Upload
independent
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their useof evidence a systematic review
Simon Innvtimesr Gunn Vist Mari Trommald Andrew OxmanHealth Services Research Unit National Institute of Public Health Oslo Norway
Objectives The empirical basis for theories and common wisdom regarding how to improve appropriate use ofresearch evidence in policy decisions is unclear One source of empirical evidence is interview studies with policy-makers The aim of this systematic review was to summarise the evidence from interview studies of facilitators ofand barriers to the use of research evidence by health policy-makers
Methods We searched multiple databases including Medline Embase Socio le PsychLit PAIS IBSS IPSA andHealthStar in June 2000 hand-searched key journals and personally contacted investigators We included interviewstudies with health policy-makers that covered their perceptions of the use of research evidence in health policydecisions at a national regional or organisational level Two reviewers independently assessed the relevance ofretrieved articles described the methods of included studies and extracted data that were summarised in tables andanalysed qualitatively
Results We identi ed 24 studies that met our inclusion criteria These studies included a total of 2041 interviewswith health policy-makers Assessments of the use of evidence were largely descriptive and qualitative focusing onhypothetical scenarios or retrospective perceptions of the use of evidence in relation to speci c cases Perceivedfacilitators of and barriers to the use of evidence varied The most commonly reported facilitators were personalcontact (1324) timely relevance (1324) and the inclusion of summaries with policy recommendations (1124)The most commonly reported barriers were absence of personal contact (1124) lack of timeliness or relevance ofresearch (924) mutual mistrust (824) and power and budget struggles (724)
Conclusions Interview studies with health policy-makers provide only limited support for commonly held beliefsabout facilitators of and barriers to their use of evidence and raise questions about commonsense proposals forimproving the use of research for policy decisions Two-way personal communication the most common suggestionmay improve the appropriate use of research evidence but it might also promote selective (inappropriate) use ofresearch evidence
Journal of Health Services Research amp Policy Vol 7 No 4 2002 239ndash244 The Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd 2002
Introduction
Weiss and Weiss argue that lsquoboth decision-makers andsocial scientists behave as though social science researchmakes a genuine contribution to public policyrsquo1 At thesame time many researchers are sceptical about theextent to which research is used and many policy-makersare sceptical about the usefulness of research AsLindblom and Cohen suggest lsquo in public policymaking many suppliers and users of social research aredissatis ed the former because they are not listened tothe latter because they do not hear much they want tolisten torsquo2
Several theories have been put forward to explain therole of research in policy-making and common wisdom
about how to improve the appropriate use of research isnot hard to nd although empirical evidence tosupport it is dif cult to nd3 One source of suchevidence is the perceptions of those involved in policy-making The objective of this systematic review was tosummarise the evidence from interview studies withhealth policy decision-makers that cover their use ofresearch evidence in health policy decisions We wereparticularly interested in identifying facilitators of andbarriers to the use of evidence by health policy decision-makers as a basis for developing strategies to improvethe appropriate use of research
We found three previous non-systematic reviews thataddressed policy-makersrsquo use of evidence4ndash6 The rstevaluated evidence regarding research utilisation inrelationship to the lsquotwo-communitiesrsquo metaphor and sixmodels of research utilisation3 The second reviewincluded 27 empirical studies with data relevant to thequestion of how to improve the utilisation of organisa-tional research5 The third review was similar to thesecond but less comprehensive6 In contrast to these
J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002 239
Review article
Simon Innvaeligr PhD Researcher Gunn E Vist PhD Researcher MariTrommald MD Researcher Andrew D Oxman MD Head of SectionHealth Services Research Unit National Institute of Public HealthPostboks 4404 Nydalen 0403 Oslo Norway
Correspondence to SI
earlier reviews we have used a systematic approach toidentify select and synthesise relevant research We havealso focused the review on interview studies involvinghealth policy decision-makers and their perceptions ofthe enablers of and barriers to the use of researchevidence for policy decisions
Methods
Search strategy
We searched PubMed using an iterative strategy begin-ning with relevant articles that we had in our les andsearching for related articles Relevant articles fromthese searches were identied and new searches forrelated articles were performed Additional articles wereidenti ed by hand-searching journals (n ˆ 2) personalcommunication (n ˆ 3) tracking references in articlesand books (n ˆ 7) and searching in other electronicdatabases
The following databases were searched in June 2000using combinations of index terms and text wordsderived from relevant articles that we had previouslyidentied Medline from 1966 EMBASE from 1980Socio le (Sociological Abstracts) from 1963 PsychLITfrom 1987 PAIS from 1972 IBSS (International Biblio-graphy of the Social Sciences) from 1981 IPSA (Interna-tional Political Science Abstracts) from 1989 HealthStarfrom 1992 ISI Web of Science from 1981 and the NHSNational Research Register
Knowledge Creation Diffusion Utilization was hand-searched Due to lack of availability only 1979 1980(vols 1 2 and 4) 1981ndash1984 1985 (vols 3 and 4) 1987ndash1993 1994 (vols 3 and 4) were hand-searched Knowledgeand Policy was hand-searched for 1995ndash1997 when itcontinued as Knowledge and Policy The InternationalJournal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization which washand-searched for 1998ndash2000
Selection criteria
We included interview studies and surveys with healthpolicy decision-makers We only included studies ofhealth policy-makers responsible for decisions on behalfof a large organisation or jurisdiction If others were alsointerviewed ndash most often researchers ndash decision-makershad to be explicitly de ned as a subgroup within thestudy Studies of clinical decision-making for individualpatients were excluded
The studies had to address decision-makersrsquo use ofresearch evidence in health policy decisions or on abroader range of policy decisions if these includedhealth policy decisions
Data collection and analysis
Articles were retrieved if it appeared likely that theycontained empirical data from interviews or if they other-wise appeared highly relevant Three people reviewed asample of 200 citations and abstracts following which
one person reviewed all of the citations and abstractsthat were found and the reference lists of all of theretrieved articles
The retrieved articles were assessed for inclusion byat least two people When disagreements could not beresolved by discussion a third person assessed the articleStudies that appeared relevant but which were not areincluded in a list of excluded studies (46 studies availablefrom the authors)
Two people extracted data from the included studiesusing a data collection form The extracted data weresummarised in three tables with the following informa-tion
Table 1 (characteristics) the studyrsquos objective thetype of interviews used characteristics of the partici-pants the types of research evidence and the types ofpolicy decisions that were considered
Table 2 (methods) the sampling frame and strategyresponse rate how the use of evidence was measuredor assessed how the determinants of use weremeasured or assessed
Table 3 (main results) identied the facilitators ofand barriers to the use of research
Tables 1 2 and 3 are included only in the onlineversion of the journal and may be viewed free of chargeat httpwwwcatchwordcomrpsvcatchwordrsm13558196v7n4s8p239
Results
More than 3000 references were found Seventy studiesappeared relevant on the basis of title keywords andabstracts Twenty-four studies reported in 26 articles metthe inclusion criteria Although non-English languagepapers were not excluded from our search all theincluded papers were in English The studies wereundertaken in the USA (n ˆ 10) both the USA and theUK (n ˆ 1) the UK (n ˆ 3) Canada (n ˆ 3) Australia(n ˆ 1) Burkina Faso (n ˆ 1) Mexico (n ˆ 1) TheNetherlands (n ˆ 1) Pakistan (n ˆ 1) South Africa(n ˆ 1) and Sweden (n ˆ 1)
Search strategy
The study designs varied Face-to-face interviews tele-phone interviews and postal questionnaires were usedwith open-ended semi-structured and structured inter-views (Table 1) Most of the studies focused on one or afew cases with widely varying policy questions and typesof evidence Generally the participants were poorlydescribed but most of the studies interviewed peoplewith apparent responsibility for making important policydecisions such as people in lsquoupper level positionsrsquo andlsquosenior managersrsquo Staff members who appeared to haveless responsibility for decisions were also included inseveral studies Twenty-one of the 24 studies examinedthe role of evidence in actual decision-making processesThe other three studies examined hypothetical decisionsAll studies measured perceptions of use or hypothetical
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
240 J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
use rather than actual use of research evidence Five ofthe included studies did not report how many policy-makers were interviewed The remaining 19 studiesinterviewed a total of 2041 policy-makers (median 58range 16ndash479)
Study methods
The included studies were all limited with respect to thegeneralisability of their results Three studies intervieweda representative sample of health policy decision-makersdrawn from a clearly described sampling frame171834
Most studies reported how many decision-makers wereincluded and their positions but the relation betweenthe included policy-makers and the system from whichthey were drawn was rarely described Three of the 24included studies met all of our methodologicalcriteria171834 ie clearly described the sampling frameand the relationship of the included policy-makers tothis had a response rate of at least 60 and clearlydescribed how the use of evidence and the determinantsof how evidence was used were measured or assessed(Table 2) Seven studies partially met our criteria(Table 2last column) The other 14 studies did not adequatelydescribe the methods that were used
Measurement or assessment of the use and determi-nants of use of evidence was mostly descriptive Moststudies included a list of what the investigators perceivedto be barriers to or facilitators of the use of evidence Itis unclear which barriers and facilitators the decisions-makers found most important and which barriers andfacilitators were considered Six of the 24 studies ratedvariables that appeared to determine the use of evidence(Table 2)914171835
Facilitators and barriers
Many of the studies used open-ended questions Therespondents and investigators used different words todescribe facilitators of and barriers to the use ofresearch evidence However several common factorswere described across studies These are summarised inTable 3 A detailed version of this table including theexact words used in each of the included studies isavailable from the authors The most commonlymentioned facilitators of the use of research evidencein policy-making were
Personal contact between researchers and policy-makers (1324)
Timeliness and relevance of the research (1324)
Research that included a summary with clear recom-mendations (1124)
Good quality research (624)
Research that con rmed current policy or endorsedself-interest (624)
Community pressure or client demand for research(424)
Research that included effectiveness data (324)
The most commonly mentioned barriers to the use ofresearch evidence in policy-making were
Absence of personal contact between researchers andpolicy-makers (1124)
Lack of timeliness or relevance of research (924)
Mutual mistrust including perceived political naivetyof scientists and scienti c naivety of policy-makers(824)
Power and budget struggles (724)
Poor quality of research (624)
Political instability or high turnover of policy-makingstaff (524)
Based on the ndings of these studies personal two-way communication between researchers and decision-makers should be used to facilitate the use of researchThis can reduce mutual mistrust and promote a betterunderstanding of policy-making by researchers andresearch by policy-makers It can inform researchersabout what the decision-makers consider timely relevantquestions and policy-makers about how to obtain validanswers to these questions However the frequentlyidentied facilitators including personal two-way commu-nication may not be easy to establish ndash for examplebecause of political instability or high turnover of policy-making staff
Discussion
The strengths of this review include an extensive andsystematic literature search explicit inclusion criteriaand a systematic and transparent approach to collectingand presenting data from the included studies Everyincluded study was read and appraised by at least two ofthe authors The limitations of our review largely re ectthe limitations of the literature we reviewed
Because much research in the social sciences is poorlyindexed in electronic databases we may have missedrelevant studies Personal communication with investiga-tors in the eld yielded only three additional studies andalthough we attempted to contact the authors of all of theincluded studies only three responded and no additionalreferences were identi ed through these contacts
The limitations of the included studies with respect tosampling and generalisability are not surprising in lightof the fact that most of the studies were qualitative andwere not necessarily intended to include representativesamples Moreover given the diversity of contexts inwhich health policy decision-making occurs it is notpossible to obtain a generalisable sample Nonethelessinadequate descriptions of the participants and contextsfor many of the included studies make it dif cult tointerpret the results
No factor was mentioned in more than 13 of the 24studies as a facilitator or barrier even when similar factorswere grouped together This variation can in part beexplained by the fact that some of the studies focusedon speci c factors that were identied a priori andtherefore may have excluded other factors Anothersource of variation is the fact that most studies focused
Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence Review article
J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002 241
on speci c cases and factors were considered only inrelationship to those cases For example in a studyfocusing on the use of an economic evaluation it ismore likely that nancial constraints would be consid-ered as a barrier In a developing country study it is morelikely that international support would be considered as afacilitator In a study focusing on an issue on whichinterest groups have a strong position it would be morelikely that decision-makers would consider alliances withinterest groups as a facilitator or a barrier
Two theoretical perspectives were dominant in theliterature The rst perspective draws analogies betweenthe relationship of researchers and policy-makers andthe relationship between the natural sciences and thehumanities From this perspective problems with com-munication between researchers and policy-makers arelarge and dif cult to overcome936 This is often referredto as the lsquotwo-communities thesisrsquo or the lsquotwo culturesrsquoThe other perspective focuses on the concept of the lsquouseof researchrsquo It addresses how the word lsquousersquo may havefundamentally different meanings
The `two-communities thesisrsquo
The lsquotwo-communities thesisrsquo postulates the existence oftwo camps that lack the ability to take into account therealities or perspectives of one another Caplan et alfound that social scientists see themselves as rationalobjective and open to new ideas9 they see decision-makers as action- and interest-oriented indifferent toevidence and new ideas Decision-makers on the otherhand see themselves as responsible action-oriented andpragmatic they see scientists as naive jargon-ridden andirresponsible in relationship to practical realities Two-way communication between the two camps can facilitatea mutual understanding of a policy question and thekind of knowledge that is needed This requires thatresearchers and decision-makers agree on which ques-tions can be answered on the basis of research evidenceand which require political judgement This does notimply that research alone can answer policy questionssince these will always require some political judgementThe aim of two-way communication is to help ensurethat research appropriately informs judgements forwhich policy-makers are accountable not for researchersto assume the role of policy-makers
The results of this review support the lsquotwo communitiesthesisrsquo since the most commonly identied facilitatorof the use of evidence was personal contact betweenresearchers and decision-makers It is further supportedby the most commonly mentioned barriers to the use ofevidence absence of personal contact and mutual mistrustbetween decision-makers and researchers Personal two-way communication may also be a necessary preconditionfor other facilitators For example without personaltwo-way communication it may be dif cult for researchersto understand what decision-makers regard as timelyrelevant or good quality research
On the other hand this review is mostly based oninformation from one side of the two camps the decision-
makers It is not surprising that decision-makers nd iteasier to use evidence that they have had an opportunityto in uence through two-way communication with theresearchers Additionally the included studies do notclarify whether decision-makers use only the researchthey want to use Decision-makers may use evidence thatsupports their own ideology or their own politicalprogramme
The lsquotwo-communitiesrsquo thesis sheds light on animportant possible paradox inherent in the results thefactors that facilitate use of research may not necessarilybe factors that researchers should seek to enhance Ifwhat is required for research to be used is that researchersdo what the policy-maker wants them to do then researchmay fail to ful l one of its most important functionsnamely to be objective reliable and unbiased
What is `usersquo of evidence
Along with the lsquotwo-communitiesrsquo thesis the question ofwhat is meant by the concept of the lsquousersquo of evidence is themost commonly discussed theoretical issue in the litera-ture on knowledge utilisation The most frequent categor-isation of different types of use in this review is direct(lsquoinstrumentalrsquo or lsquoengineeringrsquo) selective (lsquosymbolicrsquo orlsquolegitimatingrsquo) and enlightening (lsquoconceptualrsquo) use ofevidence Direct use of evidence refers to speci c use ofresearch results It indicates that if research results arerelevant for a solution the results should directly affectthe solution without much adjustment Enlighteninguse of evidence refers to research that helps to lsquoestablishnew goals and bench marks of the attainablersquo37 and helpsto lsquoenrich and deepen understanding of the complexityof problems and the unintended consequences ofactionrsquo38 Selective use is strategic involving use lsquotolegitimate and sustain predetermined positionsrsquo5
The different de nitions of lsquousersquo contribute to thedif culty of interpreting the results of the studies includedin this review A health policy decision-maker who de nesuse as direct use is likely to report less use of researchevidence than decision-makers who also include selectiveor enlightening use of evidence Many of the studies haveaddressed different kinds of use and found that healthpolicy decision-makers refer to use in all three of theabove ways
The degree to which evidence is used directly in anenlightening way or selectively may vary in relation to
Different types of decision-makers upper middle andlower level
Different types of policy questions vague andcomplex or focused and simple
Different issues adoption versus implementation ordecision versus action
The degree to which evidence was directly used variedacross studies One study found that 40 of the use ofevidence was direct de ned as the lsquoprimary source inthe policy formulation processrsquo9 Another study foundonly 7 direct use212 The study that found 40 directuse was in a context where 94 of all the research used
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
242 J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
had been commissioned The study with only 7 directuse did not cover examples of commissioned researchThis suggests that expecting direct use frequently maybe unreasonable particularly for research that is notcommissioned A third study not included in thisreview found that local administrators close to pro-gramme operations reported more direct use ofevidence than federal-level decision-makers39
Enlightening use of evidence is more dif cult to assessthan direct use Decision-makers may interpret this asno more than a question of whether they considerresearch to be of value One study found that 60 ofdecision-makers lsquousedrsquo evidence in this way9 Self-reportedselective use of research on the other hand may bedif cult to elicit in interviews because it puts decision-makers in a bad light although it is commonly perceivedas a problem by researchers and others Research thatcon rms current policy or supports community pressuremay facilitate selective use Personal contact may alsofacilitate selective use of research
Conclusions
From the results of this review of 24 studies that met ourinclusion criteria based on 2041 interviews with policy-makers researchers who wish to increase the use of theresults of their research should have personal and closetwo-way communication with decision-makers providedecision-makers with a brief summary of their researchwith clear policy recommendations ensure that theirresearch is perceived as timely relevant and of highquality include effectiveness data argue that the resultsof their research are relevant to current policy anddemands from the community They should avoid gettinginvolved in power and budget struggles and be aware ofthe high turnover of policy-making staff Of course if theaim is to increase appropriate (direct or enlightening)use of research rather than selective use these strategieswill often not be effective as well as being dif cult toimplement
If the results from the interview studies with decision-makers are taken literally use of evidence will befacilitated by timely and relevant research that givesdecision-makers the answers that they want Howeverthey may not always be able to get what they want sinceresearchers should and it is to be hoped will insist onusing methods that protect against bias If decision-makers and researchers start to talk together about thebarriers and facilitators found in this review a morere ective appropriate and cooperative way of workingtogether which values both relevance and validity mayevolve
The studies included in this review address decision-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence Some studiessuggested document analysis as a way to check whetherthese perceptions correspond to what was done1215192133
but none of the included studies did this system-atically Future research should combine interviews withdocument analysis focus on commissioned research andclearly de ne what is meant by lsquousersquo of research
The methods that were used in the included studiesand their diversity limit the extent to which any rmconclusion can be drawn from this review In fact one ofthe main conclusions of this review is that there is atbest only limited support for any of the many opinionsput forward in the literature on the use of researchevidence by policy-makers At the same time given thediversity of the included studies the policy-makers whowere interviewed and the contexts in which they workedit is striking that some factors were identied as fre-quently as they were
Advice about how to improve the use of evidence bypolicy-makers is typically based on personal experiencesupported by anecdotes The results of this review providea context in which to consider such advice They providea menu of factors to consider but not a basis for anystrong recommendations Similarly the two theoriesthat are commonly used in these studies provide usefulinsights for understanding the perceptions summarised inthis review and other opinions about the use of evidenceby policy-makers but there are limited empirical data tosupport these or other theories
AcknowledgementWe thank Janette Boynton for help with literature searches
References1 Weiss JA Weiss CH Social scientists and decision makers
look at the usefulness of mental health research InLorion RP et al eds Psychology and public policybalancing public service and professional needWashington DC American Psychological Association1996 165ndash181
2 Lindblom CE Cohen DK Usable knowledge socialscience and social problem solving New Haven CT YaleUniversity Press 1979
3 Granados A Jonsson E Banta HD Bero L Bonair ACochet C et al EUR-Assess Project Subgroup Report onDissemination and Impact International Journal ofTechnology Assessment in Health Care 1997 13 220ndash286
4 Dunn WN The two-communities metaphor and models ofknowledge use an explanatory case study KnowledgeCreation Diffusion Utilization 1980 1 515ndash536
5 Beyer JM Trice HM The utilization process a conceptualframework and synthesis of empirical ndings Adminis-trative Science Quarterly 1982 27 591ndash622
6 Nelson CE Roberts J Maederer CM Wertheimer BJohnson B The utilization of social science informationby policy makers American Behavioral Scientist 1987 30569ndash577
7 van de Vall M Bolas C Using social policy research forreducing social problems an empirical analysis of struc-ture and functions Journal of Applied Behavioral Science1982 18 49ndash67
8 Glaser EM Taylor SH Factors in uencing the success ofapplied research American Psychologist 1973 28 140ndash146
9 Caplan N Morrison A Stambaugh RJ The use of socialscience knowledge in policy decisions at the national levela report to respondents Ann Arbor MI The University ofMichigan 1975 1ndash63
10 Caplan N A minimal set of conditions necessary for theutilization of social science knowledge in policy formula-tion at the national level In Weiss CH ed Using social
Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence Review article
J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002 243
research in public policy making Toronto LexingtonBooks 1977 183ndash198
11 Patton MQ Grimes PS Guthrie KM Breanan NJ et al Insearch for impact an analysis of the utilization of federalhealth evaluation research In Weiss CH ed Using socialresearch in public policy making Toronto LexingtonBooks 1977 141ndash164
12 Weiss CH Bucuvalas MJ Truth test and utility testdecision makersrsquo frames of reference for social scienceresearch American Sociological Review 1980 45 302ndash313
13 Weiss JA Coping with complexity An experimental studyof public policy decision-making In Kinder DD PalfreyTR eds Experimental foundations of political scienceAnn Arbor MI University of Michigan Press 1993 185ndash208
14 McNeece CA DiNitto DM Johnson PJ The utility ofevaluation research for administrative decision-makingAdministration in Social Work 1983 7 77ndash87
15 Sunesson S Nilsson K Explaining research utilizationbeyond lsquofunctionsrsquo Knowledge Creation Diffusion Util-ization 1989 10 140ndash155
16 Florio E DeMartini JR The use of information bypolicymakers at the local community level Knowledge1993 15 106ndash123
17 Boyer JF Langbein LI Factors in uencing the use ofhealth evaluation research in congress Evaluation Review1991 15 507ndash532
18 Ibbotson SL Long AF Sheldon TA Mason J An initialevaluation of Effective Health Care bulletins as instru-ments of effective dissemination Journal of Managementin Medicine 1993 7 48ndash57
19 Soumerai SB Ross-Degnan D Fortess EE Walser BLDeterminants of change in Medicaid pharmaceutical costsharing does evidence affect policy Milbank Quarterly1997 75 11ndash34
20 Harries U Elliott H Higgins A Evidence-based policy-making in the NHS exploring the interface betweenresearch and the commissioning process Journal of PublicHealth Medicine 1999 21 29ndash36
21 Elliott H Popay J How are policy makers using evidenceModels of research utilisation and local NHS policymaking Journal of Epidemiology and CommunityHealth 2000 54 461ndash468
22 Trostle J Bronfman M Langer A How do researchersin uence decision-makers Case studies of Mexicanpolicies Health Policy and Planning 1999 14 103ndash114
23 Ross J The use of economic evaluation in health careAustralian decision makersrsquo perceptions Health Policy1995 31 103ndash110
24 Oh CH Explaining the impact of policy information onpolicy-making Knowledge and Policy The InternationalJournal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization 1997 1022ndash55
25 Oh CH Rich RF Explaining use of information in publicpolicymaking Knowledge and Policy The InternationalJournal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization 1996 9 3ndash35
26 Hilderbrand M Simon J Hyder A The role of research inchild health policy and programs in Pakistan Geneva TheCouncil of Health Research and Development (COHRED)Working Group on Research to Action and Policy 200077ndash85
27 Rudat K Evaluation of the Effective Health Care BulletinLondon Of ce For Public Management 1998 1ndash46
28 Burns A Charlwood P Darling H Fox DM Greeneld LHamlyn L et al Better information better outcomes Theuse of health technology assessment and clinical effective-ness data in health care purchasing decisions in theUnited Kingdom and the United States New YorkMilbank Memorial Fund 2000 1ndash26
29 Eyles J Stoddart G Lavis J Pranger T Molyneaux-Smith LMcMullan C Making resource shifts supportive of thebroad determinants of health The PEI experienceHamilton McMaster Institute of Environment and Health2000 3ndash37
30 Gerhardus A Kielmann K Sanou A Lessons in research toaction and policy case studies from seven differentcountries Geneva The Council of Health Research andDevelopment (COHRED) Working Group on Research toAction and Policy 2000 19ndash27
31 Moodley J Jacobs M Research to action and policycombating vitamin a deciencies in South Africa GenevaThe Council of Health Research and Development(COHRED) Working Group on Research to Action andPolicy 2000 54ndash66
32 Lavis JN Farrant MSR Stoddard GL Barriers to employ-ment-related healthy public policy Toronto McMasterUniversity Centre for Health Economics and PolicyAnalysis 2000 00ndash03 1ndash28
33 Lavis JN Ross SE Hohenadel J Hurley J Stoddard GLWoodward C et al The role of health services research inCanadian provincial policy-making CHSRF Report 1997-021 Hamilton McMaster University 2000 1ndash44
34 McNeece CA DiNitto DM Johnson PJ The utility ofevaluation research for administrative decision-makingAdministration in Social Work 1983 7 77ndash87
35 van de Vall M Bolas C Using social policy research forreducing social problems an empirical analysis of struc-ture and functions Journal of Applied Behavioral Science1982 18 49ndash67
36 Snow CP The two cultures and the scientic revolutionCambridge Cambridge University Press 1959
37 Merton RK The role of applied social science in theformation of policy a research memorandum Philosophyof Science 1949 16 161ndash181
38 Aaron HJ Politics and the professors the great society inperspective Washington DC Brookings Institution 1978
39 Alkin MC Kosecoff J Fitzgibbon C Seligman R Evalua-tion and decision-making the title vii experience LosAngeles Center for the Study of Evaluation University ofCalifornia 1974
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244 J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244a J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
Cha
ract
eris
tics
ofin
clud
edst
udie
s
Co
un
try
year
cond
uct
ed(
year
pu
blis
hed
)re
fere
nce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fev
iden
ce(f
rom
whi
chd
ecis
ion
sw
ere
mad
e)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17 Th
eco
nditi
ons
and
func
tions
influ
enci
ngut
ilisa
tion
ofso
cial
pol
icy
rese
arch
(p4
9)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edsu
rvey
s(p
50)
Res
earc
hers
and
polic
y-m
aker
sth
atw
ere
resp
onsi
ble
for
inco
rpor
atin
gth
ere
sear
chre
sults
(p5
0)N
ˆno
tst
ated
120
rese
arch
proj
ects
on`c
lient
-orie
nted
rsquosoc
ial
rese
arch
with
inin
dust
rial
and
labo
urre
latio
ns
regi
onal
and
urb
anpl
anni
ngs
ocia
lwel
fare
and
publ
iche
alth
(p5
0)
Per
ceiv
ed(r
etro
spec
tive)
dec
isio
ns(p
50)
Rev
ised
vers
ion
ofpa
per
pres
ente
din
1979
(p4
9)
40ou
toft
he12
0pr
ojec
tsw
ere
onso
cial
wel
fare
and
publ
iche
alth
US
A19
738
Wha
twas
done
wha
the
lped
and
wha
thin
dere
dth
esu
cces
sfo
rten
rese
arch
proj
ects
unde
rthe
Nat
iona
lIns
titut
eof
Men
tal
Hea
lth
(p1
41)
Pers
onal
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
41)
Prin
cipa
linv
estig
ator
oth
erst
affm
emb
ers
adm
inis
trato
rsan
dpe
rson
sm
ostl
ikel
yto
be
utili
sers
(p1
41)
Nˆ
notg
iven
Five
proj
ects
rate
dlo
wan
dfiv
epr
ojec
tsra
ted
high
for
`suc
cess
rsquo(p
140
)
Per
ceiv
edus
eT
hein
terv
iew
sw
ere
don
ein
eith
er19
67or
1968
(pp
140^
141)
Su
cces
sde
fined
aspr
ojec
ttha
tw
asdi
rect
edto
the
orig
inal
obje
ctiv
ese
mbo
died
ina
clea
ran
dco
gent
rep
ort
cand
iden
ough
tobe
repl
icab
lea
ndth
atth
efin
din
gsw
ere
diss
emin
ated
adeq
uate
ly(p
140
)U
SA
1973
^197
49(p
vii)
and
USA
1973
^197
410So
cial
scie
nce
rese
arch
utili
satio
nan
dpo
licy
form
atio
n(p
vii)
Aw
aren
ess
ofre
sear
chk
now
ledg
eof
sour
ces
info
rmat
ion
retri
eval
pra
ctic
ein
tere
stin
soci
alin
dica
tors
eva
luat
ion
ofw
orth
and
obje
ctiv
ity
met
hods
and
mea
sure
men
tpr
oced
ures
deg
ree
ofco
nfid
ence
onfin
ding
sat
titud
esab
outu
sef
acto
rsth
atin
fluen
ceus
e(p
ix)
Pers
onal
inte
rvie
ws
open
-en
ded
and
stru
ctur
ed(p
pv
ix)
Upp
er-le
veld
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
inth
eex
ecut
ive
bran
chof
the
US
fede
ral
gove
rnm
ent(
ppv
viii)
31
depu
tyun
ders
ecre
tarie
s54
inst
itute
dire
ctor
s67
depu
tyas
sist
antd
irect
ors
52ag
ency
pers
onne
lN
ˆ20
4(p
v)
575
repo
rted
inst
ance
sof
use
whe
re38
5in
volv
edpr
imar
yre
sear
chso
urce
s(p
8)
94
wer
eei
ther
fund
edby
the
gove
rnm
ent
cond
ucte
dby
the
gove
rnm
ento
rbot
h(p
8)
Per
ceiv
ed(s
elf-r
epor
ted)
use
with
spec
ific
follo
w-u
pq
uest
ions
whe
nus
ew
asre
porte
d(p
1)
15
ofth
eus
eof
know
ledg
ew
ason
heal
thor
wel
fare
prob
lem
s(p
5)
`Mos
toft
heex
ampl
esre
spon
dent
sof
fere
dto
illust
rate
know
ledg
eap
plic
atio
nsre
ally
invo
lved
the
appl
icat
ion
ofse
cond
ary
sour
cein
form
atio
nrsquo(p
187
)
US
A19
77
11`T
oex
amin
eth
ena
ture
and
degr
eeof
utiliz
atio
nof
fede
rale
valu
atio
nre
sear
chrsquo
(p1
43)
Op
en-e
nded
inte
rvie
ws
with
diffe
rent
ques
tions
for
the
deci
sion
-mak
eran
dth
eev
alua
tor(
p1
43)
Thre
eke
yin
form
ants
from
each
ofth
e20
stud
ies
wer
ein
terv
iew
eda
proj
ect
offic
ert
hed
ecis
ion-
mak
er(g
over
nmen
tlev
el)a
ndth
eev
alua
tor(
p14
3)N
ˆ60
(p1
43)
20na
tiona
lhea
lthca
reev
alua
tions
(cas
est
udie
s)w
ithso
me
syst
emat
icd
ata
colle
ctio
nm
ade
betw
een
1971
and
1974
bas
edon
11fa
ctor
sid
entif
ied
byth
eau
thor
s(p
p14
2^14
3)
Per
ceiv
edan
dse
lf-d
efin
edus
e(p
144
)H
ealth
train
ing
lab
orat
ory
prof
icie
ncy
neig
hbou
rhoo
dhe
alth
cent
res
heal
thse
rvic
esd
eliv
ery
syst
ems
alco
holis
ml
oan
forg
iven
ess
and
train
ing
wor
ksho
p(p
p14
2^14
3)U
SA
1980
2 an
dU
SA19
8012
Polic
y-m
aker
srsquope
rcep
tions
ofth
eus
eful
ness
ofso
cial
scie
nces
rese
arch
(pp
165
302)
Pers
onal
inte
rvie
ws
both
open
-end
edan
dst
ruct
ured
(pp
168
171
303)
51fe
dera
l52
stat
e(fr
omte
nst
ates
)and
52lo
cal
offic
iald
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
inup
per-
leve
lpos
ition
s(p
p16
730
3)N
ˆ15
5
Each
dec
isio
n-m
aker
read
two
abst
ract
s(tw
o-pa
gers
)ou
tof5
0fo
ract
uals
ocia
lsc
ienc
ere
sear
chre
ports
(p
p1
683
03)
Hyp
othe
tical
deci
sion
s(i
e`re
leva
ntto
the
issu
esyo
urof
fice
deal
sw
ithrsquo)
onm
enta
lhe
alth
alc
ohol
and
drug
abus
e
(pp
166
303
)
Not
stat
edb
utpu
blis
hed
Ap
ril19
80R
eprin
ted
from
Am
eric
anP
sych
olog
ist 1
981
Bas
edon
the
sam
ere
sear
chp
roje
ctas
US
A19
8012
(but
par
tlyon
othe
rpar
tsof
the
data
)
The
deci
sion
-mak
ers
wer
eg
iven
diffe
rent
`em
piri
calrsquo
inte
rven
tions
(ie
two-
page
rs)a
ndar
eth
eref
ore
diffi
cult
toco
mpa
reon
the
effe
ctva
riabl
esco
ntin
ued
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244b J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
USA
1982
13
Toob
serv
eth
eim
pac
ttha
tde
cisi
onco
mp
lexi
tya
ndam
ount
ofin
form
atio
nav
aila
ble
had
onth
eq
ualit
yof
the
deci
sion
proc
ess
(p1
87)
Stru
ctur
eds
emi-s
truct
ured
and
open
-end
edqu
estio
n-na
ires
com
bine
dw
itha
cont
rolle
dex
perim
ent
Con
seq
uenc
esof
com
plex
ityw
ere
exam
ined
byef
fect
sof
info
rmat
ion
load
and
num
bero
fde
cisi
onal
tern
ativ
es(p
p1
871
931
94)
Exp
erie
nced
pub
lican
dp
rivat
ese
ctor
man
ager
sfro
msi
xm
id-c
aree
rp
rog
ram
mes
atH
arva
rd
MIT
Sta
nfor
dan
dth
eW
ashi
ngto
nP
ublic
Affa
irsC
ente
r(pp
187
188
)N
ˆ13
2(p
188
)
Each
dec
isio
n-m
aker
rece
ived
alo
ngm
emor
and
umde
scrib
ing
apr
oble
mp
rese
ntin
gev
iden
ceus
eful
inan
alys
ing
the
prob
lem
and
pose
da
dec
isio
nto
bem
ade
base
don
real
peo
ple
and
even
ts(p
188
)
Two
hypo
thet
ical
dec
isio
ns
one
onth
est
atersquo
sD
epar
t-m
ento
fHea
lthan
dR
ehab
i-lit
ativ
ese
rvic
esan
don
eon
am
etha
done
mai
nten
ance
pro
gram
me
inN
ewYo
rkC
ity(p
p1
88^1
89)
Dec
isio
nha
dto
bem
ade
from
avai
labl
ein
form
atio
nw
ithin
1ho
ur45
min
utes
(p1
93)
Rep
rinte
dfro
mth
eJo
urna
lof
Pol
icy
Ana
lysi
san
dM
anag
emen
t2
66^8
7(p
185
)
The
exp
erim
entw
asb
ased
onsi
xdi
ffere
ntve
rsio
nsof
each
ofth
etw
oca
ses
The
six
diff
eren
tver
sion
sof
the
case
sva
ried
inin
form
atio
nco
mpl
exity
Eac
hde
cisi
on-m
aker
had
only
one
deci
sion
tom
ake
aton
lyon
ele
velo
fcom
plex
ity(p
p18
9^19
019
3)U
SA19
83
14To
dete
rmin
eso
me
ofth
efa
ctor
sth
atin
fluen
cead
min
istra
tors
rsquouse
ofev
alua
tive
data
inde
cisi
on-
mak
ing
and
toex
amin
eth
ety
pes
ofde
cisi
ons
(p7
9)
Stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-e
nded
post
alq
uest
ionn
aire
s(p
p7
9^80
)
Dire
ctor
sin
com
mun
itym
enta
lhea
lthce
ntre
sin
Flor
ida
and
Nor
thC
arol
ina
(p7
9)N
ˆ42
Con
duct
edst
udie
son
prog
ram
me
effe
ctiv
enes
sor
imp
actd
urin
gth
ela
st12
-m
onth
per
iod
(p8
1)
Per
ceiv
ed(i
ere
por
ted
)us
e(p
p80
^81)
Swed
en19
84^1
98515
(p1
52)
Diff
eren
tway
sof
usin
gso
cial
rese
arch
in
stru
men
tal
polit
ical
co
nflic
ten
light
enm
ent
inte
ract
ive
and
tact
ical
(pp
141
143^
144)
Inte
rvie
ws
(p1
52)
Soc
ialw
orke
rs
man
agem
entd
irect
ors
loca
land
natio
nalp
oliti
cian
sin
15Sw
edis
hci
ties
and
com
mun
es(p
152
)N
ˆ90
(p1
52)
Doc
umen
tsth
atth
ere
spon
dent
sre
ferr
edto
Th
ese
docu
men
tsw
ere
also
anal
ysed
by
the
auth
ors
(p1
52)
Per
ceiv
edre
trosp
ectiv
ed
ecis
ions
(p1
52)
USA
1990
16To
dete
rmin
ew
hatt
ype
ofin
form
atio
nd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
use
and
how
ideo
log
yan
din
tere
sts
influ
ence
the
use
ofin
form
atio
n(p
109
)
Pers
onal
sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
112
)Lo
calp
lann
ing
com
mitt
ees
and
gove
rnm
ente
mp
loye
esin
two
rura
lcom
mun
ities
inth
eP
acifi
cN
orth
wes
t(p
110
)N
ˆ27
(p1
10)
Sour
ces
ofin
form
atio
nus
edin
com
mun
ityhe
alth
care
plan
ning
and
the
asse
ssm
ento
fthe
stra
tegi
cpl
anni
ngp
roce
ss(p
112
)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
112
)
USA
1991
17
Wha
tfac
tors
influ
ence
the
use
ofev
alua
tion
rese
arch
(on
heal
than
dhu
man
serv
ices
)in
cong
ress
(p5
08)
Stru
ctur
edte
lep
hone
inte
rvie
ws
(p5
13)
C
ongr
ess
mem
bers
and
thei
rsta
ff(p
512
)N
ˆ10
0Ea
chde
cisi
on-m
aker
chos
eon
est
udy
they
wer
efa
mili
arw
ith(p
515
)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
515
)E
valu
atio
nst
udie
sfro
mth
eD
epar
tmen
tofH
ealth
and
Hum
anSe
rvic
esth
atd
eal
with
natio
nalh
ealth
pro
gram
mes
(pp
507
515
)
Use
isde
fined
here
asbo
thin
stru
men
tal(
dire
ctim
ple
men
tatio
n)c
once
ptua
l(it
chan
ged
the
way
ofth
inki
ng)a
ndpe
rsua
sive
(use
dto
conv
ince
othe
rsp
516
)
The
inte
rvie
ws
last
ed15
^40
min
utes
(p5
14)
UK
1991
18U
sean
dre
ason
sfo
ruse
not
use
ofth
eE
iexclect
ive
Hea
lthC
are
Bul
letin
(pp
51^
54)
Stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-e
nded
post
alq
uest
ionn
aire
s(p
p5
0^51
)
Dis
trict
gen
eral
man
ager
sd
irect
ors
ofpu
blic
heal
than
dd
irect
ors
ofpl
anni
ng
com
mis
sion
ing
inU
Kd
istri
cthe
alth
auth
oriti
esor
com
mis
sion
ing
cons
ortia
(p5
0)N
ˆ17
2(p
51)
Eiexcle
ctiv
eH
ealth
Car
eB
ulle
tinN
o1
1991
on
scre
enin
gfo
rost
eop
oros
isto
prev
entf
ract
ures
(p5
0)
Per
ceiv
edus
eof
info
rmat
ion
and
hypo
thet
ical
dec
isio
ns
chan
geof
opin
ion
and
conf
iden
ceto
acto
nin
form
atio
nin
the
bulle
tin(p
p52
^54)
Res
pon
dent
sw
ere
que
stio
ned
abou
tabu
lletin
that
had
been
prev
ious
lypo
sted
toth
em(p
p51
52)
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244c J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
USA
1993
^199
419Th
ero
leof
rese
arch
info
rmat
ion
inp
olic
yde
velo
pmen
t(p
29)
Que
stio
nnai
res
(p1
3)
open
-end
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
4)an
dse
mi-
stru
ctur
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
4)
Key
info
rman
ts
inst
ates
that
chan
ged
cost
-sha
ring
pol
icie
sfo
rpre
scrip
tion
reim
burs
emen
tlim
itsan
dco
-pay
men
ts(p
14)
N
ˆin
adeq
uate
lyd
escr
ibed
Res
earc
hp
ublic
atio
nsan
dco
mm
ents
(p2
5)P
erce
ived
retro
spec
tive
dec
isio
ns(p
25)
Onl
y2^
3pa
ges
outo
f21
wer
ere
leva
nt(p
25f
f)I
nfor
man
tsin
clud
edM
edic
aid
drug
prog
ram
me
adm
inis
trato
rs
dire
ctor
sor
polic
yan
alys
ts
phar
mac
yco
nsul
tant
san
dle
gisl
ator
s(p
15)
UK
1994
^199
5202
1`T
oid
entif
yfa
ctor
sw
hich
faci
litat
eor
imp
ede
evid
ence
-bas
edp
olic
y-m
akin
grsquo(
p2
9)
In-d
epth
inte
rvie
ws
(usi
nga
topi
cgu
ide)
(p2
9an
dre
spon
seto
ale
tter)
Lead
polic
y-m
aker
sG
Psan
dre
sear
cher
sin
nine
diff
eren
tcas
est
udie
sat
alo
call
evel
inth
eN
HS
(pp
293
1)N
ˆ28
Soci
alre
sear
ch(p
42
inth
epr
ojec
trep
ort)
Per
ceiv
edde
cisi
ons
Polic
yon
the
inte
rface
bet
wee
nR
ampD
and
com
mis
sion
ing
atth
ehe
alth
auth
ority
leve
l(p
30)
Mex
ico
1994
^199
522`T
here
latio
nshi
pbe
twee
nhe
alth
rese
arch
(and
rese
arch
ers)
and
heal
thpo
licie
s(a
ndpo
licy-
mak
ers)
info
urve
rtica
lhe
alth
prog
ram
mes
inM
exic
orsquo(p
104
)
Ope
n-en
ded
(in-
dept
hrsquo)
inte
rvie
ws
with
aco
mm
onin
terv
iew
prot
ocol
(p1
06)
`Res
earc
hers
and
polic
y-m
aker
sfro
mdi
ffere
ntin
stitu
tions
and
leve
lsof
resp
onsi
bilit
yrsquo(p
103
)N
ˆ67
Use
ofre
sear
chpu
blic
atio
ns`w
here
we
knew
that
ther
ew
asat
leas
tso
me
inte
ract
ion
bet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dde
cisi
on-
mak
ersrsquo
(p1
05)
Per
ceiv
ed
use
ofev
iden
ceco
ncer
ning
AID
Sch
oler
afa
mily
pla
nnin
gan
dim
mun
isat
ion
ing
over
nmen
talp
rogr
amm
es(p
103
)
Per
sona
lcom
mun
icat
ion
gav
ead
ditio
nali
nfor
mat
ion
onth
isis
sue
It
isd
iffic
ultt
od
isce
rnw
heth
erth
ede
cisi
ons
wer
ep
erce
ived
orhy
pot
hetic
als
ince
ther
ear
eno
actu
alde
cisi
ons
men
tione
d
Aus
tralia
1995
23
Dec
isio
n-m
aker
srsquoaw
aren
ess
and
use
ofec
onom
icev
alua
tions
inhe
alth
care
(p1
03)
Inte
rvie
ws
open
-end
edan
dst
ruct
ured
(not
stat
edif
post
alt
elep
hone
orfa
ce-to
-fa
ce)(
p10
5)
Sen
iorm
anag
ers
inth
eFe
der
alD
epar
tmen
tof
Hea
lthH
ousi
ngan
dC
omm
unity
Serv
ices
New
Sou
thW
ales
Stat
eth
eH
ealth
Dep
artm
ent(
p10
4)
Nˆ
34(p
105
)
Use
ofec
onom
icev
alua
tions
forp
ricin
gon
drug
ssc
reen
ing
radi
olog
ytra
nspl
ants
and
scan
ning
(p1
05)
`Per
ceiv
edus
eof
econ
omic
eval
uatio
nsrsquo(
p1
04)
USA
1996
24
and
USA
1997
25
Tode
term
ine
whe
ther
the
proc
ess
of(s
ocia
lsci
ence
)in
form
atio
nut
ilisa
tion
varie
sac
ross
diff
eren
tare
as(i
ese
rvic
epr
ovis
ion
and
finan
cing
)(pp
16^
17)
Stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
16)
Fe
der
als
tate
and
loca
lp
olic
y-m
aker
sat
diff
eren
tle
vels
deal
ing
with
finan
cean
dse
rvic
es(p
16)
N
ˆ47
9(p
16)
No
spec
ific
repo
rtb
utin
foty
persquor
efer
topr
ogra
mm
eev
alua
tion
dem
onst
ratio
np
roje
ct
stat
istic
ald
ata
and
polic
yan
alys
is(p
34)
Per
ceiv
edre
trosp
ectiv
ed
ecis
ions
(p1
7)O
pen-
ende
din
terv
iew
sw
ere
used
toob
tain
basi
cb
ackg
roun
din
form
atio
nab
outt
hep
olic
ypr
oces
sTh
est
ruct
ured
inte
rvie
ws
built
onth
eop
en-e
nded
inte
rvie
ws
(p3
3)Pa
kist
an19
9826
The
role
that
rese
arch
pla
ysin
expe
rienc
esin
linki
ngre
sear
chw
ithp
olic
y(p
77)
Ope
n-en
ded
in-d
epth
inte
rvie
ws
(p7
7)D
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
from
gov
ernm
ent
the
cent
ral
min
istry
ofhe
alth
the
pla
nnin
gco
mm
issi
onan
dp
rovi
ncia
lhea
lthau
thor
ities
(p7
7)N
ˆ16
(p7
7)
Not
stat
edG
ener
alpe
rcep
tions
C
lose
stfo
cus
onch
ildhe
alth
prob
lem
ssu
chas
co-tr
imox
azol
em
ater
nal
mor
talit
yvi
tam
inA
b
reas
tfeed
ing
and
pol
io(p
p77
79)
UK
1998
27
The
imp
actt
hatt
heE
iexclect
ive
Hea
lthca
reB
ulle
tinha
sin
side
the
NH
Sor
gan
isat
ion
(p1
)
Tele
phon
ein
terv
iew
sst
ruct
ure
notm
entio
ned
(p1
)
Hea
lthau
thor
ities
(p
2)
Nˆ
34Tw
osp
ecifi
cbu
lletin
sJu
ne19
97an
dO
ctob
er19
97(p
1)
Hyp
othe
tical
deci
sion
s(e
g
itin
fluen
ced
the
dev
elop
men
tofo
urpo
licy
alth
oug
hth
isha
sbe
eng
oing
onfo
rsom
etim
ersquo)
(p1
0)
The
date
isno
tcle
arly
stat
edb
utit
is19
98or
1999
Tr
usts
and
GPs
are
incl
uded
inth
est
udy
buta
reno
trel
evan
tin
this
revi
ew
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244d J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
UK
and
USA
1998
28
H
owU
Kan
dU
Sp
urch
aser
sva
lue
and
use
rese
arch
asse
ssin
ghe
alth
tech
nolo
gy
and
clin
ical
effe
ctiv
enes
s(p
pv
1)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p4
)U
K1
4no
n-m
edic
alhe
alth
auth
ority
pur
chas
ers
seve
np
ublic
heal
thp
hysi
cian
sni
neG
PsU
SA1
3p
ublic
offic
ials
from
11st
ates
nin
ep
rivat
ese
ctor
purc
hase
rs
thre
eco
nsul
tant
sN
ˆ55
(p4
)
Acc
ess
toan
dus
eof
heal
thte
chno
logy
asse
ssm
ent
clin
ical
effe
ctiv
enes
sin
form
atio
n(p
p4
11)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
1)
Sta
ted
1999
(p3
)
Can
ada
1998
^199
929A
case
stud
yof
cros
s-se
ctor
alre
sour
ceal
loca
tion
inth
ehu
man
serv
ices
syst
emin
Prin
ceE
dwar
dIs
land
(p4
)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-
ende
din
terv
iew
san
dfo
cus
grou
ps(p
p13
^16
App
endi
x1)
Key
info
rman
tsho
ldin
gd
iffer
entp
ositi
ons
with
inth
efiv
ehe
alth
regi
ons
the
Dep
artm
ento
fSoc
ial
Ser
vice
san
dva
rious
sect
ors
(p4
)al
lreg
ions
all
sect
ors
and
man
agem
ent
leve
ls(p
13)
Nˆ
58(p
9)
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
deci
sion
son
cros
s-se
ctor
alre
sour
ceal
loca
tions
(p5
)
Bur
kina
Faso
1999
30A
case
stud
yon
how
rese
arch
pla
yed
aro
lein
deci
sion
-mak
ing
abou
t`S
hare
dC
arersquo
fo
rch
ildho
odill
ness
(pp
19^
20)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
20)
Min
istry
ofH
ealth
offic
ials
(p2
2)N
ˆno
tgiv
enW
orks
hops
and
rese
arch
pape
rsth
atth
eau
thor
sha
dpr
ovid
edM
inis
tryof
Hea
lthof
ficia
lsw
ithd
urin
gpr
evio
usye
ars
(p2
1)
Per
ceiv
edus
eof
the
pro
vide
dsc
ient
ific
info
rmat
ion
inde
cisi
on-
mak
ing
(p2
0)
`Sha
red
care
rsquois
abou
tim
prov
edco
ntac
tand
colla
bora
tion
bet
wee
nhe
alth
cent
rest
affa
ndm
othe
rs(p
20)
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31B
arrie
rsag
ains
tand
mec
hani
sms
fori
mpr
ovin
gth
evi
tam
inA
rese
arch
^po
licy^
actio
nco
nnec
tion
(p5
5)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
55)
Key
info
rman
tsth
atw
ere
rele
vant
role
-pla
yers
(p5
5)
Nˆ
nots
tate
d
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
use
(p5
5)
Can
ada
2000
32
Toas
sess
the
influ
ence
ofin
form
atio
nab
outt
hehe
alth
cons
eque
nces
ofun
empl
oym
enta
ndin
secu
rity
onp
olic
y-m
akin
g(p
5)
Stru
ctur
eds
emi-s
truct
ured
and
open
-end
edte
lep
hone
inte
rvie
ws
(pp
59
)
Pol
icy-
mak
ers
inth
ehe
alth
and
empl
oym
ents
ecto
rsof
allt
hree
leve
lsof
Can
adia
ng
over
nmen
tan
dex
ecut
ive
dire
ctor
sof
ten
Can
adia
nno
n-g
over
nmen
talo
rgan
-is
atio
ns(p
5)
Nˆ
48(p
5)
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
retro
spec
tive
usef
ulne
ssof
past
rese
arch
info
rmat
ion
abou
tthe
heal
thco
nseq
uenc
esof
unem
ploy
men
tand
inse
curit
yon
polic
y-m
akin
g(p
5)
Sta
ted
date
forw
orki
ngpa
peri
sM
arch
2000
Can
ada
2000
33To
unde
rsta
ndw
heth
er
how
and
und
erw
hat
cond
ition
she
alth
serv
ices
rese
arch
pla
ysa
role
inpr
ovin
cial
polic
y-m
akin
g(p
i)
Bot
hpe
rson
als
emi-
stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
san
dsu
rvey
s(p
p8
11)
Key
info
rman
tsw
ithin
ava
riety
ofke
yhe
alth
polic
ies
intw
oC
anad
ian
prov
ince
s(O
ntar
ioan
dS
aska
tche
wan
)(p
ii)
Nˆ
22(p
18)
Not
stat
ed
Act
uala
ndpe
rcei
ved
dec
isio
nsw
ithin
the
field
sof
heal
thse
rvic
esju
risdi
ctio
nfin
anci
alar
rang
emen
ts
pro
gram
me
deliv
ery
arra
ngem
ents
and
pro
gram
me
cont
ent
(pp
713
)
Iti
sno
tsta
ted
wha
tkin
dof
evid
ence
was
used
but
refe
renc
esto
dire
ctus
eof
evid
ence
inde
cisi
onre
ports
rep
ortin
gon
actu
alus
eof
rese
arch
im
plie
sth
atev
iden
cew
asus
ed(p
p13
18^
19)
GPs
gen
eral
pra
ctiti
oner
sM
ITM
assa
chus
etts
Inst
itute
ofTe
chno
log
yN
HS
Nat
iona
lHea
lthS
ervi
ceR
ampD
res
earc
han
dd
evel
opm
ent
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244e J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le2
Stu
dym
etho
ds
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceS
amp
lefr
ame
(SF
)aan
dsa
mp
lest
rate
gy
(SS
)b
Res
po
nse
rate
Mea
sure
men
tofu
seo
fev
iden
ceM
easu
rem
ento
fd
eter
min
ants
ofu
seS
um
mar
yo
fdes
crip
tio
no
fmet
ho
ds
(co
mp
lete
par
tial
or
no
tad
equa
tely
des
crib
ed)a
nd
com
men
ts
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Aqu
antit
ativ
e4-
poi
ntsc
ore
wei
ghte
dac
cord
ing
toth
ree
deci
sion
leve
lsw
ithsu
mm
edsc
ore
rang
ing
from
0to
18(p
51)
Two-
way
AN
OV
A(p
66)
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
USA
1973
8SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
No
stat
istic
alte
chni
que
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
USA
1973
^197
49
and
USA
1973
^19
7410
(pv
ii)
SFp
artia
l(p
viii)
SSn
otm
entio
ned
partl
ysn
owb
alle
d(p
viii
)
95
(p2
4)B
oth
quan
titat
ivel
yra
ted
and
wei
ght
ed(p
p25
28
333
536
)and
qua
litat
ivel
yde
scrib
ed(p
p1^
4)D
escr
iptiv
elis
ting
ofra
tings
(pp
28
333
536
)and
MC
A(m
ultiv
aria
tere
gre
ssio
n)an
alys
is(p
27)
Parti
alIt
isst
ated
that
`this
repo
rtre
pre
sent
only
afir
stsu
mm
ary
ofso
me
ofth
ehi
ghlig
hts
and
mor
eim
por
tant
findi
ngsrsquo
(pv
i)S
ubse
quen
trep
orts
not
foun
d
USA
1977
11
SFp
artia
l(p
143)
SSs
now
bal
led
partl
yra
ndom
(p1
43)
Not
stat
edD
escr
iptiv
eN
ost
atis
tical
tech
niqu
ePa
rtial
The
inte
rvie
ws
appe
arto
have
bee
nm
ade
betw
een
1973
and
1976
USA
1980
2an
dU
SA19
8012
SFp
artia
l(p
167)
SSn
otst
ated
90
(p1
67)
Bot
hqu
antit
ativ
ede
scrip
tions
rat
edan
dw
eig
hted
and
qual
itativ
e(p
p16
9ff
303)
Des
crip
tive
listin
gof
ratin
gs(p
p1
70^1
72
174)
and
25va
riabl
esan
alys
edus
ing
fact
oran
alys
isto
dev
elop
five
dim
ensi
ons
(p
304
)
Parti
alB
oth
a4-
poin
t(p
168
)and
a5-
poi
ntw
eigh
ted
ratin
gsc
ale
(pp
173
303)
The
qual
itativ
era
ting
com
esfro
mlis
ting
ofm
ostm
entio
ned
char
acte
ristic
sof
usef
ulne
ss
The
five
dim
ensi
ons
are
liste
din
Tabl
e3
und
erfa
cilit
ator
s
USA
1982
13SF
Par
tial
(pp
187
^188
)SS
ran
dom
sam
ple
(pp
187
^188
)
Volu
ntee
red
(p1
88)
Qua
ntita
tive
listin
gof
the
deci
sion
qua
lity
ofev
iden
ce^
use
onsi
xdi
ffere
ntle
vels
ofco
mpl
exity
(pp
195^
208)
List
ing
offre
quen
cies
(pp
196
^198
)Pa
rtial
The
132
dec
isio
n-m
aker
sw
ere
rand
omly
dist
ribut
edto
two
of50
case
stud
ies
and
six
diff
eren
tlev
els
(p1
94)
USA
1983
14SF
not
stat
ed(p
79)
SS
not
stat
ed(p
79)
65
(p7
9)Q
uant
itativ
elis
ting
and
ratin
gs(p
p8
2^86
)Fr
eque
ncie
san
dra
ted
impo
rtanc
e(a
sve
ry
mod
erat
ely
orno
tim
porta
nt)(
p8
2)
SF
and
SSco
mpl
ete
ifth
est
udyrsquo
sfo
cus
cons
ider
edon
lydi
rect
ors
inFl
orid
aan
dN
orth
Car
olin
aan
dif
ther
ew
ere
only
one
dire
ctor
inea
chC
omm
unity
Men
talH
ealth
Cen
ter
Swed
en19
84^
1985
15SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
p14
6^15
0)Li
stin
gof
frequ
enci
es(p
p1
451
49)
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edTh
eau
thor
sm
ainl
yd
iscu
ssan
dde
mon
stra
ted
iffer
entw
ays
ofut
ilisi
ngre
sear
cha
sei
ther
ins
trum
enta
lpo
litic
alc
onfli
cte
nlig
hten
men
tin
tera
ctiv
eor
tact
ical
(p1
44)
`
usin
gre
sear
ch`in
stru
men
tally
rsquorsquoor
for
`enl
ight
enm
entrsquorsquo
purp
oses
mea
ntdi
ffere
ntth
ings
indi
ffere
ntse
tting
san
ddi
ffere
ntor
gani
zatio
nalp
ositi
onsrsquo
(p1
45)
USA
1990
16SF
par
tial(
p11
0)SS
com
ple
te
(p1
10)
100
(p1
10)
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
112
)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Com
ple
tere
fers
toth
e27
rep
rese
ntat
ives
inth
etw
opl
anni
ngco
mm
ittee
sin
the
two
com
mun
ities
