NATURAL APPROACH

NATURAL APPROACHHistory and Background

Characteristics

Roles of Teacher and Learner

Strengths and Weaknesses

Conclusion

HISTORY AND BACKGROUNDIt was developed and published as a book by Mr. Stephen Krashen and Mrs. Tracy Terrell in 1983.

Mr. Stephen Krashen is a famous linguist. He is currently a professor at University of Southern California.

Mrs. Tracy Terrell is an educational theorist and a professor at University of California.

HISTORY AND BACKGROUND

Natural Approach believes that adults can still acquire second languages. The ability of language acquisition does not disappear as we grow up.

HISTORY AND BACKGROUNDAdults have the LAD. Adults also acquire language by following the principles of Universal Grammar.

The different between adult and children acquisition skill is that adults have two things to follow when they learn foreign language: Acquisition and learning. But, children only acquire the languages.

HISTORY AND BACKGROUNDIn the book, Mr. Krashen and Mrs. Terrell consider their approach as a traditional method.

OBJECTIVESTo help adults in learning the foreign language naturally.

The learner will be able to pick up the grammar by themselves when they are ready.

THEORIESThe Acquisition-Learning hypothesis The most basic steps of all in the Krashens theory.Its the most well known among linguists and language practitioners. The learner has two ways of learning the second language, which are the acquired system and the learned system. The monitor hypothesisWhen the learner can check and correct language output.

THEORIESThe Natural Order hypothesis When people acquire language by using grammatical structures in a predictable order.The input hypothesis The acquisition of languages are in a predictable order. Everybody have the same steps of learning acquisition.

THEORIESThe Affective Filter hypothesisWhen the learners emotional state can act as a filter that can prevent input from reaching the learners language acquisition device.Filter is up = Negative emotional factors and they wont acquire language. Filter is down = Learner will learn better.

II. CHARACTERISTICSThe goal of the approach is aimed at the goal of basic personal communication skills conversations, shopping, listening to the radio, etcLearners move through three stages: 1) the preproduction stage is the development of listening comprehension skills, 2) the early production stage, marked with errors, 3) the last stage extends the production into longer stretches of discourse.The teacher needs to focus on meaning, not on form.The teacher does not correct errors.The most noteworthy characteristic is its advocacy of a silent period, where preproduction can begin.

6. The silent period encourages the delay of oral production until speech emerges.7. The Natural Approach encourages the teacher not to insist that learners speak right away.8. The Natural Approach blends well with things like TPR, which builds the learners language ego, and does not force them into risk-taking situations which could embarrass them.

III. ROLES OF TEACHER AND LEARNERTeacher:Act as an authority in the classImitate the first language learning process Creatively instruct students to do activities that benefit the language learning.Student:Responds to the teacher by physical action Interact to teacher and other students

IN CLASS ACTIVITIESFor beginners: Pointing, handing objects, writing or drawing , standing, walking, sitting downFor advanced learners: Like listening n reading tasks that learners order pictures, follow written instruction or maps.

IV. STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSESStrengths This method is very easy.Reliable as its widely usedTheres no grammar instruction in this method.

WeaknessesIt takes long time and learner can do only elementary things.It does not suit for those who do not have much time.The method rarely concerns about correctness.

TECHNIQUES INVOLVEDUsing inputs like pictures, objects

Mime

Body language

Audio-visual aids

Memorizing

V. CONCLUSIONThe Natural Approach has, like all other methods, certain strengths and weaknesses. Its strengths seem to be the avoidance of risk-taking activities that could damage a learners language ego and develop negative mindsets toward the target language. Therefore, the Natural Approach excels in building a safe environment for the learner, which may be beneficial in the end for ultimate language acquisition.

However, the Natural Approach has serious flaws. Because it focuses on the emergence of language, which is a moment that will differ for each learner, it may be difficult for the teacher to manage an entire classroom. Furthermore, there is a question about how exactly the learner will discern the grammatical structures of the language without direct instruction. As one critic wrote, The decision of which structures to use appears to be left to some mysterious sort of intuition.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

*