Upload
lamphuc
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
)
' )
)
' ' ' ' "" ""' " ' ,,.,
Test Report
Sub Soil Exploration & Testing
For '
Proposed Construction of G+3 Type houses Under
Prod han Montri A was Yojna
AT Sector-1 OB in Avodh Vihar Yojna.
District- Lucknow
For The Executive Engineer
Construction Division-7,
UP Avos Evam Vikas Porishad.Lucknow
Pl<abLO«d.-Twt /K -V~Te«"
SNOW FOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS (Nat cn~l Accredrt;an Bo~r~ lo• Testing & Caltc·~lton Lobor~torb(NA6~.1 Ac~:edtled]
:Port~er lnsti:•.re • CIDC (Goo· of IMra: JIMerrber ""cera· oo cl todran Labomtmiesl
[An ISO 9:0- :2·JI5 cert Ired Comoan·llf 25 Yecr1 cl Eng n~cnng E•ce·lencej
Regc. O~·ice 5/259 [H.I.G ,I Vr<os No go· lucm;:.w- 226022 P~ooe: 0522-4C4?624(0j, 78976SIIIIIM]
....,""'''OW. 1c 111/A, ~'m"'h~acoolo•y M R~ Ro..,, Jooalp"~" > I Pho .,..,_2540540, "'"''"'""
>o 172112, Ho""'i ~'0"• Kh•ntl Rooo, R'"""' UOO"-""d) MoOI~· ... !i5, .. 0,04 .. 15 .. 0'"
"''eb>ile wwv;_oncw!O<..nlolr _co '" E - Mai : s~owfwnbn:O:gma·l com
'
' •
•
. '
• •
•
• ' )
)
I
.: -)
• •
' .l , I•
'
Acknowledgemenl
We are grateful to the Executive Eng:neer, Construction
Divfsion-7, U= ·Avos Evo01 Vikas Parishac', LUCKnow fer
------j5(6Vidlrig an opportunity to us to corry out these
investigations. Cooperation extended by site staff during
site investigations is thankfully acknowledged.
• •
_ _!O~JiNO_W_fOUNTAIN CONSUlTANTS- -- ----
Soow Fountoln C:onoultl!nll, 6125!', Vrho Nogor, Luoknow Phono: O<n-!0476!4 (0), r,.., Fox -2>06132 (l.abJ ,
• • •
• •
' ~
.~
' ;, )
)
·' - -"--
• I., .. • • ... --
'l
i;
c
de:. dq, dr
S:, Sq S·
lc, ic. ir
-~~~~
• df
B
s;
E
Co
- __ HI
lis\ of Symbols. Abbrevlotions
Bear rg c:pocily fa:toro
Ccre!ID~ in <glc'll'
Overburden :::.-essure
Wet uni' weight of soil 9<11/Cr-t'
Deoth factors
srooe facto's
lnclhotlor. factors
-~ --- -water-\EI~k;!<:ooect:on faclors
:';hOW F::;·LNV. h CCN,I_llA-1"5
I<;C 9Xl- ::Jo~ Cerlliiec
Internal angle fiiclion degree
Ullimate Searhg capacity lr. kg/crT''
Depth ot foundation
Size olloot:ng In m
ToCci sialement
Immediate setllement
Prima'Y ccnsclido:ion sel\leme'll
foundalion pressure kq/cm'
Influence factors
Young's modulous
! Comp•esslor, index
Thl:~r~e;.s of compressive Ioyer
Void ratio
ln:tlal o.-e• burden preswre at t~e rr,tdd'e of tfle clayey
Ioyer
. Pres<Ufe increased at foundation level
Influence Factors •
Differenlicl free sweiiTesl
'
" •
' •
'
~ , • -' " ,)
' I, '
' '
SNOW 'OU'i-~lr1 CQNSJC"~NTS
ISO 9CC•l ·20C5 Ce!Hft<=d
'1. INTRODUCTION:
Tre work ol suo soil explcrol;-:::.r, one testing for proposed
site o' O.H.T. in Secto·-Jo, Avadh Virar Yojono I'SOOKLI ot
Sullonour Road, Lucknow, u. wcs awarded ·o us by th•
Executive Engineer, UP Aves Evam Vikas Paishad, Construction
Div'sion-7 vide their work order.
The object of the sub-surface investigation was to study the
pertinent physical & mechanical proPer7ies of soil underlying t'le
site so that a sole & economical foundation may be designed .
Geo-techn:cal study is involved both in field and laboratory test
to detennine sate al!owable pressure for the foundation soil. The
f1eld..vork consisted of 3 Boreholes. The boring poi"lls were
decided in consultation with Engineer-in-charge of the site.