No
furth
erge
nera
lisat
ion
can
be
mad
eon
the
basi
sof
this
sam
ple
USA
1991
17SF
com
plet
e(p
p5
13^5
14)
SSr
ando
msa
mp
le(p
513
)
60
(p5
14)
Qua
ntita
tivel
yde
scrip
tive
rate
dan
dw
eig
hted
(p
p51
9^52
2)D
escr
iptiv
elis
ting
ofw
eigh
ted
ratin
gs(p
p5
17^5
23)a
ndm
ultip
lere
gre
ssio
n(p
p5
185
23^5
27)
Com
ple
te
Wei
ghte
don
3-p
oint
and
5-p
oint
scal
es
UK
1991
18SF
com
plet
e(p
51)
SSr
ando
msa
mp
le(p
51)
73
(p5
1)Q
uant
itativ
era
ted
desc
riptio
ns(p
p51
^54)
Per
cent
ages
(pp
51^5
4)C
omp
lete
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244f J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le2
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceS
amp
lefr
ame
(SF
)aan
dsa
mp
lest
rate
gy
(SS
)b
Res
po
nse
rate
Mea
sure
men
tofu
seo
fev
iden
ceM
easu
rem
ento
fd
eter
min
ants
ofu
seS
um
mar
yo
fdes
crip
tio
no
fmet
ho
ds
(co
mp
lete
par
tial
or
no
tad
equa
tely
des
crib
ed)a
nd
com
men
ts
USA
1993
^199
419SF
par
tial(
p15
)SS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(i
esu
bjec
tive
view
onke
yva
riabl
esof
pol
icy
chan
gea
nym
entio
nno
rank
ing)
(p1
6)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edO
nly
Med
icai
dp
rog
ram
mes
with
spec
ific
cost
-con
tain
men
tpol
icie
sin
the
last
seve
raly
ears
(p2
9)U
K19
94^1
99520
21
SFp
artia
l(pp
461
46
5)SS
sno
wb
alle
d(p
p4
614
65)
100
(all
thos
eap
proa
ched
fori
nter
view
agre
edto
the
inte
rvie
w)
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
31f
f)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Mex
ico
1994
^199
522SF
not
stat
ed
SSn
otst
ated
N
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(i
esu
bjec
tive
view
onke
yva
riabl
es)(
pp
104
106^
108)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edP
urpo
sive
sam
ple
(per
sona
lcom
mun
icat
ions
)A
ustra
lia19
9523
SFp
artia
lSS
not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edQ
uant
itativ
ean
dd
escr
iptiv
e(p
p1
05^1
08)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edC
alle
d`p
urpo
sive
sam
plin
gfra
mersquo
(p1
04)
USA
1996
24an
dU
SA19
9725
SFp
artia
l(pp
16
30^3
1)SS
com
bin
edra
ndom
and
snow
-ba
lled
(pp
30^3
1)
Not
stat
edQ
uant
itativ
ere
gres
sion
and
apa
thm
odel
(p1
8)Q
uant
itativ
ere
gres
sion
and
apa
thm
odel
(p1
8)Pa
rtial
but
with
ago
odde
scrip
tion
ofSS
and
SF
Paki
stan
1998
26SF
par
tial(
p77
)SS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
(pp
788
082
)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
UK
1998
27SF
par
tial(
pp1
^2)
SSn
otst
ated
(pp
1^2
)
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(ie
subj
ectiv
evi
ewon
awar
enes
sge
nera
lper
cept
ions
and
impa
ct)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
UK
and
USA
1998
28SF
par
tial(
p4)
SSn
otst
ated
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(pp
12^2
2)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Can
ada
1998
^199
929SF
par
tial(
p16
)SS
not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ede
scrip
tions
and
quan
titat
ive
listin
gs(p
p18
^30
32^3
4)Q
ualit
ativ
ePa
rtial
Aqu
alita
tive
valid
atio
nof
the
inte
rvie
ws
isd
escr
ibed
(pp
16^1
7)B
urki
naFa
so19
9930
SFn
otst
ated
SSn
otst
ated
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(p2
2)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
Can
ada
2000
32SF
par
tial
SSn
otst
ated
42
(p
23)
Bot
hqu
antit
ativ
ean
dqu
alita
tive
des
crip
tions
ofba
rrie
rs(p
p11
^14
26)
Freq
uenc
ies
(p2
6)Pa
rtial
Cal
led
`apu
rpos
ive
sam
ple
ofC
anad
ian
polic
y-m
aker
srsquo(p
8)
Can
ada
2000
33SF
not
stat
edSS
sno
wb
alle
d(p
ii)
88
(22
25)
(p1
8)B
oth
quan
titat
ive
and
qual
itativ
ed
escr
iptio
nsof
faci
litat
ors
(pp
ii
i35
^37)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
a Sam
ple
fram
ec
omp
lete
ˆth
esa
mp
lew
asd
escr
ibed
inre
latio
nto
allt
hed
ecis
ion
-mak
ers
inth
eco
ntex
toft
hest
udy
par
tialˆ
inco
mp
lete
info
rmat
ion
not
stat
edˆ
nod
escr
iptio
nb S
amp
lest
rate
gy
com
ple
tesa
mp
ler
and
omsa
mp
les
now
bal
led
sam
ple
orn
otst
ated
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244g J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
Mai
nre
sults
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p5
4)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
60)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
54)
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
65)
USA
1973
8Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p1
41)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
142
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
143
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
43)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p14
114
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(pp
142
145)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p1
43)
USA
1973
^197
49an
dU
SA
1973
^197
410
(pv
ii)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
333
6)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
33)
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p3
3)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)
USA
1977
11Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
155
158)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p1
45)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p14
915
2)P
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p15
9^16
0)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
155
158)
USA
1980
2an
dU
SA19
8012
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
stTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sM
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
USA
1982
13N
one
ofth
efa
cilit
ator
sw
ere
men
tione
din
the
othe
rstu
dies
Non
eof
the
bar
riers
wer
em
entio
ned
inth
eot
hers
tud
ies
USA
1983
14C
omm
unity
pres
sure
orcl
ient
dem
and
forr
esea
rch
(pp
82
84)
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
82)
Not
stat
ed
Swed
en19
84^1
98515
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
p14
614
9)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
148
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
149
)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
150
)
USA
1990
16R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
114
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
18)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p11
111
5)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(pp
119
^122
)U
SA19
9117
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p5
19)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(pp
519
520)
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
19)
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
519
)U
K19
9118
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
5)N
otst
ated
USA
1993
^199
419G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
27)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p2
7)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
9)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
chA
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
13^1
427
)
UK
1994
^199
5202
1Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
32^3
4)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
p32
^34)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
pp
31^3
2)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(p3
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p3
3)M
exic
o19
94^1
99522
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
sTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
nsR
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
hIn
clus
ion
ofef
fect
iven
ess
data
(pp
106^
108
109^
113)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p10
7^11
1)
USA
1996
24Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
1)A
ustra
lia19
9523
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
107
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
108
)G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
108
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
108
)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
106
)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p1
06)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
106
)
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244h J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
Paki
stan
1998
26N
otst
ated
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p78
82)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
80)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p80
82)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
80)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p8
2)U
K19
9827
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p8
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
13)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p8
12)
UK
and
USA
1998
28Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
p3
17^2
1)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p5
12^1
7)
Can
ada
1998
^199
929Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p3
2)P
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p33
^34)
Bur
kina
Faso
1999
30N
otst
ated
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p2
1)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
23)
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
62)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p6
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
63)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
61)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
61)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p6
1)C
anad
a20
0032
Not
stat
edP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
26)
Can
ada
2000
33Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pi
)N
otst
ated
earlier reviews we have used a systematic approach toidentify select and synthesise relevant research We havealso focused the review on interview studies involvinghealth policy decision-makers and their perceptions ofthe enablers of and barriers to the use of researchevidence for policy decisions
Methods
Search strategy
We searched PubMed using an iterative strategy begin-ning with relevant articles that we had in our les andsearching for related articles Relevant articles fromthese searches were identied and new searches forrelated articles were performed Additional articles wereidenti ed by hand-searching journals (n ˆ 2) personalcommunication (n ˆ 3) tracking references in articlesand books (n ˆ 7) and searching in other electronicdatabases
The following databases were searched in June 2000using combinations of index terms and text wordsderived from relevant articles that we had previouslyidentied Medline from 1966 EMBASE from 1980Socio le (Sociological Abstracts) from 1963 PsychLITfrom 1987 PAIS from 1972 IBSS (International Biblio-graphy of the Social Sciences) from 1981 IPSA (Interna-tional Political Science Abstracts) from 1989 HealthStarfrom 1992 ISI Web of Science from 1981 and the NHSNational Research Register
Knowledge Creation Diffusion Utilization was hand-searched Due to lack of availability only 1979 1980(vols 1 2 and 4) 1981ndash1984 1985 (vols 3 and 4) 1987ndash1993 1994 (vols 3 and 4) were hand-searched Knowledgeand Policy was hand-searched for 1995ndash1997 when itcontinued as Knowledge and Policy The InternationalJournal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization which washand-searched for 1998ndash2000
Selection criteria
We included interview studies and surveys with healthpolicy decision-makers We only included studies ofhealth policy-makers responsible for decisions on behalfof a large organisation or jurisdiction If others were alsointerviewed ndash most often researchers ndash decision-makershad to be explicitly de ned as a subgroup within thestudy Studies of clinical decision-making for individualpatients were excluded
The studies had to address decision-makersrsquo use ofresearch evidence in health policy decisions or on abroader range of policy decisions if these includedhealth policy decisions
Data collection and analysis
Articles were retrieved if it appeared likely that theycontained empirical data from interviews or if they other-wise appeared highly relevant Three people reviewed asample of 200 citations and abstracts following which
one person reviewed all of the citations and abstractsthat were found and the reference lists of all of theretrieved articles
The retrieved articles were assessed for inclusion byat least two people When disagreements could not beresolved by discussion a third person assessed the articleStudies that appeared relevant but which were not areincluded in a list of excluded studies (46 studies availablefrom the authors)
Two people extracted data from the included studiesusing a data collection form The extracted data weresummarised in three tables with the following informa-tion
Table 1 (characteristics) the studyrsquos objective thetype of interviews used characteristics of the partici-pants the types of research evidence and the types ofpolicy decisions that were considered
Table 2 (methods) the sampling frame and strategyresponse rate how the use of evidence was measuredor assessed how the determinants of use weremeasured or assessed
Table 3 (main results) identied the facilitators ofand barriers to the use of research
Tables 1 2 and 3 are included only in the onlineversion of the journal and may be viewed free of chargeat httpwwwcatchwordcomrpsvcatchwordrsm13558196v7n4s8p239
Results
More than 3000 references were found Seventy studiesappeared relevant on the basis of title keywords andabstracts Twenty-four studies reported in 26 articles metthe inclusion criteria Although non-English languagepapers were not excluded from our search all theincluded papers were in English The studies wereundertaken in the USA (n ˆ 10) both the USA and theUK (n ˆ 1) the UK (n ˆ 3) Canada (n ˆ 3) Australia(n ˆ 1) Burkina Faso (n ˆ 1) Mexico (n ˆ 1) TheNetherlands (n ˆ 1) Pakistan (n ˆ 1) South Africa(n ˆ 1) and Sweden (n ˆ 1)
Search strategy
The study designs varied Face-to-face interviews tele-phone interviews and postal questionnaires were usedwith open-ended semi-structured and structured inter-views (Table 1) Most of the studies focused on one or afew cases with widely varying policy questions and typesof evidence Generally the participants were poorlydescribed but most of the studies interviewed peoplewith apparent responsibility for making important policydecisions such as people in lsquoupper level positionsrsquo andlsquosenior managersrsquo Staff members who appeared to haveless responsibility for decisions were also included inseveral studies Twenty-one of the 24 studies examinedthe role of evidence in actual decision-making processesThe other three studies examined hypothetical decisionsAll studies measured perceptions of use or hypothetical
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
240 J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
use rather than actual use of research evidence Five ofthe included studies did not report how many policy-makers were interviewed The remaining 19 studiesinterviewed a total of 2041 policy-makers (median 58range 16ndash479)
Study methods
The included studies were all limited with respect to thegeneralisability of their results Three studies intervieweda representative sample of health policy decision-makersdrawn from a clearly described sampling frame171834
Most studies reported how many decision-makers wereincluded and their positions but the relation betweenthe included policy-makers and the system from whichthey were drawn was rarely described Three of the 24included studies met all of our methodologicalcriteria171834 ie clearly described the sampling frameand the relationship of the included policy-makers tothis had a response rate of at least 60 and clearlydescribed how the use of evidence and the determinantsof how evidence was used were measured or assessed(Table 2) Seven studies partially met our criteria(Table 2last column) The other 14 studies did not adequatelydescribe the methods that were used
Measurement or assessment of the use and determi-nants of use of evidence was mostly descriptive Moststudies included a list of what the investigators perceivedto be barriers to or facilitators of the use of evidence Itis unclear which barriers and facilitators the decisions-makers found most important and which barriers andfacilitators were considered Six of the 24 studies ratedvariables that appeared to determine the use of evidence(Table 2)914171835
Facilitators and barriers
Many of the studies used open-ended questions Therespondents and investigators used different words todescribe facilitators of and barriers to the use ofresearch evidence However several common factorswere described across studies These are summarised inTable 3 A detailed version of this table including theexact words used in each of the included studies isavailable from the authors The most commonlymentioned facilitators of the use of research evidencein policy-making were
Personal contact between researchers and policy-makers (1324)
Timeliness and relevance of the research (1324)
Research that included a summary with clear recom-mendations (1124)
Good quality research (624)
Research that con rmed current policy or endorsedself-interest (624)
Community pressure or client demand for research(424)
Research that included effectiveness data (324)
The most commonly mentioned barriers to the use ofresearch evidence in policy-making were
Absence of personal contact between researchers andpolicy-makers (1124)
Lack of timeliness or relevance of research (924)
Mutual mistrust including perceived political naivetyof scientists and scienti c naivety of policy-makers(824)
Power and budget struggles (724)
Poor quality of research (624)
Political instability or high turnover of policy-makingstaff (524)
Based on the ndings of these studies personal two-way communication between researchers and decision-makers should be used to facilitate the use of researchThis can reduce mutual mistrust and promote a betterunderstanding of policy-making by researchers andresearch by policy-makers It can inform researchersabout what the decision-makers consider timely relevantquestions and policy-makers about how to obtain validanswers to these questions However the frequentlyidentied facilitators including personal two-way commu-nication may not be easy to establish ndash for examplebecause of political instability or high turnover of policy-making staff
Discussion
The strengths of this review include an extensive andsystematic literature search explicit inclusion criteriaand a systematic and transparent approach to collectingand presenting data from the included studies Everyincluded study was read and appraised by at least two ofthe authors The limitations of our review largely re ectthe limitations of the literature we reviewed
Because much research in the social sciences is poorlyindexed in electronic databases we may have missedrelevant studies Personal communication with investiga-tors in the eld yielded only three additional studies andalthough we attempted to contact the authors of all of theincluded studies only three responded and no additionalreferences were identi ed through these contacts
The limitations of the included studies with respect tosampling and generalisability are not surprising in lightof the fact that most of the studies were qualitative andwere not necessarily intended to include representativesamples Moreover given the diversity of contexts inwhich health policy decision-making occurs it is notpossible to obtain a generalisable sample Nonethelessinadequate descriptions of the participants and contextsfor many of the included studies make it dif cult tointerpret the results
No factor was mentioned in more than 13 of the 24studies as a facilitator or barrier even when similar factorswere grouped together This variation can in part beexplained by the fact that some of the studies focusedon speci c factors that were identied a priori andtherefore may have excluded other factors Anothersource of variation is the fact that most studies focused
Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence Review article
J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002 241
on speci c cases and factors were considered only inrelationship to those cases For example in a studyfocusing on the use of an economic evaluation it ismore likely that nancial constraints would be consid-ered as a barrier In a developing country study it is morelikely that international support would be considered as afacilitator In a study focusing on an issue on whichinterest groups have a strong position it would be morelikely that decision-makers would consider alliances withinterest groups as a facilitator or a barrier
Two theoretical perspectives were dominant in theliterature The rst perspective draws analogies betweenthe relationship of researchers and policy-makers andthe relationship between the natural sciences and thehumanities From this perspective problems with com-munication between researchers and policy-makers arelarge and dif cult to overcome936 This is often referredto as the lsquotwo-communities thesisrsquo or the lsquotwo culturesrsquoThe other perspective focuses on the concept of the lsquouseof researchrsquo It addresses how the word lsquousersquo may havefundamentally different meanings
The `two-communities thesisrsquo
The lsquotwo-communities thesisrsquo postulates the existence oftwo camps that lack the ability to take into account therealities or perspectives of one another Caplan et alfound that social scientists see themselves as rationalobjective and open to new ideas9 they see decision-makers as action- and interest-oriented indifferent toevidence and new ideas Decision-makers on the otherhand see themselves as responsible action-oriented andpragmatic they see scientists as naive jargon-ridden andirresponsible in relationship to practical realities Two-way communication between the two camps can facilitatea mutual understanding of a policy question and thekind of knowledge that is needed This requires thatresearchers and decision-makers agree on which ques-tions can be answered on the basis of research evidenceand which require political judgement This does notimply that research alone can answer policy questionssince these will always require some political judgementThe aim of two-way communication is to help ensurethat research appropriately informs judgements forwhich policy-makers are accountable not for researchersto assume the role of policy-makers
The results of this review support the lsquotwo communitiesthesisrsquo since the most commonly identied facilitatorof the use of evidence was personal contact betweenresearchers and decision-makers It is further supportedby the most commonly mentioned barriers to the use ofevidence absence of personal contact and mutual mistrustbetween decision-makers and researchers Personal two-way communication may also be a necessary preconditionfor other facilitators For example without personaltwo-way communication it may be dif cult for researchersto understand what decision-makers regard as timelyrelevant or good quality research
On the other hand this review is mostly based oninformation from one side of the two camps the decision-
makers It is not surprising that decision-makers nd iteasier to use evidence that they have had an opportunityto in uence through two-way communication with theresearchers Additionally the included studies do notclarify whether decision-makers use only the researchthey want to use Decision-makers may use evidence thatsupports their own ideology or their own politicalprogramme
The lsquotwo-communitiesrsquo thesis sheds light on animportant possible paradox inherent in the results thefactors that facilitate use of research may not necessarilybe factors that researchers should seek to enhance Ifwhat is required for research to be used is that researchersdo what the policy-maker wants them to do then researchmay fail to ful l one of its most important functionsnamely to be objective reliable and unbiased
What is `usersquo of evidence
Along with the lsquotwo-communitiesrsquo thesis the question ofwhat is meant by the concept of the lsquousersquo of evidence is themost commonly discussed theoretical issue in the litera-ture on knowledge utilisation The most frequent categor-isation of different types of use in this review is direct(lsquoinstrumentalrsquo or lsquoengineeringrsquo) selective (lsquosymbolicrsquo orlsquolegitimatingrsquo) and enlightening (lsquoconceptualrsquo) use ofevidence Direct use of evidence refers to speci c use ofresearch results It indicates that if research results arerelevant for a solution the results should directly affectthe solution without much adjustment Enlighteninguse of evidence refers to research that helps to lsquoestablishnew goals and bench marks of the attainablersquo37 and helpsto lsquoenrich and deepen understanding of the complexityof problems and the unintended consequences ofactionrsquo38 Selective use is strategic involving use lsquotolegitimate and sustain predetermined positionsrsquo5
The different de nitions of lsquousersquo contribute to thedif culty of interpreting the results of the studies includedin this review A health policy decision-maker who de nesuse as direct use is likely to report less use of researchevidence than decision-makers who also include selectiveor enlightening use of evidence Many of the studies haveaddressed different kinds of use and found that healthpolicy decision-makers refer to use in all three of theabove ways
The degree to which evidence is used directly in anenlightening way or selectively may vary in relation to
Different types of decision-makers upper middle andlower level
Different types of policy questions vague andcomplex or focused and simple
Different issues adoption versus implementation ordecision versus action
The degree to which evidence was directly used variedacross studies One study found that 40 of the use ofevidence was direct de ned as the lsquoprimary source inthe policy formulation processrsquo9 Another study foundonly 7 direct use212 The study that found 40 directuse was in a context where 94 of all the research used
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
242 J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
had been commissioned The study with only 7 directuse did not cover examples of commissioned researchThis suggests that expecting direct use frequently maybe unreasonable particularly for research that is notcommissioned A third study not included in thisreview found that local administrators close to pro-gramme operations reported more direct use ofevidence than federal-level decision-makers39
Enlightening use of evidence is more dif cult to assessthan direct use Decision-makers may interpret this asno more than a question of whether they considerresearch to be of value One study found that 60 ofdecision-makers lsquousedrsquo evidence in this way9 Self-reportedselective use of research on the other hand may bedif cult to elicit in interviews because it puts decision-makers in a bad light although it is commonly perceivedas a problem by researchers and others Research thatcon rms current policy or supports community pressuremay facilitate selective use Personal contact may alsofacilitate selective use of research
Conclusions
From the results of this review of 24 studies that met ourinclusion criteria based on 2041 interviews with policy-makers researchers who wish to increase the use of theresults of their research should have personal and closetwo-way communication with decision-makers providedecision-makers with a brief summary of their researchwith clear policy recommendations ensure that theirresearch is perceived as timely relevant and of highquality include effectiveness data argue that the resultsof their research are relevant to current policy anddemands from the community They should avoid gettinginvolved in power and budget struggles and be aware ofthe high turnover of policy-making staff Of course if theaim is to increase appropriate (direct or enlightening)use of research rather than selective use these strategieswill often not be effective as well as being dif cult toimplement
If the results from the interview studies with decision-makers are taken literally use of evidence will befacilitated by timely and relevant research that givesdecision-makers the answers that they want Howeverthey may not always be able to get what they want sinceresearchers should and it is to be hoped will insist onusing methods that protect against bias If decision-makers and researchers start to talk together about thebarriers and facilitators found in this review a morere ective appropriate and cooperative way of workingtogether which values both relevance and validity mayevolve
The studies included in this review address decision-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence Some studiessuggested document analysis as a way to check whetherthese perceptions correspond to what was done1215192133
but none of the included studies did this system-atically Future research should combine interviews withdocument analysis focus on commissioned research andclearly de ne what is meant by lsquousersquo of research
The methods that were used in the included studiesand their diversity limit the extent to which any rmconclusion can be drawn from this review In fact one ofthe main conclusions of this review is that there is atbest only limited support for any of the many opinionsput forward in the literature on the use of researchevidence by policy-makers At the same time given thediversity of the included studies the policy-makers whowere interviewed and the contexts in which they workedit is striking that some factors were identied as fre-quently as they were
Advice about how to improve the use of evidence bypolicy-makers is typically based on personal experiencesupported by anecdotes The results of this review providea context in which to consider such advice They providea menu of factors to consider but not a basis for anystrong recommendations Similarly the two theoriesthat are commonly used in these studies provide usefulinsights for understanding the perceptions summarised inthis review and other opinions about the use of evidenceby policy-makers but there are limited empirical data tosupport these or other theories
AcknowledgementWe thank Janette Boynton for help with literature searches
References1 Weiss JA Weiss CH Social scientists and decision makers
look at the usefulness of mental health research InLorion RP et al eds Psychology and public policybalancing public service and professional needWashington DC American Psychological Association1996 165ndash181
2 Lindblom CE Cohen DK Usable knowledge socialscience and social problem solving New Haven CT YaleUniversity Press 1979
3 Granados A Jonsson E Banta HD Bero L Bonair ACochet C et al EUR-Assess Project Subgroup Report onDissemination and Impact International Journal ofTechnology Assessment in Health Care 1997 13 220ndash286
4 Dunn WN The two-communities metaphor and models ofknowledge use an explanatory case study KnowledgeCreation Diffusion Utilization 1980 1 515ndash536
5 Beyer JM Trice HM The utilization process a conceptualframework and synthesis of empirical ndings Adminis-trative Science Quarterly 1982 27 591ndash622
6 Nelson CE Roberts J Maederer CM Wertheimer BJohnson B The utilization of social science informationby policy makers American Behavioral Scientist 1987 30569ndash577
7 van de Vall M Bolas C Using social policy research forreducing social problems an empirical analysis of struc-ture and functions Journal of Applied Behavioral Science1982 18 49ndash67
8 Glaser EM Taylor SH Factors in uencing the success ofapplied research American Psychologist 1973 28 140ndash146
9 Caplan N Morrison A Stambaugh RJ The use of socialscience knowledge in policy decisions at the national levela report to respondents Ann Arbor MI The University ofMichigan 1975 1ndash63
10 Caplan N A minimal set of conditions necessary for theutilization of social science knowledge in policy formula-tion at the national level In Weiss CH ed Using social
Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence Review article
J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002 243
research in public policy making Toronto LexingtonBooks 1977 183ndash198
11 Patton MQ Grimes PS Guthrie KM Breanan NJ et al Insearch for impact an analysis of the utilization of federalhealth evaluation research In Weiss CH ed Using socialresearch in public policy making Toronto LexingtonBooks 1977 141ndash164
12 Weiss CH Bucuvalas MJ Truth test and utility testdecision makersrsquo frames of reference for social scienceresearch American Sociological Review 1980 45 302ndash313
13 Weiss JA Coping with complexity An experimental studyof public policy decision-making In Kinder DD PalfreyTR eds Experimental foundations of political scienceAnn Arbor MI University of Michigan Press 1993 185ndash208
14 McNeece CA DiNitto DM Johnson PJ The utility ofevaluation research for administrative decision-makingAdministration in Social Work 1983 7 77ndash87
15 Sunesson S Nilsson K Explaining research utilizationbeyond lsquofunctionsrsquo Knowledge Creation Diffusion Util-ization 1989 10 140ndash155
16 Florio E DeMartini JR The use of information bypolicymakers at the local community level Knowledge1993 15 106ndash123
17 Boyer JF Langbein LI Factors in uencing the use ofhealth evaluation research in congress Evaluation Review1991 15 507ndash532
18 Ibbotson SL Long AF Sheldon TA Mason J An initialevaluation of Effective Health Care bulletins as instru-ments of effective dissemination Journal of Managementin Medicine 1993 7 48ndash57
19 Soumerai SB Ross-Degnan D Fortess EE Walser BLDeterminants of change in Medicaid pharmaceutical costsharing does evidence affect policy Milbank Quarterly1997 75 11ndash34
20 Harries U Elliott H Higgins A Evidence-based policy-making in the NHS exploring the interface betweenresearch and the commissioning process Journal of PublicHealth Medicine 1999 21 29ndash36
21 Elliott H Popay J How are policy makers using evidenceModels of research utilisation and local NHS policymaking Journal of Epidemiology and CommunityHealth 2000 54 461ndash468
22 Trostle J Bronfman M Langer A How do researchersin uence decision-makers Case studies of Mexicanpolicies Health Policy and Planning 1999 14 103ndash114
23 Ross J The use of economic evaluation in health careAustralian decision makersrsquo perceptions Health Policy1995 31 103ndash110
24 Oh CH Explaining the impact of policy information onpolicy-making Knowledge and Policy The InternationalJournal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization 1997 1022ndash55
25 Oh CH Rich RF Explaining use of information in publicpolicymaking Knowledge and Policy The InternationalJournal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization 1996 9 3ndash35
26 Hilderbrand M Simon J Hyder A The role of research inchild health policy and programs in Pakistan Geneva TheCouncil of Health Research and Development (COHRED)Working Group on Research to Action and Policy 200077ndash85
27 Rudat K Evaluation of the Effective Health Care BulletinLondon Of ce For Public Management 1998 1ndash46
28 Burns A Charlwood P Darling H Fox DM Greeneld LHamlyn L et al Better information better outcomes Theuse of health technology assessment and clinical effective-ness data in health care purchasing decisions in theUnited Kingdom and the United States New YorkMilbank Memorial Fund 2000 1ndash26
29 Eyles J Stoddart G Lavis J Pranger T Molyneaux-Smith LMcMullan C Making resource shifts supportive of thebroad determinants of health The PEI experienceHamilton McMaster Institute of Environment and Health2000 3ndash37
30 Gerhardus A Kielmann K Sanou A Lessons in research toaction and policy case studies from seven differentcountries Geneva The Council of Health Research andDevelopment (COHRED) Working Group on Research toAction and Policy 2000 19ndash27
31 Moodley J Jacobs M Research to action and policycombating vitamin a deciencies in South Africa GenevaThe Council of Health Research and Development(COHRED) Working Group on Research to Action andPolicy 2000 54ndash66
32 Lavis JN Farrant MSR Stoddard GL Barriers to employ-ment-related healthy public policy Toronto McMasterUniversity Centre for Health Economics and PolicyAnalysis 2000 00ndash03 1ndash28
33 Lavis JN Ross SE Hohenadel J Hurley J Stoddard GLWoodward C et al The role of health services research inCanadian provincial policy-making CHSRF Report 1997-021 Hamilton McMaster University 2000 1ndash44
34 McNeece CA DiNitto DM Johnson PJ The utility ofevaluation research for administrative decision-makingAdministration in Social Work 1983 7 77ndash87
35 van de Vall M Bolas C Using social policy research forreducing social problems an empirical analysis of struc-ture and functions Journal of Applied Behavioral Science1982 18 49ndash67
36 Snow CP The two cultures and the scientic revolutionCambridge Cambridge University Press 1959
37 Merton RK The role of applied social science in theformation of policy a research memorandum Philosophyof Science 1949 16 161ndash181
38 Aaron HJ Politics and the professors the great society inperspective Washington DC Brookings Institution 1978
39 Alkin MC Kosecoff J Fitzgibbon C Seligman R Evalua-tion and decision-making the title vii experience LosAngeles Center for the Study of Evaluation University ofCalifornia 1974
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244 J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244a J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
Cha
ract
eris
tics
ofin
clud
edst
udie
s
Co
un
try
year
cond
uct
ed(
year
pu
blis
hed
)re
fere
nce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fev
iden
ce(f
rom
whi
chd
ecis
ion
sw
ere
mad
e)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17 Th
eco
nditi
ons
and
func
tions
influ
enci
ngut
ilisa
tion
ofso
cial
pol
icy
rese
arch
(p4
9)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edsu
rvey
s(p
50)
Res
earc
hers
and
polic
y-m
aker
sth
atw
ere
resp
onsi
ble
for
inco
rpor
atin
gth
ere
sear
chre
sults
(p5
0)N
ˆno
tst
ated
120
rese
arch
proj
ects
on`c
lient
-orie
nted
rsquosoc
ial
rese
arch
with
inin
dust
rial
and
labo
urre
latio
ns
regi
onal
and
urb
anpl
anni
ngs
ocia
lwel
fare
and
publ
iche
alth
(p5
0)
Per
ceiv
ed(r
etro
spec
tive)
dec
isio
ns(p
50)
Rev
ised
vers
ion
ofpa
per
pres
ente
din
1979
(p4
9)
40ou
toft
he12
0pr
ojec
tsw
ere
onso
cial
wel
fare
and
publ
iche
alth
US
A19
738
Wha
twas
done
wha
the
lped
and
wha
thin
dere
dth
esu
cces
sfo
rten
rese
arch
proj
ects
unde
rthe
Nat
iona
lIns
titut
eof
Men
tal
Hea
lth
(p1
41)
Pers
onal
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
41)
Prin
cipa
linv
estig
ator
oth
erst
affm
emb
ers
adm
inis
trato
rsan
dpe
rson
sm
ostl
ikel
yto
be
utili
sers
(p1
41)
Nˆ
notg
iven
Five
proj
ects
rate
dlo
wan
dfiv
epr
ojec
tsra
ted
high
for
`suc
cess
rsquo(p
140
)
Per
ceiv
edus
eT
hein
terv
iew
sw
ere
don
ein
eith
er19
67or
1968
(pp
140^
141)
Su
cces
sde
fined
aspr
ojec
ttha
tw
asdi
rect
edto
the
orig
inal
obje
ctiv
ese
mbo
died
ina
clea
ran
dco
gent
rep
ort
cand
iden
ough
tobe
repl
icab
lea
ndth
atth
efin
din
gsw
ere
diss
emin
ated
adeq
uate
ly(p
140
)U
SA
1973
^197
49(p
vii)
and
USA
1973
^197
410So
cial
scie
nce
rese
arch
utili
satio
nan
dpo
licy
form
atio
n(p
vii)
Aw
aren
ess
ofre
sear
chk
now
ledg
eof
sour
ces
info
rmat
ion
retri
eval
pra
ctic
ein
tere
stin
soci
alin
dica
tors
eva
luat
ion
ofw
orth
and
obje
ctiv
ity
met
hods
and
mea
sure
men
tpr
oced
ures
deg
ree
ofco
nfid
ence
onfin
ding
sat
titud
esab
outu
sef
acto
rsth
atin
fluen
ceus
e(p
ix)
Pers
onal
inte
rvie
ws
open
-en
ded
and
stru
ctur
ed(p
pv
ix)
Upp
er-le
veld
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
inth
eex
ecut
ive
bran
chof
the
US
fede
ral
gove
rnm
ent(
ppv
viii)
31
depu
tyun
ders
ecre
tarie
s54
inst
itute
dire
ctor
s67
depu
tyas
sist
antd
irect
ors
52ag
ency
pers
onne
lN
ˆ20
4(p
v)
575
repo
rted
inst
ance
sof
use
whe
re38
5in
volv
edpr
imar
yre
sear
chso
urce
s(p
8)
94
wer
eei
ther
fund
edby
the
gove
rnm
ent
cond
ucte
dby
the
gove
rnm
ento
rbot
h(p
8)
Per
ceiv
ed(s
elf-r
epor
ted)
use
with
spec
ific
follo
w-u
pq
uest
ions
whe
nus
ew
asre
porte
d(p
1)
15
ofth
eus
eof
know
ledg
ew
ason
heal
thor
wel
fare
prob
lem
s(p
5)
`Mos
toft
heex
ampl
esre
spon
dent
sof
fere
dto
illust
rate
know
ledg
eap
plic
atio
nsre
ally
invo
lved
the
appl
icat
ion
ofse
cond
ary
sour
cein
form
atio
nrsquo(p
187
)
US
A19
77
11`T
oex
amin
eth
ena
ture
and
degr
eeof
utiliz
atio
nof
fede
rale
valu
atio
nre
sear
chrsquo
(p1
43)
Op
en-e
nded
inte
rvie
ws
with
diffe
rent
ques
tions
for
the
deci
sion
-mak
eran
dth
eev
alua
tor(
p1
43)
Thre
eke
yin
form
ants
from
each
ofth
e20
stud
ies
wer
ein
terv
iew
eda
proj
ect
offic
ert
hed
ecis
ion-
mak
er(g
over
nmen
tlev
el)a
ndth
eev
alua
tor(
p14
3)N
ˆ60
(p1
43)
20na
tiona
lhea
lthca
reev
alua
tions
(cas
est
udie
s)w
ithso
me
syst
emat
icd
ata
colle
ctio
nm
ade
betw
een
1971
and
1974
bas
edon
11fa
ctor
sid
entif
ied
byth
eau
thor
s(p
p14
2^14
3)
Per
ceiv
edan
dse
lf-d
efin
edus
e(p
144
)H
ealth
train
ing
lab
orat
ory
prof
icie
ncy
neig
hbou
rhoo
dhe
alth
cent
res
heal
thse
rvic
esd
eliv
ery
syst
ems
alco
holis
ml
oan
forg
iven
ess
and
train
ing
wor
ksho
p(p
p14
2^14
3)U
SA
1980
2 an
dU
SA19
8012
Polic
y-m
aker
srsquope
rcep
tions
ofth
eus
eful
ness
ofso
cial
scie
nces
rese
arch
(pp
165
302)
Pers
onal
inte
rvie
ws
both
open
-end
edan
dst
ruct
ured
(pp
168
171
303)
51fe
dera
l52
stat
e(fr
omte
nst
ates
)and
52lo
cal
offic
iald
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
inup
per-
leve
lpos
ition
s(p
p16
730
3)N
ˆ15
5
Each
dec
isio
n-m
aker
read
two
abst
ract
s(tw
o-pa
gers
)ou
tof5
0fo
ract
uals
ocia
lsc
ienc
ere
sear
chre
ports
(p
p1
683
03)
Hyp
othe
tical
deci
sion
s(i
e`re
leva
ntto
the
issu
esyo
urof
fice
deal
sw
ithrsquo)
onm
enta
lhe
alth
alc
ohol
and
drug
abus
e
(pp
166
303
)
Not
stat
edb
utpu
blis
hed
Ap
ril19
80R
eprin
ted
from
Am
eric
anP
sych
olog
ist 1
981
Bas
edon
the
sam
ere
sear
chp
roje
ctas
US
A19
8012
(but
par
tlyon
othe
rpar
tsof
the
data
)
The
deci
sion
-mak
ers
wer
eg
iven
diffe
rent
`em
piri
calrsquo
inte
rven
tions
(ie
two-
page
rs)a
ndar
eth
eref
ore
diffi
cult
toco
mpa
reon
the
effe
ctva
riabl
esco
ntin
ued
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244b J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
USA
1982
13
Toob
serv
eth
eim
pac
ttha
tde
cisi
onco
mp
lexi
tya
ndam
ount
ofin
form
atio
nav
aila
ble
had
onth
eq
ualit
yof
the
deci
sion
proc
ess
(p1
87)
Stru
ctur
eds
emi-s
truct
ured
and
open
-end
edqu
estio
n-na
ires
com
bine
dw
itha
cont
rolle
dex
perim
ent
Con
seq
uenc
esof
com
plex
ityw
ere
exam
ined
byef
fect
sof
info
rmat
ion
load
and
num
bero
fde
cisi
onal
tern
ativ
es(p
p1
871
931
94)
Exp
erie
nced
pub
lican
dp
rivat
ese
ctor
man
ager
sfro
msi
xm
id-c
aree
rp
rog
ram
mes
atH
arva
rd
MIT
Sta
nfor
dan
dth
eW
ashi
ngto
nP
ublic
Affa
irsC
ente
r(pp
187
188
)N
ˆ13
2(p
188
)
Each
dec
isio
n-m
aker
rece
ived
alo
ngm
emor
and
umde
scrib
ing
apr
oble
mp
rese
ntin
gev
iden
ceus
eful
inan
alys
ing
the
prob
lem
and
pose
da
dec
isio
nto
bem
ade
base
don
real
peo
ple
and
even
ts(p
188
)
Two
hypo
thet
ical
dec
isio
ns
one
onth
est
atersquo
sD
epar
t-m
ento
fHea
lthan
dR
ehab
i-lit
ativ
ese
rvic
esan
don
eon
am
etha
done
mai
nten
ance
pro
gram
me
inN
ewYo
rkC
ity(p
p1
88^1
89)
Dec
isio
nha
dto
bem
ade
from
avai
labl
ein
form
atio
nw
ithin
1ho
ur45
min
utes
(p1
93)
Rep
rinte
dfro
mth
eJo
urna
lof
Pol
icy
Ana
lysi
san
dM
anag
emen
t2
66^8
7(p
185
)
The
exp
erim
entw
asb
ased
onsi
xdi
ffere
ntve
rsio
nsof
each
ofth
etw
oca
ses
The
six
diff
eren
tver
sion
sof
the
case
sva
ried
inin
form
atio
nco
mpl
exity
Eac
hde
cisi
on-m
aker
had
only
one
deci
sion
tom
ake
aton
lyon
ele
velo
fcom
plex
ity(p
p18
9^19
019
3)U
SA19
83
14To
dete
rmin
eso
me
ofth
efa
ctor
sth
atin
fluen
cead
min
istra
tors
rsquouse
ofev
alua
tive
data
inde
cisi
on-
mak
ing
and
toex
amin
eth
ety
pes
ofde
cisi
ons
(p7
9)
Stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-e
nded
post
alq
uest
ionn
aire
s(p
p7
9^80
)
Dire
ctor
sin
com
mun
itym
enta
lhea
lthce
ntre
sin
Flor
ida
and
Nor
thC
arol
ina
(p7
9)N
ˆ42
Con
duct
edst
udie
son
prog
ram
me
effe
ctiv
enes
sor
imp
actd
urin
gth
ela
st12
-m
onth
per
iod
(p8
1)
Per
ceiv
ed(i
ere
por
ted
)us
e(p
p80
^81)
Swed
en19
84^1
98515
(p1
52)
Diff
eren
tway
sof
usin
gso
cial
rese
arch
in
stru
men
tal
polit
ical
co
nflic
ten
light
enm
ent
inte
ract
ive
and
tact
ical
(pp
141
143^
144)
Inte
rvie
ws
(p1
52)
Soc
ialw
orke
rs
man
agem
entd
irect
ors
loca
land
natio
nalp
oliti
cian
sin
15Sw
edis
hci
ties
and
com
mun
es(p
152
)N
ˆ90
(p1
52)
Doc
umen
tsth
atth
ere
spon
dent
sre
ferr
edto
Th
ese
docu
men
tsw
ere
also
anal
ysed
by
the
auth
ors
(p1
52)
Per
ceiv
edre
trosp
ectiv
ed
ecis
ions
(p1
52)
USA
1990
16To
dete
rmin
ew
hatt
ype
ofin
form
atio
nd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
use
and
how
ideo
log
yan
din
tere
sts
influ
ence
the
use
ofin
form
atio
n(p
109
)
Pers
onal
sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
112
)Lo
calp
lann
ing
com
mitt
ees
and
gove
rnm
ente
mp
loye
esin
two
rura
lcom
mun
ities
inth
eP
acifi
cN
orth
wes
t(p
110
)N
ˆ27
(p1
10)
Sour
ces
ofin
form
atio
nus
edin
com
mun
ityhe
alth
care
plan
ning
and
the
asse
ssm
ento
fthe
stra
tegi
cpl
anni
ngp
roce
ss(p
112
)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
112
)
USA
1991
17
Wha
tfac
tors
influ
ence
the
use
ofev
alua
tion
rese
arch
(on
heal
than
dhu
man
serv
ices
)in
cong
ress
(p5
08)
Stru
ctur
edte
lep
hone
inte
rvie
ws
(p5
13)
C
ongr
ess
mem
bers
and
thei
rsta
ff(p
512
)N
ˆ10
0Ea
chde
cisi
on-m
aker
chos
eon
est
udy
they
wer
efa
mili
arw
ith(p
515
)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
515
)E
valu
atio
nst
udie
sfro
mth
eD
epar
tmen
tofH
ealth
and
Hum
anSe
rvic
esth
atd
eal
with
natio
nalh
ealth
pro
gram
mes
(pp
507
515
)
Use
isde
fined
here
asbo
thin
stru
men
tal(
dire
ctim
ple
men
tatio
n)c
once
ptua
l(it
chan
ged
the
way
ofth
inki
ng)a
ndpe
rsua
sive
(use
dto
conv
ince
othe
rsp
516
)
The
inte
rvie
ws
last
ed15
^40
min
utes
(p5
14)
UK
1991
18U
sean
dre
ason
sfo
ruse
not
use
ofth
eE
iexclect
ive
Hea
lthC
are
Bul
letin
(pp
51^
54)
Stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-e
nded
post
alq
uest
ionn
aire
s(p
p5
0^51
)
Dis
trict
gen
eral
man
ager
sd
irect
ors
ofpu
blic
heal
than
dd
irect
ors
ofpl
anni
ng
com
mis
sion
ing
inU
Kd
istri
cthe
alth
auth
oriti
esor
com
mis
sion
ing
cons
ortia
(p5
0)N
ˆ17
2(p
51)
Eiexcle
ctiv
eH
ealth
Car
eB
ulle
tinN
o1
1991
on
scre
enin
gfo
rost
eop
oros
isto
prev
entf
ract
ures
(p5
0)
Per
ceiv
edus
eof
info
rmat
ion
and
hypo
thet
ical
dec
isio
ns
chan
geof
opin
ion
and
conf
iden
ceto
acto
nin
form
atio
nin
the
bulle
tin(p
p52
^54)
Res
pon
dent
sw
ere
que
stio
ned
abou
tabu
lletin
that
had
been
prev
ious
lypo
sted
toth
em(p
p51
52)
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244c J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
USA
1993
^199
419Th
ero
leof
rese
arch
info
rmat
ion
inp
olic
yde
velo
pmen
t(p
29)
Que
stio
nnai
res
(p1
3)
open
-end
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
4)an
dse
mi-
stru
ctur
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
4)
Key
info
rman
ts
inst
ates
that
chan
ged
cost
-sha
ring
pol
icie
sfo
rpre
scrip
tion
reim
burs
emen
tlim
itsan
dco
-pay
men
ts(p
14)
N
ˆin
adeq
uate
lyd
escr
ibed
Res
earc
hp
ublic
atio
nsan
dco
mm
ents
(p2
5)P
erce
ived
retro
spec
tive
dec
isio
ns(p
25)
Onl
y2^
3pa
ges
outo
f21
wer
ere
leva
nt(p
25f
f)I
nfor
man
tsin
clud
edM
edic
aid
drug
prog
ram
me
adm
inis
trato
rs
dire
ctor
sor
polic
yan
alys
ts
phar
mac
yco
nsul
tant
san
dle
gisl
ator
s(p
15)
UK
1994
^199
5202
1`T
oid
entif
yfa
ctor
sw
hich
faci
litat
eor
imp
ede
evid
ence
-bas
edp
olic
y-m
akin
grsquo(
p2
9)
In-d
epth
inte
rvie
ws
(usi
nga
topi
cgu
ide)
(p2
9an
dre
spon
seto
ale
tter)
Lead
polic
y-m
aker
sG
Psan
dre
sear
cher
sin
nine
diff
eren
tcas
est
udie
sat
alo
call
evel
inth
eN
HS
(pp
293
1)N
ˆ28
Soci
alre
sear
ch(p
42
inth
epr
ojec
trep
ort)
Per
ceiv
edde
cisi
ons
Polic
yon
the
inte
rface
bet
wee
nR
ampD
and
com
mis
sion
ing
atth
ehe
alth
auth
ority
leve
l(p
30)
Mex
ico
1994
^199
522`T
here
latio
nshi
pbe
twee
nhe
alth
rese
arch
(and
rese
arch
ers)
and
heal
thpo
licie
s(a
ndpo
licy-
mak
ers)
info
urve
rtica
lhe
alth
prog
ram
mes
inM
exic
orsquo(p
104
)
Ope
n-en
ded
(in-
dept
hrsquo)
inte
rvie
ws
with
aco
mm
onin
terv
iew
prot
ocol
(p1
06)
`Res
earc
hers
and
polic
y-m
aker
sfro
mdi
ffere
ntin
stitu
tions
and
leve
lsof
resp
onsi
bilit
yrsquo(p
103
)N
ˆ67
Use
ofre
sear
chpu
blic
atio
ns`w
here
we
knew
that
ther
ew
asat
leas
tso
me
inte
ract
ion
bet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dde
cisi
on-
mak
ersrsquo
(p1
05)
Per
ceiv
ed
use
ofev
iden
ceco
ncer
ning
AID
Sch
oler
afa
mily
pla
nnin
gan
dim
mun
isat
ion
ing
over
nmen
talp
rogr
amm
es(p
103
)
Per
sona
lcom
mun
icat
ion
gav
ead
ditio
nali
nfor
mat
ion
onth
isis
sue
It
isd
iffic
ultt
od
isce
rnw
heth
erth
ede
cisi
ons
wer
ep
erce
ived
orhy
pot
hetic
als
ince
ther
ear
eno
actu
alde
cisi
ons
men
tione
d
Aus
tralia
1995
23
Dec
isio
n-m
aker
srsquoaw
aren
ess
and
use
ofec
onom
icev
alua
tions
inhe
alth
care
(p1
03)
Inte
rvie
ws
open
-end
edan
dst
ruct
ured
(not
stat
edif
post
alt
elep
hone
orfa
ce-to
-fa
ce)(
p10
5)
Sen
iorm
anag
ers
inth
eFe
der
alD
epar
tmen
tof
Hea
lthH
ousi
ngan
dC
omm
unity
Serv
ices
New
Sou
thW
ales
Stat
eth
eH
ealth
Dep
artm
ent(
p10
4)
Nˆ
34(p
105
)
Use
ofec
onom
icev
alua
tions
forp
ricin
gon
drug
ssc
reen
ing
radi
olog
ytra
nspl
ants
and
scan
ning
(p1
05)
`Per
ceiv
edus
eof
econ
omic
eval
uatio
nsrsquo(
p1
04)
USA
1996
24
and
USA
1997
25
Tode
term
ine
whe
ther
the
proc
ess
of(s
ocia
lsci
ence
)in
form
atio
nut
ilisa
tion
varie
sac
ross
diff
eren
tare
as(i
ese
rvic
epr
ovis
ion
and
finan
cing
)(pp
16^
17)
Stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
16)
Fe
der
als
tate
and
loca
lp
olic
y-m
aker
sat
diff
eren
tle
vels
deal
ing
with
finan
cean
dse
rvic
es(p
16)
N
ˆ47
9(p
16)
No
spec
ific
repo
rtb
utin
foty
persquor
efer
topr
ogra
mm
eev
alua
tion
dem
onst
ratio
np
roje
ct
stat
istic
ald
ata
and
polic
yan
alys
is(p
34)
Per
ceiv
edre
trosp
ectiv
ed
ecis
ions
(p1
7)O
pen-
ende
din
terv
iew
sw
ere
used
toob
tain
basi
cb
ackg
roun
din
form
atio
nab
outt
hep
olic
ypr
oces
sTh
est
ruct
ured
inte
rvie
ws
built
onth
eop
en-e
nded
inte
rvie
ws
(p3
3)Pa
kist
an19
9826
The
role
that
rese
arch
pla
ysin
expe
rienc
esin
linki
ngre
sear
chw
ithp
olic
y(p
77)
Ope
n-en
ded
in-d
epth
inte
rvie
ws
(p7
7)D
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
from
gov
ernm
ent
the
cent
ral
min
istry
ofhe
alth
the
pla
nnin
gco
mm
issi
onan
dp
rovi
ncia
lhea
lthau
thor
ities
(p7
7)N
ˆ16
(p7
7)
Not
stat
edG
ener
alpe
rcep
tions
C
lose
stfo
cus
onch
ildhe
alth
prob
lem
ssu
chas
co-tr
imox
azol
em
ater
nal
mor
talit
yvi
tam
inA
b
reas
tfeed
ing
and
pol
io(p
p77
79)
UK
1998
27
The
imp
actt
hatt
heE
iexclect
ive
Hea
lthca
reB
ulle
tinha
sin
side
the
NH
Sor
gan
isat
ion
(p1
)
Tele
phon
ein
terv
iew
sst
ruct
ure
notm
entio
ned
(p1
)
Hea
lthau
thor
ities
(p
2)
Nˆ
34Tw
osp
ecifi
cbu
lletin
sJu
ne19
97an
dO
ctob
er19
97(p
1)
Hyp
othe
tical
deci
sion
s(e
g
itin
fluen
ced
the
dev
elop
men
tofo
urpo
licy
alth
oug
hth
isha
sbe
eng
oing
onfo
rsom
etim
ersquo)
(p1
0)
The
date
isno
tcle
arly
stat
edb
utit
is19
98or
1999
Tr
usts
and
GPs
are
incl
uded
inth
est
udy
buta
reno
trel
evan
tin
this
revi
ew
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244d J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
UK
and
USA
1998
28
H
owU
Kan
dU
Sp
urch
aser
sva
lue
and
use
rese
arch
asse
ssin
ghe
alth
tech
nolo
gy
and
clin
ical
effe
ctiv
enes
s(p
pv
1)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p4
)U
K1
4no
n-m
edic
alhe
alth
auth
ority
pur
chas
ers
seve
np
ublic
heal
thp
hysi
cian
sni
neG
PsU
SA1
3p
ublic
offic
ials
from
11st
ates
nin
ep
rivat
ese
ctor
purc
hase
rs
thre
eco
nsul
tant
sN
ˆ55
(p4
)
Acc
ess
toan
dus
eof
heal
thte
chno
logy
asse
ssm
ent
clin
ical
effe
ctiv
enes
sin
form
atio
n(p
p4
11)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
1)
Sta
ted
1999
(p3
)
Can
ada
1998
^199
929A
case
stud
yof
cros
s-se
ctor
alre
sour
ceal
loca
tion
inth
ehu
man
serv
ices
syst
emin
Prin
ceE
dwar
dIs
land
(p4
)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-
ende
din
terv
iew
san
dfo
cus
grou
ps(p
p13
^16
App
endi
x1)
Key
info
rman
tsho
ldin
gd
iffer
entp
ositi
ons
with
inth
efiv
ehe
alth
regi
ons
the
Dep
artm
ento
fSoc
ial
Ser
vice
san
dva
rious
sect
ors
(p4
)al
lreg
ions
all
sect
ors
and
man
agem
ent
leve
ls(p
13)
Nˆ
58(p
9)
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
deci
sion
son
cros
s-se
ctor
alre
sour
ceal
loca
tions
(p5
)
Bur
kina
Faso
1999
30A
case
stud
yon
how
rese
arch
pla
yed
aro
lein
deci
sion
-mak
ing
abou
t`S
hare
dC
arersquo
fo
rch
ildho
odill
ness
(pp
19^
20)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
20)
Min
istry
ofH
ealth
offic
ials
(p2
2)N
ˆno
tgiv
enW
orks
hops
and
rese
arch
pape
rsth
atth
eau
thor
sha
dpr
ovid
edM
inis
tryof
Hea
lthof
ficia
lsw
ithd
urin
gpr
evio
usye
ars
(p2
1)
Per
ceiv
edus
eof
the
pro
vide
dsc
ient
ific
info
rmat
ion
inde
cisi
on-
mak
ing
(p2
0)
`Sha
red
care
rsquois
abou
tim
prov
edco
ntac
tand
colla
bora
tion
bet
wee
nhe
alth
cent
rest
affa
ndm
othe
rs(p
20)
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31B
arrie
rsag
ains
tand
mec
hani
sms
fori
mpr
ovin
gth
evi
tam
inA
rese
arch
^po
licy^
actio
nco
nnec
tion
(p5
5)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
55)
Key
info
rman
tsth
atw
ere
rele
vant
role
-pla
yers
(p5
5)
Nˆ
nots
tate
d
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
use
(p5
5)
Can
ada
2000
32
Toas
sess
the
influ
ence
ofin
form
atio
nab
outt
hehe
alth
cons
eque
nces
ofun
empl
oym
enta
ndin
secu
rity
onp
olic
y-m
akin
g(p
5)
Stru
ctur
eds
emi-s
truct
ured
and
open
-end
edte
lep
hone
inte
rvie
