Special Eurobarometer 418 - European Commissionec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_418_e… · Special Eurobarometer 418 SOCIAL CLIMATE REPORT Fieldwork: June

Special Eurobarometer 418

SOCIAL CLIMATE

REPORT

Fieldwork: June 2014

Publication: November 2014

This survey has been requested by the European Commission, Directorate-General for

Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion and co-ordinated by Directorate-General for

Communication.

http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm

This document does not represent the point of view of the European Commission. The interpretations and opinions contained in it are solely those of the authors.

Special Eurobarometer 418 / Wave EB81.5 – TNS Opinion & Social

Project title Special Eurobarometer 418 - Social climate

Linguistic Version EN

Catalogue Number KE-05-14-032-EN-N

ISBN 978-92-79-43245-3

DOI 10.2767/54999

© European Union, 2014

Special Eurobarometer 418

Social climate

Conducted by TNS opinion & social at the request of the

Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion

Survey co-ordinated by the Directorate-General for Communication

SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 418 “Social climate”

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................. 4

I. SOCIAL CLIMATE INDEX .................................................................... 8

II. CURRENT SITUATION ...................................................................... 16

1. Personal situation ......................................................................... 16

2. Country ......................................................................................... 29

3. Social protection and inclusion ..................................................... 47

III. EXPECTATIONS FOR THE NEXT 12 MONTHS .................................. 61


2. Country ......................................................................................... 66


IV. CHANGES IN THE LAST 5 YEARS ................................................... 80


2. Country ......................................................................................... 85


GENERAL CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................... 97

ANNEXES

Technical specifications

Questionnaire

Tables


2

INTRODUCTION

This report presents the results of the sixth in a series of Eurobarometer surveys

undertaken with the overall objective of providing an up-to-date picture of European

citizens’ perceptions of the current social climate. It examines their views on 15 separate

aspects relating to personal circumstances, the national picture and social protection and

inclusion. How do Europeans judge the present situation, how does it compare with five

years ago and what are their expectations over the next 12 months – will things

improve, worsen or remain the same?

The first in this series of surveys was conducted in June 20091, eight months after the

financial and economic crisis within Europe began. By June 2010, when the second wave

of the survey was conducted2, whilst there were signs of improvement in some Member

States, the overall position was still one of economic difficulty. Twelve months later,

when the third wave was conducted in June 20113, there had been further improvement

in the situation with an increase in EU27 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and a fall in

unemployment. However, by the end of 2011, the European debt crisis had worsened,

with Greece, Italy, Ireland, Spain and Portugal receiving a financial bail-out. By June

2012, when the fourth wave of the survey was conducted4, there were signs of a

possible recovery, with first quarter GDP stabilizing after negative growth in the fourth

quarter of 2011.

Since June 2013 (when the last survey was conducted), and to set the context for this

latest wave of research, signs of an economic recovery have continued although it is still

modest. That said, the economic situation and the recovery within the EU remain fragile

and large disparities continue across Member States underpinned by structural

challenges, financing costs and public finances sustainability.

The latest wave of the Social Climate survey was carried out by TNS opinion & social

network in the 28 Member States of the European Union between the 14th and 27th June

2014. It evaluates Europeans’ current perceptions of their own situation and that of their

country. Some 27.910 respondents from different social and demographic groups were

interviewed face-to-face at home on behalf of Directorate-General for Employment,

Social Affairs & Inclusion.

The methodology used is that of Eurobarometer surveys as carried out by the DG for

Communication (“Strategy, Corporate Communication Actions and Eurobarometer”

Unit)5.. A technical note on the manner in which interviews were conducted by the

Institutes within the TNS opinion & social network is appended as an annex to this

report. Also included are the interview methods and confidence intervals6.

1 http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_315_en.pdf 2 http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_349_en.pdf 3 http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_370_en.pdf 4 http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_391_en.pdf 5 http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm 6 The results tables are included in the annex.

http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_315_en.pdf




http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm


3

The findings of the survey have been analysed firstly at EU level and secondly by

country. At an EU level the results are based on the 28 Member States. Some of the

results have also been compared with the five previous waves of the survey conducted in

2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 20097, and some have been compared with the previous

wave of research in 2013. Where appropriate a range of socio-demographic variables –

respondents’ age, terminal education age, occupation and ability to pay household bills -

have been used to provide further analysis.

Note: In this report, countries are referred to by their official abbreviation. The

abbreviations used in this report correspond to:

ABBREVIATIONS BE Belgium LT Lithuania BG Bulgaria LU Luxembourg CZ Czech Republic HU Hungary DK Denmark MT Malta DE Germany NL The Netherlands EE Estonia AT Austria IE Ireland PL Poland EL Greece PT Portugal ES Spain RO Romania FR France SI Slovenia HR Croatia SK Slovakia IT Italy FI Finland CY Republic of Cyprus*** SE Sweden LV Latvia UK The United Kingdom EU28 European Union – 28 Member States EU15 BE, IT, FR, DE, LU, NL, DK, UK, IE, PT, ES, EL, AT, SE, FI*

NMS13 BG, CZ, EE, HR, CY, LT, LV, MT, HU, PL, RO, SI, SK**

EURO AREA

BE, FR, IT, LU, DE, AT, ES, PT, IE, NL, FI, EL, EE, SI, CY,

MT, SK, LV

* EU15 refers to the 15 countries forming the European Union before the enlargements of 2004, 2007 and

2013

** The NMS13 are the 13 ‘new Member States’ which joined the European Union during the 2004, 2007 and

2013 enlargements

*** Cyprus as a whole is one of the 28 European Union Member States. However, the ‘acquis communautaire’

has been suspended in the part of the country which is not controlled by the government of the Republic of

Cyprus. For practical reasons, only the interviews carried out in the part of the country controlled by the

government of the Republic of Cyprus are included in the ‘CY’ category and in the EU28 average.

* * * * *

We wish to thank the people throughout Europe who have given their time to take part

in this survey. Without their active participation, this study would not have been

possible.

7 At an EU level previous waves of the survey are based on 27 Member States. Croatia joined the EU on the 1st July 2013, after fieldwork for the 2013 survey was conducted.


4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Europeans are divided in their overall perception of the current situation. The EU

social climate index, which takes into account views on personal circumstances,

the national picture and social protection and inclusion, is -1 in 2014. It is slightly

lower than the 2013 index (-0.9), and is the lowest index recorded in the series.

At a national level the social climate index ranges from a high of 3.1 (in Malta) to

a low of -5.3 (in Greece).

The most positive perceptions are found in the Benelux and Nordic countries,

along with Malta, Austria and Germany.

The Member States with a positive index are Malta (3.1), Denmark (2.9),

Luxembourg and the Netherlands (both 2.2), Austria (1.8), Sweden (1.7),

Germany (1.6), Finland (1.3), Belgium (0.6), the UK and Estonia (both 0.1). With

the exception of Estonia, these Member States have formed the top ten in the

overall social climate index in each of the six years of the survey8. Estonia has

ranked in the top ten in three of the six surveys: 2010, 2011 and 2014.

Only four of these eleven Member States show an improvement in the social

climate index since 2013: Malta (up 2.1 points), Estonia (up 0.6 points), the

Netherlands (up 0.3 points) and Denmark (up 0.1). The largest decline in the

social climate index can be observed in Sweden (down 0.6 points) followed by

Belgium (down 0.5), Luxembourg (down 0.4), Austria, Germany and the UK (all

down by 0.3 points), and Finland (down 0.2).

Compared with the 2009 indices, six of these eleven Member States show an

improvement, with the most notable in Malta (up 3.3 points), followed by

Germany (up 1.3), Estonia (up 0.5), Austria (up 0.2) and Denmark and the UK

(both up 0.1 point). The largest decline in the index can be seen in Belgium and

in the Netherlands (both down 0.4 points) followed by Luxembourg, Sweden and

Finland (all down 0.1 point).

The least positive perceptions can be seen in southern and eastern Member

States.

Greece is the lowest ranked Member State with an index of -5.3, followed by

Bulgaria (-3.6), Romania and Cyprus (both -3.4), Croatia (-3.3), Italy (-3),

Portugal (-2.6), Hungary (-2.3), Spain (-2.2) and Slovakia (-2.1).

Greece has been the lowest ranked Member State on this overall measure in five

of the six years, the exception being 2010, when it ranked ahead of Romania.

8 Including countries ranked equal tenth in any survey year


5

The social climate index has dropped in three of these ten Member States since

2013, with the most marked decline in Bulgaria (down 0.3 points), and followed

by Slovakia and Italy (both down 0.1). The index in Cyprus remains unchanged,

with the largest improvement in the social climate index in Portugal (up 0.8

points) followed by Romania (up 0.6), Spain (up 0.5), Croatia (up 0.2) and

Hungary and Greece (both up 0.1 points). Compared with the 2009 indices only

one Member State has improved - Hungary (up 1.4).

The only other Member States with a positive shift in their social climate index

since 2013 are Ireland up 0.4 points (to -0.9); Lithuania up 0.2 points (to -1.4);

Poland up 0.2 points (to -1.8); and Slovenia up 0.1 point (to -1.9).

Respondents who say that they almost always struggle to pay their household

bills have an overall social climate index of -4.1, compared with an index of -2.2

for those who struggle from time to time and a positive index of 0.2 for those

who almost never have difficulty paying their household bills. The index for those

who struggle to pay bills from time to time (down 0.2 points) and for those who

almost never have difficulty paying their bills (down 0.1 point) has slightly

worsened since 2013. The indices for these two groups are now at their lowest

level in the series.

Respondents who are unemployed have a lower overall social climate index (-3.3)

than all other occupational groups, while those in managerial jobs have the

highest index (0.6). Managers are the only occupational group with a positive

score.

Europeans hold more positive perceptions about their personal situation than

they do about national indicators. In terms of their personal situation, they are

most positive about the area in which they live (4.3) and their life in general

(2.5), and somewhat less positive about their personal job situation (1.2) and the

financial situation of their household (0.8).

In terms of their perceptions of measures associated with social protection and

inclusion, Europeans have a positive index on the healthcare system (1) and are

divided in their opinions about the relations between people from different

cultural and religious backgrounds or nationalities (0). They are less satisfied with

unemployment benefits (-1.4) and the pension system (-1.7), and even less so

about the way inequalities and poverty are addressed in their country (-3).

Europeans are least positive about national indicators, notably those that most

immediately affect their own economic situation: the employment situation

(-4.1), the affordability of housing (-3.3), the cost of living (-2.9), their national

economy (-2.6), and the affordability of energy (-2.5). They are somewhat less

negative about the way in which public administration runs (-1.7).

The indices for eight of the 15 measures have declined from their 2013 levels by

between 0.1 and 0.6 points, with two remaining the same and five increasing by

between 0.1 and 0.9 points.


6

The five measures where indices have improved are: the economy up 0.9 points;

local area up 0.4 points; the cost of living and unemployment benefits both up

0.2 points; and the national employment situation up 0.1 point.

The indices for personal job situation and energy affordability remain unchanged.

On the remaining eight measures, the most notable drops in opinion can be seen

for the way in which poverty and inequalities are addressed (down 0.6 points);

life in general and the affordability of housing (both down 0.4 points); and

relations between people from different cultural or religious backgrounds or

nationalities (down 0.3).

The majority of Europeans expect no change to their personal situation in the

next 12 months in relation to their local area (75%), their life in general (59%),

and their job situation (60%) and household finances (61%). Those who expect

change are a little more likely to think things will improve than that they will get

worse.

In relation to the six national indicators, the only measure where a majority of

Europeans expect no change in the next 12 months is in the way public

administration is run (59%). Across all six indicators those who expect change

are more likely to think things will become worse rather than improve: slightly

more likely in relation to the national economy and employment situation, and

much more likely in relation to the cost of living, housing affordability and energy

affordability.

On four out of the five social protection and inclusion indicators, the majority of

Europeans expect the situation to remain unchanged in the next 12 months: the

national healthcare system (57%), relations between people from different

cultural or religious backgrounds or nationalities (56%), the way inequalities and

poverty are addressed (53%) and unemployment benefits (51%). Just under half

of Europeans expect no change to pension system (49%). Across all five

measures those who expect change are much more likely to think things will

worsen than improve.

Europeans hold a more optimistic outlook than they did in 2013 with a positive

shift in the net balance of opinion9 across each of the 15 indicators, most marked

in relation to their expectations with regard to the economy and national

employment situation, followed by the cost of living, pension system and

unemployment benefits.

9 The difference between the proportion who say things will improve and the proportion who say they will get worse


7

On the measures relating to respondents’ personal circumstances, Europeans are

most likely to think that their situation is similar to five years ago in terms of the

area in which they live (60%) and their personal job situation (47%). In terms of

the household financial situation and life in general opinion is more evenly divided

between those who think the situation is unchanged and those who think it has

got worse: 42% vs. 38% on household financial situation and 40% vs. 33% on

general life. Where respondents do perceive things to have changed they are

more likely to say that they have got worse than that they have improved in

relation to: household finances (38% vs. 17%); personal job situation (26% vs.

17%) and general life (33% vs. 26%). Opinion is evenly divided on changes in

the local area (18% vs. 19%).

Europeans widely perceive the national situation to have deteriorated when

compared with five years ago across five of the six national indicators, with most

thinking the situation is worse in terms of the cost of living (74%), the

affordability of energy (63%) and of housing (62%), the national employment

situation (60%) and the national economy (57%). A large minority (38%) think

the way public administration is run has got worse.

On the five social protection and inclusion indicators, only a minority of

Europeans perceive the situation is the same as it was five years ago. The

majority of Europeans think that pension system is worse (52%), just under half

perceive the situation has become worse in relation to the healthcare system

(46%) and the way their country addresses inequalities and poverty (46%) and a

slightly smaller proportion (43%) think that unemployment benefits are worse.

The only measure where Europeans are more likely to say the situation remains

unchanged than it has worsened is relations between people from different

cultural or religious backgrounds or nationalities (44% unchanged vs. 37% got

worse).

Europeans are now somewhat more positive about the current situation relative

to five years ago than they were in 2013. There has been a positive shift in the

net balance of opinion on each of the 15 indicators, albeit in most cases relatively

small. The largest positive shifts in opinion are in relation to the economy and the

national employment situation.


8

I. SOCIAL CLIMATE INDEX

This first chapter of the report provides an overview of the current social climate in the

EU and how this compares to perceptions held over the last five years. The chapter

examines Europeans’ overall perceptions of the current situation, taking into account

their views on personal circumstances, the national picture and areas relating to social

protection and inclusion, and summarising these opinions into a single overall score.

The overall score is based on the results of two questions. The first of these asks

respondents how satisfied they are, on the whole, with the life they lead, with answers

given on a four point scale from very satisfied to not at all satisfied10. The second

question asks respondents to judge the current situation in relation to fourteen different

areas covering both their personal circumstances and social and economic factors within

their country. Responses are invited on a four-point scale ranging from very good to

very bad11. In order to calculate the overall social climate index, each measure is

allocated a score between -10 and 10, as shown below:

Q1: Satisfaction with the life you lead Q2: Judgement of current situation in

14 areas

Very satisfied 10 Very good 10

Fairly satisfied 3.33 Rather good 3.33

Not very satisfied -3.33 Rather bad -3.33

Not at all satisfied -10 Very bad -10

Don’t know Not scored Don’t know Not scored

The overall social climate index for each respondent is then calculated as the mean of

the scores for each of the 15 measures (one at Q1 and fourteen at Q2).

The following table shows the social climate index for the EU as a whole, and for each of

the 28 Member States for the latest wave (SP418), for each of the 27 Member States

and Croatia for the previous wave (SP408), and for the 27 Member States for the first

four waves: SP315 (2009), SP349 (2010), SP370 (2011) and SP391 (2012).

10 Q1 “On the whole, are you very satisfied, fairly satisfied, not very satisfied or not at all satisfied with the life you lead? (READ OUT) Very satisfied, Fairly satisfied, Not very satisfied, Not at all satisfied, Don’t know” 11 Q2 “How would you judge the current situation in each of the following? (SHOW CARD WITH SCALE – ONE ANSWER PER LINE) (READ OUT) The area you live in, the healthcare system in (OUR COUNTRY), The pension system in (OUR COUNTRY), Unemployment benefits in (OUR COUNTRY), The cost of living in (OUR COUNTRY), Relations in (OUR COUNTRY) between people from different cultural or religious backgrounds or nationalities, The way inequalities and poverty are addressed in (OUR COUNTRY), How affordable energy is in (OUR COUNTRY), How affordable housing is in (OUR COUNTRY), The way public administration runs in (OUR COUNTRY), The situation of the (NATIONALITY) economy, Your personal job situation, The financial situation of your household, The employment situation in (OUR COUNTRY)? Very good, Rather good, Rather bad, Very bad, Don’t know”


9

Special EB

315

(2009)

Special EB

349

(2010)

Special EB

370

(2011)

Special EB

391

(2012)

Special EB

408

(2013)

Special EB

418

(2014)

EU28 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.8 -0.9 -1

MT -0.2 0.2 -0.3 0.1 1 3.1

DK 2.8 2.4 2.1 2.8 2.8 2.9

LU 2.3 2.5 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.2

NL 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.8 1.9 2.2

AT 1.6 2.3 2.7 2.5 2.1 1.8

SE 1.8 2.3 2.2 2.6 2.3 1.7

DE 0.3 0.7 1.4 2 1.9 1.6

FI 1.4 1.4 1.1 1.5 1.5 1.3

BE 1 0.8 1.2 1.5 1.1 0.6

UK 0 0 -0.1 0.1 0.4 0.1

EE -0.4 0 -0.3 -0.4 -0.5 0.1

CZ -0.3 -0.1 -0.9 -0.6 -0.7 -0.9

IE -1.8 -1.4 -1.6 -1.5 -1.3 -0.9

FR -0.8 -0.8 -1.1 -0.4 -0.9 -1.1

LT -2.5 -3.1 -2.9 -2.4 -1.6 -1.4

LV -2.2 -2.3 -2.7 -1.9 -1.4 -1.7

PL -1.3 -1.4 -1.7 -2.6 -2 -1.8

SI -0.5 -0.9 -1.3 -1.4 -2 -1.9

SK -1.6 -0.8 -1.7 -1.8 -2 -2.1

ES -1 -0.9 -1.6 -2.1 -2.7 -2.2

HU -3.7 -3.4 -3.6 -3.8 -2.4 -2.3

PT -2.3 -2.8 -2.7 -3.2 -3.4 -2.6

IT -1.9 -1.8 -1.1 -3.1 -2.9 -3

HR - - - - -3.5 -3.3

CY -0.7 -0.8 -1.7 -2.9 -3.4 -3.4

RO -2.4 -4.5 -4.4 -3.8 -4 -3.4

BG -3.6 -3.1 -3 -2.9 -3.3 -3.6

EL -3.8 -4.3 -4.6 -5.8 -5.4 -5.3

OVERALL SOCIAL CLIMATE INDEX

(Evaluation of the current situation)

The overall social climate index for the EU28 is stands at -1 in 2014 which indicates that

Europeans are divided in their assessments of the current situation. This represents a

small decline from a score of -0.9 in 2013, and is the lowest index recorded in the series.


10

That said, the 2014 index is only somewhat lower than the highest index (-0.6) recorded

in 2011.

As in previous years the index varies considerably between countries. The highest

indices are found in the Nordic and Benelux countries, along with Malta, Austria and

Germany. Malta has the highest index (3.1), followed Denmark (2.9), Luxembourg and

the Netherlands (both 2.2), Austria (1.8), Sweden (1.7), Germany (1.6), Finland (1.3)

and Belgium (0.6). The UK and Estonia are the only other Member States with a positive

index, although it is only marginally so in both: UK (0.1); and Estonia (0.1). With the

exception of Estonia, these Member States have formed the top ten in the overall social

climate index in each of the six years of the survey12. Estonia has ranked in the top ten

in three of the six surveys: 2010, 2011 and 2014.

The overall social climate index has declined in seven of these Member States since

2013, and improved in four (Malta, Denmark, the Netherlands and Estonia).

The biggest improvement can be observed in Malta (up 2.1 points) and the shift is

notably greater than positive shifts in any other Member States. It is the most significant

improvement for Malta in the series, with smaller positive shifts between 2009 and

2010, and 2011 and 2012 (up 0.4 points in each case), and between 2012 and 2013 (up

0.9 points). In the 2010 to 2011 period the index in Malta declined by 0.5 points. As a

result of this large positive shift in 2014 Malta now holds its highest index to date, and

has risen from ranking ninth in 2013 to ranking first in 2014.

Estonia shows the second biggest improvement (up 0.6 points). Like Malta, it is also its

most significant improvement in the series, with a somewhat smaller positive shift

between 2009 and 2010 (up 0.4 points), and declines in the following periods, most

notable between 2010 and 2011 (down 0.3 points). The improvement in 2014 has

resulted in Estonia rising from eleventh in the rankings in 2013 to tenth in the rankings,

a position it shares jointly with the UK. This is its highest ranking in the series, and a

position it also held in 2010 (jointly with the UK) and in 2011.

The most notable decline in these eleven Member States since 2013 is witnessed in

Sweden (down 0.6 points). It is its most significant decline in the series, with smaller

negative shifts between 2010 and 2011 (down 0.1 point) and 2012 and 2013 (down 0.3

points). In the periods between 2009 and 2010, and 2011 and 2012 the index in Sweden

improved (up 0.5 points and 0.4 points respectively). The decline since 2013 sees

Sweden drop from third in the rankings in 2013 to sixth in 2014, with its worst index

(albeit marginally lower than that in 2009) and lowest ranking in the series.

12 Including countries ranked equal tenth in any survey year


11

In addition to Sweden, four other “top ten” Member States have an overall social climate

index in 2014 lower than that in 2009. The greatest declines can be seen in the

Netherlands which, in spite of a small improvement since 2013 (up 0.3 points), shows a

drop (down 0.4 points) from 2.6 in 2009 to 2.2 in 2014; and in Belgium, with a decline

(down 0.4 points) from 1 to 0.6 respectively. Luxembourg and Finland, like Sweden,

show marginal declines (down 0.1 point in each case), with a drop from 2.3 to 2.2 in

Luxembourg and 1.4 to 1.3 in Finland.

The largest improvement in the top ten Member States since 2009 can be seen in Malta

(up 3.3 points), with a notably greater positive shift than in any other Member State,

followed by Germany (up 1.3 points) and Estonia (up 0.5 points).

The bottom ten i.e. lowest ranked countries on this measure are southern and eastern

European countries. Greece is the lowest ranked country with an index of -5.3, followed

by Bulgaria (-3.6), Romania and Cyprus (both -3.4), Croatia (-3.3), Italy (-3), Portugal

(-2.6), Hungary (-2.3), Spain (-2.2) and Slovakia (-2.1).

The overall social climate index has declined in three of these Member States since

2013, improved in six (Spain, Hungary, Portugal, Croatia, Romania and Greece), and

remains unchanged in Cyprus.

Greece has been the lowest ranked Member State on this overall measure in five of the

six survey years, the exception being in 2010, when it was ranked ahead of Romania.

The index in Greece has improved marginally since 2013 (up 0.1 point), after a greater

increase in 2013 (up 0.4 points) and declines in each of the previous survey years since

2009, with the most marked decline between 2012 and 2011 (down 1.2 points). The

recent improvements in the last two survey periods are a reflection perhaps of cautious

optimism now about the economy’s prospects, although the 2014 index is still lower than

the indices between 2009 and 2011.

Among these lowest ranked countries, Portugal and Spain are the only other southern

European countries experiencing particularly difficult economic circumstances13 which

show an improvement in the social climate index since 2013. In Portugal it has increased

by 0.8 points, from -3.4 in 2013 to -2.6 in 2014, following declines in all but one of the

survey periods (2011) since 2009. Nevertheless, in ranking terms the improvement has

only seen Portugal move up from twenty-fourth position in 2013 (shared jointly with

Cyprus) to twenty-second position in 2014, lower than its highest ranking of twenty-first

in 2011 and similar to its ranking in 2009. In Spain the social climate index has

increased by 0.5 points, from -2.7 in 2013 to -2.2 in 2014, following one of the largest

declines of any Member State between 2013 and 2012 (down 0.6 points)14; broadly

similar declines between 2011 and 2012 (down 0.5 points) and 2010 and 2011 (down

0.7); and a marginal increase between 2009 and 2010 (up 0.1).

13 The countries included here are Spain, Portugal, Italy, Cyprus and Greece 14 The Netherlands showed the largest decline, down 0.9 points and Slovenia showed a similar level of decline to Spain – down 0.6 points


12

In ranking terms, the recent improvement has only seen Spain move up one position,

from twenty-first in 2013 to twentieth in 2014, lower than its sixteenth position in the

first three waves of the series15 and eighteenth position in 2012.

None of the southern European countries in the bottom ten show an improvement in the

social climate index since 2009. With the exception of Portugal, all show a deterioration

of at least one point, with the greatest decline in Cyprus (down 2.7 points) from -0.7 in

2009 to -3.4 in 2014, followed by Greece (down 1.5 points) from -3.8 to -5.3; Spain,

(down 1.2 points) from -1 to -2.2; and Italy (down 1.1 point) from -1.9 to -3. Portugal

shows only a small decline (down 0.3 points) from -2.3 in 2009 to -2.6 in 2014.

Among the eastern and central European Member States in these lowest ranked

countries16, the biggest decline since 2013 is observed in Bulgaria (down 0.3 points)

from an index of -3.3 to -3.6 in 2014, following a broadly similar drop between 2012 and

2013 (down 0.4 points), after a consistent pattern of improvement since 2009, albeit

marginal since 2010. Bulgaria’s 2014 index is similar to its baseline index of -3.6, both

being the lowest in the series.

The largest improvement since 2013 can be seen in Romania (up 0.6 points) from -4 to -

3.4, following a small decline in its index between 2012 and 2013 (down 0.2 points),

increases between the 2010 and 2011, and 2011 and 2012 periods (up 0.1 point and 0.6

points respectively), and a decline between the baseline survey and 2010 (down 2.1

points). In ranking terms, Romania has moved up from twenty-seventh position in 2013

to equal twenty-fifth in 201417, lower than its baseline ranking of twenty-third, when it

was at its highest position in the series.

In addition to Romania, Slovakia is the only other eastern European country in this

group showing a deterioration in the social climate index since 2009 (down 0.5 points)

from -1.6 to -2.1. Bulgaria’s index, as already noted, shows no change since 2009, with

Hungary the only country in the group showing an improvement since 2009, (up 1.4

points) from -3.7 to -2.3. This is driven by a marked improvement in the social climate

index between 2012 and 2013 (up 1.4 points), with only a marginal improvement (up

0.1 points) between 2013 and 2014, a slightly greater improvement between 2009 and

2010 (up 0.3 points), and small declines between the 2010 and 2011, and 2011 and

2012 survey periods (down 0.2 points in each). In ranking terms, Hungary has moved

up from a baseline ranking of twenty-sixth to twenty-first position in 2014, lower than its

twentieth ranking in 2013, the highest in the series.

Among the remaining seven Member States (those not ranked in the ‘top ten’ or ‘bottom

ten’) there has been an improvement in the overall social climate index since 2013 in

Ireland, Lithuania, Poland and Slovenia. Most increases are small, with the most notable

in Ireland, (up 0.4 points) from -1.3 in 2013 to -0.9 in 2014. Ireland and Lithuania show

the most notable improvement in their social climate indices since 2009 (Lithuania up

1.1 points and Ireland up 0.9).

15 In 2010 jointly shared with Slovenia, and in 2011 jointly shared with Ireland 16 The countries included here are Slovakia, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria 17 A position it shares with Cyprus


13

The next table shows how the overall social climate index varies by socio-demographic

characteristics at the overall EU level, again showing the results for each of the six

survey years.


14

As has been found in previous surveys in the series, the most notable socio-demographic

differences are related to employment status and economic circumstances as measured

by people’s perceptions of their difficulty in paying bills.

There is a strong relationship between how difficult people say they are finding it to pay

their household bills and their overall social climate index. Thus those who say that they

almost never find it difficult to pay their bills have a positive index in 2014 of 0.2,

compared with an index of -2.2 for those who struggle some of the time, and -4.1 for

those who almost always have difficulty paying household bills. Perceptions among each

of the three groups remain very similar to the views held in 2013. There has been a

marginal improvement in perceptions among those who struggle most of the time, up

0.1 point from -4.2, its lowest level in the series, but the index remains at its second

lowest level, down 1.1 points on the index of -3 in 2009. There has been a small

deterioration between 2013 and 2014 in perceptions among those who almost never

struggle to pay household bills (down 0.1 point), and the index is now at its lowest level

in the series, down 0.3 points on the highest score recorded in 2012. There has also

been a small deterioration between 2013 and 2014 in perceptions among those who

struggle to pay household bills from time to time (down 0.2 points). The index for this

group is also at its lowest level in the series, down 0.6 points from the highest score of

-1.6 recorded in 2009.

In terms of employment status, the most marked difference is between the perceptions

of the unemployed and all other occupational groups. Those who are unemployed have

an overall social climate index of -3.3 in 2014, compared with the EU average of -1.

There has been a small deterioration between 2013 and 2014 (down 0.2 points), and the

index is now at its lowest level in the series, down 0.4 points on the baseline index of

-2.9 in 2009. House persons have a somewhat lower index (-2.1) than all other groups

with the exception of the unemployed. The index for house persons shows a small

deterioration on the 2013 index (down 0.2 points) and is the lowest score in the series,

1.2 points below the highest index of -0.9 recorded in 2009. Managers have the highest

index (0.6, down from 0.8 in 2013). They are the only occupational group with a positive

score.

Perceptions are broadly similar across the four age groups, although those aged 15-24

and those aged 55+, both of whom have an index of -0.8 in 2014, are slightly more

positive than 40-54 year olds (-1) and 25-39 year olds (-1.2). This reflects the findings

in earlier surveys where younger people have been the most positive group and those

aged 55+ have tended to be slightly more positive than the middle age groups.

Among 15-24 year olds, perceptions are more negative than in 2013, with the social

climate index declining from -0.4 to -0.8. This follows an increase between 2012 and

2013, but otherwise reflects a generally downward trend among young people from the

benchmark index of -0.1 in 2009. The current index of -0.8 is at its lowest level in the

series. There has been a smaller decline in the index for 25-39 year olds, from -1 in

2013 to -1.2 in 2014. Again, the index for this group is now at its lowest level in the

series, down 0.4 points from the index of -0.8 in recorded in each of the first three

surveys.


15

The index of -1 for 40-54 year olds is unchanged since 2013 and remains at a similar

level to the 2009 baseline (-0.9). The slight increase in the index among those aged

55+, from -0.9 in 2013 to -0.8 in 2014, brings it into line with the index for those aged

15-24. However, the index is still somewhat lower than in 2009 (-0.5).

In terms of gender, men (-0.7) have a higher index than women (-1.3), a consistent

pattern since 2009. The index for men has improved slightly since 2013 (up 0.1 point),

although it remains at a somewhat lower level than the highest index of -0.5 recorded in

each of the first three surveys. The index for women has declined since 2013 (down 0.3

points) and is now at its lowest level in the series, down 0.5 points on the highest index

(also recorded in the first three surveys).

