Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES
(SNOW LEOPARD)
Presentation to Industry Day
DTE Working Group
6 Oct 2010
Lt Col C J Hall GBR Army
PM DTE
Intent Today
Inform about the Distributed Training and
Exercises (DTE) Program
Past
Present
Future
Advocate and Inform about new standards
Explore future opportunities for collaboration
2
To deliver to NATO and Partners a persistent,
distributed and joint training capability able to
support training from operational to tactical level
across the full spectrum of operations, whilst
leveraging existing national expertise and
capabilities.
Vision
3
2007 Industry Day
Panel led by SAIC on Modelling and
Simulation in Training
Identified Challenges of
establishing the standards, protocols,
interfaces and middleware for LVC and
C4ISR integration and interoperability
training requirements derivation
setting up the configuration, management and
sustainment organizational framework
Proposed Governance Solutions4
Current Situation
NATO TRAINING FEDERATION
Existing NTF delivered 2009. Long Term future uncertain
Used for NRF Training only – limited distribution, not utilized fully.
NATO LIVE VIRTUAL CONSTRUCTIVE
Experimental „Core‟ to transfer to JFTC Nov 2010
NC3A role to assist, not develop further.
Shared Scenarios Project
Some quick wins, developing library
ADL/NATO VBS2
Standalone Client with CIED Community for testing
Distributed Concept demonstration Nov 10
Projected to have IOC in 2011 with JFT lead
5
ACT DTE Program
“Train as you will fight”
Training support to present and future NATO missions
NATO Review
NATO
BI-SC ETEE
Review
SACT Multiple Future Study
Changes in
Processes, Technology, Organisation
NRF
Concept
National
develop
ments
New
Training
require
ments
JWC
JFTC
mission
6
Current Ops
New
NCS
CPX TRAINING LEVELS
NATO Command Structure
MCC
JFC
CJTF
DJTF
LCC
Land
Forces
Maritime
Forces
ACC
CAOC
Air
Forces
NATO Forces
NTF
NLVC? FIT?
National Systems Natl Sim Centers
Natl Simulators
Natl Ranges
New DTE Program
DTE
Programme
Board
Concept
and
Policy
Project
M&S Support
to
DTE
(Tools)
Shared
Scenarios
Project
(Content)
Communication
Information
Support to
DTE
(Networks)
8
New Challenges and Opportunities
New NATO Strategy and Structural Review
National Requirements & National Support
New Policy - New ETEE Paradigm (Resistance)?
NATO M&S Group 68 Standards and Best Practice
Improved Networks - CFBL/JTEN Initiatives
Afghan Mission Network (Training Enclave)
Distributed NATO Battle Lab Programme
Ambition versus Resources (Funding)
FFCI
10
Programme Changing
From: „build it and they will come.‟
To „they must come and build it‟
11
ACT roles in DTE Approach
ACT:
articulates agreed requirement and way forward
acts as a facilitator for national coordination
advocates standards to facilitate such cooperation
capitalizes on US JFCOM (and other national)
investments and brain power
utilizes industrial technological development to the
benefit of the Alliance
synchronizes Alliance and Partner activities towards
common goals
leads Alliance training and exercise transformation by
leveraging national investments into a cost effective
program12
2011 Activities
DTE Concept and Policy Document
Workshops
M&S Support to DTE
Assessment of JWC/JFTC M&S tools (set requirements)
Multinational Program (Implementation)
Tech Training Tools Advances (VBS2/Virtual Worlds)
Learn from and Support Experimentation (either/or)
AMN training support (venue UE-2011)
Partners interoperability (venue Viking-11)
C2 Stimulation (venue CIWX-2011)
CIS Support to DTE
Leverage and influence Afghan Mission Network & DNBL
Shared Scenarios (Library and standards) Project
13
Questions
14
NATO MODELLING AND SIMULATION
GROUP 068 EXPERIMENTATION
Multinational Research Project established 2007
Support „NATO Education & Training Network‟
Programme
Make recommendations for:
Interoperability
Technical standards,
NETN architectures
Roles and responsibilities for distributing, managing
and maintaining NETN capabilities
16
NMSG 068
NATO Education and Training Network
NMSG Proposals
NATO (NTF/NLVC) and National Convergence to one
„model independent‟ NATO training network
Draft Reference Federation Agreement document.
