Upload
will-mugford
View
219
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Enlisted Community Review
Updated 1000 27 Sep 2005
2
Table of Contents
• What Seabee’s do
• Active– Manpower– Personnel– Billet Analysis– IA– Functional Review
• SELRES
• Recommendations
No FTS for Seabees
3
Rating Scope – Seabees
• Builder (BU) – carpenters, masons, woodworkers• Construction Electrician (CE) - electrical• Construction Mechanic (CM) – mechanics for
automotive and construction equipment• Engineering Aide (EA) – surveyors, draftsmen, P&E• Equipment Operator (EO) – operate automotive and
construction equipment• Steelworkers (SW) – fabricate and erect pre-
engineered structures• Utilitiesman (UT) – plumbing, heating, compressed
air, fuel storage, ACR, water treatment, septic
Source: Navy Enlisted Occupational Standards Manual
All Ratings perform tasks related to contingency ops and disaster preparedness. Seabees represent a large Navy contribution to the GWOT.
4
Seabee Rating Compression
BU
EA
SW
CE
UT
CM
EO
CU
UC
EQ
CN (Students only)
E3-E8 E9(E8 BA)
67
8 92
17
25
46
21
28
55
27
(E9 BA)
23
15
17
Each grouping of ratings has 3 - 4 E8 billets feeding
each E9 billet
5
Active
6
Seabee Paygrade Structures
1549
1296
884
294
1041
876
291
1252
26
66
366
27
122
123E 3
PO 3
PO 2
PO 1
CPO
SCPO
MCPO
Sea Shore
1655
1373
934
282
962
780
332
1231
89
19
239
304
109
33
E 3
PO 3
PO 2
PO 1
CPO
SCPO
MCPO
Sea Shore
Aug 05Force Structure Billets
Aug 05 Force Structure Inventory
IA Billets: 1421 IA Inventory: 660
Current Manning:Total – 93.4%Sea – 104.0%Shore – 96.9%IA -- 46.4%
Total Sea Billets: 5367
Total Shore Billets: 2846
Total Sea Inventory: 5583Total Shore Inventory: 2759
Source: Ministats Source: Ministats
Total Billets: 9634 Total Inventory: 9002$566M/year
requirement
($3.7B FYDP) 73%
135%
96%
106%
106%
107%
98%
Sea
Inv/BA
7
1549
1296
884
294
1041
876
291
1252
26
66
366
27
122
123E 3
PO 3
PO 2
PO 1
CPO
SCPO
MCPO
Sea Shore
Seabee vs. Navy Paygrade Structures
39549
38644
39426
24930
10229
11245
34461
26860
13903
3180
1393
17291
3920
1582
E 3
PO 3
PO 2
PO 1
CPO
SCPO
MCPO
Sea Shore
Seabee Aug 05Force Structure Billets
Navywide FY05 Force Structure Billets
IA Billets – 1421
IA Billets - 37913
Total Sea Billets:
5367Total Shore Billets:
2846Total Sea Billets:
157351Total Shore Billets:
109262
Source: Ministats Source: Ministats
Top 2: 2.9% Top 3: 10.1%
FS only
Top 2: 3.8% Top 3: 12.8%
FS only
8
Seabee vs. NavywideSea Shore Billet Ratio
Current Seabee Sea/Shore Tour Lengths:
E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 E9
Sea 54 54 48 36 36 36 36
Shore 24 36 36 36 36 36 36
Despite widely varying sea/shore billet
ratios, Seabee sea and shore tour lengths
are standardized across all ratings.
