PERRIS UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT REGULAR MEETING …board.puhsd.org/Attachments/9efe0059-c74b-46c7-ae53-5bc2c1c0880d.pdfDr. Greenberg stated that he and Trustee Cooley recently visited

UNAPPROVED UNAPPROVED

ROLL CALL Trustee William Hulstrom, President Trustee Joan Cooley, Vice President Trustee Carolyn Twyman, Clerk Trustee Edward Agundez, Member Trustee David Nelissen, Member Administrative Staff Present: Dr. Jonathan Greenberg, Superintendent; Steve Swartz, Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources; Marcy Savage, Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services; Candace Reines, Assistant Superintendent of Business Services; Tonya Davis, Director of Human Resources; Dr. Laurie Wellner, Director of Special Education; Anna Hamilton, Purchasing Agent; Hector Gonzalez, Facilities Project Manager; Mark Lucas, Director of Fiscal Services; Vince Butler, Director of Technology; Judy Miller, Risk Manager; Stephanie Bruce, Director of Nutrition Services; Adriana Lepe, Assistant Principal, Perris High School; Julie Zierold, Principal, Heritage High School; Charles Newman, Principal, Pinacate Middle School Others Attending: Cynthia Clark, Jackie McDonald, Robert Colvin, Paul Clay, Monica LaRock, Vickey Mueller, Elaine Langendorf, Olivia Barns, Lorna Hulstrom, Chuck Reutter, Linda VanKirk, Bob Ellingsen, Marcina Riley, Kiana Gomez, Esmeralda Gutierrez, Jesus Sanchez, My Thuy Vu, Charles Tippie, Joselyn Calderon, Desirae Dyson, John Sanchez, Kyra Santa Cruz, Karina Mosqueda, Rachel Dow, Greg Wise, Tracey Ellingsen, Elvia Sanchez, Jorge Borrego, Marybeth Colvin, Marti Shaver, Dan Keenan, Brady McCarron, Norma Carrillo, Gabriela Tesoriedo, Dr. Fred Good, Scott Smith, Xochitl Molina, Derek Stemrich, Tom Kruse, Tom Ashley, Sarah Rico, Lori Ortell, and others

PERRIS UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES

MINUTES

February 20, 2013

PUHSD Administration Center 155 East Fourth Street

Perris, CA 92570

Perris Union High School District Regular Board Meeting Minutes February 20, 2013 Page 2

PUBLIC NOTICE 1.1 Public Notice: The writings, documents, or public records described in SB No. 343 are available at the District Office, currently located at 155 East Fourth Street, Perris, CA 92570

CALL TO ORDER 2.1 Call to Order - The President will call the Perris Union High School District meeting to order The President called the meeting to order at 2:10 p.m.

STUDY SESSION 3.1 The Board of Trustees will Conduct a Facilities Study Session to Include: Pinacate Focus/GO Bond 202 Candace Reines, Assistant Superintendent of Business Services introduced Scott Smith from CSG Advisors, who will be speaking to the Board on the current issues with General Obligation Bonds, Tom Kruse and Derek Stemrich from PJHM Architects, who will address the Board on the plans for the next phase(s) at Pinacate Middle School, and Dr. Fred Good who will update the Board on the progress of the educational specifications for the new middle school. Mr. Scott Smith reviewed with the Board information related to the issuance of General Obligation Bonds and provided an overview of financing considerations. A copy of that report is attached and is included as part of these minutes. Dr. Fred Good shared with the board that he and several staff members from Pinacate recently visited a fairly new middle school campus in the Corona/Norco Unified School District and then ended the trip by stopping at the site where Middle School #2 will be built. Dr. Good felt that this trip was necessary in order for everyone to understand the processes and steps that needed to take place prior to construction. He wanted the group to be able to visualize the new school and felt that this goal was accomplished when the group arrived at the new school site. Mr. Tom Kruse, reviewed with the Board architectural renderings of Pinacate Middle School from the beginning of the project, its current status, and the future projects that will be taking place at the site. A copy of those renderings can be made available upon request.


INVITATION TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS ONLY

4.1 Invitation to Address the Board of Trustees on Closed Session Items Only Mr. Paul Clay, PSEA President and Veronica Navarro, Teacher addressed the Board regarding non-reelects and the District’s evaluation processes. Mr. Clay urged the Board to reconsider the release of the teachers on the Agenda this evening.

ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION 5.1 Adjourn to Closed Session Regarding:

Pupil Matters;

Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release;

Conference with the District's Labor Negotiator, Steve Swartz, Assistant Superintendent - Human Resources Regarding the Perris Secondary Educators Association, and the California School Employees Association; and

Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation (Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4)): Consideration of Potential Litigation - One Case - Disclosure of the entity would jeopardize the District's ability to conclude existing settlement negotiations.

ORIGINAL - Motion 78 Member (Joan Cooley) moved, Member (Carolyn Twyman) seconded to approve the ORIGINAL motion, “It is recommended that the Board of Trustees adjourn to Closed Session regarding:

Pupil Matters;

Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release;

Conference with the District's Labor Negotiator, Steve Swartz, Assistant Superintendent - Human Resources Regarding the Perris Secondary Educators Association, and the California School Employees Association; and

Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation (Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4)): Consideration of Potential Litigation - One Case - Disclosure of the entity would jeopardize the District's ability to conclude existing settlement negotiations.”

Upon a roll call vote being taken, the vote was: Aye: 5, Nay: 0. The motion PASSED 5 – 0.


RECONVENE IN PUBLIC SESSION/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 6.1 Reconvene Board Meeting at 5:00 P.M./Pledge of Allegiance The President of the Board of Trustees reconvened the meeting at 5:20 p.m. and led the audience in the pledge of allegiance.

INVOCATION 7.1 Invocation: Trustee Twyman Trustee Twyman requested a moment of silence.

REVISION/ADOPTION/ORDERING OF AGENDA 8.1 Revision/Adoption/Ordering of the February 20, 2013 Agenda ORIGINAL - Motion 79 Member (Joan Cooley) moved, Member (Carolyn Twyman) seconded to approve the ORIGINAL motion, “It is recommended that the Board of Trustees approve any revision/adoption/ordering of the Agenda of the Regular Meeting of the Perris Union High School District Board of Trustees for February 20, 2013.” Upon a roll call vote being taken, the vote was: Aye: 5, Nay: 0. The motion PASSED 5 – 0.

ORAL REPORTS 9.1 Report Out of Closed Session There was no report out of Closed Session. 9.2 District Update by the Superintendent

Marcy Savage, Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services, introduced Olivia Barnes, a representative of Soroptimist International who sponsored a program for local middle school aged young women entitled “Girls Day Out”. The event was held in November of 2012 and was highly successful. Ms. Barnes presented the District with a

ORAL REPORTS (cont.)


9.2 District Update by the Superintendent (cont.)

Certificate of Appreciation. She also thanked the Board of Trustees and the District for their support of this event and hoped that in the future, they would be able to partner with the District once again to make the “Girls Day Out” event even more successful.

Marcy Savage, Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services introduced Mr. Bob Ellingsen, Perris High Schools’ Academic Decathlon Coach and his wife, Wendy Ellingsen, and explained that they are the reason this Decathlon takes place each year. Mr. Ellingsen thanked all the retired staff, current staff, and students that helped make this years’ event a success. He then introduced each student and provided them with their award certificates.

On January 25th, Pinacate Middle School held their Spelling Bee. Dr. Greenberg, and Mrs. Ventuleth, retired Chief Human Resources Officer, were judges at this event. The Superintendent stated that he was amazed how these middle school students could spell such difficult words. He said that first place went to a student at the California Military Institute. He congratulated all the students.

The Superintendent stated the District received notice from the Riverside County Office of Education announcing that the Perris Union High School District was recognized for accelerating the language development of the District’s long-term English Learners. From 2009 through 2012, the Perris Union High School District had the greatest percentage point increase in long-term English Learners than any other school district in Riverside County. Congratulations to all our employees for their efforts to make this happen.

Marcy Savage, Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services stated that Robotics is new to the Perris Union High School District. She expressed her thanks to Dian Martin, Teacher on Special Assignment who has been instrumental in getting this program started. Ms. Savage stated that the Gears2Robots Program has caught fire amongst the students and is a huge success. Perris High, Paloma High and Heritage High recently participated in a competition with their robots in San Diego. While there, Heritage High placed and will now move on to a regional tournament. Congratulations to those students their advisors.

February 3rd through the 7th was National School Counselor Week. Dr. Greenberg thanked all the counselors in the District for the hard work they do for the betterment of our students. He also thanked PSEA President Paul Clay for reminding us of that recognition.




February 6th was the National Letter of Intent Signing Day. Athletes from all three comprehensive high schools signed Letters of Intent to attend colleges.

Diana Osorio, who is a student enrolled in the Culinary Arts Program at Perris High School brought home a First Place Gold Medal in baking and pastry at the Skills USA Regional Competition. She will now advance to the California State Competition in April. Dr. Greenberg stated that he and Trustee Cooley recently visited the Panther Den to have lunch. He said the food was delicious and very well presented.

The Superintendent read a letter the District recently received from the Angel Tree Center of Nuevo: “Thank you most recently for the school district’s donation of the food collected at the Heritage High School Food Drive. This collection of canned food helped toward giving 59 families, including 164 children, a wonderful Christmas Dinner… The kids at Heritage High School have come through with a trailer full of canned food. They have opened their hearts to the less fortunate and we love them so for their caring ways. Please thank all the students at Heritage High School.” Congratulations to those students.

The Interact Club students from Paloma Valley High School fed 190 meals to needy people at Mary’s Mercy Center in San Bernardino. The Superintendent thanked Mr. Reagan Williams, the Interact Club Advisor, for making this event happen.