Locations of the boreholes has been shown in site plan.
MelhodologYi
The work assigned shall be executed as per IS/~SO/IEC
17025: 20051NDIAN STANDARDS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
THE COMPETENCE OF TESTING AND CALIBRATION LABORATORIES
and according to National occreditation Board for testing and
calibration laboratories Govt. of Indio - 142, we have caiTbroted
our equipment _used and its traceability with Regional Te3ting
centre !Northern -Regional), Government o! India. Okhala, New
Delhi: vide their letter No. 01533 & 01534 and M/ 1203/2927 and
Notional Counc~ for Cement and Building material NABL
ACCREDITED C - 0089 & C - 0090, vide their letter No. C 7502, MD
5060 to MD 5066. Sfondard vsed National Traceqbility to M/s.
National Physical Laboratory, New Delhi vide their certificate No.
sn.,. Fouotol" Conoullo-nto, 01209, Vik,. Nagar, luoknow """'"" 052!-4()~1124 101, Telo Fo< -276!132 IL.obl •
' .. ••
' '
• •
, j ·--'
' 'j :,j
" '-_. •
: .J
i'J
J
' ,_, :) ----,, 11 I; b I
' • '
,,
SN·~'N 'O,l'JlA!N CCNSULTA~-> .\0 ;oo· :2J~ CGd r,ec
9731/~.05/4/LJI and Certif cote No. 6423/02/Sll using
No. ICL/OP/Oi Section 10. To meet Ol.-1 -~,e Nofcnol ar,d
ln~ernolional standard o1 Co!ib·otion aad Traceability a: Meas'-1reMenh the procedure & policy laid down by NABL - 142
on Coliorat•on ar-d Traceoblli·y is being followed .
2. fiELD WORK:
2.1 BORE HOLES: •
150 mm. diameter boreholes were drilled by manl:a'
operation in accordance with I.S. 1892-197~. DJring, the boring
visual observations of strata were also recorded.
All the disturbed and •Jndisturbed samples were brought to
the lob-oratory tor testing.
3. LABORATORY WORK:
3.1 Disturbed/Undisturbed soil samples were examined ia the
laboratory for 1he tollowing tests as per relevan1 Indian
standard 2720 •
l. Sieve analysiS -------- ·-----
2. Plasticity Index
3. Particle size analysis
4. Natural moisi!J~e content
5. Original wet & dry density ---- --
6 Specific gravity
7. Shear strength characteristics
8. Consolidation Characteristics
9. Harmful Salts
4. DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION OF THE RESl/LTS:
4.1 STRATIGRAPHY:
Snow Fourtlln Conoult .. ts, 5/259, Vlk"' Nogor,luckn""' PM no: ""~04Tel410), Tole F•• -neolll!IUOI ' ,,,. ____________ _
, __
• ' .. •
• ,. :~
•• , . • • ,, ' " ' • ,, '· • ,,.
~ " ·,)'
I)
• I •
SNOW OJ~-~INCONSJ~ At-<lo ·so 9001 :20CO C:eri'ied
As per soil mop of Indio, Lucknow is sifuated in :ne zone
of Gcmli A:luvium. AS per Natio,-,cl [Utding code, map of nc'io
~howtng Seismic Zores ct Indio. Lucknow lies ;n zone No. Ill. As
de;-ireo by the authcrites 3 boreholes were reqUired to be
- --;voh<ed -out up to 15-Hl-deplb.
Detailed st•aligraphic poStion of boreholes is as under:
lsno \ Strcrla Depth In m. \ IS Group \ Sno \ strQ!a Depth In m. IS GIO!,!p
orhleN
j CL j2. ]7.C0tol5.?!Jmdepth I sw. I il hole No_
I. o.oo lo 7.00 l"l dep~h
a· I N
1. o.OOto7.00mdepth cc. 7.Wtc 15.00mdeplh SM
As Per I.S. 1498-1970 TypicaL Name are u under:
'·'
'·'
cc Silty Clays 01 Low Plcslicily With Low Compressiblli-y
smysana
S.P.T. VALUES:
Standard--penetrafion_lesfs _ _jSPTI were carried out Os per _ _!~ •
2131-1981 u;ihg standard split spoon sampler. wrich was driven
by means of a standard hammer of 63.5 kg. fo',ling freely from a
height of 75 em. 45cm. • sampler was driven and number af
blows required fo~ last 30 em. were recorded. The S.P.T. vOlues
ore shown in field observation chori. Standard Penetratior. Tests
were conducted in a:l the boreholes as per IS -2131-1981. The
observed 'N' values ore s"'lown in the borelog Chart.
