12
HPSR 2010. Final Program Sunday (Jun 13) Monday (Jun 14) Tuesday(Jun 15) Wednesday(Jun 16) 7:30-8:00 Shuttle to UTD Shuttle to UTD Shuttle to UTD 8:00 -8:30 Shuttle to UTD Breakfast & Registration TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102) Breakfast & Registration TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102) Breakfast & Registration TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102) 8:30-8:45 Registration TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102) Opening Conference Session 4 TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102) Session 7 TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102) 8:45-9:00 Keynote Speech - Prof. George Varghese 9:00-9:45 Tutorial 1 TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102) 9:45-10:00 Coffee break 10:00-10:15 Session 1 TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102) Coffee break Coffee break 10:15-10:30 Session 5 TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102) Session 8 TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102) 10:30-10:45 Coffee break 10:45-11:45 Tutorial 1 TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102) 11:45-12:00 Lunch 1 UTD-SU Dinning (SU 2.905) Lunch 2 UTD-SU Dinning (SU 2.905) 12:00-12:15 Closing Conference 12:15-12:30 Shuttle to Hotel 12:30-12:45 Lunch UTD-SU Dinning (SU 2.905) 12:45-13:15 13:15-13:30 Session 2 TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102) Session 6 (ECSS 2.312) 13:30-14:45 Tutorial 2 TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102) 14:45-15:00 Coffee break Coffee break 15:00-15:15 Coffee break Session 3 TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102) Panel 2 (ECSS 2.312) 15:15-16:30 Tutorial 2 TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102) 16:30-16:45 TC Meeting (ECSS 2.312) 16:45-17:00 Coffee break 17:00-17:30 Shuttle to Hotel Panel 1 TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102) 17:30-18:00 Transportation to Museum 18:00-18:30 Reception & Registration The Renaissance Dallas Richardson Hotel 18:30-19:00 Shuttle to Hotel Tour of Museum 19:00-20:00 Dinner 1 The Renaissance Dallas Richardson Hotel Dinner 2 (@ Museum) 20:00-20:30 Students returning to UTD 20:30-21:00 21:00-21:30 Students returning to UTD Transportation to Hotel 21:30-22:00

HPSR 2010. Final Programopnear.utdallas.edu/activ/hpsr2010/files/HPSR_2010... · their way into commercial systems including Linux (timing wheels), the Cisco GSR (DRR), and Microsoft

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: HPSR 2010. Final Programopnear.utdallas.edu/activ/hpsr2010/files/HPSR_2010... · their way into commercial systems including Linux (timing wheels), the Cisco GSR (DRR), and Microsoft

HPSR 2010. Final Program

Sunday (Jun 13) Monday (Jun 14) Tuesday(Jun 15) Wednesday(Jun 16)

7:30-8:00 Shuttle to UTD Shuttle to UTD Shuttle to UTD

8:00 -8:30 Shuttle to UTD

Breakfast & Registration

TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102)

Breakfast & Registration

TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102)

Breakfast & Registration

TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102)

8:30-8:45 Registration

TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102)

Opening Conference

Session 4 TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102)

Session 7 TI-Auditorium (ECSS

2.102) 8:45-9:00 Keynote Speech -

Prof. George Varghese

9:00-9:45 Tutorial 1

TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102)

9:45-10:00 Coffee break

10:00-10:15 Session 1

TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102)

Coffee break Coffee break

10:15-10:30 Session 5 TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102)

Session 8 TI-Auditorium (ECSS

2.102)

10:30-10:45 Coffee break

10:45-11:45 Tutorial 1

TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102)

11:45-12:00

Lunch 1 UTD-SU Dinning

(SU 2.905)

Lunch 2 UTD-SU Dinning

(SU 2.905)

12:00-12:15 Closing Conference

12:15-12:30 Shuttle to Hotel

12:30-12:45 Lunch UTD-SU Dinning

(SU 2.905) 12:45-13:15

13:15-13:30 Session 2 TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102)

Session 6 (ECSS 2.312) 13:30-14:45

Tutorial 2 TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102) 14:45-15:00 Coffee break Coffee break

15:00-15:15 Coffee break Session 3 TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102)

Panel 2 (ECSS 2.312) 15:15-16:30 Tutorial 2

TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102)

