40
Klickitat Watershed Enhancement Project Klickitat Watershed Enhancement Project Will Conley, Watershed Restoration Specialist Will Conley, Watershed Restoration Specialist Yakama Nation Fisheries Program Yakama Nation Fisheries Program Klickitat & White Salmon Rivers Klickitat & White Salmon Rivers Fisheries & Watershed Science Conference Fisheries & Watershed Science Conference March 10, 2009 March 10, 2009

Klickitat Watershed Enhancement Project · Project actions target stream reaches and watersheds that support steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss; ESA- listed as “Threatened”) and/or

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Klickitat Watershed Enhancement ProjectKlickitat Watershed Enhancement Project

    Will Conley, Watershed Restoration SpecialistWill Conley, Watershed Restoration SpecialistYakama Nation Fisheries ProgramYakama Nation Fisheries Program

    Klickitat & White Salmon RiversKlickitat & White Salmon RiversFisheries & Watershed Science ConferenceFisheries & Watershed Science Conference

    March 10, 2009March 10, 2009

  • Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline

    Background, Goals, and PrioritiesBackground, Goals, and Priorities

    2008 Project Implementation Highlights2008 Project Implementation HighlightsLower Klickitat RevegetationLower Klickitat Revegetation

    White Creek / IXL Road Fish PassageWhite Creek / IXL Road Fish Passage

    EF Tepee Creek / 175 Road Fish PassageEF Tepee Creek / 175 Road Fish Passage

    Swale Creek (River Mile 2)Swale Creek (River Mile 2)

    Other KWEP FunctionsOther KWEP Functions

    SummarySummary

  • The Klickitat Watershed Enhancement Project (KWEP) enhances and restores watershed health in the Klickitat River subbasin.

    Project actions target stream reaches and watersheds that support steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss; ESA- listed as “Threatened”) and/or spring Chinook (O. tshawytscha).

    KWEP is: • The principal project addressing salmonid habitat conservation and

    restoration in the Klickitat subbasin • Implemented by the Yakama Nation Fisheries Program (YNFP) • Funded by Bonneville Power Administration and matching grants• Addresses Yakima-Klickitat Fisheries Project (YKFP) goals• Addresses Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Program habitat goals

    KWEP - Background

  • KWEP KWEP -- GoalsGoalsThe overall goals of the Klickitat Watershed Enhancement Project (KWEP) are to restore watershed health and aid recovery of native salmonid stocks in the 1350 square-mile Klickitat River subbasin.

    ThreeThree--pronged approach:pronged approach:

    •• AssessAssess watershed and habitat conditions to watershed and habitat conditions to prioritizeprioritize sites sites for restoration activities. for restoration activities. •• ProtectProtect, , restorerestore, , and and enhanceenhance priority watersheds and priority watersheds and reachesreaches•• MonitorMonitor to assess watershed conditions and effectiveness of to assess watershed conditions and effectiveness of restoration activities. restoration activities.

  • KWEP KWEP –– Geographic PrioritiesGeographic Priorities

    Map Produced by:

    January 2004

  • Project Sites Project Sites

  • Lower Klickitat River Revegetation ProjectLower Klickitat River Revegetation Project

    Project Sponsor/Coordinator: Mid-Columbia FEG (MCFEG)

    Design & Construction Oversight: KWEP

    Construction Funding: SRFB, NFWF, MCFEG

    Plant Materials: KWEP and MCFEG

  • Goal is to increase bank cover, woody debris Goal is to increase bank cover, woody debris recruitment, and potential for trapping fine sediment. recruitment, and potential for trapping fine sediment. Plant materials Plant materials –– combination of dormant hardwood combination of dormant hardwood cuttings and containerized (grown at KFO nursery)cuttings and containerized (grown at KFO nursery)Installed using hydraulic stingerInstalled using hydraulic stinger

    Lower Klickitat River Revegetation ProjectLower Klickitat River Revegetation Project

  • Site 17.24Site 17.24

    Plant Species Type # Planted

    Ponderosa Pine Tall-one 206Scouler's Willow Cuttings 395Scouler's Willow Tall-one 151Black Cottonwood Cuttings 90Black Cottonwood Tall-one 9Red Alder Tall-one 0Greyers Willow Tall-one 0Coyote Willow Cuttings 75Coyote Willow Tall-one 15Dogwood Tall-one 16

