Education for Employment Sector Development Program (RRP LAO 50399)

Initial Environmental Examination

2 March 2020

Lao PDR: Education for Employment Sector Development Program

Prepared by the Government of Lao People’s Democratic Republic’s Ministry of Education and Sports for the Asian Development Bank.

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS

(as of 03 February 2020) Currency unit – Kip (KN)

KN1.00 = $0.000112 $1.00 = KN8,893.41

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB - Asian Development Bank ADPC - Asian Disaster Preparedness Center DES - District education and sports office DESB - District education sector bureaus DGE - Department of General Education DONRE - District environment and natural resources office ECDM - Education Construction and Design Management of MOES EHS - Environment, Health and Safety EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment EMP - Environmental Management Plan GRM - Grievance Redress Mechanism IEE - Initial Environmental Examination IUCN - International Union for Conservation of Nature LSE - lower secondary education MOES - Ministry of Education and Sports MOH - Ministry of Health MONRE - Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment MPWT - Ministry of Public Works and Transport NDMO - National Disaster Management Office NES - National environment specialist (consultant) NIP - national implementation plan NTFP - non-timber forest products OCHA - UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs PBL - policy-based loan PCP - ADB Public Communications Policy (2011) PCR - project completion report PES - Provincial education and sports office PMU - Project Management Unit POPs - persistent organic pollutants PPE - post-primary education PUCDA - Provincial unit for construction and development assistance REA - rapid environmental assessment SDP - sector development program SPS - ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) TVET - technical and vocational education and training UNDP - United Nations Development Program UNFCC - United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change USE - upper secondary education UXO - unexploded ordnance VEDC - Village Education Development Committee VOC - volatile organic compound WASH - water, sanitation and hygiene WHO - World Health Organization WREA - Water Resources and Environment Administration

WEIGHTS AND MEASURES

ha - hectare m - meter km - kilometer

dBA - decibels km - kilometer hr - hour mm - millimeter oC - Degree Centigrade

NOTE In this report, "$" refers to US dollars.

This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or areas.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

I. INTRODUCTION 1

A. Project Concept and Rationale 1

B. Methodology for Environmental Assessment 1

II. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK 2

A. ADB’s Environment Safeguards Policies 2

B. Legal and Institutional Framework on Environmental Management in Lao PDR 5

C. Environmental Standards 8

D. Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) 9

E. International Conventions 9

F. MOES Policies on School Construction 10

III. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT 12

A. Design Features of Schools 15

IV. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT 24

A. Existing Condition at School Sites 27

B. Topography and Natural Hazards 29

C. Climate 31

D. Air Quality 32

E. Noise 32

F. Biological Resources 33

G. UXO Contamination 33

H. Water Supply, Sanitation and Health 35

I. Historical and Cultural Resources 36

J. Presence of Asbestos and Other Hazardous Materials 36

V. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 37

A. Anticipated Benefits from the Project 37

B. Pre-Construction Impacts and Mitigation 37

C. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures During Construction 38

D. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation During School Operation 40

VI. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION 40

A. Stakeholders 41

B. Results of Stakeholders Consultations 44

C. Follow-up Information Disclosure and Stakeholder Consultations 46

VII. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM 47

VIII. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 48

A. Objectives 48

B. Mitigation Plan 48

C. Reporting 48

IX. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 50

APPENDIXES

ii

1. Environmental Management Plan 51

2. Findings on Existing 60 Schools 64

3. Documentation of Stakeholder Consultations 70

4. Sample EESDP Site Survey Checklist 141

5. Template of Environment Safeguard Monitoring Report 162

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: Environmental Safeguard Policy Principles of Asian Development Bank Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) 3

Table 2: Noise standards in Lao PDR and WHO Guideline Values 9

Table 3: Identified school sites for civil works based on school network mapping 13

Table 4: Location of School Sites 25

Table 5: Stakeholder Consultations 41

Table 6: Summary of Issues Raised During Stakeholder Consultations 45

Table 7: EMP Reporting Plan 52

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1: Location of schools 2

Figure 2: Floor Plan of a Classroom Block 16

Figure 3: Elevation Plan of Classroom Block 17

Figure 4: Floor Plan of Dormitory 18

Figure 5: Elevation Plan of Dormitory 19

Figure 6: Plan of typical sex-segregated toilet 20

Figure 7: Three-chambered septic tank plan 21

Figure 8: Neutralization tank and rainwater harvesting design 22

Figure 9: Seismicity and Other Hazards in Lao PDR 32

Figure 10: Mean annual precipitation and temperature across Lao PDR 33

Figure 11: Location of Phan Xam Secondary School in relation ot Nam Xam NBCA 34

Figure 12: UXO-contaminated sites in Lao PDR 35

PHOTOGRAPHS

Photo 1: A classroom block in Tung Heung Lower Secondary School in Sekong Province 23

Photo 2: A typical dormitory 23

Photo 3: Classroom blocks made of bamboo and wood 27

iii

Photo 4: Huts inside school compound 29

Photo 5: Water supply and toilets in existing schools 36

iv

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Introduction The proposed Education for Employment Sector Development Program (SDP) aims to strengthen human capital in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Lao PDR) and support inclusive growth and economic diversification. As an SPD, it will include two complementary components: (i) a policy-based loan (PBL); and (ii) an investment project. The PBL will help better prepare Lao PDR youth for employment by helping the Ministry of Education and Sports (MOES) to advance foundational reforms to align post-primary education—secondary education, technical and vocational education and training (TVET), and higher education—with workforce skill needs. The project component will build MOES capacity to deliver these reforms, enhance the quality and relevance of secondary education in preparing youth for employment, and increase completion rates. The proposed program builds on the Secondary Education (SDP) and related support for TVET and higher education by the Asian Development Bank (ADB). It directly supports ADB Strategy 2030 through the operational priority of improving education and training, and is closely aligned with the country partnership strategy, 2017–2020. Project Rationale Weak human resources continue to constrain Lao PDR’s efforts towards poverty reduction, inclusive growth, and economic diversification. There is extremely low enrolment and completion rates at lower secondary (Grades 6 to 9) and upper secondary (Grades 10 to 12) levels. There is also a high proportion of drop outs in secondary schools and these youth resort to taking up low-skill, temporary jobs in the informal sector. The problem stems from a combination of factors such as shortage of good quality secondary schools, lack of access (particularly for youth living in rural and remote areas), poor quality of school facilities and dormitories, teachers lacking the required educational background, pedagogy skills and motivation, outdated teaching and delivery methods, absence of rigorous classroom-based assessment, and demand-side constraints including financial and opportunity costs which makes it difficult for poor families to support children until grade 12.1 The MOES’ Vision for 2030 and the Lao PDR’s Eighth National Socio-economic Development Plan 2016-2020 prioritizes education as a prerequisite for poverty reduction and inclusive growth. The SDP is designed to support the Government’s priorities and will focus on enhancing and equitizing the flow of skills into the labor force to support inclusive growth and increased opportunities for youth. This SDP will support three core outputs:

(i) Output 1: Alignment of post-primary education (PPE2) with labor market demand strengthened.

(ii) Output 2: Quality and relevance of secondary education to emerging skills demands strengthened.

(iii) Output 3: Equitable secondary education access and completion increased.

1 Draft Report and Recommendation of the President of the proposed Education for Employment SDP. 2 Unless otherwise noted, PPE herein refers to formal general secondary education, TVET, higher education (including

teacher education), and NFE at post-primary levels.

v

Output 3 of the project will (i) help address supply-side constraints in 12 of 47 districts (covering 8 provinces) by constructing additional classroom blocks, sex-segregated dormitories, and sanitation facilities (including toilets) at 60 existing primary and secondary school sites;3 and (ii) reduce demand-side constraints to access and completion by providing stipends to youth based on a combination of need and merit. Additional classrooms will be built in schools which are currently overcrowded. The proposed new infrastructures will be built within existing school premises. Purpose and Methodology of Environmental Assessment This environmental assessment focuses on the investment component under Output 3 which involves construction of additional classroom blocks, dormitories and sanitation facilities in existing primary and secondary school sites.

Environment classification and assessments. The Project is classified as environment Category B in accordance with ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS, 2009), requiring an initial environmental examination (IEE) and environmental management plan (EMP). The IEE and EMP covers the civil works proposed under Output 3 for the investment project which includes construction of classroom blocks, sex-segregated dormitories and sanitation facilities within existing school compounds. The adverse impacts during construction are localized, short-term and reversible which are principally related to health and safety of students, staff, and adjoining communities, as well as pollution and disturbance that could arise from poor site management and inadequate sanitation infrastructure. The activities proposed through the policy-based loan are not anticipated to have any adverse impacts. The ADB SPS (2009), ADB Operational Manual Section F1/BP, Public Communications Policy (ADB PCP, 2011), World Bank Group Environment, Health and Safety (EHS) Guidelines, and relevant environmental laws and regulations of the Government of Lao PDR guided the preparation of the IEE and EMP. A comprehensive environmental and social safeguards questionnaire was prepared and used during site surveys of the 60 schools. Field assessments were undertaken by the TRTA team from January to June 2019, and from November to December 2019to verify the issues identified in the environmental and social safeguards questionnaire. The MOES district offices through the school authorities provided the data and assisted in completing the questionnaires. Simultaneous with the field assessments, consultations were undertaken with DONRE, communities, village elders (head of ethnic groups), school district and provincial representatives, teachers, students, parents, Village Development Committees including the Village Education Development Committees, Women’s Union, Youth Union, and Parents Associations to discuss the environmental and social issues about the project and at school sites. Comments and suggestions of local people, village and school authorities and students on improving the current condition of existing schools were also gathered during these consultation meetings and interviews.

3 The 12 districts were selected on the basis of (i) high dropout rate between primary and lower secondary, and lower

secondary and upper secondary schools; (ii) overcrowding in existing secondary schools; (iii) large ethnic group populations; and (iv) geographic balance.

vi

Following the field assessment and consultations, secondary information was gathered from various sources about other environmental parameters such as proximity to protected areas or biodiversity conservation areas, climate, natural and geological hazards, UXO contamination, and socio-economic condition in the identified schools. Environmental implications of project activities were reviewed and mitigation measures to address adverse environmental impacts are proposed in the EMP. Environmental Conditions at Project Sites The identified school sites where additional classroom blocks, dormitories, laboratories and other associated school facilities will be constructed were assessed. Majority of the schools (75%) are in rural areas and 15 schools are located in urban and peri-urban communities. The existing schools are located in the center of a cluster of about 4 – 8 villages. Access to existing schools, particularly those located in rural areas, is difficult. Children have to walk or travel by motorbike through several kilometers daily to go to and from the school. The situation becomes even more difficult during the rainy season because of muddy roads. The long distance and difficulty of access to schools, coupled by poverty, contributes to high dropout rates. In urban areas, the classroom blocks are single storey structures mainly made of concrete or bricks. In the rural areas, the classroom blocks are also single storey structures which are built out of bamboo and wood with some new buildings made of concrete. Some schools do not have proper windows and flooring which results in muddy and wet classrooms during the rainy season. In some of the villages, parents disclosed that they sometimes donate some money, construction materials or offer time and skills for the repair and maintenance of the schools. There are also not enough tables and chairs. The dormitories of secondary schools are overcrowded while there are no dormitories in primary schools. Students, teachers and their families build temporary huts within the school compound. These temporary wooden huts are built from used materials, are mostly not connected to electricity and shares the facilities like water supply and toilets of schools. In terms of location and topography, 46 of the school sites are located in upland areas while 14 are in lowland areas. The schools in lowland areas include the 10 schools in Feun and Meun districts in Vientiane which are located at average elevation of 300 meters above mean sea level (m asl); 5 schools in Pakkading in Bolikhamxai Province which are located at elevations of about 210 m asl; and one school (Ban Chengvilay) in Khamkeut District in Bolikhamsai Province which is at elevation 158 m asl. Land at the schools itself are already flat/level to moderately sloping. The 60 schools are not located in close proximity to any of these major rivers. In Pakkading District, there was reported overflowing of Nam Deau river in Na Kheau, however, this did not result in flooding of the school site. There is only one school within 1 km of Mekong River, Boungkouang Secondary School in Bolikhamxai. There are other schools close to small rivers only, some of which have intermittent flows. Flooding is primarily due to high precipitation events, low elevation, and poor drainage. The risks of flooding will be evaluated further by the technical team. None of the 60 school sites are in areas prone to landslides. Six schools reported drought occurrences. The schools in the provinces of Oudomxai and Luang Namtha are located in the moderate to high seismic risk zones with earthquake intensity VII of the Modified Mercalli scale. Parts of Luang Prabang, Houaphan, and Vientiane are in the moderate-low seismic risk zone which may expect

vii

intensity V and less. The remaining regions fall under the low seismic risk. The soil subsurface structure of the school sites in Oudomxai, Luang Namtha, Luang Prabang, Houaphan and Vientiane will be evaluated further during detailed design to ensure the stability of the foundation and that the structures are able to withstand strong magnitude earthquake. Based on information from the Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool (IBAT), none of the 60 schools are located in any restricted zones of protected areas or biodiversity conservation areas. All the schools are in the community zones. The school which is nearest to a protected area is the Phan Xam Secondary School in Xamtay District, Houaphan Province which is about 1.2 km away from the protection zone of the Nam Xam National Biodiversity Conservation Area (NBCA). There are no major industrial or mobile sources of air pollution in the vicinity of these schools, except for occasional movement of vehicles along unpaved roads which generates dust. Burning of garbage by households is practiced by the community to manage solid wastes which affects air quality. UXO clearance was undertaken in 16 of the 60 school sites prior to the construction of the existing schools. There is no information about UXO clearance in the remaining schools. The school authorities and villagers said that they have not encountered UXO or land mines in the area. Although construction will occur in existing school compound that have been subject to disturbance, the screening for presence of UXO needs to be confirmed to ensure safety and security of the students, teachers, and the community. In general, the schools experience problems with regard to water supply, sanitation, and waste management. Sources of water come from ground water, springs, and small streams. There are only 12 schools which are served by the local water utility. However, the schools supplement the water supply with shallow wells, rainwater, spring source, and river. It was reported during the survey that because of the lack of clean water at schools, the students have to bring their own water for drinking and for use in toilets. In some schools, students still practice open defecation and are not motivated to use the toilets because of lack of water. The students and teachers also reported the lack of toilet facilities in schools. Majority (51 schools) do not have proper drainage systems within the premises. Common diseases reported by students are colds, diarrhea, stomach ache, and skin rashes.4 Only five of the schools have regular waste collection. Majority of schools resort to burning of wastes within their school compound. None of the schools are in areas identified as historical or culturally significant areas. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Benefits of the Project. The project is expected to have a positive impact on the quality of education in Lao PDR. The students and teachers will directly benefit from better classrooms, school facilities and dormitories. The project will encourage students to pursue further secondary education because of better facilities and teaching support and accessibility of lower secondary education (LSE)-/upper secondary education (USE)-schools. Parents will also benefit because of savings from cost of transportation particularly for students who will not need to travel daily to secondary schools in other villages and districts. There is also expected benefits to health and sanitation because of improvement in toilets, water supply and drainage facilities in the schools.

4 Skin rashes are prevalent during the dry season and are a result of lack of clean water and poor hygiene practices.

viii

Pre-Construction Impacts. Environmental impacts due to location and design are associated with presence of geological hazards, UXO, cultural/heritage sites, proximity to protected areas, availability and requirements for water supply, sanitation, and drainage. The construction and improvement of schools will be performed exclusively at existing school sites. None of the 60 schools are in proximity to any restricted protected areas, hence, are not expected to induce degradation of biodiversity conservation areas. All 60 schools will also not impact upon any archaeological or historical sites and there will be no requirement for land use changes. None of the schools are in areas prone to landslides and earthquakes but the buildings should be designed to withstand earthquakes and that proper soil analysis should be done to ensure design of stable foundation. The school authorities and villagers said that they have not encountered UXO or land mines in the area. Although construction will occur in existing school compounds that have been subject to disturbance, the screening for presence of UXO needs to be confirmed to ensure safety and security of the students, teachers, and the community. The site condition, components, design configuration and sizes of facilities and other infrastructures needed by the schools will be evaluated further during detailed design. Construction Impacts. The construction works will have some minor temporary negative impacts. Adverse health and safety and other environmental impacts such as noise, dust and pollutant emissions that will arise from civil works will be minimal and localized since these are confined within a small footprint area in existing school compounds. Impacts include risks to occupational and school user’s health and safety from construction activities, e.g. school children playing near open excavation or risk of getting hit by a construction vehicle or equipment. Additional potential impacts include an increased level of noise and dust due to the vehicle movement and building construction activities. There will also be a need to properly dispose of construction debris generated during the construction works. Based on the condition of existing schools visited, hazardous materials such as asbestos or asbestos containing materials or toxic paints were not present. All of the existing schools have tin roofs and no asbestos containing materials were found. In general, the short-term construction impacts can be prevented or mitigated with good construction management practices in line with the EHS Guidelines (2007). An EMP, included in Appendix 1, outlines mitigation measures to prevent or minimize construction impacts such as those related to elevated dust, noise, erosion and sedimentation, and public and worker safety. Environmental Impacts during School Operation. The schools require sufficient and potable water supply, clean and sex-segregated toilets with septic tanks, proper solid waste management system, ventilation, and drainage. The proposed improvements proposed through Output 3 are expected to address these issues and provide positive impacts. To promote good hygiene and sanitation in schools and prevent spread of diseases, the MOES will design schools with potable water supply and latrines with proper waste disposal to eliminate open defecation. Options for water supply can be rainwater collection/harvesting system, tube or tap well, rivers/streams or piping through available utility sources. Wastewater from sinks, showers, and toilets will be connected to properly designed and built septic tanks to ensure that groundwater is not contaminated. MOES will also promote hygiene practice in schools through regular WASH campaigns that encourages students to practice handwashing and proper use of latrine facilities. Schools will be

ix

required to allocate budget for school maintenance, including regular cleaning of toilets and other facilities. Environmental Monitoring and Institutional Responsibilities The MOES will assign safeguards focal persons from relevant units within MOES to monitor the environmental safeguards compliance during project implementation at the PMU and PIU. In addition, a National Environment Specialist (NES consultant) will be engaged by the PMU to provide support in ensuring the implementation of project environment safeguards. The designated safeguards focal persons at the PMU and PIU shall be trained by the NES on environment safeguards responsibilities during implementation, in monitoring and reporting safeguards compliance of the project, and in ensuring hygiene and sanitation in schools during operation. The Contractor will be required to have a qualified Environmental, Health and Safety Officer and will submit monthly progress reports to the PMU. The NES through the safeguards focal person at the PMU will submit semi-annual environmental monitoring reports to ADB. The semi-annual reports will review progress of construction, results of site inspections, EMP implementation, status of compliance with Government’s environmental regulatory requirements and other clearances, records of grievances raised and their resolution, unforeseen environmental impacts and suggested remedial actions for the next monitoring period. Site inspections will be conducted by the district education sector bureaus (DESB) as PIUs on a monthly basis or as often as possible. The Education Construction and Design Management Division (ECDM) of MOES, through the PMU, will also conduct site inspections to check the status of civil works and mitigation measures every quarter and the Provincial Unit for Construction and Development Assistance (PUCDA) of MOES every two months, or as often as possible. The PMU with support of NES will consolidate the results of environmental monitoring from the contractors, as well as monitoring reports from PUCDA and DESB to inform periodic progress reports and semi-annual environmental monitoring reports. Safeguard monitoring reports will be disclosed on the ADB website.

I. INTRODUCTION

A. Project Concept and Rationale 1. The Education for Employment Sector Development Program (SDP) aims to strengthen human capital in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Lao PDR). The program consists of a policy-based loan (PBL) for the Ministry of Education and Sports (MOES) to advance foundational reforms to align post-primary education – secondary education, technical and vocational education and training (TVET), and higher education with the workforce skill needs. The policy component is not anticipated to have any environmental impacts. The program also provides investments to improve secondary education access in support of the post-primary education policy reforms. 2. The SDP is aligned with the Lao PDR’s Education SDP, 2016–20201 which calls for expanded investments in post-primary education to enhance youth employability and promote inclusive and diversified economic growth. The program builds on the Secondary Education (SDP) and other related support for TVET and higher education by the Asian Development Bank (ADB). This SDP will contribute to the longer-term goal of “inclusive, balanced, and skill-driven economic growth achieved”, as reflected in the MOES’ Vision for 2030. The more direct objective to be achieved by program completion will be “improvement of youth employability”, in support of the Education SDP, National Socio-economic Development and other Government directives. B. Methodology for Environmental Assessment 3. The project is classified as Category B for environment as potential adverse environmental impacts are site-specific, largely reversible, and can be mitigated with effective implementation of an environmental management plan. This Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) and Environmental Management Plan (EMP) have been prepared based on ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS, 2009). 4. The ADB SPS (2009), ADB Operational Manual Section F1/BP, Access to Information Policy (2018), World Bank Group Environment, Health and Safety (EHS) Guidelines, and relevant environmental laws and regulations of the Government of Lao PDR guided the preparation of this IEE and EMP.

5. This IEE presents the findings from the assessment of identified 60 schools which are located in the provinces of Luang Namtha, Oudomxai, Luang Prabang, Houaphan, Vientiane, Bolilkhamxai, Salavan, and Sekong. The location of the schools is shown in Figure 1. During the site survey, the environment and social safeguards questionnaire was used to get information about the existing school facilities, identify priority needs of each of the school, and gather environmental site information and involuntary resettlement-related queries. Site surveys and stakeholder consultations were undertaken by the TRTA from January to June 2019, and November to December 2019. Following the field surveys and consultations, secondary information was gathered from various sources about other environmental parameters such as proximity to protected areas or biodiversity conservation areas, climate, natural and geological hazards, UXO contamination, and socio-economic condition in the identified schools. Environmental implications of proposed activities were reviewed and mitigation measures to address adverse environmental impacts are proposed in the EMP.

1 The Eighth National Socio-economic Development Plan 2016-2020 prioritizes education as a prerequisite for

sustained economic growth and poverty reduction

2

6. The assessment focused on the existing environmental and socio-economic conditions at the project areas and the likely positive and significant negative impacts on the physical, biological and socio-economic environment. Mitigation measures were developed in the EMP to address identified impacts and risks during design, construction and operation. Environmental monitoring and reporting, institutional arrangements, and capacity development measures to ensure the implementation of the mitigation measures are outlined in the EMP.

Figure 1: Location of schools

II. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK

A. ADB’s Environment Safeguards Policies

7. The environment safeguards requirements of ADB are presented in the following guidelines:

(i) Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) (2009)

3

(ii) Operational Manual Section F1/BP2 and (iii) Access to Information Policy (2018).

8. ADB’s Strategy 20303 emphasizes the pursuit of environmentally sustainable and inclusive economic growth for developing member countries (DMCs) and requires mitigation to address environmental and social impacts of projects. The ADB’s Safeguards Policy Statement (SPS, 2009) governs the environmental and social safeguards of ADB’s operations. When a project has been identified for ADB financing, it is screened and categorized to determine the following:

(i) Significance of potential impacts or risks of the project to the environment (ii) Level of assessment and institutional resources required to address the safeguard

issues; and (iii) Information disclosure and consultation requirements.

9. The Environmental Safeguard Requirements 1 (SR1) of the SPS outlines the requirements that borrowers/clients have to meet. These requirements include assessing impacts, planning and managing impact mitigations, preparing environmental assessment reports, disclosing information and undertaking stakeholder consultations, establishing a grievance redress mechanism, and monitoring and reporting. It also includes specific environmental safeguard requirements pertaining to biodiversity conservation and sustainable management of natural resources, pollution prevention and abatement, occupational and community health and safety, and conservation of physical cultural resources. 10. Every project is initially categorized for potential environmental impacts and risks:

(i) Category A – if a proposed project is likely to have significant adverse environmental impacts that are irreversible, diverse, or unprecedented; impacts may affect an area larger than the sites or facilities subject to physical works. A full-scale environmental impact assesses (EIA) including an environmental management plan (EMP) is required.

(ii) Category B – if a proposed project’s potential environmental impacts are less adverse and fewer in number than those of category A projects; impacts are site-specific, few if any of them are irreversible, and impacts can be readily addressed through mitigation measures. An initial environmental examination (IEE), including an EMP is required.

(iii) Category C – if a proposed project is likely to have minimal or no adverse environmental impacts. No EIA or IEE is required although environmental implications need to be reviewed.

(iv) Category FI – is assigned to projects that involve investment of ADB funds to or through a financial intermediary.

11. There are eleven basic principles of the ADB safeguards policy on environment which are summarized in Table 1:

Table 1: Environmental Safeguard Policy Principles of Asian Development Bank Safeguard Policy Statement (2009)

Environment Policy Principle Requirement

1. Screening and categorization Use of a screening process for each proposed project to determine the extent and type of environmental assessment

2 Operations Manual Bank Policies (BP) issued on 1 October 2013, based on ADB Safeguard Policy Statement, 2009. 3 ADB. 2018. Strategy 2030: Achieving a Prosperous, Inclusive, Resilient, and Sustainable Asia and the Pacific.

Manila.

4

Environment Policy Principle Requirement

commensurate with the significance or potential impacts and risks.

2. Environmental assessment Conduct of an environmental assessment for each proposed project to identify potential impacts and risks to environment and people.

3. Alternatives examination Examine alternatives to project’s location, design, technology, and components and their potential environmental and social impacts. Also consider the “no project” alternative.

4. Environmental mitigation and monitoring plans

Prepare an EMP that includes the proposed mitigation measures, environmental monitoring and reporting requirements, related institutional or organizational arrangements, capacity development and training measures, implementation schedule, cost estimates, and performance indicators.

5. Consultation and grievance redress mechanism

Carry out meaningful consultation with affected people and facilitate their informed participation early in the project preparation process and ensure that their views and concerns are taken into account. Establish a grievance redress mechanism to receive and facilitate resolution of the affected people’s concerns regarding the project’s environmental performance.

6. Public disclosure Disclose the environmental assessment including the EMP in a form and language understandable to affected people and other stakeholders.

7. EMP implementation and monitoring

Implement the EMP and monitor its effectiveness. Document the monitoring results, including corrective actions and disclose the monitoring reports.

8. Protection of critical habitats Do not implement project activities in areas of critical habitats unless (i) there are no measureable adverse impacts on the critical habitat, (ii) there is no reduction in the population of any recognized endangered or critically endangered species and (iii) any lesser impacts are mitigated. If a project is located within a legally protected area, additional programs to promote and enhance the conservation aims of the protected area will be implemented.

9. Pollution prevention and control technologies

Apply pollution prevention and control technologies and practices consistent with international good practices as reflected in internationally recognized standards such as the World Bank’s Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) Guidelines.

10. Occupational health and safety

Provide workers with safe and healthy working conditions and prevent accidents, injuries and diseases in the workplace. Minimize adverse impacts and risks to the health and safety of local communities.

11. Preservation of physical cultural resources

Conserve physical cultural resources and provide a “chance find” procedure and conservation approach for materials that may be discovered during project implementation.

EHS = Environmental, Health, and Safety, EMP = environmental management plan.

12. Aside from ADB SPS (2009), the ADB also prescribes the Access to Information Policy (2018) which requires consultations, participation and disclosure of information to enhance

5

stakeholders’ trust in and ability to engage with ADB. The policy promotes transparency, accountability, and participatory development. It establishes the disclosure requirements for documents produced or to be produced through ADB assistance. The IEE, EMP and the environmental monitoring reports of the project are to be disclosed at the ADB website in accordance with the Public Communications Policy (2011). 13. Category B project, the draft IEE report should be available to interested stakeholders before project approval and posted on the ADB’s website upon Board approval of the project. B. Legal and Institutional Framework on Environmental Management in Lao PDR 14. Lao PDR’s national framework for the governance of environmental matters includes a comprehensive set of laws on environment and natural resources management, protection of health and well-being of the people, and regulations that support commitments to international environmental conventions. The applicable laws are discussed in the succeeding sections:

1. Environmental Impact Assessment

15. The principal environmental legislation in Lao PDR is the Environmental Protection Law No. 29/NA (December 2012) which requires every private and public investment project to undergo an environmental impact assessment and prepare the corresponding report to the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (MONRE) or its district/provincial offices prior to implementation. Projects are screened based on the list of investment projects and activities as embodied in Ministerial Agreement No. 8056/MONRE (2013). 16. Stakeholder consultation is an integral part of the EIA process. The guidelines in the conduct of stakeholder and community consultations as part of the environmental and social assessment process are outlined in the Ministerial Instruction on Public Involvement (2012). The guidelines provides the principles and process of engaging and consulting with project stakeholders and project affected persons in project preparation, design and implementation. It aims to ensure that the stakeholders and project-affected persons are adequately consulted and provided with opportunity to articulate their feedback and suggestions on project design and implementation to avoid or mitigate potential impacts on their livelihood and environment. 17. Recently, MONRE issued Decree No. 21/GOL (31 January 2019) which further defines the processes to be followed in screening and evaluation of investment projects and activities. Under Article 9, investment projects are grouped into two: (i) projects that will cause less social and natural environmental impacts where a preliminary environmental impact assessment is needed and (ii) projects that will cause severe impacts on social and natural environment which requires a comprehensive environmental impact assessment. The recent decree also outlines the requirements for the preparation of the preliminary or comprehensive EIA report, consultation, review of EIA reports and EMP, and approval process for the environmental certification. Under the decree, the environmental certificate is valid for the rest of the project’s lifetime but the environmental management and monitoring plan must be presented to MONRE or its provincial or district offices every two or five years depending on the type of investment project and activities. The decree also specifies the rights of persons affected by any investment project (Article 56) to have access to information, receive compensation and fair treatment, health protection, among others. 18. The construction of schools is not included in the investment projects and activities requiring an environmental assessment. Construction of dormitory with more than 50 rooms

6

require a preliminary EIA. Any project located in protection forest, protected areas, conservation zones, cultural and historical heritage sites are required to prepare the comprehensive EIA report. 19. It was confirmed from environment district offices that the proposed infrastructures under Output 3 do not require an environmental impact assessment by the MONRE/DONRE, even the school dormitory which are relatively small and only have 2-3 rooms. There is no environmental clearance required for rehabilitation works but all activities must comply with other laws, regulations and standards on environment, health, and safety. At the minimum, the DONRE requires the submission of the EMP for these civil works in schools.

2. Law on Hygiene, Disease Prevention and Health Promotion No. 08/NA (2011)

20. This law relates to the organization of activities on hygiene, disease prevention and promotion of health in order to maintain good health, quality of life, reduce the rates of morbidity and mortality, and ensure access to networks of hygiene and disease prevention for the people. 21. According to Article 10 of the law, the element of hygiene should be present in schools and other educational institutions. Article 18 (Hygiene of Schools and Educational Institutes) prescribes that location of schools and institutions shall be kept clean and orderly and that locations shall be away from external nuisance, sources of infectious diseases and other hazards. 22. Under the law, the school facilities shall have:

(i) sufficient spaces for the number of students; (ii) sufficient light and air ventilation; (iii) sufficient tables and chairs for students; (iv) constantly maintained to ensure cleanliness; (v) equipped with drinking and domestic water coming from water sources such as

urban water supply systems, dug well, rainwater, borehole, gravity fed systems, springs, hot springs, rivers, streams, and other sources with assured terms of cleanliness and safety (Article 14);

(vi) water for handwashing; and (vii) sport grounds and places of rest.

23. The law also prescribes the systematic health examinations for pupils and students at least once a year. 24. Article 35 (Health Education) prescribes that organizations involved in health, education and other organizations (both public and private) are responsible for disseminating and providing health education and knowledge to the population on a regular basis by various means, including inclusion of health education into the school curriculum.

3. Law on Forestry No. 06/NA (2007)

25. This law determines the basic principles, regulations, and measures on sustainable management, preservation, development, utilization and inspection of forest resources and forestland. It promotes regeneration and tree planting, increase of forest resource in the country aiming at maintaining a balance of nature, making forest and forestland stable sources of living and use for the people, ensuring a sustainable condition and protection of the environment, water resources, protection from soil erosion and maintenance of soil quality, protection of plants, tree species, wildlife, and aquatic life, as well as contributing to national socio-economic development.

7

26. The Forest Law classifies forest into either: (i) conservation forest, (ii) protection forest, and (iii) production forest. The first two are relevant to biodiversity conservation and watershed protection. Protected forest is defined as: forest and forest land classified for the protection of watershed areas to prevent soil erosion. It also includes areas of forest land that is significant for national security, areas for protection against natural disaster and protection of the environment. Conservation forests aim to maintain biodiversity and natural forest and landscaped for the development of national parks appropriate for tourism and scientific research. Protected forest and conservation forests are zoned into: (i) total protection zones which is closed to entry or harvesting of forest products, plants or animals, (ii) controlled use zones, and (iii) corridor zones.

4. Decree on Protected Area No. 134/G (May 2015)

27. This decree determines the principles, regulations and standards related to the establishment, allocation, protection, development, utilization and inspection of protected areas in order to make the areas become abundant and sustainable by focusing on environment protection, watershed protection, prevention from erosion, protection of soil quality, protection of strategic zone for national defense and security, adaptation and reduction of climate changes, solutions to global warming, contributing to improvement of living condition of people of all ethnic groups and developing national economy. 28. The government allows the use of protected areas only in an allocated zone which must be used in accordance with related regulation to ensure that there are no negative impacts on forest, quality of soil, natural and social environment. The use of protected areas for public benefit are for research and testing, recreation and tourism, source of medicines, and for protection of watershed, biodiversity, natural and historical environmental and cultural resources. The use of protected areas for the public benefit is permitted by MONRE. Local people who resides in and around protected areas and contribute to the protection and regeneration of forest and non-timber forest products (NTFP) in the protected areas have the right to use the forest and forest products as determined in the allocation plan of the protected area and related regulation.

5. Law on National Heritage No. 08/PDR (2005)

29. The law provides the regulations and measures for the administration, use, protection, conservation, restoration, and rehabilitation of national cultural, historical and natural heritage. Any individual is prohibited from causing damage to national cultural and historical heritage such as archaeological and anthropological sites, encroaching onto historical sites, occupying land in national heritage conservation areas, and changing the original condition of any heritage. 30. Under the law, protected area of heritage sites is divided into three zones:

(i) Zone 1 is the central area where the heritage is located and which must be protected and where no construction is permitted.

(ii) Zone 2 is the area surrounding the central area where some activities are permitted to increase the value of zone 1, provided that no damage is caused to the surrounding area.

(iii) Zone 3 is the administrative area where construction is permitted to serve zones 1 and 2 for the accommodation of tourists.

6. Law on Fisheries (2010)

31. This law prescribes the regulations governing fisheries and the promotion of aquaculture, conservation, protection, development and the sustainable use of aquatic agro-biodiversity.

8

7. Law on Water Resources (2013)

32. This law prescribes the regulations related to the protection, administration, exploitation, use and development of water and water resources, protection against damage to water or water resources, rehabilitation of affected areas to assure quality and quantity of water to respond to the people’s living requirements. The law also prescribes the protection of natural and social environment, river basin management and flood management. The law covers water diversion, abstraction, impoundment, wastewater discharge, construction along river banks, return of water after use into natural water sources, emergency response during drought, flood, and reservoir safety.

