comparison of developed and developing countries

  • Upload
    mujjji

  • View
    232

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    1/94

    PAKISTAN

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    2/94

    BASIC

    INFORMATION

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    3/94

    About Pakistan:

    Pakistan's history has been characterized by periods ofmilitary rule, political

    instability and conflicts with neighboring India. It is the sixth most populous country in the world

    and has the second largest Muslim population afterIndonesia. Pakistan also has the secondlargest Shia Muslim population. It is the only Muslim-majority nuclear state and is classified

    as major non-NATO ally of the United States. Pakistan is one of the founders of the organization

    of Islamic conference and a member of the United Nations, Commonwealth of Nations, Next

    Eleven economies and G20 developing nations.

    Independence Day:

    14th august 1947.

    Name:Islamic republic of Pakistan

    Capital:

    Name: Islamabad.

    Location:Located in south Asia. It has a 1,046-kilometre (650 mi) coastline along the ArabianSea and Gulf of Oman in the south and is bordered by Afghanistan and Iran in the west, India in

    the east and China in the far northeast. Tajikistan also lies very close to Pakistan but is separated

    by the narrow Wakhan Corridor. Thus, it occupies a crossroads position between South Asia,

    Central Asia and the Middle East.

    Area:

    803,940 km2

    Land boundaries:

    Total: 6,774 kmBorder countries: Afghanistan 2,430 km, China 523 km, India 2,912 km, Iran 909 km.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_dictatorshiphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_corruptionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_corruptionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Pakistani_Warshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_populationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_by_countryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indonesiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shia_Muslimhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Muslim_majority_countrieshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_with_nuclear_weaponshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_non-NATO_allyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Stateshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nationshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_of_Nationshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Next_Elevenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Next_Elevenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G20_developing_nationshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabian_Seahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabian_Seahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Omanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghanistanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tajikistanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wakhan_Corridorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_metrehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_metrehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_dictatorshiphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_corruptionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_corruptionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Pakistani_Warshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_populationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_by_countryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indonesiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shia_Muslimhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Muslim_majority_countrieshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_with_nuclear_weaponshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_non-NATO_allyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Stateshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nationshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_of_Nationshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Next_Elevenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Next_Elevenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G20_developing_nationshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabian_Seahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabian_Seahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Omanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghanistanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tajikistanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wakhan_Corridorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_metre
  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    4/94

    Coastline:

    1,046 km

    Natural resources:Land, extensive natural gas reserves, limited petroleum, coal, iron ore, copper, salt, limestone

    Religion:

    The religious breakdown of the country is as follows!

    Islam 173,000,000 (96%) (Nearly 76% are Sunni Muslims, 20% are Shi'a Muslims.)

    Hinduism 3,200,000 (1.85%) Christianity 2,800,000 (1.6%)

    Sikhs Around 20,000 (0.001%)

    The remaining are Parsis, Buddhists, Jews, Bah's, and Animists (mainly the Kalasha of

    Chitral).

    Major source of income:

    Service sector accounts for major portion of national income.

    Politics:

    Nature of government:

    Parliamentary federal democraticrepublic.

    political Parties:

    Pakistan People's Party Parliamentarians

    Pakistan Muslim League (N)

    Pakistan Muslim League (Q)

    Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal

    Awami National Party

    Tehreek e insaf

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Pakistanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunni_Muslimshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shi'a_Muslimshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinduism_in_Pakistanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity_in_Pakistanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikhism_in_Pakistanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parsi_peoplehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhisthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Pakistanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bah%C3%A1'%C3%AD_Faithhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animisthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalasha_of_Chitralhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalasha_of_Chitralhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliamentary_republichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_republichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Pakistanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunni_Muslimshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shi'a_Muslimshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinduism_in_Pakistanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity_in_Pakistanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikhism_in_Pakistanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parsi_peoplehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhisthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Pakistanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bah%C3%A1'%C3%AD_Faithhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animisthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalasha_of_Chitralhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalasha_of_Chitralhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliamentary_republichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_republichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic
  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    5/94

    Language:

    Pakistan is a multilingual country with more than sixty languages being spoken. English is

    the official language of Pakistan and used in official business, government, and legal

    contracts, while Urdu is the national language.

    Languages No. of speakers (%)

    (2008 est.)