WATER TABLE:
wa;er table in test bore holes was measured following t:-.e
p-ocedure la'd down I.S. 6935- 1973 (mefhod foe
.
'
•
•
'
' ' .--
I' '·'
•
•• • r, ,.
')-..---
.. l' i· . -iC· .. -
'
'
~NC'I' 'CUh ;,1,1r1 CONSJL-A~ lS
I>O 9001:2000 Cer1lfiec
ceter-niralion cf water level in lest bore hole). As oe- clause
2.4.3_ of LS. 1892- 197~ the depth o' wo·er ·:JCie !ihoulc be
ascertai"'eo by steady level of water in the lest bore holes. s;~,ce
wale: levels in lest bore holes may not reach equilibri-.m for
some _jiroe _ after __ Qoring, __ j_hese _should __ be_ measured i 2 to 24 howr.>
after boring. To get steady and stable level of water, water table
in test bore hole was measured after waiting tor 24 hours.
6. BEARING CAPACITY:
---1"00---safe ---bearing ---eapodty --.of--- -a strucrure- withoot --GA-Y--
distress of failure can be determined from rne consideration _ of
the following two criteria.
(a.) SHJ!AR FAilURE:
The soil be'leath the foundation shall be sole from risk
o: shear failure .
(b.) SETILEMENT FAILURE CRllERIA:
The foundation should not settle or deflect
extent causing damage to structure or impair fts usefulness. .. -
to an
The bearing copacity calc_ulation for foundation shall
be governed by 1S 1.904-1986, IS 6403-19.81. and I.S.
8009-1981 (Port & II) t976or\ the basis of availob_le
i'lformation . regarding the proposed desig-; t<ove been
do'le in the following paragrap'"ls,
7. SMRING CAPACITY ON SHEAR CONSIDERATION:
As per IS 6403-1981, the ultimate net bearing capodly 'qd"
on shear consideration fer structure is given by the formula .
In case of Ge-neral Shear failure :
qd = C. Nc.sc.dc.ic + q(Nq-1) sq.dq.iq.+ l/2 B:r. N·.sr.dr.ir.W' .
•
Snow FOUfll>ln Ccn•Uitants. 5/2!~. \IIKao N•gor. LucKn"" P~ono: 0622--40~762• (0), Toto Fox ..;17a8t32 (U~) ' , _____ _
'
'
r:
' ,, '
1: ,, ' '• I• ' '
! ' " ,, ' I
I, 'ii;'· ' ' , ' I·......_·
'
!n.£Qse of Lcccl Shear failure:
SNQ'{'J FOUNTAIN C::ONSLILTA!',lS IS:J 90Cl :2008 Certlhed
q'ci ~ 2/3 C."J' c. s:;:.cc.ic.+ql'<'c-1) sq.dc.io + 'h &:r.N'r.sr.dr.ir.W'.
Where.
Nc. Nq. Nr
-- c-q
y
cc, dq, dr
Sc, Sq, Sr.
ic, iq, ir
= Bear;ng capacity facto~.
= Coh_~~-o~!Kg/c~T:'I
= Overburde'l pressure
=Wet uni: weight of soil
= Depth focfors
= Shape factors:
= Inclination factors.
W' = Water table correction•factor.
Net safe bearing capacity is obtained after dividing
ultimate ne: bearing capacity (dql by o suitable foetor of
solely.
7.1.1.1 I!:EARING CAPACITY CAlCUlATION$;
The result of clossi!icalion test and SPT valul'l indicate the
Governing So~ Parameters are from borehole No. 2 for
conslll..lction of -OJf.T.- in --seaor=lo;-·-Avadh Vihar Yo) ana - -11500--
Kl). The depth of foiJndOtion at 2.50 m with size of tooting 5.00
m,
L Wet Unit Weight lgm/cc) = 1.850
2, Cohe~ion, 'C' (Kg/Cm') "0.27
3. Specific gravity = 2.650
4, Dry density lgm/cc) = 1.630
5, Void ratio = 0.630
6, Condition =Medium (Interpolation)
As the values of void ratio e• is between 0.75 \a 0.55 [i.e.
between general and local Shear failure consideration) therefore
Snow Fourrtsin Coo<olion,., 5/219, VI<"" NoQ'<. L.io"""'" Phone: 0622-"l47624 )0), Tolo F•• -270!132{lal>) •
"'' I ' I • ' .
'
' J
• ' • '
'> ,i
' I ' ,)
,J
I' ,,_ ,,
1):------
~-- ' ' • i> _.-ij. '
Sr10'11 ~ou~~-~11<1 CQNSI.JlTAWS
ISO 90C·l :2Xi' C~rllf 1ec
t'".e val<..'€5 ot bearing capacity factors a·e ·o l::e usee- based or,
interoolated values betv1een loc:JI and geneml 5'180' :ailu·e.
