Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Carbon Fiber AFO’s: Not all Carbon foot prints
are the same
Travis Carlson, LPO/Partner
Relevant to the content of this educational activity, Mr. Carlson indicated he has no financial
relationships with commercial interest companies to disclose.
Objectives
• Discuss the “where and why” of carbon fiber.
• Take a brief look at the literature.
• Discuss the significant increase in utilization.
• Un-pack the different functional mechanics of three
main manufactures of Carbon AFO lines.
• Free for all Q and A.
Definitions
• Kinematics – Study of the
relationships between
displacement, velocity, and
acceleration.
• Kinetics – Study of moving
bodies, including FORCES
producing motion.
Planes of Motion
Temporal Parameters
• Step Length – The distance from one event (usually initial contact)
of one foot to the subsequent occurrence of the other foot.
• Example: Heel strike of one foot to heel strike of the other foot.
• Stride Length – The distance from one event (usually initial contact)
of one foot to the subsequent occurrence of the same foot. • Example: Heel strike of one foot to heel strike of the same foot.
Temporal Parameters
Velocity:
• The average horizontal speed of the body along the line of
progression.
• Velocity is measured over several strides
• m/sec. or mi/hr.
• Freely selected speed for walkers = 1.3 → 1.4 meters/second
Cadence:
• The number of steps per unit of time.
• Steps/minute
• Freely selected speed for walkers = 1.3 → 1.4 meters/second
Average Velocity
• Stride length ᵡ ½ Cadence
• Step length ᵡ Cadence (assuming symmetry)
Speed…Increased Speed…
• Both cadence & step length increase
• Double support decreases with
increase speed!
Out walking the Grim Reaper…
Muscular
Contractions
Concentric
Length of muscle shortens
Muscle force is greater than the resistance
Isometric
Active constant length contraction
Muscle force is equal to the resistance
Eccentric
Active lengthing contraction
Muscle force is less than the resistance
Gait
Cycle
• Gait Cycle - The period of time from one event (usually initial
contact) of one foot to the subsequent occurrence of the same foot.
• Example: Heel strike of one foot to heel strike of the same foot.
• Stance Phase – The period in time when the foot is in contact with
the ground.
• In normal gait = 60%
• Swing Phase – The period in time when the foot is NOT in contact
with the ground.
• In normal gait = 40%
• Double Limb Stance – The period in time when BOTH feet are in
contact with the ground.
• This occurs 2x’s within a gait cycle: At the beginning and end of stance phase.
Gait Terminology
• Line of Progression – A line that is parallel to the
direction that the patient is walking.
• Toe Out (Foot Progression Angle) – A line that is
parallel to the direction that the patient is walking.
• Approx.= 5°-7° degrees
• Females prefer less than males.
• Base of Support– Area bounded by the perimeter
of the feet.
• Statically = approx. shoulder width
• Dynamically = 2”-4”
C O M (Center of Mass) & Weight Line
• Center of Mass – Average location of the mass
where the total mass can be assumed concentrated.
• Standing posture = anterior to S2
• 56% of body height
• Weight Line – Also know as the line of
gravity.
• Plumb bob
GRF – Ground Reaction Forces• Ground Reaction Force – The reaction force of
the body (usually the foot) as it interacts with the
ground.
• Newton’s 3rd Law –
• 3-dimensional vector that varies with time.
• Vertical force required to counteract the pull
of gravity.
• Shear forces required to maintain body
balance and to change speed or direction of
walking.
GRF – 3 dimensional factorsMedio-Lateral Forces:
• Small, tends to be ignored.
• For most of stance phase, it tends to accelerate the
body’s COM towards the contralateral (medial) side of
the body.
Fore-aft Forces:
• Initial: “Digging in of Heel”
• Middle: Body pushing forward into the ground.
• End: Body pushing backward into the ground.
Vertical Forces:
• Body COM is accelerating upward when the vertical
GRF is greater than the body weight.
• Body COM is accelerating downward when the vertical
GRF is less than the body weight.
Moments
• Moment of Force:
• External Moment – Rotation of segments created by external loads
(forces outside the body).
• Examples: gravity, inertia, and GRF
• What you see!
• Internal Moment – Bodies “rotational”, muscular and/or soft tissue
response to these moments created by external loads.
• Body’s response
• Data from most Motion Analysis Labs
Moments continued…
Disclaimer:
• Moments we talk about in this lecture represent
NET joint moments
• Muscle co-contractions are not taken into
account.
• Zero moments about a joint doesn’t necessarily
mean there are no forces acting across the joint –
two opposing forces could create moments of
equal magnitude that cancel each other out.
Joint Power…
Power Absorption:
• If a joint moment and angular velocity are moving in OPPOSITE
directions = usually Eccentric Contraction
Power Generation:
• If a joint moment and angular velocity are moving in the SAME
direction = usually Concentric Contraction
Moment Example• During Loading Response of gait, what effect does the
GRF vector have on the knee?
• Does the GRF Flex or Extend the Knee?
• Is this an internal or external moment?
Flexes the Knee!
External Knee Flexion Moment!
• During Loading Response of gait,
what are the muscles of the knee
trying to do?• Are the muscles flexing or extending
the knee?
• Is this an internal or external moment?
Extending the knee – controlling the rate
of knee flexion; eccentric contraction.
Internal Knee Extensor Moment!