In terms of age of leaving full-time education, those still studying have the highest index

(-0.1), closely followed by those who left education at the age of 20 or older (-0.2);

those who left aged 15 or younger have the lowest index (-2). The index has declined

since 2013 among those leaving education aged 16-19 (down 0.3 points) and, albeit

marginally, among those leaving at the age of 20 or older (down 0.1 point). It has also

declined among those who are still studying (down 0.3 points), but has improved among

those leaving aged 15 or under (up 0.3 points). These shifts in the indices mean that the

only groups with a 2014 index that is not its lowest in the series are students and people

who left education aged 15 or under.


16

II. CURRENT SITUATION

Having explored Europeans’ overall perceptions of the social climate, this chapter of the

report looks at the different measures that feed into their overall perception. These are

examined in three sections; the first examines four factors related to people’s personal

situation, the second six (primarily economic) factors related to the national situation in

their country and the third five factors related to social protection and social inclusion.

1. PERSONAL SITUATION

This section focuses on people’s current perceptions of their personal situation in four

areas: their life in general; the area in which they live; their personal job situation; and

the financial situation of their household. The results are reported as indices following

the method outlined in Chapter I. Each of the four aspects of people’s personal situation

is examined in turn for the EU as a whole, and for each of the 28 Member States for the

latest wave, for the EU27 as a whole and for each of the Member States and Croatia for

the previous wave, and for the EU27 overall and the 27 Member States across the first

four waves.


17

The table below summarises people’s satisfaction with their life in general.

Special EB

315

(2009)

Special EB

349

(2010)

Special EB

370

(2011)

Special EB

391

(2012)

Special EB

408

(2013)

Special EB

418

(2014)

EU28 3.2 3.1 3.5 2.7 2.9 2.5

DK 8 7.7 7.5 7.8 7.9 7.9

NL 6.4 6.1 6.5 6.6 6.2 6.2

SE 6.5 6.6 6.8 6.8 6.2 6

MT 3.9 3.9 4.6 3.2 4.3 5.3

LU 5.7 5.7 6.2 5.8 5.7 5

FI 5.9 5.6 5.8 5.2 5.5 5

UK 5.3 5.1 5.2 4.6 5.1 4.7

IE 5.3 5.8 5.7 4.7 3.8 4.6

AT 3.6 4 3.9 3.9 3.8 4.6

DE 3.9 3.9 4.5 4.2 4.8 4

BE 4.9 4.7 5.1 4.5 4.4 3.8

SI 3.9 4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.5

CY 4.6 4.7 5.1 3.7 2.5 2.5

CZ 3.1 2.7 2.8 2.3 2.7 2.4

FR 3.4 3.4 3.6 3 3.1 2.2

PL 2.9 3 2.7 2.2 2.4 2.1

ES 2.8 3.3 3.3 1.7 2.3 2.1

EE 1.9 1.9 2.3 1.3 1.4 1.8

SK 1.8 2.7 2.3 1.6 1.3 1.7

LT 1.1 0.5 0.4 0.6 1.8 1.6

HR - - - - 1.7 1.3

LV 0.5 0.8 0.6 1.1 1.7 1.2

HU -0.8 0 -0.3 -0.9 -0.5 0.6

IT 1.6 1.4 2.7 0.8 0.8 -0.2

RO -0.2 -2.4 -0.9 -0.7 -1 -0.3

PT 0.5 -0.5 0.3 -1.2 -1.7 -1

BG -1.9 -2.2 -0.9 -1.6 -2.2 -2.1

EL -0.6 -0.7 -0.1 -1.8 -2.2 -2.7

Your life in general



18

Europeans’ overall evaluation of their life in general is positive, although not

overwhelmingly so. This has been the pattern in each of the six survey waves. The index

of 2.5 in 2014 has decreased by 0.4 points from 2013. It is the lowest in the series, and

shows a decline of 1 point from the high of 3.5 in 2011. The score of 2.5 is, however,

the second highest EU level index across the 15 survey measures.

As in previous years the index varies considerably between countries. The highest

indices are found in the Nordic countries and Benelux states (with the exception of

Belgium18), along with Malta, the UK, Ireland, Austria and Germany. Denmark continues

to have the highest index (7.9), as it has done for the five previous years, followed by

the Netherlands (6.2), Sweden (6), Malta (5.3), and Luxembourg and Finland (both 5).

There are only five Member States where the net perception is negative, with Greece

recording the lowest index (-2.7), followed by Bulgaria (-2.1), Portugal (-1), Romania

(-0.3) and Italy (-0.2).

Comparing the results at a national level with those from 2013, nine Member States19

show a year-on-year improvement in terms of people’s satisfaction with their life as a

whole, the index remains unchanged in Denmark, the Netherlands and Cyprus, and the

remaining sixteen Member States show a decline. The largest increase is noted in

Hungary (up 1.1 point), followed by Malta (up 1), Austria and Ireland (both up 0.8) and

Romania and Portugal (both up 0.7 points). In ranking terms, Malta shows the greatest

improvement of any Member State rising from ninth position in 2013 to fourth position in

2014. Hungary and Malta have seen the largest increases of all EU Member States over

the whole survey period, both up 1.4 points from 3.9 in 2009 to 5.3 in 2014 in Malta,

and from -0.8 to 0.6 respectively in Hungary.

The largest declines since 2013 can be seen in Italy (down 1 point), France (down 0.9),

Germany (down 0.8), Luxembourg (down 0.7) and Belgium (down 0.6). Across the

2009-2014 period, the largest overall declines can be observed in Cyprus and Greece

(both down 2.1 points from 4.6 to 2.5 in Cyprus and from -0.6 to -2.7 in Greece),

followed by Italy (from 1.6 to -0.2), Portugal (from 0.5 to -1), France (from 3.4 to 2.2)

and Belgium (from 4.9 to 3.8).

18 Belgium sits just outside the top ten countries (ranked eleventh) with an index of 3.8 19 Malta, Austria, Ireland, Estonia, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Portugal and Bulgaria


19

The graph below illustrates long term trends in the overall EU index score for satisfaction

with life in general. Whilst the results in 2013 suggested possible signs of recovery with

a small uplift after the slump in 2012, which saw the index drop from its highest level

(3.5) in June 201120 to its second lowest level in the series (2.7)21, this has not

continued in 2014. The index now stands at 2.5, down 0.4 points on 2013, and at its

lowest level in the series, also recorded in January-February 2009 in the depths of the

economic crisis.

20 Also recorded in Autumn 2001 and Autumn 2000 21 Also recorded in Autumn 2008 and Spring 2000


20

The next table below shows how people rate the area in which they live.

Special EB

315

(2009)

Special EB

349

(2010)

Special EB

370

(2011)

Special EB

391

(2012)

Special EB

408

(2013)

Special EB

418

(2014)

EU28 4.2 4.2 4.4 3.8 3.9 4.3

SE 7.6 7 7.3 7.9 7.7 7.4

AT 4.8 5 5.2 5.2 5.1 6.7

LU 6 6.5 6.8 6.9 6.3 6.6

NL 6.1 6.2 6.7 6.7 6.3 6.5

IE 6.3 6.2 6.3 5.7 5.4 6.3

MT 4.3 3.6 4.5 3.7 4.3 6.2

FI 6.1 6.2 6.1 5.8 5.4 5.7

DE 5.1 5 5.2 5.2 5.7 5.3

DK 5.7 4.9 5.5 5.1 5.2 5.3

BE 6.1 5.7 5.9 5.6 5.5 5.2

UK 5.2 5.4 5.3 4.8 5.1 5.1

FR 5.3 5 5.2 4.6 4.6 4.9

LT 3.8 3.3 3.8 3.5 4.6 4.9

EE 3.8 3.4 4.2 3.6 3.7 4.3

ES 3.5 4.2 4.1 3.2 2.7 4.3

CZ 3.9 4.1 3.8 3.4 3.2 4.1

SI 3.6 3.6 2.7 3.1 3.1 3.9

CY 5 4.7 4.7 3.7 3.7 3.8

PL 3.7 3.7 4 3.4 3.5 3.8

LV 2.8 2.7 2.5 2.7 3.4 3.8

PT 3 2.5 2.7 2.4 2.6 3.6

SK 3.2 4 3.3 2.9 2.7 3.1

RO 2.6 2.3 2.7 2.2 2.6 2.9

HU 1.9 2.9 2.5 2 2 2.9

HR - - - - 1.8 2.5

EL 1.7 1.4 1.5 0 0.6 2.4

IT 2.4 2.1 2.6 1.3 1.1 2

BG 1 1.2 0.7 0.2 1.6 0.9

The area you live in



21

Europeans’ overall evaluation of the area in which they live is positive, more so than

their satisfaction with life in general, and is the highest EU level index across all of the

15 survey measures. The index of 4.3 has increased by 0.4 points since 2013. It is

marginally higher than the indices in 2009-2010 and just below (by 0.1 point) the high

of 4.4 in 2011.

The highest indices are again found in the Nordic countries and, on this measure, all the

Benelux states, along with Austria, Ireland, Malta, Germany and the UK. Respondents in

Sweden, as in each of the five earlier waves, have the most positive perceptions of the

area they live in, with an index in 2014 of 7.4, followed by Austria (6.7), Luxembourg

(6.6), the Netherlands (6.5), Ireland (6.3), Malta (6.2), Finland (5.7), Germany and

Denmark (both 5.3), Belgium (5.2) and the UK (5.1).

No country has a net negative perception of the area in which people live. Respondents

in Bulgaria are the most divided with an index of 0.9. After Bulgaria, the countries that

have the least positive perceptions are Italy (2), Greece (2.4), Croatia (2.5), and

Hungary and Romania (both 2.9).

Comparing the results at a national level with those from previous waves, twenty-three

Member States show a year-on-year improvement between 2013 and 2014 in terms of

people’s perception of the area in which they live; the UK shows no change; and the

remaining four22 show a decline.

The biggest improvements are noted in Malta, up 1.9 points, after a smaller increase of

0.6 points in 2013, to a six-year high index of 6.2; in Greece, up 1.8 points, after a

smaller increase of 0.6 points in 2013, to a six-year high of 2.4; Austria, up 1.6 points,

after a small decline of 0.1 points in 2013, to a six-year high of 6.7; Spain, also up 1.6

points, following a decline of 0.5 points in 2013, to an index of 4.3, again its highest in

the series; and Portugal, up 1 point, after a small increase of 0.2 points in 2013, also

now holding its highest index in the series standing at 3.6. Austria and Malta show the

greatest improvements of all 28 Member States in the 2014 rankings relative to those in

2013, both rising seven places, Austria from ninth to second position and Malta from

thirteenth to sixth.

Malta and Austria have also seen the largest increases of all EU Member States since

2009 (both up 1.9 points), followed by Lithuania (up 1.1 point), and Latvia and Hungary

(both up 1 point).

The largest decline since 2013 in people’s perceptions of the area they live in is seen in

Bulgaria (down 0.7 points), followed by Germany (down 0.4). Across the 2009-2014

period, the largest overall declines are observed in Cyprus (from 5 to 3.8) followed by

Belgium (from 6.1 to 5.2).

22 Sweden, Germany, Belgium and Bulgaria


22

The next table summarises Europeans’ perceptions of their personal job situation.

Special EB

315

(2009)

Special EB

349

(2010)

Special EB

370

(2011)

Special EB

391

(2012)

Special EB

408

(2013)

Special EB

418

(2014)

EU28 1.4 1.5 1.7 0.9 1.2 1.2

DK 5.1 5.4 5.1 5.6 5.4 5.8

SE 4.7 5.1 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.6

FI 5 4.9 5.6 4.4 4.7 5.3

LU 4.5 5.2 4.6 4.6 4.9 4.3

MT 1.8 1.9 2.4 1.8 2.8 3.9

AT 3.1 3.6 4.2 4 3.8 3.8

DE 2.4 2.6 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.2

NL 4.3 4 3.8 4.1 3.3 3

UK 2.5 2.7 2.4 2.1 2.7 2.8

BE 3.3 3.2 4 3.5 3.3 2.6

FR 2 2.3 2.6 1.9 2.2 1.8

EE 1.9 2.3 2.7 2.4 2.7 1.7

CZ 1.9 1.8 2 1.8 2 1.3

LV -0.2 0 0.1 0.3 1.1 1.1

SK 0.8 1.7 1.6 0.7 0.7 1.1

IE 0 0.7 0.1 -0.6 -0.6 0.8

SI 1.2 1.3 1.3 0.7 0.5 0.5

PL 1 1.2 0.7 -0.3 0.3 0.4

LT -1.4 -1.2 -1.5 -0.9 0.3 0.1

ES 0.1 0.5 0.7 -1.2 -1.8 -0.4

IT -0.3 0.2 0.8 -1.3 -0.8 -1.1

PT 0.2 -0.5 -0.5 -1.6 -0.9 -1.1

CY 1.9 2.2 1.6 -0.7 -2.1 -1.2

BG -1.5 -1.3 -1.2 -1.8 -1.6 -1.3

HR - - - - -2.2 -1.5

HU -3 -2.9 -3 -3.1 -1.8 -2.2

RO -0.5 -2.9 -2.7 -2.4 -2.1 -2.7

EL -1 -2 -2.4 -4.5 -3.7 -3.6

Your personal job situation



23

At the EU level, the overall index of 1.2 for people’s personal job situation in 2014 is

positive, and remains unchanged from 2013. However, both indices are the second

lowest in the series, ahead of only the 2012 index of 0.9, and there is a decline of 0.5

points from the high of 1.7 in 2011. That said, the EU level index for personal job

situation is the third highest among the 15 survey measures.

The highest indices are found in the Nordic and Benelux countries, along with Malta,

Austria, Germany, and the UK broadly reflecting the pattern seen to date in this section.

However, Ireland ranks sixteenth out of the twenty-eight countries on personal job

situation, compared with rankings of fifth on local area and equal eighth (along with

Austria) on life in general.

Respondents in Denmark have the most positive perception of their job situation, with

an index of 5.8, followed by Sweden (5.6), Finland (5.3), Luxembourg (4.3), Malta (3.9),

Austria (3.8), Germany (3.2), the Netherlands (3), the UK (2.8) and Belgium (2.6).

The most negative perceptions of the respondent’s personal job situation are seen in

southern and eastern European Member States. Greece (-3.6) has the lowest index,

followed by Romania (-2.7), Hungary (-2.2), Croatia (-1.5), Bulgaria (-1.3), Cyprus

(-1.2), Portugal and Italy (both -1.1) and Spain (-0.4).

Comparing the results at a national level with those from previous waves, thirteen

Member States23 show a year-on-year decline between 2013 and 2014 in terms of

people’s evaluation of their personal job situation; Austria, Latvia and Slovenia show no

change; and the remaining twelve show an improvement.

The biggest improvements between 2013 and 2014 can be observed in Ireland and

Spain (both up 1.4 points) to indices of 0.8 in Ireland (its highest index in the series)

and -0.4 in Spain. They are followed by Malta (up 1.1 point), Cyprus (up 0.9), Croatia

(up 0.7) and Finland (up 0.6 points). Malta shows the largest improvement in index

between 2009 and 2014 (up by 2.1 points), followed by Lithuania (up 1.5), Latvia (up

1.3) and Sweden (up 0.9 points). Malta is now ranked fifth on this measure, up from

ninth in 2013 and fourteenth in 2009.

The largest declines since 2013 in people’s perceptions of their job situation can be seen

in Estonia (down 1 point), Belgium and the Czech Republic (both down 0.7) and Romania

and Luxembourg (both down 0.6 points).

Across the 2009-2014 period, the largest overall declines in people’s evaluation of their

personal job situation are seen in Cyprus (down 3.1 points), Greece (down 2.6),

Romania (down 2.2), the Netherlands and Portugal (both down 1.3), and Italy (down 0.8

points). In spite of its inclusion in this group, the Netherlands still has the eighth highest

index of all 28 countries on this measure. Cyprus shows the greatest drop in ranking,

from equal eleventh in 2009 to twenty-third in 2014.

23 Sweden, Luxembourg, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Estonia, the Czech Republic, Lithuania, Italy, Portugal, Hungary and Romania


24

The last of the four measures relating to Europeans’ personal situation concerns people’s

perceptions of the current financial situation of their household.

Special EB

315

(2009)

Special EB

349

(2010)

Special EB

370

(2011)

Special EB

391

(2012)

Special EB

408

(2013)

Special EB

418

(2014)

EU28 1.2 1.1 1.5 0.8 0.9 0.8

DK 4.7 4.8 4.7 4.9 4.8 5.2

SE 5 4.8 5 5.4 5.3 4.5

NL 4.6 4 4.2 4.5 3.8 3.8

LU 4.1 4.5 4.6 4.1 3.9 3.7

FI 3.7 3.8 4 3.1 3.2 3.5

MT 0.6 0.9 0.5 0.8 1.9 3.3

AT 1.8 2.6 3 3 2.6 2.8

DE 2 1.9 2.5 2.6 2.8 2.3

UK 2.1 2.3 2.6 2.2 2.4 2.3

BE 2.8 2.7 3.3 3 2.8 1.9

EE 0.9 1.1 1.5 0.7 0.8 1.1

FR 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.5 1.4 1

SI 1.1 0.8 0.9 0.4 0.1 0.6

IE 0.7 1.1 0.8 0 -0.3 0.5

CZ 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.4

LT -0.7 -0.8 -1 -0.6 0.3 0.3

PL 0.2 0.1 0.1 -0.5 0.2 0.1

LV -0.6 -0.7 -0.4 -0.2 0.1 0.1

SK 0 1.1 0.4 0.2 -0.4 0

ES 0.7 0.6 1.1 -0.6 -0.6 -0.1

IT 0.5 0.4 1.5 -0.7 -0.7 -0.9

HR - - - - -1.7 -1.3

CY 0.5 1.1 0.2 -1 -2.2 -1.4

HU -3.2 -2.5 -2.5 -3.2 -1.9 -1.5

RO -0.9 -2.8 -2.1 -1.9 -2 -1.7

PT -0.4 -1 -0.9 -2.1 -1.7 -1.8

BG -2.5 -2.3 -2.3 -2.8 -2.7 -2.2

EL -0.8 -1.9 -2.1 -4.3 -3.9 -3.9

The financial situation of your household



25

With an EU level index of 0.8, Europeans’ overall assessment of their household’s current

financial situation broadly reflects their view of their personal job situation (1.2), and is

the fifth highest index among the 15 survey measures. The index has declined by 0.1

point since 2013 and has returned to its lowest level in the series, last recorded in 2012.

The 2014 index is 0.7 points behind the high observed in 2011.

The similarity between people’s evaluation of their household finances and personal job

situation are largely reflected at the individual country level, with the highest indices

again found in the Nordic countries and Benelux states, Malta, Austria, Germany and the

UK.

Respondents in Denmark have the most positive perception of their household’s current

financial situation, with an index of 5.2, followed by Sweden (4.5), the Netherlands

(3.8), Luxembourg (3.7), Finland (3.5), Malta (3.3), Austria (2.8), Germany and the UK

(both 2.3) and Belgium (1.9). Nine of these ten Member States have been ranked in the

top ten on this measure in each of the six survey years, the exception being Malta,

which has risen from fifteenth position in 2009 to sixth in 2014, replacing France, which

has dropped to twelfth position.

The most negative perceptions of household finances are again seen in southern and

eastern European countries. Greece (-3.9) has the lowest index in 2014, followed by

Bulgaria (-2.2), Portugal (-1.8), Romania (-1.7), Hungary (-1.5), Cyprus (-1.4) and

Croatia (-1.3).

Fourteen Member States24 show a year-on-year improvement between 2013 and 2014 in

terms of people’s evaluation of their household’s financial situation. In most cases the

movements tend to be small, with the most notable improvements in Malta (up 1.4

points), Ireland and Cyprus (both up 0.8 points) and Slovenia, Spain and Bulgaria (all up

0.5 points). Malta has seen the largest improvement of any Member State on this

measure since 2009, from a baseline of 0.6 in 2009 to 3.3 in 2014 (up 2.7 points). Other

notable improvements since 2009 can be observed in Hungary, from -3.2 to -1.5 (up 1.7

points); in Austria, from 1.8 to 2.8 (up 1 point); and in Lithuania, from -0.7 to 0.3 (also

up 1 point).

The index for the household financial situation has remained the same since 2013 in four

Member States: the Netherlands, Lithuania, Latvia and Greece. In the remaining ten

countries declines in the index tend to be small, with Belgium showing the greatest drop

(down 0.9 points), followed by Sweden (down 0.8). In spite of their inclusion in this

group, both countries remain in the top ten Member States with the highest indices on

this measure, Sweden dropping in ranking from first in 2013 to second in 2014, and

Belgium dropping from sixth to tenth position respectively.

24 Denmark, Finland, Malta, Austria, Estonia, Slovenia, Ireland, Slovakia, Spain, Croatia, Cyprus, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria


26

Across the 2009-2014 period, the largest overall declines in people’s evaluation of their

household’s financial situation can be seen in Greece (down 3.1 points), Cyprus (down

1.9), Italy and Portugal (both down 1.4) and Belgium (down 0.9). Cyprus, along with

Spain, show the largest drop of all 28 Member States in their rankings now compared

with those held in 2009: Spain dropping from equal thirteenth25 in 2009 to twentieth in

2014; and Cyprus dropping from seventeenth to twenty-third position respectively.

This section concludes by providing an overview of the most notable socio-demographic

differences on the four measures relating to people’s personal situation. As was the case

in relation to the overall social climate index, the key factors that differentiate how

people feel about their personal situation are their perception of how difficult it is to pay

their household bills, their occupational status and, to a somewhat lesser extent, the age

at which they left education.

As seen in relation to the overall social climate index, there is a strong relationship

between how difficult people are finding it to pay their household bills and their

perceptions of their personal situation. Those who struggle to pay their bills most of the

time have much lower indices than those who almost never struggle to do so on all four

measures, with particularly large differences between these two groups in relation to

both their household financial and personal job situations.

Special EB 418

(2014)Your life in general The area you live in

Your personal job

situation

The financial

situation of your

household

EU28 2.5 4.3 1.2 0.8

Most of the time -2.1 2.3 -3.9 -4.8

From time to time 0.7 3.3 -0.6 -1.2

Almost never 4.1 5.2 2.9 2.7

Difficulties paying bills

Since 2013, there have been some improvements in perceptions, most notably among

those who have difficulty paying bills most of the time in relation to the area they live in

(up 1.1 point), with smaller improvements among those who struggle with bills from

time to time (up 0.3 points) and those who almost never struggle with bills (up 0.4

points). Across the three remaining measures there are no notable improvements in

perceptions. The most notable worsening of opinion is among those who struggle to pay

their bills from time to time in relation to life in general (down 0.8 points), with a less

marked deterioration among those who struggle most of the time (down 0.5 points).

Change in index

2014 vs. 2013Your life in general The area you live in

Your personal job

situation

The financial

situation of your

household

Most of the time -0.5 +1.1 +0.1 =

From time to time -0.8 +0.3 -0.2 -0.3

Almost never -0.2 +0.4 -0.1 -0.1


25 Along with Ireland


27

Comparing the 2014 results with those from 2009 shows a deterioration in the

perceptions of those who routinely struggle to pay their household bills on all but one

measure (local area), with the most notable worsening of opinions in relation to life in

general (down 1.8 points), and with perceptions of the local area showing only a small

improvement (up 0.2 points). It also shows that those who almost never struggle to pay

bills are starting to find things more difficult, with small deteriorations across three

indicators and only a small improvement in the fourth - local area (up 0.2 points) -

among this group as well.

Change in index

2014 vs. 2009Your life in general The area you live in

Your personal job

situation

The financial

situation of your

household

Most of the time -1.8 +0.2 -1.1 -0.8

From time to time -1.1 = -0.4 -0.6

Almost never -0.3 +0.2 -0.2 -0.2


In terms of the respondent’s occupational status, the largest differences in the 2014

indices are between the unemployed, who score lowest on all four measures, and

managers, who score highest on each measure (with the exception of life in general

where students have a slightly higher index of 4.6). Not surprisingly, the difference in

perceptions between the two groups is particularly marked in relation to personal job

situation and the household financial situation:

Special EB 418


Your personal job

situation

The financial

situation of your

household

EU28 2.5 4.3 1.2 0.8

Managers 4.4 5.3 4.3 3.5

Unemployed -0.9 2.9 -5.8 -3.4

Respondent occupation scale

Since 2013 there has been a worsening in managers’ perceptions of life in general (down

0.5 points), marginal positive shifts in their opinions on the local area and household

financial situation (both up 0.1 point) and no change in perceptions of their job situation.

Compared with 2009, managers are slightly more positive about the area in which they

live (up 0.2 points) but somewhat more pessimistic about other aspects of their personal

situation, most notably their general life (down 0.4 points).

The unemployed also show an improvement since 2013 in their opinions about the local

area (up 0.3 points). They are marginally more negative about their job situation (down

0.1 point), somewhat more negative about household finances (down 0.3 points) and

notably more pessimistic about their life in general (down 1.3 points). Compared with

2009, the unemployed, like managers, hold more positive opinions on their local area

(up 0.3 points) and less positive views on each of the other measures. The largest

negative shift in opinion since 2009 is on life in general (down 1.4 points) and it is more

marked than that seen for managers in relation to this measure.


28

In terms of age of leaving education, those who left-time education at 15 or younger, or

aged 16-19, are less satisfied with their personal situation than those who continued

their education to age 20 or older and students:

Special EB 418


Your personal job

situation

The financial

situation of your

household

EU28 2.5 4.3 1.2 0.8

15- 1.2 4 -0.3 -0.5

16-19 2.1 4.1 0.6 0.3

20+ 3.5 4.8 2.5 2.2

Still studying 4.6 4.7 2 2

Education (End of)


29

2. COUNTRY

Having explored Europeans’ perceptions of their personal situation, this next section of

the chapter looks at their views on the national picture, with a particular focus on

economic indicators.

Respondents were asked to judge the current situation in relation to six aspects of life in

their own country: the cost of living; the affordability of energy; the affordability of

housing; the way public administration runs; the economic situation; and the

employment situation.

As before, the results are reported as indices. Each of the six aspects is examined in turn

for the EU as a whole, and for each country, for the latest wave and for the last five

waves.


30

The table below summarises people’s satisfaction with the cost of living in their

country.

Special EB

315

(2009)

Special EB

349

(2010)

Special EB

370

(2011)

Special EB

391

(2012)

Special EB

408

(2013)

Special EB

418

(2014)

EU28 -3 -2.7 -3.4 -3 -3.1 -2.9

SE 1.9 2.2 1.6 2.4 2.4 1.6

NL 1.4 1.2 1.2 2.1 0.8 1.5

DK 1.4 1.4 0.4 0.6 1.1 0.9

DE -0.5 -0.2 -0.7 0.7 0.5 0.1

AT 0.2 1.3 1 0.8 0.1 -1

MT -5.6 -4.8 -6.1 -4.9 -3.8 -1.2

LU 0.4 -0.8 -1.5 -0.5 -0.8 -1.7

BE -2 -1.1 -1.6 -0.8 -1 -1.8

UK -2.3 -1.7 -3.2 -2.1 -2 -1.8

FI -1.3 -1 -2 -1.9 -2.1 -2.5

FR -3.9 -3.6 -4.7 -3.1 -4 -3.4

ES -3.6 -2.7 -4.5 -3.6 -4.9 -3.7

IE -5.6 -4.9 -5.6 -4.9 -4.9 -3.8

CZ -3.1 -3.1 -4.4 -4.3 -4.2 -4

SK -4.2 -3.3 -5.1 -4.9 -5 -4.2

LT -4.3 -5.2 -5.9 -5.6 -4.7 -4.4

EE -3.2 -3.4 -5.6 -6 -6 -4.4

PL -4.2 -4 -5 -5.6 -5 -4.5

HU -6.1 -6.1 -6.3 -6.3 -4.8 -4.7

IT -4.7 -4.1 -3.5 -5.7 -4.9 -4.8

PT -5.5 -5.2 -5.6 -5.8 -6.1 -4.8

SI -4.1 -3.9 -4.4 -3.9 -4.9 -4.9

LV -5.9 -5.1 -7.3 -5.4 -4.8 -5.1

CY -4.3 -3.6 -4.9 -6.1 -6.5 -5.7

RO -5.3 -6.5 -7 -6.6 -6.6 -6.1

EL -6.1 -6.2 -6.7 -7.5 -6.8 -6.5

BG -5.8 -5.5 -5.9 -5.9 -5.8 -6.6

HR - - - - -6.7 -7.1

The cost of living in (OUR COUNTRY)



31

Europeans’ net evaluation of the cost of living in their country is somewhat negative,

with an index of -2.9 at the EU level. This is the fourth lowest overall index across the 15

survey measures. The 2014 index represents a small improvement on the overall score

of -3.1 recorded in 2013, but remains slightly below the highest point in the whole series

of -2.7 in 2010.

There is national variation, with the highest indices again found in the Nordic and

Benelux countries, Germany, Austria, Malta and the UK. Having said this, only four

countries have a positive index on this measure, and only two – Sweden (1.6) and the

Netherlands (1.5) – have an index of one or higher. Four countries have an index of -6

or lower, with Croatia having the lowest score (-7.1), followed by Bulgaria (-6.6), Greece

(-6.5) and Romania (-6.1).

Comparing the results at a national level with those from 2013, seventeen Member

States26 show an improvement in terms of people’s satisfaction with the cost of living;

Slovenia shows no change; and the remainder show a year-on-year decline. The largest

improvements are observed in Malta (up 2.6 points), Estonia (up 1.6), Portugal (up 1.3),

Spain (up 1.2) and Ireland (up 1.1), followed by Slovakia and Cyprus (both up 0.8

points).

Malta also shows the largest improvement of any Member State on this measure since

the first wave, from a baseline of -5.6 in 2009 to -1.2 in 2014 (up 4.4 points), followed

by Ireland, from -5.6 to -3.8 respectively (up 1.8). The only other Member State

showing an improvement in 2014 of at least one point on the baseline index is Hungary -

from -6.1 to -4.7 respectively (up 1.4).

Where indices on the cost of living have declined since 2013, these declines tend to be

relatively small, with the highest in Austria (down 1.1 point), followed by Luxembourg

(down 0.9) and Sweden, Belgium and Bulgaria (each down 0.8 points).

Across the 2009-2014 period, the largest deteriorations on this measure can be seen in

Luxembourg (down 2.1 points), Cyprus (down 1.4) and Austria, Finland and Estonia

(each down 1.2 points).

There have been some notable changes in the relative positions of countries on this

measure since 2009: Malta has risen sixteen places from twenty-second equal position in

2009 to sixth in 2014, whilst Ireland (also twenty-second equal in 2009) has risen nine

places to thirteenth. In contrast, Slovenia has dropped eight places from fourteenth in

2009 to twenty-second in 2014 and Cyprus, seven places from seventeenth equal

positon to twenty-fourth.

26 The Netherlands, Malta, the UK, France, Spain, Ireland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Lithuania, Estonia, Poland, Hungary, Portugal, Italy, Cyprus, Romania and Greece


32

The next table summarises Europeans’ perceptions of how affordable energy is in

their country.