ws
(pp
59
)
Pol
icy-
mak
ers
inth
ehe
alth
and
empl
oym
ents
ecto
rsof
allt
hree
leve
lsof
Can
adia
ng
over
nmen
tan
dex
ecut
ive
dire
ctor
sof
ten
Can
adia
nno
n-g
over
nmen
talo
rgan
-is
atio
ns(p
5)
Nˆ
48(p
5)
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
retro
spec
tive
usef
ulne
ssof
past
rese
arch
info
rmat
ion
abou
tthe
heal
thco
nseq
uenc
esof
unem
ploy
men
tand
inse
curit
yon
polic
y-m
akin
g(p
5)
Sta
ted
date
forw
orki
ngpa
peri
sM
arch
2000
Can
ada
2000
33To
unde
rsta
ndw
heth
er
how
and
und
erw
hat
cond
ition
she
alth
serv
ices
rese
arch
pla
ysa
role
inpr
ovin
cial
polic
y-m
akin
g(p
i)
Bot
hpe
rson
als
emi-
stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
san
dsu
rvey
s(p
p8
11)
Key
info
rman
tsw
ithin
ava
riety
ofke
yhe
alth
polic
ies
intw
oC
anad
ian
prov
ince
s(O
ntar
ioan
dS
aska
tche
wan
)(p
ii)
Nˆ
22(p
18)
Not
stat
ed
Act
uala
ndpe
rcei
ved
dec
isio
nsw
ithin
the
field
sof
heal
thse
rvic
esju
risdi
ctio
nfin
anci
alar
rang
emen
ts
pro
gram
me
deliv
ery
arra
ngem
ents
and
pro
gram
me
cont
ent
(pp
713
)
Iti
sno
tsta
ted
wha
tkin
dof
evid
ence
was
used
but
refe
renc
esto
dire
ctus
eof
evid
ence
inde
cisi
onre
ports
rep
ortin
gon
actu
alus
eof
rese
arch
im
plie
sth
atev
iden
cew
asus
ed(p
p13
18^
19)
GPs
gen
eral
pra
ctiti
oner
sM
ITM
assa
chus
etts
Inst
itute
ofTe
chno
log
yN
HS
Nat
iona
lHea
lthS
ervi
ceR
ampD
res
earc
han
dd
evel
opm
ent
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244e J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le2
Stu
dym
etho
ds
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceS
amp
lefr
ame
(SF
)aan
dsa
mp
lest
rate
gy
(SS
)b
Res
po
nse
rate
Mea
sure
men
tofu
seo
fev
iden
ceM
easu
rem
ento
fd
eter
min
ants
ofu
seS
um
mar
yo
fdes
crip
tio
no
fmet
ho
ds
(co
mp
lete
par
tial
or
no
tad
equa
tely
des
crib
ed)a
nd
com
men
ts
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Aqu
antit
ativ
e4-
poi
ntsc
ore
wei
ghte
dac
cord
ing
toth
ree
deci
sion
leve
lsw
ithsu
mm
edsc
ore
rang
ing
from
0to
18(p
51)
Two-
way
AN
OV
A(p
66)
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
USA
1973
8SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
No
stat
istic
alte
chni
que
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
USA
1973
^197
49
and
USA
1973
^19
7410
(pv
ii)
SFp
artia
l(p
viii)
SSn
otm
entio
ned
partl
ysn
owb
alle
d(p
viii
)
95
(p2
4)B
oth
quan
titat
ivel
yra
ted
and
wei
ght
ed(p
p25
28
333
536
)and
qua
litat
ivel
yde
scrib
ed(p
p1^
4)D
escr
iptiv
elis
ting
ofra
tings
(pp
28
333
536
)and
MC
A(m
ultiv
aria
tere
gre
ssio
n)an
alys
is(p
27)
Parti
alIt
isst
ated
that
`this
repo
rtre
pre
sent
only
afir
stsu
mm
ary
ofso
me
ofth
ehi
ghlig
hts
and
mor
eim
por
tant
findi
ngsrsquo
(pv
i)S
ubse
quen
trep
orts
not
foun
d
USA
1977
11
SFp
artia
l(p
143)
SSs
now
bal
led
partl
yra
ndom
(p1
43)
Not
stat
edD
escr
iptiv
eN
ost
atis
tical
tech
niqu
ePa
rtial
The
inte
rvie
ws
appe
arto
have
bee
nm
ade
betw
een
1973
and
1976
USA
1980
2an
dU
SA19
8012
SFp
artia
l(p
167)
SSn
otst
ated
90
(p1
67)
Bot
hqu
antit
ativ
ede
scrip
tions
rat
edan
dw
eig
hted
and
qual
itativ
e(p
p16
9ff
303)
Des
crip
tive
listin
gof
ratin
gs(p
p1
70^1
72
174)
and
25va
riabl
esan
alys
edus
ing
fact
oran
alys
isto
dev
elop
five
dim
ensi
ons
(p
304
)
Parti
alB
oth
a4-
poin
t(p
168
)and
a5-
poi
ntw
eigh
ted
ratin
gsc
ale
(pp
173
303)
The
qual
itativ
era
ting
com
esfro
mlis
ting
ofm
ostm
entio
ned
char
acte
ristic
sof
usef
ulne
ss
The
five
dim
ensi
ons
are
liste
din
Tabl
e3
und
erfa
cilit
ator
s
USA
1982
13SF
Par
tial
(pp
187
^188
)SS
ran
dom
sam
ple
(pp
187
^188
)
Volu
ntee
red
(p1
88)
Qua
ntita
tive
listin
gof
the
deci
sion
qua
lity
ofev
iden
ce^
use
onsi
xdi
ffere
ntle
vels
ofco
mpl
exity
(pp
195^
208)
List
ing
offre
quen
cies
(pp
196
^198
)Pa
rtial
The
132
dec
isio
n-m
aker
sw
ere
rand
omly
dist
ribut
edto
two
of50
case
stud
ies
and
six
diff
eren
tlev
els
(p1
94)
USA
1983
14SF
not
stat
ed(p
79)
SS
not
stat
ed(p
79)
65
(p7
9)Q
uant
itativ
elis
ting
and
ratin
gs(p
p8
2^86
)Fr
eque
ncie
san
dra
ted
impo
rtanc
e(a
sve
ry
mod
erat
ely
orno
tim
porta
nt)(
p8
2)
SF
and
SSco
mpl
ete
ifth
est
udyrsquo
sfo
cus
cons
ider
edon
lydi
rect
ors
inFl
orid
aan
dN
orth
Car
olin
aan
dif
ther
ew
ere
only
one
dire
ctor
inea
chC
omm
unity
Men
talH
ealth
Cen
ter
Swed
en19
84^
1985
15SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
p14
6^15
0)Li
stin
gof
frequ
enci
es(p
p1
451
49)
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edTh
eau
thor
sm
ainl
yd
iscu
ssan
dde
mon
stra
ted
iffer
entw
ays
ofut
ilisi
ngre
sear
cha
sei
ther
ins
trum
enta
lpo
litic
alc
onfli
cte
nlig
hten
men
tin
tera
ctiv
eor
tact
ical
(p1
44)
`
usin
gre
sear
ch`in
stru
men
tally
rsquorsquoor
for
`enl
ight
enm
entrsquorsquo
purp
oses
mea
ntdi
ffere
ntth
ings
indi
ffere
ntse
tting
san
ddi
ffere
ntor
gani
zatio
nalp
ositi
onsrsquo
(p1
45)
USA
1990
16SF
par
tial(
p11
0)SS
com
ple
te
(p1
10)
100
(p1
10)
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
112
)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Com
ple
tere
fers
toth
e27
rep
rese
ntat
ives
inth
etw
opl
anni
ngco
mm
ittee
sin
the
two
com
mun
ities
No
furth
erge
nera
lisat
ion
can
be
mad
eon
the
basi
sof
this
sam
ple
USA
1991
17SF
com
plet
e(p
p5
13^5
14)
SSr
ando
msa
mp
le(p
513
)
60
(p5
14)
Qua
ntita
tivel
yde
scrip
tive
rate
dan
dw
eig
hted
(p
p51
9^52
2)D
escr
iptiv
elis
ting
ofw
eigh
ted
ratin
gs(p
p5
17^5
23)a
ndm
ultip
lere
gre
ssio
n(p
p5
185
23^5
27)
Com
ple
te
Wei
ghte
don
3-p
oint
and
5-p
oint
scal
es
UK
1991
18SF
com
plet
e(p
51)
SSr
ando
msa
mp
le(p
51)
73
(p5
1)Q
uant
itativ
era
ted
desc
riptio
ns(p
p51
^54)
Per
cent
ages
(pp
51^5
4)C
omp
lete
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244f J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le2
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceS
amp
lefr
ame
(SF
)aan
dsa
mp
lest
rate
gy
(SS
)b
Res
po
nse
rate
Mea
sure
men
tofu
seo
fev
iden
ceM
easu
rem
ento
fd
eter
min
ants
ofu
seS
um
mar
yo
fdes
crip
tio
no
fmet
ho
ds
(co
mp
lete
par
tial
or
no
tad
equa
tely
des
crib
ed)a
nd
com
men
ts
USA
1993
^199
419SF
par
tial(
p15
)SS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(i
esu
bjec
tive
view
onke
yva
riabl
esof
pol
icy
chan
gea
nym
entio
nno
rank
ing)
(p1
6)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edO
nly
Med
icai
dp
rog
ram
mes
with
spec
ific
cost
-con
tain
men
tpol
icie
sin
the
last
seve
raly
ears
(p2
9)U
K19
94^1
99520
21
SFp
artia
l(pp
461
46
5)SS
sno
wb
alle
d(p
p4
614
65)
100
(all
thos
eap
proa
ched
fori
nter
view
agre
edto
the
inte
rvie
w)
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
31f
f)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Mex
ico
1994
^199
522SF
not
stat
ed
SSn
otst
ated
N
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(i
esu
bjec
tive
view
onke
yva
riabl
es)(
pp
104
106^
108)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edP
urpo
sive
sam
ple
(per
sona
lcom
mun
icat
ions
)A
ustra
lia19
9523
SFp
artia
lSS
not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edQ
uant
itativ
ean
dd
escr
iptiv
e(p
p1
05^1
08)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edC
alle
d`p
urpo
sive
sam
plin
gfra
mersquo
(p1
04)
USA
1996
24an
dU
SA19
9725
SFp
artia
l(pp
16
30^3
1)SS
com
bin
edra
ndom
and
snow
-ba
lled
(pp
30^3
1)
Not
stat
edQ
uant
itativ
ere
gres
sion
and
apa
thm
odel
(p1
8)Q
uant
itativ
ere
gres
sion
and
apa
thm
odel
(p1
8)Pa
rtial
but
with
ago
odde
scrip
tion
ofSS
and
SF
Paki
stan
1998
26SF
par
tial(
p77
)SS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
(pp
788
082
)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
UK
1998
27SF
par
tial(
pp1
^2)
SSn
otst
ated
(pp
1^2
)
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(ie
subj
ectiv
evi
ewon
awar
enes
sge
nera
lper
cept
ions
and
impa
ct)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
UK
and
USA
1998
28SF
par
tial(
p4)
SSn
otst
ated
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(pp
12^2
2)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Can
ada
1998
^199
929SF
par
tial(
p16
)SS
not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ede
scrip
tions
and
quan
titat
ive
listin
gs(p
p18
^30
32^3
4)Q
ualit
ativ
ePa
rtial
Aqu
alita
tive
valid
atio
nof
the
inte
rvie
ws
isd
escr
ibed
(pp
16^1
7)B
urki
naFa
so19
9930
SFn
otst
ated
SSn
otst
ated
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(p2
2)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
Can
ada
2000
32SF
par
tial
SSn
otst
ated
42
(p
23)
Bot
hqu
antit
ativ
ean
dqu
alita
tive
des
crip
tions
ofba
rrie
rs(p
p11
^14
26)
Freq
uenc
ies
(p2
6)Pa
rtial
Cal
led
`apu
rpos
ive
sam
ple
ofC
anad
ian
polic
y-m
aker
srsquo(p
8)
Can
ada
2000
33SF
not
stat
edSS
sno
wb
alle
d(p
ii)
88
(22
25)
(p1
8)B
oth
quan
titat
ive
and
qual
itativ
ed
escr
iptio
nsof
faci
litat
ors
(pp
ii
i35
^37)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
a Sam
ple
fram
ec
omp
lete
ˆth
esa
mp
lew
asd
escr
ibed
inre
latio
nto
allt
hed
ecis
ion
-mak
ers
inth
eco
ntex
toft
hest
udy
par
tialˆ
inco
mp
lete
info
rmat
ion
not
stat
edˆ
nod
escr
iptio
nb S
amp
lest
rate
gy
com
ple
tesa
mp
ler
and
omsa
mp
les
now
bal
led
sam
ple
orn
otst
ated
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244g J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
Mai
nre
sults
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p5
4)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
60)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
54)
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
65)
USA
1973
8Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p1
41)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
142
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
143
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
43)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p14
114
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(pp
142
145)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p1
43)
USA
1973
^197
49an
dU
SA
1973
^197
410
(pv
ii)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
333
6)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
33)
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p3
3)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)
USA
1977
11Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
155
158)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p1
45)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p14
915
2)P
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p15
9^16
0)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
155
158)
USA
1980
2an
dU
SA19
8012
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
stTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sM
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
USA
1982
13N
one
ofth
efa
cilit
ator
sw
ere
men
tione
din
the
othe
rstu
dies
Non
eof
the
bar
riers
wer
em
entio
ned
inth
eot
hers
tud
ies
USA
1983
14C
omm
unity
pres
sure
orcl
ient
dem
and
forr
esea
rch
(pp
82
84)
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
82)
Not
stat
ed
Swed
en19
84^1
98515
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
p14
614
9)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
148
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
149
)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
150
)
USA
1990
16R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
114
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
18)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p11
111
5)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(pp
119
^122
)U
SA19
9117
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p5
19)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(pp
519
520)
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
19)
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
519
)U
K19
9118
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
5)N
otst
ated
USA
1993
^199
419G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
27)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p2
7)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
9)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
chA
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
13^1
427
)
UK
1994
^199
5202
1Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
32^3
4)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
p32
^34)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
pp
31^3
2)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(p3
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p3
3)M
exic
o19
94^1
99522
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
sTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
nsR
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
hIn
clus
ion
ofef
fect
iven
ess
data
(pp
106^
108
109^
113)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p10
7^11
1)
USA
1996
24Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
1)A
ustra
lia19
9523
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
107
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
108
)G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
108
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
108
)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
106
)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p1
06)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
106
)
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244h J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
Paki
stan
1998
26N
otst
ated
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p78
82)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
80)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p80
82)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
80)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p8
2)U
K19
9827
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p8
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
13)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p8
12)
UK
and
USA
1998
28Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
p3
17^2
1)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p5
12^1
7)
Can
ada
1998
^199
929Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p3
2)P
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p33
^34)
Bur
kina
Faso
1999
30N
otst
ated
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p2
1)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
23)
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
62)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p6
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
63)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
61)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
61)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p6
1)C
anad
a20
0032
Not
stat
edP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
26)
Can
ada
2000
33Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pi
)N
otst
ated
use rather than actual use of research evidence Five ofthe included studies did not report how many policy-makers were interviewed The remaining 19 studiesinterviewed a total of 2041 policy-makers (median 58range 16ndash479)
Study methods
The included studies were all limited with respect to thegeneralisability of their results Three studies intervieweda representative sample of health policy decision-makersdrawn from a clearly described sampling frame171834
Most studies reported how many decision-makers wereincluded and their positions but the relation betweenthe included policy-makers and the system from whichthey were drawn was rarely described Three of the 24included studies met all of our methodologicalcriteria171834 ie clearly described the sampling frameand the relationship of the included policy-makers tothis had a response rate of at least 60 and clearlydescribed how the use of evidence and the determinantsof how evidence was used were measured or assessed(Table 2) Seven studies partially met our criteria(Table 2last column) The other 14 studies did not adequatelydescribe the methods that were used
Measurement or assessment of the use and determi-nants of use of evidence was mostly descriptive Moststudies included a list of what the investigators perceivedto be barriers to or facilitators of the use of evidence Itis unclear which barriers and facilitators the decisions-makers found most important and which barriers andfacilitators were considered Six of the 24 studies ratedvariables that appeared to determine the use of evidence(Table 2)914171835
Facilitators and barriers
Many of the studies used open-ended questions Therespondents and investigators used different words todescribe facilitators of and barriers to the use ofresearch evidence However several common factorswere described across studies These are summarised inTable 3 A detailed version of this table including theexact words used in each of the included studies isavailable from the authors The most commonlymentioned facilitators of the use of research evidencein policy-making were
Personal contact between researchers and policy-makers (1324)
Timeliness and relevance of the research (1324)
Research that included a summary with clear recom-mendations (1124)
Good quality research (624)
Research that con rmed current policy or endorsedself-interest (624)
Community pressure or client demand for research(424)
Research that included effectiveness data (324)
The most commonly mentioned barriers to the use ofresearch evidence in policy-making were
Absence of personal contact between researchers andpolicy-makers (1124)
Lack of timeliness or relevance of research (924)
Mutual mistrust including perceived political naivetyof scientists and scienti c naivety of policy-makers(824)
Power and budget struggles (724)
Poor quality of research (624)
Political instability or high turnover of policy-makingstaff (524)
Based on the ndings of these studies personal two-way communication between researchers and decision-makers should be used to facilitate the use of researchThis can reduce mutual mistrust and promote a betterunderstanding of policy-making by researchers andresearch by policy-makers It can inform researchersabout what the decision-makers consider timely relevantquestions and policy-makers about how to obtain validanswers to these questions However the frequentlyidentied facilitators including personal two-way commu-nication may not be easy to establish ndash for examplebecause of political instability or high turnover of policy-making staff
Discussion
The strengths of this review include an extensive andsystematic literature search explicit inclusion criteriaand a systematic and transparent approach to collectingand presenting data from the included studies Everyincluded study was read and appraised by at least two ofthe authors The limitations of our review largely re ectthe limitations of the literature we reviewed
Because much research in the social sciences is poorlyindexed in electronic databases we may have missedrelevant studies Personal communication with investiga-tors in the eld yielded only three additional studies andalthough we attempted to contact the authors of all of theincluded studies only three responded and no additionalreferences were identi ed through these contacts
The limitations of the included studies with respect tosampling and generalisability are not surprising in lightof the fact that most of the studies were qualitative andwere not necessarily intended to include representativesamples Moreover given the diversity of contexts inwhich health policy decision-making occurs it is notpossible to obtain a generalisable sample Nonethelessinadequate descriptions of the participants and contextsfor many of the included studies make it dif cult tointerpret the results
No factor was mentioned in more than 13 of the 24studies as a facilitator or barrier even when similar factorswere grouped together This variation can in part beexplained by the fact that some of the studies focusedon speci c factors that were identied a priori andtherefore may have excluded other factors Anothersource of variation is the fact that most studies focused
Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence Review article
J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002 241
on speci c cases and factors were considered only inrelationship to those cases For example in a studyfocusing on the use of an economic evaluation it ismore likely that nancial constraints would be consid-ered as a barrier In a developing country study it is morelikely that international support would be considered as afacilitator In a study focusing on an issue on whichinterest groups have a strong position it would be morelikely that decision-makers would consider alliances withinterest groups as a facilitator or a barrier
Two theoretical perspectives were dominant in theliterature The rst perspective draws analogies betweenthe relationship of researchers and policy-makers andthe relationship between the natural sciences and thehumanities From this perspective problems with com-munication between researchers and policy-makers arelarge and dif cult to overcome936 This is often referredto as the lsquotwo-communities thesisrsquo or the lsquotwo culturesrsquoThe other perspective focuses on the concept of the lsquouseof researchrsquo It addresses how the word lsquousersquo may havefundamentally different meanings
The `two-communities thesisrsquo
The lsquotwo-communities thesisrsquo postulates the existence oftwo camps that lack the ability to take into account therealities or perspectives of one another Caplan et alfound that social scientists see themselves as rationalobjective and open to new ideas9 they see decision-makers as action- and interest-oriented indifferent toevidence and new ideas Decision-makers on the otherhand see themselves as responsible action-oriented andpragmatic they see scientists as naive jargon-ridden andirresponsible in relationship to practical realities Two-way communication between the two camps can facilitatea mutual understanding of a policy question and thekind of knowledge that is needed This requires thatresearchers and decision-makers agree on which ques-tions can be answered on the basis of research evidenceand which require political judgement This does notimply that research alone can answer policy questionssince these will always require some political judgementThe aim of two-way communication is to help ensurethat research appropriately informs judgements forwhich policy-makers are accountable not for researchersto assume the role of policy-makers
The results of this review support the lsquotwo communitiesthesisrsquo since the most commonly identied facilitatorof the use of evidence was personal contact betweenresearchers and decision-makers It is further supportedby the most commonly mentioned barriers to the use ofevidence absence of personal contact and mutual mistrustbetween decision-makers and researchers Personal two-way communication may also be a necessary preconditionfor other facilitators For example without personaltwo-way communication it may be dif cult for researchersto understand what decision-makers regard as timelyrelevant or good quality research
On the other hand this review is mostly based oninformation from one side of the two camps the decision-
makers It is not surprising that decision-makers nd iteasier to use evidence that they have had an opportunityto in uence through two-way communication with theresearchers Additionally the included studies do notclarify whether decision-makers use only the researchthey want to use Decision-makers may use evidence thatsupports their own ideology or their own politicalprogramme
The lsquotwo-communitiesrsquo thesis sheds light on animportant possible paradox inherent in the results thefactors that facilitate use of research may not necessarilybe factors that researchers should seek to enhance Ifwhat is required for research to be used is that researchersdo what the policy-maker wants them to do then researchmay fail to ful l one of its most important functionsnamely to be objective reliable and unbiased
What is `usersquo of evidence
Along with the lsquotwo-communitiesrsquo thesis the question ofwhat is meant by the concept of the lsquousersquo of evidence is themost commonly discussed theoretical issue in the litera-ture on knowledge utilisation The most frequent categor-isation of different types of use in this review is direct(lsquoinstrumentalrsquo or lsquoengineeringrsquo) selective (lsquosymbolicrsquo orlsquolegitimatingrsquo) and enlightening (lsquoconceptualrsquo) use ofevidence Direct use of evidence refers to speci c use ofresearch results It indicates that if research results arerelevant for a solution the results should directly affectthe solution without much adjustment Enlighteninguse of evidence refers to research that helps to lsquoestablishnew goals and bench marks of the attainablersquo37 and helpsto lsquoenrich and deepen understanding of the complexityof problems and the unintended consequences ofactionrsquo38 Selective use is strategic involving use lsquotolegitimate and sustain predetermined positionsrsquo5
The different de nitions of lsquousersquo contribute to thedif culty of interpreting the results of the studies includedin this review A health policy decision-maker who de nesuse as direct use is likely to report less use of researchevidence than decision-makers who also include selectiveor enlightening use of evidence Many of the studies haveaddressed different kinds of use and found that healthpolicy decision-makers refer to use in all three of theabove ways
The degree to which evidence is used directly in anenlightening way or selectively may vary in relation to
Different types of decision-makers upper middle andlower level
Different types of policy questions vague andcomplex or focused and simple
Different issues adoption versus implementation ordecision versus action
The degree to which evidence was directly used variedacross studies One study found that 40 of the use ofevidence was direct de ned as the lsquoprimary source inthe policy formulation processrsquo9 Another study foundonly 7 direct use212 The study that found 40 directuse was in a context where 94 of all the research used
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
242 J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
had been commissioned The study with only 7 directuse did not cover examples of commissioned researchThis suggests that expecting direct use frequently maybe unreasonable particularly for research that is notcommissioned A third study not included in thisreview found that local administrators close to pro-gramme operations reported more direct use ofevidence than federal-level decision-makers39
Enlightening use of evidence is more dif cult to assessthan direct use Decision-makers may interpret this asno more than a question of whether they considerresearch to be of value One study found that 60 ofdecision-makers lsquousedrsquo evidence in this way9 Self-reportedselective use of research on the other hand may bedif cult to elicit in interviews because it puts decision-makers in a bad light although it is commonly perceivedas a problem by researchers and others Research thatcon rms current policy or supports community pressuremay facilitate selective use Personal contact may alsofacilitate selective use of research
Conclusions
From the results of this review of 24 studies that met ourinclusion criteria based on 2041 interviews with policy-makers researchers who wish to increase the use of theresults of their research should have personal and closetwo-way communication with decision-makers providedecision-makers with a brief summary of their researchwith clear policy recommendations ensure that theirresearch is perceived as timely relevant and of highquality include effectiveness data argue that the resultsof their research are relevant to current policy anddemands from the community They should avoid gettinginvolved in power and budget struggles and be aware ofthe high turnover of policy-making staff Of course if theaim is to increase appropriate (direct or enlightening)use of research rather than selective use these strategieswill often not be effective as well as being dif cult toimplement
If the results from the interview studies with decision-makers are taken literally use of evidence will befacilitated by timely and relevant research that givesdecision-makers the answers that they want Howeverthey may not always be able to get what they want sinceresearchers should and it is to be hoped will insist onusing methods that protect against bias If decision-makers and researchers start to talk together about thebarriers and facilitators found in this review a morere ective appropriate and cooperative way of workingtogether which values both relevance and validity mayevolve
The studies included in this review address decision-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence Some studiessuggested document analysis as a way to check whetherthese perceptions correspond to what was done1215192133
but none of the included studies did this system-atically Future research should combine interviews withdocument analysis focus on commissioned research andclearly de ne what is meant by lsquousersquo of research
The methods that were used in the included studiesand their diversity limit the extent to which any rmconclusion can be drawn from this review In fact one ofthe main conclusions of this review is that there is atbest only limited support for any of the many opinionsput forward in the literature on the use of researchevidence by policy-makers At the same time given thediversity of the included studies the policy-makers whowere interviewed and the contexts in which they workedit is striking that some factors were identied as fre-quently as they were
Advice about how to improve the use of evidence bypolicy-makers is typically based on personal experiencesupported by anecdotes The results of this review providea context in which to consider such advice They providea menu of factors to consider but not a basis for anystrong recommendations Similarly the two theoriesthat are commonly used in these studies provide usefulinsights for understanding the perceptions summarised inthis review and other opinions about the use of evidenceby policy-makers but there are limited empirical data tosupport these or other theories
AcknowledgementWe thank Janette Boynton for help with literature searches
References1 Weiss JA Weiss CH Social scientists and decision makers
look at the usefulness of mental health research InLorion RP et al eds Psychology and public policybalancing public service and professional needWashington DC American Psychological Association1996 165ndash181
2 Lindblom CE Cohen DK Usable knowledge socialscience and social problem solving New Haven CT YaleUniversity Press 1979
3 Granados A Jonsson E Banta HD Bero L Bonair ACochet C et al EUR-Assess Project Subgroup Report onDissemination and Impact International Journal ofTechnology Assessment in Health Care 1997 13 220ndash286
4 Dunn WN The two-communities metaphor and models ofknowledge use an explanatory case study KnowledgeCreation Diffusion Utilization 1980 1 515ndash536
5 Beyer JM Trice HM The utilization process a conceptualframework and synthesis of empirical ndings Adminis-trative Science Quarterly 1982 27 591ndash622
6 Nelson CE Roberts J Maederer CM Wertheimer BJohnson B The utilization of social science informationby policy makers American Behavioral Scientist 1987 30569ndash577
7 van de Vall M Bolas C Using social policy research forreducing social problems an empirical analysis of struc-ture and functions Journal of Applied Behavioral Science1982 18 49ndash67
8 Glaser EM Taylor SH Factors in uencing the success ofapplied research American Psychologist 1973 28 140ndash146
9 Caplan N Morrison A Stambaugh RJ The use of socialscience knowledge in policy decisions at the national levela report to respondents Ann Arbor MI The University ofMichigan 1975 1ndash63
10 Caplan N A minimal set of conditions necessary for theutilization of social science knowledge in policy formula-tion at the national level In Weiss CH ed Using social
Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence Review article
J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002 243
research in public policy making Toronto LexingtonBooks 1977 183ndash198
11 Patton MQ Grimes PS Guthrie KM Breanan NJ et al Insearch for impact an analysis of the utilization of federalhealth evaluation research In Weiss CH ed Using socialresearch in public policy making Toronto LexingtonBooks 1977 141ndash164
12 Weiss CH Bucuvalas MJ Truth test and utility testdecision makersrsquo frames of reference for social scienceresearch American Sociological Review 1980 45 302ndash313
13 Weiss JA Coping with complexity An experimental studyof public policy decision-making In Kinder DD PalfreyTR eds Experimental foundations of political scienceAnn Arbor MI University of Michigan Press 1993 185ndash208
14 McNeece CA DiNitto DM Johnson PJ The utility ofevaluation research for administrative decision-makingAdministration in Social Work 1983 7 77ndash87
15 Sunesson S Nilsson K Explaining research utilizationbeyond lsquofunctionsrsquo Knowledge Creation Diffusion Util-ization 1989 10 140ndash155
16 Florio E DeMartini JR The use of information bypolicymakers at the local community level Knowledge1993 15 106ndash123
17 Boyer JF Langbein LI Factors in uencing the use ofhealth evaluation research in congress Evaluation Review1991 15 507ndash532
18 Ibbotson SL Long AF Sheldon TA Mason J An initialevaluation of Effective Health Care bulletins as instru-ments of effective dissemination Journal of Managementin Medicine 1993 7 48ndash57
19 Soumerai SB Ross-Degnan D Fortess EE Walser BLDeterminants of change in Medicaid pharmaceutical costsharing does evidence affect policy Milbank Quarterly1997 75 11ndash34
20 Harries U Elliott H Higgins A Evidence-based policy-making in the NHS exploring the interface betweenresearch and the commissioning process Journal of PublicHealth Medicine 1999 21 29ndash36
21 Elliott H Popay J How are policy makers using evidenceModels of research utilisation and local NHS policymaking Journal of Epidemiology and CommunityHealth 2000 54 461ndash468
22 Trostle J Bronfman M Langer A How do researchersin uence decision-makers Case studies of Mexicanpolicies Health Policy and Planning 1999 14 103ndash114
23 Ross J The use of economic evaluation in health careAustralian decision makersrsquo perceptions Health Policy1995 31 103ndash110
24 Oh CH Explaining the impact of policy information onpolicy-making Knowledge and Policy The InternationalJournal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization 1997 1022ndash55
25 Oh CH Rich RF Explaining use of information in publicpolicymaking Knowledge and Policy The InternationalJournal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization 1996 9 3ndash35
26 Hilderbrand M Simon J Hyder A The role of research inchild health policy and programs in Pakistan Geneva TheCouncil of Health Research and Development (COHRED)Working Group on Research to Action and Policy 200077ndash85
27 Rudat K Evaluation of the Effective Health Care BulletinLondon Of ce For Public Management 1998 1ndash46
28 Burns A Charlwood P Darling H Fox DM Greeneld LHamlyn L et al Better information better outcomes Theuse of health technology assessment and clinical effective-ness data in health care purchasing decisions in theUnited Kingdom and the United States New YorkMilbank Memorial Fund 2000 1ndash26
29 Eyles J Stoddart G Lavis J Pranger T Molyneaux-Smith LMcMullan C Making resource shifts supportive of thebroad determinants of health The PEI experienceHamilton McMaster Institute of Environment and Health2000 3ndash37
30 Gerhardus A Kielmann K Sanou A Lessons in research toaction and policy case studies from seven differentcountries Geneva The Council of Health Research andDevelopment (COHRED) Working Group on Research toAction and Policy 2000 19ndash27
31 Moodley J Jacobs M Research to action and policycombating vitamin a deciencies in South Africa GenevaThe Council of Health Research and Development(COHRED) Working Group on Research to Action andPolicy 2000 54ndash66
32 Lavis JN Farrant MSR Stoddard GL Barriers to employ-ment-related healthy public policy Toronto McMasterUniversity Centre for Health Economics and PolicyAnalysis 2000 00ndash03 1ndash28
33 Lavis JN Ross SE Hohenadel J Hurley J Stoddard GLWoodward C et al The role of health services research inCanadian provincial policy-making CHSRF Report 1997-021 Hamilton McMaster University 2000 1ndash44
34 McNeece CA DiNitto DM Johnson PJ The utility ofevaluation research for administrative decision-makingAdministration in Social Work 1983 7 77ndash87
35 van de Vall M Bolas C Using social policy research forreducing social problems an empirical analysis of struc-ture and functions Journal of Applied Behavioral Science1982 18 49ndash67
36 Snow CP The two cultures and the scientic revolutionCambridge Cambridge University Press 1959
37 Merton RK The role of applied social science in theformation of policy a research memorandum Philosophyof Science 1949 16 161ndash181
38 Aaron HJ Politics and the professors the great society inperspective Washington DC Brookings Institution 1978
39 Alkin MC Kosecoff J Fitzgibbon C Seligman R Evalua-tion and decision-making the title vii experience LosAngeles Center for the Study of Evaluation University ofCalifornia 1974
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244 J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244a J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
Cha
ract
eris
tics
ofin
clud
edst
udie
s
Co
un
try
year
cond
uct
ed(
year
pu
blis
hed
)re
fere
nce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fev
iden
ce(f
rom
whi
chd
ecis
ion
sw
ere
mad
e)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17 Th
eco
nditi
ons
and
func
tions
influ
enci
ngut
ilisa
tion
ofso
cial
pol
icy
rese
arch
(p4
9)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edsu
rvey
s(p
50)
Res
earc
hers
and
polic
y-m
aker
sth
atw
ere
resp
onsi
ble
for
inco
rpor
atin
gth
ere
sear
chre
sults
(p5
0)N
ˆno
tst
ated
120
rese
arch
proj
ects
on`c
lient
-orie
nted
rsquosoc
ial
rese
arch
with
inin
dust
rial
and
labo
urre
latio
ns
regi
onal
and
urb
anpl
anni
ngs
ocia
lwel
fare
and
publ
iche
alth
(p5
0)
Per
ceiv
ed(r
etro
spec
tive)
dec
isio
ns(p
50)
Rev
ised
vers
ion
ofpa
per
pres
ente
din
1979
(p4
9)
40ou
toft
he12
0pr
ojec
tsw
ere
onso
cial
wel
fare
and
publ
iche
alth
US
A19
738
Wha
twas
done
wha
the
lped
and
wha
thin
dere
dth
esu
cces
sfo
rten
rese
arch
proj
ects
unde
rthe
Nat
iona
lIns
titut
eof
Men
tal
Hea
lth
(p1
41)
Pers
onal
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
41)
Prin
cipa
linv
estig
ator
oth
erst
affm
emb
ers
adm
inis
trato
rsan
dpe
rson
sm
ostl
ikel
yto
be
utili
sers
(p1
41)
Nˆ
notg
iven
Five
proj
ects
rate
dlo
wan
dfiv
epr
ojec
tsra
ted
high
for
`suc
cess
rsquo(p
140
)
Per
ceiv
edus
eT
hein
terv
iew
sw
ere
don
ein
eith
er19
67or
1968
(pp
140^
141)
Su
cces
sde
fined
aspr
ojec
ttha
tw
asdi
rect
edto
the
orig
inal
obje
ctiv
ese
mbo
died
ina
clea
ran
dco
gent
rep
ort
cand
iden
ough
tobe
repl
icab
lea
ndth
atth
efin
din
gsw
ere
diss
emin
ated
adeq
uate
ly(p
140
)U
SA
1973
^197
49(p
vii)
and
USA
1973
^197
410So
cial
scie
nce
rese
arch
utili
satio
nan
dpo
licy
form
atio
n(p
vii)
Aw
aren
ess
ofre
sear
chk
now
ledg
eof
sour
ces
info
rmat
ion
retri
eval
pra
ctic
ein
tere
stin
soci
alin
dica
tors
eva
luat
ion
ofw
orth
and
obje
ctiv
ity
met
hods
and
mea
sure
men
tpr
oced
ures
deg
ree
ofco
nfid
ence
onfin
ding
sat
titud
esab
outu
sef
acto
rsth
atin
fluen
ceus
e(p
ix)
Pers
onal
inte
rvie
ws
open
-en
ded
and
stru
ctur
ed(p
pv
ix)
Upp
er-le
veld
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
inth
eex
ecut
ive
bran
chof
the
US
fede
ral
gove
rnm
ent(
ppv
viii)
31
depu
tyun
ders
ecre
tarie
s54
inst
itute
dire
ctor
s67
depu
tyas
sist
antd
irect
ors
52ag
ency
pers
onne
lN
ˆ20
4(p
v)
575
repo
rted
inst
ance
sof
use
whe
re38
5in
volv
edpr
imar
yre
sear
chso
urce
s(p
8)
94
wer
eei
ther
fund
edby
the
gove
rnm
ent
cond
ucte
dby
the
gove
rnm
ento
rbot
h(p
8)
Per
ceiv
ed(s
elf-r
epor
ted)
use
with
spec
ific
follo
w-u
pq
uest
ions
whe
nus
ew
asre
porte
d(p
1)
15
ofth
eus
eof
know
ledg
ew
ason
heal
thor
wel
fare
prob
lem
s(p
5)
`Mos
toft
heex
ampl
esre
spon
dent
sof
fere
dto
illust
rate
know
ledg
eap
plic
atio
nsre
ally
invo
lved
the
appl
icat
ion
ofse
cond
ary
sour
cein
form
atio
nrsquo(p
187
)
US
A19
77
11`T
oex
amin
eth
ena
ture
and
degr
eeof
utiliz
atio
nof
fede
rale
valu
atio
nre
sear
chrsquo
(p1
43)
Op
en-e
nded
inte
rvie
ws
with
diffe
rent
ques
tions
for
the
deci
sion
-mak
eran
dth
eev
alua
tor(
p1
43)
Thre
eke
yin
form
ants
from
each
ofth
e20
stud
ies
wer
ein
terv
iew
eda
proj
ect
offic
ert
hed
ecis
ion-
mak
er(g
over
nmen
tlev
el)a
ndth
eev
alua
tor(
p14
3)N
ˆ60
(p1
43)
20na
tiona
lhea
lthca
reev
alua
tions
(cas
est
udie
s)w
ithso
me
syst
emat
icd
ata
colle
ctio
nm
ade
betw
een
1971
and
1974
bas
edon
11fa
ctor
sid
entif
ied
byth
eau
thor
s(p
p14
2^14
3)
Per
ceiv
edan
dse
lf-d
efin
edus
e(p
144
)H
ealth
train
ing
lab
orat
ory
prof
icie
ncy
neig
hbou
rhoo
dhe
alth
cent
res
heal
thse
rvic
esd
eliv
ery
syst
ems
alco
holis
ml
oan
forg
iven
ess
and
train
ing
wor
ksho
p(p
p14
2^14
3)U
SA
1980
2 an
dU
SA19
8012
Polic
y-m
aker
srsquope
rcep
tions
ofth
eus
eful
ness
ofso
cial
scie
nces
rese
arch
(pp
165
302)
Pers
onal
inte
rvie
ws
both
open
-end
edan
dst
ruct
ured
(pp
168
171
303)
51fe
dera
l52
stat
e(fr
omte
nst
ates
)and
52lo
cal
offic
iald
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
inup
per-
leve
lpos
ition
s(p
p16
730
3)N
ˆ15
5
Each
dec
isio
n-m
aker
read
two
abst
ract
s(tw
o-pa
gers
)ou
tof5
0fo
ract
uals
ocia
lsc
ienc
ere
sear
chre
ports
(p
p1
683
03)
Hyp
othe
tical
deci
sion
s(i
e`re
leva
ntto
the
issu
esyo
urof
fice
deal
sw
ithrsquo)
onm
enta
lhe
alth
alc
ohol
and
drug
abus
e
(pp
166
303
)
Not
stat
edb
utpu
blis
hed
Ap
ril19
80R
eprin
ted
from
Am
eric
anP
sych
olog
ist 1
981
Bas
edon
the
sam
ere
sear
chp
roje
ctas
US
A19
8012
(but
par
tlyon
othe
rpar
tsof
the
data
)
The
deci
sion
-mak
ers
wer
eg
iven
diffe
rent
`em
piri
calrsquo
inte
rven
tions
(ie
two-
page
rs)a
ndar
eth
eref
ore
diffi
cult
toco
mpa
reon
the
effe
ctva
riabl
esco
ntin
ued
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244b J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
USA
1982
13
Toob
serv
eth
eim
pac
ttha
tde
cisi
onco
mp
lexi
tya
ndam
ount
ofin
form
atio
nav
aila
ble
had
onth
eq
ualit
yof
the
deci
sion
proc
ess
(p1
87)
Stru
ctur
eds
emi-s
truct
ured
and
open
-end
edqu
estio
n-na
ires
com
bine
dw
itha
cont
rolle
dex
perim
ent
Con
seq
uenc
esof
com
plex
ityw
ere
exam
ined
byef
fect
sof
info
rmat
ion
load
and
num
bero
fde
cisi
onal
tern
ativ
es(p
p1
871
931
94)
Exp
erie
nced
pub
lican
dp
rivat
ese
ctor
man
ager
sfro
msi
xm
id-c
aree
rp
rog
ram
mes
atH
arva
rd
MIT
Sta
nfor
dan
dth
eW
ashi
ngto
nP
ublic
Affa
irsC
ente
r(pp
187
188
)N
ˆ13
2(p
188
)
Each
dec
isio
n-m
aker
rece
ived
alo
ngm
emor
and
umde
scrib
ing
apr
oble
mp
rese
ntin
gev
iden
ceus
eful
inan
alys
ing
the
prob
lem
and
pose
da
dec
isio
nto
bem
ade
base
don
real
peo
ple
and
even
ts(p
188
)
Two
hypo
thet
ical
dec
isio
ns
one
onth
est
atersquo
sD
epar
t-m
ento
fHea
lthan
dR
ehab
i-lit
ativ
ese
rvic
esan
don
eon
am
etha
done
mai
nten
ance
pro
gram
me
inN
ewYo
rkC
ity(p
p1
88^1
89)
Dec
isio
nha
dto
bem
ade
from
avai
labl
ein
form
atio
nw
ithin
1ho
ur45
min
utes
(p1
93)
Rep
rinte
dfro
mth
eJo
urna
lof
Pol
icy
Ana
lysi
san
dM
anag
emen
t2
66^8
7(p
185
)
The
exp
erim
entw
asb
ased
onsi
xdi
ffere
ntve
rsio
nsof
each
ofth
etw
oca
ses
The
six
diff
eren
tver
sion
sof
the
case
sva
ried
inin
form
atio
nco
mpl
exity
Eac
hde
cisi
on-m
aker
had
only
one
deci
sion
tom
ake
aton
lyon
ele
velo
fcom
plex
ity(p
p18
9^19
019
3)U
SA19
83
14To
dete
rmin
eso
me
ofth
efa
ctor
sth
atin
fluen
cead
min
istra
tors
rsquouse
ofev
alua
tive
data
inde
cisi
on-
mak
ing
and
toex
amin
eth
ety
pes
ofde
cisi
ons
(p7
9)
Stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-e
nded
post
alq
uest
ionn
aire
s(p
p7
9^80
)
Dire
ctor
sin
com
mun
itym
enta
lhea
lthce
ntre
sin
Flor
ida
and
Nor
thC
arol
ina
(p7
9)N
ˆ42
Con
duct
edst
udie
son
prog
ram
me
effe
ctiv
enes
sor
imp
actd
urin
gth
ela
st12
-m
onth
per
iod
(p8
1)
Per
ceiv
ed(i
ere
por
ted
)us
e(p
p80
^81)
Swed
en19
84^1
98515
(p1
52)
Diff
eren
tway
sof
usin
gso
cial
rese
arch
in
stru
men
tal
polit
ical
co
nflic
ten
light
enm
ent
inte
ract
ive
and
tact
ical
(pp
141
143^
144)
Inte
rvie
ws
(p1
52)
Soc
ialw
orke
rs
man
agem
entd
irect
ors
loca
land
natio
nalp
oliti
cian
sin
15Sw
edis
hci
ties
and
com
mun
es(p
152
)N
ˆ90
(p1
52)
Doc
umen
tsth
atth
ere
spon
dent
sre
ferr
edto
Th
ese
docu
men
tsw
ere
also
anal
ysed
by
the
auth
ors
(p1
52)
Per
ceiv
edre
trosp
ectiv
ed
ecis
ions
(p1
52)
USA
1990
16To
dete
rmin
ew
hatt
ype
ofin
form
atio
nd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
use
and
how
ideo
log
yan
din
tere
sts
influ
ence
the
use
ofin
form
atio
n(p
109
)
Pers
onal
sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
112
)Lo
calp
lann
ing
com
mitt
ees
and
gove
rnm
ente
mp
loye
esin
two
rura
lcom
mun
ities
inth
eP
acifi
cN
orth
wes
t(p
110
)N
ˆ27
(p1
10)
Sour
ces
ofin
form
atio
nus
edin
com
mun
ityhe
alth
care
plan
ning
and
the
asse
ssm
ento
fthe
stra
tegi
cpl
anni
ngp
roce
ss(p
112
)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
112
)
USA
1991
17
Wha
tfac
tors
influ
ence
the
use
ofev
alua
tion
rese
arch
(on
heal
than
dhu
man
serv
ices
)in
cong
ress
(p5
08)
Stru
ctur
edte
lep
hone
inte
rvie
ws
(p5
13)
C
ongr
ess
mem
bers
and
thei
rsta
ff(p
512
)N
ˆ10
0Ea
chde
cisi
on-m
aker
chos
eon
est
udy
they
wer
efa
mili
arw
ith(p
515
)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
515
)E
valu
atio
nst
udie
sfro
mth
eD
epar
tmen
tofH
ealth
and
Hum
anSe
rvic
esth
atd
eal
with
natio
nalh
ealth
pro
gram
mes
(pp
507
515
)
Use
isde
fined
here
asbo
thin
stru
men
tal(
dire
ctim
ple
men
tatio
n)c
once
ptua
l(it
chan
ged
the
way
ofth
inki
ng)a
ndpe
rsua
sive
(use
dto
conv
ince
othe
rsp
516
)
The
inte
rvie
ws
last
ed15
^40
min
utes
(p5
14)
UK
1991
18U
sean
dre
ason
sfo
ruse
not
use
ofth
eE
iexclect
ive
Hea
lthC
are
Bul
letin
(pp
51^
54)
Stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-e
nded
post
alq
uest
ionn
aire
s(p
p5
0^51
)
Dis
trict
gen
eral
man
ager
sd
irect
ors
ofpu
blic
heal
than
dd
irect
ors
ofpl
anni
ng
com
mis
sion
ing
inU
Kd
istri
cthe
alth
auth
oriti
esor
com
mis
sion
ing
cons
ortia
(p5
0)N
ˆ17
2(p
51)
Eiexcle
ctiv
eH
ealth
Car
eB
ulle
tinN
o1
1991
on
scre
enin
gfo
rost
eop
oros
isto
prev
entf
ract
ures
(p5
0)
Per
ceiv
edus
eof
info
rmat
ion
and
hypo
thet
ical
dec
isio
ns
chan
geof
opin
ion
and
conf
iden
ceto
acto
nin
form
atio
nin
the
bulle
tin(p
p52
^54)
Res
pon
dent
sw
ere
que
stio
ned
abou
tabu
lletin
that
had
been
prev
ious
lypo
sted
toth
em(p
p51
52)
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244c J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
USA
1993
^199
419Th
ero
leof
rese
arch
info
rmat
ion
inp
olic
yde
velo
pmen
t(p
29)
Que
stio
nnai
res
(p1
3)
open
-end
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
4)an
dse
mi-
stru
ctur
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
4)
Key
info
rman
ts
inst
ates
that
chan
ged
cost
-sha
ring
pol
icie
sfo
rpre
scrip
tion
reim
burs
emen
tlim
itsan
dco
-pay
men
ts(p
14)
N
ˆin
adeq
uate
lyd
escr
ibed
Res
earc
hp
ublic
atio
nsan
dco
mm
ents
(p2
5)P
erce
ived
retro
spec
tive
dec
isio
ns(p
25)
Onl
y2^
3pa
ges
outo
f21
wer
ere
leva
nt(p
25f
f)I
nfor
man
tsin
clud
edM
edic
aid
drug
prog
ram
me
adm
inis
trato
rs
dire
ctor
sor
polic
yan
alys
ts
phar
mac
yco
nsul
tant
san
dle
gisl
ator
s(p
15)
UK
1994
^199
5202
1`T
oid
entif
yfa
ctor
sw
hich
faci
litat
eor
imp
ede
evid
ence
-bas
edp
olic
y-m
akin
grsquo(
p2
9)
In-d
epth
inte
rvie
ws
(usi
nga
topi
cgu
ide)
(p2
9an
dre
spon
seto
ale
tter)
Lead
polic
y-m
aker
sG
Psan
dre
sear
cher
sin
nine
diff
eren
tcas
est
udie
sat
alo
call
evel
inth
eN
HS
(pp
293
1)N
ˆ28
Soci
alre
sear
ch(p
42
inth
epr
ojec
trep
ort)
Per
ceiv
edde
cisi
ons
Polic
yon
the
inte
rface
bet
wee
nR
ampD
and
com
mis
sion
ing
atth
ehe
alth
auth
ority
leve
l(p
30)
Mex
ico
1994
^199
522`T
here
latio
nshi
pbe
twee
nhe
alth
rese
arch
(and
rese
arch
ers)
and
heal
thpo
licie
s(a
ndpo
licy-
mak
ers)
info
urve
rtica
lhe
alth
prog
ram
mes
inM
exic
orsquo(p
104
)
Ope
n-en
ded
(in-
dept
hrsquo)
inte
rvie
ws
with
aco
mm
onin
terv
iew
prot
ocol
(p1
06)
`Res
earc
hers
and
polic
y-m
aker
sfro
mdi
ffere
ntin
stitu
tions
and
leve
lsof
resp
onsi
bilit
yrsquo(p
103
)N
ˆ67
Use
ofre
sear
chpu
blic
atio
ns`w
here
we
knew
that
ther
ew
asat
leas
tso
me
inte
ract
ion
bet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dde
cisi
on-
mak
ersrsquo
(p1
05)
Per
ceiv
ed
use
ofev
iden
ceco
ncer
ning
AID
Sch
oler
afa
mily
pla
nnin
gan
dim
mun
isat
ion
ing
over
nmen
talp
rogr
amm
es(p
103
)
Per
sona
lcom
mun
icat
ion
gav
ead
ditio
nali
nfor
mat
ion
onth
isis
sue
It
isd
iffic
ultt
od
isce
rnw
heth
erth
ede
cisi
ons
wer
ep
erce
ived
orhy
pot
hetic
als
ince
ther
ear
eno
actu
alde
cisi
ons
men
tione
d
Aus
tralia
1995
23
Dec
isio
n-m
aker
srsquoaw
aren
ess
and
use
ofec
onom
icev
alua
tions
inhe
alth
care
(p1
03)
Inte
rvie
ws
open
-end
edan
dst
ruct
ured
(not
stat
edif
post
alt
elep
hone
orfa
ce-to
-fa
ce)(
p10
5)
Sen
iorm
anag
ers
inth
eFe
der
alD
epar
tmen
tof
Hea
lthH
ousi
ngan
dC
omm
unity
Serv
ices
New
Sou
thW
ales
Stat
eth
eH
ealth
Dep
artm
ent(
p10
4)
Nˆ
34(p
105
)
Use
ofec
onom
icev
alua
tions
forp
ricin
gon
drug
ssc
reen
ing
radi
olog
ytra
nspl
ants
and
scan
ning
(p1
05)
`Per
ceiv
edus
eof
econ
omic
eval
uatio
nsrsquo(
p1
04)
USA
1996
24
and
USA
1997
25
Tode
term
ine
whe
ther
the
proc
ess
of(s
ocia
lsci
ence
)in
form
atio
nut
ilisa
tion
varie
sac
ross
diff
eren
tare
as(i
ese
rvic
epr
ovis
ion
and
finan
cing
)(pp
16^
17)
Stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
16)
Fe
der
als
tate
and
loca
lp
olic
y-m
aker
sat
diff
eren
tle
vels
deal
ing
with
finan
cean
dse
rvic
es(p
16)
N
ˆ47
9(p
16)
No
spec
ific
repo
rtb
utin
foty
persquor
efer
topr
ogra
mm
eev
alua
tion
dem
onst
ratio
np
roje
ct
stat
istic
ald
ata
and
polic
yan
alys
is(p
34)
Per
ceiv
edre
trosp
ectiv
ed
ecis
ions
(p1
7)O
pen-
ende
din
terv
iew
sw
ere
used
toob
tain
basi
cb
ackg
roun
din
form
atio
nab
outt
hep
olic
ypr
oces
sTh
est
ruct
ured
inte
rvie
ws
built
onth
eop
en-e
nded
inte
rvie
ws
(p3
3)Pa
kist
an19
9826
The
role
that
rese
arch
pla
ysin
expe
rienc
esin
linki
ngre
sear
chw
ithp
olic
y(p
77)
Ope
n-en
ded
in-d
epth
inte
rvie
ws
(p7
7)D
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
from
gov
ernm
ent
the
cent
ral
min
istry
ofhe
alth
the
pla
nnin
gco
mm
issi
onan
dp
rovi
ncia
lhea
lthau
thor
ities
(p7
7)N
ˆ16
(p7
7)
Not
stat
edG
ener
alpe
rcep
tions
C
lose
stfo
cus
onch
ildhe
alth
prob
lem
ssu
chas
co-tr
imox
azol
em
ater
nal
mor
talit
yvi
tam
inA
b
reas
tfeed
ing
and
pol
io(p
p77
79)
UK
1998
27
The
imp
actt
hatt
heE
iexclect
ive
Hea
lthca
reB
ulle
tinha
sin
side
the
NH
Sor
gan
isat
ion
(p1
)
Tele
phon
ein
terv
iew
sst
ruct
ure
notm
entio
ned
(p1
)
Hea
lthau
thor
ities
(p
2)
Nˆ
34Tw
osp
ecifi
cbu
lletin
sJu
ne19
97an
dO
ctob
er19
97(p
1)
Hyp
othe
tical
deci
sion
s(e
g
itin
fluen
ced
the
dev
elop
men
tofo
urpo
licy
alth
oug
hth
isha
sbe
eng
oing
onfo
rsom
etim
ersquo)
(p1
0)
The
date
isno
tcle
arly
stat
edb
utit
is19
98or
1999
Tr
usts
and
GPs
are
incl
uded
inth
est
udy
buta
reno
trel
evan
tin
this
revi
ew
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244d J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
UK
and
USA
1998
28
H
owU
Kan
dU
Sp
urch
aser
sva
lue
and
use
rese
arch
asse
ssin
ghe
alth
tech
nolo
gy
and
clin
ical
effe
ctiv
enes
s(p
pv
1)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p4
)U
K1
4no
n-m
edic
alhe
alth
auth
ority
pur
chas
ers
seve
np
ublic
heal
thp
hysi
cian
sni
neG
PsU
SA1
3p
ublic
offic
ials
from
11st
ates
nin
ep
rivat
ese
ctor
purc
hase
rs
thre
eco
nsul
tant
sN
ˆ55
(p4
)
Acc
ess
toan
dus
eof
heal
thte
chno
logy
asse
ssm
ent
clin
ical
effe
ctiv
enes
sin
form
atio
n(p
p4
11)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
1)
Sta
ted
1999
(p3
)
Can
ada
1998
^199
929A
case
stud
yof
cros
s-se
ctor
alre
sour
ceal
loca
tion
inth
ehu
man
serv
ices
syst
emin
Prin
ceE
dwar
dIs
land
(p4
)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-
ende
din
terv
iew
san
dfo
cus
grou
ps(p
p13
^16
App
endi
x1)
Key
info
rman
tsho
ldin
gd
iffer
entp
ositi
ons
with
inth
efiv
ehe
alth
regi
ons
the
Dep
artm
ento
fSoc
ial
Ser
vice
san
dva
rious
sect
ors
(p4
)al
lreg
ions
all
sect
ors
and
man
agem
ent
leve
ls(p
13)
Nˆ
58(p
9)
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
deci
sion
son
cros
s-se
ctor
alre
sour
ceal
loca
tions
(p5
)
Bur
kina
Faso
1999
30A
case
stud
yon
how
rese
arch
pla
yed
aro
lein
deci
sion
-mak
ing
abou
t`S
hare
dC
arersquo
fo
rch
ildho
odill
ness
(pp
19^
20)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
20)
Min
istry
ofH
ealth
offic
ials
(p2
2)N
ˆno
tgiv
enW
orks
hops
and
rese
arch
pape
rsth
atth
eau
thor
sha
dpr
ovid
edM
inis
tryof
Hea
lthof
ficia
lsw
ithd
urin
gpr
evio
usye
ars
(p2
1)
Per
ceiv
edus
eof
the
pro
vide
dsc
ient
ific
info
rmat
ion
inde
cisi
on-
mak
ing
(p2
0)
`Sha
red
care
rsquois
abou
tim
prov
edco
ntac
tand
colla
bora
tion
bet
wee
nhe
alth
cent
rest
affa
ndm
othe
rs(p
20)
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31B
arrie
rsag
ains
tand
mec
hani
sms
fori
mpr
ovin
gth
evi
tam
inA
rese
arch
^po
licy^
actio
nco
nnec
tion
(p5
5)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
55)
Key
info
rman
tsth
atw
ere
rele
vant
role
-pla
yers
(p5
5)
Nˆ
nots
tate
d
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
use
(p5
5)
Can
ada
2000
32
Toas
sess
the
influ
ence
ofin
form
atio
nab
outt
hehe
alth
cons
eque
nces
ofun
empl
oym
enta
ndin
secu
rity
onp
olic
y-m
akin
g(p
5)
Stru
ctur
eds
emi-s
truct
ured
and
open
-end
edte
lep
hone
inte
rvie
ws
(pp
59
)
Pol
icy-
mak
ers
inth
ehe
alth
and
empl
oym
ents
ecto
rsof
allt
hree
leve
lsof
Can
adia
ng
over
nmen
tan
dex