8. Wildlife and Aquatic Law No. 07/NA (2008)

33. The law prescribes the regulations to promote sustainable regeneration and utilization of wildlife and aquatic life, without any harmful impact on natural resources or habitats. It restricts anthropogenic pressure on decreasing species and the extinction of wildlife and aquatic resources by encouraging people to understand and recognize the significance of managing, monitoring, conserving, protecting, developing and utilizing wildlife in sustainable manner.

9. Law on Construction No. 197/NA (November 2009)

34. The Law on Construction prescribes the requirements of all construction activities including requirements for public works and transportation sector (including schools), water supply and sanitation, flood protection, among others. Individuals or organizations intending to construct, install, repair or demolish any structure are required to obtain a permit for construction of the project (Article 31) prior to implementation. 35. Article 34 also specify the requirements on safety during project execution such as provision of tools for workers (helmets, shoes, gloves, and glass) and measures to be implemented in case of natural calamities at the construction site.

10. Labour Law (2013)

36. This law defines the principles, regulations and measures on administration, monitoring, labour skills development, recruitment and labour protection. Section IV of the law prescribes the regulations related to labor protection, safety, and the rights of employees.

11. Law on Handling Petitions 012/NA (December 2014)

37. The revised Law on Handling Petitions 012/NA or the Grievance Redress Law was approved by the National Assembly on December 5, 2014 and the President in 2015. The law provides the objectives, principles and process of applying and handling different types of grievance, petition and complaints that may be raised by citizens. C. Environmental Standards

38. The national environmental standards in Lao PDR are based on the Environmental Protection Law No. 29/NA (December 2012) and PM Decree No. 2734/PMO.WREA (December 2009). The standards on water, soil, air and noise are set under the decree as basis for

9

environmental monitoring and pollution control. The limits set in these national standards are aligned with international standards such as in the WHO noise guidelines as shown in Table 2.

Table 2: Noise standards in Lao PDR and WHO Guideline Values

No. Area

Lao PDR Noise Standards WHO/EHS Noise Level Guidelines

0600 to 1800

1800 to 2200

2200 to 0600

Daytime 07:00-22:00

Nighttime 22:00 – 07:00

1 Quiet areas: Hospitals, libraries, kindergarten and schools

50 45 40 55 45

2 Residential areas: Hotels and houses

55 55 45

3 Commercial and service areas

70 70 50 70 70

4 Small industrial factories located in residential areas

70 70 50

Lao PDR = Lao People’s Democratic Republic, WASH = Water, Sanitation and Hygiene, WHO = World Health Organization.

D. Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) 39. Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) services are being provided at various levels and organizations in combination with strengthening the regulatory environment in Lao PDR. A draft WASH policy (2016) was developed that builds on the Water Supply Law 2009 and the National Plan of Action 2012 for Rural Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene. The Drinking Water Quality Guidelines has been issued by the Ministry of Health in 2014. 40. The Ministry of Public Works and Transport (MPWT) is the lead agency in the water supply sector. It collaborates with the Ministry of Health (MOH) which implements sanitation and hygiene activities and some water supply systems in the rural areas. The MOES is working with these agencies and with partners such as UNICEF to raise the quality and sustainability of WASH services in schools through design standardization and hygiene promotion.4 E. International Conventions

41. Lao PDR is signatory to a number of international conventions, such as: (i) Stockholm Conventions on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs): Lao PDR signed

the Stockholm Convention in 2002 and ratified in June 2006. The MONRE (previously, Water Resources and Environment Administration, WREA) serves as contact for the Stockholm Convention. A National Implementation Plan (NIP) was prepared with assistance from UNIDO.

(ii) Basel Convention: The Lao PDR became a signatory to the Basel Convention on the control of transboundary movement of hazardous wastes and their disposal on September 21, 2010.

4 World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific. 2018. Overview of Lao health system

development 20092017. Manila, Philippines.

10

(iii) Ramsar Convention on Wetlands: Lao PDR is a contracting party to the Ramsar Convention to which is acceded in 2010. It has two sites designated as wetlands of international importance, i.e. Being Kiat Ngong wetlands in Champasak and the Xe Champone wetlands in Savannakhet. Lao PDR pursues an active policy to biodiversity and has taken initiatives to support wetlands conservation and sustainable use.

(iv) CITES: The Lao PDR was a signatory to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora which entered into force on 01 July 1975.

(v) Kyoto Protocol and UNFCC: The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) was ratified by Lao PDR in 1995 and the Kyoto Protocol in 2003. The national strategy of Lao PDR on climate change builds on the country’s commitment to the UNFCC.

(vi) Rotterdam Convention: Lao PDR became the 157th party to the Rotterdam Convention on Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade on September 10, 2010.

(vii) Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer: Lao PDR became a signatory to the Vienna Convention on November 19, 1998.

F. MOES Policies on School Construction

42. The Division of Design and Construction Management (ECDM) of the MOES issued the National School Construction Guidelines in December 2009.5 The guidelines specifically takes into consideration the vulnerability of schools to hazards, particularly floods, drought, landslides, fires, earthquakes, windstorms and unexploded ordnance (UXO). The guidelines was developed as part of MOES’ program on mainstreaming disaster risk reduction into the education sector. It was prepared by referring to standards and guidelines of donor and development agencies such as the World Bank, ADB, JICA, AusAID, and UNICEF. It covers the school construction process from site planning, design, construction, and maintenance. 43. The guidelines outline certain criteria on site selection and planning related to environment safeguards which includes:

(i) Assessment of potential risks of the site to natural hazards such as flooding, landslides, cyclones, storm surges, and earthquakes to avoid building in hazard zones;

(ii) Avoid areas containing mines or UXO and seek the help of specialists if mines or UXO are suspected;

(iii) In the earthquake prone areas (particularly in the northern region), school buildings should be on open and flat land;

(iv) Assessment of site’s history or other socio-cultural values; (v) Discussion with local authorities and the community; (vi) Ensure community’s acceptance of the site location; (vii) Check whether there are issues from neighboring settlements of different ethnic

groups; (viii) Location of school should be within walking distance from houses (maximum of

about 45 minutes by walking); (ix) Land titles are available and Village Committee has verified land ownership.

5 A second edition (2019) has been drafted by MOES to align with the Sustainable Development Goal for Education.

The draft takes an integral approach to construction with a focus on student safety, disaster risk reduction, WASH, accessibility (including for children/adults with disability), gender, child protection, and environmental concerns.

11

(x) Clarify with local authorities the building permits needed; (xi) Provincial Unit for Construction and Development Assistance (PUCDA) of the

MOES must check conditions and technical requirements for water supply, sanitation, waste management, and power supply;

(xii) In mountainous areas, the buildings should not be in steep slopes and if a sloped area cannot be avoided, a platform should be built and the building placed in a secure distance from the slopes;

(xiii) Buildings should be at least 10 meters from stagnant water, e.g. dried out rivers or ponds as this may be breeding location for mosquitoes and vector-borne diseases;

(xiv) Ensure there is adequate site drainage; (xv) School should be away from sources of pollution and toxic or hazardous materials; (xvi) Recommended background noise level at the school site is 35 decibels (dBA) or

lower; (xvii) Minimum distance between water wells and septic tanks is 15m. Septic tanks need

to be placed at least 30 m away from a river; at least 5m away from the nearest water outlet; at least 3m from the nearest house; and 3m away from any property line. Soak pit should be at least 1.5m above the water table and that it should be downhill of groundwater sources; and

(xviii) Building materials used for school construction must comply with the international standards of American Society for Testing and Materials and the Thai Industrial Standard.

44. Other important elements in the design of schools are: classroom sizes, lighting and ventilation, provision of toilets/latrine, water supply, playground, access road, and fence. 45. Generally, any works in primary and secondary schools and other related facilities such as dormitories are not required to secure an environmental compliance certificate from DONRE. The guidelines specify that the Department of Environment and Social Impact Assessment (DESIA) of DONRE will be consulted whether the project requires an environmental compliance certificate or if school projects are exempt from the environmental assessment requirements. The purpose is to check whether projects will disturb water resources, forestry, and cultural and social heritage. If such is the case, the guidelines specify that no construction shall be undertaken at a project site until the certificate has been issued. The district environment offices confirmed that an environmental compliance certificate is not required for the schools and related facilities and that an EMP of the schools are to be submitted to DONRE. 46. Template for bid documents and checklists for monitoring of works have been developed in the guidelines for reference of the Division of Education Construction Development and Management (ECDM) of MOES, Project Management Unit (PMU), Provincial Education and Sports Service (PESS), Provincial Unit for Construction and Development Assistance (PUCDA), and the District Education Service Bureaus (DESBs). 47. A School Maintenance Manual is also annexed to the guidelines to identify the implementation responsibilities, maintenance checklists, training guidelines, and budgeting.

12

III. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT

48. This SDP will support three outputs: (i) Output 1: Alignment of post-primary education (PPE6) with labor market demand

strengthened. The SDP will provide policy and investment support to align PPE to evolving skill needs of Lao PDR’s economy. Output 1 will (i) strengthen MOES’ capacity and systems for monitoring skill supply from PPE, and improve cross-ministerial collaboration and industry engagement; (ii) pilot partnering models linking secondary education, TVET, and NFE schools/centers; and (iii) improve student guidance on academic and career options.

(ii) Output 2: Quality and relevance of secondary education to emerging skills demands strengthened. This output will enhance access to good quality and relevant secondary education, especially in priority subjects including the Sciences, Mathematics, English and Lao language. Output 2 will operationalize policy reforms by (i) strengthening secondary education curriculum, pedagogy, and student assessment focusing on the priority subjects, (ii) equipping selected secondary schools so that they deliver the improved curriculum effectively; and (iii) strengthening management of secondary schools.

(iii) Output 3: Equitable secondary education access and completion increased. The SDP will support reforms and investments to address supply and demand-side constraints based on an objective assessment of needs. Under the PBL component, MOES has approved a list of 47 districts suffering from acute shortage of secondary schools, over-crowded schools, and high drop-out rate after the primary level. Output 3 will (i) help address supply-side constraints in 12 of 47 districts (covering 8 provinces) by constructing additional classroom blocks, sex-segregated dormitories, and sanitation facilities (including toilets) at 60 existing primary and secondary school sites;7 and (ii) reduce demand-side constraints to access and completion by providing stipends to youth based on a combination of need and merit. At primary schools, new lower secondary facilities will be built. At lower secondary schools, facilities will be provided for upper secondary classes. Additional classrooms will be built in schools which are currently overcrowded.

49. Based on initial analysis of school network mapping and 2015 census, the MOES has identified 12 priority districts in 8 provinces for project investment in expansion of facilities to reduce dropout due to lack of schools and high overcrowding. Within the 12 selected districts, a total of 60 school sites are prioritized for new school buildings and facilities and upgrades to school buildings and ancillary facilities such as dormitories and sex-segregated toilet facilities.8 Each district will receive additional buildings and facilities, according to the following categories:

(i) Type A: Additional lower secondary education (LSE) facilities at existing primary school with available vacant land within the premises;

(ii) Type B: Additional upper secondary education (USE) facilities at existing LSE school with available land within the school premises; and

(iii) Type C: Additional LSE or USE facilities at overcrowded LSE or complete secondary schools.

6 Unless otherwise noted, PPE herein refers to formal general secondary education, TVET, higher education (including

teacher education), and NFE at post-primary levels. 7 These 12 districts were selected on the basis of (i) high dropout rate between primary and lower secondary, and

lower secondary and upper secondary schools; (ii) overcrowding in existing secondary schools; (iii) large ethnic group populations; and (iv) geographic balance.

8 This IEE covers the 60 schools that were identified by MOES.

13

50. Nominally, each district will receive one Type A, one Type B, and two Type C school upgrades. Overall, the school upgrades will consist of Type A— 7 schools; Type B— 7 schools; and Type C—46 schools. 51. The school sites and districts for civil works are presented in Table 3 based on MOES target district priority list. MOES prioritization looks at post-primary data in the education management system as part of comprehensive planning and budgeting. The 12 districts were selected based on (i) high dropout rate between primary and lower secondary, and lower secondary and upper secondary levels; (ii) overcrowding in secondary schools; and (iii) large share of ethnic groups. Note that the districts of Long, Sanamxay, Sanxay, Phouvong, Kaleum, and Moonlapamok were initially included but were excluded after the site visits conducted in March 2019 confirmed failure to satisfy the selection criteria on risks associated with flooding, planned village resettlement, encroachment into biodiversity protected areas, and insufficient land available within nominated school sites.

Table 3: Identified school sites for civil works based on school network mapping

Province District School Name Type of

Facilitiesa

Luang Namtha 1.Sing 1. Ban Mom Secondary School Type B

2. Chaphouthone Primary School Type C

3. Done May Secondary School Type B

4. Son Phao Secondary School Type C

5. Nam Keo Noy Secondary School Type C

Oudomxai 2. Hoon 6. Mokphord Primary School Type A

7. Ban Na Secondary School Type B

8. Vang Lam Secondary School Type C

9. Donemeuang Secondary School Type C

10. Houn District Secondary School Type C

Luang Prabang 3. Nambak 11. Huan Na Secondary School Type B

12. Huay Yim Primary School Type A

13. Nam Thuam Secondary School Type C

14. Nam Duan Secondary School Type C

15. Nambak Ethnic Boarding School Type C

Houaphan 4. Huameuang 16. Pa Kha Tai Secondary School Type C

17. Chom Phet Secondary School Type C

18. Homethong Secondary School Type C

19. Na Leng Secondary School Type C

20. Khang Khao Secondary School Type C

5. Xamtay 21. Vieng Phan Secondary School Type C

1. Xieng Dee Secondary School Type C

2. Phan Xam Secondary School Type C

3. Kasone Secondary School Type C

4. Phan Ngam Secondary School Type C

14

Province District School Name Type of

Facilitiesa

6. Kuane 26. Meuang Yeuang Secondary School Type C

27. Phan Thong Secondary School Type C

28. Nakormy Secondary School Type C

29. Huaysamat Secondary School Type C

30. Na Ngom Secondary School Type C

Vientiane 7. Feuang 31. Pha Sang Secondary School Type C

32. Phonethon Secondary School Type B

33. Meuang Feuang Secondary School Type C

34. Namon Phonyeng Secondary School Type C

35. Phon Hin Hae Primary School Type A

8. Meun 36. Pakchan Primary School Type A

37. Napaphai Primary School Type A

38. Sensavang Secondary School Type C

39. Namhone Secondary School Type C

40. Nampheun Secondary School Type C

Bolikhamxai 9. Pakkading 41. Ban Xod Secondary School Type C

42. Viengkham Secondary School Type C

43. Boungkouang Secondary School Type C

44. Nakheua Secondary School Type C

45. Thongnami Secondary School Type C

10. Khamkeuth 46. Nong Xong Secondary School Type C

47. Thongkhe Secondary School Type B

48. Phonemixay Secondary School Type C

49. Thongsen Secondary School Type C

50. Chengvilay Secondary School Type C

Salavan 11. Tai Oi 51. Thongkahai Primary School Type A

52. Kokbok Secondary School Type B

53. Ta Oi Secondary School Type C

54. Piko Secondary School Type C

55. Bong Nam Secondary School Type C

Xekong 12. Dakcheung 56. Dak Ta Ork Yai Primary School Type A

57. Nong Yean Secondary School Type C

58. Tang Yeung Secondary School Type C

59. Xiengluang Secondary School Type C

60. Nonsavan Secondary School Type C

Total 60 schools a Types of school improvements are: Type A =Add LSE classrooms to existing primary school; Type B =Add USE

classrooms to existing LSE school; and Type C =Add classrooms to overcrowded LSE or complete secondary school.

15

A. Design Features of Schools

52. The project will finance the construction of new secondary school blocks and dormitories, including toilets and other school facilities within existing school compounds. The school will be designed to be more convenient and conducive to learning. The design will ensure that there is potable water, sex-segregated toilets, handwashing facilities, rainwater harvesting, septic tanks (3 chambers), and fence. Solar power for lighting in common areas and for pumping water from wells will be designed for schools that are not connected to the grid and water utility providers. The design of facilities for each school will be evaluated further and prepared during detailed design. 53. The school building design remains the same as in the Secondary Education SDP. A classroom block structure consists of a single storey building covering an area of about 400 square meters. Typical dormitories (11.2m x 16.5m) consist of 2 – 3 rooms with common areas. Sex-segregated toilets are independent structures with an area of about 48 square meters. These toilets are provided with septic tanks acting as anaerobic baffled reactor systems. 54. Dormitories will be provided in Type A and B schools where level of education (lower or senior secondary) is being added because there is no access to LSE/USE schools in the catchment area mainly due to rural/remote conditions. Type C schools located in urban/semi-urban areas are less likely to require dormitories but this will be evaluated further during detailed engineering design. 55. Important features that will be incorporated in the design of schools under the project is the three-chambered septic tank to provide additional wastewater treatment efficiency. The standard septic tank design of existing schools uses two chambers only. Toilets will have handwashing facilities outside toilet walls. In addition, solar panels in schools without electricity grid connection are proposed to provide power for lighting in common areas at night and also to operate pumps for the wells in response to the problem of lack of water particularly during the dry season. Rainwater harvesting system will also be introduced. To provide protection and security of the school compound, fence will be provided.

16

Figure 2: Floor Plan of a Classroom Block

T O S L O P E

T O S L O P E

T O S L O P E

T O S L O P E

T O S L O P E

1

AB

CD

EF

GH

IJ

KL

M

123

46000

BLACKBOARD

(CONCAVE TYPE)

C O R R I D O RC O R R I D O R

C O R R I D O RC O R R I D O R

C O R R I D O R

FLOOR PLAN USSM-1CEMENT MORTAR FINISH

75mm WIDE PLAIN

CEMENT MORTAR FINISH

CEMENT MORTAR WITH V-CUT

(10mm) GROOVES @ 100mm O.C.

CONCRETE STAIRS

0.80 m wide WALKWAY1 1

2 2

33

11

11

11

11

11

23

22

22

22

22

1

40004000

8000

40004000

8000

30003000

6000

40004000

8000

40004000

8000

40004000

8000

CLASSROOMCLASSROOM

CLASSROOMMULTI PURPOSE ROOM

LABORATORY ROOM

TEACHER ROOM

2

3 5 0 03 5 0 07 0 0 0

1 7 0 0

RAMPUP

slope 10%

RAMPUP

slope 10%

33

33

33

33

33

33

CONCRETE STAIRS

25mm Ø STONE TRENCHT O S L O P E

RAMP

UP

T O S L O P E

T O S L O P E

T O S L O P E

T O S L O P E

1

AB

CD

EF

GH

IJ

KL

M

123

46000

BLACKBOARD

(CONCAVE TYPE)

C O R R I D O RC O R R I D O R

C O R R I D O RC O R R I D O R

C O R R I D O R

FLOOR PLAN USSM-1CEMENT MORTAR FINISH

0.80 m wide WALKWAY

1 1

2 2

33

11

11

11

11

11

2

333

22

22

22

22

1

40004000

8000

40004000

8000

30003000

6000

40004000

8000

40004000

8000

40004000

8000

CLASSROOMCLASSROOM

CLASSROOMMULTI PURPOSE ROOM

LABORATORY ROOM

TEACHER ROOM

2

3 5 0 03 5 0 07 0 0 0

1 7 0 0

1 0 0 0

2000

RAMP

RAMPUP

slope 10%

slope 10%

33

33

33

33

33

75mm WIDE PLAIN

CEMENT MORTAR FINISH

CEMENT MORTAR WITH V-CUT

(10mm) GROOVES @ 100mm O.C.

CONCRETE STAIRSCONCRETE STAIRS

17

Figure 3: Elevation Plan of Classroom Block

33

33

AB

CD

EF

GH

IJ

KL

M

BACK FACADE USSM-1

46000

80008000

40004000

40004000

8000

40004000

8000

40004000

8000

40004000

6000

30003000

33

33

33

10001000

Base Paint From Below Window Frame To The Floor U-90 (Tawny Peach 089)ACRYLIC EMULSION FOR EXTERIOR

33

AB

CD

EF

GH

IJ

KL

M

BACK FACADE USSM-1

46000

80008000

40004000

40004000

8000

40004000

8000

40004000

8000

40004000

6000

30003000

10001000

Base Paint From Below Window Frame To The Floor U-90 (Tawny Peach 089)ACRYLIC EMULSION FOR EXTERIOR

33

33

33

33

33

18

Figure 4: Floor Plan of Dormitory

19

Figure 5: Elevation Plan of Dormitory

20

Figure 6: Plan of typical sex-segregated toilet

21

Figure 7: Three-chambered septic tank plan

22

Figure 8: Neutralization tank and water harvesting design

23

24

Photo 1: A classroom block in Tung Heung Lower Secondary School in Sekong Province

Photo 2: A typical dormitory

25

IV. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT

56. This chapter describes the environmental condition at the schools to understand the situation where proposed additional classroom blocks, dormitories, laboratories and other associated school facilities will be constructed. The improvement in existing schools will occur in 12 districts consisting of (i) Sing District in Luang Namtha Province; (ii) Hoon District in Oudomxai Province; (iii) Nambak District in Luang Prabang Province; (iv) Huameuang District, (v) Xamtay District, and (vi) Kuane District in Houaphan Province; (vii) Feuang District and (viii) Meun District in Vientiane Province; (ix) Pakkading District and (x) Khamkeuth District in Bolikhamxai Province; (xi) Ta Oi District in Salavan Province; and (xii) Dakcheung District in Xekong Province. Table 4 presents the location of the schools while detailed description of the baseline condition in each of these schools can be found in Appendix 2.

Table 4: Location of School Sites

No. School Name Latitude Longitude Location

Condition of Access to School

from Town Center

A. Luang Namtha Province 1. Ban Mom Secondary School

Ban Mom, Sing District 21.33334016 101.1670173 Rural,

Upland Dirt road 20 km

2. Chaphouthone Primary School Ban Chaphouthone, Sing District

21.28588876 100.8780617 Rural, upland

Dirt road 50 km

3. Done May Secondary School Ban Done May, Sing District

21.22225155 101.1195114 Rural, upland

Dirt road 8 km

4. Son Phao Secondary School Ban Thongmay, Sing District

21.167043 101.117821 Urban, upland

Laterite road 4 km

5. Nam Keo Noy Secondary School Ban Nam Keo Noy, Sing District

21.16704327 101.1178214 Rural, upland

Laterite road 4 km

B. Oudomxai Province 6. Mokphord Primary School

Ban Mokphord, Hoon District 20.12343766 101.614075 Rural,

upland Laterite road-4 km; Dirt road-22 km

7. Ban Na Secondary School Ban Na, Hoon District

20.17126761 101.443972 Sub-urban, upland

Dirt road

8. Vang Lam Secondary School Ban Vang Lam, Hoon District

20.15339624 101.4883341 Urban, Upland

Laterite road 3 km

9. Donemeuang Secondary School Ban Siboun Houang, Hoon District

20.03333833 101.349762 Rural, upland

Laterite road 22 km

10. Houn District Secondary School Ban Phonsavanh (Town center), Hoon District

20.147144 101.465819 Urban, upland

Laterite road

C. Luang Prabang Province 11. Hua Na Secondary School

Ban Hua Na, Nambak District 20.46594824 102.3370512 Urban,

upland Laterite road 26 Km

12. Huay Yim Primary School Ban Huay Yim, Nambak District

20.38278826 102.27763 Rural, upland

Laterite road 38 km, dirt road 17 km

13. Nam Thuam Secondary School Ban Nam Thuam Neua, Nambak District

20.49638596 102.3574807 Rural, upland

Laterite road 21 km

14. Nam Duan Secondary School Ban Khanloum, Nambak District

20.60136456 102.5598063 Rural, upland

Dirt road 32 km

26

No. School Name Latitude Longitude Location

Condition of Access to School

from Town Center

15. Nambak Ethnic Boarding School Ban Bom, Nambak District

20.635523 102.478220 Urban, upland

Laterite road 2 km; dirt road 0.3 km

D. Houaphan Province 16. Pa Kha Tai Secondary School

Ban Pa Kha Tai, Huameuang District 20.05117583 103.9713182 Rural,

upland Laterite road 7 km; Dirt road 20 km

17. Chom Phet Secondary School Ban Na Ngiew, Huameuang District

20.09767799 104.1041143 Rural, upland

Laterite road 28 km; Dirt road 30 km

18. Homethong Secondary School Ban Somlab, Huameuang District

20.05030555 103.5791302 Rural, upland

Dirt road

19. Na Leng Secondary School Ban Na Leng, Huameuang District

20.08540756 103.876184 Rural, Upland

Dirt road

20. Khang Khao Secondary School Ban Khang Khao, Huameuang District

20.15300108 103.7982012 Rural, upland

Laterite road 20 km; Dirt 100 km

21. Vieng Phan Secondary School Ban Tao, Xamtay District

19.89633967 104.7419741 Rural, upland

Laterite road 21 km

22. Xieng Dee Secondary School Ban Xieng Dee, Xamtay District

19.92754033 104.6110181 Rural, upland

Dirt road 10 km

23. Phan Xam Secondary School Ban Phiengthin, Xamtay District

20.06791756 104.5543657 Rural, upland

Laterite road 17 km

24. Kasone Secondary School Ban Nasickamxay, Xamtay District

20.00320415 104.7334138 Rural, upland

Laterite road 10 km; Dirt road 10 km

25. Phan Ngam Secondary School Ban Phattai, Xamtay District

19.97147238 104.6642503 Rural, upland

Laterite road 11 km

26. Meuang Yeuang Secondary School Ban Meuang Yeuang, Kuane District

19.75838625 104.343222 Rural, upland

Dirt road 33 km

27. Phan Thong Secondary School Ban Nakormy, Kuane District

19.80287746 104.6662064 Rural, upland

Dirt road 36 km

28. Nakormy Secondary School Ban Done, Kuane District

19.70110003 104.5536329 Rural, upland

Dirt road 30 km

29. Huaysamat Secondary School Ban Huaysamat, Kuane District

19.474031 104.22506 Rural, upland

Dirt road 22 km

30. Na Ngom Secondary School Ban Na Ngom, Kuane District

19.806086 104.426266 Rural, upland

Dirt road 15 km

D. Vientiane Province 31. Pha Sang Secondary School

Ban Pha Sang Neua, Feuang District 18.47335973 101.9790899 Rural,

upland Dirt road 7 km

32. Phonethon Secondary School Ban Napheung, Feuang District

18.6242283 102.0583586 Lowland, sub-urban

Laterite road 6 km

33. Meuang Feuang Secondary School Ban Loakham, Feuang District

18.65631808 102.1107157 Rural, lowland

Laterite road 0.5 km

34. Namon Phonyeng Secondary School Ban Namon, Feuang District

18.60033572 102.0379921 Rural, upland

Dirt road 2 km

35. Phon Hin Hae Primary School Ban Phon Hin Hae, Feuang District

18.721317 102.082282 Urban, lowland

Laterite road 2km, Dirt road 10 km

36. Pakchan Primary School Ban Pakchan, Meun District

18.1524843 102.0182021 Rural, lowland

Laterite and Dirt road 55 km

27

No. School Name Latitude Longitude Location

Condition of Access to School

from Town Center

37. Napaphai Primary School Ban Napachai, Meun District

18.27592412 101.9559046 Rural, lowland

Inside town

38. Sensavang Secondary School Ban Phonesan, Meun District

18.37910752 101.9540744 Rural, lowland

Dirt road 22 km

39. Namhone Secondary School Ban Namhone, Meun District

18.26316282 101.9489474 Urban, lowland

Dirt road 1.5 km

40. Nampheun Secondary School Ban Nampheun, Meun District

18.144461 101.56311 Sub-urban, lowland

Dirt road 5 km

E. Bolikhamxai Province 41. Ban Xod Secondary School

Ban Xod, Pakkading District 18.19221963 104.0788059 Rural,

lowland Dirt road 18 km

42. Viengkham Secondary School Ban Viengkham, Pakkading District

18.10160563 104.2911558 Urban, lowland

Dirt road & NR13-south

43. Boungkouang Secondary School Ban Boungkouang, Pakkading District

17.98152979 104.2297025 Rural, lowland

Laterite road 60 km; Dirt road 12 Km

44. Nakheua Secondary School Ban Nakheuanok, Pakkading District

18.228172 104.204062 Sub-urban, lowland

Dirt and laterite road

45. Thongnami Secondary School Ban Thongnami, Pakkading District

18.170138 104.236514 Sub-urban, Lowland

Laterite road 17 km

46. Nong Xong Secondary School Ban Nong Xong, Khamkeuth District

18.140568 104.758826 Rural, upland

Dirt road

47. Thongkhe Secondary School Ban Thongkhe, Khamkeuth District

18.9814 105.63404 Rural, upland

Mix of laterite and dirt road

48. Phonemixay Secondary School Ban Phonhmuengnoy, Khamkeuth District

18.20103028 104.9656961 Sub-urban, upland

Mix of laterite and dirt road

49. Thongsen Secondary School Ban Korhai, Khamkeuth District

18.083916 105.042350 Rural, upland

Dirt road

50. Chengvilay Secondary School Ban Phonpheng, Khamkeuth District

18.214572 104.988018 Rural, lowland

Dirt road

F. Salavan Province 51. Thongkahai Primary School

Ban Thongkahai, Ta Oi District 15.96074344 106.6843159 Rural,

upland Dirt road

52. Kokbok Secondary School Ban Kokbok, Ta Oi District

15.96107542 106.5422417 Rural, upland

Dirt road

53. Ta Oi Secondary School Ban Thetsabanmueang (Town center), Ta Oi District

16.07679015 106.6213625 Urban, upland

Laterite road

54. Piko Secondary School Ban Piko, Ta Oi District

16.24549984 106.7899681 Rural, upland

Laterite road 49 km

55. Bong Nam Secondary School Ban Bong Nam, Ta Oi District

15.991100 106.628877 Rural, upland

Laterite road

G. Xekong Province 56. Dak Ta Ork Yai Primary School

Ban Dak Ta Ork Yai, Dakcheung District

15.47655521 107.3700325 Rural, upland

Dirt road

57. Nong Yean Secondary School Ban Dakcheung, Dakcheung District

15.461507 107.2544139 Rural, upland

Dirt road

58. Tang Yeung Secondary School Ban Dark Chom, Dakcheung District

15.52249724 107.0562114 Rural, upland

Dirt road

28

No. School Name Latitude Longitude Location

Condition of Access to School

from Town Center

59. Xiengluang Secondary School Ban Xiengluang, Dakcheung District

15.33135777 107.1122557 Rural, Upland

Dirt road

60. Nonsavan Secondary School Ban Nonsavan, Dakcheung District

15.461507 107.254414 Rural, upland

Laterite road 1 km; Dirt road 38 km

A. Existing Condition at School Sites

57. Availability of land. All of the identified schools have sufficient land for the proposed improvements. Land area ranges from 3,000 sqm to 20,000 sqm. 58. Access to schools. The existing schools are located in the center of cluster of about 4 – 8 villages. There are 45 schools that are located in rural areas and 15 in urban and peri-urban areas. Access to existing schools, particularly those located in rural areas, is difficult. Children have to walk or travel by motorbike through several kilometers daily to go to and from the school. In some schools, students have to leave home early each day to reach the school. The situation becomes even more difficult during the rainy season because of muddy roads. Some children who graduated from primary school do not pursue secondary school because the LSEs and USEs are located at the town center or in another village far from the existing primary school. The long distance and difficulty of access to schools, coupled by poverty, contributes to high dropout rates. In Kokbok village in Saravane Province, many children dropout after Grade 5 and start working in the rice fields to support their families. 59. School Buildings and Dormitories. In urban areas, the classroom blocks are single-storey structures mainly made of concrete or bricks. In the rural areas, the classroom blocks are also single storey structures which are built out of bamboo and wood with some new buildings made of concrete. Some schools do not have proper windows and flooring which results to muddy and wet classrooms during the rainy season. In some of the villages, parents disclosed that they sometimes donate some money, construction materials or offer time and skills for the repair and maintenance of the schools. There are also not enough tables and chairs. In Ban Vang Lam in Oudomxai Province, the parents made the tables and chairs by themselves.

Thongkhe Lower Secondary School

Vang Lum Lower Secondary School

29

Ban Na Lower Secondary School

Done Maye Secondary School, Luang Namtha

Mokphord Primary School, Oudomxai

Photo 3: Classroom blocks made of bamboo and wood 60. Classrooms are also overcrowded. In Thong Ka Hai Primary School, the school only has one building with three classrooms serving five grades (multi-grade classes, e.g. grades 1+2 and grades 3+4+5). 61. Associated with the problem of difficulty of access to existing schools, dormitories of secondary schools become overcrowded. There are no dormitories in primary schools. There are students, teachers and their families who built temporary huts within the school compound, just to be close to the school and also to save time and money. These temporary wooden huts are built from used materials, are mostly not connected to electricity and shares the facilities like water supply and toilets of schools, resulting to unsanitary and unorganized conditions in the school premises.

Tang Yeung Lower Secondary School Kitchen inside the school compound

in Thong Ka Hai Primary School

30

Wooden huts and toilets built by teachers inside the school compound in Thong Khe Lower Secondary School

Photo 4: Huts inside school compound

B. Topography and Natural Hazards

62. In terms of topography, 46 (77%) school sites are located in upland areas while 14 (23%) are in lowland areas. The schools in lowland areas include the 10 schools in Feun and Meun districts in Vientiane which are located at average elevation of 300 meters above mean sea level (m asl); 5 schools in Pakkading in Bolikhamxai Province which are located at elevations of about 210 m asl; and one school (Ban Chengvilay) in Khamkeut District in Bolikhamsai Province which is at elevation 158 m asl. Land at the schools itself are already flat/level to moderately sloping. None of the schools are located close to steep and mountainous slopes. 63. The National Disaster Management Committee of Lao PDR has developed a national risk profile of the country in cooperation with the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). Based on the risk profiling, sites that are prone to earthquakes, floods, drought, landslides, UXO and storm hazards were identified.

(i) Earthquake: The areas in Xayabury, Bokeo, Oudomxai, Luang Namtha and Phongsaly provinces are in the high earthquake hazard zone. About 30% of the country is located in moderate earthquake hazard zone and 43.62% falls in the low earthquake risk zone.9 The provinces of Oudomxai and Luang Namtha are located in the moderate to high seismic risk zones with earthquake intensity VII of the Modified Mercalli scale. Parts of Luang Prabang, Houaphan, and Vientiane are in the moderate-low seismic risk zone which may expect intensity V and less. The remaining regions fall under the low seismic risk. Given these information, the soil subsurface structure of the school sites in Oudomxai, Luang Namtha, Luang Prabang, Houaphan and Vientiane will be evaluated further during detailed design to ensure the stability of the foundation and that the structures are able to withstand strong magnitude earthquake.

(ii) Flooding: There are eight rivers that have been identified to have past history of flooding in Lao PDR. These rivers include Nam Ou, Nam Ngum, Nam Ngiep, Nam Xan, Xe Bang Fai, Xe Banghiang, Xe Don, and Xe kong. Districts located in these eight river basins are prone to flooding with different water levels and areas of inundation.10

9 National Risk Profile of Lao PDR. National Disaster Management Committee. Government of Lao PDR. November

2010. 10 Ibid.

