Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Rec
Un
Ne
Ne
Ne
me
Reconstruction of Midface and Orbital WallDefects After Maxillectomy and Orbital
Content Preservation With Titanium Meshand Fascia Lata: 3-Year Follow-Up
eived
iversity
*Assista
ck Surg
yProfeszAssistack Surg
xAssistack Surg
Addres
nt of O
Maziar Motiee-Langroudi, MD,* Iraj Harirchi, MD,y Amin Amali, MD,zand Mehrdad Jafari, MDx
Purpose: To describe the authors’ experience in the reconstruction of patients after total maxillectomywith preservation of orbital contents for maxillary tumors using titanium mesh and autogenous fascia lata,
where no setting for free flap reconstruction is available.
Patients and Methods: Twelve consecutive patients with paranasal sinus tumors underwent total
maxillectomy without orbital exenterations and primary reconstruction. The defects were reconstructed
by titanium mesh in combination with autogenous fascia lata in the orbital floor performed by 1 surgical
team. Titanium mesh (0.2 mm thick) was contoured and fixed to reconstruct the orbital floor and obtain
midface projection. Fascia lata was used to cover the titanium mesh along the orbital floor to prevent fat
entrapment in the mesh holes.
Results: The most common pathology was squamous cell carcinoma (50%). Patients’ mean age was
45.66 years (33 to 74 yr). The mean follow-up period was 35.2 months (30 to 49 months). During
follow-up, no infection or foreign body reaction was encountered. Extrusion of titanium mesh occurred
in 4 patients who underwent postoperative radiotherapy. Two cases of mild diplopia at extreme gazeoccurred early during the postoperative period that resolved after a few months.
Conclusion: Placing fascia lata between the titanium mesh surface of the orbital implant and the orbital
contents was successful in preventing long-term diplopia or dystopia. Nevertheless, exposure of the tita-nium implant through the skin surface represented a complication of this technique in 25% of patients.
Further studies are required with head-to-head comparisons of artificial materials and free flaps for recon-
struction of maxillectomy defects.
� 2015 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73:2447.e1-2447.e5, 2015
Maxillary and orbital reconstruction is a major
challenge for head and neck reconstructive surgeons.
Because maxillectomy is an uncommon operation,evidence is limited regarding the best reconstructive
procedure.1 Although the selection of the method
depends on the extent of the bony and soft tissue
from the Imam Khomeini Medical Complex, Tehran
of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
nt Professor, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and
ery, Otolaryngology Research Center.
sor, Department of Oncologic Surgery, Cancer Institute.
nt Professor, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and
ery, Otolaryngology Research Center.
nt Professor, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and
ery, Otolaryngology Research Center.
s correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Jafari: Depart-
tolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Otolaryngology
2447.e
defect, there is no clear optimal method of obturation,
reconstruction, and rehabilitation.2
Titanium mesh is a very suitable reconstructivematerial that allows precise anatomic reconstruction,
but subsequent extrusion and complications have
always been problematic. This report describes the
Research Center, Imam Khomeini Medical Complex, Tehran Univer-
sity of Medical Sciences, Bagherkhan Street, Tehran, Iran
1419733141; e-mail: [email protected]
Received March 17 2015
Accepted August 11 2015
� 2015 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
0278-2391/15/01178-7
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.08.011
1
2447.e2 TITANIUM MESH WITH FASCIA LATA IN RECONSTRUCTION
authors’ experience in the reconstruction of 12
patients who underwent total maxillectomywith pres-
ervation of orbital contents for maxillary tumors by
titanium mesh and autogenous fascia lata.
Patients and Methods
PATIENTS
From August 2009 to December 2010, at the Imam
Khomeini Hospital, an affiliated hospital of the
Tehran University of Medical Sciences (Tehran, Iran),
12 consecutive patients with paranasal sinus tumors
underwent total maxillectomy without orbital exen-
terations (Class III) and primary reconstruction. The
cases that required orbital exenteration wereexcluded. This study was approved by the Imam
Khomeini Hospital institutional review board and all
participants signed an informed consent agreement.
The defects were reconstructed by titanium mesh in
combination with autogenous fascia lata in the orbital
floor performed by 1 surgical team. Eleven patients
received postoperative radiotherapy (range, 30
to 66 Gy).
SURGICAL TECHNIQUES
All surgeries and reconstructions were performed
by 1 team. A total maxillectomy (including orbital
floor resection with preservation of the
orbital contents) was carried out in all patients.