High Level Architecture Evolved 2010 (STANAG 4063)
Modular FOM and Federation Design (FAFD) which
includes RPR2 for the NETN reference federation
architecture.
CFBL Net as the persistent Infrastructure Architecture
17
NMSG 068 Experiment
To test and demonstrate a secure,
persistent, on-demand, training capability
that integrates NATO and National training
Centres
18
Experiment : 24 Oct – 5 Nov 2010
IABG, OttobrunDSTL/IndustryFMV, Stocholm
SpainHungary
NATO EXERCISE AND TRAINING NETWORK
JCATS VBS2 JTLS C2
JFTC
ORQUE WAGRAMVR-Forces
France
TYR
Sweden
MARCUS
VBS2 VBS2
JWC -Dev Sup by USA- Op Sup by Bulgaria- Op Sup by Turkey- Op Sup by Romania
JFTC, Bydgoszcz CATOD, Paris
TNO, The Hague NC3A, The Hague
CFBLNetNETNEnclave
ICC/ITCNetherlands The U.K. Germany
KORA
NC3A
NETN
JCATS VBS2 JTLS ITC/ICC
NATO Systems
ORQUE WAGRAM VR-Forces KORA TYR
SLB Sitaware TYR JCATS
Persistent Partner Simulation Network (P2SN - Viking 11) Federation Potential Systems
ASCOTPLEX
commExonaut
EarthVBS2T3SIM FIREX
VBS2 JCATS
National Systems
Romani
a
USA
JWC
JFTC
IITSEC Demonstration
Next Steps
Final Presentation: NMSG Spring 2011
Under development:
Roles and Responsibilities
CFBL Net Connectivity Agreements
M&S Procedures and Agreements
Certified NATO CAX Operators
Multi-level Security
Link to DNBL and Industry
21
Follow on Project?
Multinational Project
„Operationalize‟ Capability
Develop CONOPS
Reduce uncertainty of CP development
Incrementally develop a federated training
and exercising capability across NATO and
Partner nations
MAJIIC Example – Dr Jense
22
Distributed Training & Exercising -
Future Development
Ideas for a multi-national
collaborative project
Hans Jense, NC3A
Contents
Objectives
Background
The MAJIIC example
DT&E way ahead
Objectives
Operationalize DT&E:
Capture MSG-068 output
Start using it
Ensure evolutionary development
Align national activities and priorities with NATO Capability Package development and implementation
Maximize flexibility, transparency, and control for the nations
Background
Two aspects of DT&E way forward
An amendment to an existing CP, or a new CP, describing the evolutionary development of additional federated CAX capability across JWC and JFTC, covering the NATO specific (“NCS-centric”) evolving ETEE requirements;
A multinational (MAJIIC-like) project to incrementally develop a federated training and exercising capability that reaches across (NATO and partner) nations (i.e., covering the “NFS-centric” part), and that also provides the capability to federate the multinational part to the NATO part as appropriate.
What is MAJIIC?
MAJIIC: Multi-Sensor Aerospace/ground Joint ISR Interoperability Coalition
MAJIIC is a multinational project to provide Coalition ISR interoperability Canada, France, Germany, Italy,
Netherlands, Norway, Spain, UK, US and the NATO C3 Agency
High Altitude,
Long Endurance- MTI/SAR Radar- EO/TI
Med-High Altitude, Long Endurance
- MTI/SAR radar
- ESM
Medium Altitude- MTI Radar- ESM
LEO Space Systems- MTI/SAR Radar
Med-High Altitude,
Long Endurance UAVs
- EO/TI
- MTI/SAR Radar
Med-High Altitude
- MTI/SAR radar
- ESMLand - Based Recce
- EO/TI
- MTI
Low Altitude
- EO/TI
MAJIIC Sensors and Data Types
Low Altitude UAVs
- SAR
- EO/TI Motion Imagery
Land - Based Artillery
Locating Radar
- Firing positions
National solutions with a wide range of platform types,
sensor physics and sensor products
MAJIIC Essentials
MAJIIC is about sharing JISR data
products
MAJIIC has produced standards
(STANAGS) and Coalition Shared Data
Services
MAJIIC relies on standards compliance
validation (testing) and CONOPS
development
MAJIIC works by pooling resources and
aligning national programmes
Guiding Documents
Coalition Surveillance and Reconnaissance (CSR) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
Overarching MOU
Multi-sensor Aerospace/Ground Joint ISR Interoperability Coalition (MAJIIC) Project Arrangement (PA)
Defines relationship between Nations for the MAJIIC Project
MAJIIC Technical Arrangement (TA)
Defines relationship between Nations and NC3A
Working Group Terms of Reference (TORs)
Defines tasks for and relationships between Working Groups
Project Security Instruction (PSI)
Provides guidance for release and handling of information, data, equipment, and visits of personnel between sites
Responsibilities and Tasks of
Nations
Support management structure and working groups
