1

Integrated Project Delivery

Getting Under the Hood

2

Do

es

Pro

jec

t D

eli

ve

ry

Ma

tte

r?

3

Is N

orm

al

No

rma

l?(o

r D

ys

fun

cti

on

al)

4

If Y

ou

Co

uld

Sta

rt

fro

m a

Cle

an

Sla

te…

5

An

IP

DE

xa

mp

le:

SM

C C

as

tro

Va

lle

y

6

Ove rvie w @ 70% Co mp le tio n

• Exp e c te d Co st $255 Mill io n

• Autho rize d Co st $225 Millio n

• 30% Sc he d ule Co mp re ssio n (a nd 6 we e ks a he a d )

• $5.8 Millio n Co nting e nc y (o nly $2.2 use d )

• 26 Owne r Orig ina te d Cha ng e s (<1%)

• 333 RFIs (No rma l 3,000)

• Inte nse Use o f BIM

• Full Bud g e te d Pro fit

• No Co mp ro mise s to Pro g ra m

7

Pe rfo rma nc e Me tric s

• Sc o p e Insta lle d EXACTLY a s Mo d e le d

– Me c ha nic a l 99%

– Plumb ing 99%

– Ele c tric a l 71%

– Fra ming 79%

• Re wo rk b a se line a c tua l

– Me c ha nic a l 7% 0.5%

– Plumb ing 10% 0.5%

– Ele c tric a l 10% 8.5%

– Fra ming 5% 0.5%

8

Pro d uc tivity Imp ro ve me nts

Base line Planne d Ac tual Proje c te d

Me c ha nic a l 100% 105% 116% 120%

Plumb ing 100% 100% 107% 110%

Ele c tric a l 100% 114% 105% 107%

Fra ming 100% 122% 120% 121%

9

Note: Baseline productivity based on contractors’ own historic

productivity on similar projects.

10

IPD

Str

uc

ture