Upload
independent
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Compounds from Geijera parviflora with pros-taglandin E2 inhibitory activity May explainits traditional use for pain relief
Linda K. Banbury, Qingyao Shou, Dane E.Renshaw, Eleanore H. Lambley, Hans J. Gries-ser, Htwe Mon, Hans Wohlmuth
PII: S0378-8741(15)00048-3DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2015.01.033Reference: JEP9280
To appear in: Journal of Ethnopharmacology
Received date: 14 July 2014Revised date: 8 January 2015Accepted date: 25 January 2015
Cite this article as: Linda K. Banbury, Qingyao Shou, Dane E. Renshaw,Eleanore H. Lambley, Hans J. Griesser, Htwe Mon, Hans Wohlmuth,Compounds from Geijera parviflora with prostaglandin E2 inhibitory activityMay explain its traditional use for pain relief, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2015.01.033
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted forpublication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version ofthe manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, andreview of the resulting galley proof before it is published in its final citable form.Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered whichcould affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journalpertain.
www.elsevier.com/locate/jep
Compounds from Geijera parviflora with prostaglandin E2 inhibitory activity
may explain its traditional use for pain relief
Linda K. Banburya,1, Qingyao Shoua,2, Dane E. Renshawa,3, Eleanore H. Lambleya,
Hans J. Griesserb, Htwe Monb and Hans Wohlmutha,c, *
a Southern Cross Plant Science, Southern Cross University, PO Box 157, Lismore
NSW 2480, Australia
b Mawson Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes SA 5095, Australia
c Integria Healthcare, Gallans Rd, Ballina NSW 2478, Australia
Email addresses:
LKB: [email protected]; QS: [email protected]; DER:
[email protected]; EHL: [email protected]; HJG:
[email protected]; HM: [email protected]; HW:
* Corresponding author. Current address: Integria Healthcare, Gallans Rd., Ballina
NSW 2478, Australia. E-mail address: [email protected], Tel: +61-2-
66205180 (H. Wohlmuth).
1 Current address: Division of Pathogenic Biochemistry, Institute of Natural Medicine,
University of Toyama, Sugitani 2630, Toyama 930-0194, Japan
2 Current address: Department of Chemistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL,
USA
3 Current address: R Keenan Consulting, Hindmarsh St, East Ballina NSW 2478,
Australia
ABSTRACT
Ethnopharmacological relevance: Australian Aboriginal people used crushed leaves
of Geijera parviflora Lindl. both internally and externally for pain relief, including for
toothache (Cribb and Cribb, 1981). This study tested the hypothesis that this
traditional use might be at least in part explained by the presence of compounds with
anti-inflammatory activity..
Materials and Methods: A crude extract (95% EtOH) was prepared from powdered
dried leaves. From the CH3Cl fraction of this extract compounds were isolated by
bioassay-guided fractionation and tested for: (1) cytotoxicity in RAW 264.7 murine
leukemic monocyte-macrophages, (2) prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) inhibitory activity in
3T3 Swiss albino mouse embryonic fibroblast cells, as well as (3) nitric oxide (NO)
and (4) tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) inhibitory activity in lipopolysaccharide
(LPS)-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. Isolated compounds were also tested for (5)
antibacterial activity against a panel of Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus ATCC
29213 and ATCC 25923, S. epidermidis ATCC 35984, biofilm-forming) and Gram-
negative (Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853)
strains by broth microdilution.
Results: Eleven compounds were isolated, including one new flavone and one new
natural product, with a further four compounds reported from this species for the first
time. Some of the compounds showed good anti-inflammatory activity in vitro. In
particular, flindersine (1) and N-(acetoxymethyl) flindersine (3) inhibited PGE2
release with IC50 values of 5.0 µM and 4.9 µM, respectively, without any significant
cytotoxicity. Several other compounds showed moderate inhibition of NO (5, 6, 7)
and TNFα (6), with IC50 in the low micromolar range; however much of this apparent
activity could be accounted for by the cytotoxicity of these compounds. None of the
compounds showed anti-bacterial activity.
Conclusions The inhibition of PGE2, an important mediator of inflammation and pain,
by flindersine and a derivative thereof, along with the moderate anti-inflammatory
activity shown by several other compounds isolated from G. parviflora leaf extract,
support the traditional use of this plant for pain relief by Australian Aboriginal people.
