43
Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico Association of Energy Engineers May 26, 2015

Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Hydronic Loop Performance:Design vs. Installed

Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance

David Kandel

New Mexico Association of Energy Engineers May 26, 2015

Page 2: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Agenda

Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed• Design and Modeling Assumptions & Coil Behavior• Performance Problems

• Valve Sizing• Valve Authority (Static vs Dynamic Balancing)• Coil Performance

• Potential Solutions

Page 4: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Valve / Coil Performance

Coil Performance

Co

il P

ow

er /

Flo

w

Flow / Control Signal

ΔT

BTUh

Valve GPM

Resulting Coil Output

ΔT

Page 5: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Agenda

Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed• Design and Modeling Assumptions & Coil Behavior• Performance Problems

• Valve Sizing• Valve Authority• Coil Performance

• Potential Solutions

Page 6: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Hydronic Valve Sizing

P

gpm Cv

Example:• Coil Requires 250 GPM• Design DP for valve, 4 psi • DP of Valve not to exceed 5

psi

1252

250

4

250 Cv

Page 7: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Hydronic Valve Sizing

Example:• Coil Requires 250 GPM• Design DP for valve, 4 psi • DP of Valve not to exceed 5

psi

1252

250

4

250 Cv

Page 8: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Hydronic Valve Sizing

2GPM

P

Cv

Checking DP

Example:• Coil Requires 250 GPM• Design DP for valve, 4 psi • DP of Valve not to exceed 5

psi

Page 9: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Hydronic Valve Sizing

psi7.790

250 P

2

2GPM

P

Cv

Checking DP

psi2.2170

250 P

2

Page 10: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Piping Options

Coil Balance Valve

Control Valve

Coil Control Valve

Coil Flow Limiting

Valve

Control Valve

Page 11: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

No Balancing DeviceOversized Control Valves

Coil Control Valve

Coil Control Valve

Near Pump:• High ΔP causes massive

overflow

ΔP35 psi

ΔP8 psi

Far From Pump:• Oversized Valve cause

overflow• No Protection from pressure

changes

Page 12: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Traditional Balancing ValveOversized Control Valves

Near Pump:• Major Valve Authority issues• No Protection from pressure

changes

Balance Valve

Balance Valve

Far From Pump:• Minor Valve Authority issues• No Protection from pressure

changes

Coil Control Valve

Coil Control Valve

ΔP35 psi

ΔP10 psi

Page 13: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Flow Limiting ValveOversized Control Valves

Near Pump:• Major Valve Authority issues• No Protection from pressure

changes below full flow

Far From Pump:• Minor Valve Authority issues• No Protection from pressure

changes below full flow

Coil Control Valve

Coil Control Valve

ΔP35 psi

ΔP10 psi

Flow Limiting

Valve

Flow Limiting

Valve

Page 14: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Agenda

Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed• Design and Modeling Assumptions & Coil Behavior• Performance Problems

• Valve Sizing• Valve Authority• Coil Performance

• Potential Solutions

Page 15: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

15

Valve Authority

Branchp

valvepCoil

Balance Valve

branch

valve

p

pA

Page 16: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Static BalancingFull Flow

Near Pump:• High Branch Differential• High Pressure Drop on

Balancing Valve

Balance Valve

Balance Valve

Far From Pump:• Low Branch Differential• Low Pressure Drop on

Balancing Valve

Coil Control Valve

Coil Control Valve

ΔP20 psi

ΔP10 psi

4PSI

4PSI

2PSI

4PSI

4PSI

12PSI

100%

Page 17: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Static BalancingManual Balancing Valves

• 100% flow• No pressure drop• 100% flow• 12 psi pressure drop

Page 18: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

• 20% flow• ? psi pressure drop

Static BalancingManual Balancing Valves

Page 19: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

• Limit the maximum coil flow…

• What happens below max flow?

