1
THIS series of 10 questions is brought to you by the National Current Affairs Quiz’s innovation partner Shell and aims to look for the best ideas and solutions to issues today. L This week’s question (part 1 of 10): If you were in Government, what three environmental issues would you tackle in the next five years? Why? Sum up your thoughts in 200 to 250 words and submit your essay through your teachers this week. The top 10 essays received in response to this question will be uploaded to The Straits Times’ current affairs website Singapolitics from April 8 for public voting. The top three essays with the most votes will each win $200 in vouchers and be reproduced, in full or in part, in print. This competition is open only to Pre-University 1 and Integrated Programme Year 5 students from 24 participating schools. This is the first of 12 primers on various current affairs issues, which will be published in the run-up to The Straits Times-Ministry of Education National Current Affairs Quiz. ABOUT THE BIG QUIZ L Co-organisers: The Straits Times and the Ministry of Education L Presenting sponsor: Singapore Press Holdings Foundation L Innovation partner: Shell L The run-up to the Big Quiz comprises: 1. A series of 12 primers on current affairs topics 2. Talks given by editors and correspondents of The Straits Times 3. A sponsored segment on students’ say to set questions THE BIG QUIZ CONTEST Four quiz rounds in which teams from participating schools will vie for the top prize: a championship trophy and $5,000 cash L Open to: First year pre-university students and Year 5 Integrated Programme students from 24 participating schools For more information, go to www.straitstimes.com/thebigquiz Thought Leadership Question By GRACE CHUA SINGAPORE is not unique: not in its ambition to be a leading global city, not in its size constraints, or in its diversity and the tensions that result when people from all backgrounds rub shoulders with one another. But it has tried to manage its land use in some unusual ways, such as reclaiming a large percent- age of its land area, going under- ground, and making every patch of land work harder. Turning marshes or sea to solid land is one of Singapore’s oldest methods of creating more land area. Since the 1960s, Singapore has added more than 100 sq km, or a sixth of its original size five times the size of the greater Tam- pines area. The industrial Jurong Island itself is made up of seven smaller islands stitched together by reclamation, and at 32 sq km it is larger than Singapore’s four gazetted nature reserves put to- gether. Today, the Government’s Land Use Plan proposes future reclama- tion along northern and southern coastlines and islands from Pulau Tekong to Pulau Hantu, though environment groups are con- cerned this could affect marine bi- odiversity. Land reclamation also has a lim- it: Filling in greater sea depths takes more sand and is more cost- ly. Along the southern coast, re- claiming land farther out to sea would also begin to interfere with shipping lanes. Singapore also puts some func- tions underground, particularly those that would otherwise take up too much valuable surface land. Since 2008, the military has stored ammunition beneath a dis- used Mandai quarry, while the Ju- rong Rock Cavern is being built to store crude oil and other petrole- um products. Critical infrastructure like pow- er cables, MRT lines, the Deep Tunnel Sewerage System, and the Common Services Tunnel under Marina Bay are also beneath the surface, and there are theoretical proposals and studies for housing power plants, water treatment, waste incineration and even nucle- ar energy underground. Finally, it is trying to squeeze as much use from every piece of land. The western Tengeh reservoir will get floating solar panels in a pilot project to tap the sun’s energy for electricity, while com- munity farms in Bukit Panjang and Clementi serve as recreation areas and a food source. Even roads could be put to bet- ter use. Last month, in a Budget debate in Parliament, Transport Minister Lui Tuck Yew said the Land Transport Authority was studying the feasibility of a “reversible flow” traffic scheme for some are- as where heavy traffic is one-di- rectional at different times of the day, such as the stretch between the Kranji Expressway and the Pan Island Expressway. GRACE CHUA S INGAPORE, like many other cities, is heavily planned, and replanned. It has a long history of planning, from the Raffles Town Plan of 1822 to the Singapore Improvement Trust pre-independence, and then the State and City Planning Project of 1967 to provide adequate housing and employment. The scope of city planning has grown even further. In its most recent Land Use Plan released earlier this year, the Government laid out its vision for housing, transport infrastructure, commerce and industry, and parks and reserves till 2030. But some of these plans have drawn both cheers and criticism. For example, environment and heritage groups have expressed concerns that Singapore is chip- ping away at its green and historic spaces. And in Parliament, Nominated Member of Parliament Faizah Jamal expressed worry that a proposed MRT line through the Central Catchment Nature Reserve would affect wildlife there. It is one thing to develop land use plans that meet basic needs, but quite another to create a sense of “place” or identity which draws people to a city. Around the world, cities are trying to balance economic growth, the needs of a growing population, and conserving the spaces which give a city its identity. Some have taken to redevelop- ment. In the United States, once-in- dustrial cities like Cleveland and Cincinnati are being given a new lease of life through community farms, new housing and commer- cial spaces. Shanghai’s artists, drawn by cheap rent, have turned a former textile factory area into a warren of art galleries and studios. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong and London, there is a chronic hous- ing crunch. Wealthy investors snap up mul- ti-million-dollar apartments even as these cities struggle with short- ages of affordable housing, unable to meet their residents’ needs. Might some of these cities’ much-vaunted green lungs or historic buildings have to go? In Singapore, planners make nearly every piece of land serve at least one function, and many serve multiple functions. For example, a nature reserve is also a water catchment area. Its trees capture carbon diox- ide, and it might also serve as a recreational area with trails for hikers and bikers. Reservoirs and rivers are also used for water sports and fishing. In fact, the latest land use plan consolidates single-use sites such as military areas, and devotes less space to others, like golf courses. But some of the functions of a piece of land may run counter to each other. A road may be a thoroughfare for easing jams, but also a barrier between one place and another. Consider the plight of elderly Marine Parade residents. The raised Still Road South ramp is hard to cross, separating the senior citizens’ centre on one side from other amenities in Marine Parade Central on the other. So planners must balance, for example, the need for East Coast traffic to get onto the expressway with the ability of older residents to get around the estate. Besides using land for multiple purposes, planners also conserve historic elements, giving the city character and making it a more de- sirable place to live. For example, Singapore is turn- ing historic landmarks into public institutions. The former Supreme Court and City Hall buildings will become the National Art Gallery in 2015. But at the same time, the Government tore down the former National Library at the foot of Fort Canning in 2004 to make way for a road tunnel something people are still sore about nearly a decade later. Planners recognise that a little community involvement in the use of space gives the community some ownership of that space. For example, cafes at Kampong Glam bear decorative graffiti, and businesses in the Haji Lane area organised a weekend road closure to entice visitors on foot. The former Bidadari cemetery will be turned into a housing es- tate with a memorial park to mark the cemetery’s significance. But another cemetery, Bukit Brown, will soon have a road through it and make way for housing. Though it is no longer open for new burials, biodiversity-rich Bukit Brown remains a space for religious rituals, birdwatchers and joggers – not to mention the final resting place of pioneers like Nanyang University co-founder Tan Lark Sye and businessman Ong Sam Leong. How might Singapore house a growing population while preserv- ing more nature areas and retaining the character and com- munity feel of its neighbour- hoods? Dr Stephen Cairns of the Future Cities Laboratory here, a research collaboration between Singapore and ETH Zurich, suggests allowing “3-D cities” to evolve. Of course all cities are techni- cally three-dimensional. But what Dr Cairns means is that some, like Hong Kong or Tokyo, have on their upper floors and levels the same kind of vibrant city life one normally finds on the street. Having mixed-use develop- ments at multiple levels – say a coffee shop on one floor, a hairdresser on another and allowing for serendipitous encoun- ters between neighbours could be a way of building the community even as land use intensifies, he said. “It gives more possibilities for identity to develop. If I’m living in a particular part of the block, close to emerging manufacturing, I can look across to a common park – I feel like I own it, like it’s in my neighbourhood.” And increasing density allows the city’s existing heritage areas and green spaces to be less threatened by development, he added. Singapore may not be accus- tomed to living this way, he said, but a few generations ago, even high-rise living was a new con- cept. The city is always changing – even if change takes place over very long periods. The question is how best to ease the transition. During Budget debates in Parliament last month, Senior Minister of State for National Development Tan Chuan-Jin said the Government tries to seek out and weigh different views on development, and engage stake- holders. But he noted the balance be- tween conservation and develop- ment was subjective and highly contextual. “For example, one may strong- ly believe that this patch of greenery is very important. But somebody else might say, does it really matter? Why are we spend- ing so much time, so much re- sources, dragging our feet on the issue?” [email protected] THE SINGAPORE PERSPECTIVE Making every patch of land work harder Woodleigh MRT station on the North East Line is built underground, as are other critical infrastructure like power cables, the Deep Tunnel Sewerage System, and the Common Services Tunnel under Marina Bay. ST PHOTO: KEVIN LIM A view of the Singapore Flyer and Marina Bay Golf Course as seen from the rooftop of the Ritz-Carlton hotel. The latest land use plan devotes less space to uses like golf courses. ST PHOTO: CAROLINE CHIA PRIMER Planning and replanning land use MONDAY, APRIL 1, 2013 O P I N I O N A23