31

The 60 schools are not located in close proximity to any of these major rivers. In Pakkading District, there was reported overflowing of Nam Deau river in Na Kheau, however, this did not result in flooding of the school site. There are also no schools located less than 1 km from the Mekong River. The nearest to Mekong River is Boungkouang Secondary School in Bolikhamxai which is less than 1 km away and Ban Xod Secondary School in Pakkading (Bolikhamxai) and Pakchan Secondary School (Vientiane) which are both about 2 km away from the Mekong River. There are other schools close to small rivers only, some of which have intermittent flows. The risks of flooding will be evaluated further by the technical team during detailed design.

(iii) Landslide: About 5.24% of the country is susceptible to landslides and a large part is located in low to medium landslide susceptibility zones. The areas highly prone to landslides are localized in the southeast and central part of Lao PDR.11 Five schools, located in Bolikhamxai, Salavan and Xekong provinces, reported occurrences of landslides.

(iv) Drought: The occurrence of drought was reported to be highest in Phalan in the dry season (27%) and in Phiengluang (25 – 27%). The southern and northern parts of the central region and the southern parts of the northern region are the drought susceptible areas.12 There are six schools that reported drought events once a year. These are in (i) Ban Mokphord in Oudomxai, (ii) Ban Nam Thuan in Luangprabang, (iii) Ban Namon Phonyeng in Vientiane, (iv) Ban Boungkouang and (v) Ban Thongnami in Bolikhamxai, and (vi) Xiengluang in Xekong. Damage due to drought are mostly in agriculture but high temperatures during drought events has caused inconvenience to students and teachers, particularly in schools and dormitories with poor ventilation.

(v) Storm: The national risk profile reported that Khammouane province is the most vulnerable province to storm events in the country. A class 3 (178 – 209 km/hr) storm hit parts of Khammouane province during a 50-year return period.13

Hazards due to strong storms may bring damage to schools particularly those with existing temporary, wooden structures. Strong rain events also cause students to miss classes particularly for those located in remote areas from the school because of difficulty of access due to bad road condition.

64. A map of seismicity and other hazards in Lao PDR from the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) is in Figure 7.

11 Ibid. 12 Ibid. 13 Ibid.

32

Figure 9: Seismicity and Other Hazards in Lao PDR

C. Climate

65. The climate in Lao PDR can be divided into two distinct seasons: (i) dry season from mid-October to April and (ii) rainy season dominated by the southwest monsoon between May and mid-October. The southwest monsoon brings high rainfall, humidity, and temperature. Temperatures in March to May can reach 30oC while the areas located in higher elevations experience a drop in temperatures to 15oC and below. The annual average rainfall ranges between 1,300 – 3,000mm. 66. The three climatic zones in Lao PDR are:

(i) Northern mountains above 1,000m have montane temperatures on average lower than 25oC and average rainfall between 1,500 and 2,000mm.

(ii) Central region areas have higher temperatures and higher average annual rainfall (2,500 – 3,500mm) and the communities in these areas are vulnerable to droughts. The rainy season in the central region occurs in June, July and August while the driest periods are between January and March.

33

(iii) Tropical lowland plains and floodplains in the south have an average rainfall of 1,500 to 2,000mm. These areas are exposed to floods and droughts. The rainiest period is in September and October with an average rainfall of about 400mm.

Figure 10: Mean annual precipitation and temperature across Lao PDR Source: Vulnerability, Risk Reduction, and Adaptation to Climate Change. Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery, World Bank, April 2011

67. The areas in northern Lao PDR are identified as most vulnerable to climate change. According to the vulnerability mapping exercise conducted for Southeast Asia, the areas of Phongsaly, Houaphan, and Luang Namtha are considered hotspots for multiple impacts including floods, droughts, and landslides. The hazards are either geological or hydro-meteorological in nature. These areas are shown to progress from a Koppen-Geiger classification of temperate climate with dry winters and hot summers to tropical/savannah while the areas in the far southeast are projected to shift towards tropical/savannah and tropical/ monsoon. At the same time, drought is expected to become more frequent in some southern provinces. D. Air Quality

68. There are no major industrial or mobile sources of air pollution in the vicinity of the schools, except for occasional movement of vehicles along unpaved roads which generates dust. Burning of garbage by households is practiced by the communities to manage solid wastes which affects air quality. E. Noise

69. Similarly, there are no major sources of noise in the vicinity of the schools.

34

F. Biological Resources 70. Based on information from the Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool (IBAT), none of the 60 schools are located in any restricted zones of protected area or biodiversity conservation areas. The school which is nearest to a protected area is the Phan Xam Secondary School in Xamtay District, Houaphan Province which is about 1.2 km away from the Nam Xam National Biodiversity Conservation Area (NBCA) (Figure 9).

Source: Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool (IBAT). https://ibat-alliance.org/visual-data-map

Figure 11: Location of Phan Xam Secondary School in relation ot Nam Xam NBCA

71. The Nam Xam National Biodiversity Conservation Area (NBCA) is classified as IUCN Management Category VI or protected area with sustainable use of natural resources and where low-level non-industrial use of natural resources compatible with nature conservation is seen.5 The primary objective of IUCN VI is to protect natural ecosystems and use of natural resources in a sustainable manner. The Nam Xam NBCA is a designated national protected area since 1993. Species that can be found at the Nam Xam NBCA include mammals such as the Asian small-clawed otter, binturong, greater hog badger, gaur, Owston’s civet, lesser marmoset rat, sambar, Asiatic black bear, civet, Chinese pangolin, and sun bear. Avian species that were reported in the NBCA include the Eastern imperial eagle, pochard, hornbill, spotted eagle, collared crow, yellow-breasted bunting, and woodpecker.6 G. UXO Contamination

72. UXO clearance was undertaken in 16 of the 60 school sites prior to the construction of existing schools. There are no information about UXO clearance in the remaining schools. The school authorities and villagers said that they have not encountered UXO or land mines in the area. Although construction will occur in existing school compound that have been subject to disturbance, the screening for presence of UXO needs to be confirmed to ensure safety and security of the students, teachers, and the community.

5 Source: www.iucn.org. 6 Source: www.ibat-alliance.org.

35

73. According to estimates from the Asian Disaster Preparedness Center (ADPC) and National Disaster Management Office (NDMO) of Lao PDR, there are about 78 million anti-personnel sub-munitions that are still at large in rural areas. These are most densely located along the south and central border with Viet Nam as well as in the northern provinces of Houphan and Xiengkhuang. Figure 10 shows the map of potentially UXO-contaminated sites where bombing routes occurred during the war. 74. Although construction will occur in existing school compound that have been subject to disturbance, the screening for presence of UXO needs to be confirmed to ensure safety and security of the students, teachers, and the community.

Figure 12: UXO-contaminated sites in Lao PDR

36

H. Water Supply, Sanitation and Health

75. In general, the existing schools experience problems with regard to water supply, sanitation, and waste management. Sources of water come from ground water, spring, and small streams. It was reported during the survey that because of the lack of clean water at the schools, the students have to bring their own water for drinking and for use in toilets. There are only 11 schools which are served by the local water utility. The rest sourced their water supply from rainwater, shallow well, spring, and rivers and streams. In some schools, students still practice open defecation and are not motivated to use the toilets because of lack of water. 76. One of the better schools with good water supply and toilets is in Viengkham in Pakkading District. The school is readily accessible through NR-13 on the south. It is also connected to electricity from the grid. 77. Majority (52 schools) also do not have proper drainage systems within the premises. Most of the toilets have open pit latrines. There are no separate male-female toilets in Phon Mi Xai, Ban Na, Na Kheua, and Vang Lum. 78. There are some schools with handwashing facilities which were built through support of other organizations. However, there is lack of water and poor maintenance on some of the systems resulting to non-functioning facilities. For instance, in Thong Ka Hai Primary School in Ta Oi District, Saravane Province, a handwashing facility was built with support from UNICEF that has a water supply system connected to a spring. However, the spring system was damaged two years ago and funds for repair has not been available since then.

Handpump well and drainage canal in Kok Bok Lower Secondary School

Toilet and handwashing facility in Thong Ka Hai Primary School

Toilets in Tang Yeung Lower Secondary School and the dormitory toilet

Toilet and elevated water storage tank at Viengkham Secondary School, Bolikhamxai Province

37

Toilets and hand pump in Thong Khe Lower Secondary School, Bolikhamxai Province

Photo 5: Water supply and toilets in existing schools

79. Common illnesses reported by students are colds, diarrhea, stomach ache, skin rashes, and red or bloodshot eyes. The skin rashes occur during the dry months. There are health centers in the villages but the hospitals are usually located in the districts which are quite far from the schools. 80. A report from UNICEF states that only 66% of primary schools have both water supply and latrine facilities which adversely affects enrolment, attendance, retention rates, and learning achievements.14 I. Historical and Cultural Resources

81. None of the 60 schools are in areas identified as historical or culturally significant areas. J. Presence of Asbestos and Other Hazardous Materials

82. None of the schools have any asbestos-containing materials and hazardous materials. Roofs are either made of galvanized iron, bricks, or dried vegetation such as broad-leafed grasses. Hazardous materials were also not found in the school premises that were visited.

14 UNICEF. Lao People’s Democratic Republic. Water, Sanitaion & Hygiene and Climate Change Resilience.

38

V. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

83. The identification of environmental impacts was based on the information about the project design, location, proposed activities during construction and operation, field visits, results of stakeholder consultations, and information gathered from provincial and district school authorities. A. Anticipated Benefits from the Project

84. The project is expected to have a positive impact on the quality of education in Lao PDR. The students and teachers will directly benefit from better classrooms, school facilities and dormitories. The project will encourage students to pursue further secondary education because of better facilities and teaching support. Parents will also benefit because of savings from cost of transportation particularly for students who will not need to travel daily to secondary schools in other villages and districts. There is also expected benefits to health and sanitation because of improvement in toilets, water supply and drainage facilities in the schools and reduced risk during travel to school. B. Pre-Construction Impacts and Mitigation

85. The construction and improvement of schools will be performed exclusively at existing school sites. Impacts due to location are associated with presence of geological hazards, proximity to protected areas, presence of UXO, availability and requirements for water supply, sanitation, and drainage. The site condition, components, design configuration and sizes of facilities and other infrastructures needed by the schools will be evaluated further during detailed design. 86. The following are major environmental issues related to school location. 87. Biodiversity conservation and protected areas. The improvement of the Phan Nam Secondary School in Houaphan Province is not expected to result to loss of biodiversity or critical habitat because all school activities are confined within the community area only. The school was identified as within the community zone and about 1.2 km away from the protection zone of the Nam Xam National Biodiversity Conservation Area. Schools in community zones are allowed by authorities to operate to support the educational needs of villages living near protected areas. To prevent negative impacts to the NBCA, workers during construction will be prohibited from any form of wildlife hunting or collection of natural resources from the protected area. Geological Hazards 88. UXO Contamination. Although construction will occur in areas that have been disturbed already, the screening for UXO presence is important for safety and security. This is particularly relevant for the schools where UXO clearing was not confirmed by school authorities. MOES needs to coordinate with the National Regulatory Authority (NRA) for UXO/Mine Action Sector in Lao PDR, which is the agency mandated to manage UXO mitigation in the country. 89. If the site is located in an identified UXO risk area, then UXO clearing needs to be undertaken through NRA which performs the UXO removal on request of MOES. Only schools with UXO clearance can proceed with detailed engineering design. In the event, that an ordnance is found during the course of project implementation, local Lao UXO offices will be contacted immediately to render the munition safe.

39

90. Vulnerability to climate change. Increased variability in precipitation, including increased rainfall intensities, may result in increased temporary storm water runoffs mentioned previously, strong rain events may affect temporary school structures and also result to difficulty for teachers and students in travelling to schools. On the other hand, instances of high temperature in the dry season becomes inconvenient for students particularly in classrooms and dormitories that are overcrowded and with poor ventilation. There are schools that reported incidences of skin rashes in students in the dry season. The supply from shallow wells and spring water are also affected during the dry season. 91. The design of the school and dormitories will take into consideration the provision of sufficient clean water and also ventilation in the classrooms and dormitories. In schools that are not connected to the water district, wells will be fitted with solar power supply to enable pumping of water even during the dry season. If natural ventilation is inadequate, artificial ventilation or fans will be provided in the school. 92. Historical and Cultural Resources. All of the schools will not have an impact to any historical cultural sites or temples. Should there be unanticipated discoveries of cultural or historical artifacts or human remains, the EMP shall provide measures for contractor to take all necessary steps to protect and report the chance find to concerned authorities. 93. Health, Sanitation, and Security. The project is expected to improve the current condition of schools because of better water supply systems, sex-segregated toilets with three-chambered septic tanks, proper drainage, solid waste management system, and well-ventilated classrooms and dormitories. The provision of available and potable water and adequate toilets in schools will promote hygiene, avoid water-borne and water-related diseases, and avoid the practice of open defecation. The wells in areas with insufficient supply or are not connected to the water supply system will be equipped with solar power system and water storage tanks to ensure that there is water all throughout the year. Rainwater harvesting systems will also be provided in the schools. 94. The school authorities and DESB will be trained on the proper operation and maintenance of these school facilities to ensure the long-term sustainability of the structures and utilities. Wastewater from sinks, showers, and toilets will be connected to properly designed and built septic tanks acting as anaerobic baffled reactor systems to ensure that waterways is not contaminated. 95. Classrooms and dormitories will be designed taking into consideration the natural ventilation and will also be equipped with artificial ventilation systems or fans. Security will also be improved because of the provision of fence and lightning in corridors and common areas. Drainage canals will be improved and solid waste segregation bins will be provided. C. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures During Construction

96. Construction activities will be restricted to vacant land within existing school premises. There will be no land acquisition and/or resettlement, and no temporary or permanent loss of land or other assets. 97. The construction works will have some minor temporary negative impacts. Adverse health and safety or other environmental impacts that will arise from civil works will be minimal and localized since these are confined within a small footprint area in existing school compounds. The existing schools are large enough to accommodate the proposed structures. Impacts include risks

40

to occupational and school user’s health and safety from construction activities, e.g. school children playing near open excavation or risk of getting hit by a construction vehicle or equipment. Additional potential impacts include soil runoff during rain events, an increased level of noise and dust due to vehicle movement and building construction activities, and sanitation issues due to the presence of a worker’s camp during the construction period. There will also be a need to properly dispose of construction debris generated during the construction works. Sand and gravel will be sourced from permitted quarries or commercial suppliers only. The commercial suppliers are located at the nearest town to the school. 98. There will be an increase in dust and noise caused by movement of construction vehicles to the site and construction activities. The material requirement for civil works is not significant, but the haulers need to institute measures such as reducing speeds when passing through settlement areas and water sprinkling within the construction site on areas prone to dust such as piles of materials, excavated soil, and unpaved roads. The schedule of construction activities will be scheduled in close coordination with the school authorities so that examination periods and other important school activities are avoided. To the extent possible, construction activities will be scheduled during school break. 99. Based on the condition of existing schools visited, hazardous materials such as asbestos or asbestos containing materials or toxic paints were not present. All of the existing schools have tin roofs and no asbestos containing materials were found. Construction of structures will avoid using hazardous materials, particularly asbestos, and this will be specified in the bidding documents. During construction, only low or no volatile organic compound (VOC) containing materials will be used in paints, coatings, adhesives, and furniture to ensure that indoor air quality is not adversely affected. 100. Construction activities of the proposed project are expected to cause the following adverse impacts:

(i) Cutting of trees; (ii) Airborne dust will be caused by excavation, vehicle movement and materials

handling at the construction sites; (iii) Noise and air emissions will be caused by construction activities, equipment and

vehicular movement, potentially affecting residents of nearby communities; (iv) Waste from construction camps including domestic wastewater and solid wastes; (v) Increased construction vehicle movement in rural areas which may cause hazards

in settlement areas; (vi) Exposure of school children and workers to hazards due to construction activities

within the school premises; and (vii) Hazards to workers health and safety (viii) Risks to community health and safety.

101. In general, the short-term construction impacts can be prevented or mitigated with good construction management practices. The EMP (see Appendix 1) includes mitigation measures to prevent or minimize construction impacts in line with the relevant provisions of the Environmental Health and Safety Guidelines of the World Bank Group (2007) for guidance of MOES, PMU and the contractor in addressing environmental issues during construction. The EMP includes mitigation measures on dust and noise control, erosion and sedimentation, waste management, site management, safety, provision of clean water and sanitation facilities, public and worker safety and UXO removal. The bid specifications and contracts for civil works will include the EMP.

41

D. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation During School Operation

102. During the operational phase, MOES will also promote hygiene practice in schools through regular water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) campaigns that encourages students to practice handwashing and how to use toilets, latrine and handwashing facilities. Students and teachers will also be oriented on proper solid waste segregation. Budget for maintenance of the school facilities will be allocated by MOES to ensure the long-term sustainability of the facilities.

VI. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION

103. Consultation meetings were conducted from January to May 2019 simultaneous with the pre-validation site visits and site surveys. Follow-up consultation meetings were done from November to December 2019 in 10 schools located in Houaphan, Luang Namtha, Luang Prabang and Vientiane provinces. The participants during the consultations included representatives from the education district offices, DONRE, village heads, and school authorities. The meetings aim to discuss the environment safeguards aspects of the project and the current environmental issues at the project sites. During the meetings, the proposed project was presented. Concerns and suggestions about the existing and proposed school upgrading were also discussed. Information about environmental clearance requirements, presence of protected forests, cultural heritage sites, and natural hazards were also gathered. 104. The consultation meetings were supplemented with random interviews with villagers and students to validate issues and concerns about the existing school and the proposed project and to gather information about environment and social issues in the community. Anticipated positive impacts of the project were also raised by the stakeholders. 105. One consultation workshop was held at the MOES with provincial and district representatives from the 12 districts on 03-05 April 2019 to discuss and prioritize the schools. Table 5 presents the stakeholder consultations that were conducted.

Table 5: Stakeholder Consultations

Date and Province Location 15 – 19 January 2019 Luang Prabang Province

Luang Prabang District Muang Khai Complete Secondary Education NFE Center TVET Collect Lanith Training Center Nambak District Hua Na LSE TVET Center

22-26 January 2019 Vientiane Province

Muang Feuang District Phonsavath LSE Vang Vieng District Vang Vieng USE Phatang Complete SE Phoudindeang Youth Center Ethnic Boarding School Namin LSE English Center in Pu Kham

19 – 22 March 2019 Champassak Province Mounlapamok Distrct

42

Date and Province Location Attapeu Province Sanxay District

03-05 April 2019 Vientiane

Consultation workshop at MOES

21 April to 09 May 2019 Dak Cheung District Dak Ta Ork Yai Primary School Tang Yeung Secondary School Ta Oil District Thong Ka Hai Primary School Kok Bok Secondary School Phon Mi Xai Secondary School Khamkeut District Thong Khe Secondary School Pakkading District Viengkham Secondary School Na Kheua Primary School Ban Na Lower Secondary School Vang Lum Lower Secondary School

18-19 November 2019 Houaphan Province

Xamtai District Phanxam Complete Secondary School Xiengdee Lower Secondary School

28-29 November 2019 Luang Namtha Province

Sing District Namkeo noi Upper Secondary School Sonphao Complete Secondary School

9-10 December 2019 Luang Prabang Province

Nam Bak District Hua Na–Lower Secondary School Huay Yim– Primary School

17-18 December 2019 Vientiane Province

Feung District Phone thong Lower Secondary School Namone phoneyang Lower secondary School

23-24 December 2019 Vientiane Province

Meun District Pakchanh Primary School Napha Phai Lower Secondary School

A. Stakeholders

106. Large group meetings and focused group discussions were held with students, teachers, village authorities, Women’s Union, and Parent’s Association while semi-structured interviews with some key informants such as representatives of ethnic groups, Women’s Union, and students were conducted. Participatory approach was applied during the consultation meetings. 107. The groups and key informants that were consulted during the January to May 2019 consultation included the following:

9 provincial education and sports offices 13 district education and sports offices 5 district natural resources and environment offices (DONRE) 25 school principals/directors Subject teachers

43

Students Village Development Committees, including the Village Education Development

Committees Women’s Union Youth Union Parents Associations Village elders (head of ethnic groups).

About 70 people, composed of officials from the Department of Education at the provincial level, Environmental Offices at the district level and officers from the schools, as well as key officials from the villages where proposed projects will be constructed, were consulted during the November – December 2019 follow-up consultation. The complete list of participants during the November – December 2019 consultations is listed in succeeding table. List of Participants (November – December 2019 Consultations)

No. Name Position Office

Xamtai District, Houaphan Province, 18-19 November 2019 1 Mr. Monesing Phetviengsy Deputy Head Department of Education, Houaphan

Province 2 Mr. Bounkeo Kounsisy Technical staff of

construction work Department of Education, Houaphan Province

3 Mr. Mixay Phonethavysouk Head Education District Office, Xamtai District

4 Mr. Somsack Phonphanya Deputy Head Environmental District Office, Xamtai District

5 Mr. Sychan Phetlasy Director Phanxam Complete Secondary School 6 Mr. Xiengthong Bounyathip Deputy Director Phanxam Complete Secondary School 7 Mrs. Bouason Phimmany Deputy Head,

Administrative Office Phanxam Complete Secondary School

8 Mrs. Ma Vilaythong Teacher Phanxam Complete Secondary School 9 Mr. Lamphan Head Phanxam Village

10 Mr. Maiphet Phanthavone Director Xiengdee Lower Secondary School 11 Mr. Thavesouk

Lorkhamphet Deputy Director Xiengdee Lower Secondary School

12 Mrs. Maikham Teacher Xiengdee Lower Secondary School 13 Mr. Phoneseng Bounyathip Head Xiengdee Village 14 Mr. Hounphou Phonema Village committee

member Xiengdee Village

Sing District, Luang Namtha Province, 28-29 November 2019 1 Mr. Khamsone Thongkieng Deputy Section Head Department of Education, Luang

Namtha Province 2 Mr. Thongvan Technical staff of

construction work Department of Education, Luang Namtha Province

3 Mr. Phonmany Director Namkeo Noi Upper Secondary School 4 Mr. Hormbeng Thavee Deputy Director Namkeo Noi Upper Secondary School 5 Mr. Bouavone Singthong Deputy Director Namkeo Noi Upper Secondary School 6 Mr. Ounkham Head Pha Toil Village 7 Mr. Mai Ounseng Head Namkeonoi Village 8 Mr. Mai Bee Keokhamseng Head Namkeonoi Village 9 Mrs. Chommalee Head, Women Union Namkeonoi Village

10 Mr. Phonmany Director Xiengdee Lower Secondary 11 Mr. Hormbeng Thavee Deputy Director Xiengdee Lower Secondary 12 Mr. Bouavone Singthong Deputy Director Xiengdee Lower Secondary

44

No. Name Position Office

13 Mr. Phoneseng Bounyathip Head Xiengdee Village 14 Mr. Hounphou Phonema Village Committee

Member Xiengdee Village

Nambak District, Vientiane Province, 9-10 December 2019 1 Anoupheng Keovongsa Deputy Head Department of Education, Vientiane

Province 2 Vilayvong Norasing Technical staff of

construction work Department of Education, Vientiane Province

3 Bounthan Chantaseeda Deputy Head Education District Office, Nambak District

4 Viyakone Siliphone Staff Environmental District Office, Nambak District

5 Mrs. Kamphone Director Hua Na Lower Secondary School 6 Mr. Daosengphet Deputy Director Hua Na Lower Secondary School 7 Mr. Chanhtee

Chantamanee Head of Student Union Hua Na Lower Secondary School

8 Mr. Dour Xangxong Deputy Head Hua Na Village 9 Mr. Somsee Photesad Deputy Head Hua Na Village

10 Somsack Salibout Deputy Director Huay Yim Primary School 11 Mr. Bounvong Director Nongkeo Primary School 12 Mr. Deng Phonetava Director Meungteng Primary School 13 Mr. Khamkheng Director Khongneng Primary School 14 Mr. Nana yod Head Khongneng Village 15 Mr. Huay Na Deputy Head Khongneng Village 16 Mr. Phakeo Head Nongkeo Village

Feung District, Vientiane Province, 17-18 December 2019 1 Mr. Thongkhien Kodthahan Head Education Division of Department of

Education, Vientiane Province 2 Mr. Sonesay Khampilath Deputy Head Education Division of Department of

Education, Vientiane Province 3 Mr. Vongdeun Nammexay Deputy Head Education District Office, Feung District 4 Mrs. Khamkhoun

Phonphanya Head Unit of Environmental District Office,

Feung District 5 Mr. Bounchanh

Chanthalangsy Deputy Director Phonethong Lower Secondary School

6 Mr. Soulithone Teacher Phonethong Lower Secondary School 7 Mr. Sibounheung

Phanhasay Head Phonethong Village

8 Mr. Somsee Outhavong Head of group Phonethong Village 9 MR. Soum Sihanam Village committee

member Na Pheung Village

10 Mr. Vieng Lathvongsay Director Monephonyang Lower Secondary School

11 Mr. Sython Khoutsavanh Deputy Director Monephonyang Lower Secondary School

12 Mr. Bounphieng Representative of students’ parents

Monephonyang Lower Secondary School

13 Mr. Thongchanh Koutsavanh

Head Phoneyang Village

Meun District, Vientiane Province, 23-24 December 2019 1 Mr. Thongkhien Kodthahan Head Education Division, Department of

Education, Vientiane Province

45

No. Name Position Office

2 Mr. Sonesay Khampilath Deputy Head Education Division, Department of Education, Vientiane Province

3 Mr. Sommod Southijoharn Deputy Head Education District Office, Meun District 4 Mr. Viengsavanh

Phasisomboun Head Environmental District Office, Meun

District 5 Mr. Sivilay Souliphon Director Pakchanh Primary School 6 Mr. Samphan Vilaxon Deputy Director Pakchanh Primary School 7 Mrs. Yorlatsaloung Deputy Head Pakchanh Village 8 Mrs. Vanna Keonambee Women committee

member Pakchanh Village

9 Mr. Sengthong Herjai Committee member Pakchanh Village 10 Mr. Visay Director Naphaphai Lower Secondary School 11 Mrs. Chanhtee Women committee

member Naphaphai Village

12 Mr. Sithon Young union committee member

Naphaphai Village

13 Mr. Khamaiy Soukhavong Head Ban Naphaphai Village

B. Results of Stakeholders Consultations

108. Appendix 3 presents the more detailed documentation of the stakeholder consultations. Sample of the site survey checklist to generate information on environmental, health and sanitation aspects of schools in Appendix 4. Table 6 summarizes the results of the stakeholders’ consultation meetings and interviews.

Table 6: Summary of Issues Raised During Stakeholder Consultations

Issues/Concerns Remarks Value of education and ethnic traditional practices

The parents/teachers/villager elders think that education is important for them and their community. The ethnic groups who have their own dialect but no written language felt that their new generation can use Lao script to record their unique traditional practices and culture identity rather than only story telling that they have done in the past. In most visited schools and communities, they had mobilized contributions (in both cash and kinds) from all community members and possible outsiders to build the temporary, semi-permanent and permanent classrooms for their children

Support of teachers to ethnic children

Ethnic children at the 1st year of lower secondary education (LSE) who cannot communicate well in Lao Language—teachers provided extra support to help them catch up with the class in Lao Language and doing their homework until they can catch up with the class.

Temporary shelters/huts in the school compound

Where the school is located at the remote villages, parents together with community at the host school, built the huts and temporary shelters nearby school and in the school compound for the children to stay during the weekdays and go home to help parents at the farm during the weekend and also to bring food for their children the following week at their school.

Equal opportunities for boys and girls

Parents see value of education for both boys and girls equally – it is indicated that they do not fix the division of labor at

46

Issues/Concerns Remarks home among boys and girls—both boys and girls share the daily household activities such as fetching water, taking care of their animals, etc. so that both boys and girls can have equal time going to schools and doing their homework.

Perception of students on value of education

Students think that education can give them wider knowledge which will lead them to various information and more opportunities for future career options than the farm and labor works they used to see. They want to have a better occupation and earning for living.

Challenges faced by students The following are the challenges mentioned by students causing many children to drop out after completion of primary schools: Poverty and hunger lack of learning materials (notebook, pencils/pens) and uniform distance from the school lack of available dormitory poor access roads from home to school.

Students doing farm and construction work

Most families that do farm work need their children to help during the planting and harvesting seasons. The families working as laborers for construction and other farm production in other towns, often take their children along. This cause students to miss classes and lead to weak performance, sometimes resulting to the students being asked to repeat the class or the students deciding to stop schooling.

Perceived benefits of the project

The Village Education Development Committee, parents, teachers, elders, and students think that the project will bring positive impacts because new LSE will be built in their villages. They perceive that this will result to: (i) children can continue studying at LSE in their village—this will reduce the dropout rate; (ii) their children will have more knowledge which make them see more choices in their future occupation rather than seeing only farming/traditional occupation as their parents are doing; and (iii) convenience due to better classrooms. The stakeholders also mentioned that the dormitory will provide convenience and also reduce cost of transportation going to secondary schools in other villages and districts. Some parents said that because the school is near or within the village, students can help their family in tending the rice fields.

Perceived negative impacts of the project

The stakeholders said that the negative impacts are temporary during construction such as noise, dust emission, inconvenience to vehicle movement, and risk of accidents.

Environmental issues The representatives from the district Department of Environment suggested the submission of the EMP by the

47

Issues/Concerns Remarks project, to be certified by the environment office. The schools are not located in any protected forest but are in community areas. There is insufficient water and toilets in schools and students bring water from the nearby stream and boil water for drinking. Some students do not boil water and drink directly from shallow wells, streams, and springs. The schools have no drainage system and wastewater from washing area is being directly discharged to the ground.

Approval of the project When asked if they agree with the school construction, they all answered positively.

Suggestions for project implementation

Construction shall be undertaken during the January to June dry season The contractor should provide enough water with pump system and water storage from the stream during construction The contractor should be responsible in managing construction wastes Provide barricade or fence for the construction area Provide safety signs and assign a worker to guide construction vehicles Minimize noise and dust emission Teachers should provide information to students about the project and inform them about safety during construction. In Thong Ka Hai, sand and gravel from the area do not have good quality and the materials should be bought from the main town

C. Follow-up Information Disclosure and Stakeholder Consultations

109. The IEE and EMP containing the results of the stakeholder consultations will be disclosed at ADB website and translated in Lao language. This will be available at the DESB offices to any interested party. During detailed engineering design, follow-up stakeholder consultations through the provincial and district education and sports offices will be conducted to orient the communities about the planned school improvement and to discuss any issues and suggestions that may be raised by the communities. Women’s groups, parents, teachers, students, village heads, Village Education Development Committee, ethnic groups to be served by the schools, district environment offices, and other interest groups will be invited during these consultation meetings. 110. Prior to implementation, consultations, focused group discussions or interviews, as appropriate, will be undertaken with communities within the impact area of the schools to inform them about the proposed construction activities and schedules, details of the grievance redress mechanism (GRM), discuss the proposed features of the school and proposed environmental mitigation measures, and to introduce the focal or contact persons and construction managers. Billboards or information boards indicating the names of the focal persons, construction managers and schedules will also be prominently displayed at the construction areas for reference of communities.

48

VII. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM

111. Grievances are issues, concerns or complaints that may be raised by stakeholders about the implementation of the project. There is an existing grievance redress mechanism (GRM) that has been established by the MOES. The GRM provides a systematic process for receiving, validating, and resolving complaints from affected people and is designed to achieve the following:

(i) serves as an open channel for effective communication of environmental and social issues arising from the project

(ii) allows prompt action or resolution of any complaint or adverse impacts that may occur during project construction and operation

(iii) serves as a means to hear community suggestions on the project (iv) promote transparency in project implementation.

112. Any affected person may raise and submit a grievance if the activity has detrimental impact on the environment, the community, or the quality of life of the people. Examples of grievances are hazards to community health and safety; construction-related nuisances such as noise and dust and improper disposal of wastes; adverse changes on way of life and livelihood; peace and order problems due to presence of migrant workers; and failure of the project to comply with environmental policies, safety clearance requirements, and other legal obligations. 113. The complaints management system will adopt the village complaints resolution process with the addition of project specific entry points, including the Contractor, VEDC and school authorities comprising of the principal or school director. A complaint or grievance may be lodged about the project by reporting to the village head, Contractor, VEDC, or school authorities. Public information booklet containing details of the project, the GRM, and key contacts will be provided in Lao language. Contact numbers will be shared to the stakeholders through an information board posted at each village and at each construction site to emphasize the immediate route by which complaints or concerns can be raised by the public about the project. Other modes of access are through face-to-face meetings with the PMU, contractor, or school authorities, written complaints, and telephone call at village and district offices. Each DESB will act as community liaison, coordinating with VEDC, village head, school authorities and Contractor to ensure that issues are quickly addressed as they arise. The NES will be responsible for ensuring the GRM monitoring, recording and reporting protocols are established and training is provided for all concerned parties. 114. The MOES designated focal person on safeguards under the PMU will be responsible for coordinating with the safeguards focal persons at the DESB/VEDC to ensure that issues raised are resolved and documented and included in safeguard monitoring reports submitted to ADB. The safeguards focal persons will be assisted by a national environment safeguards consultant. Once the project is turned-over to the provincial and district education offices for maintenance and operation, the assigned focal person of the DESB will be in-charge of managing the GRM. The Provincial Unit for Construction and Development Assistance (PUCDA) and DESB will coordinate with the school authorities in providing immediate action on a complaint. 115. Management of Grievances. Although several channels of communication exist, contacting the Project Contractor directly is the most efficient way to address the grievances. Each GRM focal person will maintain a Record Book to track the following details:

(i) date of the complaint (ii) details of the complainant such as name and contact information (iii) description of the grievance (iv) action taken

49

(v) follow-up requirements (if any). 116. ADB’s Accountability Mechanism. In case issues are not resolved through the GRM, affected persons may elevate their complaint to the Lao PDR ADB resident mission in Vientiane. The complainant can elevate the case further through the ADB’s accountability mechanism (May 2012) in case issues are not resolved through the GRM and ADB resident mission. The accountability mechanism provides opportunities for people that are adversely affected by ADB-financed projects to express their grievances, seek solutions, and report alleged violations of ADB’s operational policies and procedures, including safeguard policies. ADB’s accountability mechanism comprises of (i) consultation led by ADB’s special project facilitator to assist people adversely affected by ADB-assisted projects in finding solutions to their concerns and (ii) providing a process through which those affected by projects can file requests for compliance review by ADB’s Compliance Review Panel.

VIII. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

A. Objectives

117. An environmental management plan (EMP) has been prepared to provide mitigation and monitoring measures for identified impacts. The EMP outlines the mitigation and monitoring programs to be taken to avoid, reduce, and minimize adverse environmental impacts to acceptable levels. 118. The mitigation measures are divided into those that will be implemented during the design and pre-construction phase, construction phase, and during the operation and maintenance phase of the schools. The EMP matrix also identifies the units that will be in-charge of implementing and monitoring the identified measures. The EMP has been developed based on discussions with MOES, site assessment and from results of the public consultation activities. 119. The EMP will be included in the bid and contract documents to ensure that the contractors are made aware of these obligations during the construction phase as well as to guide the MOES in supervising and monitoring safeguard performance during construction.

