Upload
others
View
7
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Walden UniversityScholarWorks
Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral StudiesCollection
2016
Effects of Acculturation Gap and Attachment Styleon South Asian Adolescent Well-BeingMalliga Delaney DelaneyWalden University
Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations
Part of the Clinical Psychology Commons
This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has beenaccepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, pleasecontact [email protected].
Walden University
College of Social and Behavioral Sciences
This is to certify that the doctoral dissertation by
Malliga Obilisundar-Delaney
has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects,
and that any and all revisions required by
the review committee have been made.
Review Committee
Dr. Robin Oatis-Ballew, Committee Chairperson, Psychology Faculty
Dr. Patricia Loun, Committee Member, Psychology Faculty
Dr. Brian Zamboni, University Reviewer, Psychology Faculty
Chief Academic Officer
Eric Riedel, Ph.D.
Walden University
2016
Abstract
Effects of Acculturation Gap and Attachment Style on South Asian Adolescent Well-
Being
by
Malliga Obilisundar-Delaney
MA, Queens College, 1998
BS, Queens College, 1995
Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Degree of
Doctor of Philosophy
Clinical Psychology
Walden University
August 2016
Abstract
South Asian (SA) adolescents experience the added challenges of identity development
and coping as a minority population of color in a predominantly White host
culture. Adolescent attachment style (AS) with their parents, along with an acculturation
gap (AG) with their parents, can either add to or alleviate their struggles. A matched
acculturation style and secure AS with their parents were hypothesized to result in higher
ethnic identity and adaptive coping. The Brief COPE, Multiethnic Identity Measure,
Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment, and the Bicultural Inquiry Questionnaire were
used to measure the independent (AG and AS) and dependent variables (identity
development and coping skills) among a sample of 39 SA adolescents and their parent
dyads from India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Pakistan. All participants were
recruited through SA temples, schools, and websites. Two-way ANOVAs revealed no
effects of AG and AS on ethnic identity and coping skills, which corroborates with the
results of several other studies. However, the small sample size obtained for this study
reduced the reliability of the results. Further research with a larger sample is warranted
for more reliable results with greater power. The use of alternative measures should also
be considered given the difficulty with measuring the multifaceted constructs of
acculturation and ethnic identity. More information on the impact of attachment and
acculturation on well-being can contribute to social change by providing data needed to
develop preventive and therapeutic interventions, community programs, and government
policies to assist immigrant adolescents and families.
Effects of Acculturation Gap and Attachment Style on South Asian Adolescent Well-
Being
by
Malliga Obilisundar-Delaney
MA, Queens College, 1998
BS, Queens College, 1995
Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Degree of
Doctor of Philosophy
Clinical Psychology
Walden University
August 2016
Dedication
I would like to dedicate this dissertation to my family, especially my children
Melissa, Timothy, and Kevin, who have been extremely patient with me during my years
at Walden University.
Acknowledgments
I would like to acknowledge my chair member, Dr. Robin Oatis-Ballew, who has
supported me through the many revisions and helped me to reach my goal. In addition, I
would like to thank Dr. Loun for her great advice with the statistical part of the
dissertation, which was a big obstacle in completing this process.
i
Table of Contents
List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... vi
Chapter 1: Introduction to the Study ....................................................................................1
Introduction……………………………………………………………………………1
Background…..… ..........................................................................................................4
Problem Statement. ....................................................................................................... 5
Purpose of Study………...………………………………………………….…………6
Nature of Study……......................................................................................................7
Research Questions………..……….………………………………………………….8
Theoretical Framework………...….……………..………………………………..…..9
Definition of Terms…………….….…………………………………………………11
Operational Definitions………………………………………………………………13
Assumptions and Limitations……..…..……………………………………………..14
Scope and Delimitations……..………..……………………………………………..15
Significance of Study…………….……...…………………………………………...15
Summary….…………………………...……………………………………………..16
Chapter 2: Literature Review…...……………………………………………………….19
Introduction………………………………………………………………………….19
Organization of Literature…………...………….…….……….………..…................19
Literature Search Strategy…..…..…….……………………………….……………..20
Theoretical Foundations…………...…………………………….…….……………..20
ii
Acculturation Theory……………….……………………………………………20
Conceptualization of Acculturation……...…..………………………………......23
Attachment Theory……….…………….……………….…………….…………25
Conceptualization of Attachment…………….…...…………………….…………...27
Acculturation Gap and Intergenerational Differences………….……………………31
Impact of Acculturation Gaps across Cultures……..…..………….…………….31
Acculturation Gap in SA's……….……………..….…………………………….34
Acculturation Style Differences in SA's…………………………………………35
Coping Skills and Adolescent Immigrants…………….……….……..……………..38
Attachment and Immigrant Adolescents….…………….………………..………….40
Attachment and Identity Development with SA Adolescents………...……….…….41
Identity Development in SA Adolescent Immigrants………..……….……….……..42
Summary of Literature……………………..…….……………………….………….45
Chapter 3: Research Method ..............................................................................................47
Introduction……………………………………………………………..………...….47
Research Design and Rationale ...................................................................................48
Sample Size…..…..………………………...…….………………………………50
Participants………………………………………..………………………….…..51
Procedure for Recruitment…….…………………...………………………………...51
Instruments for Data Collection…….…………………………………...……….…..53
Demographic Questionnaire……..….……………………………..……………...…54
iii
Bicultural Identity Questionnaire (BIQ)………..………………...………………….54
Multidimensional Ethnic Identity Measure (MEIM)….……………....……………..56
Brief COPE…….……………………………….…………………...……………….57
Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA)….………......……………..……..59
Data Analysis………………………..……………..………………………….……..63
Threats to Validity…………………………………………………………………...64
Ethical Considerations……………………………………………………………….65
Summary………………………………………….………………………………….66
Chapter 4: Results ..............................................................................................................68
Introduction ..................................................................................................................68
Resarch Questions……………………………………………………………………69
Data Collection…..…….………………………....…………………….………...….70
New Power Analysis….…..…………………..….…………..………………………71
Data Cleaning and Sceening Procedures…………………………………………….71
Descriptive Statistics……..………….………….……………………………………72
Assumptions Tested……….………….……………..……………………………….72
Results……………….……….……………..………………………………….…….74
Attachment Styles……………………..…………………………………………74
Acculturation Gap…………..……………………………………………………75
Identity Development………..…………………………………………………...76
Coping Skills……………..………………………………………………………77
iv
Data Analysis…………………………………………………..….…………………77
Research Question 1…………………………………………………………….77
Research Question 2…………………………………………………………….79
Summary………………………………………………………….……………….…80
Chapter 5: Discussion, Conclusions, and Recommendations ............................................82
Introduction ..................................................................................................................82
Interpretation of Findings…………………...………………….……………………83
Acculturation Gap, Attachment Style, and Identity………….……..……………83
Acculturation Gap, Attachment Style, and Coping………………...……………86
Limitations of Study………………………………………………..………………..88
Recommendations for Future Studies………………………………………..………89
Implications for Social Change…………………………………………….…….…..90
Conclusions………………………………………………………………..…………91
References ..........................................................................................................................93
Appendix A: Assent Form………………………………..…………………………….111
Appendix B: Permission for MEIM………………………………………………….....114
Appendix C: MEIM…………………………………………………………………….116
Appendix D: Brief COPE Permission………………………………………………..…118
Appendix E: Brief COPE…………………………………………………………..…...121
Appendix F: BIQ Permission…………….……………………………………………..123
Appendix G: BIQ…………………………………………………………………….…124
v
Appendix I: IPPA Permission………………………………………………………......126
Appendix J: IPPA………………………………………………………………………128
Appendix K: Recruitment Flyer…………………………………… …………………..130
Appendix L: Demographic Questionnaire……………………………………………...131
Appendix M: Social Media Recruitment Flyer………………………………………...132
vi
List of Tables
Table 1. Demographics of the Sample …………………………………………………..72
Table 2. Demographics on IPPA by Adolescent Gender& Acculturation Style.….…….75
.
Table 3. Acculturation Styles by Gender………………………………………….……..76
Table 4. Descriptive Statistics on Ethnic Identity……………………….………………76
Table 5. Descriptive Statistics on BreifCope………...…………………………………..77
Table 6. Analysis of Ethnic Identity between Attachment Styls and Acculturation Gap..78
Table 7. Summary of the One-Way ANOVA for Ethnic Identity and Attachment Style.79
Table 8. ANOVA on Coping Skills, Attachement Style, and Acculturation Gap….……80
1
Chapter 1: Introduction to the Study
Introduction
The primary focus of this study was the well-being of South Asian (SA)
adolescent immigrants in relation to their primary caregiver versus adolescent
acculturation styles and adolescent attachment style with the parent. Immigrant
adolescents have to assimilate into their new environment while trying to successfully
achieve the developmental struggles of independence, social status, and identity
development (Barrocas, 2011; Bhattacharyya, 2009; Farver, Xu, Bhadha, & Lieber,
2007). Adolescents who are marginalized are at even greater risk of developing greater
psychological distress and problems with self-identification and self-esteem (Farver,
Bhadha, & Narang, 2002).
The well-being of immigrants has been linked to the construct of acculturation in
past studies (Farver, Bhada, & Narang, 2002; Farver, Xu, Bhadha, & Lieber, 2007). More
recently, attachment has piqued the interest of researchers as a factor involved in the
psychological well-being of adolescents and adults. Aitkins, Howes, and Hamilton (2009)
considered attachment during adolescence to be just as significant as the attachment bond
during infancy in influencing all other interpersonal relationships. Research on the
relationship of attachment, acculturation, coping skills, and identity development are very
limited. My study of the relationship of these variables with the marginalized population
of South Asian adolescents will contribute to the literature to address the needs of ethnic
minority adolescents.
2
The SA culture has been deemed a marginalized culture or of minority status
(U.S. Census Bureau, 2010). The SA cultures included in this study, based on the largest
SA population in America, are Indian, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and Nepal
(Ameridia, 2012). SAs are considered minorities because of their color and are
discriminated against by the dominant White culture. They are referred to as
marginalized because of their refrain from adapting the dominant culture or preserving
their heritage culture (Berry 1990; Sue, 2003; Sue et al., 2007). Indians are the largest SA
population in New York, followed by Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, and Sri Lankans
(Ameridia, 2012) These cultures are considered part of the minority population that will
make up the majority of the children in the United States in the near future given that
they are part of the fastest growing Asian American population within the United States
(Le, 2013). The U.S. Census Bureau (2010) refers to them as a minority population in
terms of their proportion to the non-Hispanic Caucasian race, which in 2010 was a little
over one third of the total population.
Sometimes, SA culture is referred to as the quiet race due to the characteristic trait
of internalizing problems rather than externalizing them (Bhattacharyya, 2009). For the
same reason, SA cultural groups have often been overlooked in studies. Regardless of
their quiet nature, immigrant individuals and families from this culture encounter
difficulties. When children reach adolescence, problems become particularly apparent
during this critical developmental stage. Adolescents of SA ethnic background, living in
the United States, are faced with negotiating their collectivistic culture of origin and the
individualistic cultural environment they are living in (Bhattacharyya, 2009). These
3
adolescents are especially challenged growing up in an environment that presents social,
family, cultural, and educational pressures (Bhattacharyya, 2006; Borrocas, 2011; Lee et
al., 2009).
SA parents are not known to seek help or even focus on the psychological factors
involved with their children’s’ well-being (Lee et al., 2009). Instead Lee et al. discovered
that SA children and adolescents are pressured by their parents to succeed academically
and maintain devotion to their family. Although SA parents are caring and supportive,
they are focused on success since the purpose of their migration to the United States was
to establish a better life for their families (Benson & O'Reilly, 2009).
During this stressful time when SA adolescents are attempting to overcome
migration and developmental challenges, concepts related to Bowlby’s (1973) attachment
theory may be an influential factor. Although once perceived to be a process that took
place during infancy and remained the same throughout the lifespan, in more recent
studies, attachment has been determined to be a longitudinal process that occurs as we
encounter various significant relationships (Aikins, Howes, & Hamilton, 2009). A secure
attachment was purported by Bowlby to help with the growth of self-reliance during
adolescence. It seems only logical that when considering parent-adolescent relationships,
that a secure parent-adolescent attachment is more likely to lead to successful outcomes
for adolescents than insecure attachment or ambivalent attachment. In the same vein, a
secure parent-adolescent attachment could also assist with overcoming the parent-
adolescent acculturation gap and adjustment to cultural/multicultural stressors.
4
The intent of this study was to find factors of improving the lives of SA
adolescents and their families, specifically during this tumultuous stage. I examined the
relationship of the constructs of parent-adolescent attachment and parent-adolescent
acculturation gaps to the development of coping skills and identity development as for
this reason. Even more importantly, quantitatively exploring the relationship between
attachment, identity development, and coping skills provided insight into the optimal
intervention for the positive outcome of these adolescents.
Background
In the early 20th century, a large influx of immigrants arrived in America in the
hopes of building a better life for their families (Bhattacharyya, 2009). By the year 2050,
ethnic minorities in the United States are projected to become the majority by
comprising 52.3% of the total population (Suinn, 2008). The U.S. Census 2010
estimated there are 538,388 SAs in New York state alone and 3,872,963 SAs in the
United States (Hoeffel, Rastogi, Kim, & Shahid, 2012). The growing population of
immigrants has to contend with the stress of adjusting to a new land and raising families
while trying to adapt to a culturally diverse society. Today, many families have first- and
second-generation members, creating an acculturation gap across generations, along
with multicultural aspects as a result of mixed marriages. Kurien (2005) referred to these
individuals as the “new generation” (p. 1), faced with a whole new process of
acculturation and identity development.
The greater the difference between the culture of origin and the host culture, the
greater the challenge of adaptation. SAs are challenged with the negotiation of their
5
Eastern collectivistic culture within the Western individualistic culture (Bhattacharyya,
2009). In addition, unlike some other cultures, SAs struggle not only with acculturation
and identity development but also coping within a society that views them as ethnic
minorities (Bhattacharya, 2009). Asian Americans have received little attention with
regards to documented racism and discrimination towards them because of their
reputation of being a “model minority” (Sue, Bucceri, Lin, Nadal, & Torino, 2007, p. 1).
However, those that are partially from a marginal or colored ethnic culture are more
likely to experience discrimination albeit the microaggressive type (Sue , Bucceri, Lin,
Nadal, & Torino, 2007). Sue (2003) described microaggression as a form of racism based
on people’s beliefs and attitudes regarding people of color that is subtle, indirect, and
usually unintentional. Microaggression is just as harmful as or even more so than direct
discrimination because of the subtle nature of it (Sue, Bucceri, Lin, Nadal, & Torino,
2007). The movement for a more accepting society has reduced discrimination, yet
racism and microaggression continue to be a stressor for these immigrants.
Problem Statement
The primary focus of this study was on the well-being of adolescents of SA
descent in relation to the parent-adolescent acculturation gaps and parent-adolescent
attachment style. More specifically, I predicted acculturation gap and attachment style to
be linked to the identity development and coping skills of SA adolescents and the new
generation of adolescents. Furthermore, attachment style may be influential in lessening
the acculturation gap and increasing adolescent well-being. Research has shown that
migration can adversely impact the family and the psychological well-being of children
6
and adolescents (Weise, 2010). In some instances, Weise found that the parent-child
attachment is affected by the stress of migration resulting in aggressive behaviors or
anxiety and depressive behaviors in older children.
Some of the problems arise due to SA adolescents’ struggle to develop their own
identity while trying to balance their culture with the opposing host culture (Lee et al.,
2009). The gap created by differences in acculturation levels in SA parents and
adolescents can create greater turmoil in the relationship than adolescence normally
produces (Lee et al., 2009). Future generations may be faced with similar difficulties or
different socialization challenges across generations (Padilla, 2006; Wichrama, Elder, &
Abraham, 2007). Further studies with SA adolescents are essential to the prevention of
further dispersion of psychological and health risks in future generations.
Purpose of the Study
The intention of this quantitative study was to determine the differences in the
effect of the acculturation gap and attachment style on the identity development and
coping mechanisms of SA asolescents. Acculturation gap and attachment style are the
independent variables, while coping skills and identity development are the dependent
variables in this study. Although there is extensive research on acculturation gap and
adolescents, there is little research with the integration of the two concepts of
acculturation and attachment as possible predictors of immigrant adolescent well-being.
There is also minimal research in the area of attachment style and its effects on
adolescent coping skills and identity development.
7
Enlightenment in this area will assist therapists with applying the most
appropriate therapeutic framework. Adolescence is a time of great turmoil and has been
identified in literature to be a stage in which these individuals can develop into healthy
productive adults or troubled and vulnerable individuals with an identity which Erikson
called, identity confusion (Atalay, 2007; Erikson, 1963; Smokowski, Rose, & Bacallao,
2012). Erikson’s psychology of stages and crisis is believed to be strongly influenced by
his own immigrant status in the United States (Atalay, 2007).
Additionally, Erikson’s psychology has been considered a precursor to attachment
theories because of the inclusion of the influence of mother-child relationships, although
developed more systematically by Bowlby and Ainsworth (Atalay, 2007). In this study, I
predicted that attachment style with the primary caregiver to have a significant effect on
the overall well-being of the adolescents. The constructs of attachment, acculturation, and
identity are all related to coping mechanisms in indiviudals as they work to overvome the
crisis along their lifespan (Atalay, 2007). Figuring out the relationship between these
constructs would support the use of a psychoanalytic approach to treatment combined
with attachment theories for adolescents and families faced with the challenges of
acculturation and family conflicts.
Nature of the Study
In this quantitative survey approach, I conducted two 2-way ANOVA analyses to
compare the effects of parent-adolescent acculturation gap (AG) and attachment style
(AS) with parents (secure or insecure), which were the independent variables (IVs), to
adolescent coping skills and identity development, which were the dependent variables
8
(DVs). Years in the United States, socioeconomic status, gender, age, and education,
were some of the confounding variables found in previous studies with similar variables.
These variables were not be used as covariates in this study because they would require
analysis that went beyond the scope of this study but may be useful as possible covariates
in future studies.
The data were collected from a sample of SA parents and adolescents living in
New York City (NYC) and Nassau County, New York. I distributed flyers throughout
neighborhoods dense with this culture in order to gather possible participants in one
location where the surveys could be completed by those participants who provided
informed consent. The data gathered were analyzed using SPSS computer software.
Research Questions
The primary reason for the study was to determine whether or not attachment
style influences identity development and coping skills in SA adolescents. Another
incentive for this study was to assess the impact of different styles of acculturation on
identity development and coping skills. Another force driving this study was to discover
the influence of AG and AS on identity development and coping skills in SA adolescents.
In order to address the above reasons for the study, I developed the following
research questions (RQs) to guide me:
RQ1: What are the differences between the effects (or mean scores) of parent-
adolescent AG and AS on SA adolescent identity development?
H0: There are no differences in the effects of Parent-adolescent AG and AS on
adolescent identity development.
9
H1: Participants with an acculturation style matched to their parents will have
significantly higher multiethnic identity scores compared to adolescents with an
acculturation style that is mismatched with their parents.
H2: Participants with secure ASs with their parents will have significantly higher
multiethnic identity scores than adolescents with mismatched ASs with their
parents.
RQ2: What are the differences in the effects (or mean scores) of parent-
adolescent AG and AS on SA adolescent coping skills?
H0: There are no differences in the effects of Parent-adolescent AG and AS on
adolescent coping skills.
H3: Participants with a matched acculturation style with their parents will have
significantly higher scores on adaptive coping skills than adolescents with a
mismatched acculturation style with their parents.
H4: Participants with secure ASs with their parents will have signifincantly
higher scores on adaptive coping skills than adolescents with insecure ASs with
their parents.
Theoretical Frameworks
Bowlby’s (1973) theory of attachment was used to ground this study. The
original theory consisted of four ASs: secure, insecure-avoidant, insecure-ambivalent,
and insecure-avoidant, which were believed to occur only during infancy (Bowlby, 1973;
Bowlby & Ainsworth, 1991). Contemporary theories on attachment have asserted that
10
attachment exerts influence across one’s lifespan (Aikins, Howes, & Hamilton, 2009).
The attachment theory is now used to describe how adolescents may process social
interactions and behave accordingly based on the contempory theories. Karantzas et al.
(2010) posited that attachment styles during childhood can change and indicate
unresolved adolescent representations. Even secure attachment during infancy was
reported to evolve as a result of patterns of interaction over time.
Berry’s (1991) acculturation theory also grounded this study. Berry posited that
acculturation is the manner in which people from diverse cultures learn to reside in a
society successfully. Four different options of acculturation were suggested by Berry.
The first option is separation from the majority culture and restricted identification with
the ethnic culture. The second option is assimilation with the majority culture while
rejecting the ethnic culture. Integration, the third option, is the identification with both the
ethnic and majority cultures. The final option, marginalization, is the rejection of both
cultures (Berry, 1997). In the past, researchers studied the process of acculturation as
occurring on a group level or linear model (Farver, Bhadha, & Narang, 2002). More
recent studies have found that acculturation is an ongoing process that depends on
maintaining the culture of origin while adapting to the new host culture (Berry, Kim,
Power, Young, & Bujaki, 1989).
