Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
November 2, 2102
Mr. Cliff Guffey President American Postal Workers
Union, AFL-CIO 1300 L Street, NW Washington, DC 20005-4128
Dear Cliff:
Certified Mail Tracking Number: 7011 2000 0002 7189 8794
As information, enclosed is a copy of the first Post Implementation Review for the Lancaster, Pennsylvania Processing & Distribution Center (P&DC) Area Mail Processing (AMP).
If you have any questions, please contact Rickey Dean at extension 7 412.
Sincerely,
Patrick M. Devine Manager Contract Administration (APWU)
Enclosure
(CA2012-838)
Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating
Facility Name & Type: Lancaster P&DF
Street Address: 1400 Harrisburg Pike
City: Lancaster
State: PA 50 Facility ZIP Code: 17604
District: Central Pennsylvania Area: Eastern
Finance Number: 414409
Current 30 ZIP Code(s): 174-176
Miles to Gaining Facility: 40.2
EXFC office: Yes
Plant Manager: Brian Stewart (A)
Senior Plant Manager: Christine Goughler
District Manager: Dale Walker
Facility Name & Type: Harrisburg P&DC
Street Address: 1425 Crooked Hill Road
City: Harrisburg
State: PA 50 Facility ZIP Code: 17107
District: Central Pennsylvania
Area: Eastern
Finance Number: 413485
Current 30 ZIP Code(s): 170-173, 178
EXFC office: Yes
Plant Manager: Christine Goughler
Senior Plant Manager: Christine Goughler
District Manager: Dale Walker
3~ Background Information Approval Date: June 24, 2011
Implementation Date: Jan-01-2012
PIR Type: 1st PIR
Date Range of Data: Jan-01-2012: Jun-30-2012
Processing Days per Year: 310
Bargaining Unit Hours per Year: 1,742
EAS Hours per Year: 1,819
Date of HQ memo, DAR Factors/Cost of Borrowing! New Facility Start-up Costs Update
Date & Time this workbook was last saved:
4. Other.Informaflon Area Vice President:
Vice President, Network Operations: Area AMP Coordinator:
NAI Contact:
Jordan M. Small
David E. Williams
Bob Roseberry
Barbara Brewington
May 7, 2010
~--------------------------1 09-26-2012 12:43
PIR Data Entry Page
Approval Signatures
Finance Numoor: SCF ZIP Cooe(&l.
of Distribution Consolidated;
Financf!! Numoor: SCF ZIP Code(st:
nl"'"''""lu>tinn Date:
Plant
St:mitn Plant Manager:
District
Area President:
Executive Summary Last Saved: September 26, 2012 Date Range of Data
Losing Facility Name and Type: Street Address:
City:
State:
Current SCF ZIP Code(s):
Type of Distribution Consolidated:
Gaining Facility Name and Type: Street Address:
City:
State:
Savings/Costs
Staffing
Service
Function 1 Workhour Savings
Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings (less Maint/Trans)
PCES/EAS Workhour Savings
Transportation Savings
Maintenance Savings
Space Savings
Total Annual Savings
Total One-Time Costs
Total First Year Savings
Craft Position Loss
PCES/EAS Position Loss
First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 0/N)
First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 2 Day)
First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 3 Day)
Customer Experience Measurement Overall Satisfaction Residential at PFC level
Customer Experience Measurement Overall Satisfaction Small Business at PFC level
3
Lancaster P&DF 1400 Harrisburg Pike Lancaster PA 174-176
Originating
Harrisburg P&DC 1425 Crooked Hill Road
Losing Current Qtr Gaining Current Qtr
97.30% 98.18%
95.31% 96.57%
93.03% 94.60%
93.71%
86.63%
PIR Type: 1st PIR Jan-01-2012 - Jun-30-2012
from Service Performance & CSM
from Semce Performance & CSM
from Service Performance & CSM
from Service Performance & CSM
from Semce Performance & C SM
PIR Executive Summary
Calculatioo Befereoces Combined Losing and Gaining Facility Data: PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR
Function 1 Workhour Costs $61,801,090 $59,714,566 $58,837,061 Non-Processing Craft Workhour Costs
$1,582,783 $1,585,784 $1,544,267 (less Maintenance & Transportation)
PCES/EAS Workhour Costs $7,950,011 $7,927,967 $7,818,656 Transportation Costs $8,428,407 $8,324,084 $8,513,973
Maintenance Costs $21 ,835,058 $21,533,308 $20,798,205 Space Savings $0 $0 $0
Total Annual Cost $101,597,348 $99,085,709 $97,512,161
Total One-Time Costs $0 $1,524,135 $1 '190,836
Total First Year Costs $101,597,348 $100,609,844 $98,702,997
Staffing
Craft Position Total On-Rolls 1 '129 1 '101 1 '114 PCES/EAS Position Total On-Rolls 81 85 70
1st PIR vs Proposed 1st PIR vs Pre-AMP {A~~roved) AMP Approved AMP
Function 1 Workhour Savings $2,964,029 $877,505 $2,086,524 Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings $38,515 $41,517 ($3,002) (less Maintrrrans)
PCES/EAS Workhour Savings $131,356 $109,312 $22,044 Transportation Savings ($85,566) ($189,889) $104,323
Maintenance Savings $1,036,853 $735,103 $301,750 Space Savings $0 $0 $0
Total Annual Savings $4,085,187 $1,573,548 $2,511,639
Total One-Time Costs ($1 '190,836) $333,299 ($1,524,135)
Total First Year Savings $2,894,351 $1,906,847 $987,504
Staffing Craft Position Loss 15 (13) 28
PCES/EAS Position Loss 11 15 (4)
PIR Executive Summary
4
Summary Narrative Last Saved: September 26, 2012
Losing Facility Name and Type: Lancaster P&DF Current SCF ZIP Code(s): 17 4-176
Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating
Gaining Facility Name and Type: Harrisburg P&DC Current SCF ZIP Code(s): 170-173, 178
5
Background:
The Eastern Area. with the assistance of the Central Pennsylvania District. has completed the first Post Implementation Review (PIR) of the Area Mail Processing (AMP) that consolidated originating mail from the Lancaster P&DC into the LeGree S. Daniels (Harrisburg) P&DC. The data for the pre-AMP period was January 01, 2010 though December 31, 2010 and included all operations for the Lancaster P&DC and the LeGree S. Daniels P&DC. The transfer of originating mail began on December 24. 2011. The data for the 6-month PIR is Jan 1, 2012 thru June 30, 2012.
