our safety project evaluat ion program, five before

and after acc ident reduc t ion s tud ies were comple ted . 2. Reviewed high-accident locat ions for the possible ap­

plication of traffic acc ident coun te rmeasu re s . Analyzed and p repared repor t s at four such locat ions.

3. Init iated the Accident Task Force . T h e Task Force re­viewed and analyzed the "Top 20" acc ident locations to find engineer ing and enforcement solut ions, and will also review all fatal acc ident repor ts .

Zoning and Variance Cases All reques t s for changes in t h e official zoning m a p and

requests for special pe rmi t s or var iances to t h e zoning code are reviewed by the P l ann ing Sect ion. In those cases where the requests might adverse ly affect traffic flow or pedes t r ian safety, detai led s tudies are m a d e and t h e resul ts p resen ted to the Deve lopment Commiss ion and/or t h e Board of Zon­ing A d j u s t m e n t . D u r i n g 1982, 211 s p e c i a l p e r m i t s and variances and 104 reques t s to c h a n g e t h e official zoning m a p were reviewed by the P l a n n i n g Sect ion, inc luding a 300 acre site at Hayden R u n Road and Dubl in Road which included the relocation of Dubl in Road. Also a 200 acre site at 1-270 and North High Street .

Building and Parking Lot Plans Bui lding p lans are referred by t h e Division of Zoning to

the P lanning Sect ion for review and approval . Driveway permits are referred to the Sect ion before approval by the City Engineer . The p u r p o s e of t h e review is to ensure that new d e v e l o p m e n t s will min imize conges t ion on abu t t ing public streets , and will p rovide for safe m o v e m e n t of vehi­cles and pedes t r ians to and from the pub l ic ways . In 1982, the P lanning Sect ion rev iewed 439 bui ld ing and pa rk ing lot plans.

Major Street Construction Projects The P lann ing Sect ion coord ina tes t h e Division input into

prel iminary geomet r ic des ign of s treet i m p r o v e m e n t proj­ects. Detailed review and c o m m e n t s on consu l tan t ' s p lans are done in coopera t ion wi th the Division of Engineer ing and Const ruct ion . In 1982, t h e following projects were re­viewed:

• Spr ing /Sandusky I n t e r c h a n g e and 315 Connec to r • Schrock Road—1-71 to Cleveland A v e n u e • Wilson Road—W. Broad to 1-70 • 1-670 • S.R. 104

Land Subdivision Plats All land subdivis ion pla ts are reviewed to ensu re p roper

street layout and access . T h e major e m p h a s i s of the review is to ensure access cont ro l on arterial s t reets , and to ensure the proper locat ions of col lector s t reets . Th is Sect ion re­viewed 32 subdivis ion pla ts in 1982.

Construction Design Review All cons t ruc t ion p lans for pub l ic i m p r o v e m e n t s (streets,

water lines, sewers , etc.) a re s u b m i t t e d to t h e Traffic En­gineering Division for review and approval . The P lann ing Section coord ina tes th is review wi th in the Division. The plans are reviewed to e n s u r e tha t they mee t safe design stan­dards , and to provide for t h e m a i n t e n a n c e of traffic dur ing construct ion. In 1982, 204 cons t ruc t ion p lans were s tudied.

I

Spot Improvement Programs During 1982, cooperat ive efforts were cont inued with the

City Engineer to improve hazardous and/or congested loca­tions th roughout C o l u m b u s . F u n d i n g sources which are being used include the Federal Aid Urban System funds at 75% pa r t i c ipa t ion , 90% F e d e r a l funds u n d e r the High-Hazard Safety Program.

The following locations are unde r s tudy for major street improvement:

1. S.R. 161 and 1-71 2. Refugee and Winchester P ike 3. Cleveland and Morse 4. Morse and High 5. Broad and J a m e s 6. Demorest and Sull ivant 7. Johns town and Nelson 8. Cleveland and S.R. 161 9. Main and Nelson

Traffic Volume Data A traffic vo lume coun t file is mainta ined in the Planning

Section con ta in ing data m e a s u r e d over the past several years on all major s treets and freeways in Columbus and surrounding areas. This data is extensively used by this Di­vision, other governmenta l agencies and the public.

More than 700 new counts were added to the vo lume file in 1982.

THE OPERATIONS SECTION The Operat ions Sect ion is generally responsible for the

design, instal la t ion, m a i n t e n a n c e and remova l of traffic signs and pavement mark ings on City streets. It mus t en­sure a d e q u a t e s u p p l i e s of m a t e r i a l s ; m o d e r n , re l iab le equipment ; and safe working condi t ions for crews to per­form the work. The Sect ion also mainta ins records of such installations and wri tes material and equ ipmen t specifica­tions.

Also, a par t of Opera t ions ' dut ies is installation of traffic controls for special events , and supervis ion of traffic con­trols in construct ion areas.

Investigations F o u r full-t ime I n v e s t i g a t o r s c h e c k e d over 1,300 com­

plaints from the general publ ic , and m a d e replies to all of the complainants .

Pavement Markings Paint and thermoplas t ic mark ings were applied to streets

and freeways to define proper traffic pa t terns for both vehi­cles and pedest r ians . This a m o u n t e d to over 28,200 gallons of paint, over fifty-nine tons of thermoplas t ic material, and over eighty-eight tons of reflective glass beads .

Signing In maintaining the more then 80,000 signs on City streets,

sign crews performed 13,745 sign operat ions . The operat ions included removals , rep lacements , repairs and installations.

Sign Inspection and Upgrading Recognizing the needs for a systemat ic and on-going pro­

gram of sign inspect ion, and realizing that this would not be feasible wi thout a comprehens ive inventory of all signs, per­sonnel began pre l iminary d iscuss ion and applicat ion for possible Federal funding th rough the Ohio Depar tment of Highway Safety for the es tab l i shment of such an inventory. (Note: In early January , 1983, the reques t was approved).

In the fall of 1982 traffic s igns on seven streets totalling 19.3 miles were inspected , inventoried, and brought into compliance with manda ted s tandards .

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 37

Special Events Special traffic controls were provided for the Ohio State

rair , OSU football games, the OSU Farm and Science Re­view and Columbus Clippers baseball games.

Automatic Counts 245 counts were made in 1982.

Manual Counts To assist the Planning and Systems Engineering Sections

as well as Operations personnel, 96 manual traffic counts were done.

THE PARKING SECTION

Parking Operations The Parking Section is responsible for managing on-street

parking and the loading and unloading of people and goods. Regula t ing park ing in commercia l ly developed areas is accomplished through the use of parking restrictions, park­ing meters, bus stops, taxi zones and loading zones. Where severe parking problems exist in residential areas, special residential parking permits are issued. The Parking Section also operates two off-street parking lots, one at Childrens Hospital and one in the downtown area at Third and Mound Streets. The Parking Section is funded by the City's General Fund and all revenues generated by the Section are depos­ited to that fund.

Parking Meters In areas where shor t - term park ing is needed, parking

meters are employed. At the end of 1982 there were approx­imately 2,500 meters in use, 313 more than the 1981 total. T h i s i n c r e a s e a n d a r a t e a d j u s t m e n t w h i c h w a s im­plemented dur ing the last quarter of 1981 resulted in re­venues in the amount of $866,366. This was an increase of $203,876 over the previous year.

City Operated Parking Lots Two City-owned parking lots are operated by the Parking

Section. The park ing lot at Chi ldrens Hospital provides short-term parking for hospital patrons and in 1982 served 86,036 vehicles, generated $63,237. The Mound Street and Third Street Lot is intended primarily for all day parking with monthly parking contracts available. Some short-time pa rk ing is p e r m i t t e d . In 1982 mon th ly cus tomer s paid $29,849 to park there while daily parkers paid $11,731 for a tota l of $41,580. R e v e n u e g e n e r a t e d by bo th lots w a s $104,817 in 1982, an increase of $3,924.00.

Loading Zones In those cases where it is necessary to provide for loading

or unloading at curbside, a loading zone may be established. Businesses requiring such a loading zone mus t pay a fee for its use and in 1982 loading zone fees amounted to approx­imately $36,500.

Residential Permit Parking Residential Permi t Parking has been in effect for approx­

imately two years in German Village and in the NECKO area south of Ohio S ta te Universi ty . The p rogram is accom­plishing its intended purpose, that is providing relief to resi­dents in areas where nearly all available parking was being used by motorists from outside the area. 1982 saw the ex­pansion of the NECKO area and petitions were circulated to residents of a third area which is expected to be approved for Residential Permit Parking in 1983. Fees from the two existing areas totaled $5,415 in 1981.

Code 01 02 03 05

FINANCIAL REPORT OF THE DIVISION OF TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND PARKING FUND 01-100 GENERAL FUND

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1982

Appropriation $210,099

12,562 19,789 6,000

$248,360

Transfer Net

$(22,254)

19,991

$( 2,263

Total Available $187,755

12,562 39,780

6,000

$246,097

Total Cash Disbursements

$187,755 12,039 25,172

4,450

$229,416

Encumbrances

$ 123 1,554

$ 1,677

Balance

$ 400 13,054

1,550

$ 15,004

38 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

FINANCIAL REPORT OF THE DIVISION OF TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND PARKING FUND 02-265 STREET MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR

AS OF DECEMBER 31. 1982

Code 01 02 03

0

02 06

Appropriation $2,875,224

216,348 777,323

$3,868,895

$ 332,500 27,500

$ 360,000

Transfer Net

$ 92,000 56,094 14,695

650

$163,439

$ M 6 2

$ 6,462

Total Available $2,967,224

272,442 792,018

650

$4,032,334

Encumbrances $ 358

33,817 70,248

272

$104,695

FUND 02-172 REVENUE SHARING AS OF DECEMBER 31. 1982

$ 332,500 33,962

$ 366,462

$ 9,973 13,039

$ 23,012

Total Cash Disbursements

$2,952,181 238,610 721,766

350

$3,912,907

$ 322,295 20,923

$ 343,218

Balance $14,685

15 4

28

$14,732

$ 232

$ 232

COLUMBUS TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

The Columbus Traffic and Transpor ta t ion Commiss ion is composed of seven Voting Members , four Advisory Mem­bers and one Execut ive Secretary. The Chief Traffic En­gineer is the ex-officio Execut ive Secretary of the Commis­sion. Duties of the Commission consis t of s tudying traffic problems, t ransporta t ion ne tworks and off-street park ing problems and making recommenda t ions on the control of vehicular and pedestr ian traffic and off-street park ing of motor vehicles to the Division of Traffic Engineer ing and Parking, City Council and to the Depar tmen t of Publ ic Ser­vice. Reports from other municipali t ies are reviewed regard­ing their t r anspor ta t ion and pa rk ing regula t ions . Pub l i c meetings are held as de termined by the Commiss ion Chair­man or the Execut ive Secretary to discuss general p rob lems of transportation, off-street park ing condi t ions and traffic regulations. Normally, these meet ings are held the second

Tuesday of each mon th , excep t in August , at 2:00 p.m., in the Third Floor Conference R o o m of the Beacon Building, 50 West Gay Street , C o l u m b u s .

Robert E. Schmid t , Chai rman

J a m e s E. Read ing J. David Ryan Marvin Glassman

ADVISORY MEMBERS John Wagner Florence Schulz Capt. Richard Foor

RECORDING SECRETARY Patricia R. Grove

MEMBERS William H. B r o w n Eric Clapp S u s a n Connor J a m e s V. Musick,

Execu t ive Secre tary

COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE Je r ry H a m m o n d

ANNUAL REPORT—1982

DIVISION OF WATER

ROBERT C. PARKINSON. P.E., Service Director JACK A. HOLT. P.E.. Superintendent

TOM MOODY. Mayor

numus, omo THE CITY BULLETIN

Official Publication ot the City of Columbia.

details pertaining to official actions of all city departments. Subscriptions by mail, $15.00 a Year in advance Second-Class Postage Paid at Columbus, Ohio

City Clerk FRANCINE C. RYAN

Telephone 222-7316

DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

DIVISION OF WATER 1982 ANNUAL REPORT

SECTION PAGES

I. OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT 3 A. Superintendent's Letter oi Submittal 3 B. Executive Summary 3 C. Report of the Assistant Superintendent 4

n. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP 5 A. Fiscal Administration 5 B. Policy/Procedure Research 6 C. Public Relations/Office Management 7

m. PERSONNEL SERVICES GROUP 13

IV. DATA PROCESSING GROUP 13

V. CUSTOMER SERVICES GROUP 1 A. Customer Relations 1 B. Consumer Service/Inspection 1 C. Bookkeeping 1 D. Meter Reading 1 E. Meter Maintenance 1 F. Sales Office 1

VI. DISTRIBUTION GROUP 18 A. Construction/Maintenance 18 B. Design 18 C. Operations 18

VII. SUPPLY GROUP 26 A. Dublin Road Water Plant 27 B. Morse Road Water Plant 27 C. Parsons Avenue Water Plant 27 D. Technical Services 27 E. Water Research Laboratory 28

DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

TO: Mr. Rober t C. Park inson , P.E. Director of Publ ic Service

FROM: Mr. Jack A. Holt, P.E. Super in tendent

RE: 1982 Annual Repor t—Let ter of Transmit ta l Attached is our Division's 1982 Annual Report. The report

includes an Execut ive S u m m a r y and is presented in accor­dance with the new Divisional Organization.

The most significant Adminis t ra t ive accompl i shment was the reorganization of the Division into a functional s t ructure which will provide for improved control of resources to facilitate achievement of the goals of quality water and good service at a reasonable cost. This new organizational struc­ture, along with increased c o m m i t m e n t to the Quality of Working Life program, will provide for clarification of re­sponsibility and the necessary employee participation to permit more efficient opera t ions and effective implementa­tion of p lanned future improvemen t s in Division operations.

All water quality s tandards were complied with through­out the year except for a very short te rm period when the maximum contaminant level for Nitrate was exceeded. In light of the many new water quali ty regulations, I believe this qual i ty record is a d m i r a b l e and a t t r ibu tab le to the dedication and skills of both the Water Research Laboratory and operating staff. If we are able to cont inue providing these groups with the required technical staff and equip­ment we can be assured tha t they will mee t the challenges of existing and future water quali ty s tandards .

Although the new Billing and Accounts Receivable sys­tem has been in operat ion since J u n e of 1981, we have not been successful in providing the level of service that many customers desire. This is not to say that our service is not equivalent to other comparab le service agencies, bu t that it is not at the level which is generally compl imentary to the Division. When we a re ab le to effectively interface the manual operat ions wi th the fully implemented computer system, I am confident that such services will be at a very commendable level.

The Adminis t ra t ive Services G r o u p has implemented a budgeting sys tem tha t pe rmi t s involvement of lower levels of management and supervisors in the resource allocation process and also ass igns lower levels of responsibil i t ies for budget management . This decentral izat ion of the budget ing process, along with a new cost account ing system resulting from the Cost of Service Rate S t ruc ture will provide super­vision with the cost/benefit information necessary to im­prove resource m a n a g e m e n t t h roughou t the Division.

In summary , it is my firm belief that we have a very cap­able group of personnel and if we cont inue to provide good direction we will progress in our goal achievement .

The direction and suppor t of your office, along with the management t raining p rograms initiated by you will con­t inue to b e one of t h e mos t significant a ids to mainta ining appropriate and improved levels of Publ ic Service.

DIVISION OF WATER 1982 ANNUAL REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Division of Water opera ted in a c l imate of change during 1982. An intensive p rogram of Maintenance and In­ventory control was initiated, a new Cost of Service Rate Structure was adopted , and the organization itself was re­s t ructured. These fundamen ta l changes impac ted opera­tions in every area of the Division, mak ing 1982 a dynamic year for our organization.

Planning for the reorganizat ion of the Division began in 1980. This reorganization was implemen ted in 1982. The new organizational des ign consis ts of six (6) functional groups, three (3) line and th ree (3) staff. The manage r s of these groups report to the Office of the Super in tenden t . This new structure will resul t in clearer responsibi l i ty definitions, im­proved m a n a g e m e n t control , be t te r functional groupings of activities, and will pe rmi t improved delegat ion of authori ty.

During this period of change a posit ive financial position was m a i n t a i n e d , w i t h y e a r e n d c a s h r e s e r v e s to ta l ing $6,406,117. T h e Div i s ion ' s t h r e e wa te r t r e a t m e n t p lan ts processed a record h igh vo lume of 41,789,150,000 gallons of water. Distr ibution and Main tenance personnel repaired 566 water line breaks , work ing a round the clock to ensure ser­vice to the 196,185 cus tomers in the Co lumbus water system. These and several o ther significant accompl i shment s were realized in striving to mee t our goal of providing Columbus water c u s t o m e r s w i th Q U A L I T Y WATER AND GOOD SERVICE AT A R E A S O N A B L E COST.

WATER QUALITY—1982 Columbus water plant personnel performed over 350,000

laboratory tests in 1982 to ensure the potability of our water. The Division employs twenty-six (26) persons who are certi­fied by the State of Ohio to perform chemical and bacteri-ojog'cal testing. The Water Research Lab has a staff of eight (8) fulltime chemists , microbiologists and researchers work­ing to ensure that Columbus water meets or exceeds all standards of the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974. These professionals also s tudy the Columbus water supply to de­termine sources of con taminan t s in our water. They re­search t reatment processes to remove these undesirable ele­ments and work with other agencies to reduce levels of con­taminants in the raw water source.

During J u n e of 1982, the water from the Dublin Road Treatment Plant exceeded the m a x i m u m contaminant level for nitrate. In accordance with Federal and State regula­tions, the customers receiving water from the Dublin Road plant were notified of t h e excess ive ni trate . Alternative water sources were encouraged for persons in the high ni­trate health risk group. The nitrate levels remained exces­sive for several days. When the level dropped below the MCL, customers were notified that the water was safe for all groups of consumers .

This nitrate episode and the resulting efforts in research brought about a significant accompl ishment in Columbus water quality research. High nitrate has been a problem only at the Dublin plant, where the raw water sources are rel­atively small reservoirs which collect runoff from a large, highly agricultural watershed area. It has now been con­firmed that the source of the high nitrate in water from the Dublin Road plant is a direct result of the application of high nitrogen fertilizers in the Scioto River watershed area. Water supply researchers and Division Administrat ion are participating in programs to reduce the runoff of nitrogen fertilizers during Spring rains and thereby protect the water supply from excessive nitrate and other nutr ient and pesti­cide contaminants .

There were other benefits result ing from the nitrate prob­lem. Contacts were made with other City agencies through the public notification process. Cooperation from the Health Department and Telecommunicat ions Center was very valu­able in this situation. Liasons which were made in working with these agencies have provided additional resources and benefits in other matters .

1982 saw progress towards complet ion of the third Co­lumbus water t rea tment plant. The Parsons Avenue Treat­ment Plant will begin operat ions in mid 1983. This plant, in contrast to the Dublin Road and Morse Road Plants which treat surface water, will treat g round water from a field of six underground collector wells. This facility will provide an additional 50 million gallons per day to the t rea tment capac­ity of the Columbus system, bringing the total t rea tment capacity to 235 million gallons per day. The bringing on line of the Parsons Avenue plant will secure an adequate water supply to the Columbus area through 2000.

While work cont inued on new sources of supply, the ex­isting source of supply became a concern. The period from August through mid-November was qui te dry in Central Ohio as it was in other parts of the country. Low rainfall and reduced runoff caused Hoover Reservoir to drop to levels of 6 or 7 feet below the same period in 1981. In early November Hoover Reservoir contained only 100 days of supply at a 70 million gallon per day demand rate. The demand load was shifted to t h e Sc io to River raw wate r source by valve changes t h r o u g h o u t the d is t r ibut ion system. With these changes the Dubl in Road and Morse Road plants were each supply ing approx imate ly 50% of the total d e m a n d . The lowest elevation of Hoover Reservoir for 1982 was recorded on November 21, when the pool was at elevation 869.72. This figure was only slightly higher than the record low of 868.60 in March of 1964. Thankfully, rains of late November and December replenished the reservoir to a 262 day storage level at year 's end.

SERVICE TO OUR CUSTOMERS—1982 The Division services its cus tomers in many different

ways from answering billing inquiries by phone , to reading meters to laying pipeline for new homes . We are commit ted not only to providing a quality product , bu t also to service the consumers of that product . During 1982 several mea­sures were taken to increase the level of service to our cus-

°A es r tudy of t h e Cus tomer Relat ions Activity was com­pleted This project s tudied the factors affecting the length of t ime required to service a te lephone cus tomer and the overall number of cus tomers being served dur ing a working

day. Problems were identified and short and long term solu­tion strategies were developed. Full implementation of the recommendations of the study are scheduled to be com­pleted by September 30, 1983. This will produce a higher level of service to our customer by providing more efficient, timely service over the telephone.

At year's end the distribution system was comprised of a network of 2,500 miles of water lines. During 1982, the Dis­tribution and Maintenance crews repaired a total of 566 water line breaks. These crews worked around the clock in all types of weather to restore and maintain service to our customers. , _ .

In November of 1982 construction began on a new Dis­tribution Water Service Center located just east of the Dub­lin Road Water Plant. This facility will centralize the Dis­tribution Group, the Supply Group Administration, and the Water Research Lab into one location. These activities are currently spread throughout the city. The improved facili­ties and central location will allow a more efficient operation for these groups.

REDUCING COSTS—1982 As inflation continues to soar, the need for cost control

within our Division and the entire city, becomes paramount. Water has remained a very reasonably priced commodity when compared to the costs of other utilities. In 1982 there was a 10% water rate increase passed by City Council. Due to prudent cost management and changes in the treatment of interest earnings on Division funds, the increase for 1983 is only 2.7%.

This increase is the lowest percentage boost in the last 12 years. With the passage of the City Income Tax increase. City Council voted to return the Division's interest earnings. These earnings are generated from the investment of funds the Division borrows for future capital improvements, it's reserve balances and daily cash flows.

The Division has been studying various methods of pric­ing water service since 1975. In 1982 a new rate structure was approved by City Council. This structure changes the way that costs are allocated to customers. The new "Cost of Service Rate Structure" ensures that all customers pay their "fair share" for the services which they receive. As a result of this structure change some customer groups will see a substantial increase in the cost of their water service, and conversely some groups will realize a decrease in water costs. In order to minimize the impacts of these changes, the rate structure will be gradually implemented over the next five (5) years. It is expected that all groups of customers will be paying rates which reflect their full cost of service by 1987.

The treatment and distribution of water is an energy in­tensive process. Natural gas is necessary in treatment and electricity is required to run the pumps which distribute the water throughout the city. In 1982 the cost of natural gas for the Morse Road and Dublin Road Water Plants totalled $365,605.68. The total electricity cost for the two plants amounted to $1,962,210.01. These and other division ex­penditures are climbing at a rate of 8 to 10% per year. In order to keep water a reasonable commodity we must con­stantly search for more cost effective methods of operation. Below are highlights of a few of the Division's many cost-reduction programs for 1982.

A Preventive Maintenance Program was designed to align the focus of the Division on protecting the investment in the distribution system, the water treatment plants, and other physical facilities. By concentrating on the preservation and maintenance of existing structures, costs of repair and re­placement can be averted. This project also focused on in­ventory control processes. The Division's system of stock­ing pipes, valves, meters, hydrants and other materials will be streamlined to minimize the investment in inventory while maintaining efficient access to materials. For this ex­tensive study, the Division contracted with an outside con­sultant. It has been estimated that when this program is fully implemented, savings could reach $700,000 per year.

The cost of chemicals used in the water treatment process comprises a major portion of Division expenditures each year. In 1982 total chemical costs were $2,727,456. While the purchase price of chemicals continues to increase, water treatment personnel endeavor to make the most efficient use of those dollars spent on chemicals. Chemical costs for water at the Dublin Road plant decreased from $99.53 per million gallons in 1981 to $99.14 per million gallons in 1982 Morse Road chemical costs also experienced a drop from $37.55 to $37.08 per million gallons. These costs decreased while the character of the raw water remained consistent This points to the fact that plant operators and chemists

payed careful attention to raw water quality and chemical feeds required to provide proper treatment.

The Operations section of the Distribution group is equipped with a computerized leak detection system. This system allows workers to locate a leak using sonic detectors and saves the costs of digging and street repair at several locations. Property damage from leaks is also minimized because locating the leak is faster and repair can be started much sooner. The amount of unaccounted-for water, that water which is treated and pumped, but not metered, will decrease because of the ability to locate underground leaks which went undetected in previous years. During 1982 the leak detection equipment had a success rate of 90%. Numer­ous leaks were detected, located and repaired. The com bined rate of waste of these leaks was 847,000 gallons per day. The annual savings realized from detection and repair amounted to $45,000.

LOOKING AHEAD TO 1983 As we commence operations for 1983 our efforts will con­

centrate again on the attainment of our long term goal of providing Columbus with quality water and good service at a reasonable cost. The reorganization consolidation will con­tinue to further the efficiency of our organization. Water quality researchers and treatment personnel will monitor mil • and improve the quality of our product through the protec­tion of our water sources, and the development of efficient cost effective treatment practices. Service improvements will be pursued with programs like the combination of the Domestic Meter Repair and Inspection Activities, the imple­mentation of the Customer Relations Study recommenda­tions and the Public Information and Education Program. ..i . .r The costs of providing water service will be managed 1 through better budget monitoring, preventive maintenance, inventory control systems, and efficient use of investment earnings.

TO: Jack A. Holt, P.E. Superintendent

FROM: Jerry L. Francis, P.E. Assistant Superintendent

RE: 1982 Annual Report In reviewing the activities of 1982, three (3) events stand b.ii-

out in my mind; the reorganization of the Division; the 9.;. drought which caused Hoover Reservoir to drop to record fc: low levels; and the flood at Parsons Avenue Water Plant in (PAWP) in March, which probably delayed start up of this facility by at least a year.

There were also significant events in the area of major capital improvements; the development and implementa­tion of a new cost of service rate structure; some improve- -•_ ments and additional problems with the new Water and fc Sewer Utility Billing System (WAS/UBS); the addition of another county subdivision (Ridgewood Estates) to our ser­vice area; the creation of a special task force to study the >:-service needs that we might be expected to encounter by the art.' year 2000; and another task force to study ways to improve 9</o the satisfaction level of Division employees.

The Division's management training efforts continued by / i its active participation in the National Management Associa- -KI tion (NMA), and its various training and social programs.

Our ability to predict events on the Scioto River Basin i Watershed which might affect our water quality and there- -an,. fore, treatment processes and cost was improved by the joint funding and construction with the United States 29 Geological Survey (USGS) of a new streaming gaging sta- -i tion on Bokes Creek.

We also started construction on a new $7,000,000.00 Dis- -. tribution Center designed to house various Division opera­tions.

This report provides an overview of these accomplish- -i ments and setbacks. More detailed information is contained in other reports being submitted by the Division's three sstdl . Line and three Staff Group Managers. REORGANIZATION

By the end of 1982, the formal reorganization of the Divi- i sion into six (6) functional Groups. There are three (3) Line Groups: Supply, Distribution and Customer Service and three (3) Staff Groups: Administrative Services, Data ;. Processing and Personnel Services. Each Group has a man­ager who reports to the office of the Superintendent. The u goal of the reorganization effort was to enable the Division n.:i-to better meet its goals of Quality Water, Good Service and Reasonable Cost. The intent is to have an organization that i

DIVISION OF WATER, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

can utilize and respond to a managemen t concept of objec­tive setting to reach goals establ ished by the Superinten­dent 's Office. While the formal reorganization effort is com­plete, much work remains to m a k e it function as desired. This will be a pr imary focus for 1983. THE DROUGHT OF 1982

Because of lower than normal s t ream flow in Big Walnut Creek, Hoover Reservoir recorded its lowest water levels since coming on line almost thirty years ago. In order to conserve this supply as m u c h system demand as possible was transferred from the Morse Road Water Plant (MRWP) to our Dublin Road Water P lan t (DRWP). This required rather extensive changes in the distr ibution system and the reactivation of the Ackerman Road Booster Station (ARBS). Arrangements were also m a d e with the Ohio Depar tment of Natural Resources (ODNR) and the U.S. Corps of Engineers (USCOE) to s t a r t t r a n s f e r r i n g wa te r from Alum Creek Reservoir to Hoover. This transfer was p lanned to start if the water volume in Hoover reached a point where there was only ninety days supp ly remain ing . Near the middle of November we were within one week of reaching this point. Fortunately end of t h e year rainfall and result ing runoff started to replenish the Hoover supply and by the end of the year, the reservoir had substant ial ly recovered. PARSONS AVENUE WATER PLANT

The complet ion of this plant, which will add 35 to 40 MGD to our safe yield, and 50 to 75 MGD to our t rea tment and pumping capacity cont inues to be plagued by delays.

In March, a surge ant ic ipator valve on the finished water header failed, resul t ing in considerable flood damage to the plant. By the t ime valves could be tu rned off, water had flooded the basemen t area to a dep th of nine feet.

H u n d r e d s of t h o u s a n d s of d o l l a r s w o r t h of d a m a g e occurred to various mechanical , electrical, ins t rumenta t ion and control sys tems. At this t ime, it appears that the plant might be restored to its pre-flood condit ion about the end of March, 1983, with plant s tart u p scheduled shortly thereaf­ter. Much t ime and effort has been spen t in working with the Contractor, his Insurance Company and our Consul tants to correct the damage caused by this si tuation.

The four wells were basically comple ted dur ing the year by a Contractor hired by the original Contractor 's bonding company. All p u m p s were satisfactorily tested and the wells are ready for product ion .

A problem with the pneumat i c conveying system which transports lime and soda ash from the outs ide bulk storage tanks to day t anks ins ide the p lant was discovered. The present system does not have the air capacity to move parti­cles as large as the City has in stock. This is being reviewed by the Consultant , Contractor and Supplier .

The compute r based ins t rumenta t ion and control system passed a Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) and was approved for shipment . It arrived in late December and installation is starting. The Contractor has filed a claim for extra work which is being reviewed by our staff and the Consul tants . O'SHAUGHNESSY HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT

The detail des ign was basically comple ted for this 5 Mega­watt facility. A meet ing was held for the Division's technical and operating staff to expla in some of the design and oper­ational concepts .

A writ ten M e m o r a n d u m of Under s t and ing regarding en­vironmental operat ional concerns was signed by the City, ODNR and U .S . F i s h E n e r g y R e g u l a t o r y C o m m i s s i o n (FERC) to ensure necessary federal approval for construc­tion and operat ion.

A s tudy to de te rmine the mos t economical use of power was near complet ion at years end. T h e two best al ternatives are either to use the power at the Division's DRWP and PAWP by wheel ing th rough C&SOE and Division of Elec­tricity facilities or to use power at the MRWP which would require the cons t ruc t ion of a separa te power pole line to MRWP from O 'Shaughnessy Dam.

Current plans are to start cons t ruc t ion on this project by mid-83, with start u p scheduled for the end of 84 or early 85. MRWP RAW WATER LINE (RWL) AND HYDRO

A consul tant work ing u n d e r the direction of Mr. Cosens, Water Supp ly G r o u p Manager , is p repar ing a detail design report for this $16,000,000.00 project to const ruct an 84 inch water line from Hoover D a m to Morse Road Water Plant. This project, when comple ted , will help insure the quality of our largest (75%) water supply facility. It will also el iminate the need for r e -pumping wa te r at MRWP, therefore, lower­ing electrical opera t ing costs. The plans are to provide for a future hydroelectr ic genera tor set near the plant t e rminus of this line. The economic justif ication for this was established in an earlier project feasibility s tudy. Envi ronmenta l data will be collected du r ing opera t ion of the RWL to de te rmine

if the Hydro project might have any adverse impacts. The project is currently scheduled to start construction in 1984. HAMILTON ROAD 48 INCH TRANSMISSION MAIN

Due to the bonding company having to complete this pro­ject, it is considerably behind schedule. When completed this $2,000,000.00 project will considerably improve the re­liability of our supply to the east side of our service area. Many leaks were located and repaired during the year, but the Contractor could not conduct a satisfactory pressure-leakage test. At the end of the year it was proposed to the bonding company to put the line in service on a trial basis with the unders tanding that any leaks discovered will be repaired by them. DISTRIBUTION AUTOMATION

Perhaps one of the most exciting and potentially reward­ing projects is under the direction of Mr. John Doutt , Dis­tribution Group Manager. When completed all major dis­tribution facilities (high service pumps , booster stations, tanks, and pressure regulating valves) will be able to be monitored and controlled from a computer based central Operations Center. This Operations Center will be housed in the New Distribution Center. This $3,500,000.00 project is scheduled for bids in J u n e of 1983. MAINTENANCE AND INVENTORY CONTROL PROJECT

This project, designed to improve maintenance and inven­tory practices for our three plants, distr ibution system, and meters, had some notable accompl ishments and se tbacks during the year. The Consultant and our task force com­pleted its very laborious task of document ing the existing procedures and making recommendat ions on organization­al and staffing requirements . After several meetings, it was decided that the best system was a combinat ion of central planning, monitoring and control to assist the exist ing plant maintenance personnel.

Approval of this concept was obtained from the Director and included in presentat ions to the Sewer and Water Rate Board. The plan was presented to plant management and maintenance personnel. Interviews were held to de termine the desire and capability of exist ing staff to fill three new key posi t ions ; Ma in t enance Manager , Assis tant Mainte­nance Manager and Inventory Coordinator. An existing em­ployee was promoted to the Inventory Coordinator position and another identified as a potential candidate for the Assis­tant Main tenance Manager . It was de t e rmined that the Maintenance Manager position would have to be filled by recruitment from outside the Division.

Unfortunately, the Consul tant ' s project manager termi­nated his employment and the project temporari ly was put on hold.

It is hoped that the Maintenance Manager 's position can be filled very early in 1983, and the project restarted. This should be a top 1983 priority.

In closing, I would like to express my appreciat ion to all the Division employees who made the accompl ishments of 1982 possible and whose contr ibut ions in 1983 will ensure that with P E O P L E SERVING P E O P L E , we will be able to continue to provide QUALITY WATER and GOOD SER­VICE at REASONABLE COST, to our cus tomers in Co­lumbus and its sur rounding suburbs .

TO: Jack A. Holt, P.E. Super in tendent

FROM: KenMol l i Administrat ive Services Manager

RE: 1982 Annual Repor t

I. 1982 ACCOMPLISHMENTS A. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES MANAGER

The Administrat ive Services Group was created in Janu­ary 1982 The Group consists of the Adminis t ra t ive Services Manager the Fiscal Administrat ion Section, the Policy/Pro­cedure Research and Program Management Section and the Public Relations/Office Management Section. There are 24 posi t ions b u d g e t e d for th i s g r o u p . T h e miss ion of this Group is to provide the Division with management , fiscal and informational resources to achieve its goals and objec­tives. „

Since the Administrat ive Service Group was a new orga­nizational arrangement , a good deal of t ime was spent defin­ing responsibili ty areas, j ob descript ions and internal oper­ating policies and procedures . However, considerable re­sources were spent in improving the Division s financial s tructure The development of a new rate s t ructure and im­proving the budget setting and review process is placing the Division upon a m u c h better financial foundation.

DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

The major 1982 accomplishments were: 1 Rate Structure Re-design. The Division, with the assis­

tance of Black and Veatch consulting engineers, developed a new water rate structure. The new rate structure provides for a more detailed cost allocation of the services provided by the Division. This ensures that those customers who cause certain costs, pay those costs. The result is a more equitable rate structure and improved management in­formation. _..

The Sewer and Water Board recommended and City Council approved the new cost of service water rate struc­ture. It was decided that a gradual shift to this new structure would be in the best interest of the customers and the Divi­sion. It is expected that customers will be paying full cost of service rates by January 1, 1987.

2 Division Reorganization. The Division implemented an organizational change. The change was done gradually throughout the year (Administrative Services in January; Customer Services, Personnel, Data Processing, and Supply in April; and Distribution in November). The new organiza­tion provides a better functional alignment with the Divi­sion goal of quality water, good service, and reasonable cost. Also, a more manageable span of control was developed. Exhibit 1 shows the new organizational structure.

The reorganization resulted in a more refined budgeting approach. The new budget system allocates resources to the sub-activity level instead of just the activity level. For exam­ple, the previous budget system set up a budget for the total Customer Relations Activity. However, the Customer Rela­tions Activity is made up of Administration, Telephone and Public Office components. The reorganization provided the opportunity for the Division to budget each of these compo­nents. The Division hopes to get a better feel for the rela­tionship between resources spent and services rendered under this new approach. B. FISCAL ADMINISTRATION SECTION

The Fiscal Administration Section's mission is to deter­mine the Division's financial requirements, monitor its purchases and expenditures, monitor its revenues and col­lect past due accounts.

The Fiscal Administration Section was originally assigned 17 projects for 1982. An additional 9 projects were assigned during the year. This makes a total of 26 projects which were assigned to this section for 1982.

The Division maintained a positive financial position throughout 1982. The beginning cash balance for the Divi­sion as of January 1,1982 was $7,214,869. During the year the Division had receipts totaling $40,292,335 and disburse­ments totaling $38,675,910. This left the Division with a cash balance as of December 31, 1982 of $8,831,294. The unen­cumbered portion amounted to $6,406,117. A detailed listing of these facts is included with this report following Exhibit

Since its inception in January of 1982, the Fiscal Adminis­tration Section has been seeking to improve the Division's financial structure. The major projects worked on in that regard include the following:

1. 1983 Rate Review. As a part of 1982-86 Expenditure/ Revenue Plan, 1983 Expenditure and Revenue Projections were re-examined. Also at this time projections were made for 1987 in order to maintain a five-year planning horizon. The Division requested an expenditure increase of $3.6 mil­lion (9.3%) over 1982 expenditure projections. This would have resulted in a 13.6% rate increase. The difference be­tween the rate of increase of expenditures (9.3%) and the rates requested (13.6%) is the amount of increase required to eliminate deficit spending. The Sewer and Water Advisory Board recommended a final budget of $41.8 million or $418,000 less than the Division's final request. The Depart­ment of Finance later increased this budget by approx­imately $188,000 to adjust for their revised employee insur­ance cost estimate. The final budget therefore totals $41,998,000. The Board also recommended an overall rate increase of 10%. This included the use of $766,000 from the Division's reserves. An additional $2.5 million was later allo­cated to the Division for 1983 as part of projected interest earnings. This brought the 1983 overall rate increase down to 2.7%. The rate structure employed by the Division was also changed to reflect a more equitable pricing system This will cause the amount of rate increase to vary among consumers according to their specific account characteris­tics.

2. Budget Process Improvements. During 1982 several im­provements were made to the Division's budget process More input concerning the budget was solicited from Group Managers and Activity Heads. The lines of communication concerning budget information were improved. A compari­son between 1983 budget amounts and prior years expendi­

tures was conducted prior to final budget submittal. The 1983 budget planning process was improved in order to en­sure that relevant information was available for timely dis­cussion by the Sewer and Water Advisory Board. A micro­computer was also purchased near the end of 1982 which will greatly improve the efficiency and accuracy of the budget process in future years.

3. Quarterly Review Improvements. This project was par­tially completed during 1982. The major improvement in the Quarterly Financial Review process was to more directly involve the Group Managers and Activity Heads in their expenditure projections. This will serve to increase the accuracy of the projections since the Group Managers and Activity Heads have the best knowledge of their relevant operations. The Division has also initiated the development of a more comprehensive revenue projection system. This development along with other enhancements will continue throughout 1983.

4. Collections Activity Reorganization. During 1982 the Di­vision's Collections Activity was moved from the Book­keeping/Accounts Receivable Activity to the Fiscal Ad­ministration Section. This activity was then reorganized to include not only the Division's Collections efforts but also its Claims and Property Management responsibilities. General responsibilities have been defined for the Collec­tions Activity and a new organizational structure has been developed. In the area of Claims Management, a new policy has been implemented that will make Group Managers and Activity Heads more aware of claims in their area. Claims will be paid out of the specific Activity budget that gener­ated the claim rather than out of the Division's Administra­tion budget. An improvement has also been made in the area of Property Management. A comprehensive application form has been developed for perspective tenants of Division owned property. This will provide a method of screening the applicants in order to improve the tenant selection process.

C. POLICY/PROCEDURE RESEARCH AND PROGRAM MAN­AGEMENT SECTION

The mission of the Policy/Procedure/Program Manage­ment Section is to develop, plan and implement policy/pro­cedure research and cost reduction programs.