The long-standing concept of attachment styles, along with the concept of
acculturation gap between parent and adolescent, have been revealed to impact the well-
being of adolescents (Atkin, Howes, & Hamilton, 2009; Atzaba-Poria & Pike, 2007).
Adolescents struggle to discover and find their own identity, while undergoing the
11
challenges of social interactions, fitting in, and developing a sense of morality (Erickson,
1963). Erickson’s developmental stages was another underlying framework used because
of his theories on adolescence.
Definition of Terms
Acculturation: This is the process that results when different cultures come
together and a cultural change occurs as psychological changes take place in the
individuals (Berry, 1999). It is also defined as the changes in beliefs, behavior, and values
of a minority culture to its host culture (Farver, Narang, & Bhada, 2002).
Acculturation gap: The term being used for the difference in acculturation levels
that occur overtime between generations as a result of immigration to a new
culture (Birman & Poff, 2011).
Attachment style: According to Bowlby and Ainsworth (1991), attachment style is
the type of bond established between the child and significant adult that influence the
individual’s personality development. The styles include: secure, insecure-avoidant,
insecure-ambivalent, and insecure-disorganized. It can change across a lifespan based on
genetic and environmental influences.
Coping skills: These are skills learned and used to manage feelings and situations
in a healthy manner. Coping skills can be either adaptive or maladaptive (Carver, 1997).
Culture: Cooper and Leong (2008) defined culture as the customs, traditions,
practices, psychological processes, beliefs, values, and social (Iwamoto & Liu, 2010).
Ethnic identity: The development involves self-identification with one or more
ethnic groups (Farver, Xu, Bhadha, Narang, & Lieber, 2007).
12
First generation: Native born adolescents and families that first moved to the
United States (Portes & Rumbaut, 2005).
Host culture: The culture the SAs are attempting to adapt to, which in the case of
this study is the culture within the United States and more specifically within New York
(Smokowski, Rose, & Bacallao, 2008).
Identity development: Erickson (1963) originally defined identity development as
a psychosocial phase during which adolescents from ages 12–19 years successfully
develop an identity or if unsuccessful develop role confusion.
Microaggression: Sue et al. (2007) defined microaggression as a type of racism
that is subtle, brief, and occurs on a daily basis towards minority groups of color. It can
be verbal, behavioral, or environmental denigrations that are automatic and pushed aside
as inoffensive when in fact they cause psychological harm to others.
Migration: Lifestyle migrants are considered to be affluent people from other
nations who move to places for various reasons which they believe will ultimately lead to
a better life for them. (Benson & O'Reilly, 2009)
Multicultural: Adolescents with more than one cultural or ethnic background such
as from mixed marriages (Phinney, 1992).
Second generation (new generation): American born adolescents of first
generation immigrants with mixed or a single cultural/ethnic background (Portes &
Rumbaut, 2005).
Third generation: American born adolescents of second generation parents
(Portes & Rumbaut, 2001).
13
Operational Definitions
Acculturation gap: The acculturation gap is based on the different styles of
acculturation (assimilated, marginal separated, or integrated) that the parent and
adolescent obtain based on their score on the Bicultural Involvement Questionnaire (BIQ)
(Berry,1999; Farver, Bhadha, & Narang, 2002; Szapocznik, Scopetta, Kurtines, &
Aranlsde, 1978). For the purpose of this study, an acculturation gap was calculated based
on match or mismatched acculturation styles between the parent and adolescent.
Acculturation style: The BIQ examines the involvement of the individual with
their culture of origin and host culture in terms of customs, values, and behaviors, to
determine which of three scales they fall into: Hispanic, American, or bicultural
(Szapocznik, Scopetta, Kurtines, & Aranlsde, 1978).
Attachment style: The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA),
developed by Armsden and Greenberg (1987), measures attachment bonds with parent
and peers based on degree of mutual trust, quality of communication, and extent of anger
and alienation. The revised version has three measurements: one for mother, father, and
peers, based on the ratings of the adolescent. High scores indicate secure attachment,
while low scores indicate insecure attachment.
Coping skills: The Brief COPE Scale measures adaptive coping including: self-
distraction, active coping, use of emotional support, venting, reframing, planning, humor,
acceptance, religion, and use of instrumental support. The Brief COPE Scale also
measures maladaptive coping such as: denial, substance use, behavioral disengagement,
self-distraction, and self-blame (Carver, 1997).
14
Ethnic identity: This variable, as measured by the Multigroup Ethnic Identity
Measure (MEIM), is based on the individual’s level of commitment to their native
ethnicity which is attained by 12 statements that they agree or disagree with (Phinney &
Ong, 2007). The last three questions ascertain self-identification and parents’ ethnic
identification.
Assumptions and Limitations
The participants’ responses to the surveys could not be controlled but were
assumed to be truthful. Another assumption was that the IPPA, BIQ, MEIM, Brief COPE
and acculturation gap computation all measured what they proposed to measure and were
valid and reliable tools with the SA population. There was also an assumption made that
individual differences, such as personality and the many dialects spoken, would not
significantly alter the findings. The different cultures considered in this study were
regarded as similar by proximity although from different countries. In addition, the
sample was assumed to be a good representative of the SA population since a random
sampling was collected in different environments.
Given the limited countries in South Asia that were included as the SA
population in the study, the results of the study can reliably be generalized to only these
populations. The instruments chosen were restricted because of the population choice in
terms of age, culture, and variables (Dusick, 2011). Similarly, the ability to detect
statistically significant results was limited to the statistical procedures that were used
along with the research design. Another limitation in this study was that since there were
various languages and dialects spoken by the participants, the surveys were translated by
15
a family member or friend rather than attempting to have translated surveys in every
language. In cases where there was no one available to translate, the individual was
excluded from the study.
Scope and Delimitations
In this study, the SA cultures that I considered were countries surrounding India,
Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Pakistan. One of the main reasons for including these
countries was because of their colored skin along with their similar beliefs, values, and
traditions. Cultures with colored skin are the targeted population since they are treated
differently, which in turn impacts acculturation. Adolescents between the ages of 13 to 18
were chosen to represent SAs in the midst of adolescence. The sample was obtained from
areas in New York City and Nassau County due to convenience and the large population
of SAs in this city. One primary caregiver of the adolescent was included to determine
attachment style and acculturation gap. Given that the sampling was from a limited
number of sources and neighborhoods, the results cannot be generalized to the SA
population within the United States. The findings can be used for follow-up studies
whether the alternative hypotheses or null hypotheses were verified.
Significance of Study
SA adolescents of color continue to experience threats to their healthy identity
development and psychological well-being due to persistent discrimination (lwamoto &
Liu, 2010). While American adolescents strive to achieve a healthy identity and
independence during this stage, SA adolescents have the additional task of balancing
family expectations to remain interdependent, educational pressures, and ethnic identity
16
formation (Bhattacharyya, 2009; Smith & Silva, 2011). With the increasing migration of
various cultures and growth of the multicultural community in the United States, the
mental health of adolescents, the future adults of America, is important for positive social
change (Maynard & Harding, 2010). There are many findings showing a positive
association between ethnic identity and well-being, leading scholars to conclude that a
strong ethnic identity leads to well-being in adolescence (Phinney & Ong, 2007).
Nevertheless, there is no evidence of causality between the two (Smith & Silva, 2011).
There is still minimal research on SA adolescent identity development and coping
skills within the United States. In addition, a gap is evident in the literature on the
differences of attachment in comparison to acculturation gap with regards their
relationship with coping skills and identity development. Coping skills was chosen as one
of the dependent variables due to the benefits of positive coping skills when dealing with
challenges that are encountered throughout one’s lifetime. Identity development was the
other dependent variable selected for this study because of the importance of developing
a healthy identity during this phase. Second generation SA’s are also of importance,
along with the first generation, in this study, because many immigrant families from SA
are now second or third generation U.S. residents who are also experiencing difficulties.
Finding the factors most pertinent to the well-being of SA adolescents can be used to
develop better interventions that may be implemented in schools, communities, and
therapy.
Summary
In essence, adolescence is an arduous developmental phase even under the best
17
circumstances. When growing up as an immigrant of minority status in an environment
with differing cultures, beliefs and values, it becomes even more complicated. Second
generation adolescents are no less susceptible to the pressures and may even have
greater difficulty (Farver, Bhadha, & Narang, 2002).
Parents are still a major source of influence that can be supportive or
detrimental in the adolescent’s development of a healthy identity and coping skills (Berry
& Kwak, 2001). Parent-adolescent acculturation levels and attachment style are believed
to be significant contributors during this phase of development (Lee, 2009; Weise, 2010).
For this reason, Berry’s (1991) acculturation model and Bowlby’s (1973) attachment
theory are the foundations of this study.
There is limited research on SA parent-adolescent acculturation gap. The
attachment style of SA parents and adolescents in relation to their acculturation and
its influence on identity development and coping skills was not found in my review of
existing literature review. Knowledge in this area can provide valuable information with
regards to the most influential factors in the development of a healthy identity and coping
skills in SA adolescents. Identifying these factors can be used to create more appropriate
therapeutic interventions, policies, and community programs to promote well adjusted
adolescents and consequently lead to positive social change.
Chapter 3 elaborates on the research questions and the methods that were used
to answer the above questions and test the hypotheses. Chapter 4 discusses the results
of the data collected and statistical analysis. Chapter 5 presents the interpretation and
discussion of the results. It will also contain the limitations of the study and future
18
research possibilities.
19
Chapter 2: Literature Review
Introduction
This literature review is a culmination of the results of studies on AG and AS and
their relationship to adolescent outcome. The following chapter delineates the existing
literature on the topics of parent-adolescent AG, attachment to parent during adolescence,
plight of adolescent immigrants, and establishing identity and effective coping skills
during adolescence. Additionally, I examine prior research on attempts to mitigate the
negative effects of immigration on first and second generation adolescents from
bicultural and multicultural background. Finally, the existing literature was used to show
the existence of a gap in the literature that may be filled with this study.
Organization of the Literature Review
The literature review is organized based on research with SAs and various other
cultures on acculturation gap, differences in generations, attachment, ethnic identity, and
coping skills. Also included, are relevant literature on the theories grounding this study.
The literature search strategy is first discussed, followed by a review of the literature on
the two theoretical foundations used in this study, Bowlby’s (1973) attachment theory
and Berry’s (1991) acculturation model. I also present research on acculturation and
attachment, with regards to their relationship with adolescent identity development and
coping skills, and related literatureto support the research gap that was introduced in
Chapter 1. The gap and social change relevance are also discussed in further detail.
20
Literature Search Strategy
The literature review for this study was conducted using the Walden University
Library, more specifically the Proquest, Psycharticles, Academic Premier, ERIC,
PsychInfo, and Sage Premier databases. The Scholar Google search engine and Franklin
Square local library were other tools that I also used to complete a thorough search.
Combinations of the following search words were used to locate relevant articles:
adolescents, South Asian, identity development, ethnic identity, acculturation,
multicultural, bicultural, Indian, acculturation gap, coping skills, well-being, second
generation, Erickson, Bowlby, and attachment or attachment styles. For the most part, the
search parameters and time limits were restricted to peer reviewed articles within the past
5 years. However, when recent literature could not be found on some of the constructs,
older literature was used as needed.
Theoretical Foundations
The study was grounded with the theoretical foundations of the acculturation
theory developed by Berry (1996) and the attachment theory originated by Bowlby
(1982). The two theories are described in terms of their origination and utilization in
previous studies. In this section, I also explain the reasons for their use in this study.
Acculturation Theory
Originally, acculturation was thought of as a unidimensional process in the past
(Schwartz, Unger, Zamboanga, & Szapocznik, 2010). In the old model, according to
Schwartz and colleagues, migrants (those who migrated to the new residence) were
thought to disregard their culture of origin and accept the values, beliefs, and practices of
21
their new homeland. Some continue to believe that immigrants should follow this method
of assimilation. Researchers later realized that acculturation was not unidimensional and
that it cannot be assumed that migrants will disregard their culture of origin and assume
the new culture (Schwartz, Unger, Zamboanga, & Szapocznik, 2010). In the 1980s, a
bidimensional model was created by Berry (1980) in which the retention of the heritage
culture and receiving of the host culture were viewed as being independent. The two
dimensions combined to create four separate categories of acculturation which is the
premise of Berry’s acculturation model (Berry, 1980). Berry’s (1997) theory was that the
psychological consequences of acculturation overtime can vary depending on several
variables such as the society of origin and settlement as well as social and personal
factors.
Berry (1997) purported that immigration leads to culturally plural societies in
which more than one cultural group live together. The dominant culture pressures the
nondominant culture to assume their cultural traits, leaving them with little option to
choose their acculturation style. According to Berry, integration of varied cultures
requires both groups, dominants and nondominants, to accept cultural differences.
Dominant and nondominant cultures were determined by their power within the society
(Berry, 1997). Similarly, segregation of a culture only occurs through pressure by the
dominant culture. Integration is a collective strategy while assimilation is an
individualistic strategy (Lalonde & Cameron, 1993, Moghaddam, 1998). Usually, there is
a preference for one strategy over the others. All the same variations in strategy can occur
based on location (e.g., home, workplace, community, and others). Other factors that
22
affect acculturation strategies are national context and policy and possible exploration of
various strategies over time (Berry 1997; Kim, 1988; Krishnan, & Berry, 1992).
Berry et al. (1997) have conducted numerous studies on the acculturation of
immigrants (Birman, 2006; Farver, Bhadha, & Narang, 2002; Robinson, 2009). Berry’s
bidimensional model of acculturation has also been used in many studies on AGs by
Kwak and Berry (2006). Other researchers have used this model to determine the
relationship between acculturation, ethnic identity, and the well-being of immigrants
(Farver, Bhadha, & Narang, 2002; Farver, Xu, Bhadha, & Leiber, 2007; Robinson,
2009a).
Determining which constructs affect immigrants’ well-being was also of primary
concern in this study. Berry (1997) believed that acculturation does not have to lead to
psychological problems. Berry’s model was chosen as a suitable theoretical model given
its use in many studies related to acculturation styles, psychological well-being, and
identity. The use of Berry’s model of acculturation styles was also selected for its
usefulness in answering RQs of this study: What are the differences in the effect of
parent-adolescent AG and AS on identity development in SA adolescents? and What are
the differences in the effects of AG and AS on coping skills in SA adolescents? It is also
the preferred theoretical model for this study because of its positive outlook on
acculturation through positive adaptation that can be learned (Bowlby, 1997). However,
Berry (1997) also mentioned the prospects of serious conflict occurring and leading to
“acculturative stress” (p.14) and psychopathology when extreme difficulties arise. The
hyposthesis in the current study is that AG, which often leads to stress and family
23
conflict, has a significant link with coping skills and identity development. Berry’s model
assisted with my exploration of AGs and their link to coping skills and identity
development in SA adolescents. Studying this construct partially fulfilled the principal
purpose of this endeavor which was to find what constructs are related to SA adolescent
immigrant’s psychological and physical health.
Conceptualization of Acculturation
The first complete psychological perspective of acculturation was created by
Teske and Nelson (1974). Berry (1990) expanded on this with a definition of
acculturation as a concept that refers to the changes that result, both cultural and
psychological, from the continuous interaction of two different cultural groups. Padilla
and Perez (2003) added to this model with a new perspective that included social identity
and social cognition. Further modifications to the concept were posited by Schwartz et al.
(2010). They included more constructs to their operational definition of acculturation,
believing that it was a multidimensional construct that has thus far been limited. In their
conceptualization of acculturation, contextual and individual functioning was proposed to
also play a role in acculturation.
Berry (1996) proposed four different acculturation strategies that individuals use
in their attempt to adapt to the host culture based on the conceptualization that groups
have to determine to what extent the groups should maintain their culture and to what
extent the group should immerse themselves in the other culture(s). Berry (1990) defined
acculturation strategies as the attitudes towards the four strategies and their
corresponding behaviors. According to Berry, the four possible strategies in the process
24
of acculturation included marginal, separation, integration, and assimilation. Immigrants
who use the assimilation strategy choose to interact with other cultures over their own. In
the separation strategy, individuals avoid interaction with cultures other than their own
(Berry, 1996). The integration strategy is when there is an interest in maintaining one’s
culture of origin while interacting and being a part of the larger society. In the process of
marginalization, the individual neither maintains their own culture nor do they choose to
integrate with other cultures. This style of acculturation often occurs when individuals are
forced to assimilate while also being discriminated against or segregated (Berry, 1996).
Adaptation is another construct which is closely related to acculturation. During the
process of adaptation, one group generally experiences more change than the other and is
referred to as the acculturation group (Berry, 1990).
Based on prior research, Berry (1997) developed a framework for acculturation
research that included acculturation factors at a group level and individual level. At the
group level, factors from the society of origin (political context, economic status, and
demographic information), group acculturation (physical, biological, economic, social,
and cultural), and society of settlement (attitudes and social support) were considered
(Berry, 1997). The individual level included factors that were previously found to be
moderators prior to acculturation such as age, gender, education, pre-acculturation, status,
migration motives, expectations, cultural distance, and personality of the individual.
Moderating factors during acculturation which Berry included: length of time,
acculturation strategy, coping strategies, social support, and societal attitudes.
Sometimes, a variable can act as a moderator or mediator (Berry, 1997). Other factors
25
that can effect acculturation were life events, stressors, coping, stress, and adaption on a
group and individual level. Berry posited that all of these factors must be considered in
acculturation research for accurate results.
Attachment Theory
Attachment theory is another framework that was a foundation of this study.
Bowlby developed this theory from research on the impact of separation and loss with
human infants (Bretherton, 1994). Bowlby (1982) first noticed that close proximity to the
attachment figure provided security, while separation resulted in crying and searching for
the figure to regain the contact and closeness. Bowlby proposed there were innate or
instinctive behaviors that fostered the attachment process. It was also Bowlby’s belief
that it was primarily the mother-infant bond that produced significant effects. The
contemporary view of attachment is believed to be a result of a combination of the mind,
brain, and body (Shore & Shore, 2008).
Another early researcher of attachment, Ainsworth, joined Bowlby in the late
1950s on research on the effects of separation from the mother during infancy on
personality development (Bretherton, 1994). Ainsworth (1989) reformulated the Freudian
perspective with a theory that individual differences in infants arise as a result of
caregiver-infant interactions. When Ainsworth observed the relationship pattern of
children reuniting with parents after an extended separation, the ASs of secure, anxious-
avoidant, and anxious-ambivalent were identified. At a later date, another style of
attachment, the disorganized style, was discovered by Main and Solomon (Nelson &
Bennett, 2008).
26
Initially, attachment was believed to only occur during an infant’s first year and to
predict their behavior and relationships throughout their lives. Bowlby (1973) believed
the mother-infant bond developed early on established the child’s personality and
relationships with others. However, since the original theory, researchers have discovered
that attachment styles can change over one’s lifespan and are linked to autonomy in
adolescents (Aikin, Howes, & Hamilton, 2009; Becker-Stoll & Fremmer-Bombik, 2008).
As Bowlby and Ainsworth (1991) continued their research, they extended the
attachment classification to school age children, adolescents, and adults in line with
research findings. More recent research has sought to provide elucidation on attachment
during different points in development and its stability or shift in style (Ainsworth, 1989).
Ainsworth’s research has supported Bowlby’s concept of cross-generational impact of
attachment. Investigation of attachment bonds in later years has shown bonds to include
those with individuals other than the parent-child bond (Ainsworth, 1989). Another
branch of attachment research, has applied this construct to attachment in at-risk
populations (Bowlby & Ainsworth, 1991).
Adolescents are in their own right, at-risk, because of the challenges they endure
during this developmental phase. Immigrant adolescents face even greater challenges
with things such as identity development, autonomy, and adjustment (Barrocos, 2011;
Portes & Rambaut, 2005; Steinberg, 1990). Attachment theory provided the means for
me to investigate the hypothesis of secure AS being positively correlated with integrated
identity development and positive coping skills in SA adolescents. Given that there are no
previous studies on the relationship of attachment during adolescence with acculturation
27
gaps with the SA population, this study will provide pertinent information and add to the
limited literature on acculturation gaps, attachment during adolescence, and their effects
on SA adolescents. In collaboration with Bowlby’s (1973) idea of attachment theory as a
contribution to clinical practice, this study can potentially provide important information
pertaining to encouraging outcomes for adolescents, intervention strategies, and positive
social change (Bowlby & Ainsworth, 1991).
Conceptualization of Attachment
Ethological studies by Harlow with infant monkeys provided the initial steps
towards the attachment theory (Lickliter, 2008). The separation of infant’s monkeys from
their mother was shown to have a profound effect on the behavioral, social, and
emotional development of the monkeys. While Harlow studied the effects of modifying
social experiences of infant rhesus monkeys on the development of their social and
emotional behavior, Bowlby tested human development through observation of the
effects of separation and loss during infancy (Lickliter, 2008).
Lorenz, Hinde, and other ethologists, influenced attachment theories with their
studies on animal behavior (Nelson & Bennet, 2008). Much of Bowlby’s influence came
from Lorenz’s ideas and findings on attachment and loss, as well as, imprinting in the
mid 1900’s. Imprinting is defined as the attachment of infants during a critical period to
the first suitable moving stimulus. Bowlby was also partial to the imprinting research
conducted by Lorenz who was able to demonstrate that there was possibly an innate
component to attachment in his research with chicks, ducklings, and goslings (Lickliter,
2008). The hatchlings would imprint on the first major moving object and follow it
28
around believing it to be their mother. Bowlby assumed that human infants developed in
a similar manner. Bowlby also concluded from his research that infants require a stable
and nurturing relationship with the primary caretaker to develop into a mentally healthy
individual (Bretherton, 1994). Unlike the traditional theory in which dependency had a
biological purpose during infancy and was considered useless and a sign of immaturity
during later years, Bowlby surmised that attachment was an essential component of
human behavior that has a protective and biological function throughout life (Bowlby &
Ainsworth, 1991).