Financial Summary:
Total Annual Savings
Total First Year Savings
151 PIR Vs Pre-AMP
$4,085,187
$2,894,351
Customer Service Considerations:
1"1 PIR Vs Approved
$1,573,548
$1,906,847
The EXFC overnight, 2-day and 3-day mail service performance is shown below.
Loncaster PS.DF
Fiscal Overnight 2 Day 3 o .. y Oua.rtar Pe,.centaoe Parcenta.ae Percentaao
022011 97 34 93.98 BB. !9
Be'fore AMP 03 2011 97 70 94 ae 91.70
042011 98 23 93.11 91 02
01 2012 96.85 92 39 90.12
02 2012 97 84 95 39 91.94
After AMP 032012 97 30 95 31 93.03
04 2012
_ __9_1.~-- L...-..--. -
After AMP
01 2013
PIR Summary Narrative
6
Transportation Changes:
HCR PIR vs Pre AMP shows a cost of ($85,566). The transportation loss for the PIR review is in PVS operations. No new routes were added in either site. The over-run for PVS costs are due the placement of the FSS Phase 2 testing and the addition of the destinating priority operations at the Lancaster Plant. The difference in the proposed and actual PVS was due to the fact VITAL had inaccurate mileages on the 4533s when the AMP study was done.
Total Transportation
(15) (16)
1st PIR vs 1st PIR vs PreAMP Proposed
HCR $22,094 ($75,045) PVS $63,473 $264,935
Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation (PVS & HCR): $85,566
Staffing Impacts:
The approved AMP proposal identified a reduction of 28 craft employees and an increase of 4 EAS employees. Complement data at the end of the first PIR period shows that complement has only decreased by 15 craft employees. The additional positions in the LeGree S. Daniels P&DC are due to the PSE hiring prior to the AMP implementation. The EAS staffing has been reduced by 26 total positions in both gaining and losing facilities.
1 Craft = all categories 2 Craft= F1 + F4 at Losing; F1 only at Gaining
Maintenance Impacts:
The Maintenance savings PIR vs Pre-AMP is $1,036,853 and PIR vs Approved savings is $735,103.
Space Impacts and One-Time Facilitv Costs:
The approved AMP projected $1,524,135 for projected one-time costs. The proposed costs were for facility modification and MPE relocation. The total costs incurred were $1,190,836. Although proposed, there were no employee relocation costs for this AMP.
PIR Summary Narrative
Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement Last Saved: September 26, 2012
PIR Type: 1st PIR Implementation Date: 01/01/12
Losing Facility: Lancaster P&DF District: Central Pennsylvania
After AMP
Gaining Facility: Harrisburg P&DC District: Central Pennsylvania
After AMP
(15) Notes: _____________________ _
~"<:;entre~ '..t:~nn~}'llf_a~i.CI ... I CEM Q3 2012 !Customer Satisfaction Measurement (CSM) became Customer Experience Measurement i :2010. Data reflects most recently completed quarter available in CEM.
~- auestion # /R;;~~~~}~-Pr::~:~:~:~:· 1-------------+---·---r-·~---~-·-
~---O!_ ___ L 93.71% 1 86.63% Overall Satisfaction (Overall Experience)
1- Q4a I 95.77% I 90.62% Satisfaction wrth Receiving (Experience wtth receiving)
f· Q8a ~i.~l- 88 32~- Satisfaction wtth Sending (Experience wtth sending)
! Q12a ·j' 91.38% j 85.88% Satisfaction wrth most frequently visrted PO (Experience wtth most frequently visrted PO)
! Q16a . 68.09% I 61.27% Satisfaction wrth most recent contact wtth USPS (Experience wtth most recent contact wrtt i-----o1s-~--88.s2%-·-y---S3.60% Likely to recommend the USPS
7 PIR Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement
I Combine~ilw;;-u--~ ---~
Type of Distribution Consolidated: Ongma1mg
~ENUAUZED_~ J L _ANNUALIZED
Wor1<.hour Costs • Combined Facilities Last Save& Septl!!mb~r 26, 2012
Functio'01 ,..--- -·---Function 4
t1 l$45 53 I G$39 05 41 L$35 31 G-WA
12 L~18/G~25 ., " L$45 ~7 r GS4S 07 43 L$353/G-NIA
14 L~52S/G$<417 «
" #VALUE~ .. l-N/AIG$3508
" " 17 L1431t/G.$397 47
" l$41 22/GS-4067 48~-N/A I