16:30-16:45 TC Meeting (ECSS 2.312)

16:45-17:00 Coffee break

17:00-17:30 Shuttle to Hotel Panel 1 TI-Auditorium (ECSS 2.102)

17:30-18:00 Transportation to Museum

18:00-18:30 Reception &

Registration The Renaissance

Dallas Richardson Hotel

18:30-19:00 Shuttle to Hotel Tour of Museum

19:00-20:00 Dinner 1

The Renaissance Dallas Richardson

Hotel Dinner 2

(@ Museum)

20:00-20:30 Students returning

to UTD

20:30-21:00

21:00-21:30 Students returning to UTD

Transportation to Hotel

21:30-22:00

Page 2: HPSR 2010. Final Programopnear.utdallas.edu/activ/hpsr2010/files/HPSR_2010... · their way into commercial systems including Linux (timing wheels), the Cisco GSR (DRR), and Microsoft

Getting an Edge at High Speeds: Randomized Algorithms and Networking Hardware Location: TI-Auditorium(ECSS 2.102) at UTDallas

Speaker: Prof. George Varghese

Abstract:

Even commercial router vendors have adopted randomized algorithms in a few cases because of their simplicity, speed, and memory-efficiency. in a few cases. Further, because of the opportunity to see every member of population (i.e., every arriving packet) and preserve summary information about the entire population, such randomized algorithms can obtain an "edge" over standard algorithms that merely sample the population. I illustrate this thesis by three algorithms. First, I will describe a simple algorithm for finding sources that send a large proportion of traffic, and its application in a worm detection chip. Second, I will describe an algorithm that provides an inexpensive technique for measuring the average and variance of packet latencies and loss on a link. By contrast, the majority of routers have no support for fine-grained latency measurement; managers must instead rely on approximate methods such as sending probe packets or using "tomographic" techniques. If time permits, I will describe a third algorithm which allows scalable logging, say of millions of network addresses infected after an attack, using only a small amount of memory. In all three case I will quantify the edge obtained over simple sampling.

Bio:

George Varghese worked at DEC for several years designing DECNET protocols and

products (bridge architecture, Gigaswitch) before obtaining his Ph.D in 1992 from MIT. He

worked from 1993-1999 at Washington University. He joined UCSD in 1999, where he

currently is a professor of computer science. He won the ONR Young Investigator Award

in 1996, and was elected to be a Fellow of the Association for Computing Machinery

(ACM) in 2002. Together with colleagues, he has 16 patents awarded in the general field

of Network Algorithmics. Several of the algorithms he has helped develop have found

their way into commercial systems including Linux (timing wheels), the Cisco GSR (DRR),

and Microsoft Windows (IP lookups). He also helped design the lookup engine for

Procket's 40 Gbps forwarding engine. He has written a book on building fast router and

end node implementations called "Network Algorithmics". In May 2004, he co-founded

NetSift Inc. which was acquired by Cisco Systems in 2005.

BACK

Page 3: HPSR 2010. Final Programopnear.utdallas.edu/activ/hpsr2010/files/HPSR_2010... · their way into commercial systems including Linux (timing wheels), the Cisco GSR (DRR), and Microsoft

Tutorial 1: High Capacity Carrier Ethernet Transport Location: TI-Auditorium(ECSS 2.102) at UTDallas

The path towards profitable operation of networks today is paved with emerging premium

services with strict requirements to bandwidth, delay, packet loss and resilience.

Examples are IPTV, Video on Demand (VoD), Videoconferencing and telemedicine. They

all use IP on the packet layer, but they demand reliable underlying transport networks for

proper Quality of Experience (QoE). In a telemedicine video streaming application, where

a doctor with special expertise remotely acts as second opinion, multi layer resilience is

obviously required. In addition, such a service has strict delay bounds, which demands

fast recovery or protection switching. Other services like IPTV require multicast transport,

and the ability to quickly identify and isolate a faulty situation in a complex multicast

architecture can make the difference between profitable or non-profitable operation. The

demand for high quality reliable services further increases the complexity when the range

of the services extends the local network and multi-domain issues arise. Hence,

standardized connection monitoring is required to proactively avoid most errors and to

react swiftly to the remaining. Therefore Telecom carriers have spent more than 10 years

developing a Next Generation Network concept that will allow them to replace the

classical transport network to provide high quality packet transfer. Carrier Ethernet

technologies address these challenges by adding transport functionalities including

resilience to an MPLS like network architecture.