9
Seabee Recruiting and Retention
Reenlistment Rates – Zone A/B/C near Navy averageZone FY04 FY05 FY05 Range FY05 Goal FY05 Navy Avg. A 50.3% 54.5% 50.2 – 69.2% 54% 54.2% B 71.1% 70.0% 58.6 -- 84.6% 70% 67.0% C 85.9% 84.6% 77.1 – 100% 85% 84.4%
Attrition Rates – At or below Navy avg.Zone FY04 FY05 FY05 Range FY05 Navy Avg. A 6.8% 7.1% 5.1 – 8.7% 9.6% B 3.5% 4.5% 2.9 – 7.1% 4.6% C 1.8% 1.6% 0.9 – 4.0% 1.4%
Recruiting – Under accessing FY03 FY04 FY05 (YTD) FY06
Goal 860 988 1160 (1071) 1145 Shipped 749 903 (965)Success 87% 91% (90%)
CREO Policy:
BU – 2/3/3
CE – 1/3/3
CM – 1/3/3
EA – 3/3/3
EO – 2/3/2
SW – 3/3/3
UT – 2/3/3
Striker policy (all ratings): “A” school required
10
SeaBee Pays
Rating/NEC Zone Oct 02 Jun 03 Feb 05 Apr 05BU A 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.5BU B 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5
5633 A 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.55633 B 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.55931 A 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.05931 B 2.5 2.5 3.5 3.55931 C 0.5 1.0 1.5 1.55932 A 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.05932 B 1.5 2.0 3.0 3.0CE A 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.5CE B 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5CM A 1.0 1.5 2.5 2.5CM B 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5CM C 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5EO A 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5EO B 1.0 0.5 1.0 2.0SW B 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0UT A 2.0 2.0 2.5 2.5UT B 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
SRB – significant increase in Feb 05: SDAP – new pay for E9s at NMCBs
$75 5932 Basic UCT (Diver)
$150 5931 Adv UCT (Diver)
$450 CBLC Seabee Line Comp Chiefs
EB - $1K for BU, EO, UT (FY05)
Sea Pay – none!
AIP - $750 max for E9s at NMCBs (starting May 05)
Green equals increase, red decrease
11
Advancements Seabee vs. Navy Average
•Seabee advancements appear to be driven less by the shape of the billet pyramid than other ratings. For example:
Rating Ratio E7:E8 billets E8 Advance Opp.
BU 3.11 : 1 24.2%
CE 3.13 : 1 21.5%
SW 3.61 : 1 4.7%
EA 4.00 : 1 0.0%
•E9 advancements appear to be driven less by the shape of the billet pyramid than by the number of vacancies each year.
1554
1302
902
295
1017
857
291
1255
26
75
400
27
113
121E 3
PO 3
PO 2
PO 1
CPO
SCPO
MCPO
Sea Shore
Rating E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 E9BU 44.5% 20.2% 19.4% 32.0% 24.2%CE 69.3% 25.2% 14.6% 18.8% 21.1%CM 100.0% 31.4% 4.4% 15.3% 10.0%EA 11.1% 13.3% 3.0% 10.0% 0.0%EO 65.1% 34.4% 17.6% 24.4% 17.5%SW 25.0% 5.5% 14.3% 15.4% 4.7%UT 20.9% 24.4% 12.3% 13.4% 24.1%All CB 48.5% 23.6% 13.2% 21.2% 17.4% 20.7%Navy 38.0% 17.5% 13.3% 27.0% 11.5% 13.4%CU 17.7%EQ 8.3%UC 47.1%
Mar 05 Exam FY06 Boards
12
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Length of Service
Inv
en
tory
05 EPA
E9
E8
E7
E6
E5
E4
E1-E3
08 EPA
• In the aggregate, Seabee LOS Inventory better than previously reviewed ratings.
• No excess of LOS 18-20 inventory.
• Modest number of E-6s approaching HYT.