PIR Type": ""~"s!:.:::c:~CiRp,..,R,-:o::;:~;c:,mn=•-::~-:..,:::,c:,al:;;o:;:"'=toc:cFc::,":;o'p'R
Date Range of Data: Jan-01-2012 to Jun-30~2012
c:=:!'~_.J c:::__ ANNOALlZED ~:.::J
PlR Workhour Costs- Combined Facilities
PIR Work hour Costs- Combmed Fac11!t!es
P!R Workhour Costs- Combined FaCJhtJes
(1) I. ~~·~··:m...~.·--~i A~3~HPVotu~ (() 'If ifF ~·.l~TPHf6!rN~TPHJ~ume {7) I AnnuaiWofl<hours
10 -:---rrn---T A~oducUv~ ]'1'3} Annu.:i~ r - ''{1i
P,...... I 1otPtRt P"'AMP l .,...... I 1stPIR U PaiiMP j p,.,.,.,_, htPIR P4'0AMP ,.,.,....., tstPIR PreAMP P- I 1otPIR
g 1----i~!H----- - $0
0 • $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 • $0 0 $0 $0 0 • $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 • $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 • $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 . $0
0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 "$0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0. $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0
~~~~i h.~1.tl41.~~: l u_s1.tl41.731 I "400.171.572 h 4,001,%$4,8~~~+-~--.. -00-1-.tM-... -.~-,--.-.• -..,-.• -.-3.-13-.111'""--,-,Il-~-3-,51-4-,~-,---,-~-•. -54~~:+----,-.• -1-6.-17-1 1 ____ j-- J
~~~.V~rl~~H or NATPH VofurM Valiartcu Annuaf WorthOOrs
(10) Change I (19) I (20) Change J (21) (22) ;Propo .. (! Analy~is 1atP!RvsPr•AMP 1•tP!Rv&PTopo..O Ana~is 1atP!~vsPreAMP 1•tPIJCtv•Pr~Md _j) Anatv$is I 1stP!RvsPr•AMP ) 1&tPIRv•F'ropoM<f )) Anaty$is J 1JtPIRv•Pr•AMP ) 1•tF>tRv•Pr~ (51,67<l.150) UnKs I 242,398.250 I 242,398,250 UnKs (97.343) (S-370!1 I UnKs 353 188 I I UnKs l ($2,964,029) ($877 ,505)
-----'--------'----6_% __ _, !'e.-cent I 6.1% j 6.1% Pe.-cent I -<;.4% I -0.&"/, II Pe<cent I 13.3% I 6.7% II Pe.-cent l -4.8% I -1.5%
(27) NOTES:
"'"'~
11
P! R Workhour Costs - Combmed F ac1hties
Lo$ing Facility: Lancaster P&OF
Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originatmg
Workhour Costs -Losing Facility Last SaYed Septerrber 26,2012
11 ~.:).,1
12 $48.18 13 ~.47
14 $45.25 16 $37.21 1t
17 $.43.18
PIR Type•: ""~"'s;';:,~C::,',o-;RP,.IR0<X>l=u:::mn::::,:-:,::c.,=,u:;a;;;lg:::adnto;:;r<'F=••t PIR
Date Range of Data: Jan-01-2012 to Jun-30-2012
P!R Workhour Costs - Lostng
PIR Workhour Costs- Losing
(1) ~=~cc , ; Annuo~~PVo~i !"I
~::; ~ ~ Pri$AMP PtopoMd htPIR
Ad,
Totals
Change Analysis
Unfts
Percent
379,064,130
r v .. u, ........ ~ AAnwd FHP Votume
(17) I (18) 111:PlRvsPro.AW 1a:tP1Rvs~
(11l,M7,.4&8)j 18,W4.487
·229% SO%
I 1,467,01!1,97'
---Change Analysis
Units
Percant
~ AMP
Annual Worl<hours
Propooed
10) II {11) I ·ttn· ~ : ' l {13' Annuat Productivity
1stPIR 'I P(&
I ~ca~l 1stPIR
14) I 1:!~ <I 11-51 Annual Worlrhour Cocta
PmAMP - 15t:PIR
$0 $0 No Calc NOCaiC
$0 $0 $0 $0
0
1.115,09~. 1,1a.& .......... m.l r 479,3391 m.11s1 l83,852tr 3,0571 3,2631 3,091 . $20,~51,9&9 $15,101
--- J -- l -...._ I i or NATPH-V~u~ Variances Ann~ Workhours Variances Annual ProducttVitV Variance• 1 Workhour •a.ta
4!-"lt'lo ~~· A~A ~.u ..... 7.251 $17,020,357
(19) I (20) Change I (21) J (22) Change I (23) T (24) Change (25) I (26) 1st PtR vs Pr~ AMP 1st PfR vs PropoMO Analysis 1st P1R vs Pre ANP 1st PtR 'If. Propoud Analysis 1st ptR >n Pre AI# 1st PJR w Propo:tMd Analy$is 1R PfR vs Pre AMP 1st PIR yt; Pr~
(2110,543,333)1 21,383,.04 UnitJ I (95,99711 26,737 Units I 34 f (172) Units ($3.231.612) $1,913,106
~19.1% I 1.8% Percent I -10J}% I 7.5% Percent ! 1.1% [ -5.3% Percent +H>.O% I UJ%
(27)NOTES'-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14 PlR Workhour Costs- Los1ng
Gaining Facility: Hamsburg P&DC
Type of Distribution Cons-olidated: Ongtnatmg
Worl<hour Costs -Gaining Facility Last Saved September 26,2012
PIR Type•: i~'='::.:::-:,',:-;RP""IR=w:;:-u:=mo::cs:-:~::-a:::o:;;ou::::a:;::lg::::ed:;-ro;;::,,-,F'="':7' PIR
Date Range of Data: J.an-01..-2012 to Jun..J0-2012
PIR Workhour Costs - Gaining
P!R Wori<.hour Costs - Ga1ning
.........
