28
Multinational Finance Management ‘The Merrill Case’ Presentation by: Yu Zhang, Juan Leon Sanchez, Francisco Magro Ruiz, Hongfeng Wu and Hasan Soylemez February 22, 2013

Merrill case final

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Merrill case   final

Multinational Finance Management

‘The Merrill Case’

Presentation by: Yu Zhang, Juan Leon Sanchez, Francisco Magro Ruiz,

Hongfeng Wu and Hasan Soylemez

February 22, 2013

Page 2: Merrill case   final

2

Index

Introduction

Problems

Solutions and Options

Comparison

Conclusion and Recommendation

Page 3: Merrill case   final

3

Introduction

• Merrill Electronics Cooperation (MEC) was founded in 1950 by Thomas Merrill

• After his death, Patricia Merrill inherited the 75 % of the share capital together with her mother

• In 1984, MEC signed an agreement with Goldstone Corporation in Taiwan, which was a major producer of electronic devices

• In mid-1980’s, MEC entered the fast-growing market PC market which was becoming more and more competitive each day

• In 1989, it became a national distributor for Fuji Electronics

• Yen-dominated purchases exceeded $ 20 million during the past 12 months

• Due to growing volume in the market, further Yen purchases was foresaw

Page 4: Merrill case   final

4

Problems

• High volatility of the Japanese Yen

• The payment problem: 90-day currency risk exposure (60 days shipping + 30 days grace period of payment after delivery)

• Average of 6.1¥/$ difference for a 3-month period with the average spot rate of 130.83¥/$ (Exhibit 4)

• Most of the equipment were imported from Japan

• Further Yen purchases were foreseen

• Most of the Japanese suppliers insisted on invoicing in Yen

• More sensitive to currency risk than competitors

Page 5: Merrill case   final

5

Options

• No-hedge

• Lock-in exchange rate

• Forward contract hedge

• Money market hedge

• Yen futures hedge

• Options contract

Page 6: Merrill case   final

6

Options

Historical Data and Analysis

Scenarios

Pros and Cons

Page 7: Merrill case   final

7

Options

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 115

120

125

130

135

140 *Exchange Rate Yen/USD

• A trend of Yen appreciation against the USD with an average annual rate of +10%.

• High probability that the trend will prevail for the future.

What does the historical data show and imply?

*See Exhibit 4

Page 8: Merrill case   final

8

Options

SCENARIOS

Scenario 1

Spot Rate ¥/$ remains same

124.6 ¥/$

Scenario 2

Yen Depreciates by 3%

128.338 ¥/$

Scenario 3

Yen Appreciates by 3%

120.862 ¥/$

Assumptions: • Historical trend shows that the annual appreciation of

¥/$ was app. 10%• Therefore, appreciation/depreciation of ¥/$ would be

app. +/-3% for 3 months• No-hedge: Continue buying Yen at the spot market each

time a payment has to be made

Page 9: Merrill case   final

9

Options - No-hedge

SCENARIOS

Scenario 1

Spot Rate ¥/$ remains same

124.60 ¥/$

Scenario 2

Yen Depreciates by 3%

128.34 ¥/$

Scenario 3

Yen Appreciates by 3%

120.86 ¥/$

$1,805,778¥225 million

$1,753,183¥225 million

$1,861,627¥225 million

Page 10: Merrill case   final

10

Options - No-hedge

Pros Cons

If Yen depreciates, the company can gain from

lower cost of goods

If Yen appreciates, the company may suffer from higher cost of

goods

Costs almost nothing (No premiums, fees

etc.)

Exchange rates can not be precisely predicted

Easy to implement, no need for specialized

financial staff

Market conditions make it harder to put sound

exchange rate forecasts

Completely vulnerable to market volatilities

Page 11: Merrill case   final

11

Options - Forward Contract

Forward contracts are agreements between two parties which require delivery of one currency at a specified future date of a specified amount of another currency.

• Exchange rate fixed between the parties1st step

• Time

2nd step • Buy the

currency at the price set in the 1st step

3rd step

Page 12: Merrill case   final

12

Options - Forward Contract

BID ASK

Spot rate(Yen per USD)

124.60 124.70

Forward rate(Yen per USD)

124.95 125.10

BID: The rate at which bank sells YEN

ASK: The rate at which bank buys YEN

The company needs to buy YEN;

¥225 million on the forward market:

225,000,000 / 124.95 = $ 1,800,720

Page 13: Merrill case   final

13

Options - Forward Contract

SCENARIOS

Scenario 1

Spot Rate ¥/$ remains same

124.60 ¥/$

Scenario 2

Yen Depreciates by 3%

128.34 ¥/$

Scenario 3

Yen Appreciates by 3%

120.86 ¥/$

$1,805,778$1,800,720

$1,753,183$1,800,720

$1,861,627$1,800,720

Page 14: Merrill case   final

14

Options - Forward Contract

Pros Cons

No internal costsYou are responsible to fulfill the contract

and tied-up

Minimize the risk of the currency operations

You will be unable to benefit from any

positive movements in the foreign exchange rate

Amount and date adapted to individual

requirementsIt can’t be traded

Page 15: Merrill case   final

15

Options - Money Market Hedge

Merrill would buy the YEN at today’s spot market and place it in a YEN time deposit or another YEN asset until the due date.

Deposit Credit

90-days Euroyen interest rates 4.3125 % p.a.

4.4375% p.a.

90-days Eurodollar interest rates*

3.3750% p.a. 3.5000% p.a.