KEYWORDS: Geijera parviflora, anti-inflammatory, pain relief, prostaglandin E2, flavones, flindersine, Australian plants
1. INTRODUCTION
Geijera parviflora Lindl., known as wilga or native willow, is an endemic Australian
shrub or small tree up to 7 m high, found in inland regions of Eastern Australia
(Porteners, 2014). The species was first described by English botanist John Lindley
in 1848. The genus Geijera Schott is a member of the family Rutaceae and
comprises approximately five species native to Australia, New Guinea and New
Caledonia. The Australian species are G. parviflora, G. salicifolia Schott and G.
linearifolia (DC.) J.M. Black. One species, G. paniculata F. Muell., has recently being
reclassified by Hartley in the genus Coatesia (Hartley, 2001).
Geijera parviflora was used in Australian Aboriginal ceremonies to induce
drowsiness or intoxication. The leaves were baked, powdered and mixed with other
narcotic plant material before being smoked (Lassak and McCarthy, 1983). Leaves
of the plant were also crushed and used externally and internally for pain relief,
including for toothache (Cribb and Cribb, 1981). Australian pastoralists value the tree
as a shade tree and as stock fodder, in particular in times of drought, although its
palatability is variable. The foliage has a protein content of around 15% and is
favoured by sheep but less so by cattle (Cunningham et al., 1992; Wilson and
Harrington, 1980). Plants containing the coumarin geiparvarin (6) are apparently
eaten by sheep, whereas those containing the related compound dehydrogeijerin are
not (Lassak and McCarthy, 1983).
Although the phytochemistry of the plant has been studied since the 1930s and a
number of bioactive compounds have been isolated, the constituents responsible for
the reported traditional uses have not been identified. The composition of the
essential oil from the leaves of G. parviflora was first studied in the 1930s (Penfold,
1932). More recent studies have identified a number of essential oil chemotypes of
G. parviflora (Brophy et al., 2005; Sadgrove et al., 2014; Sadgrove and Jones,
2013). The latter group speculated that minor constituents of the essential oils such
as the monoterpenes 1,8,-cineole, borneol and linalool may be responsible for the
analgesic effects reported, but considered their concentrations to be too low in all but
one geographically restricted chemotype with a high linalool content. It is also not
clear how these relatively simple and widespread compounds could account for the
observed physiological effects.
Other reported major phytochemical constituents of G. parviflora are the coumarin
geiparvarin and the 2-quinoline alkaloid flindersine (Dreyer and Lee, 1972). The
coumarins geiparvarin and dehydrogeijerin were isolated from leaves (Lahey and
Macleod, 1967). There has been considerable research on methods of synthesis of
geiparvarin and its analogues, because these compounds have displayed cytotoxic,
cytostatic and selective antitumour activity (Baraldi et al., 1989; Chimichi et al., 2009;
Viola et al., 2004). The mechanism of action has been proposed to be via disruption
of microtubule formation (Bocca et al., 2001; Miglietta et al., 2001) Inhibition of
monoamine oxidase has also been reported (Carotti et al., 2002). Extracts of leaves
and the smoke of smouldering leaves were found to contain saponins, triterpenoids
and alkaloids but these have not been tested for bioactivity (Sadgrove and Jones,
2013).
7-Geranyloxycoumarin and its derivatives (marmin, 6’-dehydromarmin, geiparvarin,
2’,3’-dihydrogeiparvarin) as well as flindersine have been isolated from the fruit of G.
parviflora (Dreyer and Lee, 1972). Flindersine, originally isolated in 1914 from the
wood of Flindersia australis R.Br. (Matthes and Schreiber, 1914) and since found in
other Rutaceae species, was reported to have antifungal and antimicrobial activity by
one group (Duraipandiyan and Ignacimuthu, 2009) but was considered inactive by
another group (O'Donnell et al., 2010). Moderate antibacterial activity has also been
reported for the leaf essential oil (Sadgrove et al., 2014; Sadgrove and Jones, 2013).
Our group has previously reported five new anthranilic acid derivatives from G.
parviflora. A mixture of three of these (11′-hexadecenoylanthranilic acid, 9′-
hexadecenoylanthranilic acid, and 7′-hexadecenoylanthranilic acid) and the new
natural product hexadecanoylanthranilic acid all showed good inhibition of several
Gram-positive bacterial strains but no anti-inflammatory activity (Shou et al., 2014).