B. Mitigation Plan

120. The environmental mitigation measures to be implemented to address potential adverse impacts of the proposed project are presented in Appendix 1. The project EMP may require updating to address unanticipated impacts not included in the table. The EMP will be included in the bid documents so that the mitigation and monitoring requirements can be evaluated and included in the specifications and cost proposals submitted for the proposed project. C. Reporting

121. Throughout the construction period, the contractor will submit monthly progress reports to PMU. The quarterly project progress reports prepared for ADB should include a short summary of EMP implementation progress and any grievances raised/resolved in the reporting period. The NES will support the safeguards focal person at the PMU to prepare and submit semi-annual environmental monitoring reports to the ADB. The semi-annual reports will include progress of construction, results of site inspections, progress made in EMP implementation, status of compliance with Government’s environmental regulatory requirements and other clearances,

50

record of community complaints, unforeseen environmental impacts and suggested corrective actions for the next monitoring period. 122. Site inspections will be conducted by the DESB on a monthly basis or as often as possible. ECDM, through the PMU, will also conduct site inspections to check the status of civil works and mitigation measures every quarter and the provincial unit for construction and development assistance (PUCDA) every two months, or as often as possible. 123. Appendix 5 presents a template of the environment safeguard monitoring report. 124. Operational Phase. The EMP monitoring during the operational phase of the project will be undertaken by the MOES District Office. The operation and performance of the project GRM, environmental institutional strengthening and training, and compliance with all covenants under the project will also be included in the report. 125. The semi-annual environment progress reports shall be prepared by the PMU and submitted to the ADB until a Project Completion Report (PCR) is issued. Within three months after completion of each contract package, environmental acceptance monitoring and audit reports for the completed package will be prepared by the contractor and submitted to the PMU through the NES. 126. The following presents the reporting plan.

Table 7: Environmental Management Plan Reporting Plan Type of Report Basic Content Prepared by Submitted to Frequency

Construction Phase Construction progress report

Progress of construction, including EMP monitoring results

Contractors Contractor and PMU

Monthly

Project Progress report

Include summary paragraph on EMP implementation and any grievances raised

PMU ADB Quarterly

Environmental Monitoring Report

EMP implementation, environmental monitoring, compliance with Government environmental requirements, complaints received and actions undertaken

PMU through NES

ADB Semi-annual

Operational Phase Progress report Project status

including section on EMP implementation and monitoring

PUCDA PMU Semi-annual until project completion report (PCR)

Reports to ADB Subproject progress report, including section on EMP

PMU through NES

ADB Semi-annual until PCR

51

Type of Report Basic Content Prepared by Submitted to Frequency implementation and monitoring

ADB = Asian Development bank, EMP = environmental management plan, NES = National Environment Specialist, PCR = project completion report, PMU =project management unit, PUCDA = Provincial Unit for Construction and Development Assistance.

IX. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

127. The results of the IEE show that the proposed project will not result in significant adverse environmental impacts. Anticipated impacts are minor and localized during construction stage and environmental mitigation measures have been designed as outlined in the EMP to address identified impacts. Overall the project is expected to be beneficial providing improved school and better hygiene and sanitation facilities. The EMP also presents the institutional responsibilities for implementing the mitigation measures, government will assign staff to implementation safeguard requirements and will be supported by a national environment consultant. 128. This draft IEE and EMP is based on the assessment of 60 identified schools. The IEE and EMP will be updated should there be any major changes in the detailed design of the project. The EMP will be included in the bid and contract documents.

52 Appendix 1

APPENDIX 1. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

Table A1.1: Environmental Management Plan Activity Parameter Mitigation Measures Responsibility Source of

Budget Implementation Monitoring

Pre-construction phase

General conditions for site selection

Location in areas prone to flooding, landslides, drought, earthquakes, and other natural hazards

Check potential risk to natural hazards during site survey

Interview local communities about natural hazards experienced in the locality

PMU, DESB, PUCDA

ECDM PMU

Location in protected area/biodiversity conservation area

Check with district environment office about allowable uses at the school sites

PMU, DESB, PUCDA

ECDM PMU

Risks due to presence of unexploded ordnance (UXO)/land mine

Coordinate with the authorities if site is located in suspected UXO-contaminated site

Ask DESB for UXO-clearance as one of the conditions to inclusion into the project

DESB PMU, ECDM

DESB

Location affecting historical or cultural heritage sites

Check with district authorities on location of historical/cultural heritage sites

DESB PMU, ECDM

DESB

Public consultation

Seek comments from the school authorities, village education development committee, affected persons, local communities, district and provincial authorities about the proposed project

Gather information about site-specific environmental issues that may affect sustainability and safety of the school

DESB PMU, ECDM

PMU

Land ownership Land titles are available for the school as verified by the village committee

DESB PMU, ECDM

DESB

Design and planning of selected sites

Water supply Evaluate location of nearest safe water supply source for the school and develop options to ensure adequate and potable water at all times

PMU ECDM PMU

Appendix 1 53

Activity Parameter Mitigation Measures Responsibility Source of Budget Implementation Monitoring

Ensure that well water source is upstream from a septic tank/soakpit and located more than 15m away from a latrine/septic tank in accordance with the National School Construction Guidelines

Construction of 6.5 cubic meter rainwater harvesting tank

Sanitation and waste disposal (including cooking facilities)

Design sex-segregated toilets with septic tanks

Ensure that there is available water supply in the toilets by providing water storage tank

Locate septic tanks at least 30m away from a river; at least 5m from a water outlet; and at least 3m from a residential dwelling in accordance with the National School Construction Guidelines.

PMU ECDM PMU

Drainage School and dormitory toilets, and kitchen will have drainage facilities per SESDP guideline

Provide neutralization tank and absorption system to treat wastewater from laboratory

Check presence of stagnant water such as dried out rivers or ponds

Provide adequate drainage canals at the school compound

Provide adequate drainage to avoid ponding of stagnant water

PMU ECDM PMU

Power supply and lighting

Check availability of power source

Develop options for power supply such as solar power and generator sets

PMU ECDM PMU

54 Appendix 1

Activity Parameter Mitigation Measures Responsibility Source of Budget Implementation Monitoring

Regular maintenance of solar panels installed in roofs of schools with no power supply from the grid

Provide lighting in school corridors and open grounds; use solar panels in common areas

Provide security lighting at corridor areas leading to toilets.

Ventilation Ensure good ventilation for schools and dormitories in the design through well-designed windows with grills

Provide false ceilings on roofs to reduce heat during hot and humid period

PMU ECDM PMU

Laboratory Provide area for safe storage of flammable chemicals and other materials that may be used in the laboratory.

PMU ECDM PMU

Construction phase

Preliminary tasks of contractors

Activities to be undertaken prior to physical works

Prepare the construction EMP (CEMP)

Appointment of qualified EHS officer

Training of contractor and EHS officer on EMP implementation, monitoring and reporting

Contractor PMU Contractor

Site preparation Soil erosion due to removal of topsoil

Establish temporary erosion control measures such as silt/sediment traps

Schedule excavation and soil moving works during the dry season

Stabilize soil through revegetation after completion of civil works

Contractor PMU ECDM PUCDA DESB

Contractor

Cutting of trees and impact on flora and fauna

Avoid cutting of trees within existing school compound as much as possible; otherwise, consider

Contractor PMU ECDM PUCDA DESB

Contractor

Appendix 1 55

Activity Parameter Mitigation Measures Responsibility Source of Budget Implementation Monitoring

earthballinga of affected trees

Orient workers on prohibition to poach and collect firewood from forests

Excavation and earthmoving activities

Blockage of drainage

Minimize spoil disposal by balancing cut and fill.

Manage spoils to reclaim land with proper landscaping and vegetation.

Inspect and check the drainage system regularly and provide temporary drainage and cut off drains, where necessary to avoid sediment loaded run-off.

Contractor PMU ECDM PUCDA DESB

Contractor

Chance discovery of historic and archaeological artifacts

Orient workers about the procedures on chance find of historical and archaeological objects.

Immediately report the chance find to authorities.

Contractor PMU ECDM PUCDA DESB

Contractor

Chance discovery of UXO

Report the chance discovery of UXO at district NRA office

Contractor PMU ECDM PUCDA DESB

Contractor

Movement of construction vehicles and operation of construction equipment

Increase in suspended particulate, SO2 and NO2 levels

Dust-generating works should be done during off-school time

Regular water sprinkling and cleaning/sweeping of construction area

Vehicles carrying construction materials and supplies should be covered.

Construction materials to be stored in covered areas.

Masks and personal protective equipment (PPE) must be provided to construction workers.

Open burning of solid waste shall not be allowed.

Provide parking area for delivery vehicles away from existing

Contractor PMU ECDM PUCDA DESB

Contractor

56 Appendix 1

Activity Parameter Mitigation Measures Responsibility Source of Budget Implementation Monitoring

classrooms, if possible

Keeping all vehicles and equipment well maintained

Construction activities and movement of vehicles

Noise Limit activities to certain hours during the day or schedule works during school holidays; avoid construction during examination periods and important school activities.

Contractor PMU ECDM PUCDA DESB

Contractor

Movement of vehicles at the site and safety of students and teachers

Provide fence with gate at the construction site

Provide separate routes for incoming and outgoing vehicles from access of students and teachers

Designate drop-off areas for construction materials

Clearly mark pedestrian walkways and crossings

Contractor PMU ECDM PUCDA DESB

Contractor

Construction activities

Production of waste materials – solid and liquid

Proper management/disposal of construction waste.

Provide awareness to the workers on how to keep waste in the safety manner

Avoid disposal of runoff and wastes including oil/grease into water bodies that are being used as sources of water supply

Provide portable/temporary toilets/latrine for workers.

Provide solid waste segregation bins for biodegradable, non-biodegradable wastes and hazardous wastes

Instruct workers to practice 3Rs (reduce, reuse and recycle)

Contractor

PMU ECDM PUCDA DESB

Contractor

Establishment of construction camp

Restore any damage to school grounds at pre-project condition.

Contractor

PMU ECDM PUCDA

Contractor

Appendix 1 57

Activity Parameter Mitigation Measures Responsibility Source of Budget Implementation Monitoring

Should there be a need to establish construction camp outside of school grounds, a written agreement from land owner will be secured by the contractor and the site will be properly restored to pre-project condition

DESB

Hazardous work areas within the school compound

Health, safety, accident hazards

Provide warning and safety signs board, enclosure at the construction area and ensure adequate supervision to avoid public access to hazards.

Prohibit use of alcohol and drugs on site;

Providing awareness to workers on health and safety including prevention of HIV/AIDs and other communicable diseases

Provide workers with potable water, toilet and washing facilities.

Provide medical and first aid facilities.

Require visitors/guests to report at check point before allowed to enter the construction site.

Orient the community regarding construction hazards

Contractor PMU ECDM PUCDA DESB

Contractor

Operation phase

Maintenance of WASH in school

Water supply Maintenance of water supply sources including regular cleaning of water storage tanks.

Conduct monthly potability tests on water supply

School authorities, DESB

ECDM DESB

Sanitation and hygiene

Maintenance of toilets/latrines

Schedule desludging of septic tanks every five years

Provide water at all times at the toilet

School authorities, DESB

ECDM DESB

58 Appendix 1

Activity Parameter Mitigation Measures Responsibility Source of Budget Implementation Monitoring

facilities Educate students on

the use and maintenance of toilets/latrines, hand washing and its importance to health

Drainage Maintain drainage canals and check against water ponding and clogging

School authorities, DESB

ECDM DESB

Solid waste management

Solid waste disposal

Provision of waste segregation bins (biodegradable and non-biodegradable bins) at several areas in the school compound

Prohibit burning of solid wastes

Practice composting for biodegradable wastes

Segregate wastes that can be recycled/reclaimed.

Include awareness raising for students on waste management practices.

School authorities, DESB

ECDM DESB

Earthquake, fire risk

Awareness of students and teachers on disaster risk management

Increase awareness of students and staff on disaster risk management.

Identify the safe evacuation procedures or assembly areas.

School authorities, DESB

ECDM DESB

DESB = District Education Sector Bureau, ECDM = Education Construction and Design Management Division, PMU =project management unit, PPE =post-primary education, PUCDA = Provincial Unit for Construction and Development Assistance. a Earthballing is a practice of transferring trees that has grown beyond the seedling stage to save the roots of the tree

so that these are planted altogether with a surrounding ball of soil wrapped in burlap and treated with temporary nutrient solution and reinforced with a rope or a wire basket.

A. Monitoring Program

1. The following table presents the proposed environmental monitoring plan of the project:

Appendix 1 59

Table A1.2: Environmental Monitoring Plan Parameters Means of

Monitoring Location Frequency/

Schedule Responsibility Source of

Fund

A. Pre-Construction Phase Inventory of affected trees

Inspection and tagging of trees based on detailed project plans

Area for construction

Once PMU Part of design cost

Update of EMP Submission of updated EMP to PMU, ADB and DONRE to include detailed plans and budget for environmental management

- Prior to construction

Contractor Part of construction cost

Orientation on environment safeguards and EMP implementation

Orientation training conducted for PMU, ECDM, PUCDA, DESB, school authorities, and safeguards focal persons at MOES, districts and provincial education offices

MOES Prior to construction

National environment specialist (Consultant)

Part of PMU budget (~US$2,000)

B. Construction Phase

Health and sanitation at construction camps

Ocular inspection of condition of temporary toilets at camp Check water supply in terms of sufficiency and potability Ocular inspection of drainage

Construction camps

Daily Monthly Daily

Contractor Water potability sampling will be included in the contractor contract. Estimated cost of sampling and laboratory analysis is US$500 per monitoring period.

Air Quality

Ocular observation of dust generation. Check efficiency of dust emission control method

Construction site

During dry and windy periods

Contractor Monitoring will be included in the construction contracts.

Noise - LAdn - LAmax

Use sound level meter

Construction site

Every 3 months

Contractor Noise monitoring will be included in the construction contract.

Waste management - Segregation of biodegradable and

Field observation Construction site

Daily inspection

Contractor / PMU

Part of construction cost

60 Appendix 1

Parameters Means of Monitoring

Location Frequency/ Schedule

Responsibility Source of Fund

non-biodegradable wastes and proper disposal of wastes - Inspection of waste oil and grease and hazardous waste storage area

Safety incidents and accidents

Recording of safety incidents and accidents during construction

Construction site

Daily Contractor/PMU Part of construction cost

Community complaints

Recording of complaints/grievance received on the project and actions undertaken to resolve complaints

Construction site

Daily Contractor/ PMU

Part of construction cost

C. Operation Phase

Water supply Conduct monthly tests on water supply to check potability

Water source/storage e tanks

Monthly DESB Part of O&M

WASH training Conduct WASH training

Each school During initial year of implementation

PMU PMU

Develop posters or information materials on WASH

Each school During initial year of implementation

PMU PMU

Training of school facilities maintenance

Train school authorities, DESB and PUCDA on school maintenance

Each province Prior to operation of schools

PMU PMU

DESB = District Education Sector Bureau, ECDM = Education Construction and Design Management Division,O&M = operation and maintenance, PMU =project management unit, PUCDA = Provincial Unit for Construction and Development Assistance.

B. Institutional Arrangements for Environmental Management

2. The Ministry of Education and Sports (MOES) has no unit within the central office nor at the provincial and district offices that is in-charge of environment and social safeguards. There are engineers at the ECDM, but major focus is on design and construction of schools and not on environment safeguards. To a certain extent, elements of environmental management are designed in schools with regards to assessment of presence of natural hazards, UXO contamination, cultural/heritage sites, and rivers and drainage based on the MOES National School Construction Guidelines. However, there is lack of training of MOES staff on environment and social safeguards. 3. As part of the project, the MOES will assign safeguards focal persons at the PMU and at the provincial and district education and sports services through the PUCDA and DESB to monitor the environmental safeguards compliance during project implementation. These focal persons shall be trained by a National Environment Specialist (NES) consultant to be hired by the PMU about environment safeguards responsibilities as well as in ensuring hygiene and sanitation in schools. The NES shall provide assistance to the project throughout the construction phase.

Appendix 1 61

4. The following section presents the roles and responsibilities of the various units in environmental management.

1. Ministry of Education and Sports

5. The MOES is the executing agency of this sector development program (SDP). The MOES shall ensure that relevant staff involved in implementation are fully aware of and comply with relevant Government and Asian Development Bank (ADB) procedures, including but not limited to, those for implementation, procurement, use of consultants, disbursement, reporting, monitoring, and prevention of fraud and corruption.

2. Education for Employment SDP Steering Committee

6. This SDP’s Steering Committee will be chaired by MOES Vice Minister. The committee will:

(i) provide senior-most supervision, guidance and cross-agency coordination to Secondary Education SDP on policy program issues.

(ii) Liaise with other government agencies at a senior level, as needed, on major policy reform issues.

3. Department of General Education

7. The Director General of Department of General Education (DGE) will serve as Program Director and will:

(i) Facilitate policy dialogue across MOES units and other agencies as necessary (ii) Mobilize professional staff to support project implementation (iii) Review and endorse any requests and documents within his/her jurisdiction during

project implementation e.g. approval of bidding documents, bid evaluation results, and contracts, overall and detailed implementation plans and cost estimates

(iv) Submit periodic progress reports to ADB.

4. Education Construction Development and Management

8. The Education Construction Development and Management (ECDM) will be responsible for:

(i) Supervise the implementation of the project in all phases (site selection, planning, design, construction and until project completion)

(ii) Site screening and selection based on the criteria developed by MOES under the National School Building Construction Guidelines

(iii) Approval of design of proposed new school facilities (iv) Review the bidding documents and evaluate bid proposals (v) Coordinate with other agencies in securing the necessary approvals for

construction (vi) Monitor construction of buildings, including implementation of the EMP on a

quarterly basis or more frequent as necessary (vii) Review reports prepared by the contractors and PMU on status of project

construction.

62 Appendix 1

5. Project Management Unit

9. The project management unit (PMU) shall be established within DGE and shall report to the Program Director. The PMU will:

(i) Provide overall management of all aspects of implementation of the SDP (ii) Ensure compliance with loan and grant covenants, relevant ADB policies, and

project administration manual (PAM), as well as alignment with the project design, gender action plan (GAP), environmental and social safeguards, and other agreements

(iii) Serve as focal point for periodic reporting, submission of annual or periodic work plans and other proposals, liquidation, and other documentation to ADB.

10. A focal person on safeguards will be assigned at the PMU to supervise and coordinate the activities related to implementation of the environmental management plan (EMP), monitoring and reporting. In addition, a National Environment Specialist (consultant) will be engaged at the PMU to provide support in ensuring the implementation of environment safeguards. The specialist NES will:

(i) Ensure that environmental safeguards clauses and the EMP are included in the bid documents and civil works contracts;

(ii) Ensure that copies of the initial environmental evaluation (IEE) and EMP are translated in Lao language, submitted to the district environment office, and any necessary national approvals are obtained prior to start of construction work. The IEE and EMP should be submitted to ADB for disclosure at ADB website and made available to concerned parties through the DESB;

(iii) Coordinate and supervise the implementation of the EMP through site visits and consultations/interviews with stakeholders;

(iv) Conduct training and orientation workshop from MOES staff from ECDM, Provincial Unit for Construction and Development Assistance (PUCDA), District Education and Sports Bureau (DESB), school authorities, and contractors on ADB safeguards policy statement (SPS) requirements, Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Lao PDR) environmental laws and regulations, EMP implementation, grievance redress mechanism (GRM), environmental monitoring and reporting;

(v) Ensure that consultations are organized with stakeholders about the project and that the IEE with the EMP and GRM is disclosed;

(vi) Prepare the public information booklet containing details of the project, GRM, and key contacts in Lao language;

(vii) Prepare the monitoring and reporting templates; and (viii) Assist PMU in reviewing compliance reports by contactors and prepare semi-

annual environmental monitoring reports to be submitted to ADB.

6. Provincial Unit for Construction and Development Assistance (PUCDA)

11. The PUCDA under the Provincial Education and Sports Services (PESS) will: (i) Oversee implementation of project-supported interventions at the provincial and

sub-provincial levels; (ii) Assist the ECDM and PMU during site survey and screening; (iii) Conduct monitoring of project construction every two months or more frequent, as

necessary; and (iv) Submit report to ECDM and PMU every two months or as often as possible on the

status of civil works and implementation of mitigation measures.

Appendix 1 63

12. A safeguards focal person will also be designated in the PUCDA.

7. District Education and Sports Bureau (DESB)

13. The DESB will: (i) Oversee implementation of project-supported interventions at the district and

school levels (ii) Assist the ECDM and PMU during site survey and screening (iii) Coordinate with the district environment office regarding environmental approvals

of the project (iv) Conduct monitoring of project construction every month or more frequent, as

necessary. (v) Submit monthly report to PUCDA on the status of project implementation.

14. A safeguards focal person will be designated in the DESB.

8. School Authorities

15. The school authorities (usually principal and other school director) will: (i) Assist the ECDM, PUCDA, DESB and PMU during site survey and consultations

with communities; (ii) Assist in the dissemination of public information booklet about the project; (iii) Provide pertinent information about the school during screening; (iv) Provide suggestions to the ECDM and PMU relative to the requirements of the

school and other issues to be integrated in the design; (v) Coordinate with the village authorities and assist during stakeholder consultations; (vi) Refer complaints to the ECDM and the contractor should there be issues raised

during implementation for immediate resolution; (vii) Work with the contractor in ensuring safety in the school compound during

construction; and (viii) Issue notices for teachers, students, and parents about the construction activities,

any temporary inconveniences that may occur, and the proposed mitigation measures to be implemented.

9. Village Education Development Committee

16. The Village Education Development Committee (VEDC) will: (i) Assist the ECDM, PUCDA, DESB, school authorities, and PMU in conducting

stakeholder consultations (ii) Provide relevant information about environmental and social issues at the sites for

reference in the assessment (iii) Act as the focal point in receiving complaints about the project (iv) Assign a community liaison officer to coordinate the project GRM.

10. Civil Works Contractors

17. The civil work contractors will have principal responsibility for environmental management during construction. They will:

(i) Ensure that bids respond to environmental management requirements of the EMP; (ii) Develop construction EMPs (CEMPs) for each school based on the EMP to be

approved prior to physical works;

64 Appendix 1

(iii) Assign or hire a qualified Environmental, Health and Safety (EHS) Officer to coordinate the CEMP implementation, including community and occupational health and safety, and ensure the health and safety of children and teachers on site;

(iv) Ensure that adequate resources are available to implement the CEMP throughout the construction period;

(v) Secure appropriate permits and licenses before undertaking the works; (vi) Establish a telephone hotline as simplified GRM, staffed at all times during working

hours; (vii) Disseminate information on the construction progress, including anticipated

activities that might cause safety risk, is disseminated in a timely manner; (viii) Inform the schools, the PMU, and ADB in case of complaints; and (ix) Complete the monthly environmental monitoring checklist and submit to the ECDM

through the PMU.

Appendix 1 65

APPENDIX 2. FINDINGS ON EXISTING 60 SCHOOLS A. SCHOOL INFORMATION

No. Province code

Province name

District code

District name

School Name Village Latitude Longitude School Level Type

1 3 Luangnamtha 302 Sing Ban Mom

ມ.ຕ. ມອມ

B. Mom

ບ. ມອມ

21.33334016 101.1670173 Secondary LSE B

2 3 Luangnamtha 302 Sing Chaphouthone

ມ.ຕ.ຈາພທອນ

B. Chaphouthone

ບ. ຈາພທອນ

21.28588876 100.8780617 Primary Complete A

3 3 Luangnamtha 302 Sing Done May

ມ.ຕ. ດອນໃຫມ

B. Done May

ບ. ດອນໃໝ

21.22225155 101.1195114 Secondary LSE B

4 3 Luangnamtha 303 Sing Son phao (Ethnic)

ຊ ນເຜາ

B. Thongmay

ທງໃໝ

21.167043 101.117821 Secondary Complete C

5 3 Luangnamtha 302 Sing Nam Keo Noy

ມ.ສ.

ນ າແກວນອຍ

B. Nam Keo Noy

ບ. ນ າແກວນອຍ

21.16704327 101.1178214 Secondary Complete C

6 4 Oudomxai 406 Hoon Mokphord

ປະຖມສມບນ

ມກພອດ

B. Mokford

ບ. ມກພອດ

20.12343766 101.614075 Primary Complete A

7 4 Oudomxai 406 Hoon Ban Na

ມ.ຕ. ບານ ນາ

B. Na

ບ. ນາ

20.17126761 101.443972 Secondary LSE B

8 4 Oudomxai 406 Hoon Vang Lam

ມ.ຕ. ວງຫາ

B. Vanglum

ບ. ວງຫາ

20.15339624 101.4883341 Secondary LSE C

9 4 Oudomxai 406 Hoon Donemeuang

ດອນເມອງ

B. SibounHouang

ບ. ສ ບນເຮ ອງ

20.03333833 101.349762 Secondary Complete C

10 4 Oudomxai 406 Hoon Houn District

ເມ ອງ ຮນ

Phonsavanh

ໂພນສະຫວນ

20.147144 101.465819 Secondary Complete C

11 6 Luangprabang 605 Nambak Hua Na

ມ.ຕ. ຫວນາ

B. Houana

ບ. ຫວນາ

20.46594824 102.3370512 Secondary LSE B

12 6 Luangprabang 605 Nambak Huay Yim

ປະຖມສມບນ

ຫວຍຢ ມ

B.Huay Yim

ບ. ຫວຍຢ ມ

20.38278826 102.27763 Primary Complete A

13 6 Luangprabang 605 Nambak Nam Thuam

ມ.ສ. ນ າຖວມ

B. Namthuam Neua

ບ. ນ າຖວມເຫນ ອ

20.49638596 102.3574807 Secondary Complete C

66 Appendix 2

No. Province code

Province name

District code

District name

School Name Village Latitude Longitude School Level Type

14 6 Luangprabang 605 Nambak Nam Duan

ມ.ຕ. ນ າດວນ

B. Khanloum

ບ. ຂນລມ

20.60136456 102.5598063 Secondary LSE C

15 6 Luangprabang 605 Nambak Nambak Ethnic Boarding School

ມ.ສ ກນນອນ

ຊນເຜາ ນ◌ ◌ າບາກ

B. Bom

ບ. ບມ

20.635523 102.478220 Secondary Complete C

16 7 Houaphan 705 Huameuang Pa Kha Tai

ມ.ສ. ປາຄາໃຕ

B. Pakatay

ບ. ປາຄາໃຕ

20.05117583 103.9713182 Secondary Complete C

17 7 Houaphan 705 Huameuang Chom Phet

ມ.ສ. ຈອມເພດ

B. Na Ngiew

ບ. ນາງ ວ

20.09767799 104.1041143 Secondary Complete C

18 7 Houaphan 705 Huameuang Homethong

ມ.ຕ. ໂຮມທອງ

B. Somlab

ບ. ສບລາບ

20.05030555 103.5791302 Secondary Complete C

19 7 Houaphan 705 Huameuang Na Leng

ມ.ຕ. ນາແລງ

B. Na Leng

ບ.ນາແລງ

20.08540756 103.876184 Secondary LSE C

20 7 Houaphan 705 Huameuang Khang Khao

ມ.ຕ. ຄງຄາວ

B. Khang Khao

ບ.ຄງຄາວ

20.15300108 103.7982012 Secondary LSE C

21 7 Houaphan 706 Xamtay Vieng Phan

ມ.ສ. ວຽງພນ

B. Tao

ບ. ເຕາ

19.89633967 104.7419741 Secondary Complete C

22 7 Houaphan 706 Xamtay Xieng Dee

ມ.ຕ. ຊຽງດ

B. Xiengdy

ບ. ຊຽງດ

19.92754033 104.6110181 Secondary LSE B

23 7 Houaphan 706 Xamtay Phan Xam

ມ.ສ. ພນຊ າ

B. Phiengthin

ບ. ພຽງຖນ

20.06791756 104.5543657 Secondary Complete C

24 7 Houaphan 706 Xamtay Kasone

ມ.ຕ. ກະສອນ

B. Nasickamxay

ບ. ນາສ ຄ າໄຊ

20.00320415 104.7334138 Secondary LSE C

25 7 Houaphan 706 Xamtay Phan Ngam

ມ.ຕ. ພນງາມ

B. Phattai

ບ. ພດໃຕ

19.97147238 104.6642503 Secondary LSE C

26 7 Houaphan 709 Kuane Meuang Yeuang

ມ.ສ. ເມ ອງເຢ ອງ

B. Meuangyeuang

ບ. ເມ ອງເຢ ອງ

19.75838625 104.343222 Secondary Complete C

27 7 Houaphan 709 Kuane Phan Thong

ມ.ຕ. ພນທອງ

B. Nakormy

ບ. ນາກມ

19.80287746 104.6662064 Secondary LSE C

28 7 Houaphan 709 Kuane Nakormy

ມ.ຕ. ນາກມ

B. Done

ບ. ດອນ

19.70110003 104.5536329 Secondary LSE C

Appendix 1 67

No. Province code

Province name

District code

District name

School Name Village Latitude Longitude School Level Type

29 7 Houaphan 709 Kuane Huaysamat

ມ.ຕ. ຫວຍສະມດ

B. Huaysamat

ບ.ຫວຍສະມດ

19.474031 104.22506 Secondary LSE C

30 7 Houaphan 709 Kuane Na Ngom

ມ.ຕ. ນາງອມ

B. Na ngom

ບ. ນາງອມ

19.806086 104.426266 Secondary LSE C

31 10 Vientiane 1006 Feuang Pha Sang

ມ.ສ. ຜາສງ

B. Phasangneua

ບ. ຜາສງເຫນ ອ

18.47335973 101.9790899 Secondary Complete C

32 10 Vientiane 1006 Feuang Phonethon

ມ.ຕ. ໂພນທອນ

B. Napheung

ບ. ນາພງ

18.6242283 102.0583586 Secondary LSE B

33 10 Vientiane 1006 Feuang Meuang Feuang

ມ.ສ. ເມ ອງເຟອງ

B. Laokham

ບ. ເລ າຄ າ

18.65631808 102.1107157 Secondary Complete C

34 10 Vientiane 1006 Feuang Namon Phonyeng

ມ.ຕ.

ນາມນໂພນແຍງ

B. Namon

ບ. ນາມນ

18.60033572 102.0379921 Secondary LSE C

35 10 Vientiane 1006 Feuang Phon Hin Hae

ປຖ. ໂພນຫ ນແຮ

B. Phonehinhae

ບ. ໂພນຫ ນແຮ

18.721317 102.082282 Primary Complete A

36 10 Vientiane 1013 Meun Pakchan

ປຖ. ປາກຈນ

B. Pakchan

ບ. ປາກຈນ

18.1524843 102.0182021 Primary Complete A

37 10 Vientiane 1013 Meun Napaphai

ປຖ. ນາປາໃຜ

B. Napaphai

ບ. ນາປາໃຜ

18.27592412 101.9559046 Primary Complete A

38 10 Vientiane 1013 Meun Sensavang

ມ.ຕ.

ແສນສະຫວາງ

B. Phonesan

ບ. ໂພນແສນ

18.37910752 101.9540744 Secondary LSE C

39 10 Vientiane 1013 Meun Namhone

ມ.ສ. ນ າຮອນ

B. Namhone

ບ. ນ າຮອນ

18.26316282 101.9489474 Secondary Complete C

40 10 Vientiane 1013 Meun Nampheun

ມ.ສ. ນ າເພນ

B. Nampheun

ບ. ນ າເພນ

18.144461 101.56311 Secondary Complete C

41 11 Bolikhamxai 1103 Pakkading Ban Xod

ມ.ຕ. ຊອດ

B. Xod

ບ. ຊອດ

18.19221963 104.0788059 Secondary LSE C

42 11 Bolikhamxai 1103 Pakkading Viengkham

ມ.ສ. ວຽງຄ າ

B. Viengkham

ບ. ວຽງຄ າ

18.10160563 104.2911558 Secondary Complete C

43 11 Bolikhamxai 1103 Pakkading Boungkouang

ມ.ຕ. ບງກວາງ

B. Boungkouang

ບ. ບງກວາງ

17.98152979 104.2297025 Secondary LSE C

44 11 Bolikhamxai 1103 Pakkading Nakheua

ມ.ຕ. ນາເຄ ອ

B. Nakheuanok

ບ. ນາເຄ ອນອກ

18.228172 104.204062 Secondary LSE C

68 Appendix 2

No. Province code

Province name

District code

District name

School Name Village Latitude Longitude School Level Type

45 11 Bolikhamxai 1103 Pakkading Thongnami

ມ.ຕ. ທງນາມ◌

B. Thongnami

ບ. ທງນາມ

18.170138 104.236514 Secondary LSE C

46 11 Bolikhamxai 1105 Khamkeuth Nong Xong

ມ.ຕ. ໜອງຊງ

B. Nongxong

ບ. ໜອງຊງ

18.140568 104.758826 Secondary LSE C

47 11 Bolikhamxai 1105 Khamkeuth Thongkhe

ມ.ຕ. ທງແຄະ

B. Thongkhe

ບ. ທງແຄະ

18.9814 105.63404 Secondary LSE B

48 11 Bolikhamxai 1105 Khamkeuth Phonemixay

ມ.ປ. ໂພນມໄຊ

B. Phonhmuengnoy

ບ. ໂພນເມ ອງນອຍ

18.20103028 104.9656961 Secondary Complete C

49 11 Bolikhamxai 1105 Khamkeuth Thongsen

ມ.ສ. ທງແສນ

B. Korhai

ບ. ກໄຮ

18.083916 105.042350 Secondary Complete C

50 11 Bolikhamxai 1105 Khamkeuth Chengvilay

ມຕ. ແຈງວ ໄລ

B. Phonpheng

ບ. ໂພນແພງ

18.214572 104.988018 Secondary LSE C

51 14 Salavan 1402 Ta oi Thongkahai

ປະຖມສມບນ

ທງກາໄຮ

B. Thongkahai

ບ. ທງກາໄຮ

15.96074344 106.6843159 Primary Incomplete A

52 14 Salavan 1402 Ta oi Kokbok

ມ.ຕ. ກກບກ

B. Kokbok

ບ. ກກບກ

15.96107542 106.5422417 Secondary LSE B

53 14 Salavan 1402 Ta oi TaOy

ມ.ສ. ຕະໂອຍ

B. Thetsabanmeuang

ບ.

ເທດສະບານເມ ອງ

16.07679015 106.6213625 Secondary Complete C

54 14 Salavan 1402 Ta oi Piko

ມ.ຕ. ປ ໂກະ

B. Piko

ບ. ປ ໂກະ

16.24549984 106.7899681 Secondary LSE C

55 14 Salavan 1402 Ta oi Bong nam

ມ.ຕ. ໂບງນ◌ ◌ າ

B. Bongnam

ບ. ໂບງນ◌ ◌ າ

15.991100 106.628877 Secondary LSE C

56 15 Xekong 1503 Dakcheung Dark Ta Ork Yai

ປະຖມສມບນ

ດາກຕະອອກໃຫຍ

B. Darkta ork yai

ບ.