    Main areas spoken

    Punjabi 44.17 PunjabPashto 15.44 Khybar pakhtoon kawa

    Sindhi 14.12 Sindh

    Saraiki 10.42 South Punjab

    Urdu 07.59 Karachi

    Balochi 03.59 Balochistan

    Others 03.59

    45%

    15%

    14%

    10%

    8%4% 4%

    LOCAL LANGUAGES

    Punjabi Pashto Sindhi Saraiki Urdu Balochi Others

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multilingualhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Official_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urduhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multilingualhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Official_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urduhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_language
  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    6/94

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    7/94

    Total population:

    (in million)

    Years 2007 2008 2009

    Population 158.17 160.97 163.76

    158.17

    160.97

    163.76

    155

    156

    157

    158

    159

    160

    161

    162

    163

    164

    165

    2007 2008 2009

    POPULATION(Mn)

    Comment:

    With a population growth rate of 1.95%(2009est.) Pakistan is facing a formidable

    challenge of tackeling the issue of economic development and poverty reduction.in the

    wake of growing population, need for food security and provisions of employment

    opportunities and shelter are becoming a burden on the economy.

    With a current rate of population growth the pakistans population is likely to be doubled

    in 39 years. The high growth rate, therefore is matter of great concern.

    Without population stabilization, addressing the critical issues such as the environment,

    energy, food/water supplies, migration and security is extremely difficult.

    Population by Urban/ Rural Areas:

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    8/94

    (I

    n millions)

    103.9 105

    104.2

    55.6 57.3 59.1

    159.5 162.3163.2

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    2007 2008 2009

    POPULATION DISTRIBUTION(Mn)

    RURAL URBAN TOTAL

    Comment:

    It would not be possible to sustain the urban infrastructure with its growing needs if the

    Population continues to grow at the present pace.People crowd the cities which alreadycannot hold more people.

    Increase in urban and rural population ensure that the living conditions in urban areas will

    get worse with no proper access to drinking water and sanitation.

    Per capita income:

    year 2007 2008 2009

    Population (rural) 103.91 105.06 104.1

    Population (urban) 55.66 57.32 59.1

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    9/94

    year 2007 2008 2009

    Per capita income 921 1042 1046

    (In u.s $)

    Comment:

    In year 2009 it grew by a meager percentage because of slower economic growth and

    depreciation of pak rupees.

    The last few years have been in full contrast, with per capita income at a much stronger

    pace.

    The per capita income in dollar terms has increased from 921$ (in 2007) to 1046$(in

    2009). The main factors responsible for rise include acceleration in real GDP growth and

    fourfold increase in workers remittances.

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    10/94

    Labor force

    Total labor force:

    YearIndicators

    2007 2008 2009

    Labor force 50.33 51.78 52.00

    Employed 47.65 49.09 48.37

    Unemployed 2.68 2.69 3.63

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    11/94

    Unemployment rate:

    Year 2007 2008 2009

    (%) 5.32 5.20 5.26

    5.32

    5.2

    5.26

    5.14

    5.16

    5.18

    5.2

    5.22

    5.24

    5.26

    5.28

    5.3

    5.32

    5.34

    2007 2008 2009

    UNEMPLOYMENT RATE (%)

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    12/94

    Health

    Health:

    yearIndicator

    2007 2008 2009

    Registered doctors 123,125 127,859 133,956

    Registered nurses 57,646 62,651 65,387

    Population/doctor 1,251 1,225 1,212

    Population/bed 1,508 1,517 1,575

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    13/94

    Comment:

    In Pakistan health services are provided through (I) the health care delivery systems and(II) public health intervention. The former include basic health units (BHUs) and ruralhealth centres (RHCs) forming the core of primary health care while public health

    intervention includes a number of public health programs which are federally led withprovincial implementation and institutional mechanism.

    The country's focus on producing more Doctors has led to marked improvement in theDoctor-to- population ratio. The population to facilities ratio in respect of a doctor andbeds has improved in comparison to previous years.

    Notwithstanding improvement in doctors/beds to population ratio, it must be recognizedthat Pakistan's key health indicators still lag behind in relation to international targetsarticulated within the millennium declaration which makes a case for reform measurewithin the health sector. Public health intervention includes a number of public healthprograms. These include the National Program for prevention and control of T.B,Malaria, HIV/ AIDs and child health care program etc. To bring a visible change in

    health status of the country, the government of Pakistan has intensified its efforts. Thefollowing core programmes are being implemented with a much sharper focus on thepoor and underprivileged segments of the society.

    CPM:

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    14/94

    Education

    Expenditure on education:

    Indicators

    year

    Public sector

    expenditure

    (in bln)

    As % of GDP % of total

    expenditure

    2007 216.5 2.50 12.00

    2008 253.7 2.47 09.80

    2009 275.5 2.10 11.52

    4.3

    4.4

    1.82 2

    3

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    2007 2008 2009

    EDUCATIONAL EXPENDITURE (%)

    GDP TOTAL EXPENDITURE

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    15/94

    Comment:

    Being an important component of social sector, govt. is adopting most feasible strategies

    for the growth of educational sector including dependence on the available financialresources, paradigm of structural development and essential element of policyframework.

    Public expenditure on education as percentage to GDP is lowest in Pakistan due tofinancial resources constraint that paved the way to synchronization in terms of GDPallocation.