Several novel alkaloids were also isolated, with one of these, parvifloranine A,
inhibiting NO production to a moderate degree (Shou et al., 2013).
During initial screening, the chloroform soluble fraction of the 95% EtOH extract of
the leaves of Geijera parviflora was found to significantly inhibit nitric oxide (NO) and
tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) production in vitro, at a concentration of 50 µg/mL.
This finding led us to hypothesise that the use of the plant for pain relief by
Australian Aboriginal people might be at least in part explained by the presence of
compounds with anti-inflammatory activity. We tested this hypothesis by assaying 11
isolated compounds for in vitro inhibitory activity of PGE2, NO and TNF-α, which are
well established mediators of inflammation. PGE2 is involved in numerous processes
that lead to the classic signs of inflammation: pain, swelling and redness. The
production of PGE2 is controlled by the cyclo-oxygenase (COX) enzymes, which are
the targets of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (Ricciotti and
FitzGerald, 2011). NO plays a key role in inflammation by regulating the expression
of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Kobayashi, 2010), while TNF-α is considered a
central regulator of inflammation by inducing the production of other inflammatory
mediators, including IL-1β, IL-6 and PGE2 (Schaible et al., 2010; Sommer and Kress,
2004). The compounds were also tested for anti-bacterial activity, since infection can
cause pain and inflammation.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.1 General Experimental Procedures. UV spectra were measured on a Hewlett
Packard 8453 polarimeter at room temperature. The IR spectra were acquired using
a Bruker Vector 33 Spectrometer. High resolution electrospray ionisation (HRESIMS)
accurate mass measurements were carried out on a Bruker micrOTOF-Q instrument
with a Bruker ESI source. NMR spectra were acquired on a Bruker AVANCE 500
MHz spectrometer with TMS as the internal standard. Column chromatography (CC)
separations were carried out using silica gel (Silica-Amorphous, precipitated, 200–
425 mesh, Sigma-Aldrich), Sepra C18-E (50 µm, 65A; Phenomenex Torrance, CA,
USA) and MCI gel CHP20P (Supelco, Bellafonte, PA, USA). Preparative HPLC was
performed on a Gilson 322 system with a UV/Vis-155 detector and a FC204 fraction
collector using a Phenomenex Luna 5 µm (150 × 21.2 mm i.d.) C-18 column.
2.2 Plant Material. The leaves of Geijera parviflora Lindl. were collected near
Lightning Ridge, New South Wales, Australia (29° 25′ S, 147° 59′ E) in December
2011 and authenticated by one of the authors (HW). A voucher specimen
(PHARM110063) has been deposited in the Medicinal Plant Herbarium at Southern
Cross University.
2.3 Extraction and Isolation. The powdered dried leaves of G. parviflora (2 kg)
were extracted with 95% ethanol at room temperature. The ethanol extract was
suspended in H2O and extracted using CHCl3 (3 × 1L). The CHCl3 portion was
evaporated under reduced pressure to afford a crude extract (167.5 g). The crude
CHCl3 extract was subjected to MCI gel (CHP20P) CC, eluted with a gradient of
MeOH/H2O (80:20–100:0) to give five fractions (A–E). After recrystallization in
methanol, Compound 1 (9.6 g) and 6 (1.6 g) were obtained from fraction B and
fraction C respectively. Fraction A was further separated by a C18-E column (4 × 50
cm), eluted with MeOH/H2O (50–70%) to give compound 8 (80 mg) and compound 9
(120 mg). Fraction B (18.4 g) was subjected to silica gel CC, eluted with a gradient of
hexane-EtOAc (4:1, 2:1) to give nine subfractions (BI–BIX), BI was further separated
by preparative HPLC [Phenomenex Luna C18 column (150 × 21.20) 5 µm; mobile
phase acetonitrile and H2O containing 0.05% TFA (0-5 min: 40% acetonitrile, 5–15
min: 40%–95% acetonitrile, 15–20 min: 95% acetonitrile); flow rate 20 mL/min; UV
detection at 210 and 280 nm] to give compound 3 (820 mg). BVIII was applied to a
C18-E column (5 × 40 cm) with a stepwise gradient of MeOH/H2O (40%–70%) to
give compound 2 (16 mg) and compound 11 (16 mg). BIX was subjected to a C18-E
column (5 × 40 cm) eluted with a gradient of MeOH/H2O (40%–60%) to give
compound 4 (8 mg) and compound 7 (12 mg). Fraction D (240 mg) was further
separated by preparative HPLC [Phenomenex Luna C18 column (150 × 21.20) 5 µm;
mobile phase acetonitrile and H2O containing 0.05% TFA (0–5 min: 40% acetonitrile,
5–15 min: 40%–95% acetonitrile, 15–20min: 95% acetonitrile); flow rate 20 mL/min;
UV detection at 210 and 280 nm] to give compound 10 (80 mg). Fraction E was
subjected to a silica gel column, with hexane-EtOAc (8:1, 4:1) as eluent to give six
subfractions (EI–EVI). Compound 5 was obtained from EIV by preparative HPLC
[Phenomenex Luna C18 column (150 × 21.20 mm) 5 µm; mobile phase acetonitrile
and H2O containing 0.05% TFA (0–5 min: 50% acetonitrile, 5–17 min: 50%–95%
acetonitrile, 17–20 min: 95% acetonitrile); flow rate 20 mL/min; UV detection at 210
and 280 nm]. Luminescence was measured on a Wallac 1450 Microbeta
luminescence counter (Wallac, Turku, Finland).