PIR Workhour Costs - Gaining
(1) m 4 • m 8 10 11 121 13 14 ~rtsl 1 Annu.a.l FHP Yotume Annu'" TPH Of NA TPH Votum& Annual WoOI.hours Annual ProductMty Annual Wortthour Costs
-~ Operlltlon Pf<>AMP ? Proposed 1st PIR PreAMP Proposed 1st PlR ~reAMP Propooed 1stPIR Pf<>AMP Propooed 1stPIR Pro AMP Pr- 1stPIR . ...,.,.,. ·. 0 No Cal<; $0 $0
0 N<>Cak; $0 $0 Ad! 0 $0
Totals '• 959,910,133 1 ,Oact,l72,088 1,021,107,442 2,$34,234,911 2,S36,161,S.t 3,0S7,176,494 1,033,675 1,067.~7 1,032,319 2,462 2,657 2,961 W.$4t.•tt $44,607,315 $41,816,704
-............. l ---- 1 --- J -- I -- T Variance-s Annual FHP Volume Varl~ Annual TPH or NATPH Volume Variance:$ Annual Workhoun Variances Annual P~~uctlvltv Variances Annual Workhour Costs
Change {17) {1S) Change (19) (20) Cllange (21) (22) Change (23) (24) Change (25) (26) Analysi$ 1m PtR" Pre ANP 1R: Plfl: n PropoMd Analysjs 1st ptR: V$ PT. A.MP 1st PlR,... Proposed Analysis 1st P1R: n Pnt AM> 1stf>tR:vsPropowd Analysis 1st P1R vs PTe AMP 1stP1R.\11;Propowd Analysfs 1st Pm \IS Pre ANP 1s:t P1R ~ Propost'd.
Units &1.197,309 (69,7M ...... ) Units 522,941,563 221,014,846 Units (1.356) (35,108) Units 510 304 Units $267,583 {$2.790,611)
Percent 64% -64% Percent I 20.6% I 7.6% Percent -0,1% I -3,3% Percent I 20.8.% I 11,5% Percent I 0.6% I -f3.3%
(V)NOTES: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___
18 P!R Workhour Costs- Gatntng
[ Other Workhour Move Analysis I Losing Facility Lancaster P&DF Harrisburg P&DC 01/01112 to 06/30/12
PIR Other Workhour Costs
Totals 165,358 148,580 155,012 ' $7,441,503 $6,655,723 $7,050,512 Totals 358,543 365,215 355,623 $16,027,073 $16,342,162 $16,016,647
20
P!R OthPr Wnrl.-hr."r f'r.d"
PIR Other Wmi<hour Costs
Totals 53,668 41,293 43.373 $2,704,634 $2,109,006 $2,193,994 Totals 108,306 120,681 110,779 $5,245,378 $5,818,962 $5,624.661
22
PIR Other Worl<hour Costs
[ Distribution to Other PIR Worksheet Tabs I
23
P!R OthAr Wnrlo:-hn, orr,..._,..,
-1 78
145"''
·2 59
-165
-936 -1 79
Losing Facility Summary
24
PIR Other Worl<hour Costs
Staffing - Craft Last Saved: September 26, 2012
PIR Type: 1st PIR Data Extraction Date: 07/17/12
Losing Facility: Lancaster P&DF Finance#: 414409
(1) (2) (3} (4) (5} I {6 •· (7) I (8) (9)
Casuai/PSE Qn-R()IIS Part TimE On-Rolls Full Time On-Rolls Total Qn-Rolls Craft Positions
PreAMP 1st PIR PreAMP 1st PIR PreAMP 1st PIR PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR
!Function 1 -Clerk 0 0 0 0 .1!51 129 158 134 129 I FLJilction 4 _Cielj< 0 0 [) 0 0 0 0 iFl:l!1_ctio_n 1 - Mail Handler 3 3 7 10! _93 119 100 1_Q~ I Function 4 - Mail Handler 0 0 J 0 0 0 0 0 'Function 3A- Vehicle Service 0 0 2 0 12 14 .·.· 14 14 14 ,Function 3B- Maummc:ulet:
~I ~ 0 0 69 65 69 63 66
Functions 67-69- Lmtd/Rehab/WC 0 0 1 1 1 Other Functions Q 0 4 4 I. 4 _4_ !Total 3 4( 9 7 353 306 ·.· ~!5 316 _317 --- ]
'go OQOW oq Total On-Rolls.
Change (10) (11)
Analysis 1st PIR vs 1st vs PreAMP
c ...... (48) 1 Percent -1~% 0.3%
Gaining Facility: Harrisbur9 P&DC Finance#: 413485
(12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20)
Casuai/PSE On-Rolls Part Time On-Rolls Full Time On-Rolls Total On-Rolls Craft Positions
PreAMP 1st PIR PreAMP 1st PIR PreAMP 1st PIR PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR
I Function 1 - Clerk 35 67 0 0 286 293 321 331 360 !Function 1 -_Mail_ Handler 26 24 19 19 205 209 250 258 252 I Function 3A- Vehicle Service 0 0 0 32 32 35 35 32 !Function 3B- Ma1 '"'"""""'
~ :, ( 0 15( 138 150 153 145
!Functions 67-69- LmttJI"\ehab/WC ( 0 0 1 1 0 Other Functions ( _0 8 7 7 8 Total .61 98 22 19 681 680 !64 785 797
--- ~ l Harrisburg includes employees from concurrent Reading AMP Variances Total 0 "toll:.