Internal Angle Interpolated value (Medium)
• 13
7.1.1.1.1 ASSUMING:
Type oftoundalion
Depth of foundation 'Of'
Width of Annular Raft
Nc
9.930
No "' 3.350 2.080
' Raft Four~dotion
' 2.50m
' 5.00m
' water Table Correction Factor • 0.88
Overburden Pressure q
SHAPE FACTORS;
QEPTH FACTORS.:
Sc
Sq ,,
' 0.463 Kg/em'
"' 1.30
"' 1.20
"' 0.60
De ' H0.2 Qf~'N0
De
Dq
INCLINATION FACTQRS:
lc=iq=ir=l
Ultimate Net bearing capacity
Foetor of safety
Net safe Bearing Capacity
' 1.126
' De
' 1 ,063'
7.1.1.2 BEARING CAPACITY CALCULATIONS:
' ' 1 +0.1 Of ..fN0
B
= 4.662 Kg/Cm'
"' 3.00
= 1.554 Kg/Cm'
The result ol classification test and SPT value indicate the
Snow FourJtaln c-utla~ls. 6/219, Vll<a• Nagar, LUoknow Phone: OOZZ..W4>5"' 101, T&lo FoK -278!132 {LaO) •
•
• ' ,) -----
• J
' ,J
,,----·
• : ,) : -i ~,,-: ::t
c).'
" ~ .... -; .) :_-
., ; -!)-----· I . I;;L
' ~--·
'
,, ,_
Gover:""ing Soi~ Parameters me from
S ~O'N FCU~ l AI" CONSU_ o ANTO ISO 9COI :2()(:0 ::er1ifiEC
borehole No. ~ for
constr:.Jction o· O.H.T. in Sectcr-10, Avodc- Viho' Ycjona (1500
KL) .. The depth of foundction a: 3.00 m with size of iooting 5.00
m.
\'lief Unit Weight (gM/CC)
2. Cohesion. 'C' (Kg/Cm2)
3. Specific gravity
4. Dry density (gm/cc]
5. Void ratio
6. Condition
"' 1.890
"- 0.26
"2.710
" 1.640
" 0.650
= Medium (Interpolation)
As the values of void ratio e•.is between 0.75 to 0.55 {i.e .
betvteen genera! and local Shear fa~ure consideration) therefore
the vaiues of bearing capacity factors ore fo be used based on .
interpolated values betwe~n local and general shear failure.
Internal Angle lnlerpolaled value (Medium)
~
13
7.1.1.2.1 ASSUMING:
Type of foundation
Depth o! foundation 'Df
Width of Annvlar Raft
Nc
9.930
Water Table Correction Foe: tor
Overburden Pressure q
SHAPE FACTORS:
DEPTH FACJQRS:
Sc
Sq
S•
"' 1.30
"' 1.20
"' 0.60
No "' 3.350 2.080
~ Roil Foundation
.~ 3.00m
·~ 5.oom
~ 0.82
~ 0.567 Kg/c:m'
snow Founloln ConoultOnlO, !!>51, Vlka• Nogor, LuoKnow Phone: OS:I!-I'l41i24 l\11, Te" Fax .Z7&11321Lobl
-
' . ' • '
•
•
De
Oq
'
ONC\'1 FOJNTA !N C:ONSJL-Af. TS
IS:;; 9JO" :2·Xl8 C~~it1ec
= 1 +0.2 Dl •11"0
B = . '151
= Dr
= 1.075
= ·1+0.1 ~'.IN0
B
-- ---JNC:LINADON FACTORS:----- -- ------
ic=iq=ir=
Ulllmate Net beating capacity
Factor of safety
-----"'"''' lsofe Beari_n_g C_OPQ<;;.Ity __ _
= 4.578 Kg/Cm•
= 3.00
- 1.526 K.QLC_m~' __
J -__ __ 8. B:EARING CAPACITY ON SffiLEMENT CONSIDERATION:
) - The result at classification tests indicates that with depth of
..
' ,.,:.....- ---),, )~'--.
:') ,.· ! ·t ,'. . ,.
•• 1
foundation as 2 . .:(), 3.00 m and width of footing as 5.00 m below
ground level. when strata in the e;fective zone comprises of
cohesive soil Ioyer, the settlement of cohesive layer has
therefore to be determined one then total settlement
evaluated .