Special EB

315

(2009)

Special EB

349

(2010)

Special EB

370

(2011)

Special EB

391

(2012)

Special EB

408

(2013)

Special EB

418

(2014)

EU28 -2.2 -2 -2.6 -2.6 -2.5 -2.5

CZ 3.2 3.2 2.9 3.4 3.7 4.2

EE 3.8 4.4 3.5 3.1 3.6 3.6

LV 3.2 2.9 1.9 2.3 2.7 1.9

NL 0.3 1.2 1.1 1.5 1 1.3

SE 0.1 -1.2 -2.2 0 0.8 0.9

AT 0.1 1.2 1.3 0.6 -0.2 0.7

DK 1.1 0.6 0 0.4 0.7 0.5

MT -4.9 -4.8 -5.9 -5.2 -3.6 0.5

LU 0 0.5 0.2 0.6 0 0.2

BG -5.9 -0.3 -0.5 -0.7 -1 -0.1

SI -1.3 -2.2 -2.5 -2 -2.2 -1.6

FI -2.2 -1 -3 -2.3 -2.1 -1.8

PL -3.6 -3.4 -4.3 -3.8 -2.9 -1.8

HU -5.9 -6 -5.9 -5.7 -3.8 -1.8

SK -2.8 -1.6 -3.6 -3.3 -3.2 -2.1

ES 1.7 1.1 0.2 -0.5 -0.2 -2.3

DE -2.1 -1.6 -1.4 -1.8 -2.2 -2.4

FR -2 -2.5 -3.9 -2.9 -3 -2.5

BE -2.8 -2.7 -3.7 -3 -2.4 -2.7

HR - - - - -3.8 -3.1

IT -2.9 -2.7 -2.4 -4.6 -4 -3.6

LT -3.7 -5.3 -5.1 -5.1 -4.5 -3.6

IE -3.7 -3.4 -4.4 -4.2 -4.2 -3.7

UK -3.3 -2.3 -4.1 -2.9 -3.3 -4.1

PT -4.7 -4.6 -5.1 -5.6 -5.7 -5.3

RO -4 -5.3 -6.1 -5.8 -6.2 -5.7

EL -5 -5.8 -6.3 -6.9 -6.8 -6.6

CY -4.4 -4.8 -5.9 -7.7 -7.6 -6.9

How affordable energy is in (OUR COUNTRY)



33

People’s perceptions of how affordable energy currently is in their country are slightly

better than their views of the overall cost of living, with an index of -2.5 at the EU level,

the sixth lowest EU level index among the 15 survey measures. The index remains

unchanged on 2013, and is somewhat lower than the baseline index (-2.2) and the

highest index in the series recorded in 2010 (-2).

There is again a large amount of variation between individual countries, although this

variation follows a somewhat different pattern from those seen earlier in the report. This

is not unexpected, since energy prices in individual countries will reflect a range of

different supply and demand conditions in each country that are not necessarily related

to a country’s overall economic situation27.

The most positive perceptions of the affordability of energy can be observed in the Czech

Republic (4.2), Estonia (3.6) and Latvia (1.9). These Member States have occupied the

first three positions on this measure in each of the six survey years. Six other countries

have positive indices on this measure in 2014: the Netherlands (1.3), Sweden (0.9),

Austria (0.7), Denmark and Malta (both 0.5) and Luxembourg (0.2). It is worth noting in

this context that the cost to consumers of gas and electricity in Sweden, Denmark and

Austria is high relative to other EU countries28.

There is more similarity with earlier findings in terms of the countries with the most

negative perceptions of the affordability of energy. Five countries have an index of -4 or

lower on this measure: Cyprus (-6.9), Greece (-6.6), Romania (-5.7) and Portugal

(-5.3), joined in this instance by the UK (-4.1).

Most Member States show an improvement in terms of people’s judgements of the

affordability of energy relative to the position in 2013, opinion in Estonia remains

unchanged, and six countries29 show a year-on-year decline.

The largest improvements since 2013 are observed in Malta (up 4.1 points), Hungary

(up 2 points), Poland and Slovakia (both up 1.1 point), and Austria, Bulgaria and

Lithuania (each up 0.9 points). The large positive shifts in Malta and Hungary have

resulted in notable improvements in their rankings: Malta rising from nineteenth position

in 2013 to equal seventh in 2014; and Hungary rising from equal twentieth to equal

twelfth.

The largest improvements between 2009 and 2014 on this measure are seen in Bulgaria,

Hungary and Malta. The largest increase (5.8 points) can be observed in Bulgaria,

although this is largely accounted for by a huge shift in perceptions between 2009 and

2010, when the index moved from -5.9 to -0.330, with slight declines in the following

years before the increase noted above in 2014. In Malta the net increase is 5.4 points,

from -4.9 in 2009 to 0.5 in 2014; with the index in Hungary increasing by 4.1 points

over the same period, from -5.9 to -1.8.

27 including the geopolitical situation, import diversification, network costs, environmental protection costs, severe weather conditions and levels of excise and taxation 28http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/images/1/1c/Half-yearly_electricity_and_gas_prices%2C_first_half_of_year%2C_2011–13_%28EUR_per_kWh%29_YB14.png 29 Latvia, Denmark, Spain, Germany, Belgium and the UK 30 This may reflect the economic recovery in Bulgaria in 2010, following a rapid economic decline in 2009

http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/images/1/1c/Half-yearly_electricity_and_gas_prices%2C_first_half_of_year%2C_2011–13_%28EUR_per_kWh%29_YB14.png

http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/images/1/1c/Half-yearly_electricity_and_gas_prices%2C_first_half_of_year%2C_2011–13_%28EUR_per_kWh%29_YB14.png


34

The shifts in Malta, Bulgaria and Hungary have resulted in big improvements in their

rankings, with Malta rising from twenty-fourth position in 2009 to equal seventh in 2014,

and Bulgaria and Hungary from twenty-sixth equal in 2009 to tenth and equal twelfth

respectively in 2014.

The largest declines in people’s judgements of the affordability of energy relative to the

position in 2013 can be observed in Spain (down 2.1 points) from -0.2 to -2.3, and

Latvia and the UK (each down 0.8 points) from 2.7 to 1.9 and from -3.3 to -4.1

respectively. The shifts in Spain and the UK have affected their rankings, with Spain

dropping from equal eighth position in 2013 to sixteenth in 2014, and the UK dropping

from eighteenth to twenty-fourth position.

The Member States with the largest deterioration in perceptions of the affordability of

energy since 2009 are Spain (down 4 points), followed by Cyprus (down 2.5), Romania

(down 1.7), Greece (down 1.6), and Latvia (down 1.3). The shift in Spain has seen it

drop twelve places in the rankings, from fourth position in 2009 to sixteenth now.


35

The next table below shows respondents’ perceptions of the affordability of housing in

their country.

Special EB

315

(2009)

Special EB

349

(2010)

Special EB

370

(2011)

Special EB

391

(2012)

Special EB

408

(2013)

Special EB

418

(2014)

EU28 -3.1 -2.7 -3.3 -3.3 -2.9 -3.3

DK 0.9 1.6 0.9 1.6 1.7 1

EE 1.1 1.6 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.7

CZ -1.3 -1.2 -1 -0.5 -0.1 0.5

LV 0.7 0.5 0 0.3 0.7 -0.2

NL 0.1 -0.2 -0.6 -0.2 -0.5 -0.5

SE 1.1 0.7 0.1 0.7 0.5 -0.6

AT -0.2 0.6 0.8 0.1 -0.7 -1.2

DE 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.3 -0.3 -1.7

BG -6.4 -1.2 -2 -1.2 -1 -1.7

HU -5.1 -5.1 -5 -5.2 -3.6 -2.6

IE -4.4 -3.1 -2.2 -1.6 -1.8 -2.9

FI -2 -1.7 -2.8 -2.5 -2.7 -2.9

MT -5 -4.6 -5.6 -4.5 -4.1 -3

BE -2.9 -2.1 -2.8 -2.1 -1.9 -3.3

HR - - - - -4.2 -3.7

FR -4 -3.3 -4.8 -3.9 -3.6 -3.8

SK -4 -3.4 -4.7 -4.2 -4.4 -3.8

IT -4.2 -3.6 -3.3 -5.2 -4 -4.1

UK -3.6 -3.1 -4.4 -3.6 -3 -4.3

PL -5 -5.3 -5.5 -5.6 -4.5 -4.3

PT -4.3 -4.3 -5 -5 -4.8 -4.5

EL -4.9 -5.1 -5.3 -5.8 -5 -4.6

SI -4 -4.4 -5.2 -4.5 -4.9 -4.7

ES -5.3 -4.1 -5.8 -5.3 -5 -4.8

LT -5.6 -5.9 -6 -5.8 -5.2 -4.8

RO -5.4 -5.7 -6.1 -5.5 -5.4 -4.8

LU -4.2 -4.2 -5.2 -5 -4.7 -5.1

CY -7.5 -6.5 -7.3 -6.9 -6.8 -6.5

How affordable housing is in (OUR COUNTRY)



36

Europeans’ evaluation of the affordability of housing in their country is somewhat

negative, with an index of -3.3 at the EU level. This index has declined since 2013 (down

0.4 points from an index of -2.9), and has returned to its lowest level in the series, also

recorded in 2011 and 2012. It is the second lowest EU level index among the 15 survey

measures.

The index varies nationally. As was the case in relation to perceptions of energy costs,

there is a less discernible pattern than on previous measures in terms of the countries

with the highest and lowest indices on this measure.

Only three Member States have a positive index on this measure, with the highest in

Denmark (1), followed by Estonia (0.7) and the Czech Republic (0.5). The remainder

have a negative index, with two having an index of -5 or lower: Cyprus (-6.5) and

Luxembourg (-5.1). A further nine countries have an index of at least -4: Spain,

Lithuania and Romania (-4.8 in each), Slovenia (-4.7), Greece (-4.6), Portugal (-4.5),

the UK and Poland (both -4.3) and Italy (-4.1).

Thirteen of the 28 Member States31 have seen an improvement since 2013 in

perceptions of the affordability of housing, opinion in the Netherlands remains the same,

and the remaining countries show a year-on-year decline.

The largest improvements since 2013 can be observed in Malta (up 1.1 point), Hungary

(up 1) and the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Romania (each up 0.6 points).

Between 2009 and 2014 the index on this measure has improved by one point or more

in six Member States. The greatest improvement is observed in Bulgaria, with a net

increase of 4.7 points, from an index of -6.4 in 2009 to -1.7 in 2014. As was the case in

relation to the affordability of energy, this relates to a shift in perceptions between 2009

and 2010, when the index moved from -6.4 to -1.2. The other Member States showing

the most marked improvements are: Hungary (up 2.5 points), Malta (up 2), the Czech

Republic (up 1.8), Ireland (up 1.5) and Cyprus (up 1 point). Bulgaria and Hungary have

risen notably in the country rankings on this measure since 2009, Bulgaria from twenty-

sixth position to equal eighth and Hungary from twenty-second position to tenth.

Only five Member States show a decline in satisfaction with housing costs since 2014 of

one point or more, with the largest in Germany and Belgium (both down 1.4 points),

followed by the UK (down 1.3), and Sweden and Ireland (both down 1.1 point).

The largest shifts towards more negative perceptions between 2009 and 2014 are again

in Germany (down 2.4 points) and Sweden (down 1.7 points), along with Austria (down

1 point), although all of these countries remain in the top ten in terms of ranking. The

most notable drops in ranking on this measure can be observed in Slovenia (from twelfth

equal in 2009 to twenty-third in 2014) and Luxembourg (from fifteenth equal to twenty-

seventh).

31 The Czech Republic, Hungary, Malta, Croatia, Slovakia, Poland, Portugal, Greece, Slovenia, Spain, Lithuania, Romania and Cyprus


37

The fourth measure in this section concerns people’s views of the way that public

administration runs in their country.

Special EB

315

(2009)

Special EB

349

(2010)

Special EB

370

(2011)

Special EB

391

(2012)

Special EB

408

(2013)

Special EB

418

(2014)

EU28 -1.2 -1.3 -1.4 -1.5 -1.6 -1.7

DE 1.2 1 1.4 2.2 2.1 2

DK 1.6 1.2 0.8 1.9 1.7 2

MT -1 -0.6 -1.4 -1 1.1 2

LU 1.5 1.6 2.4 2.4 2 1.9

EE 1.5 1.4 1.6 1.2 0.9 1.7

FI 1.4 0.9 0.5 1.5 1.2 1.4

SE 1.5 2 1.7 2 1.6 1.2

NL -0.2 -0.6 -0.5 0 -1.2 0.5

AT 1.2 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.7 0.2

BE 0.4 0.1 0.3 1 1.2 -0.3

UK -1.5 -0.4 -0.9 0 -0.6 -1.3

CZ -1.1 -1 -1.8 -2.1 -1.7 -1.6

LT -2 -3 -3.3 -3.2 -2 -1.7

FR -1.1 -1.3 -1.6 -0.8 -1.6 -1.8

HU -2.4 -2.2 -2.1 -2.7 -0.9 -1.9

SK -1.1 -0.9 -1.4 -1.6 -1.5 -2.3

PL -1.8 -1.7 -2 -3.1 -2.3 -2.3

IE -4 -4.1 -3.8 -3.8 -2.6 -2.8

LV -5 -5.6 -4.9 -3.2 -2.9 -2.9

BG -2.4 -2.2 -1.5 -1.5 -2.1 -3.3

PT -3.1 -3.5 -3.4 -3.9 -3.8 -3.3

ES -1.2 -1.3 -2.8 -3.7 -4.5 -3.4

SI 0.3 -1.2 -2.4 -2.3 -3.8 -3.6

CY -1.4 -1.1 -0.9 -3.4 -4 -3.6

RO -3.6 -6 -5.8 -4.2 -3.2 -4

IT -3.2 -2.8 -2.7 -5 -4.5 -4.8

HR - - - - -5 -5.6

EL -5 -6 -5.9 -7.1 -6.6 -6.3

The way public administration runs in (OUR COUNTRY)



38

Europeans’ overall judgement of the way that public administration runs in their country

is slightly negative, but less so than for the five other measures covered in this section,

with an index of -1.7 at the EU level. There has been a slight but consistent deterioration

in perceptions on this measure over the series, with the index falling by 0.1 each year

from a high of -1.2 in 2009.

As with other measures, there are large differences nationally in perceptions. The

pattern tends to follow that seen for most of the measures, with the highest indices

found in the Nordic and Benelux countries, Germany, Malta and Austria, with Estonia

also having relatively positive views on public administration. Germany, Denmark and

Malta have the highest indices (2 in each), followed by Luxembourg (1.9), Estonia (1.7),

Finland (1.4), Sweden (1.2), the Netherlands (0.5), Austria (0.2) and Belgium (-0.3).

The UK has the next highest index (-1.3) and has lost a position in the top ten which it

held for the previous four surveys.

Similarly, the most negative perceptions are again found in southern and eastern

European countries, reflecting the pattern seen on most measures. Nine countries have

an index of -3 or worse on this measure. Greece has the lowest index (-6.3), followed by

Croatia (-5.6), Italy (-4.8), Romania (-4), Cyprus and Slovenia (both -3.6), Spain (-3.4),

and Portugal and Bulgaria (both -3.3).

Twelve Member States32 show an improvement since 2013 in terms of people’s

satisfaction with the way that public administration runs in their country, Poland and

Latvia show no change, and the remainder show a year-on-year decline.

The largest improvement on this measure between 2013 and 2014 is seen in the

Netherlands (up 1.7 points), followed by Spain (up 1.1), Malta (up 0.9) and Estonia (up

0.8), whilst the largest improvements between 2009 and 2013 can be noted in Malta (up

3 points), Latvia (up 2.1) and Ireland (up 1.2). Malta’s equal first ranking in 2014

compares with rankings of eighth in 2013 and eleventh in 2009.

Perceptions of the way that public administration runs have worsened since 2013 in

fourteen Member States, with the largest declines in Belgium and Austria (both down 1.5

points), Bulgaria (down 1.2), Hungary (down 1) and Romania and Slovakia (both down

0.8 points).

Over the six survey years the largest decline can be observed in Slovenia, down 3.9

points from 0.3 in 2009 to -3.6 in 2014, with its ranking declining from ninth to twenty-

third equal over this period. The indices in Cyprus and Spain have also dropped by two

points or more between 2009 and 2014 (both down 2.2 points).

32 Denmark, Malta, Estonia, Finland, the Netherlands, the UK, Lithuania, Portugal, Spain, Cyprus, Slovenia and Greece


39

The next table shows Europeans’ judgement of the economic situation in their country

in 2014, and in the five previous survey years.

Special EB

315

(2009)

Special EB

349

(2010)

Special EB

370

(2011)

Special EB

391

(2012)

Special EB

408

(2013)

Special EB

418

(2014)

EU28 -4.1 -3.6 -2.9 -3 -3.5 -2.6

DE -3.2 -0.4 3.2 3.5 3.3 3.6

DK 2.4 -0.3 -0.2 1.2 1.5 2.7

MT -3.8 -2.1 -2.9 -2.3 0.2 2.7

SE -1 3.1 4.4 3.8 3.3 2.6

LU 1.4 2.3 3.4 2.8 2.7 2.2

AT -1.4 0.7 2.5 1.9 1.2 0.6

NL 0.1 0.3 1.5 0 -1.5 0.1

EE -4.7 -2.5 -1.5 -1.2 -1.7 -0.5

BE -3.4 -2.6 -0.1 -0.1 -1.4 -0.7

UK -5.5 -5.2 -4.5 -4.3 -3.7 -1

FI -0.2 0.1 0.3 1.3 -0.2 -2.3

LT -5.2 -6.1 -5.1 -4.2 -3.6 -2.3

PL -1.8 -1.4 -2.8 -2.6 -3.6 -2.8

HU -7.3 -6.5 -6.1 -6.4 -4.4 -3.3

CZ -4.4 -4.5 -5 -4.5 -5.1 -3.5

LV -8.3 -7.3 -7.1 -4.6 -4.4 -3.7

IE -6.5 -7.1 -7.8 -7.3 -6.5 -3.9

SK -3.7 -3.3 -4.7 -4 -4.9 -4.5

FR -4.3 -4.2 -3.8 -3.1 -5.2 -4.8

RO -5.1 -7.4 -7.3 -6.5 -6.6 -5.4

PT -5.9 -5.9 -6.3 -6.4 -7.2 -5.4

IT -4.8 -4.3 -3.9 -6.1 -6.1 -6

SI -2.8 -3.6 -5.5 -5.5 -7.5 -6.7

ES -5.3 -6.2 -6.8 -7.5 -7.8 -6.7

BG -5.7 -6.2 -5.9 -5.7 -6.9 -6.8

CY 0.4 -2.3 -3.4 -6.8 -8.9 -7.4

HR - - - - -7 -7.6

EL -6.2 -7.9 -8.5 -8.6 -8.5 -7.9

The economic situation in (OUR COUNTRY)



40

Europeans’ perceptions of the current economic situation in their country are somewhat

negative overall, but less so than their views on the cost of living. The index of -2.6 at

the EU level makes it the fifth lowest rated aspect of life among the 15 measured in the

survey. Having said this, perceptions have improved since 2013 (up 0.9 points), and

show the greatest improvement of any of the 15 measures since 2013. The index of -2.6

is the highest recorded in the series and up 1.5 points from the baseline index of -4.1,

and again shows the greatest improvement of all 15 measures between 2009 and 2014.

The index varies between countries, with the difference between the most positive and

most negative ratings (11.5 points) the third highest of the 15 survey measures33.

The highest indices are again found in the Nordic and Benelux countries (with the

exception on this measure of Finland), Germany, Malta, Austria, Estonia and the UK.

Finland sits just outside the top ten countries, ranked eleventh. Seven countries have a

positive index on this measure, with the highest index being found in Germany (3.6),

followed by Denmark and Malta (both 2.7), Sweden (2.6), Luxembourg (2.2), Austria

(0.6) and the Netherlands (0.1).

Nine countries have an index of -5 or lower, with Greece having the most negative

perception of their country’s current economic situation (-7.9), followed by Croatia

(-7.6), Cyprus (-7.4), Bulgaria (-6.8), Spain and Slovenia (both -6.7), Italy (-6), and

Portugal and Romania (both -5.4).

Comparing the results at a national level with those from 2013, twenty-three Member

States show a year-on-year improvement in terms of people’s satisfaction with the

current economic situation in their country. The largest improvement can be seen in the

UK (up 2.7 points), followed by Ireland (up 2.6 points) and Malta (up 2.5 points). A

further ten countries have seen their index increase by more than one point between

2013 and 2014: Portugal, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, Cyprus, Lithuania,

Denmark, Estonia, Romania, Hungary and Spain, with the most notable shifts in Portugal

(up 1.8 points), the Netherlands and the Czech Republic (up 1.6) and Cyprus (up 1.5).

There are some notable improvements in perceptions of the national economic situation

at country level across the six years of the survey, with net increases of at least four

points recorded in six Member States:

Germany has seen a particularly strong improvement in perceptions, with large

year-on-year increases in 2010 and 2011 followed by a slight improvement in

2012, a slight worsening in 2013 and a small improvement in 2014. The overall

net improvement between 2009 and 2014 is 6.8 points. This improvement has

seen Germany rise in the ranking on this measure from tenth of the 27 Member

States in 2009 to first in 2013 and again in 2014.

Malta has also seen a large increase between 2009 and 2014 of 6.5 points, with

particularly notable improvements between 2012 and 2014. This improvement

has seen Malta rise in the ranking on this measure from thirteenth position in

2009 to equal second in 2014.


41

Like Germany, Latvia has seen a year-on-year improvement, from a low of -8.3

in 2009 (when it was ranked lowest of the 27 Member States) to a high of -3.7 in

2014 (and a ranking of sixteenth), a net gain of 4.6 points.

The UK also shows improvement across the series, notably stronger between

2013 and 2014. The overall result is a 4.5 point net gain, from an index of -5.5 in

2009 to -1 in 2014, and a rise from twenty-first position to tenth.

Estonia has also seen a positive trend each year up until 2012, with a small

decline in 2013 (down 0.5 points) followed by a positive shift in 2014. The overall

result is a 4.2 point net gain, from an index of -4.7 in 2009 to -0.5 in 2014,

seeing it move from sixteenth position to eighth.

Hungary has seen an increase between 2009 and 2014 of 4 points, improving

from -7.3 in 2009 to -3.3 in 2014, with a rise in the ranking on this measure from

twenty-sixth to fourteenth position.

Only five Member States show a decline in perceptions of the current economic situation

between 2013 and 2014, with the largest in Finland (down 2.1 points), followed by

Sweden (down 0.7), Croatia and Austria (both down by 0.6 points) and Luxembourg

(down 0.5). The declines in Finland, Sweden and Austria are surprising in the context of

the other results reported to date. In Finland it reflects the actual economic situation

with the country in recession and negative growth in the third and fourth quarters last

year and the first quarter in 2014. It sees Finland drop in ranking from seventh position

in 2013 to eleventh in 2014, moving outside the top ten most positive Member States for

the first time in the series.

By far the largest deterioration in satisfaction with the current national economic

situation between 2009 and 2014 is to be seen in Cyprus where there has been a year-

on-year decline in the index up until 2014 (when it increased 1.5 points on 2013). This

has resulted in a net drop of 7.8 points, from an index of 0.4 in 2009 to -7.4 in 2014.

Cyprus, whose banks have a large exposure to Greek debt, has plummeted dramatically

in the rankings on this measure from third of 27 Member States in 2009 to become the

lowest ranked of any Member State in 2013, before improving slightly to twenty-sixth in

2014. Only two other Member States have seen their index drop by more than two

points between 2009 and 2014: Slovenia dropping 3.9 points from an index of -2.8 in

2009 to -6.7 in 2014 (with a fall in its ranking from ninth to twenty-third equal); and

Finland down 2.1 points from an index of -0.2 in 2009 to -2.3 in 2014 (with a fall in its

ranking from fifth to eleventh equal). A further five countries have seen their index drop

by at least one point: Greece (down 1.7); Spain (down 1.4); Italy (down 1.2); Bulgaria

(down 1.1); and Poland (down 1).

33 The highest difference is in relation to the pension system, followed by the healthcare system


42

The last measure examined in this section concerns people’s level of satisfaction with the

employment situation in their country.

Special EB

315

(2009)

Special EB

349

(2010)

Special EB

370

(2011)

Special EB

391

(2012)

Special EB

408

(2013)

Special EB

418

(2014)

EU28 -4.4 -4 -3.5 -4 -4.2 -4.1

DE -4.1 -2.3 0.6 1.4 1.2 1.1

MT -3.4 -1.4 -2.2 -0.9 0.4 0.8

DK 0.6 0.1 -0.1 -0.9 -0.5 0.2

LU -0.9 0.9 1.5 0.8 0.5 -0.1

AT -1.7 0 2 1.7 0.9 -0.3

SE -2.4 -0.6 0.6 -0.3 -1.6 -1.7

UK -4.6 -3.5 -3.8 -4.3 -3.3 -1.9

EE -5.1 -4.8 -3.4 -3.3 -2.5 -2.1

LT -5.6 -6.1 -5.3 -4.3 -3.4 -2.6

BE -2.8 -2.1 -0.1 -0.5 -1.6 -2.8

NL 0.8 0.6 1.6 -0.1 -3.1 -2.8

FI -2.2 -1.6 0 -0.5 -1.7 -3.6

LV -7.2 -6.9 -6.2 -5 -4.1 -4

PL -3.2 -3.2 -3.9 -4.9 -4.8 -4.5

HU -6.3 -6 -5.8 -6.1 -4.7 -4.6

CZ -4.1 -4.4 -4 -4 -4.7 -4.7

IE -6.8 -7.4 -8.1 -7.5 -6.4 -4.8

PT -6.2 -5.8 -6.2 -6.7 -7.2 -5.7

FR -5.3 -4.6 -4 -4.2 -5.9 -5.9

SK -5.1 -4.8 -5 -5.2 -6.1 -6.2

IT -4.8 -4.7 -4.1 -6.4 -6.1 -6.7

RO -4.9 -7.2 -7.1 -6.9 -7.3 -6.9

CY -1.5 -2.5 -4.1 -6.2 -7.6 -7

BG -4.9 -6.1 -6.2 -6.4 -6.9 -7.4

SI -4.1 -5.1 -5.9 -6.6 -7.9 -7.6

ES -6.4 -7 -7.7 -8.2 -8.3 -8

EL -5.8 -6.6 -7.9 -8.2 -8.2 -8.1

HR - - - - -7.6 -8.3

The employment situation in (OUR COUNTRY)



43

Europeans assess the employment situation in their country more negatively than they

do any of the other dimensions they are asked about in the survey, with an index of -4.1

at the EU level. The 2014 index shows a very small increase on the overall score of -4.2

in 2013 (up 0.1 point), and remains only slightly higher than the lowest score of -4.4

recorded in 2009.

National variation in the index broadly reflects the pattern seen on most measures, with

the highest indices found in the Nordic and Benelux countries (with the exception of

Finland), Germany, Malta, Austria, the UK and Estonia, joined on this indicator by

Lithuania. Finland sits just outside the top ten on this measure, ranked twelfth. The

lowest indices are again found in southern and eastern European states, joined on this

measure by France. Only three countries have a positive index on this measure, with

Germany having the highest index (1.1), followed by Malta (0.8) and Denmark (0.2).

Nine countries have an index of lower than -6. Croatia, Greece and Spain have the most

negative perceptions of their countries’ current employment situation, with indices of

-8.3, -8.1 and -8 respectively, followed by Slovenia (-7.6); Bulgaria (-7.4); Cyprus (-7);

Romania (-6.9); Italy (-6.7) and Slovakia (-6.2).

Not surprisingly, there is a relationship between the perceptions of individual countries of

the employment situation in their country and the level of unemployment in the country

concerned, with higher indices generally found in countries with relatively low levels of

unemployment, and vice versa. For example, Germany, Malta and Denmark, which score

highest on this measure, have some of the lowest current unemployment rates in the

EU28 (although not the lowest); and Croatia, Greece and Spain, which score lowest on

this measure, have the highest unemployment rates in the EU2834. There are some

exceptions to this rule, most notably in Romania, which has the eighth lowest

unemployment rate in the EU28, but ranks twenty-second in terms of its perceptions of

the employment situation in the country; and in Slovenia, which has the thirteenth

lowest unemployment rate in the EU28, but ranks twenty-fifth on this indicator. Of

course, people’s perceptions of the employment situation in their country may be

influenced by a wider range of factors than simply the rate of unemployment.

People’s judgements of the employment situation in their country have improved in

sixteen Member States35 since 2014; France and the Czech Republic show no change;

and the remainder show a worsening of perceptions.

The largest improvements are observed in Ireland (up 1.6 points), Portugal (up 1.5) and

the UK (up 1.4). These improvements reflect recent reductions in the unemployment

rate36 in each of these Member States.

34 Based on an analysis of the most recently published Eurostat unemployment statistics: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_PUBLIC/3-03062014-BP/EN/3-03062014-BP-EN.PDF 35 Malta, Denmark, the UK, Estonia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Latvia, Poland, Hungary, Ireland, Portugal, Romania, Cyprus, Slovenia, Spain and Greece 36 This is based on comparisons of seasonally adjusted unemployment rates in April 2013 versus April 2014. In the UK, April 2014 data is not available and comparisons are based on April 2013 versus February 2014

http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_PUBLIC/3-03062014-BP/EN/3-03062014-BP-EN.PDF


44

Germany, which, as noted earlier, has seen a particularly strong improvement in

people’s evaluation of its economic situation since 2009, has also seen the largest

improvement in perceptions of the employment situation in the country between 2009

and 2014, with a net increase of 5.2 points over this period, although the index has

declined very slightly since 2013 (down 0.1 point). The pattern is similar in other

countries where improved perceptions of the economic situation since 2009 are reflected

in improved perceptions of the employment situation over the same period, namely:

Malta (+4.2 points between 2009 and 2014, moving from tenth position to

second)

Latvia (+3.2, from twenty-seventh to thirteenth)

Estonia (+3, from eighteenth equal to eighth)

Lithuania (+3, from twenty-first to ninth)

the UK (+2.7, from fourteenth to seventh)

Ireland (+2, from twenty-sixth to seventeenth)

and Hungary (+1.7, from twenty-fourth to fifteenth).

The largest deterioration in satisfaction with the current employment situation since

2013 is noted in Finland (down 1.9 points), followed by Belgium and Austria (both down

1.2 points). Whilst all these countries have seen a rise in unemployment over the last

year they have not seen the largest relative increases in the rate of unemployment in

the past year across the EU37. The decline in Finland has pushed the country out of a top

ten ranking position for the first time in the series (now twelfth).

The largest drops in satisfaction with the current employment situation between 2009

and 2014 are to be seen in Cyprus, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Bulgaria and Greece,

reflecting a broadly similar pattern observed earlier in relation to judgements of the

economic situation more generally, with the exception of the Netherlands. Here opinions

on the employment situation are more pessimistic than views on the economy, with the

index dropping from 0.8 in 2009 (ranked first) to -2.8 in 2014 (ranked tenth equal).

In Cyprus the index has declined from -1.5 in 2009 to -7 in 2014, moving from a ranking

of fourth in 2009 to twenty-third in 2014; in Slovenia from -4.1 in 2009 (eleventh equal)

to -7.6 in 2014 (twenty-fifth); in Bulgaria from -4.9 (sixteenth equal) in 2009 to -7.4 in

2014 (twenty-fourth); and in Greece from -5.8 (twenty-second) to -8.1 (twenty-

seventh).