~·---~-·-·--~~-·-~-"'-'*'-·-~ .. (21) (22) I (23) I (24) I Change
1st PIR vs 1st PIR vs
! 1st PIR vs Pre AMP ! 1st PIR vs Pro~sed ! Analysis PreAMP Proposed I
Total Craft Position Loss:! 15 ! (13) ! Positions 33 12
L~-~-~-~-~-~-L-,_,_,_,_,_J Percent 4.3% 1.5% (Above numbers are carried forward to the Executive Summary)
rev41~110
25 PIR Staffing- Craft
Staffing - PCES/EAS
Losing Facility: Lancaster P&DF Data Extraction Date· 7/1412012
PCES/EAS Positions Authorized
(1) (2) (3}
LinE Position Title Level PreAMP
1 MGR PROCESSING/DISTRIBUTION EAS-25 1 2 MGR MAINTENANCE EAS-22 1 3 MGR IN-PLANT SUPPORT EAS-21 1 4 MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS-20 2 5 MGR TRANSPORTATION/NETWORKS EAS-18 1 6 OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS-17 I 3 7 SUPV DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS-17 I 11 8 SUPV MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS-17 4 9 SUPV TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS EAS-17 1 10 NETWORKS SPECIALIST EAS-16 1 11 SECRETARY (FLD) EAS-12 1 12 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (FLD) EAS-12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 32 33 34 I 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42
43 44 45 46 47
48 49
50 51 52 53
54 55
56 57 = 58 59
60 Totals 27
26
Last Saved: September 26, 2012
PIR Type: 1st PIR
Finance# _4_1_44_0;_9 ____ _
Staffing On-Rolls
(4) ($) (6) (7)
1st P!R PreAMP Propo•ed 1stPIR
1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 3 3 2 3
11 12 10 9 4 w 4 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
§ 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f 0 0 II 0 0
I~ 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 28 24 19
~ Variances Total On-Rolls
(15) (16)
Change 1st PIR vs 1stPIR vs Anatysis PreAMP Propo.ed
Positions (9) (5) Percent -32.1% -20.8%
PIR Staffing - P ES/EAS
27
Gaining Facility: Hanisburg P&OC Data Extraction Date:
Finance# ..;.4.:..13:..;48;,;:c.:..5 ____ _
PCES/EAS Positions Authorized
~ On-Rolls
Staffing
(19) (20) (21} (22) (2.) (25)
lin Position Title Level PreAMP 1st PIR Proposed 1st PIR
1 SR PLANT MANAGER (2) PCES-01 1 1 1 0
2 MGR IN-PLANT SUPPORT EAS-25 1 1 1 1
3 MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS-24 1 1
~~ 1 1
4 MGR MAINTENANCE (LEAD) EAS-24 t=+=t=+= 1 1
5 MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS-22 2 1
6 MGR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS-21 3 2
7 OPERATIONS INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER (FI EAS-21 3 3 3 3 3
8 MGR MAINT ENGINEERING SUPPORT EAS-20 1 1 1 1 1
9 MGR TRANSPORTATION/NETVVORKS EAS-20 1 1 1 1 1 10 OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS-20 1 1 1 1 1
11 MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING SPECIALIST EAS-19 1 1 1 1
12 MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS-19 2 0 m 2 0
13 MGR FIELD MAINT OPRNS (LEAD) EAS-19 1 1 1 1
14 MGR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SUPPT EAS-19 1 1 1 1
15 OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS-18 2 2 2 2
16 OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS-17 2 2 2 2
17 SUPV DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS-17 23 24
~ 23 19
18 SUPV MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS-17 10 10 10 7
19 SUPV TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS EAS-17 2 2 2 2
20 NETWORKS SPECIALIST EAS-16 1 1 1 1
21 SECRETARY (FLO) EAS-12 1 0 1 1 0
22 MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS-20 2 2
23 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (FLO) EAS-12 1 1
24 0 0
25 0 0
26 0 0
27 0 0
28 0 0
29 0 0
30 0 0
31 0 0
32 0 0
33 0 0
34 0 0
35 0 0
36 0 0
37 0 0
38 0 0
39 0 0
40 0 0
41 0 0
42 0 0
43 0 0
44 0 0 45 0 0 46 0 0 47 0 0 48 0 0 49 0 0 50 0 0 51 0 0 52 0 0 53 0 0 54 0 0 55 0 0 56 0 0 57 0
~ 0
58 0 0 59 I 0 0 60 0 0
Totals tj' I o1 0;:1 I b' ~
~ Variances Total On-Rolls
(33) (3<)
Change 1st PIR vs 1st PIR vs
Anatys~ Pre AMP Proposed
Positions (2) (10) Percent -3.8% -16.4%
r·----------------~----------·---~-·-----·-·---~ j Total PCES/EAS' (37> ' (3S) '
j Position Lossj 11 j 15 j ~-----------------~--------------1-------------~ (Above numbers are carried forward to the Executive Summary)
PIR Staffing - PCES/EAS
Transportation - PVS Last Saved: September 26, 2012
Losing Facility: Lancaster P&DF Finance Number: ...:4~1~44.:..0::..:9::._ _____ _
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Variance 1st Variance 1st
PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR PIR vs Pre PIRvs AMP Pronosed
PVS Owned Equipment Seven Ton Trucks 4 4 4 0 0
Eleven Ton Trucks 1 1 0 (1) (1)
Single Axle Tractors 3 3 3 0 0
Tandem Axle Tractors 1 1 1 0 0
Spotters 1 1 1 0 0
PVS Transportation ·. '
Number of Schedules 20 18 23 3 5
Total Annual Mileage 52,521 42,697 129,127 $76,606 $86,430
Total Mileage Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PVS Leases Total Vehicles Leased 0 0 0
Total Lease Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PVS Workhour Costs LDC 31 (617, 679, 764) $141,237 $120,051 $149,143 $7,906 $29,092
LDC 34 (765, 766) $1,201,843 $1,021,566 $1,288,781 $86,938 $267,214
Total Workhour Costs $1 .. 343,0~ $1,141 ,6'!!_ $1,437,924 $94,844 $296,306
(11) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-PVS Savings: $63,473 (This number added to the Executive Summary
1st PIR PIR Type: ___ .:....:...;._:...;.__ __
Date Range of Data: Jan-01-2012 ----------Gaining Facility: Harrisburg P&DC
Finance Number: 413485 ---------(6) (7)
PreAMP Proposed
PVS Owned Equipment ..
