Four Methods of Fly Ash Sampling

12/2/11 Four Methods of Fly Ash Sampling

1/5coalpowermag.com/print//Four-Methods-of-Fly-Ash-Sampling_233.html

Four Methods of Fly Ash SamplingOne of the best indications of performance in the furnace is the quality of ash coming out of a power plants boiler.

Ideally, all of the carbon is completely burned in the furnace before the products of combustion are quenched in the

superheater. Perfect combustion remains the goal, but one that can never be achieved. However, we can come

close.

Fly ash should be measured periodically (at least weekly) to determine its carbon content or loss on ignition (LOI).

Low-NOx burners make it ever more difficult to reach low levels of carbon content in fly ash. However, when a furnace

is performing well, the coal pulverizers are tuned for best fineness, and air/fuel ratios are optimum, then a realistic

goal for carbon burnout is to reduce fly ash LOI to 3% to 5% or lower for eastern coals. With western Powder River

Basin and lignite fuels, due to their high reactivity, fly ash LOI should be below 0.5%.

Obtaining representative samples of fly ash from very large flue gas ducts remains the largest challenge. For

example, a typical 500-MW coal unit firing 8% ash content fuel will be passing about 40,000 pounds of fly ash per

hour. The challenge is to obtain two representative 1-gram samples for LOI determination.

Why Doesnt All of the Carbon Burn in the Furnace?From our experience, there are three major factors that prevent complete burnout of carbon before it reaches the

furnace exit:

Insufficient furnace oxygen.

Particle size that is too large (coal fineness is too coarse).

Poor fuel and air distribution in the burner belt.

If there is insufficient well-distributed oxygen in the furnace to mix proportional amounts of fuel, it doesnt matter what

the furnace temperature is, the carbon will not burn. Its important to remember the fundamentals such as ignition

temperature, fuel, and oxygen that are required for combustion. Lack of oxygen in the furnace can be the root cause

for one of three reasons:

Insufficient total airflow.

Fuel and air imbalance in the furnace (there may be an adequate oxygen level on an average basis, but some

areas may have pockets of low oxygen levels).

Falsely high oxygen indications from air in-leakage.

Side-to-side imbalances may be determined by taking fly ash samples from both the left and right sides of the boiler.

One side of the furnace may show a carbon content of say 3%, but on the other side the LOI may be high, say 15%.

This would indicate an imbalance that can lead back to the burners or secondary air. This type of information is

valuable when tuning a boiler.

Larger fuel particle size contributes to high unburned carbon in two ways:

More time is required for the complete combustion of the carbon char. Insufficient residence time, due to the

furnace arrangement, is a big factor contributing to high LOI.

Poor fuel fineness further contributes to high LOI from the resulting poor fuel distribution. Poor fuel distribution

nearly always accompanies poor fineness.

Figure 1 illustrates how better coal fineness creates much greater surface area for optimizing the short residence

time in the furnace. Finer pulverization also yields improved distribution through each coal pipe, as shown in Figure

2.



1. FXeO fiQeQeVV iV cUiWicaO fRU Pa[iPi]iQg bRiOeU cRPbXVWiRQ efficieQc\. AW haOf Whe diaPeWeU, Whe QXPbeU Rf SaUWicOeV

iQ a giYeQ YROXPe iQcUeaVeV b\ a facWRU Rf eighW. IQ WhiV e[aPSOe, Whe VXUface aUea Rf aQ eTXaO ZeighW Rf cRaO

iQcUeaVeV b\ a facWRU Rf fRXU, aQd cRaO fXeO diVWUibXWiRQ WR Whe iQdiYidXaO bXUQeUV iV iPSURYed. SRXUce: SWRUP

TechQRORgieV IQc.

2. The UeOaWiRQVhiS beWZeeQ fXeO fiQeQeVV aQd SaUWicOe diVWUibXWiRQ iQ a W\SicaO cRPbXVWiRQ V\VWeP iV iOOXVWUaWed.

FXeO fiQeQeVV iV PeaVXUed b\ Whe SeUceQWage Rf fXeO SaVViQg a 200 PeVh VcUeeQ. SRXUce: SWRUP TechQRORgieV IQc.

IQ a fXeO-VieYiQg aQaO\ViV, Whe cRQVWiWXeQWV UeWaiQed RQ Whe 50 PeVh aUe Rf gUeaW cRQceUQ becaXVe WhaW iV Whe SRUWiRQ

Rf WheVe SaUWicOeV ZiWh Whe OeaVW SURbabiOiW\ Rf cRPSOeWe bXUQRXW befRUe UeachiQg Whe fXUQace e[iW. AOWhRXgh 100%

SaVViQg Whe 50 PeVh iV deViUed, WhiV Pa\ be iPSUacWicaO, VR a OiPiW iV XVXaOO\ SOaced aW 99.8% WR 99.9% SaVViQg 50

PeVh. WiWh ZeOO-WXQed, caUefXOO\ caOibUaWed SUiPaU\ aiUfORZV aQd fiUVW-cOaVV cRaO SXOYeUi]eU PaiQWeQaQce, a PiQiPXP

Rf 75% SaVViQg 200 PeVh aQd a Pa[iPXP Rf 0.10% UePaiQiQg RQ 50 PeVh iV a UeaOiVWic gRaO.

How Is a Fl\ Ash Sample Obtained and Anal\]ed?TheUe aUe fRXU aSSURacheV WR PeaVXUiQg fO\ aVh cRQWeQW aQd, WheUefRUe, Whe TXaOiW\ Rf fXeO cRPbXVWiRQ iQ a bRiOeU.