An analysis of demographic and socio-economic differences at the EU level in relation to

these six country measures reflects the earlier finding that the key factors that

differentiate how people feel about the situation in their country are their perception of

how difficult it is to pay their household bills, their occupational status and, to a

somewhat lesser extent, the age at which they completed their education.

37 Italy, Cyprus, Luxembourg, Malta and the Netherlands have all seen larger increases


45

Reflecting the pattern of findings concerning respondents’ personal situation, those who

struggle to pay their bills most of the time have much lower indices than those who

almost never struggle to do so on all six measures relating to the national situation. The

most marked differences in perceptions between the two groups are in relation to the

economic situation and the cost of living:

Special EB 418

(2014)

The cost of living

in (OUR

COUNTRY)

How affordable

energy is in

(OUR

COUNTRY)

How affordable

housing is in

(OUR

COUNTRY)

The way public

administration

runs in (OUR

COUNTRY)

The economic

situation in (OUR

COUNTRY)

The employment

situation in (OUR

COUNTRY)

EU28 -2.9 -2.5 -3.3 -1.7 -2.6 -4.1

Most of the time -5.9 -4.8 -5.4 -4.6 -6.0 -7.0

From time to time -4.2 -3.2 -3.9 -2.9 -4.3 -5.3

Almost never -1.8 -1.8 -2.7 -0.6 -1.3 -3.1


The most notable shifts in opinions since 2013 are in relation to:

the economy, with all groups holding more positive perceptions, the most notable

shift among those who almost never struggle to pay household bills (up 1 point)

the cost of living, with a positive shift among those struggling to pay bills most of

the time (up 0.6 points)

and housing affordability, with a worsening of opinion among those who almost

never struggle to pay bills (down 0.5 points).

Compared with 2009, those who almost always struggle with bills are less positive about

the employment situation (down 1 point); the way public administration is run (down 1.6

points); energy affordability (down 0.8 points); and, to a lesser extent, housing

affordability (down 0.4 points). Those who almost never struggle with bills now hold

more positive opinions on the economy (up 2.2 points) and, to a lesser extent, the

employment situation (up 0.8 points). They are more pessimistic about housing

affordability (down 0.4 points) and, to a somewhat lesser extent, energy affordability

(down 0.3 points).

In terms of the respondent’s occupational status, the largest differences in the 2014

indices are again between the unemployed, who score lowest on all of the measures,

and managers, who generally score highest38. The difference in perceptions between the

two groups is particularly marked in relation to the employment situation and the

economic situation:

Special EB 418

(2014)

The cost of living

in (OUR

COUNTRY)

How affordable

energy is in

(OUR

COUNTRY)

How affordable

housing is in

(OUR

COUNTRY)

The way public

administration

runs in (OUR

COUNTRY)

The economic

situation in (OUR

COUNTRY)

The employment

situation in (OUR

COUNTRY)

EU28 -2.9 -2.5 -3.3 -1.7 -2.6 -4.1

Managers -1.3 -1.6 -2.9 -0.6 -0.6 -2.1

Unemployed -4.6 -3.6 -4.4 -3.3 -5.1 -6.7


38 Students have a higher index than managers on two indicators: energy affordability (-0.7) and housing affordability (-2.3)


46

Since 2013, the most notable improvement in managers’ perceptions relates to the

economic situation (up 0.9 points), with small positive shifts in opinions on energy

affordability and the employment situation. The affordability of housing is where opinion

has worsened the most (down 0.6 points). Views on living costs are unchanged.

Compared with 2009, managers are more positive about the economy (up 2.4 points)

and the employment situation (up 0.9 points) and less positive about housing

affordability (down 0.6 points) and energy affordability (down 0.3 points). Opinions on

the cost of living and the way public administration runs have not changed.

The unemployed also show an improvement since 2013 in their opinions on the

economic situation, although it is less marked than that seen for managers (up 0.4

points). The only other positive shift of opinion among the unemployed is in relation to

the cost of living (up 0.3 points). Compared with 2013, opinion has worsened the most

in regards to the way public administration is run (down 0.5 points). When comparing

with 2009, the unemployed hold more positive opinions on four indicators, with a

worsening of opinion on the way in which public administration is run (down 1 point) and

energy affordability (down 0.6 points). The greatest improvement relates to perceptions

of the economy (up 0.6 points).

In terms of age of leaving education, those who left education at 15 or younger, or aged

16-19, have more negative perceptions of the national situation than those who

continued their education beyond the age of 19, and those who are currently studying:

Special EB 418

(2014)

The cost of living

in (OUR

COUNTRY)

How affordable

energy is in

(OUR

COUNTRY)

How affordable

housing is in

(OUR

COUNTRY)

The way public

administration

runs in (OUR

COUNTRY)

The economic

situation in (OUR

COUNTRY)

The employment

situation in (OUR

COUNTRY)

EU28 -2.9 -2.5 -3.3 -1.7 -2.6 -4.1

15- -3.7 -3.6 -3.8 -2.3 -3.5 -4.9

16-19 -3.4 -2.9 -3.5 -1.9 -2.9 -4.3

20+ -2.1 -1.9 -3.1 -1.1 -1.8 -3.4

Still studying -1.2 -0.7 -2.2 -1.0 -1.6 -3.1

Education (End of)


47

3. SOCIAL PROTECTION AND INCLUSION

The final section in this chapter examines Europeans’ satisfaction with aspects of social

protection and inclusion in their country. Respondents are asked to evaluate five specific

areas: the healthcare system; the pension system; unemployment benefits; relations

between people from different cultural or religious backgrounds, or nationalities; and the

way in which inequalities and poverty are addressed. As before, the results are reported

as indices. Each of the five aspects of social protection and inclusion is examined in turn

for the EU as a whole, and for each of the 27 Member States and Croatia for the latest

wave, and for the 27 Member States for the last four waves.


48

The following table summarises people’s satisfaction with the healthcare system in their

country.


49

Europeans’ overall evaluation of the healthcare system in their country is positive,

although only slightly, with an overall index of 1. The healthcare system is the fourth

highest rated of the 15 measures covered in the survey, behind the area in which people

live, their life in general and their job situation. There has been a small decline in the

index since 2013 (down 0.2 points) and it is now at its lowest level in the series,

although it is only slightly lower than the high of 1.3 seen in 2009 and 2010.

The index varies considerably nationally, with the difference between the most positive

and most negative ratings (11.6 points) the second highest of the 15 measures39. Fifteen

countries have a net positive perception of the healthcare system in their country, with

the rank order of countries broadly reflecting the pattern seen in most of the earlier

findings, joined on this measure by France. Luxembourg has the highest index (5.5),

followed by Austria (5.4), Belgium (5.3), Malta (5) and the Netherlands (4.9). These five

Member States are then followed by Denmark (3.7), the UK and France (both 3.4),

Finland (2.9), Germany (2.8) and Sweden (2.7). Whilst Sweden holds some of the most

positive perceptions of any Member State on its healthcare system, it sits just outside

the top ten countries on this measure (ranked eleventh) – the only measure reported

thus far where Sweden does not hold a position in the top ten.

Among the thirteen countries that have a net negative perception of their healthcare

system Greece has the lowest index (-6.1), followed by Bulgaria (-4.3), Poland (-3.6),

Romania (-3.5), Latvia (-3.1) and Hungary (-2.2).

Comparing the results at a national level with those from 2013, eight Member States40

show a year-on-year improvement in terms of people’s satisfaction with the healthcare

system in their country, Luxembourg, Finland and Estonia show no change, and the

remaining countries show a worsening of opinion on their healthcare system.

Improvements are mostly relatively modest, with the largest in Austria and Malta (both

up 1.2 points), followed by Portugal (up 0.5), Denmark and France (both up 0.3 points),

and Belgium, the Czech Republic and Spain (each up 0.1 point).

The largest decline in satisfaction with the healthcare system between 2013 and 2014

can be seen in Bulgaria (-1.7 points), followed by Latvia (-1.5), Cyprus (-1.3), Poland

(-1.2), Slovakia (-1.1) and Hungary (-1).

Across the 2009-2014 period, the greatest improvements in perceptions of the

healthcare system can be seen in Malta, up 2.3 points from 2.7 in 2009 to 5 in 2014;

Germany, up 1.8 from an index of 1 in 2009 to 2.8 in 2014; and Lithuania, up 1 from an

index of -1.1 in 2009 to -0.1 in 2014. The largest overall declines are observed in Greece

(down 3 points), followed by Spain and Poland (both down 1.9), Cyprus (down 1.5) and

Italy, Slovakia and Latvia (each down 1.3).

39 The highest difference is in relation to the pension system 40 Austria, Belgium, Malta, Denmark, France, the Czech Republic, Spain and Portugal


50

The second measure in this section concerns people’s views of the pension system in

their country.

Special EB

315

(2009)

Special EB

349

(2010)

Special EB

370

(2011)

Special EB

391

(2012)

Special EB

408

(2013)

Special EB

418

(2014)

EU28 -1 -1.2 -1.5 -1.4 -1.5 -1.7

LU 4.6 4.5 4.9 4.9 4.7 4.4

DK 3.2 3.1 3 3.3 3.6 3.8

MT 0.5 0.8 -1.5 0.3 1.1 3.3

NL 3.9 3.7 3.4 3.6 2.6 3.1

FI 1.1 1 0.2 1.3 1.6 2.7

AT 2.9 2.5 3.1 2.7 2 1.7

BE 1.5 1.1 1.3 1.8 1.7 1.1

DE -0.3 -0.1 0.1 1.2 0.6 0.4

UK 0.1 0.6 -0.2 0.3 1.2 0.2

FR -0.1 -0.8 -1.2 0.3 -0.3 -0.4

SE 0.4 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.3 -1.1

IE -1.3 -1 -0.7 -0.5 -1.4 -1.6

ES -0.5 -1.1 -2 -1.3 -2.8 -2.1

SI -0.1 -0.8 -1.1 -1.1 -1.3 -2.6

HU -3.6 -3.4 -3.8 -3.9 -1.8 -2.8

EE -0.6 -1.5 -3.4 -4.4 -4.9 -3.1

CY -0.9 -0.4 -1 -1.4 -2 -3.6

LT -1.4 -4 -4.5 -3.3 -2.8 -3.8

CZ -1.8 -1.8 -3.2 -3.2 -3.3 -4

IT -2.3 -2.2 -1.5 -4.4 -3.8 -4

HR - - - - -5.6 -4

PT -4.3 -4 -4.2 -4.7 -4.8 -4.1

SK -2.4 -2 -3.9 -4.2 -4.2 -4.3

PL -3.4 -3.8 -4 -5.5 -4.3 -4.8

LV -3.2 -4.2 -5.1 -4.6 -4.6 -5.4

RO -3.9 -6.1 -6.2 -5.5 -5.4 -5.5

BG -4.7 -4.5 -4.9 -5.5 -5 -6.3

EL -5.4 -6 -6.3 -7.2 -7.3 -7.5

The pension system in (OUR COUNTRY)



51

Europeans’ net judgement of the pension system in their country is slightly negative,

with an index of -1.7 at the EU level. Apart from a small improvement in the index in

2012, there has been a slight deterioration over the six years of the survey from a high

of -1 in 2009. The 2014 index is the lowest score in the series, showing a small decline

(down 0.2 points) since 2013.

This measure shows the most national variation of all 15 measures, with a difference of

11.9 points between the most positive and most negative ratings. Differences in the

levels of satisfaction with the pension system at country level broadly follow the pattern

for most of the measures, with the highest index found in Luxembourg (4.4) followed by

Denmark (3.8), Malta (3.3), the Netherlands (3.1), Finland (2.7), Austria (1.7), Belgium

(1.1), Germany (0.4) and the UK (0.2). No other country has a positive index. Sweden,

as seen in relation to opinions about the healthcare system, sits just outside the ten

countries holding the most positive views about the pension system, ranked eleventh

with an index of -1.1. This is only the second measure of the twelve reported so far

where Sweden does not hold a position in the top ten most positive Member States. The

lowest level of satisfaction with the pension system is found in Greece (-7.5), followed

by Bulgaria (-6.3), Romania (-5.5), Latvia (-5.4), Poland (-4.8), Slovakia (-4.3),

Portugal (-4.1) and the Czech Republic, Croatia and Italy (-4 in each).

Eight Member States41 show an improvement since 2013 in terms of people’s satisfaction

with the pension system in their country and, as seen in relation to opinions on the

healthcare system, they are mostly relatively modest. The largest improvements are

observed in Malta (up 2.2 points), Estonia (up 1.8), Croatia (up 1.6) and Finland (up

1.1). Malta and Finland have also seen the largest improvements of any Member State

between 2009 and 2014, with an increase of 2.8 points in Malta from 0.5 in 2009 to 3.3

in 2014, and an increase of 1.6 points in Finland with the index rising from 1.1 to 2.7.

The remaining twenty Member States all show a worsening of their opinions on their

pension systems since 2013, mostly relatively modest. The largest declines can be seen

in Cyprus (down 1.6 points), Sweden (down 1.4), Bulgaria and Slovenia (each down 1.3)

and Hungary, Lithuania and the UK (each down 1 point).

Over the six survey years the largest deteriorations in indices are witnessed in Cyprus,

falling 2.7 points from -0.9 in 2009 to -3.6 in 2014; Estonia and Slovenia, both down 2.5

points from -0.6 to -3.1 and from -0.1 to -2.6 respectively; Lithuania, down 2.4 points,

from -1.4 to -3.8; the Czech Republic and Latvia, both down 2.2 points from -1.8 to -4

and from -3.2 to -5.4 respectively; and Greece, down 2.1 points, from -5.4 to -7.5.

Estonia, in spite of showing the second largest improvement of any Member State on

opinions about its healthcare system since 2013, has the second largest deterioration

(along with Slovenia) over the six survey years. This is because prior to 2014 the index

has dropped each year, most notably in 2011 (down 1.9 points on 2010).

41 Denmark, Malta, the Netherlands, Finland, Spain, Estonia, Croatia and Portugal


52

The next table summarises how Europeans rate unemployment benefits in their

country.

Special EB

315

(2009)

Special EB

349

(2010)

Special EB

370

(2011)

Special EB

391

(2012)

Special EB

408

(2013)

Special EB

418

(2014)

EU28 -1.2 -1.4 -1.2 -1.4 -1.6 -1.4

LU 2.4 3.8 4.7 4.5 4.1 3.5

AT 3.1 2.9 3.7 3.5 3.2 3.3

MT -1 -0.7 -0.8 0.7 0.7 3.1

NL 3.5 3 3.1 3.6 2.5 2.9

FI 0.5 0.9 0.1 1.1 1.5 2.7

DK 2.4 2.9 2.2 3.1 2.9 2

DE 0.2 0.2 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.7

BE 1.9 2 2.8 2.3 1.8 1.2

FR 0.5 0.4 0.3 1.1 0.6 1.2

IE 0.3 0.1 0.8 0.6 0 0.4

UK 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.3

SI -0.3 -0.3 0.9 -0.9 -2.2 -1.5

SE -0.5 -0.5 -1.1 -0.6 -1 -2.1

LT -2.8 -4 -3.7 -2.5 -2 -2.6

EE -3.1 -3.4 -4.2 -4.2 -4.3 -3.1

CY -0.9 -0.6 -1.5 -2.9 -3.3 -3.3

ES -1.6 -2.5 -3.4 -3 -4.7 -3.6

LV -3.7 -3.3 -4.4 -3.7 -3.5 -3.7

CZ -2 -2.1 -3.6 -3.3 -3.4 -4

PL -3.4 -3.1 -3.5 -4.8 -4.3 -4.1

IT -3.4 -3.1 -2.4 -4.5 -4.2 -4.2

PT -3.6 -3.8 -3.7 -4.5 -5 -4.2

SK -3.2 -2.9 -3.8 -3.8 -3.9 -4.5

HU -4.2 -4.3 -5 -5.7 -4.4 -4.8

HR - - - - -5.6 -5.1

RO -4.3 -5.9 -6.3 -5.7 -5.9 -5.5

BG -5 -5 -4.9 -5.3 -5.1 -5.6

EL -5.3 -5.8 -6 -7.5 -7 -7.4

Unemployment benefits in (OUR COUNTRY)



53

Europeans’ overall satisfaction with unemployment benefits in their country is at a

broadly similar level to their satisfaction with their pension system, with an index of -1.4

at the EU level. The index has increased slightly since 2013, when it was -1.6 and at its

lowest level in the series.

Differences in perceptions at the national level broadly follow the pattern for most of the

measures, with the highest indices found in the Benelux and Nordic countries (with the

exception of Sweden), Austria, Malta and Germany, joined on this measure by France

and Ireland. The highest index is found in Luxembourg (3.5) which, as already reported,

also has the most positive opinion of any Member State in relation to both its healthcare

system and pension system. Luxembourg is followed by Austria (3.3), Malta (3.1), the

Netherlands (2.9), Finland (2.7), Denmark (2), Germany (1.7), Belgium and France

(both 1.2) and Ireland (0.4). The only other country with a positive index on this

measure is the UK (0.3). Sweden, which ranks in the top ten most positive countries on

each of the measures relating to personal situation and the national picture, again ranks

slightly lower on this measure (thirteenth), following the pattern seen earlier in relation

to its healthcare and pension systems. The UK, which ranks in the top ten most positive

countries on most of the measures already discussed42 also sits just outside the top ten

countries with the most positive perceptions of their unemployment benefits (ranked

eleventh).

Seventeen Member States have a negative index on this measure, with ten having an

index of -4 or lower. These ten are all southern and eastern European countries. Greece

has the lowest score (-7.4), followed by Bulgaria (-5.6), Romania (-5.5), Croatia (-5.1),

Hungary (-4.8), Slovakia (-4.5), Italy and Portugal (both -4.2), Poland (-4.1) and the

Czech Republic (-4).

Thirteen Member States43 show an improvement since 2013 in terms of people’s

satisfaction with unemployment benefits in their country, although increases tend to be

small. Opinion remains unchanged in Cyprus and Italy and has deteriorated in the

remaining thirteen Member States although, again, declines in indices on this measure

are for the most part small.

The greatest improvement since 2013 in perceptions of unemployment benefit provision

is seen in Malta (up 2.4 points), followed by Estonia and Finland (both up by 1.2 points)

and Spain (up 1.1). They are followed by Portugal (up 0.8 points), Slovenia (up 0.7) and

France (up 0.6). Malta and Finland also show the largest improvements since 2009, up

4.1 points from -1 in 2009 to 3.1 in 2014 in Malta, and up 2.2 points, from 0.5 to 2.7

respectively in Finland. The improvement in Malta has seen its ranking on this measure

improve from fourteenth in 2009 to third in 2014. In addition to Malta and Finland, only

two other Member States show an improvement of more than one point over the six

year series: Germany (up 1.5 points), from an index of 0.2 in 2009 to an index of 1.7 in

2014; and Luxembourg (up 1.1 point), from 2.4 to 3.5.

42 The exceptions being energy affordability (ranked 24th), housing affordability (ranked 19th), and area lived in and the way public administration runs (ranked 11th in each case) 43 Austria, Malta, the Netherlands, Finland, France, Ireland, Slovenia, Estonia, Spain, Poland, Portugal, Croatia and Romania


54

The largest declines in satisfaction with unemployment benefits between 2013 and 2014

are observed in Sweden (down 1.1 point) and Denmark (down 0.9). The greatest

declines in satisfaction with unemployment benefits between 2009 and 2014 are in

Cyprus (down 2.4 points), Greece (down 2.1), Spain and the Czech Republic (both down

2), Sweden (-1.6), Slovakia (down 1.3) and Slovenia and Romania (both down 1.2

points).


55

The report looks next at how satisfied Europeans are with the national situation in terms

of relations between people from different cultural or religious backgrounds or

nationalities.

Special EB

315

(2009)

Special EB

349

(2010)

Special EB

370

(2011)

Special EB

391

(2012)

Special EB

408

(2013)

Special EB

418

(2014)

EU28 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.3 0

LU 2.5 2.9 2.8 2.3 2.7 2.5

FI 1.5 0.3 0.5 1.4 1.7 2.2

LT 1.4 1.4 0.8 1 2.2 1.8

EE 1.4 2 1.8 1.7 2 1.7

IE 1 1.3 1.8 1.5 2.1 1.6

MT -0.2 0.3 0.8 2.1 1.6 1.5

LV 1.3 1.9 1.2 1.2 1.5 1.3

PT 0.6 0.4 0.5 -0.4 0.9 1.2

ES 0.8 1.7 0.9 0.3 0.8 0.8

NL 0.1 0 0.1 1.3 0.6 0.8

DE 0.6 0.7 0.6 1.4 1.2 0.6

UK 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.3 0.5

SK 0.2 1.6 1.6 1.3 1.3 0.4

BG 0.8 1.4 1.4 1.2 1 0.3

PL 0.8 1.4 0.6 0.4 0.7 0.3

DK -0.7 -0.6 -1 0.4 0.1 0.3

SI 0.3 0.5 0 -0.2 0.3 -0.1

RO 1.3 -0.3 -0.4 0.7 0.4 -0.2

AT 0.2 1 1.1 1.2 0.9 -0.3

CY 0.3 0.3 -0.8 -0.6 0.2 -0.3

HU -0.7 -0.4 -1.1 -0.5 -0.3 -0.3

SE -0.1 -0.4 -0.1 0.1 -0.3 -0.5

BE 0.4 -0.2 -0.6 -0.2 0 -0.6

HR - - - - -0.7 -0.7

IT -0.8 -1.1 -0.5 -0.8 -1.2 -1.1

FR -0.6 -1.1 -1.4 -0.9 -1.2 -1.3

EL -1.7 -1 -2 -3 -2.1 -1.5

CZ -1 -0.1 -1.3 -0.6 -1 -2.5

Relations in (OUR COUNTRY) between people from

different cultural or religious backgrounds or nationalities



56

Overall, Europeans are divided in their perceptions of the relations between people from

different cultural or religious backgrounds or nationalities in their country, with an index

of 0 at the EU level. The index has declined slightly since 2013 (down 0.3 points) and is

now at its lowest level in the series, compared with a ‘high’ of 0.4 in 2012.

There is less national variation on this measure than on any of the other survey

measures. As was the case in relation to perceptions of energy costs and housing

affordability, there is a less discernible pattern than on most of the 15 indicators in

terms of the countries with the highest and lowest indices on this measure.

Sixteen countries have a positive score, with the most positive perceptions held in

Luxembourg (2.5), Finland (2.2), Lithuania (1.8), Estonia (1.7), Ireland (1.6), Malta

(1.5), Latvia (1.3) and Portugal (1.2). Apart from the Czech Republic (-2.5), Greece

(-1.5), France (both -1.3) and Italy (-1.1), all countries have an index better than -1.

Only six Member States show an improvement in perceptions of relations between

people from different cultural or religious backgrounds or nationalities between 2013 and

2014, and all shifts towards more positive opinions are small. The greatest

improvements can be observed in Greece (up 0.6 points) and Finland (up 0.5). Opinions

in Spain, Hungary and Croatia remain unchanged, and have deteriorated in the

remaining nineteen countries although, again, declines in indices are for the most part

small. The greatest deterioration since 2013 can be observed in the Czech Republic

(down 1.5 points), followed by Austria (down 1.2). No other country shows a decline in

its index of at least one point.

Malta shows the largest improvement of any Member State since 2009 on this measure

(up 1.7 points), improving its ranking from twenty-first in 2009 to sixth in 2014. The

next greatest improvements are seen in Denmark (up 1 point, moving from twenty-third

position to fourteenth), the Netherlands (up 0.7, from nineteenth to ninth) and Finland

(up 0.7, ranked second in both years). The largest declines since 2009 can be seen in

Romania (down 1.5 points, moving from equal sixth position to eighteenth), the Czech

Republic (down 1.5 points, from twenty-sixth to twenty-eighth), Belgium (down 1, from

fourteenth to twenty-third) and the UK (down 0.9, from third to twelfth position).


57

The last measure examined in this section is Europeans’ satisfaction with the way in

which inequalities and poverty are addressed in their country.

Special EB

315

(2009)

Special EB

349

(2010)

Special EB

370

(2011)

Special EB

391

(2012)

Special EB

408

(2013)

Special EB

418

(2014)

EU28 -2 -2.2 -2.5 -2.1 -2.4 -3

MT -0.1 -0.1 0 0.9 1.2 1.7

LU 0.9 0.4 1.1 0.9 1.4 0.3

DK -0.3 -0.6 -0.9 0.9 0.7 0.2

FI 0 -0.8 -1.4 -0.1 -0.2 0.1

NL 0.3 -0.1 -0.9 0.5 -0.5 -0.6

AT -0.3 0.4 0 0.5 0.1 -0.7

BE -1 -1.5 -1.6 -0.5 -0.6 -1.9

DE -1.6 -1.9 -1.8 -0.7 -1.1 -1.9

SE 0 -0.1 -1 -0.7 -0.9 -2

IE -1.9 -2.1 -2.4 -1.4 -2.1 -2.2

UK -0.3 -0.4 -0.9 0 -1.1 -2.4

PL -2.4 -2.1 -3 -3.7 -3.1 -3.1

EE -3.2 -3.2 -3.9 -4 -4.1 -3.2

CY -1.1 -1.3 -2.3 -3.3 -3 -3.4

FR -3.8 -4 -4.2 -2.9 -3.3 -3.5

ES -1.7 -1.1 -2.2 -2.2 -3.5 -3.5

IT -2.1 -2.3 -1.8 -2.8 -2.7 -3.6

CZ -2 -1.6 -3.2 -2.8 -2.6 -3.7

PT -3.4 -3.4 -3.2 -3.6 -3.9 -3.8

SI -2.2 -2.3 -2.6 -2.5 -3.8 -3.9

SK -2.7 -2.2 -3 -3 -3.2 -4

HU -5 -4.6 -4.9 -5.1 -3.7 -4.4

HR - - - - -4 -4.4

LT -4 -5.1 -5.5 -4.6 -4.1 -4.5

RO -3.7 -5.8 -5.7 -5.2 -5.1 -5.1

BG -4.6 -4 -4.5 -3.7 -4.5 -5.4

LV -5.2 -5.7 -6.1 -4.7 -5.2 -5.4

EL -4.7 -4.8 -5.7 -6.3 -6 -6.5

The way inequalities and poverty are addressed in (OUR COUNTRY)



58

Overall, Europeans have a negative view of the way in which inequalities and poverty

are addressed in their country, with an index of -3 at the EU level, a decline on the index

of -2.4 in 2013, and the lowest score recorded in the series.

Only four Member States have a positive score on this measure: Malta (1.7),

Luxembourg (0.3), Denmark (0.2) and Finland (0.1). Eight countries have an index of -4

or lower, with Greece having the lowest index (-6.5), followed by Bulgaria and Latvia

(both -5.4), Romania (-5.1), Lithuania (-4.5), Croatia and Hungary (both -4.4) and

Slovakia (-4).

Only four Member States show an improvement in their evaluation of the way in which

inequalities and poverty are addressed relative to 2013. The greatest improvement is

recorded in Estonia (up 0.9 points), with its ranking improving from twenty-third equal

in 2013 to thirteenth in 2014. The other three countries where indices have improved

since 2013 are Malta (up 0.5), Finland (up 0.3) and Portugal (up 0.1). Malta also shows

the largest improvement on this measure since 2009 (up 1.8 points), moving its ranking

over the six years from fifth to first. No other Member States show an improvement of at

least 1 point since 2009, with the next greatest improvement behind Malta in Hungary

(up 0.6 points).

The indices in Poland, Spain and Romania remain unchanged since 2013. Although the

remaining twenty-one Member States show a decline in their index between 2013 and

2014, only five have seen a decline of at least one point. The largest deterioration is

observed in the UK and Belgium (both down 1.3 points), followed by Luxembourg,

Sweden and the Czech Republic (all down 1.1 point). The UK, Sweden and the Czech

Republic also show some of the largest declines of any Member State on this measure

since 2009, with their indices dropping by 2.1, 2 and 1.7 points respectively. Cyprus

shows the greatest deterioration (down 2.3 points), with Greece and Spain (both down

1.8 points), Slovenia (down 1.7 points), Italy (down 1.5), Romania (down 1.4) and

Slovakia (down 1.3) also showing a decline of at least 1 point since 2009.

The most notable socio-demographic differences in relation to these five measures are

again related to difficulty paying household bills, occupational status and age of leaving

education.

Reflecting earlier findings, those who struggle to pay their bills most of the time have

lower indices than those who almost never struggle to do so on all five measures, with

the most marked variation between the two groups on satisfaction with the pension

system and unemployment benefits:


59

Special EB 418

(2014)

The healthcare

system in (OUR

COUNTRY)

The pension system

in (OUR

COUNTRY)

Unemployment

benefits in (OUR

COUNTRY)

Relations in (OUR

COUNTRY)

between people

from different

cultural or religious

backgrounds or

nationalities

The way

inequalities and

poverty are

addressed in (OUR

COUNTRY)

EU28 1.0 -1.7 -1.4 0.0 -3.0

Most of the time -1.3 -4.7 -4.0 -1.2 -5.3

From time to time -0.1 -3.1 -2.8 -0.5 -3.7

Almost never 1.9 -0.6 -0.3 0.4 -2.3


The most notable shifts in opinions since 2013 are in relation to:

unemployment benefits, with a positive shift among those who struggle to pay

bills most of the time (up 0.8 points)

the way inequalities and poverty are addressed, with negative shifts in opinion

among all groups, strongest among those who sometimes struggle with their bills

(down 0.8 points)

relations between people from different cultural or religious backgrounds or

nationalities, with the strongest worsening of opinion among those who struggle

to pay bills from time to time (down 0.6 points)

Compared with 2009, any shifts in opinion are negative. Those who almost always

struggle with bills are notably less positive about the pension system (down 1.7 points);

the healthcare system (down 1.3 points); and the way inequalities and poverty are

addressed (down 1.3 points). Their views on unemployment benefits are unchanged.

Those who almost never struggle with bills are more pessimistic about the way in which

inequalities and poverty are addressed (down 0.8 points) and, to a lesser extent, about

their pension system (down 0.4 points). Those who sometimes struggle with paying bills

are less positive than they were in 2009 about the pension system (down 1.2 points);

the way inequalities and poverty are addressed (down 1.1 point); unemployment

benefits (down 0.8 points); and the healthcare system and relations between relations

between people from different cultural or religious backgrounds or nationalities (both

down 0.5 points).

In terms of occupational status, the largest differences in the 2014 indices are again

between the unemployed, who have the least positive perceptions of the occupational

groups, and managers, who generally have the most positive views44:

44 Students have a higher index than managers on: the healthcare system (2.5), the way inequalities and poverty are addressed (-1.8) and relations between people from different cultural or religious backgrounds or nationalities (1)


60

Special EB 418

(2014)

The healthcare

system in (OUR

COUNTRY)

The pension system

in (OUR

COUNTRY)

Unemployment

benefits in (OUR

COUNTRY)

Relations in (OUR

COUNTRY)

between people

from different


backgrounds or

nationalities

The way

inequalities and

poverty are

addressed in (OUR

COUNTRY)

EU28 1.0 -1.7 -1.4 0.0 -3.0

Managers 2.4 -0.5 0.6 0.2 -2.3

Unemployed -0.1 -3.4 -3.6 -0.6 -4.3


Since 2013 the only improvement, albeit small, in managers’ perceptions relates to

unemployment benefits (up 0.2 points). The largest worsening of opinion is on the way

inequalities and poverty are addressed (down 1 point), followed by relations between

people from different cultural or religious backgrounds or nationalities (down 0.6 points).