Seven Ton Trucks 8 8 Eleven Ton Trucks 0 0 Single Axle Tractors 8 8 Tandem Axle Tractors 0 ·. 0 Spotters I '•2 2
PVS Transportation I Number of Schedules 43. 43 Total Annual Mileage 258,036 258,038
Total Mileage Costs 0 $0
PVS Leases Total Vehicles Leased 0 0
Total Lease Costs $0 $0
PVS Workhour Costs LDC 31 (617, 679, 764) $477,858 $477,858
LDC 34 (765, 766) $2,581,457 $2,581,457
Total Workhour Costs $3,039,315 $3,039,315
-to - Jun-30-2012
(8) (9) Variance 1st
PIR PIR vs Pre AMP
8 0 0
8 0 0
2 0
41 (2)
223,822 (34,216)
$0 $0
0
$0 $0
$532,161 $54,303
$2,475,782 ($85,6751
$3,007,943 ($31,372)
(10) Variance 1st
PIRvs Prooosed
0
0
0
(2)
(34,216)
$0
$0
$54,303
($85,675)
($31,372)
(12) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation-PVS Savings: $264,935 (This number added to the Executive Summary)
(13)Notes: ___________________________________________________________ _
rev 1/8/2008 b
28 PIR Transportation - PVS
(1)
Losing Facility: Lancaster P&DF
Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating
Data of HCR Data File: 08/01/12
Route# PreAMP Annual Mileage
(3)
Proposed Annual Mileage
(4)
1st PIR Annual Mileage
29
Transportation - HCR Last Saved: September 26, 2012
(5)
PreAMP Annual
Cost
(6)
Proposed Annual
Cost
(7)
1st PIR Annual Cost
PIR Type: 1st PIR-
CT for Outbound Dock:
(8)
PreAMP Annual
Cost/Mile
(9)
Proposed Annual
Cost/Mile
(10)
1st PIR Annual
Cost/Mile
PIR Transportation HCR - Losing
0 0 0 $0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 $0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 $0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 $0 '
#DIV/0!
0 0 0 $0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 $0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 $0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 $0 #DIV/0! IT
0 0 0 $0 #DIV/0! ' 0 0 0 $0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 ! $0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 $0 ¥ #DIV/0!
0 0 0 $0 #DIV/0!
Totals 1,373,948 1,338,646 1,316,755 $3,299,716 $3,362,719 $3,187,734 ------ --- ::::::::1 -Variances Total Annual Costs
(11) (12)
Change Analysis 1st PIR vs Pre AMP 1st PIR vs Proposed
Dollars ($111 982) ($174 985) Percent L - O.Q_% - __ , 0.0%
30 PIR Transportation HCR - Losing
Gaining Facility: Harrisburg P&DC
Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating
Date of HCR Data File:
(1)
Route#
(3) (4)
1st PIR Annual
Transportation - HCR Last Saved: September 26, 2012
CET for Inbound Dock:
CET for Cancellations:
(6) (7)
Proposed I 1st PIR Annual Annual Cost Cost
PIR Type: Originating
CETforOGP: -------CT for Outbound Dock:
PreAMP
(9)
Proposed Annual
Cost/Mile
(10)
1st PIR Annual Cost/Mile
II ~ I
#DIV/0!
PIR Transportation HCR- Gaining
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
Totals ~fi~ AA3 376,449 386,081
32
$0 #DIV/01
$0 #DIV/0!
$0 #DIV/0!
$0 #DIV/0!
$0 #DIV/0!
$0 #DIV/0!
$0 i
#DIV/0!
$0 #DIV/0!
$746,296 $780,431 $880,371 ;
------ - ::::::::J Variances Total Annual Costs Summary HCR Losing & Gaining
(11) (12)
Change Analysis 1st PIR vs Pre AMP 1st PIR vs Proposed
Dollars $134 075 $99 940 Losing Percent 18.0% 12.8% Gaining
(13) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-HeR Savings: (from losing and gaining facilities)
(13)
1st PIR vs Pre AMP
($111,982) $134 075
$22,094
(14) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation-HeR Savings: (from losing and gaining facilities)
(14)
1st PIR vs Proposed
($174 985) $99,940
($75,045}
Total Transportation
(15)
1st PIR vs Pre AMP
HCR $22 094 PVS _____j§3,473
(15) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation (PVS & HeR): $85,566 (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary)
(16) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation (PVS & HeR): (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary)
(16)
1st PIR vs Proposed
($75 045) $264,935
$189,889
PIR Transportation HCR- Gaining
MPE Inventory Last Saved: September 26, 2012
Data Extraction Date: 07/18/12 PIR Type: 1st PIR Date Range of Data: Jan-01-2012 -to-- Jun-30-2012
Losing Facility: ...::L;.:;ac;..;nca=s:...:.te:..:.r...:.P.....:&:.;:D:...:F ________ _ Gaining Facility: Harrisburg P&DC
(1) (2) (3) {4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR Equipment
Proposed 1st PIR Variance in
PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR Relocation Relocation Costs
Equipment Costs Costs
AFCS 4 0 4 AFCS 5 7 7 $70,635 $70,635 $o I AFSM-ALL 2 2 2 AFSM-ALL 3 3 3 $0 $0 $o I
APPS 0 0 0 APPS 1 1 1 $0 $0 $0 ClOSS 4 4 4 ClOSS 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 CSBCS 0 0 0 CSBCS 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0
DBCS 2 4 4 DBCS 21 19 21 $5,750 $5,750 $0 DBCS-OSS 3 3 3 DBCS-OSS 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0
DIOSS 2 0 0 DIOSS 6 8 8 $5,750 $5,750 $0 FSS 0 0 0 FSS 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0
SBPS 1 1 1 SBPS 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 UFSM 0 0 0 UFSM 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0
Facer Canceller 0 0 2 Facer Canceller 2 2 2 $0 $0 $0
ROBOT GANTRY 0 0 0 I ROBOT GANTRY 6 6 6 $0 $0 $0 HSTS/HSUS 0 0 0 I HSTS I HSUS 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0
LCTS/LCUS 0 0 0 I LCTS I LCUS 1 1 1 $0 $0 $0 LIPS 0 0 0 LIPS 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0
MLOCR-ISS 0 0 0 MLOCR-ISS 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0
MPBCS-OSS 0 0 0 MPBCS-OSS 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0
TABBER 0 0 0 TABBER 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 POWERED POWERED
INDUSTRIAL 0 0 0 INDUSTRIAL 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 VEHICLE VEHICLE
LCREM 1 LCREM 1
FSS 1
18 14 .·· 22 Totals .:45 47 50 $82,135 $82,135 $0
(10) Notes: "::.. ..-:::: "::::..
