Gbd Phase 3 Design v3-1

8/3/2019 Gbd Phase 3 Design v3-1

1/22

THE PROS AND CONS

1

Business Model 1:

Low value added

Very risky because only one revenue stream

Bargaining power of customers (retailers/traditionalproviders)

Direct competition with associations: ethical issue

Business Model 3:

Wide value propositionEntire control on the business process

Too many fixed costs without opportunity to implementeconomy of scales


2/22

COMPARISON OF BUSINESS MODELS

2

Advantage of the intermediary model on the manufacturing model:

Wide customer segments

More revenue streams

Complete value proposition

Advantage of the intermediary model on the all inclusive model:

Easier to reach profitability (reasonable assets)

More flexibility in the whole process

Easier to achieve a worldwide development

Selection of Business Model 2: The intermediary solution


3/22

MORE DETAILS

3

Offer a wide range of products adapted to thedifferent scales of oil spills

After positive ROI, opportunity to develop new

products in the future (R&D investment)


4/22

Register patent of our oil spill solution

Other solution: using labels and qualitycertifications on products and services

Differentiation, credibility and quality

CREDIBILITY

4


5/22

Research potentialsuppliers- Hair dressers- Groomers

Contracting- Hair collection process

- Remuneration- Long term contract- Non competition clause

PURCHASING


6/22

Deposit empty containers at the hair

dressers and groomers- Paperboard containers with a hermetic plastic baginside to avoid hair volatility- Collect the full containers- Replace it with empty one

Containerization- Transportation to our regional warehouse- Choice of strategic located harbors

Warehouse interposing- Choice of location (Hub)- Logistics

Hair Collection Process


7/22

Hair reception- Emptying plastic bags- Put them on the assembly line

Hair processing into mat

- Compaction in a pressure pump

Hair mat into hessian : HBB creation

- Wrapping hair mat with hessian

- Sewing the hessian to finalize the boom

Temporary storage before distribution

PRODUCTION


8/22

Consulting Prevention solutions Oil spill assessment and provide response plan

Service and product provider Product sales Service/ training sales

Audit / Customer relationship Verification of product storage Appraisal of the evolution of the client

environment

SALES AND MARKETING


9/22

Assistance to implementation Emergency status

Emergency intervention in case oftechnical problem

Maintenance of the product

TECHNICAL SUPPORT


10/22

10

REPROCESSING: CURRENT SOLUTIONS

NATURAL

Evaporation

Photooxidation

Biodegradation

PHYSICAL

Booming

Skimming

Wiping

Mechanicalremoval

Washing

Surf-washing

Tilling

In-situ burning

CHEMICAL

Dispersants

Demulsifiers

Solidifiers

Surface filmchemicals


11/22

First used in theExxon Valdez

spill (89)

Based on adding

materials tospeed up naturalbiodegradation

processes

Based on readilybiodegradablecharacter of oilcomponents

REPROCESSING: BIOREMEDIATION AS AN OIL SPILL CLEANUPTECHNOLOGY

11


12/22

A biotechnological method for remediation of water or soilcontaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons

Technology based on the ability of certain bacteria to utilize crudeoil as a source of energy and carbon for their growth and producenon toxic products.

Dechloromonas: a strain of bacteriaused for oil bioremediation

12

REPROCESSING: BIOREMEDIATION


13/22

Addition of oil-degrading bacteria

Bioaugmentation

Addition of nutrients to stimulate oil degradersgrowth (nitrogen and phosphorus)

Biostimulation

REPROCESSING: BIOREMEDIATION OPTIONS

13


14/22

14

BIOREMEDIATION

1. Environmental Protection Agency2. Department of Defense

U.S. Air Force U.S. Army U.S. Navy

3. Department of Energy4. Department of Interior5. National Aeronautics and Space6. Administration Tennessee Valley

7. Authority Coast Guard


15/22

15

BIOREMEDIATION

Source :American Journal of Environmental Sciences


16/22

16


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0uephJsrRQ

Source: Center for Oceans and Human Health, University of Miami
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0uephJsrRQhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0uephJsrRQ


17/22

17

REPROCESSING: ECONOMIC COST/BENEFITSANALYSIS

Treatment Technology

Cost per Yd3

in USD

Landfill Disposal 65 -525Thermal Incineration 40 -900Solvent Extraction 85-373

Bioremediation usingmicrobe addition 17-165Natural remediation 3-50

Estimated cost of various oil treatment technologies

Variable Cost:Above table shows that cost per ton or cubic meter for bioremediation isoften less than that of other alternative technologies.Fixed Cost:Laboratory studies: $25,000 - $50,000,

Pilot or field tests; $100,000 to $500,000


18/22

Treatment timeline:

Lab test for evaluating the efficacyof oil spill bioremediation agents( 7- 30 ) days

18


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNiCcW8Ama0&feature=results_video&playnext=1&list=PL8808F2E018841483
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNiCcW8Ama0&feature=results_video&playnext=1&list=PL8808F2E018841483http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNiCcW8Ama0&feature=results_video&playnext=1&list=PL8808F2E018841483


19/22

HBBemergency

set up

HBB to containthe spill +

bioremediation

HBBrecollection

Bacteria hairand oil

degradation

Hair boom landfill ortransform into

fertilizer

REPROCESSING: OUR OPTION

19

http://www.smartgrow.us/


20/22

20

REPROCESSING: KEY PARTNERS


21/22

REPROCESSING: CONSEQUENCES IN CREATION ANDDESIGN

21

Creation of a R&D center and of aBoard of Advisors

Potential partnerships withbioremediation firms

Creation of reprocessing facilities


22/22

THANK YOU FOR LISTENING

23

Documents

Gbd Phase 3 Design v3-1