39
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)Academic Performance Index (API)

SAIT TrainingSeptember 27, 2007

Page 2: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)vs.

Academic Performance Index (API)

Understanding the Difference

Page 3: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Contents:

1. Federal Testing Accountability:

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) 2. Review of AYP Progress Report from

Spring 2007 Testing 3. State Testing Accountability: Academic

Performance Index (API)4. Review of API Progress Report from

Spring 2007 Testing 5. Preventing “Leakage”6. Summary

Page 4: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Federal Testing Accountability

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Page 5: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO)

All Title I Schools must meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) school wide.

Failure to meet AYP for two consecutive years in a single curricular area or AYP component will move a school into Program Improvement (PI) status.

Curricular Areas: Language Arts and Math

Page 6: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Exiting Program Improvement (PI)

To exit PI status, a PI school must meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in each AYP component for two consecutive years.

Page 7: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

AYP Criteria for Elementary/Middle School:

1. Participation Rate:

95% participation rate must be met in

CSTs (and CAPA) for all 2nd -8th graders

and for

each “significant” sub group.

Page 8: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

AYP Criteria Elementary/Middle School: Annual Measurable Outcomes (AMO)

ELA ’07= 24.4% ’08= 35.2% ’09= 46.0%

Mathematics ’07=26.5% ’08=37.0% ’09=47.5%

2. Testing Proficiency (AMO): Minimum Percentage of students at Proficient to Advanced levels of the California Standards Test (CST)

Page 9: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Figure #2- California Standards Test (CST) Levels: Language Arts

Far Below Basic Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced

150 to 268 269 to 299 300 to 349 350 to 392 393 to 600

State Target for

All Students

Page 10: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

AYP Criteria for Elementary/Middle School/High School:

3. Academic Performance Index (API) Elementary, Middle and High School

levels:

Minimal School API Score of 590 (620 in Spring ‘08)

Or

Increase of 1 API point per year

Page 11: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

ALL Title I Schools are accountable for significant subgroups

If a Title I School has a subgroup population which is:

100 students or greater who are to be STAR tested,

or

99 to 50 students which represent at least 15% of the total number

of students to be tested,

the subgroup must meet:

Participation Rate and

Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO) Proficiency Rates.

Page 12: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

3 Key Subgroups

English Learners Socio Economically Disadvantaged Special Education

Page 13: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Key Subgroup: EL Students

Includes RFEPS.

Page 14: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Key Subgroup: Socio Economically Disadvantaged

Free and Reduced Lunch. Parents did not graduate from High

School.

Page 15: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Key Subgroup: Special Education

Any student with an IEP. Exited Special Ed Students count for

Proficiency (2 years max). Math Proficiency Provision.

Page 16: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Review New AYP Report

2006-2007 Accountability Progress Report

Page 17: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Academic Performance Index (API)

California State Testing Accountability

Page 18: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

The Big Two: Elementary & Middle School API Component Breakdown

1. ELA CST: 50%2. Math CST EOC: 30%

Page 19: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

API Participation Rate: Elementary & Middle

School

85% participation rate must be met in California Standards Tests

(CST) Grade Level Examsexcludes End of Course tests (EOC)

Page 20: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Calculating API

Key to Understanding API Growth

Page 21: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Academic Performance Index (API) Criteria: Quintile Rankings based on ELA CST

Quintile API Weights

5 1000

4 875

3 700

2 500

1 200

Advanced

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic

Far Below Basic

Page 22: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Academic Performance Index (API) Criteria: Quintile Rankings based on Math CST

Quintile API Weights

5 1000

4 875

3 700

2 500

1 200

Advanced

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic

Far Below Basic

100

200

400

100

200

Numbers of Students

Page 23: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Academic Performance Index (API) Criteria:Quintile Rankings based on ELA CST

Quintile API Weights Gain in API Weight

5 1000 125

4 875 175

3 700 200

2 500 300

1 200 N/A

Advanced

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic

Far Below Basic

Page 24: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Figure #1- California Standards Test (CST) Levels: Language Arts

Far Below Basic Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced

150 to 268 269 to 299 300 to 349 350 to 392 393 to 600

State Target for All Students

API

For Academic Performance Index

(API), greatest gains will occur when

moving students from the lowest CST

levels due to weighting factors.

Page 25: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Review New API Report

2006-2007 Accountability Progress Report

Page 26: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Meeting AYP and

Generating API:

Preventing “Leakage”

Page 27: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

“Leakage”AYP

Two Reasons AYP is not met: 1. Failure to move Basic students to

Proficiency. 2. Having students “leak” multiple

quintile levels out of proficiency.

Page 28: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Figure #2- California Standards Test (CST) Levels: Language Arts

Far Below Basic Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced

150 to 268 269 to 299 300 to 349 350 to 392 393 to 600

State Target for

All Students

Page 29: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

“Checking for Leaks”: XXXX Middle School Spring 2004 to Spring 2005 CST results Targeted Intervention Program in Math 50 students moved to CST proficiency 60 students move out of CST proficiency Net Growth of Proficient students in

Math: -10

Page 30: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

“Leakage”API

Two Reasons API drops: 1. Failure to move students from Far

Below Basic to Below Basic. 2. Having students “leak” multiple

quintile levels.

Page 31: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Academic Performance Index (API) Criteria:Quintile Rankings and Weights

Quintile API Weights Gain in API Weight

5 1000 125

4 875 175

3 700 200

2 500 300

1 200 N/A

Advanced

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic

Far Below Basic

Page 32: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Preventing “Leaks”:

Early monitoring of proficient and above students with student work and the periodic assessments in ELA and Math.

Provide early differentiated instruction for struggling proficient students in IWT.

Page 33: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

To Insure API Growth, While Implementing the Core Program Elements with Fidelity, Consider:

Fully Reviewing School-wide

Intervention Program, including IWT.

Page 34: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Prevent Leakage:Elementary CST Comparison Data.Procedure to create an SIS report which compares two or more years of CST data for individual students.

Type/Press:Main Screen- #7Testing Menu-#4CST Menu-#2Current Teacher ReportAll or Specific Room- Press Enter

Checking for “Leaks”: Elementary

Page 35: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

ID99,2 <F1> (current year) <F2> <F10> <F2> “1” (for active) (enter today’s date) <F2> <F2><F2>“2” (select by class number)“Y” (enter by district course #)310102 – Grade 6 Math310104 - Grade 7 Math310302 – Algebra I310318 – Algebra Readiness <F2> (proceed to next step) “T” (sort by teacher) Press enter (Do start a new page or switch to Don’t)<F4> (create a new report)Type in title, then enter

Checking for “Leaks”: Secondary

Page 36: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Key to Meeting AYP and Generating API:

Positive Annual Gains

Page 37: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Goal:

Move One Testing Level Per Year regardless of assessed level.

Page 38: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Figure #1- California Standards Test (CST) Levels: Language Arts

Far Below Basic Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced

150 to 268 269 to 299 300 to 349 350 to 392 393 to 600

State Target for All Students

Page 39: State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007

Wade Hayashida

Categorical Program Coordinator Local District 8310 354 3416

[email protected]