    In comparison to year 2007 investment on education has declined to 2.10% which is onthe lowest side in accordance to its requirement given the importance of the sector.

    Along with investment, growth in budgetary allocation for this sector has also declined to8.6% which was 17% in previous years.

    Foreign aids to finance this sector seem ineffective as Pakistan is unable to match the

    standard for allocation of investments in education.

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    16/94

    Literacy rate by sex (age 10 years & above):

    Year

    Indicators

    2007 2008 2009

    Male 67 69

    Female 42 44

    Total 55 56

    (In terms of %)

    55 56 5767 69 71

    42 44 46

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    2007 2008 2009

    LITERACY RATE (%)

    TOTAL MALE FEMALE

    Comment:

    Our education system has to meet the basic learning needs of our society emphasizing basicliteracy and life skills, increasing access and completion of quality education, address genderproblem , geographical and structural disparities, and enhance the efficiency of educationgovernance.

    The point of consideration is Literacy remains higher in urban areas (71%) than in rural areas(49%) and more in men (69%) compared to women (44%).

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    17/94

    Level of education:

    Enrollment Institutions Teachers

    Year

    Level

    2007 2008 2009 2007 2008 2009 2007 2008 2009

    Primary 17,041,937 17,233,231 17,366,139 158,372 157,899 158,023 445,835 438,823 437,106

    Middle 5,367,608 5,365,907 5,400,435 40,094 40,837 41,326 313,488 320,609 323,894

    High 2,315,216 2,435,708 2,536,608 23,554 23,967 24,320 366,606 372,249 378,269

    Higher/sec. 902,448 961,661 997,703 3,095 3,218 3,292 71,246 74,222 75,821

    Degree/college 348.814 352,302 361,072 1,166 1,198 1,219 20,768 20,976 21,112

    Universities 640,061 741,092 741,092 120 124 124 44,537 46,893 46,893

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    18/94

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    19/94

    ECONOMIC INDICATORS

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    20/94

    GDP

    GDP growth:

    872310282

    12280

    0

    5000

    10000

    15000

    2007 2008 2009

    GDP AT CURRENT PRICE(Rs Billions)

    5.325.2

    5.26

    5.1

    5.2

    5.3

    5.4

    2007 2008 2009

    GDP GROTH RATE(%)

    Comment:

    The growth has shown a accelerating trend in year 2009 in comparison to previous years.Notwithstanding the intensity of the multiple shocks Pakistans economy has had to face

    GDP growth rate(at market price)

    GDP(at market price)

    (in billion Rs.)

    Year 2007 2008 2009 2007 2008 2009

    Growth 5.7% 2.0% 3.7% 8723 10282 12280

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    21/94

    over the past two years, in relative terms, its economy has exhibited a fair degree ofresilience. Compared to other countries affected by the global financial crisis, it isremarkable that Pakistan is among a handful of countries with a positive rate of growth,and among a very few with the lowest decline in real GDP growth.

    The contribution to economic growth is spearheaded by the services sectorwith 96.1 percent stake while only 3.9 percent contribution came from theCommodity Producing Sector (CPS).

    One of the important components of CPS, agriculture alone contributed 50.1percent to real GDP growth; however, this is more than neutralized by 50.4percent negative contribution from large-scale manufacturing. Thanks to 16.7percent positive contribution from small-scale manufacturing, the overallnegative contribution of the manufacturing sector stood at 31.9%.

    In the service sector major contribution to GDP growth came from transport, storage andcommunication(14.6%), wholesale and retail trade(27.1%), social services(38.6%).

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    22/94

    Fiscal developments

    Revenue:

    Revenue(as % of GDP)

    Component

    year

    Total revenue Tax revenue Non-tax revenue

    2007 14.9 10.2 4.7

    2008 14.6 10.3 4.0

    2009 14.6 11.3 3.8

    Total Revenue

    (in billion Rs.)

    Year 2007 2008 2009

    Amount 1298 1500 1809

    Comment:

    On the revenue side, tax-to-GDP and hence, revenue-to-GDP ratios either remainedstagnant or showed secular decline, owing mainly to structural deficiencies in the taxsystem and administration, both at the federal and provincial government level.

    However, in 2008-09 total revenue as percentage of GDP recovered slightly due to amarginal improvement in tax revenues as a percentage of GDP.

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    23/94

    Expenditure:

    Expenditure

    (as % of GDP)

    Component

    year

    Total expenditure Current Development

    2007 20.8 15.8 5.0

    2008 22.1 18.0 4.4

    2009 18.6 15.8 2.8

    Comment:

    Notwithstanding, difficulties being faced by the economy during the fiscal year (2008-09), better fiscal discipline and improving expenditure management led to substantialimprovement in the fiscal outlook.