Seabee LOS Diagram
Delta caused by:
-FY03-FY05 underaccessions
-excess EPA for CN (a E3 student-only EMC)
13
NMCB76%
PHIB CB7%
SPECWAR5%
NAVSUPPUN2%
NSAs2%
Miscellaneous8%
Where Seabee Billets Are – Sea (FY08)
Source: TFMMS – FY08
Total Sea
Billets: 5291
(4050)
(354)
(254)
(120)
(116)
(397)
- Includes 139 Type 3 billets (Bahrain, DGAR, Souda Bay)
- No longer included as sea billets are:
- 262 Type 6 duty billets that were Type 3
- 91 Type 3 duty that are planned for transition to Type 6
14
Where Seabee Billets are – Shore (by function)
Base Support31%
CBMU21%
Instructors10%
SRG9%
SPECWAR3%
COMMSTA2%
FAC G (General Purpose)
7%
Miscellaneous17%
Source: TFMMS – FY08
Total Shore
Billets - 2841
(88)
(856)
(289)
(242)
(600)
(61)Recruiter 68
RDC 8
9545 20
DAPA 11
Self Help 11
Brig 29
Other 55
209
(209)
(496)
15
Where Seabee billets are – Shore (by BSO)
CNI31%
CLF24%
CPF20%
NETC9%
SPECWAR4%
BUPERS4%
NAVFAC2%
CMC2%
Miscellaneous4%
Source: TFMMS – FY08
Total Shore
Billets - 2841
(870)
(56)
(66)
(689)
(254)
(113)
(566)
(105)
Most BUPERS
billets are FAC G
Resource Sponsors:
N4 1985 N61 79
N00T 254 N76 74
N75 198 N1J 33
N1 107 N76 25
Other 86
(122)
16
Seabee Fleet Concentration Areas
FCA Sea Billets Shore Billets in-rate FAC G
Pt Hueneme 2079 331 15Gulfport 2036 277 5Norfolk 419 279 18San Diego 349 289 27Washington DC 120 82 1Sigonella 7 154 16 *Type 3 (Bahrain/DGAR/Souda) 139 0 0 Other FCAs 86 419 22 *Non-FCAs 56 801 105 * Total 5291 2632+209 = 2841
* Significantly excess to rotational needs in that homeport
Source: TFMMS – FY08
Large number of
FAC G shore billets
outside FCAs
Insufficient shore
duty in these FCAs
17
Shore Billet Analysis Criteria
– Sea Shore Rotation minimum requirements • 5 years sea/3 years shore, 4/3, 4/3, 3/3, 2/2
– Career Progression• Billet pyramid requirements• Billets necessary to develop military skills
– IGCA Coding (Military Essential) – next slide
– Flt Concentration Areas/Homebasing– Billet Titles– Billet Funding (OSD, Joint, NWCF)
• 202 non-navy funded billets for SeabeeFunctional requirement for billets not questioned
7.3% of shore billets
Plus 72 facilities billets at Thurmont, MD
18
Inherently Governmental-Commercial Activity (IG-CA) Coding
• Eleven ratings completed: 3,435 enlisted billets, previously coded as “required” by N1, are no longer military essential
Excess military billets should be phased-out , and recruiting/training/PCS dollars reinvested
Military EssentialF: Military Unique Knowledge & Skills
Exempt from ReviewD: Mobilization (Dual Status)G: Esprit de Corps & Military SupportL: Law, Exec Order, TreatyM: DoD Management Decision
Exempt from ReviewB: Military Support to OperationsJ: Military RotationK: Military Career Progression
Assigned by Claimant Assigned by CNP / N1
Subject to CompetitionR: Subject to Review (CIVSUB/A-76 Competition/Elimination)
Military EssentialA: Military OperationsI: Military Augmentation (Backfill)
19
Seabee FY08 Shore Billet CA Reason Codes
• 49% of shore billets are coded for military requirements (A, B, F, etc.) or Career Progression (K)
• 23% are coded for military rotation (J)• 7% are general purpose billets (FAC G/K) • 20% are candidates for review/civsub (R or E)
CA Code CA Description E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 E9 TotalA, B Military Operations, Support 64 185 386 275 75 52 11 1048
F Military Unique Skills/Knowledge 0 0 42 105 28 16 7 198G, L, M, etc. misc 26 11 27 30 6 3 1 104Total A-I, L "Fenced" as Military Required 90 196 455 410 109 71 19 1350