ດາກຕາອອກໃຫຍ

15.47655521 107.3700325 Primary Complete A

57 15 Xekong 1503 Dakcheung Nong Yean B. Dakchung

ບ. ດກຈ ງ

15.461507 107.2544139 Secondary LSE C

58 15 Xekong 1503 Dakcheung Tang Yeung

ມ.ຕ. ຕງເຢ ງ

B. Dark Chom

ບ. ດາກໂຈມ

15.52249724 107.0562114 Secondary LSE C

59 15 Xekong 1503 Dakcheung Xiengluang

ມ.ສ. ຊຽງຫວງ

B. Xiengluang

ບ. ຊຽງຫວງ

15.33135777 107.1122557 Secondary Complete C

60 15 Xekong 1503 Dakcheung Nonsavan

ມ.ຕ. ໂນນສະຫB. Nonsavan

ບ. ໂນນສະຫວນ

15.461507 107.254414 Secondary LSE C

Appendix 1 69

No. Province code

Province name

District code

District name

School Name Village Latitude Longitude School Level Type

ວນ

70 Appendix 2

B. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SANITATION CONDITION OF SCHOOLS

a. Information on school, topography, number of students/teachers in dormitories, and distance of students from their residences

No. Province

name District name

School name Topography Are there any huts in

school area?

How many students/teachers in

huts?

How far are students in huts from their village?

1 Luangnamtha Sing Ban Mom Rolling 2 huts with 3 rooms

33 students in hut, 1 dormitory for 86

students, 10 teachers in another hut

School is located in Ban Mon village

2 Luangnamtha Sing Chaphouthone Rolling None None School is located in Ban

Mon village

3 Luangnamtha Sing Done May Flat/Level 2 huts 12 students: 6 male

and 6 female students 11 km

4 Luangnamtha Sing Son phao (Ethnic)

Flat/Level None but there is one

old dormitory

280 students: 160 male and 120 female

students The farthest village is 79 km

5 Luangnamtha Sing Nam Keo Noy Flat/Level 1 hut 30-47 students 27-28 km

6 Oudomxai Hoon Mokphord Flat/ Level,

Sloping None None 6-8 km

7 Oudomxai Hoon Ban Na Flat/Level None None 10 – 12 km 21 – 28 km

8 Oudomxai Hoon Vang Lam Lowland None None 10-13 km

9 Oudomxai Hoon Donemeuang Sloping Yes 47 students: 41 male and 6 female students

14-18 km

10 Oudomxai Hoon Houn District Flat/Level None None 36 Km

11 Luangprabang Nambak Hua Na Flat/Level 1 dormitory 50 students 30km

12 Luangprabang Nambak Huay Yim Rolling 3 huts with 3 rooms None 17 km

13 Luangprabang Nambak Nam Thuam Flat/Level 12 huts 65 students 30-31 km

14 Luangprabang Nambak Nam Duan Sloping None None 15km

15 Luangprabang Nambak Nambak Ethnic

Boarding School Flat/Level 1 dormitory 600 students

20 km, all students have to stay in dormitory

16 Houaphan Huameuang Pa Kha Tai Rolling 10 huts 80 students 6 km

17 Houaphan Huameuang Chom Phet Rolling 10-15 huts 272 people 12 km

Appendix 2 71

No. Province

name District name

School name Topography Are there any huts in

school area?

How many students/teachers in

huts?

How far are students in huts from their village?

18 Houaphan Huameuang Homethong Sloping 23 huts 163 people 15km

19 Houaphan Huameuang Na Leng Sloping 23 huts 160 people 50m

20 Houaphan Huameuang Khang Khao Sloping 1 dormitory 20 students around 500 m

21 Houaphan Xamtay Vieng Phan Flat/Level 2 huts 68 students 22km

22 Houaphan Xamtay Xieng Dee Flat/Level 6 huts 102 students 7km

23 Houaphan Xamtay Phan Xam Flat/Level 8 huts 143 students 44km

24 Houaphan Xamtay Kasone Sloping 28 huts 144 students 32km

25 Houaphan Xamtay Phan Ngam Flat/Level None None 7 Km

26 Houaphan Kuane Meuang Yeuang Sloping 32 huts 104 students 30-35km

27 Houaphan Kuane Phan Thong Sloping 28 huts 74 students 20 km

28 Houaphan Kuane Nakormy Sloping 30 huts 84students 15km

29 Houaphan Kuane Huaysamat Sloping 30 huts 64 students 19-20 km

30 Houaphan Kuane Na Ngom Sloping 30 huts 64 students 7km

31 Vientiane Feuang Pha Sang Flat/Level None None 11 Km

32 Vientiane Feuang Phonethon Flat NoneD None 7 km

33 Vientiane Feuang Meuang Feuang Flat/Level 1 hut (5 rooms) 32 students: 14 male

and 18 female students 12-13 km

34 Vientiane Feuang Namon

Phonyeng Sloping None None 10 km

35 Vientiane Feuang Phon Hin Hae lowland None None 6 Km

36 Vientiane Meun Pakchan Flat/Level None None 30 km

37 Vientiane Meun Napaphai Sloping None None School is located in the

village

38 Vientiane Meun Sensavang Flat/Level None None 22km

39 Vientiane Meun Namhone Flat/Level None None 3km

40 Vientiane Meun Nampheun Flat/Level None None 1.5km

41 Bolikhamxai Pakkading Ban Xod Flat/Level Yes, there is dormitory

(temporary) Yes 3 Km

72 Appendix 2

No. Province

name District name

School name Topography Are there any huts in

school area?

How many students/teachers in

huts?

How far are students in huts from their village?

42 Bolikhamxai Pakkading Viengkham Flat None None 30 km

43 Bolikhamxai Pakkading Boungkouang Sloping None None 7 km

44 Bolikhamxai Pakkading Nakheua Flat 2 small houses of

teachers 2 teachers 3 km

45 Bolikhamxai Pakkading Thongnami Flat/Level 1 dormitory None 6 km

46 Bolikhamxai Khamkeuth Nong Xong Sloping None None 15 km (Na Ngoy Village)

47 Bolikhamxai Khamkeuth Thongkhe Sloping 2 small houses of

teachers 18 teachers 18 km

48 Bolikhamxai Khamkeuth Phonemixay Sloping Temporary dormitory (reused old school

building) 3 teachers 18 km

49 Bolikhamxai Khamkeuth Thongsen Flat/level None None 15km

50 Bolikhamxai Khamkeuth Chengvilay Flat/Level None None 15 km

51 Salavan Ta oi Thongkahai Flat/Level None None 9 km

52 Salavan Ta oi Kokbok Flat/Level None None 25 km

53 Salavan Ta oi TaOy Flat/Level 1 hut 43 students: 22 male

and 21 female students 50km

54 Salavan Ta oi Piko Flat/Level 1 hut 30 students: 15 male

and 15 female students 9-10km

55 Salavan Ta oi Bong nam Flat/Level Yes, there is dormitory 26 students 22 Km

56 Xekong Dakcheung Dark Ta Ork Yai Flat/Level None None around 100 meters

57 Xekong Dakcheung Nong Yean Sloping 4 huts 5 teachers and their

family 37 Km

58 Xekong Dakcheung Tang Yeung Sloping Yes Yes 15 Km

59 Xekong Dakcheung Xiengluang Sloping None None 18 Km

60 Xekong Dakcheung Nonsavan Sloping None None -

Appendix 2 73

b. Information on school, distance from village, toilet adequacy, common illnesses among students, and flooding

No. Province

name District name

School name How far is the school from

village

Are toilets adequate?

Illnesses/sicknesses common among

students

School prone to

flooding?

School prone to drought?

1 Luangnamtha Sing Ban Mom School is located

in Ban Mon village

Not adequate toilet, have some latrine

type Cough, cold No No

2 Luangnamtha Sing Chaphouthone School is located near the village

Not adequate toilet, have some latrine

type Cough, cold

No No

3 Luangnamtha Sing Done May 3 km Not adequate Cough, cold, diarrhea No No

4 Luangnamtha Sing Son phao (Ethnic)

School is located in nearby village

Not adequate Cough, cold, diarrhea,

skin rashes No

No

5 Luangnamtha Sing Nam Keo Noy 28 km Not adequate Cough, cold, diarrhea No No

6 Oudomxai Hoon Mokphord 6-8 km Not adequate cold No Yes

7 Oudomxai Hoon Ban Na 10 – 12 km. 21 – 28 km

Not adequate Cough, cold, stomach

ache No

No

8 Oudomxai Hoon Vang Lam 10-13 km Not adequate Stomach ache No No

9 Oudomxai Hoon Donemeuang 14-18 km Not adequate toilet, have some latrine

type Cold

No No

10 Oudomxai Hoon Houn District 36 Km Not adequate Cold, malaria No No

11 Luangprabang Nambak Hua Na 30km Not adequate Cough, cold No No

12 Luangprabang Nambak Huay Yim 17 km Not adequate Cold, diarrhea, red eye (bloodshot eye)

No No

13 Luangprabang Nambak Nam Thuam 15 km Not adequate Cold No Yes

14 Luangprabang Nambak Nam Duan 15km Not adequate Cold, diarrhea No No

15 Luangprabang Nambak Nambak Ethnic Boarding School

120 Km Not adequate Cough No

No

16 Houaphan Huameuang Pa Kha Tai 6 km Not adequate Cold, stomach ache No No

17 Houaphan Huameuang Chom Phet 12 km Not adequate Cold No No

18 Houaphan Huameuang Homethong 15km Not adequate Diarrhea, red eye

(bloodshot eye) No

No

19 Houaphan Huameuang Na Leng 50m Not adequate – there are open defecation

practiced Cough, stomach ache

No No

74 Appendix 2

No. Province

name District name

School name How far is the school from

village

Are toilets adequate?

Illnesses/sicknesses common among

students

School prone to

flooding?

School prone to drought?

20 Houaphan Huameuang Khang Khao around 500 m Not adequate Diarrhea No No

21 Houaphan Xamtay Vieng Phan 22km Not adequate Cold, stomach ache No No

22 Houaphan Xamtay Xieng Dee 7km Not adequate Cold, diarrhea, No No

23 Houaphan Xamtay Phan Xam 44km Not adequate Cold, diarrhea, No No

24 Houaphan Xamtay Kasone 28km Not adequate Cold, cough, diarrhea No No

25 Houaphan Xamtay Phan Ngam 7 Km Not adequate Cold, diarrhea No No

26 Houaphan Kuane Meuang Yeuang 20 km Not adequate – there are open defecation

practiced

Diarrhea, stomach ache

No No

27 Houaphan Kuane Phan Thong 20 km Not adequate – there are open defecation

practiced

Diarrhea, stomach ache, cold

No No

28 Houaphan Kuane Nakormy 13km Not adequate – there are open defecation

practiced

Diarrhea, stomach ache, cold

No No

29 Houaphan Kuane Huaysamat 20 km Not adequate – there are open defecation

practiced

Diarrhea, stomach ache, cold

No No

30 Houaphan Kuane Na Ngom 7km Not adequate – there are open defecation

practiced Cold, cough

No No

31 Vientiane Feuang Pha Sang 11 Km Not adequate Cold, cough No No

32 Vientiane Feuang Phonethon 7 km Not adequate Cold, cough

Once a year,

because there is no drainage system

No

33 Vientiane Feuang Meuang Feuang 12-13 km Adequate Cold, cough No No

34 Vientiane Feuang Namon

Phonyeng 10 km Adequate Cold, cough

No Yes (once a year)

35 Vientiane Feuang Phon Hin Hae 6 Km Not adequate Cold, cough No No

36 Vientiane Meun Pakchan 30 km Not adequate Cough, diarrhea No No

Appendix 2 75

No. Province

name District name

School name How far is the school from

village

Are toilets adequate?

Illnesses/sicknesses common among

students

School prone to

flooding?

School prone to drought?

37 Vientiane Meun Napaphai School is located

in the village No toilet Cough, diarrhea No No

38 Vientiane Meun Sensavang 22km Not adequate Cough, diarrhea No No

39 Vientiane Meun Namhone 3km Not adequate Cough, diarrhea No No

40 Vientiane Meun Nampheun 1.5km Not adequate Cough, diarrhea No No

41 Bolikhamxai Pakkading Ban Xod 3 Km Not adequate Cold Yes (once every two

years) No

42 Bolikhamxai Pakkading Viengkham 30 km Not adequate Cold, cough, diarrhea No No

43 Bolikhamxai Pakkading Boungkouang 7 km Not adequate Cold No Yes (once a

year)

44 Bolikhamxai Pakkading Nakheua 3 km Not adequate Cold Yes (once a

year) No

45 Bolikhamxai Pakkading Thongnami 6 km Not adequate Cold No Yes (once a

year)

46 Bolikhamxai Khamkeuth Nong Xong 15 Km (Na Ngoy

Village) Not adequate Cold, cough No No

47 Bolikhamxai Khamkeuth Thongkhe 18 km Not adequate Cold No No

48 Bolikhamxai Khamkeuth Phonemixay 18 km Not adequate Cold No No

49 Bolikhamxai Khamkeuth Thongsen around 100 meters Not adequate Cold No No

50 Bolikhamxai Khamkeuth Chengvilay 15 km Adequate Cold No No

51 Salavan Ta oi Thongkahai 9 km

Not adequate, no water tank at school and village (teacher has to bring water from the stream

Skin rashes, cold, red eye (bloodshot eye)

No No

52 Salavan Ta oi Kokbok 25 km Not adequate Skin rashes, cold No No

53 Salavan Ta oi TaOy 0 Not adequate Cold, red eye

(bloodshot eye) No No

54 Salavan Ta oi Piko 5 km Not adequate Cold, red eye

(bloodshot eye) No No

55 Salavan Ta oi Bong nam 22 Km Not adequate – there

is open defecation practiced

Cold, red eye (bloodshot eye)

No No

76 Appendix 2

No. Province

name District name

School name How far is the school from

village

Are toilets adequate?

Illnesses/sicknesses common among

students

School prone to

flooding?

School prone to drought?

56 Xekong Dakcheung Dark Ta Ork Yai around 100 meters Not adequate Cold, diarrhea No No

57 Xekong Dakcheung Nong Yean 37 Km Not adequate Diarrhea No No

58 Xekong Dakcheung Tang Yeung 15 Km Not adequate Cold No No

59 Xekong Dakcheung Xiengluang 18 Km Adequate but don't

have water Skin rashes No

Yes (once a year)

60 Xekong Dakcheung Nonsavan 11 km Not adequate Cold, diarrhea No No

c. Information on school, drainage system, distance from nearest water body, landslide occurrence, earthquake, unexploded

ordnance clearing, and distance from protected area

No. Province

name District name

School name Is there existing

drainage?

Distance of school from the nearest receiving

waterbody / river / wetland

Area experienced landslides?

Area experienced

earthquakes?

Was UXO clearance

carried out?

Is the school near or within

a protected area?

1 Luangnamtha Sing Ban Mom Yes 11-20m

(Shallow well) No No No No

2 Luangnamtha Sing Chaphouthone Yes >20m No No No No

3 Luangnamtha Sing Done May Yes >20m No No No No

4 Luangnamtha Sing Son phao (Ethnic)

Yes >20m No No No No

5 Luangnamtha Sing Nam Keo Noy No 1-10m No No No No

6 Oudomxai Hoon Mokphord No >20 m No No No No

7 Oudomxai Hoon Ban Na No >20 m No No No No

8 Oudomxai Hoon Vang Lam Yes >20m No No No No

9 Oudomxai Hoon Donemeuang No >20m No No No No

10 Oudomxai Hoon Houn District Yes >20m No No No No

11 Luangprabang Nambak Hua Na No >20m No No No No

12 Luangprabang Nambak Huay Yim No >20m No No No No

Appendix 2 77

No. Province

name District name

School name Is there existing

drainage?

Distance of school from the nearest receiving

waterbody / river / wetland

Area experienced landslides?

Area experienced

earthquakes?

Was UXO clearance

carried out?

Is the school near or within

a protected area?

13 Luangprabang Nambak Nam Thuam Yes >20m No No Yes No

14 Luangprabang Nambak Nam Duan No >20m No No No No

15 Luangprabang Nambak Nambak Ethnic Boarding School

No >20m No No Yes No

16 Houaphan Huameuang Pa Kha Tai No >20m No No Yes No

17 Houaphan Huameuang Chom Phet No >20m No No No No

18 Houaphan Huameuang Homethong No 11-20 m No No No No

19 Houaphan Huameuang Na Leng No >20m No No Yes No

20 Houaphan Huameuang Khang Khao No >20m No No Yes Yes

21 Houaphan Xamtay Vieng Phan Yes >20m No No Yes No

22 Houaphan Xamtay Xieng Dee No >20m No No No No

23 Houaphan Xamtay Phan Xam No >20m No No Yes No

24 Houaphan Xamtay Kasone No >20m No No No No

25 Houaphan Xamtay Phan Ngam No >20 m No No No No

26 Houaphan Kuane Meuang Yeuang No >20m No No No No

27 Houaphan Kuane Phan Thong No >20m No No No No

28 Houaphan Kuane Nakormy No >20m No No No No

29 Houaphan Kuane Huaysamat No >20m No No No No

30 Houaphan Kuane Na Ngom No >20m No No No No

31 Vientiane Feuang Pha Sang No >20m (Around 1

Km) No No No

No

32 Vientiane Feuang Phonethon No >20m No No No No

33 Vientiane Feuang Meuang Feuang No >20m No No No No

34 Vientiane Feuang Namon

Phonyeng No >20m No No No

No

78 Appendix 2

No. Province

name District name

School name Is there existing

drainage?

Distance of school from the nearest receiving

waterbody / river / wetland

Area experienced landslides?

Area experienced

earthquakes?

Was UXO clearance

carried out?

Is the school near or within

a protected area?

35 Vientiane Feuang Phon Hin Hae No >20m No No No No

36 Vientiane Meun Pakchan No >20m No No No No

37 Vientiane Meun Napaphai No >20m No No No No

38 Vientiane Meun Sensavang No >20m No No No No

39 Vientiane Meun Namhone No 11-20m No No No No

40 Vientiane Meun Nampheun No 11-20m No No No No

41 Bolikhamxai Pakkading Ban Xod No >20m Yes No No No

42 Bolikhamxai Pakkading Viengkham No at least 500

meters (southeast)

No No No No

43 Bolikhamxai Pakkading Boungkouang No >20m No No No No

44 Bolikhamxai Pakkading Nakheua No >20m, it ia

around 50 m No No No

No

45 Bolikhamxai Pakkading Thongnami No >20m No No No No

46 Bolikhamxai Khamkeuth Nong Xong No >20m No No No No

47 Bolikhamxai Khamkeuth Thongkhe No >20m No No No No

48 Bolikhamxai Khamkeuth Phonemixay No >20m No No No No

49 Bolikhamxai Khamkeuth Thongsen No >20m No No Yes No

50 Bolikhamxai Khamkeuth Chengvilay No >20m No No No No

51 Salavan Ta oi Thongkahai No >20m No No Yes No

52 Salavan Ta oi Kokbok No within school

area No No Yes

Production trees of about 10-15 trees

53 Salavan Ta oi TaOy No 1-10 m No No Yes No

54 Salavan Ta oi Piko No 1-10 m No No Yes Yes

55 Salavan Ta oi Bong nam No No Yes No Yes No

Appendix 2 79

No. Province

name District name

School name Is there existing

drainage?

Distance of school from the nearest receiving

waterbody / river / wetland

Area experienced landslides?

Area experienced

earthquakes?

Was UXO clearance

carried out?

Is the school near or within

a protected area?

56 Xekong Dakcheung Dark Ta Ork Yai No No No No No No

57 Xekong Dakcheung Nong Yean No No No No No No

58 Xekong Dakcheung Tang Yeung No No Yes No Yes No

59 Xekong Dakcheung Xiengluang No No Yes No Yes No

60 Xekong Dakcheung Nonsavan No No Yes No Yes No

d. Information on school, buildings or trees considered as cultural heritage sites, water source, and waste management

practices

No. Province name District name School name

Are there buildings/structures or trees within the school compound which are

considered as cultural heritage sites?

What is the source of water in the school?

Waste management

1 Luangnamtha Sing Ban Mom None Shallow well Burning

2 Luangnamtha Sing Chaphouthone None River Burning

3 Luangnamtha Sing Done May None Local utility Burning

4 Luangnamtha Sing Son phao (Ethnic) None River Burning

5 Luangnamtha Sing Nam Keo Noy None Local utility Burning

6 Oudomxai Hoon Mokphord None Local utility Burning

7 Oudomxai Hoon Ban Na None water supply Burning

8 Oudomxai Hoon Vang Lam None Shallow well Burning

9 Oudomxai Hoon Donemeuang None Local utility and River Burning

10 Oudomxai Hoon Houn District None Local utility, Water supply Collected by waste

haulers, burning

11 Luangprabang Nambak Hua Na None Others: Nam Lin

(Rainwater) Collected by waste

haulers

80 Appendix 2

No. Province name District name School name

Are there buildings/structures or trees within the school compound which are

considered as cultural heritage sites?

What is the source of water in the school?

Waste management

12 Luangprabang Nambak Huay Yim None Others: Nam Lin

(Rainwater) Burning

13 Luangprabang Nambak Nam Thuam None Others: Nam Lin

(Rainwater) Collected by waste

haulers

14 Luangprabang Nambak Nam Duan None Local utility or Nam Line Burning

15 Luangprabang Nambak Nambak Ethnic

Boarding School None Water supply

Collected by waste haulers

16 Houaphan Huameuang Pa Kha Tai None Spring Burning

17 Houaphan Huameuang Chom Phet None Local utility Burning

18 Houaphan Huameuang Homethong None Spring Burning

19 Houaphan Huameuang Na Leng None. Chomsy temple is

near the school Spring and River Burning

20 Houaphan Huameuang Khang Khao None Spring Burning

21 Houaphan Xamtay Vieng Phan None Local utility and River Burning

22 Houaphan Xamtay Xieng Dee None Local utility Burning

23 Houaphan Xamtay Phan Xam None River Burning

24 Houaphan Xamtay Kasone None Local utility Burning

25 Houaphan Xamtay Phan Ngam None Local utility, river Burning

26 Houaphan Kuane Meuang Yeuang None Spring Burning

27 Houaphan Kuane Phan Thong None Others: Nam Lin

(Rainwater) Burning

28 Houaphan Kuane Nakormy None Spring Burning

29 Houaphan Kuane Huaysamat None Spring Burning

30 Houaphan Kuane Na Ngom None Spring Burning

31 Vientiane Feuang Pha Sang None Local utility, Ground water Burning

32 Vientiane Feuang Phonethon None Shallow well, River Burning

Appendix 2 81

No. Province name District name School name

Are there buildings/structures or trees within the school compound which are

considered as cultural heritage sites?

What is the source of water in the school?

Waste management

33 Vientiane Feuang Meuang Feuang None River, Rainwater Collected by waste

haulers

34 Vientiane Feuang Namon Phonyeng None Spring, Shallow well,

Rainwater, others Burning

35 Vientiane Feuang Phon Hin Hae None Shallow well Burning

36 Vientiane Meun Pakchan None N/A N/A

37 Vientiane Meun Napaphai None Others N/A

38 Vientiane Meun Sensavang None Others Burning

39 Vientiane Meun Namhone None Ground water Burning

40 Vientiane Meun Nampheun None Others Burning

41 Bolikhamxai Pakkading Ban Xod None River, grond water Burning

42 Bolikhamxai Pakkading Viengkham None Ground water Burning

43 Bolikhamxai Pakkading Boungkouang None Others (Ground water

supply) Burning

44 Bolikhamxai Pakkading Nakheua None Ground water Burning

45 Bolikhamxai Pakkading Thongnami None Shallow well, ground

water Burning

46 Bolikhamxai Khamkeuth Nong Xong None Gravity fed water system,

ground water Burning

47 Bolikhamxai Khamkeuth Thongkhe None Spring water (Nam line

far from village around 5-6 km)

Burning

48 Bolikhamxai Khamkeuth Phonemixay None Spring water (Nam line

within school area) Burning

49 Bolikhamxai Khamkeuth Thongsen None Shallow wells and river Burning

50 Bolikhamxai Khamkeuth Chengvilay None River, water supply Burning

51 Salavan Ta oi Thongkahai None Small stream far from

school 500 meters away Burning

52 Salavan Ta oi Kokbok None Ground water inside

school Burning

82 Appendix 2

No. Province name District name School name

Are there buildings/structures or trees within the school compound which are

considered as cultural heritage sites?

What is the source of water in the school?

Waste management

53 Salavan Ta oi TaOy None River, ground water,

water supply Burning

54 Salavan Ta oi Piko None River Burning

55 Salavan Ta oi Bong nam None Ground water Burning

56 Xekong Dakcheung Dark Ta Ork Yai None Spring water (Nam line

far from village around 5-6 km)

Burning

57 Xekong Dakcheung Nong Yean None

Spring water (distance 5-6 km ) is broken (currently

using water source at distance of 100 m

Burning

58 Xekong Dakcheung Tang Yeung None Spring, River Burning

59 Xekong Dakcheung Xiengluang None Shallow well Burning

60 Xekong Dakcheung Nonsavan None Water supply Burning

70 Appendix 3

APPENDIX 3. DOCUMENTATION OF STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS

In preparation and designing of the Education for Employment Sector Development Program (SDP_, to support and provide inputs to required assessments as well as to validate the sites which were initially identified through the analysis of education data and maps, the TRTA team had conducted the stakeholder consultation in various approaches during January to May 2019 such as 3 batches of site visits to pre- and validate the sites, one consultation workshop held at MOES with PES from 8 provinces and DEBS from 12 districts to discuss and prioritize the schools in their respective districts, and creating of a closed WhatsApp group communication with the PES and DEBS and relevant officers of MOES and TRTA team. Throughout the site pre- and validation stages (January to May 2019), the TRTA team have made a visit to total of 9 provinces, 13 districts and 25 schools, colleges and centers. A. Pre-Validation During the pre-validation, consultations and site visits were undertaken at: Batch 1:

15 – 19 January 2019: Luang Prabang Province (visit to Muang Khai Complete SE, NFE Center, TVET College and, Lanith Training Center in LPB District; and Hua Na LSE and TVET Center in Nam Bark District).

22-26 January 2019: Vientiane Province (visit to Phonsavath LSE in Muang Fuang District; Vang Vieng USE, Phatang Complete SE, Phoudindeang Youth Center, Ethnic Boarding School (A pilot project of Vocat. SE), and Namon LSE, and English center at Pu Kham cave area in Vang Vieng District).

Batch 2:

19-22 March 2019: Field (visit to Mounlapamok Distrct of Champassak province and Sanxay District of Attapeu province (by OH).

20-23 March 2019 to (Long and Sing District) Luang Namtha Province. Below are the conclusions from the consultations: The parents/teachers/villager elders think that education is important for them and their

community. The ethnic groups who have their own dialect but no written language felt that their new generation can use Lao script to record their unique traditional practices and culture identity rather than only story telling as they have done in the past. In most visited schools and communities, contributions (in both cash and kinds) were solicited from all community members and possible outsiders to build the temporary, semi-permanent and permanent classrooms for their children.

Where the school is located at the distance village, parents together with community at the host school, built the huts and temporary shelters nearby school and in the school compound for the children to stay during weekdays and go home to help parents at the farm during the weekend and also to bring food for their children the following week at school.

Students think that education can give them wider knowledge which will lead them to various information and more opportunities for future career options than the farm and labor works they used to see. They want to have a better occupation and earning for living.

Appendix 3 71

Parents see value of education for both boys and girls equally – it is indicated that they do not fix the division of labor at home among boys and girls – both boys and girls share the daily household activities such as fetching water, taking care of their animals, etc. so that both boys and girls can have equal time for schools and doing their homework.

Ethnic children at the 1st year of LSE who cannot communicate well in Lao Language – teachers provided extra support to help them catch up with the class in Lao Language and doing their homework until they can catch up with the class.

Challenges they face Poverty, hunger, lack of learning materials (note book, pencils/pens) and cloth (uniform),

distance from the school and have no dormitory available and difficult road from home to school, caused many children to drop out after completion of Primary, Lower and Upper Secondary schools.

Most families that do farm work, they need their children labor during the planting and harvesting seasons. The parents who work as laborers for construction and other farm production in other towns often take their children along. This caused students missed their classes and lead to weak performance, repeat the class, and stop schooling.

Something to prove that they need school (Annex School Conditions) The VEDC, Parents, teachers, elders, students: think that the positive impacts that the new

LSE will have to their village are (i) children can continue studying at LSE in their village – this will reduce the dropout rate; and (ii) their children will have more knowledge which make them see more choices of their future occupations rather than seeing only farming/traditional occupation as their parents are doing.

When all key informants were asked (village leaders/children/teachers/parents) about their approval on school construction project that will be implemented in their village, their answer is YES, THEY APPROVED.

B. Consultation Workshop with 8 Provincial Education and 12 District Education Offices at MOES in Vientiane Consultation workshop was held on 03-05 April 2019 at the MOES office in Vientiane to discuss the prioritization of schools at the 12 districts. The workshop was participated by head/deputy head of Provincial and District Education Offices of 8 target provinces (namely Luang Namtha, Oudomxai, Luang Prabang, Houaphan, Vientiane, Bolikhamxai, Saravan, and Sekong) and 12 target districts (namely Sing, Houn/Hoon, Nam Bark, Houa Mueang, Xam Tai, Kouan, Meun, Feuang, Pakkading, Kham Kert, Ta Oi, and Dak Chung. The TRTA team explained the concept and scope of the Education for Employment SDP and the criteria for selection of target schools. At the end of the workshop, the 12 districts have completed list of prioritized schools of their respective district. The checklist was then sent to 12 districts to provide required information of their top 4 prioritized schools. Hence, by the second week of April 2019, the filled checklists of 48 target schools were returned to the TRTA team. However, after the site visit and relevant analysis, the TRTA team and the Education for the Employment SDP advisory team has proposed to include one more school in each target district. The total number of target schools then became 60.

72 Appendix 3

Appendix 3 73

C. Validation During the validation phase, consultations and site surveys were undertaken from 21 April to 09 May 2019 at 10 schools in five districts in Xekong, Saravan, Bolikhamxai, and Oudomxai provinces, and from 18 November to 24 December 2019 at 10 schools in five districts in Houaphan, Luang Namtha, Luang Prabang, and Vientiane provinces. This part was done for the 10 target school sites in the field visit during 21 April to 09 May 2019, and another 10 schools in

Left: Consulting Head of Pakkading District Education Office and School Director at Na Kheua LSE. Middle: Consulting Students and Village

Authorities at Na Kheua LSE. Right: Consulting teachers & students at Vieng Kham Complete SE in Pakkading District, Bolikhamxai Province

Left: Meeting Kham Kert District Education Office. Middle: Consulting Phon Mixay USE, and Right: Consulting students and village

authorities at Thong Khe LSE in Kham Kert District, Bolikhamxai province.

Left: Meeting Saravan Province Education Office. Middle: Meeting Ta Oi District education office. Right: Consulting Students at Kok Bok LSE

in Ta Oi District, Saravan Province.

Left: Meeting Head of Sekong Province Education Office. Middle: Consulting Students and village authorities at Tang Yeung LSE and Right:

Consulting Students and Village Authorities at Dark Ta Ork Yai Promary School in Dark Cheung District, Sekong Province.

74 Appendix 3

the field visit during 18 November to 24 December 2019. It has confirmed the sufficient number of students at the target schools and their surrounding schools/villages who will benefit from the newly built Education for Employment SDP schools and facilities. It also provides the data/information required for in-service teachers training/capacity building as well as required additional classrooms. The summary of 20 schools validated is in succeeding table.

Province District School Name Date of Site

Validation (2019)

Luang Namtha Sing Son Phao Complete Secondary School

November 29

Nam Keo Noy Upper Secondary School

November 28

Oudomxhai Soon Ban Na Lower Secondary School May 7

Vang Lam Lower Secondary School

May 7

Luang Prabang Nambak Huan Na Lower Secondary School December 9

Huay Yim Primary School December 10

Houaphan Xamtay Xieng Dee Secondary School November 19

Phan Xam Secondary School November 18

Vientiane Feung Phonethong Lower Secondary School

17 December

Na Monephoneyang Lower Secondary School

18 December

Meun Pakchan Primary School 23 December,

Naphaiphai Primary School 24 December,

Bolikhamxai Pakkading

Viengkham Secondary School 2 May

Nakheua Secondary School 2 May

Khamkeuth Thongkhe Secondary School 30 April

Phonemixay Secondary School 30 April

Salavan Tai Oi Thong Ka Hai Primary School 24 April

Kok Bok Secondary School 24 April

Xekong Dakcheung Dark Ta Ork Yai Primary School 22-23 April

Teng Yeung Secondary School 23 April

Total 20 schools

DATE: 7 MAY 2019 LOCATION: HOON DISTRICT, OUDOMXAI PROVINCE

The consultation meeting was undertaken at Ban Na and Vanglam lower secondary school. The topic of discussion was on the environmental safeguards aspects and the current and environmental condition of the proposed site for the project.

- PARTICIPANTS:

- MR. PHOUNGVILAY INTHAVONG, DEPUTY HEAD OF DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AT THE

PROVINCE

Appendix 3 75

- MR. KEO KHAM VONGVILAY, DEPUTY HEAD OF THE EDUCATION OFFICE AT THE PROVINCE

- HOUN DISTRICT

- Mr.Khamphat Pimpha, staff of Education District office - Mr. Manichanh Khounsangon, deputy head unit at Education of the District office - Mr.Sayavong Sounthala, Staff of Environmental District Office

Ban Na Lower Secondary School

- Mr. Sonephi, Director of school - Mr. Thongphet Sichalern, head village of Ban Na village

Vanglam Lower Secondary school - Mr. Inphone Sonemany, Director of school - Mrs. Davan Chitdavong , Deputy Director school’s activity - Mr.Thongsi , head village of Vanglam

- RESULTS OF DISCUSSION:

1. Ban Na Lower Secondary School

The Deputy Head of the Environment Office, Mr. Sayavong Sounthala, at the district said that there are no environmental clearance requirements for the proposed project since the construction activities will occur within a small area and are located inside the existing compound of the school, therefore, an EMP is necessary to be certified by the district environment office during project implementation. There is no protected forest area close to the school. The school has never experienced flooding, drought, and other hazards. There are no cultural heritage sites or temples close to the school. There is no river or stream close to the school. The existing school has a temporary building made of bamboo wall and old corrugated cement roof. This could be easily damaged by strong wind and heavy rain. One building is made of concrete wall and zinc roof. The school experiences leaks during heavy rains which is inconvenient for students and teachers. Suggestions for project implementation are:

Conduct the construction activities during the dry season (January to June) The environmental impacts are not significant but safety should be considered by the

contractor by providing barricade or fence for the construction area, safety signs, and traffic/security aide to guide delivery of materials.

The construction area should have proper collection of wastes. Teachers should provide information and safety warnings to students.

Anticipated positive impacts of the project are:

Many students would be able to stay in the dormitory, thus, reducing the cost of transportation to school.

The dormitory should be offered for free. Since students will be staying at the dormitory, the risk of accidents when riding motorbikes

to school will be reduced.

76 Appendix 3

Anticipated negative impacts are small and temporary. These impacts will occur during construction only such as noise nuisance, inconvenience and risks of accidents to students due to vehicle movement.

MEETING AT BAN NA LOWER SECONDARY SCHOOL OF

HOUN DISTRICT

2. Vanglam Lower secondary School The district environment office said that the village area and school are not close to any protected forest area. The area is not prone to drought and other natural hazards. There is no cultural heritage site or temple close to the school. The nearest small stream is Beng River. The river is shallow and never cause flooding at the school and village area. The school building is made of bamboo and zinc roof which could be damaged by strong winds. The tables and chairs of the school are small and do not meet the standards because these were only made by the parents. There are insufficient toilets in the school. Suggestions for project implementation are:

Construction activities should be done during the dry season in January to June. There should be designated area for sharp and steel materials. There should be safety signs and person assigned to direct traffic or movement of delivery

trucks. Teacher should provide the project’s information and safety warnings to students against

playing or staying close to the construction area. Anticipated positive impacts of the project are:

Reduce number of students’ drop out The students will be encouraged to come to school because of improved learning

environment. Parents of students will not need to donate funds to building the school.