    Total Planted 957

    0.79 acres

  • Site 17.53Site 17.53

    Plant Species Type # Planted

    Ponderosa Pine Tall-one 0Scouler's Willow Cuttings 95Scouler's Willow Tall-one 46Black Cottonwood Cuttings 36Black Cottonwood Tall-one 24Red Alder Tall-one 0Greyers Willow Tall-one 14Coyote Willow Cuttings 113Coyote Willow Tall-one 56

    Total Planted 384

    0.32 acres

  • Site 22.06Site 22.06

    Plant Species Type # Planted

    Ponderosa Pine Tall-one 347Scouler's Willow Cuttings 381Scouler's Willow Tall-one 200Black Cottonwood Cuttings 170Black Cottonwood Tall-one 183Red Alder Tall-one 141Greyers Willow Tall-one 99Coyote Willow Cuttings 28Coyote Willow Tall-one 200Oak Tall-one 25

    Total Planted 1774

    1.05 acres

    Topographically complex

  • Site 22.68Site 22.68

    Plant Species Type # Planted

    Ponderosa Pine Tall-one 305Scouler's Willow Cuttings 123Scouler's Willow Tall-one 90Black Cottonwood Cuttings 507Black Cottonwood Tall-one 235Red Alder Tall-one 167Greyers Willow Tall-one 84Coyote Willow Cuttings 700Coyote Willow Tall-one 110

    Total Planted 2321

    1.85 acres

    Topographically complex

  • Ponderosa Pine SurvivalPonderosa Pine Survival(worst case scenario* (worst case scenario* -- as of 3/9/09)as of 3/9/09)

    Total Planted March and/or April 2008# Alive & Unbrowsed 139 67% 311 90% 200 66%# Alive & Browsed 2 1% 24 7% 61 20%# Dead & Unbrowsed 11 5% 1 0% 7 2%# Dead & Browsed 0 0% 0 0% 6 2%

    305

    RM 22.68

    206

    RM 17.24 RM 22.06

    347

    * initial planted count is from April, prior to May 2008 cattle depredation. Pines were subsequently replanted (by hand, in same holes) in late-May, but may not have equaled initial count

  • Ponderosa Pine SurvivalPonderosa Pine Survival(best case scenario* (best case scenario* –– as of 3/9/09)as of 3/9/09)

    # Alive & Unbrowsed 139 91% 311 93% 200 73%# Alive & Browsed 2 1% 24 7% 61 22%# Dead & Unbrowsed 11 7% 1 0% 7 3%# Dead & Browsed 0 0% 0 0% 6 2%

    RM 17.24 RM 22.06 RM 22.68

    * Survival as a percent of plants that were located 3/9/09

    Hardwood survival will be assessed following leaf-out in April 2009

  • Tepee Creek / White Creek Fish Passage Tepee Creek / White Creek Fish Passage Enhancement ProjectEnhancement Project

    Project Sponsor/Coordinator: Yakama Nation Fisheries (KWEP)

    Design & Construction Oversight: KWEP

    Construction Funding: SRFB

    Structure Purchase: KWEP

    Rock Materials: Yakama Nation (in-kind)

    Plant Materials: KWEP

  • Tepee Creek Fish Passage Enhancement Project:Tepee Creek Fish Passage Enhancement Project:White Creek / IXL Road

    4/25/07

    11/20/08

    After:•• 4040’’ x 16x 16’’ bridgebridge (with relief)• Native bed material on natural

    (2.2%) slope• Access restored to 2.77 miles

    of habitat

    Before:• two 7.8’ x 51’ pipe arches• barrier: water depth & velocity• restricted debris & bedload

    passage

  • Tepee Creek Fish Passage Enhancement Project:Tepee Creek Fish Passage Enhancement Project:E.F. E.F. Tepee Creek / 175 Road

    4/25/07

    11/20/08

    After:•• 1717’’--11”” x 5x 5’’--66”” x 47.5x 47.5’’ box culvertbox culvert• Roughened Channel with native bed

    material at 2.0% slope• 150’ of instream construction• Access to 1+ mi. of habitat

    Before:• Two 6’ x 66’ CMPs• barrier: water depth & velocity• restricted debris & bedload

    passage

  • Swale Creek RM2 Enhancement ProjectSwale Creek RM2 Enhancement Project

    Project Sponsor/Coordinator: Mid-Columbia FEG (MCFEG)

    Design & Construction Oversight: KWEP

    Construction Funding: NFWF, Community Salmon Fund, MCFEG

    Log Donations: - Hancock Forest Management - USFS- Klickitat County - Private Developer- Yakama Agency - BIA

    Cable and Clamps: KWEP

    Plant Materials: KWEP and MCFEG

    Planting labor assistance: landowner

  • • Railroad construction (1902) and subsequent operations have had a dramatic effect on channel conditions

    • Lower Swale Creek has a pool frequency of 7 pools per mile (4.2% of the habitat by channel length).