Compound (11). A yellow solid; UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 204.0 (4.30), 228.0 (4.11),
282.0 (4.13), 341.0 (4.07), 385.0 (3.90) nm; IR (neat) νmax 3343, 1652, 1607, 1513,
1487, 1440, 1381, 1201, 1178, 1023, 840 cm-1; 1H NMR (Table 1); 13C NMR (Table
1); HREIMS m/z 369.0581 [M + Na]+ (Calc. 369.0586 for C17H28NaO5); APCI-MS m/z
347.1 [M+H]+.
2.4 Bioassays
2.4.1 Cytotoxicity assay. Cytotoxicity in RAW 264.7 murine leukemic monocyte-
macrophages (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) was assayed in 96-well plates using the
ATPlite™ Assay kit (PerkinElmer, Glen Waverley, Australia) with chlorambucil
(Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) as a positive control, as previously described
(Shou et al., 2012). Samples were assayed in triplicate.
2.4.2 PGE2 assay. The effect of the compounds on calcium ionophore A23187-
induced PGE2 production in 3T3 Swiss albino mouse embryonic fibroblast cells
(ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) was performed as previously described (Shou et al.,
2012). The percentage inhibition of PGE2 production by each sample (assayed in
triplicate) was calculated relative to the DMSO control.
2.4.3 Nitrite (Griess) assay. All compounds were tested for their ability to inhibit
LPS-induced nitric oxide production by RAW 264.7 cells, The experimental
procedure has been reported previously (Shou et al., 2012). Samples and controls
were assayed in triplicate.
2.4.4 TNF-α assay. This assay was performed on a portion of the same cell
supernatants as was used for the nitrite assay in 2.4.3. TNF-α was quantified using a
Quantikine Mouse TNF-α immunoassay kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA)
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The percentage inhibition of TNF-α
production by each sample (assayed in triplicate) was calculated relative to the
DMSO control.
2.4.5 Selectivity Index. This index was calculated as the ratio between the IC50
value for cytotoxic activity and the IC50 value for the assay of interest (Jabit et al.,
2009).
2.4.6 Antibacterial assays. All compounds were tested for antibacterial activity
against a panel of Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 and ATCC
25923, S. epidermidis ATCC 35984, biofilm-forming) and Gram-negative
(Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853) strains as
previously described (Shou et al., 2012).
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A total of four alkaloids (1–4), six coumarins (5–10), and one flavonoid (11) were
isolated from the leaves of G. parviflora (Figure 1). Among them, compound 11 was
a new flavonol, compound 7 was a new natural product, whereas compounds 2–5
were isolated from this species for the first time.
Compound 11 was obtained as a yellow solid. Its HRESIMS exhibited an ion peak at
m/z 369.0581 [M + Na]+, which suggested a molecular formula of C17H28O8. The
characteristic UV absorptions at 282 nm, 341 nm and 385 nm indicated a flavonol
nature of compound 11 (Fang, 1985). The 1H NMR spectrum exhibited two aromatic
doublets at δH 8.24 (2H, d, J = 8.0) and δH 7.03 (2H, d, J = 7.9) in accord with a
flavonol with 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 4′- oxygenation pattern. A downfield proton at δH 11.65
assignable to the C-5-OH chelated to the carbonyl group of C-4 was also observed.