FIGURE 1. Reconstruction of the maxilla and orbital floor with
Motiee-Langroudi et al. Titanium Mesh With Fascia Lata in Reconstruct
AWeber-Ferguson incision with subciliary extension
was made. An upper cheek flap was raised with the
lower eyelid portion elevated off the orbicularis
oculi muscle. The flap was raised 1 cm lateral to
the lateral canthus. The orbicularis oculi and the
orbit periosteum were dissected off the inferior
orbital rim and elevation was carried back near the
orbital apex. The cheek skin and the contralateralpalate were preserved. After performing the maxil-
lectomy, the cheek flap was covered with a split-
thickness skin graft. Titanium mesh (0.2 mm thick)
was contoured and fixed to the remaining structures
(zygoma, hard palate, alveolar ridge, and nasal bone)
to reconstruct the orbital floor and obtain midface
projection (Figs 1, 2).
Fascia lata was harvested from the ipsilateral lowerextremity through a longitudinal incision, approxi-
mately 3 to 5 cm long, along the lateral thigh, the
center of which lies over the junction of the upper
and middle thirds of the upper leg. The graft was
used to cover the titanium mesh along the orbital
floor to prevent fat entrapment in the mesh holes
(Fig 3).
FOLLOW-UP
During follow-up, the cases were reviewed for the
presence of complications (diplopia, epiphora, enoph-
thalmos or proptosis, infection, or extrusion of
titanium mesh).
titanium mesh (asterisk) covered with fascia lata (arrow).
ion . J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015.
FIGURE2. Three-dimensional computed tomogram of a patient 6 weeks after total maxillectomy and reconstructionwith titaniummesh (arrow)and fascia lata.
Motiee-Langroudi et al. Titanium Mesh With Fascia Lata in Reconstruction . J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015.
MOTIEE-LANGROUDI ET AL 2447.e3
Results
Twelve patients with stage T3 to T4 paranasal sinus
tumors (mean age, 45.66 yr; range, 33 to 74 yr) were
enrolled in this study. The most common pathology
was squamous cell carcinoma (50%). The mean
follow-up period was 35.2 months (30 to 49 months).
During follow-up, no infection or foreign body reac-tion was encountered (Table 1). Extrusion of titanium
mesh occurred in 4 patientswho underwent postoper-
ative radiotherapy (Fig 4). Tumor recurrence was
detected in 2 extrusion cases. Two cases of mild
diplopia at extreme gaze occurred early during the
postoperative period that resolved after a few months.
There were 3 cases of ectropion, 2 of which required
surgical management. Good cosmetic results for
midface reconstruction were obtained.
Discussion
In this study, titanium mesh and fascia lata were
used for reconstruction of Class III defects ofthe maxilla and orbital walls. A vascularized osteocuta-
neous free flap is believed to be the ideal material for
reconstructing defects of the maxilla or mandible after
radical cancer surgery in many studies.3-9 However,
FIGURE 3. Prefabricated titaniummesh at the orbital floor coveredwith fascia lata.
Motiee-Langroudi et al. TitaniumMesh With Fascia Lata in Recon-
struction . J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015.
2447.e4 TITANIUM MESH WITH FASCIA LATA IN RECONSTRUCTION
reconstruction using these flaps is more complicated
than using artificial material, especially in orbital
reconstruction, and morbidity at the donor site
cannot be avoided. Furthermore, there are many
Table 1. DEMOGRAPHICS, PATHOLOGIC INFORMATION, AN
Case Gender
Age
(yr) Pathology Tumor Stage C
1 Female 33 Synovial sarcoma T3 Epiphor
2 Male 27 ACC T3 Tum
3 Male 63 SCC T4 Epip
4 Male 59 SCC T4 Tem
5 Male 74 BCC T4 Epiphor
6 Male 54 SCC T3
7 Male 35 DFP T4
8 Male 23 Ameloblastoma —
9 Female 45 SCC T3
10 Male 67 SCC T3 Tumor r
11 Male 31 Osteosarcoma T3
12 Male 37 SCC T4 Tem
Abbreviations: BCC, basal cell carcinoma; DFP, dermatofibrosis pr
Motiee-Langroudi et al. Titanium Mesh With Fascia Lata in Reconstruct
surgical centers around the world that still do not
have the expertise or adequate funding to establish
the setting required for free flap reconstruction of
head and neck defects.
Different materials for orbital support after total
maxillectomy have been described since the 1960s.
Artificial materials, especially titanium, have been
used to support orbital contents after total maxillec-tomy.10-13 Although as a thin mesh it is considered an
ideal implant for facial skeletal reconstruction, there
is a potential risk of infection and exposure because
it is a foreign body. Sun et al14 used titanium mesh
and a radial forearm flap for palatomaxillary recon-
struction, but not the orbital walls, and obtained
good cosmetic results. Extrusion of implants occurred
in 3 of 19 patients. In the present study, titaniummeshimplants were exposed after radiotherapy in 4 cases.