    Total expenditure has fluctuated between 15 to 18 percent of GDP during the last threeyears. Total expenditure as a percentage of GDP stood at 18.6 percent as compared to22.1 percent last year. The spike in 2007-08 was mainly due to huge unprecedentedexpenditures incurred on account of subsidies and political expediency on the part of the

    outgoing government. Year 2009 witnessed correction on this count and expenditure control measures brought

    significant downward adjustment in expenditure.

    The narrowing of gap between revenue and expenditure is likely to come from additionalresource mobilization rather than expenditure curtailment. At this critical juncture, theeconomy needs fiscal stimulus and compression of the revenue expenditure gap at theexpense of growth enhancing expenditure could prove counterproductive.

    Fiscal deficit:

    Total expenditure

    (In billion Rs.)

    Year 2007 2008 2009

    Amount 1800 2277 2431

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    24/94

    (as % of GDP)

    Year 2007 2008 2009

    Deficit 4.3 7.4 4.3

    (In billion Rs.)

    Year 2007 2008 2009

    Deficit (378) (777) (562)

    Comment:

    The overall fiscal deficit witnessed a sharp decline until 2007&2009, except for 2008when the pendulum swung to other extreme.

    This declining trend in fiscal deficit was due to falling expenditures rather than rising

    revenues.

    The shifting of expenditure from current expenditure to development expenditure whileleaving total expenditures stagnant mostly at around 18percent of GDP has helped toimprove the fiscal position. While the reduction in fiscal deficit in 2008-09 occurredmainly through a drastic cut in development expenditures, revenues fell short of thetarget.

    Consumer price index

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    25/94

    Component of CPI:

    Year

    Items

    2007 2008 2009

    CPI (general) 7.8 12.0 22.4

    Food group 10.4 17.5 26.6Non-food group 6.0 7.9 19.0

    Core inflation 5.9 8.3 17.8

    Comment:

    This year the increase in the price level has been extraordinary in Pakistan. The inflation ratemeasured through the Consumer Price Index (CPI) has climbed to 22.3 percent during 2008-09over the corresponding increase of 12.0 percent. Inflation accelerated at a rapid pace mainlybecause of rising food prices; a weaker rupee/dollar exchange rate; the gradual withdrawal ofsubsidies on gas, electricity and petroleum; the imposition of custom duty on the imports ofvarious items; and an upward revision in the support price of wheat and sugarcane crops.

    Both the food and non-food inflation contributed to the overall CPI inflation but in

    different ways as various factors influenced the two CPI components separately. Theincrease in food inflation was influenced mainly from a shortfall in the supply of someessential consumer food items such as wheat, meat, sugar, milk and poultry whereas thenon-food price inflation was mainly driven by the price of POL products and the resultantrise in transportation costs.

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    26/94

    Exchange rate

    Average yearly exchange rates:

    In terms of U.S $

    Years 2007 2008 2009

    Rates 60.35 60.63 81.41

    Comment:

    Pakistan has witnessed tremendous pressure on exchange rate during July-October 2008-09 when rupee depreciated by 16.3 percent. The reasons being substantial loss of foreign

    exchange reserves massive buying by businesses seeking to avoid exchange losses onimports along with other factors like trade related outflows, political uncertainty andspeculative activities in the foreign exchange market.

    With signing of Standby Arrangements with the IMF, the rupee got back some of its lostvalue and with substantial import compression, improvement in overall external balanceincluding revival of external inflows from abroad the exchange rate hovered aroundRs.80.50 during April 2009.

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    27/94

    Foreign investments

    FDIs:

    Data for July-April

    (in million US $)

    Items

    Year

    Direct Portfolio Total

    2008 3719.1 98.9 3818

    2009 3205.4 (451.5) 2753.9

    2010

    3818

    2753.92500

    3719.13205.4

    2000

    98.9 -451.5

    500

    -1000

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    2008 2009 2010

    LABOUR FORCE(Mn$)

    TOTAL FDI FPI

    Comment:

    Pakistan has also witnessed a substantial fall in FDI inflows in 2008-09 in line withall other developing countries. However, the case of Pakistan is exacerbated bythe deteriorating security environment.

    The overall foreign investment during the first ten months (July-April) of the fiscal

    year 09 has declined by 42.7 percent and stood at $ 2.2 billion compared to $3.9billion in the same period of last year.

    Foreign direct investment (private) showed more resilience and stood at $3205.4million during the first ten months (July-April) of the fiscal year 09 as compared to$3719.1 million in the same period last year thereby showing a decline of 13.8percent. Private portfolio investment on the other hand showed an outflow of$451.5 million as against an inflow of $98.9 million during the comparable periodof last year.

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    28/94

    Less progress in FDIs is majorly caused by political instability, higher interestrates, energy crisis, most important of all instable law and order situation.