Toto I Settlement of Foundgtlon on Cohesive Solis
As per I.S. 8009-19811Porl-1)
In the cose of clayey layers, the total settlement should
computed from
S: =:Si+Sc
Where
Sf = Total Settlement
Si = Immediate Settlement
Sc = Primary Consolidation Seltlem~nt
be
B.l(a} lmmesl!gle Settlement:
The immediate settlement beneath the centre or come~ of a
feasible loaded ore is given I;JY
"
•
•'
•
• -·
•
Si =[:;;x3x(l-~Jxl]!~
Where
p " ~oL.:ndation pressl.re (Kg/cr12:' •
' " Pois;on's retia= 0.5 :or cloy.
" Influence factor -----------
SNOW FCUh lAIN CO'<SULT~NTS
ISO 90GI '20C5 Cer-heci
.. . -- -----
;, _______ -
' ; J -,
J
' .. -· ~----" '
' I
E " Young's Modulus.
8.1(b) Prlmorv Consolldcllon Setllement:
Settlement of clayey soil is given by the formula:
Cc P0+.6P
c -= _;_~~=-"""XRf X Log--=------~
l+eO PO \','here Cc is the compression Index.
Ht
eo = Thickness of Compressible layer
= Void Ratio
PO = Initial overburden pressure at the middle of the Clayey
Ioyer
liP = PreMure inCreased a11ou"1dation level.
8.1.1.1 SETilEMENT OF COHESIVE SOil {for Raft Foundation):
(a} Primary Consolidation Settlement:
Governing consolidation characteristic is from borehole no. 2
i). Depth of foundation below ground level.
H). Width of footing
iii). Thickness of Effective Zone
iv). Thickness of cohesive layer in the Effective Zone
v). Depth of mid point of cohesive so~ layer
S.No. Particulars
L Original Premne at Foundation Level Kg/Cm2
2. Allowable Pressure Kg/Cm•
3, PO- Original Pre.>.~ure at Mid Point of Ck:Jy
Kg/Cm~
· = 2.50m.
= 5.00 m.
= 7.50 m.
= 7.50m
= 3.75m
!ore Hole No.2
0.463 1.554
1.156
Snow Fo"ntoln Cono"ltams, 5/2!9, lllka• lio~or, Lu<lnow Phono. 0522-4047614 (0), Tolo Fn .,!1%1Jl (lAb)
,, I\.-'---------,,··~
' •
·'
•
•
-~ j
, , ' j
i J'
,, ,,
;;~
•• ••
• • ' " ' It I
I, it
$"0\~ fC:U~-lAI~ CO~SULTAN1S
loO 9C)I'20G5 Cerl'ied
S.No. P!lrticulars
' C~onge of ?ressu·e at Foundatio~ leiel
Kg/Cm'
5 . lnft;ence Foetor 'K'
0. l!P- Cha11ge ot Pre1sure at Mid Point of Clay
Kg/Cm'
7. PO+ 6P . eo .
8. Log PO+ 6P
eo 9. CompressiorJindex. Cc
-w. Settleme:n-
8.1.1.11b)1mmedlate "Settlement:
FoJndction pre55L'!"e
Poisson's ratio
Influence foetor
Young's Modulus
Immediate Settlement
Tolgl Seltlemen1
.St .. - Si+Sc
Sf "' 0.870 + 12.280 em.
51 "' 13.150cm
~ 1.09 Kg/em"
~ 0.5 •
~ 0.85
~ 40o.oo Kg/em,
~ 0.87cm
Bore Hole No.2
1.09"
0.688
0.751
1.650
0.217
0.123
12.280
Seittement After Applying Rigidity FoetOr "' 10.52 em.
- - The TesutJs indicate that the settlement will be Not with -in
permissible :imit as per I.S. 1904-1986.
Tne res;;lts indicate that the settlement will be more than
permissible li-nit. As per National Buiding COde the pefTT1issible
settlement for Raft Foundation is 7.50 em. The pressure
corresponding to 7.~0 em. Settlement will be IFinal Trial)
1.108 Kg/cm2
8.1.1.2 SIDLEMENT Of COHESIVE SOIL (for Raft Fovndafionl:
Snow Fourrt>.ln Con•"'''""'• 61:20!, VI, .. Nogor, ~uo~now Phono: D122-'D47024 101. T~• Fox -2718132 (Lob)
1'-----~---
,_
' ' ' .. •
•
' ,. ' -~.)---
_,
,, .-_,
;j
··' ! :J
I
'' ' . ' I., ' ,, b '> ,, i) I. -If· )
•' . __
I , i I !-
1 ' ' ':·
S"O',~ FC~NTAI'< CO'<SU_]ANl$
150 90J1:2COB Ceri'ied
(o) Primary Con~ofidollon Set!lemenl:
Goverring consolidation cha'acieristic is from bore'"",o:e no. 2
i). Death of foundation below ground level
ii). Wid1h of fooling
i'i). ~hickness of Effective Zone
iv). 7hickness of cohesive layer in the Efiective Zone
v). Depth of mid point of cohes;ve soil layer
S.No. Parllculan
L Original Pressure at Foundaticn LeVel Kg/Cm0
2. Allowable Pressure Kg/Cm'
3. PO-Origiool-f'ressure at Mid Point of Clay
Kg/Cm~
'- Chang ('t of Pressure at Foundation Level
Kg/Crrf
5. Influence foetor 'K'
6. li.P- Change of Pressure at Mid Point of Clay
Kg/Cm2
7. PO+ 6P PO
8. LogP0+6P ---- - --- - -
PO
9. Compression Index. Cc
" Settlement
8.1.1,2 (b} Immediate Settlement:
Foundation pressure
Poisson's ratio
Influence factor
Young's Modulus
Immediate Settlement
Total Settlement
St = Si+Sc
- ---
" 0.96 Kg/cm2
" 05
" 0.85 • " 400.00 Kg/em•
" 0.76cm
- -
= 3.00 m.