Ainsworth added the discovery of the three styles of attachment to Bowlby’s
work (Ainsworth & Bowlby, 1991). Ainsworth observed babies in Ganda and noticed the
behaviors of the babies when their mother moved away or left briefly and when they
were hungry or hurt. The mother was observed as the secure base. Ainsworth divided the
babies into three groups based on their reaction to separation from the mother and
greeting to the mother upon her return. Infants who felt safe enough to explore their
environment in their mother’s presence and able to depend on her during times of need
were categorized as having a secure AS. Secure infants showed distress when the
caregiver left the area and displayed excitement upon their return. As they grew older,
secure infants became self-reliant individuals with a positive sense of self. Insecure-
avoidant infants were observed to avoid their caregivers and show no preference when
given a choice between the caregiver and a stranger. Ainsworth discovered that these
infants withdrew from their caregiver who was unavailable during times of need.
Children who are ambivalently attached become very distressed when the caregiver
29
leaves and sense they cannot depend on the caregiver when needed. Under extreme
stress, anxious ambivalent infants become excessively upset in order to gain greater
proximity with the mother. Infants with anxious ambivalent pattern of attachment
matured into adolescents and adults who were overly dependent.Infants who were
avoidant, later showed discomfort with close relationships. A fourth attachment style
discovered was the insecure-disorganized style. The infants considered to be insecure-
disorganized exhibited inconsistent attachment behavior including avoidant and resistant
behaviors with their caregiver. Infants with a disorganized pattern of attachment reflected
disoriented and contradictory behaviors. These infants were more likely to show
disturbed relationships during later stages of life.
Naturally during adolescence, the parent-adolescent dyad changes because of the
developmental need to become less dependent on the parent as an attachment figure
(Allen & Land, 2010). Achievement of successful development in adolescence requires
balancing of parent-adolescent relations along with striving for autonomy (Allen,
Kipermine, & Moore, 1997). Autonomy is functioning more independently and relying
less on parents in various aspects of life. Although autonomy is of great importance
during adolescence, attachment to parents is also essential during this phase of
development, especially during extremely stressful times (Barrocas, 2011; Steingberg,
1990). For these reasons, Barrocas (2011) proposed that a secure AS with the parent will
result in better relationships and adjustment in general. During adolescence, peers can
also become attachment figures and provide support for the cognitive, developmental and
social changes necessary to establish autonomy (Steinberg, 1990). Recent research has
30
shown that secure attachment figures foster the establishment of autonomy without
jeopardizing the parent-adolescent relationships (Allen, Hauser, Bell, & O’Connor, 1994;
Fraley & Davis, 1997).
Attachment theorists have used Bowlby’s and Ainsworth’s framework of
attachment and attachment style to study attachment in different cultures and in its
application to therapy with various cultures and with multicultural individuals (Brown,
Rodgers, & Kapdia, 2008: Gerber, 2007). It has also been studied for its impact across
the lifespan and with fathers, mothers, and peers (Liu, 2008; Wilkinson, 2004). The
relationship of attachment style to adolescent psychological and physical health, self-
esteem, depression, social functioning, acculturation, identity development, and more
recently with emotion regulation are other important areas of research (Armsden &
Greenberg, 1987; Nawaz, 2011; Schore & Schore, 2008). Similarly, this study focused on
how ASs relate to adolescent coping skills, identity development, and acculturation.
Since the attachment framework has been utilized in related studies, previously with
success, it was selected as an appropriate theory to ground the research hypotheses that
secure AS relates positively to both healthy identity development, acculturation and
coping skills in SA adolescents. The current study was valuable because of the limited
research on attachment style in relation to acculturation, coping skills, and identity
development in SA adolescents. Research on attachment styles with SAs is very limited,
in general. In addition, the gap in the literature on the variables being considered in this
proposed study is essential to the well-being of immigrant adolescents. Therefore, the
31
implementation of this research proposal will provide new and beneficial information not
only for the well-being of SAs but also for cross-cultural research in general.
Acculturation Gap and Intergenerational Differences
The relationship of parent- adolescent acculturation gap to poor outcome of
adolescents has been shown in prior literature with various ethnic groups including some
on SAs. The differences in acculturation between parents and adolescents can lead to
various negative consequences in not just SAs but in many cultures. Literature on the
findings on AG in other cultures, in addition to SAs, are provided to substantiate the
effects that gaps can have on adolescents and families.
Impact of Acculturation Gaps across Cultures
Several studies on AGs between immigrant Chinese adolescents and parents
found an increased risk of depression, decreased self-esteem, and higher rate of
delinquency (Birman, 2007; Crane, Ngai, Larson, & McArthur, 2005; Hwang, Wood &
Fujimoto, 2010). Generational differences in acculturation within Chinese families were
also linked to the deterioration of parenting skills along with increased risk of depressive
symptoms in adolescents (Kim, Chen, Huang, & Moon, 2009). Similarly, parent’s
acculturation improved school and home situations and enhanced child development
(Ying & Han, 2008). The depression and delinquency found by Crane et al. (2010) were
established using three different measures of acculturation rather than just one. With the
use of the measures, they were able to show that parent-adolescent differences in scores
were positively related to depression and delinquency in adolescents. The acculturation
32
levels of both adolescents and parents and their differences were important predictors of
adolescent well-being (Crane, Ngai, Larson, & McArthur, 2005).
Smokowski et al. (2008) implemented three steps to assessing AG with immigrant
Latino families. The study found acculturation conflict, consisting of inconsistent
messages from host culture and culture of origin was inversely related to positive family
dynamics while AGs were inversely related to family cohesion, adaptability, and
familism. However, the methods used by Smokowski et al. to derive AG were not
particularly reliable because gaps were measured through subtraction of parent scores
from adolescents’ scores and biculturalism was determined by adding involvement with
the culture of origin and U.S. culture. The use of these measures led to the prospect of
arriving at the same scores with different methods. Thus, making the middle ranges of
these variables difficult to interpret. Unlike other studies such as with Bhattacharyya
(2008) and Farver et al. (2002b), parent-adolescent AGs were not related to family
conflict in the study by Smokowski et al. (2008). Another discrepancy found by
Smokowski et al. was the lack of unhealthy behaviors in individuals that showed U.S.
cultural involvement. This type of involvement was an asset to family cohesion,
adaptability, less family conflict, and familism. The use of multiple measures was
considered to lead to more in-depth findings though the measurements may not be as
reliable. Smokowski et al. proposed that the operational terms and measurements of the
different levels of cultural involvement were tedious and not very prominent in
measuring acculturation conflicts.
33
Hwang and Fujimoto (2010) used a measure called Acculturative Family
Distancing (AFD) in their studies on the affect of acculturation on families. The AFD
measures AGs specifically as a breakdown of communication and incongruence in
cultural values. In one study, they found evidence to support that the gap in cultural
values was associated with increased risk of depression and family conflict in Chinese
American students. Communication was not significantly related to any of the outcome
variables. In another study by Hwang and Fujimoto (2009), the AFD was used to measure
the AG in Latino and Asian American college students. Higher psychological distress and
greater risk for clinical depression were linked to larger gaps in both ethnic groups.
Regardless of the measure or ethnic group, the literature clearly indicated the problems
that arise as a result of AGs.
Birman and Poff (2011) compared literature results on the effects of AGs. The
problems that were consistently found with acculturation gaps were family conflict and
family adjustment. Within their comparative study, Birman and Poff looked at studies
with various ethnic groups. Other common findings in many of the studies on AG were
problems with adolescent adjustment, academic achievement, depression, and problem
behaviors (Birman & Poff, 2011). Gaps in Chinese language proficiency across
generations and depression was another relationship found in some studies on Chinese-
Canadian and Chinese-American adolescents (Costgan & Dokis, 2006; Liu, Benner, Lau,
& Kim, 2009). Depression was also linked to AG in Muslim-American college students
(Asvat, & Malcarne, 2008). In Mexican Americans and Latino Americans, AGs were
related to use of alcohol and tobacco (Elder, Broyles, Brennan, Nuncio, & Nadar, 2005;
34
Martinez, 2006). In Soviet Union refugees, some AGs predicted family discord (Elder,
Broyles, Brennan, Nuncio, & Nader, 2005). AG between Indian adolescents and their
parents in Britain were linked to internalizing disorders (Atzaba-Poria & Pike, 2007). In
contrast, another study found violent behaviors were associated with acculturation
differences in Chinese and Southeast-Asian youth in the United States. (Le & Stockdale,
2008).
The cross cultural studies have found similarities and differences within and
across cultures. Most of them have linked AG with higher risk of depression in
adolescents, adjustment, and family conflict. However, there were also studies found that
did not support the theory of AG negatively impacting adjustment and family relations
(Crane, Ngai, Larson, & Hafen, 2005; Tardif & Giva, 2006). Although much of the
research supported the theory of AG causing family conflict and adjustment difficulties,
the findings were not consistent, particularly with Southeast Asians.
Acculturation Gap in South Asians (SAs)
Research on SA adolescents have shown them to be at high risk of internalizing
problems, behavior problems, depressive symptoms, family conflict, and lower self-
esteem (Atzaba & Pike, 2007; Farver, Bhadha, & Narang, 2002; Kim, Chen, Huang, &
Moon, 2009; Ying & Han, 2007). Unexpectedly, one study showed SA adolescents to
have behavior problems unlike their “model minority” (p. 186) stereotype (Farver,
Yiyuan, Bakhatawar, & Lieber, 2007; Le & Stockdale, 2008). Asian Americans obtained
that stereotype because they commonly performed exceptionally well academically, in
their work, and socially (Kim & Chum, 1994).
35
Of the studies conducted with the SA population, many occurred in Britain, which
has a large population of Indians. One study on Indian and British adolescent
acculturation and intergenerational discrepancies was conducted by Atzaba and Pike
(2007). Sixty-eight adolescents and their parents of Indian origin were recruited from
local schools. Unlike a previous study by Berry et al. (2006), traditional acculturation was
more positively related to behavior problems. Based on the Child Behavior Checklist
(CBCL) completed by parents, Indian adolescents were rated as being at a higher risk for
internalizing problems than the British adolescents. Internalizing problems were based on
the withdrawn, somatic complaints and anxious/depressed scales while the externalizing
problems were based on the aggressive and delinquent behavior scales. Externalizing and
internalizing problems occurred more frequently with Indian adolescents whose mothers
were more westernized. The authors hypothesized that the reason for the behavior
problems were possibly due to discrimination experienced and the difference between the
British and Indian cultures, identity confusion, and contradictory demands from
traditional and host cultures. The findings of the study by Atzaba et al. (2004) supported
previous findings in which acculturation style was correlated with problem behaviors
during adolescence.
Acculturation Style Differences in SAs
Several of the studies on SA population and acculturation style were completed
by Farver et al. (2002a; 2002b; 2007). In one study by Farver et al. (2002), Asian-Indian
immigrant families in California were examined to find the relationship between self-
esteem and academic functioning to acculturation styles. The sample consisted of 85
36
Asian-American adolescents between the ages of 14 to 19 (Farver, Bhadha, & Narang,
2002). The authors chose Berry’s (1980) model as an example with the four styles on
acculturation.
Farver et al. (2002) used a demographic questionnaire about both parents, which
included questions on social class and self-identification. Self-esteem and religiosity were
measured with likert scales. Acculturation style was measured with the Bicultural
Involvement Questionnaire (BIQ; Szapocnik, Scopetta, Kurtines, & Aranalde, 1978). By
using a scoring method created by Farver et al. (2000), the American and Indian
involvement was scored and was categorized as low or high and then divided into the
four acculturation styles. Farver et al. (2002) modified the scale for use with the Asian
Indian culture which consisted of 10 items answered by parents and adolescents. The
items on the revised BIQ scale were rated from 1= disagree to 5= highly agree. The
individuals were classified according to median splits into lower or higher levels of
involvement with Indian or American culture. The two scores were then categorized into
the four acculturation styles; marginal for low scores on both scales, integrated for high
scores on both scales, assimilated for low scores on Indian scales and high scores on
American scales, and separated for low scores on American scales and high scores on
Indian scales.
The correlations computed by Farver et al. (2002) showed both adolescents and
parents had similar acculturation styles. However, adolescents were more likely to
identify themselves as Indian-American. Adolescents who fell in the integrated category
of acculturation had higher Grade Point Averages (GPA) and self-esteem. Socioeconomic
37
status, religiosity, years in United States, were all related to acculturation style. A
multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) analysis showed that adolescents with
higher perceived integrated style of acculturation had higher scholastic competence,
social competence, moral conduct, friendship, and global self-worth. Chi Square tests
revealed males were likely to have an integrated style while females were likely to have a
marginalized style. Farver et al. (2002) found that self-identification was not associated
with acculturation style. Regardless of being born in the United States, adolescents still
identified with the Indian or Indian-American.
The limitations of the study by Farver et al. (2002) include: poor statistical power,
small sample size, measurement of acculturation at one point and time, and results that
cannot be generalized since it may be a reflection of the Southern California
environment. The authors suggested future studies look across generations for identity
and acculturation. This suggestion was considered but not incorporated into the present
study since it was beyond the scope of my study.
Farver et al. (2002b) also conducted another similar study on acculturation, ethnic
identity, achievement and psychological functioning. SA parents and adolescent’s self-
identification and ethnic identity were positively correlated. Those parents with higher
marginalized or separated style of acculturation were linked to higher family conflict.
Adolescents who reported less acculturation gap between parents and themselves had
higher self-esteem, less anxiety, and less family conflict. In the study by Farver and
colleagues, a modified version of the Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican Americans
with 30 items (ARMSA-II; Cuellar, Arnold, & Maldonado, 1995) was used to calculate
38
acculturation levels and styles. The MEIM (Phinney, 1992), with 20 items that are
categorized into four groups, was used to evaluate ethnic identity of the adolescents. The
MEIM also uses a 1 to 5 rating scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree. These two
studies by Farver et al. (2002; 2002b) have significant relevance to the present study in
light of the common population and variables. Furthermore, two of the same
measurements will be utilized to measure the variables (MEIM, BIQ). The BIQ was
chosen over the ARMSA II simply because of the shorter version which would be more
convenient for the participants and still provide the information needed.
Coping Skills and Adolescent Immigrants
Among the many components of the psychological well-being of adolescent
immigrants, including the stress of acculturation gaps and identity development, positive
coping strategies may be a key element. Understanding the strategies used for dealing
with cultural diversity can be useful for counseling purposes (Coleman, Casali, &
Wampold, 2001). Information on the adaptive coping strategies used by the SA
adolescents can be utilized to develop therapeutic strategies that will help promote
positive social change with struggling immigrant adolescents.
The subjective well-being and coping, ethnic identity, and culturally relevant
stressors were examined with ethnic minority adolescents in an urban area for moderators
of cultural stress (Vera et al., 2011). Ethnic minority adolescents (157) were given the
MEIM and Brief COPE scale, as well as the Urban Hassles Index and Positive and
Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) with findings including self-distraction coping as a
moderator of urban hassles and negative effect.
39
Coping strategies in various ethnicities (African-American, Asian-Americans,
Native Americans, and Middle Easterners) were looked at by Vaughn and Roesch (2003).
The researchers used the COPE scale to determine how the minority adolescents coped.
Vaughn and Roesch were also interested in looking at the stress-related growth,
depression, health, and quality of life of these individuals. Several gender differences
were revealed such as females reporting more focus, positive reinterpretation, venting of
emotions, and acceptance. Females more so than males felt they grew from the stress they
experienced. Ethnic differences were found in instrumental social support, religion,
emotional support, and acceptance. Asian-Americans used more emotional support. Age
was significantly related to positive reinterpretation, active coping, acceptance, and
planning in older students. Asian-Americans who used positive reinterpretation, active
coping, restraint, religious coping, acceptance and planning generally felt they grew from
their stressful experiences. Contrary to prior research, Vaughn and Roesch found that
Asian Americans who used active coping rather than passive or avoidant coping were
healthier.
In another study which closely resembles the present study, Belizaire and Furtes
(2011) recruited 155 Haitian immigrants in two highly diverse metropolitan areas to
study the relationship of attachment, coping, quality of life (QOL), and acculturative
stress. The Brief COPE scale, Experience in Close Relationship Scale (ECRS) and four
QOL measures were used. Findings showed correlations of higher QOL with lower
anxiety attachment and higher QOL and less acculturative stress with higher adaptive
coping. The number of years in the United States. was associated with lower levels of
40
acculturative stress, anxiety attachment, and maladaptive coping strategies. In contrast, a
regression analysis indicated the years in the United States. to have a negative impact on
QOL such as physical health, social relationships, and psychological health. Belizaire and
Furtes concluded that given the limited research on the relationship of stress and coping
across cultures much more research is needed in this area to determine what strategies
work best for the different cultures.
The Brief COPE scale was adapted to measure coping in the present study. The
scale has 28 items that are rated according to coping strategies used over the past year.
The rating ranges from 1- haven’t been doing this at all to 4- I’ve been doing this a lot.
The items include both adaptive and maladaptive coping.
The findings with SAs is conflicting such that some studies show them as having
a tendency to internalize stress and one study indicating that they use more active coping
(Atzaba-Poria & Pike, 2007; Vaughn & Roesch, 2003). Although there are only a few
studies on coping with acculturation, evidence of a strong association between
acculturative stress and attachment has been established (Belizaire & Fuertes, 2011;
Dwyer et al, 2010; Sroufe & Waters, 1977). For this reason, attachment was included as a
salient variable in the present study.
Attachment and Immigrant Adolescents
While attachment was originally a concept related to personality development
during infancy as purported by Bowlby (1969), later on Ainsworth (1989) and Baroccas
(2011) posited that attachment is an essential factor to all stages of development.
Anxious-ambivalent, insecure, and secure ASs can develop in infancy but can also
41
change at any point in an individuals’ life. Throughout the developmental stages,
especially interpersonal ones, adolescents can create unresolved attachment
representations (Dwyer et al., 2010). Bowlby suggested that attachment evolves over time
and can be established with people other than family and even with institutions such as
schools or religious groups (Bowlby, 1969). The level of attachment security is
associated with negative attributes, emotions, and coping skills (Dwyer et al., 2010).
Even when AS is secure during infancy, it can evolve as a result of patterns of interaction
over time (Karatzas, Feeney, & Wilkinson, 2010).
Attachment can have severe repercussions when children and families migrate
(Weise, 2010). Migration can impact psychological well-being of children as a result of
the acculturative stress. As infants, insecure, ambivalent, or disorganized attachment and
lack of trust in their surroundings can affect their ability to explore and gain autonomy.
Weise discovered in his exploration of children and migration that in older children and
adolescents, aggressive behavior, internalized anxiety and depressive symptoms, are
more likely to be seen.
AS was investigated in relation to adolescent difficulties by Keskin and Cam
(2010) in Turkey. Keskin and Can discovered that fearful AS was related to higher
emotional symptoms, attention deficits, and lower appropriate social behavior. Insecure
ASs were associated with greater reports of mental symptoms.
Attachment and Identity Development with SA Adolescents
Attachment with both peers and adults and identity development during
adolescence was examined by recruiting 550 boys and girls from colleges and
42
universities in Pakistan (Nawaz, 2011). The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment
scale- revised (IPPA-R) by Armsdsen & Greenberg (1987) was used to measure their
attachment level. The Extended Objective Measure of Ego Identity Status (EOM-EIS-2)
was used to measure identity levels. Nawaz first established the correlation of the
variables after which a regression analysis (multiple and hierarchical) was used to
compare for predictive value of attachment bonds of peers and parents with identity
development. The mean and standard deviations were computed to assess differences in
interpersonal identity scores in boys and girls. Gender was also a variable that was
compared with identity development which resulted in significant relationships between
parental attachment bonds and identity development in girls. Peer attachment and identity
development had a significant positive relationship in both boys and girls (Nawaz, 2011).
Secure attachment with peers acted as a moderator for healthy identity development in
Pakistani immigrant adolescents.
Nawaz (2011), Belizaire and Fuertes (2011)were the closest studies found to the
one currently being proposed. The Nawaz study was helpful in choosing a measurement
of attachment, IPPA-R, during adolescence. Given the especially meager literature on
attachment with immigrant adolescents, more robust studies and information would be
beneficial to fill this gap.
Identity Development in SA Adolescent Immigrants
Unlike, the literature on attachment with immigrants, there was extensive
literature on identity development with immigrants since this is a major part of their
adjustment to their new host culture. It is especially relevant during adolescence because
43
developmentally it is the time when identity is formed, according to Erickson (1963).