ecut
ive
dire
ctor
sof
ten
Can
adia
nno
n-g
over
nmen
talo
rgan
-is
atio
ns(p
5)
Nˆ
48(p
5)
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
retro
spec
tive
usef
ulne
ssof
past
rese
arch
info
rmat
ion
abou
tthe
heal
thco
nseq
uenc
esof
unem
ploy
men
tand
inse
curit
yon
polic
y-m
akin
g(p
5)
Sta
ted
date
forw
orki
ngpa
peri
sM
arch
2000
Can
ada
2000
33To
unde
rsta
ndw
heth
er
how
and
und
erw
hat
cond
ition
she
alth
serv
ices
rese
arch
pla
ysa
role
inpr
ovin
cial
polic
y-m
akin
g(p
i)
Bot
hpe
rson
als
emi-
stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
san
dsu
rvey
s(p
p8
11)
Key
info
rman
tsw
ithin
ava
riety
ofke
yhe
alth
polic
ies
intw
oC
anad
ian
prov
ince
s(O
ntar
ioan
dS
aska
tche
wan
)(p
ii)
Nˆ
22(p
18)
Not
stat
ed
Act
uala
ndpe
rcei
ved
dec
isio
nsw
ithin
the
field
sof
heal
thse
rvic
esju
risdi
ctio
nfin
anci
alar
rang
emen
ts
pro
gram
me
deliv
ery
arra
ngem
ents
and
pro
gram
me
cont
ent
(pp
713
)
Iti
sno
tsta
ted
wha
tkin
dof
evid
ence
was
used
but
refe
renc
esto
dire
ctus
eof
evid
ence
inde
cisi
onre
ports
rep
ortin
gon
actu
alus
eof
rese
arch
im
plie
sth
atev
iden
cew
asus
ed(p
p13
18^
19)
GPs
gen
eral
pra
ctiti
oner
sM
ITM
assa
chus
etts
Inst
itute
ofTe
chno
log
yN
HS
Nat
iona
lHea
lthS
ervi
ceR
ampD
res
earc
han
dd
evel
opm
ent
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244e J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le2
Stu
dym
etho
ds
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceS
amp
lefr
ame
(SF
)aan
dsa
mp
lest
rate
gy
(SS
)b
Res
po
nse
rate
Mea
sure
men
tofu
seo
fev
iden
ceM
easu
rem
ento
fd
eter
min
ants
ofu
seS
um
mar
yo
fdes
crip
tio
no
fmet
ho
ds
(co
mp
lete
par
tial
or
no
tad
equa
tely
des
crib
ed)a
nd
com
men
ts
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Aqu
antit
ativ
e4-
poi
ntsc
ore
wei
ghte
dac
cord
ing
toth
ree
deci
sion
leve
lsw
ithsu
mm
edsc
ore
rang
ing
from
0to
18(p
51)
Two-
way
AN
OV
A(p
66)
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
USA
1973
8SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
No
stat
istic
alte
chni
que
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
USA
1973
^197
49
and
USA
1973
^19
7410
(pv
ii)
SFp
artia
l(p
viii)
SSn
otm
entio
ned
partl
ysn
owb
alle
d(p
viii
)
95
(p2
4)B
oth
quan
titat
ivel
yra
ted
and
wei
ght
ed(p
p25
28
333
536
)and
qua
litat
ivel
yde
scrib
ed(p
p1^
4)D
escr
iptiv
elis
ting
ofra
tings
(pp
28
333
536
)and
MC
A(m
ultiv
aria
tere
gre
ssio
n)an
alys
is(p
27)
Parti
alIt
isst
ated
that
`this
repo
rtre
pre
sent
only
afir
stsu
mm
ary
ofso
me
ofth
ehi
ghlig
hts
and
mor
eim
por
tant
findi
ngsrsquo
(pv
i)S
ubse
quen
trep
orts
not
foun
d
USA
1977
11
SFp
artia
l(p
143)
SSs
now
bal
led
partl
yra
ndom
(p1
43)
Not
stat
edD
escr
iptiv
eN
ost
atis
tical
tech
niqu
ePa
rtial
The
inte
rvie
ws
appe
arto
have
bee
nm
ade
betw
een
1973
and
1976
USA
1980
2an
dU
SA19
8012
SFp
artia
l(p
167)
SSn
otst
ated
90
(p1
67)
Bot
hqu
antit
ativ
ede
scrip
tions
rat
edan
dw
eig
hted
and
qual
itativ
e(p
p16
9ff
303)
Des
crip
tive
listin
gof
ratin
gs(p
p1
70^1
72
174)
and
25va
riabl
esan
alys
edus
ing
fact
oran
alys
isto
dev
elop
five
dim
ensi
ons
(p
304
)
Parti
alB
oth
a4-
poin
t(p
168
)and
a5-
poi
ntw
eigh
ted
ratin
gsc
ale
(pp
173
303)
The
qual
itativ
era
ting
com
esfro
mlis
ting
ofm
ostm
entio
ned
char
acte
ristic
sof
usef
ulne
ss
The
five
dim
ensi
ons
are
liste
din
Tabl
e3
und
erfa
cilit
ator
s
USA
1982
13SF
Par
tial
(pp
187
^188
)SS
ran
dom
sam
ple
(pp
187
^188
)
Volu
ntee
red
(p1
88)
Qua
ntita
tive
listin
gof
the
deci
sion
qua
lity
ofev
iden
ce^
use
onsi
xdi
ffere
ntle
vels
ofco
mpl
exity
(pp
195^
208)
List
ing
offre
quen
cies
(pp
196
^198
)Pa
rtial
The
132
dec
isio
n-m
aker
sw
ere
rand
omly
dist
ribut
edto
two
of50
case
stud
ies
and
six
diff
eren
tlev
els
(p1
94)
USA
1983
14SF
not
stat
ed(p
79)
SS
not
stat
ed(p
79)
65
(p7
9)Q
uant
itativ
elis
ting
and
ratin
gs(p
p8
2^86
)Fr
eque
ncie
san
dra
ted
impo
rtanc
e(a
sve
ry
mod
erat
ely
orno
tim
porta
nt)(
p8
2)
SF
and
SSco
mpl
ete
ifth
est
udyrsquo
sfo
cus
cons
ider
edon
lydi
rect
ors
inFl
orid
aan
dN
orth
Car
olin
aan
dif
ther
ew
ere
only
one
dire
ctor
inea
chC
omm
unity
Men
talH
ealth
Cen
ter
Swed
en19
84^
1985
15SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
p14
6^15
0)Li
stin
gof
frequ
enci
es(p
p1
451
49)
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edTh
eau
thor
sm
ainl
yd
iscu
ssan
dde
mon
stra
ted
iffer
entw
ays
ofut
ilisi
ngre
sear
cha
sei
ther
ins
trum
enta
lpo
litic
alc
onfli
cte
nlig
hten
men
tin
tera
ctiv
eor
tact
ical
(p1
44)
`
usin
gre
sear
ch`in
stru
men
tally
rsquorsquoor
for
`enl
ight
enm
entrsquorsquo
purp
oses
mea
ntdi
ffere
ntth
ings
indi
ffere
ntse
tting
san
ddi
ffere
ntor
gani
zatio
nalp
ositi
onsrsquo
(p1
45)
USA
1990
16SF
par
tial(
p11
0)SS
com
ple
te
(p1
10)
100
(p1
10)
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
112
)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Com
ple
tere
fers
toth
e27
rep
rese
ntat
ives
inth
etw
opl
anni
ngco
mm
ittee
sin
the
two
com
mun
ities
No
furth
erge
nera
lisat
ion
can
be
mad
eon
the
basi
sof
this
sam
ple
USA
1991
17SF
com
plet
e(p
p5
13^5
14)
SSr
ando
msa
mp
le(p
513
)
60
(p5
14)
Qua
ntita
tivel
yde
scrip
tive
rate
dan
dw
eig
hted
(p
p51
9^52
2)D
escr
iptiv
elis
ting
ofw
eigh
ted
ratin
gs(p
p5
17^5
23)a
ndm
ultip
lere
gre
ssio
n(p
p5
185
23^5
27)
Com
ple
te
Wei
ghte
don
3-p
oint
and
5-p
oint
scal
es
UK
1991
18SF
com
plet
e(p
51)
SSr
ando
msa
mp
le(p
51)
73
(p5
1)Q
uant
itativ
era
ted
desc
riptio
ns(p
p51
^54)
Per
cent
ages
(pp
51^5
4)C
omp
lete
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244f J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le2
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceS
amp
lefr
ame
(SF
)aan
dsa
mp
lest
rate
gy
(SS
)b
Res
po
nse
rate
Mea
sure
men
tofu
seo
fev
iden
ceM
easu
rem
ento
fd
eter
min
ants
ofu
seS
um
mar
yo
fdes
crip
tio
no
fmet
ho
ds
(co
mp
lete
par
tial
or
no
tad
equa
tely
des
crib
ed)a
nd
com
men
ts
USA
1993
^199
419SF
par
tial(
p15
)SS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(i
esu
bjec
tive
view
onke
yva
riabl
esof
pol
icy
chan
gea
nym
entio
nno
rank
ing)
(p1
6)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edO
nly
Med
icai
dp
rog
ram
mes
with
spec
ific
cost
-con
tain
men
tpol
icie
sin
the
last
seve
raly
ears
(p2
9)U
K19
94^1
99520
21
SFp
artia
l(pp
461
46
5)SS
sno
wb
alle
d(p
p4
614
65)
100
(all
thos
eap
proa
ched
fori
nter
view
agre
edto
the
inte
rvie
w)
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
31f
f)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Mex
ico
1994
^199
522SF
not
stat
ed
SSn
otst
ated
N
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(i
esu
bjec
tive
view
onke
yva
riabl
es)(
pp
104
106^
108)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edP
urpo
sive
sam
ple
(per
sona
lcom
mun
icat
ions
)A
ustra
lia19
9523
SFp
artia
lSS
not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edQ
uant
itativ
ean
dd
escr
iptiv
e(p
p1
05^1
08)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edC
alle
d`p
urpo
sive
sam
plin
gfra
mersquo
(p1
04)
USA
1996
24an
dU
SA19
9725
SFp
artia
l(pp
16
30^3
1)SS
com
bin
edra
ndom
and
snow
-ba
lled
(pp
30^3
1)
Not
stat
edQ
uant
itativ
ere
gres
sion
and
apa
thm
odel
(p1
8)Q
uant
itativ
ere
gres
sion
and
apa
thm
odel
(p1
8)Pa
rtial
but
with
ago
odde
scrip
tion
ofSS
and
SF
Paki
stan
1998
26SF
par
tial(
p77
)SS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
(pp
788
082
)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
UK
1998
27SF
par
tial(
pp1
^2)
SSn
otst
ated
(pp
1^2
)
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(ie
subj
ectiv
evi
ewon
awar
enes
sge
nera
lper
cept
ions
and
impa
ct)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
UK
and
USA
1998
28SF
par
tial(
p4)
SSn
otst
ated
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(pp
12^2
2)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Can
ada
1998
^199
929SF
par
tial(
p16
)SS
not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ede
scrip
tions
and
quan
titat
ive
listin
gs(p
p18
^30
32^3
4)Q
ualit
ativ
ePa
rtial
Aqu
alita
tive
valid
atio
nof
the
inte
rvie
ws
isd
escr
ibed
(pp
16^1
7)B
urki
naFa
so19
9930
SFn
otst
ated
SSn
otst
ated
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(p2
2)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
Can
ada
2000
32SF
par
tial
SSn
otst
ated
42
(p
23)
Bot
hqu
antit
ativ
ean
dqu
alita
tive
des
crip
tions
ofba
rrie
rs(p
p11
^14
26)
Freq
uenc
ies
(p2
6)Pa
rtial
Cal
led
`apu
rpos
ive
sam
ple
ofC
anad
ian
polic
y-m
aker
srsquo(p
8)
Can
ada
2000
33SF
not
stat
edSS
sno
wb
alle
d(p
ii)
88
(22
25)
(p1
8)B
oth
quan
titat
ive
and
qual
itativ
ed
escr
iptio
nsof
faci
litat
ors
(pp
ii
i35
^37)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
a Sam
ple
fram
ec
omp
lete
ˆth
esa
mp
lew
asd
escr
ibed
inre
latio
nto
allt
hed
ecis
ion
-mak
ers
inth
eco
ntex
toft
hest
udy
par
tialˆ
inco
mp
lete
info
rmat
ion
not
stat
edˆ
nod
escr
iptio
nb S
amp
lest
rate
gy
com
ple
tesa
mp
ler
and
omsa
mp
les
now
bal
led
sam
ple
orn
otst
ated
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244g J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
Mai
nre
sults
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p5
4)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
60)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
54)
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
65)
USA
1973
8Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p1
41)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
142
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
143
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
43)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p14
114
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(pp
142
145)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p1
43)
USA
1973
^197
49an
dU
SA
1973
^197
410
(pv
ii)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
333
6)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
33)
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p3
3)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)
USA
1977
11Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
155
158)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p1
45)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p14
915
2)P
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p15
9^16
0)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
155
158)
USA
1980
2an
dU
SA19
8012
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
stTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sM
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
USA
1982
13N
one
ofth
efa
cilit
ator
sw
ere
men
tione
din
the
othe
rstu
dies
Non
eof
the
bar
riers
wer
em
entio
ned
inth
eot
hers
tud
ies
USA
1983
14C
omm
unity
pres
sure
orcl
ient
dem
and
forr
esea
rch
(pp
82
84)
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
82)
Not
stat
ed
Swed
en19
84^1
98515
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
p14
614
9)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
148
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
149
)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
150
)
USA
1990
16R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
114
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
18)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p11
111
5)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(pp
119
^122
)U
SA19
9117
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p5
19)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(pp
519
520)
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
19)
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
519
)U
K19
9118
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
5)N
otst
ated
USA
1993
^199
419G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
27)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p2
7)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
9)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
chA
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
13^1
427
)
UK
1994
^199
5202
1Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
32^3
4)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
p32
^34)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
pp
31^3
2)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(p3
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p3
3)M
exic
o19
94^1
99522
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
sTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
nsR
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
hIn
clus
ion
ofef
fect
iven
ess
data
(pp
106^
108
109^
113)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p10
7^11
1)
USA
1996
24Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
1)A
ustra
lia19
9523
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
107
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
108
)G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
108
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
108
)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
106
)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p1
06)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
106
)
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244h J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
Paki
stan
1998
26N
otst
ated
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p78
82)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
80)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p80
82)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
80)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p8
2)U
K19
9827
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p8
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
13)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p8
12)
UK
and
USA
1998
28Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
p3
17^2
1)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p5
12^1
7)
Can
ada
1998
^199
929Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p3
2)P
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p33
^34)
Bur
kina
Faso
1999
30N
otst
ated
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p2
1)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
23)
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
62)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p6
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
63)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
61)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
61)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p6
1)C
anad
a20
0032
Not
stat
edP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
26)
Can
ada
2000
33Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pi
)N
otst
ated
on speci c cases and factors were considered only inrelationship to those cases For example in a studyfocusing on the use of an economic evaluation it ismore likely that nancial constraints would be consid-ered as a barrier In a developing country study it is morelikely that international support would be considered as afacilitator In a study focusing on an issue on whichinterest groups have a strong position it would be morelikely that decision-makers would consider alliances withinterest groups as a facilitator or a barrier
Two theoretical perspectives were dominant in theliterature The rst perspective draws analogies betweenthe relationship of researchers and policy-makers andthe relationship between the natural sciences and thehumanities From this perspective problems with com-munication between researchers and policy-makers arelarge and dif cult to overcome936 This is often referredto as the lsquotwo-communities thesisrsquo or the lsquotwo culturesrsquoThe other perspective focuses on the concept of the lsquouseof researchrsquo It addresses how the word lsquousersquo may havefundamentally different meanings
The `two-communities thesisrsquo
The lsquotwo-communities thesisrsquo postulates the existence oftwo camps that lack the ability to take into account therealities or perspectives of one another Caplan et alfound that social scientists see themselves as rationalobjective and open to new ideas9 they see decision-makers as action- and interest-oriented indifferent toevidence and new ideas Decision-makers on the otherhand see themselves as responsible action-oriented andpragmatic they see scientists as naive jargon-ridden andirresponsible in relationship to practical realities Two-way communication between the two camps can facilitatea mutual understanding of a policy question and thekind of knowledge that is needed This requires thatresearchers and decision-makers agree on which ques-tions can be answered on the basis of research evidenceand which require political judgement This does notimply that research alone can answer policy questionssince these will always require some political judgementThe aim of two-way communication is to help ensurethat research appropriately informs judgements forwhich policy-makers are accountable not for researchersto assume the role of policy-makers
The results of this review support the lsquotwo communitiesthesisrsquo since the most commonly identied facilitatorof the use of evidence was personal contact betweenresearchers and decision-makers It is further supportedby the most commonly mentioned barriers to the use ofevidence absence of personal contact and mutual mistrustbetween decision-makers and researchers Personal two-way communication may also be a necessary preconditionfor other facilitators For example without personaltwo-way communication it may be dif cult for researchersto understand what decision-makers regard as timelyrelevant or good quality research
On the other hand this review is mostly based oninformation from one side of the two camps the decision-
makers It is not surprising that decision-makers nd iteasier to use evidence that they have had an opportunityto in uence through two-way communication with theresearchers Additionally the included studies do notclarify whether decision-makers use only the researchthey want to use Decision-makers may use evidence thatsupports their own ideology or their own politicalprogramme
The lsquotwo-communitiesrsquo thesis sheds light on animportant possible paradox inherent in the results thefactors that facilitate use of research may not necessarilybe factors that researchers should seek to enhance Ifwhat is required for research to be used is that researchersdo what the policy-maker wants them to do then researchmay fail to ful l one of its most important functionsnamely to be objective reliable and unbiased
What is `usersquo of evidence
Along with the lsquotwo-communitiesrsquo thesis the question ofwhat is meant by the concept of the lsquousersquo of evidence is themost commonly discussed theoretical issue in the litera-ture on knowledge utilisation The most frequent categor-isation of different types of use in this review is direct(lsquoinstrumentalrsquo or lsquoengineeringrsquo) selective (lsquosymbolicrsquo orlsquolegitimatingrsquo) and enlightening (lsquoconceptualrsquo) use ofevidence Direct use of evidence refers to speci c use ofresearch results It indicates that if research results arerelevant for a solution the results should directly affectthe solution without much adjustment Enlighteninguse of evidence refers to research that helps to lsquoestablishnew goals and bench marks of the attainablersquo37 and helpsto lsquoenrich and deepen understanding of the complexityof problems and the unintended consequences ofactionrsquo38 Selective use is strategic involving use lsquotolegitimate and sustain predetermined positionsrsquo5
The different de nitions of lsquousersquo contribute to thedif culty of interpreting the results of the studies includedin this review A health policy decision-maker who de nesuse as direct use is likely to report less use of researchevidence than decision-makers who also include selectiveor enlightening use of evidence Many of the studies haveaddressed different kinds of use and found that healthpolicy decision-makers refer to use in all three of theabove ways
The degree to which evidence is used directly in anenlightening way or selectively may vary in relation to
Different types of decision-makers upper middle andlower level
Different types of policy questions vague andcomplex or focused and simple
Different issues adoption versus implementation ordecision versus action
The degree to which evidence was directly used variedacross studies One study found that 40 of the use ofevidence was direct de ned as the lsquoprimary source inthe policy formulation processrsquo9 Another study foundonly 7 direct use212 The study that found 40 directuse was in a context where 94 of all the research used
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
242 J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
had been commissioned The study with only 7 directuse did not cover examples of commissioned researchThis suggests that expecting direct use frequently maybe unreasonable particularly for research that is notcommissioned A third study not included in thisreview found that local administrators close to pro-gramme operations reported more direct use ofevidence than federal-level decision-makers39
Enlightening use of evidence is more dif cult to assessthan direct use Decision-makers may interpret this asno more than a question of whether they considerresearch to be of value One study found that 60 ofdecision-makers lsquousedrsquo evidence in this way9 Self-reportedselective use of research on the other hand may bedif cult to elicit in interviews because it puts decision-makers in a bad light although it is commonly perceivedas a problem by researchers and others Research thatcon rms current policy or supports community pressuremay facilitate selective use Personal contact may alsofacilitate selective use of research
Conclusions
From the results of this review of 24 studies that met ourinclusion criteria based on 2041 interviews with policy-makers researchers who wish to increase the use of theresults of their research should have personal and closetwo-way communication with decision-makers providedecision-makers with a brief summary of their researchwith clear policy recommendations ensure that theirresearch is perceived as timely relevant and of highquality include effectiveness data argue that the resultsof their research are relevant to current policy anddemands from the community They should avoid gettinginvolved in power and budget struggles and be aware ofthe high turnover of policy-making staff Of course if theaim is to increase appropriate (direct or enlightening)use of research rather than selective use these strategieswill often not be effective as well as being dif cult toimplement
If the results from the interview studies with decision-makers are taken literally use of evidence will befacilitated by timely and relevant research that givesdecision-makers the answers that they want Howeverthey may not always be able to get what they want sinceresearchers should and it is to be hoped will insist onusing methods that protect against bias If decision-makers and researchers start to talk together about thebarriers and facilitators found in this review a morere ective appropriate and cooperative way of workingtogether which values both relevance and validity mayevolve
The studies included in this review address decision-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence Some studiessuggested document analysis as a way to check whetherthese perceptions correspond to what was done1215192133
but none of the included studies did this system-atically Future research should combine interviews withdocument analysis focus on commissioned research andclearly de ne what is meant by lsquousersquo of research
The methods that were used in the included studiesand their diversity limit the extent to which any rmconclusion can be drawn from this review In fact one ofthe main conclusions of this review is that there is atbest only limited support for any of the many opinionsput forward in the literature on the use of researchevidence by policy-makers At the same time given thediversity of the included studies the policy-makers whowere interviewed and the contexts in which they workedit is striking that some factors were identied as fre-quently as they were
Advice about how to improve the use of evidence bypolicy-makers is typically based on personal experiencesupported by anecdotes The results of this review providea context in which to consider such advice They providea menu of factors to consider but not a basis for anystrong recommendations Similarly the two theoriesthat are commonly used in these studies provide usefulinsights for understanding the perceptions summarised inthis review and other opinions about the use of evidenceby policy-makers but there are limited empirical data tosupport these or other theories
AcknowledgementWe thank Janette Boynton for help with literature searches
References1 Weiss JA Weiss CH Social scientists and decision makers
look at the usefulness of mental health research InLorion RP et al eds Psychology and public policybalancing public service and professional needWashington DC American Psychological Association1996 165ndash181
2 Lindblom CE Cohen DK Usable knowledge socialscience and social problem solving New Haven CT YaleUniversity Press 1979
3 Granados A Jonsson E Banta HD Bero L Bonair ACochet C et al EUR-Assess Project Subgroup Report onDissemination and Impact International Journal ofTechnology Assessment in Health Care 1997 13 220ndash286
4 Dunn WN The two-communities metaphor and models ofknowledge use an explanatory case study KnowledgeCreation Diffusion Utilization 1980 1 515ndash536
5 Beyer JM Trice HM The utilization process a conceptualframework and synthesis of empirical ndings Adminis-trative Science Quarterly 1982 27 591ndash622
6 Nelson CE Roberts J Maederer CM Wertheimer BJohnson B The utilization of social science informationby policy makers American Behavioral Scientist 1987 30569ndash577
7 van de Vall M Bolas C Using social policy research forreducing social problems an empirical analysis of struc-ture and functions Journal of Applied Behavioral Science1982 18 49ndash67
8 Glaser EM Taylor SH Factors in uencing the success ofapplied research American Psychologist 1973 28 140ndash146
9 Caplan N Morrison A Stambaugh RJ The use of socialscience knowledge in policy decisions at the national levela report to respondents Ann Arbor MI The University ofMichigan 1975 1ndash63
10 Caplan N A minimal set of conditions necessary for theutilization of social science knowledge in policy formula-tion at the national level In Weiss CH ed Using social
Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence Review article
J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002 243
research in public policy making Toronto LexingtonBooks 1977 183ndash198
11 Patton MQ Grimes PS Guthrie KM Breanan NJ et al Insearch for impact an analysis of the utilization of federalhealth evaluation research In Weiss CH ed Using socialresearch in public policy making Toronto LexingtonBooks 1977 141ndash164
12 Weiss CH Bucuvalas MJ Truth test and utility testdecision makersrsquo frames of reference for social scienceresearch American Sociological Review 1980 45 302ndash313
13 Weiss JA Coping with complexity An experimental studyof public policy decision-making In Kinder DD PalfreyTR eds Experimental foundations of political scienceAnn Arbor MI University of Michigan Press 1993 185ndash208
14 McNeece CA DiNitto DM Johnson PJ The utility ofevaluation research for administrative decision-makingAdministration in Social Work 1983 7 77ndash87
15 Sunesson S Nilsson K Explaining research utilizationbeyond lsquofunctionsrsquo Knowledge Creation Diffusion Util-ization 1989 10 140ndash155
16 Florio E DeMartini JR The use of information bypolicymakers at the local community level Knowledge1993 15 106ndash123
17 Boyer JF Langbein LI Factors in uencing the use ofhealth evaluation research in congress Evaluation Review1991 15 507ndash532
18 Ibbotson SL Long AF Sheldon TA Mason J An initialevaluation of Effective Health Care bulletins as instru-ments of effective dissemination Journal of Managementin Medicine 1993 7 48ndash57
19 Soumerai SB Ross-Degnan D Fortess EE Walser BLDeterminants of change in Medicaid pharmaceutical costsharing does evidence affect policy Milbank Quarterly1997 75 11ndash34
20 Harries U Elliott H Higgins A Evidence-based policy-making in the NHS exploring the interface betweenresearch and the commissioning process Journal of PublicHealth Medicine 1999 21 29ndash36
21 Elliott H Popay J How are policy makers using evidenceModels of research utilisation and local NHS policymaking Journal of Epidemiology and CommunityHealth 2000 54 461ndash468
22 Trostle J Bronfman M Langer A How do researchersin uence decision-makers Case studies of Mexicanpolicies Health Policy and Planning 1999 14 103ndash114
23 Ross J The use of economic evaluation in health careAustralian decision makersrsquo perceptions Health Policy1995 31 103ndash110
24 Oh CH Explaining the impact of policy information onpolicy-making Knowledge and Policy The InternationalJournal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization 1997 1022ndash55
25 Oh CH Rich RF Explaining use of information in publicpolicymaking Knowledge and Policy The InternationalJournal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization 1996 9 3ndash35
26 Hilderbrand M Simon J Hyder A The role of research inchild health policy and programs in Pakistan Geneva TheCouncil of Health Research and Development (COHRED)Working Group on Research to Action and Policy 200077ndash85
27 Rudat K Evaluation of the Effective Health Care BulletinLondon Of ce For Public Management 1998 1ndash46
28 Burns A Charlwood P Darling H Fox DM Greeneld LHamlyn L et al Better information better outcomes Theuse of health technology assessment and clinical effective-ness data in health care purchasing decisions in theUnited Kingdom and the United States New YorkMilbank Memorial Fund 2000 1ndash26
29 Eyles J Stoddart G Lavis J Pranger T Molyneaux-Smith LMcMullan C Making resource shifts supportive of thebroad determinants of health The PEI experienceHamilton McMaster Institute of Environment and Health2000 3ndash37
30 Gerhardus A Kielmann K Sanou A Lessons in research toaction and policy case studies from seven differentcountries Geneva The Council of Health Research andDevelopment (COHRED) Working Group on Research toAction and Policy 2000 19ndash27
31 Moodley J Jacobs M Research to action and policycombating vitamin a deciencies in South Africa GenevaThe Council of Health Research and Development(COHRED) Working Group on Research to Action andPolicy 2000 54ndash66
32 Lavis JN Farrant MSR Stoddard GL Barriers to employ-ment-related healthy public policy Toronto McMasterUniversity Centre for Health Economics and PolicyAnalysis 2000 00ndash03 1ndash28
33 Lavis JN Ross SE Hohenadel J Hurley J Stoddard GLWoodward C et al The role of health services research inCanadian provincial policy-making CHSRF Report 1997-021 Hamilton McMaster University 2000 1ndash44
34 McNeece CA DiNitto DM Johnson PJ The utility ofevaluation research for administrative decision-makingAdministration in Social Work 1983 7 77ndash87
35 van de Vall M Bolas C Using social policy research forreducing social problems an empirical analysis of struc-ture and functions Journal of Applied Behavioral Science1982 18 49ndash67
36 Snow CP The two cultures and the scientic revolutionCambridge Cambridge University Press 1959
37 Merton RK The role of applied social science in theformation of policy a research memorandum Philosophyof Science 1949 16 161ndash181
38 Aaron HJ Politics and the professors the great society inperspective Washington DC Brookings Institution 1978
39 Alkin MC Kosecoff J Fitzgibbon C Seligman R Evalua-tion and decision-making the title vii experience LosAngeles Center for the Study of Evaluation University ofCalifornia 1974
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244 J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244a J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
Cha
ract
eris
tics
ofin
clud
edst
udie
s
Co
un
try
year
cond
uct
ed(
year
pu
blis
hed
)re
fere
nce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fev
iden
ce(f
rom
whi
chd
ecis
ion
sw
ere
mad
e)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17 Th
eco
nditi
ons
and
func
tions
influ
enci
ngut
ilisa
tion
ofso
cial
pol
icy
rese
arch
(p4
9)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edsu
rvey
s(p
50)
Res
earc
hers
and
polic
y-m
aker
sth
atw
ere
resp
onsi
ble
for
inco
rpor
atin
gth
ere
sear
chre
sults
(p5
0)N
ˆno
tst
ated
120
rese
arch
proj
ects
on`c
lient
-orie
nted
rsquosoc
ial
rese
arch
with
inin
dust
rial
and
labo
urre
latio
ns
regi
onal
and
urb
anpl
anni
ngs
ocia
lwel
fare
and
publ
iche
alth
(p5
0)
Per
ceiv
ed(r
etro
spec
tive)
dec
isio
ns(p
50)
Rev
ised
vers
ion
ofpa
per
pres
ente
din
1979
(p4
9)
40ou
toft
he12
0pr
ojec
tsw
ere
onso
cial
wel
fare
and
publ
iche
alth
US
A19
738
Wha
twas
done
wha
the
lped
and
wha
thin
dere
dth
esu
cces
sfo
rten
rese
arch
proj
ects
unde
rthe
Nat
iona
lIns
titut
eof
Men
tal
Hea
lth
(p1
41)
Pers
onal
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
41)
Prin
cipa
linv
estig
ator
oth
erst
affm
emb
ers
adm
inis
trato
rsan
dpe
rson
sm
ostl
ikel
yto
be
utili
sers
(p1
41)
Nˆ
notg
iven
Five
proj
ects
rate
dlo
wan
dfiv
epr
ojec
tsra
ted
high
for
`suc
cess
rsquo(p
140
)
Per
ceiv
edus
eT
hein
terv
iew
sw
ere
don
ein
eith
er19
67or
1968
(pp
140^
141)
Su
cces
sde
fined
aspr
ojec
ttha
tw
asdi
rect
edto
the
orig
inal
obje
ctiv
ese
mbo
died
ina
clea
ran
dco
gent
rep
ort
cand
iden
ough
tobe
repl
icab
lea
ndth
atth
efin
din
gsw
ere
diss
emin
ated
adeq
uate
ly(p
140
)U
SA
1973
^197
49(p
vii)
and
USA
1973
^197
410So
cial
scie
nce
rese
arch
utili
satio
nan
dpo
licy
form
atio
n(p
vii)
Aw
aren
ess
ofre
sear
chk
now
ledg
eof
sour
ces
info
rmat
ion
retri
eval
pra
ctic
ein
tere
stin
soci
alin
dica
tors
eva
luat
ion
ofw
orth
and
obje
ctiv
ity
met
hods
and
mea
sure
men
tpr
oced
ures
deg
ree
ofco
nfid
ence
onfin
ding
sat
titud
esab
outu
sef
acto
rsth
atin
fluen
ceus
e(p
ix)
Pers
onal
inte
rvie
ws
open
-en
ded
and
stru
ctur
ed(p
pv
ix)
Upp
er-le
veld
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
inth
eex
ecut
ive
bran
chof
the
US
fede
ral
gove
rnm
ent(
ppv
viii)
31
depu
tyun
ders
ecre
tarie
s54
inst
itute
dire
ctor
s67
depu
tyas
sist
antd
irect
ors
52ag
ency
pers
onne
lN
ˆ20
4(p
v)
575
repo
rted
inst
ance
sof
use
whe
re38
5in
volv
edpr
imar
yre
sear
chso
urce
s(p
8)
94
wer
eei
ther
fund
edby
the
gove
rnm
ent
cond
ucte
dby
the
gove
rnm
ento
rbot
h(p
8)
Per
ceiv
ed(s
elf-r
epor
ted)
use
with
spec
ific
follo
w-u
pq
uest
ions
whe
nus
ew
asre
porte
d(p
1)
15
ofth
eus
eof
know
ledg
ew
ason
heal
thor
wel
fare
prob
lem
s(p
5)
`Mos
toft
heex
ampl
esre
spon
dent
sof
fere
dto
illust
rate
know
ledg
eap
plic
atio
nsre
ally
invo
lved
the
appl
icat
ion
ofse
cond
ary
sour
cein
form
atio
nrsquo(p
187
)
US
A19
77
11`T
oex
amin
eth
ena
ture
and
degr
eeof
utiliz
atio
nof
fede
rale
valu
atio
nre
sear
chrsquo
(p1
43)
Op
en-e
nded
inte
rvie
ws
with
diffe
rent
ques
tions
for
the
deci
sion
-mak
eran
dth
eev
alua
tor(
p1
43)
Thre
eke
yin
form
ants
from
each
ofth
e20
stud
ies
wer
ein
terv
iew
eda
proj
ect
offic
ert
hed
ecis
ion-
mak
er(g
over
nmen
tlev
el)a
ndth
eev
alua
tor(
p14
3)N
ˆ60
(p1
43)
20na
tiona
lhea
lthca
reev
alua
tions
(cas
est
udie
s)w
ithso
me
syst
emat
icd
ata
colle
ctio
nm
ade
betw
een
1971
and
1974
bas
edon
11fa
ctor
sid
entif
ied
byth
eau
thor
s(p
p14
2^14
3)
Per
ceiv
edan
dse
lf-d
efin
edus
e(p
144
)H
ealth
train
ing
lab
orat
ory
prof
icie
ncy
neig
hbou
rhoo
dhe
alth
cent
res
heal
thse
rvic
esd
eliv
ery
syst
ems
alco
holis
ml
oan
forg
iven
ess
and
train
ing
wor
ksho
p(p
p14
2^14
3)U
SA
1980
2 an
dU
SA19
8012
Polic
y-m
aker
srsquope
rcep
tions
ofth
eus
eful
ness
ofso
cial
scie
nces
rese
arch
(pp
165
302)
Pers
onal
inte
rvie
ws
both
open
-end
edan
dst
ruct
ured
(pp
168
171
303)
51fe
dera
l52
stat
e(fr
omte
nst
ates
)and
52lo
cal
offic
iald
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
inup
per-
leve
lpos
ition
s(p
p16
730
3)N
ˆ15
5
Each
dec
isio
n-m
aker
read
two
abst
ract
s(tw
o-pa
gers
)ou
tof5
0fo
ract
uals
ocia
lsc
ienc
ere
sear
chre
ports
(p
p1
683
03)
Hyp
othe
tical
deci
sion
s(i
e`re
leva
ntto
the
issu
esyo
urof
fice
deal
sw
ithrsquo)
onm
enta
lhe
alth
alc
ohol
and
drug
abus
e
(pp
166
303
)
Not
stat
edb
utpu
blis
hed
Ap
ril19
80R
eprin
ted
from
Am
eric
anP
sych
olog
ist 1
981
Bas
edon
the
sam
ere
sear
chp
roje
ctas
US
A19
8012
(but
par
tlyon
othe
rpar
tsof
the
data
)
The
deci
sion
-mak
ers
wer
eg
iven
diffe
rent
`em
piri
calrsquo
inte
rven
tions
(ie
two-
page
rs)a
ndar
eth
eref
ore
diffi
cult
toco
mpa
reon
the
effe
ctva
riabl
esco
ntin
ued
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244b J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
USA
1982
13
Toob
serv
eth
eim
pac
ttha
tde
cisi
onco
mp
lexi
tya
ndam
ount
ofin
form
atio
nav
aila
ble
had
onth
eq
ualit
yof
the
deci
sion
proc
ess
(p1
87)
Stru
ctur
eds
emi-s
truct
ured
and
open
-end
edqu
estio
n-na
ires
com
bine
dw
itha
cont
rolle
dex
perim
ent
Con
seq
uenc
esof
com
plex
ityw
ere
exam
ined
byef
fect
sof
info
rmat
ion
load
and
num
bero
fde
cisi
onal
tern
ativ
es(p
p1
871
931
94)
Exp
erie
nced
pub
lican
dp
rivat
ese
ctor
man
ager
sfro
msi
xm
id-c
aree
rp
rog
ram
mes
atH
arva
rd
MIT
Sta
nfor
dan
dth
eW
ashi
ngto
nP
ublic
Affa
irsC
ente
r(pp
187
188
)N
ˆ13
2(p
188
)
Each
dec
isio
n-m
aker
rece
ived
alo
ngm
emor
and
umde
scrib
ing
apr
oble
mp
rese
ntin
gev
iden
ceus
eful
inan
alys
ing
the
prob
lem
and
pose
da
dec
isio
nto
bem
ade
base
don
real
peo
ple
and
even
ts(p
188
)
Two
hypo
thet
ical
dec
isio
ns
one
onth
est
atersquo
sD
epar
t-m
ento
fHea
lthan
dR
ehab
i-lit
ativ
ese
rvic
esan
don
eon
am
etha
done
mai
nten
ance
pro
gram
me
inN
ewYo
rkC
ity(p
p1
88^1
89)
Dec
isio
nha
dto
bem
ade
from
avai
labl
ein
form
atio
nw
ithin
1ho
ur45
min
utes
(p1
93)
Rep
rinte
dfro
mth
eJo
urna
lof
Pol
icy
Ana
lysi
san
dM
anag
emen
t2
66^8
7(p
185
)
The
exp
erim
entw
asb
ased
onsi
xdi
ffere
ntve
rsio
nsof
each
ofth
etw
oca
ses
The
six
diff
eren
tver
sion
sof
the
case
sva
ried
inin
form
atio
nco
mpl
exity
Eac
hde
cisi
on-m
aker
had
only
one
deci
sion
tom
ake
aton
lyon
ele
velo
fcom
plex
ity(p
p18
9^19
019
3)U
SA19
83
14To
dete
rmin
eso
me
ofth
efa
ctor
sth
atin
fluen
cead
min
istra
tors
rsquouse
ofev
alua
tive
data
inde
cisi
on-
mak
ing
and
toex
amin
eth
ety
pes
ofde
cisi
ons
(p7
9)
Stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-e
nded
post
alq
uest
ionn
aire
s(p
p7
9^80
)
Dire
ctor
sin
com
mun
itym
enta
lhea
lthce
ntre
sin
Flor
ida
and
Nor
thC
arol
ina
(p7
9)N
ˆ42
Con
duct
edst
udie
son
prog
ram
me
effe
ctiv
enes
sor
imp
actd
urin
gth
ela
st12
-m
onth
per
iod
(p8
1)
Per
ceiv
ed(i
ere
por
ted
)us
e(p
p80
^81)
Swed
en19
84^1
98515
(p1
52)
Diff
eren
tway
sof
usin
gso
cial
rese
arch
in
stru
men
tal
polit
ical
co
nflic
ten
light
enm
ent
inte
ract
ive
and
tact
ical
(pp
141
143^
144)
Inte
rvie
ws
(p1
52)
Soc
ialw
orke
rs
man
agem
entd
irect
ors
loca
land
natio
nalp
oliti
cian
sin
15Sw
edis
hci
ties
and
com
mun
es(p
152
)N
ˆ90
(p1
52)
Doc
umen
tsth
atth
ere
spon
dent
sre
ferr
edto
Th
ese
docu
men
tsw
ere
also
anal
ysed
by
the
auth
ors
(p1
52)
Per
ceiv
edre
trosp
ectiv
ed
ecis
ions
(p1
52)
USA
1990
16To
dete
rmin
ew
hatt
ype
ofin
form
atio
nd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
use
and
how
ideo
log
yan
din
tere
sts
influ
ence
the
use
ofin
form
atio
n(p
109
)
Pers
onal
sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
112
)Lo
calp
lann
ing
com
mitt
ees
and
gove
rnm
ente
mp
loye
esin
two
rura
lcom
mun
ities
inth
eP
acifi
cN
orth
wes
t(p
110
)N
ˆ27
(p1
10)
Sour
ces
ofin
form
atio
nus
edin
com
mun
ityhe
alth
care
plan
ning
and
the
asse
ssm
ento
fthe
stra
tegi
cpl
anni
ngp
roce
ss(p
112
)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
112
)
USA
1991
17
Wha
tfac
tors
influ
ence
the
use
ofev
alua
tion
rese
arch
(on
heal
than
dhu
man
serv
ices
)in
cong
ress
(p5
08)
Stru
ctur
edte
lep
hone
inte
rvie
ws
(p5
13)
C
ongr
ess
mem
bers
and
thei
rsta
ff(p
512
)N
ˆ10
0Ea
chde
cisi
on-m
aker
chos
eon
est
udy
they
wer
efa
mili
arw
ith(p
515
)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
515
)E
valu
atio
nst
udie
sfro
mth
eD
epar
tmen
tofH
ealth
and
Hum
anSe
rvic
esth
atd
eal
with
natio
nalh
ealth
pro
gram
mes
(pp
507
515
)
Use
isde
fined
here
asbo
thin
stru
men
tal(
dire
ctim
ple
men
tatio
n)c
once
ptua
l(it
chan
ged
the
way
ofth
inki
ng)a
ndpe
rsua
sive
(use
dto
conv
ince
othe
rsp
516
)
The
inte
rvie
ws
last
ed15
^40
min
utes
(p5
14)
UK
1991
18U
sean
dre
ason
sfo
ruse
not
use
ofth
eE
iexclect
ive
Hea
lthC
are
Bul
letin
(pp
51^
54)
Stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-e
nded
post
alq
uest
ionn
aire
s(p
p5
0^51
)
Dis
trict
gen
eral
man
ager
sd
irect
ors
ofpu
blic
heal
than
dd
irect
ors
ofpl
anni
ng
com
mis
sion
ing
inU
Kd
istri
cthe
alth
auth
oriti
esor
com
mis
sion
ing
cons
ortia
(p5
0)N
ˆ17
2(p
51)
Eiexcle
ctiv
eH
ealth
Car
eB
ulle
tinN
o1
1991
on
scre
enin
gfo
rost
eop
oros
isto
prev
entf
ract
ures
(p5
0)
Per
ceiv
edus
eof
info
rmat
ion
and
hypo
thet
ical
dec
isio
ns
chan
geof
opin
ion
and
conf
iden
ceto
acto
nin
form
atio
nin
the
bulle
tin(p
p52
^54)
Res
pon
dent
sw
ere
que
stio
ned
abou
tabu
lletin
that
had
been
prev
ious
lypo
sted
toth
em(p
p51
52)
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244c J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
USA
1993
^199
419Th
ero
leof
rese
arch
info
rmat
ion
inp
olic
yde
velo
pmen
t(p
29)
Que
stio
nnai
res
(p1
3)
open
-end
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
4)an
dse
mi-
stru
ctur
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
4)
Key
info
rman
ts
inst
ates
that
chan
ged
cost
-sha
ring
pol
icie
sfo
rpre
scrip
tion
reim
burs
emen
tlim
itsan
dco
-pay
men
ts(p
14)
N
ˆin
adeq
uate
lyd
escr
ibed
Res
earc
hp
ublic
atio
nsan
dco
mm
ents
(p2
5)P
erce
ived
retro
spec
tive
dec
isio
ns(p
25)
Onl
y2^
3pa
ges
outo
f21
wer
ere
leva
nt(p
25f
f)I
nfor
man
tsin
clud
edM
edic
aid
drug
prog
ram
me
adm
inis
trato
rs
dire
ctor
sor
polic
yan
alys
ts
phar
mac
yco
nsul
tant
san
dle
gisl
ator
s(p
15)
UK
1994
^199
5202
1`T
oid
entif
yfa
ctor
sw
hich
faci
litat
eor
imp
ede
evid
ence
-bas
edp
olic
y-m
akin
grsquo(
p2
9)
In-d
epth
inte
rvie
ws
(usi
nga
topi
cgu
ide)
(p2
9an
dre
spon
seto
ale
tter)
Lead
polic
y-m
aker
sG
Psan
dre
sear
cher
sin
nine
diff
eren
tcas
est
udie
sat
alo
call
evel
inth
eN
HS
(pp
293
1)N
ˆ28
Soci
alre
sear
ch(p
42
inth
epr
ojec
trep
ort)
Per
ceiv
edde
cisi
ons
Polic
yon
the
inte
rface
bet
wee
nR
ampD
and
com
mis
sion
ing
atth
ehe
alth
auth
ority
leve
l(p
30)
Mex
ico
1994
^199
522`T
here
latio
nshi
pbe
twee
nhe
alth
rese
arch
(and
rese
arch
ers)
and
heal
thpo
licie
s(a
ndpo
licy-
mak
ers)
info
urve
rtica
lhe
alth
prog
ram
mes
inM
exic
orsquo(p
104
)
Ope
n-en
ded
(in-
dept
hrsquo)
inte
rvie
ws
with
aco
mm
onin
terv
iew
prot
ocol
(p1
06)
`Res
earc
hers
and
polic
y-m
aker
sfro
mdi
ffere
ntin
stitu
tions
and
leve
lsof
resp
onsi
bilit
yrsquo(p
103
)N
ˆ67
Use
ofre
sear
chpu
blic
atio
ns`w
here
we
knew
that
ther
ew
asat
leas
tso
me
inte
ract
ion
bet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dde
cisi
on-
mak
ersrsquo
(p1
05)
Per
ceiv
ed
use
ofev
iden
ceco
ncer
ning
AID
Sch
oler
afa
mily
pla
nnin
gan
dim
mun
isat
ion
ing
over
nmen
talp
rogr
amm
es(p
103
)
Per
sona
lcom
mun
icat
ion
gav
ead
ditio
nali
nfor
mat
ion
onth
isis
sue
It
isd
iffic
ultt
od
isce
rnw
heth
erth
ede
cisi
ons
wer
ep
erce
ived
orhy
pot
hetic
als
ince
ther
ear
eno
actu
alde
cisi
ons
men
tione
d
Aus
tralia
1995
23
Dec
isio
n-m
aker
srsquoaw
aren
ess
and
use
ofec
onom
icev
alua
tions
inhe
alth
care
(p1
03)
Inte
rvie
ws
open
-end
edan
dst
ruct
ured
(not
stat
edif
post
alt
elep
hone
orfa
ce-to
-fa
ce)(
p10
5)
Sen
iorm
anag
ers
inth
eFe
der
alD
epar
tmen
tof
Hea
lthH
ousi
ngan
dC
omm
unity
Serv
ices
New
Sou
thW
ales
Stat
eth
eH
ealth
Dep
artm
ent(
p10
4)
Nˆ
34(p
105
)
Use
ofec
onom
icev
alua
tions
forp
ricin
gon
drug
ssc
reen
ing
radi
olog
ytra
nspl
ants
and
scan
ning
(p1
05)
`Per
ceiv
edus
eof
econ
omic
eval
uatio
nsrsquo(
p1
04)
USA
1996
24
and
USA
1997
25
Tode
term
ine
whe
ther
the
proc
ess
of(s
ocia
lsci
ence
)in
form
atio
nut
ilisa
tion
varie
sac
ross
diff
eren
tare
as(i
ese
rvic
epr
ovis
ion
and
finan
cing
)(pp
16^
17)
Stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
16)
Fe
der
als
tate
and
loca
lp
olic
y-m
aker
sat
diff
eren
tle
vels
deal
ing
with
finan
cean
dse
rvic
es(p
16)
N
ˆ47
9(p
16)
No
spec
ific
repo
rtb
utin
foty
persquor
efer
topr
ogra
mm
eev
alua
tion
dem
onst
ratio
np
roje
ct
stat
istic
ald
ata
and
polic
yan
alys
is(p
34)
Per
ceiv
edre
trosp
ectiv
ed
ecis
ions
(p1
7)O
pen-
ende
din
terv
iew
sw
ere
used
toob
tain
basi
cb
ackg
roun
din
form
atio
nab
outt
hep
olic
ypr
oces
sTh
est
ruct
ured
inte
rvie
ws
built
onth
eop
en-e
nded
inte
rvie
ws
(p3
3)Pa
kist
an19
9826
The
role
that
rese
arch
pla
ysin
expe
rienc
esin
linki
ngre
sear
chw
ithp
olic
y(p
77)
Ope
n-en
ded
in-d
epth
inte
rvie
ws
(p7
7)D
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
from
gov
ernm
ent
the
cent
ral
min
istry
ofhe
alth
the
pla
nnin
gco
mm
issi
onan
dp
rovi
ncia
lhea
lthau
thor
ities
(p7
7)N
ˆ16
(p7
7)
Not
stat
edG
ener
alpe
rcep
tions
C
lose
stfo
cus
onch
ildhe
alth
prob
lem
ssu
chas
co-tr
imox
azol
em
ater
nal
mor
talit
yvi
tam
inA
b
reas
tfeed
ing
and
pol
io(p
p77
79)
UK
1998
27
The
imp
actt
hatt
heE
iexclect
ive
Hea
lthca
reB
ulle
tinha
sin
side
the
NH
Sor
gan
isat
ion
(p1
)
Tele
phon
ein
terv
iew
sst
ruct
ure
notm
entio
ned
(p1
)
Hea
lthau
thor
ities
(p
2)
Nˆ
34Tw
osp
ecifi
cbu
lletin
sJu
ne19
97an
dO
ctob
er19
97(p
1)
Hyp
othe
tical
deci
sion
s(e
g
itin
fluen
ced
the
dev
elop
men
tofo
urpo
licy
alth
oug
hth
isha
sbe
eng
oing
onfo
rsom
etim
ersquo)
(p1
0)
The
date
isno
tcle
arly
stat
edb
utit
is19
98or
1999
Tr
usts
and
GPs
are
incl
uded
inth
est
udy
buta
reno
trel
evan
tin
this
revi
ew
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244d J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
UK
and
USA
1998
28
H
owU
Kan
dU
Sp
urch
aser
sva
lue
and
use
rese
arch
asse
ssin
ghe
alth
tech
nolo
gy
and
clin
ical
effe
ctiv
enes
s(p
pv
1)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p4
)U
K1
4no
n-m
edic
alhe
alth
auth
ority
pur
chas
ers
seve
np
ublic
heal
thp
hysi
cian
sni
neG
PsU
SA1
3p
ublic
offic
ials
from
11st
ates
nin
ep
rivat
ese
ctor
purc
hase
rs
thre
eco
nsul
tant
sN
ˆ55
(p4
)
Acc
ess
toan
dus
eof
heal
thte
chno
logy
asse
ssm
ent
clin
ical
effe
ctiv
enes
sin
form
atio
n(p
p4
11)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
1)
Sta
ted
1999
(p3
)
Can
ada
1998
^199
929A
case
stud
yof
cros
s-se
ctor
alre
sour
ceal
loca
tion
inth
ehu
man
serv
ices
syst
emin
Prin
ceE
dwar
dIs
land
(p4
)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-
ende
din
terv
iew
san
dfo
cus
grou
ps(p
p13
^16
App
endi
x1)
Key
info
rman
tsho
ldin
gd
iffer
entp
ositi
ons
with
inth
efiv
ehe
alth
regi
ons
the
Dep
artm
ento
fSoc
ial
Ser
vice
san
dva
rious
sect
ors
(p4
)al
lreg
ions
all
sect
ors
and
man
agem
ent
leve
ls(p
13)
Nˆ
58(p
9)
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
deci
sion
son
cros
s-se
ctor
alre
sour
ceal
loca
tions
(p5
)
Bur
kina
Faso
1999
30A
case
stud
yon
how
rese
arch
pla
yed
aro
lein
deci
sion
-mak
ing
abou
t`S
hare
dC
arersquo
fo
rch
ildho
odill
ness
(pp
19^
20)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
20)
Min
istry
ofH
ealth
offic
ials
(p2
2)N
ˆno
tgiv
enW
orks
hops
and
rese
arch
pape
rsth
atth
eau
thor
sha
dpr
ovid
edM
inis
tryof
Hea
lthof
ficia
lsw
ithd
urin
gpr
evio
usye
ars
(p2
1)
Per
ceiv
edus
eof
the
pro
vide
dsc
ient
ific
info
rmat
ion
inde
cisi
on-
mak
ing
(p2
0)
`Sha
red
care
rsquois
abou
tim
prov
edco
ntac
tand
colla
bora
tion
bet
wee
nhe
alth
cent
rest
affa
ndm
othe
rs(p
20)
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31B
arrie
rsag
ains
tand
mec
hani
sms
fori
mpr
ovin
gth
evi
tam
inA
rese
arch
^po
licy^
actio
nco
nnec
tion
(p5
5)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
55)
Key
info
rman
tsth
atw
ere
rele
vant
role
-pla
yers
(p5
5)
Nˆ
nots
tate
d
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
use
(p5
5)
Can
ada
2000
32
Toas
sess
the
influ
ence
ofin
form
atio
nab
outt
hehe
alth
cons
eque
nces
ofun
empl
oym
enta
ndin
secu
rity
onp
olic
y-m
akin
g(p
5)
Stru
ctur
eds
emi-s
truct
ured
and
open
-end
edte
lep
hone
inte
rvie
ws
(pp
59
)
Pol
icy-
mak
ers
inth
ehe
alth
and
empl
oym
ents
ecto
rsof
allt
hree
leve
lsof
Can
adia
ng
over
nmen
tan
dex
ecut
ive
dire
ctor
sof
ten
Can
adia
nno
n-g
over
nmen
talo
rgan
-is
atio
ns(p
5)
Nˆ
48(p
5)
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
retro
spec
tive
usef
ulne
ssof
past
rese
arch
info
rmat
ion
abou
tthe
heal
thco
nseq
uenc
esof
unem
ploy
men
tand
inse
curit
yon
polic
y-m
akin
g(p
5)
Sta
ted
date
forw
orki
ngpa
peri
sM
arch
2000
Can
ada
2000
33To
unde
rsta
ndw
heth
er
how
and
und
erw
hat
cond
ition
she
alth
serv
ices
rese
arch
pla
ysa
role
inpr
ovin
cial
polic
y-m
akin
g(p
i)
Bot
hpe
rson
als
emi-
stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
san
dsu
rvey
s(p
p8
11)
Key
info
rman
tsw
ithin
ava
riety
ofke
yhe
alth
polic
ies
intw
oC
anad
ian
prov
ince
s(O
ntar
ioan
dS
aska
tche
wan
)(p
ii)
Nˆ
22(p
18)
Not
stat
ed
Act
uala
ndpe
rcei
ved
dec
isio
nsw
ithin
the
field
sof
heal
thse
rvic
esju
risdi
ctio
nfin
anci
alar
rang
emen
ts
pro
gram
me
deliv
ery
arra
ngem
ents
and
pro
gram
me
cont
ent
(pp
713
)
Iti
sno
tsta
ted
wha
tkin
dof
evid
ence
was
used
but
refe
renc
esto
dire
ctus
eof
evid
ence
inde
cisi
onre
ports
rep
ortin
gon
actu
alus
eof
rese
arch
im
plie
sth
atev
iden
cew
asus
ed(p
p13
18^
19)
GPs
gen
eral
pra
ctiti
oner
sM
ITM
assa
chus
etts
Inst
itute
ofTe
chno
log
yN
HS
Nat
iona
lHea
lthS
ervi
ceR
ampD
res
earc
han
dd
evel
opm
ent
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244e J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le2
Stu
dym
etho
ds
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceS
amp
lefr
ame
(SF
)aan
dsa
mp
lest
rate
gy
(SS
)b
Res
po
nse
rate
Mea
sure
men
tofu
seo
fev
iden
ceM
easu
rem
ento
fd
eter
min
ants
ofu
seS
um
mar
yo
fdes
crip
tio
no
fmet
ho
ds
(co
mp
lete
par
tial
or
no
tad
equa
tely
des
crib
ed)a
nd
com
men
ts
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Aqu
antit
ativ
e4-
poi
ntsc
ore
wei
ghte
dac
cord
ing
toth
ree
deci
sion
leve
lsw
ithsu
mm
edsc
ore
rang
ing
from
0to
18(p
51)
Two-
way
AN
OV
A(p
66)
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
USA
1973
8SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
No
stat
istic
alte
chni
que
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
USA
1973
^197
49
and
USA
1973
^19
7410
(pv
ii)
SFp
artia
l(p
viii)
SSn
otm
entio
ned
partl
ysn
owb
alle
d(p
viii
)
95
(p2
4)B
oth
quan
titat
ivel
yra
ted
and
wei
ght
ed(p
p25
28
333
536
)and
qua
litat
ivel
yde
scrib
ed(p
p1^
4)D
escr
iptiv
elis
ting
ofra
tings
(pp
28
333
536
)and
MC
A(m
ultiv
aria
tere
gre
ssio
n)an
alys
is(p
27)
Parti
alIt
isst
ated
that
`this
repo
rtre
pre
sent
only
afir
stsu
mm
ary
ofso
me
ofth
ehi
ghlig
hts
and
mor
eim
por
tant
findi
ngsrsquo
(pv
i)S
ubse
quen
trep
orts
not
foun
d
USA
1977
11
SFp
artia
l(p
143)
SSs
now
bal
led
partl
yra
ndom
(p1
43)
Not
stat
edD
escr
iptiv
eN
ost
atis
tical
tech
niqu
ePa
rtial
The
inte
rvie
ws
appe
arto
have
bee
nm
ade
betw
een
1973
and
1976
USA
1980
2an
dU
SA19
8012
SFp
artia
l(p
167)
SSn
otst
ated
90
(p1
67)
Bot
hqu
antit
ativ
ede
scrip
tions
rat
edan
dw
eig
hted
and
qual
itativ
e(p
p16
9ff
303)
Des
crip
tive
listin
gof
ratin
gs(p
p1
70^1
72
174)
and
25va
riabl
esan
alys
edus
ing
fact
oran
alys
isto
dev
elop
five
dim
ensi
ons
(p
304
)
Parti
alB
oth
a4-
poin
t(p
168
)and
a5-
poi
ntw
eigh
ted
ratin
gsc
ale
(pp
173
303)
The
qual
itativ
era
ting
com
esfro
mlis
ting
ofm
ostm
entio
ned
char
acte
ristic
sof
usef
ulne
ss
The
five
dim
ensi
ons
are
liste
din
Tabl
e3
und
erfa
cilit
ator
s
USA
1982
13SF
Par
tial
(pp
187
^188
)SS
ran
dom
sam
ple
(pp
187
^188
)
Volu
ntee
red
(p1
88)
Qua
ntita
tive
listin
gof
the
deci
sion
qua
lity
ofev
iden
ce^
use
onsi
xdi
ffere
ntle
vels
ofco
mpl
exity
(pp
195^
208)
List
ing
offre
quen
cies
(pp
196
^198
)Pa
rtial
The
132
dec
isio
n-m
aker
sw
ere
rand
omly
dist
ribut
edto
two
of50
case
stud
ies
and
six
diff
eren
tlev
els
(p1
94)
USA
1983
14SF
not
stat
ed(p
79)
SS
not
stat
ed(p
79)
65
(p7
9)Q
uant
itativ
elis
ting
and
ratin
gs(p
p8
2^86
)Fr
eque
ncie
san
dra
ted
impo
rtanc
e(a
sve
ry
mod
erat
ely
orno
tim
porta
nt)(
p8
2)
SF
and
SSco
mpl
ete
ifth
est
udyrsquo
sfo
cus
cons
ider
edon
lydi
rect
ors
inFl
orid
aan
dN
orth
Car
olin
aan
dif
ther
ew
ere
only
one
dire
ctor
inea
chC
omm
unity
Men
talH
ealth
Cen
ter
Swed
en19
84^
1985
15SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
p14
6^15
0)Li
stin
gof
frequ
enci
es(p
p1
451
49)
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edTh
eau
thor
sm
ainl
yd
iscu
ssan
dde
mon
stra
ted
iffer
entw
ays
ofut
ilisi
ngre
sear
cha
sei
ther
ins
trum
enta
lpo
litic
alc
onfli
cte
nlig
hten
men
tin
tera
ctiv
eor
tact
ical
(p1
44)
`
usin
gre
sear
ch`in
stru
men
tally
rsquorsquoor
for
`enl
ight
enm
entrsquorsquo
purp
oses
mea
ntdi
ffere
ntth
ings
indi
ffere
ntse
tting
san
ddi
ffere
ntor
gani
zatio
nalp
ositi
onsrsquo
(p1
45)
USA
1990
16SF
par
tial(
p11
0)SS
com
ple
te
(p1
10)
100
(p1
10)
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
112
)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Com
ple
tere
fers
toth
e27
rep
rese
ntat
ives
inth
etw
opl
anni
ngco
mm
ittee
sin
the
two
com
mun
ities
No
furth
erge
nera
lisat
ion
can
be
mad
eon
the
basi
sof
this
sam
ple
USA
1991
17SF
com
plet
e(p
p5
13^5
14)
SSr
ando
msa
mp
le(p
513
)
60
(p5
14)
Qua
ntita
tivel
yde
scrip
tive
rate
dan
dw
eig
hted
(p
p51
9^52
2)D
escr
iptiv
elis
ting
ofw
eigh
ted
ratin
gs(p
p5
17^5
23)a
ndm
ultip
lere
gre
ssio
n(p
p5
185
23^5
27)
Com
ple
te
Wei
ghte
don
3-p
oint
and
5-p
oint
scal
es
UK
1991
18SF
com
plet
e(p
51)
SSr
ando
msa
mp
le(p
51)
73
(p5
1)Q
uant
itativ
era
ted
desc
riptio
ns(p
p51
^54)
Per
cent
