22
Alloy Thin Films By: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

Alloy Thin Films By: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Alloy Thin Films By: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

Alloy Thin FilmsBy: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

Page 2: Alloy Thin Films By: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

Thin Film Applications

• •Semiconductor processing for integrated electronic components and sensors• •Super conductor materials for tomorrow’s new technologies• •Anti-reflective (AR) optical films for better light transmission and clarity• •Clear conductive films used in touch-screen and plasma flat panel display

technologies• •Hard film wear-ability coatings for tool steel and internal combustion engine

components• •Reflective coatings for media storage like CD’s, DVD’s, and tape• •Conductive coatings for miniature medical probes and sensors• •Flexible and bendable lenses for X-ray wave length telescopes for space

exploration• •Thin film coatings on Mylar, poly-carbine, and other substances for protective

and/or decorative applications• Etc…

Page 3: Alloy Thin Films By: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

Overview of Research

-Goals

-Sputtered films/sectioned films

-Taking data (largest hurdle)

-Results

-Future research

Page 4: Alloy Thin Films By: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

Goals• Research electronic applications (as well as

others) for alloy thin films.

• Have alloy film with columnar single crystals from top the film to bottom.

Page 5: Alloy Thin Films By: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

Phase Diagram Cu-Ag

Page 6: Alloy Thin Films By: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

Sputtering Mechanism and Film

Page 7: Alloy Thin Films By: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

Physics

Page 8: Alloy Thin Films By: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

Physics Continued.

• Em=0.4E*(M1+M2)/(M1+M2)^2• E=Kinetic energy of incoming particle.• M1=Mass of incoming particle.• M2=Mass of target particle.

• If Em>bond energy there’s a chance you can remove a target particle.

Page 9: Alloy Thin Films By: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

Hurdles with taking data• ZIESS and Profilometer microscope failed.

AFM failed at first due to 150µm maximum scanning parameter. Succeeded by measuring cracks and scratches on films

Page 10: Alloy Thin Films By: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

Measuring the films at first• Not easy, time consuming, and poor data.

Page 11: Alloy Thin Films By: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

More bad data

Page 12: Alloy Thin Films By: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

Good results

Page 13: Alloy Thin Films By: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

Gap picture

Page 14: Alloy Thin Films By: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

Results Overview• Height graphs for Ag and Cu

• Approximate Deposition rates for Ag and Cu

• Composition charts for CuAg film

Page 15: Alloy Thin Films By: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

Height graphs AgAg20min2cm side1

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 2 4 6 8 10

Series1

Ag20min2cm side2

0100200300400500600700800900

0 2 4 6 8 10

Series1

Ag30min2cm(9-16side) height(nm) vs. position

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 2 4 6 8 10

Series1

Page 16: Alloy Thin Films By: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

Deposition rates for Ag

Atoms per sec 1st half of side1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

Series1

Series2

Series3

Series4

Atoms per sec 1 side 2nd half

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

Series1

Series2

Series3

Series4

Page 17: Alloy Thin Films By: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

Unusable height graph for Cu

Cu20min2cm height(nm) vs. position

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

-Diamond scribe unreliable for scratching films.-Cuts into substrate and shatters film.

Page 18: Alloy Thin Films By: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

Most Recent Breakthrough!-Previously we thought Profilometry

gave unusable results. -However, the once deemed useless

profilometer is much quicker at measuring films. 1hr40mins per film (profilometer) vs. 5hrs per film (AFM)

Cu30min2cm side 1 height(nm) vs. position

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Series1

Cu30min2cm side 2 height(nm) vs. position

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Series1

Page 19: Alloy Thin Films By: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

Sputtering rates

Cu30min2cm and Ag30min2cm(9-16side) height(nm) vs. position

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 2 4 6 8 10

Series1

Series2

Page 20: Alloy Thin Films By: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

Concentration and Mole Wt Graphs for AgCu Alloy

Percentage vs. position

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Mole Wt% Ag

Mole Wt% Cu

Percentage vs. position

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Concen. Wt% Ag

Concen. Wt% Cu

Page 21: Alloy Thin Films By: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

For Future research• Film measurement Profilometer

• Film sputtering scotch tape method, or lithography

• Composition control Use targets with unequal element areas. Use target that is an alloy

• Need more accurate results More data points for film thickness.

Page 22: Alloy Thin Films By: Nelson Voldeng Advisor: Dr. King

Thanks• Dr. King and the Materials Department.

• Grad. Students and Kei.