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    29/94

    Balance of payments

    Exports:

    July-April($ millions)

    ($ millions)

    Particulars 2008 2009 Change%

    Absoluteincrease/decrease

    %share

    Food group 2050.0 2560.3 24.9 510.3 17.3Textilemanufacture

    8706.4 7898.9 (9.3) (807.5) 53.5

    Petroleumgroup

    974.0 702.4 (27.9) (271.6) 4.80

    Othermanufacture

    2926.2 2938.8 0.4 12.6 19.9

    All other items 566.3 661.7 16.9 95.4 4.50Total 14762.2 15222.9 (3.0) (460.7) 100

    Comment:

    Exports in FY 09 showed a decline of 3.0% in comparison to previous year.

    The major negative contribution to this sector came from textile and petroleum which

    witnessed a decrease of 9.0 percent and 27.3 percent respectively. However non-textile and petroleum sector showed a positive growth of 5.3 percent which

    is more than offset by negative contribution by textile and petroleum.

    In spite of overall decrease in exports, the export of food group on back of stellar growthperformance of the rice registered healthy growth of 24.9 percent and other items postedan increase of 16.9 percent.

    Export growth is hindered owed to lack of diversification in export goods . The trend ofPakistans export of major items remain more or less same having concentrated on five

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    30/94

    items namely cotton manufactures, leather, rice, synthetic textile and sports goods. Thesefive categories accounts for 73.5 percent of total exports during July-March 2008-09.Within these few items cotton manufactures remain major contributor in total exports.The exports structure suggests that the intensity of concentration is changing slowly.

    Imports:

    July-April($ millions)

    ($ millions)

    Particulars 2008 2009 Change%

    Absoluteincrease/decrease

    %share

    Food group 3527.4 3419.6 -3.1 -107.9 11.8Machinerygroup

    4249.8 4272.1 0.5 22.3 14.8

    Petroleum

    group

    8670.4 8012.7 -7.6 -657.6 27.7

    Consumerdurables

    1689.1 1412.3 -16.4 -276.8 4.9

    Raw material 6372.5 6042.7 -5.2 -329.9 20.9Telecom 1897.4 857.1 -54.8 -1040.3 3.0All other items 5652.8 4905.9 -13.2 -746.9 17.0Total 32059.4 28922.4 -9.8 -3137.0 100.0

    Comment:

    Imports declined by 9.8 percent and stood at $ 28,922.4 million during July-April 2008-09 as against $ 32,059.4 million of the corresponding period last year. The overall importbill is lower by $ 3,137 million than imports in the comparable period of last year. Import

    compression measures lowering domestic demand coupled with massive fall ininternational oil prices have started paying dividends and imports witnessed slowdown.Beside that depreciation of rupee had also played a significant role for lower importsduring current fiscal year.

    With the exception of machinery group, the lower level of overall import bill is outcomeof reduced imports spending on telecom ($1040.3 million), raw material ($329.9 million),consumer durables ($276.8 million), others (746.9 million), petroleum group (657.6million) and food group ($ 107.9 million). The imports less of petroleum group and

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    31/94

    excluding petroleum and food group witnessed decline of 10.6 percent and 11.9 percent,respectively.

    Further it isrevealed thatfood group

    accountingfor 11.8

    percent of total imports, shown a negative growth of 3.1 percent. Import of textile machinery is witnessing a declining trend since 2004-05 with current decline of

    49.0 percent during July-April 2008-09 over the comparable period last year revealing thecontinuous deteriorating outlook for the textile sector for past few years and declininginternational demand.

    Trade balance:

    Comment:

    Terms of Trade represent the relative prices of exports in terms of prices of imports. Pakistan iswitnessing persistent deterioration in terms of trade for almost two decades now. After witnessingdeterioration of 11.5 percent during last year 2007-08, countrys terms of trade indices with baseyear 1990 = 100 aggravated to 56.3 during July-March 2008-09 from 57.5 in the corresponding

    July-June July-April

    Year 2007 2008 2oo9

    Amount -9711 -12313 -10794

    July-June July-April

    Year 2007 2008 2009

    Amount

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    32/94

    period of last year. Thus against the 10.0 percent deterioration in the corresponding period offiscal year 2007-08, terms of trade deteriorated by 2.1 percent during July-March 2008-09.

    Deterioration in the terms of trade is the lowest ever since 2002-03 which is reflection ofdeclininginternationalprices of

    commodityand oil.

    The deterioration in the terms of trade has also contributed to deterioration of the current accountdeficit in 2007-08 and modest decline implies that current account deficit is witnessing someimprovement. The reason for deterioration of terms of trade index is the unit value index ofimports is rising at a faster pace than unit value of exports

    Improvement in trade deficit arises due to massive decline in imports on the back of importcompression measures taken by government, massive decrease in international prices of oil andcommodity and depreciation in the rupee value.