    • The bed has self-armored and has a simple, plane-bed morphology

    • Riparian vegetation has become cyclical (dis-climax)• Goal: re-introduce hydraulic and habitat complexity.

    Treatment: pool enhancement at 5 sites along 600’ of stream• excavation of pools• LWD jam construction to promote pool persistence and

    enhance primary habitat for salmonids

    Swale Creek RM2 Enhancement ProjectSwale Creek RM2 Enhancement Project

  • FrequencyFrequency Flow (cfs)Flow (cfs)Qbase 0.02 to 0.37(2006) (2008)

    QQ22 803*803*

    QQ1010 2310*2310*QQ2525 3430*3430*QQ5050 4430*4430*QQ100100 5610*5610*

    Swale Creek RM2 Swale Creek RM2 –– Design ConsiderationsDesign Considerations• hydrology – eastside low flow with westside peaks

    (Q2 : Qbase ~ 2,150 : 1 to 40,000 : 1)

    • course substrate – limiting riparian recruitment

    • minimize perturbance of knickpoint in proximity of E5

    • minimal use of cable/anchoring above grade (aesthetics / landowner)

    * Indirect estimate based on USGS regressions

    Drainage Area (mi2) 119

    Site Elevation (ft) 640

    Mean basin elev. (ft) 18601860

    Relief (ft) 25602560

    M.A.P. (in) 18.018.0

    Avg. Stream Slope 0.014

  • constructed

  • Swale Creek RM2 Swale Creek RM2 –– Element 1Element 1

    Peak water surface 1/6/09Peak water surface 1/6/09

  • Swale Creek RM2 Swale Creek RM2 –– Element 3Element 3

    Peak water surface 1/6/09Peak water surface 1/6/09

    Flow

    Snow-line indicates HWM from 1/6/09

    Flow

    Photo 1/7/09

    Post-flood 2/18/09

  • Swale Creek RM2 Swale Creek RM2 –– Element 4Element 4

    Peak water surface 1/6/09Peak water surface 1/6/09

    Under construction 8/25/08Under construction 8/25/08 PostPost--flood 2/18/09flood 2/18/09

  • Swale Creek RM2 Swale Creek RM2 –– Element 4Element 4

    Snow-line indicates HWM from 1/6/09

    Photo 1/7/09

  • Swale Creek RM2 Swale Creek RM2 –– Element 5Element 5

    High water 1/7/09High water 1/7/09

    Peak water surface 1/6/09Peak water surface 1/6/09

    Flow

    AsAs--built Sept. 2008built Sept. 2008

    Flow FlowPostPost--flood 2/18/09flood 2/18/09

  • Swale Creek RM2 Swale Creek RM2 –– Element 6Element 6AsAs--built September 2008built September 2008

    High water 1/7/09High water 1/7/09

    Flow

    Flow

  • Swale Creek RM2 Swale Creek RM2 –– Residual Pool DepthsResidual Pool Depths

    Element Pre-con As-Built March '09*

    13 0.4 2.6 2.34 1.3 3.8 2.65 0.5 3.9 3.36 0.6 4.5 3.5

    Residual Pool Depth

    no data

    * Preliminary value, pools not presently wadeable

    • Pools over-excavated

    • Expected to stabilize at RPD 2.0’ to 3.0’

  • Swale Creek RM2 Swale Creek RM2 –– Element 6Element 6

  • Monitoring and Data ManagementMonitoring and Data Management

    KWEP works interactively with YKFP projects:KWEP works interactively with YKFP projects:Data, Management, and Habitat Project (BPA # 198812035)Data, Management, and Habitat Project (BPA # 198812035)Monitoring and Evaluation Project (BPA #199506335)Monitoring and Evaluation Project (BPA #199506335)

    Data collection & relational database development:Data collection & relational database development:Habitat data Habitat data –– 78 sites on 39 streams78 sites on 39 streamsWater Temperature Water Temperature –– 37 sites on 23 streams37 sites on 23 streamsSediment Sediment –– 12 sites on 5 streams12 sites on 5 streams

    GIS data acquisition and creationGIS data acquisition and creation

  • KWEP staff have provided technical support to:KWEP staff have provided technical support to:Private landowners Private landowners