The Paloma Valley High School Dance students recently received a 3rd Place and a 1st Place Trophy at a competition held at Tahquitz High School. They also brought home the Grand Prize for Best Team Effort. Congratulations to those students.

Robin Perry, English Language Arts Teacher, from Heritage High School has been selected for a National honor. She will be presenting at the AVID Summer Institute in both Philadelphia and San Diego. Congratulations to her.

A few years ago, the NJROTC Program at Paloma Valley High School only had about 65 students. However, since Sgt. Puebla came on board the program has grown to 172 students. All of this has been accomplished during his first year at the school. Congratulations to him for a job well done.




A new Key Club was started at Heritage High School. The Cabinet attended an event on January 29th where they became their own Charter. Ms. Clough is the sponsor and faculty member for the Key Club.

The Perris Chamber of Commerce held an awards ceremony last month in which Rick Wallis, Principal of the California Military Institute and Choice 2000 received a Partner in Education Award. Congratulations to Rick!

The Superintendent addressed the District’s concerns regarding school safety. Sgt. Elwell from the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department has been visiting our school sites along with our Risk Manager, Judy Miller, talking about what each of us can do if there is an emergency on our campuses. Sgt. Elwell applauded the District’s Hour-Zero Program and is encouraging all staff to participate in the trainings made available through that website. The Sheriff’s Department is also reviewing our security protocols at the sites such as being present at lockdown drills and assisting in where and how our Campus Supervisors patrol the sites.

The Annual Panther Sports Challenge will be held Saturday, March 16th at the Perris High School Stadium from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.

On March 1st, the 8th Annual Celebrity Karaoke Event for the Menifee Community Cupboard will be held. District employees, led by the Superintendent will be participating to assist in raising money for people in need.

The Superintendent announced the schedule of Open Houses throughout the District; February 27th at Pinacate Middle School beginning at 6:00 p.m., March 5th at The Academy at 6:00 p.m., March 6th at Paloma Valley High School at 6:00 p.m., March 7th at Perris Lake High School at 6:00 p.m., March 12th at Heritage High School at 6:00 p.m., March 14th at Perris High School at 6:00 p.m., on April 10th at the California Military Institute and Choice 2000.

Dr. Greenberg read the following statement regarding a recent assembly and an upcoming assembly at Perris High School: “The S3 Safe School Grant that we received at Perris High School has a Steering Committee made up of stakeholders. The stakeholders include six teachers, Greg Wise, Norma Carrillo, Ryan Hayes, Diane Pales, Eric Tejeda and Brett Bourbeau, along with classified employee and Community Liaison, Gloria




Webster and Assistant Principal, Dr. Keyisha Holmes. The Safe School Grant for all three of our high schools was written to improve school climate and certainly race relations is a huge part of school climate. The S3 Committee at Perris High School decided that they wanted to do two assemblies on race relations. The first one was held on February 14, 2013 and all students, regardless of race, attended. The S3 Committee has also planned a second assembly for February 26, 2013. This one is for African-American students only, to address among other things the use of the “N” word. The purpose of the assembly is to encourage students not to use the word with one another, because not only do other students think it may be okay, it is also important because the word Is offensive to all of us, not just to African-Americans. The first assembly is required for all students, but parents could choose to opt their students out. All parents were invited to an informational meeting on both assemblies last week. Parents also could still opt their students out of the second assembly. Any staff member, regardless of race, is encourage to the attend the second assembly.” The Superintendent hoped that everyone understood that these assemblies are valuable and well thought out. The Steering Committee, made up of primarily classroom teachers, planned the topics and structure with the chance for parents to opt their students out if they chose to do so. Again, these assemblies have moved ahead not with just his support, but his full endorsement. This program has also received positive acclaim from CNN and Fox News, as well as Oprah Winfrey. The Superintendent introduced Mr. Greg Wise, a teacher from Perris High School and member of the S3 Committee. Mr. Wise read the following statement: “Members of the Perris Union High School Board and Dr. Greenberg, my name is Greg Wise and I am a teacher at Perris High School. I have been asked to speak to you today on behalf of our school’s S3 team and also to offer my own beliefs regarding the implementation of a series of assemblies meant to address the current academic and behavioral state of one of our ethnic sub-groups on campus. I think that it is important that I preface my following remarks by admitting that I am uncomfortable engaging in this conversation. I think that, because of the nature of the conversation, we all should be discomforted by it. First, the blatant facts: we, and by we, I mean the Perris Union High School District, the State of California, and the United States of America, are failing our black youth. On




almost any matrix one chooses to measure, be it standardized test scores, college admission rates, median income, incarceration rates, life expectancy, or homicide rates, the African American community is disproportionately represented among the lowest achieving groups in our society. These are difficult and uncomfortable realities to acknowledge and they are even more difficult and uncomfortable challenges to rectify. However, discomfort is not an excuse for inaction. It is not a controversial statement to acknowledge that we cannot begin to fix a problem until we find the courage to admit to its existence. Therefore, the admission must be made that our black youth is failing itself, and that we are failing our black youth. On the Perris High School campus, I have worked for several months with our S3 team, a group of teachers, administrators, and outside consultants, to utilize special grant money to promote the safety, well-being, and success of all students on our campus. Recently, this team has begun to address the unique challenges facing our lowest performing sub-group on campus, our African American students. Throughout these discussions, I was made aware of alarming facts regarding the severity of the achievement gap between our black students and other ethnic sub-groups. I was genuinely shocked to find that our black students as a group were performing at lower levels than both our English Language Learners and our Special Education students. It was soon apparent that this was not solely an academic challenge, but a multi-faceted one involving a surprisingly disproportionate number of disciplinary incidents within this group of students. In response to this multi-dimensional challenge, our administration has begun to implement a multi-dimensional response including programs aimed at all students on campus. Portions of this response include academic tutoring, mentoring programs, and at-risk intervention programs. Additionally, in response to the unique challenges facing our African American students, the administration has decided to incorporate a series of assemblies meant to address the unique needs of that group. The organization Village Nation is a group of outside consultants who visit schools specifically to address the needs of this particular community. Its purpose is to inform our African American students of the unique and alarming realities pertaining to their community, to promote a positive self-image, and to encourage success in all areas. Because of the nature of the material discussed, some of the assemblies within this series of talks are meant exclusively for an African American audience. The purpose of this is to avoid shining a negative and public spotlight on only one group within a multi-ethnic audience. In other words, the dirty laundry, as it were, of one group is not aired publicly, but is addressed within the confines of just that group. The intended effect of




this is the creation of a safe environment in which hard realities and hard solutions can be honestly discussed without fear of any individual or group being publicly shamed or ostracized. While this process has surely sparked controversy among some of the staff at Perris High School, it should be noted that this is not the first time this type of assembly has been held. During the 2010-2011 school year, a similar assembly was held only for African American students on the Perris High School campus. The results, I believe, speak for themselves. Following this assembly, the state test scores of this group overall rose 78 points. The following year however, during the 2011-2012 school year, this assembly was not repeated. The result was a 53 point decline on the same state test within the same sub-group of students. The bottom line is that this particular strategy, used in conjunction with a variety of other initiatives, appears effective at raising student achievement. While the academic effect this program has on students is clear and widespread throughout an entire group, the personal effect it has on individual students remains, to my knowledge, anecdotal. With that concession being made, I will offer my own experience with students who participated in this program two years ago. At the time, I shared the same concern found among many of my colleagues that this strategy of separating our student body into sub-groups based on ethnicity for the purpose of academic intervention felt alarming and could, if conducted improperly, have a negative effect on students. When my African American students returned from the assembly, I inquired as to their personal reactions. In each case, the students reported to me that they felt surprised and motivated by what they had experienced. To my pleasant surprise, they also reported that they did not feel persecuted nor stereotyped. These positive qualitative results, combined with the positive quantitative results of the rise in state test scores lead me to believe that this controversial strategy is not only not harming our kids, but is greatly benefiting them. Despite these positive results in student achievement, I believe that it is still our responsibility to ask if the ends justify the means. As with all other initiatives, we must ask ourselves if this policy is consistent with our ethical goals and our established precedents in other areas of instruction. In other words, is it right to separate our students into ethnically-based and ability-based groups in order to address the unique needs of those groups?




I believe that you, the Perris Union High School District Board, the individual teachers within our district, the State of California, and the federal government of the United States have already answered that question. As a school and as a district, we are obligated to disaggregate the results of our state test scores into a number of student sub-groups. These sub-groups are identified and separated for reporting purposes on the basis of such criteria as English language proficiency, household income, special education needs, and ethnicity. The purpose of this grouping is to accurately report how we are serving all students by understanding how we are serving individual student groups. Through this disaggregation of data, we are meant to identify not just how student groups are performing, but how well we are serving each of those groups so that no group of students is allowed to be left behind. Furthermore, at the level of the classroom, it is a widespread and research-based strategy to both differentiate student groups into either homogenous or heterogeneous student groups based on need and ability and to differentiate instruction methodology to all students based on learning ability and style to ensure success for all students by understanding and responding to unique student needs. In other words, it is fundamental to our beliefs in education that we separate students into groups based on a wide array of criteria so that we provide appropriate instruction to ensure the success of all students based on their individual and unique needs. This being said, I believe that we must admit to the legitimate concerns of those who are opposed to this kind of educational strategy. We live in a nation which still very much bears the scars of a shameful and oppressive racial history. We must not forget the lessons of segregation and subjugation. We must hold ourselves accountable to serve our students with equity. However, equity does not necessitate uniformity. We celebrate our differences when they are strengths, and we must admit to our differences when they are challenges. We must always find the strength to engage in these discussions and to make these difficult decisions not despite the fact that they are difficult and uncomfortable, but because they are difficult and uncomfortable. The strategy being proposed by the Perris High School administration and its S3 team of separating our student population into ethnically-based sub-groups in order to meet the unique needs of those groups is, I believe, consistent with district, state, and federal policy of differentiation of instruction and accountability. Furthermore, it is the belief of the Perris High School administration, the S3 team, and the Village Nation organization




that the sensitive nature of the content of the proposed student assemblies necessitates that they be held in a private manner in order to provide an environment for the participants that is safe, honest, and free from public shame and stereotyping. On a more personal note, I do not know if this course of action is the best or the only solution to address the challenges facing our African American students. What I do know is that the challenge is too great and the consequences too dire to ignore. The administration of our campus and the S3 team have chosen to pursue this course of action because it is believed to be in the best interests of a group of our students who are in immediate and significant danger. While I proceed cautiously and uncomfortably, I do so in support of their efforts, confident in the belief that it is the best interests of our students that motivates their actions and guides their decisions. I thank you for your time and your audience today.