ages
(pp
51^5
4)C
omp
lete
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244f J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le2
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceS
amp
lefr
ame
(SF
)aan
dsa
mp
lest
rate
gy
(SS
)b
Res
po
nse
rate
Mea
sure
men
tofu
seo
fev
iden
ceM
easu
rem
ento
fd
eter
min
ants
ofu
seS
um
mar
yo
fdes
crip
tio
no
fmet
ho
ds
(co
mp
lete
par
tial
or
no
tad
equa
tely
des
crib
ed)a
nd
com
men
ts
USA
1993
^199
419SF
par
tial(
p15
)SS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(i
esu
bjec
tive
view
onke
yva
riabl
esof
pol
icy
chan
gea
nym
entio
nno
rank
ing)
(p1
6)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edO
nly
Med
icai
dp
rog
ram
mes
with
spec
ific
cost
-con
tain
men
tpol
icie
sin
the
last
seve
raly
ears
(p2
9)U
K19
94^1
99520
21
SFp
artia
l(pp
461
46
5)SS
sno
wb
alle
d(p
p4
614
65)
100
(all
thos
eap
proa
ched
fori
nter
view
agre
edto
the
inte
rvie
w)
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
31f
f)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Mex
ico
1994
^199
522SF
not
stat
ed
SSn
otst
ated
N
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(i
esu
bjec
tive
view
onke
yva
riabl
es)(
pp
104
106^
108)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edP
urpo
sive
sam
ple
(per
sona
lcom
mun
icat
ions
)A
ustra
lia19
9523
SFp
artia
lSS
not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edQ
uant
itativ
ean
dd
escr
iptiv
e(p
p1
05^1
08)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edC
alle
d`p
urpo
sive
sam
plin
gfra
mersquo
(p1
04)
USA
1996
24an
dU
SA19
9725
SFp
artia
l(pp
16
30^3
1)SS
com
bin
edra
ndom
and
snow
-ba
lled
(pp
30^3
1)
Not
stat
edQ
uant
itativ
ere
gres
sion
and
apa
thm
odel
(p1
8)Q
uant
itativ
ere
gres
sion
and
apa
thm
odel
(p1
8)Pa
rtial
but
with
ago
odde
scrip
tion
ofSS
and
SF
Paki
stan
1998
26SF
par
tial(
p77
)SS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
(pp
788
082
)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
UK
1998
27SF
par
tial(
pp1
^2)
SSn
otst
ated
(pp
1^2
)
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(ie
subj
ectiv
evi
ewon
awar
enes
sge
nera
lper
cept
ions
and
impa
ct)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
UK
and
USA
1998
28SF
par
tial(
p4)
SSn
otst
ated
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(pp
12^2
2)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Can
ada
1998
^199
929SF
par
tial(
p16
)SS
not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ede
scrip
tions
and
quan
titat
ive
listin
gs(p
p18
^30
32^3
4)Q
ualit
ativ
ePa
rtial
Aqu
alita
tive
valid
atio
nof
the
inte
rvie
ws
isd
escr
ibed
(pp
16^1
7)B
urki
naFa
so19
9930
SFn
otst
ated
SSn
otst
ated
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(p2
2)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
Can
ada
2000
32SF
par
tial
SSn
otst
ated
42
(p
23)
Bot
hqu
antit
ativ
ean
dqu
alita
tive
des
crip
tions
ofba
rrie
rs(p
p11
^14
26)
Freq
uenc
ies
(p2
6)Pa
rtial
Cal
led
`apu
rpos
ive
sam
ple
ofC
anad
ian
polic
y-m
aker
srsquo(p
8)
Can
ada
2000
33SF
not
stat
edSS
sno
wb
alle
d(p
ii)
88
(22
25)
(p1
8)B
oth
quan
titat
ive
and
qual
itativ
ed
escr
iptio
nsof
faci
litat
ors
(pp
ii
i35
^37)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
a Sam
ple
fram
ec
omp
lete
ˆth
esa
mp
lew
asd
escr
ibed
inre
latio
nto
allt
hed
ecis
ion
-mak
ers
inth
eco
ntex
toft
hest
udy
par
tialˆ
inco
mp
lete
info
rmat
ion
not
stat
edˆ
nod
escr
iptio
nb S
amp
lest
rate
gy
com
ple
tesa
mp
ler
and
omsa
mp
les
now
bal
led
sam
ple
orn
otst
ated
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244g J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
Mai
nre
sults
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p5
4)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
60)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
54)
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
65)
USA
1973
8Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p1
41)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
142
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
143
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
43)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p14
114
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(pp
142
145)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p1
43)
USA
1973
^197
49an
dU
SA
1973
^197
410
(pv
ii)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
333
6)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
33)
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p3
3)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)
USA
1977
11Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
155
158)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p1
45)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p14
915
2)P
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p15
9^16
0)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
155
158)
USA
1980
2an
dU
SA19
8012
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
stTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sM
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
USA
1982
13N
one
ofth
efa
cilit
ator
sw
ere
men
tione
din
the
othe
rstu
dies
Non
eof
the
bar
riers
wer
em
entio
ned
inth
eot
hers
tud
ies
USA
1983
14C
omm
unity
pres
sure
orcl
ient
dem
and
forr
esea
rch
(pp
82
84)
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
82)
Not
stat
ed
Swed
en19
84^1
98515
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
p14
614
9)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
148
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
149
)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
150
)
USA
1990
16R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
114
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
18)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p11
111
5)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(pp
119
^122
)U
SA19
9117
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p5
19)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(pp
519
520)
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
19)
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
519
)U
K19
9118
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
5)N
otst
ated
USA
1993
^199
419G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
27)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p2
7)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
9)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
chA
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
13^1
427
)
UK
1994
^199
5202
1Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
32^3
4)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
p32
^34)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
pp
31^3
2)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(p3
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p3
3)M
exic
o19
94^1
99522
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
sTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
nsR
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
hIn
clus
ion
ofef
fect
iven
ess
data
(pp
106^
108
109^
113)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p10
7^11
1)
USA
1996
24Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
1)A
ustra
lia19
9523
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
107
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
108
)G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
108
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
108
)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
106
)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p1
06)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
106
)
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244h J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
Paki
stan
1998
26N
otst
ated
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p78
82)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
80)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p80
82)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
80)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p8
2)U
K19
9827
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p8
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
13)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p8
12)
UK
and
USA
1998
28Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
p3
17^2
1)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p5
12^1
7)
Can
ada
1998
^199
929Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p3
2)P
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p33
^34)
Bur
kina
Faso
1999
30N
otst
ated
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p2
1)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
23)
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
62)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p6
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
63)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
61)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
61)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p6
1)C
anad
a20
0032
Not
stat
edP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
26)
Can
ada
2000
33Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pi
)N
otst
ated
had been commissioned The study with only 7 directuse did not cover examples of commissioned researchThis suggests that expecting direct use frequently maybe unreasonable particularly for research that is notcommissioned A third study not included in thisreview found that local administrators close to pro-gramme operations reported more direct use ofevidence than federal-level decision-makers39
Enlightening use of evidence is more dif cult to assessthan direct use Decision-makers may interpret this asno more than a question of whether they considerresearch to be of value One study found that 60 ofdecision-makers lsquousedrsquo evidence in this way9 Self-reportedselective use of research on the other hand may bedif cult to elicit in interviews because it puts decision-makers in a bad light although it is commonly perceivedas a problem by researchers and others Research thatcon rms current policy or supports community pressuremay facilitate selective use Personal contact may alsofacilitate selective use of research
Conclusions
From the results of this review of 24 studies that met ourinclusion criteria based on 2041 interviews with policy-makers researchers who wish to increase the use of theresults of their research should have personal and closetwo-way communication with decision-makers providedecision-makers with a brief summary of their researchwith clear policy recommendations ensure that theirresearch is perceived as timely relevant and of highquality include effectiveness data argue that the resultsof their research are relevant to current policy anddemands from the community They should avoid gettinginvolved in power and budget struggles and be aware ofthe high turnover of policy-making staff Of course if theaim is to increase appropriate (direct or enlightening)use of research rather than selective use these strategieswill often not be effective as well as being dif cult toimplement
If the results from the interview studies with decision-makers are taken literally use of evidence will befacilitated by timely and relevant research that givesdecision-makers the answers that they want Howeverthey may not always be able to get what they want sinceresearchers should and it is to be hoped will insist onusing methods that protect against bias If decision-makers and researchers start to talk together about thebarriers and facilitators found in this review a morere ective appropriate and cooperative way of workingtogether which values both relevance and validity mayevolve
The studies included in this review address decision-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence Some studiessuggested document analysis as a way to check whetherthese perceptions correspond to what was done1215192133
but none of the included studies did this system-atically Future research should combine interviews withdocument analysis focus on commissioned research andclearly de ne what is meant by lsquousersquo of research
The methods that were used in the included studiesand their diversity limit the extent to which any rmconclusion can be drawn from this review In fact one ofthe main conclusions of this review is that there is atbest only limited support for any of the many opinionsput forward in the literature on the use of researchevidence by policy-makers At the same time given thediversity of the included studies the policy-makers whowere interviewed and the contexts in which they workedit is striking that some factors were identied as fre-quently as they were
Advice about how to improve the use of evidence bypolicy-makers is typically based on personal experiencesupported by anecdotes The results of this review providea context in which to consider such advice They providea menu of factors to consider but not a basis for anystrong recommendations Similarly the two theoriesthat are commonly used in these studies provide usefulinsights for understanding the perceptions summarised inthis review and other opinions about the use of evidenceby policy-makers but there are limited empirical data tosupport these or other theories
AcknowledgementWe thank Janette Boynton for help with literature searches
References1 Weiss JA Weiss CH Social scientists and decision makers
look at the usefulness of mental health research InLorion RP et al eds Psychology and public policybalancing public service and professional needWashington DC American Psychological Association1996 165ndash181
2 Lindblom CE Cohen DK Usable knowledge socialscience and social problem solving New Haven CT YaleUniversity Press 1979
3 Granados A Jonsson E Banta HD Bero L Bonair ACochet C et al EUR-Assess Project Subgroup Report onDissemination and Impact International Journal ofTechnology Assessment in Health Care 1997 13 220ndash286
4 Dunn WN The two-communities metaphor and models ofknowledge use an explanatory case study KnowledgeCreation Diffusion Utilization 1980 1 515ndash536
5 Beyer JM Trice HM The utilization process a conceptualframework and synthesis of empirical ndings Adminis-trative Science Quarterly 1982 27 591ndash622
6 Nelson CE Roberts J Maederer CM Wertheimer BJohnson B The utilization of social science informationby policy makers American Behavioral Scientist 1987 30569ndash577
7 van de Vall M Bolas C Using social policy research forreducing social problems an empirical analysis of struc-ture and functions Journal of Applied Behavioral Science1982 18 49ndash67
8 Glaser EM Taylor SH Factors in uencing the success ofapplied research American Psychologist 1973 28 140ndash146
9 Caplan N Morrison A Stambaugh RJ The use of socialscience knowledge in policy decisions at the national levela report to respondents Ann Arbor MI The University ofMichigan 1975 1ndash63
10 Caplan N A minimal set of conditions necessary for theutilization of social science knowledge in policy formula-tion at the national level In Weiss CH ed Using social
Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence Review article
J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002 243
research in public policy making Toronto LexingtonBooks 1977 183ndash198
11 Patton MQ Grimes PS Guthrie KM Breanan NJ et al Insearch for impact an analysis of the utilization of federalhealth evaluation research In Weiss CH ed Using socialresearch in public policy making Toronto LexingtonBooks 1977 141ndash164
12 Weiss CH Bucuvalas MJ Truth test and utility testdecision makersrsquo frames of reference for social scienceresearch American Sociological Review 1980 45 302ndash313
13 Weiss JA Coping with complexity An experimental studyof public policy decision-making In Kinder DD PalfreyTR eds Experimental foundations of political scienceAnn Arbor MI University of Michigan Press 1993 185ndash208
14 McNeece CA DiNitto DM Johnson PJ The utility ofevaluation research for administrative decision-makingAdministration in Social Work 1983 7 77ndash87
15 Sunesson S Nilsson K Explaining research utilizationbeyond lsquofunctionsrsquo Knowledge Creation Diffusion Util-ization 1989 10 140ndash155
16 Florio E DeMartini JR The use of information bypolicymakers at the local community level Knowledge1993 15 106ndash123
17 Boyer JF Langbein LI Factors in uencing the use ofhealth evaluation research in congress Evaluation Review1991 15 507ndash532
18 Ibbotson SL Long AF Sheldon TA Mason J An initialevaluation of Effective Health Care bulletins as instru-ments of effective dissemination Journal of Managementin Medicine 1993 7 48ndash57
19 Soumerai SB Ross-Degnan D Fortess EE Walser BLDeterminants of change in Medicaid pharmaceutical costsharing does evidence affect policy Milbank Quarterly1997 75 11ndash34
20 Harries U Elliott H Higgins A Evidence-based policy-making in the NHS exploring the interface betweenresearch and the commissioning process Journal of PublicHealth Medicine 1999 21 29ndash36
21 Elliott H Popay J How are policy makers using evidenceModels of research utilisation and local NHS policymaking Journal of Epidemiology and CommunityHealth 2000 54 461ndash468
22 Trostle J Bronfman M Langer A How do researchersin uence decision-makers Case studies of Mexicanpolicies Health Policy and Planning 1999 14 103ndash114
23 Ross J The use of economic evaluation in health careAustralian decision makersrsquo perceptions Health Policy1995 31 103ndash110
24 Oh CH Explaining the impact of policy information onpolicy-making Knowledge and Policy The InternationalJournal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization 1997 1022ndash55
25 Oh CH Rich RF Explaining use of information in publicpolicymaking Knowledge and Policy The InternationalJournal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization 1996 9 3ndash35
26 Hilderbrand M Simon J Hyder A The role of research inchild health policy and programs in Pakistan Geneva TheCouncil of Health Research and Development (COHRED)Working Group on Research to Action and Policy 200077ndash85
27 Rudat K Evaluation of the Effective Health Care BulletinLondon Of ce For Public Management 1998 1ndash46
28 Burns A Charlwood P Darling H Fox DM Greeneld LHamlyn L et al Better information better outcomes Theuse of health technology assessment and clinical effective-ness data in health care purchasing decisions in theUnited Kingdom and the United States New YorkMilbank Memorial Fund 2000 1ndash26
29 Eyles J Stoddart G Lavis J Pranger T Molyneaux-Smith LMcMullan C Making resource shifts supportive of thebroad determinants of health The PEI experienceHamilton McMaster Institute of Environment and Health2000 3ndash37
30 Gerhardus A Kielmann K Sanou A Lessons in research toaction and policy case studies from seven differentcountries Geneva The Council of Health Research andDevelopment (COHRED) Working Group on Research toAction and Policy 2000 19ndash27
31 Moodley J Jacobs M Research to action and policycombating vitamin a deciencies in South Africa GenevaThe Council of Health Research and Development(COHRED) Working Group on Research to Action andPolicy 2000 54ndash66
32 Lavis JN Farrant MSR Stoddard GL Barriers to employ-ment-related healthy public policy Toronto McMasterUniversity Centre for Health Economics and PolicyAnalysis 2000 00ndash03 1ndash28
33 Lavis JN Ross SE Hohenadel J Hurley J Stoddard GLWoodward C et al The role of health services research inCanadian provincial policy-making CHSRF Report 1997-021 Hamilton McMaster University 2000 1ndash44
34 McNeece CA DiNitto DM Johnson PJ The utility ofevaluation research for administrative decision-makingAdministration in Social Work 1983 7 77ndash87
35 van de Vall M Bolas C Using social policy research forreducing social problems an empirical analysis of struc-ture and functions Journal of Applied Behavioral Science1982 18 49ndash67
36 Snow CP The two cultures and the scientic revolutionCambridge Cambridge University Press 1959
37 Merton RK The role of applied social science in theformation of policy a research memorandum Philosophyof Science 1949 16 161ndash181
38 Aaron HJ Politics and the professors the great society inperspective Washington DC Brookings Institution 1978
39 Alkin MC Kosecoff J Fitzgibbon C Seligman R Evalua-tion and decision-making the title vii experience LosAngeles Center for the Study of Evaluation University ofCalifornia 1974
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244 J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244a J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
Cha
ract
eris
tics
ofin
clud
edst
udie
s
Co
un
try
year
cond
uct
ed(
year
pu
blis
hed
)re
fere
nce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fev
iden
ce(f
rom
whi
chd
ecis
ion
sw
ere
mad
e)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17 Th
eco
nditi
ons
and
func
tions
influ
enci
ngut
ilisa
tion
ofso
cial
pol
icy
rese
arch
(p4
9)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edsu
rvey
s(p
50)
Res
earc
hers
and
polic
y-m
aker
sth
atw
ere
resp
onsi
ble
for
inco
rpor
atin
gth
ere
sear
chre
sults
(p5
0)N
ˆno
tst
ated
120
rese
arch
proj
ects
on`c
lient
-orie
nted
rsquosoc
ial
rese
arch
with
inin
dust
rial
and
labo
urre
latio
ns
regi
onal
and
urb
anpl
anni
ngs
ocia
lwel
fare
and
publ
iche
alth
(p5
0)
Per
ceiv
ed(r
etro
spec
tive)
dec
isio
ns(p
50)
Rev
ised
vers
ion
ofpa
per
pres
ente
din
1979
(p4
9)
40ou
toft
he12
0pr
ojec
tsw
ere
onso
cial
wel
fare
and
publ
iche
alth
US
A19
738
Wha
twas
done
wha
the
lped
and
wha
thin
dere
dth
esu
cces
sfo
rten
rese
arch
proj
ects
unde
rthe
Nat
iona
lIns
titut
eof
Men
tal
Hea
lth
(p1
41)
Pers
onal
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
41)
Prin
cipa
linv
estig
ator
oth
erst
affm
emb
ers
adm
inis
trato
rsan
dpe
rson
sm
ostl
ikel
yto
be
utili
sers
(p1
41)
Nˆ
notg
iven
Five
proj
ects
rate
dlo
wan
dfiv
epr
ojec
tsra
ted
high
for
`suc
cess
rsquo(p
140
)
Per
ceiv
edus
eT
hein
terv
iew
sw
ere
don
ein
eith
er19
67or
1968
(pp
140^
141)
Su
cces
sde
fined
aspr
ojec
ttha
tw
asdi
rect
edto
the
orig
inal
obje
ctiv
ese
mbo
died
ina
clea
ran
dco
gent
rep
ort
cand
iden
ough
tobe
repl
icab
lea
ndth
atth
efin
din
gsw
ere
diss
emin
ated
adeq
uate
ly(p
140
)U
SA
1973
^197
49(p
vii)
and
USA
1973
^197
410So
cial
scie
nce
rese
arch
utili
satio
nan
dpo
licy
form
atio
n(p
vii)
Aw
aren
ess
ofre
sear
chk
now
ledg
eof
sour
ces
info
rmat
ion
retri
eval
pra
ctic
ein
tere
stin
soci
alin
dica
tors
eva
luat
ion
ofw
orth
and
obje
ctiv
ity
met
hods
and
mea
sure
men
tpr
oced
ures
deg
ree
ofco
nfid
ence
onfin
ding
sat
titud
esab
outu
sef
acto
rsth
atin
fluen
ceus
e(p
ix)
Pers
onal
inte
rvie
ws
open
-en
ded
and
stru
ctur
ed(p
pv
ix)
Upp
er-le
veld
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
inth
eex
ecut
ive
bran
chof
the
US
fede
ral
gove
rnm
ent(
ppv
viii)
31
depu
tyun
ders
ecre
tarie
s54
inst
itute
dire
ctor
s67
depu
tyas
sist
antd
irect
ors
52ag
ency
pers
onne
lN
ˆ20
4(p
v)
575
repo
rted
inst
ance
sof
use
whe
re38
5in
volv
edpr
imar
yre
sear
chso
urce
s(p
8)
94
wer
eei
ther
fund
edby
the
gove
rnm
ent
cond
ucte
dby
the
gove
rnm
ento
rbot
h(p
8)
Per
ceiv
ed(s
elf-r
epor
ted)
use
with
spec
ific
follo
w-u
pq
uest
ions
whe
nus
ew
asre
porte
d(p
1)
15
ofth
eus
eof
know
ledg
ew
ason
heal
thor
wel
fare
prob
lem
s(p
5)
`Mos
toft
heex
ampl
esre
spon
dent
sof
fere
dto
illust
rate
know
ledg
eap
plic
atio
nsre
ally
invo
lved
the
appl
icat
ion
ofse
cond
ary
sour
cein
form
atio
nrsquo(p
187
)
US
A19
77
11`T
oex
amin
eth
ena
ture
and
degr
eeof
utiliz
atio
nof
fede
rale
valu
atio
nre
sear
chrsquo
(p1
43)
Op
en-e
nded
inte
rvie
ws
with
diffe
rent
ques
tions
for
the
deci
sion
-mak
eran
dth
eev
alua
tor(
p1
43)
Thre
eke
yin
form
ants
from
each
ofth
e20
stud
ies
wer
ein
terv
iew
eda
proj
ect
offic
ert
hed
ecis
ion-
mak
er(g
over
nmen
tlev
el)a
ndth
eev
alua
tor(
p14
3)N
ˆ60
(p1
43)
20na
tiona
lhea
lthca
reev
alua
tions
(cas
est
udie
s)w
ithso
me
syst
emat
icd
ata
colle
ctio
nm
ade
betw
een
1971
and
1974
bas
edon
11fa
ctor
sid
entif
ied
byth
eau
thor
s(p
p14
2^14
3)
Per
ceiv
edan
dse
lf-d
efin
edus
e(p
144
)H
ealth
train
ing
lab
orat
ory
prof
icie
ncy
neig
hbou
rhoo
dhe
alth
cent
res
heal
thse
rvic
esd
eliv
ery
syst
ems
alco
holis
ml
oan
forg
iven
ess
and
train
ing
wor
ksho
p(p
p14
2^14
3)U
SA
1980
2 an
dU
SA19
8012
Polic
y-m
aker
srsquope
rcep
tions
ofth
eus
eful
ness
ofso
cial
scie
nces
rese
arch
(pp
165
302)
Pers
onal
inte
rvie
ws
both
open
-end
edan
dst
ruct
ured
(pp
168
171
303)
51fe
dera
l52
stat
e(fr
omte
nst
ates
)and
52lo
cal
offic
iald
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
inup
per-
leve
lpos
ition
s(p
p16
730
3)N
ˆ15
5
Each
dec
isio
n-m
aker
read
two
abst
ract
s(tw
o-pa
gers
)ou
tof5
0fo
ract
uals
ocia
lsc
ienc
ere
sear
chre
ports
(p
p1
683
03)
Hyp
othe
tical
deci
sion
s(i
e`re
leva
ntto
the
issu
esyo
urof
fice
deal
sw
ithrsquo)
onm
enta
lhe
alth
alc
ohol
and
drug
abus
e
(pp
166
303
)
Not
stat
edb
utpu
blis
hed
Ap
ril19
80R
eprin
ted
from
Am
eric
anP
sych
olog
ist 1
981
Bas
edon
the
sam
ere
sear
chp
roje
ctas
US
A19
8012
(but
par
tlyon
othe
rpar
tsof
the
data
)
The
deci
sion
-mak
ers
wer
eg
iven
diffe
rent
`em
piri
calrsquo
inte
rven
tions
(ie
two-
page
rs)a
ndar
eth
eref
ore
diffi
cult
toco
mpa
reon
the
effe
ctva
riabl
esco
ntin
ued
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244b J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
USA
1982
13
Toob
serv
eth
eim
pac
ttha
tde
cisi
onco
mp
lexi
tya
ndam
ount
ofin
form
atio
nav
aila
ble
had
onth
eq
ualit
yof
the
deci
sion
proc
ess
(p1
87)
Stru
ctur
eds
emi-s
truct
ured
and
open
-end
edqu
estio
n-na
ires
com
bine
dw
itha
cont
rolle
dex
perim
ent
Con
seq
uenc
esof
com
plex
ityw
ere
exam
ined
byef
fect
sof
info
rmat
ion
load
and
num
bero
fde
cisi
onal
tern
ativ
es(p
p1
871
931
94)
Exp
erie
nced
pub
lican
dp
rivat
ese
ctor
man
ager
sfro
msi
xm
id-c
aree
rp
rog
ram
mes
atH
arva
rd
MIT
Sta
nfor
dan
dth
eW
ashi
ngto
nP
ublic
Affa
irsC
ente
r(pp
187
188
)N
ˆ13
2(p
188
)
Each
dec
isio
n-m
aker
rece
ived
alo
ngm
emor
and
umde
scrib
ing
apr
oble
mp
rese
ntin
gev
iden
ceus
eful
inan
alys
ing
the
prob
lem
and
pose
da
dec
isio
nto
bem
ade
base
don
real
peo
ple
and
even
ts(p
188
)
Two
hypo
thet
ical
dec
isio
ns
one
onth
est
atersquo
sD
epar
t-m
ento
fHea
lthan
dR
ehab
i-lit
ativ
ese
rvic
esan
don
eon
am
etha
done
mai
nten
ance
pro
gram
me
inN
ewYo
rkC
ity(p
p1
88^1
89)
Dec
isio
nha
dto
bem
ade
from
avai
labl
ein
form
atio
nw
ithin
1ho
ur45
min
utes
(p1
93)
Rep
rinte
dfro
mth
eJo
urna
lof
Pol
icy
Ana
lysi
san
dM
anag
emen
t2
66^8
7(p
185
)
The
exp
erim
entw
asb
ased
onsi
xdi
ffere
ntve
rsio
nsof
each
ofth
etw
oca
ses
The
six
diff
eren
tver
sion
sof
the
case
sva
ried
inin
form
atio
nco
mpl
exity
Eac
hde
cisi
on-m
aker
had
only
one
deci
sion
tom
ake
aton
lyon
ele
velo
fcom
plex
ity(p
p18
9^19
019
3)U
SA19
83
14To
dete
rmin
eso
me
ofth
efa
ctor
sth
atin
fluen
cead
min
istra
tors
rsquouse
ofev
alua
tive
data
inde
cisi
on-
mak
ing
and
toex
amin
eth
ety
pes
ofde
cisi
ons
(p7
9)
Stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-e
nded
post
alq
uest
ionn
aire
s(p
p7
9^80
)
Dire
ctor
sin
com
mun
itym
enta
lhea
lthce
ntre
sin
Flor
ida
and
Nor
thC
arol
ina
(p7
9)N
ˆ42
Con
duct
edst
udie
son
prog
ram
me
effe
ctiv
enes
sor
imp
actd
urin
gth
ela
st12
-m
onth
per
iod
(p8
1)
Per
ceiv
ed(i
ere
por
ted
)us
e(p
p80
^81)
Swed
en19
84^1
98515
(p1
52)
Diff
eren
tway
sof
usin
gso
cial
rese
arch
in
stru
men
tal
polit
ical
co
nflic
ten
light
enm
ent
inte
ract
ive
and
tact
ical
(pp
141
143^
144)
Inte
rvie
ws
(p1
52)
Soc
ialw
orke
rs
man
agem
entd
irect
ors
loca
land
natio
nalp
oliti
cian
sin
15Sw
edis
hci
ties
and
com
mun
es(p
152
)N
ˆ90
(p1
52)
Doc
umen
tsth
atth
ere
spon
dent
sre
ferr
edto
Th
ese
docu
men
tsw
ere
also
anal
ysed
by
the
auth
ors
(p1
52)
Per
ceiv
edre
trosp
ectiv
ed
ecis
ions
(p1
52)
USA
1990
16To
dete
rmin
ew
hatt
ype
ofin
form
atio
nd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
use
and
how
ideo
log
yan
din
tere
sts
influ
ence
the
use
ofin
form
atio
n(p
109
)
Pers
onal
sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
112
)Lo
calp
lann
ing
com
mitt
ees
and
gove
rnm
ente
mp
loye
esin
two
rura
lcom
mun
ities
inth
eP
acifi
cN
orth
wes
t(p
110
)N
ˆ27
(p1
10)
Sour
ces
ofin
form
atio
nus
edin
com
mun
ityhe
alth
care
plan
ning
and
the
asse
ssm
ento
fthe
stra
tegi
cpl
anni
ngp
roce
ss(p
112
)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
112
)
USA
1991
17
Wha
tfac
tors
influ
ence
the
use
ofev
alua
tion
rese
arch
(on
heal
than
dhu
man
serv
ices
)in
cong
ress
(p5
08)
Stru
ctur
edte
lep
hone
inte
rvie
ws
(p5
13)
C
ongr
ess
mem
bers
and
thei
rsta
ff(p
512
)N
ˆ10
0Ea
chde
cisi
on-m
aker
chos
eon
est
udy
they
wer
efa
mili
arw
ith(p
515
)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
515
)E
valu
atio
nst
udie
sfro
mth
eD
epar
tmen
tofH
ealth
and
Hum
anSe
rvic
esth
atd
eal
with
natio
nalh
ealth
pro
gram
mes
(pp
507
515
)
Use
isde
fined
here
asbo
thin
stru
men
tal(
dire
ctim
ple
men
tatio
n)c
once
ptua
l(it
chan
ged
the
way
ofth
inki
ng)a
ndpe
rsua
sive
(use
dto
conv
ince
othe
rsp
516
)
The
inte
rvie
ws
last
ed15
^40
min
utes
(p5
14)
UK
1991
18U
sean
dre
ason
sfo
ruse
not
use
ofth
eE
iexclect
ive
Hea
lthC
are
Bul
letin
(pp
51^
54)
Stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-e
nded
post
alq
uest
ionn
aire
s(p
p5
0^51
)
Dis
trict
gen
eral
man
ager
sd
irect
ors
ofpu
blic
heal
than
dd
irect
ors
ofpl
anni
ng
com
mis
sion
ing
inU
Kd
istri
cthe
alth
auth
oriti
esor
com
mis
sion
ing
cons
ortia
(p5
0)N
ˆ17
2(p
51)
Eiexcle
ctiv
eH
ealth
Car
eB
ulle
tinN
o1
1991
on
scre
enin
gfo
rost
eop
oros
isto
prev
entf
ract
ures
(p5
0)
Per
ceiv
edus
eof
info
rmat
ion
and
hypo
thet
ical
dec
isio
ns
chan
geof
opin
ion
and
conf
iden
ceto
acto
nin
form
atio
nin
the
bulle
tin(p
p52
^54)
Res
pon
dent
sw
ere
que
stio
ned
abou
tabu
lletin
that
had
been
prev
ious
lypo
sted
toth
em(p
p51
52)
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244c J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
USA
1993
^199
419Th
ero
leof
rese
arch
info
rmat
ion
inp
olic
yde
velo
pmen
t(p
29)
Que
stio
nnai
res
(p1
3)
open
-end
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
4)an
dse
mi-
stru
ctur
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
4)
Key
info
rman
ts
inst
ates
that
chan
ged
cost
-sha
ring
pol
icie
sfo
rpre
scrip
tion
reim
burs
emen
tlim
itsan
dco
-pay
men
ts(p
14)
N
ˆin
adeq
uate
lyd
escr
ibed
Res
earc
hp
ublic
atio
nsan
dco
mm
ents
(p2
5)P
erce
ived
retro
spec
tive
dec
isio
ns(p
25)
Onl
y2^
3pa
ges
outo
f21
wer
ere
leva
nt(p
25f
f)I
nfor
man
tsin
clud
edM
edic
aid
drug
prog
ram
me
adm
inis
trato
rs
dire
ctor
sor
polic
yan
alys
ts
phar
mac
yco
nsul
tant
san
dle
gisl
ator
s(p
15)
UK
1994
^199
5202
1`T
oid
entif
yfa
ctor
sw
hich
faci
litat
eor
imp
ede
evid
ence
-bas
edp
olic
y-m
akin
grsquo(
p2
9)
In-d
epth
inte
rvie
ws
(usi
nga
topi
cgu
ide)
(p2
9an
dre
spon
seto
ale
tter)
Lead
polic
y-m
aker
sG
Psan
dre
sear
cher
sin
nine
diff
eren
tcas
est
udie
sat
alo
call
evel
inth
eN
HS
(pp
293
1)N
ˆ28
Soci
alre
sear
ch(p
42
inth
epr
ojec
trep
ort)
Per
ceiv
edde
cisi
ons
Polic
yon
the
inte
rface
bet
wee
nR
ampD
and
com
mis
sion
ing
atth
ehe
alth
auth
ority
leve
l(p
30)
Mex
ico
1994
^199
522`T
here
latio
nshi
pbe
twee
nhe
alth
rese
arch
(and
rese
arch
ers)
and
heal
thpo
licie
s(a
ndpo
licy-
mak
ers)
info
urve
rtica
lhe
alth
prog
ram
mes
inM
exic
orsquo(p
104
)
Ope
n-en
ded
(in-
dept
hrsquo)
inte
rvie
ws
with
aco
mm
onin
terv
iew
prot
ocol
(p1
06)
`Res
earc
hers
and
polic
y-m
aker
sfro
mdi
ffere
ntin
stitu
tions
and
leve
lsof
resp
onsi
bilit
yrsquo(p
103
)N
ˆ67
Use
ofre
sear
chpu
blic
atio
ns`w
here
we
knew
that
ther
ew
asat
leas
tso
me
inte
ract
ion
bet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dde
cisi
on-
mak
ersrsquo
(p1
05)
Per
ceiv
ed
use
ofev
iden
ceco
ncer
ning
AID
Sch
oler
afa
mily
pla
nnin
gan
dim
mun
isat
ion
ing
over
nmen
talp
rogr
amm
es(p
103
)
Per
sona
lcom
mun
icat
ion
gav
ead
ditio
nali
nfor
mat
ion
onth
isis
sue
It
isd
iffic
ultt
od
isce
rnw
heth
erth
ede
cisi
ons
wer
ep
erce
ived
orhy
pot
hetic
als
ince
ther
ear
eno
actu
alde
cisi
ons
men
tione
d
Aus
tralia
1995
23
Dec
isio
n-m
aker
srsquoaw
aren
ess
and
use
ofec
onom
icev
alua
tions
inhe
alth
care
(p1
03)
Inte
rvie
ws
open
-end
edan
dst
ruct
ured
(not
stat
edif
post
alt
elep
hone
orfa
ce-to
-fa
ce)(
p10
5)
Sen
iorm
anag
ers
inth
eFe
der
alD
epar
tmen
tof
Hea
lthH
ousi
ngan
dC
omm
unity
Serv
ices
New
Sou
thW
ales
Stat
eth
eH
ealth
Dep
artm
ent(
p10
4)
Nˆ
34(p
105
)
Use
ofec
onom
icev
alua
tions
forp
ricin
gon
drug
ssc
reen
ing
radi
olog
ytra
nspl
ants
and
scan
ning
(p1
05)
`Per
ceiv
edus
eof
econ
omic
eval
uatio
nsrsquo(
p1
04)
USA
1996
24
and
USA
1997
25
Tode
term
ine
whe
ther
the
proc
ess
of(s
ocia
lsci
ence
)in
form
atio
nut
ilisa
tion
varie
sac
ross
diff
eren
tare
as(i
ese
rvic
epr
ovis
ion
and
finan
cing
)(pp
16^
17)
Stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
16)
Fe
der
als
tate
and
loca
lp
olic
y-m
aker
sat
diff
eren
tle
vels
deal
ing
with
finan
cean
dse
rvic
es(p
16)
N
ˆ47
9(p
16)
No
spec
ific
repo
rtb
utin
foty
persquor
efer
topr
ogra
mm
eev
alua
tion
dem
onst
ratio
np
roje
ct
stat
istic
ald
ata
and
polic
yan
alys
is(p
34)
Per
ceiv
edre
trosp
ectiv
ed
ecis
ions
(p1
7)O
pen-
ende
din
terv
iew
sw
ere
used
toob
tain
basi
cb
ackg
roun
din
form
atio
nab
outt
hep
olic
ypr
oces
sTh
est
ruct
ured
inte
rvie
ws
built
onth
eop
en-e
nded
inte
rvie
ws
(p3
3)Pa
kist
an19
9826
The
role
that
rese
arch
pla
ysin
expe
rienc
esin
linki
ngre
sear
chw
ithp
olic
y(p
77)
Ope
n-en
ded
in-d
epth
inte
rvie
ws
(p7
7)D
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
from
gov
ernm
ent
the
cent
ral
min
istry
ofhe
alth
the
pla
nnin
gco
mm
issi
onan
dp
rovi
ncia
lhea
lthau
thor
ities
(p7
7)N
ˆ16
(p7
7)
Not
stat
edG
ener
alpe
rcep
tions
C
lose
stfo
cus
onch
ildhe
alth
prob
lem
ssu
chas
co-tr
imox
azol
em
ater
nal
mor
talit
yvi
tam
inA
b
reas
tfeed
ing
and
pol
io(p
p77
79)
UK
1998
27
The
imp
actt
hatt
heE
iexclect
ive
Hea
lthca
reB
ulle
tinha
sin
side
the
NH
Sor
gan
isat
ion
(p1
)
Tele
phon
ein
terv
iew
sst
ruct
ure
notm
entio
ned
(p1
)
Hea
lthau
thor
ities
(p
2)
Nˆ
34Tw
osp
ecifi
cbu
lletin
sJu
ne19
97an
dO
ctob
er19
97(p
1)
Hyp
othe
tical
deci
sion
s(e
g
itin
fluen
ced
the
dev
elop
men
tofo
urpo
licy
alth
oug
hth
isha
sbe
eng
oing
onfo
rsom
etim
ersquo)
(p1
0)
The
date
isno
tcle
arly
stat
edb
utit
is19
98or
1999
Tr
usts
and
GPs
are
incl
uded
inth
est
udy
buta
reno
trel
evan
tin
this
revi
ew
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244d J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
UK
and
USA
1998
28
H
owU
Kan
dU
Sp
urch
aser
sva
lue
and
use
rese
arch
asse
ssin
ghe
alth
tech
nolo
gy
and
clin
ical
effe
ctiv
enes
s(p
pv
1)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p4
)U
K1
4no
n-m
edic
alhe
alth
auth
ority
pur
chas
ers
seve
np
ublic
heal
thp
hysi
cian
sni
neG
PsU
SA1
3p
ublic
offic
ials
from
11st
ates
nin
ep
rivat
ese
ctor
purc
hase
rs
thre
eco
nsul
tant
sN
ˆ55
(p4
)
Acc
ess
toan
dus
eof
heal
thte
chno
logy
asse
ssm
ent
clin
ical
effe
ctiv
enes
sin
form
atio
n(p
p4
11)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
1)
Sta
ted
1999
(p3
)
Can
ada
1998
^199
929A
case
stud
yof
cros
s-se
ctor
alre
sour
ceal
loca
tion
inth
ehu
man
serv
ices
syst
emin
Prin
ceE
dwar
dIs
land
(p4
)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-
ende
din
terv
iew
san
dfo
cus
grou
ps(p
p13
^16
App
endi
x1)
Key
info
rman
tsho
ldin
gd
iffer
entp
ositi
ons
with
inth
efiv
ehe
alth
regi
ons
the
Dep
artm
ento
fSoc
ial
Ser
vice
san
dva
rious
sect
ors
(p4
)al
lreg
ions
all
sect
ors
and
man
agem
ent
leve
ls(p
13)
Nˆ
58(p
9)
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
deci
sion
son
cros
s-se
ctor
alre
sour
ceal
loca
tions
(p5
)
Bur
kina
Faso
1999
30A
case
stud
yon
how
rese
arch
pla
yed
aro
lein
deci
sion
-mak
ing
abou
t`S
hare
dC
arersquo
fo
rch
ildho
odill
ness
(pp
19^
20)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
20)
Min
istry
ofH
ealth
offic
ials
(p2
2)N
ˆno
tgiv
enW
orks
hops
and
rese
arch
pape
rsth
atth
eau
thor
sha
dpr
ovid
edM
inis
tryof
Hea
lthof
ficia
lsw
ithd
urin
gpr
evio
usye
ars
(p2
1)
Per
ceiv
edus
eof
the
pro
vide
dsc
ient
ific
info
rmat
ion
inde
cisi
on-
mak
ing
(p2
0)
`Sha
red
care
rsquois
abou
tim
prov
edco
ntac
tand
colla
bora
tion
bet
wee
nhe
alth
cent
rest
affa
ndm
othe
rs(p
20)
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31B
arrie
rsag
ains
tand
mec
hani
sms
fori
mpr
ovin
gth
evi
tam
inA
rese
arch
^po
licy^
actio
nco
nnec
tion
(p5
5)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
55)
Key
info
rman
tsth
atw
ere
rele
vant
role
-pla
yers
(p5
5)
Nˆ
nots
tate
d
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
use
(p5
5)
Can
ada
2000
32
Toas
sess
the
influ
ence
ofin
form
atio
nab
outt
hehe
alth
cons
eque
nces
ofun
empl
oym
enta
ndin
secu
rity
onp
olic
y-m
akin
g(p
5)
Stru
ctur
eds
emi-s
truct
ured
and
open
-end
edte
lep
hone
inte
rvie
ws
(pp
59
)
Pol
icy-
mak
ers
inth
ehe
alth
and
empl
oym
ents
ecto
rsof
allt
hree
leve
lsof
Can
adia
ng
over
nmen
tan
dex
ecut
ive
dire
ctor
sof
ten
Can
adia
nno
n-g
over
nmen
talo
rgan
-is
atio
ns(p
5)
Nˆ
48(p
5)
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
retro
spec
tive
usef
ulne
ssof
past
rese
arch
info
rmat
ion
abou
tthe
heal
thco
nseq
uenc
esof
unem
ploy
men
tand
inse
curit
yon
polic
y-m
akin
g(p
5)
Sta
ted
date
forw
orki
ngpa
peri
sM
arch
2000
Can
ada
2000
33To
unde
rsta
ndw
heth
er
how
and
und
erw
hat
cond
ition
she
alth
serv
ices
rese
arch
pla
ysa
role
inpr
ovin
cial
polic
y-m
akin
g(p
i)
Bot
hpe
rson
als
emi-
stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
san
dsu
rvey
s(p
p8
11)
Key
info
rman
tsw
ithin
ava
riety
ofke
yhe
alth
polic
ies
intw
oC
anad
ian
prov
ince
s(O
ntar
ioan
dS
aska
tche
wan
)(p
ii)
Nˆ
22(p
18)
Not
stat
ed
Act
uala
ndpe
rcei
ved
dec
isio
nsw
ithin
the
field
sof
heal
thse
rvic
esju
risdi
ctio
nfin
anci
alar
rang
emen
ts
pro
gram
me
deliv
ery
arra
ngem
ents
and
pro
gram
me
cont
ent
(pp
713
)
Iti
sno
tsta
ted
wha
tkin
dof
evid
ence
was
used
but
refe
renc
esto
dire
ctus
eof
evid
ence
inde
cisi
onre
ports
rep
ortin
gon
actu
alus
eof
rese
arch
im
plie
sth
atev
iden
cew
asus
ed(p
p13
18^
19)
GPs
gen
eral
pra
ctiti
oner
sM
ITM
assa
chus
etts
Inst
itute
ofTe
chno
log
yN
HS
Nat
iona
lHea
lthS
ervi
ceR
ampD
res
earc
han
dd
evel
opm
ent
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244e J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le2
Stu
dym
etho
ds
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceS
amp
lefr
ame
(SF
)aan
dsa
mp
lest
rate
gy
(SS
)b
Res
po
nse
rate
Mea
sure
men
tofu
seo
fev
iden
ceM
easu
rem
ento
fd
eter
min
ants
ofu
seS
um
mar
yo
fdes
crip
tio
no
fmet
ho
ds
(co
mp
lete
par
tial
or
no
tad
equa
tely
des
crib
ed)a
nd
com
men
ts
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Aqu
antit
ativ
e4-
poi
ntsc
ore
wei
ghte
dac
cord
ing
toth
ree
deci
sion
leve
lsw
ithsu
mm
edsc
ore
rang
ing
from
0to
18(p
51)
Two-
way
AN
OV
A(p
66)
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
USA
1973
8SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
No
stat
istic
alte
chni
que
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
USA
1973
^197
49
and
USA
1973
^19
7410
(pv
ii)
SFp
artia
l(p
viii)
SSn
otm
entio
ned
partl
ysn
owb
alle
d(p
viii
)
95
(p2
4)B
oth
quan
titat
ivel
yra
ted
and
wei
ght
ed(p
p25
28
333
536
)and
qua
litat
ivel
yde
scrib
ed(p
p1^
4)D
escr
iptiv
elis
ting
ofra
tings
(pp
28
333
536
)and
MC
A(m
ultiv
aria
tere
gre
ssio
n)an
alys
is(p
27)
Parti
alIt
isst
ated
that
`this
repo
rtre
pre
sent
only
afir
stsu
mm
ary
ofso
me
ofth
ehi
ghlig
hts
and
mor
eim
por
tant
findi
ngsrsquo
(pv
i)S
ubse
quen
trep
orts
not
foun
d
USA
1977
11
SFp
artia
l(p
143)
SSs
now
bal
led
partl
yra
ndom
(p1
43)
Not
stat
edD
escr
iptiv
eN
ost
atis
tical
tech
niqu
ePa
rtial
The
inte
rvie
ws
appe
arto
have
bee
nm
ade
betw
een
1973
and
1976
USA
1980
2an
dU
SA19
8012
SFp
artia
l(p
167)
SSn
otst
ated
90
(p1
67)
Bot
hqu
antit
ativ
ede
scrip
tions
rat
edan
dw
eig
hted
and
qual
itativ
e(p
p16
9ff
303)
Des
crip
tive
listin
gof
ratin
gs(p
p1
70^1
72
174)
and
25va
riabl
esan
alys
edus
ing
fact
oran
alys
isto
dev
elop
five
dim
ensi
ons
(p
304
)
Parti
alB
oth
a4-
poin
t(p
168
)and
a5-
poi
ntw
eigh
ted
ratin
gsc
ale
(pp
173
303)
The
qual
itativ
era
ting
com
esfro
mlis
ting
ofm
ostm
entio
ned
char
acte
ristic
sof
usef
ulne
ss
The
five
dim
ensi
ons
are
liste
din
Tabl
e3
und
erfa
cilit
ator
s
USA
1982
13SF
Par
tial
(pp
187
^188
)SS
ran
dom
sam
ple
(pp
187
^188
)
Volu
ntee
red
(p1
88)
Qua
ntita
tive
listin
gof
the
deci
sion
qua
lity
ofev
iden
ce^
use
onsi
xdi
ffere
ntle
vels
ofco
mpl
exity
(pp
195^
208)
List
ing
offre
quen
cies
(pp
196
^198
)Pa
rtial
The
132
dec
isio
n-m
aker
sw
ere
rand
omly
dist
ribut
edto
two
of50
case
stud
ies
and
six
diff
eren
tlev
els
(p1
94)
USA
1983
14SF
not
stat
ed(p
79)
SS
not
stat
ed(p
79)
65
(p7
9)Q
uant
itativ
elis
ting
and
ratin
gs(p
p8
2^86
)Fr
eque
ncie
san
dra
ted
impo
rtanc
e(a
sve
ry
mod
erat
ely
orno
tim
porta
nt)(
p8
2)
SF
and
SSco
mpl
ete
ifth
est
udyrsquo
sfo
cus
cons
ider
edon
lydi
rect
ors
inFl
orid
aan
dN
orth
Car
olin
aan
dif
ther
ew
ere
only
one
dire
ctor
inea
chC
omm
unity
Men
talH
ealth
Cen
ter
Swed
en19
84^
1985
15SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
p14
6^15
0)Li
stin
gof
frequ
enci
es(p
p1
451
49)
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edTh
eau
thor
sm
ainl
yd
iscu
ssan
dde
mon
stra
ted
iffer
entw
ays
ofut
ilisi
ngre
sear
cha
sei
ther
ins
trum
enta
lpo
litic
alc
onfli
cte
nlig
hten
men
tin
tera
ctiv
eor
tact
ical
(p1
44)
`
usin
gre
sear
ch`in
stru
men
tally
rsquorsquoor
for
`enl
ight
enm
entrsquorsquo
purp
oses
mea
ntdi
ffere
ntth
ings
indi
ffere
ntse
tting
san
ddi
ffere
ntor
gani
zatio
nalp
ositi
onsrsquo
(p1
45)
USA
1990
16SF
par
tial(
p11
0)SS
com
ple
te
(p1
10)
100
(p1
10)
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
112
)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Com
ple
tere
fers
toth
e27
rep
rese
ntat
ives
inth
etw
opl
anni
ngco
mm
ittee
sin
the
two
com
mun
ities
No
furth
erge
nera
lisat
ion
can
be
mad
eon
the
basi
sof
this
sam
ple
USA
1991
17SF
com
plet
e(p
p5
13^5
14)
SSr
ando
msa
mp
le(p
513
)
60
(p5
14)
Qua
ntita
tivel
yde
scrip
tive
rate
dan
dw
eig
hted
(p
p51
9^52
2)D
escr
iptiv
elis
ting
ofw
eigh
ted
ratin
gs(p
p5
17^5
23)a
ndm
ultip
lere
gre
ssio
n(p
p5
185
23^5
27)
Com
ple
te
Wei
ghte
don
3-p
oint
and
5-p
oint
scal
es
UK
1991
18SF
com
plet
e(p
51)
SSr
ando
msa
mp
le(p
51)
73
(p5
1)Q
uant
itativ
era
ted
desc
riptio
ns(p
p51
^54)
Per
cent
ages
(pp
51^5
4)C
omp
lete
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244f J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le2
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceS
amp
lefr
ame
(SF
)aan
dsa
mp
lest
rate
gy
(SS
)b
Res
po
nse
rate
Mea
sure
men
tofu
seo
fev
iden
ceM
easu
rem
ento
fd
eter
min
ants
ofu
seS
um
mar
yo
fdes
crip
tio
no
fmet
ho
ds
(co
mp
lete
par
tial
or
no
tad
equa
tely
des
crib
ed)a
nd
com
men
ts
USA
1993
^199
419SF
par
tial(
p15
)SS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(i
esu
bjec
tive
view
onke
yva
riabl
esof
pol
icy
chan
gea
nym
entio
nno
rank
ing)
(p1
6)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edO
nly
Med
icai
dp
rog
ram
mes
with
spec
ific
cost
-con
tain
men
tpol
icie
sin
the
last
seve
raly
ears
(p2
9)U
K19
94^1
99520
21
SFp
artia
l(pp
461
46
5)SS
sno
wb
alle
d(p
p4
614
65)
100
(all
thos
eap
proa
ched
fori
nter
view
agre
edto
the
inte
rvie
w)
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
31f
f)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Mex
ico
1994
^199
522SF
not
stat
ed
SSn
otst
ated
N
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(i
esu
bjec
tive
view
onke
yva
riabl
es)(
pp
104
106^
108)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edP
urpo
sive
sam
ple
(per
sona
lcom
mun
icat
ions
)A
ustra
lia19
9523
SFp
artia
lSS
not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edQ
uant
itativ
ean
dd
escr
iptiv
e(p
p1
05^1
08)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edC
alle
d`p
urpo
sive
sam
plin
gfra
mersquo
(p1
04)
USA
1996
24an
dU
SA19
9725
SFp
artia
l(pp
16
30^3
1)SS
com
bin
edra
ndom
and
snow
-ba
lled
(pp
30^3
1)
Not
stat
edQ
uant
itativ
ere
gres
sion
and
apa
thm
odel
(p1
8)Q
uant
itativ
ere
gres
sion
and
apa
thm
odel
(p1
8)Pa
rtial
but
with
ago
odde
scrip
tion
ofSS
and
SF
Paki
stan
1998
26SF
par
tial(
p77
)SS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
(pp
788
082
)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
UK
1998
27SF
par
tial(
pp1
^2)
SSn
otst
ated
(pp
1^2
)
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(ie
subj
ectiv
evi
ewon
awar
enes
sge
nera
lper
cept
ions
and
impa
ct)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
UK
and
USA
1998
28SF
par
tial(
p4)
SSn
otst
ated
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(pp
12^2
2)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Can
ada
1998
^199
929SF
par
tial(
p16
)SS
not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ede
scrip
tions
and
quan
titat
ive
listin
gs(p
p18
^30
32^3
4)Q
ualit
ativ
ePa
rtial
Aqu
alita
tive
valid
atio
nof
the
inte
rvie
ws
isd
escr
ibed
(pp
16^1
7)B
urki
naFa
so19
9930
SFn
otst
ated
SSn
otst
ated
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(p2
2)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
Can
ada
2000
32SF
par
tial
SSn
otst
ated
42
(p
23)
Bot
hqu
antit
ativ
ean
dqu
alita
tive
des
crip
tions
ofba
rrie
rs(p
p11
^14
26)
Freq
uenc
ies
(p2
6)Pa
rtial
Cal
led
`apu
rpos
ive
sam
ple
ofC
anad
ian
polic
y-m
aker
srsquo(p
8)
Can
ada
2000
33SF
not
stat
edSS
sno
wb
alle
d(p
ii)
88
(22
25)
(p1
8)B
oth
quan
titat
ive
and
qual
itativ
ed
escr
iptio
nsof
faci
litat
ors
(pp
ii
i35
^37)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
a Sam
ple
fram
ec
omp
lete
ˆth
esa
mp
lew
asd
escr
ibed
inre
latio
nto
allt
hed
ecis
ion
-mak
ers
inth
eco
ntex
toft
hest
udy
par
tialˆ
inco
mp
lete
info
rmat
ion
not
stat
edˆ
nod
escr
iptio
nb S
amp
lest
rate
gy
com
ple
tesa
mp
ler
and
omsa
mp
les
now
bal
led
sam
ple
orn
otst
ated
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244g J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
Mai
nre
sults
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p5
4)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
60)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
54)
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
65)
USA
1973
8Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p1
41)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
142
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
143
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
43)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p14
114
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(pp
142
145)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p1
43)
USA
1973
^197
49an
dU
SA
1973
^197
410
(pv
ii)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
333
6)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
33)
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p3
3)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)
USA
1977
11Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
155
158)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p1
45)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p14
915
2)P
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p15
9^16
0)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
155
158)
USA
1980
2an
dU
SA19
8012
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
stTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sM
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
USA
1982
13N
one
ofth
efa
cilit
ator
sw
ere
men
tione
din
the
othe
rstu
dies
Non
eof
the
bar
riers
wer
em
entio
ned
inth
eot
hers
tud
ies
USA
1983
14C
omm
unity
pres
sure
orcl
ient
dem
and
forr
esea
rch
(pp
82
84)
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
82)
Not
stat
ed
Swed
en19
84^1
98515
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
p14
614
9)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
148
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
149
)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
150
)
USA
1990
16R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
114
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
18)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p11
111
5)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(pp
119
^122
)U
SA19
9117
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p5
19)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(pp
519
520)
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
19)
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
519
)U
K19
9118
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
5)N
otst
ated
USA
1993
^199
419G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
27)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p2
7)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
9)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
chA
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
13^1
427
)
UK
1994
^199
5202
1Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
32^3
4)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
p32
^34)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
pp
31^3
2)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(p3
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p3
3)M
exic
o19
94^1
99522
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
sTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
nsR
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
hIn
clus
ion
ofef
fect
iven
ess
data
(pp
106^
108
109^
113)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p10
7^11
1)
USA
1996
24Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
1)A
ustra
lia19
9523
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
107
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
108
)G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
108
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
108
)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
106
)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p1
06)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
106
)
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244h J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
Paki
stan
1998
26N
otst
ated
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p78
82)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
80)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p80
82)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
80)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p8
2)U
K19
9827
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p8
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
13)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p8
12)
UK
and
USA
1998
28Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
p3
17^2
1)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p5
12^1
7)
Can
ada
1998
^199
929Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p3
2)P
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p33
^34)
Bur
kina
Faso
1999
30N
otst
ated
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p2
1)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
23)
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
62)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p6
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
63)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
61)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
61)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p6
1)C
anad
a20
0032
Not
stat
edP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
26)
Can
ada
2000
33Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pi
)N
otst
ated
research in public policy making Toronto LexingtonBooks 1977 183ndash198
11 Patton MQ Grimes PS Guthrie KM Breanan NJ et al Insearch for impact an analysis of the utilization of federalhealth evaluation research In Weiss CH ed Using socialresearch in public policy making Toronto LexingtonBooks 1977 141ndash164
12 Weiss CH Bucuvalas MJ Truth test and utility testdecision makersrsquo frames of reference for social scienceresearch American Sociological Review 1980 45 302ndash313
13 Weiss JA Coping with complexity An experimental studyof public policy decision-making In Kinder DD PalfreyTR eds Experimental foundations of political scienceAnn Arbor MI University of Michigan Press 1993 185ndash208
14 McNeece CA DiNitto DM Johnson PJ The utility ofevaluation research for administrative decision-makingAdministration in Social Work 1983 7 77ndash87
15 Sunesson S Nilsson K Explaining research utilizationbeyond lsquofunctionsrsquo Knowledge Creation Diffusion Util-ization 1989 10 140ndash155
16 Florio E DeMartini JR The use of information bypolicymakers at the local community level Knowledge1993 15 106ndash123
17 Boyer JF Langbein LI Factors in uencing the use ofhealth evaluation research in congress Evaluation Review1991 15 507ndash532
18 Ibbotson SL Long AF Sheldon TA Mason J An initialevaluation of Effective Health Care bulletins as instru-ments of effective dissemination Journal of Managementin Medicine 1993 7 48ndash57
19 Soumerai SB Ross-Degnan D Fortess EE Walser BLDeterminants of change in Medicaid pharmaceutical costsharing does evidence affect policy Milbank Quarterly1997 75 11ndash34
20 Harries U Elliott H Higgins A Evidence-based policy-making in the NHS exploring the interface betweenresearch and the commissioning process Journal of PublicHealth Medicine 1999 21 29ndash36
21 Elliott H Popay J How are policy makers using evidenceModels of research utilisation and local NHS policymaking Journal of Epidemiology and CommunityHealth 2000 54 461ndash468
22 Trostle J Bronfman M Langer A How do researchersin uence decision-makers Case studies of Mexicanpolicies Health Policy and Planning 1999 14 103ndash114
23 Ross J The use of economic evaluation in health careAustralian decision makersrsquo perceptions Health Policy1995 31 103ndash110