For the year 1982, the Policy/Procedure Section was assigned 15 projects. During the year, an additional 6 proj­ects were assigned bringing the total to 21. Of these projects, 8 were completed and 5 are very near completion.

Some of the major projects developed by the Section in­clude the following:

1. Customer Service Telephone Office Improvement Study. This study was undertaken because of the deficiencies that existed in our Customer Service Telephone Activity. The broad scope of the problem was that the length of time to service a customer and the number of customers served was at an unacceptable level.

The major objectives of the study were to: a) Increase the number of service requests that were pro­

cessed by the Customer Service Representatives. b) Increase the amount of time the Customer Service

Representative is on the telephone. c) Reduce the number of billing errors that resulted in

additional mail and multiple return phone calls to Customer Service.

d) Reduce the amount of clerical tasks that are required of the Customer Service Representatives.

To achieve these objectives, problems were identified and short term/long term strategies were developed. Short term strategies were defined as those whereby the Division has maximum control over areas being changed. Long term strategies were defined as those programs not completely under Division control. Program implementation and im­pact are dependent on coordination and cooperation from other city agencies and the constraints with which they must contend.

It was recommended that all 18 strategies be pursued as soon as possible. Full implementation of the program will be completed by September 30, 1983.

2. Obsolete Meter Replacement Program. As part of a ma­jor project to identify the Division's 18% unaccounted for water loss, the primary objective of the Obsolete Meter Program is replacement of 268 untestable and/or irreparable meters. Development of this project has required consider­able data collection, research and analysis of sub-projects.

Accomplishments include project costing, installation personnel, scheduling and warehousing requirements, meter data assembly, policy resolution and notification pro­cedures. Yet to be completed are contract development, staff selection, financial legislation and activity coordina­tion.

I" " ' ' H i ' .

f».T I T , PBi,

v s .

DIVISION OF WATER, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

Through extensive data analysis and in-field inspections, it has been found that about 180 of the large meters targeted for replacement in March 1982, need not be replaced. This represents a savings, th rough research, of about 40% of the work originally identified and is partially responsible for delaying implementa t ion until Spring, 1983.

3. Combination of Inspection/Domestic Meter Repair Activi­ties Study. In January , 1982 the Division of Water under took a s t udy to d e t e r m i n e t h e feasibi l i ty of c o m b i n i n g t h e Domestic Meter Repair and Inspect ion Activities It was felt that because of the success of the Remote Program, which eliminated much of the need to repair meters , an overlap in responsibilities and functions existed between the two ac­tivities. This being true, combin ing the two activities would more efficiently utilize resources and consequent ly increase the Division's effectiveness to the public.

As part of the s tudy a field exper iment was conducted using a combined group and a control group. The results showed that because of a greater sense of au tonomy from having tota l r e spons ib i l i t y for an area, t ravel t ime and mileage would be reduced, product ivi ty increased, dupli­cate tr ips decreased and job satisfaction would be elevated.

As a result of the s tudy, a task force was set up to formu­late an implementa t ion plan and strategy with a target date of January 1, 1983.

The p ro jec t w a s b r o k e n d o w n in to six major a reas : Physical plant, E q u i p m e n t and Suppl ies , Training, Person­nel and Civil Service, Internal P rocedures and Commercial/ Domestic Meter Repair Split .

Space has been identified and renovated to house the combination at the Dubl in Avenue Meter Shop. Equ ipmen t and supply needs have been formulated and purchased. In­ternal procedures have been developed. It was decided that it would be advantageous to split Commercia l and Domest ic Meter Repair before the combina t ion took effect. This has been accomplished. Cross t ra ining of personnel has been started. The only th ing holding u p implementa t ion of the project is tha t Civil Service m u s t approve new job descrip­t ions and i m p l e m e n t t h e revised classification sys tems . Whenever t h e a p p r o v a l is rece ived , superv i sors will be appointed, t raining comple ted and the new Combina . ion Activity will begin.

4. Violation Detection and Enforcement Policy. This project provides the Division wi th the m e a n s to reduce (in some part) the unaccoun ted for water problem. The major objec­tives of this policy are:

a) To reduce the cost of violations for the Division. b) To increase the cus tomers and Division's personnel

awareness of the Division's concern wi th the violation prob­lem.

c) To have the violator pay the cost of the violation. d) To reduce the n u m b e r of violations. d) To increase t h e Divis ion 's documen ta t i on of viola­

tions and all tha t they encompass—cost , labor t ime, extent of violation, etc.

The 1981 violation detec t ions and enforcement policy has been revamped for implementa t ion with the reorganization of the Division's Inspect ion and Meter Repair Activities. As the costs of providing water service rises and the effect of these costs upon the Division's cus tomers becomes greater, there is a potential for more inc idences of t amper ing with the Division's meter ing system. T h u s the Division needs a policy that sets u p p rocedures to actively detect , investigate and enforce the Division's rules and regulat ions. The effort by the Division to detect and correct violations as quickly as possible is a key e lement of this policy to further reduce the costs violations place on the Division's operat ing budget . Imposing a charge u p o n those who violate Division rules and regula t ions will he lp to resolve the equi ty p rob lem where all cus tomers are penalized with higher bills due to the actions of a few.

5. Senior Citizen Rate Program. The Senior Citizen Rate Program is a result of City Ord inance 1148-81, which pro­vides for a 25% rate reduct ion for low income, elderly water consumers . S ince t h e P r o g r a m was imp lemen ted on Ju ly 1, 1981,1,913 appl icants have been approved for benefit, while 607 appl icants did not qualify. The revenue loss to the Divi­sion was approximate ly $20,500 dur ing 1982, in addit ion to the adminis t ra t ive cost of $11,400. If the 1982 response rate continues, the 1983 revenue loss a lone will be $26,000.

During 1982, 3,386 appl icat ions were dis tr ibuted, and 737 were re turned, resul t ing in 580 addit ional consumers receiv­ing the senior rate reduct ion. One quar te r of the appl icants could not be approved, d u e primari ly to appl icant failure to verify claimed age and income.

The following p rocedures were revised dur ing 1982:

a) The application distribution system was revised to in­crease its efficiency. The application return rate increased from 11% previously to the current 22%.

b) The application was revised, resulting in reduced pro­cessing paperwork, reduced print ing costs, improved rec­ords, and greater emphas is on applicant concerns demon­strated during the first six months of the program.

c) The application approval postcard was revised to pro­vide more complete information to the consumer. The revi­sion has been effective in reducing bill related inquiries and complaints.

d) A desk- top card file was produced , containing in­formation on each approved applicant. It has proved valu­able in reducing inquiry response t ime and facilitating pro­gram statistical analysis.

Analysis of all applications received from the t ime the program was implemented on Ju ly 1, 1981, through Decem­ber 31, 1982, revealed:

a) The mean age at approval is 74.8 years, which is 9.8 years older than the m i n i m u m qualifying age, and

b) The mean annual income at approval is $4,983, which is only 64% of the upper limit.

D. PUBLIC RELATIONS/OFFICE MANAGEMENT SECTION As a part of the Administrat ive Services Section, the Pub­

lic Relations/Office Management activity serves both the water customers and all segments of the Division.

The mission of the Public Relations office is to provide the public with timely, accurate information about the Division of Water, its product and services. In the capacity of media liaison, the Public Relations Administrator formulates all press releases, coordinates press conferences and facilitates Division contacts with the media. More direct public educa­tion is accomplished through the development and distribu­tion of bill stuffers, brochures and displays dur ing Better Water Week and the Ohio State Fair.

The Office Management section has as its aim the provi­sion of information services and s tandard operat ing proce­dures to all areas of the Division of Water. In analyzing costs, securing efficient systems of office equ ipment and respond­ing to supply and informational needs of Division sections, the Office Management staff contr ibutes to the realization of the Division's goal of "Quality Water and Good Service at a Reasonable Cost".

The Public Relations/Office Management area was born out of the Division wide reorganization and began opera­tions in January of 1982. The staff consisted of an Adminis­trator (Development Project Assistant I), a Mail Clerk (Typ­ist Clerk I) and a Custodial Worker I.

An op t imis t i c t w e n t y - o n e (21) p ro jec t s were initially assigned to this area in 1982. An additional seven (7) were added throughout the first and second quarters . With this project schedule and numerous rout ine activities to be per­formed, the need for addit ional analytical staff became quite apparent. At mid-year a decision was m a d e to split the activ­ity into two segments , Publ ic Relations and Office Manage­ment. The process to hire an Office Manager was initiated. Also evident was a need for an Administrat ive Office Recep­tionist, this function was placed in the Office Management area and the paperwork to create the position was begun.

Projects for the PR/Office Management activity were re-prioritized. Emphas is was placed on maintaining and en­hancing routine operat ions and performing the Publ ic Rela­tions duties. The scheduled projects which related to the Office Management function were held in anticipation of the filling of the Office Manager position. Due to delays in pro­cessing, the position was not filled until December of 1982. This delay accounts for many projects being behind sche-

In retrospect the major accompl i shments of the PR/Office Management area in 1982 are as follows:

1. Public Information/Education Projects a) Two public information displays were held dur ing

1982 The Division pa r t i c ipa ted in t h e Amer i can Water Works Association sponsored "Better Water Week", May 2-9 with an informational display at Northland Mall. A dis­play was also set up in the Electric Building at the Ohio State Fair August 6-22. These events helped to educate the Columbus water cus tomers about the t reatment , quality and cost factors of their water.

b) A half hour television program was writ ten and broad­cast over t h e G o v e r n m e n t T e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n s Cable Channel 3. This program traced Columbus water th rough supply processing and distr ibution to the cus tomer ' s tap. A valuable resource exists in the Telecommunicat ions depart­ment and this initial program opened the door to many pos­sibilities for future product ions .

• » *

DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

2. Media Activities a) In June of 1982 the water from the Dublin Road Treat­

ment Plant contained nitrate in excess of the maximum allowable levels as dictated by the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974. In accordance with the State of Ohio interpretation of this federal law, the Division of Water was required to notify the public of the excessive nitrate. A press conference was held on June 23. Water Division officials, Ohio EPA Water Quality Chief and the Medical Director of the Co­lumbus Health Department presented facts and answered questions from the press. When the story aired it was por­trayed as a "Water Emergency". After many phone calls from concerned customers and follow-up news stories, the issue was put into perspective. From this episode we have learned a great deal about the treatment of these issues and therefore are much better prepared to handle future noti­fications. Through this experience, strong ties were made with other city/state agencies. These relationships offer valuable resources in many other areas of Public Relations with Division customers.

b) The Sewer and Water Advisory Board reviewed and recommended to Council a new water rate structure to be adopted over the next several years. This new cost of service structure was passed by City Council late in November. During the Board review period, several media contacts were made to explain the intent of the new structure. Sever­al newspaper articles, radio and television stories were covered in the issue. There is an ongoing effort to provide the public with additional information on the new structure and its customer impacts.

3. OFFICE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS a) The Division Administrative offices on the third floor

of the Marconi Building were redesigned in order to pro­duce a more professional, efficient work environment. The Water Engineering offices moved out of the building, freeing one-third of the floor for office redesign. Two basic premises were followed in formulating the new floor plan. One, that organizational units should be located together. And two, managers should be given private office areas and noise should be controlled in all areas. The move took place with minimal disruption of work. Phones were moved, allowing all areas to retain their original numbers. Partitions were reallocated to provide more effective section delinea­

tions and reduce traffic through work areas. Additional im­provements are slated to continue during 1983.

b) Standard office procedures were established for ordering and distribution of supplies, large volume copying and phone/building service requests. Activities have been following these procedures and cost and time savings are evident.

II. 1983 OBJECTIVES The Administrative Service Group will pursue many proj­

ects during 1983. The focus will continue to be the improve­ment of the Div is ion f inancial and organiza t ional framework. Some of the objectives to be worked on in 1983 are:

1. To implement the new cost of service water rate struc­ture and schedule and the necessary support systems by December 31, 1983.

2. To consolidate the Division reorganization by Decem­ber 31, 1983.

3. To continue the implementation of a program budget­ing structure and the necessary support by September 30, 1983.

4. To improve the financial reporting analysis structure by August 31, 1983.

5. To develop and implement a comperhensive un­accounted for water program by December 31, 1983.

6. To develop a Division wide policy and procedure manual format by December 31, 1983.

7. To study account reading and billing procedures by August 31, 1983.

8. To develop a public education program by December 31, 1983.

9. To establish and implement standardized office proce­dures by December 31, 1983.

10. To develop cost reduction programs for office opera­tions by August 31, 1983.

1983 promises to be a landmark year. Many changes to the Division's operations have been proposed and partially im­plemented. The 1983 objectives planned for the Administra­tive Services Group will re-enforce the many changes underway within the Division. This ensures another step is taken towards the goal of providing quality water and good customer service at a reasonable cost.

-ini luno

ri99d 9v

I-avoiqrn

I S86I nir

yd sme),

-l9gbud i ,08 19dm

97UJDU11C

19dm9D9(

1

DIVISION OF WATER, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

.2 2

I s 3 Eo-o

t 3

"~ § > 2

tz

e

a B a

S

i t

£ L

s c

1

e

i

tz

o

s

,_ £

s

1

£

2

1

t - t z tz "*

= -!&

I s !

fc 3 ,-tz ac IZ ^

t I I ;Etzs

§ | s |

I~tz51

S | 1 ~ g s s i ig 1 I 3 e or e = g

g

3

a:

s C O

5

tz stz , ~ s ~ 6 tz I j 8 t -z c 5

l l l s l i l

I f l i s 3 = = I i B i i

L-S?

1 s M

s

tz tzEtzE % S s " S

£ * 5 1 i 1 1 1 3 i 11 s § £= » E c g 5 E I | | I a

10 DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

DIVISION OF WATER RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND FOR THE YEAR 1982

FUND FUND FUND NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER

0390 0391 0390 & 0391

Cash Balance January 1,1982 $5,211,431 $2,003,438 $7,214,869

" S t o r e d Water Charges $20,876,495 $14,299,885 $35,17_6,380

MTsecellaneousnSale of Water "YYYYYYYYYYYY 13,461 8,265 21,726 Other Water Service a ' t a b u = 5i,BbO

Receipts from Sales of Water $20,947,816 $14,308,150 $35,255,966 Meter ReDair $ 18,693 $ — $ 18,693 Miscellaneous Sales 1 0 ' 6 6 3 130,700 141,363 Reimbursement from Sewers & brains 1,961,076 = 1,961,076

Total Operating Receipts $ 1.990,432 $ 130,700 $ 2,121,132 Sale of Taps $ 61,509 $ — $ 61,509 Meter Fees • 356,952 — 356,952 Front Foot Charge YY 142,206 142,206 System Capacity Charge 98Mli 989A¥ Mainline Extension Charge — 5,000 5,000

Total Outlay Receipts $ 418,461 $ 1,136,640 $ 1,555,101 Miscellaneous Income $ 70,901 $ 39,235 $ 110,136 Fund Transfer from 390 to 391 — "1,250,000 "1,250,000

Total Receipts $23,427,610 $16,864,725 $40,292,335 Total Receipts & Balance January 1, 1982 $28,639,041 $18,868,163 $47,507,204

Disbursements Payroll & Payroll Overhead Expense $ 9,510,979 $ — $ 9,510,979 Supplies & Materials for Operation & Maintenance 3,378,334 3,378,334 Services for Operation & Maintenance 6,777,624 683,904 7,461,528 Debt Service Requirements 16,096,460 16,096,460 Rebates & Refunds 228,483 5,399 233,882 Awards & Indemnities $ 18,359 $ — $ 18,359 Transfer of Funds *1,250,000 *1,250,000 Capital Outlay 726,368 — 726,368

Total Disbursements $21,890,147 $16,785,763 $38,675,910 Unexpended Balance $ 6,748,894 $ 2,082,400 $ 8,831,294 Outstanding Orders 2,328,796 96,381 2,425,177 Unencumbered Balance December 31, 1982 $ 4,420,098 $ 1,986,019 $ 6,406,117

"Note fund transfer from fund 08-390 to 08-391 to cover debt overstates expenditures in fund 08-390 and revenue in fund 08-391.

Source: City of Columbus, Auditor's Year-End Report.

DIVISION OF WATER SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS FOR THE YEARS 1980 THROUGH 1982

1980 1981 1982 Operating Fund No. 08-390

Cash Balance January 1st $ 4,816,805 $ 3,524,684 $ 5,211,431 Total Receipts 15,374,251 20,387,474 23,427,610 Total Receipts & Balance January 1st 20,191,056 23,912,158 28,639,041 Total Disbursements 16,666,372 18,700,724 21,890,147 Unexpended Balance December 31st 3,524,684 5,211,434 6,748,894 Outstanding Encumbrances 2,130,039 2,522,281 2,328,796 Unencumbered Balance December 31st $ 1,394,645 $ 2,689,153 $ 4,420,098

Water Works Depreciation & Improvement Fund No. 08-391 Cash Balance January 1st $ 8,283,475 $ 5,297,623 $ 2,003,438 total Receipts 9,833,802 12,547,257 16,864,725 Total Receipts & Balance January 1st 18,117,277 17,844,880 18,868,163 Total Disbursements 12,819,654 15,841,440 16,785,763 Unexpended Balance December 31st 5,297,623 2,003,440 2,082,400 Outstanding Encumbrances December 31st _ 96,38! Unencumbered Balance December 31st $ 5,297,623 $ 2,003,440 $ 1,986,019

Comparison Source of Income for Years 1980 Through 1982 Tntf! Mf^LiR!;VenUe

c; $21,876,825 $29,304,522 $35,255,966 Total Miscellaneous Revenue * 1 8 2 i ,633 2!oi7,160 2,23l!268 Total Revenue Capital Outlay 1,509,595 1,613,049 1,555,101 Total Before Fund Transfer $25,208,053 $32,934,731 $39,042,335 FundTransfer* - - •1.250.000 T o t a l D l v l s l o n Receipts $25,208,053 $32,934,731 $40,292,335

*08°391fUnd t r a n S f e r f r ° m f u n d ° 8 " 3 9 0 t o 0 8 " 3 9 1 t 0 c o v e r d e b t over-states expenditures in fund 08-390 and revenue in fund

DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

DIVISION OF WATER DISTRIBUTION OF EXPENDITURES FOR THE YEARS

1980. 1981, AND 1982 FUND 0390 AND 0391

1980 General Wages $ 5,930,290 Overtime & Holiday Pay 345,216 Sick Leave Reciprocity & Service Credit ! ! ! ! ! " ! 10L924 Terminal Leave Pay ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 64 883 Workmen's Compensat ion , Unemploymen t Compensat ion & Medicare 220^451 P.E.R.S. Contr ibut ions 885475 Employees Hospital & Life Insurance 418396 Office Suppl ies 10^207 Small Tools 20J20 Clothing 20,922 Cleaning Suppl ies 13,533 Reproduct ion & Photograph ic Suppl ies 3,381 Other General Suppl ies 21,933 Postage 11,253 Chemicals 2,392,020 Lab Supplies 21,195 Utilities—Gas, Electric & Heat 2,163,232 Printing & Publ i sh ing 2,889 Professional & Consul tant Services 150,054 Telephone & Telegraph 85,128 Rental of E q u i p m e n t 71,242 Rental of Land 5,875 Travel, Transpor ta t ion & Training 35,223 Other Services 40,089 Claims & Indemni t ies 13,277 Subscript ions & Member sh ips 6,218 Data Processing 894,795 Pro-Rata 987,876 Maint. Equ ipment , Machinery & Automobi les 561,186 Maintenance of Bui ld ing 42,974 Maintenance of Hydran t s 44,874 Maintenance of Water Meters 17,851 Maintenance of Water Mains & Other 427,255 Outlay for Furn i tu re & Office E q u i p m e n t 24,938 Outlay for Auto & Machinery E q u i p m e n t 315,455 Outlay for Water Utilities 90,763 Outlay for Water Meters 401,342 Outlay for Fire Hydran t s 46,080 Principal on Bonds 4,366,000 Interest on B o n d s 5,508,355 Interest on Notes 2,529,139 Advance to Const ruct ion Inspect ion Division 14,965 Other Transfers —0— Rebates & Refunds 132,951 Principal on Notes 24,000 Fund Transfer* —0— TOTAL E X P E N D I T U R E S $29,486,025 $34,542,130 $38,675,910

'No te fund transfer from fund 08-390 to 08-391 to cover debt over-states expendi ture in fund 08-390 and revenue in fund 08-391.

Zone 00

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

1000 1100 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 2000 2100 2700 2800 3700 Total

COLLECTIONS ACTIVITY REPORT 1982 SHERIFF SALES

No. of Accounts Amount 61 $ 10,322.76 39 7,385.45 32 7,576.58 68 11,491.37 74 8,662.17 82 10,630.89 63 8,651.90

4 733.32 4 438.49

16 7,475.16 61 10,854.28 90 12,981.44 31 3,188.43 17 1,325.96 15 2,393.56 3 492.35 i 120.54 o - o -1 47.23 5 606.90 2 115.10 a 641.56 6 _ 457.65

~~wT $106,593.09

1982 BANKRUPTCIES Claims Filed D e b t s Discharged* $42,620.88 — 167 Cases $10,093.57 — 83 Cases "represents those accounts where the debtor lacked assets enough to pay debts

CLAIMS AGAINST THE DIVISION 1981 $10,260.77 — 200 Claims $11,700.96-

1982 • 219 Claims

12 DIVISION OF WATER, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

Senior Citizen Rate Program Periodic Performance Data

Ju ly 1, 1981 to

Dec. 31, 1981 Applications dis t r ibuted

per month 2,696 New applicat ions received

per month 297 New application distr ibuted/

new applications received . . . 907 % of dis tr ibuted applicat ions

returned 11™ Telephone calls per approved

application (approx) 1-37 Disapproved Applicat ions

subsequent ly approved u n k n o w n Reasons for disapproval

Contract/Residence 21.4% Single Meter/

Single family res idence . . 0.3% Under age limit 1-9% Over income limit 2.4%

Improper application 33.1% P r o o f o f a g e f 6.2% f Proof of income < 26.8% < Incomplete form L 0.1% L

Multiple causes 40.9% Hours required to process

each application 1306 _ 737 1772

= (44.2 min.)

Year of

1982

282

61.4

4.59

22%

1.77

64%

14.5%

0.2% 1.7% 2.3%

38.2% 9.3%

28.8% 0.05

43.2% 695 750 (55.6 min.)

Year of 1982

Application Process ing T ime Consumed (Hours) 695.0

Total Appl ica t ions Dis t r ibu ted . 3,386 Total P rog ram Mailings 1,318 Total New Applications Received .. 737 Total Appl icat ions Approved . . 580 Total Appl icat ions Rema in ing

Disapproved 170

Program To Date

2,048.5 19,562 4,662 2,520 1,913

607

OIDID.-I

.927

Senior Citizen Rate Program Revenue Loss and Administrative Costs

1982 ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS

Application Processing Hourly Rate

Processor Hours + 50% OHD Cost Hunter 328.6 $ 12.85 $4,222.51 S temen 366.4 10.45 3,828.88

Total 695.0 $8,051.39

Program Mgmt. Hunter 230 $ 12.85 $2,955.50

Miscellaneous Item No. Each Cost Postage (letters) 724 $.20 $144.80 Postage (cards) 594 $.13 77.22 Phone (outgoing) 229 $.09 20.61 Pr in ted Forms . . . 90.13 Total $332.76

1982 ADMINISTRATIVE COST TOTAL $11,339.65

REVENUE LOSS Calculation of revenue loss, wi thout the aid of a compu te r requires two a s sumpt ions : 1. The average n u m b e r of approved appl icants dur ing the year, 1623, received the ra te reduct ion , and 2. The n u m b e r of approved appl icants res iding in City, contract , and non-cont rac t areas is app rox ima te ly propor t ional

to the number of accounts in each area, i.e. &5Vo—25%—10%, for es t imate purposes .

Area %/area Av. Approved Reduction Bills/yr Revenue Loss C'ty .65 1623 2.81 4 $11,857.64 Contract .25 1623 3.64 4 5,907.72 Non-Contract .10 1623 4.21 4 2,733.13

1982 Total Revenue Loss $20,498.49

1982 TOTAL PROGRAM COSTS $31,838.14

1983—First Quarter Revenue Loss Project ion

_, %/area City .65 Contract 25 Non-Contract 'lO

1983 First Quarter Loss

1983—Full Year Revenue Loss Project ion _., %/area City .65 Contract 25 Non-Contract 'lO

lunoifroqi

Approved Applicants

1913 1913 1913

Reduction $2.62

3.41 3.94

Revenue Loss $3,257.84

1,630.83 753.72

$5,642.39

. Approved 2203 2203 2203

Reduction $2.62

3.41 3.94

Bills/yr 4 4 4

Revenue Loss $15,006.84

7,512.23 3,471.93

$25,991.00

DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982 13

TO: Jack A. Holt, P.E. Superintendent

FROM: Joseph P. Miles Personnel Manager

RE: 1982 Annual Report The calendar year, 1982, has been a significant year in the

development of the Division in many ways. A long, frus­trated effort of reorganization has taken place. Perhaps, for­tunately, some ongoing programs were in place to help alleviate some of the negative impacts of the reorganization itself, the manner in which it was initiated, the morale prob­lems it has inevitably caused, and keeping in counter­balance the fuzzy lines of authority and responsibilities among the activities, as well as among individual em­ployees.

The ongoing programs which were in progress are the Management Training Program, the professional manage­ment organization available for the supervisors to partici­pate in at both a professional and social level, the Quality of Working Life program, the opportunity for supervisory per­sonnels ideas to be considered in the collective bargaining process, and some other efforts that at least were formulated and started in the calendar year, such as a task force to study employee satisfaction level survey, regular staff meetings of top management, and efforts to pursue and formulate poli­cies and programs in such areas as in-house training, em­ployee evaluation, a Division news vehicle of some sort, a formal orientation for new employees, and a manual for em­ployees in general.

The automated payroll system came on line for the Divi­sion about mid year. Although this has caused different pro­cedural efforts on the part of the payroll staff, and is produc­ing informational type reports that were not previously available, the full impact and benefit of the system has not yet been realized.

The recruitment and hiring process has continued to de­lay the filling of vacancies, both replacement and new. A different mechanical tracking system has been set up on this process that should keep affected supervisory person­nel better informed about the status of hiring efforts a: any given time for any given position.

During the 1982 calendar year thirty-one (31) original appointments were made, sixteen (16) promotional appoint­ments were processed, and twenty-one (21) employees ter­minated. There were some thirty-five (35) personnel transac­tions affecting part time employees.

A Safety Program Manager was hired late in the year. The enthusiasm that he has shown and the innovation that was put forth in the few weeks he was with the Division shows promise for a significant program in this very crucial area of the Division operations. There should be benefits derived that would be broader than a change in statistics in the safe­ty concept. Programs have been innovated and are in the planning stages that should produce a higher morale through competition and an establishment of personal pride within the Division.

This report is presented in a spirit of introspection as well as in an attempt to describe the happenings within the per­sonnel services areas in a condition of prose.

TO: Jack A. Holt, P.E. Superintendent

FROM: Don Lord Data Processing Systems Coordinator

RE: 1982 Annual Report Before reviewing the activities of 1982, one must comment

on the frenetic period of time from June, 1981 when the new data system was implemented through the first quarter of 1982 when we finally began to catch up in correcting the magnitude of errors generated when the new system was brought on-line. Many problems surfaced because of in­adequate time to fully test the system modules and thor­oughly train our employees in use of the new system. Some 240 system problems have been identified of which 190 have been resolved with proper changes to prohibit errors from reoccurring.

During the last half of 1981; after implementation of the new Data System, 12 enhancement needs were identified to facilitate processing in the system. In 1982 these enhance­ments were contracted to Peat, Marwick, Mitchell &: Co. for programming and implementation at a cost of $49,900. These enhancements were:

1. To change Account Receivable Summary Screen to show total payment and balance due on a per bill basis. This

gives our Customer Service personnel a clear picture of bill­ings and payments when talking to customers.

2. Collection Override Reports that show all charges due so they can be individually analyzed or reports for Water only charges to be sent to a collection agency or reports for Suburban Surcharges that are uncollectable and are to be suspended from customer accounts.

3. Programs to automatically adjust Sewer, Water and Surcharge amounts from customer records and add them into summary suspense accounts when they are certified to taxes, sent to a collection agency or suspended.

4. Scheduling of Billing and Meter Reading Reconciliation by Zone and/or Book within Zone to facilitate schedules for even billing and reconciling readings on a more accurate date basis.

5. A program to Rebill customers for a previous rendered bill giving a new due date and automatically cancelling any previous penalty amounts if desired.

6. The ability to check effective date of samples in extra strength billing of sewer charges to Industrial accounts.

7. The ability to add consumption (if applicable) for Water and/or Sewer to manual billings. This stores con­sumption data on customer bill records and are added to Management Statistical reports.

8. An on-line bill simulation program that allows calcula­tion of future billings if a customer needs to know such prior to a regular bill run. It also allows review of all bill structures prior to the time a rate change is put into effect.

9. The ability to remove payments, cancel billings and reapply payments in the same transaction string in one day. Previously this took two days to complete and necessitate keeping manual notes to be sure all transactions were per­formed.

10. Instead of all consumption adjustment readings being treated as actual readings, which was not always the case, the ability to enter the true reading type (estimated, actual or final) allows maintaining of a more accurate meter read­ing history.

11. A new calculation module to charge Suburban sewer surcharge based on sewer consumption instead of water consumption where suburban ordinances so designate.

12. A new calculation module to allow a percent of Water and/or Sewer charges to be billed as a suburban surcharge which eliminates the need of a suburb to change their ordi­nances everytime we change our water or sewer rates. This also eliminates the need for many entries in our rate calcula­tion tables.

The Water/Sewer Billing and Account Receivable System operates under somewhat of a handicap whereas we the user are responsible for data entry, customer maintenance and adjustments to accounts which can be properly handled and maintained under our control. But Computer Opera­tions, Programming, Computer Hardware, inputs of meter reading tickets and cash payment stubs are managed by the City Data Center over which we have no control or voice in their operation and decision making. Despite problems of System failures, Hardware changes and operational difficul­ties, we were able to maintain billing schedules and proces­sing of revenue through year end 1982. Our employees in Customer Service, Bookkeeping, Meter Reading and In­spection should be commended for a job well done in re­solving and correcting problems to give our customers bet­ter service. It proves that a user oriented on-line real time Data System can and will work.

The resumption of turn-offs for non-payment of Quarterly accounts was initiated in 1982 and the authority to turn off for non-payment of Sewer charges and Suburban Sur­charges made the process easier to perform.

The automated process of Owner Notification and Sewer Certification to property taxes performed well and on schedule with few minor errors. Normally this process took several weeks under our old system and caused us to shut down revenue processing during this time.

The Payment application and Revenue to FAMIS report­ing facets of our system are working very well. All payments for 1982, except one for $29.00, was applied to customer accounts before opening for business on January 3,1983. All Revenue was reported to the Auditor FAMIS Accounting System through December 28, 1982.

A Graduate Student for Ohio State University has been working with us compiling her Dissertation Research, "The Impact of Computer Technology on Working Life". A copy of her Dissertation will be available to us when it is com­pleted sometime in 1983. .

In October, 1982 a Task Force comprised of representa­tives from groups of the Water Division was established to study and develop a Comprehensive Micrographics

DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

Recordskeeping System(s). The scope of their task is to re­search, develop, design, document and implement a Recordskeeping System to encompass all activities and functions of the Division of Water. This study, now in its early stages, should bring to light problems and much du­plication of effort performed within the Division.

The major business Data System objectives for 1983 are as follows:

1. To continue improving Data System by resolving problems on a priority basis; maintaining schedules and im­proving system's response time.

2. To continue design and implementation of a Records-keeping/Filing system.

3. To continue development of programs to refund inac­tive customer deposits.

4. To reactivate Data System training programs for Activity Supervisors.

5. To develop procedures to implement interfacing of Billings to Auditor's FAMIS accounting system.

In summary of 1982 operations, it has been proven that the Data System is the key to giving GOOD SERVICE to our customers. When the System is up with good response to our accesses all processes function with minimal problems.

TO: Jack A. Holt, P.E. Superintendent

FROM: Charles R. Hachat Customer Services Manager

RE: 1982 Annual Report The mission of the Customer Services Group is to provide

all Division of Water customers with courteous and depend­able service in an efficient and cost effective manner. The reorganization of the Division in 1982 provides a good basis for implementation of future programs and completion of our missions in a time when the public demands a higher level of service and has a keen awareness of utility cost. I. ACCOMPLISHMENTS

The Customer Services Group consists of Customer Rela­tions, Consumer Service, Bookkeeping/Accounts Receiv­able, Meter Maintenance, Meter Reading and Sales. The goal of this group is to meet our objectives for 1983 and assist in any way possible in meeting the Division's goals of "Quality Water, Good Service, and Reasonable Cost".

The Customer Services Group realized several significant accomplishments in 1982 which dealt with carryover prob­lems from the conversion to the new on-line data system. A. CUSTOMER RELATIONS

The Customer Relations Activity is responsible for han­dling and processing all service orders from customer in­quiries to related Customer Services Activities.

During 1982, the Customer Relations Activity completed all account research necessitated by implementation prob­lems with the new on-line Water/Sewer Accounts Receiv­able Billing System. All adjustments were defined and for­warded to Bookkeeping for resolution. A backlog of mail, comprising six months of requests, was completed and pro­cedures established to ensure all written inquiries are pro­cessed within three business days.

Notification and turn-off procedures for delinquent spe­cial pay plans, deposits and lack of contract, were revised to correlate with automated reports.

The Telephone Center was restructured to consolidate clerical functions, account research, hearings, correspon­dence and training.

For the first time, property owners were notified in ad­vance of pending sewer certification to property tax bills of all unpaid sewer charges. This proved to be a worthwhile program and was well accepted by the public.

During the last three months of the year, the telephone service factor was increased to a level of answering 38 per­cent of the incoming calls within three minutes. B. CONSUMER SERVICE (INSPECTION)

The Consumer Service Activity is responsible for the in­vestigation of all high bill complaints from customers assisting them in determining the cause of high consump­tion and poor pressure. They also ensure proper installation of new and renewed service lines through inspection of all installations. This activity also performs the unpleasant task of collecting delinquent water and sewer bills by turn-offs

Due to the many problems that existed when we con­verted to the new data system, turn-offs were suspended for a period. Turn offs were resumed in May of 1982 and a notic-able increase in revenue has resulted.

All personnel from the Meter Maintenance Activity and the Consumer Service Activity have received some cross-training in preparation for the combination of the two activi­ties.

Employees of the City of Hilliard began performing in­spection duties under the direction of this activity.

A compressor has been acquired and has greatly in­creased our efficiency in servicing the customer by enabling curb boxes to be put in shape for turn-ons and turn-offs. This has also decreased the number of orders sent to the Distribution Center.

We were able to identify approximately 30,000 addresses that did not have tap locations. We were able to locate approximately 4,000 of these this year and enter 10,000 of the 190,000 tap locations into the data base.

The Consumer Services collected a total of $329,000 in the field in 1982 for delinquent bills. C. BOOKKEEPING

The Bookkeeping/Accounts Receivable Activity is re­sponsible for the accurate billing of all water and sewer ser­vices, issuing warrants for credits on overpayments, balanc­ing all revenue received, maintaining records of all docu­ments, as required, maintaining and updating information required on the data base to ensure proper billing and en­sure necessary information is available for servicing the cus­tomer.

The Bookkeeping Activity, like the Customer Relations Activity, has a large backlog of incorrect bills created by implementation of the new on-line data system. This back­log was completed in 1982.

The microfilm camera was not usable for the last three months of 1982, which has created a backlog in this area. A new camera has been requisitioned and, hopefully, this backlog will be completed in 1983.

We were able to process revenue to the City Auditor through December 28, 1982. This is the first time revenue has been processed so close to the end of the year. D. METER READING

The Meter Reading Activity is responsible for the accurate reading of all domestic and commercial water meters, assigning all billing account numbers and identifying prob­lems in the field which could create billing problems.

As in past years, the Meter Reading Activity has main­tained a high level of performance in performing their duties as in past years.

Two new subdivisions were brought into the system, con­sisting of some 813 accounts, which required routing and assigning of account numbers.

A new procedure has been developed in conjunction with the Sales Office whereby new accounts are assigned perma­nent account numbers, eliminating the need to change account numbers at a later date. E. METER MAINTENANCE

The Domestic Meter Maintenance Activity is responsible for installation and field maintenance of all Va inch through l'/i inch meters.

We were able to install new meters and remote readers in the Brookside Estates subdivision shortly after they were brought into the system. We are also planning, at this time, to changeout the metering systems in Ridgewook Estates.

In looking forward to the combination with the Consumer Service Activity, the Domestic Meter Maintenance activity has been participating in a cross-training program. F. SALES OFFICE

Due to the reorganization of the Division, the Sales Office was transferred from Engineering to the Customer Services Group during the latter part of 1982.

The responsibility of the Sales Office is to issue permits and collect all fees for new services coming into our dis­tribution system, obtain the account numbers and put all data into the computer. II. 1983 OBJECTIVES

The major objectives of the Customer Services Group for 1983 are:

1. Complete the combination of the Domestic Meter Re­pair and Consumer Service Activities by June 1, 1983. By combining the functions of these Activities, we will be pro­viding a more complete and timely service to the customer. Combination will further result in reduced travel time, few­er field calls and more timely updating of accounts.

2. Increase the capability of the Customer Relations Telephone Activity to receive and process incoming cus­tomer calls in a more timely manner, by December 31, 1983. This is planned by:

a) implementing feasible recommendations that are listed in a recent study by Administrative Services.

DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 15

b) purchas ing and installing more up-to-date te lephone system equipment .

c) a t t empt ing to r educe the n u m b e r of incoming cus­tomer inquiries.

d) testing the feasibility of establ ishing data entry posi­tions in the Cus tomer Relat ions Activity.

e) redesigning the Te lephone and Publ ic Office areas. 3. Decrease response and resolution t ime relative to cus­

tomer inquiries to seven work ing days by Ju ly 1, 1983. This should reduce valid cus tomer complaints .

4. Imp lemen t an employee cross-training program by April 1,1983 that will provide increased flexibility in person­nel ass ignments and decrease periodic negative impacts of specialization. A program will b e p lanned with emphas i s on cross-training with Activity lines, bu t general cross-training will be ex tended across Activity lines. Documenta t ion will be main ta ined r eco rd ing n a m e s of employees receiving training, n u m b e r of hours t rained and type of training re­ceived.

5. I m p r o v e e m p l o y e e mora le and job satisfaction by utilizing information provided by a recent 'Employee Satis­faction Survey' , by December 31, 1983.

a) provide be t t e r c o m m u n i c a t i o n lines from manage­ment to the employee and from the employee to manage­m e n t ( w e e k l y s c h e d u l e d A c t i v i t y m e e t i n g s , w r i t t e n announcements , etc.)

b) provide employee wi th specific direction and expecta­tions.

c) establish and imp lemen t an employee evaluation and performance appraisal program.

6. Complete additional training of supervisors and em­ployees relative to the on-line data system, by J u n e 1, 1983.

Documenta t ion will be maintained recording names of persons receiving training, number of hours trained and type of training received.

7. Reduce exis t ing G r o u p policies and procedures to written form by December 31, 1983.

This objective is inclusive of document ing existing Activ­ity procedures (Activity Procedure Manuals) and maintain­ing existing User Documentat ion.

8. Review day-to-day procedures of each Activity and implement any modifications that can be identified that will result in an increase in efficiency and productivity, by De­cember 31,1983. Any increase in efficiency and productivity should result in reduct ion of overtime.

9. Standardize report ing methods and record keeping by December 31, 1983. This can be achieved by providing Activity supervision and employees with additional training relative to account information that should be entered and retrieved from the on-line system.

Standardization will also be extended to Monthly Activity Repor t s , spec ia l r e p o r t s , a n d r e p o r t s and r e c o r d s of a routine nature.

10. Remain within the establ ished budget for the year 1983. Activity supervisors are becoming more aware and re­sponsible for their budgets . Controls that have been im­plemented at the Group managemen t level and cont inued mon i to r ing of e x p e n d i t u r e s shou ld resu l t in improved budgetary practices and more responsible planning.