Two singlets at δH 4.01 and 3.91 (3H, each) suggested the presence of two methoxyl
groups. In the HMBC spectrum of 11, the correlations of methoxyl protons (δH 3.91,
3H, s) and the proton of C-5-OH (δH 11.65) with C-6 (δc 136.8) were observed
(Figure 2), suggesting one of the methoxyl groups being located at C-6. Irradiation of
the protons of one methoxyl group gave rise to a NOE of the other methoxyl group,
which suggested the latter was unequivocally placed at C-7. Thus the structure of
compound 11 was established as 3, 5, 8, 4′-tetrahydroxy-6,7-dimethoxyflavone. All
the 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic signals of 11 were assigned on the basis of 13C
NMR, 1H-1H COSY, HSQC and HMBC spectra.
Compounds 1-10 (Figure 1) were determined to be flindersine (1) (Jung et al.,
2010), 8-(methoxyl) flindersine (2) (Thangavel et al., 2007), N-(acetoxymethyl)
flindersine (3) (Brader et al., 1993), haplaphine (4) (Ahmed et al., 2010), (R)-6-O-(4-
geranyloxy-2-hydroxy) cinnamoylmarmin (5) (Masuda et al., 1992), geiparvarin (6)
(Lahey and Macleod, 1967), 6-(methoxyl) geiparvarin (7) (Brophy et al., 2005), 6′-
dehydromarmin (8) (Lahey and Macleod, 1967), marmin (9) (Brophy et al., 2005),
and 7-geranyloxycoumarin (10) (Brophy et al., 2005).
All of the compounds (1–11) were investigated for their cytotoxic and anti-
inflammatory activities in vitro. Cytotoxic tests were included to allow for the
calculation of the Selectivity Index (the ratio of the ED50 for cytotoxicity and the IC50
for the activity of interest) (Jabit et al., 2009). The results are summarized in Table 2.
Compound 1 and 3 inhibited the synthesis of PGE2 in calcium ionophore-stimulated
3T3 fibroblast cells with IC50 values of 5.0 µM and 4.9 µM respectively (Figure 3).
Compound 2 showed greatly decreased activity compared to compound 1, with an
IC50 of 122.7 µM, while compound 4, which lacks the dimethyl pyrane ring of
compound 1, showed no activity in this assay, indicating that the presence of this
structural feature is crucial for this activity. It is noteworthy that the Selectivity Index
was relatively high for both compounds 1 and 3 (12.7 and 18.8, respectively),
suggesting the observed inhibitory activity was not a product of cytotoxic effects.
This is the first report of PGE2 inhibitory activity of flindersine and its derivatives.
PGE2 is considered the principal pro-inflammatory prostanoid and contributes to pain
in the peripheral regions as well as the central nervous system (Chen et al., 2013;
Kawabata, 2011). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which target
PGE2 synthesis by inhibiting cyclooxygenase enzymes, are widely used but have
undesirable gastrointestinal and cardiovascular side effects (Chen et al., 2013).
Consequently the inhibition of prostaglandin synthases, particularly microsomal
PGES-1, has become the focus of drug development (Chen et al., 2013), as safe
and effective inhibitors of PGE2 production are highly sought after to relieve pain and
inflammation. Further investigation of the mechanism of action of these two
compounds, in particular to determine if they inhibit COX-2 or PGE synthase
enzymes, would be valuable. The results of this study also warrant further
investigation of the structure-activity relationships within this group of compounds.
Compound 6, and to a lesser extent compound 10, inhibited the production of TNF-α
in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages, with IC50 values of 4.1 µM and 19.8
µM, respectively (Table 2). However, the selectivity indices for these compounds
were low (2.0 and 2.2, respectively), suggesting that at least some of the TNF-α
inhibitory effect can be accounted for by their cytotoxic effects. Compounds 5, 6 and
7 were fairly potent inhibitors of NO production in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells
with IC50 values in the low micromolar range. However, these compounds also
showed considerable cytotoxicity and consequently their selectivity indices were low,
ranging from 2.1 to 2.5, suggesting that cytotoxic effects account for at least some of
the observed NO inhibitory activity. The observed cytotoxicity is consistent with
previous reports of geiparvarin (6) and its analogues with a 3(2H) furanone ring
having antitumour activity (Miglietta et al., 2001; Simoni et al., 1991).
