1
2 EDITORIAL Prostate Cancer – Good News, Bad News Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in men in the US, according to the American Cancer Society. Over the past 20 years, the 5-year survival rate for this disease has increased from 67% to 99%. The most recent data show that the relative 10- and 15-year survival rates are 92% and 61%, respectively. These marked improvements in survival are partly attributable to earlier diagnosis but also to improvements in treatment. A search of R&D Insight identified over 120 products in clinical development for prostate cancer (30 at phase III or preregistra- tion stage). However, one potential treatment expected to reach blockbuster status has had its progress to market stopped – at least temporarily – by a negative advisory committee review (p11) Analysts were anticipating a 2006 launch for Abbott Laboratories’ Xinlay(atrasentan) prior to the nonapproval recommendation from the US FDA’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee. This decision is a positive for those companies with competitor products in phase III – GPC Biotech, which is developing satraplatin for hormone-refractory prostate cancer, along with Dendreon and Cell Genesys, which are developing therapeutic vaccines. Early diagnosis is the key for successful therapy. A study recently presented at the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology’s 47th Annual Meeting in Denver, CO, showed that over an estimated 10-year period, men who have an annual PSA blood test will have a 3.6% chance of dying from the disease, compared to 11.3% in the general population. And while some urologists claim that measuring PSA may not be effective in predicting risk of prostate cancer, a Johns Hopkins study of >2000 men confirms that PSA remains the best measure of the likelihood of cancer recurrence after surgery. Despite such positive news, there is still a need for new methods for diagnosing prostate cancer and predicting risk. In this issue, we report on research showing that a panel of 22 biomarkers can provide a more accurate screening test than PSA and a gene mutation that may increase the prostate cancer risk by 3-fold in African-American men with a family history of the disease (p16). Tracey Wright, Editor Pharmaceutical & Diagnostic Innovation 2005; Vol. 3, No. 10

Prostate Cancer — Good News, Bad News

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Prostate Cancer — Good News, Bad News

2

EDITORIAL

Prostate Cancer – Good News, Bad News Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in men in the US, according to the American Cancer Society. Over thepast 20 years, the 5-year survival rate for this disease has increased from 67% to 99%. The most recent data show that the relative10- and 15-year survival rates are 92% and 61%, respectively. These marked improvements in survival are partly attributable toearlier diagnosis but also to improvements in treatment.A search of R&D Insight identified over 120 products in clinical development for prostate cancer (30 at phase III or preregistra-tion stage). However, one potential treatment expected to reach blockbuster status has had its progress to market stopped – at leasttemporarily – by a negative advisory committee review (p11) Analysts were anticipating a 2006 launch for Abbott Laboratories’Xinlay™ (atrasentan) prior to the nonapproval recommendation from the US FDA’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee. Thisdecision is a positive for those companies with competitor products in phase III – GPC Biotech, which is developing satraplatinfor hormone-refractory prostate cancer, along with Dendreon and Cell Genesys, which are developing therapeutic vaccines.Early diagnosis is the key for successful therapy. A study recently presented at the American Society for Therapeutic Radiologyand Oncology’s 47th Annual Meeting in Denver, CO, showed that over an estimated 10-year period, men who have an annualPSA blood test will have a 3.6% chance of dying from the disease, compared to 11.3% in the general population. And while someurologists claim that measuring PSA may not be effective in predicting risk of prostate cancer, a Johns Hopkins study of>2000 men confirms that PSA remains the best measure of the likelihood of cancer recurrence after surgery.Despite such positive news, there is still a need for new methods for diagnosing prostate cancer and predicting risk. In this issue,we report on research showing that a panel of 22 biomarkers can provide a more accurate screening test than PSA and a genemutation that may increase the prostate cancer risk by 3-fold in African-American men with a family history of the disease (p16).Tracey Wright, Editor

Pharmaceutical & Diagnostic Innovation 2005; Vol. 3, No. 10