Merrill’s short term borrowing rate is 6.00% + 25 bps

Transactions:1-) The YEN amount needed to deposit in order to have 225M by October: 225,000,000 / (1+0.01078125) = ¥ 222,600,0932-) Borrow from the bank in USD (6.0025% / 4 = 1.500625%) 3-) Convert the USD to YEN as of today: ¥ 222,600,093 / 124.60 = $1,786,5184-) Time deposit the YEN until the payment date5-) Pay the bank back in USD, and the supplier in YEN;USD amount needed along with the interest: $ 1,786,518 * 1.01500625 = $ 1,813,327

Page 16: Merrill case   final

16

Options - Money Market Hedge

SCENARIOS

Scenario 1

Spot Rate ¥/$ remains same

124.60 ¥/$

Scenario 2

Yen Depreciates by 3%

128.34 ¥/$

Scenario 3

Yen Appreciates by 3%

120.86 ¥/$

$1,805,778$1,813,327

$1,753,183$1,813,327

$1,861,627$1,813,327

Page 17: Merrill case   final

17

Options - Money Market Hedge

Pros Cons

Highly profitability if enough cash available

High complexity of calculation

No exchange rate risk Volatility of money-markets

Generate profits if loan interest < deposit

interest

Dealing with Japanese financial market

Possibility of short term investments

Loan interest pose additional cost

No penalties for fast withdrawing

Opportunity costs may occur if USD appreciates

Page 18: Merrill case   final

18

Options - Yen Future Hedge

International Monetary Market (IMM) provided the data:

$ per ¥100 ¥ per $1

September yen futures (IMM) 0.8046 124.285

December yen futures (IMM) 0.8036 124.440

Other Data :

Standard Future size = ¥ 12,5 million per contract

Broker’s fee = $1,500 per contract

Total ¥225 million

Page 19: Merrill case   final

19

Options - Yen Future Hedge

Calculations:

How much $ should pay for the futures contract?

¥225,000,000 / 124.440 = $1,808,100

How much futures contracts should be needed? ¥225,000,000 / 12,500,000 = 18 futures contracts

How much should we pay for the Broker’s Commission ? $1,500 * 18 contracts = $27,000

So, the total cost of future contracts including commission is: $1,808,100 + $27,000 = $1,835,100

Page 20: Merrill case   final

20

Options - Yen Future Hedge

SCENARIOS

Scenario 1

Spot Rate ¥/$ remains same

124.60 ¥/$

Scenario 2

Yen Depreciates by 3%

128.34 ¥/$

Scenario 3

Yen Appreciates by 3%

120.86 ¥/$

$1,805,778$1,835,100

$1,753,183$1,835,100

$1,861,627$1,835,100

Page 21: Merrill case   final

21

Options - Yen Future Hedge

Pros Cons

Standardized contracts

No tailoring of individual needs

Possibility of trading Broker commission

Safe method Margin account is required

Possibility to reduce exchange rate risks

Page 22: Merrill case   final

22

Options - Currency Option Contract

This contract gives the right but not the obligation to buy (call) or to sell (put) currency or some other asset within a specified

period and at a predetermined price.

Types of currency options:“European”-type options“American”-type options

Page 23: Merrill case   final

23

Options - Currency Option Contract

October yen call options (IMM)

$ per 100 ¥ ¥ per $

Strike price 0.800 125

Premium price 0.0170 5882.35

Provided yen amount

225 million ¥ 225 million ¥

CALCULATIONS:

- Buy call options = ¥225,000,000 x 0.008 = $1,800,000

- Premium cost = ¥225,000,000 x 0.00017 = $ 38,250

- Total cost = $1,800,000 + $ 38,250= $1,838,250

Page 24: Merrill case   final

24

Options - Currency Option Contract

SCENARIOS

Scenario 1

Spot Rate ¥/$ remains same

124.60 ¥/$

Scenario 2

Yen Depreciates by 3%

128.34 ¥/$

Scenario 3

Yen Appreciates by 3%

120.86 ¥/$

$1,805,778$1,838,250

$1,753,183$1,838,250

$1,861,627$1,838,250

Page 25: Merrill case   final

25

Options - Currency Option Contract

Pros Cons

Not obligatory All have an expiration date

High flexibility Pre-paid premiums and fees

Unexpected market conditions only leads to a loss of the premium

Buying out of the contract leads to a loss of the premium already paid

Page 26: Merrill case   final

26

Comparison

Options

Scenario 1Current Spot Rate Remains

the Same124.60 ¥/$

Scenario 2Yen

depreciates by -3%

128.34 ¥/$

Scenario 3Yen

appreciates by +3%

120.86 ¥/$

Do Nothing - +52,595 USD -55,849 USD

Forward -5,058 USD -47,537 USD +60,907 USD

Money Market Hedge

-7,548 USD -60,144 USD +48,301 USD

Futures -29,322 USD -81,917 USD +26,527 USD

Currency Options

- 32,472 USD -38,250 USD +23,377 USD

Page 27: Merrill case   final

27

Conclusion and Recommendation

1. Shall the trend of Yen appreciation against USD continue, the best hedging option is locking-in a forward rate agreement with the bank due to the potential gain compared to the other alternatives and easy format of implementation.

2. On the other hand, shall Yen depreciate against USD, then simply doing nothing would suffice and be the best hedging option.

3. Options contracts should also be considered since they can be not exercised if Yen depreciates against USD. In such a case, only the commission would be lost.

4. All in all, even the best option is highly dependent on the expected exchange rate and an accurate prediction can never be made.

Page 28: Merrill case   final

28

Thank you!