None of the compounds showed anti-bacterial activity against the panel of Gram-
negative and Gram-positive bacteria, i.e. Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA and MSSA
strains), S. epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli.
The chemical constituents and biological activity of the vast majority of Australian
native plants used traditionally as medicines remain poorly known. The present work
demonstrates that in vitro, two alkaloids found in the leaves of G. parviflora inhibit the
release of PGE2, an important mediator of pain and inflammation. Given this plant
has been used traditionally by Australian Aboriginal people to relieve pain, we
suggest the presence of these anti-inflammatory compounds may at least in part
explain this traditional use. Further work could potentially examine specific
antinociceptic activities in animal models, and structure/activity studies of the
identified compounds may enable the design and synthesis of compounds with
enhanced activity.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Wound Management Innovation CRC (established
and supported under the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres
Program). We thank Mr Graham Macfarlane University of Queensland, School of
Chemistry & Molecular Biosciences, for determining the accurate mass of the new
compound.
References
Ahmed, N., Brahmbhatt, K.G., Sabde, S., Mitra, D., Singh, I.P., Bhutani, K.K., 2010. Synthesis and anti-
HIV activity of alkylated quinoline 2,4-diols. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry 18, 2872-2879.
Baraldi, P.G., Guarneri, M., Manfredini, S., Simoni, D., Balzarini, J., De Clercq, E., 1989. Synthesis and
cytostatic activity of geiparvarin analogues. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 32, 284-288.
Bocca, C., Gabriel, L., Miglietta, A., 2001. Cytoskeleton-interacting activity of geiparvarin,
diethylstilbestrol and conjugates. Chemico-Biological Interactions 137, 285-305.
Brader, G., Wurz, G., Greger, H., Hofer, O., 1993. Novel Prenylated 2-Quinolinones from East Asian
Zanthoxylum Species. Liebigs Annalen der Chemie 1993, 355-358.
Brophy, J.J., Goldsack, R.J., Forster, P.I., 2005. The leaf oils of Coatesia and Geiera (Rutaceae) from
Australia. J. Essent. Oil Res. 17, 169-174.
Carotti, A., Carrieri, A., Chimichi, S., Boccalini, M., Cosimelli, B., Gnerre, C., Carrupt, P.A., Testa, B.,
2002. Natural and synthetic geiparvarins are strong and selective MAO-B inhibitors. Synthesis and
SAR studies. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 12, 3551-3555.
Chen, L.H., Yang, G.R., Grosser, T., 2013. Prostanoids and inflammatory pain. Prostag Oth Lipid M
104, 58-66.
Chimichi, S., Boccalini, M., Salvador, A., Dall'Acqua, F., Basso, G., Viola, G., 2009. Synthesis and
biological evaluation of new geiparvarin derivatives. ChemMedChem 4, 769-779.
Cribb, A.B., Cribb, J.W., 1981. Wild Medicine in Australia. William Collins Pty Ltd, Sydney.
Cunningham, G.M., Mulham, W.E., Milthorpe, P.L., Leigh, J.H., 1992. Plants of Western New South
Wales. Inkata Press, Melbourne/Sydney.
Dreyer, D.L., Lee, A., 1972. Extractives of Geijera parviflora. Phytochemistry 11, 763-767.
Duraipandiyan, V., Ignacimuthu, S., 2009. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of Flindersine isolated
from the traditional medicinal plant, Toddalia asiatica (L.) Lam. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 123,
494-498.
Fang, N., Leidig, M., Mabry T. J., 1985. Fifty-one flavonoids from Gutierrezia microcephala.
Phytochemistry 25, 927-934.
Hartley, T.G., 2001. Morphology and biogeography in Australasian-Malesian Rutaceae. Malay. Nat. J.
55, 197-219.
Jabit, M.L., Wahyuni, F.S., Khalid, R., Israf, D.A., Shaari, K., Lajis, N.H., Stanslas, J., 2009. Cytotoxic and
nitric oxide inhibitory activities of methanol extracts of Garcinia species. Pharm. Biol. 47, 1019-1026.
Jung, E.J., Park, B.H., Lee, Y.R., 2010. Environmentally benign, one-pot synthesis of pyrans by domino
Knoevenagel/6π-electrocyclization in water and application to natural products. Green Chemistry 12,
2003-2011.