9.3 Report by PSEA President Paul Clay Mr. Paul Clay, President of PSEA, thanked the Board for the opportunity to address them. Mr. Clay stated that the Association and the Administration Leadership recently inaugurated site relationship councils. It is hoped that through these councils, members and Administrators at each site will be able to work more cooperatively together to resolve differences. Mr. Clay stated that the Association recently had sustainment of claims of violations of Weingarten rights by the Administrative Law Judge of the Public Employees Relationship Board (PERB). He ruled that the Administration did indeed violate Weingarten during a meeting with a member. He requested that the Board look into the nature of the this violation. Mr. Clay discussed the Association’s concerns regarding non-reelect teachers. He felt that the District’s evaluation process was flawed and that employees were forced to resign rather than be dismissed. Mr. Clay expressed his disapproval of the assemblies at Perris High School but acknowledged there was a need for improved race relations. He felt that separating the students by race was segregation. What he felt was the most inflammatory and alarming was the title of the assemblies; “The Black and Brown Love Fest”, “The ‘N’ Bomb”, and “From Princes’ and Princesses to Pimps and Hos.”



9.3 Report by PSEA President Paul Clay (cont.) Mr. Clay addressed his concerns regarding school safety and violent students. He wanted to know why students could be on campus with knives and explosive devices. He felt that they needed to be arrested and removed from campus.

9.4 Report by CSEA President Robert Colvin Mr. Colvin, President of CSEA, thanked the Board for the opportunity to address them. Mr. Colvin stated that he wanted to personally and publically thank Dr. Greenberg for providing CSEA staff members access to the Dangerous Student listing that the certificated staff have. He stated that he put in a request to Dr. Greenberg regarding this list and he immediately fixed the situation. Mr. Colvin reminded the Board that at the last meeting he had requested that Admissions Day be moved back to December in its traditional spot on the Calendar. He later learned that this item needed to be negotiated, so it will have to be put off until then. Mr. Colvin stated that CSEA had placed members on the District Insurance Committee and that he was receiving very positive responses. Mr. Colvin stated that CSEA is making efforts towards assisting its members in furthering their education by having representatives from local colleges come out and talk with employees about options they may have within the college systems. Mr. Colvin informed the Board that CSEA will be trying to hold their Chapter meetings all around the District instead of in one place. It is hoped that this will encourage participation and attendance. CSEA is hoping to Sunshine their articles for negotiations at the next Board meeting.

*************************************** The Board President stated at this time the “Invitation to Address the Board of Trustees” section will be moved up to this point in the meeting, due to the large amount of oral reports and in consideration for the members of the audience. The Oral Reports section will continue following audience member comments.

*************************************** INVITATION TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES


11.1 Invitation to Address the Board of Trustees Vickey Mueller addressed the Board regarding the plans for Pinacate Middle School. She felt that staff was not heard and their input not considered when final construction plans were made. She did not feel that four science rooms would be adequate and did not like the idea of an accordion wall separating the rooms. Chuck Reutter addressed the Board regarding a school for the deaf that he attended in New York when he was a young man. He expressed his support of the assemblies at Perris High School and for Measure T. Jackie MacDonald addressed the Board and read the following statement: “It has come to my attention that a program geared toward minority students is not being embraced by certain educators in the District. These programs are designed to help lift those targeted students from the pit of low achievement. As usual, there are a few who want to label these programs as “segregating” or “racist”. The argument being made that if programs were made for the majority (white) populations only, minorities would be protesting in the street. The reason this argument is illegitimate is that the only students with consistently below standard achievement are the ones now being targeted for additional help! I would think as “educators” those against the program would be for it, to help achieve the goal of imparting knowledge and creating life-long learners. Quite possibly, if these students gain a newfound respect for themselves, it might be a little easier for them to give that respect back to the adults they come in contact with. There was a time when Black History month was celebrated in this District with daily bulletins of Black facts. The BSU cooked and served soul food lunches and performed assemblies at both Perris High School and Pinacate Middle School. Some folks were against that at the time. Until American History is all inclusive in American History books (which probably won’t happen until Texas is no longer rewriting history as the text book printing capital) it is incumbent upon educators to teach it, to instill respect for everyone’s contribution to this great nation. This I think would help all students learn and achieve. By the way, there was a very positive article in the Press-Enterprise Monday, February 18, 2013, about the improvement in proficiency among English learners in the District. The District should be commended for doing what was necessary to facilitate those improvements. Hopefully, other targeted students can get the help they need and people can see the value in these programs, because if you are not part of the solution, that means you are part of the problem.”

INVITATION TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES (cont.)


11.1 Invitation to Address the Board of Trustees (cont.) Marcina Riley, S3 Coordinator at Perris High School addressed the Board in order to clarify a few points expressed by Mr. Paul Clay. The name of the assembly was not the “Black and Brown Love Fest” it is in fact called “Black/Brown Love Assembly.” The third assembly to which he referred to “Pimps and Hos to Princes and Princesses” is not occurring. There are only two assemblies, “Black/Brown Love Assembly” and the “N-Bomb Assembly.” The titles of both assemblies come from the Village Nation who are consultants to the District on these assemblies. The “N-Bomb” title is intended to note the obliteration of the term and its use in present time. This assembly takes students through the course of the historical perspective of the use of the word, so that they understand how the term was used in history, how it has come be used now, and how it prevents them from being successful because that is what they deem themselves to be. Both assemblies are educational, motivational and inspirational. Norma Carrillo, Teacher at Perris High School, and S3 Committee Member wanted to provide the Board with some highlights from the first assembly. She stated that Perris High School put on the first of a couple of assemblies addressing the key student subgroups mentioned earlier tonight; the Latino and African-American students. As seen from our test scores the students could definitely benefit from the differentiating instructional approaches since the programs that are currently in place, alone by themselves, are not working. The first assembly “Black/Brown Love Assembly” exposed to the students messages of pursuing dreams, culture empowerment, unity, and non-violence in the roll of storytelling. These major themes were presented through the use of various artistic mediums to include modern music, dance, and historical documents that tapped into the interest of the majority of the student population. All-in-all, it was a successful project. She wanted to thank the Board and Superintendent for their support.

ORAL REPORTS (cont.) 9.5 Curriculum: Oral Presentation to the Board of Trustees by Marcy Savage, Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services, regarding Common Core State Standards Marcy Savage, Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services gave a presentation on the Common Core Standards. A copy of that presentation is attached to and included as part of these minutes.



9.6 Curriculum: Oral Presentation to the Board of Trustees by Charles Tippie, Teacher on Special Assignment - Assessment, regarding Smarter Balance Assessment Consortium - Overview and Updates This item was postponed to the March 20, 2013 Board Meeting. 9.7 Business: Oral Presentation to the Board of Trustees by Candace Reines, Assistant Superintendent of Business Services regarding the Budget Candace Reines, Assistant Superintendent of Business Services provided the Board with an update on the 2012-13 Revised Budget. A copy of that presentation is attached and included as part of these minutes.

WRITTEN REPORTS 10.1 Suspension Reports - December 2012 The Board of Trustees received, for its information, the December 2012 Suspension Reports.

CONSENT CALENDAR 12.1 Approval of Consent Calendar Items ORIGINAL – Motion 80 Member (David Nelissen) moved, Member (Joan Cooley) seconded to approve the ORIGINAL motion, “It is recommended that the Board of Trustees approve the items listed under the Consent Calendar categories of General Functions, Personnel, Curriculum, Buildings and Grounds, and Business.” Upon a roll call vote being taken, the vote was: Aye: 5, Nay: 0. The motion PASSED 5 – 0. 12.2 General Functions: Minutes of the Study Session and Regular Board Meeting for January 16, 2013 The Board of Trustees approved the minutes of the Study Session and Regular Board Meeting of January 16, 2013.

CONSENT CALENDAR (cont.)


12.3 Personnel: Certificated Personnel Action Items The Board of Trustees ratified and/or approved the Certificated Personnel Action items as attached to these minutes. 12.4 Personnel: Classified Personnel Action Items The Board of Trustees ratified and/or approved the Classified Personnel Action items as attached to these minutes. 12.5 Curriculum: Overnight Field Trip Request for Heritage High School Key Club Students to Attend the 67th Annual Key Club California-Nevada-Hawaii District Convention in Anaheim, California, on March 22-24, 2013 (funded through Heritage High School's Key Club/Associated Student Body funds, not the General Fund) The Board of Trustees approved the overnight field trip request for Heritage High School Key Club students to attend the 67th Annual Key Club California-Nevada-Hawaii District Convention in Anaheim, California, on March 22-24, 2013. 12.6 Curriculum: Overnight Field Trip Request for Heritage High School Students to Attend the California Association of Student Leaders State Conference in San Jose, California, on April 13-15, 2013 (funded through Heritage High School's Safe and Supportive Schools (S3) Grant, not the General Fund) The Board of Trustees approved the overnight field trip request for Heritage High School students to attend the California Association of Student Leaders State Conference in San Jose, California, on April 13-15, 2013. 12.7 Curriculum: Overnight Field Trip Request for Perris High School Friday Night Live Students to Attend the Active Youth Conference at Camp Buckhorn, in Idyllwild, California, on March 22-24, 2013 (funded through Perris High School's Friday Night Live Club/Associated Student Body funds, not the General Fund) The Board of Trustees approved the overnight field trip request for Perris High School Friday Night Live students to attend the Active Youth Conference at Camp Buckhorn, in Idyllwild, California, on March 22-24, 2013.