1981 1982

CUSTOMER SERVICE TELEPHONE CENTER 1982 ACTIVITY REPORT

(with 1981 figures for comparison purposes)

TOTAL CALLS CALLS PUBLIC OFFICE CALLS PROCESSED LOST CUSTOMERS 200,129 114,208 84,856 18,889 234,205 121,597 109,201 28,814

CALLS R E C E I V E D ON 222-6604 SPECIAL I S S U E S 3,754 C A L L S R E C E I V E D ON 222-7324 RECEPTION (1st FL) 7,200 C A L L S R E T U R N E D FROM M E S S A G E S 8,000

MAIL PROCESSED

31,417 31,675

MONTH JANUARY

FEBRUARY

MARCH

APRIL

MAY

JUNE

JULY

AUGUST

SEPTEMBER

OCTOBER

NOVEMBER

DECEMBER

YEAR 81 82 81 82 81 82 81 82 81 82 81 82 81 82 81 82 81 82 81 82 81 82 81 82

MONTHLY REPORTS 1981/1 NUMBER CALLS

OFFERED 11,203 23,640 13,256 18,195 10,884 16,242 13,349 14,827 16,762 18,226 18,913 22,880 26,696 26,953 21,222 28,831 24,547 19,353 13,906 16,486 13,260 15,546 16,131 13,026

1982 increase or decrease

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

12,437

4,939

5,358

1,478

1,464

3,967

257

7,609

5,194

2,580

2,186

3,105

NUMBER CALLS PROCESSED

8,257 7,630

10,712 8,112 9,514 9,538

10,809 8,048

10,489 8,332

10,592 8,618

12,195 6,661 8,905 8,618 8,096 8,528 7,432 9,836 8,233

10,302 8,956 8,420

1982 increase or decrease

- 645

-2 ,600

+ 24

-2 ,761

-2,517

-1,974

- 5,534

- 287

+ 432

+ 2,404

+ 2,159

- 536

P E R S O N N E L TIME SPECIAL AREAS QUALITY O F WORKING LIFE PROGRAM gLJ S ^ U R S A F S C M E UNION R E P R E S E N T A T I O N 5 0 0 H U U K b

16 DIVISION OF WATER, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

METER READING SUMMARY OF

QUARTERLY AND

1982 ACTIVITY REPORT METER READINGS-MONTHLY ACCOUNTS

READINGS

MONTH JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER

TOTAL

CALLS MADE 61,656 63,803 79,476 72,745 62,603 58,809 59,054 64,304 65,882 67,374 72,134 73,059

800,899

ACTIVE/INACTIVE ACCOUNTS TICKETS

ZONE PRINTED 000 8,717 100 11,566 200 11,099 300 12,117 400 11,365 500 10,488 600 13,661 700 12,098 800 12,985 900 12,065

1000 13,615 1100 13,414 1300 5,967 1400 3,835 1500 4,972 1600 843 1700 2,204 1800 4,550 2000 910 2100 3,725 2700 2,291 2800 7,432 3700 4,212

TAKEN 59,396 61,211 76,318 70,038 60,181 56,551 57,091 62,036 63,504 65,244 69,602 70,581

771,753

ROUTE ACCOUNTS*

9,135 11,819 11,132 12,093 11,701 10,734 13,897 11,896 13,067 12,062 13,869 13,665 6,534 3,888 5,017 1,584 2,205 4,517 1,261 4,599 2,285 9,769 5,012

191,741 TOTALS 184,131 "Vacant lots with assigned accounts NOTE: These figures may vary slightly from time to time due to new accounts being added or old accounts being taken out of service.

NEW ACCOUNTS—QUARTERLY NUMBER

OF SUB-DIVISION ACCOUNTS COLUMBUS 502 COUNTY 30 UPPER ARLINGTON 22 GRANDVIEW 2 GROVE CITY 26 MARBLE CLIFF 0 MINERVA 1 VALLEYVIEW 0 RIVERLEA 0 URBANCREST 1 WORTHINGTON 13 WHITEHALL 7 BRICE GROVEPORT NEW ALBANY 0 HILLIARD 5 DUBLIN " 89 BROOKSIDE 1 RIDGEWOOD 462 OBETZ o

TOTAL NEW QUARTERLY ACCOUNTS 1,163 NEW MONTHLY ACCOUNTS 58 NEW FIRE PROTECTION ACCOUNTS 38

TOTAL NEW MONTHLY ACCOUNTS 96

TOTAL NEW ACCOUNTS MONTHLY AND QUARTERLY 1982 1,259

METER READING MISCELLANEOUS STATISTICS PERMANENT KEYS RECEIVED KEYS RETURNED B Y MAIL KEYS DESTROYED KEYS RETURNED TO CUSTOMER KEY LETTERS MAILED ON FINAL SYSTEM KEY LETTERS MAILED BROKEN KEY LETTERS MAILED KEYS RETAINED ON FINAL SYSTEM TOTAL MILEAGE FOR 1982

BREAKDOWN OF METER READING ZONES 1982 QUARTERLY NUMBER OF SEWER DE- NUMBER OF

DUCTOR METERS ACCOUNTS 8 9,133 30 10 29 7 12 5

290 42 2 14 9 12 4 7 3 7 28 3 0 3 64 6

595 516

79

ACCOUNTS READ/CHECKED QUARTERLY ACCOUNTS QUARTERLY SEWER DEDUCTOR METERS MONTHLY ACCOUNTS DETECTOR CHECK MONTHLY SEWER DEDUCTOR M E T E R S . . . WELL SEWERAGE UNMETERED FIRE PROTECTION

TOTAL

1982 135

0 381 248 585

17 1

125 158,354

,,

(1

i

ZONE NUMBER

000 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

1000 1100 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 2000 2100 2700 2800 3700 1982 TOTALS 1981 TOTALS

NET GAIN

NUMBER OF BOOKS

PER ZONE 74 84 88 83 80 75 94 81 91 83 95 97 42 27 36

7 15 30

8 22 17 43 24

1,296 1,292

4

11,819 11,131 12,093 11,699 10,732 13,897 11,895 13,061 12,062 13,869 13,665

6,534 3,883 5,018 1,584 2,203 4,517 1,261 4,579 2,285 9,755 5,103

191,688 190,429

1,259

1982 191,688

595 2,993

247 373

81 208

196,185

.

•III! • 80S

.

DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 17

METER CALLS WING 70,405 MESENGER 70,202 MCKEEVER 69,073 MCANINCH 67,669 GORBY 62,330 JOHNSON 62,113 ROONEY 56,547 CHAPMAN 52,744 MOLTER 51,260 JACKSON 39,512 GREENE 31,025 TAYLOR 27,103 SNIDER 25,310 REINHARDT 19,921 LINN 19,852 HILLEARY 14,181 SEEGER 13,785 COIL 11,690 CONNOR 11,178 POWELL 10,792 MANGUM 10,736 OVERTIME 1,782 S P E A R S 1,602 OFFICE 87

1982 INDIVIDUAL METER METER READINGS

WING M E S E N G E R MCKEEVER MCANINCH J O H N S O N GORBY ROONEY CHAPMAN MOLTER JACKSON G R E E N E TAYLOR S N I D E R L I N N R E I N H A R D T H I L L E A R Y S E E G E R COIL CONNOR MANGUM P O W E L L OVERTIME S P E A R S OFFICE

68,511 68,312 67,095 66,058 60,005 59,996 54,678 50,894 49,716 38,058 30,044 26,344 24,498 19,397 18,775 12,863 12,367 10,994 10,329 9,955 9,466 1,759 1,555

84

READER PERFORMANCE % NOT HOME

OVERTIME 1.3 LINN 2.3 MCANINCH 2.4 WING 2.7 MESENGER 2.7 TAYLOR 2.8 MCKEEVER 2.9 S P E A R S 2.9 MOLTER 3.0 GREENE 3.2 SNIDER 3.2 ROONEY 3.3 JOHNSON 3.4 CHAPMAN 3.5 OFFICE 3.5 JACKSON 3.7 GORBY 3.8 REINHARDT 5.8 COIL 6.0 MANGUM 7.3 CONNOR 7.6 HILLEARY 9.3 SEEGER 10.3 POWELL 12.3

% OWNER CARDS JACKSON 36.13 TAYLOR 33.43 CHAPMAN 28.44 WING 25.92 MCKEEVER 25.92 MCANINCH 25.35 SNIDER 24.02 G R E E N E 23.05 JOHNSON 22.35 MESENGER 22.17 REINHARDT 21.05 SEEGER 20.97 HILLEARY 20.07 ROONEY 18.45 GORBY 5.96 MOLTER 5.06

METER SHOP ACTIVITY REPORT 1982 FIELD SERVICE—DOMESTIC 1981

METERS STUCK 2,537 REMOTE STUCK 1,439 METERS L E A K I N G 1,483 NEW INSTALLATIONS 2,727 HIGH BILL T E S T 145 FROZEN M E T E R S 587 CHANGE OUT 2,409 WIRE CUT 436 VANDALISM 160 INSPECTION 1,883 METER ON FLOOR 530 BACK IN S E R V I C E 137 OUT OF SERVICE 300

TOTAL 14,773 MISCELLANEOUS S T O P S 2,700 NOTICES L E F T 2,285

TOTAL 4,985 TOTAL A C T I V I T Y -

F I E L D SERVICE 19,758

OFFICE PERSONNEL TOTAL T E L E P H O N E C A L L S . . .

REQUESTS FOR SERVICE P H O N E MAIL DIVISION WALK-IN

REPAIR WORK IN SHOP

21,796

10,218 15

4,539 1

14,773

1982 2,872 1,166 1,401 1,634

132 1,178 2,358

298 223

1,774 538

91 236

13,901 2,115 2,946

5,061

18,962

16,677

8,984 121

4,794 2

13,901

METERS INSTALLED

METERS TESTED

REPAIRS NEW USED TOTAL

COMMERCIAL METER ACTIVITY REPAIRED AND TESTED

IN SHOP REPAIRED ON SITE .. REPAIRED AND TESTED

ON SITE . TEST VALVES INSTALLED TOTAL ACTIVITY—

5,277 2,339 2,662 2,615

12,893

60 1,149

821 0

2,030

2,634 1,409 1,097 1,537 6,677

4 356

836 374

1,570

IN THE % % 1

l'/2 2" 3" 4" 3" 4"

10" 10x12"

3" 4" 6"

10"

FIELD inch inch inch inch CT CT CT FMCT FMCT FMCT FMCT FMCT FMCT DC DC DC DC DC

NEW 3,284

601 234 104 43 14 4 0 4

19 5 2 0 0

12 14 2 0

1981 REBUILT NEW

TOTALS 5/a" — 1V4" 2" CT—10" DC

1982 METERS INSTALLED

2,069 217

76 76

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1981 6,661

119

6,780

4,316 614 260 223

25 12

3 1 3

21 5 2 2 3

12 12

2 0

1982 REBUILT

1,391 78 29

8 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1982 6,919

110

7,029

DISPOSITION OF COMPONENTS RETURNED TO SHOP METERS GENERATORS REMOTES

1981 1982 1981 1982 1981 1982 Returned To

Inventory 1,389 1,432 881 920 87 71 Returned To

Manufacturer . . . 602 1,125 83 5 1 3 1 Scrapped

With Value 2,305 2,760 0 0 0 0 Scrapped

With No V a l u e . . 156 47_ _31 37, _ ? _ 6 TOTALS 4,452 5,364 995 1,008 92 78

WATER SALES OFFICE 1982 ACTIVITY REPORT CUSTOMERS SERVED IN OFFICE

NEW T A P S 505 NEW M E T E R S 1,338 NEW CONTRACTS 1,017 MISC 872

TOTAL 3,667

CUSTOMERS SERVED BY P H O N E OR MAIL NEW T A P P E R M I T S 7 NEW METERS 416 NEW CONTRACTS 364 MISC 1.679

TOTAL 2,446

NEW TAP CARDS SET U P FROM SUBDIV P L A T S 639

18 DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

S E E METER SALES FOR THE YEAR 1 9 8 2 ^ ^

% inch 1^*l % inch *%> 1 inch w

l'/2 inch ™ 2 inch fg 3 inch *°

4" CT 5 4" DC ° 4" FMCT 4 6" CT 0 6" DC }5 6" FMCT 1 2

8" DC 4

8" FMCT 4 10 inch 0 10"xl2" 1

TOTAL METERS SOLD 1.754

NEW TAP PERMITS ISSUED OUTSIDE OF COLUMBUS 1982 BRICE } BROOKSIDE 1 COUNTY 46 DUBLIN 98 GRANDVIEW 1 GROVE CITY 27 GROVEPORT 4 HILLIARD 7 MINERVA PARK 1 WHITEHALL 6 WORTHINGTON 18

TOTAL 210

TO: Jack A. Holt, P.E. Superintendent

FROM: John R. Doutt, P.E. Distribution Manager

RE: 1982 Annual Report The mission of the Distribution Group is to distribute safe

water in ample quantity while providing reliable service to all customers throughout the distribution system in the most cost effective manner. The formal implementation of the new Organizational Structure was a significant accom­plishment of the Division in 1982 and will provide a strong management system to provide a good level of service to all our customers in a time of great technological change and consumer awareness of utility costs.

The Distribution Group is comprised of three major activ­ities — Construction and Maintenance, Design, and Opera­tions. The goal of the Distribution Group is to provide a distribution system that maintains the integrity of water quality at acceptable standards and to provide uninter­rupted service to all customers. I. ACCOMPLISHMENTS

While we can not expect significant accomplishments as a result of the reorganization until 1983, many programs have been started that will show significant benefits in years to come. We did, however, have several major accomplish­ments in 1982 worth noting.

1) Plans were completed and bids were received for the new Distribution Water Service Center. Construction started in November 1982 and is scheduled to be completed in December 1983.

2) Plans were completed and bids were received on the new dual frequency Mobile Radio System for the Division. We anticipate installation of the new system will be com­plete by September 1983.

3) The percentage of fire hydrants out-of-service at the end of 1982 was only 0.3%, which is 49 of the 16,580 hydrants we maintain in the City of Columbus. This is the lowest number of out-of-service at the end of any year since we have been responsible for maintaining them.

4) The Emergency Contingency Plan was completed and submitted to the Ohio EPA on time and approved for use.

5) In 1982, all the major transmission mains required to service for the new Parsons Avenue Treatment Plant were placed in service. These contracts included 6,060' of 24" 7,820' of 30", 5,540' of 36", 52,790' of 42", and 5,730' of 66", for a total dollar investment of $8,600,000.00.

6) The new leak detection equipment was used on 61 leaks that could be correlated through the computer Of these 61 leaks only seven (7) were not found at the indicated

location, i.e., we successfully pinpointed 89% of the leaks we could correlate. It should be noted that this equipment was used almost exclusively on leaks which could not be located using other methods.

We are excited about the new full time Civil Engineer Aide I approved for 1983 that will permit us to operate this equipment on a full time basis. In 1982 this equipment was only used when needed because of the limited staff.

A. CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE The Construction and Maintenance activity has the re­

sponsibility of maintaining the water distribution system within the City of Columbus, Marble Cliff, Grandview Heights, Whitehall, Hilliard, Upper Arlington, Worthington, Riverlea, Minerva Park, Urbancrest, Grove City, Dublin, Brice, Valleyview, Groveport, Ridgewood Estates and Groveport. This activity also maintains the Division of Wa­ter's vehicular fleet, repairs all public fire hydrants within the City of Columbus, approves and inspects all new water service taps three inches (3") and larger and through the use of our emergency services, personnel respond to all Division of Water emergency calls at night, on weekends and holi­days.

There were a total of 566 main line breaks in 1982, 2% more than in 1981. One significant statistic in the number of breaks is in the monthly distribution. Twenty-eight percent (28%) of all breaks in 1982 occurred in two (2) months, Janu­ary and February. The vast majority of these breaks were on 6" and 8" gray iron pipe. The three breaks reported on Duc­tile Iron Pipe were all joint leaks. Tables I and I-A show a detailed summary of work performed in this activity and Main Line Break data respectively.

A total of 366 fire hydrants were repaired in 1982 with only 49 hydrants remaining out-of-service at the end of the year. As mentioned earlier, this is the lowest number of out-of-service since we took over their maintenance in 1974. Traffic type hydrants were effective in reducing repair costs for 73% of the hydrants damaged. Detailed statistics on fire hydrants is shown in Tables II and II-A.

Table III shows a summary of work performed by person­nel in Vehicle Maintenance.

B. DESIGN The Design Activity is responsible for review and approv­

al of all projects designed by consulting engineers and in-house preparation of plans for improvements to our dis­tribution system and related facilities. The Design activity also develops and updates the Capital Improvement Pro­gram and prepares all legislation and modifications for these projects, maintains and updates all Division of Water Engineering records, and provides required survey and en­gineering support to the Division.

In 1982 there were thirteen (13) projects contracted for a total of $13,275,695.10 and twenty-nine (29) projects under construction for a dollar investment of $53,475,930.80. Tables 4 thru 8 provide details of the Division's Capital Im­provement Program for 1982. We prepared fifty-four (54) pieces of legislation associated with these projects.

The major role of the Design Activity is review and approval of plans, both C.I.P. and private development types. In 1982 we reviewed plans for twenty (20) C.I.P. proj­ects under design, eighty-three (83) Private Development plans and forty (40) Sewer and Street Improvement plans.

This activity is also responsible for obtaining permits associated with Division Improvements . In 1982 we obtained four (4) railroad permits, three (3) Corps of En­gineering permits, six (6) highway crossing permits from the Ohio Department of Transportation and two (2) Federal Highway permits.

C. OPERATIONS The Operations Activity is responsible for commercial

meter repair and testing system surveillance of the distribu­tion system, including district measurements for determin­ing lost water from leakage and inaccurate meter registra­tion, and the use of the Leak Detection Equipment. This activity will be responsible for the operation of the new automated, computer controlled distribution system. This $3,500,000.00 project is scheduled for bids in June and will be housed in the Operations Center that is a part of the new Distribution Water Service Center.

The Commercial Meter Repair/Testing section is charged with providing an accurate measurement of water useage by all Divisions customers and to verify that these measure­ments are available for billing purposes. During 1982 we successfully completed the second year of a three year com­mercial meter testing program. In conjunction with this program 374 test valves were installed on existing meters.

A new standard-order inventory plan was adopted in 1982 which will provide for a sufficient number of meters to be

DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 19

on hand at all t imes wi thout exceeding our stock area ca­pacities. A s u m m a r y of Commercial Meter Repair/Testing is shown in Table 9.

System Surveil lance is charged with the detection and location of underg round leakage from the distr ibution sys­tem and the moni to r ing and invest igat ion of system hy­draulics. This is accompl ished through the efforts of our own personnel and the P i tometer Associates.

As ment ioned earlier, t he leak detect ion equ ipment was successful 90% of the t ime used and it is hoped the equip­ment can be used on a full t ime basis in 1983.

A total of fifty-two (52) flow tests were conducted in 1982 including eleven (11) special mult iple hydran t tests in the Central Business District. Other special hydraulic studies were conducted in 1982 in t h e Muirfield Area, Ackerman Road Booster Stat ion and alterations to the Cleveland Ave­nue Booster Station.

The Pi tometer survey accompl ished the following; 1) Diurnal Water D e m a n d Pa t t e rns were measured for 21

separate districts in the d is t r ibut ion sys tem providing con­sumption records and indicat ions of leakage for some 300 sq. mi. of our service area.

2) Numerous unde rg round leaks were detected, located and repaired. The combined rate of water wasted by these totaled 847,000 gallons per day. An annual savings of ap­proximately $45,000.00 was obta ined by these repairs.

3) A total of 16 comercial meters were tested under nor­mal operating condit ions. Five of these meters were under-registering water consumpt ions by 7 - 15% for a total unme-tered rate of 300,000 gallons per day. The correction of these metering deficiencies will provide an annual savings to the Division of more than $50,000.00.

4) The finished water meters at the M.R.W.P. were tested and found to be measur ing only 92% of the plants produc­tion.

5) P u m p i n g efficiency tes t s were conducted at Mound Street Booster Stat ion which showed the p u m p s to be oper­ating at satisfactory levels.

6) P u m p i n g efficiency tests were comple ted following al­terations to the p u m p motors at Cleveland Avenue Booster Station the need for which was indicated by earlier Pi tom­eter measurements . These final tests show that p u m p effi­ciency was a lmost doubled by rewiring the p u m p motors .

7) Hydraul ic m e a s u r e m e n t s were m a d e in conjunct ion with low pressure p rob lems near the Joyce Avenue Booster Station and near the new Grove City Tank on Groveport-London Road. S tud ies were also conduc ted to show the feasibility of supply ing A c k e r m a n Road Booster Station for D.R.W.P. instead of M.R.W.P.

8) Many cor rec t ions to t h e ex is t ing wa te r l ine records were made based on P i tomete r m e a s u r e m e n t s and observa­tions and useful information on the condit ion of our main line valves was reported.

The pr imary object of Sys tem Survei l lance for 1983 is fair­ly simple. Reduce the percen t of unaccoun ted for water by finding more leakage, us ing t h e leak detect ion equ ipmen t full t ime, and mainta in the meter ing sys tem of our top fifty (50) users in good condi t ion to measu re their useage accu­rately.

Table 10 shows the S u m m a r y of P u m p a g e for 1982. Table 11 shows the Consumpt ion Compar i son for the last 20 years. Table 12 and 13 show the s u m m a r y of water lines in our distribution system. The County footage reflects the addi­tion of Brookside Es ta te and Ridgewood Estates .

It is unfortunate , bu t again this year we were not able to obtain the Total Metered Water for 1982. This makes it im­possible for us to calculate the pe rcen t of our p u m p a g e un­accounted for. Hopefully this p rob lem will be resolved next year so we can gauge the effectiveness of our efforts in this area. U. 1983 OBrECTIVES

1) Cont inue to provide a d is t r ibut ion sys tem that moni­tors the integri ty of wa te r qual i ty wi th m i n i m u m interrup­tion of service to all cus tomers by el iminat ing major dead end water lines and replacing those water lines that have a high frequency of repair and/or water quali ty problems. We have budgeted $300,000.00 in C.I.P. 236 for 1983 to work toward this ongoing objective.

2) To comple t e the des ign of t h e Dis t r ibut ion Sys t em Automation, Contract No. 635, and advert ise for construc­tion by Ju ly 30, 1983 at a cost not to exceed $3,290,000.00.

3) Cont inue to str ive for a reduct ion of unaccounted-for-water th rough the use of the Leak Detector, P i tometer and Associates and improving overall mete r accuracy. We will hire a new Civil Engineer Aide I by J u n e 1983 to be able to use the Leak Detector full t ime at a cost of $9,900.00. The contract with P i tomete r and Associates will cost approx­imately $80,000.00. The improving of mete r accuracy will be

accomplished by establishing a better testing schedule, re­viewing meter sizing and Pi tometer testing, all at no addi­tional cost.

4) Improve both mechanical and aesthetic qualities of the Division's motorized fleet by Janua ry 1985 at a minimal cost. The aesthet ic value is difficult to measure, bu t the mechanical qualities will be measured by tracking down time and cost of repairs versus productive t ime.

5) To complete the installation of the new dual frequency Mobile Radio System for the Division by September 1983 at a cost not to exceed $181,000.00.

6) To complete the new Distribution Center building on schedule within the budgeted amount of $7,250,000.00.

7) Cont inue to mainta in the out-of-service fire hydrant percentage at less than 0.5% throughout the year at a cost increase equal to the yearly inflation rate and to maintain our current policy of no two hydrants in a row being out-of-service.

8) Improve through centralization the tap inspection rec­ords by J u n e 1983 at no additional cost to the Division.

9) Initiate procedures for bet ter managemen t coordina­tion on large main line breaks, normally 24" arid larger, but could be any size that has a serious impact on the distribu­tion system or larger n u m b e r of cus tomers by Ju ly 1983 at no additional cost to the Division.

10) To have the 1984 — 88 C.I.P. completed by Sep tember 1, 1983 at no addit ional cost to the Division.

In conclusion, the Distribution Group is excited about what lies ahead for 1983. The potential for growth and im­provements have never been better. We look forward to the completion of the new Distr ibution Water Service Center, the completion of plans and bidding of the Automation of the Distribution System and the new Mobile Radio System. All of this will help us better fullfil the goal of this Division of "Quality Water, Good Service and Reasonable Costs".

TABLE 1 THREE YEAR COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF

TAPS 1980 Repaired 436 Renewed 133 CutOff 101 Pu t in Shapes 1,044 Relocated 3 New Taps 85 MAINLINE Leaks 2" & Under 148 Leaks 2" & Over 362 Extensions 2" & Unde r ( L F ) . . . . 602 Extensions 2" & Over (LF) 248 MISCELLANEOUS JOBS Two Man Crew 2,754 Four Man Crew 412 FIRE HYDRANTS Repaired 785 Replaced 100 Installed 5 Checked 822 Painted 5,351 SURFACE REPAIRS Sidewalks 1,280 Yards 9,804 CHLORINATIONS

l'/2" 0 2" 223 3" 698 4" 410 6" " 62,389 8" 68,574

io-::'.:::'.'. wis 12" 62,485 itrY.Y.Y.... 2i,596 20" 0 24" 6,606 so-:::::::::::::::: o 36" o 42" ° 60" 0 66" ° VALVES Installed, ML ' Installed, FH 4

Repaired, ML 30 Repaired, F H ° Pu t In Shapes °{ Worked J ' l b 5

1981 430 131 63 992 11 127

172 382

1,080 525

1,686 685

794 104 2

847 5,783

548 10,236

82 584 796 935

47,469 42,877

0 27,970 18,291

0 9,737

0 0 0 0 0

4 0 47 9

258 3,390

1982 417 135 66

1,001 7

145

196 370 317 0

1,644 601

774 108 3

745 2,929

630 10,354

0 2,451

0 1,836 11,969 36,502 1,471

23,464 43,793 2,650 2,603 7,813 5,538

35,774 30

5,710

4 1 62 8

211 2,353

20 DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

Number Pipe Material Of Breaks Cast Iron 371 Galvanized 177 Lead 9 Ductile Iron 3 Copper 2 Plastic (PVC) 2 Transite 1 Concrete 1

Total 566

Total does not include the 78 Valve Repairs.

TABLE 1-A MAIN LINE BREAK DATA

Number Type of Break Of Breaks Cracked Across Pipe 278 Split Along Pipe 58 Pit or Hole In Pipe 147 Cracked at Corporation Stop 26 Fitting or Joint Leak 53 Man-Made 4

Total 566

Age Number Of Pipe Of Breaks

1 - 10 4 11 - 15 4 1 6 - 20 16 2 1 - 25 64 26 - 30 96 3 1 - 40 99 41 - 50 18 51 - 75 95 7 6 - 1 0 0 7 Not Available _163

Total 566 The Avg. age for pipes

incurring breaks was 38.0 years

Monthly Distribution Distribution No. of Breaks Year Distribution January 84 1969 February 73 1970 March 29 1971 April 29 1972 May 23 1973 June 29 1974 July 36 1975 August 43 1976 September 30 1977 October 65 1978 November 67 1979 December 58 1980

Total "5BB" 1981 1982

No. of Breaks 253 229 305 315 319 367 353 438 563 425 408 509 551 566

Pipe Size %" 1"

l'/i" l W

2" 3" 4" 6" 8"

10" 12" 14" 16" 20" 24" 36"

No. of Breaks 3

18 2

42 128

2 17

220 103

4 12

1 6 4 1 3

Total 566

Year 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982

TABLE II FIRE HYDRANT REPAIRS

Damaged Hydrants Repaired

158 156 292 245 360 323 480 438 366

Hydrants Out-Of-Service

150 175 123 118 49

TABLE HA HYDRANT BREAK RING EFFECTIVENESS

Manufacturer Hydrants Damaged Number Failed (%) Clow-Eddy 122 8 ( 6.6%) Kennedy 113 50 (44.0%) Mueller 106 34 (32.0%) American-Darling 11 MMM (36.0%)

TABLE III VEHICULAR MAINTENANCE

Major Repairs Tune Up Service Calls (Totals) (Totals) (Totals)

405 157 511 285 100 471

75 40 101 70 46 90

—^^^^^^^^— 35 — Body Repairs (September thru December): 40 Tire Changes or Repairs: 1 0 6 6

Vehicle Type Cars Trucks Backhoes Compressors Trailers

DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 21

1982 C.I.B./ANNUAL REPORT TABLE #4—PROTECTS UNDER DESIGN

Estimated CLP. No. Project Title and Description Distribution

C.I.P. No. Project Title and Description Distribution

047 Groveport Road 12" W.L. Part II - Augmont Ave. to Parsons Ave.

103 High Street - Flint Road 16" W.L., Part I

161 Alkire Road 16" W.L. - Norton Rd. to a point 2300 ft. West

164 Galloway Road 16" W.L. - Part II - 870" South of Glenwillow Blvd. to Alkire Rd.

189 Scioto-Darby Creek Road 12" W.L. - Walcutt Rd. to 1-270 189 Scioto-Darby Creek Road 12" W.L. - Westbelt Business Park

to a Point East of 1-270 194 Doherty Road 12" W.L. - W. Broad St. to Penn-Central R.R. 206 Spindler Road 12" W.L. - Renner Rd. to Roberts Road 230 Lockbourne Road 12" W.L. - Marion Rd. to Livingston 236 Water Circulation Improvements 236 Water Line Improvements 240 Gender Road - Refugee Road Water Line - Chantry Dr. to

Bennell Dr. 240 Gender Road - Refugee Road Water Line - Bennell Dr. to

Hines Rd.

DISTRIBUTION 263 Doherty Road - Feder Road 12" W.L. - Penn-Central R.R. to Jones & Stuckey

Hilliard-Rome Rd. 264 W. North Broadway-Kenny Road W.L. - Olentangy River Rd. Erikkson Engineering Completed 12-14-82

to Tremont Rd. 274 Stygler Road 12" W.L. John E. Foster & Assoc. Completed 6-1-82

TRANSMISSION 227 Groveport-Bixby Road 42" W.L. - Alum Creek Dr. to

Hamilton Rd.

228 Bixby Road 30" W.L. - Hamilton Rd. to Brice Rd. 245 Hamilton Road 24" W.L. - Winchester Pk. To Refugee Rd. 271 Hamitlton Road 36" W.L. - Bixby Rd. to Williams Rd.

Consulting Engineer

Consulting Engineer Columbus Engineering Consultants Columbus Engineering Consultants Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton Water Engineers Water Engineers

Sticklen & Belsheim Hockaden & Associates R D . Zande & Assoc. Water Engineers Water Engineers Heritage Consultants

Completion Date

Estimated Completion Date Mid 1984

Completed

Fall 1983

Late 1984

Sept., 1983 2/8/83

Sept., 1983 Completed J u n e 1983 Completed J u n e 1983 March 1983

Estimated Bid Date

Estimated Bid Date 1985

12/21/82

Fall 1984

1985

S u m m e r 1984 Spring 1983

Fall 1984 Fall 1984 Spring 1984 11-16-82 Late 1983 Late 1983

Heritage Consultants March 1983 1985

June 1983 Summer 1984

Columbus Engineering Completed 7-6-82 Consultant

TREATMENT 225 M.R.W.P. - Concrete Repairs 243 253

McKinley Avenue Sludge Pump Station Control System M.R.W.P. - Miscellaneous Improvements

Sticklen & Belsheim Dodson & Lindblom Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton

Brundage, Baker & Stauffer Water Engineers Brundage, Baker & Stauffer

Aug. 1983 March 1984 Completed 10-19-82 April 1983 June 1983

Completed 5-11-82

May 1983 June 1983

BOOSTER STATIONS AND TANKS 177 Hilliard-Rome Raod 2 M.G. Tank 208 Morrison Road Booster Station Enlargement

SUPPLY 244 Hoover Dam Safety Upgrading 265 M.R.W.P. Raw Water Line — Hoover Dam Hydroelectric

Facilities MISCELLANEOUS 209 Division of Maintenance Facilities 226 New Mobile Radio System 236 Fire Hydrant Replacements 246 Distribution System Automation 251 O'Shaughnessy Dam Hydroelectric Facilities 279 M.R.W.P. - Recondition 1400 GPM Pump

Columbus Engineering Completed 12/21/82 Consultants Franklin Consultants Completed 1-25-83

Burgess & Nipple Malcolm-Pirnie, Inc.

June 1983 Sept. 1983 Nov. 1983 Jan. 1984

Ames, Elzey & Thomas Completed 9-21-82 Water Engineers Completed 10-14-82 Water Engineers Completed 11-16-82 EMA, Inc. July 1983 Sept. 1983 Burgess & Niple April 1983 Mid 1983 Water Engineers Completed 10-5-82

22 DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

C.I.P. No.

041

176 184

185

236

237 255 256 257

274

107

166

220

227

245

125 125 125 125 125 125 125 225

128 131 233

236

1982 C.I.B./ANNUAL REPORT TABLE #5 — PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION

Project Title & Description DISTRIBUTION Cassady Avenue 12" W.L. - 1,000' N of

S.R. 62 to Hudson St. Henderson Road - Dublin Road Water Line Winchester Pike 16" Water Line -

Noe-Bixby Rd. to Ebright Rd. Winchester Pike 16" Water Line -

Ebright Rd. to Brice Rd. Fair Avenue, W. Goodale Street, Olentangy Blvd.

Water Lines Noe-Bixby - Broad Street Connector N. High Street 16" W.L., Flint Rd. to Lazelle Rd. Case Road 12" W.L. - Sawmill Rd. to Dublin Rd. Sunbury Road 12" W.L. - 1100' S. of S.R. 161 to

Valley Quail Dr. Stygler Road 12" W.L. - Wendler Blvd. to Morse Rd.

TRANSMISSION Hamilton Road 30" W.L. - Livingston Ave. to

Refugee Rd. Hamilton Road 36" W.L. - Williams Rd. to

Winchester Pike Parsons Avenue 42" W.L. - Williams Rd. to

Refugee Rd. Groveport Road-Bixby Road 42" W.L. -

Alum Creek Dr. to Hamilton Rd.

DISTRIBUTION Hamilton Road 24" W.L.

Winchester Pike Refugee Rd. to

TREATMENT S.W.F. Collector Wells S.W.F. Power Distribution Line P.A.W.P. - Main Building P.A.W.P. - Sludge Lagoons S.W.F. - Pumps & Super Structures P.A.W.P. - Basins, Clearwells & Misc. P.A.W.P. - Instrumentation & Controls M.R.W.P. - Concrete Repairs

BOOSTER STATIONS 8t TANKS E. Broad Street 2 M.G. Tank Henderson Road 1 M.G. Tank Morse Road 10 M.G. Tank Painting

SERVICE & METERS Water Service Transfers & W.L. Abandonments MISCELLANEOUS

209 Division Maintenance Facilities 226 New Mobile Radio System "Denotes 100% Complete

Contractor

J & L Construction Co. Kokosing Construction

John Eramo & Sons

Jack Conie & Sons

N. Savko & Sons Mid-Ohio Utilities F.C. Hall Const. RA. Bores Exc.

N. Savko & Sons Mid-Ohio Utilities

Tata Excavating

John Eramo & Sons

Capital City Exc.

Concrete Construction

Capital City Exc.

The Ranney Co. Foreman Industries Dugan and Myers Danis Industries R.G. Beer Corporation Kokosing Construction Johnson Controls Central Ohio Building

Pittsburgh-Des Moines Pittsburgh-Des Moines Neer Enterprises

Capital City Excavating

Peterson Construction General Electric

Amount of Bid

Completion Date

$ 111,983.15 5-31-82

961,332.00 7-30-82

126,966.71 5-28-82*

331,068.00 5-28-82"

68,905.00 5-30-82* 135,295.00 9-30-82 214,631.99 10-26-82* 133,001.00 7-30-82 99,937.00 88,402.00

7-31-82 8- 1-82

1,075,407.70 10- 1-82

481,511.75 6-19-82*

1,248,391.00 8-31-82

1,591,317.50 6-17-82

369,655.00

3,484,503.00 226,435.00

13,387,000.00 1,828,356.00 1,793,930.00

12,945,000.00 1,998,000.00 1,226,749.00

1,615,000.00 702,050.00 52,285.00

4-30-83

6-25-82' 10- 1-79' 6- 1-81 6- 1-81' 6- 1-81 6- 1-81 6- 1-81 12-27-83

7-31-81 12-31-79 11-30-81

88,950.00 8-20-82*

6,910,000.00 7-30-84 179,868.00 Summer

DIVISION OF WATER, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 23

CLP. No.

041

176

237

256

107

166

227

245

225

236

279

209

226

1982 CI.B./ANNUAL REPORT TABLE #6 —

Project Title and Description

DISTRIBUTION Cassady Avenue 12" W.L. - 1000' N. of

S.R. 62 to H u d s o n St.

Henderson Road-Dubl in Road W.L.

Noe-Bixby Rd. - Broad St. Connector

PROJECT CONTRACTED FOR

Auditor No.

CT-03831

CT-03856

CT-04082

Case Road 12" W.L. - Sawmil l Rd. to Dublin Rd. CT-03897

TRANSMISSION Hamil ton Road 30" W.L. - Livingston Ave.

to Refugee Rd.

Hamil ton Road 36" W.L. - Williams Rd. to Winchester P i k e

Groveport Road - Bixby Road 42" W.L. -Alum Creek Dr. to Hamil ton Rd.

Hamil ton Road 24" W.L. - Refugee Rd. to Winchester P ike

TREATMENT M.R.W.P. - Concre te Repairs

SERVICES & METERS Water Service Transfers and Water Line

A b a n d o n m e n t s

M.R.W.P. - Recondi t ion 1400 G P M P u m p

MISCELLANEOUS Division Main tenance Facilit ies

New Mobile Radio Sys tem

CT-03837

CT-03833

CT-04148

CT-04334

CT-04081

CT-03841

CT-04323

CT-04322

AC-01986

Ord. No. & Date

194-82 1/25/82 415-82 2/22/82

1125-82 6/7/82 414-82 2/22/82

412-82 2/22/82

411-82 2/22/82

1626-82 7/26/82

2280-82 11/15/82

1261-82 6/21/82

413-82 2/22/82

2121-82 11/1/82

2167-82 11/8/82

1982

Bid Amount

$ 111,983.15

961,332.00

135,295.00

133,001.00

1,075,407.70

481,511.75

1,591,317.50

369,655.00

1,226,749.00

88,950.00

22,625.00

6,910,000.00

167,868.00

Mod. Amount Ord. No. & Date

— $13,215.54

2486-82 12/20/82

—

—

—

—

$47,910.73 2281-82 11/22/82

$16,837.00 1123-82 6/7/82

—

— —

Contractor

J & L Const. Co. Kokosing Const. Co.

Mid-Ohio Utilities R A . Bores Excav.

Tata Exc.

J o h n Eramo & Sons

Concrete Construct ion

Capital City Exc .

Central Ohio Bldg.

Capital City Excavat ing

Layne-Ohio Company

Pe terson Const. Co. General Elec. Co.