Kawabata, A., 2011. Prostaglandin E-2 and Pain-An Update. Biol Pharm Bull 34, 1170-1173.
Kobayashi Y, 2010. The regulatory role of nitric oxide in proinflammatory cytokine expression during
the induction and resolution of inflammation. Journal of Leukocyte Biology 88, 1157-1162.
Lahey, F., Macleod, J., 1967. The coumarins of Geijera parviflora Lindl. Australian Journal of
Chemistry 20, 1943-1955.
Lassak, E.V., McCarthy, T., 1983. Australian Medicinal Plants. Methuen Australia Pty Ltd, North Ryde.
Masuda, T., Muroya, Y., Nakatani, N., 1992. 7-Hydroxycoumarin derivatives from the juice oil of
Citrus hassaku. Phytochemistry 31, 1363-1366.
Matthes, H., Schreiber, E., 1914. Poisonous woods. Ber. Dtsch. Pharm. Ges. 24, 385-444.
Miglietta, A., Bocca, C., Gabriel, L., Rampa, A., Bisi, A., Valenti, P., 2001. Antimicrotubular and
cytotoxic activity of geiparvarin analogues, alone and in combination with paclitaxel. Cell
Biochemistry and Function 19, 181-189.
O'Donnell, F., Smyth, T.J.P., Ramachandran, V.N., Smyth, W.F., 2010. A study of the antimicrobial
activity of selected synthetic and naturally occurring quinolines. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 35, 30-38.
Penfold, A.R., 1932. Natural chemical resources of Australian plant products. Part ii. Journal of
Chemical Education 9, 429-438.
Porteners, M.F., 2014. NSW Flora Online , in PlantNET - The Plant Information Network System of
The Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Sydney, Australia. http://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au
Ricciotti, E., FitzGerald G.A., Prostaglandins and inflammation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2011.
31(5): p. 986-1000.
Sadgrove, N.J., Gonçalves-Martins, M., Jones, G.L., 2014. Chemogeography and antimicrobial activity
of essential oils from Geijera parviflora and Geijera salicifolia (Rutaceae): two traditional Australian
medicinal plants. Phytochemistry 104, 60-71..
Sadgrove, N.J., Jones, G.L., 2013. Characterization and bioactivity of essential oils from Geijera
parviflora (Rutaceae): A native bush medicine from Australia. Natural Product Communications 8,
747-751.
Schaible, H.G., et al., The role of proinflammatory cytokines in the generation and maintenance of
joint pain. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2010. 1193: p. 60-9.
Shou, Q., Banbury, L.K., Maccarone, A.T., Renshaw, D.E., Mon, H., Griesser, S., Griesser, H.J.,
Blanksby, S.J., Smith, J.E., Wohlmuth, H., 2014. Antibacterial anthranilic acid derivatives from Geijera
parviflora. Fitoterapia 93, 62-66.
Shou, Q., Banbury, L.K., Renshaw, D.E., Lambley, E.H., Mon, H., MacFarlane, G.A., Griesser, H.J.,
Heinrich, M.M., Wohlmuth, H., 2012. Biologically active dibenzofurans from Pilidiostigma glabrum,
an endemic Australian Myrtaceae. Journal of Natural Products 75, 1612-1617.
Shou, Q., Banbury, L.K., Renshaw, D.E., Smith, J.E., He, X., Dowell, A., Griesser, H.J., Heinrich, M.,
Wohlmuth, H., 2013. Parvifloranines A and B, two 11-carbon alkaloids from Geijera parviflora.
Journal of Natural Products 76, 1384-1387.
Simoni, D., Manfredini, S., Tabrizi, M.A., Bazzanini, R., Baraldi, P.G., Balzarini, J., De Clercq, E., 1991.
Geiparvarin analogues. 2. Synthesis and cytostatic activity of 5-(4- arylbutadienyl)-3(2H)-furanones
and of N-substituted 3-(4-oxo-2-furanyl)-2- buten-2-yl carbamates. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
34, 3172-3176.
Sommer, C. and M. Kress, Recent findings on how proinflammatory cytokines cause pain: peripheral
mechanisms in inflammatory and neuropathic hyperalgesia. Neurosci Lett, 2004. 361(1-3): p. 184-7.