12.8 Curriculum: Overnight Field Trip Request for Perris High School Future Farmers of America Students to Attend the Career Development Event at the University of California - Davis, in Davis, California, on March 1-3, 2013 (funded through Perris High School's Future Farmers of America/Associated Student Body funds, not the General Fund) The Board of Trustees approved the overnight field trip request for Perris High School FFA students to attend the Career Development Event at UC Davis, Davis, California, on March 1-3, 2013. 12.9 Curriculum: Overnight Field Trip Request for Perris High School Band Students to Attend the San Diego Band Concert Tour in San Diego, California, on May 17-19, 2013 (funded through fundraising, not the General Fund) The Board of Trustees approved the Overnight Field Trip Request for Perris High School Band students to attend the San Diego Band Concert Tour, in San Diego, California, on May 17-19, 2013. 12.10 Curriculum: Overnight Field Trip Request for Paloma Valley High School Key Club Students to Attend the 67th Annual Key Club California-Nevada-Hawaii District Convention in Anaheim, California, on March 22-24, 2013 (funded through Paloma Valley High School's Key Club/Associated Student Body funds and student donations, not the General Fund) The Board of Trustees approved the overnight field trip request for Paloma Valley High School Key Club students to attend the 67th Annual Key Club California-Nevada-Hawaii District Convention in Anaheim, California, on March 22-24, 2013. 12.11 Curriculum: Overnight Field Trip Request for Pinacate Middle School Friday Night Live Club Students to Attend Friday Night Live Leadership Training at Camp Buckhorn, in Idyllwild, California, on March 15-17, 2013 (funded through Pinacate Middle School's Friday Night Live Club/Associated Student Body funds, not the General Fund) The Board of Trustees approved the overnight field trip request for Pinacate Middle School Friday Night Live students to attend the Active Youth Conference at Camp Buckhorn, in Idyllwild, California, on March 15-17, 2013.



12.12 Curriculum: Consultant Agreement (Addendum II) with THINK Together, Inc. for Perris High School (funded through the Safe and Supportive Schools (S3) Grant, not the General Fund) The Board of Trustees approved the Consultant Agreement (Addendum II) with THINK Together, Inc., for Perris High School. 12.13 Curriculum: Consultant Agreement (Addendum) with Nethersprings (funded through Title I, not the General Fund) The Board of Trustees approved the addendum (III) to the Consultant Agreement with Nethersprings. 12.14 Curriculum: 2011-12 School Accountability Report Cards The Board of Trustees approved the 2011-12 School Accountability Report Cards for Perris High School, Paloma Valley High School, Heritage High School, Perris Lake High School, Pinacate Middle School, and The Academy. 12.15 Building and Grounds: Notice of Completions - Pinacate Middle School - Phase 1 - Administration/Gymnasium (no fiscal impact) The Board of Trustees approved the Notice of Completions for Lee & Stires Inc., Category 1-Demo & Earth, Nature Tech Landscape, Category 2-Landscape, KAR Construction, Inc., Category 3-Concrete, Kretschmar & Smith Inc., Category 4-Masonry, SCW Contracting, Category 5-Structural Steel, Church & Larsen Inc., Category 7-Metal Stud Framing, David M. Bertino Mfg. Inc., Category 8-Casework, BEST Contracting Services, Category 9-Built Up Roofing, RB Sheet Metal, Category 10-Sheet Metal Roofing, Whitehead Construction, Category 11-Glass & Glazing, Continental Marble & Tile, Category 12-Ceramic Tile, Southcoast Acoustical, Category 13-Acoustical Ceiling, Riccardi Floor Covering, Category 14-Resilient Flooring, Triumph Painting, Category 15-Painting & Waterproofing, Inland Building Construction, Category 16-Specialties, West Tech Mechanical Inc., Category 17-HVAC, JPI Development, Category 18-Building Plumbing, Daniels Electric Inc., Category 19-Electrical, JPI Development, Category 20-Fire Sprinklers, Montgomery Hardware Inc., Category 21-Door & Hardware, and JPI Development, Category 23-Utilities.



12.16 Building and Grounds: Award of One (1) Category and Ratification of Contract Award for Perris High School Classroom Expansion - Phase 1B Project (funded through the Capital Facilities Fund, not the General Fund) The Board of Trustees ratified the contract award to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, American Modular Systems, for the Perris High School Classroom Expansion - Phase 1B Project. 12.17 Business: Report of Purchases - January 2013 The Board of Trustees approved the Report of Purchases for January 2013. 12.18 Business: Out-of-State Conference Request for Joseph Williams and Charles Tippie, Teachers on Special Assignments, to Attend the International Society for Technology in Education, in San Antonio, Texas, on June 23-26, 2013 (funded through Economic Impact Aid funds, not the General Fund) The Board of Trustees approved the out-of-state conference request for Joseph Williams and Charles Tippie, Teachers on Special Assignments, to attend the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) in San Antonio, Texas, on June 23-26, 2013. 12.19 Business: Catering Services Agreement with Aramark Entertainment, LLC for the Paloma High School 2014 Prom (funded through Paloma Valley High School's Associated Student Body funds, not the General Fund) The Board of Trustees approved the Catering Services Agreement with Aramark Entertainment, LLC (dba Aventura) for the Paloma Valley High School 2014 Prom. 12.20 Business: Donations - Perris Union High School District and Paloma Valley High School The Board of Trustees accepted the monetary donations of $500 from Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo for the Employee Recognition Program of the Perris Union High School District and $100 from Mr. Edward Agundez, Board of Education, for the Paloma Valley High School Library.

ACTION ITEMS


13.1 General Functions: Adoption of Resolution No. 16:12-13 - Week of the School Administrator Dr. Greenberg complimented the District’s Administrative Team and asked the Board to approve this resolution recognizing the Week of the Administrator. ORIGINAL – Motion 81 Member (Edward Agundez) moved, Member (Joan Cooley) seconded to approve the ORIGINAL motion, “It is recommended that the Board of Trustees adopt Resolution No. 16:12-13 - Week of the School Administrator, commending school leaders for the contributions they make to successful student achievement.” Upon a roll call vote being taken, the vote was: Aye: 5, Nay: 0. The motion PASSED 5 – 0. 13.2 General Functions: Resolution No. 17:12-13 - Trustee Compensation Due to Hardship Trustee Agundez excused himself at this time. President Hulstrom informed the Board the Trustee Agundez was unable to attend the January Board meeting due to a death in his family. This Resolution allows for Trustee Agundez to be compensated for that meeting. ORIGINAL – Motion 82 Member (David Nelissen) moved, Member (Carolyn Twyman) seconded to approve the ORIGINAL motion, “It is recommended that the Board of Trustees adopt Resolution No. 17:12-13 - Trustee Compensation Due to Hardship, allowing Trustee Agundez to be compensated for the January 16, 2013, Regular Board Meeting.” Upon a roll call vote being taken, the vote was: Aye: 4, Nay: 0, Abstain: 1 (Edward Agundez). The motion PASSED 4 – 0 – 1. 13.3 General Functions: 2013 CSBA Delegate Assembly Election ORIGINAL – Motion 83 Member (Joan Cooley) moved, Member (Carolyn Twyman) seconded to approve the ORIGINAL motion, “It is recommended that the Board of Trustees vote for up to six 2013 CSBA Delegate Assembly candidates from a field of six. The candidates are as follows: Robin J. Crist, Incumbent, Murrieta Valley Unified School District; Bruce Dennis, Riverside County Office of Education; Erasmo (Memo) Mendez, Incumbent, Jurupa Unified School District; John I. Norman, Incumbent, San Jacinto Unified School District; Sandra Ann Tusant, Romoland School District; and Vincent O'Neal, Incumbent, Temecula Valley Unified School District.” Upon a roll call vote being taken, the vote was: Aye: 5, Nay: 0. The motion PASSED 5 – 0.

ACTION ITEMS (cont.)


13.4 Personnel: Ratification of Riverside County Superintendent of Schools Memorandum of Understanding and Agreement (Agreement No. C-1003720) for Participation in the Riverside, Inyo, Mono, and San Bernardino Counties Beginning Teacher (RIMS-BTSA) Consortium Professional Teacher Induction Program (revenue) Trustee Nelissen stated that he had been through the BTSA program personally and felt that it was a tremendous resource for new teachers. ORIGINAL – Motion 84 Member (David Nelissen) moved, Member (Joan Cooley) seconded to approve the ORIGINAL motion, “It is recommended that the Board of Trustees ratify the Riverside County Superintendent of Schools Memorandum of Understanding and Agreement (Agreement No. C-1003720) for Participation in the Riverside, Inyo, Mono, and San Bernardino Counties Beginning Teacher (RIMS-BTSA) Consortium Professional Teacher Induction Program.” Upon a roll call vote being taken, the vote was: Aye: 5, Nay: 0. The motion PASSED 5 – 0. 13.5 Business: Resolution No. 20:12-13 - Resolution of the Board of Trustees of the Perris Union High School District Implementing a Supplementary Employee Retirement Plan (SERP) President Hulstrom asked staff to explain why the SERP was only being offered to certificated personnel and not classified. Candace Reines, Assistant Superintendent of Business Services explained that the District uses Keenan and Associates to assist in determining which employee groups qualify. The main focus is based on natural attrition; i.e. who is going to retire anyway and how many. Then if the District offers a SERP, what number will actually retire. It is hoped that by offering the program it will assist in accelerating the rate of retirement. When these numbers are finalized, the District then has to determine if there will be a savings, i.e. replacing employees with others that would come in at a lower rate of pay or not replacing the employees. After completing this process for all employee groups, it was determined that the District would only benefit financially by offering the SERP to certificated bargaining unit personnel. ORIGINAL – Motion 85 Member (Joan Cooley) moved, Member (David Nelissen) seconded to approve the ORIGINAL motion, “It is recommended that the Board of Trustees adopt Resolution No. 20:12-13 - Resolution of the Board of Trustees of the Perris Union High School District Implementing a Supplementary Employee Retirement Plan (SERP).” Upon a roll call vote being taken, the vote was: Aye: 5, Nay: 0. The motion PASSED 5 – 0.