K Career Progression 0 1 22 16 4 4 1 48
Total A-I, K, L Total "Fenced" 90 197 477 426 113 75 20 1398
J Military Rotation 0 3 324 215 89 25 7 663
R Subject to Review 42 166 124 148 60 11 2 553E Civilian Authority & Control 0 3 9 4 1 1 0 18
FAC G/K Shore Billets 0 36 93 49 30 1 0 209
Total Shore Billets 132 405 1027 842 293 113 29 2841
20
30 Aug 2005Train Sea Shore Sea Shore Sea Shore Sea Shore
LOS: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
100% of E3 sea billets 368 92% E5 263 55% of E5 sea billets 166 0% E5 0 0% of E8 sea billets 0 78% E7 70 5% E7 5 00% E8
100% of E4 sea billets 430 8% E6 23 40% of E6 sea billets 83 93% E6 152 60% of E6 sea billets 126 22% E8 20 100% E8 18 0% E9
45% of E5 sea billets 134 0% E4 0 0 7% E7 12 95% of E7 sea billets 90 rqrd 0% E9 0 rqrd
932 rqrd shore 286 249 rqrd shore 164 216 shore 90 23 shore
# in LOS 232 214 198 183 104 100 95 91 64 63 62 61 55 55 54 54 54 54 54 30 30 30 8 8 7 0932 286 249 164 216 90 23
e4 0 0 0
e5 104 98 88 79 52 45 38 32 0 0
e6 2 7 12 12 18 24 29 55 51 46 41 35 29 21 0 total seaSt State Reenlistment goals 12 month cummulative attrition e7 0 4 8 13 19 25 33 25 23 22 5 0
Zone A (2-6) 57% Zone A 0.076 0.924 e8 0 0 0 0 5 7 8 3 8 7 0
Zone B (6-10) 70% Zone B 0.044 0.956 e9 0 0 0 0
Zone C (10-14) 90% Zone C 0.016 0.984Zone D 0.003 0.997Zone E 0.144 0.856
ProposedProposed Billet Pyramid
Sea Billets (FY08) Shore Billets (FY08) Shore Billets Sea + ShoreE3 368 E3 41 E3 0 E3 368E4 430 E4 79 E4 0 E4 430E5 300 E5 249 E5 263 -14 E5 563E6 209 E6 225 E6 175 +14 E6 384E7 95 E7 98 E7 82 E7 177
E8 18 E8 48 BU E8 20 E8 38E9 0 E9 0 E9 0 E9 0Total 1420 Total 740 Total 540 Total 1960
38.0%
Minimum Shore Billet Requirements – BU only
FY08 Shore Billets: 740 Minimum Shore Billets Required to support SSR: 540
Total Potential
Billet Candidates:
740 (shore billets)
- 540 (min for SSR)
200 (potential excess)
BU needs more E5 shore
billets than are available!
21
Seabee Rating Sea/Shore Billet Ratios vary widely
• CM, EO, SW are sea intensive– No E5-E8 shore billets to spare– Even some E4 shore billets required for SSR
• BU is more balanced– But has an excess of shore billets at E6-E8
• CE, EA, UT are shore intensive– Excess shore billets at E5-E7 (but not E8)
• Compressed ratings: only CU has an excess of E9 shore billets (in theory)
22
• Claimant CA coding is generally consistent and reasonable• 7 “F” coded billets are questionable military unique skills
– 6 facility maintenance billets at Bay St. Louis– 1 self-help billet at NAS Pax River
• One RDC billet coded as “J” vice “F”• Five billets at 20th SRG coded as “B”, remainder as E/F/J/R• Billet coding for these billets will be reviewed in the FY05
IG&CA inventory
Seabee Questionable CA Reason Codes
Billet by billet review of CA Reason Codes is a benefit of each ECR
23
CA Code E3/E4 E5/E6 E7 E8/E9 TotalA-I, L * 286 865 109 90 1350
J 18 642 118 26 804K 0 33 4 4 41
FAC G/K 22 88 18 0 128Retain 326 1628 249 120 2323
R 194 174 31 20 419E 3 13 1 1 18
FAC G/K 14 54 12 1 81Excess 211 241 44 22 518
Total 537 1869 293 142 2841
Final Proposed Seabee Shore Billet Coding
Represents 18% of Seabee
shore billets and 6.4% of total
Seabee sea and shore billets
37 candidates
for ‘R’ coding
24
Seabee FAC G Billets
Required for Rotation 128– Retain within current rating– Includes 20 E4-E5 9545 billets that will transfer to MA
Available for transfer 44– 36 E5-E6, 8 E7-E8 billets– RDC, Recruiter, Brig, CAAC, etc.