Anticipated negative impacts of the project are:

Appendix 3 77

The negative impacts are small and temporary and will occur only during the construction such as noise nuisance, inconvenience and risk of accidents.

MEETING AT VANGLAM LOWER SECONDARY SCHOOL OF HOUN DISTRICT

78 Appendix 3

Appendix 3 79

80 Appendix 3

DATES: 22- 23 APRIL 2019 LOCATION: DAK CHEUNG DISTRICT, XEKONG PROVINCE

The consultation meeting was undertaken at Dark Ta Ork Yai primary and Teng yung secondary school. The topic was discussion on the environmental safeguards aspects and the current and environmental condition of the proposed site for the project. Environmental Specialist of the project met Department of Natural Resource and Environment of Xekong Province to discuss about the environmental requirement of the project proposed activity such as proposed new /additional building inside school area.

- PARTICIPANTS: - DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT OF XEKONG PROVINCE - Mr. Sengphachan, the Environmental staff office of DONRE of Xekong province

- DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OF XEKONG PROVINCE - Mr. Khamtai, Technical staff - DAK CHEUNG DISTRICT - Mr. Ongsiapha, district staff of Education office - Mr. Phatana Siapha, district staff of Education office - Mr. Ornkeo Thongthasay, district office of Environmental office

Dark Ta Ork Yai –Primary school

- Mrs. Vienglaimone Khamdasouk, deputy director of primary school - Mrs. Sonesamai, Teacher - Mrs. Latnida, Teacher - Mrs. Kheumchone, Teacher

Teng Yung- Secondary school - Mr. Phetthana , Deputy head office of school - Mr. Mounsaveng, Director of school - Mr. Viengkham jue, Head village of Dark Jom village

RESULTS OF DISCUSSION: In the morning of 23 April 2019, Environmental Specialist of the Project met Mr. Sengphachan, environmental staff of Department of Natural Resources and Environment of Xekong Province, he suggested that the Environmental Management Plan for the project shall be conducted and certified by the Environmental office of the District level.

3. Dark Ta Ork Yai Primary school

(i) The environment office at Dak Cheung District said that the village is part of the Biodiversity Corridor Conservation (BCC) project of the agriculture office but is not located in the National Biodiversity Conservation Area (NBCA). The BCC project has the objective of carrying out awareness and conservation program for the people, prohibiting hunting and logging of trees.

(ii) The primary school has not experienced flooding, drought and other hazards.

Appendix 3 81

(iii) There is no cultural heritage site or temple close to the school. (iv) There is insufficient water in the school and the village. The students have to bring

water from the houses (around 100m) to the school for washing at the school’s toilet.

(v) Suggestions for project implementation are: a. The contractor should provide enough water with pump system and water

storage from the stream during construction b. Provide barricade or fence for the construction area c. Provide safety signs and assign a worker to guide construction vehicles d. Minimize noise and dust emission e. Teachers should provide information to students about the project and

safety warnings. (vi) Anticipated positive impacts of the project are:

a. The project will bring better learning environment for students because of better classrooms.

b. The dormitory will provide convenience and also reduce cost of transportation going to secondary schools in other villages and districts.

(vii) Anticipated negative impacts of the project are:

The negative impacts are temporary during construction such as noise, dust emission, inconvenience due to vehicle movement, and risk of accidents.

MEETING AT DARK TA ORK YAI PRIMARY SCHOOL OF DAK CHEUNG DISTRICT

4. Teng Yung District The environment office at Dak Cheung district said that the village and school are not close to any protected forest area. The primary school has not experienced flooding, drought and other natural hazards. There are no cultural heritage sites or temples close to the school. There is insufficient water in the school and village. The toilets are not being used because there is not enough water. No electricity is connected to the school. There is a small generator to provide electricity to the dormitory building. Suggestions for project implementation are:

Provide fence to barricade the construction area

82 Appendix 3

Provide safety signs and assign a worker to guide movement of construction vehicles Minimize noise and dust emission during construction Teachers should provide the project’s information and safety warnings to students.

Anticipated positive impacts of the project are:

The project will provide better learning environment for students. The dormitory will allow students to stay at the school and reduce cost of transportation

as compared to studying in secondary schools in other villages and districts. Anticipated negative impacts are temporary and small, primarily occurring during construction stage only such as noise, dust emission, inconvenience and risk of accidents due to construction vehicle movement.

MEETING AT TENG YUNG SECONDARY SCHOOL OF DAK CHEUNG DISTRICT

Appendix 3 83

84 Appendix 3

Appendix 3 85

- DATE: 30 APRIL 2019 - LOCATION: KHAMKEUT DISTRICT OF BORIKHAMXAY PROVINCE

The consultation meeting was undertaken at Phon Mixay and Thong Khe secondary schools. The topic includes discussion on environmental safeguards aspects and the current and environmental condition of the proposed site for the project.

PARTICIPANTS:

- KHAMKEUT DISTRICT

- Mrs. Khamhack Layvanh, Deputy head of Education District office - Mr. Thod Vongsichanh, Deputy head of Environmental District office - Mr. Bounphasert Yamnengvang, technical staff office of Education District office

Phon Mixay –Secondary school

- Mr. Khamsamone phoutchampha, Director of school - Mr. Yangna Yeithengvang, head village of Phone Meuang noi village - Mr. La Mon, head of student’s development unit of school

Thong khe- Secondary school - Mr. Jhone Fasavang , Deputy Director of school - Mr. Mai Man La vanhdee, head unit of school’s activity - Mr. Sonekeo Yeisuevau, head of unit of Admin - Mr. Xiengsiphone, head of young generation Union of Thong khe village - Mr.Xiengbai, Deputy head of village of Thong khe village

- RESULTS OF DISCUSSION:

5. Phon Mixay Secondary school

The environment office at the district said that the project will not require an environmental clearance because the construction activities are small and located inside the existing boundary of the school. The district office suggested the preparation of the EMP to be certified by the environment office at the district level.

There are no protected areas close to the school. There is a mountain about 200m – 300m away which is for tourist conservation area. The school has not experienced flooding, drought, and other natural hazards. There are no cultural heritage sites or temples close to the school. The nearest available water source is a spring located about 100km away. There is no drainage system in the school.

The school has high number of students and there are limited classrooms and teachers. The students find the situation inconvenient causing them to miss classes. Some students also have difficulty going to school because their houses/villages are far from the school. They come to school by renting bus and stay at school during weekdays. There is no convenient place to stay.

86 Appendix 3

Suggestions: The construction activities should be undertaken during the dry months of June to September and the main construction activities should be completed before school opens.

Perceived benefits: The project will provide benefits because of free dormitory and proper place to stay for students. It will also reduce cost of transportation.

Perceived negative impacts: The negative impacts are temporary and will occur during construction.

MEETING AT PHON MIXAY SECONDARY SCHOOL OF KHAMKHERT DISTRICT

6. Thong Khe Secondary school The environment office in Khamkhert district said that the village and school are not close to any protected area. The protected forest area is about 5 km away from the village. The school has not experienced flooding, drought and other natural hazards. There are no cultural heritage sites or temples close to the school. The river (Houay Peung) is about 400-500 m away from the school. Source of water for the school is from the spring which is distributed by gravity to the school. There is no drainage system in the school. The student population in the school is high and the school buildings just made of temporary structures. Every year parents of students would provide funds/money for the maintenance of the school building. The teachers built a small house within the school compound using old building materials and wood. There are insufficient toilets in the school area and the accommodation for teachers is too small. Suggestions:

The construction activity should be done during the school holidays (June to September) and the main construction activity should be completed before the school opens.

The contractor should provide a fence to barricade the construction area, safety signs, and designate workers to guide construction vehicles.

Teachers should provide the project’s information and safety warnings to students. Anticipated positive impacts of the project are:

High number of students’ drop out will be reduced. The family cannot support the education of students if they would study in the district or main town.

Appendix 3 87

Save cost or funds from parents to maintain the school Students will have the chance to complete the secondary level Teachers will have better dormitory. Students will have free dormitory which also reduces the cost of transportation when they

study in other villages or districts.

The anticipated negative impacts are temporary and small.

MEETING AT THONG KHE SECONDARY SCHOOL OF KHAM KHERT DISTRICT

88 Appendix 3

Appendix 3 89

90 Appendix 3

DATE: 24 APRIL 2019 LOCATION: THONG KA HAI PRIMARY AND KOK BOK SECONDARY SCHOOL TA OI DISTRICT OF SALAVAN PROVINCE

The consultation meeting was undertaken at Thong Ka hai primary and Kok bok secondary school. The topic was to discuss the environmental safeguards aspects and the current and environmental condition of the proposed site for the project.

PARTICIPANTS:

- TA OI DISTRICT

- District staff of Education office - District office of Environmental office

Thong Kor Hai –Primary school

- Mr. Kham sone, Deputy Director of primary school - Mr. Kham phan, Teacher - Mr. Kham Ngem, Head of Thong kor hai village

Kok Bok- Secondary school - Mr. Oudomphone Dengamphone , Director of school - Mr. Doungpasert Manyvong, Deputy Director of school - Mr. Ong, head of village - RESULTS OF DISCUSSION:

7. Thong Ka hai Primary school

The head of the environment office of Ta Oi district suggested the submission of the EMP by the project. The EMP will be certified by the environment office at the district. The village and school are not close to any protected area. The protected forest is far from the village area, about 3-4 km away. The primary school has not experienced flooding, drought and other natural hazards. There are no cultural heritage sites or temples close to the school. There is insufficient water in the school. Students bring water from the stream and boil water for drinking. There is no electricity connection at the school. Suggestions for project implementation are:

The construction should have enough water. The contractor should provide a pump system from the stream with water storage.

Sand and gravel from the area does not have good quality and this should be bought from the main town.

Provide fence to barricade the construction area Provide safety signs and traffic personnel to guide movement of construction vehicles. Teachers should provide information to students about the project and on safety.

Anticipated benefits of the project are:

Convenience due to better classrooms Students will have free dormitory

Appendix 3 91

Reduce cost of transport rather than studying in secondary schools in other villages and districts.

Because the school is near or within the village, students can help the family in tending the rice fields.

The negative impacts are small and temporary and will occur during construction only.

Meeting at Thong kor Hai primary school of Ta oi district

8. Kok Bok Secondary school Ta Oi environment district office said that school and village are not close to any national protected area. The school has not experienced flooding, drought and other hazards. There are no cultural heritage sites or temples close to the school. There is no stream close to the school or village area. The main concern of the school is on the health of students. The male students at the dormitory suffer from skin rashes which becomes itchy. The students went to the health center for treatment but there was no medicine prescribed at the health center. Some students in the school drink water directly from the well without boiling. Suggestions for project implementation are:

The contractor should provide enough water with pump system and storage. Sand and gravel should be bought outside the village because the quality and supply of

construction materials in the area is not enough and is not of good quality. Provide fence to barricade the construction area Provide safety signs Assign a worker to direct the movement of construction vehicles Minimize noise and dust emission during construction Teachers should disseminate the project information to students and inform them about

safety during construction. The project is anticipated to bring benefits to students because of better classrooms and dormitory. The dormitory will be free. The project is also expected to reduce cost of transport rather than studying in secondary schools in other villages and districts. The anticipated negative impacts are small and temporary.

92 Appendix 3

Meeting at Kok Bok secondary school of Ta oi district

Appendix 3 93

DATE: 2 MAY 2019 LOCATION: VIENGKHAM SECONDARY SCHOOL AND NA KHEUA PRIMARY SCHOOL PAKKADING DISTRICT OF BORIKHAMXAY PROVINCE

The consultation meeting was undertaken at Viengkham secondary and Na kheua primary school to discuss the environmental safeguards aspects and the current and environmental condition of the proposed site for the project.

PARTICIPANTS:

- PAKKADING DISTRICT

- Mr Khampeay, Head of Education District office - Mr. Vonechai Xaysomboun, staff of Environmental District office

Viengkham –Secondary school

- Mr. Siamphone, Director of school - Mr. Inphone khammany, head village of Viengkham village

Nakheua – Lower Secondary school - Mr. Xaysouphan , Director of school - Mr. K head unit of school’s activity - Mr.Khen, head of village of Nakheua village

94 Appendix 3

RESULTS OF DISCUSSION:

The deputy head of environment office at Pakkading district, Mrs. Vonechai Xayxomboun said that the project needs to prepare an EMP to be certified by the district environment office. 9. Viengkham Secondary school

There is no protected forest close to the school. The school has not experienced flooding, drought and other natural hazards. There are no cultural heritage sites or temples close to the school. There is no river close to the school. There is a pond called Nong Lom which is across NR13 south but this is far (400-500m away) from the school. The school uses water from a well which is pumped to a water storage tank. There is a small treatment facility consisting of a water filtration and disinfection system. Water quality seems good and some students drink water after treatment. Some students buy potable water from a local facility in the town. The school has high density of students and limited classrooms and teachers. The students have inconvenient learning environment, causing some to miss classes. Some students also complain about difficulty in getting to school because their houses are far from the school. They come to school by renting bus. Suggestions for project implementation are:

The construction activities should be undertaken during the school holiday (June to September) and the main construction activity completed before school opens.

Trucks and construction vehicles should enter the back gate of the school Provide safety signs Assign a worker to guide movement of trucks and construction vehicles. Teachers should provide students with information about the project and on safety.

The project will bring benefits because of free dormitory and also reduced cost of transportation going to school.

The anticipated negative impacts will occur during construction only such as noise, inconvenience and risk of accidents from vehicle movement.

10. Na Kheua Primary School The environment office at Pakkading district said that the village and school are not close to any protected area. The area is not prone to natural hazards and that there are no cultural heritage sites or temples close to the school. The nearest stream (Houay Deau) is far (about 100m away) from the school. The school uses groundwater and pump water at a storage tank. There is no drainage system in the school. During heavy rainfall, stagnant water remain in the open yard which causes inconvenience to students and teachers and could provide breeding ground for mosquitoes. The access road from the main road (NR13-south) becomes muddy during the rainy season which makes it difficult to travel in the area during this period.

Appendix 3 95

The existing school has a building for Year 1 and 2 of primary level and old teacher office building. There are insufficient toilets in the school. Suggestions for implementation are: Provide a fence to barricade the construction area Provide safety signs Designate a worker to guide movement of construction vehicles Teachers should disseminate information about the project and on safety to students. Anticipated positive impacts of the project are:

Reduce number of students’ drop outs Parents of students can save money because they will no longer donate funds for the

school building Student and teachers will have better buildings which makes studying conducive.

Anticipated negative impacts are on noise, inconvenience and risk of accidents due to vehicle movement in the school premises. The impacts are temporary and will occur during construction only.

MEETING AT NA KHEUA PRIMARY SCHOOL OF PAKKADING DISTRICT

96 Appendix 3

Appendix 3 97

98 Appendix 3

Appendix 3 99

DATES: 18-19 NOVEMBER 2019 LOCATION: PHANXAM COMPLETE SECONDARY SCHOOL

XIENGDEE LOWER SECONDARY SCHOOL

XAMTAI DISTRICT OF HOUAPHAN PROVINCE The consultation meeting took place in Phanxam Complete Secondary School & Xiengdee Lower Secondary School. Environmental safeguards aspects and the current and environmental condition of the proposed site were the topic of discussion. PARTICIPANTS:

HOUAPHAN PROVINCE Mr. Monesing Phetviengsy, Deputy Head of the Department of Education of Houaphan Province Mr. Bounkeo Kounsisy, Technical Staff of construction work of Department of Education of Houaphan Province

XAMTAI DISTRICT Mr. Mixay Phonethavysouk, Head of Education of District Office Mr. Somsack Phonphanya, Deputy Head of Environmental District Office

Phanxam Complete Secondary School

Mr. Sychan Phetlasy, Director of school Mr. Xiengthong Bounyathip, Deputy Director of school Mrs. Bouason Phimmany, Deputy Head of administrative office Mrs. Ma Vilaythong, a teacher of school Mr. Lamphan, Head of Ban Phanxam village

Xiengdee Lower Secondary school Mr. Maiphet Phanthavone, Director of School Mr. Thavesouk Lorkhamphet, a deputy director of school Mrs. Maikham , Teacher of school Mr.Phoneseng Bounyathip , head village of Xiengdee village Mr. Hounphou Phonema, Village committee of xiengdee village

RESULTS OF DISCUSSION:

The Deputy Head of Environment Office in the district, Mr. Somsack Phongphanya, suggested the environmental requirements of the proposed projects in the two schools, Phanxam and Xiengdee schools. The proposed construction activities will have small footprint, and will only be confined within the school boundary. The environmental management plan (EMP) for the proposed project shall be prepared, submitted and will be certified by the Environmental Office at the district level prior to project implementation. 11. Phanxam Complete Secondary School

General information

100 Appendix 3

The Environmental Office of the district confirmed that there are no protected forestry areas close to the school, but there is only a national protect area called Nam Add close to school area approximately 6.6 kilometers in the northeast direction. The school has no history of flooding, drought and other climatic hazards. There are no cultural heritage sites or temples near the school. Nam Add River is located 600 meters away from the school in the northeast direction. The school has no water supply connection but gets its water by pumping from Nam Add River. Concerns/issues of the school: There is one permanent school building and 10 temporary school buildings made of wooden materials and old zinc roof. The temporary buildings are still functional but needs yearly maintenance. There is one permanent and eight temporary dormitories, also made of wooden materials and old zinc roof. The dormitories are still functional but needs regular maintenance. There is no drainage system in the school. Wastewater coming from washing area is directly discharged to the ground. The number of toilets in the school is insufficient for the students. The school has no water supply connection.Water is pumped from Nam Add River, but the volume is not sufficient for the use of the school and dormitories. Students are forced to bring their own water from the river. Because of leaking roof in classrooms due to heavy rain, floor becomes wet which posed problems and inconvenience for students and teachers. Suggestions for project implementation:

The construction activity shall be done during January to June dry season. Environmental impacts are localized, temporary and limited only within the

boundary of the school. Safety aspects should be prioritized during construction. Specific measures to be

implemented include: Access to construction site shall be separate from access of students and teachers to school area. Provision of traffic safety signs and assigning traffic enforcer during construction phase, specifically during transport of construction materials to the school. Teachers will provide information about the project as well as orient students on safety aspects. The contractor shall provide new access to students apart from the access that will be used to transport construction materials, to avoid accident risks and lessen traffic conflict between equipment and students. The contractor also should be responsible in the management of construction wastes.

Anticipated positive impacts of the project:

Many pupils/students will have opportunity to stay in new dormitories, leading to reduction in daily cost of transportation going to school.

There will be reduced accident risks from riding motorcycles going to school, as students are now staying in dormitories.

Anticipation negative impacts of the project:

The negative impacts are only temporary and will only occur during project implementation. The anticipated impacts include noise, traffic inconvenience and risk of accidents for students, teachers, and people living near the school.

Appendix 3 101

Meeting at Phanxam Complete Secondary School in Xamtai District

12. Xiengdee Lower Secondary School General information

The Environmental Office of the district said that there is no any protected forestry area close to the school. The school has never experienced flooding, drought and other hazards. There are no cultural heritage sites or temples within or near the school. The school is connected to Nam Lin local water supply. Water storage collection tanks have insufficient capacity for the use of the school. Nam Add river is located in the northeast direction from the school. The head of village mentioned that this river is protected as fishing is not allowed except during Lao New Year where people are allowed to fish during the celebration. Issues/concerns of the school: There are 4 temporary school buildings made of wooden materials and old zinc roof that are still functioning but needs yearly maintenance. The school has no drainage system and wastewater from washing area is directly being discharged to the ground. Toilets are not sufficient for students and teachers. Because of leaking roof in classrooms due to heavy rain, floor becomes wet which posed problems and inconvenience for students and teachers. Suggestions for project implementation:

Construction activity shall be scheduled during January to June dry season. Environmental impacts are localized, temporary and limited only within the

boundary of the school. Safety aspects should be prioritized during construction. Specific measures to be

implemented include: Access to construction site shall be separate from access of students and teachers to school area. Provision of traffic safety signs and assigning traffic enforcer during construction phase, specifically during transport of construction materials to the school. Teachers will provide information about the project as well as orient students on safety aspects. The contractor shall provide new access to students apart from the access that will be used to transport construction materials, to avoid accident risks and lessen traffic conflict between equipment and students. The contractor also should be responsible in the management of construction wastes.

102 Appendix 3

Anticipated negative impacts of the project:

The anticipated impacts are localized and temporary in nature and will occur during construction phase. These include noise nuisance, dust emission, inconvenience due to expected traffic from construction vehicle movement, and risk of accidents to students and children living near the school compound.

Meeting at Xiengdee Lower Secondary School in Xam Tai District

Appendix 3 103

List of Participants Phanxam Complete Secondary School

Of

104 Appendix 3

List of Participants Xiengdee Lower Secondary School

Appendix 3 105

106 Appendix 3

DATES: 28-29 NOVEMBER 2019 LOCATION: NAMKEO NOI UPPER SECONDARY SCHOOL

SONPHAO COMPLETE SECONDARY SCHOOL

SING DISTRICT OF LUANGNAMTHA PROVINCE The consultation meeting was conducted at Namkeo Noi Upper Secondary School & Sonphao Complete Secondary School. The topic of discussion was the environmental safeguards aspects and the current and environmental condition of the proposed site for the project. PARTICIPANTS:

LUANGNAMTHA PROVINCE

- Mr. Khamsone Thongkieng ,Deputy head section of Education at the Province - Mr. Thongvan , Technical staff of construction work of Department of education at the

Province

SING DISTRICT

- Mr.Khamsone Thongkeung, Head of Education District office - Mr. Outhong Xongvilay, Environmental district office staff.

Namkeo Noi–Upper Secondary School

- Mr. Phonmany , Director of School - Mr. Hormbeng Thavee, a deputy director of school - Mr. Bouavone Singthong, a deputy director of school - Mr. Ounkham , head village of Pha toi village - Mr. Mai Ounseng, head village of namekeonoi village - Mrs. Sengnoun, deputy head of namkeonoi village - Mr.Mai bee keokhamseng, head village of keonoi village - Mrs. Chommalee, head of women union of Namkeo noi village

Sonphao Lower Secondary school - Mr. Phonmany , Director of School - Mr. Hormbeng Thavee, a deputy director of school - Mr.Bouavone Singthong, a deputy director of school - Mr.Phoneseng Bounyathip , head village of Xiengdee village - Mr. Hounphou Phonema, Village committee of xiengdee village

RESULTS OF DISCUSSION: General information

The Environmental Office of Sing district through Mr. Outhong Xongvilay, the Environmental Officer, suggested the environmental requirements of the two schools Namkeo No and Sonphao schools. Since there will be construction activities to be located inside the school compound, an environmental management plan (EMP) shall be prepared, submitted and needs to be certified by the Environmental Office at the district level during project implementation. The Contractor’s EMP shall be submitted to the Environmental District Office prior to issuance of Environmental Certification.

Appendix 3 107

13. Namkeo noi Upper Secondary School

General information:

The Environmental Office of the district confirmed that there are no protected areas near the school. The school has never experienced flooding, drought and other climatic hazards. There are also no cultural heritage site or temple close to the school. The school is connected to local water supply although the quantity is not sufficient for school’s use. Concerns/issues of the school: There are three permanent school buildings and 2 temporary school buildings made of wooden materials and old zinc roof. The temporary buildings are still functional but needs yearly maintenance. There is one permanent and dormitory made of concrete materials and zinc roof. The dormitory is for teachers and for several students. The school needs additional dormitories as some students are staying with their relatives in the village. One student is staying with the head of the village. Wastewater coming from washing area is directly discharged to the ground. The number of toilets in the school is insufficient for the students. The school is connected with the local water supply connection, but water is not sufficient for the use of school. Because of leaking roof in classrooms due to heavy rain, floor becomes wet which posed problems and inconvenience for students and teachers. Many students use their own motorbikes to go to school. Since parking for motorcycles is not managed well, some students even park adjacent to classrooms. Suggestions for project implementation:

The construction activity shall be done during January to June dry season. Environmental impacts are localized, temporary and limited only within the

boundary of the school. Safety aspects should be prioritized during construction. Specific measures to be

implemented include: Access to construction site shall be separate from access of students and teachers to school area. Provision of traffic safety signs and assigning traffic enforcer during construction phase, specifically during transport of construction materials to the school. Teachers will provide information about the project as well as orient students on safety aspects. The contractor shall provide new access to students apart from the access that will be used to transport construction materials, to avoid accident risks and lessen traffic conflict between equipment and students. The contractor also should be responsible in the management of construction wastes.

Anticipated positive impacts of the project:

Many pupils/students will have opportunity to stay in new dormitories and not disturb their relatives. This will also leads to reduction in daily cost of transportation going to school.

There will be reduced accident risks from riding motorcycles going to school, as students are now staying in dormitories.

Anticipation negative impacts of the project:

108 Appendix 3

The negative impacts are only temporary and will only occur during project implementation. The anticipated impacts include noise, traffic inconvenience and safety risks for the students and teachers, and the community living near the school.

Meeting at Namkeo noi Upper Secondary School in Sing District

14. Sonphao Complete secondary School General information

Sonphao is a complete secondary school fully supported by the government through the Ministry of Education and Sports (MOES). The school has been built for pupils who lacked opportunities, pupils from the poorest families, and the orphans.

The Environmental Office of the district confirmed that there are no protected, nor any environmentally sensitive areas near the school. The school has never experienced flooding, drought and other climatic hazards. There are also no cultural heritage site or temple close to the school. The school is connected to local water supply although the quantity is not sufficient for school’s use. Issues/concerns of this school: There are 2 temporary school buildings built in 1994 made of old concrete wall, cement floor and corrugated tile roof. The buildings are already very old and are prone to greater risks of collapse. The dormitories are permanent, with materials made of concrete wall, concrete floor and modern tile roof. Dormitories are still in very good condition. There is one old dormitory that was built in 1994 made of old concrete wall, cement floor and corrugated tile roof. They in very old condition, with risk of building collapse.There is no drainage system in the school, and wastewater from washing area is directly discharged to the ground. Toilet units are also not sufficient fro students and teachers. Suggestions for project implementation:

The construction activity shall be done during January to June dry season. Environmental impacts are localized, temporary and limited only within the

boundary of the school. Safety aspects should be prioritized during construction. Specific measures to be

implemented include: Access to construction site shall be separate from access

Appendix 3 109

of students and teachers to school area. Provision of traffic safety signs and assigning traffic enforcer during construction phase, specifically during transport of construction materials to the school. Teachers will provide information about the project as well as orient students on safety aspects. The contractor shall provide new access to students apart from the access that will be used to transport construction materials, to avoid accident risks and lessen traffic conflict between equipment and students. The contractor also should be responsible in the management of construction wastes.

The two old school buildings are proposed to be demolished after the new school building is completed. Proper and good management of demolishing two old buildings shall be monitored and mitigating measures such as green barricade should be put in place.

Anticipated negative impacts of the project:

Negative impacts will only be temporary and will occur during construction phase of the new building and demolition of two old school buildings. Anticipated impacts include noise, dust emission, inconvenience to students and the community due to traffic, and risk of accidents to students and the community near the school.

Meeting at Sonphao Complete Secondary School in Sing District

110 Appendix 3

List of Participants Namkeo noi Upper Secondary School

Appendix 3 111

List of Participants

Son phao Complete Secondary School

112 Appendix 3

Appendix 3 113

Dates: 9-10 December 2019 LOCATION: HUA NA LOWER SECONDARY SCHOOL

HUAY YIM PRIMARY SCHOOL

NAM BAK DISTRICT OF LUANGPRABANG PROVINCE The consultation meeting was held at Huan Na Lower Secondary School & Huay Yim Primary School. The topic was discussion on environmental safeguards aspects and the current and environmental condition of the proposed site for the project. PARTICIPANTS:

LUANGPRABANG PROVINCE

- Mr. Anoupheng Keovongsa, Deputy Head of Department of Education - Mr. Vilayvong Norasing, Technical Staff of Construction Work of Department of

Education at the province

NAMBAK DISTRICT

- Mr.Bounthan Chantaseeda, Deputy Head of Education District office - Mr. Viyakone Siliphone, Staff at the Environmental District Office

Hua Na–Lower Secondary School

- Mrs. Khamphone, Director of school - Mr.Daosengphet , Deputy Director of school - Mr. Chanhtee Chantamanee, Head of Student Union - Mr. Dour Xangxong. Deputy head of Hua Na village - Mr. Somsee Photesad, Deputy Head of Hua Na village Huay Yim– Primary school - Mr. Somsack Salibout, Deputy Director of School - Mr. Liasang Her, deputy head of Huay Yim village

a. Other primary school and village that will feed students for proposed additional

lower secondary facilities of Huay Yim school. - Mr. Bounvong, Director of Nongkeo primary school - Mr. Deng Phonetava, Director of Meungteng primary school - Mr. Khamkheng, Director of Khoneng primary school - Mr. Nana yod, head village of Khongneng - Mr. Huay Na, deputy head village of khongneng - Mr. Phakeo, head village of Nongkeo

RESULTS OF DISCUSSION: The Deputy Head of Environment Office in the district, Mr. Yiyakone Siliphone, suggested the environmental requirements of the proposed projects in two schools, Hua Na and Huay Yim schools. The construction of new school facilities for the two schools include:

a. Hua Na Lower Secondary School – proposed construction of new facilities within the school compound;

b. Huay Yim Primary School – proposed new additional secondary (Type A) facilities within school compound currently occupied by two temporary huts of two villagers, Mrs. Hay and Mr.

114 Appendix 3

Sam. The proposed removal and eventual transfer of these two huts was confirmed with the head of the village. The villagers will help in the removal and successful transfer of the two huts in a new land. Mrs. Hay and Mr. Sam have to agree on the terms of relocation prior to construction of new facilities. The environmental management plan (EMP) of the proposed project has to be submitted and certified by the Environmental Office at the district level prior to start of construction. 15. Hua Na Lower Secondary School

General information

The Environmental Office of the district confirmed that there are no protected forestry areas close to the school. The school has not experienced flooding, drought and other climatic and hazards. There are also no cultural heritage sites or temples close to the school. The land title was already issued by Environmental Office of the district of Nam Bak of Luang Prabang. Even though the school is connected to Nam Lin (local water supply), the supply is still not sufficient as there is not enough water storage facility. There are no rivers or small streams close to school area. There is no properly managed sanitation and drainage system. Wastewater effluent is being discharged directly to the ground. Issues/Concerns of the school There are 3 temporary shelters with wooden walls and floors and old zinc roof for teachers and their families within the school compound. The shelters are still functioning but due to their condition, requires repair and maintenance every year. There is also one permanent dormitory building for students, with materials made of concrete walls and floor and zinc roof. There are also temporary kitchen facilities, located between existing toilets and teachers’ shelters. There are no drainage facilities in the school, as wastewater from washing area is discharged directly to the ground. Toilet facilities for students and teachers are inadequate. Suggestions for project implementation are:

Fencing of construction area to prevent unlawful access. Construction activity shall be done during January to June dry season. Safety aspects should be prioritized during construction. Specific measures to be

implemented include: Access to construction site shall be separate from access of students and teachers to school area. Provision of traffic safety signs and assigning traffic enforcer during construction phase, specifically during transport of construction materials to the school. Teachers will provide information about the project as well as orient students on safety aspects. The contractor should be responsible in the management of construction wastes.

Anticipated negative impacts of the project:

The anticipated impacts are localized and temporary in nature and will occur during construction phase. These include noise nuisance, dust emission, inconvenience due to expected traffic from construction vehicle movement, and risk of accidents to students and children living near the school compound.

Appendix 3 115

Meeting at Hua Na lower secondary school in Nam Bak District

16. Huay Yim Primary School General information

The Environmental Office of the district confirmed that there are no protected forestry areas close to Huay Yim Primary School. The school has not experienced flooding, drought and other climatic and hazards. There are also no cultural heritage sites or temples close to the school. The land title was already issued by Environmental Office of the district of Nam Bak of Luang Prabang. The proposed area for construction of additional facilities are not connected to water supply and electricity line yet. There is a small stream 128 meters to the south from the proposed school area. The proposed area for school building, with an elevation of 1410 ft, is previously an agricultural area and is higher than the small stream (1391 ft). There is no direct access from the school to the small stream. Currently, the proposed site has two small huts / shelters that requires relocation prior to construction activities. Issues/Concerns of the school: There are 2 temporary houses/huts located at the proposed access road leading to the new school facility. The huts, made of wooden materials and old zinc roof, are still functional but already in a deteriorated condition. The village committee of Huay Yim will provide assistance in the removal of the huts and a new land will also be provided. Water and electricity lines will be provided to the site before construction. Suggestions for project implementation:

Construction activity shall be done during January to June dry season. Safety aspects should be prioritized during construction. Specific measures to be

implemented include: Access to construction site shall be separate from access of students and teachers to school area. Provision of traffic safety signs and assigning traffic enforcer during construction phase, specifically during transport of construction materials to the school. Teachers will provide information about the project as well as orient students on safety aspects. The contractor should be responsible in the management of construction wastes.

Anticipated negative impacts of the project:

The anticipated impacts are localized and temporary in nature and will occur during construction phase. These include noise nuisance, dust emission, inconvenience

116 Appendix 3

due to expected traffic from construction vehicle movement, and risk of accidents to students and children living near the school compound.

Meeting at Huay Yim Primary school in Nam Bak District

Appendix 3 117

List of Participants Hua Na Lower Secondary School

118 Appendix 3

List of Participants Huay Yim Primary School

Appendix 3 119

120 Appendix 3

Annex 1: Photos of two small huts that requires relocation and general information of owner of two houses

No. General

information of two houses

Photo and

1. Mr. Sam, his age is 35 years old. He is a farmer. He stays in this house with his two children and his mother. Mr. Sam said that if the village could provide land within Huay Yim village for new house settle then he agreed to move.

Appendix 3 121

2. Mrs. Hay , her age is 31 years

old She stay with her husband and one daughter and one son. Mrs. Hay said that she agrees to move for the access road to new school, if there is available land for her house to settle in Huay Yim Village. Mrs. Hay and her husband are farmer ,she has a rice field everyday if she finish her work at rice field then she will go to her garden for growing vegetables for daily food and selling.

122 Appendix 3

Annex 2: Agreement between owner of houses and head of village of Huay Yim 1. Minute of note of the agreement between Mrs. Hay and Village head of Huay

Yim Original of Minute of note for the agreement to move house note between Mrs. Hay and Village head of Huay Yim

Translation into English version of Minute of note for the agreement to move house between Mrs. Hay and Village head of Huay Yim

Lao People’s Democratic

Republic

Peace Independence

Democracy Unity

Prosperity

****************

Nam Bak District

Date on 19 Nov

2019

Huay Yim Village

Minute of note The agreement to move

house between Mrs. Hay & Village head

of Huay Yim

I am Mrs. Hay, her age 31 years old. She is a farmer. Currently, she is live in Huay Yim village , Meung Teng group of Nam Bak District . I agreed to transfer my land to be the access road of new school facility that will be built in the future. This value of land will compensate by provision land in Huay Yim village area. Therefore, the village committee of Huay Yim have been established Agreement note for evidence.