24 Oh CH Explaining the impact of policy information onpolicy-making Knowledge and Policy The InternationalJournal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization 1997 1022ndash55
25 Oh CH Rich RF Explaining use of information in publicpolicymaking Knowledge and Policy The InternationalJournal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization 1996 9 3ndash35
26 Hilderbrand M Simon J Hyder A The role of research inchild health policy and programs in Pakistan Geneva TheCouncil of Health Research and Development (COHRED)Working Group on Research to Action and Policy 200077ndash85
27 Rudat K Evaluation of the Effective Health Care BulletinLondon Of ce For Public Management 1998 1ndash46
28 Burns A Charlwood P Darling H Fox DM Greeneld LHamlyn L et al Better information better outcomes Theuse of health technology assessment and clinical effective-ness data in health care purchasing decisions in theUnited Kingdom and the United States New YorkMilbank Memorial Fund 2000 1ndash26
29 Eyles J Stoddart G Lavis J Pranger T Molyneaux-Smith LMcMullan C Making resource shifts supportive of thebroad determinants of health The PEI experienceHamilton McMaster Institute of Environment and Health2000 3ndash37
30 Gerhardus A Kielmann K Sanou A Lessons in research toaction and policy case studies from seven differentcountries Geneva The Council of Health Research andDevelopment (COHRED) Working Group on Research toAction and Policy 2000 19ndash27
31 Moodley J Jacobs M Research to action and policycombating vitamin a deciencies in South Africa GenevaThe Council of Health Research and Development(COHRED) Working Group on Research to Action andPolicy 2000 54ndash66
32 Lavis JN Farrant MSR Stoddard GL Barriers to employ-ment-related healthy public policy Toronto McMasterUniversity Centre for Health Economics and PolicyAnalysis 2000 00ndash03 1ndash28
33 Lavis JN Ross SE Hohenadel J Hurley J Stoddard GLWoodward C et al The role of health services research inCanadian provincial policy-making CHSRF Report 1997-021 Hamilton McMaster University 2000 1ndash44
34 McNeece CA DiNitto DM Johnson PJ The utility ofevaluation research for administrative decision-makingAdministration in Social Work 1983 7 77ndash87
35 van de Vall M Bolas C Using social policy research forreducing social problems an empirical analysis of struc-ture and functions Journal of Applied Behavioral Science1982 18 49ndash67
36 Snow CP The two cultures and the scientic revolutionCambridge Cambridge University Press 1959
37 Merton RK The role of applied social science in theformation of policy a research memorandum Philosophyof Science 1949 16 161ndash181
38 Aaron HJ Politics and the professors the great society inperspective Washington DC Brookings Institution 1978
39 Alkin MC Kosecoff J Fitzgibbon C Seligman R Evalua-tion and decision-making the title vii experience LosAngeles Center for the Study of Evaluation University ofCalifornia 1974
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244 J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244a J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
Cha
ract
eris
tics
ofin
clud
edst
udie
s
Co
un
try
year
cond
uct
ed(
year
pu
blis
hed
)re
fere
nce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fev
iden
ce(f
rom
whi
chd
ecis
ion
sw
ere
mad
e)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17 Th
eco
nditi
ons
and
func
tions
influ
enci
ngut
ilisa
tion
ofso
cial
pol
icy
rese
arch
(p4
9)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edsu
rvey
s(p
50)
Res
earc
hers
and
polic
y-m
aker
sth
atw
ere
resp
onsi
ble
for
inco
rpor
atin
gth
ere
sear
chre
sults
(p5
0)N
ˆno
tst
ated
120
rese
arch
proj
ects
on`c
lient
-orie
nted
rsquosoc
ial
rese
arch
with
inin
dust
rial
and
labo
urre
latio
ns
regi
onal
and
urb
anpl
anni
ngs
ocia
lwel
fare
and
publ
iche
alth
(p5
0)
Per
ceiv
ed(r
etro
spec
tive)
dec
isio
ns(p
50)
Rev
ised
vers
ion
ofpa
per
pres
ente
din
1979
(p4
9)
40ou
toft
he12
0pr
ojec
tsw
ere
onso
cial
wel
fare
and
publ
iche
alth
US
A19
738
Wha
twas
done
wha
the
lped
and
wha
thin
dere
dth
esu
cces
sfo
rten
rese
arch
proj
ects
unde
rthe
Nat
iona
lIns
titut
eof
Men
tal
Hea
lth
(p1
41)
Pers
onal
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
41)
Prin
cipa
linv
estig
ator
oth
erst
affm
emb
ers
adm
inis
trato
rsan
dpe
rson
sm
ostl
ikel
yto
be
utili
sers
(p1
41)
Nˆ
notg
iven
Five
proj
ects
rate
dlo
wan
dfiv
epr
ojec
tsra
ted
high
for
`suc
cess
rsquo(p
140
)
Per
ceiv
edus
eT
hein
terv
iew
sw
ere
don
ein
eith
er19
67or
1968
(pp
140^
141)
Su
cces
sde
fined
aspr
ojec
ttha
tw
asdi
rect
edto
the
orig
inal
obje
ctiv
ese
mbo
died
ina
clea
ran
dco
gent
rep
ort
cand
iden
ough
tobe
repl
icab
lea
ndth
atth
efin
din
gsw
ere
diss
emin
ated
adeq
uate
ly(p
140
)U
SA
1973
^197
49(p
vii)
and
USA
1973
^197
410So
cial
scie
nce
rese
arch
utili
satio
nan
dpo
licy
form
atio
n(p
vii)
Aw
aren
ess
ofre
sear
chk
now
ledg
eof
sour
ces
info
rmat
ion
retri
eval
pra
ctic
ein
tere
stin
soci
alin
dica
tors
eva
luat
ion
ofw
orth
and
obje
ctiv
ity
met
hods
and
mea
sure
men
tpr
oced
ures
deg
ree
ofco
nfid
ence
onfin
ding
sat
titud
esab
outu
sef
acto
rsth
atin
fluen
ceus
e(p
ix)
Pers
onal
inte
rvie
ws
open
-en
ded
and
stru
ctur
ed(p
pv
ix)
Upp
er-le
veld
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
inth
eex
ecut
ive
bran
chof
the
US
fede
ral
gove
rnm
ent(
ppv
viii)
31
depu
tyun
ders
ecre
tarie
s54
inst
itute
dire
ctor
s67
depu
tyas
sist
antd
irect
ors
52ag
ency
pers
onne
lN
ˆ20
4(p
v)
575
repo
rted
inst
ance
sof
use
whe
re38
5in
volv
edpr
imar
yre
sear
chso
urce
s(p
8)
94
wer
eei
ther
fund
edby
the
gove
rnm
ent
cond
ucte
dby
the
gove
rnm
ento
rbot
h(p
8)
Per
ceiv
ed(s
elf-r
epor
ted)
use
with
spec
ific
follo
w-u
pq
uest
ions
whe
nus
ew
asre
porte
d(p
1)
15
ofth
eus
eof
know
ledg
ew
ason
heal
thor
wel
fare
prob
lem
s(p
5)
`Mos
toft
heex
ampl
esre
spon
dent
sof
fere
dto
illust
rate
know
ledg
eap
plic
atio
nsre
ally
invo
lved
the
appl
icat
ion
ofse
cond
ary
sour
cein
form
atio
nrsquo(p
187
)
US
A19
77
11`T
oex
amin
eth
ena
ture
and
degr
eeof
utiliz
atio
nof
fede
rale
valu
atio
nre
sear
chrsquo
(p1
43)
Op
en-e
nded
inte
rvie
ws
with
diffe
rent
ques
tions
for
the
deci
sion
-mak
eran
dth
eev
alua
tor(
p1
43)
Thre
eke
yin
form
ants
from
each
ofth
e20
stud
ies
wer
ein
terv
iew
eda
proj
ect
offic
ert
hed
ecis
ion-
mak
er(g
over
nmen
tlev
el)a
ndth
eev
alua
tor(
p14
3)N
ˆ60
(p1
43)
20na
tiona
lhea
lthca
reev
alua
tions
(cas
est
udie
s)w
ithso
me
syst
emat
icd
ata
colle
ctio
nm
ade
betw
een
1971
and
1974
bas
edon
11fa
ctor
sid
entif
ied
byth
eau
thor
s(p
p14
2^14
3)
Per
ceiv
edan
dse
lf-d
efin
edus
e(p
144
)H
ealth
train
ing
lab
orat
ory
prof
icie
ncy
neig
hbou
rhoo
dhe
alth
cent
res
heal
thse
rvic
esd
eliv
ery
syst
ems
alco
holis
ml
oan
forg
iven
ess
and
train
ing
wor
ksho
p(p
p14
2^14
3)U
SA
1980
2 an
dU
SA19
8012
Polic
y-m
aker
srsquope
rcep
tions
ofth
eus
eful
ness
ofso
cial
scie
nces
rese
arch
(pp
165
302)
Pers
onal
inte
rvie
ws
both
open
-end
edan
dst
ruct
ured
(pp
168
171
303)
51fe
dera
l52
stat
e(fr
omte
nst
ates
)and
52lo
cal
offic
iald
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
inup
per-
leve
lpos
ition
s(p
p16
730
3)N
ˆ15
5
Each
dec
isio
n-m
aker
read
two
abst
ract
s(tw
o-pa
gers
)ou
tof5
0fo
ract
uals
ocia
lsc
ienc
ere
sear
chre
ports
(p
p1
683
03)
Hyp
othe
tical
deci
sion
s(i
e`re
leva
ntto
the
issu
esyo
urof
fice
deal
sw
ithrsquo)
onm
enta
lhe
alth
alc
ohol
and
drug
abus
e
(pp
166
303
)
Not
stat
edb
utpu
blis
hed
Ap
ril19
80R
eprin
ted
from
Am
eric
anP
sych
olog
ist 1
981
Bas
edon
the
sam
ere
sear
chp
roje
ctas
US
A19
8012
(but
par
tlyon
othe
rpar
tsof
the
data
)
The
deci
sion
-mak
ers
wer
eg
iven
diffe
rent
`em
piri
calrsquo
inte
rven
tions
(ie
two-
page
rs)a
ndar
eth
eref
ore
diffi
cult
toco
mpa
reon
the
effe
ctva
riabl
esco
ntin
ued
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244b J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
USA
1982
13
Toob
serv
eth
eim
pac
ttha
tde
cisi
onco
mp
lexi
tya
ndam
ount
ofin
form
atio
nav
aila
ble
had
onth
eq
ualit
yof
the
deci
sion
proc
ess
(p1
87)
Stru
ctur
eds
emi-s
truct
ured
and
open
-end
edqu
estio
n-na
ires
com
bine
dw
itha
cont
rolle
dex
perim
ent
Con
seq
uenc
esof
com
plex
ityw
ere
exam
ined
byef
fect
sof
info
rmat
ion
load
and
num
bero
fde
cisi
onal
tern
ativ
es(p
p1
871
931
94)
Exp
erie
nced
pub
lican
dp
rivat
ese
ctor
man
ager
sfro
msi
xm
id-c
aree
rp
rog
ram
mes
atH
arva
rd
MIT
Sta
nfor
dan
dth
eW
ashi
ngto
nP
ublic
Affa
irsC
ente
r(pp
187
188
)N
ˆ13
2(p
188
)
Each
dec
isio
n-m
aker
rece
ived
alo
ngm
emor
and
umde
scrib
ing
apr
oble
mp
rese
ntin
gev
iden
ceus
eful
inan
alys
ing
the
prob
lem
and
pose
da
dec
isio
nto
bem
ade
base
don
real
peo
ple
and
even
ts(p
188
)
Two
hypo
thet
ical
dec
isio
ns
one
onth
est
atersquo
sD
epar
t-m
ento
fHea
lthan
dR
ehab
i-lit
ativ
ese
rvic
esan
don
eon
am
etha
done
mai
nten
ance
pro
gram
me
inN
ewYo
rkC
ity(p
p1
88^1
89)
Dec
isio
nha
dto
bem
ade
from
avai
labl
ein
form
atio
nw
ithin
1ho
ur45
min
utes
(p1
93)
Rep
rinte
dfro
mth
eJo
urna
lof
Pol
icy
Ana
lysi
san
dM
anag
emen
t2
66^8
7(p
185
)
The
exp
erim
entw
asb
ased
onsi
xdi
ffere
ntve
rsio
nsof
each
ofth
etw
oca
ses
The
six
diff
eren
tver
sion
sof
the
case
sva
ried
inin
form
atio
nco
mpl
exity
Eac
hde
cisi
on-m
aker
had
only
one
deci
sion
tom
ake
aton
lyon
ele
velo
fcom
plex
ity(p
p18
9^19
019
3)U
SA19
83
14To
dete
rmin
eso
me
ofth
efa
ctor
sth
atin
fluen
cead
min
istra
tors
rsquouse
ofev
alua
tive
data
inde
cisi
on-
mak
ing
and
toex
amin
eth
ety
pes
ofde
cisi
ons
(p7
9)
Stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-e
nded
post
alq
uest
ionn
aire
s(p
p7
9^80
)
Dire
ctor
sin
com
mun
itym
enta
lhea
lthce
ntre
sin
Flor
ida
and
Nor
thC
arol
ina
(p7
9)N
ˆ42
Con
duct
edst
udie
son
prog
ram
me
effe
ctiv
enes
sor
imp
actd
urin
gth
ela
st12
-m
onth
per
iod
(p8
1)
Per
ceiv
ed(i
ere
por
ted
)us
e(p
p80
^81)
Swed
en19
84^1
98515
(p1
52)
Diff
eren
tway
sof
usin
gso
cial
rese
arch
in
stru
men
tal
polit
ical
co
nflic
ten
light
enm
ent
inte
ract
ive
and
tact
ical
(pp
141
143^
144)
Inte
rvie
ws
(p1
52)
Soc
ialw
orke
rs
man
agem
entd
irect
ors
loca
land
natio
nalp
oliti
cian
sin
15Sw
edis
hci
ties
and
com
mun
es(p
152
)N
ˆ90
(p1
52)
Doc
umen
tsth
atth
ere
spon
dent
sre
ferr
edto
Th
ese
docu
men
tsw
ere
also
anal
ysed
by
the
auth
ors
(p1
52)
Per
ceiv
edre
trosp
ectiv
ed
ecis
ions
(p1
52)
USA
1990
16To
dete
rmin
ew
hatt
ype
ofin
form
atio
nd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
use
and
how
ideo
log
yan
din
tere
sts
influ
ence
the
use
ofin
form
atio
n(p
109
)
Pers
onal
sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
112
)Lo
calp
lann
ing
com
mitt
ees
and
gove
rnm
ente
mp
loye
esin
two
rura
lcom
mun
ities
inth
eP
acifi
cN
orth
wes
t(p
110
)N
ˆ27
(p1
10)
Sour
ces
ofin
form
atio
nus
edin
com
mun
ityhe
alth
care
plan
ning
and
the
asse
ssm
ento
fthe
stra
tegi
cpl
anni
ngp
roce
ss(p
112
)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
112
)
USA
1991
17
Wha
tfac
tors
influ
ence
the
use
ofev
alua
tion
rese
arch
(on
heal
than
dhu
man
serv
ices
)in
cong
ress
(p5
08)
Stru
ctur
edte
lep
hone
inte
rvie
ws
(p5
13)
C
ongr
ess
mem
bers
and
thei
rsta
ff(p
512
)N
ˆ10
0Ea
chde
cisi
on-m
aker
chos
eon
est
udy
they
wer
efa
mili
arw
ith(p
515
)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
515
)E
valu
atio
nst
udie
sfro
mth
eD
epar
tmen
tofH
ealth
and
Hum
anSe
rvic
esth
atd
eal
with
natio
nalh
ealth
pro
gram
mes
(pp
507
515
)
Use
isde
fined
here
asbo
thin
stru
men
tal(
dire
ctim
ple
men
tatio
n)c
once
ptua
l(it
chan
ged
the
way
ofth
inki
ng)a
ndpe
rsua
sive
(use
dto
conv
ince
othe
rsp
516
)
The
inte
rvie
ws
last
ed15
^40
min
utes
(p5
14)
UK
1991
18U
sean
dre
ason
sfo
ruse
not
use
ofth
eE
iexclect
ive
Hea
lthC
are
Bul
letin
(pp
51^
54)
Stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-e
nded
post
alq
uest
ionn
aire
s(p
p5
0^51
)
Dis
trict
gen
eral
man
ager
sd
irect
ors
ofpu
blic
heal
than
dd
irect
ors
ofpl
anni
ng
com
mis
sion
ing
inU
Kd
istri
cthe
alth
auth
oriti
esor
com
mis
sion
ing
cons
ortia
(p5
0)N
ˆ17
2(p
51)
Eiexcle
ctiv
eH
ealth
Car
eB
ulle
tinN
o1
1991
on
scre
enin
gfo
rost
eop
oros
isto
prev
entf
ract
ures
(p5
0)
Per
ceiv
edus
eof
info
rmat
ion
and
hypo
thet
ical
dec
isio
ns
chan
geof
opin
ion
and
conf
iden
ceto
acto
nin
form
atio
nin
the
bulle
tin(p
p52
^54)
Res
pon
dent
sw
ere
que
stio
ned
abou
tabu
lletin
that
had
been
prev
ious
lypo
sted
toth
em(p
p51
52)
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244c J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
USA
1993
^199
419Th
ero
leof
rese
arch
info
rmat
ion
inp
olic
yde
velo
pmen
t(p
29)
Que
stio
nnai
res
(p1
3)
open
-end
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
4)an
dse
mi-
stru
ctur
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
4)
Key
info
rman
ts
inst
ates
that
chan
ged
cost
-sha
ring
pol
icie
sfo
rpre
scrip
tion
reim
burs
emen
tlim
itsan
dco
-pay
men
ts(p
14)
N
ˆin
adeq
uate
lyd
escr
ibed
Res
earc
hp
ublic
atio
nsan
dco
mm
ents
(p2
5)P
erce
ived
retro
spec
tive
dec
isio
ns(p
25)
Onl
y2^
3pa
ges
outo
f21
wer
ere
leva
nt(p
25f
f)I
nfor
man
tsin
clud
edM
edic
aid
drug
prog
ram
me
adm
inis
trato
rs
dire
ctor
sor
polic
yan
alys
ts
phar
mac
yco
nsul
tant
san
dle
gisl
ator
s(p
15)
UK
1994
^199
5202
1`T
oid
entif
yfa
ctor
sw
hich
faci
litat
eor
imp
ede
evid
ence
-bas
edp
olic
y-m
akin
grsquo(
p2
9)
In-d
epth
inte
rvie
ws
(usi
nga
topi
cgu
ide)
(p2
9an
dre
spon
seto
ale
tter)
Lead
polic
y-m
aker
sG
Psan
dre
sear
cher
sin
nine
diff
eren
tcas
est
udie
sat
alo
call
evel
inth
eN
HS
(pp
293
1)N
ˆ28
Soci
alre
sear
ch(p
42
inth
epr
ojec
trep
ort)
Per
ceiv
edde
cisi
ons
Polic
yon
the
inte
rface
bet
wee
nR
ampD
and
com
mis
sion
ing
atth
ehe
alth
auth
ority
leve
l(p
30)
Mex
ico
1994
^199
522`T
here
latio
nshi
pbe
twee
nhe
alth
rese
arch
(and
rese
arch
ers)
and
heal
thpo
licie
s(a
ndpo
licy-
mak
ers)
info
urve
rtica
lhe
alth
prog
ram
mes
inM
exic
orsquo(p
104
)
Ope
n-en
ded
(in-
dept
hrsquo)
inte
rvie
ws
with
aco
mm
onin
terv
iew
prot
ocol
(p1
06)
`Res
earc
hers
and
polic
y-m
aker
sfro
mdi
ffere
ntin
stitu
tions
and
leve
lsof
resp
onsi
bilit
yrsquo(p
103
)N
ˆ67
Use
ofre
sear
chpu
blic
atio
ns`w
here
we
knew
that
ther
ew
asat
leas
tso
me
inte
ract
ion
bet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dde
cisi
on-
mak
ersrsquo
(p1
05)
Per
ceiv
ed
use
ofev
iden
ceco
ncer
ning
AID
Sch
oler
afa
mily
pla
nnin
gan
dim
mun
isat
ion
ing
over
nmen
talp
rogr
amm
es(p
103
)
Per
sona
lcom
mun
icat
ion
gav
ead
ditio
nali
nfor
mat
ion
onth
isis
sue
It
isd
iffic
ultt
od
isce
rnw
heth
erth
ede
cisi
ons
wer
ep
erce
ived
orhy
pot
hetic
als
ince
ther
ear
eno
actu
alde
cisi
ons
men
tione
d
Aus
tralia
1995
23
Dec
isio
n-m
aker
srsquoaw
aren
ess
and
use
ofec
onom
icev
alua
tions
inhe
alth
care
(p1
03)
Inte
rvie
ws
open
-end
edan
dst
ruct
ured
(not
stat
edif
post
alt
elep
hone
orfa
ce-to
-fa
ce)(
p10
5)
Sen
iorm
anag
ers
inth
eFe
der
alD
epar
tmen
tof
Hea
lthH
ousi
ngan
dC
omm
unity
Serv
ices
New
Sou
thW
ales
Stat
eth
eH
ealth
Dep
artm
ent(
p10
4)
Nˆ
34(p
105
)
Use
ofec
onom
icev
alua
tions
forp
ricin
gon
drug
ssc
reen
ing
radi
olog
ytra
nspl
ants
and
scan
ning
(p1
05)
`Per
ceiv
edus
eof
econ
omic
eval
uatio
nsrsquo(
p1
04)
USA
1996
24
and
USA
1997
25
Tode
term
ine
whe
ther
the
proc
ess
of(s
ocia
lsci
ence
)in
form
atio
nut
ilisa
tion
varie
sac
ross
diff
eren
tare
as(i
ese
rvic
epr
ovis
ion
and
finan
cing
)(pp
16^
17)
Stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
16)
Fe
der
als
tate
and
loca
lp
olic
y-m
aker
sat
diff
eren
tle
vels
deal
ing
with
finan
cean
dse
rvic
es(p
16)
N
ˆ47
9(p
16)
No
spec
ific
repo
rtb
utin
foty
persquor
efer
topr
ogra
mm
eev
alua
tion
dem
onst
ratio
np
roje
ct
stat
istic
ald
ata
and
polic
yan
alys
is(p
34)
Per
ceiv
edre
trosp
ectiv
ed
ecis
ions
(p1
7)O
pen-
ende
din
terv
iew
sw
ere
used
toob
tain
basi
cb
ackg
roun
din
form
atio
nab
outt
hep
olic
ypr
oces
sTh
est
ruct
ured
inte
rvie
ws
built
onth
eop
en-e
nded
inte
rvie
ws
(p3
3)Pa
kist
an19
9826
The
role
that
rese
arch
pla
ysin
expe
rienc
esin
linki
ngre
sear
chw
ithp
olic
y(p
77)
Ope
n-en
ded
in-d
epth
inte
rvie
ws
(p7
7)D
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
from
gov
ernm
ent
the
cent
ral
min
istry
ofhe
alth
the
pla
nnin
gco
mm
issi
onan
dp
rovi
ncia
lhea
lthau
thor
ities
(p7
7)N
ˆ16
(p7
7)
Not
stat
edG
ener
alpe
rcep
tions
C
lose
stfo
cus
onch
ildhe
alth
prob
lem
ssu
chas
co-tr
imox
azol
em
ater
nal
mor
talit
yvi
tam
inA
b
reas
tfeed
ing
and
pol
io(p
p77
79)
UK
1998
27
The
imp
actt
hatt
heE
iexclect
ive
Hea
lthca
reB
ulle
tinha
sin
side
the
NH
Sor
gan
isat
ion
(p1
)
Tele
phon
ein
terv
iew
sst
ruct
ure
notm
entio
ned
(p1
)
Hea
lthau
thor
ities
(p
2)
Nˆ
34Tw
osp
ecifi
cbu
lletin
sJu
ne19
97an
dO
ctob
er19
97(p
1)
Hyp
othe
tical
deci
sion
s(e
g
itin
fluen
ced
the
dev
elop
men
tofo
urpo
licy
alth
oug
hth
isha
sbe
eng
oing
onfo
rsom
etim
ersquo)
(p1
0)
The
date
isno
tcle
arly
stat
edb
utit
is19
98or
1999
Tr
usts
and
GPs
are
incl
uded
inth
est
udy
buta
reno
trel
evan
tin
this
revi
ew
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244d J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
UK
and
USA
1998
28
H
owU
Kan
dU
Sp
urch
aser
sva
lue
and
use
rese
arch
asse
ssin
ghe
alth
tech
nolo
gy
and
clin
ical
effe
ctiv
enes
s(p
pv
1)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p4
)U
K1
4no
n-m
edic
alhe
alth
auth
ority
pur
chas
ers
seve
np
ublic
heal
thp
hysi
cian
sni
neG
PsU
SA1
3p
ublic
offic
ials
from
11st
ates
nin
ep
rivat
ese
ctor
purc
hase
rs
thre
eco
nsul
tant
sN
ˆ55
(p4
)
Acc
ess
toan
dus
eof
heal
thte
chno
logy
asse
ssm
ent
clin
ical
effe
ctiv
enes
sin
form
atio
n(p
p4
11)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
1)
Sta
ted
1999
(p3
)
Can
ada
1998
^199
929A
case
stud
yof
cros
s-se
ctor
alre
sour
ceal
loca
tion
inth
ehu
man
serv
ices
syst
emin
Prin
ceE
dwar
dIs
land
(p4
)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-
ende
din
terv
iew
san
dfo
cus
grou
ps(p
p13
^16
App
endi
x1)
Key
info
rman
tsho
ldin
gd
iffer
entp
ositi
ons
with
inth
efiv
ehe
alth
regi
ons
the
Dep
artm
ento
fSoc
ial
Ser
vice
san
dva
rious
sect
ors
(p4
)al
lreg
ions
all
sect
ors
and
man
agem
ent
leve
ls(p
13)
Nˆ
58(p
9)
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
deci
sion
son
cros
s-se
ctor
alre
sour
ceal
loca
tions
(p5
)
Bur
kina
Faso
1999
30A
case
stud
yon
how
rese
arch
pla
yed
aro
lein
deci
sion
-mak
ing
abou
t`S
hare
dC
arersquo
fo
rch
ildho
odill
ness
(pp
19^
20)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
20)
Min
istry
ofH
ealth
offic
ials
(p2
2)N
ˆno
tgiv
enW
orks
hops
and
rese
arch
pape
rsth
atth
eau
thor
sha
dpr
ovid
edM
inis
tryof
Hea
lthof
ficia
lsw
ithd
urin
gpr
evio
usye
ars
(p2
1)
Per
ceiv
edus
eof
the
pro
vide
dsc
ient
ific
info
rmat
ion
inde
cisi
on-
mak
ing
(p2
0)
`Sha
red
care
rsquois
abou
tim
prov
edco
ntac
tand
colla
bora
tion
bet
wee
nhe
alth
cent
rest
affa
ndm
othe
rs(p
20)
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31B
arrie
rsag
ains
tand
mec
hani
sms
fori
mpr
ovin
gth
evi
tam
inA
rese
arch
^po
licy^
actio
nco
nnec
tion
(p5
5)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
55)
Key
info
rman
tsth
atw
ere
rele
vant
role
-pla
yers
(p5
5)
Nˆ
nots
tate
d
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
use
(p5
5)
Can
ada
2000
32
Toas
sess
the
influ
ence
ofin
form
atio
nab
outt
hehe
alth
cons
eque
nces
ofun
empl
oym
enta
ndin
secu
rity
onp
olic
y-m
akin
g(p
5)
Stru
ctur
eds
emi-s
truct
ured
and
open
-end
edte
lep
hone
inte
rvie
ws
(pp
59
)
Pol
icy-
mak
ers
inth
ehe
alth
and
empl
oym
ents
ecto
rsof
allt
hree
leve
lsof
Can
adia
ng
over
nmen
tan
dex
ecut
ive
dire
ctor
sof
ten
Can
adia
nno
n-g
over
nmen
talo
rgan
-is
atio
ns(p
5)
Nˆ
48(p
5)
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
retro
spec
tive
usef
ulne
ssof
past
rese
arch
info
rmat
ion
abou
tthe
heal
thco
nseq
uenc
esof
unem
ploy
men
tand
inse
curit
yon
polic
y-m
akin
g(p
5)
Sta
ted
date
forw
orki
ngpa
peri
sM
arch
2000
Can
ada
2000
33To
unde
rsta
ndw
heth
er
how
and
und
erw
hat
cond
ition
she
alth
serv
ices
rese
arch
pla
ysa
role
inpr
ovin
cial
polic
y-m
akin
g(p
i)
Bot
hpe
rson
als
emi-
stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
san
dsu
rvey
s(p
p8
11)
Key
info
rman
tsw
ithin
ava
riety
ofke
yhe
alth
polic
ies
intw
oC
anad
ian
prov
ince
s(O
ntar
ioan
dS
aska
tche
wan
)(p
ii)
Nˆ
22(p
18)
Not
stat
ed
Act
uala
ndpe
rcei
ved
dec
isio
nsw
ithin
the
field
sof
heal
thse
rvic
esju
risdi
ctio
nfin
anci
alar
rang
emen
ts
pro
gram
me
deliv
ery
arra
ngem
ents
and
pro
gram
me
cont
ent
(pp
713
)
Iti
sno
tsta
ted
wha
tkin
dof
evid
ence
was
used
but
refe
renc
esto
dire
ctus
eof
evid
ence
inde
cisi
onre
ports
rep
ortin
gon
actu
alus
eof
rese
arch
im
plie
sth
atev
iden
cew
asus
ed(p
p13
18^
19)
GPs
gen
eral
pra
ctiti
oner
sM
ITM
assa
chus
etts
Inst
itute
ofTe
chno
log
yN
HS
Nat
iona
lHea
lthS
ervi
ceR
ampD
res
earc
han
dd
evel
opm
ent
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244e J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le2
Stu
dym
etho
ds
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceS
amp
lefr
ame
(SF
)aan
dsa
mp
lest
rate
gy
(SS
)b
Res
po
nse
rate
Mea
sure
men
tofu
seo
fev
iden
ceM
easu
rem
ento
fd
eter
min
ants
ofu
seS
um
mar
yo
fdes
crip
tio
no
fmet
ho
ds
(co
mp
lete
par
tial
or
no
tad
equa
tely
des
crib
ed)a
nd
com
men
ts
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Aqu
antit
ativ
e4-
poi
ntsc
ore
wei
ghte
dac
cord
ing
toth
ree
deci
sion
leve
lsw
ithsu
mm
edsc
ore
rang
ing
from
0to
18(p
51)
Two-
way
AN
OV
A(p
66)
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
USA
1973
8SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
No
stat
istic
alte
chni
que
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
USA
1973
^197
49
and
USA
1973
^19
7410
(pv
ii)
SFp
artia
l(p
viii)
SSn
otm
entio
ned
partl
ysn
owb
alle
d(p
viii
)
95
(p2
4)B
oth
quan
titat
ivel
yra
ted
and
wei
ght
ed(p
p25
28
333
536
)and
qua
litat
ivel
yde
scrib
ed(p
p1^
4)D
escr
iptiv
elis
ting
ofra
tings
(pp
28
333
536
)and
MC
A(m
ultiv
aria
tere
gre
ssio
n)an
alys
is(p
27)
Parti
alIt
isst
ated
that
`this
repo
rtre
pre
sent
only
afir
stsu
mm
ary
ofso
me
ofth
ehi
ghlig
hts
and
mor
eim
por
tant
findi
ngsrsquo
(pv
i)S
ubse
quen
trep
orts
not
foun
d
USA
1977
11
SFp
artia
l(p
143)
SSs
now
bal
led
partl
yra
ndom
(p1
43)
Not
stat
edD
escr
iptiv
eN
ost
atis
tical
tech
niqu
ePa
rtial
The
inte
rvie
ws
appe
arto
have
bee
nm
ade
betw
een
1973
and
1976
USA
1980
2an
dU
SA19
8012
SFp
artia
l(p
167)
SSn
otst
ated
90
(p1
67)
Bot
hqu
antit
ativ
ede
scrip
tions
rat
edan
dw
eig
hted
and
qual
itativ
e(p
p16
9ff
303)
Des
crip
tive
listin
gof
ratin
gs(p
p1
70^1
72
174)
and
25va
riabl
esan
alys
edus
ing
fact
oran
alys
isto
dev
elop
five
dim
ensi
ons
(p
304
)
Parti
alB
oth
a4-
poin
t(p
168
)and
a5-
poi
ntw
eigh
ted
ratin
gsc
ale
(pp
173
303)
The
qual
itativ
era
ting
com
esfro
mlis
ting
ofm
ostm
entio
ned
char
acte
ristic
sof
usef
ulne
ss
The
five
dim
ensi
ons
are
liste
din
Tabl
e3
und
erfa
cilit
ator
s
USA
1982
13SF
Par
tial
(pp
187
^188
)SS
ran
dom
sam
ple
(pp
187
^188
)
Volu
ntee
red
(p1
88)
Qua
ntita
tive
listin
gof
the
deci
sion
qua
lity
ofev
iden
ce^
use
onsi
xdi
ffere
ntle
vels
ofco
mpl
exity
(pp
195^
208)
List
ing
offre
quen
cies
(pp
196
^198
)Pa
rtial
The
132
dec
isio
n-m
aker
sw
ere
rand
omly
dist
ribut
edto
two
of50
case
stud
ies
and
six
diff
eren
tlev
els
(p1
94)
USA
1983
14SF
not
stat
ed(p
79)
SS
not
stat
ed(p
79)
65
(p7
9)Q
uant
itativ
elis
ting
and
ratin
gs(p
p8
2^86
)Fr
eque
ncie
san
dra
ted
impo
rtanc
e(a
sve
ry
mod
erat
ely
orno
tim
porta
nt)(
p8
2)
SF
and
SSco
mpl
ete
ifth
est
udyrsquo
sfo
cus
cons
ider
edon
lydi
rect
ors
inFl
orid
aan
dN
orth
Car
olin
aan
dif
ther
ew
ere
only
one
dire
ctor
inea
chC
omm
unity
Men
talH
ealth
Cen
ter
Swed
en19
84^
1985
15SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
p14
6^15
0)Li
stin
gof
frequ
enci
es(p
p1
451
49)
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edTh
eau
thor
sm
ainl
yd
iscu
ssan
dde
mon
stra
ted
iffer
entw
ays
ofut
ilisi
ngre
sear
cha
sei
ther
ins
trum
enta
lpo
litic
alc
onfli
cte
nlig
hten
men
tin
tera
ctiv
eor
tact
ical
(p1
44)
`
usin
gre
sear
ch`in
stru
men
tally
rsquorsquoor
for
`enl
ight
enm
entrsquorsquo
purp
oses
mea
ntdi
ffere
ntth
ings
indi
ffere
ntse
tting
san
ddi
ffere
ntor
gani
zatio
nalp
ositi
onsrsquo
(p1
45)
USA
1990
16SF
par
tial(
p11
0)SS
com
ple
te
(p1
10)
100
(p1
10)
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
112
)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Com
ple
tere
fers
toth
e27
rep
rese
ntat
ives
inth
etw
opl
anni
ngco
mm
ittee
sin
the
two
com
mun
ities
No
furth
erge
nera
lisat
ion
can
be
mad
eon
the
basi
sof
this
sam
ple
USA
1991
17SF
com
plet
e(p
p5
13^5
14)
SSr
ando
msa
mp
le(p
513
)
60
(p5
14)
Qua
ntita
tivel
yde
scrip
tive
rate
dan
dw
eig
hted
(p
p51
9^52
2)D
escr
iptiv
elis
ting
ofw
eigh
ted
ratin
gs(p
p5
17^5
23)a
ndm
ultip
lere
gre
ssio
n(p
p5
185
23^5
27)
Com
ple
te
Wei
ghte
don
3-p
oint
and
5-p
oint
scal
es
UK
1991
18SF
com
plet
e(p
51)
SSr
ando
msa
mp
le(p
51)
73
(p5
1)Q
uant
itativ
era
ted
desc
riptio
ns(p
p51
^54)
Per
cent
ages
(pp
51^5
4)C
omp
lete
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244f J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le2
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceS
amp
lefr
ame
(SF
)aan
dsa
mp
lest
rate
gy
(SS
)b
Res
po
nse
rate
Mea
sure
men
tofu
seo
fev
iden
ceM
easu
rem
ento
fd
eter
min
ants
ofu
seS
um
mar
yo
fdes
crip
tio
no
fmet
ho
ds
(co
mp
lete
par
tial
or
no
tad
equa
tely
des
crib
ed)a
nd
com
men
ts
USA
1993
^199
419SF
par
tial(
p15
)SS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(i
esu
bjec
tive
view
onke
yva
riabl
esof
pol
icy
chan
gea
nym
entio
nno
rank
ing)
(p1
6)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edO
nly
Med
icai
dp
rog
ram
mes
with
spec
ific
cost
-con
tain
men
tpol
icie
sin
the
last
seve
raly
ears
(p2
9)U
K19
94^1
99520
21
SFp
artia
l(pp
461
46
5)SS
sno
wb
alle
d(p
p4
614
65)
100
(all
thos
eap
proa
ched
fori
nter
view
agre
edto
the
inte
rvie
w)
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
31f
f)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Mex
ico
1994
^199
522SF
not
stat
ed
SSn
otst
ated
N
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(i
esu
bjec
tive
view
onke
yva
riabl
es)(
pp
104
106^
108)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edP
urpo
sive
sam
ple
(per
sona
lcom
mun
icat
ions
)A
ustra
lia19
9523
SFp
artia
lSS
not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edQ
uant
itativ
ean
dd
escr
iptiv
e(p
p1
05^1
08)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edC
alle
d`p
urpo
sive
sam
plin
gfra
mersquo
(p1
04)
USA
1996
24an
dU
SA19
9725
SFp
artia
l(pp
16
30^3
1)SS
com
bin
edra
ndom
and
snow
-ba
lled
(pp
30^3
1)
Not
stat
edQ
uant
itativ
ere
gres
sion
and
apa
thm
odel
(p1
8)Q
uant
itativ
ere
gres
sion
and
apa
thm
odel
(p1
8)Pa
rtial
but
with
ago
odde
scrip
tion
ofSS
and
SF
Paki
stan
1998
26SF
par
tial(
p77
)SS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
(pp
788
082
)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
UK
1998
27SF
par
tial(
pp1
^2)
SSn
otst
ated
(pp
1^2
)
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(ie
subj
ectiv
evi
ewon
awar
enes
sge
nera
lper
cept
ions
and
impa
ct)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
UK
and
USA
1998
28SF
par
tial(
p4)
SSn
otst
ated
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(pp
12^2
2)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Can
ada
1998
^199
929SF
par
tial(
p16
)SS
not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ede
scrip
tions
and
quan
titat
ive
listin
gs(p
p18
^30
32^3
4)Q
ualit
ativ
ePa
rtial
Aqu
alita
tive
valid
atio
nof
the
inte
rvie
ws
isd
escr
ibed
(pp
16^1
7)B
urki
naFa
so19
9930
SFn
otst
ated
SSn
otst
ated
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(p2
2)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
Can
ada
2000
32SF
par
tial
SSn
otst
ated
42
(p
23)
Bot
hqu
antit
ativ
ean
dqu
alita
tive
des
crip
tions
ofba
rrie
rs(p
p11
^14
26)
Freq
uenc
ies
(p2
6)Pa
rtial
Cal
led
`apu
rpos
ive
sam
ple
ofC
anad
ian
polic
y-m
aker
srsquo(p
8)
Can
ada
2000
33SF
not
stat
edSS
sno
wb
alle
d(p
ii)
88
(22
25)
(p1
8)B
oth
quan
titat
ive
and
qual
itativ
ed
escr
iptio
nsof
faci
litat
ors
(pp
ii
i35
^37)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
a Sam
ple
fram
ec
omp
lete
ˆth
esa
mp
lew
asd
escr
ibed
inre
latio
nto
allt
hed
ecis
ion
-mak
ers
inth
eco
ntex
toft
hest
udy
par
tialˆ
inco
mp
lete
info
rmat
ion
not
stat
edˆ
nod
escr
iptio
nb S
amp
lest
rate
gy
com
ple
tesa
mp
ler
and
omsa
mp
les
now
bal
led
sam
ple
orn
otst
ated
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244g J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
Mai
nre
sults
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p5
4)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
60)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
54)
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
65)
USA
1973
8Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p1
41)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
142
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
143
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
43)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p14
114
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(pp
142
145)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p1
43)
USA
1973
^197
49an
dU
SA
1973
^197
410
(pv
ii)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
333
6)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
33)
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p3
3)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)
USA
1977
11Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
155
158)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p1
45)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p14
915
2)P
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p15
9^16
0)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
155
158)
USA
1980
2an
dU
SA19
8012
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
stTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sM
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
USA
1982
13N
one
ofth
efa
cilit
ator
sw
ere
men
tione
din
the
othe
rstu
dies
Non
eof
the
bar
riers
wer
em
entio
ned
inth
eot
hers
tud
ies
USA
1983
14C
omm
unity
pres
sure
orcl
ient
dem
and
forr
esea
rch
(pp
82
84)
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
82)
Not
stat
ed
Swed
en19
84^1
98515
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
p14
614
9)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
148
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
149
)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
150
)
USA
1990
16R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
114
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
18)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p11
111
5)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(pp
119
^122
)U
SA19
9117
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p5
19)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(pp
519
520)
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
19)
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
519
)U
K19
9118
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
5)N
otst
ated
USA
1993
^199
419G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
27)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p2
7)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
9)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
chA
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
13^1
427
)
UK
1994
^199
5202
1Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
32^3
4)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
p32
^34)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
pp
31^3
2)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(p3
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p3
3)M
exic
o19
94^1
99522
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
sTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
nsR
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
hIn
clus
ion
ofef
fect
iven
ess
data
(pp
106^
108
109^
113)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p10
7^11
1)
USA
1996
24Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
1)A
ustra
lia19
9523
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
107
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
108
)G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
108
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
108
)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
106
)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p1
06)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
106
)
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244h J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
Paki
stan
1998
26N
otst
ated
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p78
82)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
80)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p80
82)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
80)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p8
2)U
K19
9827
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p8
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
13)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p8
12)
UK
and
USA
1998
28Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
p3
17^2
1)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p5
12^1
7)
Can
ada
1998
^199
929Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p3
2)P
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p33
^34)
Bur
kina
Faso
1999
30N
otst
ated
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p2
1)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
23)
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
62)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p6
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
63)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
61)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
61)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p6
1)C
anad
a20
0032
Not
stat
edP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
26)
Can
ada
2000
33Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pi
)N
otst
ated
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244a J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
Cha
ract
eris
tics
ofin
clud
edst
udie
s
Co
un
try
year
cond
uct
ed(
year
pu
blis
hed
)re
fere
nce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fev
iden
ce(f
rom
whi
chd
ecis
ion
sw
ere
mad
e)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17 Th
eco
nditi
ons
and
func
tions
influ
enci
ngut
ilisa
tion
ofso
cial
pol
icy
rese
arch
(p4
9)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edsu
rvey
s(p
50)
Res
earc
hers
and
polic
y-m
aker
sth
atw
ere
resp
onsi
ble
for
inco
rpor
atin
gth
ere
sear
chre
sults
(p5
0)N
ˆno
tst
ated
120
rese
arch
proj
ects
on`c
lient
-orie
nted
rsquosoc
ial
rese
arch
with
inin
dust
rial
and
labo
urre
latio
ns
regi
onal
and
urb
anpl
anni
ngs
ocia
lwel
fare
and
publ
iche
alth
(p5
0)
Per
ceiv
ed(r
etro
spec
tive)
dec
isio
ns(p
50)
Rev
ised
vers
ion
ofpa
per
pres
ente
din
1979
(p4
9)
40ou
toft
he12
0pr
ojec
tsw
ere
onso
cial
wel
fare
and
publ
iche
alth
US
A19
738
Wha
twas
done
wha
the
lped
and
wha
thin
dere
dth
esu
cces
sfo
rten
rese
arch
proj
ects
unde
rthe
Nat
iona
lIns
titut
eof
Men
tal
Hea
lth
(p1
41)
Pers
onal
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
41)
Prin
cipa
linv
estig
ator
oth
erst
affm
emb
ers
adm
inis
trato
rsan
dpe
rson
sm
ostl
ikel
yto
be
utili
sers
(p1
41)
Nˆ
notg
iven
Five
proj
ects
rate
dlo
wan
dfiv
epr
ojec
tsra
ted
high
for
`suc
cess
rsquo(p
140
)
Per
ceiv
edus
eT
hein
terv
iew
sw
ere
don
ein
eith
er19
67or
1968
(pp
140^
141)
Su
cces
sde
fined
aspr
ojec
ttha
tw
asdi
rect
edto
the
orig
inal
obje
ctiv
ese
mbo
died
ina
clea
ran
dco
gent
rep
ort
cand
iden
ough
tobe
repl
icab
lea
ndth
atth
efin
din
gsw
ere
diss
emin
ated
adeq
uate
ly(p
140
)U
SA
1973
^197
49(p
vii)
and
USA
1973
^197
410So
cial
scie
nce
rese
arch
utili
satio
nan
dpo
licy
form
atio
n(p
vii)
Aw
aren
ess
ofre
sear
chk
now
ledg
eof
sour
ces
info
rmat
ion
retri
eval
pra
ctic
ein
tere
stin
soci
alin
dica
tors
eva
luat
ion
ofw
orth
and
obje
ctiv
ity
met
hods
and
mea
sure
men
tpr
oced
ures
deg
ree
ofco
nfid
ence
onfin
ding
sat
titud
esab
outu
sef
acto
rsth
atin
fluen
ceus
e(p
ix)
Pers
onal
inte
rvie
ws
open
-en
ded
and
stru
ctur
ed(p
pv
ix)
Upp
er-le
veld
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
inth
eex
ecut
ive
bran
chof
the
US
fede
ral
gove
rnm
ent(
ppv
viii)
31
depu
tyun
ders
ecre
tarie
s54
inst
itute
dire
ctor
s67
depu
tyas
sist
antd
irect
ors
52ag
ency
pers
onne
lN
ˆ20
4(p
v)
575
repo
rted
inst
ance
sof
use
whe
re38
5in
volv
edpr
imar
yre
sear
chso
urce
s(p
8)
94
wer
eei
ther
fund
edby
the
gove
rnm
ent
cond
ucte
dby
the
gove
rnm
ento
rbot
h(p
8)
Per
ceiv
ed(s
elf-r
epor
ted)
use
with
spec
ific
follo
w-u
pq
uest
ions
whe
nus
ew
asre
porte
d(p
1)
15
ofth
eus
eof
know
ledg
ew
ason
heal
thor
wel
fare
prob
lem
s(p
5)
`Mos
toft
heex
ampl
esre
spon
dent
sof
fere
dto
illust
rate
know
ledg
eap
plic
atio
nsre
ally
invo
lved
the
appl
icat
ion
ofse
cond
ary
sour
cein
form
atio
nrsquo(p
187
)
US
A19
77
11`T
oex
amin
eth
ena
ture
and
degr
eeof
utiliz
atio
nof
fede
rale
valu
atio
nre
sear
chrsquo
(p1
43)
Op
en-e
nded
inte
rvie
ws
with
diffe
rent
ques
tions
for
the
deci
sion
-mak
eran
dth
eev
alua
tor(
p1
43)
Thre
eke
yin
form
ants
from
each
ofth
e20
stud
ies
wer
ein
terv
iew
eda
proj
ect
offic
ert
hed
ecis
ion-
mak
er(g
over
nmen
tlev
el)a
ndth
eev
alua
tor(
p14
3)N
ˆ60
(p1
43)
20na
tiona
lhea
lthca
reev
alua
tions
(cas
est
udie
s)w
ithso
me
syst
emat
icd
ata
colle
ctio
nm
ade
betw
een
1971
and
1974
bas
edon
11fa
ctor
sid
entif
ied
byth
eau
thor
s(p
p14
2^14
3)
Per
ceiv
edan
dse
lf-d
efin
edus
e(p
144
)H
ealth
train
ing
lab
orat
ory
prof
icie
ncy
neig
hbou
rhoo
dhe
alth
cent
res
heal
thse
rvic
esd
eliv
ery
syst
ems
alco
holis
ml
oan
forg
iven
ess
and
train
ing
wor
ksho
p(p
p14
2^14
3)U
SA
1980
2 an
dU
SA19
8012
Polic
y-m
aker
srsquope
rcep
tions
ofth
eus
eful
ness
ofso
cial
scie
nces
rese
arch
(pp
165
302)
Pers
onal
inte
rvie
ws
both
open
-end
edan
dst
ruct
ured
(pp
168
171
303)
51fe
dera
l52
stat
e(fr
omte
nst
ates
)and
52lo
cal
offic
iald
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
inup
per-
leve
lpos
ition
s(p
p16
730
3)N
ˆ15
5
Each
dec
isio
n-m
aker
read
two
abst
ract
s(tw
o-pa
gers
)ou
tof5
0fo
ract
uals
ocia
lsc
ienc
ere
sear
chre
ports
(p
p1
683
03)
Hyp
othe
tical
deci
sion
s(i
e`re
leva
ntto
the
issu
esyo
urof
fice
deal
sw
ithrsquo)
onm
enta
lhe
alth
alc
ohol
and
drug
abus
e
(pp
166
303
)
Not
stat
edb
utpu
blis
hed
Ap
ril19
80R
eprin
ted
from
Am
eric
anP
sych
olog
ist 1
981
Bas
edon
the
sam
ere
sear
chp
roje
ctas
US
A19
8012
(but
par
tlyon
othe
rpar
tsof
the
data
)
The
deci
sion
-mak
ers
wer
eg
iven
diffe
rent
`em
piri
calrsquo
inte
rven
tions
(ie
two-
page
rs)a
ndar
eth
eref
ore
diffi
cult
toco
mpa
reon
the
effe
ctva
riabl
esco
ntin
ued
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244b J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
USA
1982
13
Toob
serv
eth
eim
pac
ttha
tde
cisi
onco
mp
lexi
tya
ndam
ount
ofin
form
atio
nav
aila
ble
had
onth
eq
ualit
yof
the
deci
sion
proc
ess
(p1
87)
Stru
ctur
eds
emi-s
truct
ured
and
open
-end
edqu
estio
n-na
ires
com
bine
dw
itha
cont
rolle
dex
perim
ent
Con
seq
uenc
esof
com
plex
ityw
ere
exam
ined
byef
fect
sof
info
rmat
ion
load
and
num
bero
fde
cisi
onal
tern
ativ
es(p
p1
871
931
94)
Exp
erie
nced
pub
lican
dp
rivat
ese
ctor
man
ager
sfro
msi
xm
id-c
aree
rp
rog
ram
mes
atH
arva
rd
MIT
Sta
nfor
dan
dth
eW
ashi
ngto
nP
ublic
Affa
irsC
ente
r(pp
187
188
)N
ˆ13
2(p
188
)
Each
dec
isio
n-m
aker
rece
ived
alo
ngm
emor
and
umde
scrib
ing
apr
oble
mp
rese
ntin
gev
iden
ceus
eful
inan
alys
ing
the
prob
lem
and
pose
da
dec
isio
nto
bem
ade
base
don
real
peo
ple
and
even
ts(p
188
)
Two
hypo
thet
ical
dec
isio
ns
one
onth
est
atersquo
sD
epar
t-m
ento
fHea
lthan
dR
ehab
i-lit
ativ
ese
rvic
esan
don
eon
am
etha
done
mai
nten
ance
pro
gram
me
inN
ewYo
rkC
ity(p
p1
88^1
89)
Dec
isio
nha
dto
bem
ade
from
avai
labl
ein
form
atio
nw
ithin
1ho
ur45
min
utes
(p1
93)
Rep
rinte
dfro
mth
eJo
urna
lof
Pol
icy
Ana
lysi
san
dM
anag
emen
t2
66^8
7(p
185
)
The
exp
erim
entw
asb
ased
onsi
xdi
ffere
ntve
rsio
nsof
each
ofth
etw
oca
ses
The
six
diff
eren
tver
sion
sof
the
case
sva
ried
inin
form
atio
nco
mpl
exity
Eac
hde
cisi
on-m
aker
had
only
one
deci
sion
tom
ake
aton
lyon
ele
velo
fcom
plex
ity(p
p18
9^19
019
3)U
SA19
83
14To
dete
rmin
eso
me
ofth
efa
ctor
sth
atin
fluen
cead
min
istra
tors
rsquouse
ofev
alua
tive
data
inde
cisi
on-
mak
ing
and
toex
amin
eth
ety
pes
ofde
cisi
ons
(p7
9)
Stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-e
nded
post
alq
uest
ionn
aire
s(p
p7
9^80
)
Dire
ctor
sin
com
mun
itym
enta
lhea
lthce
ntre
sin
Flor
ida
and
Nor
thC
arol
ina
(p7
9)N
ˆ42
Con
duct
edst
udie
son
prog
ram
me
effe
ctiv
enes
sor
imp
actd
urin
gth
ela
st12
-m
onth
per
iod
(p8
1)
Per
ceiv
ed(i
ere
por
ted
)us
e(p
p80
^81)
Swed
en19
84^1
98515
(p1
52)
Diff
eren
tway
sof
usin
gso
cial
rese
arch
in
stru
men
tal
polit
ical
co
nflic
ten
light
enm
ent
inte
ract
ive
and
tact
ical
(pp
141
143^
144)
Inte
rvie
ws
(p1
52)
Soc
ialw
orke
rs
man
agem
entd
irect
ors
loca
land
natio
nalp
oliti
cian
sin
15Sw
edis
hci
ties
and
com
mun
es(p
152
)N
ˆ90
(p1
52)
Doc
umen
tsth
atth
ere
spon
dent
sre
ferr
edto
Th
ese
docu
men
tsw
ere
also
anal
ysed
by
the
auth
ors
(p1
52)
Per
ceiv
edre
trosp
ectiv
ed
ecis
ions
(p1
52)
USA
1990
16To
dete
rmin
ew
hatt
ype
ofin
form
atio
nd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
use
and
how
ideo
log
yan
din
tere
sts
influ
ence
the
use
ofin
form
atio
n(p
109
)
Pers
onal
sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
112
)Lo
calp
lann
ing
com
mitt
ees
and
gove
rnm
ente
mp
loye
esin
two
rura
lcom
mun
ities
inth
eP
acifi
cN
orth
wes
t(p
110
)N
ˆ27
(p1
10)
Sour
ces
ofin
form
atio
nus
edin
com
mun
ityhe
alth
care
plan
ning
and
the
asse
ssm
ento
fthe
stra
tegi
cpl
anni
ngp
roce
ss(p
112
)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
112
)
USA
1991
17
Wha
tfac
tors
influ
ence
the
use
ofev
alua
tion
rese
arch
(on
heal
than
dhu
man
serv
ices
)in
cong
ress
(p5
08)
Stru
ctur
edte
lep
hone
inte
rvie
ws
(p5
13)
C
ongr
ess
mem
bers
and
thei
rsta
ff(p
512
)N
ˆ10
0Ea
chde
cisi
on-m
aker
chos
eon
est
udy
they
wer
efa
mili
arw
ith(p
515
)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
515
)E
valu
atio
nst
udie
sfro
mth
eD
epar
tmen
tofH
ealth
and
Hum
anSe
rvic
esth
atd
eal
with
natio
nalh
ealth
pro
gram
mes
(pp
507
515
)
Use
isde
fined
here
asbo
thin
stru
men
tal(
dire
ctim
ple
men
tatio
n)c
once
ptua
l(it
chan
ged
the
way
ofth
inki
ng)a
ndpe
rsua
sive
(use
dto
conv
ince
othe
rsp
516
)
The
inte
rvie
ws
last
ed15
^40
min
utes
(p5
14)
UK
1991
18U
sean
dre
ason
sfo
ruse
not
use
ofth
eE
iexclect
ive
Hea
lthC
are
Bul
letin
(pp
51^
54)
Stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-e
nded
post
alq
uest
ionn
aire
s(p
p5
0^51
)
Dis
trict
gen
eral
man
ager
sd
irect
ors
ofpu
blic
heal
than
dd
irect
ors
ofpl
anni
ng
com
mis
sion
ing
inU
Kd
istri
cthe
alth
auth
oriti
esor
com
mis
sion
ing
cons
ortia
(p5
0)N
ˆ17
2(p
51)
Eiexcle
ctiv
eH
ealth
Car
eB
ulle
tinN
o1
1991
on
scre
enin
gfo
rost
eop
oros
isto
prev
entf
ract
ures
(p5
0)
Per
ceiv
edus
eof
info
rmat
ion
and
hypo
thet
ical
dec
isio
ns
chan
geof
opin
ion
and
conf
iden
ceto
acto
nin
form
atio
nin
the
bulle
tin(p
p52
^54)
Res
pon
dent
sw
ere
que
stio
ned
abou
tabu
lletin
that
had
been
prev
ious
lypo
sted
toth
em(p
p51
52)
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244c J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
USA
1993
^199
419Th
ero
leof
rese
arch
info
rmat
ion
inp
olic
yde
velo
pmen
t(p
29)
Que
stio
nnai
res
(p1
3)
open
-end
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
4)an
dse
mi-
stru
ctur
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
4)
Key
info
rman
ts
inst
ates
that
chan
ged
cost
-sha
ring
pol
icie
sfo
rpre
scrip
tion
reim
burs
emen
tlim
itsan
dco
-pay
men
ts(p
14)
N
ˆin
adeq
uate
lyd
escr
ibed
Res
earc
hp
ublic
atio
nsan
dco
mm
ents
(p2
5)P
erce
ived
retro
spec
tive
dec
isio
ns(p
25)
Onl
y2^
3pa
ges
outo
f21
wer
ere
leva
nt(p
25f
f)I
nfor
man
tsin
clud
edM
edic
aid
drug
prog
ram
me
adm
inis
trato
rs
dire
ctor
sor
polic
yan
alys
ts
phar
mac
yco
nsul
tant
san
dle
gisl
ator
s(p
15)
UK
1994
^199
5202
1`T
oid
entif
yfa
ctor
sw
hich
faci
litat
eor
imp
ede
evid
ence
-bas
edp
olic
y-m
akin
grsquo(
p2
9)
In-d
epth
inte
rvie
ws
(usi
nga
topi
cgu
ide)
(p2
9an
dre
spon
seto
ale
tter)
Lead
polic
y-m
aker
sG
Psan
dre
sear
cher
sin
nine
diff
eren
tcas
est
udie
sat
alo
call
evel
inth
eN
HS
(pp
293
1)N
ˆ28
Soci
alre
sear
ch(p
42
inth
epr
ojec
trep
ort)
Per
ceiv
edde
cisi
ons
Polic
yon
the
inte
rface
bet
wee
nR
ampD
and
com
mis
sion
ing
atth
ehe
alth
auth
ority
leve
l(p
30)
Mex
ico
1994
^199
522`T
here
latio
nshi
pbe
twee
nhe
alth
rese
arch
(and
rese
arch
ers)
and
heal
thpo
licie
s(a
ndpo
licy-
mak
ers)
info
urve
rtica
lhe
alth
prog
ram
mes
inM
exic
orsquo(p
104
)
Ope
n-en
ded
(in-
dept
hrsquo)
inte
rvie
ws
with
aco
mm
onin
terv
iew
prot
ocol
(p1
06)
`Res
earc
hers
and
polic
y-m
aker
sfro
mdi
ffere
ntin
stitu
tions
and
leve
lsof
resp
onsi
bilit
yrsquo(p
103
)N
ˆ67
Use
ofre
sear
chpu
blic
atio
ns`w
here
we
knew
that
ther
ew
asat
leas
tso
me
inte
ract
ion
bet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dde
cisi
on-
mak
ersrsquo
(p1
05)
Per
ceiv
ed
use
ofev
iden
ceco
ncer
ning
AID
Sch
oler
afa
mily
pla
nnin
gan
dim
mun
isat
ion
ing
over
nmen
talp
rogr
amm
es(p
103
)
Per
sona
lcom
mun
icat
ion
gav
ead
ditio
nali
nfor
mat
ion
onth
isis
sue
It
isd
iffic
ultt
od
isce
rnw
heth
erth
ede
cisi
ons
wer
ep
erce
ived
orhy
pot
hetic
als
ince
ther
ear
eno
actu
alde
cisi
ons
men
tione
d
Aus
tralia
1995
23
Dec
isio
n-m
aker
srsquoaw
aren
ess
and
use
ofec
onom
icev
alua
tions
inhe
alth
care
(p1
03)
Inte
rvie
ws
open
-end
edan
dst
ruct
ured
(not
stat
edif
post
alt
elep
hone
orfa
ce-to
-fa
ce)(
p10
5)
Sen
iorm
anag
ers
inth
eFe
der
alD
epar
tmen
tof
Hea
lthH
ousi
ngan
dC
omm
unity
Serv
ices
New
Sou
thW
ales
Stat
eth
eH
ealth
Dep
artm
ent(
p10
4)
Nˆ
34(p
105
)
Use
ofec
onom
icev
alua
tions
forp
ricin
gon
drug
ssc
reen
ing
radi
olog
ytra
nspl
ants
and
scan
ning
(p1
05)
`Per
ceiv
edus
eof
econ
omic
eval
uatio
nsrsquo(
p1
04)
USA
1996
24
and
USA
1997
25
Tode
term
ine
whe
ther
the
proc
ess
of(s
ocia
lsci
ence
)in
form
atio
nut
ilisa
tion
varie
sac
ross
diff
eren
tare
as(i
ese
rvic
epr
ovis
ion
and
finan
cing
)(pp
16^
17)
Stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
16)
Fe
der
als
tate
and
loca
lp
olic
y-m
aker
sat
diff
eren
tle
vels
deal
ing
with
finan
cean
dse
rvic
es(p
16)
N
ˆ47
9(p
16)
No
spec
ific
repo
rtb
utin
foty
persquor
efer
topr
ogra
mm
eev
alua
tion
dem
onst
ratio
np
roje
ct
stat
istic
ald
ata
and
polic
yan
alys
is(p
34)
Per
ceiv
edre
trosp
ectiv
ed
ecis
ions
(p1
7)O
pen-
ende
din
terv
iew
sw
ere
used
toob
tain
basi
cb
ackg
roun
din
form
atio
nab
outt
hep
olic
ypr
oces
sTh
est
ruct
ured
inte
rvie
ws
built
onth
eop
en-e
nded
inte
rvie
ws
(p3
3)Pa
kist
an19
9826
The
role
that
rese
arch
pla
ysin
expe
rienc
esin
linki
ngre
sear
chw
ithp
olic
y(p
77)
Ope
n-en
ded
in-d
epth
inte
rvie
ws
(p7
7)D
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
from
gov
ernm
ent
the
cent
ral
min
istry
ofhe
alth
the
pla
nnin
gco
mm
issi
onan
dp
rovi
ncia
lhea
lthau
thor
ities
(p7
7)N
ˆ16
(p7
7)
Not
stat
edG
ener
alpe
rcep
tions
C
lose
stfo
cus
onch
ildhe
alth
prob
lem
ssu
chas
co-tr
imox
azol
em
ater
nal
mor
talit
yvi
tam
inA
b
reas
tfeed
ing
and
pol
io(p
p77
79)
UK
1998
27
The
imp
actt
hatt
heE
iexclect
ive
Hea
lthca
reB
ulle
tinha
sin
side
the
NH
Sor
gan
isat
ion
(p1
)
Tele
phon
ein
terv
iew
sst
ruct
ure
notm
entio
ned
(p1
)
Hea
lthau
thor
ities
(p
2)
Nˆ
34Tw
osp
ecifi
cbu
lletin
sJu
ne19
97an
dO
ctob
er19
97(p
1)
Hyp
othe
tical
deci
sion
s(e
g
itin
fluen
ced
the
dev
elop
men
tofo
urpo
licy
alth
oug
hth
isha
sbe
eng
oing
onfo
rsom
etim
ersquo)
(p1
0)
The
date
isno
tcle
arly
stat
edb
utit
is19
98or
1999
Tr
usts
and
GPs
are
incl
uded
inth
est
udy
buta
reno
trel
evan
tin
this
revi
ew
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244d J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
UK
and
USA
1998
28
H
owU
Kan
dU
Sp
urch
aser
sva
lue
and
use
rese
arch
asse
ssin
ghe
alth
tech
nolo
gy
and
clin
ical
effe
ctiv
enes
s(p
pv
1)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p4
)U
K1
4no
n-m
edic
alhe
alth
auth
ority
pur
chas
ers
seve
np
ublic
heal
thp
hysi
cian
sni
neG
PsU
SA1
3p
ublic
offic
ials
from
11st
ates
nin
ep
rivat
ese
ctor
purc
hase
rs
thre
eco
nsul
tant
sN
ˆ55
(p4
)
Acc
ess
toan
dus
eof
heal
thte
chno
logy
asse
ssm
ent
clin
ical
effe
ctiv
enes
sin
form
atio
n(p
p4
11)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
1)
Sta
ted
1999
(p3
)
Can
ada
1998
^199
929A
case
stud
yof
cros
s-se
ctor
alre
sour
ceal
loca
tion
inth
ehu
man
serv
ices
syst
emin
Prin
ceE
dwar
dIs
land
(p4
)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-
ende
din
terv
iew
san
dfo
cus
grou
ps(p
p13
^16
App
endi
x1)
Key
info
rman
tsho
ldin
gd
iffer
entp
ositi
ons
with
inth
efiv
ehe
alth
regi
ons
the
Dep
artm
ento
fSoc
ial
Ser
vice
san
dva
rious
sect
ors
(p4
)al
lreg
ions
all
sect
ors
and
man
agem
ent
leve
ls(p
13)
Nˆ
58(p
9)
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
deci
sion
son
cros
s-se
ctor
alre
sour
ceal
loca
tions
(p5
)
Bur
kina
Faso
1999
30A
case
stud
yon
how
rese
arch
pla
yed
aro
lein
deci
sion
-mak
ing
abou
t`S
hare
dC
arersquo
fo
rch
ildho
odill
ness
(pp
19^
20)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
20)
Min
istry
ofH
ealth
offic
ials
(p2
2)N
ˆno
tgiv
enW
orks
hops
and
rese
arch
pape
rsth
atth
eau
thor
sha
dpr
ovid
edM
inis
tryof
Hea
lthof
ficia
lsw
ithd
urin
gpr
evio
usye
ars
(p2
1)
Per
ceiv
edus
eof
the
pro
vide
dsc
ient
ific
info
rmat
ion
inde
cisi
on-
mak
ing
(p2
0)
`Sha
red
care
rsquois
abou
tim
prov
edco
ntac
tand
colla
bora
tion
bet
wee
nhe
alth
cent
rest
affa
ndm
othe
rs(p
20)
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31B
arrie
rsag
ains
tand
mec
hani
sms
fori
mpr
ovin
gth
evi
tam
inA
rese
arch
^po
licy^
actio
nco
nnec
tion
(p5
5)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
55)
Key
info
rman
tsth
atw
ere
rele
vant
role
-pla
yers
(p5
5)
Nˆ
nots
tate
d
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
use
(p5
5)
Can
ada
2000
32
Toas
sess
the
influ
ence
ofin
form
atio
nab
outt
hehe
alth
cons
eque
nces
ofun
empl
oym
enta
ndin
secu
rity
onp
olic
y-m
akin
g(p
5)
Stru
ctur
eds
emi-s
truct
ured
and
open
-end
edte
lep
hone
inte
rvie
ws
(pp
59
)
Pol
icy-
mak
ers
inth
ehe
alth
and
empl
oym
ents
ecto
rsof
allt
hree
leve
lsof
Can
adia
ng
over
nmen
tan
dex
ecut
ive
dire
ctor
sof
ten
Can
adia
nno
n-g
over
nmen
talo
rgan
-is
atio
ns(p
5)
Nˆ
48(p
5)
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
retro
spec
tive
usef
ulne
ssof
past
rese
arch
info
rmat
ion
abou
tthe
heal
thco
nseq
uenc
esof
unem
ploy
men
tand
inse
curit
yon
polic
y-m
akin
g(p
5)
Sta
ted
date
forw
orki
ngpa
peri
sM
arch
2000
Can
ada
2000
33To
unde
rsta
ndw
heth
er
how
and
und
erw
hat
cond
ition
she
alth
serv
ices
rese
arch
pla
ysa
role
inpr
ovin
cial
polic
y-m
akin
g(p
i)
Bot
hpe
rson
als
emi-
stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
san
dsu
rvey
s(p
p8
11)
Key
info
rman
tsw
ithin
ava
riety
ofke
yhe
alth
polic
ies
intw
oC
anad
ian
prov
ince
s(O
ntar
ioan
dS
aska
tche
wan
)(p
ii)
Nˆ
22(p
18)
Not
stat
ed
Act
uala
ndpe
rcei
ved
dec
isio
nsw
ithin
the
field
sof
heal
thse
rvic
esju
risdi
ctio
nfin
anci
alar
rang
emen
ts
pro
gram
me
deliv
ery
arra
ngem
ents
and
pro
gram
me
cont
ent
(pp
713
)
Iti
sno
tsta
ted
wha
tkin
dof
evid
ence
was
used
but
refe
renc
esto
dire
ctus
eof
evid
ence
inde
cisi
onre
ports
rep
ortin
gon
actu
alus
eof
rese
arch
im
plie
sth
atev
iden
cew
asus
ed(p
p13
18^
19)
GPs
gen
eral
pra
ctiti
oner
sM
ITM
assa
chus
etts
Inst
itute
ofTe
chno
log
yN
HS
Nat
iona
lHea
lthS
ervi
ceR
ampD
res
earc
han
dd
evel
opm
ent
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244e J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le2
Stu
dym
etho
ds
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceS
amp
lefr
ame
(SF
)aan
dsa
mp
lest
rate
gy
(SS
)b
Res
po
nse
rate
Mea
sure
men
tofu
seo
fev
iden
ceM
easu
rem
ento
fd
eter
min
ants
ofu
seS
um
mar
yo
fdes
crip
tio
no
fmet
ho
ds
(co
mp
lete
par
tial
or
no
tad
equa
tely
des
crib
ed)a
nd
com
men
ts
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Aqu
antit
ativ
e4-
poi
ntsc
ore
wei
ghte
dac
cord
ing
toth
ree
deci
sion
leve
lsw
ithsu
mm
edsc
ore
rang
ing
from
0to
18(p
51)
Two-
way
AN
OV
A(p
66)
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
USA
1973
8SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
No
stat
istic
alte
chni
que
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
USA
1973
^197
49
and
USA
1973
^19
7410
(pv
ii)
SFp
artia
l(p
viii)
SSn
otm
entio
ned
partl
ysn
owb
alle
d(p
viii
)
95
(p2
4)B
oth
quan
titat
ivel
yra
ted
and
wei
ght
ed(p
p25
28
333
536
)and
qua
litat
ivel
yde
scrib
ed(p
p1^
4)D
escr
iptiv
elis
ting
ofra
tings
(pp
28
333
536
)and
MC
A(m
ultiv
aria
tere
gre
ssio
n)an
alys
is(p
27)
Parti
alIt
isst
ated
that
`this
repo
rtre
pre
sent
only
afir
stsu
mm
ary
ofso
me
ofth
ehi
ghlig
hts
and
mor
eim
por
tant
findi
ngsrsquo
(pv
i)S
ubse
quen
trep
orts
not
foun
d
USA
1977
11
SFp
artia
l(p
143)
SSs
now
bal
led
partl
yra
ndom
(p1
43)
Not
stat
edD
escr
iptiv
eN
ost
atis
tical
tech
niqu
ePa
rtial
The
inte
rvie
ws
appe
arto
have
bee
nm
ade
betw
een
1973
and
1976
USA
1980
2an
dU
SA19
8012
SFp
artia
l(p
167)
SSn
otst
ated
90
(p1
67)
Bot
hqu
antit
ativ
ede
scrip
tions
rat
edan
dw
eig
hted
and
qual
itativ
e(p
p16
9ff
303)
Des
crip
tive
listin
gof
ratin
gs(p
p1
70^1
72
174)
and
25va
riabl
esan
alys
edus
ing
fact
oran
alys
isto
dev
elop
five
dim
ensi
ons
(p
304
)
Parti
alB
oth
a4-
poin
t(p
168
)and
a5-
poi
ntw
eigh
ted
ratin
gsc
ale
(pp
173
303)
The
qual
itativ
era
ting
com
esfro
mlis
ting
ofm
ostm
entio
ned
char
acte
ristic
sof
usef
ulne
ss
The
five
dim
ensi
ons
are
liste
din
Tabl
e3
und
erfa
cilit
ator
s
USA
1982
13SF
Par
tial
(pp
187
^188
)SS
ran
dom
sam
ple
(pp
187
^188
)
Volu
ntee
red
(p1
88)
Qua
ntita
tive
listin
gof
the
deci
sion
qua
