FROM: Bond, S

ORIGINAL DUE DT: 04/11/00 TICKET NO: 020000007 DOC DT: 01/11/00

NRR RCVD DATE: 01/19/00

TO:

Adensam E

FOR SIGNATURE OF : ** YEL **

DESC: ROUTING:

Millstone

ASSIGNED TO:

Collins/zimmermn Johnson Sheron NRR Mailroom

CONTACT:

DLPM Zwolinski

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS:

January 1i, 2000

Director Elinor G. Adensam Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulator Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-000.

Dear Director Adensam:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the danger posed to Long Island residents by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Connecticut.

You say in your letter of October 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planning to open up the nuclear power station at Shorehamx emergency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISLAND. For that reason, the operation of Shoreham was prohibited.

Do we realli need another long and expensive study to tell us something we have already known for years? Furthermore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less likely, as the population has grown dramatically on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadequate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan died last week. The leakage around that plant went far beyond the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it did in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE M1LLSTONE NOW.

Sincerely,

BOND 19 WIDGEON LANE

SAG HARBOR, NY 11963

January 11, 2000

Director Elinor G. Adenqam Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulator Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Dear Director Adensam:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the danger posed to Long Island residents by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Connecticut.

You say in your letter of October 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planning to open up the nuclear power station at Shoreham emergency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISLAND. For that reason, the operation of Shoreham was prohibited.

Do we really need another long and expensive study to tell us something we have already known for years? Furthermore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less likely, as the population has grown dramatically on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadequate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan died last week. The leakage around that plant went far beyonid the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it did in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

Sincerely,

BOND 19 WIDGEON WANE

SM HARBOR, NY 11963

January 11, 2000

Director Elinor G. Adensam Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulator Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Dear Director Adensam:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts

to minimize the danger posed to Long Island residents by the

Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Connecticut.

You say in your letter of October 1, 1999 that you

support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an

evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planning to open up the nuclear

power station at Shoreham emergency planners concluded that

IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISLAND. For

that reason, the operation of Shoreham was prohibited.

Do we really need another long and expensive study to

tell us something we have already known for years?

Furthermore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less

likely, as the population has grown dramatically on the East

End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and

inadequate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan

died last week. The leakage around that plant went far

beyond the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your

current planning. As well it did in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

Sincerely,

LA

January II, 2000

Director Elinor G. Adensam Division of Licensing Project Managecent U.S. Nuclear Regulator Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Dear Director Adensam:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the danger posed to Long Island residents by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Connecticut.

You say in your letter of Octnber 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planring to open up the nuclear power station at Shoreham emergency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISLAND. For that reason, the operation of Shoreham was prohibited.

Do we really need another long and expensive study to tell us something we have already known for years? Furthermore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less likely, as the population has. grown dramatically on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadequate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan died last week. The leakage around that plant went far beyond the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it did in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

Sincerely,

iobb2 3z4ý vw At0

scrb NY

1&ýGv LOL et2 )'4 tc

January 1I, 2000

Director Elinor G. Adensam Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulator Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Dear Director Adensam:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the danger posed to Long Island residents by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Connecticut.

You say in your letter of October 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planning to open up the nuclear power station at Shoreham emergency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISLAND. For that reason, the operation of Shoreham was prohibited.

Do we really need another long and expensive study to tell us something we have already known for years? Furthermore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less likely, as the populaticn has grown dramatically on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadeqpuate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan died last week. The leakage around that plant went far beyond the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it did in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

Sincerely,

January 11, 2000

Director Elirnor G. Adensam Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulator Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Dear Director Adensam:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the aanger posed to Long Island residents by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Connecticut.

You say in your letter of October 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planning to open up the nuclear power station at Shoreham emergency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISILAND. For that reason, the operation of Shoreham was prohibited.

Do we really need another long and expensive -tudy to tell us something we have already known for years? Furthermore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less likely, as the population has grown dramatically on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadequate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan died last week. The leakage around that plant went far beyond the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it d-d in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

Sincerely,

n

January 11, 2000

Director Elinor G. Adensam Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulator Corramission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Dear Director Adensam:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the danger posed to Long Island rssidenzs by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Connecticut.