Appendix 3 123

Huay Yim date 19 December 2019. Signed by Owner of land Mrs. Hay Signed by Village head of Huay Yim Mr. Khamlot Sengdara Witness Signed by 1) Mr. Lia seng, village

committee 2) Mr. Phengsong Note: the village of Huay Yim will help to move Mrs. Hay’s house until her house relocate to new land successfully.

2. Minute of note of the agreement between Mr. Sam and Village head of Huay Yim Original of Agreement to move house note between Mr. Sam and Village head of Huay Yim

Translation into English version of Minute of note for the agreement to move house between Mr. Sam and Village head of Huay Yim

Lao People’s Democratic

Republic

Peace Independence

Democracy Unity

Prosperity

****************

Nam Bak District

Date on 19 Nov

2019

Huay Yim Village Minute of note

The agreement to move house between

Mrs. Hay & Village head of Huay Yim

WitnesSigned1) M

vi2) M

124 Appendix 3

I am Mr. Sam, her age 35 years old. He is a farmer. Currently, he is live in Huay Yim village, Meung Teng group of Nam Bak District. I agreed to transfer my land to be the access road of new school facility that will be built in the future. This value of land will compensate by provision land in Huay Yim village area. Therefore, the village committee of Huay Yim have been established Agreement note for evidence. Huay Yim date 19 December 2019. Signed by Village head of Huay Yim Mr. Khamlot Sengdara Note: the village of Huay Yim will help to move Mr. Sam’s house until his house relocate to new land successfully.

Appendix 3 125

Image of Google map of proposed Huay Yim school to be constructed

126 Appendix 3

DATE: 17-18 DECEMBER 2019 LOCATION: PHONE THONG LOWER SECONDARY SCHOOL NAMONE PHONEYANG LOWER SECONDARY SCHOOL

FEUNG DISTRICT OF VIENTIANE PROVINCE The consultation meeting was held at Phone Thong & Na Monephoneyang lower secondary schools. The topic was discussion on the environmental safeguards aspects and the current and environmental condition of the proposed site for the project. PARTICIPANTS: VIENTIANE PROVINCE

- Mr. Thongkhien Kodthanan, Head, Education Division of Department of Education of

the province - Mr. Sonesay Khampilath, Deputy Head, Education Division of Department of

Education of the province

FEUNG DISTRICT

- Mr.Vongdeun Nammexay, Deputy Head of Education District office - Mrs. Khamkhoun Phonphanya, Head of Unit of Environmental District Office

Phonethong Lower Secondary School - Mr. Bounchanh Chanthalangsy, Deputy Director of school - Mr. Soulithone, Teacher of school - Mr. Sibounheung Phanhasay, Head of Ban Phonethong village - Mr.Somsee Outhavong, Head of group of Phonethong village - Mr.Soum Sihanam , Village Committee of Ban Na Pheung village

Na Monephonyang Lower Secondary school - Mr. Vieng Lathvongsay, Director of School - Mr. Sython Khoutsavanh, Deputy director of School - Mr. Bounphieng, Group of student’s parents - Mr. Thongchanh Koutsavanh, Head of Phoneyang village

RESULTS OF DISCUSSION: Mrs. Khamkhoun, the Head of Unit of Environmental District Office, suggested the environmental requirements of the proposed projects in the two schools, Phonethong and Na Monephoneyang schools. The proposed projects will only involve small construction activities and the construction footprints will only be confined within the school compounds. The environmental management plan (EMP) of the proposed project has to be submitted and certified by the Environmental Office at the district level prior to start of construction.

Appendix 3 127

17. Phonethong Lower Secondary School

General Information The Environmental Office of the district said that there are no protected forestry areas close to the school. However, Phonethong Village cemetery is adjacent to the school’s fence, and about 100 meters away in the eastern direction from the proposed project. The school, with an area of 23,746 square meters, has been flooded in recent years. The flooding is caused due to the absence of drainage system coupled with rainwater inundating the lowest area in the school. However, the proposed site for the construction facilities has never been flooded. The school has never experienced drought and other climate hazards. There are also no cultural heritage sites or temples close to the school. The school has no connection to any local water supply, but source its supply from groundwater extracted via water pump. Although the proposed site for new facilities has never been flooded before, the ground level will be further elevated prior to construction. Issues / Concerns of the school: There are 2 permanent school buildings being used in the school. Another building, made of wooden walls and ground floor, and old zinc roof, is still functional but needs regular maintenance every year. There is no drainage system within the school compound, as wastewater from washing area is being discharged directly to the ground. The toilets are also insufficient for the student population. As there is no water supply connection, water being pumped from the ground is not sufficient during dry season for the need of students and teachers living in dormitories and students in general. The heavy rain that causes lower area of the school being flooded brings inconvenience to students and teachers alike.

Suggestions for project implementation:

Construction activity shall be done during January to June dry season. Safety aspects should be prioritized during construction. Specific measures to be

implemented include: Fencing of the construction area to prohibit unlawful access; Provision of traffic safety signs and assigning traffic enforcer during construction phase, specifically during transport of construction materials to the school; Teachers will provide information about the project as well as orient students on safety aspects.

Filling-up the proposed site with earth materials to prevent flooding prior to start of construction.

Provide proper access to students and teachers as the construction activities may cause traffic accidents and risks.

The contractor will be responsible in the management of wastes generated from construction activities.

Anticipated positive impacts of the project:

There will be newer and additional classrooms for students. There will also be expected reduction in transportation costs as more students from the village will avail of the new facilities rather than studying in schools located in other villages.

It is also expected that there will be corresponding reduction in accident risks with the reduction of travel distances going to and from school.

There will be less impact of flooding as the new facilities will be elevated.

128 Appendix 3

Anticipated negative impacts of the project:

The anticipated impacts are localized and temporary in nature and will occur during construction phase. These include noise nuisance, dust emission, inconvenience due to expected traffic from construction vehicle movement, and risk of accidents to students and children living near the school compound.

Meeting at Phonethong Lower Secondary School in Feung District

18. Na Monephoneyang Lower Secondary School General information

The Environmental Office of the district said that there are no protected forestry areas close to the school. The school has never been flooded and has not experienced any drought and other hazards. There are no cultural heritage sites or temples close to the school. The school has no connection to any local water supply, but source its supply from groundwater extracted via water pump for use in the toilets and supply for water storage tank. The water extracted underground however is still insufficient for the school. Tong River, a small river located southeast of the school, is about 100 meters away.

Issue/Concerns of the school: There is a temporary school building made of wooden materials and zinc roof that is still functional but requires yearly maintenance. Another three school buildings made of concrete materials and zinc roof, needs repainting and minor repair works. There is no drainage system in the school, and wastewater from the washing area is directly discharged to the ground. Toilet facilities are inadequate for students and teachers. Leaking roof during heavy rain causes puddles in classroom floors, which poses safety risks for students and teachers. Suggestions for project implementation:

Construction activities shall be undertaken during the January to June dry

season Safety aspects should be prioritized during construction. Specific measures to

be implemented include: Fencing of the construction area to prohibit unlawful access; Provision of traffic safety signs and assigning traffic enforcer during construction phase, specifically during transport of construction materials to

Appendix 3 129

the school; Teachers will provide information about the project as well as orient students on safety aspects.

Filling-up the proposed site with earth materials to prevent flooding prior to start of construction.

Provide proper access to students and teachers as the construction activities may cause traffic accidents and risks.

The contractor will be responsible in the management of wastes generated from construction activities.

Anticipated negative impacts of the project:

The anticipated impacts are localized and temporary in nature and will occur during construction phase. These include noise nuisance, dust emission, inconvenience due to expected traffic from construction vehicle movement, and risk of accidents to students and children living near the school compound.

Meeting at Namone Phoneyang Lower Secondary School in Feung District

130 Appendix 3

List of Participants Phonethong Lower Secondary School

Appendix 3 131

132 Appendix 3

List of Participants

Na Monephoneyang Lower Secondary School

Appendix 3 133

134 Appendix 3

DATES: 23-24 DECEMBER 2019 LOCATION: PAKCHANH PRIMARY SCHOOL AND NAPHA PHAI LOWER SECONDARY SCHOOL

MEUN DISTRICT OF VIENTIANE PROVINCE The consultation meeting was done at Pakchanh Primary School & Naphaphai yang Lower Secondary School. The topic was discussion on the environmental safeguards aspects and the current and environmental condition of the proposed site for the project. PARTICIPANTS:

VIENTIANE PROVINCE

- Mr.Thongkhien Kodthahan, Head, Education Division of Department of Education at the

province - Mr. Sonesay Khampilath, Deputy Head, Education Division of Department of Education at

the province

MEUN DISTRICT

- Mr.Sommod Southijoharn , Deputy Head of Education District office - Mr. Viengsavanh Phasisomboun, Head of Environmental district office

Pakchanh Primary School

- Mr. Sivilay Souliphon, Director of school - Mr. Samphan Vilaxon, Deputy Director of school - Mrs.Yorlatsaloung, Deputy Head of Ban Pakchanh village - Mrs. Vanna Keonambee, Women Committee of Pakchanh village - Mr. Sengthong Herjai, Committee of Ban Pakchanh village

Naphaphai Lower Secondary school

- Mr. Visay, Director of School - Mrs. Chanhtee, Women Committee of Naphaphai village - Mr. Sithon, Young Union Committee of Naphaphai village - Mr. Khamaiy Soukhavong, Head of Ban Naphaphai Village

RESULTS OF DISCUSSION: The Head of the Environmental Office of the district, Mr. Viengsavanh Phasisomboun suggested that an environmental management plan must be prepared and must be certified by their office prior to construction activities. The proposed additional school facilities will be constructed inside the school compound and it is expected that the environmental impacts from construction activities will only be minimal. 19. Pakchanh - Primary School

Appendix 3 135

General information

The Environmental Office of the district said that there are no protected forestry areas close to the school. The school has not experienced drought, flood and other climate hazards. There are also no cultural heritage sites or temples close to the school. The proposed project site has no connection to any local water supply and electricity yet. The proposed additional facilities will be located close to the football area of primary school in the north direction.

Issues / Concerns of the school: The students have higher risks of accidents and difficulty in travelling because of the 20-km distance they need to traverse each day from their houses to the school. The proposed new facilities need to connect to utility connections since there are no electricity and water supply connections yet. The extracted water pumped from groundwater is not sufficient for the use of the school as the existing school buildings have no water connection. Many students, after completing primary school, did not continue with their schooling to lower secondary school since their parents cannot support them in their education because of the high cost of transportation, dormitories, and educated related expenses. Suggestions for project implementation:

Construction activities shall be undertaken during the January to June dry

season Safety aspects should be prioritized during construction. Specific measures to be

implemented include: Fencing of the construction area to prohibit unlawful access; Provision of traffic safety signs and assigning traffic enforcer during construction phase, specifically during transport of construction materials to the school; Teachers will provide information about the project as well as orient students on safety aspects.

Filling-up the proposed site with earth materials to prevent flooding prior to start of construction.

Provide proper access to students and teachers as the construction activities may cause traffic accidents and risks.

The contractor will be responsible in the management of wastes generated from construction activities.

Anticipated positive impacts of the project:

Construction of new school facilities will allow the students to stay in dormitories, effectively reducing the cost of travel of students and the accident risks from traversing the 20-km road.

The additional construction of school facilities will lessen the number of students who discontinued with their schooling to lower secondary level,

Anticipated negative impacts of the project:

The anticipated negative impacts are mostly temporary and will only occur during construction phase. These impacts include noise nuisance, traffic inconvenience near the proposed construction site, and risk of accidents that may occur because of construction activities.

136 Appendix 3

Meeting at Pakchanh Primary School in Meun District

20. Naphaiphai Primary School General information

The Environmental Office of the district said that there are no protected forestry areas close to the school. The school has not experienced drought, flood and other climate hazards. There are also no cultural heritage sites or temples close to the school. The proposed site for additional school facilities is currently planted with cassava. The army office has borrowed the area to grow the root crop and it was understood that the area will be turned over after harvesting the crop. The project site has no connection to any local water supply and electricity yet. Issues/concerns of the school: The students have higher risks of accidents and difficulty in travelling because of the 1-km distance they need to traverse each day from their houses to the school. Suggestions for project implementation:

Construction activities shall be undertaken during the January to June dry

season Safety aspects should be prioritized during construction. Specific measures to be

implemented include: Fencing of the construction area to prohibit unlawful access; Provision of traffic safety signs and assigning traffic enforcer during construction phase, specifically during transport of construction materials to the school; Teachers will provide information about the project as well as orient students on safety aspects.

The contractor will be responsible in the management of wastes generated from construction activities.

Appendix 3 137

Anticipated negative impacts of the project:

The negative impacts are foreseen to be limited in nature and will only occur during construction phase. These include noise nuisance, traffic inconvenience within school area, and accident risks for students studying in school and children who lives near the school.

Meeting at Naphaphai Primary School in Meun District

138 Appendix 3

List of Participants Pakchanh Primary school

Appendix 3 139

List of Participants Naphaphai Primary school

140 Appendix 3

Appendix 4 141

141

APPENDIX 4. SAMPLE EESDP SITE SURVEY CHECKLIST

ສາທາລະນະລດ ປະຊາທ ປະໄຕ ປະຊາຊນລາວ: ໂຄງການພດທະນາທວຂະແໜງການສ ກສາ ເພອການຈາງງານ

ແບບສອບຖາມ ກຽວກບ ການກສາງ ໂຮງຮຽນ ໃນໂຄງການ EESDP Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Education for Employment Sector Development Program

EESDP Site Survey CHECKLIST ຜຕອບຄ າຖາມໃນແບບສອບຖາມ/the checklist completer ຊ ແລະ ນາມສະກນ/Full name: Phaylin ຕາແໜງ (ໃນໂຮງຮຽນ)/Position (at school): ຮອງຫວໜາໜວຍງານສ ກສາພາກບງຄບ ວນທ /Date: 17/12/2019

A. ລາຍລະອຽດຂອງໂຮງຮຽນ SCHOOL PROFILE

ຊ ໂຮງຮຽນ: Name of School:

Phonethong

ເລກລະຫດ ໂຮງຮຽນ: School Code (ID):

21006005

ທ ຕງ: Location:

ຊ ແລະ ເລກທ ຖະໜນ: ຫ ນເຫ ບ-ຊະນະຄາມ ບານ: ນາພງ ເມ ອງ: ເຟອງ ແຂວງ: ວຽງຈນ No. Street Village District Province

ປະເພດ ຂອງໂຮງຮຽນ: Classification of School:

� ປະຖມ Primary school

ມ ຕນ Lower Secondary school

� ມ ປາຍ Upper Secondary school

ມ ສມບນ Complete Secondary school

A.1 ໄລຍະທາງຈາກເທດສະບານເມອງ ຫາ ໂຮງຮຽນ/Distance from district to school: ທາງປຢາງ / Paved road: ໄລຍະທາງ 6 km

ທາງດ ນແດງ / unpaved road : ໄລຍະທາງ 0 km, ລດແລນໄດຕະຫອດປ / Accessible by car

the whole year round; □ ລດແລນໄດຈາກ ເດ ອນໃດ / accessible by car from (Month)

……..............................ຫາ ເດ ອນໃດ / to (Month)……………..…………..…............ ທາງນ າ / travel on river: ໄລຍະທາງ......................km, □ ເຮ ອແລນໄດຕະຫອດປ / Accessible by

boat the whole year round, □ ເຮ ອແລນໄດຈາກ ເດ ອນໃດ / Accessible by boat from

(Month)…………….........................ຫາ ເດ ອນໃດ to (Month) ....................................... ທາງຍາງ / walking: ໄລຍະທາງ............................km, ໃຊເວລາຍາງ / walking for (how

many)……...............................ຊວໂມງ / hours.

A. 2 ໂຮງຮຽນທ ຈະສາງກວມເອ າຈກບານ? How many villages does this school cover? 7 ບານ / villages

142 Appendix 4

142

A.3 ໄລຍະທາງຈາກແຕບານ ຫາໂຮງຮຽນ/Distance from each village to school:

1) ບານ / Name of Village: Napheug

ທາງປຢາງ / paved road: ໄລຍະທາງ 0 km

ທາງດ ນແດງ / unpaved road: ໄລຍະທາງ 0 km, ລດແລນໄດຕະຫອດປ / Accessible by

car the whole year round, □ ລດແລນໄດຈາກ ເດ ອນ / Accessible by car from

(Month)…………..........ຫາ ເດ ອນto (Month) ………………............... ທາງນ າ / travel on river: ໄລຍະທາງ.................km, □ ເຮ ອແລນໄດຕະຫອດປ / Accessible by

boat the whole year round, □ ເຮ ອແລນໄດຈາກ ເດ ອນ / Accessible by boat from

(Month)................................ຫາ ເດ ອນto (Month) …………………………............... ທາງຍາງ / walking : ໄລຍະທາງ………………….......km, ໃຊເວລາຍາງ / walking for (how

many)……………………………………....ຊວໂມງ / hours.

2) ບານ / Name of Village: Phonethong

ທາງປຢາງ / paved road: ໄລຍະທາງ 0 km

ທາງດ ນແດງ / unpaved road: ໄລຍະທາງ 0 km, ລດແລນໄດຕະຫອດປ / Accessible by

car the whole year round, □ ລດແລນໄດຈາກ ເດ ອນ / Accessible by car from

(Month)…………..........ຫາ ເດ ອນto (Month) ………………............... ທາງນ າ / travel on river: ໄລຍະທາງ.................km, □ ເຮ ອແລນໄດຕະຫອດປ / Accessible by

boat the whole year round, □ ເຮ ອແລນໄດຈາກ ເດ ອນ / Accessible by boat from

(Month)................................ຫາ ເດ ອນto (Month) …………………………............... ທາງຍາງ / walking : ໄລຍະທາງ...........................................km, ໃຊເວລາຍາງ / walking for

(how many)……………………………………...ຊວໂມງ / hours.

3) ບານ / Name of Village: Phonexay

ທາງປຢາງ / paved road: ໄລຍະທາງ 3 km

ທາງດ ນແດງ / unpaved road: ໄລຍະທາງ 0 km, ລດແລນໄດຕະຫອດປ / Accessible by

car the whole year round, □ ລດແລນໄດຈາກ ເດ ອນ / Accessible by car from

(Month)…………..........ຫາ ເດ ອນto (Month) ………………............... ທາງນ າ / travel on river: ໄລຍະທາງ.................km, □ ເຮ ອແລນໄດຕະຫອດປ / Accessible by

boat the whole year round, □ ເຮ ອແລນໄດຈາກ ເດ ອນ / Accessible by boat from

(Month)................................ຫາ ເດ ອນto (Month) …………………………............... ທາງຍາງ / walking : ໄລຍະທາງ.............................................km, ໃຊເວລາຍາງ / walking for

(how many)……………………………………....ຊວໂມງ / hours.

4) ບານ / Name of Village: Phonebeng

Appendix 4 143

143

ທາງປຢາງ / paved road: ໄລຍະທາງ.....................................km

ທາງດ ນແດງ / unpaved road: ໄລຍະທາງ 4 km, ລດແລນໄດຕະຫອດປ / Accessible by

car the whole year round, □ ລດແລນໄດຈາກ ເດ ອນ / Accessible by car from

(Month)…………..........ຫາ ເດ ອນto (Month) ………………............... ທາງນ າ / travel on river: ໄລຍະທາງ.................km, □ ເຮ ອແລນໄດຕະຫອດປ / Accessible by

boat the whole year round, □ ເຮ ອແລນໄດຈາກ ເດ ອນ / Accessible by boat from

(Month)................................ຫາ ເດ ອນto (Month) …………………………............... ທາງຍາງ / walking : ໄລຍະທາງ..........................................km, ໃຊເວລາຍາງ / walking for

(how many)………………………………………....ຊວໂມງ / hours.

5) ບານ / Name of Village: Phouvieng

ທາງປຢາງ / paved road: ໄລຍະທາງ.....................................km

ທາງດ ນແດງ / unpaved road: ໄລຍະທາງ 6 km, ລດແລນໄດຕະຫອດປ / Accessible by

car the whole year round, □ ລດແລນໄດຈາກ ເດ ອນ / Accessible by car from

(Month)…………..........ຫາ ເດ ອນto (Month) ………………............... ທາງນ າ / travel on river: ໄລຍະທາງ.................km, □ ເຮ ອແລນໄດຕະຫອດປ / Accessible by

boat the whole year round, □ ເຮ ອແລນໄດຈາກ ເດ ອນ / Accessible by boat from

(Month)................................ຫາ ເດ ອນto (Month) …………………………............... ທາງຍາງ / walking : ໄລຍະທາງ…………………………….......km, ໃຊເວລາຍາງ / walking for

(how many)………………………………………....ຊວໂມງ / hours.

6) ບານ / Name of Village: Nathoun

ທາງປຢາງ / paved road: ໄລຍະທາງ.....................................km

ທາງດ ນແດງ / unpaved road: ໄລຍະທາງ 5,5 km, ລດແລນໄດຕະຫອດປ / Accessible by

car the whole year round, □ ລດແລນໄດຈາກ ເດ ອນ / Accessible by car from

(Month)…………..........ຫາ ເດ ອນto (Month) ………………............... ທາງນ າ / travel on river: ໄລຍະທາງ.................km, □ ເຮ ອແລນໄດຕະຫອດປ / Accessible by

boat the whole year round, □ ເຮ ອແລນໄດຈາກ ເດ ອນ / Accessible by boat from

(Month)................................ຫາ ເດ ອນto (Month) …………………………............... ທາງຍາງ / walking : ໄລຍະທາງ…………………………….......km, ໃຊເວລາຍາງ / walking for

(how many)………………………………………....ຊວໂມງ / hours.

7) ບານ / Name of Village: Nahai

ທາງປຢາງ / paved road: ໄລຍະທາງ.....................................km

ທາງດ ນແດງ / unpaved road: ໄລຍະທາງ 5,5 km, ລດແລນໄດຕະຫອດປ / Accessible by

car the whole year round, □ ລດແລນໄດຈາກ ເດ ອນ / Accessible by car from

(Month)…………..........ຫາ ເດ ອນto (Month) ………………...............

144 Appendix 4

144

ທາງນ າ / travel on river: ໄລຍະທາງ.................km, □ ເຮ ອແລນໄດຕະຫອດປ / Accessible by

boat the whole year round, □ ເຮ ອແລນໄດຈາກ ເດ ອນ / Accessible by boat from

(Month)................................ຫາ ເດ ອນto (Month) …………………………............... ທາງຍາງ / walking : ໄລຍະທາງ…………………………….......km, ໃຊເວລາຍາງ / walking for

(how many)………………………………………....ຊວໂມງ / hours.

(ໃນກລະນ ຫາກມເກ ນ 5 ບານອອມຂາງ ໃຫຂຽນດວຍມເພມເຕມໃສທາງດານຫງ / please add more sheets in case if there are more than 5 surrounded villages).

A.4 ໄລຍະຫາງກນ ຂອງ 5 ໂຮງຮຽນເປ າໝາຍ ໃນແຕລະເມອງ /Distance of the 5 target schools in each

district: ..............................km

ຖາເຮດເປນ 2 ກມ ເພອວຽກກສາງ, ໂຮງຮຽນໃດຄວນເຂາກມກບໂຮງຮຽນໃດ (ໂຮງຮຽນທ ໃກກນ) / if they have to be made in 2 groups, which school should be with which school?

ກມ 1 / group 1: ໂຮງຮຽນ/school: ມສ ຜາສງ ແລະ ມຕ ໂນນຫນແຮ. .......................................................................................................................................

ກມ 2 / group 2: ໂຮງຮຽນ/school: ມສ ເມອງເຟ ອງ, ມຕ ໂພນທອນ ແລະ ມຕ ນາມນ-ໂພນແຍງ.

Appendix 4 145

145

A.5 ສະຖຕນກຮຽນ ແລະ ຄ

A.6 ໂຮງຮຽນທ ຈະສາງກວາມເອ າຈກບານ? How many villages does this school cover?

A.7 ກຽວກບສະຖຕຄໂຮງຮຽນປະຖມທງກາໄຮ Primary Schools Teachers Statistic

A.8 ສະພາບນກຮຽນ Enrolment, dropout and transition rates

146 Appendix 4

146

B. ອາຄານຮຽນ ແລະ ສ ງອ ານວຍຄວາມສະດວກ ທ ມ ຢ EXISTING SCHOOL FACILITIES

ອາຄານຮຽນ SCHOOL

BUILDINGS

ສາງຂ ນໃນປ ໃດ? In what

year was

building constructed?

ສະພາບປະຈບນ Condition ໝາຍເຫດRemarks ສະພາບດ /ຍ

ງໃຊງານໄດ Good/

Functional

ຕອງການການສອງແປງNeeds

repair

ຕອງປຽນໃໝ/ສາງອນໃໝ

For replacement

ຊວຄາວ

(ບ ຖາວອນ) Makeshift or

temporary

ຕອງໄດຮ ຖອນ

For demolit

ion

ຫອງຮຽນ/ວ ຊາການ Academic classrooms

-Two building built in 2002 -One building built in 2013 -One building built in 1994

-Functioning -Functioning -poor condition

Yes Yes yes

No No yes

No No yes

No No yes

To proposed construction 1 building

ຫອງທດລອງ ວ ທະຍາສາດ Science laboratory

× × × × × × To proposed construction

ຫອງຮຽນເສດຖະກດຄອບຄວ Home economics

× × × × × ×

ຫອງຮຽນວ ຊາອດສະຫະກາ Industrial arts

× × × × × ×

ອະນບານKindergarten

× × × × ×

ມ ຄວາມສຽງບ ວາວດສະດທ ໃຊ ມ ທາດແຮໃຍຫ ນ (ວດສະດທ ໃຊ ມທາດແຮໃຍຫນບ ?) Is there a risk that materials used in construction contain asbestos?

� ມ Yes

ບ ມ No

Appendix 4 147

147

ເຄ ອງອປະກອນ ອ ານວຍຄວາມສ

ະດວກຕາງໆ ANCILLARY FACILITIES

ສາງຂ ນ ປ ໃດ?

In what year was

building

constructed?

ສະພາບປະຈບນ Condition ໝາຍເຫດRemarks ສະພາບດ /ຍ

ງໃຊງານໄດ Good/ Functional

ຕອງການສອງແປງNeeds repair

ຕອງປຽນໃໝ/ສາງອນໃໝ For replacement

ຊວຄາວ (ບ ຖາວອນ) Makeshift or temporary

ຕອງໄດຮ ຖອນ For demolition

ຫອງການ/ບ ລ ຫານ Admin offices

It built in 2002

Good

no no no no Proposed more class rooms construction

ຫອງສະມດLibrary

× × × × × ×

ຫອງອາຫານCanteen

× × × × × ×

ຫພກDormitories

× × × × × ×

ອ ນໆ Others

ມ ຄວາມສຽງບ ວາວດສະດທ ໃຊ ມ ທາດແຮໃຍຫນ (ວດສະດທ ໃຊ ມ ທາດແຮໃຍຫນບ ?) Is there a risk that materials used in construction contain asbestos?

� ມ Yes

ບ ມ No

ມ ຕບ/ເຮ ອນພກ ທ ຜປກຄອງ/ການຈດຕງ ສາງຂ ນໃນບ ລ ເວນໂຮງຮຽນ ເພອໃຫນກຮຽນໄດມາເຂ າໂຮງຮຽນ ຈກແຫງ ? How many huts/shelters have been constructed within school grounds to accommodate children attending the school? ມ ນກຮຽນທ ອາໃສຢຕບທງໝດ ຈກຄນ? How many persons are accommodated in these huts? ນກຮຽນທ ອາໃສຢຕບແຕງກນຢພາຍໃນຕບ ແມນບ ? Are persons living in the huts preparing food in the huts?

� ແມນ Yes

ບ ແມນ No

ມ ບອນຄວກນ ທ ໃຊລວມກນ ບ ? Are there shared cooking facilities available? A temporary canteen that sometime teachers cook for lunch

ມ Yes

ບ ມ � No

ໂຮງຮຽນໄກຈາກບານຂອງນກຮຽນທ ຢຫພກ/ຕບ ເທາໃດ (ປະມານຈກຫກ)? How far is the school from the villages of students who stay at the dormitories/huts (km)? Around 6 km far distance

ນກຮຽນທ ອາໃສຢຕບ ໄປໃຊຫອງອາບນ າ ແລະ ວ ດຖາຍ ຢໃສ? ຫານ າດ ມຈາກໃສ? ໄປຫາຟນຢໃສ? Where do those students living in huts/shelters go to toilet? Get drinking water? Get fire wood?

148 Appendix 4

148

ເຄ ອງອປະກອນ ອ ານວຍຄວາມສ

ະດວກຕາງໆ ANCILLARY FACILITIES

ສາງຂ ນ ປ ໃດ?

In what year was

building

constructed?

ສະພາບປະຈບນ Condition ໝາຍເຫດRemarks ສະພາບດ /ຍ

ງໃຊງານໄດ Good/ Functional

ຕອງການສອງແປງNeeds repair

ຕອງປຽນໃໝ/ສາງອນໃໝ For replacement

ຊວຄາວ (ບ ຖາວອນ) Makeshift or temporary

ຕອງໄດຮ ຖອນ For demolition

ມ ວ ດຖາຍພຽງພບ ຫ ຖາຍຕາມປາ? Are there adequate toilets or is open defecation practiced? Inadequate of toilet unit in school, to request more toilet units construction ສກສາລາທ ໄກສດຢໃສ? ແລະ ໂຮງໝທ ໄກສດ ຢໃສ? Where is the nearest clinic? Hospital? ພະຍາດຫຍງ ທ ມກເກດ ກບນກຮຽນໃນໂຮງຮຽນ? What kind of illnesses/sicknesses are most common amongst students at the school? Get cold ໂຮງຮຽນ/ບານ ໄດມ ການຈດການສາງຈ ດສ ານ ກກຽວກບ ການນ າໃຊນ າ ແລະ ສຂາພບານ (ນ າ ແລະ ວ ດຖາຍ) ຫ ການຮກສາສຂະພາບ ແລະ ຄວາມສະອາດ ບ ? Has the school/village had any WASH or other similar awareness raising on hygiene and sanitation?

� ມ Yes

ບ ມ No

ສ ງອ ານວນຄວາມສະດວກ ກຽວກບນ າ ແລະ ສຂາພບານ WASH FACILITIES

ຈ ານວນNo. of Units

ສະພາບດ /ຍງໃຊງານໄດ Good/ Functional

ຕອງການສອງແປງNeeds repair

ຕອງປຽນໃໝ/ສາງອນໃໝ For replacement

ຊວຄາວ (ບ ຖາວອນ)Makeshift or temporary

ໝາຍເຫດRemarks

ວ ດຖາຍທ ຕດກບອາຄານຮຽນ Attached Toilets

× × × × ×

ໂຖຖາຍເບ າ Urinals

× × × × ×

ວ ດຖາຍ (ຊກໂຄກ) Toilet seat

× × × × ×

ວ ດຖາຍ (ນງຢອງ) Squat type

3 toilet units 1 toilet unit

Functioning Not functioning

× × × Proposed construction more toilet units

ວ ດຖາຍສ າຫບຄນພການ Toilet for PWD

× × × × ×

ວ ດຖາຍ ທ ບ ຕດກບອາຄານ

× × × × ×

Appendix 4 149

149

ຮຽນDetached Toilets ໂຖຖາຍເບ າ Urinals

× × × × ×

ວ ດຖາຍ (ຊກໂຄກ) Toilet seat

× × × × ×

ວ ດຖາຍ (ນງຢອງ) Squat type

× × × × ×

ວ ດຖາຍສ າຫບຄນພການ Toilet for PWD

× × × × ×

ສ ງອ ານວຍຄວາມສະດວກ ໃນການລາງມ (ບອນລາງມ ) Hand washing facilities

× × × × ×

ວ ດຖາຍ ໄດແຍກສ າຫບ ຍ ງ/ຊາຍ ບ ? Are the toilets sex-segregated?

� ແຍກ Yes ບ ແຍກ No

ມ ຂມວ ດບ ? Are there septic tanks/latrines for toilets? � ມ Yes ບ ມ No ໄດມ ການດດສວມ (ເວລາມນເຕມ) ເປນປກກະຕບ ? Are septic tanks de-sludged regularly?

� ໄດເຮດ Yes

ບ ໄດເຮດ No

ມ ແຫງນ າສ າຫບບ ລ ໂພກ ເຊ ນ: ນ າສາງ, ໜອງ, ອ ນໆ ຕງຢໄກວ ດຖາຍ ໃນລດສະໝ 30 ແມດບ ? Is there a drinking water supply source, i.e. bore wells, lagoon, etc. within 30m from the latrine?

ມ Yes � ບ ມ No

ໄລຍະຫາງຈາກ ວ ດຖາຍ/ຂມວ ດ ຫາ ແຫງນ າດ ມ ແລະ ນ າໃຊ (ນ າບາດານ, ນ າສາງ, ອາງເກບນ າລ ນ, ຫວຍ, ແມນ າ) ຈກແມດ? Distance between toilet/latrine to sources of drinking and using water (borehole tap, shallow wells, Gravity-fed water tank, stream, river)…the ground water source is far from toilet around 10 meters …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ມ ລະບບນ າໃຊແບບໃດ (ນ າປະປາ, ນ າລ ນ, ນ າສາງ, ນ າບາດານ, ນ າຫວຍ, ອ ນໆ)? ໄດຊ ນ າກະຕກບ ? What type of water supply is available? is it portable? Ground water

ໃຫຈດອນດບ ບລ ມະສ ດ (ສ ງທ ຕອງການແກໄຂດວນທ ສດ) ຂອງໂຮງຮຽນ: List down the priority needs of the school:

1. To request more class rooms or school building 2. to request more toilet units 3. to request library and laboratory

150 Appendix 4

150

B. ຂ ມນກຽວກບ ຂອງພນທ ແລະ ດ ນ ຂອງໂຮງຮຽນເປ າໝາຍ (ທ ກຽວກບການຖ ກຍກຍາຍບານ) School land acquisition (with involuntary resettlement related queries)

1. ກາມະສ ດ ໃນພນທ : Site Ownership:

ໃບຕາດນອອກຊ : Titled under the name of:

� ສນຍາເຊ າ Contract of Lease

� ຂ ຕກລງ/ສນຍາ ການ ການບ ລ ຈາກ (ການມອບ) ທ ດ ນ Deed of Donation

� ຂ ຕກລງ/ສນຍາ ການ ການຊ ຂາຍ ທ ດ ນ Deed of Sale

School is owner

2. ທ ຕງ:Location:

ໃນຕວເມ ອງUrban

� ເຂດພດອຍ Upland

� ເຂດປາ Forest land � ອ ນໆ Others

� ເຂດຊນນະບດRural

ເຂດທງພຽງ Lowland

� ເຂດປາສະຫງວນ/ເຂດຫວງຫາມProtected area

� ໃຈກາງເມອງTown center

3. ການນາໃຊທ ດນ: Land use:

� ທງນາ (ປກເຂ າ) Rice field

� ລຽງສດນອຍ Small livestock

� ການເກບກເຄ ອງປາຂອງດງ NTFP collection

ຜນ າໃຊດ ນ ເປນເຈ າຂອງ Land user is OWNER

� ປກພດເສດຖະກດCash crop

� ສດລຽງໃຫຍທ ກນຫຍາ Large Livestock grazing

� ອ ນໆ others ຜນ າໃຊດ ນ ເປນຜນ າໃຊ Land user is USER

� ລຽງປາ Fish

Appendix 4 151

151

raising

ໃຜເປນເຈ າຂອງເນ ອທ ດ ນໂຮງຮຽນ / who own the land? ໂຮງຮຽນ / school, □ ບານ / village, □ ສວນບກຄນ / individual.