Carried to Space Evaluation and
-- Other Costs Move 2 AFCS's (@ $23,730 each) with BDS and VFS@ $23,175 from LNC to HBG = $70,635 [VFS- Siemens ($14,17§) and 1 Dual BDS ($9,QQOJ =_ $23, 175]; moved 1 DBCS and 1 DIOSS.
Addjsonal equipment at Harrisburg comes from approved Reading AMP. PIR MPE Inventory
LDC 36
LDC 37
LDC 38
LDC 39
Maintenance Last Saved September 26, 2012
PIR Type•:_1_st_P_IR ______ _
Date Range of Data: Jan-01-2012 Jun-30-2012
Losing Facility: Lancaster P&DF Gaining Facility: Harrisburg P&DC ---------------------------------------- ----~~---------------------------------
Wotf!:tiour A.ctivij'l
Building Equipment S
Building Services $ (Cu$/Odtal C/eanmg)
(2)
Proposed Costs
$ 2,775,944 $
452,220 $ 452,220 $
1,512,548 $ 1,512,548 $
378,935 $ 359,989 $
(3)
1st PIR Costs
2,683,432 $
497,492 $
1,626,333 $ -----416,414 $
---
(4) (5) Variance 1st Variance 1st
PIR to Pre PIRto AMP Proposed
(621,264) $ (92,512)
45,272 $ 45,272
113,785 113,785
37,479 56,425
Workhcn.1r A.ctivity
(6)
PreAMP Costs
(7)
Proposed Costs
(8)
1stPIR Costs
(9) Variance 1st PIR to Pre
AMP
198.943 $ I. ~oc 36 Mail PEroc_essinntg $ 6,232,330 $ 6,490,330 $ 6,431,273 $ ~-====~--------~~QcU~tp~rne~= _______ _
LDC 37
LDC 38
LDC 39
Building Equipment $
Building Services $ (Custodial Ctoanmg)
Maintenance Operations $
Suooort
1,926,879 $
-----3,097,331 $
734,973 $
1,926,879 $ 1,811,185 $ (115,694) $
3,097,331 $ 2,960,277 $ {137,054) $
752,440 $ 774,346 $ 39,374
(10) Variance 1st PIR to Pre Proposed
(59,057)
(115,694)
(137,054)
21,906
(48,136) 971 .$, =
127,296 $ 127,296 $ 152,344 .$, I. Maintenance$ 49,1o7 $ 49,107 $ LDC 93 Training -----
(48,136) 25,048 25,048
•>,~, *"" YJ,, '"'",; '""h"k'""'''" ,,, ,,,Ad
$
Pans and Supplies
$
Grand 'total $
. $ 5,149,808 $ 5,224,641 l (472,865) 74,833
1,364,372 $
0 $
7,061,878 $
1,255,222 $ 1,003,372 $ (361,000) (251,850)
0 $ 0 $ 0 o.
6,405,030 6,228,013 $ (833,865) (177,017)
(11) 1st PIR vs Pre AMP- Maintenance Savings:
(12) 1st PIR vs Proposed- Maintenance Savings:
12,118,809 $ 12,394,276 $ 12,129,425 $ 10,617 $
Pans and Supplies
Maintenance Stockroom $ 2,654,371 · $ 2,734,002 $ and Suoohes
2,440,766 $ (213,605) $
BDS Testing Consttmables OnJ· · $ o $ o $ 0 $ 0 $
Grand 'total $ 14,773,180. $ 15,128,278 14,570,191 $ (202,988) $
($1,036,853)
($735,103) (These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)
(These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)
(264,850)
(293,236)
0
(558,686)
(13)Nows: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___
*Data in PIR columns Is annualized fOl F1rst PIR
. ""'jJer.lOO$·
34
PIR Maintenance
(1)
Distribution Changes Last Saved: September 26, 2012
Losing Facility : Lancaster P&DF PIR Type: 1st PIR
Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating Date Range of Data: Jan-01-2012 --to-- Jun-30-2012
Place a "X" next to the DMM labeling list(s) revised as result of the approved AMP.
DMM L001 DMM L011
DMM L002 X DMM L201
DMM L003 DMM L601
DMM L004 DMM L602
DMM L005 DMM L603
DMM L006 DMM L604
DMM L007 DMM L605
DMM L008 DMM L606
DMM L009 DMM L607
DMM L010 DMM L801
Identify the date of the Postal Bulletin that contained DMM labeling list revisions.