[Primer] land use

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: [Primer] land use

THIS series of 10 questionsis brought to you by theNational Current AffairsQuiz’s innovation partnerShell and aims to look forthe best ideas andsolutions to issues today.

L This week’s question(part 1 of 10): If you werein Government, what threeenvironmental issues wouldyou tackle in the next fiveyears? Why?

Sum up your thoughtsin 200 to 250 words andsubmit your essay throughyour teachers this week.

The top 10 essaysreceived in response to thisquestion will be uploadedto The Straits Times’current affairs websiteSingapolitics from April 8for public voting.

The top three essayswith the most votes willeach win $200 in vouchersand be reproduced, in fullor in part, in print.

This competition isopen only toPre-University 1 andIntegrated ProgrammeYear 5 students from 24participating schools.

This is the first of 12primers on variouscurrent affairs issues,which will bepublished in therun-up to The StraitsTimes-Ministry ofEducation NationalCurrent Affairs Quiz.

ABOUT THE BIG QUIZ

L Co-organisers: The Straits Times and the Ministry of EducationL Presenting sponsor: Singapore Press Holdings FoundationL Innovation partner: ShellL The run-up to the Big Quiz comprises:1. A series of 12 primers on current affairs topics2. Talks given by editors and correspondents of TheStraits Times3. A sponsored segment on students’ say to set questions

THE BIG QUIZ CONTEST

Four quiz rounds in which teams from participating schools willvie for the top prize: a championship trophy and $5,000 cashL Open to: First year pre-university students and Year 5Integrated Programme students from 24 participating schools

For more information, go to www.straitstimes.com/thebigquiz

ThoughtLeadershipQuestion

By GRACE CHUA

SINGAPORE is not unique: not inits ambition to be a leading globalcity, not in its size constraints, orin its diversity and the tensionsthat result when people from allbackgrounds rub shoulders withone another.

But it has tried to manage itsland use in some unusual ways,such as reclaiming a large percent-age of its land area, going under-ground, and making every patchof land work harder.

Turning marshes or sea to solidland is one of Singapore’s oldestmethods of creating more landarea.

Since the 1960s, Singapore hasadded more than 100 sq km, or asixth of its original size – fivetimes the size of the greater Tam-pines area.

The industrial Jurong Islanditself is made up of seven smallerislands stitched together byreclamation, and at 32 sq km it islarger than Singapore’s fourgazetted nature reserves put to-gether.

Today, the Government’s LandUse Plan proposes future reclama-tion along northern and southerncoastlines and islands from PulauTekong to Pulau Hantu, thoughenvironment groups are con-cerned this could affect marine bi-odiversity.

Land reclamation also has a lim-it: Filling in greater sea depthstakes more sand and is more cost-ly. Along the southern coast, re-claiming land farther out to seawould also begin to interfere withshipping lanes.

Singapore also puts some func-tions underground, particularlythose that would otherwise takeup too much valuable surfaceland.

Since 2008, the military hasstored ammunition beneath a dis-used Mandai quarry, while the Ju-rong Rock Cavern is being built tostore crude oil and other petrole-um products.

Critical infrastructure like pow-er cables, MRT lines, the DeepTunnel Sewerage System, and theCommon Services Tunnel under

Marina Bay are also beneath thesurface, and there are theoreticalproposals and studies for housingpower plants, water treatment,waste incineration and even nucle-ar energy underground.

Finally, it is trying to squeezeas much use from every piece ofland.

The western Tengeh reservoirwill get floating solar panels in apilot project to tap the sun’senergy for electricity, while com-munity farms in Bukit Panjangand Clementi serve as recreation

areas and a food source.Even roads could be put to bet-

ter use.Last month, in a Budget debate

in Parliament, Transport MinisterLui Tuck Yew said the LandTransport Authority was studyingthe feasibility of a “reversibleflow” traffic scheme for some are-as where heavy traffic is one-di-rectional at different times of theday, such as the stretch betweenthe Kranji Expressway and thePan Island Expressway.GRACE CHUA

SINGAPORE, like manyother cities, is heavilyplanned, and replanned.

It has a long historyof planning, from the

Raffles Town Plan of 1822 to theSingapore Improvement Trustpre-independence, and then theState and City Planning Project of1967 to provide adequate housingand employment.

The scope of city planning hasgrown even further.

In its most recent Land UsePlan released earlier this year, theGovernment laid out its vision forhousing, transport infrastructure,commerce and industry, andparks and reserves till 2030.

But some of these plans havedrawn both cheers and criticism.

For example, environment andheritage groups have expressedconcerns that Singapore is chip-ping away at its green and historicspaces.

And in Parliament, NominatedMember of Parliament FaizahJamal expressed worry that aproposed MRT line through theCentral Catchment NatureReserve would affect wildlifethere.

It is one thing to develop landuse plans that meet basic needs,but quite another to create a senseof “place” or identity whichdraws people to a city.

Around the world, cities aretrying to balance economicgrowth, the needs of a growingpopulation, and conserving thespaces which give a city itsidentity.

Some have taken to redevelop-ment.

In the United States, once-in-dustrial cities like Cleveland andCincinnati are being given a newlease of life through communityfarms, new housing and commer-cial spaces.