= 5.00 m.
= 7.50 m.
= 7.50 m
= 3.75 m
Sore Hole No.2
0.567 ' 1.526
- . 1,276 --
0.959
0.6BB
0.660
1.517
0.181 -- -- --··
0.123
10.120
Sn~w Fountain Conoultants. 012~. 1'1~,. Nag or, luo~no~· Pho.,., 0~2-4047124 (0), TOl• F"' ·2706132 (LOl>(
-
"
_, • ' • ,
~
• • .~
·J ··--' -)~
I) ' . ,, I . I ', I ', . ) I . I' ·--.1-,----
' I·' I,
' i ' ' '
,.
.. ' • •
St "' 0.76C- 10.12C err
St = I 0.880 em
Settle-ner.t Alter Apply;ng Rig:dity Factor
S~OW fOUNT AI~ :::o~SUL]At-;]S ISO 90:,1:2008 Ce~i'iM
= 8.70 em.
The results indi:::ote that the settleme:--.~ will be Not with in
permissible limit os pe·J.S. 1904-: 986.
--- The- res-u'fs -kidlCale -lhat --HlE,- ··se;t;ement will be more Than-
' permissible limit. As per National 8Jildhg Code the . permissible
settlement for Rott Foundatio~ is 7.50 em. The pressure
corresponding to 7.50 em. Settlement will be I Final Trial)
--W"LJ 5l<Kgghlccmrr"''---·------ _
9. HARMFUl SALIS IN SOil;
Soil samples obtained from 1.00 m. depth of all the
boreholes were analysed for the presence of Harmful salts viz.,
Sulphotes. Carbonates, Bicotonates, and Chlorides.
ihe results given in the table below indicate that harmful
salts are Within permissible lim;ts .
Borehole D~~;h Carb~~a1e Bicor~nate Ch:~~e Sulphate No 1% '% 1%1
1 --- --- LOO o.coo- 0:~722 0.0423 .. . '
' LOO 0.000 0.0676 0.0344 0.000
' LOO ODOO 0.0861 Q0332 0000
10. CONCLUSION·
Propose-d CO!'IsirucHon of O.H.T. in Sector·HI. Avadh Vlhar Yojana
(1500 KL) at SuHtmpur Road. Luck.now.
10.1 The strata in the effective zone comprises ol Cohesive layers
only. The design load has therefoie to er~sure safety against
10.2
fa~ure due to shear as well as total settlement
No filled up spii has been met in any of the 3 Boreholes drilli'Jd
at th-e site. It ·may also be ensured that filed up soil does no;
Snow Fo"nloln Con••"'""'• 61201, llil<a• N•gor, Luoknow Pho"": 0522..oll4112~ (0], T•'• F•• ·2711132 (l.•Oi "
11'11 ________ ...._ ___ _
•
' ~
~ ------
>
• • • , ,.--.. -
)
' ") -I , (•.' ,,·--:·-.' ~;.
10.3
10.5
10.6
$NOW 'OU~-~IN CON5U.TANIC
!SO 90Ci:<X2 CM<fied
founo to exist at any s·age wr.ile diggi:-19 the actual
louncations. other wise dep•~ of fcundotio~, below grcu"'d
level be increased occo;cingly.
L
11.08
A net safe bearing copoctty of soil is 1.108 Kg/Sqc'Tl i.e.
tonne per square meter at a depth of foundation 2.5· m
below existing ground level is • recommended to be coopted
for R.C.C. raft annular foundation with outer die meter of 20.0
mete. and internal dio mete: of 10.0 meter .