Support integration of national systems into the Testbed
Support technical participation in exercises
Endeavour to provide:
Military support to working groups
Military evaluation of MAJIIC products
Military participation in appropriate exercises
Provide systems for incorporation into the Testbed to support:
Development efforts
Experiments
Demonstrations
Exercises
Provide documentation and information necessary to produce the deliverables
Responsibilities and Tasks
of NC3A
Host the Testbed for MAJIIC and activities carried out in NC3A
Make the Testbed for MAJIIC available to the Participants
Tasks
Provide technical, operational and architectural expertise and management
Provide infrastructure and equipment for, and support to, integration of national systems and simulators into the Testbed
Support exercises and experiments
Facilitate controlled interfaces with NATO agencies and the NATO military structure
Contribute to, edit, and release reports which incorporate national inputs
Provide administrative and secretarial support, including editing, version control and distributing reports
Report to the NPO and the Management Team (MT)
Organization Chart
MAJIIC Management Team
National Project Officers
Architecture Working Group Operational Working Group Technical Working Group
Technical Manager
Analyze Requirements
Define Storage & Dissemination Architecture
Implement Architecture
Support ExercisesAnd Experiments
Support Transition
Provide Reports MT
Analyze and DevelopRequirements
Develop Ops Documents
Support ExercisesAnd Experiments
Identify and ImplementStandards
Tools and Procedures DevelopmentAnd Implementation
Support Network Implementation
Support ExercisesAnd Experiments
Support Transition
Provide Reports to MT
Support CGP
Mission Planning, TaskingMonitoring, and Management
Time Sensitive Ops Support
Requirements for Information Exchange
Support Transition
Provide Reports to MT
Conclusions
MAJIIC considered very effective and successful by NATO and nations
Many similarities between the MAJIIC case and the DT&E case
Mutual reinforcement between CP effort and formal multinational project
Maximises flexibility, transparency, and control for the nations to directly steer the development of the multi-national capability based on rapidly emerging, still developing, and continuously evolving E&T requirements, and
Provides an excellent opportunity to quickly engage the PfP nations (and other coalition partners) and their existing distributed exercising and simulation capabilities
Discussion 1
What DT&E opportunities do you see
based on your involvement in providing
national training assets and/or services
and programmes?
How do you think DT&E can capitalize on
the DNBL Framework and Service Model?
Discussion 2 (if needed!)
What does industry need from NATO?
What are the necessary elements for this capability?
What is the benefit? Cost Benefit Analysis?
Can we use standards to achieve a training network?
Implications for how training is planned and conducted?
What kind of training audiences can benefit and how?
What are the risks & timeline for achieving this capability?
Do you have experiences and lessons learned on the field?
What current efforts are underway in Nations and industry?
Is Industry interested in offering managed services?
37
• The FFCI enables Collaborative work to be carried out in non-
procurement manner between ACT and industry/academia to
effectively leverage the expertise each party brings to Alliance
capability development efforts
• Objectives
– Allow ACT to better formulate its requirements
– Improve solutions developed by ACT and Industry
– Increase both parties‟ knowledge and perspective
• FFCI collaborative projects to be conducted in compliance with
FFCI rules and principles:– Transparency
– Fairness and openness
– Fair treatment and positive partnering
– Costs lie where they fall
– Etc.
• Collaborations to be of mutual benefit to all parties
FFCI
Benefits to NATO:
Accelerate capability development
efforts
Improve solutions
Reduce costs
Benefits to Industry:
Increased knowledge and awareness
of ACT‟s, NATO‟s and Nations‟ priorities /
areas of interest
Development of solutions better fitted
to the Nations‟ requirements
Access to more realistic data, doctrine
and procedures for development and
testing of products
Participation in the development of
NATO standards
FFCI
