34
CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation: CAUL-SCIP model Alex Byrne University of Technology, Sydney

CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation: CAUL-SCIP model

  • Upload
    kirsi

  • View
    52

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation: CAUL-SCIP model. Alex Byrne University of Technology, Sydney. SCIP National Site Licence Working Group Criteria. Transparency Inclusiveness Fairness Predictability Sustainability. Transparency. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

CAUL-Industry Think Tank

Intra-consortium cost allocation: CAUL-SCIP model Alex Byrne

University of Technology, Sydney

Page 2: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

SCIP National Site Licence Working Group Criteria

TransparencyInclusivenessFairnessPredictabilitySustainability

Page 3: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

TransparencyThe data used in the cost allocation model should be drawn from verifiable sources such as DEST data CAUL/AARL statisticsThe formula should be easily comprehensible

Page 4: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

InclusivenessThe cost allocations determined by the formula should enable the participation of any interested member of the consortiumInstitutional characteristics such as size, location, distribution of campuses should not inhibit participation

Page 5: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

Fairness The formula should apply relevant criteria which reflect the value or potential value of the resource to each participant eg For research To coursework students

Page 6: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

PredictabilityLarge variations in cost allocation from year to year should be avoided and hence …Data used should not be volatile

Page 7: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

SustainabilityThe formula should be robust so that the consortium will be unlikely to collapse if prices rise or a few members leave

Page 8: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

Possible criteriaStudent numbersResearch student numbersResearch student completionsStudent ethnic diversityEquity measuresStaff numbersTotal university incomeResearch income

Size of collectionCurrent subscriptionsLibrary budgetNumber of branchesNumber of ILLs supplied/requestedUniversity Librarian’s discretionVice-Chancellor’s humilityPublishers’ philanthropy

Page 9: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

Modifications and adjustments

To include or exclude printFor prior subscriptionFor different packagesTo apply creditsTo not exceed previous expenditureTo apply maxima or minima

Page 10: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

Formulae - characteristicsWeightedFlag fall or thresholdCappedBanded Equal number in each band By category of library (eg Go8, ATN,

Go5) At break points in the data

Page 11: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

An exampleTen university libraries:

Innisfail UTFalls Creek UU GibraltarU CarcoarU BegaU ArdrossanU Edith FallsDalby UJerilderee UTU Herberton

Three elements:Vice-Chancellors' Humility Index (HIV)University Librarians' Silent Thoughts (LUST)Publishers' Charity (PC)

Three formulae:Model X: 1/2 LUST and 1/2 HIVModel Y: 1/3 LUST and 1/3 PC and 1/3 HIVModel Z: 1/2 LUST and 1/4 HIV and 1/4 PC

Page 12: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

LUST, HIV and PC

Vice

-Cha

ncel

lors

' H

umili

ty In

dex

(HIV

)

Uni

vers

ity

Libr

aria

ns' S

ilent

Th

ough

ts (L

UST

)

Publ

ishe

rs' C

harit

y (P

C)

Mod

el X

: 1/2

LU

ST

and

1/2

HIV

Mod

el Y

: 1/

3 LU

ST

and

1/3

PC a

nd 1

/3

HIV

Mod

el Z

: 1/

2 LU

ST

and

1/4

HIV

and

1/4

PC

Innisfail UT 0.9186 0.8420 0.2917 0.2608 0.1936 0.1892Falls Creek U 0.5165 0.6457 0.4072 0.1646 0.1373 0.1367U Gibraltar 0.4011 0.0435 0.3221 0.0800 0.0751 0.0586U Carcoar 0.3988 0.7452 0.7448 0.1529 0.1523 0.1532U Bega 0.1155 0.2536 0.6645 0.0482 0.0771 0.0711U Ardrossan 0.1040 0.5580 0.7035 0.0779 0.0995 0.1038U Edith Falls 0.1015 0.4661 0.5728 0.0678 0.0840 0.0874Dalby U 0.0721 0.2602 0.5927 0.0407 0.0673 0.0641Jerilderee UT 0.0183 0.0362 0.2361 0.0072 0.0208 0.0175U Herberton 0.0124 0.9331 0.3881 0.0999 0.0929 0.1184Total 2.6588 4.7836 4.9235 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000Mean 0.2659 0.4784 0.4923 0.1000 0.1000 0.1000Median 0.1098 0.5121 0.4900 0.0789 0.0884 0.0956Low er Quartile 0.0794 0.2553 0.3386 0.0531 0.0756 0.0658Upper Quartile 0.4005 0.7203 0.6466 0.1396 0.1279 0.1321

PC on HIV w ith LUST

0.00000.1000

0.20000.3000

0.40000.5000

0.60000.7000

Model Z: 1/2 LUST and 1/4 HIV and1/4 PCModel Y : 1/3 LUST and 1/3 PC and1/3 HIVModel X: 1/2 LUST and 1/2 HIV

Page 13: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

LUST, HIV and PCLUST, HIV and PC

0.0000

0.1000

0.2000

0.3000

0.4000

0.5000

0.6000

0.7000

0.8000

0.9000

1.0000

Vice-Chancellors' Humility Index(HIV)University Librarians' SilentThoughts (LUST)Publishers' Charity (PC)

Model X: 1/2 LUST and 1/2 HIV

Model Y : 1/3 LUST and 1/3 PC and1/3 HIVModel Z: 1/2 LUST and 1/4 HIV and1/4 PC

Page 14: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

SCIP modellingForty universities

(including ADFA & Notre Dame)

Four elements:RQ Recalculated % for 2000% Total tertiary Students% Total research population% Total library resources budget