    Current account:

    Comment:

    The current account deficit has improved by $2.6 billion and stood at $ 8.547 billionduring July- April 2009-09 as against $ 11.173 billion in the corresponding period of lastyear, thereby showing an improvement of 23.5 percent.

    The improvement in the current account deficit started in the period November- April2008-09 when it has shown remarkable improvement by 74 percent over thecorresponding period last year on the back of reduction in trade and services accountdeficits.

    This improvement contributed by deceleration in import growth owing to easing of thedemand pressures and helped by commodity and petroleum prices crash. Increase inworkers remittance and reduction in services account deficit leads to improvement ofinvisible account.

    July-June July-April

    Year 2007 2008 2009

    Amount -6878 -11173 -8547

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    33/94

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    34/94

    External debt:

    Year 2007 2008 2009

    Amount (bln US $) 40.5 46.3 50.1

    As % of GDP 28.3 28.1 30.2

    Comment:

    During the first nine months of the current fiscal year 2008-09, Pakistans total external debtincreased from $ 46.3 billion at end-June 2008 to $ 50.1 billion by end-March 2009 anincrease of US $ 3.8 billion or 8.2 percent.

    A high and persistent current account deficit implies greater financing requirement by the

    economy. A global environment plagued by the economic slowdown has hampered non-debtcreating inflows like FDI and in constricted availability of the non-debt creating inflows; thegovernment has to resort to multilateral and bilateral sources for its financing requirement andthus leading to the stock of outstanding external debt.

    In relative terms, EDL as percentage of GDP increased from 28.1 percent at end-June 2008 to30.2 percent by end-March 2009 an increase of 2.1 percentage points. This is the highest everrise in a single year for almost one decade [See Table-9.1]. A significantly depressed economicgrowth and massive depreciation of rupee against dollar partially explains this increase in EDL asa percentage of GDP.

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    35/94

    UNITED KINGDOM

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    36/94

    BASIC

    INFORMATION

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    37/94

    About United Kingdom:1927; England has existed as a unified entity since the 10th century; the union between Englandand Wales, begun in 1284 with the Statute of Rhuddlan, was not formalized until 1536 with anAct of Union; in another Act of Union in 1707, England and Scotland agreed to permanently joinas Great Britain; the legislative union of Great Britain and Ireland was implemented in 1801 with

    the adoption of the name the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland; the Anglo-Irish treatyof 1921 formalized a partition of Ireland; six northern Irish counties remained part of the UnitedKingdom as Northern Ireland; the current name of the country, the United Kingdom of GreatBritain and Northern Ireland, was adopted in 1927

    Name:United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

    name: London

    Location:

    Western Europe, islands including the northern one-sixth of the island of Ireland between theNorth Atlantic Ocean and the North Sea, northwest of France.

    Area:

    total: 244,820 sq km

    land: 241,590 sq km

    water: 3,230 sq km

    note: includes Rockall and Shetland Islands

    Land boundaries:

    Total: 360 kmBorder countries: Ireland 360 km

    Coastline:

    12,429 km

    Natural resources:

    coal, petroleum, natural gas, iron ore, lead, zinc, gold, tin, limestone, salt, clay, chalk, gypsum,potash, silica sand, slate, arable land.

    Capital:

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    38/94

    Religion:

    Government type:

    Christian (Anglican, Roman Catholic, Presbyterian, Methodist): 71.6%,

    Muslim 2.7%,Hindu 1%,other 1.6%,unspecified or none 23.1%

    Constitutional monarchy and Commonwealth realm.

    Political parties:

    Conservative [David CAMERON]; Democratic Unionist Party or DUP (Northern Ireland) [Peter ROBINSON];

    Labor Party [Harriet HARMAN];

    Liberal Democrats (Lib Dems) [Nick CLEGG];

    Party of Wales (Plaid Cymru) [Ieuan Wyn JONES];

    Scottish National Party or SNP [Alex SALMOND];

    Sinn Fein (Northern Ireland) [Gerry ADAMS];

    Social Democratic and Labor Party or SDLP (Northern Ireland) [Margaret RICHIE];

    Ulster Unionist Party (Northern Ireland) [Sir Reg EMPEY]

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    39/94

    SOCIAL INDICATORS

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    40/94

    Total population:(in million)

    Years 2007 2008 2009

    Population 60.776 60.943 61.284

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    41/94

    Labor forceTotal labor force:

    30.48

    30.89

    31.25

    30

    30.2

    30.4

    30.6

    30.8

    31

    31.2

    31.4

    2007 2008 2009

    LABOUR FORCE(Mn)

    Year 2007 2008 2009

    Labor 30.48 30.89 31.25

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    42/94

    Unemployment rate:

    Year 2007(2006 est.)