1982 C.I.B. ANNUAL REPORT TABLE #7 — MAJOR PROJECTS DELAYED

CLP. No. Project Title and Description

161 Alkire Road Water Line, Pa r t I 194 Doherty Road Water L ine 206 Spindler Road Water Line 228 Bixby Road Transmiss ion Main 230 Lockbourne Road Water Line 244 Dam Renovat ions 246 Automat ion of Dis t r ibut ion Sys tem 248 Morse Road Water P l an t Au tomat ion 250 Hydroelectr ic Project Griggs Dam 253 Morse Road Water P l an t

Improvemen t s 263 Doher ty Road - F e d d e r Road

Water Line 267 Remote Meter P r o g r a m - Clean U p 268 Changeout of Obsole te Commerc ia l

Meters 271 Hamil ton Road Transmiss ion Main -

Bixby Rd. to Williams Rd. Various Engineer ing Contrac ts

TOTAL

Estimated Construction

Cost

107 205 295

1,637 1,126 1,045 2,400 1,090 2,600

000.00 ,000.00 000.00 000.00 ,000.00 000.00 000.00 ,000.00 000.00

1,000,000.00

337,000.00 525,000.00

814,000.00

890,000.00 1,756,000.00

$15,827,000.00

TABLE #8 SUMMARY OF 1982 CIB ACTIVITY

I. PROJECTS UNDER DESIGN

A. Distribution B. Transmission C. Trea tment D. Booster Stat ions and Tanks E. Supply F. Miscellaneous

16 4 3 2 2 6

~33~

H. PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION

Distribution Transmission Trea tment Booster Stat ions and Tanks Service & Meters Miscellaneous

10 5 8 3 1 2

2,271,521.85 4,766,282.95

$36,889,973.00 2,369,335.00

88,950.00 7,089,868.00

Total 29 @ $53,475,930.80

III. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS LET IN 1982

A. Distribution B. Transmission C. Trea tment D. Services and Meters E. Miscellaneous

<» $ 1,341,611.15 @!i 3,517,891.95 @ ii 1,226,749.00 @!i 111,575.00 (S $ 7,077,868.00

Total 13 @ $13,275,695.10

24 DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

TABLE #9 METER SHOP ACTIVITIES 1981 ANND 1982

SHOP REPAIRS AND TESTING: 1981

Meters Repaired ?'?,22 Meters Tested 5,277

New 2,662 Used 2,615

FIELD REPAIRS AND TESTING: Repaired and Tested in Shop 60 Repaired on Premise 1,149 Repaired and Tested on Premise 821 Test Valves Installed 0

1982 1,409 2,634 1,097 1,537

4 356 836 374

METERS INSTALLED IN THE HELD:* 1981 1982 1981 1982

New Rebuilt New Rebuilt Totals Totals

%" 3,284 2,069 4,316 1,391 5,353 5,707 W 601 217 614 78 818 692 1" 234 76 260 29 310 289 iy2" 104 76 223 8 180 231

6,661 6,919 2"CT 43 0 25 4 3"CT 14 0 12 3 4"CT 4 0 3 0 3" FMCT 0 0 1 0 4" FMCT 4 0 3 0 6" FMCT 19 0 21 0 8" FMCT 5 0 5 0

10" FMCT 2 0 2 0 10" x 12" FMCT. . 0 0 2 0 3" DC 0 0 3 0 4" DC 12 0 12 0 6" DC 14 0 12 0 8" DC 2 0 2 0

10" DC 0 0 0 0 119 110 6,780 7,029

*5/B", %", 1", and l'/i" meters installed by the Domestic Meter Activity.

DISPOSITION OF COMPONENT RETURNED TO SHOP: Meters Generators Remotes

1981 1982 1981 1982 1981 1982 Return to Inventory .. Return to Manufacturer. Scrapped with Value . Scrapped no Value . . .

1389 1432 881 920 87 71 602 1125 83 51 3 1

2305 2760 0 0 0 0 156 47 31 37 2 6

4452 5364 995 1008 92 78

TABLE #10 SUMMARY OF PUMPAGE FOR 1982

Finished Water Morse Rd. Plant Dublin Rd. Plant Parsons Ave. Plant

Totals

2. Extremes Maximum Day Minimum Day Maximum Hour Minimum Hour

3. Raw Water Morse Rd. Plant Dublin Rd. Plant Parsons Ave. Plant

Totals

Booster Station Pumpage Ackerman Rd. Big Run Rd. Cleveland Ave. Deer Run Fisher Rd. Henderson Rd. Gantz Rd. Joyce Ave. Morrison Rd. Morse Rd. Mound St. Post Rd. Smoky Row Rd. Star Rd.

Totals

Total (MG) Avg. (MGD) 27,759.41 76.05 14,029.74 38.44

0.00 0.00 41,789.15

Date 07-26-82 12-25-82 07-26-82 11-14-82

114.49

(MG) 160.60 93.89

211.80 37.00

Total (MG) Avg. (MGD) 30,121.44 82.52 15,367.39 42.10

0.00 0.00 45,488.83

Total (MG) 200.00 500.41

6,898.00

2,716.69 1,629.04

8.63 337.00

1,124.30 973.27*

1,619.82

177.66* 33.51

16,218.33

124.62

Days Pumped

40 365 365 283 365 365

14'/2 211 365 365 365

365 101

Pet. 66.43 33.57

0.00 100.00

Pumpage Ratio to

Avg. Day 1.40 0.82 1.85 0.32

Pet. 66.22 33.78

0.00 100.00

Ave. (MGD)

5.0 1.37

18.90

7.44 4.46 0.60 1.60 3.08 2.67 4.44

0.49 0.33

The following facilities have been taken out of service as of 12/31/82:

A. Nelson Rd. Plant B. Indianola Ave. Booster Station

Plant Usage (Not Included in Finished Water)

Morse Rd. = 412.25 M.G. John R. Doutt Dublin Rd. = 517.39 M.G.

•Estimated

John R. Doutt, P.E. Distribution Manager

TABLED 20 YEAR PUMPAGE & CONSUMPTION COMPARATIVE REPORT

YEAR 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982

Total Pumpage TO City M.G.

28,112.56 27,980.25 29,690.74 30,715.62 31,190.29 33,558.78 33,871.17 34,163.22 35,335.11 37,706.38 36,157.36 38,105.35 36,686.61 38,184.58 39,124.74 37,531.85 37,709.27 37,924.67 39,266.98 41,789.15

Total Metered Water M.G.

22,337.42 22,806.05 23,383.60 23,863.54 26,316.14 26,621.39 27,976.07 29,712.67 30,913.85 31,066.99 31,237.27 30,786.08 29,925.77 29,742.67 31,234.59 30,432.25 30,626.86 30,543.21

N/A N/A

Unaccounted For Water (%)

20.5% 18.5% 21.2% 22.3% 18.8% 20.7% 17.4% 13.0% 12.5% 17.6% 13.6% 19.2% 18.4% 22.1% 20.2% 18.9% 18.8% 19.5% N/A N/A

TABLE 11-A WATER PUMPAGE TO GREATER COLUMBUS AREA (20 YEARS)

YEAR 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982

Million Gallons

28,112.56 27,980.25 29,690.74 30,715.62 31,190.29 33,558.78 33,871.17 34,163.22 35,335.11 37,706.38 36,157.36 37,296.34 36,686.61 38,184.58 39,124.74 37,531.85 37,709.27 37,924.67 39,266.98 41,789.15

Minimum Daily (MG)

59.53 55.62 60.01 61.87 64.89 70.71 69.90 66.83 65.45 69.93 75.18 76.50 81.15 78.18 81.39 76.12 86.89 85.90 89.53 93.89

Average Daily (MG)

77.02 76.45 81.34 34.15 85.45 91.69 92.80 93.59 96.81 97.01 99.06

102.13 100.51 104.33 107.25 102.82 103.31 103.62 107.58 114.49

Maximum Daily (MG)

115.17 106.55 116.34 120.48 121.66 120.60 124.88 122.02 139.60 124.97 133.51 137.37 140.85 138.33 138.59 145.56 129.09 129.25 137.56 160.60

DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 25

£ £ s s a s s

I I I

PS w m % w u w Q (* o

< w En C/3 >< W K W H <

<N 1/1

s ^ CQ

3 3 H o o w

i i ml 5

I I I I I I I

I I I " !

fc •3

If "

Z O M W

• J

Pi w

I O H W W u. J < w

! ? S I I

I t i « t . I I

i i a - I i

i j " i i e a i '

| . i i — i

j . 11.11 I 2 "

2 « i § « I * * Cd

o < « w 2 g

= t=3 ? 3 J

26 DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

Size

2" 8 Under

3" 4" 6" 8"

10" 12" 14" 16" 20" 24" 30" 36" 42" 48" 60" 66"

Total Feet Total Miles

SYSTEM MAIN LINES/COLUMBUS

Total Feet as of

12-31-81

741 ,457 88,194

146,262 3 ,380,414 2 ,682,189

43 ,974 1,002,510

3,730 513,926 215 ,829 364 ,675

91,811 119,730 67,392 83,784

30 5,710

9,551,618

1,809.0

Laid By Shop Contract'

317 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

317

0.1

— —

821 1,250

— 11,477

— 31,151 2,560 — —

5,538 20,543

— — —

73,430

13.9

Laid By Others

— — —

2,583 8,545

— 5,458

— — — — — — — — — —

16,586

3.1

Total Feet as of

12-31-82

741 ,774

88,194 146,262

3,383,818 2,691,984

43,974 1,019,445

3,730 545,077 218,479 364,675

91,811 125,268 87,935 83,785

30 5,710

9,641,951

Total Miles

140.5 16.7 27.7

640.9 509.8

8.3 193.1

0.7 103.2 41.4 69.1 17.4 23.7 16.7 15.9 0.0 1.0

1,826.1 ' Inc ludes Water Lines Gained and/or Lost D u e to Freeways , Outerbelts, and Expressways .

TO: Jack A. Holt, P.E., Superintendent

FROM: Kenneth W. Cosens, P.E. Water Plants Coordinator

RE: 1982 Annual Report The mission of the supply group is to provide an adequate

and reliable supply of high quality water with the best tech­nology available, using cost effective methods.

On the average 114.5 million gallons (mil gal) of potable water were delivered daily to the distribution system during 1982 by the Morse Road and Dublin Road Water Plants. This represents an increase of 6.9 million gallons per day (mgd) over 1981, an increase of 6.4%. Two thirds of the flow was provided by the Hoover Reservoir and treated at the Morse Road Water Plant. The maximum hourly finished water pumpage rate was 211.8 mgd and the average rate for the maximum day was 160.6 mgd, both established on July 26, 1982. The latter figure of 160.6 mgd establishes a new record. Booster station pumpage was 16,218 mil gal or 44.4 mgd. Average raw water withdrawal from the sources was 124.6 mgd with 66.2% coming from the Hoover Reservoir.

During the period August through mid-November rather severe drouth conditions were experienced. Hoover Reser­voir was 6 to 7 ft below levels during the same portion of 1981. By early November there was only about 100 days stor­age at 70 mgd demand on the Hoover Reservoir. Demand for raw water was shifted to the Scioto River supply by several actions, the major ones being the starting of the Ackerman Road and Joyce Avenue booster stations, shifting Ohio State University to the Dublin Rd system and several valve changes which shifted the pumpage until each plant deliv­ered approximately half of the total demand. On November 21, 1982 the Hoover Reservoir pool was at elevation 869.72 the lowest for 1982, which is only slightly higher than the record low of 868.60 on March 2, 1964. Rains of November and December replenished storage to the point where the reservoir was 76% full at the end of 1982 and there was 262 days storage at 65 mgd demand rate.

Considering both plants, natural gas consumption in­creased 1.09% in 1982 to 77,643 thousand cubic feet (mcf) with cost of gas amounting to $257,232.62 which represents a 32.9% increase.

The total electrical energy used at the two treatment plants increased from 45,137,130 kilowatt hours (KWhr) in 1981 to 47,693,800 KWhr, an increase of 5.66% in 1982. Cost of e lect r ica l energy inc reased from $1,711,708.00 to $1,962,210.01 in 1982, representing a 14.63% increase. Cost per KWhr, including demand charges, increased at the Morse Road Water Plant from 3.775 to 4.132 cents. At the Dublin Road Water Plant costs increased from 3.819 to 4 089 cents/KWhr when comparing 1981 to 1982 values.

Chemical costs at the Dublin Road Water Plant dropped from $99.53 in 1981 to $99.14 in 1982 per million gallons of raw water treated. At the Morse Road Water Plant chemical costs experienced a similar drop from $37.55 to $37 08 per

mil gal. Total hardness and turbidity of raw water was slightly lower in 1982 than in 1981 accounting for part of the reason for the reduction in chemical use in 1982.

The principal chemicals used in coagulating and softening the water at the two plants are alum, lime and soda ash. At both plants the total tonnage of these three chemicals used, decreased in 1982 when compared with 1981 even though there was very little change in hardness or turbidity for the two years. There was a modest increase in total flow treated. At the Morse Road Water Plant this total tonnage dropped from 10,770.1 to 10,578.1 and at the Dublin Road Water Plant it dropped from 13,891 to 13,064.3. This indicates the careful attention the operators and chemists are paying to raw wa­ter quality and chemical feed amounts required to provide proper treatment.

There were six power outages at the Dublin Road Water Plant during 1982 accounting for 7 hrs and 35 minutes of down time. At the Morse Road Water Plant there was one outage in 1982 which shut down only the B plant for 1 hr 30 min. Parsons Avenue Plant experienced fifteen power out­ages during 1982. The outage of March 9 triggered a mal­functioning valve and caused flooding of lower levels of the plant, delaying plant startup by nearly a year and causing many hundred thousands of dollars damage to equipment which had to be replaced.

By the end of 1982 progress at the Parsons Avenue Water Plant indicates that before mid 1983 the plant should be placed in operation. The wells have all been pumped at full capacity. Principal delays were associated with the March 1982 flooding of lower levels of the plant.

All water quality requirements of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency and the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act were met during the year 1982 except the Nitrate-N require­ment at the Dublin Road Water Plant. When the nitrates, reported as N, exceeded 10 milligrams/liter (mg/L) on June 23, 1982 this fact was reported to the media in conformance with Ohio EPA requirements. Levels exceeded 10 mg/L through July 8, 1982.

Taste and odor problems, commonly attributed to sum­mer growth of plankton, did not develop at either water plant. A stubborn taste and odor problem persisted during the spring runoff months at the Dublin Road Water Plant. Powdered activated carbon and potassium permanganate were used in varying dosages to reduce severity of the taste and odor problems. The plant operators and chemists have met with the Water Research Laboratory staff to mount a more effective deterrent program for the next taste and odor season.

Laboratories at all three water treatment plants are certi­fied in both the microbiological and chemical areas. Two or th ree staff are cer t i f ied at each l abora to ry in the microbiological area and from three to seven staff are certi­fied in the chemical area at each laboratory. Four members of the Water Research Laboratory staff are collectively certi­fied in their respective laboratories for all Safe Drinking Water Act parameters except radio activity and pesticides.

During 1982 major administrative reorganization was put into operation. The supply group, subdivided into five areas of activity, consists of the three water plants, the Water Re­search Laboratory and the Technical Support Group.

The Alum Creek Pump Station has been repaired and brought through several periods of short runs. Each 35 mgd pump has been operated for a short period, in order to assure that it will be operational when needed. Maintenance and major repairs to this station have been provided by the Morse Road Water Plant staff. A program has been set up to operate each of the two pumps approximately three hours monthly at off-peak hours.

An emergency contingency plan, developed by the Divi­sion, was put into operation. It was approved by the Ohio EPA. An important adjunct of the emergency contingency plan was the refinement of the strike plan. The supply group staff contributed in a major way to the preparation of these plans.

The supply staff has been very active in presenting papers in technical and research areas supporting water quality pa­rameters. Several technical papers have been published in national publications during 1982. Numerous papers have been presented to a variety of organizations, including the following: American Water Works Association Ohio Section, International Association for Great Lakes Research, OTCO Workshops, Soil Conservation Service Seminars, Ohio State University Seminars, Battelle Technical Meetings, Amer­ican Chemical Society and AWWA Water Quality Technolo­gy Conference.

The Water Research Laboratory organized and made ma­jor presentations at the DOW Technical Meeting and at the

DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 27

Nitrate Summit , both meet ings were hosted at the Dublin Road Water Plant .

Two staff m e m b e r s actively part icipated in AWWA's Vola­tile Organic Chemical Workshops and two different staff at tended the 1982 AWWA Water Quality Technology Confer­ence.

Large n u m b e r s of plant staff have retired dur ing the 1982 year. Most have been replaced. There was a serious shortage of maintenance and operat ing staff at the Morse Road Water Plant necessitat ing excessive overt ime dur ing the year. Ex­treme difficulties have been exper ienced in replacing re­tired staff and procur ing new staff for approved positions.

The new m a i n t e n a n c e and inven tory activity is being staffed within the Technical Suppor t Group. Most of this activity has been deferred to 1983. A. DUBLIN ROAD WATER PLANT Report on the Scioto River Plankton Survey for 1982.

The Survey followed most ly the procedures established during the 1981 Survey where the Griggs and Intake Reser­voirs were checked regularly by weekly samples. A slight variance occurred at O 'Shaughnessy Reservoir where a few microscopic samples were taken in addit ion to the Reser­voir being periodically checked visually for algae.

The Survey at Stat ion No. 4, Dubl in Rd. Intake and at Station No. 2., Griggs Dam began 4 May, while that at Sta­tion No. 1, Griggs Dam began 13 May. Collecting at Station No. 1 terminated 25 Augus t as it could no longer be reached, while the Survey at Sta t ions 2 and 4 terminated 3 Novem­ber.

Some algae were presen t dur ing May but considerable turbidity in Griggs dur ing J u n e resul ted in low numbers of algae. However, dur ing the first two weeks of Ju ly there was an enormous influx of the genus Tribonema. an alga usually found in small ponds , pools, or backwaters . Its sudden pres­ence in a reservoir such a Griggs is not explained here. By the third week it had d isappeared .

At Stat ions 1 and 2 th roughou t the summer , and mainly at No. 2 dur ing Sep tember , the n u m b e r s of numerous algae remained moderate ly high, bu t none were serious in num­bers or kind. In fact no ser ious odor or flavor contr ibutors such as were presen t dur ing 1978 and 1979 were noted dur­ing 1982. Zooplankters were generally numerous through­out the summer .

The Dublin Road In take algal pat tern is usually similar to that at Griggs. In 1982, the In t ake dur ing the first two weeks of May had a high popula t ion of d ia toms, none of which were necesarily serious for water quality. By the early part of June , turbidi ty had reduced the n u m b e r of algae which did not again appear in quan t i ty unti l Tribonema appeared during early July, as it did at Griggs. It also disappeared late in July. Diatoms generally accounted for modera te popula­t ions of algae d u r i n g A u g u s t and into S e p t e m b e r when Melosira and Synedra became dominant . This dominance along with n u m e r o u s zooplankters cont inued th roughout October bu t d iminished in November . N u m b e r s and kinds of algae were never serious enough to require algicidal treat­ment.

O ' S h a u g h n e s s y R e s e r v o i r s a m p l e s d u r i n g J u n e and September and periodic observat ions indicated no real need for regular samples . Turbid i ty well into the s u m m e r elimi­nated to a great ex ten t the produc t ion of phytop lankton and much of the shore-line algae. Blooms of blue-green algae such as occurred dur ing the s u m m e r s of 1978 and 1979 were non-existent.

The summer of 1982 jo ins those of 1980 and 1981 as being an unusual year from the s tandpoin t of algal growth. There have been few algae excep t the peculiar influx of Tribonema. and none that can be accused of p roducing odors and fla­vors.

1983 Objectives 1. To develop m e a n s to interface p u m p i n g uni ts in mains

to supply sect ions of the sys tem in case of disaster. 2. To repair b r ickwork at the Dubl in Road Water Plant. 3. To repair concre te at O 'Shaughnessy Dam. 4. To repair concre te at Griggs Dam. 5. Have Engineer ing s tudy to develop auxiliary electrical

power to: a) Treat water . b) Run finished water p u m p .

6. Have mobi le uni t to use where needed in the system: a) Tanks . b) Booster Stat ions.

B. MORSE ROAD WATER PLANT Report on the Hoover Reservoir Plankton Survey for 1982

The 1982 Survey began 19 May and cont inued with some interruptions at some Sta t ions d u e to weather and person­

nel problems until terminated on the last collecting date, 4 November.

The 1982 Survey followed in general the procedures estab­lished dur ing preced ing years . Algae at the three lower basin Stations were relatively sparse most of the summer, and especially so at Station No. 3 near the Dam throughout May and June . The peak abundance of algae in the lower basin occurred between 26 August and 16 September when Melosira r eached its m a x i m u m . Blue-green algae were almost non-exis tent wi th Aphanizomenon and Anabaena having occurred only two or three times, and then only as individual tr ichomes.

The deeper waters behind the Dam generally had few algae, t h o u g h the re was an increase in Melosira dur ing September. This however, was never abundan t enough to cause problems. Organisms most prevalent were zooplank­ters, Copepods and Cladoecrans. Iron and sulfur bacteria were never dominant in any of the depth samples during 1982 as they were during 1981.

The Morse Road Intake, as always, was largely free of algae. Some Melosira and Navicula was noted in late J u n e and early July, while another small increase of these di­atoms along with Cyclotella appeared during the latter part of September.

Algae were sparse in Hoover Reservoir during the sum­mer of 1982 and algicidal t rea tment was not necessary. 1983 Objectives

1. To return No.'s 2, 8 & 9 "A" filters to service at an estimated cost of $65,000.00, whenever C.I.P. money is available.

2. To pull one of the "A" high service pumps for inspec­tion, at no additional cost, using Parsons Avenue and Morse Road personnel.

3. To install steel s ludge chain in 1 of the 2 softening basins, if it is received in t ime to install during 1983.

4. To repair screen outlet valve at Alum Creek P u m p i n g Sta t ion . The re will be some e q u i p m e n t ren ta l re­quired.

5. To renew high service meter ing when C.I.P. money is available.

6. To have better control on stock received and invento­ried, by better planning and use of the stockroom per­sonnel.

7. To hand le c o n s u m e r compla in ts , as received, in a satisfactory manner and without delay.

8. To operate within the assigned budget in a more pro­fessional manner and at reduced overtime cost.

C PARSONS AVENUE WATER PLANT The Parsons Avenue Water Plant was scheduled to be

completed in 1981. Due to unforeseen delays, the plant will not be operational until 1983. The delays resulted from de­sign modifications, contractor financial difficulties, poor subcontractor workmanship , and faulty equipment .

During the evening of March 9, 1982, a power failure trig­gered the opening of a 10" surge anticipator valve on the 60" finished water header. When the valve failed to close proper­ly after a normal t ime delay, the excess water overflowed into the p u m p room basement , the filter building pipe gal­lery, and the chemical building sub-basement . The resultant 9 foot deep water caused several hundred thousand dollars damage to electrical and control equipment . The damaged equipment is supposed to be replaced in 1983.

The collector well p u m p s were tes ted in Augus t and Sep tember . E x c e p t for m ino r p r o b l e m s and p u n c h list items, the City is satisfied with their performance.

Both the chemical and microbiological labs were certified by the Ohio EPA. All the operating personnel were also cer­tified. The microbiological lab has been used by the Re­search Lab since August , 1982 for the Division's distribution sampling program. 1983 Objectives

1. To operate plant by Ju ly 1, 1983. 2. To acquire South Well Field property. 3. To institute 12-hour shift. 4. To acquire an adequate staff to operate and maintain

plant. 5. To provide adequa te equ ipment for maintenance per­

sonnel. D. TECHNICAL SUPPORT GROUP

The Technical Suppor t Group provides plant engineering support and resources to the Supply Group. In furtherance of this mission, we a t tempt to provide facilities and person­nel for:

1. Engineering review of plant operational problems. 2. Liaison with outside consul tants performing facilities

engineering for the Division.

28 DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

3. Liaison and technical review on capital improvements constructions projects for the Supply Group.

4 In-house design services for small projects. 5. Administration of maintenance and inventory policies

and procedures for the Supply Group. 6. Coordinating the upgrading and creation of a proper

set of operating manuals for our major supply facili­ties.

7. Servicing digital electronics equipment operated by the Division.

8. Facilitating technology transfer of new, reliable tech­nologies and applications for consideration by appropriate users within the Division.

1982 Accomplishments During 1982 an interregnum of some 3'/2 months occurred

in the Technical Support Group, as the position of Chief was vacant from the beginning of April through the middle of July. Although this disruption had an effect upon the year's business, several significant items were accomplished, as follows:

Centralized Maintenance and Inventory. By working with the consultant for the study and development phase of this program, cost/benefit data, staffing requirements and job descriptions were developed. Data processing equipment specifications were developed and equipment procured. Personnel will be provided in 1983 to proceed with this program, with its anticipated benefits to the Division.

Dublin Road Water Plant. Investigated the problems associ­ated with the frequent power interruptions to their facility. Specifications have been prepared for revisions to the chlor­ine system to eliminate maintenance problems created by these power interruptions. Cost studies begun preparatory to recommendations for power supply revisions.

Morse Road Water Plant. Replaced Water Engineers' per­sonnel as liaison to the current construction work on con­crete revisions at this plant.

Parsons Avenue Water Plant. Progress toward completion of this facility was essentially halted during 1982 by the flooding of the construction work which occurred on March 9, 1982. During the balance of the year, Technical Support assisted in determining the required replacements of flood-damaged equipment, and in facilitating those replacements. Technical Support will be intensively involved in the actual plant and control system startup, now expected in mid-1983.

Alum Creek Raw Water Pumping Station. Techincal Sup­port assisted in the repairs and adjustments required to make the instrumentation and control equipment in this sta­tion functional again, preparatory to periodic "exercising" of the station. We are involved in developing criteria for the consultant who will be writing an operation and mainte­nance manual for the facility.

Morrison Road Booster Station Enlargement. Worked with the consultant for this project, in order to assure that all pertinent Division comments upon the design were proper­ly handled.

Smoky Row Booster Station. Assisted Morse Road Water Plant maintenance personnel in servicing the controls dam­aged in this system by freezing. Provided technical informa­tion required for servicing the control equipment. Restored the automatic controls to stable operation by gradually re­storing the process controller to its former tuning. Obtained missing operation and maintenance instructions from the contractor for the facility. 1983 Objectives

1. To carry forward current work not completed in 1982, especially the Maintenance and Inventory program.

2. To provide technical liaison to the construction of the Morrison Road Booster Station Enlargement and the Division of Water Service Center.

3. To undertake such additional or revised projects as the Supply Manager or the Superintendent may direct.

E. WATER RESEARCH LABORATORY The challenge of the Water Research Laboratory (WRL) is

to serve customers by insuring that potable water meets or exceeds the water quality requirements of the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act regarding water quality, and to ascer­tain that the most current developments in water treatment and testing are used. Certified personnel, knowledgeable in chemistry, biology, instrument analysis quality control and water treatment practices, are dedicated to continually up­grading the safety and palatability of Columbus drinking water. Our professional staff is ready to respond to water quality emergencies, caused by natural event or human in­tervention, and is prepared to use all possible resources to maintain high water quality during such times. Other areas ot responsibility include monitoring and improving raw

water supplies, developing methods to preserve water treat­ment and water distribution facilities, and optimizing water treatment costs. Finally, the WRL is committed to providing information to residential customers, business, industry, and the educational community through talks, correspon­dence, and publications relating to treatment techniques, testing improvements, and research results. 1983 Objectives

The WRL has over 120 discrete projects each one of which is replete with its respective goals and objectives. A WRL 5-year plan, with time lines, will be completed by mid-March 1983.

WRL 1983 goals can be condensed into the following general statements:

1. To study and research water quality parameters in an effort to adopt the most satisfactory treatment methods for maintaining a high quality, potable water.

2. To promote conditions in the distribution system that will provide all customers with quality water.

3. To provide readily accessible water quality data and treatment algorithms for use in water source selec­tion so the most economical, safe and adequate sup­plies are treated and pumped.

4. To improve the water source protection by routine sewage surveys, eutrophication studies, augmenting the existing monitoring network and promoting non-point source pollution reductions.

5. To fully implement and practice the WRL portion of the DOW Emergency Plan, including assisting in the development of a cross connection control program.

6. To improve water treatment process control by ex­pediting and assisting improvements in monitoring and control instrumentation.

7. To hire a technician to free the WRL group leaders from some routine analyses, to increase our techni­cian to analyst ratio, and to adjust WRL activities to our stated level of 20 percent monitoring, 30 percent research and 50 percent development.

8. To increase centralization of microbiology to im­prove the efficiency and organization of the testing and reporting.

9. To develop "good practice" guidelines for the control of opportunistic pathogens in customers' piping sys­tems.

10. To demonstrate needs for testing improvements in­cluding gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/ MS) capability.

11. To determine the consolidation characteristics and volume of water treatment sludge stored at the McKinley Avenue Quarry.

12. To develop improved WRL library, data manage­ment, and communications systems.

13. To develop WRL accounting procedures, assisted by TSG and Bill Mahaffey, to have continuously up­dated information on expenditures in all minor ob­ject codes, contracts and blanket purchase orders.

14. To assist the Micrographics Task Force in meeting all designated goals.

15. To develop a water quality brochure for customers and others, which is suitable for national distribu­tion, and to assist on other public relations projects including public displays and DOW history.

WRL 1982 Accomplishments: The WRL made significant contributions in the following

areas: 1. Centralized the microbiological testing resulting in

greater efficiency and accuracy. 2. Performed comprehensive trihalomethane (THM)

and total organic halide (TOX) monitoring. 3. Demonstrated that synthetic organic chemicals, ex­

clusive of agricultural pesticides, are not presently a problem in Columbus raw water supplies.

4. Documented nitrate and pesticide sources, with fol­low-up resulting in significant strides towards meet­ing the 5-year goals contained in the Division of Water nutrient and pesticide policy statement.

5. Assisted during the nitrate MCL violation by effec­tively handling an estimated three-hundred consum­er inquiries.

6. Made progress in preparations for control of taste and odor problems which result from winter/spring runoff.

7. Developed capillary gas chromatographic tech­niques.

8. Detected and quantitated dichloroacetonitriles and aliphatic aldehydes in our drinking water.

DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 29

9. Rapidly and accurately performed preliminary start­up of the new Technicon autoanalyzer.

10. Assisted an OSU project and technical paper which de te rmined bacterial g roup association in the Co­lumbus dis t r ibut ion system.

11. Studied Legionella pneumophila and other opportu­nistic pa thogens .

12. Charac te r ized ch lo r ine res idua l losses of t rea ted water at representat ive t empera tu re ranges using in vitro (bottle) tests .

13. E x p a n d e d t race meta l s mon i to r ing and corrosion coupon moni tor ing resulted in more economical zinc or thophospha te feed and documented that corrosion rates are "mild".

14. Coordinated the U S G S s t ream flow monitoring and South Well Field quali ty monitoring.

15. Assis ted and coord ina ted g round water investiga­tions, by Geodyssey, at the South Well Field to deter­mine possible qual i ty and quant i ty effects of bedrock "ar tes ian" flow into the glacial aquifer.

16. Organized the DOW techincal meeting. Presented below are the WRL section reports which con­

tain summaries and relevant data: Biological and Environmental Research. 1982 Microbiological Analysis:

The Water Research Labora tory (WRL) had a qualified microbiologist on staff in 1982, that was directly involved in the bacteriological moni tor ing program. This deviates from previous p rac t i ce , s i nce h is tor ica l ly the bacter io logical program had been executed by non-microbiologists. The program has been upgraded substantial ly and significant advances were m a d e towards a stream-lined centralized op­eration. A central bacteriological laboratory was established at the Parsons Avenue Water P lan t th rough cooperative ac­tions of DRWP, MRWP, PAWP, and WRL personnel . The laboratory and personnel received State of Ohio certifica­tion for bacteriological test ing in J u n e , 1982. Centralization of testing provides a more efficient, higher quality program. For the last half of 1982 the central laboratory processed approximately 3,000 samples . Resul t s of dis t r ibut ion system monitoring are presen ted in the annual reports of *he re­spective plants .

Water Research Labora tory personnel collaborated with Ohio State Universi ty researchers in a s tudy to determine the presence, d is t r ibut ion and control of Legionella in the Columbus water d is t r ibut ion sys tem and University Hospi­tal. This s tudy (begun J u n e 1, 1982) is still cont inuing and a final repor t is s c h e d u l e d in 1983. A cont rac t a m o u n t of $82,979.00 was appropr ia ted to cover personnel , materials and other direct costs. A total of $32,254.20 had been ex­pended by December , 1982.

Chlorine res iduals wi th in the dis t r ibut ion system were also invest igated resul t ing in a practical , appl ied under­standing of the re la t ionship be tween some physical/chemi­cal parameters and chlor ine residuals. As a consequence , chlorine residuals have been improved in several areas.

The water d is t r ibut ion sys tem was moni tored to delineate the distr ibution boundar ies of the Morse Road and Dublin Road Water P lants . This required frequent sampl ing in the latter half of 1982 in response to numerous distr ibution sys­tem valving changes in an effort to conserve the MRWP's raw water supply. Chlor ide was the parameter used to analy­tically de te rmine the source of the water in quest ion.

Rout ine d i s t r ibu t ion sys tem sample points and routes were evaluated, resu l t ing in several changes to improve sampling coverage and sample representat iveness . Metal Analysis:

Heavy metal moni tor ing in t h e dis t r ibut ion system, water plants, and raw water supply cont inued in 1982. Distribu­tion system grab samples were collected in 14 pressure dis­tricts, utilizing sampl ing sites es tabl ished in previous years. Monthly composi te samples of raw and finished water were collected at the Dubl in Road Water P lan t (DRWP) and the Morse Road Water P lan t (MRWP). All samples were ana­lyzed for a luminum, arsenic, bar ium, cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, manganese , mercury , nickel, selenium, silver, sodium and zinc. T h e analytical methodology em­ployed is precise and accurate , giving results at concentra­tions as low as 0.0001 mg/L (100 parts per trillion). It would have cost $34,000.00 to have this metal analysis done in a commercial laboratory. Resul t s are presented in Table 1-5.

New Federa l regulat ions require moni tor ing of dr inking water for sodium. Biological and Envi ronmenta l Research staff (WRL) developed an effective analytical method for sodium analysis utilizing a tomic absorpt ion. The Water Re­search Laboratory has provisional certification for this tech­nique and should receive full certification in 1983. Sodium

concentrations can be used effectively and efficiently to dis-tinquish DRWP drinking water from MRWP drinking water when soda ash is being used at the DRWP.

The 1982 Columbus drinking water contained concentra­tions of arsenic, bar ium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mer­cury, selenium and silver far below the max imum contami­nant level's established by the Safe Drinking Water Act. The metal data indicate that Columbus drinking water generally exhibits a low corrosion potential to consumers plumbing. However, more test ing of water which remains in contact with plumbing overnight needs to be undertaken.

The DRWP and MRWP taps were monitored for zinc to ascertain proper feed rates of zinc-orthophosphate (ZOP). Monthly composite data indicate that the ZOP feed rate is much more accurate at the DRWP than at the MRWP. ZOP concentration at the MRWP is apparently below effective dosages for periods of t ime dur ing the summer months , be­cause of feed fluctuations. Seven distribution system sites were monitored for zinc and copper to assist in evaluating the effectiveness of ZOP in corrosion control. Approximate­ly 245 samples were analyzed for zinc and copper.

As in previous years raw water heavy metal concentra­t ions were generally h igher at the D R W P (Scioto River watershed) than at the MRWP (Big Walnut Creek water­shed). Metal pulses are associated with runoff and do not indicate significant anthropogenic (man-made) contamina­tion. An exception is the presence of mercury throughout most of the year at DRWP. Nutrient Analysis:

Water s a m p l e s for n u t r i e n t a n a l y s i s w e r e co l l ec ted approximately every two weeks from Grigg's, O'Shaughnes­sy, Alum Creek and Hoover Reservoirs, the Scioto River at 1-270 nor th and from the Dublin Road Water P lan t and Morse Road Water Plant raw water intakes. A total of 175 samples were collected and analyzed for total Kjeldahl nit­rogen, ni tr i te-ni trogen, ni t rate-ni t rogen, ammonia , total-phosphorus and or tho-phosphorus . Analytical results are presented in Tables 6-12.

As in previous years the Scioto River watershed exhibited higher nutr ient levels than either the Alum Creek or Big Walnut Creek (Hoover Reservoir) watersheds during high flow periods. The highest nitrate concentrat ion (13.9 mg/L) occurred on 6/30/82 at the Grigg's Reservoir sample site. This concentration is higher than any nitrate concentrat ion recorded during a similar sampling period in 1981.

Nutrient monitoring not only gives useful watershed in­formation, but also aids in the water t rea tment area. The total Kjeldahl nitrogen componen t contains fractions which can impar t flavors to d r ink ing water . Kjeldahl ni t rogen monitoring during taste and odor events gives information helpful in determining the best water t rea tment strategy. More distribution system samples need to be analyzed to ascertain the fate of the total Kjeldahl nitrogen after this componen t passes t h rough the water p lants . Ammonia , when present in the raw water, creates a chlorine demand, which requires more chlor ine to reach breakpoint . This situation creates problems for the water plant operator in determining correct chlorine feed rates. Ammonia monitor­ing would provide informat ion for de te rmin ing correct chlorine dosages which would result in a bet ter quality water.

Nu t r i en t ana lyses of wa te r s ample s from the rou t ine watershed monitor ing program were performed by the Sur­veillance Laboratory of the Division of Sewerage and Drain­age at a cost of $5,544.00 in 1982. The same sample protocal would cost $8,820.00 in 1983. The Water Research Labora­tory is bringing ins t rumentat ion on-line (as described in the Water Quality Research section) to perform nutr ient analy­ses, which will defray these costs. Water Quality Research Regulatory Compliance and Quality Assurance

The Columbus water system is in full compliance with all Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), PL-93-523, primary and secondary regulations. A brief SDWA nitrate violation was followed by public notification and is reported in a follow­ing section.

Division of Water laboratories are certified to perform all SDWA testing except for radioactivity and pesticide/herbi­cide parameters . Dublin Road Water Plant temporari ly lost coliform test certification while method and record-keeping changes were made. Morse Road Water Plant maintained testing continuity for both plants while bacterial certifica­tion was received at Parsons Avenue Water Plant for cen­tralized microbiological testing.

The Water Research Laboratory (WRL) coordinates the performance of all SDWA compliance monitoring, thus en­suring that frequencies, deadlines, certification and report-

30 DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

ing requirements are met. Currently the WRL has certified status for nine metals, including sodium, and trina-lomethanes (THMs). Performance Evaluation samples were submitted to the WRL by the USEPA. Four pesticide com­pounds, eight metals and four THMs were analyzed in two concentrations. Only selenium and bromoform caused analysts minor difficulties. Neither parameter required re-testing. Both compounds and pesticide certification are targeted for additional emphasis in 1983.

Quality assurance programs were expanded this year tor nitrate and THM testing. Initial development of quality con­trol checks were initiated for fluoride and pesticide analy­ses. Quarterly introduction of spike reference samples for WRL chemists, plant chemists and operational staff will commence in 1983. Occasional blind spiked samples will be introduced. The importance of a highly visible quality assur­ance program for all phases of water plant operation cannot be overemphasized. This is equally true for contaminant monitoring and research activities. Nitrate Control Strategy Development.

During 1981 non-certified test analyses for nitrate identi­fied the likelihood of exceeding the SDWA, maximum con­taminant level (MCL) of 10 mg/L, N03 as N, in Dublin Road Water Plant finished water. Upon OEPA recommendation more frequent certified nitrate testing was performed dur­ing a similar period in 1982. Laboratory analyses identified 18 days when the MCL was violated from 6/22/82 through 7/9/82. Public notification, which is required for MCL viola­tions, was accomplished by a press conference and resulted in hundreds of consumer inquiries about the health effects of the high nitrate water. Bottled water consumption was great during the period of the MCL violation.

Prior to violation of the MCL and following the event three areas were focused upon to identify the source of the nitrate and develop ways to prevent reoccurrence of the MCL violation. The areas investigated are as follows: a) research and monitoring programs b) interaction with cooperating agencies c) educational program development A sampling program to determine the impact of nonpoint

sources, on the elevated Scioto River nitrate levels began in 1982. The sub-basin watershed of Bokes Creek in Union County was selected because it is free of any major point source impact, and is considered to be representative of the Upper Scioto Basin. A gauging station was needed to evalu­ate flow on Bokes Creek. Arrangements were made with USGS for such an installation near the mouth of Bokes Creek and Rt. 257. The station was operational by early spring.

Data collected from many locations along the Creek, in­cluding farm tile effluent, at a range of water flows, demons­trated the impact of nonpoint source nitrate on Bokes Creek and the Scioto River. Effluent from field tile drainage approached 30 mg/L N03-N during storm events and is con­sidered a major contributor to high nitrate levels. Extrapola­tions from the Bokes Creek watershed indicate that the ni­trate contribution from nonpoint sources to the Scioto River above O'Shaughnessy following spring fertilization repre­sents more than 95% of the total nitrate present during very high flow conditions and greater than 80% during typical river stage.

Monitoring will continue in Bokes Creek in 1983 to add to our own baseline knowledge of agricultural effects on water supply and quality. Parameters to be studied will include pesticide levels, taste and odor potential, water hardness, nutrient and rainfall runoff patterns.