13.6 Business: Citizen's Oversight Committee - Measure Z Appointments Candace Reines, Assistant Superintendent of Business Services stated that she would like to provide a brief staff report that would address the next four Action Items. She stated that last month these items were discussed and reviewed with the Board in the Study Session. Ms. Reines recapped the items listed below for the Board members. ORIGINAL – Motion 86 Member (Joan Cooley) moved, Member (Edward Agundez) seconded to approve the ORIGINAL motion, “It is recommended that the Board of Trustees approve the reappointments of Mark Hickman, Taxpayer Organization, Barry Busch, Business Organization, Bob Duke, Senior Citizen’s Organization, and Lee Tankesley, Member-at-Large to the Citizens' Oversight Committee - Measure Z for a two-year term.” Upon a roll call vote being taken, the vote was: Aye: 5, Nay: 0. The motion PASSED 5 – 0. 13.7 Business: Resolution No. 21:12-13 - Resolution of the Board of Trustees of the Perris Union High School District Amending Policies and Regulations Relative to Citizens’ Oversight Committees for General Obligation Bonds Approved Pursuant to Proposition 39 and Related Law ORIGINAL – Motion 87 Member (Edward Agundez) moved, Member (Joan Cooley) seconded to approve the ORIGINAL motion, “It is recommended that the Board of Trustees adopt Resolution No. 21:12-13 - Resolution of the Board of Trustees of the Perris Union High School District amending policies and regulations relative to Citizens’ Oversight Committees for General Obligation Bonds approved pursuant to Proposition 39 and related law.” Upon a roll call vote being taken, the vote was: Aye: 5, Nay: 0. The motion PASSED 5 – 0. 13.8 Business: Resolution No. 22:12-13 - Resolution of the Board of Trustees of the Perris Union High School District Canvassing the Results of General Obligation Bond Election Held Within the District on November 6, 2012 ORIGINAL – Motion 88 Member (David Nelissen) moved, Member (Joan Cooley) seconded to approve the ORIGINAL motion, “It is recommended that the Board of Trustees adopt Resolution No. 22:12-13 - Resolution of the Board of Trustees of the Perris Union High School District canvassing the results of the General Obligation Bond election held within the District on November 6, 2012.” Upon a roll call vote being taken, the vote was: Aye: 5, Nay: 0. The motion PASSED 5 – 0.



13.9 Business: Solicitation of Applications for Perris Union High School District Measure T Citizens' Oversight Committee and Concerning Selection of Members to Such Committee ORIGINAL – Motion 89 Member (Joan Cooley) moved, Member (David Nelissen) seconded to approve the ORIGINAL motion, “It is recommended that the Board of Trustees provide direction to District staff to solicit applications, review the submitted applications and otherwise evaluate applications and Committee applicants, provide applicants to the Board for consideration/approval and schedule a meeting(s) to appoint the initial members to the District's Measure T Committee.” Upon a roll call vote being taken, the vote was: Aye: 5, Nay: 0. The motion PASSED 5 – 0.

INFORMATION ITEMS 14.1 General Functions: Review of Board Policy/Administrative Regulation 1240 - Volunteer Assistance and Education Code 35021 - Volunteer Aides This item was postponed to the March 20, 2013 Board Meeting. 14.2 Curriculum: New Course: Principles of Biomedical Science The Board of Trustees received for review and consideration, as part of the first reading, the new course curriculum, Principles of Biomedical Science. 14.3 Curriculum: New Course: Trigonometry The Board of Trustees received for review and consideration, as part of the first reading, the new course curriculum, Trigonometry. 14.4 Curriculum: New Course: Honors Principles of Biomedical Science The Board of Trustees received for review and consideration, as part of the first reading, the new course curriculum, Honors Principles of Biomedical Science. 14.5 Business: Revolving Cash Report - January 2013 The Board of Trustees received for its information the Revolving Cash Report for January 2013.

INFORMATION ITEMS (cont.)


14.6 Board Policies: Philosophy, Goals, Objectives and Comprehensive Plans (Series 0000) The Board of Trustees received for review and consideration, as part of the first reading, AR 0420.4 - Charter School Authorization; BP 0420.42 - Charter School Renewal; and BP 0420.43 - Charter School Revocation. 14.7 Board Policies: Business and Non-Instructional Operations (Series 3000) The Board of Trustees received for review and consideration, as part of the first reading, BP/AR 3260 - Fees and Charges, and AR 3543 - Transportation Safety and Emergencies. 14.8 Board Policies: Personnel (Series 4000) The Board of Trustees received for review and consideration, as part of the first reading, BP 4030 - Nondiscrimination in Employment, AR 4161.2, 4261.2, 4361.2 - Personal Leaves, and AR 4217.3 Layoff/Rehire. 14.9 Board Policies: Students (Series 5000) The Board of Trustees received for review and consideration, as part of the first reading, BP/AR 5113.1 - Chronic Absence and Truancy, AR 5125 - Student Records, AR 5126 - Awards for Achievement, AR 5127 – Graduation Ceremonies and Activities, AR 5141.31 – Immunizations, BP/AR 5144 – Discipline, BP/AR 5144.1 - Suspension and Expulsion/Due Process, BP 5145.6 - Parental Notifications, and BP/AR 5148.3 - Preschool/Early Childhood Education. 14.10 Board Policies: Instruction (Series 6000) The Board of Trustees received for review and consideration, as part of the first reading, BP/AR/E 6161.1 - Selection and Evaluation of Instructional Materials, BP 6161.11 - Supplementary Instructional Materials, AR 6173.1 - Education for Foster Youth, and BP/AR/E 6174 - Education for English Language Learners. 14.11 Board Policies: Facilities (Series 7000) The Board of Trustees received for review and consideration, as part of the first reading, BP/AR 7214- General Obligation Bonds.

INFORMATION ITEMS (cont.)


14.12 Board Policies: Board Bylaws (Series 9000) The Board of Trustees received for review and consideration, as part of the first reading, BB 9322 - Agenda/Meeting Materials, and BB/E 9323.2 - Actions by the Board.

CLOSED SESSION (IF NECESSARY) 15.1 Adjourn to the Continuation of Closed Session (if necessary) It was not necessary to adjourn into Closed Session.

RECONVENE IN PUBLIC SESSION (IF NECESSARY) 16.1 Reconvene in Public Session (if necessary) It was not necessary to reconvene the meeting.

ACTION ITEMS (CONTINUED) 17.1 General Functions: Board Review of Student Discipline Matters - Approval of Administrative Hearing Panel's Recommendation ORIGINAL – Motion 90 Member (Joan Cooley) moved, Member (Carolyn Twyman) seconded to approve the ORIGINAL motion, “It is recommended that the Board of Trustees adopt as its own the Administrative Hearing Panel's recommendation of Findings of Fact and Decision on Student Discipline Cases: 023/2012-2013, and 030/2012-2013.” Upon a roll call vote being taken, the vote was: Aye: 5, Nay: 0. The motion PASSED 5 – 0. 17.2 General Functions: Reinstatement of Student Discipline Matters ORIGINAL – Motion 91 Member (Joan Cooley) moved, Member (Carolyn Twyman) seconded to approve the ORIGINAL motion, “It is recommended that the Board of Trustees approve the Director's recommendation for reinstatement of Student Discipline Cases: 041/2011-2012, 081/2011-2012, 082/2011-2012, 084/2011-2012, 086/2011-2012, 094/2011-2012, 103/2011-2012, 113/2011-2012, 118/2011-

ACTION ITEMS (CONTINUED) (cont.)


17.2 General Functions: Reinstatement of Student Discipline Matters (cont.) 2012, 121/2011-2012, 165/2011-2012, 167/2011-2012, 170/2011-2012, 232/2011-2012, TVUSD001/2011-2012, CCSD002/2011-2012, EBR003/2011-2012, SAUSD004/2011-2012, HUSD005/2011-2012, MOVUSD006/2011-2012, and VVUSD007/2011-2012.” Upon a roll call vote being taken, the vote was: Aye: 5, Nay: 0. The motion PASSED 5 – 0.

OTHER ITEMS BY THE SUPERINTENDENT 18.1 Other Items by the Superintendent There were no other items by the Superintendent.

OTHER ITEMS BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 19.1 Other Items by the Board of Trustees There were no other items by the Board of Trustees.