Shanghai’s artists, drawn bycheap rent, have turned a formertextile factory area into a warrenof art galleries and studios.

Meanwhile, in Hong Kong andLondon, there is a chronic hous-ing crunch.

Wealthy investors snap up mul-ti-million-dollar apartments evenas these cities struggle with short-ages of affordable housing, unableto meet their residents’ needs.Might some of these cities’much-vaunted green lungs orhistoric buildings have to go?

In Singapore, planners makenearly every piece of land serve atleast one function, and manyserve multiple functions.

For example, a nature reserveis also a water catchment area.

Its trees capture carbon diox-ide, and it might also serve as arecreational area with trails forhikers and bikers.

Reservoirs and rivers are alsoused for water sports and fishing.

In fact, the latest land use planconsolidates single-use sites suchas military areas, and devotes lessspace to others, like golf courses.

But some of the functions of apiece of land may run counter toeach other.

A road may be a thoroughfarefor easing jams, but also a barrierbetween one place and another.

Consider the plight of elderlyMarine Parade residents.

The raised Still Road Southramp is hard to cross, separatingthe senior citizens’ centre on oneside from other amenities inMarine Parade Central on theother.

So planners must balance, forexample, the need for East Coasttraffic to get onto the expresswaywith the ability of older residentsto get around the estate.

Besides using land for multiplepurposes, planners also conservehistoric elements, giving the citycharacter and making it a more de-sirable place to live.

For example, Singapore is turn-ing historic landmarks into publicinstitutions. The former Supreme

Court and City Hall buildings willbecome the National Art Galleryin 2015.

But at the same time, theGovernment tore down theformer National Library at thefoot of Fort Canning in 2004 tomake way for a road tunnel –something people are still soreabout nearly a decade later.

Planners recognise that a littlecommunity involvement in theuse of space gives the communitysome ownership of that space. Forexample, cafes at Kampong Glambear decorative graffiti, andbusinesses in the Haji Lane areaorganised a weekend road closureto entice visitors on foot.

The former Bidadari cemeterywill be turned into a housing es-tate with a memorial park to markthe cemetery’s significance.

But another cemetery, BukitBrown, will soon have a roadthrough it and make way forhousing.

Though it is no longer open fornew burials, biodiversity-richBukit Brown remains a space forreligious rituals, birdwatchers andjoggers – not to mention the finalresting place of pioneers like

Nanyang University co-founderTan Lark Sye and businessmanOng Sam Leong.

How might Singapore house agrowing population while preserv-ing more nature areas andretaining the character and com-munity feel of its neighbour-hoods?

Dr Stephen Cairns of theFuture Cities Laboratory here, aresearch collaboration betweenSingapore and ETH Zurich,suggests allowing “3-D cities” toevolve.

Of course all cities are techni-cally three-dimensional.

But what Dr Cairns means isthat some, like Hong Kong orTokyo, have on their upper floorsand levels the same kind ofvibrant city life one normallyfinds on the street.

Having mixed-use develop-ments at multiple levels – say acoffee shop on one floor, ahairdresser on another – andallowing for serendipitous encoun-ters between neighbours could bea way of building the communityeven as land use intensifies, hesaid.

“It gives more possibilities for

identity to develop. If I’m livingin a particular part of the block,close to emerging manufacturing,I can look across to a common

park – I feel like I own it, like it’sin my neighbourhood.”

And increasing density allowsthe city’s existing heritage areas

and green spaces to be lessthreatened by development, headded.

Singapore may not be accus-tomed to living this way, he said,but a few generations ago, evenhigh-rise living was a new con-cept.

The city is always changing –even if change takes place oververy long periods. The question ishow best to ease the transition.

During Budget debates inParliament last month, SeniorMinister of State for NationalDevelopment Tan Chuan-Jin saidthe Government tries to seek outand weigh different views ondevelopment, and engage stake-holders.

But he noted the balance be-tween conservation and develop-ment was subjective and highlycontextual.

“For example, one may strong-ly believe that this patch ofgreenery is very important. Butsomebody else might say, does itreally matter? Why are we spend-ing so much time, so much re-sources, dragging our feet on theissue?”

[email protected]

THE SINGAPORE PERSPECTIVE

Making every patch of land work harder

Woodleigh MRT station on the North East Line is built underground, as are other critical infrastructure like power cables,the Deep Tunnel Sewerage System, and the Common Services Tunnel under Marina Bay. ST PHOTO: KEVIN LIM

A view of the Singapore Flyer and Marina Bay Golf Course as seen from the rooftop of the Ritz-Carlton hotel. The latest land use plan devotes less space to uses like golf courses. ST PHOTO: CAROLINE CHIA

PRIMER

Planning and replanning land use

M O N D A Y , A P R I L 1 , 2 0 1 3 OOPPIINNIIOONN A23