This tutorial provides a thorough introduction to the Carrier Ethernet technology. In

particular, we focus on MPLS-TP and PBB-TE and related Operation, Administration and

Maintenance (OAM) functions. Furthermore, we address how Carrier Ethernet

technologies can be used in the transport network to provide resilience to the packet

layer. Explicit focus is on the multicast situation, where the signaling to identify faults is

described. The standards covering the field are presented, and ongoing efforts in different

standardization bodies are detailed. Finally, we present illustrative examples and best

practices of how Carrier Ethernet can be applied for resilient IPTV transport.

BACK

Page 4: HPSR 2010. Final Programopnear.utdallas.edu/activ/hpsr2010/files/HPSR_2010... · their way into commercial systems including Linux (timing wheels), the Cisco GSR (DRR), and Microsoft

Tutorial 2: Survey and Proposal on Packet Classification Algorithms Location: TI-Auditorium(ECSS 2.102) at UTDallas

Accompanied with rapidly growing real-time traffic in the Internet, the policy-based routing

which can provide variable levels of quality of services becomes more important. For

Internet routers to provide different service qualities for each flow, packet classification is

an essential prerequisite. Packet classification classifies an incoming packet based on

predefined rules so that the packet can be provided with the service defined for the class

to which it belongs. In this tutorial, efficient algorithmic approaches for packet

classification are comparatively studied. Packet classification algorithms can be classified

into different categories depending on their principles: algorithms based on hierarchical

approach, algorithms based on range cutting, and algorithms based on individual field

search. Using a consistent set of example data, a set of different algorithms is explained

in each category with respects to their data structures, characteristics, and performances.

Performance of each algorithm is evaluated using pre-defined metrics such as search

speed, memory requirement, and table update. Simulation results will be shown for the

well known rule database with the sizes of 1000 and 5000 rules created from Classbench.

Suggestions are made for the choice of algorithms depending on the number of rules, rule

statistics, or implementation flexibility, etc

BACK

Page 5: HPSR 2010. Final Programopnear.utdallas.edu/activ/hpsr2010/files/HPSR_2010... · their way into commercial systems including Linux (timing wheels), the Cisco GSR (DRR), and Microsoft

Panel 1: Multi-pathing in the Data Center for high-availability and load balancing. Is it the end for Spanning Tree? Location: TI-Auditorium(ECSS 2.102) at UTDallas

Donald Eastlake IETF TRILL Working Group Chair

Paul Unbehagen Alcatel-Lucent Distinguished Engineer

Uri Cummings Fulcrum Microsystems

Dinesh G Dutt Cisco Systems

Moderator:

Paul Congdon CTO HP ProCurve

BACK

Panel 2: Packet Optical Transport. Location: TI-Auditorium(ECSS 2.102) at UTDallas

Packet Optical Transport Network is the solution for the fast growing packet traffic being

carried on the traditional TDM-based SONET/SDH network. It merges packet

routing/switching, wavelength switching, and connection-oriented Ethernet functionalities

onto a single device. It allows the convergence of the Layer 1, 2 and 3 networks in order

to reduce network costs, and provide more flexible services across the carrier networks.

This panel will discuss the driver and benefits of the P-OTP as well as the challenges of

the technology from router equipment vendor, transport equipment vendor, and service

provider’s perspective.

Enrique Hernandez Director of Tech. & Standards/Bell Lab Fellow Alcatel-Lucent

Raghu Ranganathan Network Architect Ciena

Mauro Macchi Sr. Product Line Manager Juniper Networks

Rick Schell Sr. Engineer Verizon Inc.

Moderator:

Ning So Advisory Engineer Verizon Inc.

