16
Most pediatric patients should be treated at proton therapy centers Stella Flampouri July 2020 Yes, because proton therapy is technically superior to photon therapy Protons are more suitable than photons for children in need of radiation treatment 1

Most pediatric patients should be treated at proton

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Most pediatric patients should be treated at proton

Most pediatric patients should be treated at proton therapy centers

Stella Flampouri

July 2020

Yes, because proton therapy is technically superior to photon therapy

Protons are more suitable than photons for children in need of radiation treatment

1

Page 2: Most pediatric patients should be treated at proton

time

Progress in radiotherapy means less dose to non-target tissue.

2

Page 3: Most pediatric patients should be treated at proton

Cylindrical phantom, Ø = 25 cm, l = 25 cmSpherical target, Ø = 5 cm

Proton are ‘technically’ better than photons because they treat the target while irradiating less of non-target tissue or to lower dosesWater phantom example

3

Page 4: Most pediatric patients should be treated at proton

I𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒∗ = 29

𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝐷𝑜𝑠𝑒∗∗= 18

I𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 = 13

𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝐷𝑜𝑠𝑒 = 7

* Irradiated Volume: Volume of phantom receiving dose greater than 5% of prescribed dose in units of target volume

** Integral dose: 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒𝐶𝑦𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 ∙ 𝐷𝑜𝑠𝑒𝐶𝑦𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟, in units of target integral dose (𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑇𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑡 ∙ 𝐷𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑇𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑡)

Single proton field treats target with homogenous dose while irradiating less volume and depositing less energy outside the target

4

Page 5: Most pediatric patients should be treated at proton

I𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒∗ = 29

𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝐷𝑜𝑠𝑒∗∗= 17

I𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 = 18

𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝐷𝑜𝑠𝑒 = 7

For 2 fields, photons treat the target almost as well as protons but do not spare non-target tissues

5

Page 6: Most pediatric patients should be treated at proton

I𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒∗ = 39

𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝐷𝑜𝑠𝑒∗∗= 17

I𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 = 27

𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝐷𝑜𝑠𝑒 = 7

With 4 fields photons are improving

6

Page 7: Most pediatric patients should be treated at proton

I𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒∗ = 56

𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝐷𝑜𝑠𝑒∗∗= 16

I𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 = 43

𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝐷𝑜𝑠𝑒 = 8

Photon state of the art treatments are delivered by arcs. Similar field arrangement with protons still deposits less dose outside the target.

7

Page 8: Most pediatric patients should be treated at proton

I𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒∗ = 56

𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝐷𝑜𝑠𝑒∗∗= 16

I𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 = 26

𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝐷𝑜𝑠𝑒 = 7

Accepting similar proximal non-target dose, protons can deliver the same target dose with partial arcs and spare completely tissues (full photon arc versus 130degree proton arc)

8

Page 9: Most pediatric patients should be treated at proton

Pediatric CNS

Homogeneity Index

Normal Brain Dmean

Superior proton distribution holds not only for the simple example but also patients. It is very difficult to find a dosimetric comparison study that photon dose is better.This is a recent review of dosimetric comparisons between protons and photons for pediatric CNS. Protons better on everything but conformity

9

Page 10: Most pediatric patients should be treated at proton

Lymphoma

Pediatric HL dose comparison. State of the art plans for both modalities

10

Page 11: Most pediatric patients should be treated at proton

kidneys liver

spleen pancreas

This dose comparison includes daily setup errors and their dosimetric effects

11

Page 12: Most pediatric patients should be treated at proton

Lymphoma

Photon dose equivalent per Gy

Neutron dose equivalent per Gy

Not pediatric specific but this study includes integral dose and out of field dose.

12

Page 13: Most pediatric patients should be treated at proton

Another inherent quality of protons is our ability to modulate them in depth, an additional dimension compared to photons

13

Page 14: Most pediatric patients should be treated at proton

There are uncertainties, but proton planning is more advanced than photon planning and takes care of them efficiently. 4D robust optimization is just an example.

14

Page 15: Most pediatric patients should be treated at proton

From PTV optimization we moved to robust optimization and soon to LET-optimization.

15

Page 16: Most pediatric patients should be treated at proton

time

Remember what progress in radiotherapy means!

16