Erickson’s developmental stages are the primary theory supporting identity development
as a variable in this study. In Erickson’s six psychosocial stages of development, the
stage of individuation versus confusion described the conflict and struggle towards
independence in adolescents (Erickson, 1963). During this stage, which is also called the
latency stage, adolescents attempt to find their own identity while trying to negotiate peer
relations and right from wrong. When examining identity development in immigrants,
most racial identity developmental frameworks were based on the notion that adolescents
go through stages of choosing to identify with one race, both, or the dominant rather than
the marginalized (Crawford, 2009).
Some studies on identity development in immigrants have already been discussed
in earlier sections. The literatures on the studies by Farver and his colleagues (2002,
2002b, 2007) were all studies that included identity development as well as acculturation
style. In summary, these studies found Asian-Indian adolescents to have higher ethnic
identity, greater family conflict and psychological difficulties with greater AG (Farver,
Narang, & Bhadha, 2002). Parents and adolescents were more likely to identify with the
Indian culture than American even when the adolescents were born in the United States.
(Farver, Xu, Bhadha, Narang, & Lieber, 2007). Adolescents, however, were also more
prone to identifying themselves as Indian-American than their parents regardless of
acculturation styles (Farver et al, 2002). The acculturation and adjustment of adolescents
was relevant to identity in one study (Farver, Xu, Bhadha, Narang, & Lieber, 2007). In
44
contrast, acculturation was negatively related in importance or unrelated to identity in
some other studies (Farver, Xu, Bakhtawar, & Lieber, 2002; Kim & Omizo, 2010).
Although there is some discrepancy in findings regarding identity and
acculturation, parent-child conflicts have consistently been associated with psychological
problems and identity development in adolescents (Bhattacharyya, 2009; Farver, Narang,
& Bhadha, 2002). In SA adolescents the conflicts were specifically about adolescent
aspirations, parenting styles, dating and marriage, as expressed by SA adolescents in a
mixed method study (Bhattacharyya, 2009). Intergenerational conflicts were related to a
loss of identity in the children of this study.
Cultural differences in identity can differ even within nationalities, according to a
study which was part of a larger study called the International Comparative Study of
Ethnocultural Youth (ICSEY). The ICSEY project is an ongoing study on the identity of
SA youth across time in 13 Western countries (Robinson, 2009a). Robinson found second
generation Pakistani’s were inclined to use the separation strategy of acculturation while
Indians were inclined to use the integration strategy. However, both scored higher on
ethnic identity than national identity. In an extended study of the ICSEY project by Berry
et al. (2006), adolescents who identified with their culture of origin had fewer adjustment
problems.
Iwamoto and Liu (2010) conducted another study on identity status across
generations with several Asian groups, including SA. Multiple measures of identity were
used given Iwamoto and liu’s interpretation that ethnic identity is a multidimensional
construct. Several forms of identity were found to be related to well-being, including:
45
racial identity internalization, Immersion-Emmersion dissonance, Asian values, and
ethnic identity affirmation and belonging.
Ethnic identity is a multidimensional construct according to some researchers and
has had inconsistent findings regarding identity and acculturation. Nonetheless, research
has found SAs to have greater ethnic identity in general. In addition, the majority of the
literature indicated a relationship between family conflict and acculturation differences
which in turn were linked to adolescent well-being. Further research in this area is
warranted to add to and possibly strengthen previous findings.
Summary of Literature
Studies particularly on acculturation styles in SAs showed links with behavior and
psychological problems in adolescents (Atzaba & Pike, 2007; Farver, Bhadha & Narang,
2002; Lau, McCabe, Yeh, Wood & Hough, 2005). The acculturation style that was
related positively to psychological health in adolescents was the integrated style (Atzaba
& Pike, 2007). Some variations in acculturation style differences and gender were found.
Moderators of family conflict, within SA families and in all cultures in general, were
family social support, social involvement, parenting style, and parent acculturation
(Hamid, 2007; Kim, Chen, Huang & Moon, 2009; Yu-Wen & Meekung, 2008).
The literature on coping skills with immigrant adolescents was found to affect the
mental health of adolescents (Gutafson, 2009). The stress level of Asian adolescents can
result in serious negative outcomes (Lee et al., 2009). As per Lee and colleagues, Asians
were, unfortunately, not known to seek support (Lee et al., 2009). Conversely, when
immigrants utilize active coping skills, they fare much better (Vaughn & Roesch, 2003).
46
Not unlike coping skills, attachment style was shown to influence adolescent
well-being (Nawaz, 2011). A secure attachment style has generally been identified as
resulting in better outcomes than insecure or anxious styles of attachment. In SAs,
attachment style was related to identity development much like the proposition of
Bowlby and colleagues (Nawaz, 2011).
Identity development in SAs and in general was linked not only to ASs but also to
acculturation styles (Belizaire & Fuertes, 2011; Farver, Narang, & Bhadha, 2002). A
comparison of Indians and Pakistanis revealed that Indians were prone to the integration
style of acculturation. In contrast, Pakistani’s were more prone to using the segregated
strategy. Regardless of the different accutruation styles, both cultures scored high on
ethnic identity.
In general, while there was limited research on SA adolescent’s well-being, the
research revealed that they were suffering many consequences (Gutafson, 2009; Lee et
al., 2009). Some studies even showed that the newer generations have more problems.
The damage will continue even as generations change and their time in the United States.
grows larger. The literature supports the importance of further research in the area of
acculturation of the growing population of SAs with the United States. The following
chapter will clarify the research method used for this study based on the literature review
findings. The measurements chosen are also discussed in greater detail.
47
Chapter 3: Research Method
Introduction
At a growth rate of 81%, the South Asian community is one of the fastest
growing ethnic groups in the United States based on the U.S. Census from 2000 to 2010
(Hoeffel, Rastogi, Kim, & Shahid, 2012). As the Indian population continues to expand,
their acculturation strategies become even more important for the society as a whole.
Adjustment as an immigrant can be especially challenging during adolescence, when they
are struggling with autonomy and identity development. According to the literature,
without support and proper development during this developmental phase, adolescents
suffer negative consequences (Erickson, 1968; Nawaz, 2011).
Appropriate coping skills, secure attachment figures, positive identity
development, and adjustment to their immigrant status are features that prior research has
linked to healthier adolescent outcomes (Farver, Bhadha, & Lieber, 2007; Farver,
Bhadha, & Narang, 2002). Past literature has provided evidence of the negative impact of
differences in acculturation strategies between parent and adolescent (Atzaba-Poria &
Pike; Bhattacharyya, 2009; Birman & Poff, 2011; Smokowski, Rose & Bacallao, 2008)
There is also research indicating how later generations continue to suffer the impact of
generational gaps (Abad & Sheldon, 2008; Lee et al., 2009). For these reasons, adding to
the limited literature on adolescents with respect to the variables of AG, attachment,
coping skills, and identity development will benefit SA adolescents and promote social
change within any community to which this population migrates to and/or resides in. The
purpose of the current study was to explore the relationship between AG and AS on the
48
well-being of SA adolescents in order to create programs and interventions that will
benefit these immigrants.
One of the following sections in Chapter 3 includes details about the Asian
population from NYC that was recruited for the present study. New York City is one of
the metropolitan areas to which many of the Asian Indian’s migrate. It has many pockets
of Indian communities spread throughout the city, which were a good resource for this
study (Ameridia, 2012). In this chapter, I also present information on the research design
that was used and the rationale for its use, the needed sample size and the means of
calculating the sample size, along with the methods used to collect and analyze the data.
A description is provided of the surveys and interviews used to measure the variables. In
this chapter, I also specify the means of recruiting the participants, the demographic
makeup of the participants, and any small incentives used. Another important step to any
research study, that I also discuss in this chapter, is the method of obtaining permission
for the use of the measurements and for minors to participate in the study. Ethical
considerations are also included to ensure that participants and the research were within
the APA guidelines to ensure the protection and proper treatment of all parties.
Research Design and Rationale
Creswell (2009) posited that the quantitative approach is used for testing a
hypothesis via the collection and analysis of data using statistical tools and procedures.
Since it my intention with this study was to compare the differences between the groups
of matched and mismatched acculturation gap and secure and insecure attachment style
and the interaction between the independent variables and their effect on the dependant
49
variables, the ANOVA method enabled me to accomplish this. The ANOVA provided
mean scores for the independent variables that were anaylzed for a signifant effect on the
dependent variables. The survey method of data gathering was used for the purpose of
this study. AG and AS were the independent variables of interest, and coping skills and
identity development were the dependent variables that were chosen for this study.
Often, the postpositivist worldview coincides with the quantitative design
(Creswell, 2009). Creswell stated that the postpositivist worldview developed when
scientists opposed the positivist worldview where knowledge gained from research is
absolute. Postpositvists proposed that the study of human behavior cannot be defined as
the absolute truth. Furthemore, Creswell stated that the research by postpostivists focuses
on identifying and testing hypotheses. The research on the influence of AGs and AS on
coping skills and identity development of SA adolescents falls under the category of
positivist worldview. In this study, I tested several hypotheses developed about the well-
being of SA adolescents through data collection and were either supported or refuted
using objective methods. The research will advance knowledge in the area of SA
adolescents’ well-being in relation to the variables being studied.
The survey method of data collection was preferred for this study because of its
convenience, ease, and availability. The surveys used were unbiased and had suitable
reliability and validity. Most of the questionnaires, rating scales, and survey tools used
were fairly brief, simple to complete, and available online. The instruments were used to
collect numerical data needed to answer the RQs, which were: What are the differences
in the effects of parent-adolescent AG and AS on SA adolescent identity development?
50
and What are the differences in the effects of parent-adolescent AG and AS on SA
adolescent coping skills?
Sample Size
In a prior study with similar variables (Farver, Bhadha, & Narang, 2002), the
recommended power of .80 and large effect size of r =.2 was used based on correlation
coefficients found. A MANCOVA was performed to determine the difference in group
means of AS in relation to self-esteem and school performance. The power of .80 assures
that, if the study was repeated, the same results would be obtained 80 out of 100 times
(Burkholder, n.d.). In another study with similar variables as the present one, a medium
effect size (R2 = .17 to R2 = .22) was found when studying the relationship of attachment,
coping, acculturative stress, and the QOL (Belizaire & Fuertes, 2011).
Given the findings of prior similar studies, a medium effect size (ω2= .14) was
used, along with a power of .80, and a significance of .05 to determine the sample size.
According to a sample size table for an ANOVA analysis with two independent and
dependent variables, a sample size of 18 for each group was needed based on the
suggestion (Burkholder, n.d.). A total of 72 adolescents and one parent for each
adolescent was required to test the hypotheses of this study with a two-way ANOVA
(four groups = insecure and secure; matched or mismatched, 2 x 2). The ANOVA
provides a way to compare significant mean differences of each categorical independent
variable (AG and AS) on each continuous dependent variable (coping skills and identity
development; Gravetter & Wallnau, 2007). An ANOVA can also determine the
interaction effects of the independent variables on the dependent variables, which
51
answered the RQs which sought to find the effects of the independent variables on the
dependent variables along with their interactive effects.
Participants
Approximately 20 flyers were posted and another 30 left in the Indian temple.
Over 250 surveys were mailed to parents in schools once permission was attained from
the Istitutional Review Board (IRB # 6 18:01:13–06’00’) of the NYC schools. Follow-up
calls were made to SA organizations and principals. After over a year of attempting to
recruit participants, only a portion of volunteers needed were acquired from schools,
word of mouth, and a SA website. Due to the low sample size obtained, a new power
analysis was needed. Given the actual sample size obtained of 39 parent-adolescents, a
significance level of .05, and a medium effect size, the new power of the analysis was
substantially reduced to β= .65 (Burkholder, n.d). Of the volunteers recruited, there were
none from Nepal and Pakistan, which led to the removal of these ethnicities in the
conclusions.
Procedure for Recruitment
Several methods of recruitment including distributing flyers throughout the Indian
and Asian communities with the necessary information along with a request for a
response prior to the date of the event. The date of the event, exact location, time,
approximate duration, age and ethnicity of participants needed, the sponsoring agency,
general purpose of event, my name and contact information as researcher, and any
incentives offered were mentioned in the flyers. Any further collection of data was
completed through e-mail attachments or the regular mail service. Other data collection
52
methods that I attempted were distribution and collection in high schools and via Survey
Monkey online.
Participants received a brief summary of the study in order to obtain informed
consent. The information given included: the purpose of the study, the sample population
needed, the approximate length of time, the questionnaires and rating scales they were
expected to complete, and the incentives offered ($5 to $7 Dunkin Donut cards). I
provided the participants or primary caregivers with contact information for any
assistance they may have required after completing the surveys. Once the primary
caregivers consented to participate and gave their adolescent(s), between the ages of 13–
18 permission to participate, consent from the adolescent was also obtained. Prior to
participation, each individual was given a written summary of the study and their
responsibilities in order to make an informed decision to participate.
The forums for recruitment were within the restaurant adjacent to a Hindu
temple, Survey Monkey, a Sikh Coalition organization, and a high school with a large
number of SAs. The temple canteen was used to set a table and passively recruit members
with permission from the temple administration. Once IRB approval was granted by the
NYC Department of Education, permission from one principal was acquired to have the
guidance counselor collect data in the school. Although the school had a large population
of SA students, only a few completed the surveys.
Possible candidates were interviewed briefly to check for the inclusion criteria,
regarding their age, country of origin, and age of the children, for the purpose of
recruiting the appropriate participants. The ethnic background of participants that were
53
included consisted of individuals born in South Asia (India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka,
Pakistan, and Nepal) or a descendant of South Asia and second generation immigrants.
The ethnicities were chosen based on geographical proximity and culture which made it
easier to propose generalizations about them. Unfortunately, there were no third
generation Pakistani or Nepali participants recruited. Since the study was on adolescents,
children under the age of 13 were excluded from the study. If either the adolescent or
parent from a family did not consent, they were not used in the study. Other exclusion
criteria was a reading level below fifth grade and SAs who were just visiting the United
States and not a resident.
At the end of the data collection, participants were interviewed to receive
feedback on their experience of how the process affected them and whether they had any
questions or concerns. The participants were provided with a list of counseling agencies
and networks for support if desired. They were also offered the option of requesting a
summary of the results of the study. Follow-up upon completion of the data collection,
unless otherwise requested by the participants, was not deemed necessary.
Instruments for Data Collection
Initially, background information on both parents and adolescents was obtained
using a demographic questionnaire. Then, parents completed only the BIQ survey to
determine the parent-adolescent acculturation gap. The adolescents completed the BIQ,
MEIM, IPPA, and Brief COPE surveys to acquire the data needed to answer the RQs.
54
Demographic Questionnaire
The parent participants were given a demographic questionnaire to ascertain
essential information about both parent and adolescent including: ethnicity, age,
educational level, gender, marital status, length of time in the United States, generational
status, religion, employment, and economical status. This questionnaire was completed
prior to enlisting the participants and distributing the assessments (Belizaire & Fuertes,
2011). For the other variables, surveys and questionnaires were used as a quick and
effective method of data collection (Creswell, 2003).
Bicultural Identity Questionnaire (BIQ)
The BIQ-short version is a questionnaire that assesses individual acculturation
strategies created by Szapocznick, Scopetta, Kurtines, and Aranalde, (as cited in
Szapocznick, Kurtines, & Fernandez, 1980). It measures the acculturation style of
individuals and requires rating of items with 1 for disagree to 5 for highly agree. The 24
questions on the scale are related to the individuals’ comfort with their culture of origin
and host culture. There are two independent bipolar dimensions ranging from
monocultural to bicultural and dimension of cultural marginality to cultural involvement
(Szapocznik, Kurtines, & Fernandez, 1980). One scale measures Americanism and the
other Hispanicism. In this study, the second scale has been adapted for SAs. The sum of
Items 6–10 and 18–24, reflect Americanism while items 1–5 and 11–17 South Asianism.
Biculturalism is obtained by subtracting the sum of Americanism from the sum of South
Asianism with a score closer to zero reflecting biculturalism, a positive difference
55
indicating monolculturalism on the SA side and a negative difference suggesting
monoculturalism on the American side.
The scale has been used reliably with several different cultures such as Latino-
Americans, Korean-Americans, and Indian-Americans (Farver, Bhadha, & Narang,
2002). In a study with Latino families, the BIQ, the internal consistency reliability was
.89 for adolescents and .90 for parents on their involvement with the culture of origin
(Smokowski, Rose, & Bacallao, 2008). On the U.S. cultural involvement scale, an
internal consistency reliability of .90 for adolescents and .93 for parents was specified.
AG was also measured in the study by Smokowski et al. (2008) by subtracting the
adolescent culture of origin involvement scores from their parents’ score in this area. The
same process was applied to determine the difference of U.S. cultural involvement. The
last step was subtracting the parents’ culture of origin involvement scores from
adolescents’ U.S. cultural involvement scores.
Farver et.al (2002a) originally developed a method for establishing acculturation
styles using the BIQ. The scores obtained from the subscales of the BIQ were split in the
middle and separated into high and low ethnic involvement and categorized into the four
different acculturation styles. The categories were based on Berry’s model of
acculturation. Americanism and Indianism were calculated by summing the scores on
involvement in Indian culture (parent alpha= .82, adolescent alpha= .84) and involvement
in American culture (parent alpha= .81, adolescent alpha= .83). High scores on both
American and Indian scales were considered the integrated style, high scores on the
American scale and low scores on the Indian scale reflected the assimilated style, low
56
scores on both scales was deemed the marginal style, and high scores on Indian and low
scores of American scale was categorized as the separated style.
An AG can be calculated in two different ways. Smokowski et al. (2008)
determined the AG by subtracting the adolescent culture of origin involvement scores
from their parents’ score in this area. The same process was applied to determine the
difference of U.S. cultural involvement. The last step was subtracting the parents’ culture
of origin involvement scores from adolescents U.S. cultural involvement scores. Farver et
al. (2002a) used the acculturation styles, once they were determined, to find the AG
based on match/mismatch of parent and adolescent acculturation style. The latter method
of assessing the AG has been adopted for the current study.
The BIQ has not only been used previously with the Indian population, it has also
been used to calculate the AG between parents and adolescents. For these reasons, it is an
appropriate tool to answer the research questions of whether AG effect adolescent coping
skills and identity development.
Multidimensional Ethnic Identity Measure (MEIM)
The MEIM (Phinney, 1992) is a common instrument used to identify ethnic
identity in culturally diverse populations. The MEIM-revised has 15 items which measure
two scopes of ethnic identity which can be used to measure identity development in
adolescents. The first is ethnic identity achievement and the second is affirmation,
commitment and belonging (Phinney, 1999). The items on the scale are scored on a 4-
point likert scale with 1 representing strongly disagree to 4 which represents strongly
agree. The higher the score on the MEIM suggests stronger ethnic identity. Items 1,2,4,8,
57
and 10 measure ethnic identity whereas items 3,5,6,7,9,11, and 12 measure affirmation,
belonging and commitment (Phinney, 1992) . The mean of the 12 items provides a total
score with a low score indicating low ethnic identity and a high score suggesting high
ethnic identity. The last three items, 13–15, are not included in the score. These items are
only used for ethnic identification and categorization.
Phinney (1992) mentioned that the MEIM has good reliability above .80 across a
wide range of ethnic populations and construct validity of .66 and above after extensive
psychometric research. In the study by Farver et al. (2007) with an Asian Indian sample,
the following alphas were found on ethnic identity achievement items: α = .75 Asian
Indian parent, α = .82 Asian Indian adolescents (Farver, Xu, Bhadha, & Narang, 2007).
The MEIM helped measure the identity of Indian adolescents and provided the
opportunity to answer part of the following RQ: What are the effects of parent-adolescent
AG or AS on SA adolescent identity development? Once the AG and attachment style
were discovered, their effects on identity development were computed using an ANOVA
analysis to verify the hypothesis that acculturation gap effects ethnic identity
development. The MEIM provided data on the degree of adolescent ethnic identity with
the culture of origin. Higher ethnic identity scores suggested better adjustment in the
adolescent.
Brief COPE
The Brief COPE scale has a summed score for active coping, planning, positive
framing, acceptance, humor, religion, and use of emotional and instrumental support
(Carver, 1997). It was created from the original COPE scale by Carver, Scheier, and
58
Wientraub (1989). The scale also has a summed score for ratings of maladaptive coping
strategies, like self-distraction, substance abuse, denial, venting of emotions, substance
use, behavioral disengagement, and self-blame. It is a 28-item scale on which the coping
skills used for stressors over the past year are rated from 0 for never to 6 for always
(Belizaire & Fuertes, 2011). The scale does not provide a single overall score. The two
summed subscales for adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies are commonly used for
studies such as this. A high score on each subscale indicates greater use of adaptive or
maladaptive strategies whereas a low score signifies the opposite.
The reliability of most of the subscales were above .60 which was considered
adequate for the study on culturally relevant stress, coping, ethnic identity and subjective
well-being conducted by the American School Counselor Association (Pronterotto &
Ruckeschel, as cited in Vera et al., 2011). The factor structure was similar to the original
COPE scale. The items are categorized into and summed as adaptive (active coping,
planning, positive framing, acceptance, religion, humor, and emotional and instrumental
support) or maladaptive (self–blame, self–distraction, venting of emotion, substance use,
denial, and behavioral disengagement; Carver, Scheier, & Weintraub, 1989). In a study
by Belizaire and Fuentes (2011), the Brief COPE scale yielded reliability values of .89
for adaptive coping and .81 for maladaptive coping. Similarly, a summed score for
adaptive coping skills was used in this study.
