Fairness Coalition's USTA Handout

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Fairness Coalition's USTA Handout

    1/2

    10 Reasons to Vote No on USTA ExpansionUSTA Taking Valuable Parkland WithoutReplacement. Seeking to evade a long held

    legal precedent, the USTA will not replace anyof the parkland that will be lost and thenpermanently turned over to USTA control.(Crains Tennis expansion in Queens nets locals a royal headache by Annie Karni 12/16/12)

    2) Power Plant in the Park? The plan calls for building a dirty dieselfuel power plant to be built inside the park. Hidden inside the mostrecent DEIS report, the USTA seeks to build a 8 Megawatt, 20 foot highdiesel-fueled power plant. Surrounding communities already suffer from

    air quality and asthma rates at epidemic levels. This power plant willemit a massive amount of air pollution into the park and surroundingcommunities. (page 11-17 DEIS Jan 2013)

    3) USTA Moves Jobs to Westchester County. NYCtaxpayers have provided $322,025,000 in City Bondsfor USTA construction - why hasnt the BloombergAdministration guaranteed that USTA base itsheadquarters in Queens? The full-time, high salary jobs

    for USTA executives are all based in Westchester. Whyare we giving taxpayer funds and more parkland to aprivate corporation that wont even keep jobs in ourcommunity? (Internal Revenue Service Form 990 2010)

    4: Destroying Precious Green Space. The USTA destroys entire sections of the park byencouraging cars to drive and park on grass. Can you imagine cars parking on the Great Lawnin Central Park? (page 10-5 DEIS Jan 2013) The USTA proposal will result in destroying 400 maturetrees including state-listed endangered species willow oak trees. (Page S-8 DEIS Jan 2013; Page S-23DEIS Jan 2013)

  • 7/29/2019 Fairness Coalition's USTA Handout

    2/2

    10 Reasons to Vote No on USTA Expansion5: The USTA is a Bad Neighbor. USTA blocks communitysoccer leagues from playing during the US Open. (El Diario Fuerade Juego 8/17/12) The USTA dominates the park with car and

    truck traffic which restricts community access and enjoyment.The courts are overpriced and there is very little communityoutreach and involvement. The expansion will result in the

    removal of a bike lane that is a critical link for cyclists to enterthe park. (Figure S-6 DEIS Jan 2013)

    6: USTA expansion plan would add 10,000 Spectators everyday during the US Open. This will induce significantly more trafficcongestion, overwhelm local parking, and strain subways with moreovercrowding. (Page S-4 DEIS Jan 2013)

    7: The USTA is not open to the public. It has 8 foothigh steel gates around the perimeter that arepadlocked to keep the community out of the facility.There is no signage indicating that the USTA site is free

    and open to the public. The hourly court rental rates aremore expensive than any public courts in NYC. TheUSTA has not provided the local neighborhoods with anygrants in recent years. And finally, USTA seeks to buildeven more retail space on site which will negativelyimpact local small businesses by preventingspectators from going into the community. (Capital New York

    Tennis Expansion Requires Tricky Definition of Public by Dana Rubenstein1/22/13; Page S-5 DEIS Jan 2013)

    8: Just One of Three Major Proposals. The BloombergAdministration does not have a plan for Flushing Meadows-CoronaPark. They are three separate development projects, which are indirect conflict with each other, and each will destroy parkland andreduce property values in Queens. This administration has failed toproperly maintain the park and has abandoned even trying toadequate resources for it. (Figure S-7 DEIS Jan 2013)9: Labor Violations. The New York Times reports a class action

    lawsuit in Federal Court against the USTA forlabor violations andfailure to pay overtime to workers. (New York Times For Courtside Officials, a PayFight Resonates by John Martin 1/17/13)

    10: Flooding Problems. The park is a natural wetlands that shouldbe protected and enhanced to restore its ability to absorb flooding fromstorms. If more parkland is lost here, it will result in more flooding in

    the surrounding residential communities. (page 7-8 DEIS Jan 2013; Figure S-7DEIS Jan 2013)