BACK

Page 6: HPSR 2010. Final Programopnear.utdallas.edu/activ/hpsr2010/files/HPSR_2010... · their way into commercial systems including Linux (timing wheels), the Cisco GSR (DRR), and Microsoft

Session 1: Router and Switch Architectures Chair: Eiji Oki, The University of Electro-Communications, Tokyo, JP Location: TI-Auditorium(ECSS 2.102) at UTDallas

Software Emulation of Programmable Optical Routers, Walter Cerroni (Universita' di Bologna, IT);

Carla Raffaelli (University of Bologna, IT); Michele Savi (University of Bologna, IT)

Implementation of a Simplified Network Processor, Qiang Wu (University of Massachusetts, US);

Danai Chasaki (University of Massachusetts, US); Tilman Wolf (University of Massachusetts, US)

Efficient Singlecast / Multicast Method For Active Optical Access Network Using PLZT High-

speed Optical Switches, Kunitaka Ashizawa (Keio University, JP); Kazumasa Tokuhashi (Keio

University, JP); Daisuke Ishii (Keio University, JP); Satoru Okamoto (Keio University, JP); Naoaki

Yamanaka (Keio University, JP); Eiji Oki (The University of Electro-Communications, JP)

Cost Analysis of DWDM Multi-Mode Switching Routers, Vikram Shete (University of Houston,

US); Yiyong Zha (University of Houston, US); Lei Wang (University of Houston, US); Yuhua Chen

(University of Houston, US)

A Virtual Switch Architecture for Hosting Virtual Networks on the Internet, Fabienne

Anhalt (Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon - INRIA, FR); Dinil Mon Divakaran (ENS Lyon,

INRIA, FR); Pascale Vicat-Blanc Primet (INRIA, FR)

BACK

Session 2: Buffer Design and Analysis Chair: Nikolaos Ioa. Chrysos, IBM Zurich Research Laboratory, CH Location: TI-Auditorium(ECSS2.102) at UTDallas Designing packet buffers in high-bandwidth switches and routers, Dong Lin (Hong Kong

University of Science & Technology, HK); Mounir Hamdi (Hong Kong University of

Science and Technology, CN); Jogesh Muppala (The Hong Kong University of Science

and Technology, HK)

Block-Based Packet Buffer with Deterministic Packet Departures, Hao Wang (University of

California, San Diego, US); Bill Lin (University of California, San Diego, US)

A Novel Hybrid Memory Architecture with Parallel DRAM for Fast Packet Buffers, Arthur Mutter

(University of Stuttgart, DE)

Packet Loss Process under Bounded Delay, Jianming Liu (GuiLin University of Electronic

Technology, CN); Xiaohong Jiang (Tohoku University, JP); Achille Pattavina (Politecnico di

Milano, IT)

BACK

Page 7: HPSR 2010. Final Programopnear.utdallas.edu/activ/hpsr2010/files/HPSR_2010... · their way into commercial systems including Linux (timing wheels), the Cisco GSR (DRR), and Microsoft

Session 3: Routing Chair: Walter Cerroni, Universita' di Bologna, IT Location: TI-Auditorium(ECSS 2.102) at UTDallas

Computing Alternate Multicast Trees with Maximum Latency Guarantee, Limin Tang (University of

Texas at Dallas, US); Miguel Razo (University of Texas at Dallas, US); Wanjun Huang (University

of Texas at Dallas, US); Arularasi Sivasankaran (University of Texas at Dallas, US); Paolo Monti

(The Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), SE); Marco Tacca (University of Texas at Dallas, US);

Andrea Fumagalli (UTD, US)

A Fast Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm based Approach for Energy Efficient QoS Routing in Two-

tiered Wireless Sensor Networks, Gholamhossein Ekbatanifard (Ferdowsi University of Mashhad,

IR)

MultiRoute - A Congestion-Aware Routing Protocol, Ali Al-Shabibi (CERN, CH); Brian Martin

(CERN, CH)

Oblivious Routing and QoS Guarantee in Wireless Mesh Networks, Yuanzhe Xuan (HonKong

University of Science and Technology, HK); Chin Tau Lea (Hong Kong University of Science and

Technology, HK)

Fast Convergence with Fast Reroute in IP Networks, James Bedenbaugh (University of South

Carolina, US); Glenn Robertson (University of South Carolina, US); Srihari Nelakuditi (University

of South Carolina, US)

BACK

Session 4: Packet Processing Chair: Shivendra Panwar, Polytechnic Institute of New York University, US Location: TI-Auditorium(ECSS 2.102) at UTDallas Scalability Analysis of NEMO Prefix Delegation-based Schemes, Md Shohrab Hossain (University of Oklahoma, US); Abu Zafar M Shahriar (University of Oklahoma, US); Mohammed Atiquzzaman

(University of Oklahoma, US), William Ivancic (NASA Glenn Research Center, US).