Another study on coping with patients with diabetes also reported good test–retest
reliability with the use of the Brief Cope in their study (Tuncay, Musabak, & Kutlu,
2008). Good internal consistency and concurrent validity were studied and found to have
59
acceptable statistical value. Alphas of .93 for diversion, .88 for ameliorative coping and
.87 for destructive coping and .94 for the composite were obtained in this study.
Cornbach’s Alpha found a.82 alpha for the scale and the following alpha’s on the
subscales: religion .77, substance use .92, planning .75, acceptance .82, positive
reframing .87, active coping .83, using instrumental support .76, using emotional support
.71, denial .96, behavioral disengagement .81, venting .84, self-distraction .73, humor
.89, self-blame .92, and acceptance .82.
The Brief Cope inventory provided the information needed to establish
adolescent’s use of adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies. Once this was
established, the hypotheses that secure attachment and smaller acculturation gaps have a
effect on coping skills was verified or rejected. The scale has previously been used with a
wide variety of ethnicities including SA (Vaughn & Roesch, 2003; Vera et al., 2011). It
was one inventory with 28 items which measure 14 different strategies by having
adolescents rate each item from “0” for “never” to “6”for always. A high score on the
adaptive scale indicated healthy coping skills.
Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA)
In order to measure ASs, the IPPA (Armsden & Greenberg, 1987) inventory was
completed by the adolescents to measure parental and peer attachments. The developers
originally created the IPPA as a means of assessing adolescent perceptions of their
relationships in terms of positive and negative/ cognitive dimension and particularly what
type of security relationships provide. The inventory can be used with children and
adolescents from the age of 12 to 20. The 54-item scale has two (2) separate 28-item
60
scales to measure the quality of parent and friendship bonds. Each scale attempts to
assess trust, quality of communication, and amount of anger and alienation, as specified
by Armsden & Greenberg (1987). It is a self-report questionnaire with a 5 point Likert-
style scale to rate the items with 1 for almost never true to 5 for almost always true. The
IPPA provides a score for the extent of a secure and insecure attachment rather to parents
and peers. It does not provide a score for all 4 attachment styles. The information the
IPPA provided was appropriate for this study as it sougth to answer questions about
insecure and secure attachments rather than specific attachment styles.
The IPPA was found to have test-retest reliabilities of .93 for parent attachment
and .86 for peer attachment after three weeks with a sample of twenty-seven 18 to 20
year old participants (Armsden & Greenberg, 1987). The subscales items measured three
factors which are based on Bowlby’s perspective of attachment; trust (feeling secure)
alpha = .91, communication alpha= .91 , and alienation alpha= .86 on the parent scales.
On the peer scales, trust had an alpha= .91, communication had an alpha= .87 and
alienation had an alpha= .72. Each of the two subscales, parent attachment and peer
attachment, were scored separately and provide separate scores. The items that were
worded negatively require reverse scoring. The two scores were added together for a total
attachment score (Barrocas, 2011). Armsden and Greenberg (1987), divided each
subscale total into lowest, middle and highest for each participant and assigned the
middle to highest scores on trust and communication and alienation score that was not too
high as high security and low scores on trust and communication and high scores on
61
alienation as low security. This scoring method was adopted for the current study to
determine secure and insecure ASs.
As for the validity of the test, Armsden and Greenberg (1987) compared the IPPA
to Family and Social Self scores from the Tennessee Self Concept Scale (TSCS) and the
Family Environmental Scale (FES) and found high to moderate correlations. The Family
and Peer Utilization factors correlated significantly with parent attachment on 5 out of the
6 scales for family climate. High associations were found with Family self-concept and
parent attachment and social self-concept from the TSCS with peer attachment. A
moderate correlation was found with positive family coping through communication
among family members and relatives concerning problems and scores on Family
Adaptability and Cohesion Scale ( FACES; Lewis, Woods, & Lewis, 1987). Secure
attachment with the mother and father was linked to identifying delinquent from
nondeliquent adolescents and to less conflict with parents and less loneliness by Martin,
Fernandez, and Loper (as cited in Armsden, 1986). Other studies have found attachment
with parents and peers to be related to personality characteristics such as positive self-
esteem, affective status and life satisfaction (Armsden & Greenberg, 1986). The quality
of attachment, particularly with parents, was correlated to greater problem-solving coping
strategies during stressful situations, less hopelessness, and external locus of control
(Armsden, 1986; Armsden et al., 1987). Parent attachment was also determined to have
strong relationship with the well–being measures of life satisfaction and self–esteem.
Parent attachment, slightly more so than peer attachment, had predictive values for
affective-status measures of depression/anxiety and resentment/alienation. Both affective
62
status and well-being measures were not predicted by gender. Good potential validity was
established but further exploration of construct validity was suggested.
The IPPA has not been used previously in any similar studies with the SA
population. Nevertheless, it served to identify the difference in parent (mother and father)
to peer attachment in relation to levels of depression and identity development (Armsden,
Mccauley, Greenberg, Burke & Mithcell, 1991; Nawaz, 2011). The quality of attachment
to parents and to peers, to a lesser degree, was related to problem solving coping
strategies during stressful times (Armsden, 1986). The instrument was used with age
groups inclusive of 12 to 18 with various ethnic groups and variables. It was a useful
instrument to answer the research question of whether attachment style in SA adolescents
effects coping skills and identity development.
The following research questions and hypotheses, as originally stated in Chapter
1, are driving this research study:
RQ1: What are the differences between the effects of parent-adolescent AG and
AS on SA adolescent identity development?
H0: There are no differences in the effects of Parent-adolescent AG and AS on
SA adolescent identity development.
H1: Participants with an acculturation style matched to their parents will have
significantly higher multiethnic identity scores compared to adolescents with an
acculturation style that is mismatched with their parents.
H2: Participants with secure ASs with their parents will have significantly higher
multiethnic identity scores than adolescents with insecure ASs with their parents.
63
RQ2: What are the differences in the effects of parent-adolescent AG and AS on
SA adolescent coping skills?
H0: There are no differences in the effects of Parent-adolescent AG and AS on
SA adolescent coping skills.
H3: Participants with a matched acculturation style with their parents will have
significantly higher scores on adaptive coping skills than adolescents with a
mismatched acculturation style with their parents.
H4: Participants with secure ASs with their parents will have signifincantly
higher scores on adaptive coping skills than adolescents with insecure ASs with
their parents.
Data Analysis
The SPSS computer program for analysis of statistical data was used to test
research questions or hypotheses in this study. An initial descriptive analysis of the
demographic information provided the makeup of the sample. Two 2-way ANOVA
analyses was then used to determine the effects of the independent variables on each
dependent variable and the interaction between the independent variables on the
dependent variables. This test was appropriate for a study with multiple independent
variables that produce categorical data and dependent variables that provide continuous
data (Creswell, 2009). The RQs on the effects of AG and ASs on coping skills and
identity development and the interaction of their effects was answered with this analysis
method.
64
A screening or cleaning process with the raw data set is recommended to optimize
the quality of the data and analysis process (Odom & Henson, 2002). Therefore, the
SPSS was used for the purpose of screening data for unusual data that can lead to
inaccurate analysis of the data. Several types of errors are possible in quantitative data
collection. There may be error on the participants’ part in filing out survey such as
leaving out items or using incorrect ratings. The participant may complete some of the
surveys needed but not others since this study contains four different rating scales. The
researcher may enter data incorrectly. Outliers, data that vary significantly from the
norm, may need to be considered for elimination since they are prone to cause
inaccuracies in the estimates.
The data was analyzed and interpreted using the p = .05 alpha level. The alpha
level of .05 enabled rejection or verification of the null hypothesis and consideration of
the results as being statistically significant or not. Values less than or greater than .05 can
be claimed as significant since this indicates a low probability of the results occurring by
chance (Gravetter & Wallnau, 2007).
Threats to Validity
Because of the setting and the specific cultural sample, there may be a threat to
the external validity of the test. So as to compensate for this threat, the results of the
study must be restricted to the cultural population within the setting from which the
sample was obtained for this study (Creswell, 2009). Since the participants were recruited
in an area with a high density of SAs, claims can only be made about the culture within
this setting. In another setting, with less density of SAs or different environmental
65
conditions, the results may vary. Similarly, the characteristics of the participants within
the area of recruitment may differ from those in other areas therefore restricting claims to
the participants within the recruitment environment. Finally, the validity of the results can
be compramised and the generalizability reduced by recruitment of a lesser number of
volunteers than needed for this study (Creswell, 2009).
Threats to internal validity were not of major concern under the conditions of this
study. Internal validity is threatened only when it is an experimental study with the
application of treatment procedures and pre- and posttesting (Creswell, 2009).
Additionally, when studies are conducted over time, there is greater chance of mortality,
communication between groups, maturation, experiences over time, and others. The one
concern that may be considered a threat to the validity of the results of this study was the
selection of the sample. The participants may have had certain joint characteristics that
influenced the results. Although they were recruited within a few specific SA populated
areas, people come to the merchant areas from all over the city and were thus partially
randomly selected, other than the requirements needed for the study.
Ethical Considerations
Once the potential participants were gathered at the temple cafeteria or a
community restaurant, they were notified that participation is voluntary. The participants
of the study were treated with compassion and respect to prevent any feeling of pressure
to participate. Rather, the guidelines for informed consent based on Sarantakos (2005)
were followed so that potential participants can make an informed choice. The threats to
physical, emotional, social, economic, and psychological were little to none (Creswell,
66
2009). Any possible emotional responses that may arise were addressed by providing
participants with resources which they can reach out to. Since parents and adolescents
were involved, they were informed that information between family members cannot be
shared. The adolescents needed to know that the information they provide will not be
shared with the parents to encourage them to respond without concern of any
repercussions from their parents. The collection of participants and data took place once
the IRB approved the proposal after reviewing it for ethical procedures with human
participant’s potential adverse outcomes for the participants.
The personal information collected on the participants (name, address, telephone
number, etc.) were saved under a password locked site on a personal computer. The data
collected will remain in files not accessible to others. Data will not be shared with other
parties without the consent of the participants. Confidentiality was maintained with
personal information and gathered data. Although demographic information was needed
for statistical analysis of the data, the instruments themselves did not require names
thereby protecting participant anonymity.
Summary
This study used a nonexperimental quantitative design to ascertain the answers to
the RQs. The specific data collection methods were questionnaires and surveys this were
entered onto statistical analysis software. The BIQ was used to gather information on
adolescent and adult acculturation style which can then be used to determine the gap.
Cultural or ethnic identity was measured with the MEIM. In order to identify adolescent
attachment style to their parents, the IPPA was used. Finally, the Brief Cope was chosen
67
to provide data on adolescent coping strategies. The data obtained was analyzed using
two 2 way ANOVAs which provided the information needed to reject or accept the null
hypothesis.
The participants were gathered on a voluntary basis upon informed consent by
parent or both parent and adolescent. Their safety, confidentiality, and anonymity was a
priority at the time of data collection, storing, and dissemination. Ethical considerations
regarding the participants and research process were maintained at all times. The
participants were recruited on a totally voluntary basis once informed of the study. The
place of gathering potential participants were a nonthreatening environment such as the
Indian temple cafeteria or a community restaurant. The participants’ safety and well-
being were upheld foremost. The SPSS were used to screen and analyze the data.
Interpretation of the data was include alpha of p ≤ .05 for statistical significance of the
results and for rejection of the null hypothesis. Confounding variables were controlled to
reduce the possibility of these variables having produced the results.
Chapter 4 contains the presentation of the data collected. In Chapter 4, specific
details of the collection of the data and the demographic makeup of the participants in
relation to their representation of the SA population are discussed. The statistical analysis
of the data, along with graphs and charts to summarize the results, are also included in the
following chapter.
68
Chapter 4: Results
Introduction
As the number of SAs in the United States increases, their acculturation to the
multicultural environment, exposure to bias, and family relations, among other related
issues, become more of a concern to society as a whole. Research has shown how SA
adolescents and families are negatively impacted by acculturation differences or a gap
between SA parents and adolescents (Farver et al.. 2002b). The AG can lead to family
conflict, a decrease in grades, substance use, and even suicidal ideation (Farver et al.,
2002b). Parent-adolescent attachment styles is another factor that has been shown to
influence adolescent outcomes (Armsden & Greenberg, 1987). For this reason, this study
was conducted to determine the effects of AG and ASs on identity development and
coping skills. Knowing whether there are any significant differences between the main
effects or interaction of the IV groups on the DV groups via a two-way ANOVA can
provide valuable information on the variables that can promote healthier SA families and
adolescents.
In this chapter, the data collection time frame, recruitment strategies, and response
rates are provided. Also specified in this chapter, are the actual data collection results as
opposed to the original plan. A summary of new power analysis that was conducted is
presented . Also included in this chapter are the demographics of the sample population
obtained along with the validity and results of the analysis.
69
Research Questions
The following research questions and hypothesis were developed based on the
interest in determining the effects of the independent variables (AG and ASs) on the
dependent variables (coping skills and identity development).
RQ1: What are the differences between the effects of parent-adolescent AG and
AS on SA adolescent identity development?
H0: There are no differences in the effects of Parent-adolescent AG and AS on
SA adolescent identity development.
H1: Participants with an acculturation style matched to their parents will have
significantly higher multiethnic identity scores compared to adolescents with an
acculturation style that is mismatched with their parents.
H2: Participants with secure ASs with their parents will have significantly higher
multiethnic identity scores than adolescents with insecure ASs with their parents.
RQ2: What are the differences in the effects of parent-adolescent AG and
attachment style on SA adolescent coping skills?
H0: There are no differences in the effects of Parent-adolescent AG and AS on
adolescent coping skills.
H3: Participants with a matched acculturation style with their parents will have
significantly higher scores on adaptive coping skills than adolescents with a mismatched
acculturation style with their parents.
H4: Participants with secure ASs with their parents will have significantly higher
scores on adaptive coping skills than adolescents with insecure ASs with their parents.
70
Data Collection
The data collection process took place during the span of over a year, from May
2014 through December 2015. Most of the volunteers were recruited at schools, some at
temples, and a few through word of mouth. In the process of recruiting the participants,
flyers were posted in a neighborhood with a large number of SAs. In addition schools,
SA community organizations, and SA websites were contacted. Hard copies of the
surveys and online surveys through Survey Monkey were available for participant’s
convenience. Many religious institutions declined participation, along with many of the
NYC public schools and cultural institutions contacted. After over a year of rigorous data
collection efforts, Walden University and the dissertation members permitted the
completion of the study with the data collected.
A total of 39 survey packets (each survey packet consisted of one parent survey
and four adolescent surveys) were collected for the study during the period of participant
recruitment. The parents completed the BIQ and demographic information page and the
adolescents completed the BIQ, IPPA, MEIM, and Brief COPE surveys. Fourteen other
surveys packets were submitted by adolescents but were unusable because of lack of
parent participation. Parent completion of the BIQ survey was needed for this study in
order to calculate the parent-adolescent AG. Seven other packets were discarded because
of incorrect completion of one or more of the surveys. Therefore, the final number of
total packets used was 39 . All participants were provided with a $5 dollar gift card to
Dunkin Donuts whether their survey were used or not.
71
New Power Analysis
Since the original desired number of participants (71 parent-adolescents dyads)
was not acquired, the power of analysis was revisited to obtain an accurate power for the
sample attained. A new power analysis with the sample size of 39, a medium effect size
of .14 at the significance level of .05 lowered the power of the analysis substantially to β
= .65 (Burkholder, n.d). If this study is repeated there is a 65 percent chance of obtaining
the same results with an effect size of f = .14. Additionally, the sample obtained may be
considered best representative of the Indian and to a lesser degree the Bangladesh
population given the lack of volunteers from the other ethnic backgrounds (Sri Lankan,
Nepali, and Pakistani) that were initially included in this study.
Data Cleaning and Screening Procedures
In order to ensure accuracy of coding and data entry into the SPSS program, the
the data codes were rechecked and corrected as necessary. The survey responses were
examined and recoded for missing data codes according to the SPSS guidelines and those
outlined by Broeck et al. (2005). The mean score of the item with the missing data was
calculated and the missing data was replaced with the mean for that item. The IPPA
survey had several items that required reverse coding which had to be defined as such on
SPSS to attain accurate analysis of responses. Tests of normality, outliers, skewness, and
linearity of the variables to clean up the data and prepare them for analysis.
72
Descriptive Statistics
Of the total 39 parent-adolescent dyads, 100% of the adults were employed and
first generation immigrants. Only two of the parents were divorced. The majority of the
parents were from India (27), 11 were from Bangladesh, and one was from Sri Lanka. The
number of years that the parents lived in the United States ranged from 4 years to 45 years.
All of the parents had at least completed high school with 76% of them having completed
some college. Table 1 summarizes the breakdown of female and male participants and their
generation.
Table 1
Demographics of the Study Sample
Age
Range
Male Female 1st
Generation
2nd
Generation
Parent 40- 53 20 19 39 0
Adolescent 13- 18 19 27 12 27
Assumptions Tested
The two-way ANOVA was conducted twice to obtain the mean differences of the
samples for the two independent variables (AS and AG) with each of the dependent
variables (coping skills and identity development) and the interactions of the variables.
The dependent variables that are on a continuous scale while the independent variables
are categorical and each have at least two levels. The ANOVA integrates three
assumptions that were considered first prior to running the analysis.
73
The first assumption states that the populations from which the samples were
obtained must be normally distributed (Crestwell, 2009). The Shapiro-Wilk test of
normality was run for each group on the SPSS since it is recommended over others for
small and medium size samples. The results indicated that the distribution of the coping
skills group did not vary significantly from normal distribution and therefore the
assumption of normality was met (S-W = .972, df = 1, p = .432). The ethnic identity
group did show a significantly skewed distribution in which the assumption of normality
was not met (S-W = .904, df = 1, p = .003). However, when the SPSS explore function
was run to determine the skewness of the data, a negative skewness of -.610 was
revealed. The standard error of measurement was .378 which when doubled provided a
significance range of +/- .756. The negative skew of -.610 falls within this range
indicating that the skew was not significant. When Tukey’s formula for outliers was run,
there were no outliers and thus no further treatment of data was required. In this study,
the sample was chosen based on convenience but still revealed an approximately normal
distribution.
Levene’s test of fit was conducted for the second assumption which proposes that
each group has equal variances or are homogeneous (Crestwell, 2009). The coping skills
group showed a nonsignificant variance (F (35) =1.48, p = .238) but ethnic identity
showed a significant variance (F (35) = 4.68, p = .007). The heterogeneity of the groups
minimally increases the Type I error when the sample group sizes are equal. When the
assumption of homogeneity is violated, the Welsch test or Brown Forsyth tests are
recommended along with the ANOVA because they are robust to variance in
74
homogeneity. Consequently, these tests need to be applied to the analysis of ethnic
identity to avoid a Type I error.
The third assumption is that the groups are independent of each other (Crestwell,
2009). A Pearson’s chi-square test on the independent variables was run to determine if a
significant relationship exists between acculturation gap and attachment style. The results
revealed a chi-square value of χ2 (1, N = 39) =.1.06, p = .303 indicating that there was no
significant association between the two independent variables. The assumption that the
groups are independent of each other was met.
Results
Attachment Styles
Based on the IPPA-R surveys completed by the adolescents, the total attachment
scores ranged from 69 to 100 (M = 88.51, SD = 7.06). The data were recoded according
to Armsden and Greenberg’s (1987) method in which scores were divided into low,
medium, and high for communication and trust items with the high and medium scores
plus the low scores on alienation categorized as secure. The table below (Table 2)
specifies the adolescents with secure and insecure attachment style, according to their
gender.
75
Table 2
Demographics on IPPA Score by Adolescent Gender and Attachment Style
Male Female Total
Secure 10 11 21
Insecure 10 8 18
Total 20 19 39
Acculturation Gap
The parent and adolescent AG was computed by adding the items on the BIQ for
each individual and categorizing the scores by acculturation styles (assimilated,
integrated, marginalized, and separated). The categorized scores for each parent and
adolescent were then used to identify a match or mismatch in parent and adolescent
acculturation styles. A mismatch in acculturation styles between the parent and
adolescent was considered an AG. There were 25 mismatched and 14 matched parent-
adolescent pairs based on the acculturation styles. Of the 14 matches detected, seven
were male and seven were female adolescents with the same acculturation style as their
parents. A higher percentage (64%) of the adolescent and parents acculturation style were
mismatched regardless of whether the adolescent was first generation (n =12, 66%) or
second generation (n = 27, 62%). The breakdown of acculturation style of adolescents
and parents by gender is summarized in Table 3.
76
Table 3
Acculturation Styles by Gender
Parent Adolescent
Acculturation Style Male Female Male Female
Assimilated 3 7 5 5
Integrated 6 5 6 5
Marginalized 4 4 3 4
Separated 6 5 6 5
Identity Development
The MEIM examined the ethnic identity achievement of the adolescents. The
ethnic choice of all the adolescents on Question 13, “What ethnicity do you consider
yourself?” was Choice 1: Asian/Asian American. Items 1 through 12 were added to attain
the ethnic identity score. The total ethnic scores ranged from 12 to 48 (M = 31.80, SD =
10.87) with lower scores indicating low ethnic identity achievement and high scores
revealing high ethnic identity achievement.