ADJOURNMENT 20.1 Adjournment of the February 20, 2013, Regular Meeting of the Board of Trustees ORIGINAL – Motion 92 Member (Joan Cooley) moved, Member (Carolyn Twyman) seconded to approve the ORIGINAL motion, “It is recommended that the Board of Trustees adjourn the February 20, 2013, Regular Meeting of the Board of Trustees” at 8:10 p.m. Upon a roll call vote being taken, the vote was: Aye: 5, Nay: 0. The motion PASSED 5 – 0. Dr. Jonathan Greenberg, Superintendent William Hulstrom, President Carolyn Twyman, Clerk

Perris Union High School District��2013 Board Workshop��Issuing General Obligation Bonds – Overview of Financing Considerations

II. Current Issues with GO Bonds

February 20, 2013

2

Tentative Board Workshop Schedule – Financing Issues

Date* Finance Topic

January 2013 •  Introduction to General Obligation Bonds

February 2013 •  Current Issues with GO Bonds

March 2013 •  Developing the District’s Measure T “Financing Plan”

April 2013 •  Seek authorization for initial bond issuance in accordance with Measure T Financing Plan

* Preliminary, Subject to Change

3

Recap of Workshop #1 – Introduction to GO Bonds

•  PUHSD Measure T bond capacity highly dependent on future expected Assessed Value growth

•  PUHSD Assessed Value history characterized by substantial growth but significant market cycle volatility

•  Bond structuring must balance desire to capture bond capacity from future assessed value growth with sensitivity to future market uncertainty

•  Leveraging other sources (as the District did with Measure Z) will be an important hedge given uncertainty about future AV growth

•  On January 17, Torlakson (State Superintendent of Schools) issued letter requesting districts to refrain from issuing Capital Appreciation Bonds (CAB’s) while the Governor and Legislature considers K-13 General Obligation Bond reform

•  On January 24, AB 182 (Buchanan, Hueso) introduced, which included the following provisions: –  Ratio of Principal to Debt Service cannot exceed 4 to 1 for each series of bonds

–  All CAB’s maturing 10 years or later must be subject to tender or purchase within 10 years of issuance

–  Any issuance of CAB’s requires certain financial analysis regarding costs and alternatives to the use of CAB’s

–  Precludes school districts from issuing bonds that exceed coupon rates of 8% or issuing bonds beyond 25 years

•  On February 11, ACSA, CASBO & CSBA send letter to Buchanan & Hueso: –  Defending use of CAB’s & highlighting negative consequences of AB 182;

–  Supporting improved transparency and adjusting Prop 39 tax limitations

4

Evolving Legislative Environment

•  Reduced bond capacity for all districts with outstanding bond authorization

•  Less flexibility to shape financing program to changing economic conditions

•  Districts with lower tax base/wealth or smaller size are disproportionately impacted

•  Under current financial conditions, delayed financing programs subject to greater inflation risk (inflation is very low at the moment) and interest rate risk (interest rates are currently at or near 40 year lows)

5

Implications of AB 182

6

What are Capital Appreciation Bonds (CAB’s) and how are they different from Current Interest Bonds (CIB’s)?

Current Interest Bond (CIB’s) - Bonds that pay interest to investors semi-annually until the final maturity of the bonds.

Capital Appreciation Bonds (CAB’s) - Bonds that defer payment of interest to investors until the maturity of the bond by compounding interest semi-annually at a specified rate.

•  School districts, community colleges and other entities typically issue multiple series of bonds within a given funding program whereby CAB’s are frequently used as a component in tandem with CIB’s

•  CAB’s are utilized to generate additional construction dollars by capturing anticipated growth in assessed value and leveraging taxes over a longer period of time

•  If a district is currently at its maximum tax rate, CAB’s are useful in order to structure payments on new bonds around existing debt service while maintaining the current tax rate

•  Since the 2008 financial crisis, CAB’s have been even more prevalent to keep existing bond programs funding construction despite near-term falling assessed values

•  Maturing Proposition 39 bond programs (those issuing the last of a series of bonds for a given authorization) have typically include a CAB’s component

7

Why Do School District’s Use CAB’s?

8

Illustrative Example: How CIB’s & CAB’s work together under the tax rate constraints of Proposition 39

9

Measure T Implications (Preliminary Estimates)

•  Based on current PUHSD Assessed Valuation for 2013, the following are preliminary estimates of bond capacity for initial Measure T bonds at a 3% average annual AV growth estimate.

•  Alternatives below are meant to demonstrate impact on 2016 borrowing capacity assuming a $35 Million borrowing in 2013 if changing assumptions about bond term (if AB 162 is implemented) and use of CAB’s.

•  Background

–  On Jan 14, 2013 RCOE advised PUHSD that, based on its review of the 1st Interim Report, they notified the CA Dept of Ed regarding a change of the District’s certification from “positive” to “qualified”

•  Impact 1: Higher Borrowing Costs

–  Such certification poses risk of downgrade of the District’s credit rating

–  Generic Example: If it was the District’s goal to raise $35 million, a downgrade of the District’s credit rating from “A+” to “A”, would cost the District an additional $37.5k per year in annual debt service or PV cost over 25 years of approx. $528,000

•  Impact 2: Loss of Local Control

–  With qualified certification, bonds must be issued through the County; in current cases, the County is imposing structuring constraints beyond those under current law

10

Qualified vs. Positive Certification of ��District Financial Capacity

11

Takeaways on Current Issues

•  Legislature is considering proposals which could negatively impact school district financing programs (especially Measure T)

•  PUHSD Board can play an active role: –  Develop financing program sensitive to funding needs, but also

taxpayer impacts

–  While some reform is clearly needed, advocate to the State not to overreach with financing reforms which punish good actors

–  Educate the public on how its financing program is distinct from other high profile cases

•  With passage of Proposition 30 in November & 1st issuance under Measure T imminent, 2nd Interim is key moment to begin work to strengthen the District’s balance sheet

•  March Workshop #3 –  Alternative Financing Plan scenarios and preliminary

staff recommendation –  Perris High School project update

•  April Board Meeting

–  2013 Series A authorization parameters, tax rate projections

–  Projects to be funded from bond proceeds

12

Next Steps

COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS (ccss)

PUHSD Governing Board

February 20, 2013

• Moving from

• Adoption to

• Implementation

• to Sustainability

The Launch

“We are living in a world

without borders. To meet

the realities of the 21st

century global economy and

maintain America’s

competitive edge into the

future, we need students

who are prepared to

compete not only with their

American peers, but with

students from all across the

globe for the jobs of

tomorrow.” - Benchmarking for Success

Adoption

By September 2012, 46 states, the District of Columbia, and other

U.S. territories adopted the CCSS.

Not adopted by Alaska, Nebraska, Texas, and Virginia

Minnesota adopted only English language arts and literacy

standards.

Mission Statement

The CCSS provides a consistent, clear understanding of what students

are expected to learn, so teachers and parents know what they need to

do to help them. The standards are designed to be robust and relevant

to the real world, reflecting the knowledge and skills that our young

people need for success in college and careers.

Implementation Professional Development Educators need • Effective professional development to build the capacity of educators.

• Time to plan to implement the new standards.

• Guidance about the efficient use of funds and time for professional development.

• Resources and guidance about best practices to build educators’ understanding of the standards’ structure, content knowledge, and ability to employ strategies reflecting the new instructional shifts.

• Guidance and support to help enhance professional learning through teacher communication and collaboration, such as professional learning communities.

• Professional development and resources about how to engage the community and garner its support.

Assessments Educators need • Knowledge about various kinds of assessments related to CCSS and how to use the data from assessments to inform

instruction.

• Information about the summative assessments and their technology requirements.

• Guidance and support about how to best prepare for the assessments in 2014-2015 (e.g., availability, sample items, clarity on what will be assessed, training on creating assessments that accurately test students’ competency with the new standards).

Technology Educators need • To build knowledge and skill sets for working with and using technology as an instructional tool in the classroom.

• Guidance and support of teaching and learning at the school level.

Instructional Shifts

for ELA/Literacy Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction and

informational texts. Reading, writing, and speaking grounded in evidence. Regular practice with complex texts (and its vocabulary).

Focus Rigor Application of learning to real world situations Technology and media sources Justification and evidence Communication/collaboration Expository reading and writing Research

ELA Claims

Claim #1: Students can read closely and critically to comprehend a range of increasingly complex literary and informational texts.

Claim #2: Students can produce effective writing for a range of purposes and audiences.

Claim #3: Students can employ effective speaking and listening skills for a range of purposes and audiences.

Claim #4: Students can engage appropriately in collaborative and independent inquiry to investigate/research topics, pose questions, and gather and present information.

Claim #5: Students can use oral and written language skillfully across a range of literary tasks.

Instructional Shifts

for Math Focus: Focus strongly where the standards focus. Coherence: Think across grades, and link to major topics. Rigor: Require fluency, application, and deep

understanding. Focus Conceptual understanding Standards for mathematical practice Number sense in elementary Application to real world problems Rigor Success in algebra and higher level mathematics

Math Claims

Claim #1: Students can explain and apply mathematical concepts and carry out mathematical procedures with precision and fluency.

Claim #2: Students can frame and solve a range of complex problems in pure and applied mathematics.

Claim #3: Students can clearly and precisely construct viable arguments to support their own reasoning and to critique the reasoning of others.

Claim #4: Students can analyze complex, real-world scenarios and can use mathematical models to interpret and solve problems.