Architecture-Aware Data Structure Optimization for Power-Efficient IP Lookup, Weirong Jiang

(University of Southern California, US); Viktor K. Prasanna (University of Southern California, US)

SPADE: Statistical Packet Acceptance Defense Engine, Shimrit Tzur-David (The Hebrew

University of Jerusalem, IL); Harel Avissar (The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel, IL); Danny

Dolev (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, IL); Tal Anker (The Hebrew University, Jerusalem,

Israel, IL)

Towards Optimized Packet Processing for Multithreaded Network Processor, Yeim-Kuan Chang

(National Cheng Kung University, TW); Fang-Chen Kuo (National Cheng Kung University, TW)

BACK

Page 8: HPSR 2010. Final Programopnear.utdallas.edu/activ/hpsr2010/files/HPSR_2010... · their way into commercial systems including Linux (timing wheels), the Cisco GSR (DRR), and Microsoft

Session 5: Switching Networks Chair: Andrea Francini, Bell Labs, Alcatel-Lucent, US Location: TI-Auditorium(ECSS 2.102) at UTDallas

The FPGA Implementation of the Log2(N; 0; p) Switching Fabric Control Algorithm, Wojciech Kabacinski (Poznan University of Technology, PL); Marek Michalski (Poznan University of Technology, PL)

Towards Low-Cost High-Performance All-Optical Interconnection Networks, Cyriel Minkenberg

(IBM Zurich Research Laboratory, CH); Nikolaos Ioa. Chrysos (IBM Zurich Research Laboratory,

CH); Jens Hofrichter (IBM Research GmbH, Zurich Research Laboratory, CH); Folkert Horst (IBM

Research GmbH, Zurich Research Laboratory, CH); Bert Jan Offrein (IBM Research GmbH,

Zurich Research Laboratory, CH)

Resource Allocation in Buffered Crossbar Switches for Supporting Network Virtualization, Qiang

Duan (The Pennsylvania State University, US)

2-Dilated Flattened Butterfly: A Nonblocking Switching Network, Ajithkumar Thamarakuzhi

(University of Connecticut, US); John A Chandy (University of Connecticut, US)

BACK

Session 6: Packet Scheduling Chair: Wojciech Kabacinski, Poznan University of Technology, PL Location: ECSS 2.312 at UTDallas Size-Based Flow Scheduling in a CICQ Switch, Dinil Mon Divakaran (ENS Lyon, INRIA, FR); Fabienne Anhalt (Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon - INRIA, FR); Eitan Altman (INRIA, FR); Pascale Vicat-Blanc Primet (INRIA, FR)

Packet Scheduling in a Low Latency Optical Packet Switch, Lin Liu (State University of

New York at Stony Brook, US); Zhenghao Zhang (Florida State University, US);

Yuanyuan Yang (Stony Brook University, US)

Designing Fully Distributed Scheduling Algorithms for Contention-Tolerant Crossbar

Switches, Guannan Qu (Jilin University, P.R. China, US); Hyung Jae Chang (University of

Texas at Dallas, US); Jianping Wang (City University of Hong Kong, HK); Zhiyi Fang (Jilin

University, CN); Si-Qing Zheng (University of Texas at Dallas, US)

DISQUO: A Distributed 100% Throughput Algorithm for a Buffered Crossbar Switch,

Shunyuan Ye (Polytechnic University, US); Yanming Shen (Dalian University of

Technology, Dalian, P.R. China, CN); Shivendra Panwar (Polytechnic Institute of New

York University, US)

BACK

Page 9: HPSR 2010. Final Programopnear.utdallas.edu/activ/hpsr2010/files/HPSR_2010... · their way into commercial systems including Linux (timing wheels), the Cisco GSR (DRR), and Microsoft

Session 7: Signaling, Testing, Monitoring and Control Chair: Jason Jue, UTD, Dallas, TX, US Location: TI-Auditorium(ECSS 2.102) at UTDallas