Five formulae:Model A: 1/2 RQ and 1/2 eftsuModel B: 1/3 RQ and 1/3 eftsu and 1/3 resources budgetModel C: 1/4 RQ and 1/4 research pop 1/4 eftsu and 1/4 resources budgetModel D: 1/3 RQ and 1/3 eftsu and 1/3 research popModel E: 1/2 RQ and 1/4 eftsu and 1/4 resources budget

Page 15: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

SCIP – sorted by Model DModel D: 1/3 RQ and 1/3 eftsu and 1/3 research pop

19

99

CA

UL

Sta

tis

tic

s -

in

pu

t

fac

tors

- C

os

t-

sh

ari

ng

op

tio

ns

fo

r

Na

tio

na

l S

ite

Lic

en

ce

RQ

Re

ca

lcu

late

d %

for

20

00

% T

ota

l te

rtia

ry

Stu

de

nts

% T

ota

l re

se

arc

h

po

pu

lati

on

% T

ota

l R

es

ou

rce

s

Mo

de

l A

: 1

/2 R

Q a

nd

1/2

eft

su

Mo

de

l B

: 1

/3 R

Q

an

d 1

/3 e

fts

u a

nd

1/3

re

so

urc

es

bu

dg

et

Mo

de

l C

: 1

/4 R

Q

an

d 1

/4 r

es

ea

rch

po

p 1

/4 e

fts

u a

nd

1/4

re

so

urc

es

Mo

de

l D

: 1

/3 R

Q

an

d 1

/3 e

fts

u a

nd

1/3

re

se

arc

h p

op

Mo

de

l E

: 1

/2 R

Q

an

d 1

/4 e

fts

u a

nd

1/4

re

so

urc

es

bu

dg

et

U n iv e r s i t y o f M e l b o u r n e 0 . 1 1 5 5 0 . 0 5 3 6 0 . 0 6 6 5 0 . 0 6 7 7 0 . 0 6 0 0 0 . 0 7 9 0 0 . 0 7 5 8 0 . 0 7 8 5 0 . 0 8 8 1U n iv e r s i t y o f S y d n e y 0 . 1 0 4 0 0 . 0 5 5 8 0 . 0 7 0 3 0 . 0 4 9 9 0 . 0 6 3 1 0 . 0 6 9 9 0 . 0 7 0 0 0 . 0 7 6 7 0 . 0 7 8 4U n iv e r s i t y o f N e w S o u t h W a le s 0 . 0 9 8 8 0 . 0 4 5 2 0 . 0 7 4 5 0 . 0 5 8 9 0 . 0 5 9 8 0 . 0 6 7 6 0 . 0 6 9 3 0 . 0 7 2 8 0 . 0 7 5 4U n iv e r s i t y o f Q u e e n s la n d 0 . 1 0 1 5 0 . 0 4 6 6 0 . 0 5 7 3 0 . 0 7 3 0 0 . 0 5 1 9 0 . 0 7 3 7 0 . 0 6 9 6 0 . 0 6 8 5 0 . 0 8 0 7M o n a s h U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 7 2 1 0 . 0 6 0 2 0 . 0 5 9 3 0 . 0 5 1 8 0 . 0 5 9 7 0 . 0 6 1 3 0 . 0 6 0 8 0 . 0 6 3 8 0 . 0 6 4 0U n iv e r s i t y o f W e s t e r n A u s t r a l i a 0 . 0 6 3 6 0 . 0 2 2 7 0 . 0 3 0 0 0 . 0 3 4 6 0 . 0 2 6 3 0 . 0 4 0 3 0 . 0 3 7 7 0 . 0 3 8 8 0 . 0 4 6 1U n iv e r s i t y o f A d e la id e 0 . 0 5 9 5 0 . 0 2 1 4 0 . 0 2 4 7 0 . 0 4 0 7 0 . 0 2 3 1 0 . 0 4 0 5 0 . 0 3 6 6 0 . 0 3 5 2 0 . 0 4 5 3R M I T U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 1 6 5 0 . 0 4 5 7 0 . 0 4 0 7 0 . 0 1 9 4 0 . 0 4 3 2 0 . 0 2 7 2 0 . 0 3 0 6 0 . 0 3 4 3 0 . 0 2 4 5Q u e e n s l a n d U n i v e r s i t y o f T e c h n o lo g y 0 . 0 1 8 6 0 . 0 4 2 0 0 . 0 2 9 2 0 . 0 4 3 5 0 . 0 3 5 6 0 . 0 3 4 7 0 . 0 3 3 3 0 . 0 2 9 9 0 . 0 3 0 7U n iv e r s i t y o f W e s t e r n S y d n e y 0 . 0 1 0 7 0 . 0 4 4 3 0 . 0 3 2 2 0 . 0 3 3 4 0 . 0 3 8 3 0 . 0 2 9 5 0 . 0 3 0 2 0 . 0 2 9 1 0 . 0 2 4 8C u r t i n U n i v e r s i t y o f T e c h n o l o g y 0 . 0 1 8 3 0 . 0 3 6 2 0 . 0 3 2 4 0 . 0 3 1 5 0 . 0 3 4 3 0 . 0 2 8 7 0 . 0 2 9 6 0 . 0 2 9 0 0 . 0 2 6 1M a c q u a r i e U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 2 2 8 0 . 0 2 7 8 0 . 0 3 5 1 0 . 0 2 4 0 0 . 0 3 1 5 0 . 0 2 4 9 0 . 0 2 7 4 0 . 0 2 8 6 0 . 0 2 4 3U n iv e r s i t y o f T e c h n o l o g y , S y d n e y 0 . 0 1 2 4 0 . 0 3 3 1 0 . 0 3 8 8 0 . 0 3 2 7 0 . 0 3 6 0 0 . 0 2 6 1 0 . 0 2 9 3 0 . 0 2 8 1 0 . 0 2 2 7G r i f f i t h U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 2 0 4 0 . 0 3 5 0 0 . 0 2 8 0 0 . 0 2 8 5 0 . 0 3 1 5 0 . 0 2 8 0 0 . 0 2 8 0 0 . 0 2 7 8 0 . 0 2 6 1L a T r o b e U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 2 2 3 0 . 0 3 2 4 0 . 0 2 7 7 0 . 0 4 0 3 0 . 0 3 0 0 0 . 0 3 1 6 0 . 0 3 0 6 0 . 0 2 7 4 0 . 0 2 9 3U n iv e r s i t y o f S o u t h A u s t r a l i a 0 . 0 1 6 3 0 . 0 3 4 7 0 . 0 2 8 9 0 . 0 1 9 5 0 . 0 3 1 8 0 . 0 2 3 5 0 . 0 2 4 8 0 . 0 2 6 6 0 . 0 2 1 7A u s t r a l i a n N a t i o n a l U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 2 9 9 0 . 0 1 5 4 0 . 0 2 7 9 0 . 0 3 9 1 0 . 0 2 1 6 0 . 0 2 8 1 0 . 0 2 8 1 0 . 0 2 4 4 0 . 0 2 8 6U n iv e r s i t y o f N e w c a s t l e 0 . 