Many key individuals within important cooperating agen­cies were contacted to coordinate an understanding of the nitrate problem. OEPA officials were helpful during public notification but were slow to categorize the Upper Scioto as a Category I, Nonpoint Source Water Quality Problem Area. This was accomplished, however, late this year.

A meeting of concerned individuals representing State, Local and private interests was held July 22, 1982 ("Nitrate Summit" — proceedings available upon request from WRL). A general conclusion that much more research is needed in the area of nonpoint source water pollution was reached. Also, a committee was formed to investigate research direc­tion and funding. This committee is responsible for report­ing to the Policy Advisory Committee of the Scioto River Basin.

Interrelationships formed during investigating the nitrate problem focused attention on the need for a handbook de­tailing agencies and individuals involved with agriculture practice and water quality/resource management. Develop­ment of such a guide is a goal for 1983.

Informing as many people as possible of the relationship

between farming practices and water quality is an essential element of the overall nitrate control strategy.

The agricultural effects on Columbus water supply and an economic analysis of fertilizer nutrient consumption pro­vided the basis for a three-panel poster presentation.

A photographic study of the Bokes Creek Research Area highlighted the display.

Poster-sized graphs depicting nitrogen fertilizer con­sumption increases, rising nutrient costs, and usage shifts played to one central theme: nitrogen use is increasing as fertilizer prices continue to rise.

Charts and maps, including a comparison of the Upper Scioto and Big Walnut watersheds and consumption ad­justed fertilizer cost analysis provide additional informa­tion. Data was provided by the on-going agricultural re­search undertaken by the WRL staff.

This presentation was on display at an Ohio Chapter meet­ing of a national soil conservation society. Additional show­ings are scheduled.

Additionally, the WRL has added laboratory equipment and a laboratory technician to take over much of the nitrate analysis needs. The Technicon Auto Analyzer will also be able to supply data for all other nutrients and the Total Or­ganic Carbon parameter.

Even with additional equipment, manpower and a highly coordinated research and educational effort, prevention of another SDWA violation is not guaranteed. The DRWP source water will always be more vulnerable to contamina­tion since this watershed is very large with small storage reservoirs (with the opposite being true for the MRWP source). Therefore, the feasibility of supplying DRWP cus­tomers with an alternate source during high nitrate episodes must be evaluated. Contaminant Identification:

Herbicide testing was conducted on a limited basis this year. Only the Scioto River and DRWP tap were targeted for monitoring. This source has previously shown higher con­centrations of herbicides than the Big Walnut Creek source. Some effort was made to reduce finished water contamina­tion by treatment alteration and is presented in other sec­tions of this report. Concentra t ions of Alachlor and Metoachlor were similar in both raw and tap water except during powdered activated carbon treatment which re­duced their levels. The combined total of both compounds was at times greater than 10 ug/1. Other pesticide com­pounds are likely at various concentrations from agricultu­ral runoff in the Scioto River watershed. Additional trained laboratory personnel and equipment acquisition will ex­pand the number of samples and pesticides parameters ex­amined in 1983. Toxicological information indicates the compounds identified have not been extensively studied, however they are, generally, categorized as moderately tox­ic.

Additional investigations have shown sporadic occur­rence of other organics at trace levels in our raw water sup­plies.

Contract laboratory analyses occasionally identify low levels of several volatile organic chemical (VOC) com­pounds.

Tetrachloroethylene. trichloroethene, and carbon tetra­chloride have been identified in DRWP finished water sam­ples at values less than 1 ug/1. While these levels are well under suggested no adverse effect concentrations and well below proposed MCLs, future efforts will seek their source or sources which could include contamination during sam­ple handling.

Several special analytical studies were undertaken in 1982. A contract laboratory examined two DRWP tap sam­ples and a raw water for semi-volatile organic identification. A Closed-Loop Stripping Apparatus (CLSA) was used for sample concentration. Identification of compounds was accomplished by gas chromatography in conjunction with mass spectrometry. Using this technique aldehydes were detected in a 7/16/82 sampling of DRWP tap water. One com­pound, dodecanal, was at a significant concentration of 4.8 ug/1. A second sampling, 10/5/82, of raw and tap water did not detect the presence of the aldehydes, however other compounds were detected at very low levels in tap but not raw water samples. The compounds detected by this method are thought to have natural biological origins, ex­cept THM and the VOCs, and are not considered harmful. Synthetic organic chemicals (SOCs) of concern were not de­tected during these tests.

Water Treatment Research 1982 Disinfection By-product Monitoring:

Total trihalomethane (TTHM) and total organic halidie

DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 31

(TOX) monitor ing programs cont inued in 1982. The running annual averages for t r iha lomethanes were well below the max imum contaminan t level (MCL) or 0.10 mg/1, based on required quarter ly compl iance samples (DRWP 0.05 mg/1 OMRWP 0.07 mg/1). In-house TTHM and TOX monitoring consisted of month ly grap samples a t 8 distr ibution points, and four monthly composi te samples at plant taps and two distribution points , the annual averages based on these sam­ples are shown in Tables 16 and 17. The concentrat ion pro­files are shown in Figures 2, 3, and 4. Some TOX degrada­tion was observed dur ing storage on montly composites of distribution samples dur ing s u m m e r months . Total Organic Halaide Characterizat ion:

The TOX concentra t ion is expressed as micrograms per liter of chlorine. The total organic halide can be classified into purgeable organic halide (POX) which includes mostly TTHM, and nonpurgeab l e organic halide (NPOX), which according to recent findings may be heavily represented by chlorinated fatty acids such as dichloroacetic, trichloroace­tic, dichloropropionic, chlorosuccinic, dichlorosuccinic and dichloromaleic.

We have contracted with Battelle to look for these com­pounds in our finished water. (DOW Contract #00982). The results will be available in early 1983. Knowledge of TOX chemistry will assist our efforts to reduce formation and develop removal me thods . TOX Analyses:

TOX moni tor ing procedures were improved during 1982. The improved me thod permi ts bet ter reproducibil i ty and more accurate results. An impor tan t part of the progress was an improved sample preservat ion method which was developed by our l abora to ry and which m a y be widely accepted by other laboratories. Capillary Gas Chromatography (CGC):

The chromatographic capillary t echn ique (CGC) is a state-of-the-art me thod for t h e analysis of organic compounds which the WRL developed dur ing 1982. The main advan­tages of a capillary co lumn is bet ter separation of complex mixtures of ogranic c o m p o u n d s . This me thod enables us to detect more con taminan t s in the water and s tudy their re­moval dur ing water t rea tment . The capillary technique was applied to t r iha lomethane analysis, which resulted in an im­proved analytical me thod . Another application was the de­

velopment by WRL of an "organic scan" procedure in which organic contaminants are concentrated on carbon then de-sorbed by a solvent, resulting in an concentration factor of 100, then subsequent qualitative analysis of the complex mixture by (CGC). Figure 5 is an example of an organic scan of DRWP tap analysed 3/1/82 during a serious taste and odor event. Three peaks (A, B, D) represent t r ihalomethanes. A fourth peak (C) has been identified as dichloroacetonitrile, Dichloroacetonitri le (DCAN) is formed as a chlorination byproduct under ph 9, The DCAN concentration in DRWP tap is a round 5 ug/1 . This c o m p o u n d was found to be mutagenic in the Ames test. We are working on identifica­tion of other unknown peaks, which are suspected taste and odor producers.

Figure 6 is an organic scan of DRWP tap water analysed on 7/14/82 during our plant trail for pesticide removal. There are again three t r iha lomethanes and dichloroacetonitrile. Some previously high unknown peaks were lower at this time. Taste and Odor Problems:

In D e c e m b e r 1982 p r e p a r a t i o n s were s t a r t ed for t h e annua l late win ter t as te and odor even t which usual ly accompanies the first runoff after a long freeze. Agreement was reached among supply staff that these problems should be eliminated. Different t rea tment options were developed that will be used if needed in 1983. These corrective mea­sures would increase the t rea tment cost. Alternative Disinfectants:

The possibility of using alternative disinfectants in the future was again cons ide red in 1982. Chlor ine dioxide, which would reduce the t r ihalomethane and total organic halide formation and which would also help in taste and odor treatment, is a pr ime candidate for the follow-up eva­luation planned for early 1983. Consumer Complaints:

A comparat ive s tudy of consumer complaints shows the serious increases in taste and odor problems in 1982 caused by runoff. Corrosion related complaints (rusty water) may be decreasing at MRWP but a rash of complaints at DRWP in March, April and May were of u n k n o w n cause. Hydrant flushing in June , Ju ly and August caused almost no prob­lems in the DRWP system.

CHEMICAL RESULTS FROM DAILY ANALYSES AND MONTHLY COMPOSITE SAMPLES Milligrams Per Liter

(Except Where Units Are Indicated) Raw Water Dublin Road Water Plant—1982

Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov

Total Alkalinity ( C a C 0 3 ) . . . . . 119 82 104 139 158 141 144 149 160 165 157

Noncs rbons t s Hardness (CaC0 3 ) 124 57 80 105 125 131 132 130 125 133 128

Total Hardness (CaC0 3 ) . 243 139 184 244 283 272 276 279 285 298 285 Calcium ( C a ) . . . . 64 39 49 63 69 71 7 67 70 73 71 Magnesium (Mg) 20 10 15 21 27 23 24 27 27 28 26 Sodium (Na . . 17 11 10 6 7 13 15 19 19 10 28 Chloride (CD 38 23 22 29 32 29 33 38 38 40 41 F m o r i d l FK Y.YY. Y.YY. 0.26 0.18 0.20 0.24 0.31 0.33 0.32 0.35 0.37 0.41 0.40 Nitrate ( N ) ' 6.5 3.8 2.1 3.7 1.3 9.5 9.7 3.7 2.7 1.3 1.1 Total P h o s p h a t e (P) 0.24 1.04 0.16 0.16 0.22 0.16 0.18 - 0 - 1 8 - 0.04 Sulfate ( S 0 4 ) . . . . 99 74 117 72 105 115 108 102 99 147 125 Total Cations (meq-1) . . . 5.6 3.3 4.1 5.1 6.0 6.0 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.4 6.9 Total Anions ( m e q / 1 ) . . . . 6.0 4.1 5.3 5.4 6.4 6.7 6.8 6.5 6.6 7.6 7.0 Total Solids 419 269 438 400 419 446 315 435 346 669 185 Turbidity (NTU) 82 122 35 76 10 48 15 10 10 6 9 Silica (SiOz) 4 5 6 6 7 8 4 6 6 9 8 Color (Color Units) 27 33 35 27 20 35 28 21 19 16 21

C h £ h S ) 430 265 325 405 475 460 480 500 500 530 530 pH Value (pH U n i t s ) . . . . 8.2 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.1 8.3 8.2 8.1 8.1 8.1

Dec Avg

157 140

154 311 80 27 32 48 0.41 1.5 0.14

129 7.6 8.3

596 31 4 24

560 8.1

119 258 66 23 16 34 0.32 3.9 0.16

108 5.9 6.4

411 38 6 26

455 8.2

32 DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982 **

CHEMICAL RESULTS FROM DAILY ANALYSES AND MONTHLY COMPOSITE SAMPLES Milligrams Per Liter

(Except Where Units Are Indicated) Finished Water Dublin Road Water Plant-1982

Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov

T ( £ c 0 3 ) a i n i t y 34 55 41 34 40 21 24 33 44 40 36

P ( C a C o T l i n i t y - . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

XCdnbess(CaC03) 91 68 83 91 83 104 101 87 82 86 89 T((C^CO,r)dneSS 125 123 124 125 123 125 125 120 126 126 125 ciidum3^:::::::::::: 4 4 44 45 4o » 40 3 ? 35 u 29 34 SSKSW*::::::::» * 2? 1! 3 iS xl J ll 3 % Chloride(CI 44 29 27 32 37 35 38 42 42 43 43 Fluoride F) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.99 Nitrate m . . . . . . . . . . . 6.9 3.6 2.5 4.1 1.5 9.0 8.7 5.4 2.2 1.2 1.1 Total Phosphate (P04) .. 0.52 0.28 0.16 0.18 0.65 0.46 0 . 3 8 - 0 . 3 2 - 0.16 Sulfate ( S 0 4 ) . . . . . . . 98 88 89 86 122 101 133 207 144 159 178 Total Cations (meq/1) . . . 4.2 3.4 3.4 3.0 4.0 3.3 3.3 4.4 4.5 4.1 4.6 Total Anions (meq/1).... 4.6 4.1 3.7 3.7 4.6 4.2 5.0 6.6 5.3 5.5 5.8 Total Solids 181 215 238 265 158 300 342 369 358 331 188 Turbidity (NTU) 0.24 0.17 0.25 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.14 0.09 0.09 Silica (SiOj) 3 2 2 3 6 3 2 4 3 3 2 Color (Color Units) <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 Conductivity

(umhos/cm) 370 290 300 310 365 350 360 390 390 400 400 pH Value (pH Units) . . . . 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.8 7.7 7.8 7.9 7.8 7.6 7.9 8.0 Total THM's (ug/1) 36 38 29 49 68 64 101 79 74 75 63 Free Chlorine 1.20 1.10 0.96 0.87 1.00 1.10 1.30 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40

Dec Avg

46

80

37

87

126 36

9 69 47

0.99 1.3 0.22

192 5.5 6.4

381 0.15 1

<5

470 7.8

42 1.40

124 37

8 33 38

1.00 4.0

0.33 133

4.0 5.0

277 0.14 3

<5

366 7.8

60 1.22

0.1-a

COMPARATIVE MAXIMUM. MINIMUM & AVERAGE RESULTS OF HARDNESS Previous 10 Years 1973-1982

Dublin Road Water Plant Total Hardness Noncarbonate Hardness

mg/1 Raw Finished Raw

mg/1 Finished

Water Water Water Water Year max min ave max min ave max min 1973 365 154 250 141 92 110 145 56 1974 341 118 270 163 100 121 153 53 1975 351 89 266 158 104 126 153 36 1976 417 104 284 143 100 120 218 59 1977 399 165 296 181 94 124 171 77 1978 363 85 289 152 102 121 165 27 1979 356 94 276 187 57 124 187 38 1980 387 116 258 144 93 123 171 55 1981 396 142 294 145 104 124 203 65 1982 333 89 253 144 77 124 170 38

ave max min ave 95 103 53 79

111 127 59 93 116 127 34 92 124 104 76 77 137 122 31 79 116 107 49 81 127 156 1 85 106 110 1 69 134 112 2 86 119 113 16 87

TURBIDITY & VOLUME OF WATER PUMPED

Carbonate Hardness mg/1

Raw Finished Raw Water Water Wate

max min ave max min 220 81 155 55 211 54 160 53 200 53 150 79 210 73 160 79 229 77 159 97 222 58 173 103 222 55 149 125 216 52 152 96 215 77 160 109 175 51 140 81

18 17 17 25 21 16 15 19 14 16

ave max min 31 726 9 28 407 8 34 1156 7 43 802 4 45 354 2 40 178 4 39 678 6 54 1700 3 37 777 3 37 798 3

Turbidity Units

Finished r Watei ave max min 62 0 0 52 2.2 .06 66 1.1 .08 27 .91 .04 26 .67 .09 30 .40 .16 57 .49 .19 81 .75 .09 39 .85 .06 38 .61 .03

ave 0

.28

.22

.23

.21

.23 23 .19 16

.14

Raw Water

Finished Water

Average Average mgd 39.72 37.53 33.78 35.52 39.50 33.03 36.90 38.28 39.91 42.08

mgd

larlaiafl reroW i

>DD19V/l n

bpm 37.93 36.70 30.58 32.25 35.73 29.44 33.69

.

34.60 36.69 38.41

183.3E 1

CHEMICAL COSTS — 1982 Dublin Road Water Plant

Tons Cost Cost Per Chemical Used Per Ton mil gal Alum 1,559.35 $ 114.41 $11.61 Carbon 116.25 645.00 4.88 Ferric Sulphate — — 0 Carbon Dioxide (N.G.) 1,901.48 81.20 10.05 Carbon Dioxide (Liq) 720.74 53.05 2.50 Chlorine 274.19 167.50 2.99 Copper Sulphate 0 468.00 0 Fluoride 216.96 103.73 1.47 Hydrogen Peroxide 0 676.00 0 Lime 8,627.16 53.11 29.82 Natural Gas (mcf) 32,781.50 4.71 — Polyphosphate 4.08 783.87 0.21 Potassium Permanganate 15.00 1,881.03 184 Soda Ash 2,877.82 148.80 27.87 Sodium Chlorite 0.66 2,721.46 0 12 Sodium Hydroxide 69.20 161.43 0 73 Zinc Orthophosphate 221.64 349.80 5.05

Total Cost per Million Gallon $99 14 mcf = Thousand cu ft (N.G.) = Natural gas (Liq) = Liquid

Month

January . . . February .. March April May June July August September October November. December. Average . . .

DP/ISION OF WATER.

MAJOR TREATMENT CHEMICALS

Alum lbs per mil gal

284 425 492 225 133 175 108 150 100 133 150 158 211

mg/1 34 51 59 27 16 21 13 18 12 16 18 19 25

COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

APPLIED TO WATER DURING 1982 Dublin Road Water Plant

Lime lbs per mil gal

842 834

1,059 1,034 1,226 1,151

951 1,068 1,176 1,343 1,301 1,443 1,119

mg/1 101 100 127 124 147 138 114 128 141 161 156 173 134

Soda Ash lbs per mil gal

234 158 234 259 442 342 342 367 442 500 417 676 368

mg/1 28 19 28 31 53 41 41 44 53 60 50 81 44

Chlorine lbs per mil gal

37 45 41 30 30 44 40 37 36 31 29 32 36

mg/1 4.4 5.4 4.9 3.6 3.6 5.3 4.8 4.4 4.3 3.7 3.5 3.8 4.3

33

lbs per mil gal

6.7 6.7 6.8 6.3 6.6 6.1 5.8 5.8 5.9 5.9 6.2 6.3 6.3

mg/1 .80 .80 .81 .75 .79 .73 .69 .69 .71 .71 .74 .75 .76

Month avg max January 42.15 50.51 February 40.61 49.00 March 37.76 43.48 April 37,42 46.45 May 43.50 55.50 June 41.27 49.41 July 44.37 57.63 August 43.08 54.95 September 40.14 47.13 October 41.12 46.56 November 45.93 55.99 December 47.61 57.14 Ave for year — 42.08 Max Day of yr.. 57.63 Min Day of yr

DAILY PUMPING RATES Dublin Road Water Plant - 1982 Raw Water Pumping

mgd ping

m i n 33.57 31.86 31.03 31.32 30.46 33.66 31.05 30.94 31.66 35.54 37.33 35.42

Finished Water Pumping

avg 37.31 36.05 33.68 33.99 40.23 36.76 39.96 39.21 35.50 39.82 43.38 44.99 38.41

mgd max 41.27 40.38 36.74 38.30 49.53 40.48 50.20 48.99 40.15 43.33 50.17 51.66

nun 29.78 31.82 29.04 28.39 30.45 30.60 25.68 32.01 28.95 32.27 36.74 33.56

51.66 25.68

DUBLIN ROAD WATER PUMPAGE AND USAGE -Million Gallons

1982

Month Raw January 1,306.72 February 1,136.98 March 1,170.45 April 1,122.66 May 1,348.53 June 1,238.16 July 1,375.47 August 1,335.51 September 1,204.30 October 1,274.76 November 1,377.94 December 1,475.91 Total 15,367.39

Finished 1,156.50 1,009.48 1,044.20 1,019.80 1,247.16 1,102.81 1,238.64 1,215.43 1,065.10 1,234.28 1,301.53 1,394.81

14,029.74

Plant 47.00 41.66 32.76 26.31 24.75 33.67 34.16 44.66 39.33 34.65 34.64 32.87

426.46

Wash Water

Wash 5.09

12.86 9.92 6.66

11.95 7.02 8.71 6.00 3.80 6.37 6.59 5.96

90.93

Percent of Raw Water

0.39 1.06 0.85 0.60 0.82 0.56 0.71 0.47 0.29 0.50 0.48 0.39

Length Filter Runs Between

Washes

Hours 399 159 184 343 305 288 318 391 379 372 390 377

BOOSTER STATIONS MONTHLY PUMPAGE REPORT -Million Gallons

Dublin Road Water Plant

1982

January . . . February .. March April May June July August September October . . . November December Total

Ackerman Rd.

60 00 140 00 200.00

Big Run

43.83 39.40 44.64 41.44 43.21 40.43 38.77 44.80 40.86 39.93 41.97 41.13

500.41

Fisher

216.12 196.46 213.72 204.87 250.33 227.64 263.26 256.69 229.98 229.31 212.86 215.45

2,716.69

Joyce

— — — —

34.78 39.56 40.34 49.98 45.78 46.13 40.22 40.21

337.00

Mound

133.02 136.30 148.27 134.59 143.96 129.06 170.52 130.91 130.37 123.83 118.28 120.71

1,619.82

Star

1.53 2.10 1.03 5.38 9.10

.56 9.20 4.44

.17 — — —

33.51

Gantz

6.95

1.68

8.63

34 DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

ELECTRIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION Dublin Road Water Plant — 1982

Month

January . . . February .. March April May June July August September October . . . November. December. Total Avg/Month Avg/Day. . .

rnand kw

2976 2880 2650 2650 3216 3024 3216 3072 3792 3312 3744 3600

Kilowatt Hours Amount

1,608,000 $ 60,158.94 1,752,000 1,411,200 1,464,000 1,512,000 1,478,400 1,732,800 1,579,200 1,416,000 1,728,000 1,804,800 2,020,800

62,458.78 53,172.05 54,300.33 64,288.39 62,556.59 71,608.80 66,688.41 64,692.16 68,514.60 82,687.20 86,459.30

19,507,200 $797,585.55 1,625,600

54,187 66,465.46

2,215.52

Month Co?

January 3,786.40 February 3,189.80 March 2,834.90 April 1,958.70 May 2,354.90 June 2,268.40 July 1,929.10 August 1,846.60 September 2,491.90 October 2,746.00 November 3,228.00 December 4,146.80 Total 32,781.50

mcf = Thousand cu ft

NATURAL GAS USAGE — 1982 Dublin Road Water Plant

& Misc

3,266.60 3,068.20 3,325.10 1,948.30 1,027.10 1,108.60

584.90 869.40 927.10 782.00

2,280.00 2,632.20

21,819.50

Total mcf

7,053.00 6,258.00 6,160.00 3,907.00 3,382.00 3,377.00 2,514.00 2,716.00 3,419.00 3,528.00 5,508.00 6,779.00

54,601.00

Cost

$ 28,749.88 25,576.05 27,551.90 17,562.07 15,202.18 15,725.13 11,706.54 12,647.16 18,104.79 18,681.98 29,106.56 36,618.38

$257,232.62

Cost/mcf

$4.076262 4.086936 4.472711 4.495026 4.495027 4.656538 4.656539 4.656539 5.295346 5.295345 5.284415 5.401737

$4.711134 (Average)

RESULTS OF FREE RESIDUAL CHLORINE TESTING Dublin Road Water Plant — 1982

milligrams per liter

No. of Samples

January 31 February 28 March 31 April 30 May 31 June 30 July 31 August 31 September 30 October 31 November 30 December 31 Average 30

Finished Water

Max Min Avg No. of

Samples

Distribution System

Max Min Avg

Percent Less Than

0.2 1.5 1.4 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4

1.1 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.1

1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.2

112 95

152 107 128 103 132 134 100 115 131 118 119

1.18 1.05 1.17 0.82 1.48 1.08 1.37 1.20 1.37 1.30 1.29 1.26 1.22

0.03 0.03 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.05 0.04

0.73 0.68 0.61 0.56 0.55 0.51 0.59 0.69 0.68 0.72 0.83 0.80 0.67

7 5 3 4 8

18 17 11

5 11 7 8 9

II

DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 35

THRESHOLD ODOR VALUES SCIOTO RIVER SYSTEM—1982

O'Shaughnessy Griggs Raw Water Raw Water Dublin Rd. Water Plant Near #5 Shelter Near Intake Finished

Date Barrels House Barrels Dam Water

2 3 7 3 6 6 4 6 8 4 6

5-4 5-6 5-10 5-13 5-17 5-24 5-27 6-9 6-14 6-17 6-24 6-28 7-1 7-8 7-12 7-14 7-19 7-21 7-26 7-28 8-2 8-4 8-9 8-11 8-16 8-18 9-1 9-8 9-15 9-20 9-22 9-27 9-29

10-4 10-6 10-13 10-18 10-20 10-25 10-27 11-1 11-3

3 3

3

3 6

6 6 8

10 12 12 10

7

6

6

12

12 8

10 12

10

8

8 3

8

4

6

3 6

10 10 12 12 10 10

8

8

12

10

8

10 12 12 12 7 7

12 6

12 12 10 12 10 12 10 10 12 6 8 5 6 6 6 3 6 6 4 4 3 4

RESULTS OF BACTERIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION* Dublin Road Water Plant—1982

,;i M | B-l Ml fAi •Ai M| t\.< & rA: I >VI| ,0 •A1

M o n t h

January February March April May June July August September October November December Average

Fecal Coliform Raw Water

Numerical avg 100 ml

220 1353 342 165 60

508 421

81 94 25

251 167 307.25

Geometric avg/100 ml

186 1020 275 142 48

315 206

48 79 13

105 139 214.67

Finished Water Number

of Samples

31 28 31 30 31 29 31 31 30 29 30 31 30.17

No. oi Positive Samples

<1 <1 <1 <1 <1

1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

0.083

Total Coliform Distribution System

Number of

Samples 119 100 158 111

**133 **100 **132 "142 **107 **114 **130 **119

122.08

No. of Positive Samples

2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

0.33

Numerical avg 100 ml

0.09 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

0.004 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

0.008

'Utilizing Membrane Filter Technique "Test Run At P.A.W.P.

36 DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

Date 5-4 5-6 5-10 5-13 5-17 5-20 5-24 5-27 6-9 6-14 6-16 6-23 6-24 6-28 7-1 7-8 7-12 7-14 7-19 7-21 7-26 7-28 8-2 8-4 8-9 8-11 8-16 8-18 8-23 8-25 9-1 9-8 9-13 9-15 9-20 9-22 9-27 9-29

10-4 10-6 10-11 10-12 10-18 10-20 10-25 10-27 11-1 11-3

O'Shaughnessy Dam at Barrels plankton

phyto zoo

320

80 1,760

'Counts per 25 gallon samples

LW WATER PLANKTON COUNTS* Scioto River System—1982

Griggs

#5 Shelter House plankton

phyto

560

320 240

80

3,100 18,720

365,240 4,080

160 1,040

400

4,640

960

1,200

1,840 1,360

zoo

2,320

2,080 720

—

800 1,520

720 560

80 320

1,520

320

5,440

9,760

880 5,360

Dam

at Barre s plankton

phyto 1,840 1,680

720

560 240

160 80 80

480 960

11,200 76,220 25,200

720 320

320

3,360

1,360

1,920

1,040 1,120

25,280

17,440

2,720

640

1,040

24,560

6,400

8,240

8,480

zoo 240

3,040

2,720

1,040 240

160 80

240 — 320

80 — 160 — 240

1,280

320

6,000

9,280

560 8,920 3,600

3,680

80

1,920

160

1,900

1,120

2,880

1,040

Intake Dam

at Plant plankton

phyto 880

12,060 6,040 1,760

560 480 400 480

80 480 640

80 160

9,280 400

3,200 31,600 84,640

480 5,600

920 1,120 3,440 9,120

560 880

2,760 160

5,600 320

2,880 10,760 10,880 8,640

18,080 6,720 1,920

10,000 6,240 2,320 1,680 2,240 6,560 6,560

800 5,200 3,280 5,760

zoo 80

240 2,880

240 240

80 800 — 80

80 — 240 — 640 — 560 160 — 160 80

400 560

1,280 1,600 2,320 2,640

80 1,680

160 1,920

640 2,560 4,880

720 320 240 240 400

80 2,320 1,120 1,280

960

400 480 320

1982 CONSUMER COMPLAINTS Dublin Road Water Plant

68 Rusty Water 61 Odor

2 Color 1 Cloudy

DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 37

Row Water

CHEMICAL RESULTS

Jan

FROM DAILY ANALYSES AND MONTHLY COMPOSITE SAMPLES Milligrams Per Liter

(Except Where Units Are Indicated) Morse Road Water Plant—1982

Total Alkalinity (CaC03) .108 Noncarbonate

Hardness (CaC03) 79 Total Hardness (CaC03) . 187 Calcium (Ca) 49 Magnesium (Mg) 16 Sodium (Na) 15 Chloride (CI) 24 Fluoride (F) — Nitrate (N) 3.3 Total Phosphate (P) — Sulfate (S0 4) 59.9 Total Cations (meq/1) . . . 4.41 Total Anions (meq/1) 4.32 Total Solids 310 Turbidity (NTU) 29 Silica (SiOz) 14.4 Color (Pt-Co Color Units) 55 Conductivity (umhos/cm) 380 pH Value (pH U n i t s ) . . . . 7.9

Feb

84

74 158 42 13 11 20 — 2.9

53.2 3.65 3.56

290 45 18.0 109 350 7.7

Mar

80

71 151 39 13 12 18 — 2.9

49.4 3.55 3.35

280 67 14.8 107 330 7.7

Apr 71

62 133 34 12 9 16 — 2.7

44.8 3.08 2.99

260 42 12.4 104 300 7.8

May 75

63 138 36 12 9 16 — 2.3

45.6 3.18 3.06

250 17 7.6 51 310 7.9

June

80

63 143 37 12 9 16 — 2.2

44.6 3.23 3.14

260 26 12.4 56 310 7.8

July

88

65 153 41 13 8 17 — 2.3

55.1 3.47 3.55

270 26 18.4 58 320 7.7

Aug 97

67 164 43 14 9 17 0.19 1.2

58.1 3.69 3.72

270 17 16.0 33 330 7.8

Sept

103

67 170 45 14 11 19 0.19 1.2

57.9 3.88 3.89

280 35 18.4 39 370 7.9

Oct 107

70 177 46 15 8 20 0.19 0.9

56.8 3.88 3.95

280 16 9.2 34 370 7.9

Nov 106

74 180 46 16 12 21 0.19 0.7

58.9 4.13 3.97

300 27 8.4 51 380 8.0

Dec 104

80 184 45 17 13 21 0.19 1.8

62.4 4.21 4.11

310 33 11.2 68 390 8.0

Avg 92

69 162 42 14 10 19 0.19 1.9

53.9 3.70 3.63

280 32 13.4 64 340 7.8

Finished Water

CHEMICAL RESULTS FROM DAILY ANALYSES AND MONTHLY COMPOSITE SAMPLES Milligrams Per Liter

(Except Where Units Are Indicated) Morse Road Water Plant—1982

Jan Feb 39

0

88 127 33 11 7 23 1.0 2.8 0.05

64.7 2.86 3.03

250 0.2 3.2 0

320 7.6 53.6 1.5

Mar 35

0

83 118 30 11 9 21 0.9 2.8 0.05

61.7 2.80 2.83

240 0.3 2.4 0

300 7.9 51.9 1.6

Apr 41

0

76 117 32 10 6 19 1.0 2.7 0.06 56.1 2.69 2.77

230 0.3 1.6 0

290 7.8

1.8

May

39

0

75 114 31 8 8 19 1.0 2.4 0.12 52.5 2.55 2.64

220 0.2 4.0 0

280 7.7

71.7 1.7

June

43

0

74 117 32 9 9 19 1.1 2.2 0.14 53.2 2.73 2.74

220 0.3 2.8 0

280 7.9 — 1.7

July

37

0

77 114 31 9 9 19 0.9 2.1 0.10 62.2 2.68 2.78

220 0.3 4.0 0

270 7.6 63.3 1.7

Aug 37

0

73 110 30 9 9 19 1.1 1.2 0.29 61.2 2.63 2.72

210 0.2 4.4 0

280 7.8 — 1.7

Sept

38

0

73 111 28 10 9 21 1.0 1.0 0.55 61.7 2.62 2.81

220 0.3 5.2 0

280 7.7

98.6 1.8

Oct 43

0

74 117 27 12 10 22 1.0 0.9 0.15 68.3 2.78 3.03

230 0.3 2.8 0

280 7.8 71.5 1.7

Nov 46

0

80 126 29 13 11 23 1.0 0.7 0.10 58.4 3.01 2.90

250 0.3 2.0 0

300 7.9 75.3 1.8

Dec 44

0

84 128 29 14 15 24 1.0 1.2 0.04 70.3 3.26 3.16

260 0.2 4.4 0

310 8.1 — 1.7

Avg 40

0

79 119 30 11 10 21 1.0 1.9 0.14 61.2 2.82 2.88

230 0.3 3.5 0

290 7.8 68.2 1.7

Total Alkalinity (CaC03) . 42 Phenol

Alkalinity (CaC03) . . . . 0 Noncarbonate

Hardness (CaC03) 85 Total Hardness (CaC03). 127 Calcium (Ca) 29 Magnesium (Mg) 13 Sodium (Na) 16 Chloride (CD 24 Fluoride (F) 1.0 Nitrate (N) 3.2 Total Phosphate (P) 0.05 Sulfate (S0 4) 64.7 Total Cations (meq/1) . . . 3.21 Total Anions (meq/1) 3.15 Total Solids 250 Turbidity (NTU) 0.4 Silica (SiOJ 4.8 Color (Pt-Co Color Units) 0 Conductivity (umhos/cm) 330 pH Value (pH U n i t s ) . . . . 7.8 Total THM's (ug/1) 59.3 Free Chlorine 1.4

COMPARATIVE. MAXIMUM. MINIMUM & AVERAGE RESULTS OF HARDNESS. TURBIDITY & VOLUME OF WATER PUMPED Ten Previous Years 1973—1982

Morse Road Water Plant

mg/1

Water Water Year Max Min Avg Max Min Avg 1973 184 145 164 112 90 99 1974 164 148 157 116 103 109 1975 156 137 148 108 97 102 1976 203 105 165 127 100 112 1977 227 127 176 217 101 118 1978 167 144 156 113 100 105 1979 154 129 144 122 103 111 1980 187 133 154 129 85 105 1981 174 154 166 117 104 109 1982 198 120 162 148 106 121

Noncarbonate Hardness

i

Max 78 65 58 71 94 67 61 75 69 75

mg/1

Hater Min 48 61 52 61 23 58 53 45 63 66

Finished Water

Avg Max Min Avg 61 79 57 67 62 54 65 69 62 58 59 66 70

75 72 84 94 73 75 90 77 88

76 71 75 69 68 70 53 73 76

78 72 78 80 70 72 72 74 81

Carbonate Hardness mg/1

Raw Finished Water Water

Raw

Turbidity NTU

Water Max Min Avg Max Min Avg Max Min Avg 98 91 95 38 27 31 1100 6 57 87 95 75 34 28 99 85 95 37 26 119 85 100 39 30 140 74 107 123 22 101 93 93 39 31 92 76 86 47 33 117 79 95 49 20 105 90 99 40 30 119 54 92 60 30

31 30 34 38 3b 39 33 35 40

346 12 246 22 740 3 784 1 325 9 1100 9 700 6 329 11 470 9

43 42 2b 32 19 45 29 33 32

Finished Water

Max Min 2.5 0 1.0 0 .6 0 1.5 .1 .7 0 .5 .2 .7 .1 1.0 .1 .6 .2 .8 .06

Avg .3 .2 .1 .& .3

.3

.3

.4

.3

Raw Water

Finished Water

Average Average mgd

67.9 70.9 73.5 75.8 78.1 79.7 76.2 77.0 78.7 82.5

mgd

63.9 67.7 69:9

73.1 73.4 69.6 69.0 70.9 76.3

38 DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

CHEMICAL COSTS—1982 Morse Road Water Plant

Tons Cost Chemical Used Per Ton Alum 1929.5 $114.17 Carbon Dioxide (N.G.) 496.6 81.79 Carbon Dioxide (Liq) 1905.2 53.38 Chlorine 411 166.83 Fluoride 506.5 103.70 Lime 8614.6 54.68 Natural Gas (mcf) 8636 mcf 4.70/mcf Polyphosphate Soda Ash 34 136.65 Zinc Or thophospha te 447.3 353.89

Total Cost Per Million Gallon mcf = Thousand cu ft. (N.G.) = Natural gas (Liq) = Liquid

Cost Per mil gal

$ 7.31 1.35 3.38 2.27 1.74

15.63

0.15 5.25

$37.08

MAJOR TREATMENT CHEMICALS APPLIED TO WATER DURING—1982

Alum lbs per

Month mil gal mg/1 January 94 11 February 186 22 March 173 21 April 174 21 May 142 17 June 116 14 July 125 15 August 73 9 September 58 7 October 48 6 November 85 10 December 125 15 Average 116 14

Morse Road Water Plant Chlorine

lbs per mil gal

25 28 29 28 28 27 26 27 28 26 25 26 26

mg/1 3.0 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.2

Fluor lbs per mil gal

7.1 7.2 7.2 8.1 7.7 7.8 6.3 7.1 7.5 6.7 6.4 6.1 7.1

de

mg/1 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.9

Lime lbs per mil gal

652 548 532 464 501 501 534 579 587 599 567 583 554

mg/1 78 66 64 56 60 60 64 69 70 72 68 70 66

Liquid C 0 2

lbs per mil gal

139 136 122 131 118 120 103 98 94 95 99

109 114

mg/1 17 16 15 16 14 14 12 12 11 11 12 13 14

Soda Ash lbs per mil gal

50 50

mg/1

6.0 6.0

Zinc lbs per mil gal

13 13 13 15 41 37 36 37 38 39 38 19 28

mg/1 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.8 4.9 4.4 4.3 4.4 4.6 4.7 4.6 2.3 3.4

Horn a. i

DAILY PUMPING RATES Morse Road Water Plant—1982

Raw Water Pumping Finished Water Pumping mgd mgd

Month avg max min avg max min January 79.52 February 80.36 March 77.41 April 78.41 May 83.49 June 84.56 July 102.54 August 98.56 September 88.07 October 79.56 November 71.82 December 65.70 Avg for year . . . 82.50 Max Day of yr . Min Day of yr. .