Scheme to Measure One-way Delay Variation with Detection and Removal of Clock

Skew, Makoto Aoki (Cyber Creative Institute, JP); Eiji Oki (The University of Electro-

Communications, JP); Roberto Rojas-Cessa (New Jersey Institute of Technology, US)

Framed Bit Error Rate Testing for 100G Ethernet Equipment, Anders Rasmussen (DTU

Fotonik, DK); Sarah Ruepp (Technical University of Denmark, DK); Henrik Wessing

(Technical University of Denmark, DK); Michael S. Berger (Technical University of

Denmark, DK)

Cost Analysis of Mobility Management Entities for SIGMA, Md Shohrab Hossain (University of Oklahoma, US); Mohammed Atiquzzaman (University of Oklahoma, US), William Ivancic (NASA Glenn Research Center, US).

Performance Bounds of Rate-Adaptation Schemes for Energy-Efficient Routers, Andrea

Francini (Bell Labs, Alcatel-Lucent, US); Dimitrios Stiliadis (Bell Labs, Lucent

Technologies, US)

BACK

Session 8: Fault-Tolerance and Survivability Chair: Si Qing Zheng, UTD, Dallas, TX, US Location: TI-Auditorium(ECSS 2.102) at UTDallas

2-SRLG-Connected Partitioning in Optical Networks, Mohammad Masud Hasan

(University of Texas at Dallas, US); Jason Jue (University of Texas at Dallas, US)

A New Framework for Efficient Shared Segment Protection Scheme for WDM Networks,

Brigitte Jaumard (Concordia University, CA); Nazmun N Bhuiyan (Concordia University,

CA); Samir Sebbah (Concordia University, CA); Florian Huc (Universite de Geneve, CH);

David Coudert (INRIA, I3S, CNRS, Université de Nice Sophia, FR)

Capacity Upgrade of Passive Optical Networks with Minimum Cost and System

Disruption, Marilet De Andrade Jardin (Universitat Politécnica de Catalunya, ES);

Massimo Tornatore (University of California, Davis, US); Sebastia Sallent (Universidad

Politecnica de Catalunya, ES); Biswanath Mukherjee (Dept. of Computer Science -

University of California Davis, US)

Shared Path Protection in GMPLS Networks with Limited Wavelength Conversion

Capability, Anna V Manolova (Danish Technical University, DK); Sarah Ruepp (Technical

University of Denmark, DK); Raul Muñoz (CTTC, ES); Ricardo Martinez (CTTC, ES);

Page 10: HPSR 2010. Final Programopnear.utdallas.edu/activ/hpsr2010/files/HPSR_2010... · their way into commercial systems including Linux (timing wheels), the Cisco GSR (DRR), and Microsoft

Ramon Casellas (CTTC, ES); Isabella Cerutti (Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, IT); Nicola

Sambo (Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, IT); Alessio Giorgetti (Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna,

IT); Nicola Andriolli (Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, IT); Piero Castoldi (Scuola Superiore

Sant'Anna, IT)

Advanced Crankback Provisioning for Multi-Domain Networks, Nasir Ghani (University of

New Mexico, US); Feng Xu (University of New Mexico, US); Mostafa Esmaeili (University

of New Mexico, US); Min Peng (Wuhan University, CN)

BACK

Page 11: HPSR 2010. Final Programopnear.utdallas.edu/activ/hpsr2010/files/HPSR_2010... · their way into commercial systems including Linux (timing wheels), the Cisco GSR (DRR), and Microsoft
Page 12: HPSR 2010. Final Programopnear.utdallas.edu/activ/hpsr2010/files/HPSR_2010... · their way into commercial systems including Linux (timing wheels), the Cisco GSR (DRR), and Microsoft

Shuttle Schedule

From - To Sunday (June 13) Monday (June 14) Tuesday (June 15) Wednesday (June 16)

Hotel-UTD 7:55 AM 7:20 AM 7:20 AM 7:20 AM

8:15 AM 7:45 AM 7:45 AM 7:45 AM

UTD-Hotel 5:00 PM 6:30 PM 12:15 PM

5:15 PM 6:45 PM 12:30 PM

Hotel-UTD 8:00 PM 9:00 PM

8:15 PM 9:15 PM

UTD-Museum 5:30 PM

Museum-Hotel 9:00 PM

BACK