Views on the healthcare system are unchanged. Compared with 2009, managers are

more positive about unemployment benefits (up 0.5 points) and the healthcare system

(up 0.4 points) and less positive about the way inequalities and poverty are addressed

(down 1 point) and relations between people from different cultural or religious

backgrounds or nationalities (down 0.5 points).

Perceptions among the unemployed are more negative now than in 2013 on all five

social protection and inclusion indicators. They are notably more pessimistic about

relations between people from different cultural or religious backgrounds or nationalities

(down 0.8 points); the way inequalities and poverty are addressed (down 0.8 points);

the healthcare system (down 0.5 points); and pension system (down 0.5 points).

Compared with 2009, the indices for the unemployed have deteriorated most notably in

relation to the pension system (down 1.2 points), the way inequalities and poverty are

addressed (down 0.9 points) and unemployment benefits (down 0.5 points).

In terms of age of leaving education, those who left-time education at 15 or younger, or

aged 16-19, have more negative perceptions of the national situation than those who

continued with their education beyond the age of 19, and those who are still in

education:

Special EB 418

(2014)

The healthcare

system in (OUR

COUNTRY)

The pension system

in (OUR

COUNTRY)

Unemployment

benefits in (OUR

COUNTRY)

Relations in (OUR

COUNTRY)

between people

from different


backgrounds or

nationalities

The way

inequalities and

poverty are

addressed in (OUR

COUNTRY)

EU28 1.0 -1.7 -1.4 0.0 -3.0

15- 0.4 -2.1 -2.5 -0.2 -3.5

16-19 0.7 -2.1 -1.7 -0.2 -3.4

20+ 1.5 -0.9 -0.5 0.0 -2.5

Still studying 2.7 -1.1 -0.5 1.0 -1.8

Education (End of)


61

III. EXPECTATIONS FOR THE NEXT 12 MONTHS

The final two chapters of the report examine whether Europeans think that things will

improve, get worse or remain the same in the forthcoming year, and how they perceive

the current situation compared with five years ago - is it better, worse or similar? For

both chapters the results for the 15 measures used in the survey are analysed at overall

EU and Member State levels, with comparisons made between the results of the 2014

wave and those from the 2013 survey only. The results are presented in percentage

terms rather than as indices. Comparisons are also made between EU15 and NMS13

Member States and socio-demographic groups on the 2014 results.

This chapter begins with an overview of Europeans’ perceptions of what they think will

happen over the course of the next year in terms of their personal situation, before

examining perceptions in relation to national issues and concluding with a review of what

Europeans think the short-term future holds in relation to aspects of social protection

and inclusion.


On each of the measures relating to respondents’ personal circumstances, most

Europeans expect things to remain unchanged in the next twelve months. Across all four

measures, where respondents do perceive things will change, they are more likely to say

that they will get better than that they will get worse.45

Three quarters of Europeans (75%) anticipate no change in their local area, with 16%

expecting things to get better and 7% things to get worse. Around three in five (59%)

expect no change in their life in general, with just over one in four (27%) anticipating an

improvement and one in nine (11%) believing that their life will get worse.

45 Q3 “What are your expectations for the next twelve months: will the next twelve months be better, worse or the same, when it comes to….? (ONE ANSWER PER LINE) (READ OUT) Your life in general, The area you live in, …….Your personal job situation, The financial situation of your household….Better, Worse, Same, Don’t know” NB The statements relating to national situation and social protection and inclusion are also asked in this question


62

Similar proportions expect no change in their job situation and household finances (60%

and 61% respectively). Those who expect their job situation to change are more likely to

expect things will get better (19%) than get worse (10%), with the remainder (11%)

unsure how the situation will change. Fewer respondents (4%) are uncertain how their

household finances will change, with one in five (20%) thinking that they will improve

and one in seven (15%) expecting them to get worse.

Europeans are slightly more optimistic than they were in 2013 about how things will

change in the short term on each of the measures relating to their personal

circumstances. The most notable improvements are in relation to general life and the

household financial situation, with increases (+4 percentage points and +3 points

respectively) in the proportions expecting things to get better, and somewhat larger

corresponding decreases in the proportions thinking things will get worse (general life -5

points; household finances -6 points). This has changed the overall balance of opinion46

on household finances from being negative in 2013 to positive in 2014.

The differences between EU15 and NMS13 are that:

People in EU15 are more optimistic than those in NMS13 in relation to:

o their job situation (20% thinking it will improve, 9% expecting it to get

worse, compared with 17% and 12% respectively in NMS13)

o their household finances (20% thinking it will improve, 15% expecting it

to get worse, compared with 19% and 17% respectively in NMS13)

Those in NMS13 are more positive in relation to:

o their local area (21% expecting it to improve, 8% thinking it will get

worse), compared with 15% and 7% of those in EU15)

At a national level, the Member States that tend to have the most consistently positive

views in terms of their current personal situation are Sweden, Malta and Estonia,

followed by Latvia and the UK.

In terms of the balance of opinion on each of the four measures, respondents in Sweden

have the most positive outlook of any country on three: life in general, with over two

fifths (45%) expecting their life to improve and only 2% thinking it will get worse; job

situation (30% and 4% respectively); and household finances (32% vs. 8%). They are

less positive than some other Member States about the area in which they live, although

they still hold the eighth most positive outlook.

46 i.e. the difference between the proportion of respondents who say things will improve and the proportion who say they will get worse on this measure


63

Respondents in Malta have the second most positive views of any Member State on each

of the four measures: life in general, with 38% thinking it will improve and only 3%

expecting it to get worse; local area (27% and 2% respectively); job situation (26% vs.

3%); and household finances (25% vs. 4%).

Estonia has the most positive outlook on the local area, with around three in ten

respondents (29%) expecting it to get better and 3% expecting it to get worse; the third

most positive views on job situation (28% and 6% respectively) and on household

finances (31% vs. 11%).

Respondents in Latvia have the third most positive views on the area in which they live,

with a quarter (24%) expecting it to improve and 2% thinking it will get worse. They are

also among the most positive of the Member States in terms of the household financial

situation (ranked fifth), personal job situation (sixth) and life in general (seventh).

The UK has the fourth most positive outlook of any country in relation to life in general,

with around two in five respondents (42%) thinking it will improve and one in ten (10%)

expecting it to get worse; and their personal job situation (26% and 7% respectively);

and the sixth most positive in terms of their personal financial situation.

In terms of other Member States, respondents in Ireland are particularly optimistic about

life in general, behind only Sweden and Malta, with around two in five (38%) expecting

their life to get better and 5% thinking it will get worse.

Respondents in Greece have by far the most negative outlook in relation to their

personal situation, followed by those in Portugal and Italy.

Greece has the most negative outlook of any EU Member State on all four measures:

They are particularly pessimistic about household finances, with over two fifths

(45%) thinking they will get worse and around one in six (16%) expecting them

to improve.

In relation to job situation, around three in ten (29%) expect things to get worse

and one in seven (14%) anticipate improvement

In relation to life in general, around one in three (34%) think it will get worse and

a fifth (21%) expect it to improve. Greece is the only Member State with a net

negative balance of opinion on this measure.

In terms of the area where they live, around one in four respondents in Greece

(23%) think their area will deteriorate with one in seven (15%) expecting an

improvement. Again, it is the only Member State with a net negative balance of

opinion on this measure.


64

Respondents in Portugal hold the second most pessimistic expectations on three

measures: the household financial situation, with a quarter (26%) expecting it to get

worse, and 16% expecting an improvement; personal job situation (18% and 14%

respectively); and life in general (17% vs. 19%); and the third most negative outlook on

local area (9% vs. 12%).

Respondents in Italy have the third most negative outlook on their personal job

situation, with around one in five (18%) expecting it to get worse and around one in six

(16%) thinking it will get better; the third most negative on the area in which they live

(11% and 15% respectively); and are among the most negative in terms of their

expectations concerning life in general (ranked twenty-fourth equal) and the household

financial situation (twenty-third).

Moving on to look at shifts in the balance of opinion on these measures between 2013

and 2014, respondents in Cyprus stand out in terms of a notable positive shift in their

expectations of how their personal situation will change in the next 12 months, although

they still hold the fourth most negative outlook of any Member State in relation to their

household finances and the fifth most negative outlook on personal job situation. Cyprus

shows the largest improvement of any Member State in terms of the balance of opinion

on three indicators:

household finances, with 15% of respondents expecting this situation to improve

and 21% expecting it to get worse, compared with 4% and 51% respectively in

2013

life in general, with 27% expecting their life to improve, and 14% expecting it to

get worse, compared with 12% and 36% respectively in 2013

and personal job situation, with 16% anticipating an improvement, and 16%

thinking it will worsen, compared with 4% and 30% respectively in 2013

Portugal and Greece, in spite of having the most negative outlooks of the 28 Member

States (as noted earlier) also show some of the most notable positive shifts in

expectations on all four measures. In Portugal the shift in balance of opinion is most

notable in relation to respondents’ outlook on life in general (19% expecting it to

improve, and 17% expecting it to get worse, compared with 10% and 39% respectively

in 2013), followed by their expectations concerning the financial situation in the

household (16% expecting it to improve, and 26% anticipating it will get worse,

compared with 9% and 44% respectively in 2013). In Greece the shift in balance of

opinion is largest in relation to the local area (15% expecting it to improve, and 23%

expecting it to get worse, compared with 9% and 37% respectively in 2013); and

household financial situation (16% expecting this to improve, and 45% expecting it to

get worse, compared with 10% and 59% respectively in 2013).

Other Members States which have seen the most notable positive shifts in expectations

since 2013 are Ireland and Slovenia.


65

In Ireland the balance of opinion has improved most notably in relation to expectations

concerning household finances (23% expecting this situation to improve, and 14%

expecting it to get worse, compared with 14% and 30% respectively in 2013), and

expectations with regard to life in general (38% expecting it to improve, and 5%

anticipating it will get worse, compared with 26% and 18% respectively in 2013). In

Slovenia, the most positive shift is in relation to expectations concerning the local area

(16% expecting it to improve, and 9% expecting it to get worse, compared with 7% and

23% respectively in 2013).

On each of the four measures, any negative shifts of opinion since 2013 are small (no

more than 6 percentage points).

There are some notable socio-demographic differences in relation to how respondents

expect their personal situation to change in the next 12 months. Younger people, in

particular those aged 15-24, are relatively optimistic and older people (particularly those

aged 55+) tend to be more pessimistic. Differences are particularly marked in relation to

outlooks on life in general, job situation and household finances.

Reflecting the pattern by age, optimism tends to increase in line with terminal education

age. The differences by age are also reflected in terms of occupational status with

students being more optimistic and those who are retired more pessimistic. Managers

are also relatively optimistic, in particular when compared with house persons in relation

to expectations concerning life in general and job situation, and the unemployed in

relation to local area. Reflecting the findings in Chapter II, those who almost never

struggle to pay their household bills are more optimistic, those who struggle to pay bills

most of the time are more pessimistic, while those who struggle from time to time have

a tendency to sit somewhere in between.


66

2. COUNTRY

This section covers Europeans’ perceptions of what they think will happen in the next 12

months in six areas relating to their own country: the cost of living; how affordable

energy is; how affordable housing is; the country’s economic situation; its employment

situation; and the way in which public administration is handled47.

As in 2013, the large majority of Europeans expect either no change in these areas or

think things will get worse, with only minorities believing the situation will improve.

Most Europeans (59%) expect no change in the way public administration is run,

although the balance of opinion is negative, with a fifth (21%) expecting things to get

worse and one in eight (12%) thinking it will improve.

In relation to the cost of living, energy affordability and the affordability of housing

Europeans are fairly evenly divided between those thinking things will get worse and

those thinking the situation will stay the same:

44% expect the cost of living to get worse, 41% think it will stay the same, 11%

expect it to improve

40% expect energy will become less affordable, 42% expect no change, 12%

expect it to become more affordable

47 Q3 “What are your expectations for the next twelve months: will the next twelve months be better, worse, or the same, when it comes to ….? (ONE ANSWER PER LINE) (READ OUT) ….. The cost of living, How affordable energy is in (COUNTRY), How affordable housing is in (COUNTRY), The way public administration runs in (OUR COUNTRY), The economic situation in (OUR COUNTRY), ….The employment situation in (OUR COUNTRY) Better, Worse, Same, Don’t know” NB The statements relating to personal situation and social protection and inclusion are also asked in this question


67

37% expect housing will become less affordable, 44% expect no change, 12%

expect it to become more affordable

Europeans are more optimistic about the economic and employment situation, although

over two fifths (45% for each indicator) think things will not change in the next 12

months and the balance of opinion remains negative:

23% expect the economic situation will improve, 26% expect it to get worse

21% expect the employment situation will get better, 28% expect it to get worse

Europeans’ opinions have changed since 2013. Whilst most still expect either no change

or think things will get worse in these areas, Europeans are more optimistic in 2014 than

in 2013 across all six measures. The most marked shifts are in relation to the economic

situation, the national employment situation and the cost of living:

the economic situation: 23% expecting an improvement and 26% expecting it to

get worse, compared with 15% and 42% respectively in 2013

the employment situation: 21% expecting improvement, 28% a worsening (vs.

15% and 43%)

the cost of living: 11% expecting improvement, 44% a worsening (vs. 8% and

57%)

the affordability of energy: 12% expecting improvement, 40% a worsening (vs.

10% and 48%)

the affordability of housing: 12% expecting improvement, 37% a worsening (vs.

11% and 43%)

the way public administration is run: 12% expecting improvement, 21% a

worsening (vs. 9% and 27%)

The differences between EU15 and NMS13 are that:

People in EU15 are particularly more pessimistic than those in NMS13 in relation

to:

o energy affordability (11% thinking it will become more affordable, 44%

expecting it to become less affordable, compared with 15% and 25%

respectively in NMS13)

o housing affordability (12% expecting it to improve, 41% believing it will

get worse, compared with 13% and 24% respectively in NMS13)

and somewhat more pessimistic than those in NMS13 in relation to:

o the cost of living (11% expecting it to improve, 45% believing it will get



68

o the way public administration will be run (12% expecting it to improve,

21% thinking it will get worse, compared with 13% and 18% respectively

in NMS13)

Those in NMS13 hold a somewhat more negative outlook in relation to:

o the economy (18% expecting it to get better, 26% expecting it to get

worse, compared with 25% and 26% respectively in EU15)

o the employment situation (16% expecting it to get better, 27% expecting

it to get worse, compared with 23% and 29% respectively in EU15)

Analysis of these findings at a national level reveals some consistent patterns of relative

optimism and pessimism in the different countries. Those that stand out as being the

most optimistic are Malta, Sweden, Denmark and Estonia.

In terms of the balance of opinion on each of the six measures48, respondents in Malta

have the most positive outlook of any country on three: the affordability of energy, with

50% thinking it will get better and only 6% expecting it to get worse; the way in which

public administration is run (31% and 8% respectively); and the cost of living (26% vs.

22%), where Malta is the only Member State with a net positive balance of opinion on

this indicator. Respondents in Malta also have the second most positive outlook on the

three remaining measures, even though on one, housing affordability, the net balance of

opinion is negative (19% expecting improvement, and 22% anticipating it will become

less affordable). The net negative balance of opinion on this indicator is significantly

lower than in most other countries.

Estonia is the only Member State with a net balance of opinion which is positive in

relation to the outlook on housing affordability, with 19% of respondents expecting

improvement and 8% anticipating a worsening. It has the second most positive outlook

of any Member State in relation to energy affordability (18% and 6% respectively),

albeit a much lower net positive balance than in Malta; and the way in which public

administration is run (18% vs. 5%); and is among the most positive Member States in

terms of its outlook on the economy (ranked seventh) and employment situation (fifth)

but has a less optimistic outlook than most on the cost of living (eighteenth).

Respondents in Denmark hold the most positive expectations of any Member State in

relation to their economy, with half (50%) anticipating an improvement and just 3%

expecting the economy will worsen; and the employment situation (52% and 5%

respectively); and the second most positive on the cost of living (9% vs. 18%). They

have a less optimistic outlook than some other countries in relation to energy and

housing affordability (ranked twelfth and tenth equal respectively) and the way in which

public administration is run (eleventh).

48 i.e. the difference between the proportion of respondents who say things will improve and the proportion who say they will get worse on a particular measure


69

Sweden has the third most positive outlook of any Member State on the employment

situation, the cost of living and the way in which public administration is run; the fourth

most positive in relation to the economic situation; and the sixth most positive on

energy affordability. It has a more pessimistic outlook than most countries on the

affordability of housing (ranked eighteenth).

The only other Member States with a notable net positive balance of opinion (more than

six percentage points) on any of the six national indicators are:

The Netherlands, Ireland and the UK in relation to expectations concerning the

economy

The Netherlands, Ireland, the UK and Latvia on employment

Hungary on energy affordability

The most pessimistic Member States on these measures are Greece, Austria, Slovenia

and Finland. Among the Member States that tend to have more positive views of the

current situation (see Chapter II), in addition to Austria, Germany and Luxembourg are

the most pessimistic about the future.

Greece has the most negative outlook of any Member State on its economy, with more

than half (55%) expecting things to get worse and one in six (17%) anticipating an

improvement; the employment situation (55% and 17% respectively); and the way

public administration is run (46% vs. 16%). It is notably more pessimistic than any

other Member State on each of these three indicators. Greece also has a more negative

outlook than most countries in relation to the affordability of energy (ranked twenty-

fourth), the cost of living (twenty-second) and housing affordability (nineteenth).

Slovenia has the most negative outlook on the cost of living, with almost six in ten

respondents (58%) believing things will get worse and only 4% anticipating an

improvement; the second most negative in relation to the way in which public

administration is run (28% and 6% respectively); and the third most negative on the

economic situation (38% vs. 17%). It also has a more pessimistic outlook than most

other Member States on energy affordability (ranked twenty-first equal), housing

affordability (twentieth) and the employment situation (twentieth equal).

Respondents in Austria hold the most pessimistic expectations in relation to the

affordability of housing, with just over half (54%) believing housing will become less

affordable and only 8% thinking it will become more affordable; and the third most

negative in relation to the cost of living (57% and 9% respectively) and the affordability

of energy (53% vs. 12%). Austria is also more pessimistic than most other Member

States in relation to its outlook on the employment situation (ranked twenty-second),

the way public administration runs (twenty-first equal) and the economic situation

(eighteenth).


70

Finland (along with the UK) has the third most negative outlook of any Member State on

housing affordability, with just over two fifths (45%) thinking it will become less

affordable and only 3% anticipating improvement; and the fourth most negative on

energy affordability (41% and 3% respectively) and on the way in which public

administration is run (18% vs. 4%). It is also more pessimistic than most in terms of its

outlook on the economic situation (ranked twenty-fourth), employment situation

(twenty-third equal) and living costs (twenty-third).

In terms of the other Member States, respondents in Germany are particularly

pessimistic about energy affordability, and have the most negative outlook of any

country, with two thirds (66%) thinking it will worsen and only 5% thinking the cost will

improve. They also have the second most negative expectations in relation to housing

affordability (50% and 5% respectively). Respondents in the UK also have a particularly

pessimistic outlook on these two measures, with the second most negative outlook on

energy affordability (53% vs. 11%), and, as already noted, the third most negative

outlook (along with Finland) on housing affordability (54% vs. 12%).

Croatia has the second most negative outlook of any EU Member State in relation to the

economy, with 42% thinking it will get worse and 14% that it will get better; and the

employment situation (44% and 16% respectively). Respondents in the Czech Republic

hold the second most pessimistic outlook on the cost of living (54% vs. 5%), and the

third most negative in relation to employment (34% vs. 10%). Portugal holds

particularly negative expectations in relation to the way in which public administration is

run (32% vs. 13%), behind only Greece and Slovenia.

On all of the six national measures the balance of opinion has become more positive

since 2013 in the large majority of Member States. The most positive shifts in opinion

since 2013 on these national indicators can be seen in Cyprus, Portugal, the Netherlands

and Slovenia. With the exception of the Netherlands each of these countries also shows

some of the most notable positive shifts in opinion in relation to people’s outlook on their

personal situation (outlined in the previous section of this chapter).

The balance of opinion in Cyprus has improved more than in any other country since

2013 on four measures, although the net balance of opinion remains negative on each:

the economy, with 23% of respondents expecting it to improve and 29%

expecting it to get worse, compared with 4% and 74% respectively in 2013

the cost of living, with 13% expecting it to improve and 35% expecting it to get

worse, compared with 5% and 67% respectively in 2013

the affordability of energy, with 15% thinking it will improve and 32% expecting

it to worsen, compared with 7% and 60% respectively in 2013

housing affordability, with 16% expecting it to improve and 26% thinking it will

worsen, compared with 13% and 48% respectively in 2013


71

Cyprus also shows the second largest improvement of any EU Member State in the

balance of opinion on the employment situation (18% expect it to improve, 35% expect

it to worsen, compared with 4% and 79% respectively in 2013). It is less optimistic than

some other Member States about any change to the way public administration is run

(ranked ninth).

Portugal shows the largest improvement of any Member State in relation to opinions on

the way in which public administration runs, although again the balance of opinion

remains negative, with 13% expecting improvement and 32% a worsening, compared

with 5% and 48% respectively in 2013. It shows the second largest improvement in

opinions on the cost of living (15% expecting it to improve and 47% anticipating it will

get worse, compared with 4% and 75% respectively in 2013); energy affordability (11%

thinking it will become more affordable and 44% expecting it to become less so,

compared with 5% and 67% respectively in 2013); and housing affordability (11%

expecting it to improve and 41% expecting it to worsen, compared with 6% and 60%

respectively in 2013). Portugal also (along with Ireland) shows the third largest

improvement in relation to opinions on the economic situation (20% expecting it to

improve and 41% expecting it to worsen, compared with 7% and 74% respectively in

2013); and the fourth largest in relation to the employment situation.

Respondents in the Netherlands show the strongest improvement of any Member State

in their perceptions of the employment situation, with 38% expecting this to improve

and 27% expecting a deterioration, compared with 11% and 62% respectively in 2013;

and the second largest improvement in their expectations with regard to the economic

situation, with 46% thinking it will improve and 17% expecting it to get worse,

compared with 17% and 49% respectively in 2013. Both measures show a reversal from

a net negative balance of opinion in 2013 to a net positive balance in 2014. The

Netherlands also shows the third largest improvement of any Member State in relation to

the way public administration runs, although here the overall balance of opinion remains

negative (8% anticipating an improvement and 18% expecting a worsening, compared

with 4% and 34% respectively in 2013).

Slovenia (along with Greece), has the third largest improvement of any Member State in

relation to opinions on energy affordability; the fourth largest in relation to housing

affordability (with Spain also ranked fourth on this indicator) and the way in which public

administration is run; and the fifth largest in terms of the national economy and

employment situation. Across these five measures, the largest improvements in Slovenia

are in relation to opinions on the economy (17% expecting it to get better and 38%

expecting it to get worse, compared with 6% and 70% respectively in 2013); and the

employment situation (17% expecting it to improve and 38% expecting it to get worse,

compared with 7% and 70% respectively in 2013).

In terms of notable improvements elsewhere in the EU, Ireland, as noted earlier, shows

the third largest positive shift in expectations concerning the economic situation - 32%

expecting it to get better and 18% expecting it to get worse, compared with 15% and

47% respectively in 2013. It also shows the third largest improvement in opinions on the

employment situation, with 34% anticipating improvement and 16% a worsening,


72

compared with 15% and 43% respectively in 2013. Both these indicators show a

reversal in Ireland from a net negative balance of opinion in 2013 to a net positive

balance in 2014. Greece, as noted earlier, has the third largest improvement of any EU

country in relation to opinions about energy affordability (along with Slovenia); and

housing affordability. Spain shows a particularly marked improvement in opinions about

the way public administration runs, second only to Portugal, although the overall net

balance remains negative - 11% anticipating an improvement and 22% thinking it will

get worse, compared with 7% and 41% respectively in 2013. As noted earlier, it also

shows the fourth largest improvement in opinions about housing affordability (along with

Slovenia).

Only a minority of Member States show negative shifts in the balance of opinion on

these national indicators and shifts are, for the most part, small. Austria and Finland are

the only two Member States where opinion on all six measures has become more

negative. Most of the shifts are relatively small, with the most notable in Austria in

relation to employment - 38% expecting it to get worse and 16% expecting it to get

better, compared with 28% and 19% respectively in 2013; and the cost of living - 57%

thinking this will get worse and 9% anticipating it will improve, compared with 47% and

10% respectively in 2013.

The socio-demographic differences in relation to how respondents expect the national

situation to change in the next 12 months generally reflect those found in relation to the

respondent’s personal situation. However, differences are, for the most part, less

pronounced than was the case for most of the personal indicators.

In terms of age, younger people (aged 15-24) are slightly more optimistic and older

people (those aged 55+, but also, in this case, those aged 40-54) tend to be more

pessimistic.

Those leaving education aged 20 or older hold notably more positive views than those

leaving education aged 15 or under in relation to the economy and employment, but

have only slightly more positive views in relation to the cost of living, the way public

administration is run, energy affordability and housing affordability.

In relation to occupational status, students remain more optimistic than other groups,

particularly in their outlooks on the economy, the cost of living, energy affordability and

the way public administration is run. Managers are also as optimistic as students in

relation to their views of the employment situation, and relatively optimistic in relation to

their opinions on the economic situation. The unemployed and retired tend to be the

most pessimistic, although managers are equally as pessimistic in relation to their

outlook on energy affordability and the most pessimistic of all occupational groups about

housing affordability; and house persons are more pessimistic than the retired (but less

pessimistic than the unemployed) about the economy and employment.


73

On most of the national indicators those who almost never struggle to pay their

household bills are more optimistic in their expectations, those who struggle to pay bills

most of the time are more pessimistic, while those who struggle from time to time have

a tendency to sit somewhere in between. However, in relation to expectations

concerning energy affordability and housing affordability those who struggle to pay bills

from time to time are no less pessimistic than those who struggle to pay them most of

the time.


74


The final section of this chapter examines Europeans’ expectations as to what will

happen to areas of social protection and inclusion over the next year49.

As in 2013, most Europeans expect no change in the five areas of social protection and

inclusion or think things will get worse, with small minorities anticipating improvements.

When compared with perceptions of the national situation, Europeans are generally more

likely to expect things to remain the same and less likely to think they will get worse50.

Just under three in five Europeans (57%) think the healthcare system in their country

will remain the same in the next 12 months, with a quarter (26%) thinking it will get

worse and 13% that it will get better.

In relation to the pension system, half of all Europeans think it will stay the same (49%),

around a third (31%) think it will deteriorate, with 12% expecting it to improve. Views

on unemployment benefits are broadly similar, with 51% anticipating no change, 27%

expecting them to get worse and 11% thinking they will improve.

49 Q3 “What are your expectations for the next twelve months: will the next twelve months be better, worse or the same, when it comes to…..? (ONE ANSWER PER LINE) (READ OUT) ….The healthcare system in (OUR COUNTRY), The pension system in (OUR COUNTRY), Unemployment benefits in (OUR COUNTRY), Relations in (OUR COUNTRY) between people from different cultural or religious backgrounds or nationalities, The way inequalities and poverty are addressed in (OUR COUNTRY)? Better. Worse, Same, Don’t know” NB Measures relating to personal situation and the national picture are also included in this question

50 The exceptions are views on the way public administration is run, where Europeans are much more likely to think things will stay the same than get worse; and views on the pension system, where the balance of opinion between those thinking it will stay the same and those thinking it will worsen is similar to the balance of opinion on the economic situation and the employment situation


75

In terms of relations between people from different cultural or religious backgrounds or

nationalities, most (56%) think there will be no change, around a quarter (23%) expect

such relations to worsen and 14% think they will get better.

A small majority (53%) expect the way their country addresses inequality and poverty to

remain unchanged, with around a quarter (27%) thinking that this will deteriorate and

13% believing it will improve.

The most notable differences compared with 2013 are declines in the proportion of

respondents expecting things to worsen across all five social protection and inclusion

indicators. Whilst there have been small increases in the proportions expecting things to

improve across all five indicators, the shifts away from anticipating things will get worse

are largely towards respondents thinking things will stay the same or respondents saying

they ‘don’t know’ what will happen in the next 12 months.

The most marked decreases in the proportions thinking things will get worse are in the

areas of:

unemployment benefits, with 27% expecting it to worsen and 11% anticipating

improvement, compared with 38% and 8% respectively in 2013

the pension system, with 31% expecting this to get worse and 12% expecting

things to improve (compared with 41% and 8%)

and the healthcare system, with 26% expecting it to worsen and 13% thinking it

will improve (vs. 33% and 11%)

The main differences between EU15 and NMS13 are that respondents in EU15 are more

pessimistic than those in NMS13 on all five social protection and inclusion indicators,

most notably in relation to:

relations between people with different cultural and religious backgrounds or

nationalities (25% expecting them to get worse, 14% expecting them to improve,

compared with 16% and 15% respectively in NMS13)

the healthcare system (28% expecting it will get worse, 13% believing it will

improve, compared with 20% and 15% respectively in NMS13)

the pension system (32% thinking they will get worse, 12% that they will

improve, compared with 24% and 12% respectively in NMS13)

Analysis of these findings at a national level reveals some consistent patterns of relative

optimism and pessimism in the different countries. Across the 28 countries, Malta stands

out as being the most optimistic in terms of the balance of opinion on these indicators,

followed by Estonia and Sweden. As noted earlier these three Member States are (along

with Denmark) the most optimistic in relation to national expectations and (along with

the UK and Latvia) the most optimistic in relation to their outlook on the personal

situation. Malta, Estonia and Sweden are the only Member States in which there is a

positive balance of opinion on each of the five social protection and inclusion measures.


76

Malta has notably more positive opinions than any other country on four indicators:

the healthcare system, with 44% expecting it to get better and 4% thinking it will

get worse

the pension system, with 31% expecting it to improve and 4% expecting it to get

worse

the way the country addresses inequality and poverty, with 36% expecting this

to get better and 5% anticipating a worsening

and unemployment benefits, with 27% thinking they will improve and 4%

thinking they will get worse

On the fifth indicator – relations between people with different cultural and religious

backgrounds or nationalities – the positive balance of opinion in Malta is broadly similar

to that in Estonia:

25% of respondents in Malta expect them to improve and 8% expect them to

worsen, compared with 20% and 5% respectively in Estonia

Estonia holds the second most positive outlook of any country on three measures:

relations between people with different cultural and religious backgrounds or

nationalities (as noted above), the healthcare system, with 22% anticipating

improvement and 12% a worsening, and the pension system (20% and 11%

respectively); and the third most positive outlook on unemployment benefits and the

way the country addresses inequality and poverty.