0 2 7 3 0 . 0 2 5 7 0 . 0 2 0 0 0 . 0 2 6 8 0 . 0 2 2 9 0 . 0 2 6 6 0 . 0 2 4 9 0 . 0 2 4 3 0 . 0 2 6 8D e a k in U n i v e r s i t y L i b r a r y 0 . 0 0 9 2 0 . 0 3 3 0 0 . 0 2 1 7 0 . 0 3 1 0 0 . 0 2 7 3 0 . 0 2 4 4 0 . 0 2 3 7 0 . 0 2 1 3 0 . 0 2 0 6U n iv e r s i t y o f W o l l o n g o n g 0 . 0 1 9 5 0 . 0 1 9 1 0 . 0 2 3 7 0 . 0 2 2 1 0 . 0 2 1 4 0 . 0 2 0 2 0 . 0 2 1 1 0 . 0 2 0 8 0 . 0 2 0 1F l i n d e r s U n i v e r s i t y o f S o u t h A u s t r a l i a 0 . 0 2 7 2 0 . 0 1 6 0 0 . 0 1 6 8 0 . 0 2 0 9 0 . 0 1 6 4 0 . 0 2 1 4 0 . 0 2 0 2 0 . 0 2 0 0 0 . 0 2 2 8U n iv e r s i t y o f T a s m a n ia 0 . 0 2 4 1 0 . 0 1 9 0 0 . 0 1 5 7 0 . 0 1 4 9 0 . 0 1 7 4 0 . 0 1 9 3 0 . 0 1 8 4 0 . 0 1 9 6 0 . 0 2 0 5C h a r l e s S t u r t U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 0 4 1 0 . 0 2 8 8 0 . 0 2 4 1 0 . 0 1 9 6 0 . 0 2 6 4 0 . 0 1 7 5 0 . 0 1 9 1 0 . 0 1 9 0 0 . 0 1 4 2V ic t o r i a U n i v e r s i t y o f T e c h n o lo g y 0 . 0 0 5 8 0 . 0 2 5 2 0 . 0 2 1 9 0 . 0 1 7 3 0 . 0 2 3 5 0 . 0 1 6 1 0 . 0 1 7 5 0 . 0 1 7 6 0 . 0 1 3 5U n iv e r s i t y o f N e w E n g l a n d 0 . 0 1 4 8 0 . 0 1 6 7 0 . 0 1 7 9 0 . 0 1 5 9 0 . 0 1 7 3 0 . 0 1 5 8 0 . 0 1 6 3 0 . 0 1 6 5 0 . 0 1 5 5M u r d o c h U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 1 4 9 0 . 0 1 5 8 0 . 0 1 7 2 0 . 0 1 3 0 0 . 0 1 6 5 0 . 0 1 4 5 0 . 0 1 5 2 0 . 0 1 5 9 0 . 0 1 4 6E d i t h C o w a n U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 0 4 9 0 . 0 2 4 8 0 . 0 1 4 9 0 . 0 1 5 5 0 . 0 1 9 8 0 . 0 1 5 0 0 . 0 1 5 0 0 . 0 1 4 8 0 . 0 1 2 5J a m e s C o o k U n i v e r s i t y o f N o r t h Q u e e n s la n d 0 . 0 1 4 4 0 . 0 1 5 1 0 . 0 1 2 9 0 . 0 1 5 3 0 . 0 1 4 0 0 . 0 1 4 9 0 . 0 1 4 4 0 . 0 1 4 1 0 . 0 1 4 8S w i n b u r n e U n i v e r s i t y o f T e c h n o l o g y 0 . 0 0 6 0 0 . 0 1 7 7 0 . 0 1 3 9 0 . 0 1 1 1 0 . 0 1 5 8 0 . 0 1 1 6 0 . 0 1 2 2 0 . 0 1 2 6 0 . 0 1 0 2U n iv e r s i t y o f S o u t h e r n Q u e e n s l a n d 0 . 0 0 3 2 0 . 0 1 6 6 0 . 0 1 3 5 0 . 0 1 4 9 0 . 0 1 5 0 0 . 0 1 1 6 0 . 0 1 2 1 0 . 0 1 1 1 0 . 0 0 9 5C e n t r a l Q u e e n s l a n d U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 0 3 2 0 . 0 1 6 7 0 . 0 1 1 0 0 . 0 1 2 6 0 . 0 1 3 9 0 . 0 1 0 8 0 . 0 1 0 9 0 . 0 1 0 3 0 . 0 0 8 9U n iv e r s i t y o f C a n b e r r a 0 . 0 0 5 9 0 . 0 1 3 0 0 . 0 1 0 5 0 . 0 0 7 8 0 . 0 1 1 7 0 . 0 0 8 9 0 . 0 0 9 3 0 . 0 0 9 8 0 . 0 0 8 1S o u t h e r n C r o s s U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 0 5 0 0 . 0 1 1 4 0 . 0 0 9 3 0 . 0 0 8 5 0 . 0 1 0 4 0 . 0 0 8 3 0 . 0 0 8 6 0 . 0 0 8 6 0 . 0 0 7 5A u s t r a l i a n C a t h o l i c U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 1 1 4 0 . 0 1 0 5 0 . 0 0 8 8 0 . 0 1 1 0 0 . 0 0 7 2 0 . 0 0 8 0 0 . 0 0 7 8 0 . 0 0 5 8N o r t h e r n T e r r i t o r y U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 0 4 5 0 . 0 0 5 2 0 . 0 0 5 4 0 . 0 0 6 6 0 . 0 0 5 3 0 . 0 0 5 4 0 . 0 0 5 4 0 . 0 0 5 0 0 . 0 0 5 2U n iv e r s i t y o f B a l l a r a t 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 7 4 0 . 0 0 4 0 0 . 0 0 7 6 0 . 0 0 5 7 0 . 0 0 5 5 0 . 0 0 5 1 0 . 0 0 4 3 0 . 0 0 4 5B o n d U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 0 2 8 0 . 0 0 7 2 0 . 0 0 6 6 0 . 0 0 5 0 0 . 0 0 3 2 0 . 0 0 4 2 0 . 0 0 3 3 0 . 0 0 2 4A u s t r a l i a n D e f e n c e F o r c e A c a d e m y 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 8 0 . 0 0 4 2 0 . 0 0 8 0 0 . 0 0 3 5 0 . 0 0 3 6 0 . 0 0 3 8 0 . 0 0 2 3 0 . 0 0 2 7U n iv e r s i t y o f t h e S u n s h in e C o a s t 0 . 0 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 3 5 0 . 0 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 6 7 0 . 0 0 2 0 0 . 0 0 3 5 0 . 0 0 2 7 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 2 7U n iv e r s i t y o f N o t r e D a m e A u s t r a l i a 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0