A net safe bearirlg Ccip:lcity of soi: is 1.315Kg/Sqcm i.e. 13.15 ---- -- -
tonne per square meter at a depth of foundation 3m below
eidSHng··-·grOi.ir'id leVel- is ·recommended to be-··adopted -for
R.C.C. raft annular foundation with outer dia meter of 20.0
meter and internal dia meter of 10.0 meter.
Analysis of soil samples collected from the Site indicate that
the harmful sa tis are present wHhin permissible limit.
As per Annexure J (CI. 5.3.4.21 G, NATIONAL BUILDING CODE.
Lucknow lie~ in Zone Ill For • measure o' Earthquake the
structural· -dt'lslg/1 of O"iJ11ain~:r----;!;oold be done - ru -'-per prnvl510n-·
' given in ICI. 5.3.4,.21 G. NATIONAL BUILDING CODE.
Tho above recommendations based 00 the field
investigations data and the laboratory test resull a: the samples
co~ected from sHe and our experience in this regards.
If the actual sub-soil co'ldition during excavations for
foundation differs fiom that has been reported a reference
should be made to us for suggestions.
' ' Snow Fourlt>ln CooG"Itan,., 1.'161, Vli<a< llogor, L""'""" Phono: Di22--4D4762< iOi. Tolo fu -276~132 (L.o~) " r.
'
--
• ,
' . .; ::,---
·-~
)
• • . ----
~ , -;_)_."""
- ;,. ...
'
.,
BORE-LOG
"
Silty Sand
Deptt·
"
1.35
2.85
4.35
5.85
7.35
8.85
;.. Not Applicable lo case of Clayey Soil
O.H.T. l1 Sooto·-10 Av.o~, y,,, •. Yo,or• a: Su~•npur RoaO,
JOS 80DE BORE-><OLE ~0
Luo>no" I ~otiSFC34:7t2_005'
S.P.T VaiL•~• S PT. Value•
17.17
• 19 17.85
22 18.94
27 20.81
;11 22.07
SNOW FOUNTA!N CONSULTANTS- IS09CJ(J1:2000 Cerlined REGel OFFICE- 5/259, VIKAS NAGAR LUCKI'IO.V, PH.: 0522-40476:24. D522- 276735810:·, TELE-fAX: ~522·27681~2
'·- .
•
·'
;. iJ I . ••
I , ' . i" ~· .. ' . ·~ ~>·
l''' ,) -. -·-' .. il '' '
' ' ' I• ' '' '
I '
,,
Soli Typ~ "
Cow
1.35
2.85
5.85
S~ty Sand
7.35
8.85
* Not Appllcable in case of Clayey Soil
""~'E OF PROJECT
JOB CODC SQRE·KOLE N~
--- .... ~ ~
D.K T 10 Seelor-10. lwod' lilhar Vol"' at su~><•P"' Ro•~. LJOko:.•, s0, sFc_04·;71 ;_oos·
'
S.P.l, \iatuo• S.P.l. v~·u .. lable
' '
~~·
13
" "
17.74
18.4
19.98
21.3
23.09
SN::!W FOUNT Ali': CO~SULTANTS- tSO 9001;2000 Certtfied REGD OFFICE- 5/259, V'KAS NAGAR, LUCKNOW, PH .. 0522-40L7624, JS22 -2767358 !OJ , '~lE·FAX: 0522-276-8132
>
·' ' • ' ' )
>
• J
•• )
:·r.J-.
·)
)
·---," ,_ J '.,,
' ' .-..
' ,.
Silty Sand
Depll.
'"
1.35
2.85
5.85
7.35
8.85
1
* Not Applicable in c:a&e of Clayey Soil
'-S
r;MiE O• ?RO..'EC~·
JOE COCE BCRE-HOLE NC
11
"
28
"
• 0 H T. 11 ~eoto:- · 0 A\'adh ''''"' YOJana >t s J '·'""' Rood, ~uckrow
;o,,FC_ 04:112:_005.
S P.T. Yal~e'
St• 1
19.5
21.67
22.06
22.78
30 23.95
SNOW i'OUNTAIN COI-iSULTANTS- ISO 9001-2:JOO Ce~ified REGO OFFICE- 5125S, VIKAS NAGAR, LUCKNOW, PH· 0522-4()47624, 0522 • 2767359 p; . TEL,·FAX· O.S:U-2768~32
• ll' J " • o,
" • c ,, I • I • I 0 • • J o'
!§ 0
j !~ ' ' " ' ' • • • • • • .. J 0
· : • I I' • ' ' ' ' ' • ' ' ' 0 •
0 > 8
. ··-·· ...•.•. ~. 1'1~~~~ '~I· k~ I· I , . f... I . H·
. ) .·
ll. II! ·/!" J! ·f!. ~~I! I! fk[! [! ' e , ·.,. >
-.)- 'l ! ' I ! ' ! ' ! . I ! . ' • • • • • - -' ---'
.. , !! I I i ll !1 If jf·IT ·~· •
' i.i.J I ~ H1 I · 1l ' I il 1H-rft :. ~· 1- , I .