Table 4
Descriptive Statistics on Ethnic Identity Data
Attachment Style Acculturation Gap M SD
insecure mismatch 32.80 8.48
match 27.75 11.10
Total 30.56 9.77
secure mismatch 31.13 12.46
match 44.67 3.14
Total 35.00 12.26
Total mismatch 31.80 10.87
match 35.00 12.07
Total 32.95 11.26
77
Coping Skills
The Brief Cope data were first categorized in terms of adaptive and maladaptive
coping scales. The seven adaptive coping items (active coping, planning, positive
reframing, acceptance, religion, humor, and emotional and instrumental support) were
added to obtain the adaptive coping scale. Only the sum of the adaptive scales for each
participant was used in the ANOVA. The sum of adaptive scales ranged from 16 to 55
with a mean of M = 39.01and of SD = 11.33 Descriptive statistics on the Brief Cope
scales are presented in Table 5.
Table 5
Descriptive Statistics on Brief COPE Data
Acculturation gap Secure/insecure M SD
mismatch secure 34.15 12.11
insecure 41.58 9.41
Total 37.72 11.33
match secure 43.71 15.24
insecure 39.43 5.88
Total 41.57 11.31
Total secure 37.50 13.70
insecure 40.79 8.17
Total 39.10 11.33
Data Analysis
Research Question 1
In the first research question, the effect of AG and ASs on the identity
development of adolescents was explored. The results of the ANOVA confirmed the null
hypothesis which states that there is no difference in the effects of AG and ASs on and
identity development. The main effect for AG (match/mismatch) was not significant (F
78
(1, 35) = 1.47 with an observed power of β = .22. The main effect for AS
(secure/insecure) was significant, F (1, 35) = 4.76, p = .04 with an observed power of β =
.56, as shown in Table 6. The interaction effect of AS and AG on ethnic identity revealed
a significant difference, F (1, 35) = 7.06, p = .01 with an observed power of β = .73.
Table 6
Analysis of Variance for Ethnic Identity between Attachment Style and Acculturation
Gap
Source df F η p
Attachment style 1 4.75 .56 .04
Acculturation Gap 1 1.47 .22 .23
Attachment/acculturation 1 7.06 .73 .01
error 35
However, the Welsch and Brown Forsyth tests were conducted in light of the
violation of the assumption of homogeneity and possibility of a Type I error with
attachment style and the interaction of AS and AG. The adjusted ANOVA results along
with the Welsch and Brown Forsyth tests revealed no significance differences in mean
ethnic identity scores between securely and insecurely attached adolescents difference
F(1, 38)= 1.53, p = .22, (W = 1.58, p = .22; BF = 1.58, p = .22), as shown in Table 7. The
null hypothesis was accepted based on these results and there was no real effect of AS on
ethnic identity.
79
Table 7
Summary of One-Way ANOVA for Ethnic Identity and Attachment Style
Source Sum of Squares df F Sig
Between Groups
191.45 1 1.53 .22
Within Group 4632.44
37
Total 4823.89 38
Research Question 2
The second research question addressed the relationship of AS and AG with
coping skills. The null hypothesis stating that there is no significant difference in the
effect of AG or AS on coping skills was confirmed. The main effect for AG and coping
skills was not significant, F (1, 35) = 1.74 with an observed power of β = .25. The main
effect for AS and coping skills was also not significant, F (1, 35) = 3.49 with an observed
power of β= .44. Finally, the interaction of AG and AS on coping skills was similarly not
significant, F (1, 35) = 1.12 with an observed power of β = .18. The data on the effects
for the analysis of variance for coping skills (DV), AS (IV) and AG (IV) is shown on
table 8.
80
Table 8
Analysis of Variance of Coping Skills, Attachment Style, and Acculturation Gap
Source df F η p
Attachment style 1 3.49 .444 .199
Acculturation Gap 1 1.74 .250 .196
Attachment/acculturation 1 1.12 .178 .297
error 35
Summary
The data collection process was conducted over a year using distribution of flyers,
word of mouth, Survey Monkey, setting up a table at a Hindu temple, and reaching out to
schools and SA community associations, and SA websites. The efforts yielded a minimal
sample of 39 dyads due to declination from most organizations and poor parent
participation. As a result of the limited data, a new power analysis was conducted with
the original effect size of .14, significance level of .05, and the new power was only β =
.50.
The assumptions of an ANOVA were reviewed and determined to have an
increased risk of a Type I error given the heterogeneity of the groups. Initially, the two-
way ANOVA from the first research question resulted in rejection of the null hypothesis
since significant effects of AS on ethnic identity and the interaction of AS and AG on
ethnic identity. However, due to the violation of the assumption of homogeneity found
with the Welch and BW tests, a one-way ANOVA was conducted with AS to obtain a
81
robust analysis of variance. The results of the showed that null hypothesis was confirmed
for the first research question. There were no real significant effects between AS or AG
and identity development. There was no significant effect between the interaction of AS
and AG on identity development.
Similarly, the null hypothesis for the second research question was also verified.
A significant effect was not found for either AS or AG on coping skills. Additionally, the
interaction of AG and AS did not have a significant effect on coping skills.
In Chapter5 , the results of the study are discussed further in relation to previous
similar studies conducted on the same topic. The findings of the study are interpreted
based upon its generalizability and validity. Recommendations for further studies on the
topic of the current study are included. In addition, the impact of the study on social
change and the importance of this study are incorporated.
82
Chapter 5: Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations
Introduction
The purpose of this study was to determine how AG and AS relate to healthier
coping and identity development in the growing population of SA adolescents in the
United States. There is limited research on SAs due to their quiet nature and internalizing
of difficulties (Atzaba-Poria & Pike, 2007; Bhattacharyya, 2009). Regardless, they suffer
emotional and physical symptoms as a consequence of acculturation differences and
insecure attachment between adolescents and parents (Atalay, 2007; Farver, Bhadha, &
Narang, 2002). Prior studies with SAs have found acculturation style differences between
parents and adolescents can lead to family conflict, substance abuse in adolescents,
depression, poor grades, and other detrimental outcomes (Atzaba & Pike, 2007; Farver,
Bhadha, & Narang, 2002; Kim, Chen, Huang, & Moon, 2009; Ying & Han, 2007).
However, the results in the studies are not consistent. Additionally, past researchers have
shown that secure attachment with parents results in better outcomes in adolescents
(Bowlby, 1991). The impact of acculturation differences and AS, in particular, has not
been examined to any great extent with the SA population. This study was conducted in
the hopes of filling in some of the gaps that exist in the research on SA adolescents in
relation to attachment and acculturation. The second reason for the study was to obtain
information that may lead to better adjusted SA adolescents and families.
Based on the two-way ANOVA analysis performed with the data obtained, the
main effects of AG (low, high) and AS (secure, insecure) on identity development were
not significantly different. In addition, the main effects of AG and AS on coping skills
83
were also not significantly different. The null hypotheses for both of the dependent
variables were confirmed:
1. There are no differences in the effects of Parent-adolescent AG and AS on SA
adolescent identity development.
2. There are no differences in the effects of Parent-adolescent AG and AS on SA
adolescent coping skills.
Furthermore, the interaction between AG and AS with the dependent variables (ethnic
identity development and coping skills) was also not significantly different.
In the following chapter, the interpretation of the results of this study are
presented. In addition, the findings are related to Berry’s (1997) acculturation theory and
Bowlby (1982) attachment theory which grounded this study. The limitations and
contributions of the study along with its validity and reliability are also discussed.
Finally, the social change implications of the study are delineated.
Interpretation of Findings
Acculturation Gap, Attachment Style, and Identity
The primary interest in the first research question was in finding whether there is
a difference in the effects of parent-adolescent AG or parent-adolescent AS on adolescent
identity development. The null hypothesis for this research question stated that there are
no differences in the effects of parent-adolescent AG and parent-adolescent AS on
adolescent identity development. The two-way ANOVA analysis of the data from the
four surveys completed by the SA adolescents (BIQ, IPPA-R, Brief COPE, and MEIM)
84
along with the one completed by parents (BIQ) resulted in confirmation of the null
hypothesis for the first research question.
Acculturation and identity. Aternative hypothesis one specified that participants
with an acculturation style matched to their parents will have significantly higher
multiethnic identity scores compared to adolescents with an acculturation style that is
mismatched with their parents. This hypothesis was not confirmed and the results are
consistent with prior research where findings varied on the relationship of acculturation
style and identity. Farver et al. (2002; 2007) found relevance in the relationship of
acculturation and identity in one study, while another study showed a negative
relationship between acculturation and identity. It still remains unclear whether
acculturation style has an effect on adolescent identity development. One outcome of
interest was that adolescents identified themselves as either Indian or Bangladesh on the
BIQ, while parents also identified themselves as the same ethnicity on the demographic
profile and BIQ. Although SA parents and adolescents may acculturate in different styles,
they identified themselves with their culture of origin whether first or second generation.
Studies by Farver et al. showed discrepancy with adolescents identifying themselves as
Indian in one study and more likely to identify themselves as Indian-American in another.
More studies with acculturation and identity are needed, perhaps with greater attention to
the surveys in terms of how the question of ethnic identity is posed along with the
measure used for acculturation styles.
According to Berry’s (1997) theory on acculturation and differences in
acculturation styles, an AG could lead to conflict and stress in immigrant families. The
85
hypothesis stating that matched acculturation styles would result in a significant effect on
identity development was based on Berry’s theory and past studies. Although this study
did not find a significant relationship between AG and identity development, prior studies
have shown a link in these concepts (Phinney, 1999). Further research on the link could
be beneficial to immigrants struggling to find their identity in a new cultural
environment. Instead of the MEIM, which has a limited number of items, a qualitative
study on acculturation styles and identity development may provide more in-depth
information and clarity on the association of the variables.
Attachment style and identity.The second alternative hypothesis from RQ1
stated that participants with secure attachment style with their parents will have
significantly higher ethnic identity scores than adolescents with insecure attachment style
with their parents. This hypothesis was also not supported by the results. The findings
also do not support prior research by Nawaz (2011), which revealed a significant
relationship between identity development in Pakistani girls and parental attachment.
The findings are not as expected based on Bowlby and Ainsworth’s (1989) theory
of attachment, which was a grounding theory of this study. They purported that
attachment is considered essential in all stages of development. Furthermore, establishing
an identity is vital during adolescence and has been found to be associated with healthier
identity development (Erickson, 1963; Phinney, 1992). As such, it was expected that
adolescents with secure attachment style would show a significant effect on the mean
scores of the MEIM survey.
86
The results obtained were based on a sample of families in which parents and
adolescents willingly participated. In many instances, parents were especially difficult to
engage in this study even when the adolescents were willing. Often, schools and
community organizations declined to participate in the study because of the lack of
parental involvement. Therefore, the sample did not include these families that
presumably have a different dynamic than the ones that did choose to participate. ASs
and acculturation styles could vary in these families and have led to different results.
Acculturation Gap, Attachment Style, and Coping
The second research question examined the relationship between AG and AS with
coping skills: What is the difference in the effects of AG and ASs on coping skills? The
null hypothesis for this question, which stated that there is no difference in the effects of
AG or ASs on coping skills, was confirmed by the two-way ANOVA analysis.
Additionally, both alterative hypotheses made regarding this question were not supported.
Acculturation gap and coping. Contrary to expectations, the results did not
support the third alternative hypothesis which stated that matched parent-adolescent
acculturation style will have significantly higher mean scores on adaptive coping skills
than mismatched parent-adolescent acculturation style. Previous studies have found a
relationship between acculturation style and coping skills. In a similar study to the current
one, less acculturation stress was associated with higher adaptive coping in Haitian
immigrants (Belizaire & Furtes, 2011). In the several other studies based on Berry’s
theory of acculturation, acculturative stress was linked to many factors including coping
as a moderator (Berry, 1990; 1997).
87
A link between acculturation and coping is evident (Belizaire & Furtes, 2011). In
fact, Berry (1997) posited that coping is a facet of acculturation. How coping is related
and interacts with acculturation continues to be an area that needs further research.
Researchers have suggested that the reason for varied results with acculturation may be
the multidimensional nature of the construct (Schwartz, Unger, Zamboanga, &
Szapocznik, 2010). Another reason for the lack of a significant relationship between the
factors in this study could be due to not controlling for the many variables effecting
acculturation. Additionally, the limited sample of participants from one school and
temples rather than a normal distribution of the population may have also skewed the
results of this study. Finally, Berry (1997) and other acculturation theorists defined
acculturation as a psychological process rather than a static concept. Therefore, more in-
depth measures may be needed to fully study this complex variable.
Attachment style and coping. Alternative hypothesis four stated that secure
attachment style with the parent would have a significant effect on coping skills. Similar
to the other alterative hypotheses, in alterative hypothesis four, secure attachment style
with parents was not related to coping skills. However, previous research has shown a
positive correlation between lower anxious attachment, less acculturative stress, and
higher adaptive coping in Haitian immigrants (Belizaire & Furtes, 2011). In another
study, attachment style was associated with coping skills in girls but not boys (Dwyer et
al., 2010).
An interesting secondary finding in this study was in the larger number of
matched acculturation styles between parents and adolescents associated with an insecure
88
attachment with parent when compared with a secure attachment with parent
(insecure/match= 15 and secure/match= 10,). A secure attachment with the parent was
expected to have a significant relationship with matched acculturation style. The sample
was not large enough to draw any real conclusions, especially given parent
noncompliance. Not having a well-distributed population, very likely impacted the
validity of the findings. Regardless, this finding may warrant further investigation to
identify whether parent-adolescent attachment style affects parent-adolescent
acculturation style or not. Additionally, peer attachment was not included in this study
and may be another important aspect to research given that peer relationships, as per
Erickson’s (1963) developmental stages, are particularly important during the adolescent
stage. As such, peer relations may have a greater impact on acculturation and coping
during this stage than parent attachment.
According to attachment theorists like Bowlby and Ainsworth (1991) and
Barrocas (2011), secure attachment leads to healthier adjustment and relationships. Along
the same lines, secure attachment is still believed to lead to better coping skills in
adolescence. Parent and peer attachment may need to be included to identify the
interactions of the variables. The research gap in this area continues to need further
research to shed light on the relationship of attachment and coping skills in SA
adolescents.
Limitations of the Study
Several limitations of the study prevented establishing more confident results and
recommendations. These findings were based on surveys completed by volunteer
89
participants and as such could be biased and inaccurate. For example, some participants
completed the Brief COPE survey incorrectly or did not complete them at all. In general,
SA adolescents were not keen on completing this survey. The SAs were not easily
recruited given their reluctance to share personal information. Another limitation was the
findings of this study cannot be generalized to the SA population originally included,
since the majority of the volunteers were Indian and Bengali. Therefore the results can
only be generalized to these two cultures. A major limitation was in the small sample size
that was obtained. The sample was much less than originally proposed based on the
power analysis, limiting the reliability and validity of the results of this study
substantially. Lastly, when categorizing the variables, a median split was used to
dichotomize the results into two groups (secure and insecure or matched and
mismatched) of acculturation between the parent and adolescent, which reduced the
power. In the future, a different method of categorizing the variables is suggested because
of the loss of power when splitting for high and low at the median value.
Recommendations for Future Studies
In spite of the limitations of the study, valuable information on attachment, AG,
identity, and coping skills was acquired which can be added to the insufficient research in
this area with SA adolescents. Future research should be conducted using a larger sample
to obtain more reliable and valid results with greater power. Controlling for gender, age,
generation, religion, and culture can provide information on the relationship of the IVs
and DVs in future studies. Another interesting variable that can provide information for
treatment is the relationship of the IVs and DVs with multicultural adolescents from
90
parents from two different ethnic backgrounds, which is becoming increasingly common.
As mentioned earlier, the measure (BIQ) used to determine acculturation gap may not
have been the best. A different survey or combined quantitative and qualitative
methodology may provide more robust results. The use of only adolescents should also
be considered in future studies to obtain a large normally distributed population of SA
adolescents. Additional in-depth studies on attachment and acculturation with coping
strategies and identity could shed light on the most appropriate therapeutic strategies to
use with the SA immigrant population.
Implications for Social Change
Regardless of the meager studies completed with SAs in the areas of attachment,
acculturation gap, coping skills, and identity, attachment throughout development is
presenting itself as a potential variable related to positive social change. In spite of a lack
of support of the hypotheses in this study, attachment theorists such as Bowlby and
Ainsworth (1991) have posited and shown in their research that positive parent
attachment is crucial to the development of psychological well-being across one’s
lifespan. As such, attachment-based therapy may be a valuable treatment method for
adolescents at-risk. The conceptual framework of attachment has been used mainly with
understanding and treating psychopathology. However, it has value in other regards such
as with preventive and clinical intervention with immigrants at risk. In the course of
recruiting participants, a major obstacle was the lack of parental involvement (Bowlby,
2005). Presumably, these parents are struggling themselves with acculturative stress.
Community resources, political policies, educational programs, and other clinical
91
interventions, with the attachment framework in mind, may be a valuable support to these
parents and adolescents.
Although hypotheses one and two stating that there is a relationship between AG
and identity development and coping skills were also not confirmed in this study, there
are other empirical studies revealing a relationship (Belizaire & Furtes, 2011; Farver,
2002b; Farver, Xu, Bhada & Narang, 2007). Dissonance with parent and adolescent
acculturation has been shown to create conflict in families. Unhealthy ASs also have
evidence of leading to poor outcomes in family relations and adolescent well-being. For
these reasons, the four principal variables were chosen according to their impact on
adolescents and families. As posited by Erickson (1963), Bowly (1991), Ainsworth
1989), and Berry (1991), all of the variables are essential to immigrant family and
adolescent well being. Knowing their effects in greater detail can be used in developing
therapeutic intervention and prevention strategies with the perpetually growing
population of SAs in the United States.
Conclusion
The constructs of acculturation styles, ASs, coping, and identity are clearly
relevant to the well-being of SA immigrants based on the extensive literature compiled in
this study. Consequently, my focus in this study was on the effects of these constructs on
SA adolescents to identify factors leading to better adjustment. Regretfully, a major
downfall of the study was in the very small sample size (n = 39) obtained in comparison
to the originally proposed sample size (n = 147). The results with the obtained sample
resulted in verification of the null hypotheses for the two research questions. However,
92
these results are not conclusive given the sample size, power, and validity. Further
research in this area, to fill in the gap and provide information on interventions for SA
immigrant adolescents and families, continues to be warranted.
SAs are evidently private and as such not as willing to participate in research
studies. However, they are in need of support which they may not readily seek. Finding
ways to support this ethnic group to adjust to a culture that diverges from theirs is crucial
to their well-being and society as a whole. Determining how to help them acculturate
positively, form secure attachments, develop healthy ethnic identity, and positive coping
strategies are valuable constructs to follow-up in an endeavor to create positive social
change.
93
References
Aikins, J. W., Howes, C., & Hamilton, C (2009). Attachment stability and the
emergency of unresolved representations during adolescence. Attachment &
Human Development, 11(5), 491–512. doi: 10.1080/14616730903017019.
Ainsworth, M. S. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44(4),
709–716. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.44.4.709
Ainsworth, M. S., & Bowlby, J. (1991). An ethological approach to personality
development. American Psychologist, 46(4), 333–341. doi: 10.1037/0003-
066X46.4333 –
Allen, J. P., Hauser, S. T., Bell, K. L., & O’Connor, T. G. (1994). Longitudinal
assessment of autonomy and relatedness in adolescent-family interactions as
predictors of adolescent ego development and self-esteem. Child Development,
65(1), 179–194. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.ep9406130688
Allen, J. P., McElhanney, K. B., Kiperminc, G. P., Moore, C. W., Beirne-Kelly, H., &
Kilmer, S. L. (2003). A secure base in adolescence: Markers of attachment
security in the mother-adolescent relationship. Child Development, 74(1), 292–
307. Retrieved from http://sfxhosted.exlibrisgroup.com/waldenu?url_ver=Z39.88-
2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-
8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-
2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_i
d=954925390257&rft.object_portfolio_id=1000000000667733
Ameridia. (2012). Indian American demographics (South Asian). Ameridia: Integrated
94
multicultural marketing. Ameridia Inc. Retrieved from
http://www.ameredia.com/resources/demographics/south_asian.html
Armsden, G. C. (1986). Attachment to parent and peers in alter adolescence:
Relationships to affective status, self-esteem, and coping with loss, threat and
challenges. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47(4). Available on microfilm.
Armsden, G. C., & Greenberg, M. T. (1987). The inventory of parent and peer
attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-
being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16(5), 427–454.
Retrievedfrom
http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED241853
Armsden, G. C., McCauley, E., Greenberg, M. T., Burke, P., & Mitchell, J. (1991).
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 18, 683–692. doi: 10.1007/BF01342754
Asvat, Y., & Malcarne, V. L. (2008). Acculturation and depressive symptoms in Muslim
university students: Personal-family acculturation match. International Journal of
Psychology. 43 (2), 114–124. doi: 10.1080/00207590601126668.
Atalay, M. (2007). Psychology of crisis: An overall account of the psychology of
Erikson. Ekev Academic Review, 11(33), 15–34.
Atzaba-Poria, N., & Pike, A. (2007). Are adolescents at risk for problem behaviors?