Page 16: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

SCIP –Model D – first quartile

University of MelbourneUniversity of SydneyUniversity of New South WalesUniversity of QueenslandMonash UniversityUniversity of Western AustraliaUniversity of AdelaideRMIT UniversityQueensland University of TechnologyUniversity of Western Sydney

ANU and La Trobe most volatile in this quartile

Page 17: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

SCIP –Model D – second quartile

Curtin University of TechnologyMacquarie UniversityUniversity of Technology, SydneyGriffith UniversityLa Trobe UniversityUniversity of South AustraliaAustralian National UniversityUniversity of NewcastleDeakin University LibraryUniversity of Wollongong

RMIT, UWS, UWA and Adelaide can move from this quartile

Page 18: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

SCIP –Model D – third quartile

Flinders University of South AustraliaUniversity of TasmaniaCharles Sturt UniversityVictoria University of TechnologyUniversity of New EnglandMurdoch UniversityEdith Cowan UniversityJames Cook University of North QueenslandSwinburne University of TechnologyUniversity of Southern Queensland

Flinders, CSU and VUT most volatile in this quartile

Page 19: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

SCIP –Model D – fourth quartile

Central Queensland UniversityUniversity of CanberraSouthern Cross UniversityAustralian Catholic University Northern Territory UniversityUniversity of BallaratBond UniversityAustralian Defence Force AcademyUniversity of the Sunshine CoastUniversity of Notre Dame Australia