90.46 86.21 83.39 85.33

102.00 96.52

124.02 116.77 103.06 89.13 90.62 79.96

68.00 70.33 70.70 66.83 67.77 74.85 80.90 82.40 74.48 71.75 58.50 52.08

72.94 72.20 70.51 72.75 83.33 78.92 93.88 87.99 80.18 76.50 64.79 61.55

77.16 74.72 80.79 79.47

101.17 88.26

110.40 104.49 88.56 81.55 73.61 74.21

63.51 69.67 64.37 67.02 70.91 72.72 74.26 79.47 72.50 68.52 52.71 52.25

124.02 76.29

52.08 110.40

52.25

DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982 39

WATER PUMPAGE AND USAGE Morse Road Water Plant—1982

Million Gallons

Month Raw

January 2,465.31 February 2,250.19 March 2,399.57 April 2,352.47 May 2,588.21 June 2,536.84 July 3,173.82 August 3,055.27 September 2,642.14 October 2,466.43 November 2,154.57 December 2,036.62

Total 30,121.44 Average 2,510.12 Maximum 3,173.82 Minimum 2,036.62 Max Day of yr 124.02 Min Day of yr 52.08 Avg Day of yr 82.50

BOOSTER STATION PUMPAGE—1982 Million Gallons

Finished 2,261.32 2,021.72 2,185.98 2,182.78 2,583.28 2,368.41 2,910.43 2,727.69 2,405.25 2,260.65 1,943.64 1,908.26

27,759.41 2,313.28 2,910.43 1,908.26

110.40 52.25 76.29

Plant 35.36 30.41 34.97 33.75 35.25 34.08 35.13 34.99 33.99 35.21 33.93 35.19

412.26 34.36 35.36 30.41

Wash Water

Wash

35.00 31.28 35.27 32.70 34.16 32.98 34.59 33.61 33.56 33.30 34.26 34.83

405.54 33.80 35.27 31.28

Percent of Total

Pumpage

1.42 1.39 1.47 1.39 1.32 1.30 1.09 1.10 1.27 1.35 1.59 1.71

1.37 1.71 1.09

Length of Filter Runs

Between Washes

Hours

71 72 72 71 72 72 73 74 73 72 72 71

72 74 71

Cleveland Month Ave

J a n u a r y . . . . 487.35 F e b r u a r y . . . 466.30 March 517.36 April 530.80 May 655.62 June 603.32 July 746.41 August 658.60 S e p t e m b e r . 586.71 O c t o b e r . . . . 572.71 November . . 534.87 December . . 537.95

Total 6,898.00

•Estimated

Henderson Road

158.85 142.35 148.79 122.87 162.39 123.17 227.83 168.03 112.06 92.92 82.87 86.91

Morrison Road

93.71 *87.48 93.90 93.47 110.98 99.72 101.41 102.35 90.86 87.56 82.34 80.52

Morse Road

*39.72 *37.80 *35.49 *80.00

•140.00 131.72 196.21 168.61 35.49 30.71 37.80 39.72

Smokey Row Road

*9.12 *7.99 •8.92 *9.87

*12.10 *11.14 27.32 27.40 14.17

*15.31 16.23 18.09

1,629.04 1,124.30 973.27 177.66

ELECTRIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION Morse Road Water Plant—1982

Demand Kilowatt Month KW Hours Cost

January 4688 2,272,200 $ 89,033.33 February 4688 2,251,200 88,601.72 March 4688 2,272,200 89,033.33 April 4688 2,209,200 87,671.83 May 4832 2,326,800 91,735.88 June 4688 2,423,400 99,339.58 July 5842 2,738,400 120,286.85 August 6205 3,099,600 131,932.27 September 4964 2,465,800 105,885.84 October 4964 2,209,200 91,887.42 November 3798 1,911,000 83,630.21 December 3743 2,007,600 85,586.20

Total 28,186,600 $1,164,624.46 Avg/Month 2,348,883 97,052.03 Avg/Day 77,223 $ 3,190.75

NATURAL GAS USAGE Morse Road Water Plant—1982

Month Co2

January 0 February 0 March 0 April 409 May . 1,000 June 981 July 989 August 969 September 1,046 October 1,274 November 1,182 December 786

Total 8,636

mcf Thousand cu ft

Heat & Misc

3,312 3,217 2,830 1,216

0 0

16 0

72 339

1,679 1,725

14,406

Total mcf

3,312 3,217 2,830 1,625 1,000

981 1,005

969 1,118 1,613 2,861 2,511

23,042

Cost $ 13,614.84

13,224.31 12,720.93 7,304.43 4,495.03 4,568.06 4,679.82 4,512.19 5,920.20 8,541.39

15,149.99 13,641.87

$108,373.06

Cost/mcf $4.11

4.11 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.66 4.66 4.66 5.30 5.30 5.30 5.43

$4.75 (Average)

40 DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

RESULTS OF FREE RESIDUAL CHLORINE TESTING Morse Road Water Plant—1982

milligrams per liter

January . . . February .. March April May June July August September October November. December. Average

No. of Samples

297 282 311 299 304 299 305 304 289 299 292 308 299

Finished Water

Max

2.0 1.7 2.2 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 1.9 2.1 1.9 2.0

Min

1.3 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.6 1.5 1.4

Avg

1.4 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.7

No. of Samples

241 229 274 266 248 266 238 276 253 229 245 252 251

Distr

Max

1.8 2.0 1.9 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.3 1.9 2.3 1.7 2.0

bution Si

Min

.1

.1

.2

.2

.2

.1

.1

.2

.2

.2

.1

.1

.2

rstem

Avg

.9

.9 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0

.9 1.0

Percent Less Than

0.2

2.9 2.2 0 0 0

0.8 0.4 0 0 0

0.4 0.8 0.6

trie and'

!

RESULTS OF BACTERIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION Morse Road Water Plant—1982

Fecal Coliform Raw Water

Total Coliform

Numerical Geometric Month avg 100 ml avg 100 ml

January 156 February 194 March 73 April 94 May 54 June 390 July 260 August 200 September 290 October 210 November 280 December 35 Average 186

•Utilizing Membrane Filter Technique

Finished Water Number

of Samples

16 15 18 17 16 17 15 18 17 16 16 16 16

No. of Positive Samples

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Distribution Sys Number

of Samples

246 233 295 273 254 277 243 279 271 253 259 256 262

Percent Positive Samples

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.9 0 0 0 0 .24

em

Numerical avg/100 ml

<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1

.04

ImOOH

Date

5-19 5-26 6-2 6-9 6-16 6-23 6-30 7-7 7-21 7-29 8-26 9-2 9-9 9-16 9-23 9-30

10-14 11-4 Avg.

County Line Bridge Planktor

Phyto

0 160 160 80 80

400 720 160 880

80 1840 1760 1200 400 560 160 240

80 498

i

Zoo

2360 2080

640 800 400

80 320 400 240 240 400 320 320 240 160 80

400 240 540

RAW WATER PLANKTON COUNTS' Big Walnut Creek System—1982

Hoover Reservoir West Center of Basin Dam at Spillway

Plankton Plankton Phyto Zoo Phyto

•Counts per 25 gallon samples

0 0

240 0

80 240 320 160

1280 240

1120 3600

640 560

80 240 240 480 529

3920 3360 2160

880 800 160 240 240

6720 640 480 560

80 720 720

0 960 320

1276

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

800 720 320

1680 2400

320 80

160 80 80 80

373

way

Zoo

2960 3680 1360 1280 1120

80 80

160 3040 1680 960 160

0 1200 240

80 640 240

1053

Morse Road Water Plant Intake

Plankton Phyto

0 240 160 240 480

80 880 880 480

0 80

160

320 —

360 —

0 291

Zoo

0 160

0 240

80 160

0 0

400 0

160 0

240 — — —

0 103

tnnN ii

ooS

DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 41

1982 CONSUMER COMPLAINTS During 1982, 236 complaints were received at the Morse

Road Water Plant. Color complaints were received of which 151 were rusty. This, in turn, resulted in 74 loads of rust stained clothes Taste Odor Particles Low pressure Water tested Illness

155

31 16 16 4

13 1

ODOR TEST—BIG WALNUT CREEK SYSTEM—1982

Date

5-19 5-26 6-2 6-9 6-16 6-23 6-30 7-7 7-21 7-29 8-26 9-2 9-9 9-16 9-23 9-30

10-14

CL FT M

Hoover Reservoir County

Line Bridge

M-FT M-FT M-N M-SL M-FT M-FT M-FT M-FT M-FT M-N M-FT M-FT M-N M-N M-N M-FT M-N

West Center

oi Basin M-FT M-FT M-FT M-SL M-FT M-FT M-FT M-FT M-FT M-FT M-N M-N M-N M-N M-N M-N M-N

CHLORINE FAINT MUSTY

Dam at

Spillway M-FT M-FT M-FT M-SL M-N M-FT M-FT M-FT M-FT M-FT F-N F-N M-N M-N M-FT M-N M-N N SL H

Morse Road Water Plant

Raw Water Intake

M-N M-N M-FT M-FT M-FT M-FT M-N M-N M-N M-SL M-N M-N M-N M-N M-N M-N M-N

Finished Water

CL-N CL-N CL-N CL-N CL-FT CL-N CL-N CL-N CL-N CL-FT CL-N CL-N CL-N CL-N CL-N CL-N CL-N

NORMAL SLIGHT HEAVY

42 DIVISION OF WATER, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

O K

DUiz

tunipog

."•MIS

.AjriDjaj-j

.PD31

OOJI

jaddo-3

# nmitnpD^

.u imjDg

uinuiuiniy

# eidaii>S i a M

pw«a

T*<COCOOC001'^ ,uOirt'<J*OlT*r'C00001 f c - H H i N H O H O O H O H H r l N

c J o o o o o o ' o ^ 0 0 0 0 0 ^

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V

t N N N N N t N C N ' N N N ' N t N t N t N ' N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V

N N t N N N t N C M N ' M N l N M C M ' N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V ( N t M M N N t N M N M ' M ' N N ' N ^ N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o o o o o o o p p o p p p p p O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V m*->mmmom>-ir-«t~'<roimcico O H O O O i O H M C N H H O O r t H O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o o o o o o o p o o p p o p o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V V V V

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V V V V V V V V V V V V V V

COOCOOOCOO'^-<}'fMCOir5'M-«rOtM H - D O M N t - H N H H O - H N C O H O O p O p - - H O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

COt-O'M'^O-MOOOl'^t'TfOOlXMtO ocor-TiMtro*-<---oo--H--<oo--*o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

1^M-^l^cTN--H---v-lf-H^-l^--f-41-g-—'!—I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

V V V V V

^!23 — *^cooooo--Hooo>co*-HCoos O O p p O p O O — ' O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ocooiOt-Hcgcoirscot^oooioco"*^ Wt***3C'*3'-*J*;^T* , ' 'Tj<Tf'-^T**<T*r' '**t«U^<-*0'^ COCOCOCOCOCDCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCO

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

-"5 3*3

c

•§fs| o

as

5?

2 . B ^ 2 l l CU^ OJS u cu o O B J 3

0JJMMC1O

S E E S

1 3 2 i_

'S 1*3:11

b i ox acty)

s s s s 0 0

0 0

nil " i s 7 3 S3 b. CO cox: •aSPQUU

fi

DIVISION OF WATER, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982 43

0 U I 2

a m i p o g

" • M I S

AjriDJ3[Aj

P D 9 1

n o J j

j s d d o Q

m n i r a p D Q

n i n u D g

o t u a s j y

u i n u T o i n j y

# aidraoe -m^

M»uow

w N n n o o o n e o o o o ) *^t^cN-^'*'rjHTr*<j'tr»T}'**t''**r*—« o o o o o o o o o o o o

01 •—i >—i •—< c*5 a i O) m t o co co a i co CO *M CN •—< (N •—< >-H "»« * ^ CO "••J*" CO —

o o o o o o o o o o o o O O O O O O O O O O O O

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o v v v v v v v v v v v v o o o o o o o o o o o o O O O O O O O O O O O O o o o o o o o o o o o o v v v v v v v v v v v N N C v l N C N N M M N N N N o o o o o o o o o o o o p p p p o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o w w w v w w Loirt^*r^Mc*-icN*^riOMintrq o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

W W V V • — i t - c - i n c ^ i r t L t o c o m i O L o c o • — l O T f O O O O O O O O O o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

W V V V

o o o o o o o o o o o o V V V V V V V V V V V V mm*pmmmmcommmco o o m o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o V V V V W

c o - t - o - N t N i O T f t N O T r m o i 0 O O O 0 0 O - - H 1 - I O O O o o o p p o o p p p o p o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o V V V V V V V V V V V V

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o V V V V V V V V V V V V

o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o V V V V V V • < J " ^ 0 0 L O C O C ^ M < N - - ' - - < - - H * - ; 0 , 1 , 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

o o o o o o o o o o o o "

i — i t N C O ' t i O C O r - C O O l O r - " tM C— t— t— C—t—C—C—C—C— COCOCO

tococococococococoococo o o o o o o o o o o o o

= al « ajS iq "^ 3 aj o o <u

££§

DUIZ

u i n t p o g

J3A[IS

m m u a j a g

IasP*N

AjnDjajAj

9S3UD6UDJ.J

p D e q

n o j ]

j a d d o Q

u i n i u i o j i { 3

u m i t a p D Q

u z n i J D g

o i u e s j y

u i n u i i u n i v

# a j d n i D S T U M

t r t i ^ i n i n i n i n L O i O L f s i o t o i o p p p p o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o W V W V V V V W

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o p o o p p p p o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o V V V V V V V V V V V V CNtNlN'NCNCN'N-N-NN'NiM

O O O O O O O O O O O O p o o p p p p o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o V V V V V V V V V V V V COOCOCOCgcOCNCMCNCqeNCO O'-'^ooooooooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

V v w w cor-c^'«*lt

,coco(N*(t,cgcg'**rc^ O O . - HOO—:*-iOOOOO o o o o o o o o o o o o p p o o p p p o o o o p o o o o o o o o o o o o

V V o r - c o c q o en co-—•*••»< I T S ' * ** i n i n o o i n ^ c o c o c o ' ^ c N M c o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

* * * , c o t r - - - i - - t i r 5 M t > j c o - - ' [ > o O O O O O O O O O O O t M o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

W V

• t i o o n o t N o o o o o o

T r c o c o ' ^ c o c o c o ' ^ r ' o c o c o c o n O - H r H O C N - i - H C O O H t -o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

w*-'0>0'*,cococgcocoini>

_-_,f--q---0'-<000000

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

V W W W V

o o o o o o o o o o o o

0 0 - - " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o C O O O ( D C O O ' * C N - * 1 " t t , N O O O l O O C O p T j - C O r r - ^ i O C O

6 - H M » d o * - i 6 H o 6 n r-ir-id

m c o [ r - c o o o - - H t M c o ' * m c o O I O J O O O O O O O O O O COCOCOCOCDOt—E—r— C- c— t—

o o o o o o o o o o o o

i^cSoll

44 DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

Uco blcn

w o .

is US

So O H

JiSO

is l o UPS 3 U 05H U <

sag

30!Z

mnipog

tuniua |OS

AjnojofAj

asauDBuDiAj

PD«1

noJl

j e d d o Q

umi rao j i iQ

u m i u i p D ^

tunuDg

Diaasjv

iunui iun[V

# aiduiDS -m^v

• > m i r t t N t - O J i > r t O - H r t i r t O r H r H - H l N - H t N m * ^ M « * - ;

o o o o o o o o o o o o

cot—ascocooooioo-—* io

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o O O O O O O O O O O O O o o o o o o o o o o o o V V V V V V V V V V V V

• N C N t N t N O C N W t N C N t N W t N o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o V V V V V V V V V V V V

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o V V V V V V V V V V V V

• N M M t N C N t N N N t N ' N t N ' N O O O O O O O O O O O O o o o o o o o o o o o o O O O O O O O O O O O O o o o o o o o o o o o o

V V V V V V V V V V V V i>-ininLfscoioo>oinoocO'«r O O O O O O O O O O - — ' - — • • — < o o o o o o o o o o o o O O O O O O O O O O O O o o o o o o o o o o o o " V V

o o o o o o o o o o o o V V V V V V V V V V V V

mmcommmmcommmto o o o o o o o c o o o o o p p p p o p p p p p o p o o o o o o o o o o o o

W W V V

coM * coogcoco*r*3cocoM o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o

V V V V V V V V V V V V

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

V V V V V V V V V V V V

o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o V V V V V V V

o o o o o o o o o o o o

co-*mcor-cooo--HtNco-**t< cococococococoa iooo io i cococoococococococococo o o o o o o o o o o o o

oaiz

m m p o g

u in iuajag

I<"P!N

3SGUD6UDI*J

PD91

nojj

JGddOQ

mmnxoiio

u i n i L u p o ^

uiniJDcj

LunuTiunjY

H»aoW

o o o o o o o o o o o o V V V W V V V V V V

m—•MOSO1OJ00OJ-—<OOC*-JCO

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o p p o p p p o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o V V V V V V V V V V V V

t N N t N N N N C N N N N t N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o o o o o o o o o o o o

V V V V V V V V V V V V M O - f i t N t N N N N t N I N M t N © • - • O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V W W V V V V V •NtNtNtNtNMCNNM CNN O O O O O O O O O . O O O O O O O O O O O * , o o o o o o o o o o o I o o o o o o o o o o o ' o o W V V V V V V V V V

i>cO' j ,* t fCM<cocomco** 1 ' m m m i n - t t D c o i r t o j c o i f i m o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o W V V V V V V V W

OC0L0rrr-OC0Lf5C0if5O"2 O f j i * > o r - T f * * t a j n c o c 3 i c ?

m c o o o o - t ^ c - r - c o c o c o m O O — ' O O O O O O O O O o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

NCOC^CO--HCNCO-****«C^CO*-"<*N o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

I-H,_,,_,,_,,_,,_,,_|,_IC^---H----'--* O O O O O O O O O O O O o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o V W V V V VVV

o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o p p p o o o p p p p p p o o o o o o o o o o o o

N m M n - H c g N r - t N - H t N t N

i > c o a o * - i N « - i , i n t D i > c o 000--H--H--H--H--H--H--H--H--H c— c-c-c- c-c- c-r-t— r - r - c-o o o o o o o o o o o o e.D t- ^ d _ M a*j > CJ

I t 'J

1-4

a U

•

> P S

DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 45

Date 01/20 01/27 02/12 02/24 03/10 03/24 04/07 04/21 05/06 05/19 06/02 06/16 06/30 07/'/«3 08/12 08/25 09/08 09/23 10/06 10/20 11/04 11/17 12/01 12/15 12/29

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

0.9 1.1 0.7 0.9 1.3 1.4 1.0 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.3 1.1 4.2 1.2 1.1

<0.2 0.7 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 1.3

Table 6. NUTRIENT ANALYSIS (mg/L) OF SCIOTO RIVER WATER

AT THE DUBLIN ROAD PLANT INTAKE. 1982.

Ammonia <0.2

0.3 0.2

<0.3 0.3 0.2

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

0.3 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Nitrite 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.05 0.02 0.03 0.20 0.10 0.03

<0.02 <0.02

0.02 0.02

<0.02 <0.02

<0.02 <0.02 <0.02

0.02 0.05

Nitrate 7.5 4.4 2.7 2.1 3.1 4.2 4.1 4.9 3.1 1.9 8.9 8.3

12.0 7.0 4.1 2.4 2.1 1.5 1.2 1.1* 0.9 0.7 0.9 2.1

Total Phosphorus

0.3 0.3

<0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

0.3

Ortho Phosphorus

0.17 0.13 0.10 0.14 0.16 0.07 0.13 0.07 0.11

<0.02 0.13 0.02

— —

<0.02 <0.02

0.02 0.04 0.02

— 0.02

<0.02 <0.02

0.05 0.07

*Nitrate + Nitrate

Table 7. NUTRIENT ANALYSIS (mg/L) OF GRIGG'S RESERVOIR

NEAR GRIGG'S DAM. 1982.

Date 01/20 01/27 02/12 02/24 03/10 03/24 04/07 04/21 05/06 05/19 06/02 06/16 06/30 07/23 08/12 08/25 09/08 09/23 10/06 10/20 11/04 11/17 12/01 12/15 12/29

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

1.3 1.1 0.8 1.0 1.7 1.6 1.0 0.6 0.6 1.1 1.3 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.8 0.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 1.0 0.9 1.0

•Nitrate + Nitrate

Ammonia <0.2

0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

0.3 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

0.3 <0.2

0.2 <0.2

0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

0.2

Nitrite 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.23 0.14 0.08 0.05 0.04 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.06

0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.05

Nitrate 7.7 4.1 2.7 2.0 3.2 3.9 4.2 4.8 3.4 1.9

10.6 8.7

13.9 8.1 4.0 3.1 2.5 1.8 1.2 1.1* 1.2 1.0 0.9 2.3

Total Phosphorus

0.4 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.3

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

0.2 <0.2 <0.2

0.2

Ortho Phosphorus

0.20 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.29 0.13 0.11 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.14 0.19 0.13

— 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.07 0.02

— 0.02

<0.02 0.02 0.10 0.06

46 DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

Table 8. NUTRIENT ANALYSIS (mg/L) OF SCIOTO RIVER

AT STATE ROUTE 257 AND 1-270.

Date 01/20 01/27 02/12 02/24 03/10 03/24 04/07 04/21 05/06 05/19 06/02 06/16 06/30 07/23 08/12 08/25 09/08 09/23 10/06 10/20 11/04 11/17 12/01 12/15 12/29

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

1.2 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.3 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.3 0.9 0.7 1.0

<0.2 0.9 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.7 1.1

Ammonia

0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

0.2 0.2

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Nitrite

0.07 0.05 0.04 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.17 0.17 0.04 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.02

<0.02 <0.02

<0.02 <0.02

0.05 0.02 0.07

Nitrate

2.8 2.3 2.2 3.2 4.4 4.0 4.6 2.8 2.1 7.8 7.9

12.8 6.0 4.3 3.3 2.8 2.3 1.9 1.8* 1.7 1.3 2.1 2.8

Total Phosphorus

0.4 <0.2

0.2 0.2 0.3

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

0.3 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

0.2

Ortho Phosphorus

0.15 0.10 0.13 0.26 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.04 0.04 0.13 0.03 0.08

0.02 0.02 0.02 0.12 0.03

0.04 <0.02

0.06 0.08 0.10

•Nitrate + Nitrate

Table 9. NUTRIENT ANALYSIS (mg/L) OF O'SHAUGHNESSY RESERVOIR

NEAR O'SHAUGHNESSY DAM. 1982.

Date 01/20 01/27 02/12 02/24 03/10 03/24 04/07 04/21 05/06 05/19 06/02 06/16 06/30 07/23 08/12 08/25 09/08 09/23 10/06 10/20 11/04 11/17 12/01 12/15 12/29 •Nitrate + Nitrate

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

1.4 1.2 0.7 0.8 1.2 1.3 0.9 0.6 0.8 0.6 1.3 1.0 1.1 2.0 0.8 0.4 1.1 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.5

Ammonia 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

0.2 0.2

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

0.2

Nitrite 0.04 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.23 0.18 0.19 0.14 0.11 0.36 0.24 0.13

<0.02

0.04 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.10

Nitrate 8.1 2.7 2.5 2.0 3.0 4.4 4.2 4.9 2.9 1.7

10.2 8.2

12.2 6.5 4.4 3.3 2.9 2.5 2.4 2.0* 1.9 1.6 1.8 3.2

Total Dsphorus

0.2 0.3

<0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

1.1 0.3

Ortho Phosphorus

0.13 0.17 0.12 0.17 0.21 0.10 0.10 0.06 0.11 0.02 0.17 0.04 0.04

— 0.02 0.05 0.03 0.06 0.02

0.06 0.03 0.06 0.10 0.16

DIVISION OF WATER, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 47

Date 01/20 01/27 02/12 02/24 03/10 03/24 04/07 04/21 05/06 05/19 06/02 06/16 06/30 07/23 08/12 08/25 09/08 09/23 10/06 10/20 11/04 11/17 12/01 12/15 12/29

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

0.6 0.5 0.4

<0.2 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.5

<0.2 0.6 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.5

Table 10. NUTRIENT ANALYSIS (mg/L) OF ALUM CREEK RESERVOIR

NEAR ALUM CREEK DAM, 1982.

Ammonia <0.2

0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

0.4 0.2

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2

0.2

Nitrite 0.03

<0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02

0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02

<0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03

0.02 <0.02

0.02 <0.02 <0.02

Nitrate 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.9 1.9 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 1.7 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.7* 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7

Total Phosphorus

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Ortho Phosphorus

0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.06

<0.02 <0.02

0.08 <0.02

0.07 0.11 0.03

— <0.02 <0.02 <0.02

0.02 <0.02

— <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02

0.02 •Nitrate + Nitrate

Table 11. NURTIENT ANALYSIS (mg/L) OF HOOVER RESERVOIR

NEAR HOOVER DAM. 1982.

Date

:i> -.0 '0 i(V P.O

so-so m no TO 80 80 (10

eo 01

or ir u U: U SI

01/20 01/27 02/12 02/24 03/10 03/24 04/07 04/21 05/06 05/19 06/02 06/16 06/30 07/23 08/12 08/25 09/08 09/23 10/06 10/20 11/04 11/17 12/01 12/15 12/29

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

0.6 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4

0.4 <0.2

0.5 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.6

Ammonia <0.2

0.2 0.2

<0.2 0.2

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Nitrite 0.03 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03

<0.02 <0.02

0.02 0.05 0.02

Nitrate 2.5 3.0 2.9 2.5 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.4 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.6 1.3 1.2 0.9 0.9 0.8* 0.8 1.0 0.7 1.4

Total Phosphorus Phosphorus

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

0.6 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Ortho Phosphorus

0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.11

<0.02 0.07

<0.02 0.02 —

<0.02 <0.02 <0.02

0.02 <0.02

— <0.02 <0.02 <0.02

0.03 0.03

•Nitrite + Nitrate

48 DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

Table 12. NUTRIENT ANALYSIS (mg/L) OF BIG WALNUT CREEK WATER

AT THE MORSE ROAD WATER PLANT INTAKE. 1982.

Date 01/20 01/27 02/12 02/24 03/10 03/24 04/07 04/21 05/06 05/19 06/02 06/16 06/30 07/23 08/12 08/25 09/08 09/23 10/06 10/20 11/04 11/17 12/01 12/15 12/29 *Nitrite + Nitrate

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

0.4

0.5 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5

<0.2 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.4

0.4 0.6 0.5

Ammonia <0.2

<0.2 0.2

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Nitrite 0.02

0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.07

<0.02 0.02

<0.02

<0.02 <0.02

0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02

<0.02

<0.02 0.02

<0.02

Nitrate 2.5

3.0 2.3 2.7 2.2 2.5 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.3

1.8 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.8* 0.8

0.7 1.4

Total Phosphorus

<0.2

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

<0.2 0.5

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Ortho Phosphorus

0.03

0.05 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.02 0.11 0.02 0.06

<0.02

Z <0.02 <0.02

0.02 0.04 0.02

<0.02

<0.02 <0.02

0.03

Table 13. Nitrate-N (Mg/L) Concentration of Dublin Road Water Plant

Raw and Tap Water with Scioto River Flow* and Columbus Airport

Rainfall During June July 1982 Runofl Event

Date 6/01 6/03 6/04 6/05 6/06 6/07 6/08 6/09 6/10 6/12 6/13 6/14 6/15 6/16 6/17 6/18 6/19 6/20 6/21 6/22 6/23 6/24 6/25 6/26 6/27 6/28 6/29 6/30 7/01 7/02 7/03 7/04 7/05 7/06 7/07 7/08 7/09 7/10 7/11

Rainfall inches

.05

.03

.32

.64

.02

.40

.89

.06

.12

.05

.79

Flow cfs

1520 1034 563 383 372 276 172 147 451

1145 1194 601 307 837

1739 2125 1485 823 550 405 383 296 226 163 139 116 131 131 87 94

123 147 139 164 139 87 54 43 33

Raw 4.4 7.6 9.2 9.0 7.6 9.1

10.0 8.9 7.6 9.8 9.3 8.5 8.8 7.6 8.0 8.0 7.8 8.1

10.2 11.1 11.0 11.3 12.3 11.6 10.9 14.1 12.3 10.4 13.3 11.8 11.5 11.1 10.3 12.0 10.7 9.9 9.8 8.9 8.0

Nitrate Tap 2.2 4.8 7.8 8.5 7.7 8.7 8.4 8.0 8.3 8.1 8.6 9.2 9.2 8.5 8.4 8.0 7.2 7.6 7.9

10.4 10.9 10.9 11.5 9.9

11.2 13.9 12.4 11.8 11.9 11.4 11.5 11.9 11.7 10.3 10.5 10.6 9.8 8.6 8.2

Table 14. Nitrate-N (mg/L) Concentrations and Flow of Bokes Creek at

Rt. 257 During 1982

Date cis* 5/22 76 5/23 44 5/24 32 5/25 22 5/28 16 5/29 38 5/31 36 6/01 39 6/02 27 6/03 19 6/10 14 6/11 19 6/16 61 6/17 182 6/18 175 6/19 73 6/22 23 6/26 9.0 6/30 5.5 *Mean Discharge of cfs as measured b> Creek Gauging Station.

Table 15. Herbicide Concentrations (mg/L) in Raw and Finished Water

at The Dublin Road Water Plant for 1982

Nitrate 7.8

12.8 13.6 16.0 11.6 9.7

18.8 20.0 15.9 15.2 9.7 9.8

20.4 22.4 28.4 24.0 16.0 8.5 2.7

GS at Bokes t

Date 6/01 6/03 6/08 6/11 6/30 7/02 7/11 7/12 7/13* 7/14 7/21

Raw 4.88 5.02 5.62 6.10 2.51 2.21 1.75 1.79 1.81 1.82 1.44

Alachlor Tap 4.51 5.10 5.33 5.71 2.70 2.34 1.64 1.65 0.83 0.31 1.02

Metolachlor Raw 5.70 6.95 7.13 6.22 5.46 4.41 2.13 2.02 2.12 2.03 1.63

Tap 5.56 6.91 6.98 6.75 5.26 4.83 1.81 1.82 1.06 0.48 1.31

•Measured at Intake Dam •Three-day water plant trial using powdered activated car bon reduced herbicide concentrations in finished water

DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

DRWP Intake 1982

49

N03-N-

4

^^ Jan. Mar. May Jul. Sep. Nov.

Feb. Apr. Jun. Aug. Oct. Dec.

Figure 1.

Table 16. ANNUAL AVERAGES BASED ON MONTHLY COMPOSITES,

Table 18. COMPARATIVE REPORT OF CONSUMER COMPLAINTS.

Trihalomethanes TTHM(ug/L)

Total Organic Halide

TOX (ug/L) TOX

1 DRWP

Tap 53.9

193.9

982. MRWP

Tap 50.4

172.9

DRWP DS* 69.9

165.2

MRWP DS* 61.7

160.5

Year 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982

Rustv DRWP

43 38 33 36 36 68

MRWP 249 148 250 188 161 151

Taste 8t Odor DRWP

22 13 7 1

44 >61

MRWP 31 48 67 64 24 47

Other DRWP

0 1 1 2 0 3

MRWP 24 36 53 25 19 38

3.6 TTHM R a t i o ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ *DS means "Distribution System

3.4 2.4 2.6

Table 17. ANNUAL AVERAGES BASED ON MONTHLY GRAB SAMPLES

IN THE DUBLIN ROAD DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM. 1982*

Trihalomethanes TTHM (ug/L)

Total Organic Halide

TOX (ug/L) TOX TTHM R a t i o

*See Fig. 4.

Grove City (1)

69.7

241.8

3.4

West Side (2)

58.4

3.8

Central Point (3)

60.5

3.6

North Side (4)

57.6

219.1 215.3 219.5

3.8

50 DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

280

260

240

220

200

180

~ 160

CT> a. *-* 140 c x H 120 o < 100 X o

i- 80

60

40

20 0

I-OT0X • TOX

---

--

O

• _

- A

A

^ ^

DRWP TAP

D I S T R I B U T I O N SYSTEM

o

•

A A

O

•

A A

o

o

• •

A A

A A

o

•

A

A

o

• o •

A A

A A

o •

A

A

A TTHM A TTHM

O •

A A

l

o

•

A A

DRWP TAP

D I S T R I B U T I O N

U

•

A A

9

o

•

*t 1 1

SYSTEM

O

•

A A

i

o

•

A

A

• n

A

A

o

•

A

A

o

•

A

A

i

o •

4

i i

APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

1981 1982

FIG. 1 PROFILE FOR DRWP TAP AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM BASED ON MONTHLY COMPOSITES

280

260

240

220

200

180

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

OTOX MRWP TAP

• TOX DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

A T T H M MRWP TAP

A T T H M D I S T R I B U T I O N SYSTEM

O o o •

o • o

o

o 8 o o o o

8 * •

A A

o o

8«

A ^ A A A A A * A A A A A A

£ A A A ^ A A A A A A ^ A A A A A A A A

1 ' ' ' ' i i i APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1981 1982

FIG.3 PROFILE FOR MRWP TAP AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM BASED ON MONTHLY COMPOSITES

DIVISION OF WATER. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 51

320

300

280

260

240

220

200

180

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

• SAMPLES:

• TOX # 1

A TOX 02 # TOX 03

I TOX #1 OTTHM #1

ATTHM n

OTTHM #3

OTTHM 04

.1

A

A • A A

t I : " f D O

»!J

APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

(1981) F|g,4 PROFILE FOR DRWP DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM MONTHLY GRAB SAMPLES

DIVISION OF WATER, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

S Solvent

D Trihalomethanes

C Dichloroacetonitrile

Other peaks are unknown contaminants.

LL 5 10 15

Time (Minutes) Figure 5 Organic scan of Dublin Road plant tap analysed 3/1/82.

20 25

S Solvent

A,B,D Trihalomethanes

C Dichloroacetonitrile

Other peaks are unknown contaminants.

Time (Minutes) 1 0 15 20

Figure 6 Organic scan of Dublin Road plant tap analysed 7/14/82.

25

REPORT of

THE TRUSTEES OF THE SINKING FUND

of the CITY OF

COLUMBUS, OHIO

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1982

PUBLISHED AS A SUPPLEMENT TO THE CITY BULLETIN, OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE CITY OF COLUMBUS, OHIO

SINKING FUND, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

Office of

The Trustees of the Sinking Fund

City Hall

Columbus, Ohio 43215

The City Council of Columbus Columbus, Ohio

Submitted herewith is the report of the Trustees of the Sinking Fund of the City of Columbus for the year ended December 31, 1982. This report includes all debt trans­actions under our jurisdiction undertaken by the City during 1982.

Sincerely,

RICHARD A. BUEHLER President

TRUSTEES

Jane Reese Richard A. Buehler Richard P. Devine Louis A. Nobile, Jr.

Term Expires February 1

1983 1984 1985 1986

OFFICERS AND STAFF

Richard A. Buehler Louis A. Nobile, Jr. David E. Dettra John F. Harmon

President Vice-President Secretary Assistant Secretary

Principal and interest are payable at the office of the City Treasurer of Columbus, or, effective January 1, 1982, through the Chemical Bank of New York. The addresses are shown below.

City Treasurer Chemical Bank of New York City Hall 55 Water Street Columbus, Ohio 43215 New York, New York 10041

SINKING FUND, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

STATEMENT OF TOTAL DEBT December 31, 1982

ASSESSMENT BONDS AND NOTES

Bonds Rate % 9.875 8.125 5.750 5.125 5.000 4.625

Notes 8.200-9.720

Amount $ 87 ,421.04

845 ,000 .00 420 ,000 .00 355 ,000 .00

3 ,000.00 45 ,000 .00

$ 1,755,421.04

73 ,106.00 $ 1,828,527.04

GENERAL CITY BONDS AND NOTES

Cash City Treasurer Chemical Bank

Investments

Bonds Rate %

12.375 12.250 12.000

9.875 8.125 7.750 6.750 6.375 6.250 6.125 5.875 5.750 5.500 5.375 5.125 5.000 4.875 4.750 4.625 4 .000 3.625 3.500 3.250 3.125 3.000 2.750 2.500 2.250 2.000 1.500

Notes 4.300-11.000

Total Debt

$ 34 ,495 ,000 .00 8 ,375 ,000.00

104 ,194 ,000 .00 43 ,270 ,000 .00 82 ,255 ,000 .00

525 ,000 .00 8 ,400 ,000.00 2 ,520 ,000 .00 6 ,000 ,000.00

26 ,062 ,000 .00 11 ,640 ,000 .00 55 ,885 ,000 .00

305 ,000 .00 10 ,325 ,000 .00 27 ,309 ,000 .00 37 ,370 ,000 .00 25 ,695 ,000 .00 13 ,450 ,000 .00

8 ,200 ,000 .00 3 ,355 ,000 .00

415 ,000 .00 13 ,226 ,000 .00

4 ,443 ,000 .00 3 ,326,000.00 4 ,961 ,000 .00 2 ,008 ,000 .00 2 ,374 ,000 .00 1 ,338,000.00

5 8 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 10,000.00

$542 ,314 ,000 .00

152 ,275 ,000 .00

Net Sinking Fund Assets Net Debt

$694,589,000.00

$696,417,527.04 2,284,594.36

$694^132,932.68

CASH AND INVESTMENTS ON HAND DECEMBER 31, 1982

$137,805.53 590,317.75 $ 728,123.28

3,068.487.35 $ 3,796,610.63

SINKING FUND, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

ASSETS Cash

City Treasurer Chemical Bank

Investments Accounts Receivable

Due from Capital South Corporation Debt Service Fund

Delinquent Property Taxes TOTAL ASSETS

LIABILITIES Trust Funds

Water Electricity

Off-Street Parking Debt Service Fund Outstanding Interest

Limited Tax Property Tax Property Tax - Income Tax Electricity Water Airport Sewer Assessment

Unlimited Tax Property Tax Electricity Water Airport Sewer

TOTAL LIABILITIES

NET BOND RETIREMENT FUND

FUND STATEMENT

137,805.53 590,317.75

237,306.54 364,606.00

$1,328,048.62 387,202.18

20,325.00

39,408.41 5,438.27 1,218.72

83,266.65 13,549.22 65,920.19

203.12

86,062.34 7,500.00

28,028.65 32,673.87 15,083.57

$ 728,123.28 3,068,487.35

601,912.54

$1,735,575.80

$4,398,523.17

378,353.01

2.113,928.81 $2,284,594.36

BONDS AND NOTES ISSUED AND REDEEMED DURING 1982 (Excluding Renewal Notes)

ISSUED Bonds Notes

REDEEMED Bonds Notes

Increase (Decrease) in Debt

General City

$ 82,505,000.00 37,262,500.00

$119,767,500.00

$ 19,544,000.00 81,217,500.00

$100,761,500.00

$_19,P06,000.00

Assessment $ -0-

73,106.00 $ 73,106.00

$ 320,909.16 -0-

$ 320,909.16

($ 247,803.16)

Total $ 82,505,000.00

37,335,606.00 $119,840,606.00

$ 19,864,909.16 81,217,500.00

$101,082,409.16

$ 18_,758J96.84

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1982

Balance January 1 Receipts

Disbursements Balance December 31

Encumbered Unencumbered

General Fund

$ 3,799,757.63 780,482,739.28

$784,282,496.91 782,201,137.08

$ 2,081,359.83

$ 538,678.01 1,542,681.82

$ 2,081,359.83

Assessment Fund

$ -0-390,899.35

$390,899.35 390,899.35

$ -0-

$ -0--0-

$ -0-

Trust Funds

$1,572,300.17 321,476.20

$1,893,776.37 178,525.57

$1,715,250.80

$ -0-1,715,250.80

$1,715,250.80

Total

$ 5,372,057.80 781,195,114.83

$786,567,172.63 782,770,562.00

$ 3,796,610.63

$ 538,678.01 3^257,932.62

$ 3,796,610.63

SINKING FUND, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

STATEMENT OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1982

General Fund

RECEIPTS Taxes

Current Delinquent Assessment

Bonds Sold Limited Tax Unlimited Tax Limited Tax-Income Tax Airport Enterprise-

Limited Tax Water Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax Sewer Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax Notes Sold

Limited Tax Unlimited Tax Limited Pax - Income Tax Electricity Enterprise-

Limited Tax Electricity Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax Water Enterprise-

Limited Tax Water Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax Sewer Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax Note Interest

Unlimited Tax Limited Tax-Income Tax Electricity Enterprise-

Limited Tax Electricity Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax Airport Enterprise-

Limited Tax Water Enterprise-

Limited Tax Water Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax Sewer Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax Bond Premium

Limited Tax Unlimited Tax Limited Tax-Income Tax Airport Enterprise-

Limited Tax Water Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax Sewer Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax Note Premium

Limited Tax Unlimited Tax Electricity Enterprise-

Limited Tax Electricity Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax Water Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax Sewer Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax Assessment

$ 2,280,556.08 65,428.48

2,600,000.00 2,495,000.00

12,910,000.00

350,000.00

28,000,000.00

20,800,000.00

17,465,000.00 24,735,000.00 14,120,000.00

51,620,000.00

432,200,000.00

16,950,000.00

58,850,000.00

16,275,000.00

14,452.64 1,887,648.79

1,850,123.41

4,000,017.64

23,362.50

1,331,183.86

1,950,906.21

2,462,185.72

1,684.26 22,114.27

3,514.26

226.73

38,721.97

117,714.79

58.00 125.00

13,799.00

39,599.00

7,224.00

4,410.00

Assessment Funds

$390,891.35

Trust Funds Total

$ 2,280, 65,

390,

2,600, 2,495,

12,910,

350,

28,000,

20,800,

17,465, 24,735, 14,120,

51,620,

432,200,

16,950

58,850

16,275

14 1,887

1,850

4,000

23

1,331

1,950

2,4'.2

1 22 3

8.00

38

117

13

39

7

4

556.08 428.48 891.35

000.00 000.00 000.00

000.00

000.00

000.00

000.00 000.00 000.00

000.00

000.00

,000.00

000.00

,000.00

,452.64 648.79

,123.41

,017.64

,362.50

183.86

906.21

.185.72

,684.26 ,114.27 514.26

226.73

,721.97

714.79

58.00 125.00

799.00

,599.00

,224.00

410.00 8.00

SINKING FUND, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

STATEMENT OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1982 (Continued)

RECEIPTS (Continued) Accrued Interest of Bonds Sold

Limited Tax Unlimited Tax Limited Tax-Income Tax Airport Enterprise-

Limited Tax Water Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax Sewer Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax Unexpended Balances Investment Income Rent-Wager Street Parking Miscellaneous Funds Received From

Other Departments For Bond Debt Service

Nationwide Debt Service City Income Tax Electricity Airport Water Sewer

Funds Received From Other Departments For Note Debt Service

City Income Tax Sewer

Deposits Water Electricity

DISBURSEMENTS Bonds Redeemed

Limited Tax Unlimited Tax Limited Tax-Income Tax Electricity Enterprise-

Limited Tax Airport Enterprise-

Limited Tax Water Enterprise-

Limited Tax Water Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax Sewer Enterprise-

Limited Tax Sewer Enterprise-

Unlimited Off-Street Parking Enterprise-

Limited Tax Assessment

Notes Redeemed Limited Tax Unlimited Tax Limited Tax-Income Tax Electricity Enterprise-

Limited Tax Electricity Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax Airport Enterprise-

Limited Tax Water Enterprise-

Limited Tax Water Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax Sewer Enterprise-Limited Tax

General Fund

$ 1,769.45 3,658.71

22,675.00

238.19

8,682.01

18,822.92 3,524.33

363,677.07 5.599.00

547.94

539,000.00 14,393,401.08

6,022,506.31 6,932,520.15

12,814,369.58 10,152,915.93

1,213,775.00 12,500 000.00

$780,482,739.28

$ 1,894,000.00 7,852,000.00

95,000.00

125,000.00

544,000.00

3,904,000.00

1,080,000.00

3,425,000.00

605,000.00

20,000.00

29,232,500.00 345,000.00

46,310,000.00

51,620,000.00

432,200,000.00

350,000.00

22,950,000.00

80,850,000.00 49,575,000.00

Assessment Fund Trust Funds

$218,672.87

6,485.03 96,318.30

$390,899.35 $321,476.20

$320,909.16

Total

$ 1,769.45 3,658.71

22,675.00

238.19

8,682.01

18,822.92 3,524.33

582,349.94 5,599.00

547.94

539,000.00 14,393,401.08

6,022,506.31 6,932,520.15

12,814,369.58 10,152,915.93

1,213,775.00 12,500,000.00

6,485.03 96,318.30

$781,195,114.83

$ 1,894,000.00 7,852,000.00

95,000.00

125,000.00

544,000.00

3,904,000.00

1,080,000.00

3,425,000.00

605,000.00

20,000.00 320,909.16

29,232,500.00 345,000.00

46,310,000.00

51,620,000.00

432,200,000.00

350,000.00

22,950,000.00

80,850,000.00 49,575,000.00

SINKING FUND, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

STATEMENT OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1982 (Continued)

General Fund DISBURSEMENTS (Continued)

Bond Interest Limited Tax $ 1,955,224.92 Unlimited Tax 6,022,337.82 Limited Tax-Income Tax 456,159.19 Electricity Enterprise-

Limited Tax 91,617.77 Electricity Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax 5,800,500.00 Airport Enterprise-

Limited Tax 1,287,289.69 Airport Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax 5,103,408.19 Water Enterprise-Limited Tax 3,249,567.29 Water Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax 4,567,318.00 Sewer Enterprise-

Limited Tax 2,623,502.02 Sewer Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax 3,630,633.33 Off-Street Parking Enterprise-

Limited Tax 991.25 Assessment

Note Interest Limited Tax 728,899.06 Unlimited Tax 14,452.63 Limited Tax-Income Tax 1,887,648.80 Electricity Enterprise-

Limited Tax 1,845,636.60 Electricity Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax 4,000,017.64 Airport Enterprise-

Limited Tax 23,362.50 Water Enterprise-Limited Tax 1,331,183.86 Water Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax 1,950,906.21 Sewer Enterprise-

Unlimited Tax 2,462,185.72 Deposits Refunded

Water Electricity

Administrative Expense Salaries Contract Labor PERS Employer Share Group Insurance Worker's Compensation Telephone Service Office Supplies Paying Agent Attorney Fee Printing Postage Equipment Maintenance Equipment Purchase Travel and Registration Dues and Subscriptions Parking Safe Box County Auditor Deductions

Excess of Receipts Over (Under) Disbursements

66,522.67 624.00

9,280.05 4,242.00 1,495.38

899.92 632.98

18,836.65 768.13

1,325.52 138.41 307.00 179.50

2,691.74 120.00 550.00

24.00 17,673.06

$782,135,653.50

($ 1,652.914.221

Assessment Fund Trust Funds

$135,473.77

$ 83,133.79 95,391.78

Total

$ 1,955,224.92 6,022,337.82

456,159.19

91,617.77

5,800,500.00

1,287,289.69

5,103,408.19 3,249,567.29

4,567,318.00

2,623,502.02

3,630,633.33

991.25 135,473.77

728,899.06 14,452.63

1,887,648.80

1,845,636.60

4,000,017.64

23,362.50 1,331,183.86

1,950,906.21

2,462,185.72

83,133.79 95,391.78

126,311.01 $456,382.93 $178,525.57 $782,770,562.00

65,483.58) $142,950.63 ($ 1,575,447.17)

SINKING FUND, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

FUNDING OF DEBT SERVICE

Throughout the remainder of this report , bond and note issues are designated by the primary source of funding, using the following abbreviations:

L From Limited Property Tax Issued by the City Council wi thout voter approval.