    2008(2007 est.)

    2009(2009 est.)

    Rate (%) 5.3 13.6 15.2

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    43/94

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    44/94

    Education

    Literacy rate by sex:

    Year

    Indicators

    2007(2003 est.)

    2008

    (2003 est.)

    2009

    (2003 est.)

    Male 67 69 69

    Female 42 44 44

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    45/94

    Total 55 56 56

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    46/94

    Economic indicators

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    47/94

    GDP

    GDP growth:

    GDP growth rate GDP (ppp)(tln $)

    Year 2007 2008 2009 2007 2008 2009

    Growth 2.8% 3.1% (4.8)% 1.928 2.13 2.149

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    48/94

    Fiscal developments

    Revenue:

    In trillions$ In billions$Year 2007 2008 2009

    Amount 1.001 1.154 819.9

    Expenditure:

    In trillions $Year 2007 2008 2009

    Amount 1.071

    1.239

    1.132

    Fiscal surplus/deficit:

    In trillions $

    Year 2007 2008 2009

    Amount (0.07)

    (0.085)

    0.067

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    49/94

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    50/94

    Consumer price index

    Inflation rate:

    Year 2007 2008 2009

    Rate 2.3% 2.3% 2.1%

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    51/94

    Exchange rate

    Average yearly exchange rates:

    In terms of U.S $Years 2007 2008 2009

    Rates 0.4993

    0.5302

    -0.6494

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    52/94

    Foreign direct investments

    In trillions $

    Years 2007 2008 2009

    Values 1.135 1.288 1.025

    1.135

    1.288

    1.025

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    1.4

    2007 2008 2009

    FOREIGN INVESTMENTS(Tr US$)

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    53/94

    Balance of payments

    Exports:

    In billions $

    Years 2007 2008 2009

    Values 450.3 442.2 351.3

    Imports:

    In billions $

    Years 2007 2008 2009

    Values 604.2 621.4 473.6

    Current account balance:

    In billions $

    Years 2007 2008 2009

    Values (88.1)

    (119.2)

    (32.2)

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    54/94

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    55/94

    External debt

    In trillions $

    Years 2007 2008 2009

    Values 8.28 10.45 9.088

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    56/94

    Foreign exchange & gold reserve

    In billions $

    Years 2007 2008 2009

    Values 47.04 57.3 52.98

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    57/94

    China

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    58/94

    BASIC

    INFORMATION

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    59/94

    About china:

    221 BC (unification under the Qin or Ch'in Dynasty); 1 January 1912 (Manchu Dynasty replaced

    by a Republic); 1 October 1949 (People's Republic established).

    Name:

    People's Republic of China.

    Capital:

    Location:

    Eastern Asia, bordering the East China Sea, Korea Bay, Yellow Sea, and South China Sea,

    between North Korea and Vietnam.

    Area:

    Total: 9,596,960 sq km

    land: 9,326,410 sq km

    Land boundaries:total: 22,117 km

    border countries: Afghanistan 76 km, Bhutan 470 km, Burma 2,185 km, India 3,380 km, Kazakhstan

    1,533 km, North Korea 1,416 km, Kyrgyzstan 858 km, Laos 423 km, Mongolia 4,677 km, Nepal 1,236

    km, Pakistan 523 km, Russia (northeast) 3,605 km, Russia (northwest) 40 km, Tajikistan 414 km,

    Vietnam 1,281 kmregional borders: Hong Kong 30 km, Macau 0.34 km

    Coastline:

    14,500 km

    Natural resources:

    coal, iron ore, petroleum, natural gas, mercury, tin, tungsten, antimony, manganese,

    molybdenum, vanadium, magnetite, aluminum, lead, zinc, uranium, hydropowerpotential (world's largest).

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    60/94

    Religion:

    Daoist (Taoist), Buddhist, Christian 3%-4%,Muslim 1%-2%.

    Languages:

    Standard Chinese or Mandarin (Putonghua, based on the Beijing dialect), Yue(Cantonese), Wu (Shanghainese), Minbei (Fuzhou), Minnan (Hokkien-Taiwanese),Xiang, Gan, Hakka dialects, minority languages (see Ethnic groups entry.

    Government type:

    Communist state

    Political party:

    Chinese Communist Party or CCP [HU Jintao];eight registered small parties controlled by CCP.