None move from this quartile

Page 20: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

SCIP – sorted by Model A1

99

9 C

AU

L

Sta

tis

tic

s -

in

pu

t

fac

tors

- C

os

t-

sh

ari

ng

op

tio

ns

fo

r

Na

tio

na

l S

ite

Lic

en

ce

RQ

Re

ca

lcu

late

d %

for

20

00

% T

ota

l te

rtia

ry

Stu

de

nts

% T

ota

l re

se

arc

h

po

pu

lati

on

% T

ota

l R

es

ou

rce

s

Mo

de

l A

: 1

/2 R

Q

an

d 1

/2 e

fts

u

Mo

de

l B

: 1

/3 R

Q

an

d 1

/3 e

fts

u a

nd

1/3

re

so

urc

es

bu

dg

et

Mo

de

l C

: 1

/4 R

Q

an

d 1

/4 r

es

ea

rch

po

p 1

/4 e

fts

u a

nd

1/4

re

so

urc

es

Mo

de

l D

: 1

/3 R

Q

an

d 1

/3 e

fts

u a

nd

1/3

re

se

arc

h p

op

Mo

de

l E

: 1

/2 R

Q

an

d 1

/4 e

fts

u a

nd

1/4

re

so

urc

es

bu

dg

et

U n i v e r s i t y o f S y d n e y 0 . 1 0 4 0 0 . 0 5 5 8 0 . 0 7 0 3 0 . 0 4 9 9 0 . 0 6 3 1 0 . 0 6 9 9 0 . 0 7 0 0 0 . 0 7 6 7 0 . 0 7 8 4U n i v e r s i t y o f M e l b o u r n e 0 . 1 1 5 5 0 . 0 5 3 6 0 . 0 6 6 5 0 . 0 6 7 7 0 . 0 6 0 0 0 . 0 7 9 0 0 . 0 7 5 8 0 . 0 7 8 5 0 . 0 8 8 1U n i v e r s i t y o f N e w S o u t h W a l e s 0 . 0 9 8 8 0 . 0 4 5 2 0 . 0 7 4 5 0 . 0 5 8 9 0 . 0 5 9 8 0 . 0 6 7 6 0 . 0 6 9 3 0 . 0 7 2 8 0 . 0 7 5 4M o n a s h U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 7 2 1 0 . 0 6 0 2 0 . 0 5 9 3 0 . 0 5 1 8 0 . 0 5 9 7 0 . 0 6 1 3 0 . 0 6 0 8 0 . 0 6 3 8 0 . 0 6 4 0U n i v e r s i t y o f Q u e e n s l a n d 0 . 1 0 1 5 0 . 0 4 6 6 0 . 0 5 7 3 0 . 0 7 3 0 0 . 0 5 1 9 0 . 0 7 3 7 0 . 0 6 9 6 0 . 0 6 8 5 0 . 0 8 0 7R M I T U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 1 6 5 0 . 0 4 5 7 0 . 0 4 0 7 0 . 0 1 9 4 0 . 0 4 3 2 0 . 0 2 7 2 0 . 0 3 0 6 0 . 0 3 4 3 0 . 0 2 4 5U n i v e r s i t y o f W e s t e r n S y d n e y 0 . 0 1 0 7 0 . 0 4 4 3 0 . 0 3 2 2 0 . 0 3 3 4 0 . 0 3 8 3 0 . 0 2 9 5 0 . 0 3 0 2 0 . 0 2 9 1 0 . 0 2 4 8U n i v e r s i t y o f T e c h n o l o g y , S y d n e y 0 . 0 1 2 4 0 . 0 3 3 1 0 . 0 3 8 8 0 . 0 3 2 7 0 . 0 3 6 0 0 . 0 2 6 1 0 . 0 2 9 3 0 . 0 2 8 1 0 . 0 2 2 7Q u e e n s l a n d U n i v e r s i t y o f T e c h n o l o g y 0 . 0 1 8 6 0 . 0 4 2 0 0 . 0 2 9 2 0 . 0 4 3 5 0 . 0 3 5 6 0 . 0 3 4 7 0 . 0 3 3 3 0 . 0 2 9 9 0 . 0 3 0 7C u r t i n U n i v e r s i t y o f T e c h n o l o g y 0 . 0 1 8 3 0 . 0 3 6 2 0 . 0 3 2 4 0 . 0 3 1 5 0 . 0 3 4 3 0 . 0 2 8 7 0 . 0 2 9 6 0 . 0 2 9 0 0 . 0 2 6 1U n i v e r s i t y o f S o u t h A u s t r a l i a 0 . 0 1 6 3 0 . 0 3 4 7 0 . 0 2 8 9 0 . 0 1 9 5 0 . 0 3 1 8 0 . 0 2 3 5 0 . 0 2 4 8 0 . 0 2 6 6 0 . 0 2 1 7G r i f f i t h U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 2 0 4 0 . 0 3 5 0 0 . 0 2 8 0 0 . 0 2 8 5 0 . 0 3 1 5 0 . 0 2 8 0 0 . 0 2 8 0 0 . 0 2 7 8 0 . 0 2 6 1M a c q u a r i e U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 2 2 8 0 . 0 2 7 8 0 . 0 3 5 1 0 . 0 2 4 0 0 . 0 3 1 5 0 . 0 2 4 9 0 . 0 2 7 4 0 . 0 2 8 6 0 . 0 2 4 3L a T r o b e U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 2 2 3 0 . 0 3 2 4 0 . 0 2 7 7 0 . 0 4 0 3 0 . 0 3 0 0 0 . 0 3 1 6 0 . 0 3 0 6 0 . 0 2 7 4 0 . 0 2 9 3D e a k i n U n i v e r s i t y L i b r a r y 0 . 0 0 9 2 0 . 0 3 3 0 0 . 0 2 1 7 0 . 0 3 1 0 0 . 0 2 7 3 0 . 0 2 4 4 0 . 0 2 3 7 0 . 0 2 1 3 0 . 0 2 0 6C h a r l e s S t u r t U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 0 4 1 0 . 0 2 8 8 0 . 0 2 4 1 0 . 0 1 9 6 0 . 0 2 6 4 0 . 0 1 7 5 0 . 0 1 9 1 0 . 0 1 9 0 0 . 0 1 4 2U n i v e r s i t y o f W e s t e r n A u s t r a l i a 0 . 0 6 3 6 0 . 0 2 2 7 0 . 0 3 0 0 0 . 0 3 4 6 0 . 0 2 6 3 0 . 0 4 0 3 0 . 0 3 7 7 0 . 0 3 8 8 0 . 0 4 6 1V i c t o r i a U n i v e r s i t y o f T e c h n o l o g y 0 . 0 0 5 8 0 . 0 2 5 2 0 . 0 2 1 9 0 . 0 1 7 3 0 . 0 2 3 5 0 . 0 1 6 1 0 . 0 1 7 5 0 . 0 1 7 6 0 . 