Each iV RXWOiQed beORZ.

Fl\ Ash Sampling Method 1. FRU bRiOeU WeVWiQg, Whe PRVW SUacWicaO Za\ WR dUaZ a UeSUeVeQWaWiYe fO\ aVh VaPSOe fRU

WXQiQg iV b\ WUaYeUViQg Whe bRiOeU e[iW ZiWh a high-YROXPe fO\ aVh SURbe, aV VhRZQ iQ FigXUe 3. The SURceVV UeTXiUeV a

VaPSOe WiS diUecWed iQWR Whe gaV VWUeaP ZiWh a fiOWeU caQiVWeU WR cROOecW Whe fO\ aVh. AQ aVSiUaWRU aVVePbO\ iV XVed RQ

Whe eQd Rf Whe e[WeQViRQ SiSe WR SURYide Whe VXcWiRQ. ThiV XVXaOO\ UeTXiUeV RQe SeUVRQ aQd RQe hRXU WR cRPSOeWe

(deSeQdiQg RQ Whe dXcW Vi]e aQd fXeO). IW iV ViPSOe iQ deVigQ: AOO WhaW iV Qeeded iV WR WXUQ Whe aiU RQ, iQVeUW Whe SURbe,

aQd PRYe iW fURP SRiQW WR SRiQW.



3. The high-volume in-situ fly ash sampler. Source: Storm Technologies Inc.

Remember that the intent of fly ash sampling is to obtain a representative ash sample from very large ducts. To do

this requires that many points be sampled. For boiler acceptance testing, as many as one point sample every 9

square feet of duct area is usually collected by experienced test engineers. This is equivalent to one sample every 3

feet. Of course, this is impractical for weekly tests, but at least a reasonable number of sample points must be

sampled. One sample every 25 square feet of duct area (one point every 5 feet) is typical.

Fl\ Ash Sampling Method 2. Using an isokinetic fly ash probe is the most accurate method, although this

approach requires a minimum of two people, more time, and attention to detail during testing. A fecheimer probe is

built into the head of the fly ash sampler, which measures the velocity in the duct. Once the velocity is measured,

the sampling rate is matched with a manometer attached across an in-line orifice. The weight of the sample

collected over a defined period of time can be used to calculate the ash flow rate in the duct. Other data taken during

the test are the duct gas velocity, temperature, static pressure, and gas density. This level of precision is not needed

for periodic performance testing.

Perhaps the biggest challenge is to obtain a representative sample. Our experience with the sampler shown in

Figure 4 with a nozzle sized for near isokinetic sampling shows that it is quite sufficient for weekly sampling.

However, we feel it is our obligation to state that the best and most accurate fly ash sampling method is the

isokinetic sampler used for a representative number of sample points.



4. The isokinetic fly ash sampler. Source: Storm Technologies Inc.

Fl\ Ash Sampling Method 3. The multipoint fly ash sampler system in Figure 5 uses a probe that is essentially an

arrangement of sample tubes installed in the flue gas duct to extract fly ash samples simultaneously from multiple

points. By so doing, reasonably representative ash samples can be collected by one operator with minimal effort.

Incorporated into this arrangement are thermocouples and flue gas sampling tubes so that representative

temperatures and flue gas analyses can also be collected. This system was designed by Storm Technologies Inc.,

and a patent application has been filed.

5. The integral in-situ fly ash sampler. Source: Storm Technologies Inc.

Fl\ Ash Sampling Method 4. The fourth and least accurate, but most common, method is taking grab samples

from the ash hoppers. The three-part fly ash sample analysis method can determine whether the root cause of high

fly ash LOI is due to the pulverizers or other combustion issues, such as poor airflow distribution, unbalanced fuel



flows, or postcombustion duct air in-leakage. Because these ash samples can be very biased, they are not

recommended for determination of furnace performance or combustion efficiency.

Fly ash samples are first burned to determine their carbon content either in a furnace or by the hot foil method. Both

operate under the same principle: Heat the sample to about 200F to drive off the moisture, and then weigh the

difference (WO). Then heat the sample to at least 1,600F and weigh the difference again (WF). The weight difference,

(WO-WF)/WO will give the percent moisture and the percent unburned carbon, or LOI, in percentage of weight loss.

When calculating the LOI it is assumed that all of the remaining combustibles are carbon.

If there is a problem with high LOI in the fly ash, a representative sample can be further analyzed to ascertain the

root cause of the problem. The fly ash can be sieved through a 200 mesh screen, and the portion that passes the

200 mesh screen (fine particles) can be burned for LOI (Figure 6). If the fine particle LOI is higher than required, then

the unburned carbon can be attributed to a combustion problem.

. The three-part fly ash test separates coarse and fine particle samples (left) and a composite sample (right) that

are weighed and compared to determine LOI. Source: Storm Technologies Inc.

If the fine particles are above 2% LOI for bituminous coal, this indicates that, although the particles are fine enough,

there was not enough oxygen to complete combustion. If the LOI of the coarse particles is high, the problem can be

traced back to the pulverizers. Thats because if the fine particle LOI is low, then the fine particles had enough

oxygen and residence time in the furnace to burn. The unburned carbon in the larger particles indicates that the

particles are too large to burn in the residence time allotted.

Richard F. (Dick) Storm, PE is senior consultant for Storm Technologies Inc.

Close Window

Documents

Four Methods of Fly Ash Sampling