ຖາເປນດ ນຂອງໂຮງຮຽນ ມໃບຕາດ ນບ / if the land is owned by school, does the school have the land title? □ ບ ມ ໃບຕາດ ນ / no, □ ໃບນາໃຊທ ດ ນຊວ / Permission of using, ໃບຕາດ ນຖາວອນ / permanent land title.

ຖາເປນດ ນຂອງບານ/ສວນບກຄນ ມ ໃບມອບສ ດບ / if the land is owned by individual, do they have the Permission for using (formal document)? □ ມ / yes, ບ ມ /no.

4. ການທບຊອນກບໂຄງການອ ນ / Overlap with other project:

ປະຈບນໂຮງຮຽນມໂຄງການອ ນສະໜບສະໜນບ / is there any other project support to this school? □ ມ /yes, ບ ມ /no.

ໂຮງຮຽນມແຜນທ ຈະໄດຮບທນສະໜບສະໜນຈາກໂຄງການອ ນບ / does the school have the map of other project supporting site? □ ມ /yes, ບ ມ /no.

ສະຖານທ ສ າລບການປກສາງອາຄານຮຽນໃໝມ ການທບຊອນກບແຜນໂຄງການອ ນທຈະໃຫທນສະໜບສະໜນບ / is the site for construction of the new school overlapping with construction plan of any other project? □ ມ / yes , ບ ມ / no.

5. ຂ ມນກຽວກບສະຖານທ ປກສາງອາຄານຮຽນໃໝ/School construction site for new facility:

ພມ ປະເທດ (ສະພາບພນທ): Topographical condition of the new construction site:

ພນທ ຮາບພຽງ Flat/Level

� ພນອຽງ/ເປນຄອຍ ປະມານ /sloping….................ອງສາ/degree

� ພນເປນຄ ນ (ຂ ນໆລງໆ) Rolling

� ດ ນມ ຄວາມສຽງຈາກນ າປາໄຫນອງ / the area that in risk for sudden flood from the forest water

� ດ ນຕາ ເຄ ຍມ ນ າຖວມຈາກແມນ າໃນລະດຝນ ຕອງຖມດ ນສງຂ ນອ ກປະມານ / lower land area, use to be flooded during the rainy season, and need to fill in the soil to elevate the land …. ................ແມດ/m, ເນ ອທ ກວາງປະມານ / in area of...............ແມດມນທນ/m2.

ດ ນລບ ນ າຖວມຂງເວລາຝນຕກໜກ ຕອງຖມດ ນສງຂ ນອ ກປະມານ / rangeland with march and need to fill in more soil, ເນ ອທ ກວາງປະມານ / in area of...... it’s flooding around 20-30% of (total area 16,770.25m2 ) for the low area of the school is area is usually flooded up to 30-40 centimeters and the higher area such upgrade area for new building will not flood during the rainy season. � ດ ນຖມໃໝສງປະມານຈກແມດ / land just newly elevated, how high that elevate

up……..For the proposed school building construction around 0.7 to 1 /m, ເນ ອທ ກວາງປະມານ / in area of...............ແມດມນທນ/m2.

152 Appendix 4

152

ໂຮງຮຽນມສະຖານທ ກວາງຂວາງພຽງພສ າລບການປກສາງອາຄານຮຽນໃໝບ / is the school space large enough for construction of new facility? ມ /yes, □ ບ ມ /no.

ດານທດເໜອຕດກບ / the land is connected with paved road to the North, ດານທດໃຕຕດກບ / with villager’s area to the South., ດານທດຕາເວນອອກຕດກບ / with cemetery are of Phonethong village to the East, ດານທດຕາເວນຕກຕດກບ / with villager’s area to the West.

ຂອບເຂດຂອງໂຮງຮຽນມຮວບ / does the school compound have fence? ມ /yes, □

ບ ມ /no. ຖາມ ຮວ / if yes, please specify which type: □ ກດ ນຈ /ດ ກບອກ / bricks, □ ເສ າເບຕງ+ໜາມໝາກຈບ / concrete poles with metal fencing wire, ເສ າໄມ+ໜາມໝາກຈບ / wooden poles with metal fencing wire, □ ຮວໄມແບບຊາຊາຊວຄາວ / temporary wooden fence.

6. ທ ຕງໂຮງຮຽນ ແລະ ເຂດອອມຂາງ ມແນວໂນມວາ

ຈະເກດນ າຖວມບ ? Is the school site and surrounding areas prone to flooding? The flooding occurs during there is hard rain because it’s no drainage system and level of school is quite low.

ມ Yes ບ ມ No

7. ລະດບນ າຖວມ ປກກະຕ ເລ ກປານໃດ? How high is the normal flood level?

� ເລ ກພຽງແອວ Waist deep

ພຽງຫວເຂ າKnee high � ພຽງຂຕນ Ankle deep

8. ທ ຜານມາ ນ າເຄ ຍຖວມດປານໃດ? How frequent is flooding experienced?

ປ ລະເທ ອOnce a year

� 2 ປ ເທ ອຫນ ງ Once every two years

ບ ເຄ ຍຖວມNot at all

9. ທ ຕງໂຮງຮຽນ ແລະ ເຂດອອມຂາງ ມ ແນວໂນມວາ ຈະເກດໄພແຫງແລງບ ? Is the school site and surrounding areas prone to drought?

� ມ Yes ບ ມ No

10. ລະດບແຫງແລງປກກະຕ ຮາຍແຮງປານໃດ? How serious is the normal drought level?

� ຮາຍແຮງ Serious

� ບ ຮາຍແຮງ Not serious

ບ ເຄ ຍແຫງແລງ

Not at all

Appendix 4 153

153

11. ທ ຜານມາ ເຄ ຍເກດໄພແຫງແລງດປານໃດ? How frequent is drought experienced?

� ປ ລະເທ ອOnce a year

� 2 ປ ເທ ອຫນ ງ Once every two years

ບ ເຄ ຍແຫງແລງ Not at all

12. ມ ລະບບລະບາຍນ າເປ ອນບ ? Is there existing drainage?

� ມ Yes

ບ ມ None ມ ຄ າຄ ດເຫນບ ?Comments?

13. ໄລຍະຫາງໄກ ຂອງໂຮງຮຽນ

ຫາແມນ າ/ແຫງນ າ/ເຂດດ ນຊມນ າ (ບ ງ) ທ ໄກທ ສດ ແມນປະມານເທາໃດ? What is the estimated distance of the school from the nearest river/ waterbody/wetland?

� 1-10 ແມດ m

� 11-20 ແມດ m ຫລາຍກວາ 20 ແມດ >20m

14. ຊ ຂອງແມນ າ/ແຫງນ າ/ບ ງ: Name of the river/waterbody/wetland:

15. ພນທ ໂຮງຮຽນ ແລະ ເຂດອອມຂາງ (ຕດກນ) ເຄ ຍມດ ນເຈ ອນບ ? Has the site and immediate surrounding area experienced landslides?

� ເຄ ຍ Yes

ບ ເຄ ຍ No

ຖາມ, ມນເກດຂ ນເທ ອສດທາຍຕອນໃດ? If yes, when was the most recent landslide?

ເດ ອນ/ປ :Month/Year:

16. ພນທ ໂຮງຮຽນ ແລະ ເຂດອອມຂາງ (ຕດກນ) ເຄ ຍເກດແຜນດ ນໄຫວບ ? Has the site and immediate surrounding area experienced earthquakes?

� ເຄ ຍ Yes

ບ ເຄ ຍ No

ຖາມ, ແຜນດ ນໄຫວຄງຫາສດເກດຂ ນຕອນໃດ? If yes, when was the most recent earthquake?

ເດ ອນ/ປ : Month/Year:

17. ໂຮງຮຽນມແຜນສກເສ ນ ໃນກລະນ ເກດ ໄພພບດທາງທາມະຊາດ ເຊ ນ: ນ າຖວມ, ແຜນດ ນໄຫວ, ດ ນເຈ ອນ ບ ? Does the school have an emergency response plan in case of natural disasters like flooding, earthquake, and landslides?

� ມ Yes

ບ ມ No

18. ໂຮງຮຽນມມາດຕະການປອງກນ ແລະ ຮບມ ກບອກຄ ໄພ (ໄຟໄໝ) ບ ? Does the school have fire prevention and response measures?

� ມ Yes

ບ ມ No

ຖາມ, ກະລນາລະບ ບນດາມາດຕະການດງກາວ. If yes, please specify these measures.

19. ພນທ ທ ຖ ກການດໃຫເປນ ເຂດລະເບ ດທ ບ ທນແຕກ/ເຂດມ ລະເບ ດຝງໃນພນດ ນ ຢບ ລ ເວນໄກຄຽງ ມບ ? Are

� ມ Yes ບ ມ None

154 Appendix 4

154

there identified UXO/landmine sites in the immediate vicinity?

20. ໄດມ ການເກບກ ລະເບ ດທ ບ ທນແຕກ ໃນພນທ ໂຮງຮຽນ ແລວບ ? Was UXO clearance carried out for the school site? This area is not risk of UXO found area , there is only clearing area of construction before

ໄດເຮດ Yes ບ ໄດເຮດ No

21. ທ ຕງຂອງໂຮງຮຽນ ໄກກບ ຫ ຢໃນ ເຂດປາສະຫງວນ/ເຂດຫວງຫາມ ແມນບ ? Is the school located near or within a protected area?

� ແມນ Yes

ບ ແມນ No

22. ມ ອາຄານ/ສ ງກສາງ ຫ ຕນໄມ ພາຍໃນຂອບເຂດບ ລ ເວນຂອງໂຮງຮຽນ ທ ຖ ກຈດໃຫເປນພນທ ມລະດກທາງດານວດຖະນະທາ ບ ? Are there buildings/structures or trees within the school compound which are considered as cultural heritage sites?

� ມ Yes

ບ ມ No

ຖາມ, ກະລນາລະບ ບນດາສ ງປກສາງ/ອາຄານດງກາວ. If Yes, specify these structures/buildings: 23. ມ ອາຄານ/ສ ງກສາງ ໃນບ ລ ເວນວງລດສະໝ 100

ແມດຈາກຂອງໂຮງຮຽນ ທ ຖ ກຈດໃຫເປນພນທ ມລະດກ ບ ? Are there buildings or structures within 100m from the school compound which are considered as heritage sites?

� ມ Yes

ບ ມ No

ຖາມ, ກະລນາລະບ ບນດາສ ງປກສາງດງກາວ. If Yes, specify these structures: 24. ໃນໂຮງຮຽນມແຫ

ງນ າໃດແດ? What is the source of water in the school?

� ແຫງນ າໃຊສອຍຂອງທອງຖນLocal utility

� ບ ນ າທາມະຊາດ Spring ນ າສາງShallow well

� ສະ/ໜອງPond/lagoon

� ແມນ າ River � ນ າຝນRainwater � ອ ນໆ Others: 25. ໂຮງຮຽນມນ າໃຊບ / Does the school have water for using? ມ / yes, □ ບ ມ / no.

ຖາມ / if yes, please specify type of water use: □ ນ າປະປາ / water supply system, □ ນ າລ ນ / gravity fed water system, ນ າບາດານ / Borehole (ground water pumping system), ນ າສາງ / Shallow wells, □ ອາງເກບນ າຝນ / Rain water harvesting tank (basin) □ ແມນ າ / river (or stream). ນ າປະປາ / Water Supply: ສະໜອງນ າໃຊພຽງພ ຫ ບ ພຽງພ ຕາມຄວາມຕອງການ /

does the system supply sufficient water? □ ພຽງພ / yes, □ ບ ພຽງພ / no

Appendix 4 155

155

ນ າລ ນ / Gravity fed water system: ສະໜອງນ າໃຊພຽງພ ຫ ບ ພຽງພ ຕາມຄວາມຕອງການ does the system supply sufficient water? □ ພຽງພ / yes, □ ບ ພຽງພ / no

ຖາບ ພຽງພ / if not: ແຕ ເດ ອນ / from (which month)……..... ຫາ ເດ ອນ to (month)...............

ນ າບາດານ / Borehole (ground water pumping system): ສະໜອງນ າໃຊພຽງພ ຫ ບ ພຽງພ ຕາມຄວາມຕອງການ / does the system supply sufficient water? ພຽງພ /

yes, □ ບ ພຽງພ / no. ຖາບ ພຽງພ / if not: ແຕ ເດ ອນ / from (which month)ມງກອນ ຫາ ເດ ອນ to (month) ທນວາ

ນ າສາງ / Shallow wells: ຄວາມເລ ກປະມານ / how deep: 10 ແມດ/m; ມ ປະລ ມານນ າພຽງພ ຫ ບ ພຽງພ ຕາມຄວາມຕອງການ do the wells supply sufficient

water ? ພຽງພ / yes, □ ບ ພຽງພ / no; ຖາບ ພຽງພ / if not: ແຕ ເດ ອນ / from (which month) ມງກອນ ຫາ ເດ ອນ to (month) ທນວາ

ອາງເກບນ າຝນ / Rain water harvesting tank (basin) : ສາມາດສະໜອງນ າ ເລ ມແຕ ເດ ອນ / can supply water from which month……....ຫາ ເດ ອນ to which month

…….........

ນ າເຊ/ນ າຫວຍ / river (or stream): ມ ປະລ ມານນ າພຽງພ ຫ ບ ພຽງພ ຕາມຄວາມຕອງການ / do the river (stream) supply sufficient water ? □ ພຽງພ / yes, □ ບ ພຽງພ / no;

ຖາບ ພຽງພ / if not: ແຕ ເດ ອນ / from (which month)……..... ຫາ ເດ ອນ to (month)...............

ຂ ສະເໜກຽວກບລະບບນ າໃຊ / Request about water system: To propose construct additional water storage or water tank of school

............................................................................................................................................

............................................................................................................................................

26. ມ ອາງເກບນ າ ໃນໂຮງຮຽນບ ? Is there

a water storage tank in the school? ມ Yes � ບ ມ None

27. ມ ແຫງພະລງງານ (ໄຟຟາ) ໃດແດໃນໂຮງຮຽນ? Does the school have access to electricity? ມ

ໄຟຟາຈາກເຄ ອນ Hydropower dam)

� ໃຊຈກປນໄຟGenerator engine

� ໄຟຟາພະລງແສງຕາເວນ Sola power:

� ອ ນໆ Others:

156 Appendix 4

156

/ yes, □ ບ ມ / No. What is the

source of power in the school?

ຖາມ ໄຟຟາ / if yes, please specify which type:

ຖາບ ມ ໄຟຟາ / if the school has no access to electricity: ພາຍໃນບ ລ ເວນ ໃກຄຽງໂຮງຮຽນ ມ ລະບບໄຟຟາ ແຮງຕາບ / is there any low voltage electricity system nearby? □ ມ / yes, □ ບ ມ /no.

ຖາມ ລະບບໄຟຟາແຮງຕາ / if there is a low voltage electricity system nearby: ຈາກແລວສາຍໄຟຟາແຮງຕາ ຫາຈດຈະຕດຕງກງເຕໄຟຟາຢພາຍໃນໂຮງຮຽນ ມ ໄລຍະຫາງ ຈກແມດ / how far from the cable/system to the school (where to install the power metter) 20 ແມດ/m,

ຖາກາຍ 50 ແມດ ຈະຕອງໄດຕງເສ າໄຟຟາໃຫມ, ຕອງເຊກລາຄາການຕງເສ າໃຫມ ເທາໃດ? If the distance between the cable/system is more than 50m, new electricity pole needs to be installed, and it costs ……………………… kip.

ການຂ ອະນມດຕດຕງກງໄຟຟາໃຊເວລາ/time required for requesting (get approval) for installation of the power metter............ມ /days, ມນຄາການຕດຕງກງເຕໄຟຟາ / cost for installation .................................ກ ບ/kip.

ໂຮງຮຽນມຄວາມສາມາດໃນການຊ າລະຄາໄຟຟາປະຈ າເດ ອນບ / will the school be able to pay for monthly electricity bill? ມ / yes, □ ບ ມ /no.

ຖາມ ຄວາມສາມາດຊ າລະຄາໄຟຟາ / if the school have ability to pay for monthly electricity bill? ແຫງງບປະມານມາຈາກໃສ / where the budget is from?ເງ ນບ ລ ຫານໂຮງຮຽນທ ລດຖະບານສະໜອງໃຫ

ຂ ສະເໜກຽວກບລະບບໄຟຟາ / request about electricity system:

.......................................................................................................................................................

.......................................................................................................................................................

28. ໃນບ ລ ເວນໂຮງຮຽນມເສ າອງແຕນໂທລະສບບ / does the school are (compound) have the telephone antenna? □ ມ /yes, ບ ມ /no

Appendix 4 157

157

29. ໂຮງຮຽນມຖງ/ກະຕາ ແຍກປະເພດຂ ເຫຍ ອບ? Does the school have waste segregation bins?

� ມ Yes ບ ມ No

30. ບນດາຖງຂ ເຫຍ ອງຕງຢໃສ? Where are the waste bins located?

ຢໃນທກໆຫອງຮຽນ In every classroom

� ຢລະບຽງ In the corridor � ຢນອກອາຄານຮຽນ Outside the school building

� ບອນອນ, ກະລນາລະບOthers, specify

31. ໂຮງຮຽນທາການກາຈດຂ ເຫຍ ອ ວ ທ ໃດ? How is solid waste disposed by the school?

� ມ ຄນມາເກບຂ ເຫຍ ອCollected by waste haulers

� ເຮດປຍComposting ເຜາ/ຈດBurning

� ແບບອນ, ກະລນາລະບOthers, specify

32. ຖາມຄນມາເກບຂ ເຫຍ ອ ດນປານໄດຈ ງມາ? If solid waste is collected by haulers, how frequent is the waste collection?

� ທກມ Daily � ວນເວນວນ (ທກສອງມ) Every other day

� ອາທດລະເທ ອ Once a week

ບ ມ ຄນເກບຂ ເຫຍ ອ Not collected

33. ມ ບອນ ແລະ ເຄ ອງກາຈດຂ ເຫຍ ອ ຢໃນທອງຖນບ ? Is there waste disposal facility in the local area?

� ມ Yes

ບ ມ None

ແຜນການພດທະນາ ພ ທ : Site development plan:

ເນ ອທ : 23,746 ແມດມນທນ Land area: sqm

ເນ ອທ ອາຄານ: 1005 ແມດມນທນ Building area: _____ sqm

158 Appendix 4

158

ແຜນທ ຂອງບ ລ ເວນໄກຄຽງ Vicinity map:

C. ການກສາງ CONSTRUCTION

1. ສ ງປກສາງອນໃດ ທ ສະເໜ ໃຫປກໃນໂຮງຮຽນ? ໃຫອະທບາຍໂດຍຫຍ ກຽວກບສ ງເຫານນ. What structures are proposed for the school? Provide brief description of the proposed facilities.

ປະເພດ A/Type A: ປກ ມ ຕນ /Build Lower Secondary School ປະເພດ B/Type B: ປກ ມ ປາຍ /Build Upper Secondary School ປະເພດ C/Type C: ປກຫອງຮຽນເພມ /Build Additional Classrooms and Facilities

B ສາງເປນ ມສ. 2. ການກສາງຕາງໆຂອງໂຄງການ ຈະໃຊເວລາ

ຈກເດ ອນ? How many months will it take to complete the construction of the project?

6 ເດ ອນ

3. ບ ລ ສດກສາງທອງຖນ/Local contractor capability ຈ ານວນບ ລ ສດກສາງ/A number of contractor

relevant to the work ຈ ານວນບ ລ ສດທ ມ ຂ ດຄວາມອາດສາມາດ/Qualifi

ed contractor

ມ

4. ມນຄາສະເລຍວຽກກສາງ ຕ ຕາແມດ/Average construction cost per m2

200 $ / m2

5. ວດສະດກສາງ/Construction material ຂ ດຄວາມສາມາດໃນການສະໜອງວດສະດ/Availa

bility of materials supplier

ສາມາດຈດຊ ອປະກອນຢພາຍໃນທອງຖນໄດ

Appendix 4 159

159

ເປ ເຊນວດສະດທ ສາມາດຈດຊ ໄດພາຍທອງຖນ/Percentage of the source of materials used in the past (locally)

ເປ ເຊນວດສະດທ ຈດຊ ມາຈາກຕາງແຂວງ/Percentage of the source of materials used in the past (imported from other provinces)

6. ກະລນາ ລະບເວລາ ແລະ ຕາຕະລາງການ ກສາງ: Please specify the construction schedule and time:

ມ ເຂ າການ (ໃນອາທດ) Weekdays ເວລາ Time: 8 ຊວໂມງ

ເສ າອາທດ Weekends ເວລາ Time: 8 ຊວໂມງ

7. ມ ໄລຍະເວລາທ ຕອງຫກລຽງ ເຊ ນ ຊວງເວລາທາງສາສະໜາ ແລະ ການສ ກສາ? Are there sensitive periods to be avoided such as religious periods and study periods?

ມ Yes ກະລນາລະບ ເດ ອນ ຫ ມ ທ ຕອງຫກລຽງ ວຽກກສາງ: Please specify months or days to be avoided: ມ ກາ ( ວນສ ນ )

� ບ ມ No

8. ຕອງການຄນເຮດວຽກ/ກາມະກອນກສາງ ຈ ານວນຈກຄນ ໃນໄລຍະກສາງ? How many workers will be needed during construction?

15-20 ຄນ

9. ໄລຍະຫາງຂອງບອນສາງໂຮງຮຽນ ແລະ ແຫງສະໜອງວດສະດ (ສາງເຄ ອງກສາງ): Distance from the school site of material source for construction:

ໜອຍກວາ 50 ແມດ <50m

ຫາຍກວາ 50 ແມດ >50m

10. ວດສະດທ ສາມາດຫາໄດໃນທອງຖນ ມ ຫຍງແດ? ມາຈາກເມ ອງໃດ? ໄກຈກ ກໂລແມດ? What are the construction materials that available in the area? from which city/town? How far (km)?

Wood Metal Furniture Roofing sheets

11. ຈະຕອງໄດມ ການຕດຕນໄມບ

ເພອຈດຕງປະຕບດໂຄງການດງກາວນ ? is there any tree to be cut down by the implementation of the project?

� ມ Yes ບ ມ No

ຖາມ, ກະລນາລະບ ຈ ານວນຂອງຕນໄມທ ຕອງຕດ. If yes, please specify the number of trees to be cut down.

12. ຫອງຮຽນຊວຄາວ ໃນໄລຍະກສາງ ໂຮງຮຽນໃຫມ / Temporary classrooms

160 Appendix 4

160

ໃນຊວງປກໂຮງຮຽນໃຫມ ມ ບອນໃຫນກຮຽນຊວຄາວບ ?

ມ Yes � ບ ມ No

ຢໃສ? (ເຮ ອນປະຊາຊນ, ວດ, ສະໂມສອນບານ, ...) ມ ນກຮຽນຈກຄນ ຕອງໄດຮຽນຢຫອງຮຽນຊວຄາວ

ໄລຍະການກສາງ? ຈກຫອງ? ທາງບານ ແລະ ໂຮງຮຽນ

ຈະກະກຽມຫອງຮຽນຊວຄາວແນວໃດ?

ຢໂຮງຮຽນ

D. ຮບ PHOTOS

ຮບຂອງໂຮງຮຽນ, ພນທ ຕດກບໂຮງຮຽນ, ພນທ ທ ສະເໜໃຫມ ການປກສາງ, ກະຕາຂ ເຫຍ ອ, ກອກນ າ, ວ ດຖາຍ, ຖງສວມ/ຂມວ ດ ແລະ ບອນລາງມ (ເພມໜາເຈຍ ຖາຈ າເປນ): Photos of the school, immediate vicinity, proposed construction site, waste bins, water supply, toilets, septic tanks and handwashing facilities: (Provide additional sheets as necessary)

Appendix 4 161

161

Existing one school building that is not good condition

Existing toilets

Propose area for construction new facilities

E. ຄນທອງຖນ/ຄນພນເມ ອງ INDIGENOUS PEOPLE

162 Appendix 5

162

APPENDIX 5. TEMPLATE OF ENVIRONMENT SAFEGUARD MONITORING REPORT

Safeguards Monitoring Report # Monthly/Quarterly/Semiannual/Annual Report xxx {month} 20xx

COUNTRY: xxx {Project name}, xxx {sub-project name,

if report covers only one sub-project}

Prepared by the Project Management Unit of {complete name of Implementing Agency} for the

{complete name of the borrower} and the Asian Development Bank.

NOTE

(i) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars.

Appendix 5 163

163

This safeguards monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

164 Appendix 5

164

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

{Read and delete: Provide short summary of the following items:

Summary of EMP/RP Implementation

Description of monitoring activities carried out (e.g. field visits, environment effect monitoring, survey questionnaire, public consultation meetings, focus group discussions, etc)

Key issues, any corrective actions already taken, and any grievances Key activities planned in the next reporting period Recommendations

Use the paragraph numbering format provided below throughout the report} 1. xxx 2. xxx

II. PROJECT OVERVIEW, GENERAL SAFEGUARD MATTERS

1. Project Overview {Read and delete: Briefly describe project objectives, scope and components – can be taken from PAM or other relevant document} 2. xxx 3. xxx

2. Project Progress {Read and delete: Using most recent project progress report, describe status of project implementation, including full list of contracts, status of contract awarding and implementation, name of contractor, Engineer, Project Supervision Consultant.} 5. xxx 6. xxx

Table 1: Project Overview, Snapshot of Project Progress Project Number and Title:

Safeguards Category

Environment

Indigenous Peoples

Involuntary Resettlement

Reporting period:

Last report date:

Appendix 5 165

165

Key sub-project activities since last report:

{Read and delete: This section should include, among others, the following:} Contract awarding Progress of Work (% physical completion) Status of Safeguard Approvals / Permits / Consents

Report prepared by:

3. Safeguard Plans Implementation Arrangements

{Read and delete: Describe institutional arrangements and responsibilities for EMP and RP implementation, internal and external monitoring, and reporting, defining roles of PMU, Engineer, Implementation Consultant, Contractors. (Table format as needed)} 7. xxx 8. xxx

4. Updated EMPs and RPs, Incorporation of Safeguards Requirements into Project Contractual Arrangements

{Read and delete: Define manner by which EMP and RP requirements are incorporated into bidding documents, contracts. Indicate when updated EMPs and RPs were submitted for approval to ADB (Table format appropriate).} 9. xxx 10. xxx

III. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING

1. Status of EMP implementation (Mitigation Measures) {Read and delete: Summarize main mitigation/protection measures implemented in the reporting period (narrative section). Structure in accordance to phases (detailed design, construction preparation, construction, and operation).} 21. xxx 12. xxx {Read and delete: Include EMP table or updated EMP table if applicable. Assess compliance of environmental management activities with the original or updated EMP. For that purpose, include additional columns entitled “Compliance Status”, "Comment or Reasons for Non-Compliance", and "Issues for Further Action". Example is provided below.}

Table 2: Compliance with EMP Requirements (Environmental Performance)

EMP Requirements Compliance Status (Yes, No, Partial)

Comment or Reasons for Non-Compliance

Issues for Further Action

Use environmental impact as main heading and EMP as listing (see example below)

Use EMP list as basis for rating/evaluating compliance (see example below)

166 Appendix 5

166

Rise of employment opportunities: Job openings of the project should give priority to local communities. Recruitment of local laborers should be stipulated in the contract for construction

Field inspections and interviews with communities - DONE Note each complaint case in the field – 3 COMPLAINTS RECEIVED Set up grievance centre and report as part of monitoring action plan – NOT DONE

Table 3: Issues for Further Action

Issue Required Action Responsibility and Timing Resolution

Old Issues from Previous Reports

List of EMP measures or activities not completed (last column of previous table)

New Issues from This Report

2. Health and Safety

{Read and delete: Provide narrative of occupational and community health and safety issues that occurred during the reporting period. Any accident involving injury or death of workers or community members must be reported. Include investigation report of DOLISA as attachment to the report. Provide details in the Table below}. 13. xxx 14. xxx

Table 4: Health and Safety Issues

Issue Required Action Responsibility and Timing

Resolution

Old Issues from Previous Reports

New Issues from This Report

Appendix 5 167

167

3. Environment Effect Monitoring

15. Monitoring plan. xxx {Read and delete: Present the environment effect monitoring plan as defined in the EMP or the updated monitoring plan. Refer to Table 4. Describe monitoring responsibilities} 16. Monitoring activities in the reporting period. Xxx {Read and delete: Describe the environment effect monitoring activities in the reporting period, including number of monitoring campaigns, number of samples, etc. Confirm compliance with the monitoring plan, or justify any deviation from the plan}

Table 4: Environment Effect Monitoring Results in the Reporting Period

{Read and delete: Present monitoring result in a Table (see example below, adjust as needed). Any non-compliance should be highlighted for attention and follow-up.}

Location Parameter Date

Monitoring value Relevant government standard, standard value

17. Assessment. Xxx {Read and delete: Compare monitoring results with baseline conditions (if baseline data is available) and relevant government standards in qualitative terms. Additional explanatory comments should be provided as necessary. Possible reasons for non-compliance should be identified.}

IV. INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT PERFORMANCE MONITORING {Read and delete: Provide narrative of status of implementation of the RP(s), including but not limited to: status of RP or Resettlement Framework updating; number of households relocated during the reporting period; outstanding resettlement activities; etc}. 18. xxx 19. xxx

Table 6: Summary of Compliance with RP Requirements

RP Requirements

Compliance status Yes/No/Partial

Comment or Reasons for Compliance, Partial Compliance/Non-Compliance

Issues for Further Action7

Establishment of personnel in PMU/PIU

{Read and delete: This section should include, among others, the following:}

7 To be elaborated further in table 3.b (Issues for Further Action)

168 Appendix 5

168

Identify position and name of Safeguards/Resettlement staff of the PMU/PIU

Public consultation and socialization process

{Read and delete: This section should include, among others, the following:} Provide information on: Public consultation, participation activities carried out Inclusive dates of these activities To be elaborated on in Item 5

Land area to be acquired is identified and finalized

{Read and delete: This section should include, among others, the following:} Provide information on: Land area (of each parcel to be acquired) Current land use (residential, agri, etc) Current ownership status (private, state) Provide attachments on land titles/user rights certificates,

Resettlement plan(s) updated after detailed design

Land acquisition completed

Establishment of Resettlement Site(s)

Please state: Number of AHs to be relocated as per agreed RP Number of AHs already relocated Number of houses built Status of installation of community facilities to be provided as per agreed RP

Compensation payments for affected assets is completed

Please state: Total Number of Eligible AHs and APs (as per agreed RP)

Appendix 5 169

169

Number of AHs and APs compensated as of this monitoring period Total Budget allocation as per agreed RP Total budget disbursed to AHs as of this monitoring period

Transport assistance for relocating affected households

As above

Additional assistance to vulnerable affected household

Please state: Total Number of vulnerable AHs and APs (as per agreed RP) Agreed forms of assistance as per RP Number of AHs and APs assisted as of this monitoring period

Income Restoration Program

Please state progress per income restoration feature/activity and actual period of implementation

Temporary impacts have been addressed (affected properties restored to at least pre-project conditions)

Please state: Total Number of AHs affected by temporary impacts as per agreed RP Actual Number of AHs and total area affected by temporary impacts (if this differs from the projected number, such as in cases of unforeseen project impacts) Status of restoring affected property

Capacity building activities

Table 7: Issues for Further Action

Issue Required Action Responsibility and Timing

Resolution

Old Issues from Previous Reports

List of RP activities not completed (last column of previous table)

New Issues from This Report

170 Appendix 5

170

V. INDIGENOUS PEOPLE PERFORMANCE MONITORING {Read and delete: Provide narrative of status of implementation of the REGDP(s)/IPP(s), including but not limited to: status of REGDP or IP Framework updating; implementation updates on the IP component during the reporting period; outstanding activities; etc}. 20.xxx 21. xxx

Table 6: Summary of Compliance with IP Requirements

IP Requirements

Compliance status Yes/No/Partial

Comment or Reasons for Compliance, Partial Compliance/Non-Compliance

Issues for Further Action8

Establishment of personnel in PMU/PIU

{Read and delete: This section should include, among others, the following:} Identify position and name of Safeguards/IP staff of the PMU/PIU

Public consultation and socialization process

{Read and delete: This section should include, among others, the following:} Provide information on: Public consultation, participation activities carried out Inclusive dates of these activities To be elaborated on in Item 5

IP plan(s) updated after detailed design

IP plan implementation specifics

Capacity building activities

Table 7: Issues for Further Action

Issue Required Action Responsibility and Timing

Resolution

Old Issues from Previous Reports

8 To be elaborated further in table 3.b (Issues for Further Action)

Appendix 5 171

171

List of IP activities not completed (last column of previous table)

New Issues from This Report

VI. COMPLIANCE WITH SAFEGUARDS RELATED PROJECT COVENANTS {Read and delete: List all environment and resettlement related loan covenants, and assess project’s compliance with the covenants (Table format is appropriate, with concluding statement on compliance, partial compliance or non-compliance, and corrective actions as needed)

Schedule Para No. Covenant Remarks/Issues (Status of Compliance)

Schedule 5 xxx Complied with / Partially complied with / Not complied with. {Identify reason for partial or non-compliance}

VII. PUBLIC CONSULTATION, INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, CAPABILITY BUILDING {Read and delete: Describe public consultation activities during the reporting period. Confirm compliance with consultation plan defined in the IEE/EMP and the RP(s), or justify deviation from these plans. Present planned consultation activities in next reporting period. Use Tables as appropriate.}

Field Visits (sites visited, dates, persons met) Public Consultations and meetings (Date; time; location; agenda; number of participants

disaggregated by sex and ethnic group, not including project staff; Issues raised by participants and how these were addressed by the project team)

Training (Nature of training, number of participants disaggregated by gender and ethnicity, date, location, etc.)

Press/Media Releases Material development/production (e.g., brochure, leaflet, posters) Information disclosure

VIII. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM

{Read and delete: Describe mechanisms established to address and redress public complaints and grievances related to social and environment safeguards. Summarize grievances received, if any, and measures implemented to redress them.}

Number of new grievances, if any, since last monitoring period: ____

172 Appendix 5

172

Number of grievances resolved: _____ Number of outstanding grievances: _____

Type of Grievance Details (Date, person, address, contact details, etc.)

Required Action, Responsibility and Timing

Resolution

Old Issues from Previous Reports

New Issues from This Report

IX. CONCLUSION {Read and delete: Highlight important results from the implementation of EMP and RP monitoring; recommendations to improve EMP and RP management, implementation, and monitoring; key activities planned in next reporting period}. 22. xxx 23. xxx

X. ATTACHMENTS

Consents / permits Monitoring data (water quality, air quality, etc.) Inspection checklists Photographs Others