L* From City Income Tax Collections

From Unlimited Property Tax

F rom Enterprise Revenues

From Special Assessments

Issued by the City Council wi thout voter approval, supported on the secondary level by limited property tax collections, but , by special ordinance, serviced on the primary level by city income tax collections.

Issued by authorization by vote of the people, but , by ordi­nance, serviced from City income tax collections on the primary level, with secondary support , if ever needed, from additional property taxes.

Issued with or without voter approval, funded on the primary level from division revenues, with secondary support, if ever needed, from either limited or unlimited property taxes, depending on the type of authorization for issue.

Issued by the City Council wi thout voter approval. Funded on the primary level by special assessments levied on the individual properties involved in the individual improvements.

DEBT LIMITATIONS

There are two direct limitations on indebtedness, one for bonds and notes issued without vote of the people (5 .5% of the City's assessed valuation) and one for the total indebtedness (10.5% of the City's as­sessed valuation).

In the calculation of both of these limitations certain issues are exempt .

Exempt ions in the limited category are assessment, special urban redevelopment, and enterprise issues (excluding division of electricity issues).

Exempt ions in the total indebtedness also include federal assistance issued (U-FA) and regular urban redevelopment (U-UR). Issues not exempt are designated (U-NE) in the 1983 requirement schedule.

There is also an indirect limit on bonds and notes issued wi thout voter approval. This limit includes interest payment as well as principal payment . The Ohio Consti tution states that the amount of unvoted bonds and notes that can be issued by overlapping political sub-divisions cannot exceed an amount that can be serviced by a ten mill tax on the assessed valuation, regardless of whether the particular bonds and notes are exempt from direct limits and regardless of whether they may be serviced from enterprise revenues or o ther sources other than property taxes.

SINKING FUND, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

GENERAL BONDED DEBT (In Detail)

The following is a correct statement of the date, amount, rate of interest, time of maturity and the pur­pose of the issue of each series of the general bonds of the City, outstanding December 31, 1982.

Issued Rate %

U May

U Apr. U Apr. U May U Jun.

U Dec. U Mar. U Jul. U Nov. U Nov. U Jul. U Aug. U Aug. U Aug.

L Jul. L Apr.

L May L Feb. L Jun. L Oct. L Apr. L Nov. L Jun. L Dec. L Jul. L May L Jul. L Nov. U Nov. U Aug. U Aug. U Jun. U Aug.

L May U Jul. U Nov. U Dec. U Mar.

L May L May L Aug. L Nov. L Jul. L Nov. U Aug. U Mar. L Mar. L Aug. L Aug.

16, 1947

1, 1961 1, 1962 1, 1963 1, 1964

15, 1972 15, 1973 15, 1976

1, 1977 15, 1978 15, 1979 15, 1980 1 5 , 1 9 8 1 15, 1982

1, 1957 1, 1961

1, 1963 1, 1970 1, 1970

1 5 , 1 9 7 0 15, 1971 1 5 , 1 9 7 1 15, 1972 1 5 , 1 9 7 2 15, 1976

1, 1977 1 5 , 1 9 7 7

1, 1977 15, 1978 15, 1980 1 5 , 1 9 8 1

1, 1982 15, 1982

1, 1967 1 5 , 1 9 7 1 15, 1971 15, 1972 15, 1973

1, 1963 1, 1966 1, 1967

15, 1971 15, 1977 15, 1978 15, 1980

1, 1981 1, 1981

15, 1981 15, 1982

1 1 1/2

3 1/2 3 1/8 3 3 1/4

5 1/8 4 7/8 6 1/8 5 5 3/4 5 3/4 8 1/8

12 12 3/8

3 1/2 3 1/2

3 6 3/8 6 3/4 6 1/4 4 3/4 4 5/8 5 5 1/8 6 1/8 5 1/8 5 1/8 5 1/8 5 3/4 8 1/8

12 12 12 3/8

3 5/8 7 3/4 4 5/8 5 1/8 4 7/8

3 3 1/2 4 4 5/8 5 1/8 5 3/4 8 1/8 9 7/8 9 7/8

12 12 1/4

SEWER BONDS

Issue

Relief, Sanitary and Storm Sewers No. 3

Sewerage Improvement No. 461 No. 361 No. 322 No. 6

Storm Sewerage System No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6 No. 7

Storm Sewerage No. 8 (U) Storm Sewerage No. 9 (U-NE)

SEWER BONDS-ENTERPRISE Sewerage Improvement and Extension

No. 2 Sewerage System Improvement No. 561 Sewer Improvement

No. 323 No. 7 No. 8 No. 9 No. 10 No. 11 No. 12 No. 13 No. 14 No. 15 No. 16 No. 17 No. 18 No. 19 No. 20 (E-U) No. 21 (E-U) No. 22 (E-U)

ZOO BONDS Zoo Improvement

No. 6994 No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4

AIRPORT BONDS-ENTERPRISE Municipal Airport

No. 319 No. 17 No. 18 No. 19 No. 20 No. 21 No. 22 No. 23 (E-U) No. 24 (E-L) No. 25 (E-L) No. 26 (E-L)

Final Maturity

Nov.

Apr. Mar. Nov. Dec.

Sep. Feb. May Aug. Oct. Mar. May Jul. Feb.

Jul. Apr.

Nov. Feb. Jun. Jul. Jun. May Jun. Sep. May Oct. Aug. Aug. Oct. May Jul. May Feb.

Jul. Jan. May Sep. Feb.

Nov. Jul. Feb. May Aug. Oct. May Apr. Apr. Jul. Feb.

1, 1972

1, 1997 1, 1998 1 , 1 9 9 8 1, 1999

15, 2008 15, 2009 15, 2002

1, 2004 1, 2004 1, 2005 1, 2006

15, 2003 1 5 , 2 0 0 9

1, 1983 1, 1997

1, 1988 1, 1996 1, 1996

15, 1997 15, 1997 15, 1998 15, 1998 15, 1998 15, 2002 15, 2002

1, 2003 1, 2004 1, 2009 1, 2007

15, 2008 15, 2007 15, 2 0 0 9

1, 1993 15, 1992 15, 1993 15, 1993 15, 1994

1, 1988 1, 1992 1, 1993

15, 1998 1, 1998 1, 1999 1, 2005

15, 2005 15, 2005 15, 2006 15, 2007

Amount

$ 10 ,000 .00

1 ,800,000.00 36 ,000 .00

1 ,600,000.00 875 ,000 .00

755 ,000 .00 2 ,300 ,000 .00 2 ,400 ,000 .00 4 ,325 ,000 .00

440 ,000 .00 705 ,000 .00 285 ,000 .00

1 ,084,000.00 200 ,000 .00

$16 ,815 ,000 .00

$ 200 ,000 .00 1 ,275,000.00

1 ,295,000.00 2 ,520 ,000 .00 8 ,400 ,000 .00 6 ,000 ,000 .00 5 ,175 ,000 .00 5 ,760 ,000 .00 2 ,560 ,000 .00 2 ,880 ,000 .00

800 ,000 .00 6 ,800 ,000 .00 1 ,360,000.00 1 ,325,000.00

15 ,930 ,000 .00 21 ,200 ,000 .00

3 ,625 ,000 .00 10 ,500 ,000 .00 22 ,800 ,000 .00

$120 ,405 ,000 .00

$ 165 ,000 .00 250 ,000 .00 165 ,000 .00 360 ,000 .00 630 ,000 .00

$ 1 ,570 ,000 .00

$ 135 ,000 .00 1 ,250,000.00 3 ,355 ,000 .00 1 ,120,000.00

384 ,000 .00 255 ,000 .00

19 ,675 ,000 .00 35 ,325 ,000 .00

7 ,945 ,000 .00 2 ,000 ,000 .00

350 ,000 .00

$ 71,794,000.00

SINKING FUND, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

Issued

L Nov. L Dec. L Aug. L May L Dec. L Jul. L Nov. L July L Jun. L May L Oct. L Feb. L Jun. L Dec. L Apr. L Jul. L May L Nov. U Nov. U Apr. U Jul. U Aug. U Jun. U Aug.

L Apr.

15 15 15 15 15

1 1

15 15 15 15

1 15

1

Rate %

1951 1952 1953 1954 1954 1955 1955 1956 1964 1966 1968 1972 1972 1972 1976 1976 1977 1977 1978 1979 1979 1980 1982 1982

1961

2 2 1/4 3 2 1/2 2 1/4 2 1/2 2 1/2 2 3/4 3 1/4 3 1/2 4 5/8 4 7/8 5 4 3/4 6 1/8 6 1/8 5 1/8 5 1/8 5 3/4 5 7/8 5 3/4 8 1/8

12 12 3/8

3 1/2

WATER WORKS BONDS-ENTERPRISE

Issue Water Works Enlargement

No. 14 No. 15 No. 16 No. 17 No. 18 No. 19 No. 20 No. 21 No. 25 No. 26 No. 27 No. 28 No. 29 No. 30 No. 31 No. 32 No. 33 No. 34 No. 35 No. 36 No. 37 No. 38 No. 39 No. 40

Southeast Water Line No. 261

Final Maturity

Sep. Oct. Jun. Nov. Oct. Feb. Nov. May Dec. Jul. Oct. Jun. Jun. Sep. Apr. May Oct. Aug. Oct. Jul. Mar. May May Feb.

Apr.

1 ,1987 1, 1988 1 ,1989 1, 1989 1 ,1990 1, 1991 1, 1991 1, 1991 1, 1989 1, 1992 1, 2007

15, 2003 15, 2003 15, 2003 15, 2002 15, 2002 15, 2002

1, 2004 1, 2009

15, 2005 1, 2005 1, 2007

15 ,2007 15, 2009

1, 2001

^

Amount

$ 580,000.00 426,000.00

1,212,000.00 1,184,000.00

912,000.00 639,000.00 515,000.00 375,000.00

1,021,000.00 2,950,000.00 6,590,000.00

12,390,000.00 3,490,000.00 7,690,000.00

12,800,000.00 4,000,000.00 2,800,000.00 4,485,000.00

11,975,000.00 .11,640,000.00

3,220,000.00 22,725,000.00 20,500,000.00

7,500,000.00

608,000.00 $142,227,000.00

L May

L Nov. L Aug. U Aug.

1, 1962 3 1/2

15, 1971 15, 1980

4 5/8 8 1/8

15, 1981 12

MUNICIPAL LIGHT PLANT BONDS-ENTERPRISE

Electric Plant and System Improvement No. 1

Municipal Electric Plant Improvement No. 1 No. 2

Refuse/Coal Fired Power Plant No. 1 (E-U)

OFF-STREET PARKING BONDS-ENTERPRISE

L Apr. 1 , 1 9 6 2 3 1/4 Off-Street Parking No. 561 (Long St.)

EXPRESSWAY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS

Jul.

May May Jul.

Mar.

1, 1990

1 5 , 1 9 9 5 1, 2001

15, 2008

1 ,1983

$ 520,000.00

325,000.00 640,000.00

52,800,000.00 $ 54,285,000.00

$ 20,000.00

L Jan.

U Jun. U Dec. U Dec. U Dec. U Jan. U Apr. U May

U May

U May U May U Jan. U Jul. U Jul. U Jun. L Jun. U Dec. U Mar.

1, 1957

15, 1958 1, 1958 1, 1958

15, 1958 1, 1960 1, 1962 1, 1963

1, 1966

1, 1966 1, 1967

15, 1971 15, 1971 15, 1971 15, 1972 15, 1972 15, 1972 15, 1973

3 1/4

3 3 3 3 3 1/2 3 1/8 3

3 1/2

3 1/2 3 1/2 5 5 5 5 5 5 1/8 4 7/8

Expressway Plans No. 3

General Expressways No. 3 No. 5 No. 6 No. 7 No. 9 No. 11 No. 12

General Expressway Improvement and Construction No. 1

Expressway and Street Improvement No. 1 No. 5758 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6 No. 7 No. 8 No. 9

Jan.

Jan. Dec. Dec. Dec. Jan. Mar. Nov.

Jul.

Jul. Jul. Jan. Jan. Jan. Jun. Jun. Sep. Feb.

1, 1983

1, 1984 1, 1983 1, 1983 1 ,1983 1, 1986 1, 1988 1, 1988

1, 1992

1, 1992 1, 1993

15, 1997 15 ,1997 15, 1997 15, 1998 15, 1998 1 5 , 1 9 9 8 15, 1999

$ 5,000.00

61,000.00 75,000.00 11,000.00 25,000.00

700,000.00 450,000.00 330,000.00

500,000.00

600,000.00 1,760,000.00 3,950,000.00 1,575,000.00

900,000.00 1,920,000.00 1,095,000.00 1,920,000.00 2,520,000.00

10 SINKING FUND, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

Issued Feb. 15, 1974

15, 1980 15, 1982

EXPRESSWAY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS (Continued)

Issue Maturity

L U Aug. U Aug.

U Dec. U Feb. U Jul. U Nov. U Nov. U Jul.

Rate %

5 8 1/8 12 3/8

15, 1972 15, 1974 15, 1976 1, 1977

15, 1978 15, 1979

5 1/8 5 6 1/8 5 5 3/4 5 3/4

No. 10 No. 11 No. 12

Expressway, Streets and Traffic Control No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6

Feb. May Feb.

Sep. Feb. May Aug. Oct. Mar.

FLOOD PROTECTION BONDS

U Apr. U May U Jun. U May U May U Jun. U Jan.

1, 1962 1, 1963 1, 1964 1, 1966 1, 1967

15, 1972 15, 1971

3 1/8 3 3 1/4 3 1/2 3 1/2 5 5

Flood Control No. 162 No. 330 No. 2 No. 3 No. 6801 No. 4

Flood Prevention and Control No. 1

15, 2000 1, 2001

15, 2004

15, 1996 15, 1998 15, 1997

1, 1999 1, 1999 1, 2000

Mar. Nov. Dec. Jul. Jul. Jun. Jan.

1, 1, 1, 1, 1,

15, 15,

1993 1993 1994 1997 2003 2008 1997

Amount 1,440,000.00 2,350,000.00 1,200,000.00

840,000.00 2,080,000.00

750,000.00 1,410,000.00 2,805,000.00

13,825.000.00 $ 45,097,000.00

$ 75,000.00 605,000.00 235,000.00 385,000.00 420,000.00 910,000.00

1,725.000.00

$ 4,355,000.00

GRADE CROSSING BONDS

U Jan. U Feb.

1, 1957 3 1, 1958 3

Grade Crossing Elimination Project No. 3 No. 4

Jul. Jul.

L Apr.

L Apr.

L Apr

*L Apr.

L Mar. L Feb. L May

U May U May U Jan. U Mar.

L Dec. L Mar.

1, 1983 1, 1984

50,000.00 43,000.00

MOTORIZED VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT BONDS

L Aug. 15,1980 8 1/8 Street Equipment No. 1-L May 1,1986

1, 1961

1, 1961

1, 1962

1,1962

15, 1973 15, 1974

1, 1963

L May 1, 1963 3

1, 1966 1, 1967

15, 1971 15, 1973

15, 1972 15, 1973

FIRE AND POLICE DEPARTMENT BONDS

3 1/2 West Third Avenue Fire Station No. 1 Fire Training School and

3 1/2 Communication Building No. 1 Police Headquarters Conversion

3 1/4 No. 162 Fire Department Building Inprovement

3 1/4 No. 162 Fire and Police Communication System

4 7/8 No. 6 5 No. 7 3 Division of Fire Real Estate No. 314

Division of Police Building and ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ B Structures Improvement No. 315

Fire Station Improvement 3 1/2 No. 1 3 1/2 No. 5626 5 No. 2 4 7/8 No. 3

Fire Apparatus 5 1/8 No. 1 4 7/8 No. 2

Apr.

Apr.

Mar.

Mar.

Feb. Feb. Nov.

Nov.

Jul. Jul. Jan. Feb.

Sep. Feb.

1,

1,

1,

1,

15, 15,

1,

1,

1, 1,

15, 15,

15, 15,

1986

1985

1988

1988

1986 1987 1988

1986

1992 1993 1997 1999

1983 1984

93,000.00

340,000.00

340,000.00

32,000.00

39,000.00

24,000.00

225,000.00

60,000.00 25,000.00 24,000.00

135,000.00

100,000.00 150,000.00 325,000.00 540,000.00

15,000.00 80,000.00

SINKING FUND, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 11

U

Issued

U Jul. L May

U May U Nov. U Nov. U Jul.

Aug. U Jun. U Aug. U Nov. U Jul. U Aug. U Aug.

15, 1,

1, 1,

15, 15, 15,

1, 15, 15, 15, 15, 15,

1976 1977

1977 1977 1978 1979 1980 1982 1982 1978 1979 1980 1982

Rate %

6 1/8 5 1/8

5 3/8 5 5 3/4 5 3/4 8 1/8

12 12 3/8

5 3/4 5 3/4 8 1/8

12 3/8

FIRE AND POLICE DEPARTMENT BONDS (Continued) Final

Issue Fire Station Improvement and

Apparatus No. 1 Police Sub-Station No. 1 Fire Station Improvement and

No. No. No. No. No.

Apparatus No. 2 No. 3

. 4

. 5

. 6

. 7

. 8 Police Facilities No. 1

No. 2 No. 3

Police Facilities No. 4 (U-NE)

PARK AND RECREATION BONDS

Mat

May Oct.

Oct. Aug. Oct. Mar. May May Feb. Oct. Mar. May Feb.

urity

15, 15,

15, 1, 1, 1, 1,

15, 15

1 1 1

15

1992 1992

1992 1994 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1994 1995 1996 2004

Amount

$ 140,000.00 53,000.00

510,000.00 1,010,000.00

75,000.00 1,475,000.00 2,190,000.00 1,150,000.00

855,000.00 120,000.00 865,000.00 140,000.00 100,000.00

$ 10,457,000.00

L Mar. L Mar.

L Apr. L Apr.

L Apr. U Apr. L Apr.

U May U Jun. U May U May U Jan. U Jul. U Jun. U Dec. U Mar. U Feb. U May U Nov. U Nov. U Jul. U Aug. L Aug. L Aug. U Aug.

L Apr.

U Apr. U Apr. L Apr. U May U Jun.

L Apr. L Jun. L Aug.

1, 1953 1, 1953

1, 1962 1, 1961

1, 1961 1, 1962 1, 1962

1, 1963 1, 1964 1, 1966 1, 1966

15, 1971 15, 1971 15, 1972 15, 1972 15, 1973 15, 1974

1,1977 1, 1977

15, 1978 15, 1979 15, 1980 15, 1981 15, 1982 15, 1982

1, 1961

1, 1961 1, 1962 1, 1962 1, 1963 1, 1964

1, 1962 1, 1964

15, 1980

2 3/4 2 3/4

3 1/2 3 1/2

3 1/2 3 1/8 3 1/4

3 3 1/8 3 1/2 3 1/2 5 5 5 5 1/8 4 7/8 5 5 3/8 5 5 3/4 5 3/4 8 1/8

12 12 1/4 12 3/8

3 1/2

3 1/2 3 1/8 3 1/4 3 3 1/8

3 1/4 3 1/4 8 1/8

Parks, Playgrounds, Recreation Building Facilities and Equipment No. 15

Olentangy Park No. 1 Senior Citizens Recreation Center

No. 1 Parks and Forestry Improvement No. 1 City Parks - Land and Development

No. 1 Parks and Recreation No. 1 Recreation Centers and Parks No. 162 Parks and Receation Centers

Improvement No. 327 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6 No. 7 No. 8 No. 9

Parks, Recreation and Zoo No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6

Park Development No. 2 (L) Parks, Recreation and Zoo No. 7 (L)

No. 8

STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS

Livingston Avenue Improvement No. 1 Engineering Improvement

No. 261 No. 162 No. 262 No. 321 No. 4

Street Maintenance Yard Improvement No. 361

Street Betterment No. 4 Street Improvement No. 5-L

Sep. Sep.

Apr. Apr.

Apr. Mar. Mar.

Nov. Dec. Jul. Jul. Jan. Jan. Jun. Sep. Feb. Feb. Oct. Aug. Oct. Mar. May Jul. Feb. Feb.

Apr.

Apr. Mar. Mar. Nov. Dec.

Mar. Dec. May

1, 1983 1,1983

1, 1987 1, 1987

1, 1990 1, 1988 1, 1983

1, 1988 1,1989 1, 1992 1,1992

15,1997 15,1997 15,1998 15, 1998 15,1999 15, 1995 15, 1997

1,1999 1, 1999 1, 2000 1, 2001

15, 2003 15,2006 15, 2004

1, 1987

1, 1987 1, 1988 1, 1988 1, 1988 1,1989

1,1983 1, 1984 1, 1986

$ 3,000.00 5,000.00

25,000.00 20,000.00

62,000.00 625,000.00

10,000.00

120,000.00 490,000.00 180,000.00 650,000.00

1,700,000.00 600,000.00 640,000.00

1,920,000.00 680,000.00

2,340,000.00 375,000.00

1,400,000.00 2,470,000.00 6,445,000.00

210,000.00 4,900,000.00 1,850,000.00 1.240.000.00

$ 28,960,000.00

$ 20,000.00

200,000.00 265,000.00 130,000.00 600,000.00 630,000.00

5,000.00 15,000.00

560.000.00 $ 2,425,000.00

12 SINKING FUND, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

SANITATION BONDS

Issued Rate %

L Apr. 1, 1962 3 1/4

L May 1, 1967 3 5/8 L Feb. 15, 1972 4 7/8

Issue

Incinerator No. 362 Landfill

No. 5967 No. 1

Final Maturity

Mar.

Jul. Jun.

GENERAL SLUM CLEARANCE BONDS

U Jan. U Jan. U May U Jun.

1, 1960 1, 1960 1, 1963 1, 1964

3 1/2 3 1/2 3 3 1/8

General Slum Clearance No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5

1, 1983

1, 1998 15, 2003

Amount

1,000.00

230 ,000 .00 210 ,000 .00

4 4 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0

Jan. Jan. Nov. Dec.

1, 1, 1, 1,

1986 1986 1988 1989

$

$

240 ,000 .00 240 ,000 .00 240 ,000 .00 280 ,000 .00

1 ,000,000.00

OFF-STREET PARKING BONDS

L Apr.

*L Jun. U Jan.

U Jan. U Feb. U Dec. U Mar. U Feb. U Jul. U May U Nov. U Nov. U Nov. U Jul. U Aug. U Aug. U Aug.

1, 1962

1, 1964 1 5 , 1 9 7 1

15, 1971 1 5 , 1 9 7 2 15, 1972 15, 1973 1 5 , 1 9 7 4 15, 1976

1, 1977 1, 1977

1 5 , 1 9 7 8 15, 1978 15, 1979 15, 1980 15, 1981 15, 1982

3 i / 4

3 1/4 5

7 3/4 4 7/8 5 1/8 4 7/8 5 6 1/8 5 3/8 5 5 3/4 5 3/4 5 3/4 8 1/8

12 12 3/8

Off-Street Parking No. 461 (Wager Street)

STREET LIGHTING BONDS

Street Lighting Improvement No. 4

Street Lighting System No. 1 Street Lighting

No. 6 No. 7 No. 8 No. 9 No. 10 No. 11 No. 12 No. 13 No. 14 No. 15 No. 16 No. 17 No. 18 No. 19

Mar.

Dec. Jan.

Jan. Jun. Sep. Feb. Feb. May Oct. Aug. Oct. Oct. Mar. May Jul. Feb.

1, 1988 $ 72 ,000 .00

1, 1986 $ 80 ,000 .00 15, 1987

15, 1987 15, 1988 15, 1988 15, 1989 15, 1990 15, 1992 15, 1992

1, 1994 1, 1994 1, 1994 1, 1995 1, 1996

15, 1998 15, 1999

2 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0

275 ,000 .00 90 ,000 .00

285 ,000 .00 8 0 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 275 ,000 .00 340 ,000 .00 525 ,000 .00

1 ,380,000.00 740 ,000 .00 180 ,000 .00

1 ,560,000.00 7 9 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 150 ,000 .00 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0

$ 8 ,275 ,000 .00

May Oct. May

Feb. Jun. Apr.

Apr. Apr.

L Jun.

May May

Apr. Jan. Dec.

PUBLIC LAND AND BUILDING BONDS

Health and Safety Center Building 1, 1953 2 3/4 No. 7 1, 1954 2 No. 9 1, 1956 3 1/4 No. 10

New Municipal Building 1, 1955 2 1/2 No. 1 1, 1955 2 3/4 No. 2 1, 1962 3 1/4 Land Acquisition No. 162

Workhouse Building Improvement 1, 1962 3 1/4 No. 162 1 ,1962 3 1/4 Central Garage Improvement No. 162

Building and Structures Improvement 1, 1964 3 1/4 No. 1

Public Lands and Buildines 1, 1966 3 1/2 No 2 1, 1967 3 5/8 No. 5966

i 1 Q C o , , , „ Lands and Building Improvement 1, 1962 3 1/4 No. 362

15, 1971 5 No 1 15, 1972 5 1/8 No. 2

Nov. Oct. May

Feb. Jun. Mar.

Mar. Mar.

Dec.

Jul. Jul.

Mar. Jan. Sep.

1, 1983 $ 1, 1985 1, 1987

1, 1986 1, 1986 1, 1993

1, 1986 1, 1983

1, 1988

1, 1992 1, 1983

1, 1983 15, 1987 15, 1 9 9 3

1 ,000.00 3 ,000 .00 5 ,000 .00

36 ,000 .00 24 ,000 .00 33 ,000 .00

75 ,000 .00 2 ,000.00

30 ,000 .00

100 ,000 .00 20 ,000 .00

5 ,000 .00 50 ,000 .00

155 ,000 .00

SINKING FUND, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982 13

PUBLIC LAND AND BUILDING BONDS (Continued)

Issued

L Mar. L Jul. L May L Jul. L Jun. L Jul. U Jul. L May L Jul. L Jul. L Jul. L Aug. L Aug. L Aug.

15, 15,

1, 15, l b , l b , l b ,

1, l b , 15, l b , 15, 15, l b ,

1973 1979 1977 1977 1972 1976 1976 1977 1979 1979 1979 1980 1980 1980

Rate %

4 7/8 5 3/4 5 1/8 5 1/8 5 1/2 6 1/8 6 1/8 5 1/8 5 3/4 5 3/4 5 3/4 8 1/8 8 1/8 8 1/8

Issue

No. 3 No. 4 L No. 4 I No. 5

Maintenance Yard Facilities No. 1 Municipal Garage Facilities No. 1 Development Land Real Estate No. 1 Municipal Garage Facilities No. 2

No. 3 Convention Center No. 1

No. 2 No. 3

Public Lands and Buildings 3-L Public Lands and Buildings 4-L

Final Maturity

Feb. Mar. Oct. Aug. Jun. May May Oct. Mar. Mar. Mar. May May May

15, 1989 1, 1985

15, 1992 1 ,1993

15, 1993 15, 1992 15, 2002 15, 1997

1, 1990 1, 2000 1, 1990 1, 1996 1, 2001 1, 2001

Amount

$ 145,000.00 165,000.00

22,000.00 390,000.00 305,000.00

32,000.00 4,800,000.00

560,000.00 80,000.00

765,000.00 280,000.00

3,360,000.00 5,340,000.00 2,090,000.00

$ 18,873,000.00

MISCELLANEOUS BONDS

L *L

L

L L

*L *L *L *L

L L

Jun. Jun.

Mar.

Feb. Nov. Aug. Jun. Aug. Aug.

Aug. Aug.

1, 1,

15,

15, 15 , 15,

1, 15 15

15 15,

1964 1964

1973

1974 1978 1980 1982 1982 1982

1982 1982

3 1/4 3 1/4

4 7/8

5 5 3/4 8 1/8

12 12 1/4 12 1/4

12 1/4 12 1/4

Dennison Avenue Conservation Area (Urban Renewal No. 1) Dec.

Urban Renewal No. 1 Dec. Municipal Electric Plant Improvement

No. 2 Feb. Auditor 's and Treasurer's Equipment

No. 1 Feb. Amtrak Station No. 1 Oct. Capital South Sewer No. I L May Capital South Redevelopment No. 1 (L*) May

No. 2 Feb. Capital South Utilities No. 1 (L*) Feb. Mt. Vernon South Redevelopment

No. 1 (L) Feb. Communi ty Center No. 1 (L) Feb.

1989 1989

15, 1989

15, 1985 1, 1989 1, 2006

15, 2007 1, 2009 1, 2009

15, 2004 15, 2004

$ 75,000.00

175,000.00

70,000.00

45,000.00 425,000.00 360,000.00

7,485,000.00 4,425,000.00 1,000,000.00

500,000.00 250,000.00

$ 14,810,000.00

ASSESSMENT BONDS

A Dec. 15, 1972 4 5/8

A Nov. 15 , 1971 4 5/8

A Mar. 1, 1975 5

A Jul. A May A Nov. A Aug. A Aug.

1, 1,

15 , 15, 15,

1975 1977 1978 1980 1981

5 3/4 5 1/8 5 3/4 8 1/8 9 7/8

Street Improvement and Sanitary Sewer No. 322

Street Improvement No. 321

Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. 323

Street Sanitary Sewer and Sidewalk Improvement No. 324

Various Improvements No. 1 Various Improvements No. 2 Various Improvements No. 3 Street Improvement No. 28-A

Sep.

May

Sep.

Jul. Oct. Oct. May Jul.

15,

15,

1,

1, 15,

1 1

15

1983

1983

1985

1986 1988 1989 1991 1992

$

$

30,000.00

15,000.00

3,000.00

240,000.00 355,000.00 180,000.00 845,000.00

87,421.04 1,755,421.04

NOTE: Debt Service Charges on Water Works, Sewers and Drains, Airport, Light Plant, and Off Street Parking Enterprise obligations are paid from the net income earned by the respective divisions.