(Z) Oct-06-2011, Postal Bulletin 22321
Was the Service Standard Directory updated for the approved AMP?
(3) Yes
(4) Drop Shipments for Destination Entry Discounts
FAST Appointment Summary Report NASS
Facility Name Total No-Show Late Arrival O~en
Month Losing/ Gaining Facility Code Schd Count % Count % Count % Count
May '12 losing Facility 175 Lancaster P&DC 282 31 10.99% 124 43.97% 0 0.00% 251
June'12 losing Facility 175 Lancaster P&DC 271 49 18.08% 108 39.85% 0 0.00% 222
May '12 Gaining Facility 170 Harrisburg P&DC 693 170 24.53% 202 29.15% 0 0.00% 521
June '12 Gaining Facility 170 Harrisburg P&DC 640 147 22.97% 194 30.31% 0 0.00% 493 .
Closed %
89.01%
81.92%
75.18%
77.03%
(5lNotes: --------------------------------------------------------~======================================== rev 1/8/2008
35
Unschd I Count
5
2
10
3
PIR Distribution Changes
Customer Service Issues Last Saved September 26, 2012
Losing Facility: Lancaster P&DF 5-Digit ZIP Code: -:1-'::-7""60:..4:._ _____ _
Data Extraction Date: 07/18/12
3-Digit ZIP Code: 174 3-Digit ZIP Code: 175 3-Digit ZIP Code: 176 3-Digit ZIP Code:
PreAMP PIR PreAMP PIR PreAMP PIR PreAMP PIR
1. Collection Points Mon.-Fri. Sat Mon.-Fri. Sat. Mon.-Fri. Sat. Mon.· Fri. Sat. Mon.-Fri. Sat. Mon. -Fri. Sat. Mon.-Fri. Sat Mon.· Fri. Sat. Number picked up before 1 p.m. 36 43 22 40 74 177 69 174 4& 53 29 34 0 0
Number picked up between 1·5 p.m. 68 14 62 14 165 25 165 23 00 !l4 66 63 0 0
Number picked up after 5 p.m. 10 () 10 0 1 0 0 0 16 4 13 4 0 0 Total Number of Collection Points 112 57 94 54 240 202 234 197 150 141 108 101 0 o. 0 0
2. How many collection boxes are currently designated for "local delivery"? c~
3. How many "local delivery" boxes were removed as a result of AMP? I~
4. Delivery Performance Report PreAMP 1st PIR
Central PA District QuarteriFY Percent QuarteriFY Percent
%Carriers returning before 5 p.m. Q1 2011 !3:4.3% Q1 2012 74.2%
Q2 2011 88.6% Q2 2012 85.5%
Q3 2011 83.8% Q3 2012
Q4 2011 75.0°~ Q4 2012
5. Retail Unit Inside Losing Facility (Window Service Times) 6. Business (Bulk) Mall Acceptance Hours
Proposed 1st PIR PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR
Start End Start End Start End Start End Start End
7:30AM 7:00PM 7.30AM 700PM Monday 9:00AM 5:00PM 9:00AM 5:00PM 900AM 5:00PM
7:30AM 7:00PM 7:30AM 700PM Tuesday 9:00AM 5:00PM 9:00AM 5:00PM 9:00AM SOOPM
J 7:00PM II 730AM 7:00PM 730AM 700PM Wednesday 9:00AM 5:00PM 9:00AM 5:00PM 9:00AM 5:00PM
I .. 7:00PM ll 730AM 7:00PM 730AM 7:00PM Thursday 9:00AM 5:00PM 9:00AM 5:00PM 900AM 5:00PM
7:30AM 7:00PM 730AM 700PM Friday 9:00AM 5:00PM 9:00AM 5:00PM 9:00AM 5:00PM
Saturday( 9:00AM I 2:00PM II 9:00AM 2:00PM 900AM 200PM Saturday Closed CloSed Closed Closed CloSed cloSed
7. Can customers obtain a local postmark In accordance with applicable policies In the Postal Operations Manual? Yes
8. Notes:
Gaining Facility: Harrisburg P&DC
9. What postmark is printed on collection mail? I HARRISBURG PA 171 I . ""'119/Z008
36 PIR Customer Service Issues
Space Evaluation and Other Costs Last Saved September 26, 2012
Losing Facility: Lancaster P&DF Date: ___ O:...:Sc.../1'-4"'-/1.;.:2;;_ __
1 Affected Facility
2. One-Time Costs
Enter any one-time costs: $1,302 000 $1 '108,701 ($193,299) (These numbers shown below under One-Time Costs section.)
3. Savings Information
Space Savings ($): __ ,.,;$0"'---- $0 $0 (These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)
4. Did you utilize the acquired space as planned? Explain.
Space will be used to acccmmodate 2 additional DBCS machines for PARS consolidation
5. Notes: One time costs include $91,022 for new dock doors and $1,017,679 for 010 modifications as approved in AMP.
Employee Relocation Costs
Mail Processing Equipment Relocation Costs (from MPE Inventory)
(1)
Facility Costs (from above)
Total One-Time Costs
Losing Facility: Lancaster P&DF
Pre-AMP: FY 2011
(2) (4)
$82,135 $82,135 $0
$1,302,000 $1,108,701 ($193,299)
$1,524,135 $1,190,836 ($333,299) PIR costs canied forward to ExaClJfiv9 Summary)
Range of Report
(5) 16)
Gaining Facility: Harrisburg P&DC
PIR: FY 2012 YTD
(7) (3) 191
Product
(31
PreAMP Co.st per 1,000
lmajje•
1stPIR Associated REC
1st PIR Cost per 1,000 Images Product 1st PIR
37
110)
1st PIR Cost per 1,000 Images
PIR Space Evaluation and Other Costs