The rate of infection also is low in patients who
undergo reconstruction with titanium mesh. Dep-
prich et al15 found fewer pathologic micro-organisms
on titanium-based obturators compared with
polymer-based obturators for oral rehabilitation of pa-
tients after maxillectomy. None of the present patients
developed infection during the postoperative period.The titanium mesh was not removed; thus, the dehis-
cence was reconstructed using locoregional flaps.
No extrusion was detected afterward.
This study showed that placing fascia lata between
the superior aspect of the titanium mesh surface of
the orbital implant and the orbital contents can be suc-
cessful in preventing long-term diplopia or dystopia.
Nevertheless, exposure of the titanium mesh throughthe anterior skin represented a complication of this
technique in 25% of patients. The authors suggest
that reconstruction of combined maxillectomy and
D COMPLICATION RECORDS OF STUDY PATIENTS
omplications Extrusion
Extrusion
Occurrence
(mo)
Follow-Up
(mo)
a, tumor recurrence + 17 33
or recurrence � 49
hora, ectropion + 8 39
porary diplopia � 31
a, tumor recurrence + 11 37
Ectropion � 30
— � 34
— + 27 30
Epiphora � 36
ecurrence, ectropion � 39
— � 31
porary diplopia � 34
otuberans; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma.
ion . J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015.
FIGURE 4. Extrusion of titanium mesh after maxillectomy andpostoperative radiotherapy.
Motiee-Langroudi et al. TitaniumMesh With Fascia Lata in Recon-
struction . J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015.
MOTIEE-LANGROUDI ET AL 2447.e5
orbital floor defects with titanium mesh covered by
fascia lata might be an option to consider. Further
studies are required with head-to-head comparison of
allografts, alloplasts, and free flaps for reconstruction
of maxillectomy defects that also involve the
orbital floor.
References
1. Brown JS, Jones DC, Summerwill A, et al: Vascularized iliaccrest with internal oblique muscle for immediate reconstruc-tion after maxillectomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:183,2002
2. Andrades P, Militsakh O, Hanasono MM, et al: Current strategiesin reconstruction of maxillectomy defects. Arch OtolaryngolHead Neck Surg 137:806, 2011
3. Triana RJ Jr, Uglesic V, Virag M, et al: Microvascular free flapreconstructive options in patients with partial and total maxil-lectomy defects. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2:91, 2000
4. Futran ND, Wadsworth JT, Villaret D, et al: Midface reconstruc-tion with fibula free flap. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg128:161, 2002
5. Muzaffar AR, Adams WP Jr, Hartog MJ, et al: Maxillary recon-struction: Functional and aesthetic consideration. Plast ReconstrSurg 104:2172, 1999
6. Uglesi�c V, Virag M, Varga S, et al: Reconstruction followingradical maxillectomy with flaps supplied by the subscapularartery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 28:153, 2000
7. Bidros RS, Metzinger SE, Guerra AB: The thoracodorsal arteryperforator-scapular osteocutaneous (TDAP-SOC) flap for recon-struction of palatal and maxillary defects. Ann Plast Surg 54:59, 2005
8. Yazar S, Cheng MH, Wei FC, et al: Osteomyocutaneous peronealartery perforator flap for reconstruction of composite maxillarydefects. Head Neck 28:297, 2006
9. Rodriguez ED, Bluebond-Langer R, Park JE, et al: Preservation ofcontour in periorbital and midfacial craniofacial microsurgery:Reconstruction of the soft-tissue elements and skeletal but-tresses. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:1738, 2008
10. Hashikawa K, Tahara S, Ishida H, et al: Simple reconstructionwith titanium mesh and radial forearm flap after globe-sparingtotal maxillectomy: A 5-year follow-up study. Plast ReconstrSurg 117:963, 2006
11. Yamamoto Y, Minakawa H, Kawashima K, et al: Role of buttressreconstruction in zygomaticomaxillary skeletal defects. PlastReconstr Surg 101:943, 1998
12. Pollice PA, Frodel JL Jr: Secondary reconstruction of upper mid-face and orbit after total maxillectomy. Arch Otolaryngol HeadNeck Surg 124:802, 1998
13. Nakayama B, Hasegawa Y, Hyodo I, et al: Reconstructionusing a three-dimensional orbitozygomatic skeletal modelof titanium mesh plate and soft-tissue free flap transferfollowing total maxillectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:631,2004
14. Sun G, Yang X, Tang E, et al: Palatomaxillary reconstruction withtitanium mesh and radial forearm flap. Oral Surg Oral Med OralPathol Oral Radiol Endod 108:514, 2009
15. Depprich RA, Handschel JG, Meyer U, et al: Comparison of prev-alence of microorganisms on titanium and silicone/polymethylmethacrylate obturators used for rehabilitation of maxillarydefects. J Prosthet Dent 99:400, 2008