lity
ofev
iden
ce^
use
onsi
xdi
ffere
ntle
vels
ofco
mpl
exity
(pp
195^
208)
List
ing
offre
quen
cies
(pp
196
^198
)Pa
rtial
The
132
dec
isio
n-m
aker
sw
ere
rand
omly
dist
ribut
edto
two
of50
case
stud
ies
and
six
diff
eren
tlev
els
(p1
94)
USA
1983
14SF
not
stat
ed(p
79)
SS
not
stat
ed(p
79)
65
(p7
9)Q
uant
itativ
elis
ting
and
ratin
gs(p
p8
2^86
)Fr
eque
ncie
san
dra
ted
impo
rtanc
e(a
sve
ry
mod
erat
ely
orno
tim
porta
nt)(
p8
2)
SF
and
SSco
mpl
ete
ifth
est
udyrsquo
sfo
cus
cons
ider
edon
lydi
rect
ors
inFl
orid
aan
dN
orth
Car
olin
aan
dif
ther
ew
ere
only
one
dire
ctor
inea
chC
omm
unity
Men
talH
ealth
Cen
ter
Swed
en19
84^
1985
15SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
p14
6^15
0)Li
stin
gof
frequ
enci
es(p
p1
451
49)
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edTh
eau
thor
sm
ainl
yd
iscu
ssan
dde
mon
stra
ted
iffer
entw
ays
ofut
ilisi
ngre
sear
cha
sei
ther
ins
trum
enta
lpo
litic
alc
onfli
cte
nlig
hten
men
tin
tera
ctiv
eor
tact
ical
(p1
44)
`
usin
gre
sear
ch`in
stru
men
tally
rsquorsquoor
for
`enl
ight
enm
entrsquorsquo
purp
oses
mea
ntdi
ffere
ntth
ings
indi
ffere
ntse
tting
san
ddi
ffere
ntor
gani
zatio
nalp
ositi
onsrsquo
(p1
45)
USA
1990
16SF
par
tial(
p11
0)SS
com
ple
te
(p1
10)
100
(p1
10)
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
112
)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Com
ple
tere
fers
toth
e27
rep
rese
ntat
ives
inth
etw
opl
anni
ngco
mm
ittee
sin
the
two
com
mun
ities
No
furth
erge
nera
lisat
ion
can
be
mad
eon
the
basi
sof
this
sam
ple
USA
1991
17SF
com
plet
e(p
p5
13^5
14)
SSr
ando
msa
mp
le(p
513
)
60
(p5
14)
Qua
ntita
tivel
yde
scrip
tive
rate
dan
dw
eig
hted
(p
p51
9^52
2)D
escr
iptiv
elis
ting
ofw
eigh
ted
ratin
gs(p
p5
17^5
23)a
ndm
ultip
lere
gre
ssio
n(p
p5
185
23^5
27)
Com
ple
te
Wei
ghte
don
3-p
oint
and
5-p
oint
scal
es
UK
1991
18SF
com
plet
e(p
51)
SSr
ando
msa
mp
le(p
51)
73
(p5
1)Q
uant
itativ
era
ted
desc
riptio
ns(p
p51
^54)
Per
cent
ages
(pp
51^5
4)C
omp
lete
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244f J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le2
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceS
amp
lefr
ame
(SF
)aan
dsa
mp
lest
rate
gy
(SS
)b
Res
po
nse
rate
Mea
sure
men
tofu
seo
fev
iden
ceM
easu
rem
ento
fd
eter
min
ants
ofu
seS
um
mar
yo
fdes
crip
tio
no
fmet
ho
ds
(co
mp
lete
par
tial
or
no
tad
equa
tely
des
crib
ed)a
nd
com
men
ts
USA
1993
^199
419SF
par
tial(
p15
)SS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(i
esu
bjec
tive
view
onke
yva
riabl
esof
pol
icy
chan
gea
nym
entio
nno
rank
ing)
(p1
6)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edO
nly
Med
icai
dp
rog
ram
mes
with
spec
ific
cost
-con
tain
men
tpol
icie
sin
the
last
seve
raly
ears
(p2
9)U
K19
94^1
99520
21
SFp
artia
l(pp
461
46
5)SS
sno
wb
alle
d(p
p4
614
65)
100
(all
thos
eap
proa
ched
fori
nter
view
agre
edto
the
inte
rvie
w)
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
31f
f)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Mex
ico
1994
^199
522SF
not
stat
ed
SSn
otst
ated
N
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(i
esu
bjec
tive
view
onke
yva
riabl
es)(
pp
104
106^
108)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edP
urpo
sive
sam
ple
(per
sona
lcom
mun
icat
ions
)A
ustra
lia19
9523
SFp
artia
lSS
not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edQ
uant
itativ
ean
dd
escr
iptiv
e(p
p1
05^1
08)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edC
alle
d`p
urpo
sive
sam
plin
gfra
mersquo
(p1
04)
USA
1996
24an
dU
SA19
9725
SFp
artia
l(pp
16
30^3
1)SS
com
bin
edra
ndom
and
snow
-ba
lled
(pp
30^3
1)
Not
stat
edQ
uant
itativ
ere
gres
sion
and
apa
thm
odel
(p1
8)Q
uant
itativ
ere
gres
sion
and
apa
thm
odel
(p1
8)Pa
rtial
but
with
ago
odde
scrip
tion
ofSS
and
SF
Paki
stan
1998
26SF
par
tial(
p77
)SS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
(pp
788
082
)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
UK
1998
27SF
par
tial(
pp1
^2)
SSn
otst
ated
(pp
1^2
)
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(ie
subj
ectiv
evi
ewon
awar
enes
sge
nera
lper
cept
ions
and
impa
ct)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
UK
and
USA
1998
28SF
par
tial(
p4)
SSn
otst
ated
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(pp
12^2
2)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Can
ada
1998
^199
929SF
par
tial(
p16
)SS
not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ede
scrip
tions
and
quan
titat
ive
listin
gs(p
p18
^30
32^3
4)Q
ualit
ativ
ePa
rtial
Aqu
alita
tive
valid
atio
nof
the
inte
rvie
ws
isd
escr
ibed
(pp
16^1
7)B
urki
naFa
so19
9930
SFn
otst
ated
SSn
otst
ated
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(p2
2)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
Can
ada
2000
32SF
par
tial
SSn
otst
ated
42
(p
23)
Bot
hqu
antit
ativ
ean
dqu
alita
tive
des
crip
tions
ofba
rrie
rs(p
p11
^14
26)
Freq
uenc
ies
(p2
6)Pa
rtial
Cal
led
`apu
rpos
ive
sam
ple
ofC
anad
ian
polic
y-m
aker
srsquo(p
8)
Can
ada
2000
33SF
not
stat
edSS
sno
wb
alle
d(p
ii)
88
(22
25)
(p1
8)B
oth
quan
titat
ive
and
qual
itativ
ed
escr
iptio
nsof
faci
litat
ors
(pp
ii
i35
^37)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
a Sam
ple
fram
ec
omp
lete
ˆth
esa
mp
lew
asd
escr
ibed
inre
latio
nto
allt
hed
ecis
ion
-mak
ers
inth
eco
ntex
toft
hest
udy
par
tialˆ
inco
mp
lete
info
rmat
ion
not
stat
edˆ
nod
escr
iptio
nb S
amp
lest
rate
gy
com
ple
tesa
mp
ler
and
omsa
mp
les
now
bal
led
sam
ple
orn
otst
ated
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244g J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
Mai
nre
sults
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p5
4)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
60)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
54)
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
65)
USA
1973
8Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p1
41)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
142
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
143
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
43)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p14
114
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(pp
142
145)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p1
43)
USA
1973
^197
49an
dU
SA
1973
^197
410
(pv
ii)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
333
6)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
33)
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p3
3)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)
USA
1977
11Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
155
158)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p1
45)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p14
915
2)P
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p15
9^16
0)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
155
158)
USA
1980
2an
dU
SA19
8012
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
stTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sM
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
USA
1982
13N
one
ofth
efa
cilit
ator
sw
ere
men
tione
din
the
othe
rstu
dies
Non
eof
the
bar
riers
wer
em
entio
ned
inth
eot
hers
tud
ies
USA
1983
14C
omm
unity
pres
sure
orcl
ient
dem
and
forr
esea
rch
(pp
82
84)
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
82)
Not
stat
ed
Swed
en19
84^1
98515
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
p14
614
9)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
148
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
149
)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
150
)
USA
1990
16R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
114
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
18)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p11
111
5)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(pp
119
^122
)U
SA19
9117
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p5
19)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(pp
519
520)
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
19)
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
519
)U
K19
9118
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
5)N
otst
ated
USA
1993
^199
419G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
27)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p2
7)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
9)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
chA
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
13^1
427
)
UK
1994
^199
5202
1Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
32^3
4)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
p32
^34)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
pp
31^3
2)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(p3
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p3
3)M
exic
o19
94^1
99522
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
sTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
nsR
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
hIn
clus
ion
ofef
fect
iven
ess
data
(pp
106^
108
109^
113)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p10
7^11
1)
USA
1996
24Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
1)A
ustra
lia19
9523
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
107
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
108
)G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
108
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
108
)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
106
)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p1
06)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
106
)
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244h J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
Paki
stan
1998
26N
otst
ated
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p78
82)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
80)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p80
82)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
80)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p8
2)U
K19
9827
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p8
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
13)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p8
12)
UK
and
USA
1998
28Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
p3
17^2
1)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p5
12^1
7)
Can
ada
1998
^199
929Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p3
2)P
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p33
^34)
Bur
kina
Faso
1999
30N
otst
ated
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p2
1)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
23)
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
62)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p6
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
63)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
61)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
61)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p6
1)C
anad
a20
0032
Not
stat
edP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
26)
Can
ada
2000
33Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pi
)N
otst
ated
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244b J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
USA
1982
13
Toob
serv
eth
eim
pac
ttha
tde
cisi
onco
mp
lexi
tya
ndam
ount
ofin
form
atio
nav
aila
ble
had
onth
eq
ualit
yof
the
deci
sion
proc
ess
(p1
87)
Stru
ctur
eds
emi-s
truct
ured
and
open
-end
edqu
estio
n-na
ires
com
bine
dw
itha
cont
rolle
dex
perim
ent
Con
seq
uenc
esof
com
plex
ityw
ere
exam
ined
byef
fect
sof
info
rmat
ion
load
and
num
bero
fde
cisi
onal
tern
ativ
es(p
p1
871
931
94)
Exp
erie
nced
pub
lican
dp
rivat
ese
ctor
man
ager
sfro
msi
xm
id-c
aree
rp
rog
ram
mes
atH
arva
rd
MIT
Sta
nfor
dan
dth
eW
ashi
ngto
nP
ublic
Affa
irsC
ente
r(pp
187
188
)N
ˆ13
2(p
188
)
Each
dec
isio
n-m
aker
rece
ived
alo
ngm
emor
and
umde
scrib
ing
apr
oble
mp
rese
ntin
gev
iden
ceus
eful
inan
alys
ing
the
prob
lem
and
pose
da
dec
isio
nto
bem
ade
base
don
real
peo
ple
and
even
ts(p
188
)
Two
hypo
thet
ical
dec
isio
ns
one
onth
est
atersquo
sD
epar
t-m
ento
fHea
lthan
dR
ehab
i-lit
ativ
ese
rvic
esan
don
eon
am
etha
done
mai
nten
ance
pro
gram
me
inN
ewYo
rkC
ity(p
p1
88^1
89)
Dec
isio
nha
dto
bem
ade
from
avai
labl
ein
form
atio
nw
ithin
1ho
ur45
min
utes
(p1
93)
Rep
rinte
dfro
mth
eJo
urna
lof
Pol
icy
Ana
lysi
san
dM
anag
emen
t2
66^8
7(p
185
)
The
exp
erim
entw
asb
ased
onsi
xdi
ffere
ntve
rsio
nsof
each
ofth
etw
oca
ses
The
six
diff
eren
tver
sion
sof
the
case
sva
ried
inin
form
atio
nco
mpl
exity
Eac
hde
cisi
on-m
aker
had
only
one
deci
sion
tom
ake
aton
lyon
ele
velo
fcom
plex
ity(p
p18
9^19
019
3)U
SA19
83
14To
dete
rmin
eso
me
ofth
efa
ctor
sth
atin
fluen
cead
min
istra
tors
rsquouse
ofev
alua
tive
data
inde
cisi
on-
mak
ing
and
toex
amin
eth
ety
pes
ofde
cisi
ons
(p7
9)
Stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-e
nded
post
alq
uest
ionn
aire
s(p
p7
9^80
)
Dire
ctor
sin
com
mun
itym
enta
lhea
lthce
ntre
sin
Flor
ida
and
Nor
thC
arol
ina
(p7
9)N
ˆ42
Con
duct
edst
udie
son
prog
ram
me
effe
ctiv
enes
sor
imp
actd
urin
gth
ela
st12
-m
onth
per
iod
(p8
1)
Per
ceiv
ed(i
ere
por
ted
)us
e(p
p80
^81)
Swed
en19
84^1
98515
(p1
52)
Diff
eren
tway
sof
usin
gso
cial
rese
arch
in
stru
men
tal
polit
ical
co
nflic
ten
light
enm
ent
inte
ract
ive
and
tact
ical
(pp
141
143^
144)
Inte
rvie
ws
(p1
52)
Soc
ialw
orke
rs
man
agem
entd
irect
ors
loca
land
natio
nalp
oliti
cian
sin
15Sw
edis
hci
ties
and
com
mun
es(p
152
)N
ˆ90
(p1
52)
Doc
umen
tsth
atth
ere
spon
dent
sre
ferr
edto
Th
ese
docu
men
tsw
ere
also
anal
ysed
by
the
auth
ors
(p1
52)
Per
ceiv
edre
trosp
ectiv
ed
ecis
ions
(p1
52)
USA
1990
16To
dete
rmin
ew
hatt
ype
ofin
form
atio
nd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
use
and
how
ideo
log
yan
din
tere
sts
influ
ence
the
use
ofin
form
atio
n(p
109
)
Pers
onal
sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
112
)Lo
calp
lann
ing
com
mitt
ees
and
gove
rnm
ente
mp
loye
esin
two
rura
lcom
mun
ities
inth
eP
acifi
cN
orth
wes
t(p
110
)N
ˆ27
(p1
10)
Sour
ces
ofin
form
atio
nus
edin
com
mun
ityhe
alth
care
plan
ning
and
the
asse
ssm
ento
fthe
stra
tegi
cpl
anni
ngp
roce
ss(p
112
)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
112
)
USA
1991
17
Wha
tfac
tors
influ
ence
the
use
ofev
alua
tion
rese
arch
(on
heal
than
dhu
man
serv
ices
)in
cong
ress
(p5
08)
Stru
ctur
edte
lep
hone
inte
rvie
ws
(p5
13)
C
ongr
ess
mem
bers
and
thei
rsta
ff(p
512
)N
ˆ10
0Ea
chde
cisi
on-m
aker
chos
eon
est
udy
they
wer
efa
mili
arw
ith(p
515
)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
515
)E
valu
atio
nst
udie
sfro
mth
eD
epar
tmen
tofH
ealth
and
Hum
anSe
rvic
esth
atd
eal
with
natio
nalh
ealth
pro
gram
mes
(pp
507
515
)
Use
isde
fined
here
asbo
thin
stru
men
tal(
dire
ctim
ple
men
tatio
n)c
once
ptua
l(it
chan
ged
the
way
ofth
inki
ng)a
ndpe
rsua
sive
(use
dto
conv
ince
othe
rsp
516
)
The
inte
rvie
ws
last
ed15
^40
min
utes
(p5
14)
UK
1991
18U
sean
dre
ason
sfo
ruse
not
use
ofth
eE
iexclect
ive
Hea
lthC
are
Bul
letin
(pp
51^
54)
Stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-e
nded
post
alq
uest
ionn
aire
s(p
p5
0^51
)
Dis
trict
gen
eral
man
ager
sd
irect
ors
ofpu
blic
heal
than
dd
irect
ors
ofpl
anni
ng
com
mis
sion
ing
inU
Kd
istri
cthe
alth
auth
oriti
esor
com
mis
sion
ing
cons
ortia
(p5
0)N
ˆ17
2(p
51)
Eiexcle
ctiv
eH
ealth
Car
eB
ulle
tinN
o1
1991
on
scre
enin
gfo
rost
eop
oros
isto
prev
entf
ract
ures
(p5
0)
Per
ceiv
edus
eof
info
rmat
ion
and
hypo
thet
ical
dec
isio
ns
chan
geof
opin
ion
and
conf
iden
ceto
acto
nin
form
atio
nin
the
bulle
tin(p
p52
^54)
Res
pon
dent
sw
ere
que
stio
ned
abou
tabu
lletin
that
had
been
prev
ious
lypo
sted
toth
em(p
p51
52)
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244c J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
USA
1993
^199
419Th
ero
leof
rese
arch
info
rmat
ion
inp
olic
yde
velo
pmen
t(p
29)
Que
stio
nnai
res
(p1
3)
open
-end
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
4)an
dse
mi-
stru
ctur
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
4)
Key
info
rman
ts
inst
ates
that
chan
ged
cost
-sha
ring
pol
icie
sfo
rpre
scrip
tion
reim
burs
emen
tlim
itsan
dco
-pay
men
ts(p
14)
N
ˆin
adeq
uate
lyd
escr
ibed
Res
earc
hp
ublic
atio
nsan
dco
mm
ents
(p2
5)P
erce
ived
retro
spec
tive
dec
isio
ns(p
25)
Onl
y2^
3pa
ges
outo
f21
wer
ere
leva
nt(p
25f
f)I
nfor
man
tsin
clud
edM
edic
aid
drug
prog
ram
me
adm
inis
trato
rs
dire
ctor
sor
polic
yan
alys
ts
phar
mac
yco
nsul
tant
san
dle
gisl
ator
s(p
15)
UK
1994
^199
5202
1`T
oid
entif
yfa
ctor
sw
hich
faci
litat
eor
imp
ede
evid
ence
-bas
edp
olic
y-m
akin
grsquo(
p2
9)
In-d
epth
inte
rvie
ws
(usi
nga
topi
cgu
ide)
(p2
9an
dre
spon
seto
ale
tter)
Lead
polic
y-m
aker
sG
Psan
dre
sear
cher
sin
nine
diff
eren
tcas
est
udie
sat
alo
call
evel
inth
eN
HS
(pp
293
1)N
ˆ28
Soci
alre
sear
ch(p
42
inth
epr
ojec
trep
ort)
Per
ceiv
edde
cisi
ons
Polic
yon
the
inte
rface
bet
wee
nR
ampD
and
com
mis
sion
ing
atth
ehe
alth
auth
ority
leve
l(p
30)
Mex
ico
1994
^199
522`T
here
latio
nshi
pbe
twee
nhe
alth
rese
arch
(and
rese
arch
ers)
and
heal
thpo
licie
s(a
ndpo
licy-
mak
ers)
info
urve
rtica
lhe
alth
prog
ram
mes
inM
exic
orsquo(p
104
)
Ope
n-en
ded
(in-
dept
hrsquo)
inte
rvie
ws
with
aco
mm
onin
terv
iew
prot
ocol
(p1
06)
`Res
earc
hers
and
polic
y-m
aker
sfro
mdi
ffere
ntin
stitu
tions
and
leve
lsof
resp
onsi
bilit
yrsquo(p
103
)N
ˆ67
Use
ofre
sear
chpu
blic
atio
ns`w
here
we
knew
that
ther
ew
asat
leas
tso
me
inte
ract
ion
bet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dde
cisi
on-
mak
ersrsquo
(p1
05)
Per
ceiv
ed
use
ofev
iden
ceco
ncer
ning
AID
Sch
oler
afa
mily
pla
nnin
gan
dim
mun
isat
ion
ing
over
nmen
talp
rogr
amm
es(p
103
)
Per
sona
lcom
mun
icat
ion
gav
ead
ditio
nali
nfor
mat
ion
onth
isis
sue
It
isd
iffic
ultt
od
isce
rnw
heth
erth
ede
cisi
ons
wer
ep
erce
ived
orhy
pot
hetic
als
ince
ther
ear
eno
actu
alde
cisi
ons
men
tione
d
Aus
tralia
1995
23
Dec
isio
n-m
aker
srsquoaw
aren
ess
and
use
ofec
onom
icev
alua
tions
inhe
alth
care
(p1
03)
Inte
rvie
ws
open
-end
edan
dst
ruct
ured
(not
stat
edif
post
alt
elep
hone
orfa
ce-to
-fa
ce)(
p10
5)
Sen
iorm
anag
ers
inth
eFe
der
alD
epar
tmen
tof
Hea
lthH
ousi
ngan
dC
omm
unity
Serv
ices
New
Sou
thW
ales
Stat
eth
eH
ealth
Dep
artm
ent(
p10
4)
Nˆ
34(p
105
)
Use
ofec
onom
icev
alua
tions
forp
ricin
gon
drug
ssc
reen
ing
radi
olog
ytra
nspl
ants
and
scan
ning
(p1
05)
`Per
ceiv
edus
eof
econ
omic
eval
uatio
nsrsquo(
p1
04)
USA
1996
24
and
USA
1997
25
Tode
term
ine
whe
ther
the
proc
ess
of(s
ocia
lsci
ence
)in
form
atio
nut
ilisa
tion
varie
sac
ross
diff
eren
tare
as(i
ese
rvic
epr
ovis
ion
and
finan
cing
)(pp
16^
17)
Stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
16)
Fe
der
als
tate
and
loca
lp
olic
y-m
aker
sat
diff
eren
tle
vels
deal
ing
with
finan
cean
dse
rvic
es(p
16)
N
ˆ47
9(p
16)
No
spec
ific
repo
rtb
utin
foty
persquor
efer
topr
ogra
mm
eev
alua
tion
dem
onst
ratio
np
roje
ct
stat
istic
ald
ata
and
polic
yan
alys
is(p
34)
Per
ceiv
edre
trosp
ectiv
ed
ecis
ions
(p1
7)O
pen-
ende
din
terv
iew
sw
ere
used
toob
tain
basi
cb
ackg
roun
din
form
atio
nab
outt
hep
olic
ypr
oces
sTh
est
ruct
ured
inte
rvie
ws
built
onth
eop
en-e
nded
inte
rvie
ws
(p3
3)Pa
kist
an19
9826
The
role
that
rese
arch
pla
ysin
expe
rienc
esin
linki
ngre
sear
chw
ithp
olic
y(p
77)
Ope
n-en
ded
in-d
epth
inte
rvie
ws
(p7
7)D
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
from
gov
ernm
ent
the
cent
ral
min
istry
ofhe
alth
the
pla
nnin
gco
mm
issi
onan
dp
rovi
ncia
lhea
lthau
thor
ities
(p7
7)N
ˆ16
(p7
7)
Not
stat
edG
ener
alpe
rcep
tions
C
lose
stfo
cus
onch
ildhe
alth
prob
lem
ssu
chas
co-tr
imox
azol
em
ater
nal
mor
talit
yvi
tam
inA
b
reas
tfeed
ing
and
pol
io(p
p77
79)
UK
1998
27
The
imp
actt
hatt
heE
iexclect
ive
Hea
lthca
reB
ulle
tinha
sin
side
the
NH
Sor
gan
isat
ion
(p1
)
Tele
phon
ein
terv
iew
sst
ruct
ure
notm
entio
ned
(p1
)
Hea
lthau
thor
ities
(p
2)
Nˆ
34Tw
osp
ecifi
cbu
lletin
sJu
ne19
97an
dO
ctob
er19
97(p
1)
Hyp
othe
tical
deci
sion
s(e
g
itin
fluen
ced
the
dev
elop
men
tofo
urpo
licy
alth
oug
hth
isha
sbe
eng
oing
onfo
rsom
etim
ersquo)
(p1
0)
The
date
isno
tcle
arly
stat
edb
utit
is19
98or
1999
Tr
usts
and
GPs
are
incl
uded
inth
est
udy
buta
reno
trel
evan
tin
this
revi
ew
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244d J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
UK
and
USA
1998
28
H
owU
Kan
dU
Sp
urch
aser
sva
lue
and
use
rese
arch
asse
ssin
ghe
alth
tech
nolo
gy
and
clin
ical
effe
ctiv
enes
s(p
pv
1)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p4
)U
K1
4no
n-m
edic
alhe
alth
auth
ority
pur
chas
ers
seve
np
ublic
heal
thp
hysi
cian
sni
neG
PsU
SA1
3p
ublic
offic
ials
from
11st
ates
nin
ep
rivat
ese
ctor
purc
hase
rs
thre
eco
nsul
tant
sN
ˆ55
(p4
)
Acc
ess
toan
dus
eof
heal
thte
chno
logy
asse
ssm
ent
clin
ical
effe
ctiv
enes
sin
form
atio
n(p
p4
11)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
1)
Sta
ted
1999
(p3
)
Can
ada
1998
^199
929A
case
stud
yof
cros
s-se
ctor
alre
sour
ceal
loca
tion
inth
ehu
man
serv
ices
syst
emin
Prin
ceE
dwar
dIs
land
(p4
)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-
ende
din
terv
iew
san
dfo
cus
grou
ps(p
p13
^16
App
endi
x1)
Key
info
rman
tsho
ldin
gd
iffer
entp
ositi
ons
with
inth
efiv
ehe
alth
regi
ons
the
Dep
artm
ento
fSoc
ial
Ser
vice
san
dva
rious
sect
ors
(p4
)al
lreg
ions
all
sect
ors
and
man
agem
ent
leve
ls(p
13)
Nˆ
58(p
9)
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
deci
sion
son
cros
s-se
ctor
alre
sour
ceal
loca
tions
(p5
)
Bur
kina
Faso
1999
30A
case
stud
yon
how
rese
arch
pla
yed
aro
lein
deci
sion
-mak
ing
abou
t`S
hare
dC
arersquo
fo
rch
ildho
odill
ness
(pp
19^
20)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
20)
Min
istry
ofH
ealth
offic
ials
(p2
2)N
ˆno
tgiv
enW
orks
hops
and
rese
arch
pape
rsth
atth
eau
thor
sha
dpr
ovid
edM
inis
tryof
Hea
lthof
ficia
lsw
ithd
urin
gpr
evio
usye
ars
(p2
1)
Per
ceiv
edus
eof
the
pro
vide
dsc
ient
ific
info
rmat
ion
inde
cisi
on-
mak
ing
(p2
0)
`Sha
red
care
rsquois
abou
tim
prov
edco
ntac
tand
colla
bora
tion
bet
wee
nhe
alth
cent
rest
affa
ndm
othe
rs(p
20)
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31B
arrie
rsag
ains
tand
mec
hani
sms
fori
mpr
ovin
gth
evi
tam
inA
rese
arch
^po
licy^
actio
nco
nnec
tion
(p5
5)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
55)
Key
info
rman
tsth
atw
ere
rele
vant
role
-pla
yers
(p5
5)
Nˆ
nots
tate
d
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
use
(p5
5)
Can
ada
2000
32
Toas
sess
the
influ
ence
ofin
form
atio
nab
outt
hehe
alth
cons
eque
nces
ofun
empl
oym
enta
ndin
secu
rity
onp
olic
y-m
akin
g(p
5)
Stru
ctur
eds
emi-s
truct
ured
and
open
-end
edte
lep
hone
inte
rvie
ws
(pp
59
)
Pol
icy-
mak
ers
inth
ehe
alth
and
empl
oym
ents
ecto
rsof
allt
hree
leve
lsof
Can
adia
ng
over
nmen
tan
dex
ecut
ive
dire
ctor
sof
ten
Can
adia
nno
n-g
over
nmen
talo
rgan
-is
atio
ns(p
5)
Nˆ
48(p
5)
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
retro
spec
tive
usef
ulne
ssof
past
rese
arch
info
rmat
ion
abou
tthe
heal
thco
nseq
uenc
esof
unem
ploy
men
tand
inse
curit
yon
polic
y-m
akin
g(p
5)
Sta
ted
date
forw
orki
ngpa
peri
sM
arch
2000
Can
ada
2000
33To
unde
rsta
ndw
heth
er
how
and
und
erw
hat
cond
ition
she
alth
serv
ices
rese
arch
pla
ysa
role
inpr
ovin
cial
polic
y-m
akin
g(p
i)
Bot
hpe
rson
als
emi-
stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
san
dsu
rvey
s(p
p8
11)
Key
info
rman
tsw
ithin
ava
riety
ofke
yhe
alth
polic
ies
intw
oC
anad
ian
prov
ince
s(O
ntar
ioan
dS
aska
tche
wan
)(p
ii)
Nˆ
22(p
18)
Not
stat
ed
Act
uala
ndpe
rcei
ved
dec
isio
nsw
ithin
the
field
sof
heal
thse
rvic
esju
risdi
ctio
nfin
anci
alar
rang
emen
ts
pro
gram
me
deliv
ery
arra
ngem
ents
and
pro
gram
me
cont
ent
(pp
713
)
Iti
sno
tsta
ted
wha
tkin
dof
evid
ence
was
used
but
refe
renc
esto
dire
ctus
eof
evid
ence
inde
cisi
onre
ports
rep
ortin
gon
actu
alus
eof
rese
arch
im
plie
sth
atev
iden
cew
asus
ed(p
p13
18^
19)
GPs
gen
eral
pra
ctiti
oner
sM
ITM
assa
chus
etts
Inst
itute
ofTe
chno
log
yN
HS
Nat
iona
lHea
lthS
ervi
ceR
ampD
res
earc
han
dd
evel
opm
ent
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244e J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le2
Stu
dym
etho
ds
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceS
amp
lefr
ame
(SF
)aan
dsa
mp
lest
rate
gy
(SS
)b
Res
po
nse
rate
Mea
sure
men
tofu
seo
fev
iden
ceM
easu
rem
ento
fd
eter
min
ants
ofu
seS
um
mar
yo
fdes
crip
tio
no
fmet
ho
ds
(co
mp
lete
par
tial
or
no
tad
equa
tely
des
crib
ed)a
nd
com
men
ts
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Aqu
antit
ativ
e4-
poi
ntsc
ore
wei
ghte
dac
cord
ing
toth
ree
deci
sion
leve
lsw
ithsu
mm
edsc
ore
rang
ing
from
0to
18(p
51)
Two-
way
AN
OV
A(p
66)
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
USA
1973
8SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
No
stat
istic
alte
chni
que
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
USA
1973
^197
49
and
USA
1973
^19
7410
(pv
ii)
SFp
artia
l(p
viii)
SSn
otm
entio
ned
partl
ysn
owb
alle
d(p
viii
)
95
(p2
4)B
oth
quan
titat
ivel
yra
ted
and
wei
ght
ed(p
p25
28
333
536
)and
qua
litat
ivel
yde
scrib
ed(p
p1^
4)D
escr
iptiv
elis
ting
ofra
tings
(pp
28
333
536
)and
MC
A(m
ultiv
aria
tere
gre
ssio
n)an
alys
is(p
27)
Parti
alIt
isst
ated
that
`this
repo
rtre
pre
sent
only
afir
stsu
mm
ary
ofso
me
ofth
ehi
ghlig
hts
and
mor
eim
por
tant
findi
ngsrsquo
(pv
i)S
ubse
quen
trep
orts
not
foun
d
USA
1977
11
SFp
artia
l(p
143)
SSs
now
bal
led
partl
yra
ndom
(p1
43)
Not
stat
edD
escr
iptiv
eN
ost
atis
tical
tech
niqu
ePa
rtial
The
inte
rvie
ws
appe
arto
have
bee
nm
ade
betw
een
1973
and
1976
USA
1980
2an
dU
SA19
8012
SFp
artia
l(p
167)
SSn
otst
ated
90
(p1
67)
Bot
hqu
antit
ativ
ede
scrip
tions
rat
edan
dw
eig
hted
and
qual
itativ
e(p
p16
9ff
303)
Des
crip
tive
listin
gof
ratin
gs(p
p1
70^1
72
174)
and
25va
riabl
esan
alys
edus
ing
fact
oran
alys
isto
dev
elop
five
dim
ensi
ons
(p
304
)
Parti
alB
oth
a4-
poin
t(p
168
)and
a5-
poi
ntw
eigh
ted
ratin
gsc
ale
(pp
173
303)
The
qual
itativ
era
ting
com
esfro
mlis
ting
ofm
ostm
entio
ned
char
acte
ristic
sof
usef
ulne
ss
The
five
dim
ensi
ons
are
liste
din
Tabl
e3
und
erfa
cilit
ator
s
USA
1982
13SF
Par
tial
(pp
187
^188
)SS
ran
dom
sam
ple
(pp
187
^188
)
Volu
ntee
red
(p1
88)
Qua
ntita
tive
listin
gof
the
deci
sion
qua
lity
ofev
iden
ce^
use
onsi
xdi
ffere
ntle
vels
ofco
mpl
exity
(pp
195^
208)
List
ing
offre
quen
cies
(pp
196
^198
)Pa
rtial
The
132
dec
isio
n-m
aker
sw
ere
rand
omly
dist
ribut
edto
two
of50
case
stud
ies
and
six
diff
eren
tlev
els
(p1
94)
USA
1983
14SF
not
stat
ed(p
79)
SS
not
stat
ed(p
79)
65
(p7
9)Q
uant
itativ
elis
ting
and
ratin
gs(p
p8
2^86
)Fr
eque
ncie
san
dra
ted
impo
rtanc
e(a
sve
ry
mod
erat
ely
orno
tim
porta
nt)(
p8
2)
SF
and
SSco
mpl
ete
ifth
est
udyrsquo
sfo
cus
cons
ider
edon
lydi
rect
ors
inFl
orid
aan
dN
orth
Car
olin
aan
dif
ther
ew
ere
only
one
dire
ctor
inea
chC
omm
unity
Men
talH
ealth
Cen
ter
Swed
en19
84^
1985
15SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
p14
6^15
0)Li
stin
gof
frequ
enci
es(p
p1
451
49)
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edTh
eau
thor
sm
ainl
yd
iscu
ssan
dde
mon
stra
ted
iffer
entw
ays
ofut
ilisi
ngre
sear
cha
sei
ther
ins
trum
enta
lpo
litic
alc
onfli
cte
nlig
hten
men
tin
tera
ctiv
eor
tact
ical
(p1
44)
`
usin
gre
sear
ch`in
stru
men
tally
rsquorsquoor
for
`enl
ight
enm
entrsquorsquo
purp
oses
mea
ntdi
ffere
ntth
ings
indi
ffere
ntse
tting
san
ddi
ffere
ntor
gani
zatio
nalp
ositi
onsrsquo
(p1
45)
USA
1990
16SF
par
tial(
p11
0)SS
com
ple
te
(p1
10)
100
(p1
10)
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
112
)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Com
ple
tere
fers
toth
e27
rep
rese
ntat
ives
inth
etw
opl
anni
ngco
mm
ittee
sin
the
two
com
mun
ities
No
furth
erge
nera
lisat
ion
can
be
mad
eon
the
basi
sof
this
sam
ple
USA
1991
17SF
com
plet
e(p
p5
13^5
14)
SSr
ando
msa
mp
le(p
513
)
60
(p5
14)
Qua
ntita
tivel
yde
scrip
tive
rate
dan
dw
eig
hted
(p
p51
9^52
2)D
escr
iptiv
elis
ting
ofw
eigh
ted
ratin
gs(p
p5
17^5
23)a
ndm
ultip
lere
gre
ssio
n(p
p5
185
23^5
27)
Com
ple
te
Wei
ghte
don
3-p
oint
and
5-p
oint
scal
es
UK
1991
18SF
com
plet
e(p
51)
SSr
ando
msa
mp
le(p
51)
73
(p5
1)Q
uant
itativ
era
ted
desc
riptio
ns(p
p51
^54)
Per
cent
ages
(pp
51^5
4)C
omp
lete
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244f J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le2
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceS
amp
lefr
ame
(SF
)aan
dsa
mp
lest
rate
gy
(SS
)b
Res
po
nse
rate
Mea
sure
men
tofu
seo
fev
iden
ceM
easu
rem
ento
fd
eter
min
ants
ofu
seS
um
mar
yo
fdes
crip
tio
no
fmet
ho
ds
(co
mp
lete
par
tial
or
no
tad
equa
tely
des
crib
ed)a
nd
com
men
ts
USA
1993
^199
419SF
par
tial(
p15
)SS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(i
esu
bjec
tive
view
onke
yva
riabl
esof
pol
icy
chan
gea
nym
entio
nno
rank
ing)
(p1
6)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edO
nly
Med
icai
dp
rog
ram
mes
with
spec
ific
cost
-con
tain
men
tpol
icie
sin
the
last
seve
raly
ears
(p2
9)U
K19
94^1
99520
21
SFp
artia
l(pp
461
46
5)SS
sno
wb
alle
d(p
p4
614
65)
100
(all
thos
eap
proa
ched
fori
nter
view
agre
edto
the
inte
rvie
w)
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
31f
f)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Mex
ico
1994
^199
522SF
not
stat
ed
SSn
otst
ated
N
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(i
esu
bjec
tive
view
onke
yva
riabl
es)(
pp
104
106^
108)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edP
urpo
sive
sam
ple
(per
sona
lcom
mun
icat
ions
)A
ustra
lia19
9523
SFp
artia
lSS
not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edQ
uant
itativ
ean
dd
escr
iptiv
e(p
p1
05^1
08)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edC
alle
d`p
urpo
sive
sam
plin
gfra
mersquo
(p1
04)
USA
1996
24an
dU
SA19
9725
SFp
artia
l(pp
16
30^3
1)SS
com
bin
edra
ndom
and
snow
-ba
lled
(pp
30^3
1)
Not
stat
edQ
uant
itativ
ere
gres
sion
and
apa
thm
odel
(p1
8)Q
uant
itativ
ere
gres
sion
and
apa
thm
odel
(p1
8)Pa
rtial
but
with
ago
odde
scrip
tion
ofSS
and
SF
Paki
stan
1998
26SF
par
tial(
p77
)SS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
(pp
788
082
)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
UK
1998
27SF
par
tial(
pp1
^2)
SSn
otst
ated
(pp
1^2
)
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(ie
subj
ectiv
evi
ewon
awar
enes
sge
nera
lper
cept
ions
and
impa
ct)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
UK
and
USA
1998
28SF
par
tial(
p4)
SSn
otst
ated
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(pp
12^2
2)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Can
ada
1998
^199
929SF
par
tial(
p16
)SS
not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ede
scrip
tions
and
quan
titat
ive
listin
gs(p
p18
^30
32^3
4)Q
ualit
ativ
ePa
rtial
Aqu
alita
tive
valid
atio
nof
the
inte
rvie
ws
isd
escr
ibed
(pp
16^1
7)B
urki
naFa
so19
9930
SFn
otst
ated
SSn
otst
ated
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(p2
2)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
Can
ada
2000
32SF
par
tial
SSn
otst
ated
42
(p
23)
Bot
hqu
antit
ativ
ean
dqu
alita
tive
des
crip
tions
ofba
rrie
rs(p
p11
^14
26)
Freq
uenc
ies
(p2
6)Pa
rtial
Cal
led
`apu
rpos
ive
sam
ple
ofC
anad
ian
polic
y-m
aker
srsquo(p
8)
Can
ada
2000
33SF
not
stat
edSS
sno
wb
alle
d(p
ii)
88
(22
25)
(p1
8)B
oth
quan
titat
ive
and
qual
itativ
ed
escr
iptio
nsof
faci
litat
ors
(pp
ii
i35
^37)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
a Sam
ple
fram
ec
omp
lete
ˆth
esa
mp
lew
asd
escr
ibed
inre
latio
nto
allt
hed
ecis
ion
-mak
ers
inth
eco
ntex
toft
hest
udy
par
tialˆ
inco
mp
lete
info
rmat
ion
not
stat
edˆ
nod
escr
iptio
nb S
amp
lest
rate
gy
com
ple
tesa
mp
ler
and
omsa
mp
les
now
bal
led
sam
ple
orn
otst
ated
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244g J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
Mai
nre
sults
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p5
4)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
60)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
54)
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
65)
USA
1973
8Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p1
41)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
142
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
143
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
43)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p14
114
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(pp
142
145)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p1
43)
USA
1973
^197
49an
dU
SA
1973
^197
410
(pv
ii)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
333
6)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
33)
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p3
3)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)
USA
1977
11Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
155
158)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p1
45)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p14
915
2)P
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p15
9^16
0)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
155
158)
USA
1980
2an
dU
SA19
8012
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
stTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sM
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
USA
1982
13N
one
ofth
efa
cilit
ator
sw
ere
men
tione
din
the
othe
rstu
dies
Non
eof
the
bar
riers
wer
em
entio
ned
inth
eot
hers
tud
ies
USA
1983
14C
omm
unity
pres
sure
orcl
ient
dem
and
forr
esea
rch
(pp
82
84)
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
82)
Not
stat
ed
Swed
en19
84^1
98515
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
p14
614
9)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
148
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
149
)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
150
)
USA
1990
16R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
114
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
18)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p11
111
5)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(pp
119
^122
)U
SA19
9117
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p5
19)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(pp
519
520)
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
19)
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
519
)U
K19
9118
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
5)N
otst
ated
USA
1993
^199
419G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
27)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p2
7)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
9)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
chA
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
13^1
427
)
UK
1994
^199
5202
1Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
32^3
4)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
p32
^34)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
pp
31^3
2)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(p3
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p3
3)M
exic
o19
94^1
99522
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
sTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
nsR
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
hIn
clus
ion
ofef
fect
iven
ess
data
(pp
106^
108
109^
113)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p10
7^11
1)
USA
1996
24Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
1)A
ustra
lia19
9523
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
107
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
108
)G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
108
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
108
)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
106
)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p1
06)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
106
)
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244h J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
Paki
stan
1998
26N
otst
ated
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p78
82)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
80)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p80
82)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
80)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p8
2)U
K19
9827
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p8
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
13)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p8
12)
UK
and
USA
1998
28Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
p3
17^2
1)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p5
12^1
7)
Can
ada
1998
^199
929Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p3
2)P
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p33
^34)
Bur
kina
Faso
1999
30N
otst
ated
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p2
1)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
23)
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
62)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p6
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
63)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
61)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
61)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p6
1)C
anad
a20
0032
Not
stat
edP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
26)
Can
ada
2000
33Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pi
)N
otst
ated
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244c J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
USA
1993
^199
419Th
ero
leof
rese
arch
info
rmat
ion
inp
olic
yde
velo
pmen
t(p
29)
Que
stio
nnai
res
(p1
3)
open
-end
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
4)an
dse
mi-
stru
ctur
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p1
4)
Key
info
rman
ts
inst
ates
that
chan
ged
cost
-sha
ring
pol
icie
sfo
rpre
scrip
tion
reim
burs
emen
tlim
itsan
dco
-pay
men
ts(p
14)
N
ˆin
adeq
uate
lyd
escr
ibed
Res
earc
hp
ublic
atio
nsan
dco
mm
ents
(p2
5)P
erce
ived
retro
spec
tive
dec
isio
ns(p
25)
Onl
y2^
3pa
ges
outo
f21
wer
ere
leva
nt(p
25f
f)I
nfor
man
tsin
clud
edM
edic
aid
drug
prog
ram
me
adm
inis
trato
rs
dire
ctor
sor
polic
yan
alys
ts
phar
mac
yco
nsul
tant
san
dle
gisl
ator
s(p
15)
UK
1994
^199
5202
1`T
oid
entif
yfa
ctor
sw
hich
faci
litat
eor
imp
ede
evid
ence
-bas
edp
olic
y-m
akin
grsquo(
p2
9)
In-d
epth
inte
rvie
ws
(usi
nga
topi
cgu
ide)
(p2
9an
dre
spon
seto
ale
tter)
Lead
polic
y-m
aker
sG
Psan
dre
sear
cher
sin
nine
diff
eren
tcas
est
udie
sat
alo
call
evel
inth
eN
HS
(pp
293
1)N
ˆ28
Soci
alre
sear
ch(p
42
inth
epr
ojec
trep
ort)
Per
ceiv
edde
cisi
ons
Polic
yon
the
inte
rface
bet
wee
nR
ampD
and
com
mis
sion
ing
atth
ehe
alth
auth
ority
leve
l(p
30)
Mex
ico
1994
^199
522`T
here
latio
nshi
pbe
twee
nhe
alth
rese
arch
(and
rese
arch
ers)
and
heal
thpo
licie
s(a
ndpo
licy-
mak
ers)
info
urve
rtica
lhe
alth
prog
ram
mes
inM
exic
orsquo(p
104
)
Ope
n-en
ded
(in-
dept
hrsquo)
inte
rvie
ws
with
aco
mm
onin
terv
iew
prot
ocol
(p1
06)
`Res
earc
hers
and
polic
y-m
aker
sfro
mdi
ffere
ntin
stitu
tions
and
leve
lsof
resp
onsi
bilit
yrsquo(p
103
)N
ˆ67
Use
ofre
sear
chpu
blic
atio
ns`w
here
we
knew
that
ther
ew
asat
leas
tso
me
inte
ract
ion
bet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dde
cisi
on-
mak
ersrsquo
(p1
05)
Per
ceiv
ed
use
ofev
iden
ceco
ncer
ning
AID
Sch
oler
afa
mily
pla
nnin
gan
dim
mun
isat
ion
ing
over
nmen
talp
rogr
amm
es(p
103
)
Per
sona
lcom
mun
icat
ion
gav
ead
ditio
nali
nfor
mat
ion
onth
isis
sue
It
isd
iffic
ultt
od
isce
rnw
heth
erth
ede
cisi
ons
wer
ep
erce
ived
orhy
pot
hetic
als
ince
ther
ear
eno
actu
alde
cisi
ons
men
tione
d
Aus
tralia
1995
23
Dec
isio
n-m
aker
srsquoaw
aren
ess
and
use
ofec
onom
icev
alua
tions
inhe
alth
care
(p1
03)
Inte
rvie
ws
open
-end
edan
dst
ruct
ured
(not
stat
edif
post
alt
elep
hone
orfa
ce-to
-fa
ce)(
p10
5)
Sen
iorm
anag
ers
inth
eFe
der
alD
epar
tmen
tof
Hea
lthH
ousi
ngan
dC
omm
unity
Serv
ices
New
Sou
thW
ales
Stat
eth
eH
ealth
Dep
artm
ent(
p10
4)
Nˆ
34(p
105
)
Use
ofec
onom
icev
alua
tions
forp
ricin
gon
drug
ssc
reen
ing
radi
olog
ytra
nspl
ants
and
scan
ning
(p1
05)
`Per
ceiv
edus
eof
econ
omic
eval
uatio
nsrsquo(
p1
04)
USA
1996
24
and
USA
1997
25
Tode
term
ine
whe
ther
the
proc
ess
of(s
ocia
lsci
ence
)in
form
atio
nut
ilisa
tion
varie
sac
ross
diff
eren
tare
as(i
ese
rvic
epr
ovis
ion
and
finan
cing
)(pp
16^
17)
Stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
16)
Fe
der
als
tate
and
loca
lp
olic
y-m
aker
sat
diff
eren
tle
vels
deal
ing
with
finan
cean
dse
rvic
es(p
16)
N
ˆ47
9(p
16)
No
spec
ific
repo
rtb
utin
foty
persquor
efer
topr
ogra
mm
eev
alua
tion
dem
onst
ratio
np
roje
ct
stat
istic
ald
ata
and
polic
yan
alys
is(p
34)
Per
ceiv
edre
trosp
ectiv
ed
ecis
ions
(p1
7)O
pen-
ende
din
terv
iew
sw
ere
used
toob
tain
basi
cb
ackg
roun
din
form
atio
nab
outt
hep
olic
ypr
oces
sTh
est
ruct
ured
inte
rvie
ws
built
onth
eop
en-e
nded
inte
rvie
ws
(p3
3)Pa
kist
an19
9826
The
role
that
rese
arch
pla
ysin
expe
rienc
esin
linki
ngre
sear
chw
ithp
olic
y(p
77)
Ope
n-en
ded
in-d
epth
inte
rvie
ws
(p7
7)D
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
from
gov
ernm
ent
the
cent
ral
min
istry
ofhe
alth
the
pla
nnin
gco
mm
issi
onan
dp
rovi
ncia
lhea
lthau
thor
ities
(p7
7)N
ˆ16
(p7
7)
Not
stat
edG
ener
alpe
rcep
tions
C
lose
stfo
cus
onch
ildhe
alth
prob
lem
ssu
chas
co-tr
imox
azol
em
ater
nal
mor
talit
yvi
tam
inA
b
reas
tfeed
ing
and
pol
io(p
p77
79)
UK
1998
27
The
imp
actt
hatt
heE
iexclect
ive
Hea
lthca
reB
ulle
tinha
sin
side
the
NH
Sor
gan
isat
ion
(p1
)
Tele
phon
ein
terv
iew
sst
ruct
ure
notm
entio
ned
(p1
)
Hea
lthau
thor
ities
(p
2)
Nˆ
34Tw
osp
ecifi
cbu
lletin
sJu
ne19
97an
dO
ctob
er19
97(p
1)
Hyp
othe
tical
deci
sion
s(e
g
itin
fluen
ced
the
dev
elop
men
tofo
urpo
licy
alth
oug
hth
isha
sbe
eng
oing
onfo
rsom
etim
ersquo)
(p1
0)
The
date
isno
tcle
arly
stat
edb
utit
is19
98or
1999
Tr
usts
and
GPs
are
incl
uded
inth
est
udy
buta
reno
trel
evan
tin
this
revi
ew
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244d J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
UK
and
USA
1998
28
H
owU
Kan
dU
Sp
urch
aser
sva
lue
and
use
rese
arch
asse
ssin
ghe
alth
tech
nolo
gy
and
clin
ical
effe
ctiv
enes
s(p
pv
1)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p4
)U
K1
4no
n-m
edic
alhe
alth
auth
ority
pur
chas
ers
seve
np
ublic
heal
thp
hysi
cian
sni
neG
PsU
SA1
3p
ublic
offic
ials
from
11st
ates
nin
ep
rivat
ese
ctor
purc
hase
rs
thre
eco
nsul
tant
sN
ˆ55
(p4
)
Acc
ess
toan
dus
eof
heal
thte
chno
logy
asse
ssm
ent
clin
ical
effe
ctiv
enes
sin
form
atio
n(p
p4
11)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
1)
Sta
ted
1999
(p3
)
Can
ada
1998
^199
929A
case
stud
yof
cros
s-se
ctor
alre
sour
ceal
loca
tion
inth
ehu
man
serv
ices
syst
emin
Prin
ceE
dwar
dIs
land
(p4
)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-
ende
din
terv
iew
san
dfo
cus
grou
ps(p
p13
^16
App
endi
x1)
Key
info
rman
tsho
ldin
gd
iffer
entp
ositi
ons
with
inth
efiv
ehe
alth
regi
ons
the
Dep
artm
ento
fSoc
ial
Ser
vice
san
dva
rious
sect
ors
(p4
)al
lreg
ions
all
sect
ors
and
man
agem
ent
leve
ls(p
13)
Nˆ
58(p
9)
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
deci
sion
son
cros
s-se
ctor
alre
sour
ceal
loca
tions
(p5
)
Bur
kina
Faso
1999
30A
case
stud
yon
how
rese
arch
pla
yed
aro
lein
deci
sion
-mak
ing
abou
t`S
hare
dC
arersquo
fo
rch
ildho
odill
ness
(pp
19^
20)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
20)
Min
istry
ofH
ealth
offic
ials
(p2
2)N
ˆno
tgiv
enW
orks
hops
and
rese
arch
pape
rsth
atth
eau
thor
sha
dpr
ovid
edM
inis
tryof
Hea
lthof
ficia
lsw
ithd
urin
gpr
evio
usye
ars
(p2
1)
Per
ceiv
edus
eof
the
pro
vide
dsc
ient
ific
info
rmat
ion
inde
cisi
on-
mak
ing
(p2
0)
`Sha
red
care
rsquois
abou
tim
prov
edco
ntac
tand
colla
bora
tion
bet
wee
nhe
alth
cent
rest
affa
ndm
othe
rs(p
20)
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31B
arrie
rsag
ains
tand
mec
hani
sms
fori
mpr
ovin
gth
evi
tam
inA
rese
arch
^po
licy^
actio
nco
nnec
tion
(p5
5)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
55)
Key
info
rman
tsth
atw
ere
rele
vant
role
-pla
yers
(p5
5)
Nˆ
nots
tate
d
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
use
(p5
5)
Can
ada
2000
32
Toas
sess
the
influ
ence
ofin
form
atio
nab
outt
hehe
alth
cons
eque
nces
ofun
empl
oym
enta
ndin
secu
rity
onp
olic
y-m
akin
g(p
5)
Stru
ctur
eds
emi-s
truct
ured
and
open
-end
edte
lep
hone
inte
rvie
ws
(pp
59
)
Pol
icy-
mak
ers
inth
ehe
alth
and
empl
oym
ents
ecto
rsof
allt
hree
leve
lsof
Can
adia
ng
over
nmen
tan
dex
ecut
ive
dire
ctor
sof
ten
Can
adia
nno
n-g
over
nmen
talo
rgan
-is
atio
ns(p
5)
Nˆ
48(p
5)
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
retro
spec
tive
usef
ulne
ssof
past
rese
arch
info
rmat
ion
abou
tthe
heal
thco
nseq
uenc
esof
unem
ploy
men
tand
inse
curit
yon
polic
y-m
akin
g(p
5)
Sta
ted
date
forw
orki
ngpa
peri
sM
arch
2000
Can
ada
2000
33To
unde
rsta
ndw
heth
er
how
and
und
erw
hat
cond
ition
she
alth
serv
ices
rese
arch
pla
ysa
role
inpr
ovin
cial
polic
y-m
akin
g(p
i)
Bot
hpe
rson
als
emi-
stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
san
dsu
rvey
s(p
p8
11)
Key
info
rman
tsw
ithin
ava
riety
ofke
yhe
alth
polic
ies
intw
oC
anad
ian
prov
ince
s(O
ntar
ioan
dS
aska
tche
wan
)(p
ii)
Nˆ
22(p
18)
Not
stat
ed
Act
uala
ndpe
rcei
ved
dec
isio
nsw
ithin
the
field
sof
heal
thse
rvic
esju
risdi
ctio
nfin
anci
alar
rang
emen
ts
pro
gram
me
deliv
ery
arra
ngem
ents
and
pro
gram
me
cont
ent
(pp
713
)
Iti
sno
tsta
ted
wha
tkin
dof
evid
ence
was
used
but
refe
renc
esto
dire
ctus
eof
evid
ence
inde
cisi
onre
ports
rep
ortin
gon
actu
alus
eof
rese
arch
im
plie
sth
atev
iden
cew
asus
ed(p
p13
18^
19)
GPs
gen
eral
pra
ctiti
oner
sM
ITM
assa
chus
etts
Inst
itute
ofTe
chno
log
yN
HS
Nat
iona
lHea
lthS
ervi
ceR
ampD
res
earc
han
dd
evel
opm
ent
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244e J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le2
Stu
dym
etho
ds
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceS
amp
lefr
ame
(SF
)aan
dsa
mp
lest
rate
gy
(SS
)b
Res
po
nse
rate
Mea
sure
men
tofu
seo
fev
iden
ceM
easu
rem
ento
fd
eter
min
ants
ofu
seS
um
mar
yo
fdes
crip
tio
no
fmet
ho
ds
(co
mp
lete
par
tial
or
no
tad
equa
tely
des
crib
ed)a
nd
com
men
ts
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Aqu
antit
ativ
e4-
poi
ntsc
ore
wei
ghte
dac
cord
ing
toth
ree
deci
sion
leve
lsw
ithsu
mm
edsc
ore
rang
ing
from
0to
18(p
51)
Two-
way
AN
OV
A(p
66)
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
USA
1973
8SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
No
stat
istic
alte
chni
que
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
USA
1973
^197
49
and
USA
1973
^19
7410
(pv
ii)
SFp
artia
l(p
viii)
SSn
otm
entio
ned
partl
ysn
owb
alle
d(p
viii
)
95
(p2
4)B
oth
quan
titat
ivel
yra
ted
and
wei
ght
ed(p
p25
28
333
536
)and
qua
litat
ivel
yde
scrib
ed(p
p1^
4)D
escr
iptiv
elis
ting
ofra
tings
(pp
28
333
536
)and
MC
A(m
ultiv
aria
tere
gre
ssio
n)an
alys
is(p
27)
Parti
alIt
isst
ated
that
`this
repo
rtre
pre
sent
only
afir
stsu
mm
ary
ofso
me
ofth
ehi
ghlig
hts
and
mor
eim
por
tant
findi
ngsrsquo
(pv
i)S
ubse
quen
trep
orts
not
foun
d
USA
1977
11
SFp
artia
l(p
143)
SSs
now
bal
led
partl
yra
ndom
(p1
43)
Not
stat
edD
escr
iptiv
eN
ost
atis
tical
tech
niqu
ePa
rtial
The
inte
rvie
ws
appe
arto
have
bee
nm
ade
betw
een
1973
and
1976
USA
1980
2an
dU
SA19
8012
SFp
artia
l(p
167)
SSn
otst
ated
90
(p1
67)
Bot
hqu
antit
ativ
ede
scrip
tions
rat
edan
dw
eig
hted
and
qual
itativ
e(p
p16
9ff
303)
Des
crip
tive
listin
gof
ratin
gs(p
p1
70^1
72
174)
and
25va
riabl
esan
alys
edus
ing
fact
oran
alys
isto
dev
elop
five
dim
ensi
ons
(p
304
)
Parti
alB
oth
a4-
poin
t(p
168
)and
a5-
poi
ntw
eigh
ted
ratin
gsc
ale
(pp
173
303)
The
qual
itativ
era
ting
com
esfro
mlis
ting
ofm
ostm
entio
ned
char
acte
ristic
sof
usef
ulne
ss
The
five
dim
ensi
ons
are
liste
din
Tabl
e3
und
erfa
cilit
ator
s
USA
1982
13SF
Par
tial
(pp
187
^188
)SS
ran
dom
sam
ple
(pp
187
^188
)
Volu
ntee
red
(p1
88)
Qua
ntita
tive
listin
gof
the
deci
sion
qua
lity
ofev
iden
ce^
use
onsi
xdi
ffere
ntle
vels
ofco
mpl
exity
(pp
195^
208)
List
ing
offre
quen
cies
(pp
196
^198
)Pa
rtial
The
132
dec
isio
n-m
aker
sw
ere
rand
omly
dist
ribut
edto
two
of50
case
stud
ies
and
six
diff
eren
tlev
els
(p1
94)
USA
1983
14SF
not
stat
ed(p
79)
SS
not
stat
ed(p
79)
65
(p7
9)Q
uant
itativ
elis
ting
and
ratin
gs(p
p8
2^86
)Fr
eque
ncie
san
dra
ted
impo
rtanc
e(a
sve
ry
mod
erat
ely
orno
tim
porta
nt)(
p8
2)
SF
and
SSco
mpl
ete
ifth
est
udyrsquo
sfo
cus
cons
ider
edon
lydi
rect
ors
inFl
orid
aan
dN
orth
Car
olin
aan
dif
ther
ew
ere
only
one
dire
ctor
inea
chC
omm
unity
Men
talH
ealth
Cen
ter
Swed
en19
84^
1985
15SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
p14
6^15
0)Li
stin
gof
frequ
enci
es(p
p1
451
49)
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edTh
eau
thor
sm
ainl
yd
iscu
ssan
dde
mon
stra
ted
iffer
entw
ays
ofut
ilisi
ngre
sear
cha
sei
ther
ins
trum
enta
lpo
litic
alc
onfli
cte
nlig
hten
men
tin
tera
ctiv
eor
tact
ical
(p1
44)
`
usin
gre
sear
ch`in
stru
men
tally
rsquorsquoor
for
`enl
ight
enm
entrsquorsquo
purp
oses
mea
ntdi
ffere
ntth
ings
indi
ffere
ntse
tting
san
ddi
ffere
ntor
gani
zatio
nalp
ositi
onsrsquo
(p1
45)
USA
1990
16SF
par
tial(
p11
0)SS
com
ple
te
(p1
10)
100
(p1
10)
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
112
)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Com
ple
tere
fers
toth
e27
rep
rese
ntat
ives
inth
etw
opl
anni
ngco
mm
ittee
sin
the
two
com
mun
ities
No
furth
erge
nera
lisat
ion
can
be
mad
eon
the
basi
sof
this
sam
ple
USA
1991
17SF
com
plet
e(p
p5
13^5
14)
SSr
ando
msa
mp
le(p
513
)
60
(p5
14)
Qua
ntita
tivel
yde
scrip
tive
rate
dan
dw
eig
hted
(p
p51
9^52
2)D
escr
iptiv
elis
ting
ofw
eigh
ted
ratin
gs(p
p5
17^5
23)a
ndm
ultip
lere
gre
ssio
n(p
p5
185
23^5
27)
Com
ple
te
Wei
ghte
don
3-p
oint
and
5-p
oint
scal
es
UK
1991
18SF
com
plet
e(p
51)
SSr
ando
msa
mp
le(p
51)
73
(p5
1)Q
uant
itativ
era
ted
desc
riptio
ns(p
p51
^54)
Per
cent
ages
(pp
51^5
4)C
omp
lete
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244f J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le2
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceS
amp
lefr
ame
(SF
)aan
dsa
mp
lest
rate
gy
(SS
)b
Res
po
nse
rate
Mea
sure
men
tofu
seo
fev
iden
ceM
easu
rem
ento
fd
eter
min
ants
ofu
seS
um
mar
yo
fdes
crip
tio
no
fmet
ho
ds
(co
mp
lete
par
tial
or
no
tad
equa
tely
des
crib
ed)a
nd
com
men
ts
USA
1993
^199
419SF
par
tial(
p15
)SS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(i
esu
bjec
tive
view
onke
yva
riabl
esof
pol
icy
chan
gea
nym
entio
nno
rank
ing)
(p1
6)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edO
nly
Med
icai
dp
rog
ram
mes
with
spec
ific
cost
-con
tain
men
tpol
icie
sin
the
last
seve
raly
ears
(p2
9)U
K19
94^1
99520
21
SFp
artia
l(pp
461
46
5)SS
sno
wb
alle
d(p
p4
614
65)
100
(all
thos
eap
proa
ched
fori
nter
view
agre
edto
the
inte
rvie
w)
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
31f
f)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Mex
ico
1994
^199
522SF
not
stat
ed
SSn
otst
ated
N
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(i
esu
bjec
tive
view
onke
yva
riabl
es)(
pp
104
106^
108)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edP
urpo
sive
sam
ple
(per
sona
lcom
mun
icat
ions
)A
ustra
lia19
9523
SFp
artia
lSS
not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edQ
uant
itativ
ean
dd
escr
iptiv
e(p
p1
05^1
08)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edC
alle
d`p
urpo
sive
sam
plin
gfra
mersquo
(p1
04)
USA
1996
24an
dU
SA19
9725
SFp
artia
l(pp
16
30^3
1)SS
com
bin
edra
ndom
and
snow
-ba
lled
(pp
30^3
1)
Not
stat
edQ
uant
itativ
ere
gres
sion
and
apa
thm
odel
(p1
8)Q
uant
itativ
ere
gres
sion
and
apa
thm
odel
(p1
8)Pa
rtial
but
with
ago
odde
scrip
tion
ofSS
and
SF
Paki
stan
1998
26SF
par
tial(
p77
)SS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
(pp
788
082
)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
UK
1998
27SF
par
tial(
pp1
^2)
SSn
otst
ated
(pp
1^2
)
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(ie
subj
ectiv
evi
ewon
awar
enes
sge
nera
lper
cept
ions
and
impa
ct)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
UK
and
USA
1998
28SF
par
tial(
p4)
SSn
otst
ated
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(pp
12^2
2)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Can
ada
1998
^199
929SF
par
tial(
p16
)SS
not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ede
scrip
tions
and
quan
titat
ive
listin
gs(p
p18
^30
32^3
4)Q
ualit
ativ
ePa
rtial
Aqu
alita
tive
valid
atio
nof
the
inte
rvie
ws
isd
escr
ibed
(pp
16^1
7)B
urki
naFa
so19
9930
SFn
otst
ated
SSn
otst
ated
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(p2
2)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
Can
ada
2000
32SF
par
tial
SSn
otst
ated
42
(p
23)
Bot
hqu
antit
ativ
ean
dqu
alita
tive
des
crip
tions
ofba
rrie
rs(p
p11
^14
26)
Freq
uenc
ies
(p2
6)Pa
rtial
Cal
led
`apu
rpos
ive
sam
ple
ofC
anad
ian
polic
y-m
aker
srsquo(p
8)
Can
ada
2000
33SF
not
stat
edSS
sno
wb
alle
d(p
ii)
88
(22
25)
(p1
8)B
oth
quan
titat
ive
and
qual
itativ
ed
escr
iptio
nsof
faci
litat
ors
(pp
ii
i35
^37)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
a Sam
ple
fram
ec
omp
lete
ˆth
esa
mp
lew
asd
escr
ibed
inre
latio
nto
allt
hed
ecis
ion
-mak
ers
inth
eco
ntex
toft
hest
udy
par
tialˆ
inco
mp
lete
info
rmat
ion
not
stat
edˆ
nod
escr
iptio
nb S
amp
lest
rate
gy
com
ple
tesa
mp
ler
and
omsa
mp
les
now
bal
led
sam
ple
orn
otst
ated
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244g J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
Mai
nre
sults
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p5
4)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
60)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
54)
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
65)