PUHSD PROGRESS REPORT CCSS IMPLEMENTATION

February 20, 2013

2012-2013 REVISED BUDGET

Approved by voters in November 2012, allocated temporary tax revenues for education and other state funding uses

Provided a narrow window during which further budget cuts are avoided

Provided for relatively flat funding for 2012 -2013 over 2011-2012 funding levels with some relief on deferrals from previous years

Did NOT provide any additional budget authority over 2011 -2012 funding levels

Only avoided drastic cuts, above the more than 22% already being sustained

Allowed school districts to restore contingency cuts or not implement planned contingency cuts

PROPOSITION 30

In January, the Governor proposed his initial plans for the 2013 -2014 state budget

For the first time in five years, education funding goes up on a per-student basis with a 1.65% COLA

In order to fund the COLA in 2013-14, the deficit factor would remain unchanged at 22.272%

$1.8 bill ion in 2013-2014 to further reverse the interyear K-12 apportionment deferrals that were implemented before and during the economic downturn beginning in 2008 -2009

The Governor proposes a sweeping reform of the state’s school finance system with the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) – previously the Weighted Student Formula of 2012

GOVERNOR’S JANUARY BUDGET

Major Proposition 98 budget changes for K -12 education include:

$1.8 billion to reduce interyear deferrals to $5.6 billion

$1.6 billion to begin implementation of a new school finance formula (LCFF) for school districts and charter schools

$400.5 million to support energy efficiency projects in schools from Proposition 39 revenues

$100 million increase for the K-12 Mandate Block Grant to fund the Science Graduation Requirement and Behavioral Intervention Plan mandates

$62.8 million for a 1.65% COLA for selected categorical programs

$48.5 million for charter school ADA growth

$28.2 million to begin implementation of a new funding formula for county offices of education (COEs)

PROPOSITION 98

The revenue limit deficit continues to be more than 20%, but for the first time since 2007-2008 does not grow

Funding is still about 10% less than the amount received in 2007-2008

The Governor continues to deal with the “wall of debt,” but does not dedicate all of the growth in Proposition 98 to this single purpose

Increased funding for K-12 education is dependent upon a continued improved economy in the state and the nation

State and national economic growth are far from certain

The economy is no longer shrinking, but it is not growing at a recovery rate

EDUCATION RECEIVES MORE, BUT…

CALIFORNIA’S EDUCATION SPENDING

$9,524

$11,305

$18,660

K-12 Education Expenditures per Average Daily Attendance (ADA) 2010-2011

*Average of the five states with the highest expenditures per ADA

Source: National Education Association

California

National

Average

Top

Five

States*

Along with slightly higher funding, the Governor

proposes a different method of distribution – the LCFF

Revenue limits and categorical programs are replaced by

base grants and supplemental grants over a phase -in

period

The stated goal is to focus more resources on California’s

most needy students

Funding allocated through the formula would generally

be flexible and could be used for any educational

purpose

FUNDING DISTRIBUTION METHOD

Elements of the proposed formula

A base grant target equal to the undeficited statewide average base revenue limit per ADA – $6,816 (includes the 1.65% statutory COLA)

Differential adjustments for early primary, primary, middle, and high school grade spans; added funding for K-3 Class-Size Reduction (CSR) and 9-12 Career Technical Education (CTE)

Additional funding based on the demographics of the schools, including:

English Learner population

Pupils eligible for free and reduced-price meals

Foster youth

MAJOR LCFF ELEMENTS

LCFF AND CATEGORICAL PROGRAMS

Special Education, Child Nutrition, QEIA, After School Education and Safety (ASES), and other federally mandated programs are not included in the formula

Transportation and Targeted Instructional Improvement Grant (TIIG) funding continue as add-ons to the formula for those school districts that currently receive funding through these programs

And the funds can be used for any educational purpose

The new formula will allocate funds to charter schools in the same way as for school districts

However, concentration grants for charter schools will be limited to no more than the concentration grant increase provided to the school district where the charter school resides

HOW MUCH IS FUNDED?

Fully funding the new formula in 2013-2014 would cost more than $15 billion

Governor’s Proposal sets aside $1.6 billion

A 10% proration factor provides a reasonable estimate, but as more details about the proposal emerges the estimates could change

Department of Finance staff expect to provide estimates of LEA funding under the Governor ’s Proposal within the next few weeks

Most categorical funds are kept in the base, but programs go away

Timeline: Phased in over seven years – completed in 2020-2021

There are currently insufficient details to allow a school district to determine its funding under implementation of the LCFF for 2013 -2014, or for any year thereafter

The Legislature must enact this measure as a change to current school finance statutes

Governor Brown has made the LCFF and continued deferral reduction reform the capstone components of the 2013 -2014 State Budget

Last year, he said he would propose dividing additional revenue between growth and debt reduction, and he is keeping that promise

He is providing additional Proposition 98 General Fund to schools

The LCFF is the Governor’s proposed primary mechanism for new revenues to schools

WHERE DOES THE PROPOSAL STAND?

Cuts to federal funding remain in flux for 2013 -2014

A temporary reprieve from tumbling over the federal “fiscal cliff ” occurred when a “deal” was reached to extend the middle class tax cuts, increase income taxes on high-income earners, and delay the automatic cuts to nondefense discretionary programs, including most education programs, until March 1, 2013

Prior to the “deal,” cuts to federal education programs were estimated to be as much as 8.2%

Programs affected include:

Education for the Disadvantaged (Title I, Elementary and Secondary Education Act [ESEA])

School Improvement (Title II, ESEA)

Special Education (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Part B)

Career, Technical, and Adult Education

Federal Impact Aid

FEDERAL PROGRAMS

Governor proposes shifting responsibility for Adult Education programs from K-12 school agencies to community colleges effective 2013-2014

Proposal establishes a new $300 million block grant

Community colleges are “encouraged to leverage the capacity and expertise currently available at K -12 district adult schools”

The $588.9 million in existing Adult Education funding currently being provided to school districts as Tier III flexible funding is proposed to be folded into the LCFF

School districts would be given the flexibility to continue operation of the program locally

ADULT EDUCATION

The Governor ’s Budget assumes that his new LCFF is passed in the Legislature

There is much to learn about the LCFF proposal, and it is uncertain what would happen to the resources dedicated to the proposal if it does not pass the Legislature

Until state law is changed, revenue limits are the means by which state apportionment aid is distributed to school districts statewide

This leaves the District in a position of needing to plan our budget based on the current funding model, plus 1.65% COLA until the details and fate of the LCFF become clear

Additional revenues associated with the factors in the LCFF could be part of an alternate budget plan

DISTRICT BUDGET PLANNING

$6,652

$7,031

$7,331 $7,302

$7,466

$7,709 $7,837

$6,652 $6,479

$5,985 $5,990 $5,928

$5,992 $6,091

$5,300

$6,300

$7,300

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-14

Do

llars

Per

AD

A

Base Revenue Limit

Projected Statutory COLA

Flat Funding

Actual Funding

$5,551

Loss of

baseline

dollars

Loss of

cost-of-

living

adjustment

(COLA)

If Election had Failed

BASE REVENUE LIMIT (PER-ADA) FUNDING SUMMARY

8,152

8,811

9,289

9,504

9,649 9,651 9,640 9,522

9,354 9,354

8,000

8,200

8,400

8,600

8,800

9,000

9,200

9,400

9,600

9,800

10,000

05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15

District (non-Charter) Enrollment

HISTORICAL & PROJECTED ENROLLMENT

2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015

COLA 3.24% 1.65% 2.20%

Deficit 22.272% 22.272% 22.272%

Enrollment 9,428 9,259 9,259

ADA 8,835.62 8,686.66 8,686.66

Automatic Step Increases

Certificated $123,876 $957,375 $508,804

Classified $97,813 $108,800 $110,999

Health & Welfare Increases $465,888 $600,000 $650,000

KEY BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS

FEBRUARY REVISED BUDGET UNRESTRICTED GENERAL FUND

2012-2013 Adopted Budget

2012-2013 Revised Budget

2013-2014 Projected

Budget

2014-2015 Projected

Budget

Beginning Balance $6,570,781 $6,686,367 $5,149,363 *$2,500,774

Net Revenue $61,135,745 $60,620,231 $61,520,781 $61,885,492

Contributions ($6,966,217) ($7,195,973) ($7,695,589) ($7,883,945)

Proposition 30 Contingency ($4,002,825)

ADA Decrease ($774,704) ($952,881)

Total Budgeted Revenue $50,166,703 $53,424,258 $53,050,488 $53,048,666

Budgeted Expenditures $54,499,181 $54,961,262 $57,554,210 $58,856,061

Net Increase/(Decrease) to Ending Balance (deficit spending amount)

($4,332,478) ($1,537,004) ($4,503,722) ($5,807,395)

Total Ending Balance $2,238,303 $5,149,363 $ 645,641 ($5,161,754)

3% Minimum Required Reserve (plus revolving and other assignments)

2,201,520 2,521,573 2,579,938 2,623,652

Excess/(Shortfall) of 3% Reserve (Required Expenditure Reductions)

$36,782 $2,627,790 ($1,934,297) *($5,851,109)

* 2014-2015 adjusted beginning balance and shortfall assumes reductions of $2M are made for 2013-2014

Even with minimum cut levels, there stil l remains a structural budget deficit – we spend more than we receive in a year!

Depleted reserves make the cuts feel worse

Declining enrollment will be a significant challenge

This can impact staffing and programs

“Prior year guarantee” provides some relief

Governor ’s plan begins to reduce deferrals making our cash position slightly improved

We MUST carefully consider how we spend every dollar

While we struggle to survive the short term, we can’t forget about the long term…or more importantly, the continued forward movement of our instructional programs

THE BOTTOM LINE

As is true every year, the Governor ’s Budget Proposals mark the beginning – not the end – of the process

2nd Interim Financial Report will be presented to the Board for approval in March 2013

A Qualified Certification will be recommended given the current budget shortfall, absent Board approved budget reductions

3rd Interim Financial Report will be presented to the Board for approval in May 2013

Required as a result of a Qualified 2nd Interim

Be prepared for changes with the Governor ’s May Revision

It may or may not incorporate LCFF, depending on how details evolve

District ’s 2013-2014 Adopted Budget will be presented to the Board for approval in June 2013

Final 2013-2014 State Budget - June 2013?