Sweden holds the second most positive outlook of any country on two measures: the

way the country addresses inequality and poverty, with 31% of respondents thinking

this will improve and 12% expecting a worsening, and unemployment benefits (26% and

10% respectively); the third most positive outlook in relation to its healthcare system

and the pension system; and the sixth most positive on relations between people with

different cultural and religious backgrounds or nationalities.

Most countries have a negative balance of opinion on all or most of the indicators, with

the most pessimistic views being found in Greece, the Netherlands and Slovenia. As

noted earlier Greece and Slovenia have (along with Austria and Finland) the most

pessimistic outlook on the national situation, and Greece also has (along with Portugal

and Italy) the most pessimistic outlook on the personal situation.

Greece has the most negative outlook of any Member State on three measures: the

pension system, with the majority (63%) anticipating a worsening and one in eight

(12%) thinking this will improve, unemployment benefits (56% and 12% respectively),

and the way in which their country addresses inequality and poverty (48% vs. 13%);

and it has the second most pessimistic outlook on its healthcare system (53% vs. 14%).

Its views on relations between people with different cultural and religious backgrounds

are more pessimistic than those held in most other countries (ranked twenty-third).


77

Respondents in the Netherlands hold the most pessimistic outlook on their healthcare

system, with just under half of respondents (48%) expecting it to get worse and only

5% anticipating it will improve; and the second most pessimistic in relation to the

pension system (46% and 5% respectively), unemployment benefits (46% vs. 4%), and

relations between people with different cultural and religious backgrounds (30% vs.

8%). Their expectations in relation to the way their country addresses inequality and

poverty are more pessimistic than those in most other Member States (ranked twenty-

fourth equal).

Respondents in Slovenia have the second most pessimistic outlook on the way their

country addresses inequality and poverty, with 37% thinking things will get worse and

7% expecting an improvement; and the third most pessimistic outlook on each of the

other four measures, most marked in relation to the pension system (39% expecting a

worsening and 6% expecting improvement) and unemployment benefits (38% and 5%

respectively).

In terms of other Member States, respondents in the Czech Republic are more

pessimistic than any other about relations between people with different cultural and

religious backgrounds, with just over a third (35%) expecting them to worsen, and only

5% thinking they will improve; and the third pessimistic on the way in which their

country addresses inequality and poverty (30% and 5% respectively).

Moving on to look at shifts in the balance of opinion on these measures between 2013

and 2014, the most notable positive shifts are observed in Cyprus, Portugal and Slovenia

- countries which also showed notable positive shifts in opinions in relation to personal

circumstances and the national picture. Cyprus has improved more than any other

Member State on all five measures, although the overall balance of opinion remains

negative on most:

14% expect the pension system to get better, and 25% expect it to get worse,

compared with 2% and 62% respectively in 2013

12% expect unemployment benefits to improve, and 29% expect them to get

worse (vs. 2% and 59%)

22% expect the healthcare system to improve, and 20% expect it to worsen (vs.

8% and 38%), with a shift away from a large net negative to a small net positive

balance of opinion

15% expect the way in which the country addresses inequality and poverty to

improve, 28% think it will worsen (vs. 5% and 49%)

23% expect relations between people with different cultural and religious

backgrounds to get better, 11% that they will get worse (vs. 2% and 42%)


78

Whilst the overall balance of opinion remains negative across all five measures in

Portugal, it shows the second largest improvements of any Member State on three: the

healthcare system, with 13% expecting improvement and 25% a worsening, compared

with 5% and 48% respectively in 2013; the pension system, with 11% anticipating the

system will improve and 38% thinking it will get worse (vs. 5% and 63%); and

unemployment benefits, with 11% expecting improvement and 38% a worsening (vs.

5% and 63%). It also, along with Slovenia, shows the second largest improvement in

relation to the way in which the country addresses inequalities and poverty, with 14%

anticipating it will get better and 32% that it will get worse (vs. 5% and 48%).

Similarly, whilst the overall balance of opinion remains negative on all five indicators in

Slovenia, in addition to showing the second largest improvement on the way the country

addresses inequalities and poverty, it shows the third biggest improvement in opinions

about relations between people from different cultural or religious backgrounds or

nationalities. The largest shift on these two indicators is on the way inequalities and

poverty are addressed, with 7% expecting improvement, 37% a worsening, compared

with 4% and 59% respectively in 2013.

In terms of other Member States, the balance of opinion has improved most notably in:

Greece, in the area of relations between people from different cultural or religious

backgrounds or nationalities - 14% expecting them to get better, 32% thinking

they will worsen, compared with 7% and 45% respectively in 2013 – with this

shift being the second largest across the EU28.

Spain, in relation to the healthcare system - 14% expecting improvement, 27% a

worsening (vs. 9% and 44%); and the pension system, with 11% expecting

improvement, 30% a worsening (vs. 7% and 52%), with both these shifts being

the third largest across the EU28.

Ireland, in relation to unemployment benefits - 13% thinking they will improve,

21% anticipating a worsening (vs. 7% and 47%); and the way the country

addresses inequalities and poverty - 15% expecting improvement, 15% a

worsening (vs. 10% and 29%), with both shifts being the third largest across the

EU28, shared with

Sweden, in relation to the way the country addresses inequalities and poverty -

31% anticipating improvement, 12% a worsening (vs. 16% and 16%), showing a

shift away from the idea that things will be the same to a net positive balance of

opinion

Any negative shifts in opinion since 2013 are small, with the most notable in:

Bulgaria, in relation to the health system, with 22% expecting it to get worse and

9% anticipating improvement, compared with 20% and 16% respectively in

2013; the pension system, with 19% thinking it will get worse and 7% expecting

it to improve (vs. 18% and 13%); and unemployment benefits, with 18%

expecting these to worsen, 6% thinking they will get better (vs. 17% and 12%)


79

Austria, in relation to cultural relations, with 32% thinking they will worsen and

13% anticipating improvement (vs. 24% and 13%); the way inequalities and

poverty are addressed, with 33% anticipating a worsening, and 14% an

improvement (vs. 23% and 12%); and the pension system, with 37% thinking

this will worsen and 9% that it will improve (vs. 29% and 8%)

and Finland, in relation to unemployment benefits, with 17% expecting these to

worsen and 3% anticipating improvement (vs. 10% and 5%)

Austria and Finland are the only two Member States where opinion on all five social

protection and inclusion measures has become more negative since 2013, although most

of the shifts are relatively small. These are the only Member States where opinion on all

six national measures has also become more negative since 2013 (reported in the

previous section of this Chapter), although, again, most of the shifts on national

indicators are relatively small.

The socio-demographic differences in relation to how respondents expect these

measures to change over the next year reflect those found in relation to the national

situation, with differences, for the most part, being less pronounced than was the case

for most of the personal indicators.

In terms of age, younger people (aged 15-24) are relatively optimistic and those aged

40+ more pessimistic, although the young are only marginally more positive in relation

to expectations concerning the way inequalities and poverty are addressed.

In terms of age of leaving education, there is very little variance. Those leaving

education aged 20 or older are somewhat more positive in their outlook on the way

inequalities and poverty are addressed but only marginally more positive on each of the

other measures, with those leaving education aged 15 or younger having slightly more

negative expectations in relation to all five indicators.

There are also less pronounced differences in relation to occupational status as was the

case for measures relating to the national situation. Students remain more optimistic

than other groups. There is no consistent pattern in terms of occupations with the most

pessimistic views.

Respondents who almost never have difficulties paying bills are more positive than those

who find it difficult to pay them most of the time.


80

IV. CHANGES IN THE LAST 5 YEARS

This final chapter examines Europeans’ perceptions of whether the current situation is

better or worse, or unchanged, relative to the situation five years ago for each of the 15

measures51. The first part of this chapter explores how Europeans perceive their

personal situation compared with five years ago. It then examines Europeans’

perceptions in relation to national issues, before concluding with a review of opinions on

areas of social protection and inclusion.


In each of the four areas relating to their personal situation, Europeans are most likely

to report that things have remained about the same compared with five years ago. In

relation to their general life situation, job situation and household finances, where

Europeans do perceive change, they are more likely to say that things have got worse

than that they have got better, and particularly likely to report that their household

financial situation has deteriorated in the past five years. Europeans are least likely to

perceive change in relation to their local area and, where they do report a change, are

evenly divided between those who think their area has improved and those who think it

has got worse.

The majority of Europeans (60%) think that the area they live in has not changed

compared with five years ago, with around one in five (19%) thinking it has got better

and a similar proportion (18%) believing that it has become worse.

Just under half of Europeans (47%) perceive no change in their personal job situation in

recent years, while 17% say that their situation has improved in this respect, compared

with around one in four (26%) reporting that it has got worse. One in ten (10%) are

unable to offer a view on this measure. Europeans present a more negative view of how

51 Q4 “Compared with five years ago, would you say things have improved, got worse or stayed about the same when it comes to….? (ONE ANSWER PER LINE) (READ OUT) Your life in general, The area you live in, Your personal job situation, The financial situation of your household” Improved, Got worse, Stayed about the same, Don’t know


81

the financial situation of their household has changed compared with five years ago.

While just over two in five (42%) say that it has not changed, a broadly similar

proportion (38%) perceive it to have deteriorated, with 17% thinking it has improved.

In terms of their life in general, two in five Europeans (40%) say that things have stayed

about the same compared with five years ago, with a third (33%) thinking it has got

worse and around a quarter (26%) that it has improved.

Europeans are slightly more optimistic than they were in 2013 about how things are now

compared with five years ago on each of the measures relating to their personal

circumstances. The most notable improvements are in relation to life situation and local

area, with small increases (+3 percentage points and +2 points respectively) in the

proportions thinking things are better, and slightly larger decreases (-4 points and -5

points respectively) in the proportions thinking that things have got worse.

The most notable differences between EU15 and NMS13 are:

People in EU15 are more likely than those in NMS13 to think that their personal

situation has improved in relation to:

o their job situation (18% thinking it has improved, 25% believing it has got


and those in NMS13 are more positive in relation to:

o their local area (29% seeing improvement, 17% a worsening), compared

with 17% and 19% of those in EU15)

Nationally, respondents in Sweden and Malta have the most positive perceptions across

all 28 countries of how their personal situation has changed compared with five years

ago. Respondents in Denmark and Luxembourg are also relatively positive in their

assessment of how their lives have changed.

Respondents in Sweden have the most positive views of any of the 28 countries on three

of the four measures. It is one of only two countries (the other being Malta) where a

majority of respondents (55%) think their life in general has improved, with one in eight

(13%) feeling it has got worse. Sweden is also most positive in relation to job situation

(42% and 12% respectively) and household finances (45% vs. 22%), and is ranked

seventh in terms of views on the local area.

Respondents in Malta have the second most positive views of any Member State on

three measures: life in general, with 52% thinking it has improved and 13% saying it

has got worse; the area in which they live (35% and 8% respectively); and their

household financial situation (30% vs. 11%); and the third most positive views in

relation to their job situation, 29% thinking it has improved and 11% saying it has got

worse.


82

Respondents in Denmark hold the second most positive views about their job situation,

with 31% saying it has improved and 11% thinking it has got worse; and the third most

positive on life in general (48% and 13% respectively) and their household finances

(34% vs. 19%). They are somewhat less positive than some other Member States in

relation to improvements in their local area (ranked ninth).

Respondents in Luxembourg hold the fourth most positive views that things are better

than five years ago on all four personal situation measures: life in general, with 38%

thinking it has improved and 15% saying it has got worse; the area in which they live

(28% and 5% respectively); their job situation (25% vs. 9%); and their household

financial situation (25% vs. 12%).

Respondents in Estonia hold the most positive perceptions in terms of changes in the

last five years in their local area, with 39% thinking it has improved and 12% saying it

has worsened.

In contrast, perceptions of change are much more negative in Greece than in any other

Member State. After Greece, Cyprus has the least positive views, followed by Portugal.

Greece has the most negative outlook of any EU Member State on all four measures:

They are particularly negative about household finances, with around nine in ten

(87%) reporting they have got worse and just 3% thinking they are better

Four in five (83%) believe that their life in general has got worse, with only 4%

thinking it has improved

More than half (56%) think that the area where they live has deteriorated, with

only 5% seeing improvement. It is the only country where a majority think that

their local area has worsened

Around three in five (61%) report that their job situation has got worse, and just

3% think it has improved

Respondents in Cyprus are the second most negative in their perceptions of change over

the previous five years in relation to: life in general, with 65% seeing a deterioration and

11% thinking their life has improved; their household financial situation (76% and 3%

respectively); and personal job situation (53% vs. 4%). Their views about the area in

which they live are also more pessimistic than all but four Member States (38% vs.

16%).

Respondents in Portugal hold the third most negative views of any Member State in

relation to the household financial situation, with 66% thinking it has worsened and only

4% seeing improvement; their life in general (60% and 8% respectively); and their

personal job situation (50% vs. 5%). Their perceptions of change in relation to the local

area are more negative than all but six Member States (29% vs. 10%).

The only other countries where a majority think that their personal situation has

worsened in the last five years are:


83

Croatia, in relation to life in general and the household financial situation (56%

and 60% respectively)

Spain, in relation to life in general and the household financial situation (52% and

65% respectively)

and Slovenia, also in relation to life in general and the household financial

situation (51% and 58% respectively)

In terms of shifts in perceptions between 2013 and 2014, the most positive are observed

in Hungary and Malta, followed by Poland and Ireland.

Hungary has seen the most positive shift of any Member State on three measures: life in

general, with 22% thinking things have improved and 31% saying they have got worse,

compared with 11% and 47% respectively in 2013; local area, with 26% thinking things

have improved and 17% saying they have got worse (vs. 17% and 29%); and personal

job situation, with 12% saying it has improved and 28% that it has deteriorated (vs. 9%

and 41%). Hungary also shows the second strongest improvement in relation to opinions

about household finances - with 15% of respondents saying things have improved and

36% that they have got worse (vs. 11% and 55%).

Malta shows the most positive improvement of any Member State in relation to the

household financial situation, with 30% thinking it has improved and 11% seeing a

worsening (vs. 17% and 25%); the second most positive shift in relation to life in

general, with 52% thinking it has improved and 13% that it has worsened (vs. 36% and

22% in 2013); and the third most positive shift (along with Poland) on job situation,

with 29% seeing improvement and 11% a deterioration (vs. 22% and 15%). It also

shows a shift towards more positive opinions on the local area although this is not as

large as in some other countries (ranked seventh equal), with 35% saying it has

improved and 8% that it has worsened (vs. 25% and 9%).

Poland (along with Malta) shows the third largest improvement in opinions relating to job

situation, with 18% seeing an improvement and 23% a worsening (vs. 12% and 28%);

local area, where 37% think it has got better and 11% that it has got worse (vs. 26%

and 15%); and household finances, where 18% see improvement and 30% a worsening

(vs. 14% and 40%). It also shows an improvement in perceptions of life in general

although the shift is less marked than in some other countries (ranked seventh equal).

Ireland shows the third most positive shift of all 28 Member States in relation to life in

general, with 31% saying it has improved and the same proportion that it has worsened

(vs. 23% and 47% respectively in 2013); and the fourth largest in relation to views

about the local area and job situation.

Among the other countries, Denmark shows the second most positive shift of any

country in relation to job situation, with 31% saying it has improved and 11% that it has

worsened (vs. 25% and 17% respectively in 2013). Spain shows the second most

positive shift in opinions about the local area, with 12% seeing improvement and 33% a

deterioration (vs. 9% and 46% respectively in 2013).


84

On each of the four measures, any negative shifts of opinion between 2013 and 2014

are, for the most part, small. The most notable shifts are witnessed in Finland, where

perceptions have deteriorated more than in any other EU Member State in relation to

their household’s financial situation, with 21% saying it has become worse and 21% that

it has got better (vs. 17% and 27% respectively in 2013); and opinions on life in general

- 16% thinking it has worsened and 35% that it has improved (vs. 18% and 45%).

There are some notable socio-demographic differences in relation to how respondents

perceive their current situation compared with five years ago.

As was found in Chapter II, there is a strong relationship between how difficult people

are finding it to pay their household bills and their perceptions of their personal

situation: those who struggle to pay their bills most of the time are much more likely to

be pessimistic and think their personal situation has got worse – particularly in relation

to their household financial situation and their life in general; those who almost never

struggle to pay bills are more likely to be optimistic, while those who struggle from time

to time have a tendency to sit somewhere in between.

In terms of occupation, unsurprisingly, the unemployed have exceptionally negative

perceptions of how their personal situation has changed, particularly in relation to job

situation, household finances and life in general. Managers and students hold the most

positive perceptions, with managers holding particularly positive views about their

household financial situation and job situation and students holding slightly more

positive opinions than managers about changes in the local area and life in general.

Younger people, in particular those aged 15-24, are relatively positive, particularly about

their life in general, and older people (aged 40+) tend to be more negative, particularly

about life in general and household finances. In terms of age of leaving education, those

leaving aged 20 or older have the most positive views, those leaving education aged 15

or younger the most negative perceptions.


85

2. COUNTRY

This section covers Europeans’ perceptions of six areas: the cost of living, energy and

housing affordability, the national economy and employment situation, and the way

public administration is handled52.

The majority of Europeans perceive the national situation to have deteriorated compared

with five years ago across five of the six indicators. Opinions are less clear-cut on the

way in which public administration is run, with around two in five Europeans thinking it

has got worse and almost half thinking it has not changed:

Most respondents think the situation is worse than it was five years ago in terms of the

cost of living (74%), the affordability of energy (63%) and housing (62%), the

employment situation (60%) and the national economy (57%). A large minority (38%)

think the way public administration is handled has got worse, while only 6% think it has

improved.

Europeans opinions have changed since 2013. Whilst most still think either that things

have got worse or have stayed the same, the proportion of respondents thinking things

have worsened has decreased across all six measures, most notably on opinions about

the economy and economic situation. These two indicators also show the largest

increases in the proportion believing things have improved: in relation to the economy,

the proportion thinking it has got worse dropping from 71% in 2013 to 57% in 2014,

and the proportion thinking it has got better increasing from 10% to 17%; and in

52 Q4 “Compared with five years ago, would you say things have improved, got worse or stayed about the same when it comes to…….? (ONE ANSWER PER LINE) (READ OUT) The cost of living, How affordable energy is in (COUNTRY), How affordable housing is in (COUNTRY), The way public administration runs in (OUR COUNTRY), The economic situation in (OUR COUNTRY), The employment situation in (OUR COUNTRY) Improved, Got worse, Stayed about the same, Don’t know” NB The statements relating to personal situation and social protection and inclusion are also asked in this question


86

relation to the employment situation the proportion thinking it has worsened declining

from 71% in 2013 to 60% in 2014, with the proportion thinking it has improved

increasing from 8% to 14%.

Across the remaining four measures, which show smaller declines in the proportions

thinking things have worsened, the shifts in opinions are towards thinking things have

stayed the same or not knowing if things have changed, with any increase in the

proportions thinking things have improved only very small.

The most notable differences between EU15 and NMS13 are:

People in EU15 are more likely than those in NMS13 to think that the national

situation has worsened in relation to:

o energy affordability (69% thinking it has worsened, 4% believing it has

improved, compared with 42% and 13% respectively in NMS13)

o housing affordability (67% thinking it has worsened, 5% that it has


o the way public administration is run (40% thinking it has got worse, 5%

that it has improved, compared with 32% and 10% respectively in

NMS13)

o the cost of living (76% thinking it has got worse, 4% that it has improved,


They are more somewhat more positive than NMS13 in relation to:

o the employment situation (16% seeing improvement, 61% a worsening,


Nationally, the countries that stand out as having the most negative views on how the

situation has changed are Greece, Spain and Cyprus, followed by Portugal and Slovenia.

Respondents in Greece have the most negative views on four of the six measures: the

employment situation, which 95% perceive to have deteriorated and only 1% think has

got better; the cost of living (92% and 2% respectively); energy affordability (88% vs.

2%) and the way in which public administration runs (76% vs. 6%); and they hold the

second most negative opinions about the economy (92% vs. 2%).

Respondents in Spain have the most negative views in relation to housing affordability,

around eight in ten (81%) perceiving it to have got worse, compared with only 5%

thinking it has improved. They hold the second most negative opinions about the way

public administration runs has deteriorated (68% and 3% respectively) and are among

the five most negative countries in relation to the economy (88% vs. 3%), the

employment situation (90% vs. 4%) and the cost of living (86% vs. 3%).


87

Respondents in Cyprus have the most negative views in relation to the economy, 95%

thinking it has got worse in the last five years, compared with only 1% thinking it has

improved; the second most negative opinions about the employment situation (93% vs.

1%) and energy affordability (86% vs. 3%); and the third most negative views,

(alongside Slovenia), on the cost of living (89% vs. 3%).

Respondents in Portugal have the third most negative views on energy affordability,

eight in ten respondents (80%) thinking it has got worse in the last five years, compared

with only 1% thinking it has improved; and, along with respondents in Finland, on

housing affordability (72% vs. 2%); whilst those in Slovenia have the third most

negative views on the economy (88% vs. 2%), the employment situation (88% vs. 1%)

and, (as already noted, along with Cyprus), the cost of living (87% vs. 1%).

The countries that stand out as having the most positive views on how the national

situation has changed in the past five years are Malta, Denmark and Estonia, with

Germany also holding particularly positive perceptions in terms of its economy and

employment situation. This is consistent with the finding in Chapter II that Germany has

seen a particularly strong improvement between 2009 and 2014 in perceptions of its

economy and employment situation.

Respondents in Malta hold the most positive views of any Member State on four of the

six national indicators: the economy, where 49% think things have improved and 14%

think they have got worse; energy affordability (43% and 25% respectively); the way

the country runs public administration (30% vs.10%); and the cost of living, although

only just over one in five (22%) think it has improved, compared with 43% who think it

has worsened. Malta holds the second most positive opinions on the employment

situation, with 36% perceiving the situation to have improved and 20% seeing it as

having got worse; and the fourth most positive perceptions of housing affordability.

Respondents in Denmark hold the third most positive opinions about things improving on

three measures: the economy, where 46% say it has improved and 25% think it has got

worse; employment (38% and 31% respectively); and the cost of living (6% vs. 45%).

It holds the fifth most positive opinions in relation to housing affordability. Perceptions of

improvements in energy affordability and the way the country runs public administration

are not as positive as in some other Member States (ranked ninth on both).

Estonia has the most positive opinions on housing affordability, notably better than any

other Member State, with 19% thinking housing has become more affordable and 22%

thinking it has worsened. It holds the second most positive perceptions on two

measures: energy affordability, with 28% thinking it has improved and 13% thinking it

is now less affordable; and the way public administration runs in their country (18% and

8% respectively). It holds the fourth most positive opinions on the employment situation

and the fifth most positive in relation to the economy. It is far less positive about the

cost of living, with only eight Member States holding more negative perceptions.


88

Germany (as already noted) holds the most positive opinions of any Member State on

improvements to the employment situation, where 44% think it has got better and 18%

that it has got worse; and the second most positive views on the economic situation

(49% and 16% respectively). It holds more positive perceptions than most other

countries in relation to the cost of living (ranked ninth equal) and the way public

administration runs (ranked sixth) but is far less positive than most countries about

improvements to energy (with only three Member States holding more negative

perceptions) and housing affordability (with only five countries holding more negative

opinions).

In terms of other countries, the most notable findings are that:

Sweden has (along with Malta) by far the least negative perceptions in relation to

the cost of living, although only one in seven respondents (15%) think it has

improved, 37% that it has worsened.

Sweden is the only other Member State (in addition to Malta, Germany, Denmark

and Estonia, as already noted) with a net positive balance of opinion on the

economic situation, with 34% thinking it has improved and 28% seeing a

worsening.

The Czech Republic holds the second most positive opinions on housing

affordability, with 30% seeing improvement and 16% a worsening.

Latvia holds the third most positive views on the affordability of housing, with

12% thinking it has improved and 26% believing it has got worse.

Hungary has the third most positive opinions in relation to energy affordability,

with 35% seeing improvement and 28% a worsening. The only other Member

State (apart from, as already noted, Malta and Estonia) showing a net positive

balance of opinion on this measure is the Czech Republic.

Hungary holds the third most positive opinions on improvements to the cost of

living, with 13% thinking things have got better and 52% that they are worse.

Luxembourg holds the third most positive opinions on improvements to the way

public administration runs although, unlike Malta and Estonia, the balance of

opinion is negative – 9% seeing improvement and 11% a worsening.

The shifts between 2013 and 2014 in perceptions of how the national situation has

changed compared with five years ago do not follow as clear a pattern as on other

measures, particularly in relation to any negative shifts.

Most shifts are towards more positive perceptions of the national situation compared

with five years ago, with any shifts towards more negative perceptions generally quite

small.


89

The main patterns that emerge in terms of positive shifts are that Malta, Hungary and

Denmark stand out as showing the most notable improvement (reflecting some of the

earlier findings in relation to Malta and Denmark), followed, to a lesser extent, by the

UK, Lithuania and Slovakia.

Malta shows the most positive shifts of any Member State on two measures: energy

affordability, with a much more marked improvement than in any other Member State -

43% think it has got better and 25% that it has got worse, compared with 6% and 68%

respectively in 2013; and the cost of living, where 22% think it has got better and 43%

that it has got worse (compared with 5% and 66% respectively in 2013). Along with

Hungary, Malta also shows the most positive shifts on opinions about housing

affordability, with 21% saying this has improved and 38% thinking it has worsened (vs.

8% and 58%); and the second most positive shift in opinions on the way public

administration is run, with 30% thinking it has improved, 10% that it has deteriorated

(vs. 17% and 14%).

As noted above, Hungary - along with Malta - has the most positive shifts of the EU28

countries in relation to opinions on the affordability of housing – 18% see an

improvement and 37% a worsening, compared with 11% and 63% respectively in 2013.

Hungary also shows the second most positive shift of any country in relation to energy

affordability, with 35% seeing an improvement and 28% a worsening (vs. 16% and

60%); and in relation to living costs – 13% seeing improvement and 52% a worsening

(vs. 6% and 75%).

Denmark shows the largest positive shift in opinions on two measures, with these shifts

being exceptionally large compared with those in any other Member State: the economy,

where 46% see improvement and 25% a worsening, compared with 13% and 66%

respectively in 2013; and the employment situation, where 38% see improvement and

31% a worsening (vs. 8% and 71%).

The UK shows the second largest positive shifts in opinions on both the economic

situation and employment: 28% seeing improvement in the economy, 45% a worsening,

compared with 7% and 77% in 2013; and 24% seeing improvement in the employment

situation, 6% a worsening (vs. 45% and 71%). It shows the fourth biggest improvement

of any Member State in opinions about living costs with improvements in perceptions of

the running of public administration less marked than in some other countries (ranked

ninth equal). The UK is far less positive than most countries about improvements to

energy (with only four Member States holding more negative perceptions).

Lithuania shows the third biggest positive shift of opinions on energy affordability, with

10% seeing improvement and 53% a worsening, compared with 2% and 75%

respectively in 2013. Lithuania also shows more positive shifts in opinions than most

Member States across the other five national measures: the fifth largest improvement in

relation to the economy; equal sixth in relation to living costs (along with the

Netherlands and Ireland) and the running of public administration (along with Poland);

and eighth largest in relation to housing affordability, equal eighth on employment

(along with Slovakia).


90

Slovakia shows the third largest positive shifts on two measures: living costs, 5%

seeing an improvement, 65% a worsening, compared with 3% and 82% respectively in

2013; and on housing affordability, with 8% seeing an improvement and 49% a

worsening (vs. 6% and 68% in 2013).

Other notable positive shifts are:

Nineteen Member States show shifts of more than 10 percentage points in the net

positive balance of opinion about their economies, with fifteen showing increases

of at least 20 percentage points. In addition to the six countries already discussed

the countries which show shifts of 20 percentage points or more are: the

Netherlands and Ireland (both up 35 points), the Czech Republic (+32 points),

Poland (+29 points), Estonia and Latvia (each +27 points), Bulgaria (+26 points),

Romania (+24 points) and Germany (+20 points)

Sweden and Ireland, and to a lesser extent Estonia, Latvia and Bulgaria, in terms

of opinions on the employment situation: in Sweden, 19% see improvement and

46% a worsening, compared with 8% and 69% respectively in 2013; and in

Ireland 15% see improvement, 62% a worsening (vs. 3% and 82%)

Poland, Bulgaria, Luxembourg, Romania and Croatia in terms of views about the

affordability of energy

The Netherlands in relation to the running of public administration. It shows the

greatest improvement of any Member State, although the shift is away from

thinking things have become worse to believing they have stayed the same, with

only a very small increase in the proportion thinking public administration is run

better than it was five years ago: 7% see improvement, 31% a worsening and

51% see no change, compared with 5%, 49% and 41% respectively in 2013.

Finland is the only country where the balance of opinion has worsened since 2013 on the

majority of these six measures, although the shifts in opinions are small. Other than

this, the most notable negative shift relative to other countries can be seen in Spain in

relation to energy affordability, with 4% seeing an improvement and 67% a worsening,

compared with 6% and 50% respectively in 2013. Latvia is the only other Member State

showing a negative shift in opinions on energy affordability.


91

Socio-demographic differences on these measures are less marked than in relation to

respondents’ personal situation. Those who struggle to pay their bills most of the time

have more negative views than those who almost never struggle to do so, but

differences are less pronounced than in relation to their personal situation. The most

pronounced differences are in relation to views on the economy and employment

situation. In terms of occupation, there are no consistent patterns. The unemployed

have somewhat more negative perceptions in relation to most indicators, although they

are joined by other occupational groups: the retired, house persons and managers in

relation to energy affordability; house persons in relation to housing affordability. House

persons hold marginally more negative perceptions than the unemployed in relation to

the way public administration is run. Students have somewhat more positive opinions on

most indicators, joined by managers in relation to the economy. Managers have the

most positive opinions on employment.

Those aged 15-24 are more positive than other age groups and those who left education

aged 20 or older have more positive views than those leaving at an earlier age, though

not markedly so.


92


The final section of this chapter focuses on Europeans’ views on the situation now

compared with five years ago in relation to social protection and inclusion: the

healthcare system, the pension system and unemployment benefits; relations in the

country between people from different cultural, religious or national backgrounds; and

the way inequalities and poverty are addressed53.

As was the case in 2013, the large majority of Europeans perceive the five areas of

social protection and inclusion to have got worse or remained the same compared with

five years ago, with few respondents perceiving them to have improved.

Just under half of all Europeans (46%) think that the healthcare system in their country

has got worse in the last five years. Four in ten (40%) think it has stayed the same and

one in ten (10%) think it has improved.

Perceptions concerning the way that inequality and poverty are addressed are similar,

with almost half (46%) of Europeans thinking things have got worse, around two fifths

(39%) believing it has remained unchanged and only 7% thinking things have got

better.

Perceptions concerning unemployment benefits are broadly similar. A slightly smaller

proportion, just over two fifths of respondents (43%), think they have got worse, just

over a third (35%) that they have remained the same and only 6% that they have got

better. Around one in six respondents (16%) are unable to offer a view on this question.

53 Q4 “Compared with five years ago, would you say things have improved, got worse or stayed about the same when it comes to…….? (ONE ANSWER PER LINE) (READ OUT) The healthcare system in (OUR COUNTRY), The pension system in (OUR COUNTRY), Unemployment benefits in (OUR COUNTRY), Relations in (OUR COUNTRY) between people from different cultural or religious backgrounds or nationalities, The way inequalities and poverty are addressed in (OUR COUNTRY) Improved, Got worse, Stayed about the same, Don’t know” NB The statements relating to personal and national situation are also asked in this question


93

In relation to the pension system, the balance of opinion is more negative, with just over

half of Europeans (52%) believing that it has deteriorated, a third (33%) that it has

stayed the same and only 5% that it has got better.