Static BalancingAutomatic Balancing Valves

Control Valve + Automatic Balancing valve = PI Valve

Page 20: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Static BalancingLess than Full Flow

Near Pump:• Massive overflow

Balance Valve

Balance Valve

Far From Pump:• Small overflow

Coil Control Valve

Coil Control Valve

ΔP20 psi

ΔP10 psi

5PSI

< 4PSI

1PSI

14PSI

< 4PSI

2PSI

20%

Page 21: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Dynamic Balancing

Page 22: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Dynamic BalancingAll Flows

Near Pump:• Exact GPM

Far From Pump:• Exact GPM

Coil PI Valve

CoilPI Valve

ΔP20 psi

ΔP10 psi

0 to 100%

Page 23: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Agenda

Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed• Design and Modeling Assumptions & Coil Behavior• Performance Problems

• Valve Sizing• Valve Authority• Coil Performance

• Potential Solutions

Page 24: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Valve / Coil Performance

Coil Performance

Co

il P

ow

er /

Flo

w

Flow / Control Signal

ΔT

BTUh

Valve GPM

Resulting Coil Output

ΔT

Page 25: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Low Delta T at the Coil

T500Q(Btu/h) GPMPower Output:

Operating in the Waste Zone1. Pumping more Water2. Reduced Delta T3. No additional BTUs

Page 26: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Low Delta T at the Coil

Page 27: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Coil Degradation

Heat Transfer of Coil Degrades Over Time• Damage to coil or fins• Air-side fouling• Water-side fouling

Page 28: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Coil Degradation

Coil Performance

Co

il P

ow

er /

Flo

w

Flow / Control Signal

ΔT

BTUh

Valve GPM

Resulting Coil Output

ΔT

Page 29: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Coil Performance

Coil Degradation

Wa

ste

Zon

e

Co

il P

ow

er /

Flo

w

Flow / Control Signal

ΔT

Page 30: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Agenda

Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed• Design and Modeling Assumptions & Coil Behavior• Performance Problems

• Valve Sizing• Valve Authority• Coil Performance

• Potential Solutions• Pressure Independent Valves• Delta T Limiting

Page 32: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Pressure Independent ValvesPI Valve Technologies

Mechanical Regulator Flow Meter

Page 33: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Pressure Independent TechnologyMechanical Regulator

Pu Pd

Pd

Page 34: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Pressure Independent TechnologyMechanical Regulator

Pu Pd

Pd

Page 35: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Pressure Independent TechnologyElectronic Pressure Independence

Real Time Flow Measurement

Unrestricted Flow Pattern

Page 36: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Advantages of Electronic PI ValvesDP Reset Strategy

DP reset can now be employed with Pressure Independence

Page 37: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Advantages of Electronic PI ValvesDP Reset Strategy

At Design• “Critical Zone” valve full

open at 5 psi

Coil ePIV

Coil ePIV

100%

5PSI

100% Open

9PSI

Page 38: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

9PSIAdvantages of Electronic PI ValvesDP Reset Strategy

At High Demand• “Critical Zone” valve full

open at 5 psi

Coil ePIV

45%

5PSI

At Reduced Demand• “Critical Zone” valve driven

open, as pump reduced as far as possible.

40%

50% Open

8PSI

Page 39: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

65% Open80% Open90% Open

8PSIAdvantages of Electronic PI ValvesVFD Reset Strategy

At High Demand• “Critical Zone” valve full

open at 5 psi

Coil ePIV

45%

5PSI

At Reduced Demand• “Critical Zone” valve driven

open, as pump reduced as far as possible.

4PSI3PSI2PSI

40%35%30%

7PSI6PSI

Page 40: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Pressure Independent TechnologyDelta T Limiting

Page 41: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Pressure Independent TechnologyDelta T Limiting

Page 42: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Delta T LimitingCase Study: Large Tech Company in North Carolina

Position Control 240 GPM

144 GPM

96 GPM

Pressure Independent

P.I.+DT Management

Page 43: Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed Why design and modeling data don’t always match a building’s actual performance David Kandel New Mexico

Hydronic Loop Performance: Design vs. Installed• Design and Modeling Assumptions & Coil Behavior• Performance Problems

• Valve Sizing• Valve Authority• Coil Performance

• Potential Solutions• Pressure Independent Valves• Delta T Limiting

[email protected]