Candidates for CA “R” 37– 29 E4-E5, 8 E6-E7 billets– Hazmat, Self-Help, MWR, etc.– Most already coded as “R”– Can also be transferred to other Seabee Ratings
Total 209
25
Summary of Proposed Seabee IGCA J / R Coding
• Shore Intensive Ratings:– CE: recode some E6/E7/E8 billets from ‘J’ to ‘R’– EA: recode some E5/E6/E8 billets from ‘J’ to ‘R’– UT: recode some E7/E8 billets from ‘J’ to ‘R’
• Sea Intensive Ratings:– CM: recode all E5/E6/E7 billets from ‘R’ to ‘J’– EO: same– SW: same, plus E8 billets
• Balanced Rating:– BU: recode some E5/E6/E7 billets from ‘R’ to ‘J’, but E8
billets from ‘J’ to ‘R’
These 3 ratings also need to retain a portion of E4 shore billets to support SSR
26
1538
1256
863
286
903
722
253
1250
25
73
233
27
91
90E 3
PO 3
PO 2
PO 1
CPO
SCPO
MCPO
Sea Shore
1538
1256
863
286
1027
842
293
1250
25
73
405
29
113
132E 3
PO 3
PO 2
PO 1
CPO
SCPO
MCPO
Sea Shore
Seabee Paygrade StructuresCurrent and Proposed billet structure
Total Sea Billets: 5291
Total Shore Billets: 2841
IA Billets: 1282
Total Sea Billets: 5291
Total Shore Billets: 2319
IA Billets: 1235
Source: TFMMS Source: TFMMS
Total Billets: 9414
Force Structure BilletsCurrent FY08 plan
Force Structure BilletsProposed FY09
Total Billets: 8845
Top 6 - 83.0%
Top 2 - 2.9%
Top 6 - 82.4%
Top 2 - 2.8%
27
Seabee Student Execution
FY04 Avg Student Inv: 252
FY04 Student EPA: 837
FY05 Student EPA: 838
FY07 Student EPA: 772
Total Seabee Student Avg. Execution – 30%
28
Seabee TPPH Execution
Seabee TPPH Avg.
Execution – 162%
FY04 Avg TPPH Inv: 354
FY04 TPPH EPA: 219
FY05 TPPH EPA: 238
MA IA imbalance may grow even larger
as MA EPA continues to increase
29
M600 Student EMC
• The purpose of EMC M600 should be to account for undesignated Seabees in RTC or “A” School
• However, billets in the M600 EMC do not fully account for “A” school students
• Even worse, an improper EMC logic results in the EMF accounting for only a few Seabee students
• As a result, latest ministats shows only 15 inventory in an EMC with 347 billets
• Trainee Working Group is working to correct this issue.
30
E9 Sea Manning Challenge
31
CU Shore Manning
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Ju
l01
Oct
Jan
02
Ap
r
Ju
l
Oct
Jan
03
Ap
r
Ju
l
Oct
Jan
04
Ap
r
Ju
l
Oct
Jan
05
Ap
r
Ju
l05
Shore BA
Shore Inv
Poly. (Shore Inv)
CU Sea Manning
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Ju
l01
Oct
Jan
02
Ap
r
Ju
l
Oct
Jan
03
Ap
r
Ju
l
Oct
Jan
04
Ap
r
Ju
l
Oct
Jan
05
Ap
r
Ju
l05
Sea BA
Sea Inv
Poly. (Sea Inv)
E9 Sea/Shore ManningCU Rating
• Sea manning trending steadily downward; shore steady
Sea manning 110-150%
Sea manning 25 - 88%
Sea and shore tour lengths steady at 36/36 during the entire period
May 05 $750 AIP
Jun 05 $450 SDAP
Inventory Sea – 7 Shore - 20
32
EQ Shore Manning
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Ju
l01
Oct
Jan
02
Ap
r
Ju
l
Oct
Jan
03
Ap
r
Ju
l
Oct
Jan
04
Ap
r
Ju
l
Oct
Jan
05
Ap
r
Ju
l05
Shore BA
Shore Inv
Poly. (Shore Inv)
EQ Sea Manning
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Ju
l01
Oct
Jan
02
Ap
r
Ju
l
Oct
Jan
03
Ap
r
Ju
l
Oct
Jan
04
Ap
r
Ju
l
Oct
Jan
05
Ap
r
Ju
l05
Sea BA
Sea Inv
Poly. (Sea Inv)
E9 Sea/Shore ManningEQ Rating
• Sea manning trending steadily downward; shore steady
Sea manning 80-110%
Sea manning 33 - 67%
Sea and shore tour lengths steady at 36/36 during the entire period
Inventory Sea – 4 Shore - 12
33
UC Shore Manning
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Ju
l01
Oct
Jan
02
Ap
r
Ju
l
Oct
Jan
03
Ap
r
Ju
l
Oct
Jan
04
Ap
r
Ju
l
Oct
Jan
05
Ap
r
Ju
l05
Shore BA
Shore Inv
Poly. (Shore Inv)
UC Sea Manning
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Ju
l01
Oct
Jan
02
Ap
r
Ju
l
Oct
Jan
03
Ap
r
Ju
l
Oct
Jan
04
Ap
r
Ju
l
Oct
Jan
05
Ap
r
Ju
l05
Sea BA
Sea Inv
Poly. (Sea Inv)
E9 Sea/Shore ManningUC Rating
• Sea manning trending downward, with brief up tick; shore declining
Sea manning 75-100%
Sea manning 44 - 100%
100% !
