Glaucoma Surgery 2011:

Why am I Still Doing a Trabeculectomy?

Garry P Condon, MD

Associate Professor OphthalmologyDrexel University College of Medicine

Chairman Dept OphthalmologyAllegheny General Hospital

Pittsburgh PAEXP11749SK

EX-PRESS® Device Brief StatementCAUTION: Federal law restricts this device to sale by or on the order of a physician.

INDICATION: The EX-PRESS® Glaucoma Filtration Device is intended to reduce intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients where medical and conventional surgical treatments have failed.

GUIDANCE REGARDING THE SELECTION OF THE APPROPRIATE VERSION: Prior clinical studies were not designed to compare between the various versions of the EX-PRESS® Glaucoma Filtration Device. The selection of the appropriate version is according to the doctor's discretion.

CONTRAINDICATIONS: The use of this device is contraindicated if one or more of the following conditions exist:· Presence of ocular disease such as uveitis, ocular infection, severe dry eye, severe blepharitis.· Pre-existing ocular or systemic pathology that, in the opinion of the surgeon, is likely to cause postoperative complications following implantation of the device.· Patients diagnosed with angle closure glaucoma.

WARNINGS/PRECAUTIONS: · The surgeon should be familiar with the instructions for use. · The integrity of the package should be examined prior to use and the device should not be used if the package is damaged and sterility is compromised. · This device is for single use only. · MRI of the head is permitted, however not recommended, in the first two weeks post implantation. ATTENTION: Reference the Directions for Use labeling for a complete listing of indications, warnings, precautions, complications and adverse events.

EXP11749SK

Why do I still do some form of Trabeculectomy?

Experience…stood the test of timeIt worksCan repeat itDoing it better

EXP11749SK

Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS)

• 465 trabeculectomies (300 patients) • Pre-op IOP: 27 mmHg• Post-op IOP: 15 mmHg

– 44% reduction• 5 years follow-up

EXP11749SKLichter PR, Musch DC, Gillespie BW, et al; CIGTS Study Group. Ophthalmology. 2001;

What counts in glaucoma surgery…

“Is Scoring With Efficacy”

IOP Reduction of

30% and More…

EXP11749SK

Trab: Nothing else stacks up!

Failed ContendersViscocanalostomyDeep sclerectomyDeep sclerectomy with

AquaflowSinusotomyThermal sclerostomyIridencleisisLaser sclerostomyInternal sclerectomyCyclodialysisTrabeculotomyGoniotomyCyclophotocoagulation

TransscleralEndoscopic

EXP11749SK

Trab’s Two Biggest Contenders:Tube Shunts

Canaloplasty

EXP11749SK

Trabeculectomy …a life after TVT?

Tube vs Trab Study

A new Star? Or tubes just on a Power Play?

EXP11749SK

Trabeculectomy …a life after TVT?

• Study limitations – Preliminary data– More data being published

• 5yr results presented at AGS

EXP11749SK

TUBE VS TRAB:SOME BOOTH COMMENTARY…

Listen to me...I’m a Canadian!

EXP11749SK

TVT Probability of Failure

30.7%

15.1%

p = 0.010

EXP11749SKGedde SJ et al. TVT 3 yr follow up, AJO 2009

TVT Probability of Failure

30.7%

15.1%

p = 0.010

EXP11749SKGedde SJ et al. TVT 3 yr follow up, AJO 2009

The Fight Wasn’t Fair!

While all eyes were good candidates for a tube….Failed trab eyes not good cases for another

trab

EXP11749SK

And yet…The Overtime Period!

Trab was ‘effective’ in 70% of casesAnd on fewer meds!

… available options down the roadNeedling / revisionTrab again!

EXP11749SKGedde SJ et al. TVT 3 yr follow up, AJO 2009

TVT: The Off Sides

Tube first … Big Bloody OperationOne Good ShotTrab after a tube??

EXP11749SK

TVT: The Penalty Box!

New motility problems in tube group 10%

EXP11749SKGedde SJ et al. TVT 3 yr follow up, AJO 2009

Replay… what can we say?• Do TVT results to date favor tubes?• Yes – In patients with previous conj surgery

But…• In Clear corneal pseudophakes?• In Primary glaucoma surgery??

We just don’t know.

EXP11749SK

Canaloplasty?