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    61/94

    SOCIAL INDICATORS

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    62/94

    Population

    Total population:

    In billionsYears 2007 2008 2009

    Values 132.13

    133.00

    133.014

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    63/94

    Population by rural/urban:

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    64/94

    Per capita income

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    65/94

    Labor force

    Total labor force:

    In millionsYears 2007 2008 2009

    Values 769.9 800.7 812.7

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    66/94

    Unemployment rate:

    Years 2007 2008 2009

    Values 4.0% 4.2% 4.3%

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    67/94

    Health

    Infant mortality rate:

    Life expectancy:

    Total fertility:

    Deaths/1000

    Years 2007 2008 2009

    Values 21.16 16.51

    Years 2007 2008 2009

    Values 73.18 74.51

    Children born/women

    Years 2007 2008 2009

    Values 1.77 1.54

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    68/94

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    69/94

    Education

    Literacy rate by sex:

    Year

    Indicators

    2007(2000 census)

    2008(2000 census)

    2009(2000 census)

    Male 95.1% 95.1%

    Female 86.5% 86.5%

    Total 90.9% 90.9%

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    70/94

    ECONOMIC INDICATORS

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    71/94

    GDP

    Growth:

    11.9

    9 8.7

    0

    24

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    2007 2008 2009

    GDP GROWTH RATE(%)

    GDP growth rate GDP (ppp)(tln $)

    Year 2007 2008 2009 2007 2008 2009

    Growth 11.9% 9.00% 8.70% 7.099 6.460 4.814

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    72/94

    Fiscal developments

    Revenues:

    In billions$Year 2007 2008 2009

    Amount 513.2 674.3 972.3

    Expenditures:

    In billions$ In trillions$

    Year 2007 2008 2009

    Amount 497.8 651.6 1.137

    Fiscal surplus/deficit:

    In billions$

    Year 2007 2008 2009

    Amount 15.4 22.7 (164.7)

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    73/94

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    74/94

    Consumer price index

    Inflation rate:

    Year 2007 2008 2009Rate 4.8% 5.8% (0.8)

    %

    4.8

    5.8

    -0.8

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    2007 2008 2009

    CONSUMER PRICE INDEX(%)

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    75/94

    Exchange rate

    In terms of U.S $

    Years 2007 2008 2009

    Rates 7.61 6.94 6.82

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    76/94

    Foreign direct investments

    In billions $Years 2007 2008 2009

    Values 747.68

    758.9 576.1

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    77/94

    Balance of payments

    Exports:

    In trillions $Years 2007 2008 2009

    Values 1.22 1.43 1.20

    Imports:

    Years 2007

    (billion$)

    2008

    (trillion$)

    2009

    (billion$)

    Values 904.6 1.131 921.5

    Trade balance:

    In billions $

    Years 2007 2008 2009

    Values 315.4 299 278.5

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    78/94

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    79/94

    External debt

    In billions $

    Years 2007 2008 2009

    Values 363 400.6 347.1

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    80/94

    Foreign exchange & gold reserve:

    1.534

    1.955

    2.206

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    2007 2008 2009

    FOREIGN & GOLD RESERVES(Trillion US$)

    In trillions $Years 2007 2008 2009

    Values 1.534 1.955 2.206

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    81/94

    COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

    (2009 EST.)

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    82/94

    GDP

    U.K Pakistan China

    GDP(PPP) 2.149($tln) 449.3($bln) 8.789 ($tln)GDP growth (4.8)% 2.7% 8.7%

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    83/94

    Labor force

    U.K Pakistan China

    Labor force 31.25(mln) 55.88(mln) 812.7(mln)

    Unemployment rate 15.2% 4.3%

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    84/94

    Labor force by occupation

    U.K Pakistan China

    Agriculture 1.4% 39.5%

    Industry 18.2% 27.2%

    Service 80.4% 33.2%

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    85/94

    Population below poverty line

    U.K Pakistan China

    14% 24%(2006est) 2.3%(2007est)

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    86/94

    Fiscal surplus/deficit

    U.K Pakistan China

    0.067($tln) (6.84)($bln) (164.7)($bln)

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    87/94

    Public debt

    % of GDP

    U.K Pakistan China68.5% 45.3 18.2

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    88/94

    Inflation

    U.K Pakistan China

    CPI 2.1% 14.2% (0.8)%

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    89/94

    Trade balance

    U.K Pakistan China

    (122.3)$bln (13.7)$bln 278($bln)

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    90/94

    Exchange rate

    U.K Pakistan China

    0.6494/U.S $ 81.41/U.S $ 6.8249/U.S $

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    91/94

    Infrastructure

    U.K Pakistan China

    Airports 506 145 482

    Roadways 398,366km 259,197km 3,583,715km

    Railways 16,454km 7,791km 77,834km

    Waterways 3200km N/A 110,000

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    92/94

    HDI

    Composition:

    U.K Pakistan China

    Literacy rate 99% 49.9% 90.9%

    Life expectancy 79.16 year 65.62 year 74.51 year

    GDP/capita 35,200 $ 2600$ 6600 $

    Ranking 21 141 91

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    93/94

    CPM

  • 8/8/2019 comparison of developed and developing countries

    94/94