Acculturation and intergenerational acculturation discrepancies in early
adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25(4), 527–541. doi:
10.1348/026151006X173053
95
Atzaba-Poria, N., Pike, A., & Barrett, M. (2004). Internalizing and externalizing
problems in middle childhood: A study of Indian (ethnic minority) and English
(ethnic majority) children living in Britain. International Journal of Behavioral
Development. 28 (5), 449–460. doi: 10.1080/01650250444000171.
Barrocas, A. L. (2011). Attachment theory: Adolescent attachment to parents and
peers. The Emory Center for Myth and Ritual in American Life (Working
Paper No. 5). Retrieved from
www.marial.emory.edu/pdfs/barrocas%20thesisfinal.doc
Bartholomew, K., & Horovitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: a
test of four-category model. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 61(2)
226–244. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226
Becker-Stoll, F., & Fremmer-Bombik, E. (2008). Is attachment at ages 1, 66, and 16
related to autonomy and relatedness behaviors of adolescent in interaction
towards their mother. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(5),
372–380. doi:10.1177/0165025408093654.
Belizaire, L. S., & Fuertes, J. N. (2011). Attachment, coping, acculturative stress,
and quality of life among Haitian immigrants. Journal of Counseling &
Development, 89(1), 89– 97. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2011.tb00064.x
Benson, M. & O'Reilly, K. (2009). Migration and the search for a better way of life: A
critical exploration of lifestyle migration. Sociological Review, 57(4), 608– 625.
doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.2009.01864.x
Berry, J. W., Kim, U., Power, S., Young, M., & Bujaki, M. (1989). Acculturation
96
attitudes in plural societies. Applied Psychology, 38(2), 185–206. doi:
10.1111/j.1464-0597.1989.tb01208.x
Berry, J. W. (1990). The role of psychology in ethnic studies. Canadian Ethnic studies,
22(1),8–14. Retreived from
http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/ehost/detail/detail?sid=1d0196
24-4b27-4f4e-ac59-
1488dc6063be%40sessionmgr4007&vid=22&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWh
vc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=9607082881&db=sih
Berry, J. W. (1991). Understanding and managing multiculturalism. Psychology and
Developing Societies, 3(1), 17–49. doi:10.1177/097133369100300103
Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology:
An International Review, 46(1), 5– 68. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x.
Berry, J. W. (1999). Intercultural relations in plural societies. Canadian
Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 40(1), 12–21. doi:10.1037/h0086823
Berry, J. W., Phinney, J. S., Sam, D. L. & Vedder, P. (2006). Immigrant youth in cultural
transition: Acculturation, identity, and adaptation across national contexts.
Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Berry, J. W., Segall, M. H. & Kagitcibasi. C. (1997). Handbook of cross-cultural
psychology. Vol. 3: Social behavior and applications. Boston, MA: Allyn &
Bacon.
Bhattacharyya, S. (2009). Intergenerational conflicts in the Indian American adolescents.
97
International Journal of Diversity in Organizations, Communities & Nations, 9
(4), 171–181. Retrieved from
http://web.ebscohost.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/ehost/detail?hid=11&sid=4aae5
30d-b75f-4f64-90d4-
cb82e8dabd89%40sessionmgr14&vid=7&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZ
zY29wZT1zaXRl#db=sih&AN=50282518
Birman, D. (2006). Acculturation gap and family adjustment findings with Soviet Jewish
refugees in the United States and implications for measurement. Journal of Cross-
Cultural Psychology, 37(5), 568– 589. doi:10.1177/0022022106290479
Birman , D. & Poff , M. (2011) Intergenerational differences in acculturation.
Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development [online], 1–8. Retrieved from
http://www.childencyclopedia.com/documents/Birman-
PoffANGxp1.pdf.
Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss, Volume II: Separation, anxiety and anger. New
York, NY: Basic Books, Inc.
Bowlby, J. (1979). The making and break of affectional bonds. New York, NY: Brunner-
Routledge
Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss, Vol. I: Attachment (2nd ed.). New York, NY:
Basic (Original work published 1969).
Bowlby, J. & Ainsworth, M. (1997). The origins of attachment theory. Developmental
Psychology, 28(5), 759–775. doi:10.1037/10155-029
Brown, D., Rodgers, Y. H., & Kapdia.K., (2008). Multicultural considerations for the
98
application of attachment theory. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 62(4),
353–363. Retrieved from
http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?si
d=1d019624-4b27-4f4e-ac59-
1488dc6063be%40sessionmgr4007&vid=19&hid=4109
Burkholder, G. J. (n.d.). The essentials of sample size analysis or: You too can be a
statistical power guru. The absolute essentials of sample size analysis [Power
Point]. Retrieved from www.waldenu.edu
Carver, C. S. (1997). Brief COPE inventory [Database record]. PsycTESTS. doi:
10.1037/t04102-000
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F. & Weintraub, J. K., (1989). Assessing coping strategies. A
theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66,
184–195.
http://www.psy.miami.edu/faculty/ccarver/documents/p89COPE.pdf
Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. R. (1999). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and
implications. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Retrieved from
http://people.virginia.edu/~psykliff/pubs/publications/at2.pdf
Coleman, H. L., Casali, S. B., & Wampold, B. E., (2001). Adolescent strategies for
coping with cultural diversity. Journal of Counseling & Development, 79(3), 356–
364. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.2001.tb01981.x
Cooper, S. & Leong, F. (2008) Introduction to the special issue on culture, race, and
99
ethnicity in organizational consulting psychology. Consulting Psychology
Journal: Practice and Research, 60(2), 133–138. doi:10.1037/0736-
9735.60.2.133
Costgan, C. L., & Dokis, D. P. (2006). Relations between parent–child acculturation
differences and adjustment within immigrant Chinese families. Child
Development, 77(5), 1252-1267. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00932.x.
Crane, R., Ngai, S. W., Larson, J. H., & McArthur, H. (2005). The influence of family
functioning and parent-adolescent acculturation on North American Chinese
adolescent outcomes. Family Relations, 54(3). doi:10.1111/j.1741-
3729.2005.00326.x
Crawford, S. E. & Alaggia, R. (2008). The best of both worlds? Family influences on
mixed race youth identity development. Qualitative Social Work: Research and
Practice, 7(1), 81–98. doi:10.1177/1473325007086417
Crestwell, J. W. (2009). Reasearch desighn: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed
methods (3rd ed). Los Angeles, CA: Sage
Cuellar, I. N., Maldonado, B., & Roberts, R. (1995). Ethnic identity and acculturation in a
young adult Mexican-origin population. Journal of Community Psychology,
25(6), 535–549. doi:10.1002/ (SICI) 1520-6629(199711)25:6<535: AID-
JCOP4>3.0.CO; 2-O
Davis, W. (1997). Understanding the function of acculturation and prejudicial attitudes
among Asian Americans. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology,
5(4), 317–328. doi:10.1037/1099-9809.5.4.317
100
Dusick, D. M. (2011). BOLD software: Writing assumptions and limitations. Retrieved
from http://bold-ed.com/assumptions.htm
Dwyer, K. M., Fredstrom, B. K., Rubin, K. H., Booth-LaForce, C., Rose-Krasnor,
L. & Burgess, K. B. (2010). Attachment, social information processing, and
friendships quality of early adolescent girls and boys. Journal of Social and
Personal Relationships, 27(1), 91–116. doi:10.1177/0265407509346420
Elder, J., Broyles, S., Brennan, J., Nuncio, M. & Nadar, P. (2005). Acculturation,
parent–child acculturation differential, and chronic disease risk factors in a
Mexican–American population. Journal of Immigrant Health, 7(1), 1–9. doi:
10.1007/s10903-005-1385-x
Erickson, E. (1963). Childhood and society. New York, N.Y.: W. W. Norton &
Company.
Farver, J. M., Bhadha, B. R., & Narang, S. K. (2002a). Acculturation and psychological
functioning in Asian Indian adolescents. Social Development, 11(1), 11–29.
doi:10.1111/1467-9507.0018
Farver, J. M., Narang, S.K. & Bhadha, B. R. (2002b). East meets west: Ethnic identity,
acculturation, and conflict in Asian Indian families. Journal of Family
Psychology, 16(3), 338–350. doi:10.1037//0893-3200.16.3.338
Farver, J. M., Yiyuan, X., Bhadha, B., Narang, S. & Lieber, E. (2007). Ethnic identiy,
acculturation, parenting beliefs, and adolescent adjustment: A comparison of
Asian Indian and European American families. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 53(2),
184–215. doi:10.1353/mpq.2007.0010
101
Fraley, R. & Davis, K. E. (1997). Attachment formation and transfer in young adults’
close friendships and romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 4(2), 131–
144. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00135.x
Furnham, A., & Bochner, S. (1986). Culture shock: psychological reactions to unfamiliar
environments. London, England: Methuen.
Gerber, A. J. (2007). Attachment, resilience, and psychoanalysis commentary on Hauser
and Allen’s “Overcoming Adversity in Adolescence”. Psychoanalytic Inquiry: A
topical Journal for Mental Health Professionals, 26(4), 585–594. doi:
10.1080/07351690701310649
Hamid, R. (2007). Perceived parental acculturation and psychological well-
being of South Asian college students and young adults (Doctoral dissertation).
Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations database. (UMI No. 304729004)
Harker, K. (2001). Immigrant generation, assimilation and adolescent psychological
well–being. Social Forces, 79(3), 969–1004. doi:10.1353/sof.2001.0010
Hoeffel, E. M., Rastogi, S., Kim, M. O., & Shahid, H. (2012). The Asian population:
2010 census briefs. Retrieved from
http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-11.pdf
Hwang, W., Wood, J. J. & Fujimoto, K. (2010). Acculturative family distancing (AFD)
and depression in Chinese American families. Journal of Consulting & Clinical
Psychology, 78(5), 655–667. doi:10.1037/a0020542
Iwamoto, D. K. & Liu, M. L. (2010). The impact of racial identity ethnic identity, Asian
102
values and race–related stress on Asian Americans and Asian International
college students’ psychological well–being. Journal Counseling psychology.
57(1), 79–91. doi: 10.1037/a0017393
Karantzas, G. C., Feeney, J. A., & Wilkinson, R. (2010). Is less more? Confirmatory
factor analysis of the attachment style questionnaire. Journal of Social &
Personal Relationships, 27(6), 749–780. doi:10.1177/0265407510373756
Keskin, G. & Cam, O. (2010). Adolescents’ strengths and difficulties: Approach to
attachment styles. Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing, 17(5),433–
441. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2009.01540.x.
Kim, U. & Chun, M. (1994). The educational success of Asian American: An indigenous
perspective. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15, 329–339.
doi:10.1016/0193-3973(94)90035-3
Kim, S. Y., Chen, Qi. L., J., Huang, X. & Moon, U. J. (2009). Parent–child acculturation,
parenting, and adolescent depressive symptoms in Chinese immigrant families.
Journal of Family Psychology, 23(3), 426–437. doi:10.1037/a0016019
Kim , B. S. & Omizo, M. M. (2010). Behavioral enculturation and acculturation,
psychological functioning, and help-seeking attitudes among Asian American
adolescents. Asian American Journal of Psychoogy, 1(3), 175–185. doi:
10.1037/a0021125
Krishnan, A., & Berry, J. W. (1992). Acculturative stress and acculturation attitudes
among Indian immigrants to the United States. Psychology and Developing
Societies, 4, 187–212. doi:10.1177/097133369200400206
103
Kurien, P. A. (2005). Being young, brown, and Hindu: The identity struggles of
Second–generation Indian Americans. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography,
34(4), 434–469. doi:10.1177/0891241605275575
Kwak, K., & Berry, J. W. (2001). Generational differences in acculturation among Asian
families in Canada: A comparison of Vietnamese, Korean, and East–Indian
groups. International Journal of Psychology, 36(3), 152–162.
doi:10.1080/0020759004200011
Landis, D. & Brislin, R.W. (1983). Handbook of intercultural training volume I issues in
theory and design. New York, NY: Pergamon.
Lau, A. S, McCabe, K. M., Yeh, G., Wood, P. A. & Hough, R. L. (2005). The
acculturation gap-distress hypotheses among high–risk Mexican American
families. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(3), 367–375. doi:10.1037/0893-
3200.19.3.367.
Le, C. N. (2013). Population Statistics & Demographics: Asian-Nation: The Landscape
of Asian America. Retrieved from http://www.asian-nation.org/population.shtml
Le, T. N., & Stockdale, G. (2008). Acculturative dissonance, ethnic identity, and youth
violence. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14(1), 1–9. doi:
10.1037/1099-9809.14.1.1
Lee, S., Juon, Hee-Soon, Martinez, G., Hsu, C. E., Robinson, J. B., & Ma, Grace
(2009). Model minority at risk: Expressed needs of mental health by Asian
American young adults. J Community Health, 34, 144–152. doi:10.1007/s10900-
008-9137-1
104
Lickliter, R. (2008). Theories of attachment: The long and winding road to an integrative
developmental science. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 42(4),
397–405. doi:10.1007/s12124-008-9073-8.
Liu, Y. L. (2008). An examination of three models of the relationships between parental
attachments and adolescent’s social functioning and depressive symptoms. J
Youth Adolescence, 37, 941–952. doi:10.1007/s10964-00609147-1
Liu, L., Benner, A., Lau, A. & Kim, S. (2009). Mother–adolescent language proficiency
and adolescent academic and emotional adjustment among Chinese–American
families. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 38(4), 572–586, doi:10.1007/s10964-
008-9358-8
Lolande, R. N., & Cameron, J. E. (1993). An intergroup perspective on immigrant
acculturation with a focus on collective strategies. International Journal of
Psychology, 28(1), 57–74. Retrieved from
http://www.psych.yorku.ca/lalonde/documents/Lalonde_CameronIJP.pdf
Malzberg. B. & Lee, E. (1956). Migration and mental disease. New York, NY: Social
Science Research Council.
Maynard, M. J. & Harding, S. (2010). Perceived parenting and psychological well-being
in UK ethnic minority adolescents. Child: Care, Health and Development, 36(5),
630–638. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2010.01115.x
Mirsky, J. (2007). Post–migratory milieu and the wellbeing of adolescent immigrants.
European Journal of Social Work, 10(3), 353 – 366. doi:
10.1080/13691450701356713
105
Moghaddam, F. M. (1988). Individualistic and collective integration strategies among
immigrants. International Journal of Psychology, 22, 301–333. Retrieved from
http://fathalimoghaddam.com/research_files/1259782853.pdf
Murphy. H. B. M. (1973). Migration and the major mental disorders: A reappraisal.
Retrieved from springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/97834295213-5_17.pdf
Nawaz, S. (2011). The relationship of parental and peer attachment bonds with the
identity development during adolescence. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 104–
119. Retrieved from
http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?si
d=cf4c67d0-c022-48fd-85f8-da53edb750ba%40sessionmgr107&vid=3&hid=128
Nelson, J., & Bennett, S. (2008). Introduction: Special issue on attachment. Clinical
Social Work Journal, 36(1), 3–7. doi:10.1007/s10615-007-0114-4
Padilla, A. M. & Perez, W. (2003). Acculturation, Social identity, and social cognition:
A new perspective on acculturation & social cognition: A new perspective.
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25(1), 35–55. doi:
10.1177/0739986303251694.
Padilla, A. M. (2006). Bicultural social development. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral
Sciences, 28(4), 467– 497. doi:10.1177/0739986306294255
Perreira, K. M. & Ornelas, I. J. (2011). The physical and psychological well-being of
immigrant children. Future of Children, 21(1), 195– 218. doi:
10.1353/foc.2011.0002
Phinney, J. (1992). The Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure: A new scale for use with
106
adolescents and young adults from diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent
Research, 7, 156–176. doi: 10.1177/074355489272003
Phinney, J. S. & Ong, A. (2007). Conceptualization and measurement of ethnic identity.
Current status and future directions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(3),
271–281. doi:10.1037/0022-067.54.3.271.
Portes, A. & Rumbaut, R. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second
generation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press and Russull Sage
Foundation.
Portes, A. & Rumbaut, R. (2005). Introduction: The second generation and the children
of immigrants longitudinal study. Ethnic & Racial Studies, 28(6), 983– 999. doi:
10.1080/01419870500224109
Reitmanova, S. & Gustafson, D. (2009). Mental health needs of visible minority
immigrants in a small urban center: Recommendations for policy makers and
service providers. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 11(1), 46–56. doi:
10.1007/s10903-008-9122-x
Robinson, L. (2009a). Cultural identity and acculturation preferences among South
Asian adolescents in Britain: An exploratory study. Children & Society, 23(6),
442–454. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2008.00179.x
Robinson, L. (2009b). South Asians in Britain: Acculturation, cultural identity,
and perceived discrimination. International Journal of Diversity in Organizations,
Communities and Nations, 9(4), 71–84. Retrieved from
107
http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?si
d=cf4c67d0-c022-48fd-85f8-da53edb750ba%40sessionmgr107&vid=8&hid=128
Sarantakos, S. (2005). Social research (3rd ed.). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Schwartz, S. J., Unger, J. B., Zamboanga, B. L. & Szapocznik, J. (2010). Rethinking the
concept of acculturation: Implications for theory and research. American
Pscyhoogistl. 65(4), 237–251. doi:10.1037/a0019330.
Shaver, P. R. & Mikulincer, M. (2010). An attachment theory framework for fourteen
items are rated on conceptualizing interpersonal behavior. Retrieved from
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=a1jP6csDbTIC&oi=fnd&pg=
PA17&dq=bowlby%27s+attachment+theory+&ots=qF2mcW41fv&sig=F7O
XyQoq8EoV1tD7qqejgBSD9Bc#v=onepage&q=bowlby%27s%20attachme
nt%20theory&f=false
Shore, J. R. & Shore, A. N. (2008). Modern attachment theory: The central role of affect
regulation in development and treatment. Clinical Social Work Journal, 36(1), 9–
20. doi:10.1007/s10615-007-0111-7
Smith, T. B. & Silva, L. (2011). Ethnic identity and personal well-being of people of
color: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(1). 42–60. doi:
10.1037/a0021528
Smokowski, P. R. (2007). Acculturation and violence in minority adolescents: A Review
of the empirical literature. The Jorunal of Primary Prevention, 30(3), 215–263.
doi:10.1007/s10935-009-0173-0
108
Smokowski, P. R., Rose, R. & Bacallao, M. L. (2008). Acculturation and Latino family
processes: How cultural involvement, biculturalism and acculturation gap
influence family dynamics. Family Relations, 57(3), 295–308. doi:
10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00501.x
Steinberg , L. (1990). Autonomy, conflict, and harmony in the family relationship. In S.
Feldman and G. Elliot (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp.
255-276). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Szapocznik, H., Kurtines, W. & Fernandez, T. (1980). Bicultural involvement and
adjustment in Hispanic-American youths. International Journal of Interrcultural
Relations, 4, 353–365. doi.10.1016/0147-1767(80)90010-3
Szapocznik, H., Scopetta, J., Kurtines , W. & Aranalde, M. (1978). Theory and
measurement of acculturation. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 12, 113–
130. doi:10.1037/t07673-000
Sue, D .W. (2003). Overcoming our racism: The journey to liberation. San Francisco,
CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sue, D. W., Bucceri, J., Lin, A. I., Nadal, K.L., & Torino, G.C. (2007). Racial
microaggressions and the Asian American experience. Ethnic Minority
Psychology, 13(1), 72–81. doi:10.1037/1099-9809.3.1.72
Suinn, R. M. (2008). The ethnicity gap: The past, present, and future. Professional
Psychology: Research and Practice, 39(6), 646– 651. doi:10.1037/0735-
7028.39.6.646
Tardif, C. Y. & Geva, E. (2006). The link between acculturation and conflict among
109
Chinese Canadian immigrant mother-adolescent dyads. Journal of Cross-Cultural
Psychology, 37(2), 191–211. doi: 10.1177/0022022105284496
Teske, R. H. C., & Nelson, B. H. (1974). Acculturation and assimilation: A clarification.
American Ethnologist, 17, 218–235. doi:10.1525/ae.1974.1.2.02a00090
Tuncay, T., Musabak, I., Gok, D. E. & Kutlu, M. (2008). The relationship between
anxiety, coping strategies and characteristics of patients with diabetes. Health and
Quality of Life Outcomes, 6, 79–87. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-6-79
United States Census Bureau (2010). United States Census 2010. Retrieved from
http://www.census.gov/2010census/
Vaughn, A. S. & Roesch, S. C. (2003). Psychological and physical correlates of coping in
minority adolescents. Journal of Health Psychology, 8(6), 671–683. doi:
10.1177/13591053030086002
Vera, E. M., Vacek, K., Coyle, L. D., Stinson, J., Mull, M., Doud, K., Buchheit, C.,
…Langrehr, K.J. (2011). An examination of culturally relevant stressors, coping,
ethnic identity, and subjective well–being in urban, ethnic minority adolescents.