Sea and shore tour lengths steady at 36/36 during the entire periodInventory Sea – 6 Shore - 7
34
Seabee Khaki % Retiring
11%
5%
16% 16%15%
10%
28%
18%
14%
9%11%
14% 10%12%
14%
23%
11%
14%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06Fiscal Year
% o
f In
ven
tory
E7
E8
E9
Seabee Retirement Trends
Will receive more FRRAs FY 06
As of 6 Jul 05
35
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
300%
350%
400%
450%
500%
AC DK
YN
(SW
)M
UH
MC
TT
ST
GG
MC
TR
CT
MLN CT
IQ
MA
G OS
CU
MA PN
AF HT
AS
MA
S D
IVE
RA
LNA
VC
MC
GS
CS
(SW
)S
HS
TS
EM
(SS
)NU
CS
K(S
W)
SE
AL IT
ET
(SS
)NU
CF
CM
TA
W NC IS
EO
DE
QD
CB
MA
ZA
OM
M(S
S)N
UC
UC
AV
MM
(SS
)AU
XE
M(S
W)
EN
ET
(SS
)E
T(S
W)
MM
(SW
)A
BE
M(S
W)N
UC
FT
ET
(SW
)NU
CM
M(S
W)N
UF
C(A
EG
IS) 0
1
2
3
4
5
E9 Sea Manning
E9 S/S Billet Ratio
Log. (E9 Sea Manning)
E9 Sea Manning vs. E9 Sea/Shore Billet Ratio
There is an (imperfect) correlation between E9 sea manning and E9 sea/shore billet ratios CU E9 sea manning is well below the E9 manning trend line
Source: Aug 05 Ministats
E9 Sea
ManningE9 SSR
36
E9 Seabee Billet Review
1. CUCM is very shore intensive, while EQ, UC are not
– However, 4 E8 billets feed into each CUCM billet, but only about 3 E8 billets feed into EQ/UC
– Accordingly, recommend against transferring billets from CUCM to the other two ratings
2. E9 IA EPA matches 12 month execution avg. means no change required
3. Bottom line – no obvious billet adjustments to fix E9 sea manning
Rate Sea Shore Sea ShoreCUCM 8 14 8 14EQCM 9 7 9 8*UCCM 9 6 8** 7**
**Assumes transition of Type 3 billet in Iceland to Type 6
FY05 BA FY08 BA
*One shore billet comes on line Oct 05
37
Summary of Active Duty Seabee Findings
• Community is currently manned at 93% overall and 104% at sea. – E9 manned at 73% at sea and 122% ashore.
• Ratings vary from sea intensive (CM, EO, SW) to shore intensive (CE, EA, UT). – FAC G billets can be reassigned within Seabee ratings to help balance
sea shore billet ratio.
• Relatively poor homebasing opportunity between sea and shore.– 78% of sea billets in Pt. Hueneme/Gulfport, but only 22% of shore
billets
• 474 shore billets identified as candidates for civilianization.• IA EPA severely out of balance, particularly for Students.
38
SELRES
39
Seabee Paygrade StructuresSELRES
2472
3464
2531
847
504
71
150
E 3
PO 3
PO 2
PO 1
CPO
SCPO
MCPO
Sea
1508
2620
2072
395
312
123
53
130
140
73
24
268
7
6
E 3
PO 3
PO 2
PO 1
CPO
SCPO
MCPO
In Billets IAP
FY05Force Structure Billets
Aug 05 Force Structure Inventory
IA Billets - 0 IA Inventory – 0
Current Manning:Total – 77.0%
Assigned to Billets: 7083
Assigned to IAP: 648 (8.4%)
Total Billets - 10039Total Inventory - 7731
40
Seabee SELRES Comments
• 55% of Seabee force structure billets are SELRES• SELRES are assigned to twelve NMCBs, two Naval Const
Regts, CBMUs, two Supply Support BNs, NAVSPECWAR OPSUP Tms, Naval Const Force Support Unit, PHIB CB, BMU, EODMU, 18 MIUWUs, etc.