0 1 3 5U n i v e r s i t y o f A d e l a id e 0 . 0 5 9 5 0 . 0 2 1 4 0 . 0 2 4 7 0 . 0 4 0 7 0 . 0 2 3 1 0 . 0 4 0 5 0 . 0 3 6 6 0 . 0 3 5 2 0 . 0 4 5 3U n i v e r s i t y o f N e w c a s t l e 0 . 0 2 7 3 0 . 0 2 5 7 0 . 0 2 0 0 0 . 0 2 6 8 0 . 0 2 2 9 0 . 0 2 6 6 0 . 0 2 4 9 0 . 0 2 4 3 0 . 0 2 6 8A u s t r a l i a n N a t i o n a l U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 2 9 9 0 . 0 1 5 4 0 . 0 2 7 9 0 . 0 3 9 1 0 . 0 2 1 6 0 . 0 2 8 1 0 . 0 2 8 1 0 . 0 2 4 4 0 . 0 2 8 6U n i v e r s i t y o f W o l l o n g o n g 0 . 0 1 9 5 0 . 0 1 9 1 0 . 0 2 3 7 0 . 0 2 2 1 0 . 0 2 1 4 0 . 0 2 0 2 0 . 0 2 1 1 0 . 0 2 0 8 0 . 0 2 0 1E d i t h C o w a n U n iv e r s i t y 0 . 0 0 4 9 0 . 0 2 4 8 0 . 0 1 4 9 0 . 0 1 5 5 0 . 0 1 9 8 0 . 0 1 5 0 0 . 0 1 5 0 0 . 0 1 4 8 0 . 0 1 2 5U n i v e r s i t y o f T a s m a n i a 0 . 0 2 4 1 0 . 0 1 9 0 0 . 0 1 5 7 0 . 0 1 4 9 0 . 0 1 7 4 0 . 0 1 9 3 0 . 0 1 8 4 0 . 0 1 9 6 0 . 0 2 0 5U n i v e r s i t y o f N e w E n g l a n d 0 . 0 1 4 8 0 . 0 1 6 7 0 . 0 1 7 9 0 . 0 1 5 9 0 . 0 1 7 3 0 . 0 1 5 8 0 . 0 1 6 3 0 . 0 1 6 5 0 . 0 1 5 5M u r d o c h U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 1 4 9 0 . 0 1 5 8 0 . 0 1 7 2 0 . 0 1 3 0 0 . 0 1 6 5 0 . 0 1 4 5 0 . 0 1 5 2 0 . 0 1 5 9 0 . 0 1 4 6F l i n d e r s U n i v e r s i t y o f S o u t h A u s t r a l i a 0 . 0 2 7 2 0 . 0 1 6 0 0 . 0 1 6 8 0 . 0 2 0 9 0 . 0 1 6 4 0 . 0 2 1 4 0 . 0 2 0 2 0 . 0 2 0 0 0 . 0 2 2 8S w i n b u r n e U n i v e r s i t y o f T e c h n o l o g y 0 . 0 0 6 0 0 . 0 1 7 7 0 . 0 1 3 9 0 . 0 1 1 1 0 . 0 1 5 8 0 . 0 1 1 6 0 . 0 1 2 2 0 . 0 1 2 6 0 . 0 1 0 2U n i v e r s i t y o f S o u t h e r n Q u e e n s l a n d 0 . 0 0 3 2 0 . 0 1 6 6 0 . 0 1 3 5 0 . 0 1 4 9 0 . 0 1 5 0 0 . 0 1 1 6 0 . 0 1 2 1 0 . 0 1 1 1 0 . 0 0 9 5J a m e s C o o k U n i v e r s i t y o f N o r t h Q u e e n s l a n d 0 . 0 1 4 4 0 . 0 1 5 1 0 . 0 1 2 9 0 . 0 1 5 3 0 . 0 1 4 0 0 . 0 1 4 9 0 . 0 1 4 4 0 . 0 1 4 1 0 . 0 1 4 8C e n t r a l Q u e e n s l a n d U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 0 3 2 0 . 0 1 6 7 0 . 0 1 1 0 0 . 0 1 2 6 0 . 0 1 3 9 0 . 0 1 0 8 0 . 0 1 0 9 0 . 0 1 0 3 0 . 0 0 8 9U n i v e r s i t y o f C a n b e r r a 0 . 0 0 5 9 0 . 0 1 3 0 0 . 0 1 0 5 0 . 0 0 7 8 0 . 0 1 1 7 0 . 0 0 8 9 0 . 0 0 9 3 0 . 0 0 9 8 0 . 0 0 8 1A u s t r a l i a n C a t h o l i c U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 1 1 4 0 . 0 1 0 5 0 . 0 0 8 8 0 . 0 1 1 0 0 . 0 0 7 2 0 . 0 0 8 0 0 . 0 0 7 8 0 . 0 0 5 8S o u t h e r n C r o s s U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 0 5 0 0 . 0 1 1 4 0 . 0 0 9 3 0 . 0 0 8 5 0 . 0 1 0 4 0 . 0 0 8 3 0 . 0 0 8 6 0 . 0 0 8 6 0 . 0 0 7 5U n i v e r s i t y o f B a l l a r a t 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 7 4 0 . 0 0 4 0 0 . 0 0 7 6 0 . 0 0 5 7 0 . 0 0 5 5 0 . 0 0 5 1 0 . 0 0 4 3 0 . 0 0 4 5N o r t h e r n T e r r i t o r y U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 0 4 5 0 . 0 0 5 2 0 . 0 0 5 4 0 . 0 0 6 6 0 . 0 0 5 3 0 . 0 0 5 4 0 . 0 0 5 4 0 . 0 0 5 0 0 . 0 0 5 2B o n d U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 0 2 8 0 . 0 0 7 2 0 . 0 0 6 6 0 . 0 0 5 0 0 . 0 0 3 2 0 . 0 0 4 2 0 . 0 0 3 3 0 . 0 0 2 4A u s t r a l i a n D e f e n c e F o r c e A c a d e m y 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 8 0 . 0 0 4 2 0 . 0 0 8 0 0 . 0 0 3 5 0 . 0 0 3 6 0 . 0 0 3 8 0 . 0 0 2 3 0 . 0 0 2 7U n i v e r s i t y o f t h e S u n s h i n e C o a s t 0 . 0 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 3 5 0 . 0 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 6 7 0 . 0 0 2 0 0 . 0 0 3 5 0 . 0 0 2 7 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 2 7U n i v e r s i t y o f N o t r e D a m e A u s t r a l i a 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0