Professional School Counseling, 15(2), 55– 66. doi:10.5330/PSC.n.2011-15.55
Weise, E. (2010). Culture and migration: Psychological trauma in children and
adolescents. Traumatology, 16(4), p. 142–152. doi: 10.1177/1534765610388304
Wichrama, K. A. S, Elder, G. H. & Abraham, W. T. (2007). Rurality and ethnicity in
adolescent physical illness: Are children of the growing rural Latino population at
excess health risk? The Journal of Rural Health, 23(3), 228– 237. doi:
10.1111/j.1748-0361.2007.00095.x
110
Wilkinson, R. B. (2004). The role of parental and peer attachment in the psychological
health and self–esteem of adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescents. 33(6),
479–493. doi:10.1023/B:JOYO.0000048063.59425.20
Ying, Y. W. & Han, M. (2008). Parental contributions to Southeast Asian American
adolescents’ well–being. Youth & Society, 40(2), 289–306. doi:
10.1177/0044118X08315506
Yu-Wen, Y. & Meekung, H. (2008). Parental acculturation, parental involvement,
intergenerational relationship and adolescent outcomes in immigrant Filipino
American families. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 6(1), 112–131. doi:
10.1080/15362940802119351
111
Appendix A: Assent Form
My name is Malliga Obilisundar-Delaney. I am trying to learn about the relationship
between differences in acculturation of South Asian (SA) parents and their teens, parent-
teen relationships, and their ethnic identity and coping skills. The purpose of this study is
to find what leads to healthier SA teens. The information from the study can be used for
helping SA children and families to have a better life.
Who I am:
I am a student at Walden University and am completing this study for a doctoral degree. I
am also an immigrant of SA with three U.S. born children.
Surveys:
If you decide you want to be in my study, you will be asked to Complete 4 short
questionnaires that will take about 1–1 1/2 hours:
1. Brief COPE scale- e.g.” I've been getting emotional support from others.”
______, “I’ve been giving up trying to deal with it.” _____
2. Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA) - Revised- e.g. “I feel it’s no use
letting my feeling show.”____, “My parents sense when I’m upset about
something.”_____
3. Bicultural Inquiry Questionnaire (BIQ) - e.g. “How comfort are you speaking
your native language in school? “ ______“How comfortable are you speaking you native
with friends? “ ______
112
4. Multicultural Ethnic Identity Measure (MEIM) - e.g. “I have a clear sense of my
ethnic background and what it means for me.” ____, “I think a lot about how my life will
be affected by my ethnic group membership.” _____
Your Choice:
It’s your choice if you want to participate. Your parents have to say it is OK first. You
can then decide if you want to volunteer. You can always change your mind at any time.
If you decide not to participate no one will be upset with you.
Privacy:
Other people will not know if you are in my study. I will put things I learn about you
together with things I learn about other teens so no one can tell what things came from
you. When I tell other people about my research, I will not use your name, so no one can
tell who I am talking about.
Contact:
My telephone number is XXXXXXXXX. You or your parents can call me with any
questions about the study or if you decide you don’t want to be in the study any more or
that you do. You can also reach Dr. Otis-Ballew, my supervisor at Walden University to
discuss the study further at XXXXXXX or XXXXXXX.
I will give you a copy of this form in case you want to ask questions later.
Consent:
To protect your privacy, I am not asking for your name. Just return your anonymously
completed survey packet in the sealed envelope
if you wish to be part of this study. The surveys can also be completed by email or online.
You can choose which way you would like
113
to complete the surveys.
If you find yourself upset at any time because of the study or otherwise, 1(800) LIFENET
(543-3638) is a source that will provide therapists and networks based on your insurance
and area, as well as, low cost therapists.
Cost and Gifts:
There is no cost to you or your parent for participating in this study. Your parent has been
asked to provide contact information so that I may send you a small thank you gift card
for your participation. The information will only be used to send you the gift.
You may keep this copy for your information.
114
Appendix B: Permission for Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (MEIM)
The MEIM was originally published in the following article:
Phinney, J. (1992). The Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure: A new scale for use with
adolescents and young adults from diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent
Research, 7, 156-176.
It has subsequently been used in dozens of studies and has consistently shown
good reliability, typically with alphas above .80 across a wide range of ethnic groups and
ages. On the basis of recent work, including a factor analysis of a large sample of
adolescents*, it appears that the measure can best be thought of as comprising two
factors, ethnic identity search (a developmental and cognitive component) and
affirmation, belonging, and commitment (an affective component). Two items have been
dropped and a few minor modifications have been made. Attached is the current revision
of the measure, without the measure of Other-group orientation. The two factors, with
this version, are as follows: ethnic identity search, items 1, 2, 4, 8, and 10; affirmation,
belonging, and commitment, items 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12. (None of the items are reversed.)
The preferred scoring is to use the mean of the item scores; that is, the mean of the 12
items for an over-all score, and, if desired, the mean of the 5 items for search and the 7
items for affirmation. Thus the range of scores is from 1 to 4.
The suggested ethnic group names in the first paragraph can be adapted to
particular populations. Items 13, 14, and 15 are used only for purposes of identification
and categorization by ethnicity.
115
The Other-group orientation scale, which was developed with the original MEIM,
is not included, as it is considered to be a separate construct. It can, of course, be used in
conjunction with the MEIM.
Translations of the measure into Spanish and French now exist and are available,
but we currently have no information on their reliability.
No written permission is required for use of the measure. However, if you decide
to use the measure, please send me a summary of the results and a copy of any papers or
publications that result from the study.
Jean S. Phinney, Ph.D.
Department of Psychology
California State University, Los Angeles
*Roberts, R., Phinney, J., Masse, L., Chen, Y., Roberts, C., & Romero, A. (1999). The
structure of ethnic identity in young adolescents from diverse ethnocultural groups.
Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 301-322.
116
Appendix C: MEIM
In this country, people come from many different countries and cultures, and there
are many different words to describe the different backgrounds or ethnic groups that
people come from. Some examples of the names of ethnic groups are Hispanic or Latino,
Black or African American, Asian American, Chinese, Filipino, American Indian,
Mexican American, Caucasian or White, Italian American, and many others. These
questions are about your ethnicity or your ethnic group and how you feel about it or react
to it.
Please fill in: In terms of ethnic group, I consider myself to be ____________________
Use the numbers below to indicate how much you agree or disagree with each statement.
(4) Strongly agree (3) Agree (2) Disagree (1) Strongly disagree
1- I have spent time trying to find out more about my ethnic group, such as
its history, traditions, and customs.
2- I am active in organizations or social groups that include mostly members
of my own ethnic group.
3- I have a clear sense of my ethnic background and what it means for me.
4- I think a lot about how my life will be affected by my ethnic group membership.
5- I am happy that I am a member of the group I belong to.
6- I have a strong sense of belonging to my own ethnic group.
7- I understand pretty well what my ethnic group membership means to me.
117
8- In order to learn more about my ethnic background, I have often talked
to other people about my ethnic group.
9- I have a lot of pride in my ethnic group.
10- I participate in cultural practices of my own group, such as special food,
music, or customs.
11- I feel a strong attachment towards my own ethnic group.
12- I feel good about my cultural or ethnic background.
13- My ethnicity is
(1) Asian or Asian American, including Chinese, Japanese, and others
(2) Black or African American
(3) Hispanic or Latino, including Mexican American, Central American, and
others
(4) White, Caucasian, Anglo, European American; not Hispanic
(5) American Indian/Native American
(6) Mixed; Parents are from two different groups
(7) Other (write in): _____________________________________
14- My father's ethnicity is (use numbers above)
15- My mother's ethnicity is (use numbers above)
118
Appendix D: Brief COPE- Permission
The items below are an abbreviated version of the COPE Inventory. We have
used it in research with breast cancer patients, with a community sample recovering from
Hurricane Andrew, and with other samples as well. At present, none of that work has
been published, except for an article reporting the development of the Brief COPE, which
includes information about factor structure and internal reliability from the hurricane
sample (citation below). The Brief COPE has also been translated into French and
Spanish (see below), as separate publications.
We created the shorter item set partly because earlier patient samples became
impatient at responding to the full instrument (both because of the length and redundancy
of the full instrument and because of the overall time burden of the assessment protocol).
In choosing which items to retain for this version (which has only two items per scale),
we were guided by strong loadings from previous factor analyses, and by item clarity and
meaningfulness to the patients in a previous study. In creating the reduced item set, we
also "tuned" some of the scales somewhat (largely because some of the original scales
had dual focuses) and omitted scales that had not appeared to be important among breast
cancer patients. In this way the positive reinterpretation and growth scale became positive
reframing (no growth); focus on and venting of emotions became venting (focusing was
too tied to the experiencing of the emotion, and we decided it was venting we were really
interested in); mental disengagement became self-distraction (with a slight expansion of
mentioned means of self-distraction). We also added one scale that was not part of the
119
original inventory--a 2-item measure of self-blame--because this response has been
important in some earlier work.
You are welcome to use all scales of the Brief COPE, or to choose selected scales
for use. Feel free as well to adapt the language for whatever time scale you are interested
in.
Citation: Carver, C. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too
long: Consider the Brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 92-100.
[abstract]
Following is the BRIEF COPE as we are now administering it, with the instructional
orientation for a presurgery interview (the first time the COPE is given in this particular
study). Please feel free to adapt the instructions as needed for your application.
Scales are computed as follows (with no reversals of coding):
Self-distraction, items 1 and 19
Active coping, items 2 and 7
Denial, items 3 and 8
Substance use, items 4 and 11
Use of emotional support, items 5 and 15
Use of instrumental support, items 10 and 23
Behavioral disengagement, items 6 and 16
Venting, items 9 and 21
120
Positive reframing, items 12 and 17
Planning, items 14 and 25
Humor, items 18 and 28
Acceptance, items 20 and 24
Religion, items 22 and 27
Self-blame, items 13 and 26
I have had many questions about combining scales into "problem focused" and
"emotion focused" aggregates, or into an "overall" coping index. I have never done that
in my own use of the scales. There is no such thing as an "overall" score on this measure,
and I recommend no particular way of generating a dominant coping style for a give
person. Please do NOT write to me asking for instructions to for "adaptive" and
"maladaptive" composites, because I do not have any such instructions. I generally look
at each scale separately to see what its relation is to other variables. An alternative is to
create second-order factors from among the scales (see the 1989 article) and using the
factors as predictors. If you decide to do that, I recommend that you use your own data to
determine the composition of the higher-order factors. Different samples exhibit different
patterns of relations.
121
Appendix E: Brief COPE
These items deal with ways you've been coping with the stress in your life since
you found out you were going to have to have this operation. There are many ways to try
to deal with problems. These items ask what you've been doing to cope with this one.
Obviously, different people deal with things in different ways, but I'm interested in how
you've tried to deal with it. Each item says something about a particular way of coping. I
want to know to what extent you've been doing what the item says. How much or how
frequently. Don't answer on the basis of whether it seems to be working or not—just
whether or not you're doing it. Use these response choices. Try to rate each item
separately in your mind from the others. Make your answers as true FOR YOU as you
can.
1 = I haven't been doing this at all
2 = I've been doing this a little bit
3 = I've been doing this a medium amount
4 = I've been doing this a lot
1. I've been turning to work or other activities to take my mind off things.
2. I've been concentrating my efforts on doing something about the situation I'm in.
3. I've been saying to myself "this isn't real.".
4. I've been using alcohol or other drugs to make myself feel better.
5. I've been getting emotional support from others.
6. I've been giving up trying to deal with it.
7. I've been taking action to try to make the situation better.
122
8. I've been refusing to believe that it has happened.
9. I've been saying things to let my unpleasant feelings escape.
10. I’ve been getting help and advice from other people.
11. I've been using alcohol or other drugs to help me get through it.
12. I've been trying to see it in a different light, to make it seem more positive.
13. I’ve been criticizing myself.
14. I've been trying to come up with a strategy about what to do.
15. I've been getting comfort and understanding from someone.
16. I've been giving up the attempt to cope.
17. I've been looking for something good in what is happening.
18. I've been making jokes about it.
19. I've been doing something to think about it less, such as going to movies,
watching TV, reading, daydreaming, sleeping, or shopping.
20. I've been accepting the reality of the fact that it has happened.
21. I've been expressing my negative feelings.
22. I've been trying to find comfort in my religion or spiritual beliefs.
23. I’ve been trying to get advice or help from other people about what to do.
24. I've been learning to live with it.
25. I've been thinking hard about what steps to take.
26. I’ve been blaming myself for things that happened.
27. I've been praying or meditating.
28. I've been making fun of the situation.
123
Appendix F: Bicultural Involvement Questionnaire Permission
Bicultural Involvement Questionnaire—Short Version
Test Format:
The language use items of the Bicultural Involvement Questionnaire-Short Version (BIQ-
S) are answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale of 1 = not at all comfortable to 5 = very
comfortable, and the behavior items are answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale of 1 =
not at all to 5 = very much. The BIQ-S is available in English and Spanish.
Source:
Guo, X., Suarez-Morales, L., Schwartz, S. J., & Szapocznik, J. (2009). Some evidence for
multidimensional biculturalism: Confirmatory factor analysis and measurement
invariance analysis on the Bicultural Involvement Questionnaire–Short Version.
Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 22–31. doi:10.1037/a0014495
Permissions:Test content may be reproduced and used for noncommercial research and
educational purposes without seeking written permission. Distribution must be
controlled, meaning only to the participants engaged in the research or enrolled in the
educational activity. Any other type of reproduction or distribution of test content is not
authorized without written permission from the author and publisher.
124
Appendix G: Bicultural Involvement Questionnaire—Short Version
BIQ-S
Items:
1 = not at all comfortable to 5 = very comfortable, and the behavior items are answered
on a 5-point Likert-type scale of 1 = not at all to 5 = very much
1. How comfortable are you speaking your native language at home? ______
2. How comfort are you speaking your native language in school? ______
3. How comfortable are you speaking you native language at work? ______
4. How comfortable are you speaking your native language with friends? ______
5. How comfortable are you speaking your native language in general? ______
6. How comfortable are you speaking English at home? ______
7. How comfortable are you speaking English in school? ______
8. How comfortable are you speaking English at work? ______
9. How comfortable are you speaking English with friends? ______
10. How comfortable are you speaking English is general? ______
11. How much do you enjoy native music? ______
12. How much do you enjoy native dances? ______
13. How much do you enjoy native-oriented places? ______
14. How much do you enjoy native-type recreation? ______
15. How much do you enjoy native TV programs? ______
16. How much do you enjoy native radio stations? ______
125
17. How much do you enjoy native books and magazines? ______
18. How much do you enjoy American music? ______
19. How much do you enjoy American dances? ______
20. How do you enjoy American-oriented places? ______
21. How much do you enjoy American-type recreation? ______
22. How much do you enjoy American TV programs? ______
23. How much do you enjoy American radio stations? ______
24. How much do you enjoy American books and magazines? ______
126
Appendix H: Inventory of Parent & Peer Attachment (IPPA)
August 2009
Mark T. Greenberg Ph.D.
Bennett Chair of Prevention Research
Director, Prevention Research Center
College of Health and Human Development
Dear Colleague:
Thank you for your request for information concerning the research that we have
conducted on adolescents’ perceived attachment to peers and parents. First, we have
enclosed a copy of our article in the Journal of Youth and Adolescence in 1987 that
introduced the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment. We have also enclosed a manual
providing information on our factor analyses of the scales, information on reliability of
the scales, and a scoring key.
Since the study reported in the 1987 paper was carried out, we have revised the IPPA. In
her dissertation, Gay Armsden modified the IPPA so as to separately assess perceived
quality of attachment to mothers and fathers (instead of parents together). We have
enclosed a copy of this unpublished measure, The IPPA (Mother, Father, Peer Version),
127
and a page of scoring information. In her study of over 400 college students, Gay has
found that most of the same items fall on the same factors for mothers and father
separately that we found in the factor analysis of parents together on the IPPA. However,
there were enough differences in loadings that we judged it best to discourage the use of
subscales in the revised version of the IPPA until further research could be done.
Recommended scoring for this version thus involves total scores for Mother, Father, and
Peer, but no subscale scores. However, while scoring subscales is not advised, we have
included instructions for doing so, since many researchers have requested this
information.
If you have further questions, please feel free to call XXXXXX or e-mail Gay Armsden
at XXXXXXXX, or write. If you decide to use our measures in data collection, please let
us know. We would also appreciate a copy of papers that utilize the measure(s).
Sincerely,
Mark T. Greenberg, Ph.D. Gay Armsden, Ph.D.
Professor Research Consultant
128
Appendix I: IPPA
Please respond to each item by filling in the number that best describes your
relationships, experiences, and feelings. The first column asks about relationships with
parents. Please provide ONE rating to describe your parents and your relationship with
them. If only one parent is living, or if your parents are divorced or separated, respond
with reference to your living parent or the parent with whom you feel closer. These
answers will be kept confidential.
1 = Almost never or never true 2 = Seldom 3 = Sometimes 4 = Often 5 = Almost always
or always true
_____ 1. My parents respect my feelings.
_____ 2. I feel my parents are successful as parents.
_____ 3. I wish I had different parents.
_____ 4. My parents accept me as I am.
_____ 5. I have to rely on myself when I have a problem to solve.
_____ 6. I like to get my parents’ point of view on things I’m concerned about.
_____ 7. I feel it’s no use letting my feeling show.
_____ 8. My parents sense when I’m upset about something.
_____ 9. Talking over my problems with my parents makes me feel ashamed or foolish.
_____ 10. My parents expect too much from me.
_____ 11. I get upset easily at home.
_____ 12. I get upset a lot more than my parents know.
129
_____ 13. When we discuss things, my parents consider my point of view.
_____ 14. My parents trust my judgment.
_____ 15. My parents have their own problems so I don’t bother them with mine.
_____ 16. My parents help me to understand myself better.
_____ 17. I tell my parents about my problems and troubles.
_____ 18. I feel angry with my parents.
_____ 19. I don’t get much attention at home.
_____ 20. My parents encourage me to talk about my difficulties.
_____ 21. My parents understand me.
_____ 22. I don’t know whom I can depend on these days.
_____ 23. When I am angry about something, my parents try to be understanding.
_____ 24. I trust my parents.
_____ 25. My parents don’t understand what I’m going through these days.
_____ 26. I can count on my parents when I need to get something off my chest.
_____ 27. I feel that no one understands me.
_____ 28. If my parents know something is bothering me, they ask me about it.
Reprinted with permission: Mark Greensberg
130
Appendix J: Recruitment Flyer
Volunteers Needed for a Clinical Psychology Research Study
South Asians (from India, Pakistan, Bengali, Nepal, and Sri Lanka) participants between
13 and 18 years of age needed plus one parent needed to complete surveys for the
purpose of expanding our knowledge on the adjustment of adolescent immigrants. Only,
1st generation, 2nd generation (born in the U.S. to 1st generation immigrants) and 3rd
generation (born in U.S. with at least one parent who is 2nd generation) from above
ethnic groups can be included. Volunteers must be able to read and speak English. Both
parent and child must agree and complete surveys.
The surveys should take approximately 1- 1 ½ hours for the adolescents and 20 minutes
for the parents.
Participation in this study will assist with determining factors related to
adolescent adjustment and provide information on counseling strategies for healthy
identity development and coping skills for SA adolescents.
For more information: Contact the primary investigator of this study: Malliga
Obilisundar-Delaney. (email-XXXXXXXX) or call XXXXXX
This research is being conducted under the direction of Dr. Robin Otis-Ballew of Walden
University. It has been approved by the Institutional Review Board for ethical practice
with human research subjects.
*All participants will receive a $5 appreciation gift card.*
Please inform friends, family and anyone else who may be interested in participating in
this study.
Thank you!!!
131
Appendix K: Demographic Questionnaire for Primary Caregiver
1. Place of Birth: Nepal ____ Bangladesh____ India ____ Sri Lanka ___
Pakistan ____ U.S. ____
2. Place of Birth of Spouse (if applicable): Nepal___ Bangledesh ___ India
___ Sri Lanka ___ Pakistan ___
3. Age: ________
4. List Gender, Place of Birth, and Age of children between 13 and 18
_______________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________
5. Gender: Male ____ Female ____
6. Education Completed: _____________________
7. Employment: __________________________________
8. Marital Status: Married ____ Separated ____ Divorced ____
9. Number of years in U.S.: ___________
10. Current County of Residence: __________________________________
132
Appendix L: Social Media Recruitment Flyer
Volunteers Needed for a Clinical Psychology Research Study
South Asians (from India, Pakistan, Bengali, Nepal, and Sri Lanka) participants between
13 and 18 years of age needed plus one parent needed to complete surveys for the
purpose of expanding our knowledge on the adjustment of adolescent immigrants. Only,
1st generation, 2nd generation (born in the U.S. to 1st generation immigrants) and 3rd
generation (born in U.S. with at least one parent who is 2nd generation) from above
ethnic groups can be included. Volunteers must be able to read and speak English. Both
parent and child must agree and complete surveys.
Participation in this study will assist with determining factors related to adolescent
adjustment and provide information on counseling strategies for healthy identity
development and coping skills for SA adolescents.
Just copy link onto your browser to get to the surveys which will remain confidential.
Parent link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/saadolescentstudy-parent (20 min)
Adolescent links: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/saadolescentstudy-assent&surveys
(1hr)
(Please complete all surveys.)
For more information: Contact the primary investigator of this study: Malliga
Obilisundar-Delaney. (email-XXXXXXX) or call XXXXXXXX)
*All participants will receive a $5 appreciation gift card.*
133
This research is being conducted under the direction of Dr. Robin Otis-Ballew of Walden
University. It has been approved by the Institutional Review Board for ethical practice
with human research subjects.