Best study: 89 patients 3-year F/UPre-op IOP: 23.5 mmHgPost-op IOP:15.5 mmHg

34% reduction

EXP11749SKLewis, RA, et al, Canaloplasty: 3 yr results, Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2011

Canaloplasty: Problems No independent data…

Uncontrolled, non-randomized study from i-Science

And…15% of cases surgeons couldn’t

complete the operation!!Find the canal Pass the Microcatheter

EXP11749SKLewis, RA, et al, Canaloplasty: 3 yr results, Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2011

Canaloplasty vs Trabeculectomy

Sponsor i-Science CIGTS NIH

Patients (#)

89 465

F/U (yrs) 3 5

IOP reduction

34% 44%

EXP11749SK

Lewis, RA, et al, Canaloplasty: 3 yr results, Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2011Lichter PR, Musch DC, Gillespie BW, et al; CIGTS Study Group. Ophthalmology. 2001;

So for that super-LOW IOP

In Primary Virgin Eyes

For now…

EXP11749SK

Trabeculectomy is the Gold Standard!

Trab… The Winning play!!!

EXP11749SK

…but live with this!?

EXP11749SK

…and this

EXP11749SK

… We CAN DO IT BETTER!Surgery 1 year apart

OS limbal based OD fornix based

Fornix based flapBroader MM-C applicationBullet-proof Conj closure

EXP11749SK

Mastering water-tight closure

Condon Conj Closure video: Eyetube.netEXP11749SK

EX-PRESS® Device Indication

The EX-PRESS® Glaucoma Filtration Device is intended to reduce intraocular pressure in

glaucoma patients where medical and conventional surgical treatments (SLT/ALT)

have failed.

EXP11749SK

More precision?More control?

Maris, Ishida and Netland. J Glaucoma, Jan 2007

Hearndon and Marzette. AGS 2008

EX-PRESS® device under scleral flap

EXP11749SK

Trab-what I hated

EXP11749SK

EX-PRESS® device titled 220EXP11749SK

EX-PRESS® Device: P-50

EXP11749SK

EX-PRESS® device P-50 DETAIL

EXP11749SK

My Flap Technique

Conj flap technique: Limbus-Based <2001

Fornix-Based>2001

Number of consec eyes:(min 4 wk f/up)

107 199

wound leaks req surg repair: 2 2

wound leaks req surg repair % 1.9 1.0

Video: ‘Closing the Conjunctival Flap’www.Eyetube.net

EXP11749SK

1 mo

1 yr

EXP11749SK

Assessment of Bleb Morphology and Post-operative Outcomes After

EX-PRESS® device Versus Trabeculectomy(Good & Kahook, AJO 2011)

• Retrospective Consecutive Case Control Series

• Seventy Patients (n=35 each group) with Mean of ~28 months of follow up

• Also assessed time to visual recovery

EXP11749SK

Post-operative Outcomes After EX-PRESS® device Versus Trabeculectomy

Final IOP decreased by 45.15% and 48.45% from baseline in the EX-PRESS® device and Trabeculectomy groups respectively (p=0.209)

EXP11749SK

Assessment of Visual RecoveryEX-PRESS® device Versus Trabeculectomy

* Best CorrectedEXP11749SK

EX-PRESS® Glaucoma Filtration Device

Remarkably Biocompatible

EXP11749SK

A Nyska, Y. Glovinsky, M. Belkin, and Y. Epstein. Biocompatibility of the EX-PRESS® miniature glaucoma drainage implant. J Glaucoma. 2003 Jun; 12(3):275-80

De Feo etal. 2009• 2 yr postop EX-PRESS® device in one eye

(postmortem)• No difference in corneal endothelial cell density

between the two eyes

EXP11749SK

F. De Feo, S. Jacobson, A Nyska, P. Pagani, C.E Traverso. Histological Biocompatibility of a Stainless Steel Miniature Glaucoma Drainage Device in Humans: A Case Report. Toxicologic Pathology, 37: 512-516, 2009

We can do BETTER than this!

EXP11749SK

And this…

EXP11749SK

Let’s raise the bar…

More correct and effective standard surgery

New approaches to enhance current techniques

Smoother more favorable outcomes

No… Let’s Raise a Glass at the Bar!

EXP11749SK

Thank-you

EXP11749SK