In terms of relations between people from different cultural or religious backgrounds or

nationalities, the most common view (44%) is that there has been no change, but the

overall balance of opinion is negative, with just under two fifths (37%) thinking things

have got worse, compared with 11% who think that relations have improved.

Whilst the overall picture of Europeans’ perceptions on these measures remains broadly

similar to that presented in 2013 – with most respondents still thinking that things have

either got worse or have stayed the same – the balance of opinion is slightly more

positive than in 2013 on all five measures, most notably in relation to unemployment

benefits, with 6% in 2014 thinking they have improved and 43% that they have got

worse, compared with 5% and 50% respectively in 2013.

The differences between EU15 and NMS13 are:

People in EU15 are more likely than those in NMS13 to think that the situation

has worsened in relation to:

o relations between people from different cultural, religious or national

backgrounds (40% thinking they have worsened, 11% that they have


o the pension system (54% thinking it has worsened, 5% that it has


o the way the country addresses inequality and poverty (48% thinking it has

worsened, 7% believing it has improved, compared with 39% and 7%

respectively in NMS13)

o the healthcare system (46% thinking it has worsened, 9% that it has


Across the EU, Malta stands out as having the most positive perceptions of change on

these indicators. It is the only Member State with a net positive balance of opinion

across all five social protection and inclusion indicators. Among the remaining twenty

seven Member States, Estonia and Luxembourg tend to have the least negative

perceptions.

Malta has the most positive balance of opinion on all five measures:

It has a particularly positive view on its healthcare system with half of

respondents (51%) thinking the system has improved, compared with only 10%

who say it has got worse. This is a considerably more positive result than for any

other country.

In relation to the way the country addresses inequalities and poverty, 39% think

this has improved, compared with 9% who say it has got worse


94

In relation to the pension system, 32% think things have improved, compared

with just 4% who think it is now worse

In relation to unemployment benefits, 27% think they have improved, and just

4% that they have worsened

And in terms of relations between people from different cultural, religious or

national backgrounds, 29% think they have improved, compared with 15% who

think they have got worse

Estonia holds the second most positive perceptions of any country about the situation

relative to five years ago in relation to the way in which inequalities and poverty are

addressed, with 20% thinking they have improved and 13% thinking they have

deteriorated and concerning relations between people with different cultural and

religious backgrounds and nationalities (20% and 8% respectively); the third most

positive views on the pension system (13% vs. 24%) and unemployment benefits (13%

vs. 19%); and the fourth most positive perceptions of an improved healthcare system

(21% vs. 28%).

Luxembourg has the second most positive views on improvements in the areas of its

healthcare system, with 11% seeing improvement and 9% a worsening, the pension

system (7% and 13% respectively) and unemployment benefits (9% vs. 14%); the third

most positive perceptions about the way inequalities and poverty are addressed (9% vs.

19%); and the fifth most positive views on improved relations between people with

different cultural and religious backgrounds and nationalities (12% vs. 14%).

By far the most strongly negative views are again found in Greece, followed by Spain,

Slovenia and Portugal.

Greece has the most negative perceptions on all five measures:

Almost all respondents (93%) think that the pension system is worse than five

years ago, compared with just 1% thinking it has improved

Almost all respondents (90%) think that the healthcare system is worse,

compared with only 2% who say it has improved

Nearly nine in ten (88%) think that unemployment benefits are worse, compared

with only 2% who say they have improved

Eight in ten (82%) think that the way inequalities and poverty are tackled has got

worse, with just 3% thinking it has improved

More than six in ten (64%) think that relations between people with different

cultural and religious backgrounds and nationalities have worsened, with only 8%

seeing improvement.


95

Spain has particularly negative views, second only to Greece, in relation to the pension

system (2% thinking they have improved, 76% that they have got worse),

unemployment benefits (3% and 76% respectively) and its healthcare system (4% vs.

74%); the third most negative opinions of any Member State about improvements in the

way the country addresses inequalities and poverty (5% vs. 66%); and the fifth most

negative views (along with Cyprus) about improvements in relations between people

with different cultural and religious backgrounds or nationalities (5% vs. 46%).

Slovenia has the third most negative perceptions after Greece and Spain on its

healthcare system (3% thinking it has improved, 61% that it has got worse); the fourth

most negative views on the country improving the way it handles inequalities and

poverty (3% and 63% respectively) and on relations between people with different

cultural and religious backgrounds or nationalities (3% vs. 49%); and the fifth most

negative views on the pension system (1% vs. 68%) and unemployment benefits (2%

vs. 61%).

Portugal has the second most negative views about improvements in the way

inequalities and poverty are addressed (3% thinking this has got better and 68%

thinking this has got worse); the third most negative views in relation to unemployment

benefits (1% and 72% respectively) and the pension system (2% vs. 73%); and is the

fifth most pessimistic Member State about improvement to its healthcare system (5%

vs. 59%). It is less negative than some other countries about improvements in relations

between people with different cultural and religious backgrounds or nationalities (ranked

twentieth).

The shifts in perceptions between 2013 and 2014 of how areas relating to social

protection and inclusion have changed compared with five years ago do not follow as

clear a pattern as on other measures, reflecting the earlier findings in relation to shifts in

perceptions of how the national situation compared with five years ago.

Most shifts in opinions on how areas of social protection and inclusion have changed

compared with five years ago are towards more positive perceptions, although shifts are

for the most part relatively small compared with those seen on some other measures.

Poland is among the countries with the largest positive shifts across all five measures,

whilst Hungary and Ireland are among those with the largest positive shifts on the

majority of the measures.

The balance of opinion in Poland has improved more than any other Member State in

relation to the way the country addresses inequality and poverty, with 9% thinking it has

improved and 32% that it has got worse, compared with 5% and 41% respectively in

2013. Poland shows the second largest improvement on unemployment benefits, 6%

seeing improvement and 34% a worsening (vs. 3% and 45%); the third largest

improvement on perceptions of its healthcare system, 10% seeing improvement and

40% a worsening (vs. 5% and 47%) and on relations between people with different

cultural and religious backgrounds or nationalities, 16% seeing improvement and 20% a

worsening (vs. 12% and 24%); and the fifth largest improvement (along with Ireland) in

relation to opinions about its pension system.


96

Hungary shows the largest improvement of any Member State in relation to

unemployment benefits, where 7% say they have got better and 49% believe they are

worse (vs. 5% and 68%); and (along with the Czech Republic) on perceptions of its

healthcare system, where 11% believe it has improved and 41% that it has got worse

(vs.9% and 52%). It shows the fourth largest improvement (along with the UK, Italy,

Denmark and Cyprus) on relations between people with different cultural and religious

backgrounds or nationalities.

Ireland shows the second largest improvement in relation to the way the country

addresses inequalities and poverty, where 12% see improvement and 37% a

deterioration (vs. 7% and 43%); the third largest improvement in perceptions of

unemployment benefits, where 10% say they have got better and 49% believe they are

worse (vs. 6% and 58%); and the fifth largest improvement (as already noted, along

with Poland) on opinions about pension benefits.

Any negative shifts are, for the most part, small. There are no Member States where the

balance of opinion has deteriorated across all five indicators. The only notable negative

shift is noted in Cyprus in relation to perceptions of the healthcare system, with 8%

thinking it has improved and 63% that it has deteriorated, compared with 11% and 46%

respectively in 2013.

Socio-demographic differences on these measures are broadly similar to those noted in

relation to the national situation. Those who struggle to pay their bills most of the time

have more negative views than those who almost never struggle to do so. In terms of

occupation, students have the least negative perceptions, whilst the unemployed have

somewhat more negative perceptions than other groups, joined by house persons on all

but one indicator which is, not surprisingly, unemployment benefits. Those aged 15-24

are more positive than other age groups and those who left education aged 20 or older

have slightly more positive views than those leaving at an earlier age.


97

GENERAL CONCLUSIONS

The Social Climate survey, conducted for DG Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion for

the sixth time, provides an overview of the social climate in the European Union. It

measures the nature of the current situation regarding key social concerns of EU

citizens, their expectations for the coming twelve months and their evaluations of how

things have changed compared with six years ago. The survey explores three broad

components of the social climate: Europeans’ perceptions on different aspects of their

personal lives, their opinions of the general situation in their country, and their view of

the state of social protection and inclusion. The survey enables analysis of how the

public mood varies between the 28 Member States within the EU and between different

socio-demographic groups across the EU, and monitors how public opinion and

perceptions change over time.

The first in this series of surveys was conducted in June 2009, eight months after the

financial and economic crisis within Europe began, and the survey has been undertaken

each June since then, enabling the passage of EU citizens through the turbulent period

that has followed the Autumn 2008 crisis to be charted on an annual basis. The latest

wave of the survey, in June 2014, was conducted against a backdrop of continued

economic recovery, first seen in the second quarter of 2013. There has been GDP growth

across the last four consecutive quarters (Q2 2013 – Q1 2014) across Europe as a whole

and, albeit to a lesser extent, in the Euro area. That said, the growth in GDP is modest

and some Member States are recovering more strongly than others. Whilst

unemployment levels have declined in the EU28 since March 2013, high unemployment

levels and a youth unemployment crisis remain a serious challenge for some Member

States. Europe is in the early stages of economic recovery, but wage growth is low, with

many people not seeing increases in their wages or improvements in their living

standards. Austerity measures are still in place, and planned for quite some time ahead,

and governments continue to spend less on public services.

Against this mixed background, the overall 2014 EU social climate, which summarises

Europeans’ views across the three areas of personal circumstance, the national picture

and social protection and inclusion, has declined, albeit marginally, from -0.9 in 2013 to

-1 in 2014. The index is now at a low point in the six year series, with indices of -0.7

recorded in 2009 and 2010, -0.6 in 2011 and -0.8 in 2012. Nonetheless, the index,

based on a scale from +10 to -10, still presents Europeans as a whole as being divided

in their evaluation of the current situation.

However, the overall picture masks very substantial differences between the evaluations

of citizens in the different Member States, and also between the perceptions of

respondents in different socio-demographic groupings.


98

At a national level the social climate index ranges from a high of 3.1 (in Malta) to a low

of -5.3 (in Greece). Aside from Malta, the most positive perceptions are found in the

Benelux and Nordic countries, along with Austria, Germany, the UK and Estonia, and the

least positive among southern and eastern Member States. This pattern is generally

consistent with the earlier surveys in the series, with the exception that Malta, where the

overall index has increased by 2.1 points from 1 in 2013, now heads the ‘league table’ of

EU countries on the overall social climate index, having overtaken eight countries since

2013. Malta apart, country-level shifts in the social climate index since 2013 are

relatively small. Among the thirteen Member States that show an improvement in their

social climate index since 2013, it is notable that the country with the second largest

positive shift is Portugal (up by 0.8 points); and that Spain shows the fifth largest

improvement (up by 0.5 points) – both countries that have faced some of the most

difficult economic times but are now starting to show some signs of recovery.

Furthermore, among the fourteen Member States showing a decline in their social

climate index since 2013, the largest deteriorations can be observed in Sweden and

Belgium (both down 0.5 points) – both countries with a top ten ranking and among

those who have faced less profound challenges to their economies than some southern

European Member States. This illustrates that the consequences of an economic climate

that continues to remain tough are not just being experienced by those who were hit

worst in the economic crisis.

In terms of socio-demographics there are also wide disparities between groupings, most

notably in relation to how difficult respondents say they are finding it to pay their

household bills. Thus, those who say that they almost never find it difficult to pay their

bills have a positive index in 2014 of 0.2, compared with an index of -2.2 for those who

struggle most of the time, and -4.1 for those who almost always have difficulty paying

household bills. Since 2013 there has been a very slight improvement in the index

among those who almost always struggle with their bills (up by 0.1 point) but a slight

worsening among those who almost never struggle (down by 0.1 point), and those who

struggle from time to time (down by 0.2 points). The indices for these two groups are

now at their lowest levels in the six year series. Similarly, in terms of employment

status, there are marked differences between the perceptions of the unemployed, who

have an overall social climate index of -3.3 in 2014, slightly lower than the level of -3.1

in 2013, and those in managerial jobs, who have the highest index (0.6), down from 0.8

in 2013, and who are the only occupational group with a positive score in 2014.

As in the five previous surveys, Europeans assess their personal situation positively on

balance, especially in relation to the area in which they live and their life in general,

somewhat less so in terms of their job situation and the financial situation of their

household. Perceptions are broadly similar to those recorded in 2013, with a small

increase in the index for local area, small decreases in relation to life in general and

household financial situation and no change for personal job situation.

In contrast, the balance of opinion on most of the social protection and national

indicators is negative. In relation to social protection, there is a positive balance of

opinion on the healthcare system and a divided view on relations between people from

different cultural and religious backgrounds or nationalities, but a negative balance of


99

opinion on the three other areas covered by the survey, with Europeans particularly

negative about the way in which inequalities and poverty are addressed in their country.

With the exception of unemployment benefits (up by 0.2 points), there have been small

declines in the index across these measures since 2013, the largest (down by 0.6 points)

concerning the way in which inequalities and poverty are addressed.

Europeans are particularly critical in their assessment of the six national indicators, all of

which attract a negative balance of opinion. Indeed, the indices for five of the six

measures (the employment situation, the affordability of housing, the cost of living, the

national economy and the affordability of energy) are among the six lowest of the fifteen

areas measured in the survey (the other being the way in which inequalities and poverty

are addressed), whilst the index for public administration is equal seventh lowest

(together with the pension system). That said, there have been some interesting shifts

in perceptions of the national situation since 2013. In particular Europeans are now more

positive about the economic situation (with the index up by 0.9 points).

Looking to the future, the majority of Europeans do not expect their personal

circumstances to change in the next twelve months. However, those who do expect their

personal situation to change are a little more likely to think things will improve than that

they will get worse. In this respect Europeans are somewhat more optimistic than they

were at the same point in 2013. Europeans also expect little change in the areas of

social protection and inclusion, although their views are again slightly more optimistic

than in 2013.

Perhaps surprisingly, given that Europeans’ views on the economy have improved since

2013, many remain pessimistic about what will happen in relation to economic measures

in their country in the next twelve months. Around two in five think that the cost of

living will increase and similar proportions that energy and housing will become less

affordable. However, fewer (around one in four) expect the economy and employment

situation to worsen and almost as many expect them to improve. Moreover, Europeans

are again more optimistic now than they were in 2013, with declines in the proportions

thinking things will get worse across all six national measures, and increases in the

proportions thinking things will get better, most notably in relation to the economy, the

employment situation and the cost of living.

The results on what Europeans expect to happen across the 15 indicators in the next 12

months reveal some interesting findings at Member State level, with some consistent

optimism about the future in Malta, Sweden and Estonia and a more positive outlook in

Cyprus, Portugal and Slovenia relative to 2013. The social climate index for Cyprus

remains unchanged since 2013, the first time there has been a halt in its decline since

2009, although it remains at its lowest level in the series. In Portugal the optimism is

reflected in an improvement in its social climate index (as already noted, up by 0.8

points). Expectations of the short-term future have not really worsened notably

anywhere in Europe – Austria and Finland show the most consistently more negative

outlook, but shifts in opinion since 2013 are small.


100

Overall, the findings in 2014 suggest that, whilst Europeans appear to recognise the

economic recovery that is taking place, there is little evidence as yet that they are

feeling the benefits of the recovery at a personal or family level. There is also some

indication that they are seeing the effects of cutbacks on public service spending on the

provision of social protection. In this sense the survey findings do appear to provide an

accurate reflection of the macro-economic trends over the period since the last survey in

2013. However, there are some signs of optimism – albeit somewhat weak signs – that

economic improvement will continue and that the benefits of this improvement will start

to filter through more directly to individuals and their families in Europe in the coming

period.

ANNEXES

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS


TS1

SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 418 Social climate

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Between the 14th and the 26th of June 2014, TNS opinion & social, a consortium created between TNS political & social, TNS UK and TNS opinion, carried out the wave 81.5 of the EUROBAROMETER survey, on request of the EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Directorate-General for Communication, “Strategy, Corporate Communication Actions and Eurobarometer” unit. The special Eurobarometer survey 418 is part of the wave 81.5 and covers the population of the respective nationalities of the European Union Member States, resident in each of the Member States and aged 15 years and over. The basic sample design applied in all states is a multi-stage, random (probability) one. In each country, a number of sampling points was drawn with probability proportional to population size (for a total coverage of the country) and to population density.

In order to do so, the sampling points were drawn systematically from each of the "administrative regional units", after stratification by individual unit and type of area. They thus represent the whole territory of the countries surveyed according to the EUROSTAT NUTS II (or equivalent) and according to the distribution of the resident population of the respective nationalities in terms of metropolitan, urban and rural areas. In each of the selected sampling points, a starting address was drawn, at random. Further addresses (every Nth address) were selected by standard "random route" procedures, from the initial address. In each household, the respondent was drawn, at random (following the "closest birthday rule"). All interviews were conducted face-to-face in people's homes and in the appropriate national language. As far as the data capture is concerned, CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview) was used in those countries where this technique was available. For each country a comparison between the sample and the universe was carried out. The Universe description was derived from Eurostat population data or from national statistics offices. For all countries surveyed, a national weighting procedure, using marginal and intercellular weighting, was carried out based on this Universe description. In all countries, gender, age, region and size of locality were introduced in the iteration procedure. For international weighting (i.e. EU averages), TNS Opinion & Social applies the official population figures as provided by EUROSTAT or national statistic offices. The total population figures for input in this post-weighting procedure are listed below.


TS2

Readers are reminded that survey results are estimations, the accuracy of which, everything being equal, rests upon the sample size and upon the observed percentage. With samples of about 1,000 interviews, the real percentages vary within the following confidence limits:

various sample sizes are in rows various observed results are in columns

5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%

95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50%

N=50 6,0 8,3 9,9 11,1 12,0 12,7 13,2 13,6 13,8 13,9 N=50

N=500 1,9 2,6 3,1 3,5 3,8 4,0 4,2 4,3 4,4 4,4 N=500

N=1000 1,4 1,9 2,2 2,5 2,7 2,8 3,0 3,0 3,1 3,1 N=1000

N=1500 1,1 1,5 1,8 2,0 2,2 2,3 2,4 2,5 2,5 2,5 N=1500

N=2000 1,0 1,3 1,6 1,8 1,9 2,0 2,1 2,1 2,2 2,2 N=2000

N=3000 0,8 1,1 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,8 1,8 1,8 N=3000

N=4000 0,7 0,9 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,5 1,5 1,5 N=4000

N=5000 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,3 1,4 1,4 1,4 N=5000

N=6000 0,6 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,2 1,2 1,3 1,3 N=6000

N=7000 0,5 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,1 1,1 1,2 1,2 N=7000

N=7500 0,5 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,1 1,1 1,1 1,1 N=7500

N=8000 0,5 0,7 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,1 1,1 1,1 N=8000

N=9000 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,0 N=9000

N=10000 0,4 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,0 N=10000

N=11000 0,4 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,9 0,9 0,9 0,9 0,9 N=11000

N=12000 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,9 0,9 0,9 0,9 N=12000

N=13000 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,9 0,9 N=13000

N=14000 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,8 N=14000

N=15000 0,3 0,5 0,6 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,8 N=15000

5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%

95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50%

Statistical Margins due to the sampling process

(at the 95% level of confidence)


TS3

QUESTIONNAIRE


QA1

12345

QA2

12

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

1213

14

A. SOCIAL CLIMATE

On the whole, are you very satisfied, fairly satisfied, not very satisfied or not at all satisfied with the life you lead?

(ONE ANSWER ONLY)Very satisfiedFairly satisfiedNot very satisfied Not at all satisfied DKEB79.4 QA1

How would you judge the current situation in each of the following?

(SHOW SCREEN – READ OUT – ONE ANSWER PER LINE)Very good Rather good Rather bad Very bad DK

The area you live in 1 2 3 4 5Health care provision in (OUR COUNTRY)

1 2 3 4 5

The pension system in (OUR COUNTRY)

1 2 3 4 5

Unemployment benefits in (OUR COUNTRY)

1 2 3 4 5

The cost of living in (OUR COUNTRY)

1 2 3 4 5

Relations in (OUR COUNTRY) between people from different cultural or religious backgrounds or nationalities

1 2 3 4 5


1 2 3 4 5

How affordable energy is in (OUR COUNTRY)

1 2 3 4 5


1 2 3 4 5


1 2 3 4 5

The situation of the (NATIONALITY) economy

1 2 3 4 5

Your personal job situation 1 2 3 4 5The financial situation of your household

1 2 3 4 5

The employment situation in (OUR COUNTRY)

1 2 3 4 5

EB79.4 QA2

Q1


QA3

123

4567

8

9

10

11

12131415

What are your expectations for the next twelve months: will the next twelve months be better, worse or the same, when it comes to...?

(READ OUT – ONE ANSWER PER LINE)Better Worse Same DK

Your life in general 1 2 3 4The area you live in 1 2 3 4The healthcare system in (OUR COUNTRY) 1 2 3 4

The pension system in (OUR COUNTRY) 1 2 3 4Unemployment benefits in (OUR COUNTRY) 1 2 3 4The cost of living in (OUR COUNTRY) 1 2 3 4Relations in (OUR COUNTRY) between people from different cultural or religious backgrounds or nationalities

1 2 3 4


1 2 3 4

How affordable energy is in (OUR COUNTRY) 1 2 3 4


1 2 3 4


1 2 3 4

The economic situation in (OUR COUNTRY) 1 2 3 4Your personal job situation 1 2 3 4The financial situation of your household 1 2 3 4The employment situation in (OUR COUNTRY)

1 2 3 4

EB79.4 QA3

Q2


QA4

123

4567

8

9

10

11

12131415

QA5

12345

Compared with five years ago, would you say things have improved, got worse or stayed about the same when it comes to…?

(READ OUT – ONE ANSWER PER LINE)Improved Got worse Stayed

about the same

DK

Your life in general 1 2 3 4The area you live in 1 2 3 4The healthcare system in (OUR COUNTRY) 1 2 3 4

The pension system in (OUR COUNTRY) 1 2 3 4Unemployment benefits in (OUR COUNTRY) 1 2 3 4The cost of living in (OUR COUNTRY) 1 2 3 4Relations in (OUR COUNTRY) between people from different cultural or religious backgrounds or nationalities

1 2 3 4


1 2 3 4

How affordable energy is in (OUR COUNTRY) 1 2 3 4


1 2 3 4


1 2 3 4

The economic situation in (OUR COUNTRY) 1 2 3 4Your personal job situation 1 2 3 4The financial situation of your household 1 2 3 4The employment situation in (OUR COUNTRY)

1 2 3 4

EB79.4 QA4

And would you say that poverty in (OUR COUNTRY) is …? (READ OUT – ONE ANSWER ONLY)Very widespreadFairly widespreadNot very widespreadNot at all widespreadDKEB74.1 QA4

Q3


QA6

123456

QA7

1

QA8

DK

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

QA9

1

234

QA6: ROTATE ITEMS 1 TO 4Why in your opinion are there people who live in poverty? Here are four opinions: which is closest to yours?

(SHOW SCREEN – READ OUT – ONE ANSWER ONLY)They have been unlucky (M)They are lazy and lack willpower (M)There is much injustice in our society (M)It’s an inevitable part of progress (M)None (SP.)DKEB74.1 QA8

For each of the following statements, please tell me whether you ...

(SHOW SCREEN – READ OUT – ONE ANSWER ONLY)Totally agree

Tend to agree

Tend to disagree

Totally disagree

DK

Nowadays in (OUR COUNTRY) income differences between people are far too large

1 2 3 4 5

EB74.1 QA14.2

Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted or not? Please use a scale from 1 to 10, where '1' means that "most people cannot be trusted" and '10' means that "most people can be trusted".

(SHOW SCREEN - ONE ANSWER ONLY)1 Most people cannot be trusted

10 Most people can be trusted

EB74.1 QA16

QA9: ROTATE ITEMS 1 AND 2People have different views on how to help solve social and economic problems in (OUR COUNTRY). I’m going to read you two statements on this topic. Please tell me which one comes closest to your view. (M)

(SHOW SCREEN – READ OUT – ONE ANSWER ONLY)It is primarily up to the (NATIONALITY) Government to provide jobs for the unemployedIt is primarily up to private companies and markets in general to provide jobs for the unemployed (M)It depends (SP.)DKEB74.1 QA25a

Q4


QA10

1

234

QA11

1

234

QA12

1234

QA10: ROTATE ITEMS 1 AND 2Which of these two statements comes closest to your view?

(SHOW SCREEN – READ OUT – ONE ANSWER ONLY)Education should be totally free, even if this means that the quality might be lowerTuition fees are necessary for providing high quality education, even if this means that some people won’t be able to afford it

It depends (SP.)DKEB74.1 QA25b

QA11: ROTATE ITEMS 1 AND 2Still about the different steps that should be taken to help solving social and economic problems in (OUR COUNTRY), which of these two statements comes closest to your view?

(SHOW SCREEN – READ OUT – ONE ANSWER ONLY)A high level of health care, education and social spending must be guaranteed, even if it means that taxes might increase (M)

Taxes should be decreased even if it means a general lower level of health care, education and social spendingIt depends (SP.)DKNEW (BASED ON EB74.1 QA25c)

QA12: ROTATE ITEMS 1 AND 2And which of these two statements comes closest to your view?

(SHOW SCREEN – READ OUT – ONE ANSWER ONLY)

DKEB74.1 QA25d

The (NATIONALITY) Government should take more responsibility to ensure that everyone is provided for People should take more responsibility to provide for themselvesIt depends (SP.)

Q5

TABLES


`

% SP 418 Diff.SP 408 SP 418 Diff.

SP 408 SP 418 Diff.SP 408 SP 418 Diff.


SP 408 SP 418 Diff.SP 408

EU 28 19 -3 56 1 18 1 6 0 1 1 75 -2 24 1

BE 24 -4 62 1 10 1 3 1 1 1 86 -3 13 2

BG 2 -1 36 3 41 2 21 -2 0 -2 38 2 62 0

CZ 12 -1 65 -1 20 3 2 -1 1 0 77 -2 22 2

DK 71 -1 26 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 97 -1 3 1

DE 25 -7 62 3 11 3 2 1 0 0 87 -4 13 4

EE 8 0 65 5 22 -5 4 -1 1 1 73 5 26 -6

IE 32 2 56 3 9 -2 3 -3 0 0 88 5 12 -5

EL 4 0 31 -3 37 -1 28 4 0 0 35 -3 65 3

ES 14 -4 59 4 21 0 6 0 0 0 73 0 27 0

FR 15 -3 61 -4 16 3 7 3 1 1 76 -7 23 6

HR 14 -1 50 -2 27 2 8 1 1 0 64 -3 35 3

IT 5 -4 49 -5 33 5 12 3 1 1 54 -9 45 8

CY 21 -2 54 3 16 -1 9 0 0 0 75 1 25 -1

LV 8 -2 58 -3 28 5 6 0 0 0 66 -5 34 5

LT 14 0 52 -3 26 3 7 0 1 0 66 -3 33 3

LU 32 -10 62 9 5 1 1 0 0 0 94 -1 6 1

HU 9 3 50 8 32 -8 9 -3 0 0 59 11 41 -11

MT 41 14 50 -11 8 -4 1 1 0 0 91 3 9 -3

NL 50 2 44 -3 5 0 1 1 0 0 94 -1 6 1

AT 31 8 57 -6 10 -2 1 -1 1 1 88 2 11 -3

PL 8 -4 64 0 19 1 4 1 5 2 72 -4 23 2

PT 2 1 43 2 42 2 13 -5 0 0 45 3 55 -3

RO 5 -1 47 5 36 4 12 -8 0 0 52 4 48 -4

SI 21 -1 62 -1 15 3 2 -1 0 0 83 -2 17 2

SK 14 3 54 -2 26 1 6 -2 0 0 68 1 32 -1

FI 33 -5 60 3 6 2 1 0 0 0 93 -2 7 2

SE 44 -3 52 3 3 0 1 0 0 0 96 0 4 0

UK 32 -4 58 4 7 -1 2 0 1 1 90 0 9 -1

nicht sehr zufrieden

QA1 D'une façon générale, êtes-vous très satisfait(e), plutôt satisfait(e), plutôt pas satisfait(e) ou pas du tout satisfait(e) de la vie que vous menez ?

QA1 On the whole, are you very satisfied, fairly satisfied, not very satisfied or not at all satisfied with the life you lead?

