Upload
satriya-tjahja-hudaya
View
30
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
journal reading Benign Paroxysmal Peripheral Vertigo
Citation preview
JOURNAL READING“ The Role of Postural Restrictions
after BPPV Treatment: RealEffect on Successful Treatment and
BPPV’s Recurrence Rates “
Edited by :
Satriya Tjahja H.
Veransa Arizona
Concelors :
dr. Agus Sudarwi, Sp.THT-KL
dr. Afif Zjauhari, Sp.THT-KL
The Role of Postural Restrictions after BPPV Treatment: Real
Effect on Successful Treatment and BPPV’s Recurrence Rates
• George X. Papacharalampous,• P. V. Vlastarakos,• G. P. Kotsis,• D. Davilis,• L.Manolopoulos
ABSTRACT
Canalith repositioning techniques (CRT) as the
treatment of choice BPPV.
A retrospective review of 82 patients was conducted to determine the e cacy of ffi
postural restrictions, when combined with the classic CRT, for successful treatment and recurrence rates. Follow-up period
until 12 months after the initial treatment.
In this study, postural restrictions did not
appear to significantly a ect theff
outcomes of repositioning
maneuvers and recurrence rate.
there is no significant e ect of postmaneuver postural ffrestrictions on both treatment and recurrence rates.
larger multicentric research projects, adopting improved methodology, are still necessary in order to determine the contribution of such restrictions to both
the therapeutic results and the prevention of recurrence. Adequate follow-up, focusing on the first six months after the initially successful repositioning
maneuver, is important.
INTRODUCTIONBPPV is a common
peripheral vestibular disorder encountered in primary care
and specialist otolaryngology and neurology clinics.
Typically, BPPV is associated with a characteristic paroxysmal positional
nystagmus elicited withspecific diagnostic positional maneuvers
The patient is usually advised to
avoid sleeping over the a ected ear for the ffnext five days following the repositioning maneuver.
avoid head and trunk movement
use a cervical collar
sleep in a semiseated position for two days
The aim of the present study is to assess the efficacy of such restrictions, when combined with the classic canalith repositioning techniques. A retrospective chart review of 82 patients, divided into two different groups and treated either with canalith repositioning techniques plus postural restrictions or with repositioning maneuvers alone, was conducted.
Group B(CRT only)
82 patients with BBPV
Group ACRT and postural
restriction
Dix Hallpike diagnostic manuver
Follow up period until 12 months
By phone
TreatmentRecurrence rate
Statistic analyze with X2 and Student’s t-test
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Each group
Dix Hallpike diagnostic manuver
Horizontal canal involve
Anterior or posterior canal involve
Treated with Epley modified canalith
reposition maneuver
Treated with Vannucchi Maneuver
Just once
Reexamined after 7 days
Semont maneuver
Failure or incomplete remission
retreated
Complete remission
Follow up period until 12 months
Epley Maneuver
Vannucchi Maneuver
Semont Maneuver
• INCLUTIONS
1. Patients who suffering from BPPV
2. Age : 18-84 years
• EXCLUTIONS
1. Patients with abnormalities of central nervous system
RESULTS
82 patients BPPV
( 34 ♂ and 48♀)
Group A
17 ♂ and 24 ♀
Mean Age : 58.9 ± 13.7
Group B
18 ♂ and 23 ♀
Mean Age : 60.5 ± 14.8
GROUP A GROUP B TOTAL
Posterior semicircular canal
involvement32 34 66
Horizontal canal involvement
5 3 8
Anterior canal involvement
2 - 2
Posterior Canal affected bilateral
2 2 4
Successfully treated BPPV
appeared to be the posteriorcanal variant
30 30 60
DISCUSSIONSThe “canalith repositioning procedure” (CRP), induced by Epley in 1992, founded a new era in the treatment of BPPV
Various modifications proposed by several researchers, since Epley’s original description, developed and improved repositioning procedure towards an essential and e cient ffitherapeutic tool because of its simplicity, noninvasive nature, and apparent e ectiveness in relieving vertigoff
Most authors divide treated patients into two di erent groups: one ffgroup of individuals instructed to restrict their movement after CRP and another group (control group) of patients who are usually advised to behave normally at least after 48 hours from the last repositioning maneuver. Follow-up period varies between 3 and 12 months in most studies.
In our patients postural restrictions had no statistically significant contribution to successful treatment, as treatment rates were almost similar in both groups.
In addition, most of our patients, who were instructed to restrict their movement right after CRP, expressed a serious sense of discomfort.