You say in your letter of October 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planning to open up the nuclear power station at Shoreham emergency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISLAND. For that reason, the operation of Shcreham was prohibited.

Do we really need another long and expensive study to tell us something we have already known for years? Furthermore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less likely, as the population has grown dramatically on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadequate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan died last week. The leakage around that plant went far beyond the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it d.d in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lessen to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

Sincerely,

c9~Jib,N c-0WL

January 11, 2000

Director Elinor G. Adensam Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulator Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Dear Director AdensamL

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the danger posed to Long Island residents by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Connecticut.

You say in your letter of Oct:ober 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

.But, years ago, when planning to open up the nuclear power station at Shoreharn emergency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE 1MPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERk LONG ISLAND. For that reason, the operation of Shoreham was prohibited.

Do we really need another long and expensive study to tell us something we have already known for years? Furthermore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less likely, as the population has grown dramatically on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadequate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan died last week. The leakage around that plant went far beyond the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it dld in Chernoby.!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

January II, 2000

Director Elinor G. Adensam Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulator Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Dear Director Adensam:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the danger posed to Long Island residents by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Connecticut.

You say in your letter of October 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planning to open up the nuclear power station at Shoreham emergency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISLAND. For that reason, the operation of Shoreham was prohibited.

Do we really ne-ed another long and expensive study to tell us something we have already known for years? Furthermore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less likely, as the population has grown dramatically on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadequate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan died last week. The leakage around that plant went far beyond the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it dd in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

Sincerely,

January 11, 2000

Director Elinor G. Adensam Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulator Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-000i

Dear Director Adensam:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the danger posed to Long Island residents by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Ccnnecticut.

You say in your letter of Octnber 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planning to open up the nuclear power station at Shorehaous emergency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISLAND. For that reascn, the operation of Shoreham was prohibited.

Do we really need another long and expensive study to tell us something we have already known for years? Furthermore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less likely, as the populaticn has grown dramatically on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadeqaate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan died last week. The leakage around that plant went far beyond the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it did in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

Sincerely,

4K(2

January i1, 2000

Director Elinor C. Adensam Division of Licensing Project Managemrent U.S. Nuclear Regulator Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Dear Director Adensam:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the danger posed to Long Island residents by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Connecticut.

You say in your letter of Octnber 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planning to open up the nuclear power station at Shoreharn emergency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISLAND. For that reason, the operation of Shoreham was prohibited.

Do we really need another long and expensive study to tell us something we have already known for years? Furthermore, the feasibility of eivauation now is even less likely, as the population has grown dramatically on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadequate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan died last week. The leakage eround that plant went far beyond the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it did in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

/fi

January II, 2000

Director Elinor C. Adensam Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulator Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-000.

Dear Director Adensam:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the danger posed to Long Island rasidents by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Connecticut.

You say in your letter of Octzber 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planr"ing to open up the nuclear power station at Shoreham emergency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISLAND. For that reason, the operation of Shoreham was prohibited.

Do we really need another long and expensive study to tCell us something we have already known for years? Furthermore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less likely, as the population has grown dramatically on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadequate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan died last week. The leakage around that plant went far beyond the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it did in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

Sincerely,

r, r,

January ii, 2000

Director Elinor G. Adensam Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulator Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Dear Director Adensamt:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the danger posed to Long Island residents by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Connecticut.

You say in your letter of Octnber 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planning to open up the nuclear power station at Shoreham emergency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISLAND. For that reason, the operation of Shoreham was prohibited.

Do we really need another long and expensive study to tell us something we have already known for years? Furthermore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less likely, as the population has grown dramatically on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadequate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan died last week. The leakage around that plant went far beyond the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it did in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

Sincerely,

ALI- /i9t

January 11, 2000

Director Elinor G. Adensam Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulator Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Dear Director AdensairL:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the danger posed to Long island residents by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Connect icut.

You say in your letter of October 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planning to open up the nuclear power station at Shoreham emergency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISILAND. For that reason, the operation of Shoreham was prohibited.