L Inside Ten Mill-Unvoted-Limited Tax U Outside Ten Mill-Voted-Unlimited Tax (Serviced by City Income Tax)

*L Inside Ten Mill Payable from City Income Tax-Limited Tax A Assessment

CITY DEBT-GENERAL OBLIGATION 1978-1982

December 31, December 31,

December 31,

1978 1979 1980 1981 1982

Bonds and Notes

$447,802,769.58 650,232,807.58 634,749,400.83 677,659,330.20 696,417,527.04

Sinking Fund Assets

$ 2 ,921,610.58 83 ,154 ,080 .42

3 ,088,671.29 3 ,946 ,486 .30 2 ,284,594.36

Net Debt

$444 ,881 ,159 .00 567 ,078 ,727 .16 631 ,660 ,729 .54 673 ,712 ,843 .90 694 ,132 ,932 .68

Tax Rate

38.54 41 .20 40.00 48 .78 48.98

TAX SUPPORTED DEBT Bonds-Limited Bonds-Limited-Income Tax Notes-Limited Notes-Limited-Income Tax Bonds-Unlimited Notes-Unlimited

TOTAL TAX SUPPORTED DEBT

ENTERPRISE DEBT Electricity

Bonds-Limited Notes-Limited Bonds-Unlimited Notes-Unlimited

Water Bonds-Limited Notes-Limited Bonds-Unlimited

Airport Bonds-Limited Bonds-Unlimited

Sewer Bonds-Limited Bonds-Unlimited Notes-Unlimited

Off-Street Parking Bonds-Limited

TOTAL ENTERPRISE DEBT

ASSESSMENT Bonds Notes

TOTAL DEBT

GENERAL OBLIGATIONS DEBT SUMMARY December 3 1 , 1982

Gross Debt

$ 27,088,000.00 13,750,000.00

4 ,040,000.00 7,450,000.00

$112,745,000.00 260,000.00

$ 1,485,000.00 42,700,000.00 52,800,000.00 65,200,000.00

$ 64,667,000.00 27,375,000.00 77,560,000.00

$ 16,794,000.00 55,000,000.00

$ 46,350,000.00 74,055,000.00

5 ,250,000.00

1,755,421.04 73 ,106.00

Bond Retirement Fund Net Debt

$ 52 ,328 ,000 .00 $2 ,152 ,594 .36 $ 50 ,175 ,405 .64

113 ,005 ,000 .00 16 ,000 .00 112 ,989 ,000 .00 $165 ,333 ,000 .00 $2 ,168 ,594 .36 $163 ,164 ,405 .64

$162 ,185 ,000 .00

$169 ,602 ,000 .00 $ 61 ,000 .00

71 ,794 ,000 .00

125 ,655 ,000 .00

20,000.00

15,000 .00

40,000.00

$162 ,185 ,000 .00

$169 ,541 ,000 .00

71 ,779 ,000 .00

125 ,615 ,000 .00

20 ,000 .00 $529 ,256 ,000 .00 $ 116 ,000 .00 $529,140,00') 00

$ 1,828.527.04

$696,417,527.04 $2,284,594.36 $ 1,828,527.04

$694,132,932.68

SINKING FUND, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

MATURITY OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST UNVOTED INSIDE TEN MILL LIMITATION

SERVICED FROM PROPERTY TAXES-LIMITED TAX

15

Principal Interest Total

Outstanding 12-31-1982 1983 1984

1985 1986 1987

1988 1989 1990

1991 1992 1993

1994 1995 1996

1997 1998 1999

2000 2001 2002

2003 2004 2005

2006

Notes

$ 8,000.00 1,767,000.00 1,916,000.00

1,992,000.00 1,900,000.00 1,590,000.00

1,551,000.00 1,520,000.00 1,410,000.00

1,368,000.00 1,358,000.00 1,348,000.00

1,250,000.00 1,255,000.00 1,255,000.00

1,015,000.00 975,000.00 895,000.00

890,000.00 770,000.00 380,000.00

380,000.00 125,000.00 85,000.00

85,000.00 $27,088,000.00 4,040,000.00

$ 39,408.41 2,193,512.83 2,082,192.83

1,938,097.16 1,790,351.54 1,655,227.54

1,532,123.79 1,409,678.79 1,288,800.01

1,173,587.51 1,060,047.51 946,343.12

834,306.87 725,688.12 617,019.37

517,844.13 428,675.38 343,050.38

259,719.13 179,681.53 118,637.49

73,437.49 28,481.25 15,618.75

5,206.25

$21,256,737.18

$ 47,408.41 3,960,512.83 3,998,192.83

3,930,097.16 3,690,351.54 3,245,227.54

3,083,123.79 2,929,678.79 2,698,800.01

2,541,587.51 2,418,047.51 2,294,343.12

2,084,306.87 1,980,688.12 1,872,019.37

1,532,844.13 1,403,675.38 1,238,050.38

1,149,719.13 949,681.53 498,637.49

453,437.49 153,481.25 100,618.75

90,206.25

$48,344,737.18 4,040,000.00

$31,128,000.00 $21,256,737.18 $52,384,737.18

VOTED OUTSIDE TEN MILL LIMITATION SERVICED FROM CITY INCOME TAX-UNLIMITED TAX

Principal Interest Total

Outstanding 12-31-1982 1983 1984

1985 1986 1987

1988 1989 1990

1991 1992 1993

1994 1995 1996

1997 1998 1999

2000 2001 2002

$ 16,000.00 7,643,000.00 7,687,000.00

7,794,000.00 7,859,000.00 7,498,000.00

7,419,000.00 6,858,000.00 6,600,000.00

6,508,000.00 6,554,000.00 6,128,000.00

5,865,000.00 5,488,000.00 5,034,000.00

4,748,000.00 3,740,000.00 3,026,000.00

2,240,000.00 1,110,000.00 980,000.00

$ 86,062.34 6,252,371.41 5,864,929.42

5,454,652.85 5,033,051.55 4,615,852.14

4,209,100.92 3,808,977.68 3,425,132.54

3,050,858.19 2,677,778.81 2,306,982.48

1,952,559.39 1,608,834.97 1,294,830.60

1,001,759.13 747,395.41 532,805.35

354,153.85 243,560.10 170,734.97

$ 102,062.34 13,895,371.41 13,551,929.42

13,248,652.85 12,892,051.55 12,113,852.14

11,628,100.92 10,666,977.68 10,025,132.54

9,558,858.19 9,231,778.81 8,434,982.48

7,817,559.39 7,096,834.97 6,328,830.60

5,749,759.13 4,487,395.41 3,558,805.35

2,594,153.85 1,353,560.10 1,150,734.97

16 SINKING FUND. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982

VOTED OUTSIDE TEN MILL LIMITATION SERVICED FROM CITY INCOME TAX-UNLIMITED TAX (Continued)

Principal Interest Total

2003 2004 2005

2006 2007 2008

$ 620,000.00 545,000.00 200,000.00

170,000.00 160,000.00 160,000.00

$ 114,215.86 68,722.11 38,571.98

28,228.23 19,153.22 10,484.47

$ 734,215.86 613,722.11 238,571.98

198,228.23 179,153.22 170,484.47

2009

Notes

95,000.00 $112,745,000.00

260,000.00 $113,005,000.00

2,690.72 $54,974,450.69

$54,974,450.69

97,690.72

$167,719,450.69 260,000.00

$167,979,450.69

UNVOTED INSIDE TEN MILL LIMITATION SERVICED FROM CITY INCOME TAX-LIMITED TAX

Principal Interest Total

Outstanding 12-31-1982 1983 1984

1985 1986 1987

1988 1989 1990

1991 1992 1993

1994 1995 1996

1997 1998 1999

2000 2001 2002

2003 2004 2005

2006 2007 2008

$ -0-100,000.00 405,000.00

625,000.00 620,000.00 605,000.00

600,000.00 565,000.00 540,000.00

540,000.00 540,000.00 540,000.00

540,000.00 540,000.00 540,000.00

540,000.00 540,000.00 545,000.00

550,000.00 550,000.00 550,000.00

550,000.00 550,000.00 550,000.00

550,000.00 535,000.00 220,000.00

$ 5,438.27 1,606,353.14 1,583,853.14

1,529,584.39 1,462,146.89 1,394,709.39

1,327,921.89 1,261,784.39 1,196,215.64

1,131,459.39 1,066,703.14 1,001,946.89

937,190.64 872,434.39 807,678.14

742,921.89 678,165.64 613,109.39

547,446.89 481,478.14 415,509.39

349,540.64 283,571.89 217,603.14

151,634.39 86,275.00 40,425.00

$ 5,438.27 1,706,353.14 1,988,853.14

2,154,584.39 2,082,146.89 1,999,709.39

1,927,921.89 1,826,784.39 1,736,215.64

1,671,459.39 1,606,703.14 1,541,946.89

1,477,190.64 1,412,434.39 1,347,678.14

1,282,921.89 1,218,165.64 1,158,109.39

1,097,446.89 1,031,478.14 965,509.39

899,540.64 833,571.89 767,603.14

701,634.39 621,275.00 260,425.00

2009

Notes

220,000.00

$13,750,000.00 7,450,000.00

$21,200,000.00

13,475.00

$21,806,576.13

$21,806,576.13

233,475.00 $35,556,576.13

7,450,000.00

$43,006,576.13

SINKING FUND, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982 17

DIVISION OF ELECTRICITY-ENTERPRISE SERVICED FROM DIVISION REVENUE-LIMITED TAX

Principal

Outstanding 12-31-1982 1983 1984

1985 1986 1987

1988 1989 1990

1991 1992 1993

1994 1995 1996

1997 1998 1999

2000 2001

Notes

$ -0-125,000.00 125,000.00

125,000.00 125,000.00 125,000.00

125,000.00 125,000.00 125,000.00

60,000.00 60,000.00 60,000.00

60,000.00 60,000.00 35,000.00

30,000.00 30,000.00 30,000.00

30,000.00 30,000.00

$ 1,485,000.00 42,700,000.00

$44,185,000.00

Interest

$ 1,218.72 83,231.31 76,956.31

70,681.31 64,406.31 58,131.31

51,866.31 45,581.31 39,306.31

33,031.31 29,031.31 25,031.31

21,031.31 17,031.31 13,609.41

10,968.78 8,531.28 6,093.78

3,656.28 1,218.78

$ 660,604.06

$ 660,604.06

Total

$ 1,218.72 208,231.31 201,956.31

195,681.31 189,406.31 183,131.31

176,856.31 170,581.31 164,306.31

93,031.31 89,031.31 85,031.31

81,031.31 77,031.31 48,609.41

40,968.78 38,531.28 36,093.78

33,656.28 31,218.78

$ 2,145,604.06 42,700,000.00

$44,845,604.06

DIVISION OF ELECTRICITY-ENTERPRISE SERVICED FROM DIVISION REVENUE-UNLIMITED TAX

Principal Interest Total

Outstanding 12-31-1982 1983 1984

1985 1986 1987

1988 1989 1990

1991 1992 1993

1994 1995 1996

1997 1998 1999

2000 2001 2002

2003 2004 2005

$ -0--0-

865,000.00

865,000.00 865,000.00 865,000.00

865,000.00 865,000.00 865,000.00

2,595,000.00 2,595,000.00 2,595,000.00

2,595,000.00 2,595,000.00 2,595,000.00

2,595,000.00 2,595,000.00 2,595,000.00

2,595,000.00 2,595,000.00 2,600,000.00

2,600,000.00 2,600,000.00 2,600,000.00

$ 7,500.00 6,336,000.00 6,336,000.00

6,232,200.00 6,128.400.00 6,024,600.00

5,920,800.00 5,817,000.00 5,713,200.00

5,609,400.00 5,298,000.00 4,986,600.00

4,675,200.00 4,363,800.00 4,052,400.00

3,741,000.00 3,429,600.00 3,118,200.00

2,806,800.00 2,495,400.00 2,184,000.00

1,872,000.00 1,560,000.00 1,248,000.00

$ 7,500.00 6,336,000.00 7,201,000.00

7,097,200.00 6,993,400.00 6,889,600.00

6,785,800.00 6,682,000.00 6,578,200.00

8,204,400.00 7,893,000.00 7,581,600.00

7,270,200.00 6,958,800.00 6,647,400.00

6,336,000.00 6,024,600.00 5,713,200.00

5,401,800.00 5,090,400.00 4,784,000.00

4,472,000.00 4,160,000.00 3,848,000.00

18 SINKING FUND, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

DIVISION OF ELECTRICITY-ENTERPRISE SERVICED FROM CITY INCOME TAX-UNLIMITED TAX (Continued)

2006 2007 2008

Notes

Principal

$ 2 ,600,000.00 2 ,600,000.00 2 ,600,000.00

$52 ,800 ,000 .00 65 ,200,000.00

$118 ,000 ,000 .00

Interest

$ 936 ,000 .00 624 ,000 .00 312 ,000 .00

$101 ,828 ,100 .00

$101 ,828 ,100 .00

DIVISION TOTAL ELECTRICITY-ENTERPRISE

Principal Interest

Total

$ 3 ,536,000.00 3 ,224,000.00 2 ,912 ,000 .00

$154 ,628 ,100 .00 65 ,200 ,000 .00

$219 ,828 ,100 .00

Total

Bonds-L Bonds-U

Notes-L Notes-U

$ 1,485,000.00 52,800,000.00

$ 54,285,000.00 42,700,000.00 65,200,000.00

$107,900,000.00

$162,185,000.00

$ 660,604.06 101,828,100.00

$102,488,704.06

$102,488,704.06

$ 2,145,604.06 154,628,100.00

$156,773,704.06 42,700,000.00 65,200,000.00

$107,900,000.00

$264,673,704.06

DIVISION OF WATER-ENTERPRISE SERVICED FROM DIVISION REVENUE-LIMITED TAX

Principal Interest Total

Outstanding 12-31-1982 1983 1984

1985 1986 1987

1988 1989 1990

1991 1992 1993

1994 1995 1996

1997 1998 1999

2000 2001 2002

2003 2004 2005

2006 2007

Notes

$ 51,000.00 3,855,000.00 3,860,000.00

3,851,000.00 3,851,000.00 3,846,000.00

3,737,000.00 3,661,000.00 3,182,000.00

3,063,000.00 2,902,000.00 2,602,000.00

2,597,000.00 2,602,000.00 2,597,000.00

2,602,000.00 2,602,000.00 2,602,000.00

2,597,000.00 2,597,000.00 2,565,000.00

1,585,000.00 465,000.00 265,000.00

265,000.00 265,000.00

$64,667,000.00 27,375,000.00

$92,042,000.00

$ 83,266.65 3,105,262.72 2,932,982.72

2,760,696.47 2,588,585.22 2,416,536.47

2,244,493.97 2,074,725.22 1,909,125.22

1,754,996.47 1,604,876.47 1,457,562.72

1,320,705.22 1,184,078.97 1,047,221.47

910,595.22 773,746.72 636,880.22

500,022.72 363,421.47 227,380.22

117,530.01 59,275.00 36,768.75

24,512.50 12,256.25

$32,147,505.06

$32,147,505.06

$ 134,266.65 6,960,262.72 6,792,982.72

6,611,696.47 6,439,585.22 6,262,536.47

5,981,493.97 5,735,725.22 5,091,125.22

4,817,996.47 4,506,876.47 4,059,562.72

3,917,705.22 3,786,078.97 3,644,221.47

3,512,595.22 3,375,746.72 3,238,880.22

3,097,022.72 2,960,421.47 2,792,380.22

1,702,530.01 524,275.00 301,768.75

289,512.50 277,256.25

$ 96,814,505.06 27,375,000.00

$124,189,505.06

SINKING FUND, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

DIVISION OF WATER-ENTERPRISE SERVICED FROM DIVISION REVENUE-UNLIMITED TAX

Outstanding 12-31-1982 1983 1984

1985 1986 1987

1988 1989 1990

1991 1992 1993

1994 1995 1996

1997 1998 1999

2000 2001 2002

2003 2004 2005

2006 2007 2008

2009

Principal

$ 10,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,420,000.00

2,570,000.00 2,570,000.00 2,570,000.00

2,570,000.00 2,565,000.00 2,570,000.00

2,565,000.00 2,570,000.00 2,565,000.00

2,570,000.00 2,905,000.00 3,410,000.00

3,555,000.00 3,710,000.00 3,710,000.00

3,710,000.00 3,710,000.00 3,710,000.00

3,705,000.00 3,705,C00.00 3,705,000.00

3,060,000.00 3,060,000.00

895,000.00

895,000.00 $77,560,000.00

Interest

$ 28,028.65 6,750,513.41 6,588,063.41

6,391,138.56 6,184,926.06 5,978,719.81

5,772,507.31 5,566,301.06 5,360,382.31

5,154,176.06 4,948,257.31 4,742,051.06

4,536,132.31 4,309,526.06 4,032,807.31

3,716,519.96 3,381,957.61 3,037,826.36

2,693,695.11 2,349,563.86 2,005,432.61

1,661,504.48 1,317,779.48

974,054.48

634,354.48 328,348.23 134,706.70

53,431.70 $98,632,705.75

Total

$ 38,028.65 8,750,513.41 9,008,063.41

8,961,138.56 8,754,926.06 8,548,719.81

8,342,507.31 8,131,301.06 7,930,382.31

7,719,176.06 7,518,257.31 7,307,051.06

7,106,132.31 7,214,526.06 7,442,807.31

7,271,519.96 7,091,957.61 6,747,826.36

6,403,695.11 6,059,563.86 5,715,432.61

5,366,504.48 5,022,779.48 4,679,054.48

3,694,354.48 3,388,348.23 1,029,706.70

948,431.70 $176,192,705.75

19

DIVISION TOTAL-WATER-ENTERPRISE

Principal Interest

Bonds-L Bonds-U

Notes-L

64,667,000.00 77.560,000.00

$142,227,000.00 27,375,000.00

$169,602,000.00

$ 32,147,505.06 98,632,705.75

$130,780,210.81

$130,780,210.81

Total

$ 96,814,505.06 176,192,705.75

$273,007,210.81 27,375,000.00

$300,382,210.81

DIVISION OF AIRPORT-ENTERPRISE SERVICED FROM DIVISION REVENUE-LIMITED TAX

Outstanding 12-31-1982 1983 1984

1985 1986 1987

1988 1989 1990

Principal

15,000.00 904,000.00 989,000.00

1,004,000.00 1,004,000.00 1,004,000.00

1,004,000.00 984,000.00 984,000.00

Interest

13,549.22 1,310,383.54 1,253,809.79

1,186,117.29 1,117,506.04 1,048,894.79

980,283.54 911,672.29 843,661.04

Total

$ 28,549.22 2,214,383.54 2,242,809.79

2,190,117.29 2,121,506.04 2,052,894.79

1,984,283.54 1,895,672.29 1,827,661.04

DIVISION OF AIRPORT-ENTERPRISE SERVICED FROM DIVISION REVENUE-LIMITED TAX (Continued)

Principal Interest Total

1991 1992 1993

1994 1995 1996

1997 1998 1999

2000 2001 2002

2003 2004 2005

2006 2007

$ 984,000.00 984,000.00 859,000.00

554,000.00 554,000.00 554,000.00

554,000.00 559,000.00 465,000.00

450,000.00 450,000.00 450,000.00

450,000.00 455,000.00 455,000.00

105,000.00 20,000.00

$16,794,000.00

$ 775,649.79 707,638.54 639,627.29

582,091.04 530,654.79 479,218.54

427,782.29 376,346.04 325,928.47

278,359.72 231,653.47 184,947.22

138,240.97 91,287.85 44,087.85

14,168.75 1,225.00

$14,494,785.16

$ 1,759,649.79 1,691,638.54 1,498,627.29

1,136,091.04 1,084,654.79 1,033,218.54

981,782.29 935,346.04 790,928.47

728,359.72 681,653.47 634,947.22

588,240.97 546,287.85 499,087.85

119,168.75 21,225.00

$31,288,785.16

DIVISION OF AIRPORT-ENTERPRISE SERVICED FROM DIVISION REVENUE-UNLIMITED TAX

Principal Interest

Outstanding 12-31-1982 1983 1984

1985 1986 1987

1988 1989 1990

1991 1992 1993

1994 1995 1996

1997 1998 1999

2000 2001 2002

2003 2004 2005

$ -0-880,000.00 880,000.00

880,000.00 2,615,000.00 2,615,000.00

2,615,000.00 2,615,000.00 2,615,000.00

2,615,000.00 2,615,000.00 2,615,000.00

2,615,000.00 2,620,000.00 2,615,000.00

2,620,000.00 2,615,000.00 2,620,000.00

2,620,000.00 2,625,000.00 2,620,000.00

2,625,000.00 2,620,000.00 2,625,000.00

$55,000,000.00

$ 32,673.87 5,046,244.63 4,964,857.13

4,883,469.63 4,721,843.24 4,479,974.49

4,238,105.74 3,996,236.99 3,754,368.24

3,512,499.49 3,270,630.74 3,028,761.99

2,786,893.24 2,544,821.37 2,302,749.49

2,060,677.62 1,818,605.74 1,576,533.87

1,334,215.12 1,091,649.50 849,083.87

606,518.25 363,952.62 121,387.00

$63,386,753.87

Total

$ 32,673.87 5,926,244.63 5,844,857.13

5,763,469.63 7,336,843.24 7,094,974.49

6,853,105.74 6,611,236.99 6,369,368.24

6,127,499.49 5,885,630.74 5,643,761.99

5,401,893.24 5,164,821.37 4,917,749.49

4,680,677.62 4,433,605.74 4,196,533.87

3,954,215.12 3,716,649.50 3,469,083.87

3,231,518.25 2,983,952.62 2,746,387.00

$118,386,753.87

SINKING FUND, COLUMBUS. OHIO 1982 21

DIVISION TOTAL-AIRPORT-ENTERPRISE

Principal Interest

Bonds-L Bonds-U

$16,794,000.00 55,000,000.00

$71,794,000.00

$14,494,785.16 63,386,753.87

$77,881,539.03

Total

$ 31,288,785.16 118,386,753.87

$149,675,539.03

DIVISION OF SEWER-ENTERPRISE SERVICED FROM DIVISION REVENUE-LIMITED TAX

Outstanding 12-31-1982 1983 1984

1985 1986 1987

1988 1989 1990

1991 1992 1993

1994 1995 1996

1997 1998 1999

2000 2001 2002

2003 2004

Principal

$ 40,000.00 3,225,000.00 3,025,000.00

3,025,000.00 3,025,000.00 3,025,000.00

3,025,000.00 2,815,000.00 2,815,000.00

2,815,000.00 2,815,000.00 2,815,000.00

2,815,000.00 2,815,000.00 2,815,000.00

2,035,000.00 1,205,000.00 505,000.00

505,000.00 505,000.00 505,000.00

120,000.00 60,000.00

$46,350,000.00

Interest

$ 65,920.19 2,465,518.97 2,295,715.22

2,132,931.47 1,970,137.72 1,807,343.97

1,644,550.22 1,481,756.47 1,325,262.72

1,168,768.97 1,012,275.22 855,781.47

699,287.72 542,793.97 386,300.22

255,794.15 160,956.65 113,125.04

86,843.79 60,562.54 34,281.29

9,225.00 3,075.00

$20,578,207.98

Total

$ 105,920.19 5,690,518.97 5,320,715.22

5,157,931.47 4,995,137.72 4,832,343.97

4,669,550.22 4,296,756.47 4,140,262.72

3,983,768.97 3,827,275.22 3,670,781.47

3,514,287.72 3,357,793.97 3,201,300.22

2,290,794.15 1,365,956.65 618,125.04

591,843.79 565,562.54 539,281.29

129,225.00 63,075.00

$66,928,207.98

DIVISION OF SEWER-ENTERPRISE SERVICED FROM DIVISION REVENUE-UNLIMITED TAX

Principal Interest Total

Outstanding 12-31-1982 1983 1984

1985 1986 1987

1988 1989 1990

1991 1992 1993

1994 1995 1996

1997 1998 1999

$ -0-1,440,000.00 1,795,000.00

2,260,000.00 2,260,000.00 2,260,000.00

2,260,000.00 2,260,000.00 2,260,000.00

2,260,000.00 2,260,000.00 2,260,000.00

2,260,000.00 2,680,000.00 2,680,000.00

2,695,000.00 3,605,000.00 3,605,000.00

$ 15,083.57 7,120,444.60 7,004,857.10

6,830,498.19 6,627,366.94 6,424,235.69

6,221,104.44 6,017,973.19 5,814,841.94

5,611,710.69 5,408,579.44 5,205,448.19

5,002,316.94 4,773,985.69 4,520,454.44

4,265,995.08 3,954,195.99 3,585,983.49

$ 15,083.57 8,560,444.60 8,799,857.10

9,090,498.19 8,887,366.94 8,684,235.69

8,481,104.44 8,277,973.19 8,074,841.94

7,871,710.69 7,668,579.44 7,465,448.19

7,262,316.94 7,453,985.69 7,200,454.44

6,960,995.08 7,559,195.99 7,190,983.49

22 SINKING FUND, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

DIVISION OF SEWER-ENTERPRISE SERVICED FROM DIVISION REVENUE-UNLIMITED TAX (Continued)

Principal Interest

$ 79,305,000.00 $110,301,733.82

Total

2000 2001 2002

2003 2004 2005

2006 2007 2008

2009

Notes

$ 3,605,000.00 3,605,000.00 3,605,000.00

3,605,000.00 3,605,000.00 3,605,000.00

3,605,000.00 3,605,000.00 2,130,000.00

1,985,000.00

$ 74,055,000.00 5,250,000.00

$ 3,217,770.99 2,849,558.49 2,481,345.99

2,113,133.49 1,744,920.99 1,376,708.49

1,008,495.99 640,283.49 344,198.27

120,242.02

$110,301,733.82

$ 6,822,770.99 6,454,558.49 6,086,345.99

5,718,133.49 5,349,920.99 4,981,708.49

4,613,495.99 4,245,283.49 2,474,198.27

2,105,242.02

$184,356,733.82 5,250,000.00

$189,606,733.82

DIVISION TOTAL-SEWER-ENTERPRISE

Bonds-L Bonds-U

Notes-U

Principal $ 46,350,000.00

74,055,000.00 $120,405,000.00

5,250,000.00 $125,655,000.00

Interest $ 20,578,207.98

110,301,733.82 $130,879,941.80

$130,879,941.80

Total $ 66,928,207.98

184,356,733.82 $251,284,941.80

5,250,000.00 $256,534,941.80

DIVISION OF OFF-STREET PARKING-ENTERPRISE SERVICED FROM DIVISION REVENUE-LIMITED TAX

1983 Principal

20,000.00 Interest

325.00 Total

20,325.00

ASSESSMENT SERVICED FROM SPECIAL PROPERTY TAX

Principal Interest Total

Outstanding 12-31-1982 1983 1984

1985 1986 1987

1988 1989 1990

1991 1992

Notes

$

$

$

-0-313,421.04 266,000.00

261,000.00 260,000.00 200,000.00

130,000.00 130,000.00 95,000.00

95,000.00 5,000.00

1,755,421.04 73,106.00

1,828,527.04

$

$

$

203.12 116,082.94 96,440.72

78,953.22 61,721.97 46,265.72

32,534.47 22,390.72 12,450.09

4,643.84 493.75

472,180.56

472,180.56

$

$

$

203.12 429,503.98 362,440.72

339,953.22 321,721.97 246,265.72

162,534.47 152,390.72 107,450.09

99,643.84 5,493.75

2,227,601.60 73,106.00

2,300,707.60

SUMMARY OF OUTSTANDING DEBT DECEMBER 31, 1982

Principal

Outstanding 12-31-1982 1983 1984

1985 1986 1987

$ 140,000.00 22,272,421.04 24,233,000.00

25,252,000.00 26,954,000.00 26,203,000.00

Interest

378,353.01 42,386,244.50 41,080,657.79

39,489,020.54 37,750,443.48 35,950,491.32

Total

518,353.01 64,658,665.54 65,313,657.79

64,741,020.54 64,704,443.48 62,153,491.32

SINKING FUND, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982 23

SUMMARY OF OUTSTANDING DEBT DECEMBER 31, 1982 (Continued)

Principal Interest Total

1988 1989 1990

1991 1992 1993

1994 1995 1996

1997 1998 1999

2000 2001 2002

2003 2004 2005

2006 2007 2008

2009

Notes

$ 25,901,000.00 24,963,000.00 24,061,000.00

25,468,000.00 25,258,000.00 24,387,000.00

23,721,000.00 24,114,000.00 24,130,000.00

22,989,000.00 22,176,000.00 20,598,000.00

19,792,000.00 18,547,000.00 17,965,000.00

16,240,000.00 14,730,000.00 14,090,000.00

10,440,000.00 10,245,000.00 6,005,000.00

3,195,000.00

$544,069,421.04 152,348,106.00

$ 34,175,382.60 32,414,078.11 30,682,746.06

28,980,781.71 27,084,312.24 25,196,136.52

23,347,714.68 21,473,649.64 19,554,288.99

17,651,858.25 15,758,176.46 13,889,536.35

12,082,683.60 10,347,747.88 8,671,353.05

7,055,346.19 5,521,066.19 4,072,800.44

2,802,600.59 1,711,541.19 841,814.44

189,839.44

$540,540,665.26

$ 60,076,382.60 57,377,078.11 54,743,746.06

54,448,781.71 52,342,312.24 49,583,136.52

47,068,714.68 45,587,649.64 43,684,288.99

40,640,858.25 37,934,176.46 34,487,536.35

31,874,683.60 28,894,747.88 26,636,353.05

23,295,346.19 20,251,066.19 18,162,800.44

13,242,600.59 11,956,541.19 6,846,814.44

3,384,839.44

$1,084,610,086.30 152,348,106.00

$696,417,527.04 $540,540,665.26 $1,236,958,192.30

SINKING FUND, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

L E E E E

U-NE U-FA U-UR

E E E

A

L *L

E E E

U-NE E E

L *L

E E E

U-NE U-FA

E

A

L E E E

U-NE E E E

A

BOND PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST DUE DURING 1983

JANUARY Limited Tax

Property Tax Electricity Water

Sewer Total Limited Tax

Unlimited Tax Property Tax Property Tax Property Tax

Sub-Total Electricity Water Sewer

Total Unlimited Tax Assessment

Total Due January 1983

FEBRUARY Limited Tax

Property Tax Property Tax Water Airport Sewer

Total Limited Tax Unlimited Tax

Property Tax Water Sewer

Total Unlimited Tax Total Due February 1983

MARCH

Limited Tax Property Tax Property Tax Water Sewer Off-Street Parking

Total Limited Tax Unlimited Tax

Property Tax Property Tax

Sub-Total Water

Total Unlimited Tax Assessment

Total Due March 1983

APRIL Limited Tax

Property Tax Water Airport Sewer

Total Limited Tax Unlimited Tax

Property Tax Water Airport

Total Unlimited Tax

Total Due April 1983

PRINCIPAL

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$ $

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$ $

15,000.00 -0--0--0--0-

15,000.00

830 ,000 .00 204 ,000 .00 120,000.00

1,154,000.00 -0--0--0-

1,154,000.00 60 ,000 .00

1,229,000.00

199,000.00 -0-

71 ,000 .00 305 ,000 .00 180,000.00 755 ,000 .00

820 ,000 .00 -0--0-

820 ,000 .00 1,575,000.00

227 ,000 .00 40 ,000 .00

-0--0-

20 ,000 .00 287 ,000 .00

1,612,000.00 75 ,000 .00

1,687,000.00 140,000.00

1,827,000.00 -0-

2 ,114,000.00

42 ,000 .00 672 ,000 .00 345 ,000 .00

85 ,000 .00 1,144,000.00

160 ,000 .00 -0-

565 ,000 .00 -0-

725 ,000 .00 -0-

1,869,000.00

INTEREST

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$ $

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

304 ,602 .71 9 ,100.00

51 ,625 .00 141 ,875 .00 191,000.00 698 ,202 .71

444 ,396 .25 21 ,870 .00

8 ,400.00 474 ,666 .25

3 ,168,000.00 341 ,619 .62 217 ,500 .00

4 ,201 ,785 .87 11 ,216 .33

4 ,911 ,204 .91

216 ,096 .84 332 ,281 .25 122 ,911 .14

98 ,377 .18 148 ,994 .80 918 ,661 .21

797 ,280 .42 464 ,070 .00

1,410,772.80 2 ,672 ,123 .22 3 ,590 ,784 .43

47 ,355 .17 3 ,656.25

188 ,337 .50 73 ,802 .88

325.00 313 ,476 .80

886 ,597 .95 7 ,029.00

893 ,626 .95 92 ,575 .00

986 ,201 .95 843 .78

1,300,522.53

31 ,909 .67 641 ,832 .84 399 ,623 .57 196 ,569 .30

1 ,269,935.38

269 ,257 .66 344 ,281 .25

1 ,744,207.20 457 ,987 .50

2 ,815 ,733 .61 14 ,272 .23

4 ,099 ,941 .22

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$ $

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

TOTAL

319 ,602 .71 9,100.00

51 ,625 .00 141 ,875 .00 191,000.00 713 ,202 .71

1,274,396.25 225 ,870 .00 128 ,400 .00

1,628,666.25 3 ,168,000.00

341 ,619 .62 217 ,500 .00

5 ,355,785.87 71 ,216 .33

6 ,140 ,204 .91

415 ,096 .84 332 ,281 .25 193,911.14 403 ,377 .18 328 ,994 .80

1 ,673,661.21

1,617,280.42 464 ,070 .00

1,410,772.80

3 ,492 ,123.22 5 ,165 ,784 .43

274 ,355 .17 43 ,656 .25

188 ,337 .50 73 ,802 .88 20 ,325 .00

600 ,476 .80

2 ,498 ,597 .95 82 ,029 .00

2 ,580 ,626 .95 232 ,575 .00

2 ,813 ,201 .95 843 .78

3 ,414 ,522 .53

73 ,909 .67 1,313,832.84

744 ,623 .57 281 ,569 .30

2 ,413 ,935 .38

429 ,257 .66 344 ,281 .25

2 ,309 ,207 .20 457 ,987 .50

3 ,540 ,733 .61 14 ,272 .23

5 ,968,941.22

SINKING FUND, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982 25

BOND PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST DUE DURING 1983 (Continued)

MAY PRINCIPAL

L *L

E E E E

U-NE U-FA U-UR

E E E

A

L *L

E E

U-NE U-FA U-UR

L E E E E

U-NE U-FA U-UR

E E E

A

L *L

E E E

U-NE E E

Limited Tax Property Tax Property Tax Electricity Water Airport Sewer

Total Limited Tax Unlimited Tax

Property Tax Property Tax Property Tax

Sub-Total Water Airport Sewer

Total Unlimited Tax Assessment

Total Due May 1983

JUNE Limited Tax

Property Tax Property Tax Water Sewer

Total Limited Tax Unlimited Tax

Property Tax Property Tax Property Tax

Total Unlimited Tax Total Due June 1983

JULY Limited Tax

Property Tax Electricity Water Airport Sewer

Total Limited Tax Unlimited Tax

Property Tax Property Tax Property Tax

Sub-Total Electricity Water Sewer

Total Unlimited Tax Assessment

Total Due July 1983

AUGUST Limited Tax

Property Tax Property Tax Water Airport Sewer

Total Limited Tax Unlimited Tax

Property Tax Water Sewer

Total Unlimited Tax

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$ $

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

864,000.00 -0-

60,000.00 245,000.00

70,000.00 400,000.00

1,639,000.00

860,000.00 -0--0-

860,000.00 910,000.00 315,000.00 850,000.00

2,935,000.00 110,000.00

4,684,000.00

116,000.00 -0-

926,000.00 1,105,000.00 2,147,000.00

210,000.00 -0--0-

210,000.00 2,357,000.00

60,000.00 65,000.00

295,000.00 125,000.00 600,000.00

1,145,000.00

435,000.00 50,000.00

-0-485,000.00

-0-510,000.00

-0-995,000.00

12,421.04 2,152,421.04

40,000.00 -0-

205,000.00 24,000.00

125,000.00 394,000.00

560,000.00 -0--0-

560,000.00

INTEREST

$ 478,303.10 463,725.36

33,516.59 148,647.75

27,701.12 176,606.56

$ 1,328,500.48

$ 617,919.66 4,950.00 3,600.00

$ 626,469.66 2,153,225.85

799,316.55 1,491,271.20

$ 5,070,283.26 34,675.86

$ 6,433,459.60

$ 43,161.04 $ 4,143.75

423,692.61 470,406.25 941,403.65

$ 124,475.56 1,665.00 4,374.72

$ 130,515.28 $ 1,071,918.93

$ 304,272.29 9,100.00

51,625.00 141,875.00 191.000.00

$ 697,872.29

$ 422,546.25 18,372.50

6,300.00 $ 447,218.75

3,168,000.00 341,642.88 217,500.00

$ 4,174,361.63 9,491.50

Total Due August 1983 954,000.00

Sl.725.42

$ 211,290.75 332,281.25 122,032.61 92,277.82

143,267.52 $ 901,149.95

$ 777,054.43 464,055.00

1,410,727.20 $ 2,651,836.63 $ 3,552,986.58

TOTAL

$ 1,342,303.10 463,725.36

93,516.59 393,647.75 97,701.12

576,606.56 $ 2,967,500.48

$ 1,477,919.66 4,950.00 3,600.00

$

$

1,486,469.66 3,063,225.85 1,114,316.55 2,341,271.20 8,005,283.26

144,675.86 $ 11,117,459.60

$ 159,161.04 4,143.75

1,349,692.61 1,575,406.25

$ 3,088,403.65

$ 334,475.56 1,665.00 4,374.72

$ 340,515.28 $ 3,428,918.93

$ 364,272.29 74,100.00

346,625.00 266,875.00 791,000.00

$ 1,842,872.29

$ 857,546.25 68,372.50

6,300.00 $ 932,218.75

3,168,000.00 851,642.88 217,500.00

$ 5,169,361.63 21,912.54

$ 7,034,146.46

$ 251,290.75 332,281.25 327,032.61 116,277.82 268,267.52

$ 1,295,149.95

$ 1,337,054.43 464,055.00

1,410,727.20 $ 3,211,836.63 $ 4,506,986.58

SINKING FUND, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982

L *L

E E

U-NE U F A

E

A

L E E E

U-NE E E E

A

L *L

E E E E

U-NE U-FA U-UR

E E E

A

L *L

E E

U-NE U-FA U-UR

BOND PRINCIPAL AND

SEPTEMBER Limited Tax

Property Tax Property Tax Water Sewer

Total Limited Tax Unlimited Tax

Property Tax Property Tax

Sub-Total Water

Total Unlimited T a x Assessment

Total Due September 1983

OCTOBER Limited Tax

Property Tax Water Airport Sewer

Total Limited Tax Unlimited Tax

Property Tax Water Airport Sewer

Total Unlimited Tax Assessment

Total Due October 1983

NOVEMBER Limited Tax

Property Tax Property Tax Electricity Water Airport Sewer

Total Limited Tax Unlimited Tax

Property Tax Property Tax Property Tax

Sub-Total

Airport Sewer

Total Unlimited Tax Assessment

Total Due November 1 9 8 3

DECEMBER Limited Tax

Property Tax Property Tax Water Sewer

Total Limited Tax Unlimited Tax

Property Tax Property Tax Property Tax

Total Unlimited T a x Total Due December 1 9 8 3

INTEREST DUE DURING 1983 (Cont inued)

PRINCIPAL

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$ $

38,000.00 -0-

479 ,000 .00 180,000.00 697 ,000 .00

415 ,000 .00 -0-

415 ,000 .00 -0-

415 ,000 .00 31 ,000.00

1,143,000.00

103 ,000 .00 590 ,000 .00

15 ,000.00 340 ,000 .00

1,048,000.00

545 ,000 .00 4 4 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0

-0-590 ,000 .00

1,575,000.00 100,000.00

2 ,723 ,000 .00

35 ,000 .00 15 ,000 .00

-0-227 ,000 .00

20 ,000 .00 210 ,000 .00 507 ,000 .00

275 ,000 .00 55 ,000 .00 40 ,000 .00

370 ,000 .00 -0--0--0-

370 ,000 .00 -0-

8 7 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0

28 ,000 .00 45 ,000 .00

145 ,000 .00 -0-

218 ,000 .00

226 ,000 .00 111 ,000 .00

40 ,000 .00 377 ,000 .00 595 ,000 .00

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$ $

INTEREST

41 ,853 .58 3 ,006.25

188 ,337 .60 73 ,797.12

306 ,994 .45

842 ,310 .64 5 ,861.25

848 ,171 .89 88 ,550 .00

9 3 6 , 7 2 1 . 8 9 843 .72

1,244,560.06

31 ,172 .83 621 ,679 .02 382 ,573 .65 195 ,068 .20

1,230,493.70

266 ,454 .84 3 4 4 , 2 8 1 . 2 5

1,716,240.24 457 ,987 .50

2 ,784 ,963 .83 14 ,271.52

4 ,029 ,729 .05

443 ,234 .65 463 ,115 .28

31 ,514 .72 141 ,896 .20

26 ,080 .20 167 ,043 .84

1,272,884.89

587 ,818 .70 4 ,950 .00 3,600.00

596 ,368 .70 2 ,116 ,212 .56

786 ,480 .64 1 ,456,698.40 4 ,955 ,760 .30

30 ,468 .00

6 ,259 ,113 .19

40 ,260 .20 4 ,143 .75

4 0 2 , 6 4 5 . 5 5 437 ,962 .50

885 ,012 .00

119 ,246 .30 1,665.00 4 ,375 .28

125 ,286 .58 1 ,010,298.58

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$ $

TOTAL

79,853 .58 3,006.25

667 ,337 .50 253 ,797 .12

1,003,994.45

1,257,310.64 5,861.25

1,263,171.89 88 ,550 .00

1 ,351,721.89 31 ,843 .72

2 ,387 ,560 .06

134 ,172 .83 1,211,679.02

397 ,573 .65 535 ,068 .20

2 ,278,493.70

811 ,454 .84 7 8 4 , 2 8 1 . 2 5

1,716,240.24 1,047,987.50 4 ,359 ,963 .83

114 ,271 .52 6 ,752,729.05

478 ,234 .65 478 ,115 .28

31 ,514.72 368 ,896 .20

46 ,080 .20 377 ,043 .84

1,779,884.89

862 ,818 .70 59 ,950 .00 43 ,600 .00

966 ,368 .70 2 ,116 ,212 .56

786 ,480 .64 1,456,698.40

5 ,325 ,760 .30 30 ,468.00

7 ,136 ,113 .19

68 ,260 .20 49 ,143 .75

5 4 7 , 6 4 5 . 5 5 437 ,962 .50

1,103,012.00

345 ,246 .30 112 ,665 .00

44 ,375 .28 502 ,286 .58

1,605,298.58

SINKING FUND, COLUMBUS, OHIO 1982 27

A

L *L E E E E E

U-NE U-FA U-UR

E E E E

A

BOND PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST DUE DURING 1983 (Continued)

TOTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR 1983 Limited Tax

Property Tax Property Tax Electricity Water Airport Sewer Off-Street Parking

Total Limited Tax Unlimited Tax

Property Tax Property Tax Property Tax

Sub-Total Electricity Water Airport Sewer

Total Unlimited Tax Assessment

Total Due 1983

PRINCIPAL

$

$

$

$

$

$

1,767,000.00 100,000.00 125,000.00

3,855,000.00 904,000.00

3,225,000.00 20,000.00

9,996,000.00

6,948,000.00 495,000.00 200,000.00

7,643,000.00 -0-

2,000,000.00 880,000.00

1,440,000.00 11,963,000.00

313,421.04 22,272,421.04

$

$

$

$

$

$

INTEREST

2,193,512.83 1,606,353.14

83,231.31 3,105,262.72 1,310,383.54 2,465,518.97

325.00 10,764,587.51

6,155,358.66 66,362.75 30,650.00

6,252,371.41 6,336,000.00 6,750,513.41 5,046,244.63 7,120,444.60

31,505,574.05 116,082.94

42,386,244.50

$

$

$

$

$

$

TOTAL

3,960,512.83 1,706,353.14

208,231.31 6,960,262.72 2,214,383.54 5,690,518.97

20,325.00 20,760,587.51

13,103,358.66 561,362.75 230,650.00

13,895,371.41 6,336,000.00 8,750,513.41 5,926,244.63 8,560,444.60

43,468,574.05 429,503.98

64,658,665.54

DIVISION

Electricity E-L E-U

Division Total

Water E-L E-U

Division

Airport E-L E-U

Total

Division Total

Sewer E-L E-U

Division Total

DIVISION TOTALS-FOR INFORMATION ONLY

PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

125,000.00 -0-

125,000.00

3,855,000.00 2,000,000.00 5,855,000.00

904,000.00 880,000.00

1,784,000.00

3,225,000.00 1,440,000.00

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

83,231.31 6,336,000.00 6,419,231.31

3,105,262.72 6,750,513.41 9,855,776.13

1,310,383.54 5,046,244.63 6,356,628.17

2,465,518.97 7,120,444.60

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

208,231.31 6,336,000.00 6,544,231.31

6,960,262.72 8,750,513.41

15,710,776.13

2,214,383.54 5,926,244.63 8,140,628.17

5,690,518.97 8,560,444.60

$ 4,665,000.00 $ 9,585,963.57 $ 14,250,963.57

o

. . . ' • . ' • ' • .'

Columbus Metropolitan Libuiv _ • igraphy, History & Travel

•y*|