Page 21: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

SCIP – sorted by Model AModel A: 1/2 RQ and 1/2 eftsuRMIT, UWA and Adelaide go downCSU and VUT go up

Page 22: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

SCIP – sorted by Model BModel B: 1/3 RQ and 1/3 eftsu and 1/3 resources budgetRMIT goes downANU and La Trobe go up

Page 23: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

SCIP – sorted by Model CModel C: 1/4 RQ and 1/4 research pop 1/4 eftsu and 1/4 resources budget

ANU and La Trobe go up

Page 24: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

SCIP – sorted by Model EModel E: 1/2 RQ and 1/4 eftsu and 1/4 resources budget

RMIT goes downFlinders, ANU and La Trobe go up

Page 25: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

Sensitivity analysisRMIT, ANU, La Trobe are the most sensitive to changes in formulaeCSU, VUT, UWA, Flinders and Adelaide are also affected.The smaller (fourth quartile) are unaffected.The largest jockey for position but do not leave the first quartile.Can also analyse capacity to pay ie cost compared to resources budget – rejected by AVCC.

Page 26: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

AVCC formulaElements: Share of

Actual student load (EFTSU)National total of publicationsTotal higher degree completionsNational competitive grantsTotal research incomeFTE staffExisting spend for 2001

Page 27: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

AVCC formulaElement Weighting

Total EFTSU

Total Research EFTSU

Total Research Publications

HDR Students Completions

Research Income

Staff FTE

Current Expenditure Weighting

TOTAL

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

10% 7.50% 8.40% 9.20% 10.00% 10.00%

0% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

10% 7.50% 8.40% 9.20% 10.00% 10.00%

0% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

70% 52.50% 58.80% 64.40% 70.00% 70.00%

10% 7.50% 8.40% 9.20% 10.00% 10.00%

  25% 16% 8% 0% 0%

100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Page 28: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

AVCC formula% o f C u r r e n t % A v e r a g e % A v e r a g e 9 8 % T o t a l 2 0 0 0 P r o j e c t e d C o n t r i b u t i o n

T o t a l 2 0 0 0 S p e n d 1 9 9 8 & 1 9 9 9 & 9 9 R e s e a r c hT o n l y & T R o n l y( C u r r e n t E x p b yE F T S U ( i ) P u b l i c a t i o n s ( i i ) I n c o m e ( i i ) S t a f f F T E ( i ) + 5 % ) P a r t i c i p a n t

I n s t i t u t i o n 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 2% % % % % U S $ U S $

