16
PSWG March 2008 1 Adaptive Optics Systems Engineering on GMT Peter McGregor

Adaptive Optics Systems Engineering on GMT

  • Upload
    damita

  • View
    26

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Adaptive Optics Systems Engineering on GMT. Peter McGregor. Will GMT queue schedule instruments? What instrument configuration time is acceptable? Will GMT have general-purpose ports ? What field of view? Will the upper IP support non-AO instruments ? What field of view? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

  • Adaptive Optics Systems Engineering on GMT Peter McGregor

    PSWG March 2008

  • Top-Level Questions:Will GMT queue schedule instruments?What instrument configuration time is acceptable?Will GMT have general-purpose ports?What field of view?Will the upper IP support non-AO instruments?What field of view?What acquisition/calibration support?Will M1/M2 be phased intrinsically?If extrinsic, what FoV/magnitude star is required?What are the advantages of using an ASM?What is optimal AO instrument performance?How can maximum AO sky coverage be achieved?What TTWFS patrol field?Yes5 minYes5 arcminYes5 arcminFullYes?TBDTBDTBDTBD

    PSWG March 2008

  • Proposed Solution:5 arcmin folded Gregorian focus on upper IP+/- 75 arcsec AO engineering field+/- 30 arcsec AO science fieldIntegrated acquisition and calibration facilitiesMultiple (4-6) non-AO & AO instrument portsRapid reconfiguration between instrumentsMaximum cryogenic AO system and instrumentsMaximum AO tip-tilt WFS patrol fieldMinimum interference in science path

    PSWG March 2008

  • New ASM AO ParadigmInstrumentAcqCamNGS WFSLGS WFSPhasing CamT-T-FWFSTruth WFS

    PSWG March 2008

  • Outstanding Issues:Does M1 phasing require a 10 arcmin patrol field?Does this invalidate the concept?Or does it demand an intrinsic telescope solution?How should field/pupil rotation be compensated?Large diameter ferro-fluidic hermetic seals?Implications for servicability?How to calibrate LGS AO system with ASM?Are non-common path phase errors acceptable?Where to locate the IR instrument cold stop?Should GMACS/NIRMOS have exclusive access?Do they restrict on AO designs?

    PSWG March 2008

  • Non-AO Support RequirementsMultiple (6?) instrument ports5 arcmin diameter FOV2 Peripheral Wave Front SensorsMaintain independent tip-tilt-focus of 7 M1 segmentsActive optics monitoringInstrument rotator monitoringAcquisition cameraInstrument (& WFS) calibration unit

    PSWG March 2008

  • Wave Front Sensor Drum

    PSWG March 2008

  • Acquisition Camera

    PSWG March 2008

  • AO WFS Requirements> 3 NGS tip-tilt/focus near-infrared WFS (> 60 rad.)6 LGS high-order WFS (35 radius)1 high-order optical NGS WFS (on-axis)1 high-order optical(?) truth WFSM1 segment phasing WFS

    PSWG March 2008

  • Full AO WFS SystemPhasing CameraNGS WFSLGS WFS

    PSWG March 2008

  • GLAO LGS WFS

    PSWG March 2008

  • Complete Instr. Support UnitPhasing CameraNGS WFSLGS WFSCalibration Unit3.5 m

    PSWG March 2008

  • Complete Instr. Support Unit

    PSWG March 2008

  • At Second FocusTip-tilt-focus wave front sensors for LTAOTruth wave front sensorMinimize non-common path errorsScience instrument

    All with field derotation

    PSWG March 2008

  • Full AO System + GMTIFS

    PSWG March 2008

  • SummaryDemonstrated a feasible implementation of AO at the f/8 Gregorian focusOptics are large and complexConsequences of moving to an f/16 feed should be consideredMore work is required to:Improve optical performanceDevelop concepts for science instruments (GMTIFS, MOAO, MCAO)Include WFSs at second focusAddress field derotation on a stationary Instrument PlatformConsider 10 arcmin(?) diameter phasing camera patrol field

    PSWG March 2008