Do we really need another long and expensive study to tell us something we have already known for years? Furthermore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less likely, as the population has grown dramatically on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadequate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan died last week. The leakage around that plant went far beyond the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it dld in Chernoby.!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

Sincerely,

U ,/V

•__- I•

January 11, 2000

Director Elinor G. Adensam Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulator Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Dear Director Adensam:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the danger posed to Long Island residents by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Ccnnecticut.

You say in your letter of October 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planning to open up the nuclear power station at Shorehar. emergency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISLAND. For that reason, the operation of Shoreham was prohibited.

Do we really need another long and expensive study to tell us something we have already known for years? Furtherrmore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less likely, as the population has grown dramatically on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadequate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan died last week. The leakage around that plant went far beyond the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it did in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

Sincerely,

3 /2, O~ctk

January 11, 2000

Director Elinor G. Adensam Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulator Comrmission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Dear Director Adensam:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the danger posed to Long Island residents by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Ccnnecticut.

You say in your letter of October 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planning to open up the nuclear power station at Shoreham, emergency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISLAND. For that reason, the operation of Shoreham was prohibited.

Do we really need another long and expensive study to tell us something we have already known for years? Furthermiore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less likely, as the population has grown dramatically on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadequate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan died last week. The leakage around that plant went far beyond the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it did in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

Sincerely,

44.rQA

January 11, 2000

Director Elinor G. Adensam Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulator Comrmission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Dear Director Adensam.:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the danger posed to Long Island residents by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Connecticut.

You say in your letter of October 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planning to open up the nuclear power station at Shoreham emergency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISLAND. For that reascn, the operation of Shoreham was prohibited.

Do we really need another long and expensive study to tell us something we have already known for years? Furthermore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less l1kely, as the population has grown dramatically on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadequate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokaj, Japan died last week. The leakage around that plant went far b'eyond the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it di4d in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

Sincerely,

Cr

January 11, 2000

Director Elinor G. Adenqam Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulator ComMission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Dear Director Adensam:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the danger posed to Long Island residents by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Connecticut.

You say in your letter of October 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planning to open up the nuclear power station at Shoreham emergency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISLAND. For that reason, the operation of Shoreham was prohibited.

Do we really need another long and expensive study to tell us something we have already known for years? Furthermore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less likely, as the population has grown dramatically on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadequate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan died last week. The leakage around that plant went far beyond the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it did in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

Sincerel 7 6'AE 2). SIN u- , rz-

X ~Janu~ary 1 -1, 2000

Director Elinor G. Adensam Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulator Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Dear Director Adensam:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the danger posed to Long Island rasidents by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Co-nnecticut.

You say in your letter of October 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to Investigate an evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planrning to open up the nuiclear power station at Shoreham emergency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISLAND. For that reason, the operation of Shcreham was prohibited.

Do we really need another lona and expensive study to tell us something we have already known for years? Furthermoore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less likely, as the population has. Grown dramatically on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadequate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan died last week. The leakage around that plant went far beyond the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it did in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

Sincerely,

P S4Aý

January -1, 2000

fiectCCo C ELCorS 3. Addensam Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulator Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-001

Dear Director Adensam:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts "to minize tile danger pozed LO Long island residents by tne Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Connecticut.

You say in your letter of Octcber 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planning to open up the nuclear power station at Shoreham emergency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISLAND. For tt.at reascn, the operation of Shoreham was prohibited.

Do we really need another long and expensive study to tell us something we have already known for years? Furthermore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less likely, as the populaticn has grown dramatically on. the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadequate for the needs of evacuacion.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan died last week. The leakage around that plant went far beyond the inadequate I0 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it did in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

Sincerely,

January i1, 2000

Director Elinor G. Adensam Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulator Cowrission Washington, D.C. 20555-COG:

Dear Director Adensam:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the danger posed to Long Island residents by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Connecticut.

You say ir4 your letter of October 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planning to open up the nuclear power station at Shoreham emergency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISLAND. For that reason, the operation of Shoreham was prohibited.

Do we really need another long and expensive study to tell us something we have already known for years? Furthermore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less likely, as the population has crown dramatically on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadequate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in TQkai, Japan died last week. The leakage around that plant went far beyond the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it did in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

Sincerely,

SPEED VOGEL

BOX 2131 - 10 LATIAM ST. SAG I JARBOR, NEW YORK 1963 rr_

,January 11, 2000

Director Elinor G. Adensam Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulator Comrizsion Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Dear Director Adensam:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the danger posed to Long Island residents by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Ccnnecticut.

