37
Larry D. Dodge, MD

Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

  • Upload
    joanna

  • View
    53

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine. Larry D. Dodge, MD. Clinical Evaluation. Proper Immobilization Assume a spine injury with head or neck trauma 3 to 25% of spinal cord injuries occur after initial traumatic episode. Ankylosing Spondylitis or DISH. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Larry D. Dodge, MD

Page 2: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Clinical Evaluation

Proper Immobilization

Assume a spine injury with head or neck trauma

3 to 25% of spinal cord injuries occur after initial traumatic episode.

Page 3: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Ankylosing Spondylitis or DISH Increased risk of fracture even with

minor trauma

Frequent through ossified disk space

Obtain a CAT scan

Very unstable – spinal cord injuries.

Page 4: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Asymptomatic Trauma Patient

Cervical x-rays not required in patients without tenderness and are alert.

Page 5: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Trauma Patients with Neck Pain

2 to 6% incidence of significant spine injuries.

Page 6: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Do Not Remove Collar Until

Absence of tenderness

Absence of pain

Normal mental status

complete radiographic evaluation

Page 7: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Most Common Missed Diagnosis

Occipitoathlantoaxial region or cervicothoracic junction

Plain x-ray will miss 15 to 17% of injuries

Page 8: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

CAT scan has 99% predictive value

MRI better for soft tissue, may be oversensitive

Page 9: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Flexion and Extension Radiographs

Safe in awake alert patients

Exclude significant instability

Page 10: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Obtunded Patient EvaluationControversial

MRI- limited usefulness, lack of correlation between MRI and significant injury

Passive flexion – extension x-ray – possible iatrogenic injury

Combination of CAT and plain x-ray probably standard.

Page 11: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Fractures of the Cervical Spine

Most do not require surgery

Ligamentous injuries less predictable, and more require surgery

Page 12: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Types of OrthrosisHalo- the best, especially at upper cervical

Soft collars – little immobilization

Semi rigid- ( Miami J, Philadelphia, Aspen) – still allow motion

8-12 weeks of immobilization required with follow-up flexion and extension x-ray.

Page 13: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Occipitocervical Dissocation

Most are lethal

Neurologic injuries vary from complete to cranial nerve injuries

Diagnosis can be difficult

Occipitocervical fusion is required

Page 14: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Atlas FracturesAxial load

Stability requires healing of transverse ligament – MRI

Halo- reasonable treatment

C1-C2 fusion if transverse ligament disrupted

Page 15: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Axis Fractures

Odontoid fractures are most common

Type I – Avulsion Type II – Waist Type III – Vertebral body

Page 16: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Type Odontoid

Treated with external orthrosis

Page 17: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Type Odontoid

Controversial treatment

Elderly do not tolerate halo – consider C1- C2 fusion

Fusion needed if reduction not achieved or maintained

Page 18: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Type Odontoid

High healing rate with halo vest

Page 19: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Traumatic Spondylolisthesis of Axis

MVA- hyperextension, compression and rebound flexion

Most treated in halo

Page 20: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Subaxial Compression Fractures

Failure of anterior column

Orthosis for 6 – 12 weeks

Page 21: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Subaxial Burst Fracture

Fracture into posterior cortex with retropulsion

Spinal cord injury rate is high

Most require surgery – anterior or anterior and posterior

Page 22: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Facet DislocationsTimely reduction required

Subluxation of 25% suggests unilateral, 50% suggests bilateral

MRI needed to assess for HNP

Failure of closed reduction mandates open reduction

Page 23: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Cervical Disk Disease

Symptoms can be insidious or acute

Minor injured can aggravate the root (radiculopathy) or spinal cord ( myelopathy)

Page 24: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

PathophysiologyDisk loses water and proteoglycan content

changes – less able to support load

Decreased disk height leads to loss of lordosis

Osteocartilaginous overgrowth occurs in response to increased load – stenosis develops

Page 25: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Cervical Roots exhibit a higher degree of overlap than seen in the thoracolumbar spine, therefore symptom patterns may fail to localize.

Page 26: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Hyporeflexia

Biceps

Brachioradialis C- 6

Triceps C- 7

Page 27: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Most Commonly Affected

C-5, C-6, C-7

More motion in these areas

Watershed area of blood supply – roots more susceptible

Page 28: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Myelopathy

Most commonly presents as clumsiness, ataxia, loss of fine motor skills.

Page 29: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Cervical Spondylosis

May cause radicular pain from nerve root origin

May cause referred sclerotomal pain ( occiput, interscapular region, or

shoulders)

Page 30: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Treatment

75% of radiculopathy improve with P.T. , activity modification, medication

Soft disk herniations can resorb

Myelopathy

Page 31: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Imaging StudiesPlain x-ray – alignment, spondylosis

Flexion – extension for instability

MRI

CAT – defines bone anatomy

Diskography

Page 32: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Electrodiagnostic Studies

Paresthesias cannot be localized

Imaging does not correlate with clinical picture

Page 33: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Nonsurgical Care

P.T. – emphasize isometric exercise

Traction with slight flexion

Medication

Epidural steroids

Page 34: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Surgical Indications

Success for axial pain is 60 %

Success for radiculopathy is 90%

Disk Replacement – evolving technology

Page 35: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

ACDF

Allograft versus autograft

Plate fixation

Accelerates degeneration at adjacent levels

Page 36: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Posterior Decompression

Foraminotomy for bony foraminal stenosis

Laminectomy – risk of kyphosis

Laminectomy – decompression without adding fusion

Page 37: Evaluation and Treatment of the Cervical Spine

Thank you

We will now move into the exam

part of the lecture.