Money is tight, but don't tell the state

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 Money is tight, but don't tell the state

    1/4

    The Morning Call ArchivesCopyright 2010 The Morning Call

    ID: 4613246

    Publication Date: June 7, 2010Day: Monday

    Page: A1

    Edition: FIRST

    Section: News

    Type: Local

    Dateline:

    Column:

    Length: long

    Byline: Christopher Baxter OF THE MORNING CALL

    Headline: Money is tight, but don't tell the state **School districts can't

    cut teachers for financial reasons, but find other ways.

    When Easton Area Superintendent Susan McGinley read each of the 84

    job cuts at a public meeting in April, she noted the district's bleak financialfuture and called the decision "fiscally responsible."

    But when she asked the state to approve the cuts, which will result inteachers and staffers losing their jobs, she said nothing about the need to

    stem the rising cost of contracted salaries and benefits.

    She couldn't. That would be illegal.

    A rule etched into the decades-old Pennsylvania School Code bars districts

    from laying off teachers for financial reasons. So McGinley told the state

    the 73 teaching jobs are being cut to "support our goal of enhancedopportunities for improved student performance."

    "There's a paradox there," said Kevin Deely, head of the Easton teachersunion. "You can't cut for economic reasons, but obviously this is an

    economic reason."

    Faced with some of the toughest budget decisions in recent history,

    Pennsylvania school districts are trimming jobs and programs to balancetheir ledgers. But the argument they make to the state, which must approvethe cuts, is often different from the one they make to the public.

  • 8/9/2019 Money is tight, but don't tell the state

    2/4

    Unable to cite budget troubles, dozens of school districts have applied to

    the Department of Education to change programs and eliminate jobs for

    one of the two reasons allowed under the School Code: decliningenrollment, or the need to better meet state guidelines.

    And for the most part, they have been successful.

    The state received 35 requests for the 2009-10 school year, and has logged44 requests so far for the 2010-11 school year, said Leah Harris,

    spokeswoman for the department. Of the 79 applications, two have been

    denied, Harris said.

    The few rejections suggest the state has been reluctant to meddle in local

    financial affairs, and that most districts that want to make cuts can meetone of the School Code's benchmarks.

    If this year's batch of requests is approved, hundreds of teaching jobs willbe lost next school year, according to applications submitted as of May 20.

    The requests were obtained by The Morning Call under the state's Right to

    Know Law.

    "It's absurd that school districts jump through legislative hoops to pretend

    they're not [cutting for financial reasons] when they really are," said JamesBroussard, head of Citizens Against Higher Taxes, a statewide advocacy

    group.

    Hundreds more secretaries, custodians, maintenance workers and other

    staff employees may also lose their jobs, which districts can cut withoutstate approval and for financial reasons.

    Most, like Thomas Persing, acting superintendent of Bethlehem AreaSchool District, agree with the intent of the School Code rules, meant to

    keep school boards or superintendents from arbitrarily slashing programs

    and teachers.

    But Persing and others argue the provisions are outdated. Burdened by

    unfunded state and federal mandates, which in many cases have led to

    more employees and higher costs, district officials argue they should be

    able to cut back when needed.

    "When you put all that together, frankly, you're almost at wits' end,"

    Persing said. " You want to be legal, ethical, moral. But by the same token,

    in the current fiscal situation we're in, the Legislature is going to have tolook at this seriously."

    The Pennsylvania School Boards Association is lobbying for districts to be

  • 8/9/2019 Money is tight, but don't tell the state

    3/4

    able to lay off for financial reasons. Attorney Sean Fields said most school

    districts making cuts are motivated at least in part by financial pressure.

    The law's supporters, notably state and local teachers unions, say it's an

    important safeguard against school boards whose elected members would

    rather trash programs than raise taxes.

    "Instead of trying to get around what the law says, we should be looking athow we fund our schools," said Michael Crossey, vice president of the

    Pennsylvania State Education Association.

    Easton's Deely said he is concerned about the effectiveness of the rules.

    "I'm hopeful the state will look more closely at a lot of these requests this

    year," he said.

    Among the applications pending before the state:

    The Mountain View School District in Susquehanna County proposeseliminating 13 positions in English, music, business technology, art,

    Spanish, French, Latin, social studies and kindergarten.

    The Newport School District in Perry County wants to drop 12 employees

    in elementary education, high school English, music and technology

    education.

    Locally, the Easton Area, Northampton Area, Bangor Area and Bethlehem

    Area school districts plan to reduce or eliminate programs for acwombined loss of 174 jobs.

    Most of the applications to the state make no reference to financial

    troubles, despite widespread agreement that Pennsylvania districts face

    some of the hardest economic times in recent history.

    The Daniel Boone Area School District in Berks County wants to

    eliminate its full-day kindergarten program and return to half-day classes,cutting five jobs, according to its application to the state.

    To meet the School Code, the district stated the changes would result "in amore efficient and effective educational program." But unlike most other

    applications, it gives another reason.

    "The school district is currently faced with a severe financial crisis and a

    substantial projected budget deficit," which led to a review of all the

    district's programs to find savings, the letter states.

  • 8/9/2019 Money is tight, but don't tell the state

    4/4

    State approval is pending.

    [email protected]

    610-778-2283