Thangavel, D., Ravindran, S., Moonsamy, G.R., Palathurai, M.S., 2007. Simple efficient synthesis of
pyranoquinoline alkaloids: Flindersine, khaplofoline, haplamine and their analogues. Journal of
Chemical Research, 124-126.
Viola, G., Vedaldi, D., dall'Acqua, F., Basso, G., Disarò, S., Spinelli, M., Cosimelli, B., Boccalini, M.,
Chimichi, S., 2004. Synthesis, cytotoxicity, and apoptosis induction in human tumor cells by
geiparvarin analogues. Chemistry & biodiversity 1, 1265-1280.
Wilson, A.D., Harrington, G.N., 1980. Nutritive value of Australian browse plants, in: Le Houerou,
H.N. (Ed.), Browse in Africa - the current state of knowledge. International Livestock Centre for
Africa, Addis Ababa, pp. 291-298.
Table 1 The 1H, 13C NMR Data of Compound 11 in Acetone-d6 (δ, ppm; J, Hz)
No. 13C No. 1H 13C
2 147.9 1′ 123.5
3 136.6 2′ 8.24, d (8.0) 130.9
4 177.6 3′ 7.03, d (7.9) 116.4
5 145.1 4′ 160.4
6 136.8 5′ 7.03, d (7.9) 116.4
7 148.0 6′ 8.24, d (8.0) 130.9
8 131.8 6-Me 3.91, s 61.1
9 141.3 7-Me 4.01, s 61.9
10 106.7
Table 2 Cytotoxic and anti-inflammatory activities of compounds 1–11
Compound
no. Cytotoxicity
ECD50 (95% CI)
(µM)
Nitric oxide
inhibition
IC50 (95% CI)
(µM)
TNFα inhibition
IC50 (95% CI)
(µM)
PGE2
inhibition
IC50 (95% CI)
(µM)
Selectivity
Index
1 63.4(48.0–
83.3)
64.0 (54.5–
75.1)
38.4 (21.9–
67.3)
5.0 (3.1–8.3) 12.7 (PGE2)
2 >200 169.6 (135.9–
211.7)
>390 122.7 (77.3–
195.0)
-
3 92.0 (79.6–
106.6)
111.5 (99.8–
124.6)
60.3( 46.3–
78.6)
4.9 (3.1–7.8) 18.8 (PGE2)
4 151.0 (121.4–
187.9)
79.2 (56.6–
110.1)
173.6 (151.7–
198.6)
NA -
5 11.9 (10.1–
13.9)
5.8 (4.1–8.2) 92 (60–139) NA 2.1 (NO)
6 8.3 (6.4–11.0) 3.8 (3.7–4.0) 4.1 (2.2–8.0) NA 2.2 (NO), 2.0
(TNF)
7 12.6 (11.2–
14.1)
5.0 (3.8–6.7) >280 NA 2.5 (NO)
8 43.7 (37.0–
51.5)
57.6 (52.7–
62.9)
>300 NA -
9 79.8 (66.2–
96.1)
105.2 (99.7–
111.8)
>300 NA -
10 43.6 (35.0–
54.3)
62.7 (49.9–
78.8)
19.8 (8.0–48.7) NA 2.2 (TNF)
11 > 300 141.0(119.2–
166.8)
NA NA -
Positive
control
Chlorambucil
31.5 (26.4–
37.6) µM
Dexamethasone
20.8(13.9–31.9)
nM
Dexamethasone
37.0(20.1–67.8)
nM
Indomethacin
6.8 (4.4–10.7)
nM
NA: not active
NH
O
O
NH
O
O
O
N O
O
O
O
NH
O
O
O OO
OH
O
O
HO O
1 2 3 4
5
OOO
O
O
OO O
OOO
O
O
O
6
10
OO O
HO
OH
OO OHO
O
7
89
11
O
O
OH
OH
MeO
MeO
OHOH
Figure 1. Chemical structures of compounds 1–11
Figure 2. Key HMBC and NOE correlations of compound 11
Figure 3. Inhibition of prostaglandin E2 synthesis in 3T3 Swiss albino
cells: dose response curves for compounds 1 and 3.
Figure captions
Figure 1. Chemical structures of compounds 1-11.
Figure 2. Key HMBC and NOE correlations of compound 11.
Figure 3. Inhibition of prostaglandin E2 synthesis in 3T3 Swiss albino cells: dose
response curves for compounds 1 and 3.