You say in your letter of October 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planning to open up the nuclear power station at Shoreham eirergerncy planners concluded that IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISLAND. For that reason, the operation of Shoreham was pruhibited.

Do we really need another long and expensive study to tell us something we have already known for years? Furthermore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less likely, as the population has grown dramatically on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadequate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan died last week. The leakage around that plant went far beyond the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it did in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

Sincerely,

Kate Walker Vogel Y'

PO Box 2131 Sag Harbor, New York 11963

Januarv 11, 2000

Director Elinor G. Adensam Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulator Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Dear Director Adensam:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the danger posed to Long Island rasidents by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Connecticut.

You say in your letter of October 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planning to open up the nuclear power station at Shorehar emergency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE TMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISLAND. For that reason, the operation of Shoreham was prohibited.

Do we really need another long and expensive study to tell us something we have already known for years? Furthermiore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less likely, as the population has grown dramatically on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadequate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan died last week. The leakage around that plant went far beyond the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it dý.d in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

ALou Ann Walke PO-Box 2N3116

,Sag Habor, NY 1196

January II, 2000

Director Elinor 0. Adensam Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulator Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-C000

Dear Director Adensam:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the danger posed to Long island rasiden.s by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Connecticut.

You say in your letter of Octnber 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planning to open up the nuclear power station at Shoreham emergency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISLAND. For that reason, the operation of Shcreham was prohibited.

Do we realil need another long and expensive study to tell us something we have already known for years? Furthermore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less likely, as the population has grown dramatically on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadequate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan died last week. The leakage around that plant went far beyond the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it dzd in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

Sincerely,

4AL49-W

2ck5-

,4-~4I~s

....-..

January av , 2000

lirector Eiirnor -. Adensam Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulator Corrnnisson Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Dear Director Adensan:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the danger posed to Long island rssidents by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plarit in Ccnnecticut.

You say in your letter of Octnber 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

Sut, years ago, when planning to open up the nuclear power station at Shoreham amerqency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISLAND. For that reason, the operation of Shoreham was prohibited.

Do we really need another long and expensive study to tell us something we have already known for years? Furthermore, the feasibility of rvacuation now is even less likely, as the population has crown dramatioailly on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadequate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan died last week. The leakage around that plant went far beycnd the inadequate IC mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it did in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

Sincerel1

C, rý

7

January ii, 2000

Director Elinor G. Aden!am Division of Licensing Project management U.S. Nuclear Regulator ConmmisFsion Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Dear Director Adensam:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the danger posed to Long Island residents by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Connecticut.

You say in your letter of October 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planning to open up the nuclear power station at Shoreham emergency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISLAND. For that reason, the operation of Shcreham was prohibited.

Do we really need another long and expensive study to tell us something we have already known for years? Furthermore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less likely, as the population has grown dramatically on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadequate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan died last week. The leakage ar..u.d that plant went far beyond the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it did in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

Sincerely,

January 11, 2000

Director Elinor G. Adensam Division of Licensing Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulator Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Deiar irector Aderlsam:

I was pleased to learn of your support of the efforts to minimize the danger posed to Long Island residents by the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Connecticut.

You say in your letter of October 1, 1999 that you support attempts by Suffolk County to investigate an evacuation plan.

But, years ago, when planning to open up the nuclear power station at Shoreham emergency planners concluded that IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO EVACUATE EASTERN LONG ISLAND. For that reason, the operation of Shoreham was prohibited.

Do we really need another long and expensive study to tell us something we have already known for years? Furthermore, the feasibility of evacuation now is even less likely, as the population has grown dramatically on the East End of Long Island, and the road system remains clogged and inadequate for the needs of evacuation.

The first victim of the radiation leak in Tokai, Japan died last week. The leakage around that plant went far beyond the inadequate 10 mile radius you rely upon in your current planning. As well it did in Chernobyl!

Let this man's death be a lesson to us: CLOSE MILLSTONE NOW.

Sincerely,