    Private nonPrivate non--profitsprofits

    Tribal ProgramsTribal Programs

    Conservation DistrictsConservation Districts

    Subbasin Planning (Northwest Power Council)Subbasin Planning (Northwest Power Council)

    Recovery Planning (NOAA Fisheries)Recovery Planning (NOAA Fisheries)

    Strategic Planning (WA Salmon Recovery Funding Board)Strategic Planning (WA Salmon Recovery Funding Board)

    Watershed Planning (WA Department of Ecology)Watershed Planning (WA Department of Ecology)

    Technical SupportTechnical Support

  • Outreach, Education, and Information Outreach, Education, and Information DisseminationDissemination

    Professional meetingsProfessional meetingsRiver Restoration NorthwestRiver Restoration NorthwestAmerican Water Resources Assoc.American Water Resources Assoc.American Fisheries SocietyAmerican Fisheries Society

    Local schoolsLocal schoolsDallesportDallesportKlickitat Klickitat Goldendale Goldendale

    Stakeholder educationStakeholder educationWhite Salmon River FestivalWhite Salmon River Festival

    LyleLyleMosierMosier

  • Since 2000, KWEP has sponsored or played a major role in 17 compSince 2000, KWEP has sponsored or played a major role in 17 completed leted projects encompassing over 60 sites. Project highlights includeprojects encompassing over 60 sites. Project highlights include::

    Restoration of fish, sediment, and debris Restoration of fish, sediment, and debris passagepassage at 10 sites restoring fish at 10 sites restoring fish access to over access to over 18.1 miles18.1 miles of habitatof habitat

    Enhancement of >12,600Enhancement of >12,600’’ of streamof stream & floodplain including 62 LWD jams & floodplain including 62 LWD jams RevegetationRevegetation of >13,000of >13,000’’ of stream with over 25,400 plantingsof stream with over 25,400 plantingsDrainage improvementsDrainage improvements on 10.5 miles of forest roadon 10.5 miles of forest roadLivestock fencingLivestock fencing: over 10000: over 10000’’ of streamof streamWetlandsWetlands: Creation of more than 3500 square: Creation of more than 3500 square--feet of wetlandfeet of wetlandSide ChannelsSide Channels: Restoration of high: Restoration of high--flow access to over 800 lineal feetflow access to over 800 lineal feetRoad treatmentsRoad treatments: drainage improvements on 10.5 miles of forest roads: drainage improvements on 10.5 miles of forest roadsMorphologic and Habitat AssessmentMorphologic and Habitat Assessment: over 74 miles of stream : over 74 miles of stream Road AssessmentRoad Assessment: over 145 miles of road and railroad : over 145 miles of road and railroad

    KWEP AccomplishmentsKWEP Accomplishments

  • AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements

    David LindleyDavid Lindley Ralph KionaRalph KionaDeanna LamebullDeanna Lamebull Jamie Jamie BrisboisBrisbois

    Margaret NeumanMargaret Neuman

    FundingFunding::

    Bonneville Power AdministrationBonneville Power Administration

    WA Salmon Recovery Funding BoardWA Salmon Recovery Funding Board

    Columbia River InterColumbia River Inter--Tribal Fish CommissionTribal Fish Commission

    MidMid--Columbia Regional Fisheries Enhancement GroupColumbia Regional Fisheries Enhancement Group

    Bureau of Indian Affairs Bureau of Indian Affairs –– Watershed ProgramWatershed Program

    Yakama NationYakama Nation

  • http://www.ykfp.org/klickitat/KWEP_sites.htmhttp://www.ykfp.org/klickitat/KWEP_sites.htm(currently under development)(currently under development)

    For More InformationFor More Information

    http://www.ykfp.org/klickitat/KWEP_sites.htm

    Presentation OutlineSite 17.24Site 17.53Site 22.06Site 22.68Ponderosa Pine Survival�(worst case scenario* - as of 3/9/09)Ponderosa Pine Survival�(best case scenario* – as of 3/9/09)Tepee Creek / White Creek Fish Passage Enhancement ProjectTepee Creek Fish Passage Enhancement Project:�White Creek / IXL RoadTepee Creek Fish Passage Enhancement Project:�E.F. Tepee Creek / 175 RoadSwale Creek RM2 – Residual Pool DepthsMonitoring and Data ManagementTechnical SupportOutreach, Education, and Information DisseminationKWEP AccomplishmentsAcknowledgementsFor More Information