ROAD TO BUDGET ADOPTION

1

PERRIS UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING

February 20, 2013 CERTIFICATED PERSONNEL ACTION ITEMS

REVISED NEW EMPLOYEE INFORMATION EFFECTIVE DATE Byers Jr., Robert Substitute Teacher February 21, 2013 District Administration Center Carvajal, Elba Substitute Teacher February 21, 2013 District Administration Center Chacon, Anna Substitute Teacher February 21, 2013 District Administration Center Hunter, Elizabeth Substitute Teacher February 21, 2013 District Administration Center McQueen, Monique Substitute Teacher February 21, 2013 District Administration Center Mora, Barbara Substitute Teacher February 21, 2013 District Administration Center Oliphant, Taddesse Substitute Teacher February 21, 2013 District Administration Center Pena, Jose Substitute Teacher February 21, 2013 District Administration Center Pouncey, Cedric Substitute Teacher February 21, 2013 District Administration Center Serafin, Melina Substitute Teacher February 21, 2013 District Administration Center

Perris Union High School District Certificated Personnel Action Items February 20, 2013 - Revised

2

STATUS CHANGE INFORMATION EFFECTIVE DATE Alderete, Maribel Ratification January 18, 2013 Resignation School Nurse Pupil Services Brickley, Christopher Resignation June 28, 2013 Athletic Director/Dean of Students Perris High School Bush, Andrea Resignation June 7, 2013 Foreign Language - Spanish Perris Lake High School Carnagey, Barney Retirement June 7, 2013 Special Education Paloma Valley High School Driskill, Deena Resignation March 1, 2013 Program Specialist – Special Education Hambly, Wendy Resignation June 7, 2013 English The Academy Hilovsky, Robert Resignation June 7, 2013 Mathematics The Academy Navarro, Veronica Resignation June 7, 2013 Science Heritage High School EXTRA DUTY ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION EFFECTIVE DATE Avila, Heather Ratification February 1, 2013 Girls’ Track and Field Varsity Coach Perris High School


3

EXTRA DUTY ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION EFFECTIVE DATE (continued) Berni, Jason Ratification February 1, 2013 Baseball Co-Varsity Coach Split with Luis Marin Perris High School Boulais, Candace Ratification February 4, 2013 Sixth Period Assignment On Campus Suspension Paloma Valley High School Chase, Gerald Ratification February 1, 2013 Boys’ Track and Field Assistant Coach Paloma Valley High School Cloo, William Ratification February 4, 2013 Sixth Period Assignment English Heritage High School Corona, Malcolm Ratification February 1, 2013 Boys’ Track and Field Assistant Coach Perris High School Diaz-Arntzen, Sondra Ratification January 18, 2013 Sixth Period Assignment Ended Physical Education Paloma Valley High School Ellett, Joseph Ratification February 1, 2013 Baseball Co-Varsity Coach Split with Charles Kemp Paloma Valley High School


4

EXTRA DUTY ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION EFFECTIVE DATE (continued) Ellis, Andrew Ratification November 15, 2012 Boys’ Basketball Assistant Coach Heritage High School Esposito, Bert Ratification February 1, 2013 Boys’ Track and Field Varsity Coach Paloma Valley High School Gray, James Ratification February 1, 2013 Baseball Co-Assistant Coach Split with David McCoy Paloma Valley High School Higgins, Carrie Ratification January 22, 2013 Sixth Period Assignment Mathematics Paloma Valley High School Karg, Pamela Ratification December 20, 2012 Sixth Period Assignment Ended Physical Education Pinacate Middle School Kemp, Charles Ratification February 1, 2013 Baseball Co-Varsity Coach Split with Joseph Ellett Paloma Valley High School King, Alison Ratification February 1, 2013 Boys’ Tennis Varsity Coach Paloma Valley High School


5

EXTRA DUTY ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION EFFECTIVE DATE (continued) LaRock, Monica Ratification February 4, 2013 Sixth Period Assignment On Campus Suspension Paloma Valley High School Lyman, Elizabeth Ratification February 13, 2013 Department Chair Assignment Ended Mathematics Perris High School MacPherson, Stacey Ratification February 4, 2013 Sixth Period Assignment Mathematics Heritage High School Matlock, Gary Ratification February 1, 2013 Baseball Co-Assistant Coach Split with Patrick Mason Paloma Valley High School McCoy, David Ratification January 18, 2013 Sixth Period Assignment Ended Social Science Paloma Valley High School McCoy, David Ratification February 1, 2013 Baseball Co-Assistant Coach Split with James Gray Paloma Valley High School Miller, Jason Ratification February 1, 2013 Sixth Period Assignment Ended Science Paloma Valley High School


6

EXTRA DUTY ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION EFFECTIVE DATE (continued) Moreno, Mario Ratification December 4, 2012 Wrestling Head Coach Heritage High School Noble, Lan Ratification February 1, 2013 Boys’ Tennis Varsity Coach Perris High School Page, Cory Ratification February 1, 2013 Boys’ Golf Head Coach Paloma Valley High School Pena, Jeffrey Ratification February 1, 2013 Baseball Co-Assistant Coach Split with Rudolph Schoenfelder Perris High School Randall, John Ratification January 28, 2013 Sixth Period Assignment Ended Social Science Paloma Valley High School Schoenfelder, Rudolph Ratification February 1, 2013 Baseball Co-Assistant Coach Split with Jeffrey Pena Perris High School Schoenfelder, Rudolph Ratification February 1, 2013 Baseball Co-Assistant Coach Split with Michael Sotelo Perris High School


7

EXTRA DUTY ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION EFFECTIVE DATE (continued) Schoenfelder, Rudolph Ratification November 1, 2012 Wrestling Co-Assistant Coach Split with Chris Dowdy Perris High School Sever, Robert Ratification February 1, 2013 Boys’ Tennis Assistant Coach Perris High School Shah, Julie Ratification January 14, 2013 Title 1 Lead Heritage High School Tejeda-Van Rensburg, Erika Ratification January 15, 2013 Sixth Period Assignment PLUS Leadership Perris High School Vangeison, Tom Ratification December 20, 2012 Sixth Period Assignment Ended Mathematics Paloma Valley High School Velasquez, Brenda Ratification January 14, 2013 Fit Club Advisor Pinacate Middle School Wells, Briana Ratification February 1, 2013 Softball Varsity Coach Paloma Valley High School Wesley, Byron Ratification January 28, 2013 Sixth Period Assignment Ended Physical Education Pinacate Middle School


8

EXTRA DUTY ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION EFFECTIVE DATE (continued) West, Jennifer Ratification December 20, 2012 Sixth Period Assignment Ended Science Paloma Valley High School

1

PERRIS UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING

February 20, 2013 CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL ACTION ITEMS

Revised

STATUS CHANGE INFORMATION EFFECTIVE DATE Carthen, Tara Ratification February 5, 2013 Resignation Paraeducator - Resources Specialist Program/ Special Day Program Perris High School

Employee # 202210 Ratification February 7, 2013 Placement on 39 - Reemployment list

Gonzales, Estela Retirement April 1, 2013 Senior Clerk Perris High School

Valenzuela, Martha Promotion February 25, 2013 From Guidance Technician Pinacate Middle School To Translator Student Services Center – Pupil Services NEW EMPLOYEE INFORMATION EFFECTIVE DATE Carpenter, Angela Classified Substitute February 21, 2013 Custodian District Administration Center

Garcia, Virgilio Ratification January 28, 2013 Tutor Paloma Valley High School

Jones, Donald Classified Substitute February 21, 2013 Custodian District Administration Center

Perris Union High School District Classified Personnel Action Items February 20, 2013 - Revised

2

EXTRA DUTY INFORMATION EFFECTIVE DATE Carlos, Jerry Ratification February 1, 2013 Boys’ Tennis Assistant Coach Paloma Valley High School

Cordova, Orlando Ratification February 7, 2013 Wrestling Volunteer Assistant Coach Paloma Valley High School

Harrison, Bryan Ratification February 13, 2013 Softball Assistant Coach Heritage High School

Harrison, Ebony Ratification February 12, 2013 Volunteer Heritage High School

Hifo, Tonieta Classified Substitute February 20, 2013 Custodian District Administration Center

Mason, Patrick Ratification January 30, 2013 Baseball Co - Assistant Coach Split with Gary Matlock Paloma Valley High School

Ramiro, Mario Ratification January 23, 2013 Softball Assistant Coach Heritage High School

Rico, Aaron Ratification February 12, 2013 Baseball Assistant Coach Paloma Valley High School


3

EXTRA DUTY INFORMATION EFFECTIVE DATE (continued) Robles, Monique Ratification February 1, 2013 Softball Assistant Coach Perris High School

Sweeney, Richard Ratification February 1, 2013 Boys’ Track and Field Assistant Coach Perris High School

Thomas, Alana Ratification January 24, 2013 Girls’ Basketball Assistant Coach Perris High School

Valdez, Joseph Ratification February 1, 2013 Girls’ Swimming Assistant Coach Perris High School

Vera, Jose Ratification February 1, 2013 Boys’ Volleyball Assistant Coach Perris High School

Wells, Briana Ratification February 1, 2013 Softball Varsity Coach Paloma Valley High School

Williams, Marvin Ratification February 1, 2013 Girls’ Track and Field Assistant Coach Perris High School


4

EXTRA DUTY INFORMATION EFFECTIVE DATE (continued) Williams, Tina Ratification November 1, 2012 Girls’ Basketball Co-Assistant Coach Split with Walter Garland and Erica Eickhoff Paloma Valley High School

Documents

PERRIS UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT REGULAR MEETING …board.puhsd.org/Attachments/9efe0059-c74b-46c7-ae53-5bc2c1c0880d.pdfDr. Greenberg stated that he and Trustee Cooley recently visited