. ~-··· It• , " , - , ·I· ' , • • 0 • 0 • • 0 • • • • - -
'·'" ·- ' - ' . ' 'I' ' • ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ,
' ' •• • • • :; I . < • ••• ' • ' ' ! ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' • • ,.Cr-• ..
l ..
' • . • • • • • • • • • • • • ' . .. •. ·. )"" : l;m " " " " " " , • • ' ,
' , '
, • ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • • • •
- ---
I .. lfl1 ,, , •1•1•1· H• j
,'1 , •. ' ' ' ' ' ' I• 'I *!l)l(1(1 I> I: )1(1\1-'. j:'_
.. if 'I' ' ' ' I ' • • ,, "
'I' I' -I~ ~~ ' ' ,
' ' • • • • • • • • ) ; -
jft1 !i 1•1•1•1•1••1• I• I•, • • • •l•I•IB •I•)• --· .. ' '
..
' ., ' 1l•l~ I•' •1•1• ' '' '' '•1•1•''' ! ~]!!§;j!sEj!!)!! sj!!sssss 8ss:s ' ' - - - fiti - -- -ti --' :•1••1•1••1•1• 1•1• 1•1•1• I• 1•1• !
~~~ I• *I'~~ l•li'l·li'~ '" g I!! g ' 0
' 0
li il ' ' ' ' ' '
. " • • • • ·I• " ' • !!' fi ~ • • 0 -- - - - " •
--t::
' i
' , ' ! l • , ' , ' ' ' )
_,_ __ --
' ' ' ' '
I !
' I '
L ) ,: __
:~: _j_~
»·~~ _,. ,-7- -
' ,. J .. -
. ' ,)
• ;'J .... } -"~:
• • I; ,. ' .. ,,
'
•
' '
"
,, ' I
.. -- ,.
. . .. ..
...
• 0
~' ' 0 • 0
J " ~ ' ' ..
0 z
--
.
ll ' I• J
. • I '
!ll I ~ ' ~ I 0 '
.. •• 'H v , I . ' ' ' I ' I · ' • ' " ' • ' lmj~! ~ I! I ! l ' I . '
=t'ff I I! .j!~~ I! I· ll~/! ~h l!l ~ •
(:! I ' I ! i. 0 ; ' I! 1 .. I . • • ' . . . .. . . . I ! ll I ! . ll • I " I ' • . ..
I . ! I~ 11 I! ' I! • • • ' ' I§• I' ' ' ' ' ' ' '' • + • • ·I· • • • • •
I• • • !· " • • • • ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ll' • • • • ' ' ' ' ' ' ' , ' ' ' ' ' ' ' .. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
"I " \!! 8-! ~ i" " ' " ' 'I' ' > ,
' ' ' • , ' > , I'" " • • • • • • • • " '
.. I ' ' , I' •
I' ' ' ' ' •I• •1>.\Jiil>~l> l;l;~pli •!,:1• I" ' ' ' ~
i ! ' ' • • • lll:;ll"""'"'"'"r: • • • • • . " . 'I' ' I ' 'I' ' • ' ' ' ' ' ' ' • • • ' ' •
' • " • • •
' ! ! ! §; II~ ' I' ! ! II ! !I! Ill! I I• 0 I ! ' '
II ' ' i: ~~I: •1•1• ' •f!: ' [!: ' ' ' I
!!l;li ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I ' ' IL:h I• I•~!< ' I' '
0 • 0
' 0 • 0 ,J, ' ' • ' I' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
• • • • ' •
- • • • • • • 0
' • • • • ' • • • 0 -- • •
' -----------~-~-
• " "
'
IH .
' 1 " 0 0
hl •
J
,J
' ' ' ' ' ., _______ _
)
-) -·
• ) ' > - ' ' )
. '
'
••
iii .. _ _,_.
' H •
'
' -• '
'
• •
' ' '
' • •
' ' ' "
'
' • ' • •
. . ' ' '
' • • ' •
' • ' " • •
•
' ~
•
• • • ~ --
'
' • ' •
•
' '
•
!
' •
•
•
•
' ' •
'' .
' .
"
~ '
' •
•
'
' '· • -
"' .. _.. ..
• • •
•, . ' '
' ' • -
' ' • -• 5
'
•
'
•
•
' '
•
'
' • ' l