Carbon fiber production
The manufacturing process is
expensive and nasty.
Precursors of plyacrylonitrile and
or petroleum pitch are the
foundations.
Add a nasty mix of chemicals, gas
and heat within a vacuum and
there you have it.
There are only 12 main producers
of carbon fiber in the world.
Carbon Fiber is heterogeneous as
opposed to steel which is
homogenous.
Material Science of
Carbon Fiber
The strongest carbon fiber is about five
times stronger than steel while being a
fraction of the mass.
Carbon fiber is extremely resilient and
therefore energy efficient.
Carbon fiber can be manipulated over
and infinite amount of shapes and
designs.
Variability of epoxy resins can alter the
raw stress/strain data.
What does the literature say?
• 2004 Swedish study found the use of carbon fiber AFO’s
increased walking speed 20% and decreased energy cost by
12%. (1)
• 2007 German study found carbon afo’s significantly increased
energy return at third rocker and kinematic analysis of the ankle
and knee showed more physiologic gait. (2)
• 2010 Netherland study explored the relationship between
energy return, stiffness and timing. Lowest energy cost
determined by stiffness associated with highest ankle push off
velocity just before contralateral foot strike. (3)
Utilization
• Prospective payment/ DRG
• Two day rule
• LCD documentation requirements for custom
fabrication vs OTS carbon
• Lighter than custom poly pro
• Easier to don/doff, wider selection of shoe
possibilities
• Dynamic
• Patient compliance
THREE BIG HITTERS
Main design options
• Anterior approach
– Easy donning
– Smooth transition at heel strike
– Strong influence to the knee mid to late
stance
– Great for partial foot amputees
– Not indicated if hyperextension of the knee is
present
Main Design Options
• Posterior approach
– Strong knee flexion moment at heel strike
– Less visually obvious
– Most benefits during swing phase
– Not indicated if quads are involved
Main design options
• Medial strut
– Slight medial bias during swing
– Indicated for neutral and varus foot structures
– Heavy pronators with struggle with comfort
Main Design Options
• Lateral strut
– Slight external rotation during swing
– Indicated for neutral or valgus foot structures
– Strong supinators will struggle with comfort
Ottobock Walk On
Medial strut/anterior entry
Flat stress/strain curve
Soft heal strike
Smooth stance transitions
Poor knee flexion/extension
control
Ottobock Walk On Flex
Similar in design as the Walk On
Similar stress/strain fingerprint as
Walk ON
Spiral shape produces external
rotation moment
Walk ON Reaction
Posterior entry
Medial strut
Does have lateral T-strap option for
control of the ankle
Shorter than other anterior
approach options
Allard Toe OFF
Designed for late stance
instabilities
Soft heel strike
User must have good posterior
knee control
Thusane SpryStep
Very rigid
Lateral strut
Anterior entry
Strong knee flexion moment at
initial contact
User must have good anterior
control of the knee
SpryStep Max
Posterior entry
Lateral strut
Most “action” at late
stance
SpryStep Plus
True ground reaction design
Strut placement and overall weight
may limit use
Limited experience at this time
Overall Goals of Gait
1. Propulsion
2. Stance Stability
3. Shock Absorption
4. Energy Conservation
Initial Contact Goals
Goals:
• Transfer weight to Stance
Phase Limb
• Shock Absorption
Loading Response Goals
Goals:
• Shock Absorption
• Completely Transfer Weight
• Begin Single Limb Stance
Phase Limb
Midstance Goals
Goals:
• Maintain Momentum
• Highest Position (greatest
potential energy)
• Slowest Velocity in Gait Cycle
Terminal Stance GoalsGoals:
• Allow mass to progress over the
foot for an adequate step length.
• Opposite foot contacts the
ground.
• Downward movement of the
body (velocity increases).
Pre-Swing Goals
Goals:
• Preparation of limb for Swing
Phase.
• Aid in transferring load to
opposite limb.
Initial Swing Goals
Goals:
• Continued Plantar Flexion (via
inertia) followed by Rapid Ankle
Dorsiflexion.
• Continued Knee Flexion.
• Hip Flexion used for Swing Phase
Clearance.
• Preparation for Swing Phase
Clearance.
Mid-Swing Goals
Goals:
• Continue with Dorsiflexion for
Swing Phase Clearance.
• Maintenance of Knee Flexion for
Swing Phase Clearance.
• Continue with Hip Flexion for
Swing Phase Clearance.
Terminal Swing Goals
Goals:
• Return to neutral position.
• Preparation for initial contact
5 Pre-requisites of GaitPerry & Gage
1.Stability in Stance
2.Clearance in Swing
3.Pre-Position of the foot in Terminal Swing
4.Adequate Step Length
5.Energy ConservationReference:
References
• 1. Danielsson A, Sunnerhagen K. Energy expenditure
in stroke subjects walking with a carbon composite ankle
foot orthosis. J Rehabil Med 2004;36(4);165-168.
• 2. Alimusaj M, Knie I, Wolf S, et al. Functional impact of
carbon fiber springs in ankle foot orthosis. Orthopade
2007;36(8):752-756.
• 3. Bregman DJ, van der Krogt MM, de Groot V, et al.
The effect of ankle foot orthosis stiffness in the energy
cost of walking: a simulation study. Poster presented at
13th ISPO world conference, Leipzig Germany, May
2010.
Thank You!