U n i v e r s i t y o f N e w S o u t h W a l e s 0 . 0 4 9 0 . 1 1 9 0 . 0 7 5 0 . 1 0 4 0 . 0 6 0 1 2 9 5 1 2 8 1 0 6 5 0 9 2T h e U n i v e r s i t y o f Q u e e n s l a n d 0 . 0 4 5 0 . 1 0 6 0 . 0 9 1 0 . 1 0 5 0 . 0 6 4 1 1 5 0 7 5 0 1 0 5 1 7 2 5T h e U n i v e r s i t y o f M e l b o u r n e 0 . 0 5 2 0 . 0 5 7 0 . 1 0 1 0 . 1 1 8 0 . 0 6 6 6 1 5 5 5 8 1 0 0 7 2 2 7T h e U n i v e r s i t y o f S y d n e y 0 . 0 5 5 0 . 0 7 6 0 . 0 7 7 0 . 1 1 1 0 . 0 6 9 8 2 6 2 8 7 1 0 0 2 6 1 2M o n a s h U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 6 0 0 . 0 5 9 0 . 0 7 2 0 . 0 6 8 0 . 0 6 7 6 3 9 8 4 8 7 1 0 9 5 1T h e U n i v e r s i t y o f W e s t e r n A u s t r a l i a 0 . 0 2 2 0 . 0 4 1 0 . 0 5 3 0 . 0 6 5 0 . 0 3 5 4 4 7 2 1 8 5 7 1 1 5 7T h e U n i v e r s i t y o f A d e l a i d e 0 . 0 2 0 0 . 0 4 0 0 . 0 4 4 0 . 0 6 1 0 . 0 3 4 4 3 2 6 4 3 5 3 7 2 3 5T h e A u s t r a l i a n N a t i o n a l U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 1 5 0 . 0 4 8 0 . 0 2 9 0 . 0 2 9 0 . 0 4 6 5 1 6 8 0 6 3 6 7 8 5 6L a T r o b e U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 3 0 0 . 0 4 2 0 . 0 3 2 0 . 0 1 9 0 . 0 3 3 4 6 0 8 3 0 2 9 9 6 3 3F l i n d e r s U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 1 6 0 . 0 2 5 0 . 0 2 3 0 . 0 3 1 0 . 0 2 1 2 6 6 1 1 3 2 8 9 9 1 2T h e U n i v e r s i t y o f N e w c a s t l e 0 . 0 2 6 0 . 0 1 9 0 . 0 3 1 0 . 0 2 9 0 . 0 2 6 2 0 5 8 5 9 2 8 6 3 2 9C u r t i n U n i v e r s i t y o f T e c h n o l o g y 0 . 0 3 6 0 . 0 4 5 0 . 0 2 4 0 . 0 1 7 0 . 0 2 7 4 8 4 0 0 3 2 8 6 1 9 3Q u e e n s l a n d U n i v e r s i t y o f T e c h n o l o g y 0 . 0 4 2 0 . 0 3 4 0 . 0 2 7 0 . 0 1 5 0 . 0 3 4 3 6 8 6 1 1 2 6 4 2 2 6G r i f f i t h U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 3 6 0 . 0 2 5 0 . 0 2 6 0 . 0 2 0 0 . 0 3 2 2 7 1 5 8 6 2 6 0 6 6 2M a c q u a r i e U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 2 8 0 . 0 3 1 0 . 0 2 5 0 . 0 2 1 0 . 0 2 0 3 3 5 9 0 7 2 6 0 6 1 4R M I T U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 4 5 0 . 0 2 8 0 . 0 1 9 0 . 0 1 6 0 . 0 3 5 2 9 9 3 6 2 2 4 7 2 2 3 W o l l o n g o n g 0 . 0 1 9 0 . 0 2 4 0 . 0 2 3 0 . 0 2 1 0 . 0 2 0 2 5 7 2 6 9 2 3 4 2 1 2U n i v e r s i t y o f T a s m a n i a 0 . 0 1 8 0 . 0 1 5 0 . 0 2 2 0 . 0 2 4 0 . 0 1 9 1 5 9 0 2 0 2 2 6 6 5 9U n i v e r s i t y o f S o u t h A u s t r a l i a 0 . 0 3 5 0 . 0 1 4 0 . 0 1 8 0 . 0 1 8 0 . 0 2 9 1 4 8 9 1 3 2 0 7 9 0 1 W e s t e r n S y d n e y 0 . 0 4 4 0 . 0 1 9 0 . 0 1 8 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 3 3 2 1 1 0 4 4 1 9 0 0 0 5U n i o f T e c h n o l o g y , S y d n e y 0 . 0 3 3 0 . 0 1 8 0 . 0 1 7 0 . 0 1 1 0 . 0 2 8 1 9 4 4 7 3 1 7 6 4 9 7M u r d o c h U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 1 6 0 . 0 1 8 0 . 0 1 5 0 . 0 1 5 0 . 0 1 5 2 0 0 3 0 1 1 7 2 2 0 0T h e U n i v e r s i t y o f N e w E n g l a n d 0 . 0 1 5 0 . 0 1 5 0 . 0 2 8 0 . 0 1 1 0 . 0 1 3 1 6 1 8 5 3 1 4 6 7 6 9D e a k i n U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 3 2 0 . 0 1 6 0 . 0 1 9 0 . 0 0 7 0 . 0 2 4 1 7 5 0 5 6 1 4 5 5 8 3J a m e s C o o k U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 1 5 0 . 0 1 4 0 . 0 1 1 0 . 0 1 1 0 . 0 1 4 1 4 8 0 4 5 1 3 1 9 4 0V i c t o r i a U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 2 4 0 . 0 0 6 0 . 0 1 1 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 2 0 6 0 7 0 3 8 9 0 4 8E d i t h C o w a n U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 2 5 0 . 0 0 6 0 . 0 1 6 0 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 2 0 6 7 2 1 1 8 7 5 1 5C h a r l e s S t u r t U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 3 3 0 . 0 0 7 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 1 8 7 2 3 5 0 8 3 6 1 8S w i n b u r n e 0 . 0 1 7 0 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 7 0 . 0 0 6 0 . 0 1 0 4 3 3 9 0 7 0 5 7 7U n i v e r s i t y o f S o u t h e r n Q u e e n s l a n d 0 . 0 1 7 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 6 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 1 1 1 0 3 5 8 9 6 9 7 3 8U n i v e r s i t y o f C a n b e r r a 0 . 0 1 2 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 7 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 9 3 4 7 3 0 6 2 9 3 7C e n t r a l Q u e e n s l a n d 0 . 0 2 0 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 7 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 1 1 3 6 2 5 4 5 7 6 9 5S o u t h e r n C r o s s U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 1 1 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 9 3 2 7 0 2 5 3 3 3 9N o r t h e r n T e r r i t o r y U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 1 0 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 5 1 3 3 6 7 3 5 5 8 1A u s t r a l i a n C a t h o l i c U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 1 3 0 . 0 0 2 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 1 0 . 0 1 2 1 8 0 1 2 3 5 1 6 8U n i v e r s i t y o f B a l l a r a t 0 . 0 0 7 0 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 2 0 . 0 0 5 4 4 3 4 4 3 2 4 2 0B o n d U n i v e r s i t y 0 . 0 0 7 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 2 0 . 0 0 5 2 7 5 8 0 2 8 2 2 8 S u n s h i n e C o a s t 0 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 2 9 7 8 1 1 4 2 1 8

Page 29: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

AVCC formula - 1st & 2nd quartiles

University of New South WalesThe University of QueenslandThe University of MelbourneThe University of SydneyMonash UniversityThe University of Western AustraliaThe University of AdelaideThe Australian National UniversityLa Trobe UniversityFlinders University

The University of NewcastleCurtin University of TechnologyQueensland University of TechnologyGriffith UniversityMacquarie UniversityRMIT University WollongongUniversity of TasmaniaUniversity of South Australia Western Sydney

Page 30: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

AVCC formula - 3rd & 4th quartiles

Uni of Technology, SydneyMurdoch UniversityThe University of New EnglandDeakin UniversityJames Cook UniversityVictoria UniversityEdith Cowan UniversityCharles Sturt UniversitySwinburne University of Southern Queensland

University of CanberraCentral QueenslandSouthern Cross UniversityNorthern Territory UniversityAustralian Catholic UniversityUniversity of BallaratBond University Sunshine Coast

Page 31: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

AVCC formulaAVCC formula - input data

0.0000.0200.0400.0600.0800.1000.1200.140

(%)

% Total EFTSU 200Current SpendAv 1998 and 1999 publicationsAv 1998 & 1999 Research IncomeFTE staff

Page 32: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

AVCC formulaAVCC formula vs projected 2002

0200000

400000600000800000

1000000

12000001400000

Projected 2002 spend (current +5%) (USD)Contribution 2002 (USD)

Page 33: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

What’s best?Meets criteriaCan test sensitivityAcceptance!!!!!!!!!!!!

Page 34: CAUL-Industry Think Tank Intra-consortium cost allocation:  CAUL-SCIP model

Thank you!