Cakir et al. reported that such postural restrictions enhanced the e ect of canalith ffrepositioning, when the posterior semicircular canal is involved, especially in resistant cases
About half of our patients, classified in group A, expressed sleep disorders of some extent, mainly for the next two days following CRP, probably because of the awkward sleeping position that they were advised to adopt.
In our study, patients included in group B were given no
posttreatment instructions at all. Normal activity was
encouraged, even from the first hours after treatment. However, this fact did not a ect the final ff
result in a statistically significant level
In a recent study by McGinnis
et al., the authors stated that therapists could reduce the length of
postural restrictions to 24 hours upright, withoutadversely a ecting the ffsuccessful result of the
repositioningmaneuver
The follow-up period is not clearly defined in all studies.
Therefore, a follow-up periodof 6–12 months is recommended to avoid underestimatingrecurrence rates.
The crucial methodological advantages of the present study are :
(a) the number of patients is adequate, compared with most studies conducted and published during the 10 last years
(b) group B patients were given no postural restrictions at all, so that any probable e ect gained even from restricting head movement for ff24–48 hours (which is still advocated by most authors) is totally eliminated, along with the possible placebo e ect of such ffinstructions
(c) follow-up period comprises with the gold standards, suggested by the majority of researchers. Therefore, the possibility of missing any expected recurrences is considered to be almost negligible
(d) In the present study, each semicircular canal is evaluated separately, allowing comparative assessment of CRP among the di erent canal variants.ff
CONCLUSIONSAlthough the e cacy of canalith repositioning ffimaneuvers in the therapeutic management of BPPV has been definitely established in the literature, the role of the posttreatment instructions is still not clearly defined.
Even though most recent control studies state that there is no significant e ect of postmaneuver postural ffrestrictions on both treatment and recurrence rates, larger multicentric studies, adopting improved methodology, are still necessary in order to determine the realistic contribution of such restrictions to the final outcomes of the canalith repositioning techniques.
CRITICAL APPRAISAL
Judul dan PengarangNo. Kriteria Ya (+) atau Tidak (-)
1 Jumlah kata dalam judul < 12 kata -(17 kata)
2 Deskripsi judul Menggambarkan isi utama penelitian,
menarik dan tanpa singkatan
3 Daftar penulis sesuai aturan jurnal +
4 Korespondensi penulis +
5 Tempat & waktu penelitian dalam judul -
Abstrak
No. Kriteria Ya (+) atau Tidak (-)
1 Abstrak satu paragraf +
2 Mencakup komponen IMRC +
3 Secara keseluruhan informatif +
4 Tanpa singkatan selain yang baku +
5 Kurang dari 250 kata +(176)
Pendahuluan No. Kriteria Ya (+) atau Tidak (-)
1 Terdiri dari dua bagian atau dua paragraf -( 4 paragraf )
2 Paragraf pertama mengemukakan alasan dilakukan penelitian
-
3 Paragraf kedua menyatakan hipotesis atau tujuan penelitian
-
4 Didukung oleh pustaka yang relevan +
5 Kurang dari satu halaman +
Bahan dan Metode PenelitianNo. Kriteria Ya (+) atau Tidak (-)
1 Jenis dan rancangan penelitian +
2 Waktu & tempat penelitian -
3 Populasi sumber -
4 Teknik sampling +
5 Kriteria inklusi +
6 Kriteria ekslusi +
7 Perkiraan dan perhitungan besar sampel -
8 Perincian Cara penelitian +
9 Blind -
10 Uji statistik +
11 Program komputer +
12 Persetujuan subjek (IC) -
Hasil
No. Kriteria Ya (+) atau Tidak (-)
1 Jumlah subjek +
2 Tabel karakteristik subjek -
3 Tabel hasil penelitian +
4 Komentar & pendapat penulis ttg hasil +
5 Tabel analisis data dengan uji -
Pembahasan, Kesimpulan, Daftar Pustaka
No. Kriteria Ya (+) atau Tidak (-)
1 Pembahasan & kesimpulan dipaparkan terpisah
+
2 Pembahasan & kesimpulan dipaparkan dengan jelas
+
3 Pembahasan mengacu dari penelitian sebelumnya
+
4 Pembahasan sesuai landasan teori +
5 Keterbatasan penelitian +
6 Simpulan utama +
7 Simpulan berdasarkan hasil penelitian +
8 Saran penelitian +
9 Penulisan daftar pustaka sesuai aturan +
Thank
You