• BA will drop from 10039 in FY05 to 8718 in FY08 due to Reserve ZBR cuts – Chronic reserve Seabee vacancies drove the decision to cut billets
to more executable levels
41
Recommendations
42
Seabee Recommendations
1. Review 437 in-rate and 37 FAC G billets as candidates for civilianization (mostly in CE, EA, UT ratings).
2. Transfer 44 FAC G billets to other Seabee ratings in need of shore billets.
3. Adjust Seabee IA billet allocation to reflect execution as part of a navywide IA billet review.
4. Correct M600 EMC billet/inventory allocation5. Continue steps to improve E9 sea manning.
– Change sea/shore tour lengths to 36/30– Monitor affects of SDAP and AIP increases
43
Estimated Seabee Manpower Costs and Savings
• The Seabee community is a ~$3.9B enterprise
• Estimated gross MPN savings if 474 excess Seabee shore billets are civilianized:
FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11Cummulative MPN Costs $566M $1,147M $1,749M $2,372M $3,017M $3,683M
FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11Cummulative MPN Savings $0M $0M $8.7M $35.6M $72.6M $110.9M
Net savings of $28.9M across the FYDP
(assumes 20% savings (100% IA))
No FTS
Cummulative MPN Costs $608M $1,240M $1,881M $2,533M $3,205M $3,895M
MPN Comp Rates
EDW
44
Seabee Skills Functional Review
• HRCAT tool predicts that total costs for military are generally higher than GS, but less than contractors:
Billet Location PGMilitary Cost
Contractor Cost
WG/GS Cost
EO3 - Boat Equip Op San Diego E4 $75,352 $70,947 $49,719EA2 - Engineer Tech Brunswick ME E5 $64,346 $72,193 $52,455UT2 - Utilitiesman Indian Head E5 $66,170 $76,047 $52,455CE1 - Maint/Repair Pearl Harbor E6 $81,642 $100,144 $55,108CEC - Cont Surveil MCB Quantico E7 $86,087 $102,167 $60,322
45
Proposed PR-07 Billet Changes Affecting Seabee Ratings
• Added sea billets for MK V SOC Dets (4 billets), EODGRU Mobile Comm Dets (2), Inshore Boat Units (6), and SOC GMV Maint Personnel (37).
• Added shore billets for NAS Keflavik (30) and NAVSUPPFAC Thurmont (7).
• Reduced shore billets due to CNI and NETWARCOM cuts, recruiting and NETC cuts, and 1NCD reductions.
• Net reduction in Seabee endstrength:
FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11Sea 49 49 49 49 49
Shore -15 -92 -99 -99 -99Total 34 -43 -50 -50 -50
46
ECR Schedule
• Completed ECRs (10): MR, HT, YN(SW), YN(SS), AS, ET(SW), QM, DK/PN, MM(SW), MN
• ECRs in progress (3): AT, IT, Seabee
• Future ECR candidates: JO/PH/LI/DM, AB, MA, TM,
47
Back-up
48
Construction Industry Trends
Construction Industry
Unemployment Rate
Construction Industry Hourly
Earnings
49
Enlisted Community Reviews
• “Vertical” look at individual enlisted communities – Focus first on manpower requirements (billet base)
• Sea / Shore rotation; Career Progression; Home-basing• Challenge military essentiality• Review how rating’s function is delivered across Navy
– Review community management issues • Advancement Opportunity; Retention; Accessions• Individuals Account; Special Pays & Bonuses
– Develop actionable recommendations for N1 decision to deliver manpower savings
• Time-phase changes over FYDP as required to support executability
Provide the Community Sponsor recommendations for their Human Capital Strategy
50
Community Review Process
• Establish initial working relationship with selected community sponsors and managers– Vision, background, data, core competencies, career paths, etc.
• Review TFMMS Billet Base– Military essentiality & IGCA coding consistency across claimancies– Identify target billets for review
• Review Personnel Inventories– Alignment of strength to authorizations
• Assess Influencing and Executability Factors– Law, policy, costs, career expectations, community management issues
• Develop Alternatives & Recommendations– Actionable and executable….Total Force & Human Capital perspective…
• Conduct Decision Briefing• Sponsor/claimants submit program adjustments