USA
1973
8Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p1
41)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
142
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
143
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
43)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p14
114
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(pp
142
145)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p1
43)
USA
1973
^197
49an
dU
SA
1973
^197
410
(pv
ii)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
333
6)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
33)
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p3
3)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)
USA
1977
11Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
155
158)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p1
45)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p14
915
2)P
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p15
9^16
0)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
155
158)
USA
1980
2an
dU
SA19
8012
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
stTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sM
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
USA
1982
13N
one
ofth
efa
cilit
ator
sw
ere
men
tione
din
the
othe
rstu
dies
Non
eof
the
bar
riers
wer
em
entio
ned
inth
eot
hers
tud
ies
USA
1983
14C
omm
unity
pres
sure
orcl
ient
dem
and
forr
esea
rch
(pp
82
84)
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
82)
Not
stat
ed
Swed
en19
84^1
98515
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
p14
614
9)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
148
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
149
)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
150
)
USA
1990
16R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
114
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
18)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p11
111
5)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(pp
119
^122
)U
SA19
9117
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p5
19)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(pp
519
520)
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
19)
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
519
)U
K19
9118
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
5)N
otst
ated
USA
1993
^199
419G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
27)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p2
7)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
9)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
chA
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
13^1
427
)
UK
1994
^199
5202
1Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
32^3
4)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
p32
^34)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
pp
31^3
2)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(p3
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p3
3)M
exic
o19
94^1
99522
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
sTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
nsR
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
hIn
clus
ion
ofef
fect
iven
ess
data
(pp
106^
108
109^
113)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p10
7^11
1)
USA
1996
24Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
1)A
ustra
lia19
9523
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
107
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
108
)G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
108
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
108
)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
106
)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p1
06)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
106
)
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244h J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
Paki
stan
1998
26N
otst
ated
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p78
82)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
80)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p80
82)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
80)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p8
2)U
K19
9827
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p8
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
13)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p8
12)
UK
and
USA
1998
28Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
p3
17^2
1)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p5
12^1
7)
Can
ada
1998
^199
929Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p3
2)P
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p33
^34)
Bur
kina
Faso
1999
30N
otst
ated
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p2
1)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
23)
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
62)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p6
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
63)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
61)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
61)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p6
1)C
anad
a20
0032
Not
stat
edP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
26)
Can
ada
2000
33Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pi
)N
otst
ated
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244d J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le1
cont
inue
d
Co
un
try
year
con
duc
ted
(ye
arp
ub
lish
ed)
refe
ren
ce
Ob
ject
ive
Stu
dy
des
ign
Par
tici
pan
tsl
evel
of
po
licy-
mak
ing
Typ
eso
fevi
den
ce(f
rom
wh
ich
dec
isio
ns
wer
em
ade)
Typ
eso
fdec
isio
ns
(hyp
oth
etic
alp
erce
ived
or
actu
al)
typ
eso
fpo
licy
Co
mm
ents
UK
and
USA
1998
28
H
owU
Kan
dU
Sp
urch
aser
sva
lue
and
use
rese
arch
asse
ssin
ghe
alth
tech
nolo
gy
and
clin
ical
effe
ctiv
enes
s(p
pv
1)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edte
leph
one
inte
rvie
ws
(p4
)U
K1
4no
n-m
edic
alhe
alth
auth
ority
pur
chas
ers
seve
np
ublic
heal
thp
hysi
cian
sni
neG
PsU
SA1
3p
ublic
offic
ials
from
11st
ates
nin
ep
rivat
ese
ctor
purc
hase
rs
thre
eco
nsul
tant
sN
ˆ55
(p4
)
Acc
ess
toan
dus
eof
heal
thte
chno
logy
asse
ssm
ent
clin
ical
effe
ctiv
enes
sin
form
atio
n(p
p4
11)
Per
ceiv
edus
e(p
1)
Sta
ted
1999
(p3
)
Can
ada
1998
^199
929A
case
stud
yof
cros
s-se
ctor
alre
sour
ceal
loca
tion
inth
ehu
man
serv
ices
syst
emin
Prin
ceE
dwar
dIs
land
(p4
)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edan
dop
en-
ende
din
terv
iew
san
dfo
cus
grou
ps(p
p13
^16
App
endi
x1)
Key
info
rman
tsho
ldin
gd
iffer
entp
ositi
ons
with
inth
efiv
ehe
alth
regi
ons
the
Dep
artm
ento
fSoc
ial
Ser
vice
san
dva
rious
sect
ors
(p4
)al
lreg
ions
all
sect
ors
and
man
agem
ent
leve
ls(p
13)
Nˆ
58(p
9)
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
deci
sion
son
cros
s-se
ctor
alre
sour
ceal
loca
tions
(p5
)
Bur
kina
Faso
1999
30A
case
stud
yon
how
rese
arch
pla
yed
aro
lein
deci
sion
-mak
ing
abou
t`S
hare
dC
arersquo
fo
rch
ildho
odill
ness
(pp
19^
20)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
20)
Min
istry
ofH
ealth
offic
ials
(p2
2)N
ˆno
tgiv
enW
orks
hops
and
rese
arch
pape
rsth
atth
eau
thor
sha
dpr
ovid
edM
inis
tryof
Hea
lthof
ficia
lsw
ithd
urin
gpr
evio
usye
ars
(p2
1)
Per
ceiv
edus
eof
the
pro
vide
dsc
ient
ific
info
rmat
ion
inde
cisi
on-
mak
ing
(p2
0)
`Sha
red
care
rsquois
abou
tim
prov
edco
ntac
tand
colla
bora
tion
bet
wee
nhe
alth
cent
rest
affa
ndm
othe
rs(p
20)
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31B
arrie
rsag
ains
tand
mec
hani
sms
fori
mpr
ovin
gth
evi
tam
inA
rese
arch
^po
licy^
actio
nco
nnec
tion
(p5
5)
Sem
i-stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
s(p
55)
Key
info
rman
tsth
atw
ere
rele
vant
role
-pla
yers
(p5
5)
Nˆ
nots
tate
d
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
use
(p5
5)
Can
ada
2000
32
Toas
sess
the
influ
ence
ofin
form
atio
nab
outt
hehe
alth
cons
eque
nces
ofun
empl
oym
enta
ndin
secu
rity
onp
olic
y-m
akin
g(p
5)
Stru
ctur
eds
emi-s
truct
ured
and
open
-end
edte
lep
hone
inte
rvie
ws
(pp
59
)
Pol
icy-
mak
ers
inth
ehe
alth
and
empl
oym
ents
ecto
rsof
allt
hree
leve
lsof
Can
adia
ng
over
nmen
tan
dex
ecut
ive
dire
ctor
sof
ten
Can
adia
nno
n-g
over
nmen
talo
rgan
-is
atio
ns(p
5)
Nˆ
48(p
5)
Not
stat
edP
erce
ived
retro
spec
tive
usef
ulne
ssof
past
rese
arch
info
rmat
ion
abou
tthe
heal
thco
nseq
uenc
esof
unem
ploy
men
tand
inse
curit
yon
polic
y-m
akin
g(p
5)
Sta
ted
date
forw
orki
ngpa
peri
sM
arch
2000
Can
ada
2000
33To
unde
rsta
ndw
heth
er
how
and
und
erw
hat
cond
ition
she
alth
serv
ices
rese
arch
pla
ysa
role
inpr
ovin
cial
polic
y-m
akin
g(p
i)
Bot
hpe
rson
als
emi-
stru
ctur
edin
terv
iew
san
dsu
rvey
s(p
p8
11)
Key
info
rman
tsw
ithin
ava
riety
ofke
yhe
alth
polic
ies
intw
oC
anad
ian
prov
ince
s(O
ntar
ioan
dS
aska
tche
wan
)(p
ii)
Nˆ
22(p
18)
Not
stat
ed
Act
uala
ndpe
rcei
ved
dec
isio
nsw
ithin
the
field
sof
heal
thse
rvic
esju
risdi
ctio
nfin
anci
alar
rang
emen
ts
pro
gram
me
deliv
ery
arra
ngem
ents
and
pro
gram
me
cont
ent
(pp
713
)
Iti
sno
tsta
ted
wha
tkin
dof
evid
ence
was
used
but
refe
renc
esto
dire
ctus
eof
evid
ence
inde
cisi
onre
ports
rep
ortin
gon
actu
alus
eof
rese
arch
im
plie
sth
atev
iden
cew
asus
ed(p
p13
18^
19)
GPs
gen
eral
pra
ctiti
oner
sM
ITM
assa
chus
etts
Inst
itute
ofTe
chno
log
yN
HS
Nat
iona
lHea
lthS
ervi
ceR
ampD
res
earc
han
dd
evel
opm
ent
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244e J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le2
Stu
dym
etho
ds
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceS
amp
lefr
ame
(SF
)aan
dsa
mp
lest
rate
gy
(SS
)b
Res
po
nse
rate
Mea
sure
men
tofu
seo
fev
iden
ceM
easu
rem
ento
fd
eter
min
ants
ofu
seS
um
mar
yo
fdes
crip
tio
no
fmet
ho
ds
(co
mp
lete
par
tial
or
no
tad
equa
tely
des
crib
ed)a
nd
com
men
ts
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Aqu
antit
ativ
e4-
poi
ntsc
ore
wei
ghte
dac
cord
ing
toth
ree
deci
sion
leve
lsw
ithsu
mm
edsc
ore
rang
ing
from
0to
18(p
51)
Two-
way
AN
OV
A(p
66)
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
USA
1973
8SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
No
stat
istic
alte
chni
que
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
USA
1973
^197
49
and
USA
1973
^19
7410
(pv
ii)
SFp
artia
l(p
viii)
SSn
otm
entio
ned
partl
ysn
owb
alle
d(p
viii
)
95
(p2
4)B
oth
quan
titat
ivel
yra
ted
and
wei
ght
ed(p
p25
28
333
536
)and
qua
litat
ivel
yde
scrib
ed(p
p1^
4)D
escr
iptiv
elis
ting
ofra
tings
(pp
28
333
536
)and
MC
A(m
ultiv
aria
tere
gre
ssio
n)an
alys
is(p
27)
Parti
alIt
isst
ated
that
`this
repo
rtre
pre
sent
only
afir
stsu
mm
ary
ofso
me
ofth
ehi
ghlig
hts
and
mor
eim
por
tant
findi
ngsrsquo
(pv
i)S
ubse
quen
trep
orts
not
foun
d
USA
1977
11
SFp
artia
l(p
143)
SSs
now
bal
led
partl
yra
ndom
(p1
43)
Not
stat
edD
escr
iptiv
eN
ost
atis
tical
tech
niqu
ePa
rtial
The
inte
rvie
ws
appe
arto
have
bee
nm
ade
betw
een
1973
and
1976
USA
1980
2an
dU
SA19
8012
SFp
artia
l(p
167)
SSn
otst
ated
90
(p1
67)
Bot
hqu
antit
ativ
ede
scrip
tions
rat
edan
dw
eig
hted
and
qual
itativ
e(p
p16
9ff
303)
Des
crip
tive
listin
gof
ratin
gs(p
p1
70^1
72
174)
and
25va
riabl
esan
alys
edus
ing
fact
oran
alys
isto
dev
elop
five
dim
ensi
ons
(p
304
)
Parti
alB
oth
a4-
poin
t(p
168
)and
a5-
poi
ntw
eigh
ted
ratin
gsc
ale
(pp
173
303)
The
qual
itativ
era
ting
com
esfro
mlis
ting
ofm
ostm
entio
ned
char
acte
ristic
sof
usef
ulne
ss
The
five
dim
ensi
ons
are
liste
din
Tabl
e3
und
erfa
cilit
ator
s
USA
1982
13SF
Par
tial
(pp
187
^188
)SS
ran
dom
sam
ple
(pp
187
^188
)
Volu
ntee
red
(p1
88)
Qua
ntita
tive
listin
gof
the
deci
sion
qua
lity
ofev
iden
ce^
use
onsi
xdi
ffere
ntle
vels
ofco
mpl
exity
(pp
195^
208)
List
ing
offre
quen
cies
(pp
196
^198
)Pa
rtial
The
132
dec
isio
n-m
aker
sw
ere
rand
omly
dist
ribut
edto
two
of50
case
stud
ies
and
six
diff
eren
tlev
els
(p1
94)
USA
1983
14SF
not
stat
ed(p
79)
SS
not
stat
ed(p
79)
65
(p7
9)Q
uant
itativ
elis
ting
and
ratin
gs(p
p8
2^86
)Fr
eque
ncie
san
dra
ted
impo
rtanc
e(a
sve
ry
mod
erat
ely
orno
tim
porta
nt)(
p8
2)
SF
and
SSco
mpl
ete
ifth
est
udyrsquo
sfo
cus
cons
ider
edon
lydi
rect
ors
inFl
orid
aan
dN
orth
Car
olin
aan
dif
ther
ew
ere
only
one
dire
ctor
inea
chC
omm
unity
Men
talH
ealth
Cen
ter
Swed
en19
84^
1985
15SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
p14
6^15
0)Li
stin
gof
frequ
enci
es(p
p1
451
49)
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edTh
eau
thor
sm
ainl
yd
iscu
ssan
dde
mon
stra
ted
iffer
entw
ays
ofut
ilisi
ngre
sear
cha
sei
ther
ins
trum
enta
lpo
litic
alc
onfli
cte
nlig
hten
men
tin
tera
ctiv
eor
tact
ical
(p1
44)
`
usin
gre
sear
ch`in
stru
men
tally
rsquorsquoor
for
`enl
ight
enm
entrsquorsquo
purp
oses
mea
ntdi
ffere
ntth
ings
indi
ffere
ntse
tting
san
ddi
ffere
ntor
gani
zatio
nalp
ositi
onsrsquo
(p1
45)
USA
1990
16SF
par
tial(
p11
0)SS
com
ple
te
(p1
10)
100
(p1
10)
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
112
)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Com
ple
tere
fers
toth
e27
rep
rese
ntat
ives
inth
etw
opl
anni
ngco
mm
ittee
sin
the
two
com
mun
ities
No
furth
erge
nera
lisat
ion
can
be
mad
eon
the
basi
sof
this
sam
ple
USA
1991
17SF
com
plet
e(p
p5
13^5
14)
SSr
ando
msa
mp
le(p
513
)
60
(p5
14)
Qua
ntita
tivel
yde
scrip
tive
rate
dan
dw
eig
hted
(p
p51
9^52
2)D
escr
iptiv
elis
ting
ofw
eigh
ted
ratin
gs(p
p5
17^5
23)a
ndm
ultip
lere
gre
ssio
n(p
p5
185
23^5
27)
Com
ple
te
Wei
ghte
don
3-p
oint
and
5-p
oint
scal
es
UK
1991
18SF
com
plet
e(p
51)
SSr
ando
msa
mp
le(p
51)
73
(p5
1)Q
uant
itativ
era
ted
desc
riptio
ns(p
p51
^54)
Per
cent
ages
(pp
51^5
4)C
omp
lete
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244f J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le2
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceS
amp
lefr
ame
(SF
)aan
dsa
mp
lest
rate
gy
(SS
)b
Res
po
nse
rate
Mea
sure
men
tofu
seo
fev
iden
ceM
easu
rem
ento
fd
eter
min
ants
ofu
seS
um
mar
yo
fdes
crip
tio
no
fmet
ho
ds
(co
mp
lete
par
tial
or
no
tad
equa
tely
des
crib
ed)a
nd
com
men
ts
USA
1993
^199
419SF
par
tial(
p15
)SS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(i
esu
bjec
tive
view
onke
yva
riabl
esof
pol
icy
chan
gea
nym
entio
nno
rank
ing)
(p1
6)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edO
nly
Med
icai
dp
rog
ram
mes
with
spec
ific
cost
-con
tain
men
tpol
icie
sin
the
last
seve
raly
ears
(p2
9)U
K19
94^1
99520
21
SFp
artia
l(pp
461
46
5)SS
sno
wb
alle
d(p
p4
614
65)
100
(all
thos
eap
proa
ched
fori
nter
view
agre
edto
the
inte
rvie
w)
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
31f
f)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Mex
ico
1994
^199
522SF
not
stat
ed
SSn
otst
ated
N
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(i
esu
bjec
tive
view
onke
yva
riabl
es)(
pp
104
106^
108)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edP
urpo
sive
sam
ple
(per
sona
lcom
mun
icat
ions
)A
ustra
lia19
9523
SFp
artia
lSS
not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edQ
uant
itativ
ean
dd
escr
iptiv
e(p
p1
05^1
08)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edC
alle
d`p
urpo
sive
sam
plin
gfra
mersquo
(p1
04)
USA
1996
24an
dU
SA19
9725
SFp
artia
l(pp
16
30^3
1)SS
com
bin
edra
ndom
and
snow
-ba
lled
(pp
30^3
1)
Not
stat
edQ
uant
itativ
ere
gres
sion
and
apa
thm
odel
(p1
8)Q
uant
itativ
ere
gres
sion
and
apa
thm
odel
(p1
8)Pa
rtial
but
with
ago
odde
scrip
tion
ofSS
and
SF
Paki
stan
1998
26SF
par
tial(
p77
)SS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
(pp
788
082
)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
UK
1998
27SF
par
tial(
pp1
^2)
SSn
otst
ated
(pp
1^2
)
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(ie
subj
ectiv
evi
ewon
awar
enes
sge
nera
lper
cept
ions
and
impa
ct)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
UK
and
USA
1998
28SF
par
tial(
p4)
SSn
otst
ated
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(pp
12^2
2)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Can
ada
1998
^199
929SF
par
tial(
p16
)SS
not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ede
scrip
tions
and
quan
titat
ive
listin
gs(p
p18
^30
32^3
4)Q
ualit
ativ
ePa
rtial
Aqu
alita
tive
valid
atio
nof
the
inte
rvie
ws
isd
escr
ibed
(pp
16^1
7)B
urki
naFa
so19
9930
SFn
otst
ated
SSn
otst
ated
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(p2
2)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
Can
ada
2000
32SF
par
tial
SSn
otst
ated
42
(p
23)
Bot
hqu
antit
ativ
ean
dqu
alita
tive
des
crip
tions
ofba
rrie
rs(p
p11
^14
26)
Freq
uenc
ies
(p2
6)Pa
rtial
Cal
led
`apu
rpos
ive
sam
ple
ofC
anad
ian
polic
y-m
aker
srsquo(p
8)
Can
ada
2000
33SF
not
stat
edSS
sno
wb
alle
d(p
ii)
88
(22
25)
(p1
8)B
oth
quan
titat
ive
and
qual
itativ
ed
escr
iptio
nsof
faci
litat
ors
(pp
ii
i35
^37)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
a Sam
ple
fram
ec
omp
lete
ˆth
esa
mp
lew
asd
escr
ibed
inre
latio
nto
allt
hed
ecis
ion
-mak
ers
inth
eco
ntex
toft
hest
udy
par
tialˆ
inco
mp
lete
info
rmat
ion
not
stat
edˆ
nod
escr
iptio
nb S
amp
lest
rate
gy
com
ple
tesa
mp
ler
and
omsa
mp
les
now
bal
led
sam
ple
orn
otst
ated
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244g J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
Mai
nre
sults
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p5
4)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
60)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
54)
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
65)
USA
1973
8Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p1
41)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
142
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
143
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
43)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p14
114
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(pp
142
145)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p1
43)
USA
1973
^197
49an
dU
SA
1973
^197
410
(pv
ii)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
333
6)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
33)
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p3
3)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)
USA
1977
11Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
155
158)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p1
45)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p14
915
2)P
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p15
9^16
0)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
155
158)
USA
1980
2an
dU
SA19
8012
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
stTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sM
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
USA
1982
13N
one
ofth
efa
cilit
ator
sw
ere
men
tione
din
the
othe
rstu
dies
Non
eof
the
bar
riers
wer
em
entio
ned
inth
eot
hers
tud
ies
USA
1983
14C
omm
unity
pres
sure
orcl
ient
dem
and
forr
esea
rch
(pp
82
84)
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
82)
Not
stat
ed
Swed
en19
84^1
98515
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
p14
614
9)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
148
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
149
)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
150
)
USA
1990
16R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
114
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
18)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p11
111
5)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(pp
119
^122
)U
SA19
9117
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p5
19)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(pp
519
520)
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
19)
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
519
)U
K19
9118
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
5)N
otst
ated
USA
1993
^199
419G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
27)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p2
7)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
9)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
chA
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
13^1
427
)
UK
1994
^199
5202
1Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
32^3
4)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
p32
^34)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
pp
31^3
2)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(p3
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p3
3)M
exic
o19
94^1
99522
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
sTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
nsR
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
hIn
clus
ion
ofef
fect
iven
ess
data
(pp
106^
108
109^
113)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p10
7^11
1)
USA
1996
24Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
1)A
ustra
lia19
9523
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
107
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
108
)G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
108
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
108
)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
106
)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p1
06)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
106
)
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244h J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
Paki
stan
1998
26N
otst
ated
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p78
82)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
80)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p80
82)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
80)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p8
2)U
K19
9827
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p8
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
13)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p8
12)
UK
and
USA
1998
28Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
p3
17^2
1)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p5
12^1
7)
Can
ada
1998
^199
929Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p3
2)P
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p33
^34)
Bur
kina
Faso
1999
30N
otst
ated
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p2
1)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
23)
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
62)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p6
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
63)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
61)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
61)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p6
1)C
anad
a20
0032
Not
stat
edP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
26)
Can
ada
2000
33Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pi
)N
otst
ated
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244e J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le2
Stu
dym
etho
ds
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceS
amp
lefr
ame
(SF
)aan
dsa
mp
lest
rate
gy
(SS
)b
Res
po
nse
rate
Mea
sure
men
tofu
seo
fev
iden
ceM
easu
rem
ento
fd
eter
min
ants
ofu
seS
um
mar
yo
fdes
crip
tio
no
fmet
ho
ds
(co
mp
lete
par
tial
or
no
tad
equa
tely
des
crib
ed)a
nd
com
men
ts
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Aqu
antit
ativ
e4-
poi
ntsc
ore
wei
ghte
dac
cord
ing
toth
ree
deci
sion
leve
lsw
ithsu
mm
edsc
ore
rang
ing
from
0to
18(p
51)
Two-
way
AN
OV
A(p
66)
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
USA
1973
8SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
No
stat
istic
alte
chni
que
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
USA
1973
^197
49
and
USA
1973
^19
7410
(pv
ii)
SFp
artia
l(p
viii)
SSn
otm
entio
ned
partl
ysn
owb
alle
d(p
viii
)
95
(p2
4)B
oth
quan
titat
ivel
yra
ted
and
wei
ght
ed(p
p25
28
333
536
)and
qua
litat
ivel
yde
scrib
ed(p
p1^
4)D
escr
iptiv
elis
ting
ofra
tings
(pp
28
333
536
)and
MC
A(m
ultiv
aria
tere
gre
ssio
n)an
alys
is(p
27)
Parti
alIt
isst
ated
that
`this
repo
rtre
pre
sent
only
afir
stsu
mm
ary
ofso
me
ofth
ehi
ghlig
hts
and
mor
eim
por
tant
findi
ngsrsquo
(pv
i)S
ubse
quen
trep
orts
not
foun
d
USA
1977
11
SFp
artia
l(p
143)
SSs
now
bal
led
partl
yra
ndom
(p1
43)
Not
stat
edD
escr
iptiv
eN
ost
atis
tical
tech
niqu
ePa
rtial
The
inte
rvie
ws
appe
arto
have
bee
nm
ade
betw
een
1973
and
1976
USA
1980
2an
dU
SA19
8012
SFp
artia
l(p
167)
SSn
otst
ated
90
(p1
67)
Bot
hqu
antit
ativ
ede
scrip
tions
rat
edan
dw
eig
hted
and
qual
itativ
e(p
p16
9ff
303)
Des
crip
tive
listin
gof
ratin
gs(p
p1
70^1
72
174)
and
25va
riabl
esan
alys
edus
ing
fact
oran
alys
isto
dev
elop
five
dim
ensi
ons
(p
304
)
Parti
alB
oth
a4-
poin
t(p
168
)and
a5-
poi
ntw
eigh
ted
ratin
gsc
ale
(pp
173
303)
The
qual
itativ
era
ting
com
esfro
mlis
ting
ofm
ostm
entio
ned
char
acte
ristic
sof
usef
ulne
ss
The
five
dim
ensi
ons
are
liste
din
Tabl
e3
und
erfa
cilit
ator
s
USA
1982
13SF
Par
tial
(pp
187
^188
)SS
ran
dom
sam
ple
(pp
187
^188
)
Volu
ntee
red
(p1
88)
Qua
ntita
tive
listin
gof
the
deci
sion
qua
lity
ofev
iden
ce^
use
onsi
xdi
ffere
ntle
vels
ofco
mpl
exity
(pp
195^
208)
List
ing
offre
quen
cies
(pp
196
^198
)Pa
rtial
The
132
dec
isio
n-m
aker
sw
ere
rand
omly
dist
ribut
edto
two
of50
case
stud
ies
and
six
diff
eren
tlev
els
(p1
94)
USA
1983
14SF
not
stat
ed(p
79)
SS
not
stat
ed(p
79)
65
(p7
9)Q
uant
itativ
elis
ting
and
ratin
gs(p
p8
2^86
)Fr
eque
ncie
san
dra
ted
impo
rtanc
e(a
sve
ry
mod
erat
ely
orno
tim
porta
nt)(
p8
2)
SF
and
SSco
mpl
ete
ifth
est
udyrsquo
sfo
cus
cons
ider
edon
lydi
rect
ors
inFl
orid
aan
dN
orth
Car
olin
aan
dif
ther
ew
ere
only
one
dire
ctor
inea
chC
omm
unity
Men
talH
ealth
Cen
ter
Swed
en19
84^
1985
15SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
p14
6^15
0)Li
stin
gof
frequ
enci
es(p
p1
451
49)
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edTh
eau
thor
sm
ainl
yd
iscu
ssan
dde
mon
stra
ted
iffer
entw
ays
ofut
ilisi
ngre
sear
cha
sei
ther
ins
trum
enta
lpo
litic
alc
onfli
cte
nlig
hten
men
tin
tera
ctiv
eor
tact
ical
(p1
44)
`
usin
gre
sear
ch`in
stru
men
tally
rsquorsquoor
for
`enl
ight
enm
entrsquorsquo
purp
oses
mea
ntdi
ffere
ntth
ings
indi
ffere
ntse
tting
san
ddi
ffere
ntor
gani
zatio
nalp
ositi
onsrsquo
(p1
45)
USA
1990
16SF
par
tial(
p11
0)SS
com
ple
te
(p1
10)
100
(p1
10)
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
112
)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Com
ple
tere
fers
toth
e27
rep
rese
ntat
ives
inth
etw
opl
anni
ngco
mm
ittee
sin
the
two
com
mun
ities
No
furth
erge
nera
lisat
ion
can
be
mad
eon
the
basi
sof
this
sam
ple
USA
1991
17SF
com
plet
e(p
p5
13^5
14)
SSr
ando
msa
mp
le(p
513
)
60
(p5
14)
Qua
ntita
tivel
yde
scrip
tive
rate
dan
dw
eig
hted
(p
p51
9^52
2)D
escr
iptiv
elis
ting
ofw
eigh
ted
ratin
gs(p
p5
17^5
23)a
ndm
ultip
lere
gre
ssio
n(p
p5
185
23^5
27)
Com
ple
te
Wei
ghte
don
3-p
oint
and
5-p
oint
scal
es
UK
1991
18SF
com
plet
e(p
51)
SSr
ando
msa
mp
le(p
51)
73
(p5
1)Q
uant
itativ
era
ted
desc
riptio
ns(p
p51
^54)
Per
cent
ages
(pp
51^5
4)C
omp
lete
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244f J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le2
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceS
amp
lefr
ame
(SF
)aan
dsa
mp
lest
rate
gy
(SS
)b
Res
po
nse
rate
Mea
sure
men
tofu
seo
fev
iden
ceM
easu
rem
ento
fd
eter
min
ants
ofu
seS
um
mar
yo
fdes
crip
tio
no
fmet
ho
ds
(co
mp
lete
par
tial
or
no
tad
equa
tely
des
crib
ed)a
nd
com
men
ts
USA
1993
^199
419SF
par
tial(
p15
)SS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(i
esu
bjec
tive
view
onke
yva
riabl
esof
pol
icy
chan
gea
nym
entio
nno
rank
ing)
(p1
6)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edO
nly
Med
icai
dp
rog
ram
mes
with
spec
ific
cost
-con
tain
men
tpol
icie
sin
the
last
seve
raly
ears
(p2
9)U
K19
94^1
99520
21
SFp
artia
l(pp
461
46
5)SS
sno
wb
alle
d(p
p4
614
65)
100
(all
thos
eap
proa
ched
fori
nter
view
agre
edto
the
inte
rvie
w)
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
31f
f)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Mex
ico
1994
^199
522SF
not
stat
ed
SSn
otst
ated
N
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(i
esu
bjec
tive
view
onke
yva
riabl
es)(
pp
104
106^
108)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edP
urpo
sive
sam
ple
(per
sona
lcom
mun
icat
ions
)A
ustra
lia19
9523
SFp
artia
lSS
not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edQ
uant
itativ
ean
dd
escr
iptiv
e(p
p1
05^1
08)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edC
alle
d`p
urpo
sive
sam
plin
gfra
mersquo
(p1
04)
USA
1996
24an
dU
SA19
9725
SFp
artia
l(pp
16
30^3
1)SS
com
bin
edra
ndom
and
snow
-ba
lled
(pp
30^3
1)
Not
stat
edQ
uant
itativ
ere
gres
sion
and
apa
thm
odel
(p1
8)Q
uant
itativ
ere
gres
sion
and
apa
thm
odel
(p1
8)Pa
rtial
but
with
ago
odde
scrip
tion
ofSS
and
SF
Paki
stan
1998
26SF
par
tial(
p77
)SS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
(pp
788
082
)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
UK
1998
27SF
par
tial(
pp1
^2)
SSn
otst
ated
(pp
1^2
)
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(ie
subj
ectiv
evi
ewon
awar
enes
sge
nera
lper
cept
ions
and
impa
ct)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
UK
and
USA
1998
28SF
par
tial(
p4)
SSn
otst
ated
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(pp
12^2
2)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Can
ada
1998
^199
929SF
par
tial(
p16
)SS
not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ede
scrip
tions
and
quan
titat
ive
listin
gs(p
p18
^30
32^3
4)Q
ualit
ativ
ePa
rtial
Aqu
alita
tive
valid
atio
nof
the
inte
rvie
ws
isd
escr
ibed
(pp
16^1
7)B
urki
naFa
so19
9930
SFn
otst
ated
SSn
otst
ated
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(p2
2)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
Can
ada
2000
32SF
par
tial
SSn
otst
ated
42
(p
23)
Bot
hqu
antit
ativ
ean
dqu
alita
tive
des
crip
tions
ofba
rrie
rs(p
p11
^14
26)
Freq
uenc
ies
(p2
6)Pa
rtial
Cal
led
`apu
rpos
ive
sam
ple
ofC
anad
ian
polic
y-m
aker
srsquo(p
8)
Can
ada
2000
33SF
not
stat
edSS
sno
wb
alle
d(p
ii)
88
(22
25)
(p1
8)B
oth
quan
titat
ive
and
qual
itativ
ed
escr
iptio
nsof
faci
litat
ors
(pp
ii
i35
^37)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
a Sam
ple
fram
ec
omp
lete
ˆth
esa
mp
lew
asd
escr
ibed
inre
latio
nto
allt
hed
ecis
ion
-mak
ers
inth
eco
ntex
toft
hest
udy
par
tialˆ
inco
mp
lete
info
rmat
ion
not
stat
edˆ
nod
escr
iptio
nb S
amp
lest
rate
gy
com
ple
tesa
mp
ler
and
omsa
mp
les
now
bal
led
sam
ple
orn
otst
ated
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244g J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
Mai
nre
sults
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p5
4)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
60)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
54)
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
65)
USA
1973
8Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p1
41)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
142
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
143
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
43)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p14
114
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(pp
142
145)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p1
43)
USA
1973
^197
49an
dU
SA
1973
^197
410
(pv
ii)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
333
6)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
33)
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p3
3)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)
USA
1977
11Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
155
158)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p1
45)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p14
915
2)P
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p15
9^16
0)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
155
158)
USA
1980
2an
dU
SA19
8012
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
stTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sM
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
USA
1982
13N
one
ofth
efa
cilit
ator
sw
ere
men
tione
din
the
othe
rstu
dies
Non
eof
the
bar
riers
wer
em
entio
ned
inth
eot
hers
tud
ies
USA
1983
14C
omm
unity
pres
sure
orcl
ient
dem
and
forr
esea
rch
(pp
82
84)
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
82)
Not
stat
ed
Swed
en19
84^1
98515
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
p14
614
9)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
148
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
149
)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
150
)
USA
1990
16R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
114
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
18)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p11
111
5)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(pp
119
^122
)U
SA19
9117
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p5
19)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(pp
519
520)
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
19)
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
519
)U
K19
9118
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
5)N
otst
ated
USA
1993
^199
419G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
27)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p2
7)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
9)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
chA
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
13^1
427
)
UK
1994
^199
5202
1Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
32^3
4)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
p32
^34)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
pp
31^3
2)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(p3
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p3
3)M
exic
o19
94^1
99522
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
sTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
nsR
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
hIn
clus
ion
ofef
fect
iven
ess
data
(pp
106^
108
109^
113)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p10
7^11
1)
USA
1996
24Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
1)A
ustra
lia19
9523
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
107
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
108
)G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
108
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
108
)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
106
)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p1
06)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
106
)
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244h J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
Paki
stan
1998
26N
otst
ated
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p78
82)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
80)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p80
82)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
80)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p8
2)U
K19
9827
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p8
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
13)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p8
12)
UK
and
USA
1998
28Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
p3
17^2
1)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p5
12^1
7)
Can
ada
1998
^199
929Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p3
2)P
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p33
^34)
Bur
kina
Faso
1999
30N
otst
ated
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p2
1)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
23)
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
62)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p6
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
63)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
61)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
61)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p6
1)C
anad
a20
0032
Not
stat
edP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
26)
Can
ada
2000
33Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pi
)N
otst
ated
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244f J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le2
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceS
amp
lefr
ame
(SF
)aan
dsa
mp
lest
rate
gy
(SS
)b
Res
po
nse
rate
Mea
sure
men
tofu
seo
fev
iden
ceM
easu
rem
ento
fd
eter
min
ants
ofu
seS
um
mar
yo
fdes
crip
tio
no
fmet
ho
ds
(co
mp
lete
par
tial
or
no
tad
equa
tely
des
crib
ed)a
nd
com
men
ts
USA
1993
^199
419SF
par
tial(
p15
)SS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(i
esu
bjec
tive
view
onke
yva
riabl
esof
pol
icy
chan
gea
nym
entio
nno
rank
ing)
(p1
6)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edO
nly
Med
icai
dp
rog
ram
mes
with
spec
ific
cost
-con
tain
men
tpol
icie
sin
the
last
seve
raly
ears
(p2
9)U
K19
94^1
99520
21
SFp
artia
l(pp
461
46
5)SS
sno
wb
alle
d(p
p4
614
65)
100
(all
thos
eap
proa
ched
fori
nter
view
agre
edto
the
inte
rvie
w)
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(p
31f
f)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Mex
ico
1994
^199
522SF
not
stat
ed
SSn
otst
ated
N
otst
ated
Qua
litat
ive
and
desc
riptiv
e(i
esu
bjec
tive
view
onke
yva
riabl
es)(
pp
104
106^
108)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edP
urpo
sive
sam
ple
(per
sona
lcom
mun
icat
ions
)A
ustra
lia19
9523
SFp
artia
lSS
not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edQ
uant
itativ
ean
dd
escr
iptiv
e(p
p1
05^1
08)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
edC
alle
d`p
urpo
sive
sam
plin
gfra
mersquo
(p1
04)
USA
1996
24an
dU
SA19
9725
SFp
artia
l(pp
16
30^3
1)SS
com
bin
edra
ndom
and
snow
-ba
lled
(pp
30^3
1)
Not
stat
edQ
uant
itativ
ere
gres
sion
and
apa
thm
odel
(p1
8)Q
uant
itativ
ere
gres
sion
and
apa
thm
odel
(p1
8)Pa
rtial
but
with
ago
odde
scrip
tion
ofSS
and
SF
Paki
stan
1998
26SF
par
tial(
p77
)SS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
(pp
788
082
)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
UK
1998
27SF
par
tial(
pp1
^2)
SSn
otst
ated
(pp
1^2
)
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(ie
subj
ectiv
evi
ewon
awar
enes
sge
nera
lper
cept
ions
and
impa
ct)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
UK
and
USA
1998
28SF
par
tial(
p4)
SSn
otst
ated
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(pp
12^2
2)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Can
ada
1998
^199
929SF
par
tial(
p16
)SS
not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ede
scrip
tions
and
quan
titat
ive
listin
gs(p
p18
^30
32^3
4)Q
ualit
ativ
ePa
rtial
Aqu
alita
tive
valid
atio
nof
the
inte
rvie
ws
isd
escr
ibed
(pp
16^1
7)B
urki
naFa
so19
9930
SFn
otst
ated
SSn
otst
ated
Not
stat
edQ
ualit
ativ
ean
dde
scrip
tive
(p2
2)Q
ualit
ativ
eN
otad
equa
tely
desc
ribed
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31SF
not
stat
edSS
not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Des
crip
tive
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
Can
ada
2000
32SF
par
tial
SSn
otst
ated
42
(p
23)
Bot
hqu
antit
ativ
ean
dqu
alita
tive
des
crip
tions
ofba
rrie
rs(p
p11
^14
26)
Freq
uenc
ies
(p2
6)Pa
rtial
Cal
led
`apu
rpos
ive
sam
ple
ofC
anad
ian
polic
y-m
aker
srsquo(p
8)
Can
ada
2000
33SF
not
stat
edSS
sno
wb
alle
d(p
ii)
88
(22
25)
(p1
8)B
oth
quan
titat
ive
and
qual
itativ
ed
escr
iptio
nsof
faci
litat
ors
(pp
ii
i35
^37)
Qua
litat
ive
Not
adeq
uate
lyde
scrib
ed
a Sam
ple
fram
ec
omp
lete
ˆth
esa
mp
lew
asd
escr
ibed
inre
latio
nto
allt
hed
ecis
ion
-mak
ers
inth
eco
ntex
toft
hest
udy
par
tialˆ
inco
mp
lete
info
rmat
ion
not
stat
edˆ
nod
escr
iptio
nb S
amp
lest
rate
gy
com
ple
tesa
mp
ler
and
omsa
mp
les
now
bal
led
sam
ple
orn
otst
ated
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244g J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
Mai
nre
sults
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p5
4)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
60)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
54)
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
65)
USA
1973
8Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p1
41)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
142
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
143
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
43)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p14
114
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(pp
142
145)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p1
43)
USA
1973
^197
49an
dU
SA
1973
^197
410
(pv
ii)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
333
6)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
33)
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p3
3)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)
USA
1977
11Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
155
158)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p1
45)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p14
915
2)P
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p15
9^16
0)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
155
158)
USA
1980
2an
dU
SA19
8012
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
stTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sM
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
USA
1982
13N
one
ofth
efa
cilit
ator
sw
ere
men
tione
din
the
othe
rstu
dies
Non
eof
the
bar
riers
wer
em
entio
ned
inth
eot
hers
tud
ies
USA
1983
14C
omm
unity
pres
sure
orcl
ient
dem
and
forr
esea
rch
(pp
82
84)
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
82)
Not
stat
ed
Swed
en19
84^1
98515
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
p14
614
9)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
148
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
149
)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
150
)
USA
1990
16R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
114
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
18)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p11
111
5)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(pp
119
^122
)U
SA19
9117
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p5
19)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(pp
519
520)
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
19)
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
519
)U
K19
9118
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
5)N
otst
ated
USA
1993
^199
419G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
27)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p2
7)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
9)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
chA
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
13^1
427
)
UK
1994
^199
5202
1Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
32^3
4)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
p32
^34)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
pp
31^3
2)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(p3
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p3
3)M
exic
o19
94^1
99522
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
sTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
nsR
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
hIn
clus
ion
ofef
fect
iven
ess
data
(pp
106^
108
109^
113)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p10
7^11
1)
USA
1996
24Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
1)A
ustra
lia19
9523
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
107
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
108
)G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
108
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
108
)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
106
)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p1
06)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
106
)
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244h J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
Paki
stan
1998
26N
otst
ated
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p78
82)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
80)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p80
82)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
80)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p8
2)U
K19
9827
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p8
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
13)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p8
12)
UK
and
USA
1998
28Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
p3
17^2
1)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p5
12^1
7)
Can
ada
1998
^199
929Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p3
2)P
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p33
^34)
Bur
kina
Faso
1999
30N
otst
ated
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p2
1)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
23)
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
62)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p6
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
63)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
61)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
61)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p6
1)C
anad
a20
0032
Not
stat
edP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
26)
Can
ada
2000
33Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pi
)N
otst
ated
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244g J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
Mai
nre
sults
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
The
Net
herla
nds
1969
^197
17Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p5
4)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
60)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
54)
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
65)
USA
1973
8Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p1
41)
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
h(p
142
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
143
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
43)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p14
114
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(pp
142
145)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p1
43)
USA
1973
^197
49an
dU
SA
1973
^197
410
(pv
ii)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
333
6)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
33)
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p3
3)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
8)
USA
1977
11Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
155
158)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p1
45)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p14
915
2)P
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p15
9^16
0)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
155
158)
USA
1980
2an
dU
SA19
8012
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
stTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sM
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
USA
1982
13N
one
ofth
efa
cilit
ator
sw
ere
men
tione
din
the
othe
rstu
dies
Non
eof
the
bar
riers
wer
em
entio
ned
inth
eot
hers
tud
ies
USA
1983
14C
omm
unity
pres
sure
orcl
ient
dem
and
forr
esea
rch
(pp
82
84)
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
82)
Not
stat
ed
Swed
en19
84^1
98515
Res
earc
hth
atco
nfirm
scu
rren
tpol
icy
oren
dors
esse
lf-in
tere
st(p
p14
614
9)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
148
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
149
)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
150
)
USA
1990
16R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
114
)R
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
(p1
18)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
p11
111
5)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(pp
119
^122
)U
SA19
9117
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
(p5
19)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(pp
519
520)
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
19)
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
519
)U
K19
9118
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
(p5
5)N
otst
ated
USA
1993
^199
419G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
27)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p2
7)Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
9)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
chA
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(pp
13^1
427
)
UK
1994
^199
5202
1Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pp
32^3
4)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
p32
^34)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
pp
31^3
2)P
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
(p3
3)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p3
3)M
exic
o19
94^1
99522
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
sTi
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
chR
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
nsR
esea
rch
that
conf
irms
curr
entp
olic
yor
endo
rses
self-
inte
rest
Com
mun
itypr
essu
reor
clie
ntde
man
dfo
rres
earc
hIn
clus
ion
ofef
fect
iven
ess
data
(pp
106^
108
109^
113)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oliti
cali
nsta
bilit
yor
high
turn
over
ofpo
licy-
mak
ing
staf
f(p
p10
7^11
1)
USA
1996
24Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p2
1)A
ustra
lia19
9523
Pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
rese
arch
ers
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s(p
107
)Ti
mel
ines
san
dre
leva
nce
ofth
ere
sear
ch(p
108
)G
ood
qual
ityre
sear
ch(p
108
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
108
)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
106
)La
ckof
timel
ines
sor
rele
vanc
eof
rese
arch
(p1
06)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
106
)
cont
inue
d
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244h J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
Paki
stan
1998
26N
otst
ated
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p78
82)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
80)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p80
82)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
80)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p8
2)U
K19
9827
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p8
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
13)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p8
12)
UK
and
USA
1998
28Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
p3
17^2
1)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p5
12^1
7)
Can
ada
1998
^199
929Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p3
2)P
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p33
^34)
Bur
kina
Faso
1999
30N
otst
ated
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p2
1)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
23)
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
62)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p6
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
63)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
61)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
61)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p6
1)C
anad
a20
0032
Not
stat
edP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
26)
Can
ada
2000
33Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pi
)N
otst
ated
Review article Health policy-makersrsquo perceptions of their use of evidence
244h J Health Serv Res Policy Vol 7 No 4 October 2002
Tab
le3
cont
inue
d
Stu
dy
refe
ren
ceFa
cilit
ato
rsto
use
ofr
esea
rch
iden
ticente
din
thre
eo
rm
ore
stu
die
sB
arri
ers
tou
seo
fre
sear
chid
enti
cented
inth
ree
or
mo
rest
ud
ies
Paki
stan
1998
26N
otst
ated
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
p78
82)
Pow
eran
dbu
dget
stru
ggle
s(p
80)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p80
82)
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
80)
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p8
2)U
K19
9827
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p8
)R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
13)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p8
12)
UK
and
USA
1998
28Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
Goo
dqu
ality
rese
arch
Res
earc
hth
atin
clud
esa
sum
mar
yw
ithcl
earr
ecom
men
dat
ions
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
Incl
usio
nof
effe
ctiv
enes
sda
ta(p
p3
17^2
1)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
sP
oorq
ualit
yof
rese
arch
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p5
12^1
7)
Can
ada
1998
^199
929Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(p3
2)P
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
p33
^34)
Bur
kina
Faso
1999
30N
otst
ated
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p2
1)A
bse
nce
ofpe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
(p2
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
23)
Sout
hA
frica
2000
31R
esea
rch
that
incl
udes
asu
mm
ary
with
clea
rrec
omm
end
atio
ns(p
62)
Tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
eof
the
rese
arch
(p6
2)M
utua
lmis
trust
betw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
63)
Ab
senc
eof
pers
onal
cont
actb
etw
een
polic
y-m
aker
san
dre
sear
cher
s(p
61)
Lack
oftim
elin
ess
orre
leva
nce
ofre
sear
ch(p
61)
Pol
itica
lins
tab
ility
orhi
ghtu
rnov
erof
polic
y-m
akin
gst
aff(
p6
1)C
anad
a20
0032
Not
stat
edP
ower
and
budg
etst
rugg
les
Mut
ualm
istru
stbe
twee
npo
licy-
mak
ers
and
rese
arch
ers
Poo
rqua
lity
ofre
sear
ch(p
26)
Can
ada
2000
33Pe
rson
alco
ntac
tbet
wee
nre
sear
cher
san
dd
ecis
ion-
mak
ers
(pi
)N
otst
ated