8/9/2019 Cini_noile teorii ale IE.pdf

1/20

New

Theories

f

European

tntesrailon

BEN

ROSAMOND

n The m c of th. .a$ caldebate

r nn tut ional ismndih. ELI

.

Theor

e5olpoLi.y

mak nga.d

th-"

ELI

s Mlt eve governance

, 5oc: iconstruct ivEt:pprcachestotheEU

r l.ternatona Reatonsand nt.rnatio.alPo

tca

Econony

evls ed

This hapt.rdc:lswh rec.nttneoreiicalwor[o.

he

Europan

non. tconcentrates

po']

approa.he5,which,varolstrals,5eektodep.l t f ronrtheennbl is l redthortLcaostons

es|abrLshed

y.eo

Lrnci nalrsm

seeCh;rpter

)ard

ntergovernmentallsrnseeChapterT).

Thi5 hapter

omme.cerwh adi5cLrssionlhow'newefapproachesdentifytlre

irnirat ns

ofthe

classical

ebate

Mlch

oflh 5discussr hingeson owanalysls

haracieflzeheEU

Fo.manytheEUsbesl .on.ed

iara

pol t

casystem,wh.hslg|estsrharthetheoretcal

toot .f.onventional

o

t.a scenceand

poicy

analysis lghrhJ.;e

reatei

iptariirtory

.

power

hanapproachesrom h. d s.ip ne

of

.Gnrationai

elarioos

iR)

To

rptotehe:

pau bLl l lyof lhspfoposLtiof, th i5.hapterdiscu5sesint rnthcontr ibut iontoEUstudte

' . .

f "

d" ,o T. l . -e\F

oo

e

-r .e"-d

Lon5t ( .Lm t

".

"pte.atoe/poF,

'howlnternat-onalnet. l t ionsrheoresmghtbebro tshtba \ntoEUn dle5Th."purydeof

1e

r"Dter.

ro" o | ' roo' '

q

4

or(br,or

1-heo-nLa

Fpenoi- i r Ucrrde

c

' '

hor

or ' ." .

r

g

r '

- ,

,

o

,e

or5

dbo-L

1e ."ot arrho-fy

arehobd.

nd he. san dro. ormL nl 'ndr na .

e,

nr6

,t6

noaloej .od

Q

cnapterontents

Q

neaoerscuiae

8/9/2019 Cini_noile teorii ale IE.pdf

2/20

[ '

118

Bei Ro5amond

Introd

ction

Much

of the

academic

wo k

on

the Europan

Unio

n

rcnuins

under

the

spell

oI the

.dassical'

debate

b.lween

neo-tunctionalism

and

intergovern

mcntalisn

(see

Chapterc

6

and 7).

There

is a ratioDate

for

continuing

to

exptore

the

oFposition

behveen

these

wo schools.

hnrking

nr

this way

forces

us

to

rddre*

l.er

i .sre,

or

.onr ir - i ' )

\e1u\.h,ntsp

rr

European

potitics.

Does

he growth

of

rheEUinply

the

transcendeDce

f

the turopean

narion

stare

sv^stem?If o,

oes

his

bring to

thc fore

a new group

oi

acllvrst

nLpranational

nstitutn,rs

and

confirm

the

rise

to prorninence

of

powerill

non

srare

Alternativell,

are

thc

member

states

the

Kcv

rcro^

i1rhi,

pro,

e. '

rnd rre

rh( f t ,(eyJlmJmi.

intergolernDrental?

These

rival

a.ademic

dis

courses

have their

equivalenrs

nr

thc poticv

world.

The strategyofthe fbunding fathersofintegrarion

(srch

as

lean

Monnct

aDd

Robert

schuman)

ms

often

been thought

of as'no-Iirnctiona]istl

rhite

politicians

still

rend

to

use a vo.abulary

that is

underwritten

by statist

and

intergovernmentaxsl

Howev.:r,

.ecent

years

havc

witncssed

concertecl

altempts

to

'thiil