QA1 Sind Sie insgesamt gesehen mit dem Leben, das Sie führen …

Très satisfait(e)

Very satisfied

Pas du tout satisfait(e)

Not at all satisfied

Weiß nicht

Total 'Satisfait(e)'

Total 'Satisfied'

Gesamt 'Zufrieden'sehr zufrieden

Plutôt satisfait(e)

Fairly satisfied

ziemlich zufrieden

Plutôt pas satisfait(e)

Not very satisfied

überhaupt nicht zufrieden

Total 'Pas satisfait(e)'

Total 'Not satisfied'

Gesamt 'Nicht zufrieden'

Ne sais pas

Don't know

T1






EU 28 29 2 59 1 9 -3 2 -1 1 1 88 3 11 -4

BE 38 -2 54 2 6 -2 2 2 0 0 92 0 8 0

BG 11 -4 50 0 27 0 10 3 2 1 61 -4 37 3

CZ 26 8 61 -4 11 -3 1 -2 1 1 87 4 12 -5

DK 39 4 52 -6 7 2 1 0 1 0 91 -2 8 2

DE 35 -5 59 3 5 1 0 0 1 1 94 -2 5 1

EE 25 6 64 -4 9 -2 1 -1 1 1 89 2 10 -3

IE 51 10 43 -6 5 -2 1 -1 0 -1 94 4 6 -3

EL 16 7 59 6 20 -7 5 -6 0 0 75 13 25 -13

ES 26 8 63 3 9 -7 1 -5 1 1 89 11 10 -12

FR 33 3 59 -1 6 -2 2 0 0 0 92 2 8 -2

HR 22 6 50 -2 20 -3 7 -1 1 0 72 4 27 -4

IT 10 4 66 4 19 -5 5 -3 0 0 76 8 24 -8

CY 33 -1 48 2 10 -1 9 0 0 0 81 1 19 -1

LV 22 4 65 -2 12 0 1 -1 0 -1 87 2 13 -1

LT 29 0 65 4 5 -2 1 -1 0 -1 94 4 6 -3

LU 52 4 45 -4 2 -1 1 1 0 0 97 0 3 0

HU 19 9 61 -1 15 -9 5 1 0 0 80 8 20 -8

MT 50 22 42 -18 7 -2 0 -3 1 1 92 4 7 -5

NL 51 2 46 -2 3 0 0 0 0 0 97 0 3 0

AT 55 18 40 -14 4 -4 1 0 0 0 95 4 5 -4

PL 21 2 65 0 11 -1 1 -1 2 0 86 2 12 -2

PT 11 6 83 2 6 -7 0 -1 0 0 94 8 6 -8

RO 20 1 57 1 18 0 4 -2 1 0 77 2 22 -2

SI 22 3 65 4 10 -5 2 -2 1 0 87 7 12 -7

SK 15 -1 69 7 13 -6 2 -1 1 1 84 6 15 -7

FI 39 3 57 -3 3 -1 0 0 1 1 96 0 3 -1

SE 65 -2 32 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 97 -1 3 1

UK 37 0 52 -2 8 1 2 0 1 1 89 -2 10 1

QA2.1 Comment jugez-vous la situation actuelle de chacun des domaines suivants ? L’endroit où vous habitez

QA2.1 How would you judge the current situation in each of the following? The area you live in

QA2.1 Wie beurteilen Sie die gegenwärtige Lage in den Bereichen auf dieser Liste? Die Gegend, in der Sie leben

Très bonne Plutôt mauvaise Ne sais pas Total

'Mauvaise'

Rather bad Total 'Bad'

Ziemlich schlecht

Très mauvaise

Very bad

Sehr schlecht

Very good

Sehr gut

Plutôt bonne

Rather good

Ziemlich gut Gesamt 'Schlecht'

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Total 'Bonne'

Total 'Good'

Gesamt 'Gut'

T2






EU 28 13 0 48 -2 26 0 11 2 2 0 61 -2 37 2

BE 37 -1 55 3 6 -3 1 0 1 1 92 2 7 -3

BG 1 -2 19 -6 44 -4 34 13 2 -1 20 -8 78 9

CZ 12 1 57 -2 23 -2 7 2 1 1 69 -1 30 0

DK 26 5 55 -6 15 1 3 0 1 0 81 -1 18 1

DE 17 1 61 -3 18 1 3 1 1 0 78 -2 21 2

EE 3 -1 52 0 34 0 7 -1 4 2 55 -1 41 -1

IE 7 -1 33 -3 35 0 22 4 3 0 40 -4 57 4

EL 1 0 9 -3 38 -7 52 10 0 0 10 -3 90 3

ES 7 -1 50 3 35 2 7 -3 1 -1 57 2 42 -1

FR 20 5 61 -6 15 0 2 0 2 1 81 -1 17 0

HR 6 0 42 -8 38 9 12 -2 2 1 48 -8 50 7

IT 2 0 41 -1 38 -1 16 0 3 2 43 -1 54 -1

CY 4 -1 40 -10 35 5 18 6 3 0 44 -11 53 11

LV 2 0 24 -10 46 2 24 10 4 -2 26 -10 70 12

LT 3 -2 49 -1 37 4 8 -1 3 0 52 -3 45 3

LU 38 0 53 -1 7 2 0 0 2 -1 91 -1 7 2

HU 4 1 33 -7 38 -3 24 10 1 -1 37 -6 62 7

MT 34 15 56 -11 8 -1 1 -1 1 -2 90 4 9 -2

NL 37 -2 50 -4 10 4 2 1 1 1 87 -6 12 5

AT 40 14 50 -11 8 -4 1 0 1 1 90 3 9 -4

PL 2 0 22 -5 44 -5 29 11 3 -1 24 -5 73 6

PT 2 1 49 2 38 -2 10 -1 1 0 51 3 48 -3

RO 2 0 20 -4 48 4 27 0 3 0 22 -4 75 4

SI 7 0 51 -9 32 7 9 3 1 -1 58 -9 41 10

SK 1 -2 39 -6 41 1 17 6 2 1 40 -8 58 7

FI 17 2 62 -4 18 1 2 0 1 1 79 -2 20 1

SE 19 -4 56 -2 21 5 4 2 0 -1 75 -6 25 7

UK 25 -5 54 1 15 4 4 0 2 0 79 -4 19 4

QA2.2 Comment jugez-vous la situation actuelle de chacun des domaines suivants ? Les prestations des services de santé en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA2.2 How would you judge the current situation in each of the following? Health care provision in (OUR COUNTRY)

QA2.2 Wie beurteilen Sie die gegenwärtige Lage in den Bereichen auf dieser Liste? Das Gesundheitswesen in (UNSER LAND)


'Mauvaise'


Ziemlich schlecht

Très mauvaise

Very bad

Sehr schlecht

Very good

Sehr gut

Plutôt bonne

Rather good


Don't know

Weiß nicht

Total 'Bonne'

Total 'Good'

Gesamt 'Gut'

T3






EU 28 5 0 31 -2 37 0 19 2 8 0 36 -2 56 2

BE 10 -1 47 -5 30 2 5 1 8 3 57 -6 35 3

BG 1 0 5 -4 37 -8 48 16 9 -4 6 -4 85 8

CZ 1 -1 18 -4 43 -1 30 4 8 2 19 -5 73 3

DK 23 6 51 -7 13 2 2 0 11 -1 74 -1 15 2

DE 6 1 50 -2 31 1 8 1 5 -1 56 -1 39 2

EE 1 0 21 9 48 2 19 -16 11 5 22 9 67 -14

IE 5 -1 25 -3 33 5 15 -2 22 1 30 -4 48 3

EL 0 0 3 1 29 -7 66 5 2 1 3 1 95 -2

ES 2 0 29 4 47 1 16 -5 6 0 31 4 63 -4

FR 5 1 41 -1 33 -2 11 3 10 -1 46 0 44 1

HR 2 1 17 8 46 3 30 -13 5 1 19 9 76 -10

IT 0 -2 19 2 48 -3 28 1 5 2 19 0 76 -2

CY 2 -2 21 -5 36 -8 29 14 12 1 23 -7 65 6

LV 0 -1 9 -2 43 -5 38 9 10 -1 9 -3 81 4

LT 1 0 16 -7 49 4 24 5 10 -2 17 -7 73 9

LU 24 2 51 0 10 4 0 0 15 -6 75 2 10 4

HU 3 2 25 -10 40 -2 24 8 8 2 28 -8 64 6

MT 17 12 51 4 15 -11 1 -3 16 -2 68 16 16 -14

NL 21 4 50 -4 17 -1 4 0 8 1 71 0 21 -1

AT 16 5 44 -15 31 9 4 0 5 1 60 -10 35 9

PL 1 0 13 -2 45 -3 35 5 6 0 14 -2 80 2

PT 0 0 12 3 58 2 24 -6 6 1 12 3 82 -4

RO 0 0 8 -3 46 6 39 1 7 -4 8 -3 85 7

SI 1 -2 30 -9 40 2 22 5 7 4 31 -11 62 7

SK 1 0 14 -1 49 1 30 1 6 -1 15 -1 79 2

FI 10 5 67 8 15 -11 2 0 6 -2 77 13 17 -11

SE 4 -2 39 -6 34 -1 16 10 7 -1 43 -8 50 9

UK 9 -1 35 -6 27 5 9 2 20 0 44 -7 36 7

QA2.3 Comment jugez-vous la situation actuelle de chacun des domaines suivants ? Le système de retraites en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA2.3 How would you judge the current situation in each of the following? The pension system in (OUR COUNTRY)

QA2.3 Wie beurteilen Sie die gegenwärtige Lage in den Bereichen auf dieser Liste? Die Rentenversorgung in (UNSER LAND)


'Mauvaise'


Ziemlich schlecht

Très mauvaise

Very bad

Sehr schlecht

Very good

Sehr gut

Plutôt bonne

Rather good


Don't know

Weiß nicht

Total 'Bonne'

Total 'Good'

Gesamt 'Gut'

T4






EU 28 6 0 30 1 32 0 18 -1 14 0 36 1 50 -1

BE 12 -1 43 -7 29 1 7 4 9 3 55 -8 36 5

BG 1 1 9 0 35 -8 38 8 17 -1 10 1 73 0

CZ 2 -1 17 -3 40 -2 29 2 12 4 19 -4 69 0

DK 14 -1 51 -7 22 7 5 2 8 -1 65 -8 27 9

DE 10 -1 54 2 22 0 5 1 9 -2 64 1 27 1

EE 1 0 18 6 33 -8 18 -6 30 8 19 6 51 -14

IE 11 -1 42 5 22 -2 14 -2 11 0 53 4 36 -4

EL 1 1 3 -1 28 -7 64 5 4 2 4 0 92 -2

ES 2 0 17 3 49 6 24 -13 8 4 19 3 73 -7

FR 7 2 45 6 22 -1 5 -2 21 -5 52 8 27 -3

HR 0 -1 13 4 39 -1 37 -5 11 3 13 3 76 -6

IT 1 0 14 -1 43 1 27 -3 15 3 15 -1 70 -2

CY 1 -1 24 5 33 -3 26 3 16 -4 25 4 59 0

LV 1 1 16 0 35 -6 22 2 26 3 17 1 57 -4

LT 4 2 20 -4 36 0 19 6 21 -4 24 -2 55 6

LU 18 1 42 -8 11 3 3 2 26 2 60 -7 14 5

HU 1 -1 14 1 37 -9 36 4 12 5 15 0 73 -5

MT 16 11 36 3 12 -7 3 -3 33 -4 52 14 15 -10

NL 16 2 54 3 13 -5 5 1 12 -1 70 5 18 -4

AT 24 5 46 -11 17 2 4 2 9 2 70 -6 21 4

PL 2 1 15 3 42 -6 29 2 12 0 17 4 71 -4

PT 1 1 12 4 54 1 25 -6 8 0 13 5 79 -5

RO 0 0 7 1 40 5 34 -2 19 -4 7 1 74 3

SI 3 0 31 1 36 -1 13 -7 17 7 34 1 49 -8

SK 1 -1 10 -4 51 1 28 2 10 2 11 -5 79 3

FI 11 6 61 6 16 -8 2 -1 10 -3 72 12 18 -9

SE 4 -1 27 -5 40 4 19 7 10 -5 31 -6 59 11

UK 10 0 30 -4 22 2 11 0 27 2 40 -4 33 2

QA2.4 Comment jugez-vous la situation actuelle de chacun des domaines suivants ? Les allocations chômage en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA2.4 How would you judge the current situation in each of the following? Unemployment benefits in (OUR COUNTRY)

QA2.4 Wie beurteilen Sie die gegenwärtige Lage in den Bereichen auf dieser Liste? Die Arbeitslosenunterstützung in (UNSER LAND)


'Mauvaise'


Ziemlich schlecht

Très mauvaise

Very bad

Sehr schlecht

Very good

Sehr gut

Plutôt bonne

Rather good


Don't know

Weiß nicht

Total 'Bonne'

Total 'Good'

Gesamt 'Gut'

T5






EU 28 2 0 26 0 46 2 24 -3 2 1 28 0 70 -1

BE 3 0 30 -8 52 3 14 4 1 1 33 -8 66 7

BG 0 0 7 -1 36 -10 55 11 2 0 7 -1 91 1

CZ 2 1 19 2 46 -5 31 0 2 2 21 3 77 -5

DK 8 2 49 -9 35 3 5 2 3 2 57 -7 40 5

DE 3 -1 52 -3 35 1 8 2 2 1 55 -4 43 3

EE 0 0 12 4 55 13 28 -21 5 4 12 4 83 -8

IE 2 0 19 5 48 5 30 -11 1 1 21 5 78 -6

EL 1 1 6 2 38 -1 55 -2 0 0 7 3 93 -3

ES 1 0 16 3 60 13 22 -16 1 0 17 3 82 -3

FR 1 1 20 3 54 -1 23 -3 2 0 21 4 77 -4

HR 1 1 5 -1 32 -4 62 5 0 -1 6 0 94 1

IT 0 -2 10 1 55 3 33 -4 2 2 10 -1 88 -1

CY 1 1 12 3 38 3 49 -7 0 0 13 4 87 -4

LV 3 2 8 -4 45 -2 40 3 4 1 11 -2 85 1

LT 0 -1 14 1 53 2 31 -3 2 1 14 0 84 -1

LU 2 -2 31 -8 54 6 12 4 1 0 33 -10 66 10

HU 1 0 14 4 47 -7 37 3 1 0 15 4 84 -4

MT 3 2 34 16 50 0 9 -17 4 -1 37 18 59 -17

NL 7 1 59 5 28 -7 3 -1 3 2 66 6 31 -8

AT 7 2 32 -16 48 7 12 6 1 1 39 -14 60 13

PL 1 0 14 3 49 0 34 -3 2 0 15 3 83 -3

PT 0 0 12 7 53 5 34 -13 1 1 12 7 87 -8

RO 1 1 8 2 40 3 50 -5 1 -1 9 3 90 -2

SI 0 0 14 1 47 -3 37 0 2 2 14 1 84 -3

SK 1 1 15 4 53 3 29 -9 2 1 16 5 82 -6

FI 1 1 27 -5 53 -1 17 4 2 1 28 -4 70 3

SE 6 -3 65 -3 23 3 4 3 2 0 71 -6 27 6

UK 3 0 34 -1 40 0 19 -2 4 3 37 -1 59 -2

QA2.5 Comment jugez-vous la situation actuelle de chacun des domaines suivants ? Le coût de la vie en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA2.5 How would you judge the current situation in each of the following? The cost of living in (OUR COUNTRY)

QA2.5 Wie beurteilen Sie die gegenwärtige Lage in den Bereichen auf dieser Liste? Die Lebenshaltungskosten in (UNSER LAND)


'Mauvaise'


Ziemlich schlecht

Très mauvaise

Very bad

Sehr schlecht

Very good

Sehr gut

Plutôt bonne

Rather good


Don't know

Weiß nicht

Total 'Bonne'

Total 'Good'

Gesamt 'Gut'

T6






EU 28 4 -2 46 -2 33 0 9 1 8 3 50 -4 42 1

BE 3 -3 42 -2 42 -2 9 4 4 3 45 -5 51 2

BG 8 2 48 -9 24 1 13 6 7 0 56 -7 37 7

CZ 3 -1 29 -7 42 -5 22 12 4 1 32 -8 64 7

DK 4 0 49 2 39 -4 5 0 3 2 53 2 44 -4

DE 3 -2 51 -6 33 3 3 0 10 5 54 -8 36 3

EE 4 0 61 -10 19 1 3 1 13 8 65 -10 22 2

IE 10 -3 57 2 22 0 6 2 5 -1 67 -1 28 2

EL 5 2 37 3 34 -7 21 0 3 2 42 5 55 -7

ES 3 -5 60 9 28 -1 6 -1 3 -2 63 4 34 -2

FR 2 0 35 -2 40 -3 12 1 11 4 37 -2 52 -2

HR 6 1 42 -4 27 0 17 -1 8 4 48 -3 44 -1

IT 2 -1 39 -1 38 -3 11 -2 10 7 41 -2 49 -5

CY 8 -1 43 -3 26 -6 16 5 7 5 51 -4 42 -1

LV 6 -1 60 0 24 -2 6 2 4 1 66 -1 30 0

LT 9 0 58 -5 21 3 5 1 7 1 67 -5 26 4

LU 8 -4 68 1 16 -2 2 0 6 5 76 -3 18 -2

HU 6 3 42 -6 29 -6 14 4 9 5 48 -3 43 -2

MT 13 4 44 -9 30 5 4 0 9 0 57 -5 34 5

NL 6 2 54 2 33 -4 5 1 2 -1 60 4 38 -3

AT 7 -1 39 -14 39 9 9 2 6 4 46 -15 48 11

PL 5 -1 48 -1 27 -3 10 3 10 2 53 -2 37 0

PT 7 2 56 0 26 5 6 -2 5 -5 63 2 32 3

RO 6 0 41 -6 29 8 12 1 12 -3 47 -6 41 9

SI 3 -3 53 2 28 -3 11 2 5 2 56 -1 39 -1

SK 4 -4 52 -5 29 2 8 3 7 4 56 -9 37 5

FI 7 3 66 0 19 -6 3 2 5 1 73 3 22 -4

SE 4 -1 43 0 43 -1 8 1 2 1 47 -1 51 0

UK 7 -3 47 -6 25 -1 10 3 11 7 54 -9 35 2

QA2.6 Comment jugez-vous la situation actuelle de chacun des domaines suivants ? Les rapports entre les personnes d’origines culturelles ou religieuses différentes ou de nationalités différentes en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA2.6 How would you judge the current situation in each of the following? Relations in (OUR COUNTRY) between people from different cultural or religious backgrounds or nationalities

QA2.6 Wie beurteilen Sie die gegenwärtige Lage in den Bereichen auf dieser Liste? Die Beziehungen zwischen Menschen mit unterschiedlichem kulturellen oder religiösen Hintergrund oder verschiedener Nationalitäten in (UNSER LAND)


'Mauvaise'


Ziemlich schlecht

Très mauvaise

Very bad

Sehr schlecht

Very good

Sehr gut

Plutôt bonne

Rather good


Don't know

Weiß nicht

Total 'Bonne'

Total 'Good'

Gesamt 'Gut'

T7






EU 28 2 0 22 -5 47 -1 21 3 8 3 24 -5 68 2

BE 4 0 28 -11 48 0 14 7 6 4 32 -11 62 7

BG 2 1 11 -3 36 -7 41 10 10 -1 13 -2 77 3

CZ 2 -1 18 -5 46 -7 28 10 6 3 20 -6 74 3

DK 7 -1 44 -4 39 4 7 0 3 1 51 -5 46 4

DE 2 -1 28 -7 49 1 12 3 9 4 30 -8 61 4

EE 0 0 17 2 51 -3 16 -10 16 11 17 2 67 -13

IE 3 -1 29 0 42 0 19 0 7 1 32 -1 61 0

EL 1 0 6 -2 38 -4 54 5 1 1 7 -2 92 1

ES 0 -2 22 1 50 2 25 -1 3 0 22 -1 75 1

FR 1 0 18 -1 51 -5 24 4 6 2 19 -1 75 -1

HR 1 -1 16 0 43 -5 34 4 6 2 17 -1 77 -1

IT 0 -1 18 -8 51 -1 23 5 8 5 18 -9 74 4

CY 1 -3 25 3 43 -5 28 3 3 2 26 0 71 -2

LV 0 0 7 -2 47 -3 35 0 11 5 7 -2 82 -3

LT 0 -1 13 -1 51 -1 30 3 6 0 13 -2 81 2

LU 3 -3 48 -5 32 7 6 4 11 -3 51 -8 38 11

HU 2 1 16 -2 42 -12 36 11 4 2 18 -1 78 -1

MT 11 6 47 -4 23 -4 5 2 14 0 58 2 28 -2

NL 3 -1 43 1 40 -3 10 2 4 1 46 0 50 -1

AT 8 3 30 -16 45 8 10 3 7 2 38 -13 55 11

PL 1 -1 22 3 49 -5 20 0 8 3 23 2 69 -5

PT 1 1 15 0 57 2 23 0 4 -3 16 1 80 2

RO 0 -1 10 1 48 1 35 -1 7 0 10 0 83 0

SI 1 0 18 -2 48 -1 28 -1 5 4 19 -2 76 -2

SK 1 0 14 -7 54 2 25 3 6 2 15 -7 79 5

FI 3 1 50 3 38 -6 6 1 3 1 53 4 44 -5

SE 3 -2 33 -3 43 -3 19 9 2 -1 36 -5 62 6

UK 3 -2 24 -11 39 0 18 5 16 8 27 -13 57 5

QA2.7 Comment jugez-vous la situation actuelle de chacun des domaines suivants ? La manière dont les inégalités et la pauvreté sont traitées en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA2.7 How would you judge the current situation in each of the following? The way inequalities and poverty are addressed in (OUR COUNTRY)

QA2.7 Wie beurteilen Sie die gegenwärtige Lage in den Bereichen auf dieser Liste? Die Art und Weise der Auseinandersetzung mit sozialer Benachteiligung und Armut in (UNSER LAND)


'Mauvaise'


Ziemlich schlecht

Très mauvaise

Very bad

Sehr schlecht

Very good

Sehr gut

Plutôt bonne

Rather good


Don't know

Weiß nicht

Total 'Bonne'

Total 'Good'

Gesamt 'Gut'

T8






EU 28 3 0 27 0 43 -2 21 -1 6 3 30 0 64 -3

BE 2 -1 22 -1 55 -3 17 3 4 2 24 -2 72 0

BG 9 4 39 1 27 -9 14 -1 11 5 48 5 41 -10

CZ 32 3 49 -1 13 -4 3 0 3 2 81 2 16 -4

DK 4 -1 52 -2 31 -3 7 2 6 4 56 -3 38 -1

DE 1 -1 29 -1 50 -2 17 2 3 2 30 -2 67 0

EE 19 -6 62 6 11 -1 2 -3 6 4 81 0 13 -4

IE 3 1 18 0 46 5 28 -6 5 0 21 1 74 -1

EL 0 0 6 2 37 -2 56 0 1 0 6 2 93 -2

ES 2 -4 31 -16 43 13 20 7 4 0 33 -20 63 20

FR 1 0 27 4 48 -2 16 -5 8 3 28 4 64 -7

HR 3 1 20 2 42 -6 24 -5 11 8 23 3 66 -11

IT 0 -1 17 1 50 -3 21 -6 12 9 17 0 71 -9

CY 0 0 8 5 30 2 60 -9 2 2 8 5 90 -7

LV 13 -1 55 -8 19 4 7 3 6 2 68 -9 26 7

LT 0 -1 19 6 52 0 24 -7 5 2 19 5 76 -7

LU 2 -1 50 3 37 1 5 -1 6 -2 52 2 42 0

HU 3 2 35 17 41 -13 19 -7 2 1 38 19 60 -20

MT 9 8 42 23 38 -14 5 -20 6 3 51 31 43 -34

NL 7 1 55 2 26 -5 5 0 7 2 62 3 31 -5

AT 11 6 43 -3 37 -3 7 -1 2 1 54 3 44 -4

PL 2 1 34 10 41 -8 17 -3 6 0 36 11 58 -11

PT 1 1 6 0 55 5 35 -7 3 1 7 1 90 -2

RO 0 0 9 2 44 3 44 -5 3 0 9 2 88 -2

SI 2 1 36 4 43 -4 15 -4 4 3 38 5 58 -8

SK 2 1 31 10 47 -9 17 -4 3 2 33 11 64 -13

FI 3 1 30 1 50 -4 14 0 3 2 33 2 64 -4

SE 6 -1 52 1 27 -1 7 0 8 1 58 0 34 -1

UK 2 0 18 -6 42 -1 32 4 6 3 20 -6 74 3

QA2.8 Comment jugez-vous la situation actuelle de chacun des domaines suivants ? Le caractère abordable des coûts de l’énergie en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA2.8 How would you judge the current situation in each of the following? How affordable energy is in (OUR COUNTRY)

QA2.8 Wie beurteilen Sie die gegenwärtige Lage in den Bereichen auf dieser Liste? Bezahlbare Energie in (UNSER LAND)


'Mauvaise'


Ziemlich schlecht

Très mauvaise

Very bad

Sehr schlecht

Very good

Sehr gut

Plutôt bonne

Rather good


Don't know

Weiß nicht

Total 'Bonne'

Total 'Good'

Gesamt 'Gut'

T9






EU 28 2 0 22 -3 45 1 25 1 6 1 24 -3 70 2

BE 2 -1 19 -10 52 -3 23 11 4 3 21 -11 75 8

BG 7 2 31 -7 30 -3 23 8 9 0 38 -5 53 5

CZ 11 3 42 -3 34 1 10 -3 3 2 53 0 44 -2

DK 4 -2 56 -8 30 6 4 1 6 3 60 -10 34 7

DE 2 -3 31 -10 45 5 14 5 8 3 33 -13 59 10

EE 7 -1 47 -5 30 2 6 -1 10 5 54 -6 36 1

IE 3 -1 24 -8 43 6 23 4 7 -1 27 -9 66 10

EL 1 0 19 6 39 -6 40 0 1 0 20 6 79 -6

ES 1 0 11 -2 52 9 35 -6 1 -1 12 -2 87 3

FR 0 0 16 -2 55 3 23 0 6 -1 16 -2 78 3

HR 2 0 17 1 46 -1 27 -5 8 5 19 1 73 -6

IT 0 -1 15 0 49 -3 25 -2 11 6 15 -1 74 -5

CY 1 1 11 5 26 -9 57 -1 5 4 12 6 83 -10

LV 6 -1 44 -6 32 3 11 3 7 1 50 -7 43 6

LT 0 0 14 1 45 4 35 -5 6 0 14 1 80 -1

LU 1 0 11 -1 45 -5 39 6 4 0 12 -1 84 1

HU 3 2 28 11 44 -13 23 0 2 0 31 13 67 -13

MT 4 3 23 6 40 -6 27 -2 6 -1 27 9 67 -8

NL 3 1 43 -2 38 -4 10 1 6 4 46 -1 48 -3

AT 6 2 32 -8 47 4 13 2 2 0 38 -6 60 6

PL 1 0 16 1 46 0 31 -2 6 1 17 1 77 -2

PT 1 1 10 0 57 2 27 -5 5 2 11 1 84 -3

RO 1 1 14 2 40 2 36 -5 9 0 15 3 76 -3

SI 1 0 14 0 45 1 34 -4 6 3 15 0 79 -3

SK 2 2 19 4 45 -6 30 -2 4 2 21 6 75 -8

FI 1 1 23 -3 55 -2 19 3 2 1 24 -2 74 1

SE 4 -2 44 -6 37 4 12 5 3 -1 48 -8 49 9

UK 1 -1 19 -7 38 -1 36 10 6 -1 20 -8 74 9

QA2.9 Comment jugez-vous la situation actuelle de chacun des domaines suivants ? Le caractère abordable du coût du logement en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA2.9 How would you judge the current situation in each of the following? How affordable housing is in (OUR COUNTRY)

QA2.9 Wie beurteilen Sie die gegenwärtige Lage in den Bereichen auf dieser Liste? Erschwinglicher Wohnraum in (UNSER LAND)


'Mauvaise'


Ziemlich schlecht

Très mauvaise

Very bad

Sehr schlecht

Very good

Sehr gut

Plutôt bonne

Rather good


Don't know

Weiß nicht

Total 'Bonne'

Total 'Good'

Gesamt 'Gut'

T10






EU 28 4 0 33 -3 36 -1 18 0 9 4 37 -3 54 -1

BE 4 -2 46 -13 34 7 10 4 6 4 50 -15 44 11

BG 1 -1 24 -3 36 -4 26 10 13 -2 25 -4 62 6

CZ 4 -1 33 0 40 -2 17 0 6 3 37 -1 57 -2

DK 11 2 61 -1 23 -1 4 0 1 0 72 1 27 -1

DE 12 2 57 -6 19 -2 5 1 7 5 69 -4 24 -1

EE 4 0 54 0 19 -6 2 -3 21 9 58 0 21 -9

IE 2 -1 23 -4 42 4 21 -2 12 3 25 -5 63 2

EL 1 1 8 2 36 -1 54 -2 1 0 9 3 90 -3

ES 1 0 20 4 52 8 23 -13 4 1 21 4 75 -5

FR 2 1 36 -2 34 -5 19 3 9 3 38 -1 53 -2

HR 1 0 12 -3 36 -5 46 6 5 2 13 -3 82 1

IT 0 -1 11 -2 52 2 32 -2 5 3 11 -3 84 0

CY 1 -1 24 4 36 -6 29 -4 10 7 25 3 65 -10

LV 1 0 24 -1 42 -2 21 0 12 3 25 -1 63 -2

LT 1 0 30 2 33 -4 13 -1 23 3 31 2 46 -5

LU 7 -5 65 9 17 -4 5 0 6 0 72 4 22 -4

HU 3 0 33 -6 35 -3 20 8 9 1 36 -6 55 5

MT 16 13 38 -13 25 4 4 -1 17 -3 54 0 29 3

NL 2 0 55 17 28 -15 6 -6 9 4 57 17 34 -21

AT 9 2 44 -18 32 7 12 8 3 1 53 -16 44 15

PL 2 1 30 1 43 -3 18 1 7 0 32 2 61 -2

PT 1 1 18 2 55 0 20 -3 6 0 19 3 75 -3

RO 1 0 16 -9 46 7 28 3 9 -1 17 -9 74 10

SI 1 0 23 -1 40 1 28 -5 8 5 24 -1 68 -4

SK 2 0 29 -8 42 -1 18 4 9 5 31 -8 60 3

FI 5 1 61 -1 25 -2 4 0 5 2 66 0 29 -2

SE 6 -3 57 0 23 -2 6 2 8 3 63 -3 29 0

UK 3 -1 30 -11 32 1 13 0 22 11 33 -12 45 1

QA2.10 Comment jugez-vous la situation actuelle de chacun des domaines suivants ? Le fonctionnement de l’administration publique en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA2.10 How would you judge the current situation in each of the following? The way public administration runs in (OUR COUNTRY)

QA2.10 Wie beurteilen Sie die gegenwärtige Lage in den Bereichen auf dieser Liste? Das Funktionieren der öffentlichen Verwaltung in (UNSER LAND)


'Mauvaise'


Ziemlich schlecht

Très mauvaise

Very bad

Sehr schlecht

Very good

Sehr gut

Plutôt bonne

Rather good


Don't know

Weiß nicht

Total 'Bonne'

Total 'Good'

Gesamt 'Gut'

T11






EU 28 4 0 28 5 39 1 26 -7 3 1 32 5 65 -6

BE 3 1 39 4 48 -4 7 -3 3 2 42 5 55 -7

BG 0 0 5 2 35 -3 56 -1 4 2 5 2 91 -4

CZ 1 0 20 11 52 0 25 -13 2 2 21 11 77 -13

DK 9 -1 70 14 15 -14 1 -2 5 3 79 13 16 -16

DE 16 1 70 1 9 -3 2 0 3 1 86 2 11 -3

EE 1 -1 42 9 43 -7 5 -7 9 6 43 8 48 -14

IE 1 1 19 10 48 16 30 -27 2 0 20 11 78 -11

EL 0 0 3 2 25 4 72 -6 0 0 3 2 97 -2

ES 0 -1 4 1 41 15 55 -15 0 0 4 0 96 0

FR 0 0 7 0 60 5 29 -5 4 0 7 0 89 0

HR 0 0 4 -1 26 -8 69 9 1 0 4 -1 95 1

IT 0 -2 5 -2 48 9 45 -7 2 2 5 -4 93 2

CY 0 0 5 4 27 13 67 -18 1 1 5 4 94 -5

LV 1 1 17 4 54 0 24 -6 4 1 18 5 78 -6

LT 0 0 29 9 53 0 15 -9 3 0 29 9 68 -9

LU 4 -7 72 8 19 0 1 0 4 -1 76 1 20 0

HU 2 1 24 12 46 -10 26 -4 2 1 26 13 72 -14

MT 11 10 61 8 18 -9 1 -6 9 -3 72 18 19 -15

NL 4 1 50 17 38 -12 7 -6 1 0 54 18 45 -18

AT 6 1 51 -9 35 3 6 4 2 1 57 -8 41 7

PL 1 0 26 9 47 -7 20 -4 6 2 27 9 67 -11

PT 0 0 6 4 55 16 38 -21 1 1 6 4 93 -5

RO 1 1 11 6 43 4 42 -11 3 0 12 7 85 -7

SI 0 0 7 3 36 7 56 -10 1 0 7 3 92 -3

SK 0 0 13 2 53 0 31 -4 3 2 13 2 84 -4

FI 1 -1 27 -23 58 18 13 6 1 0 28 -24 71 24

SE 10 -7 66 2 17 2 2 0 5 3 76 -5 19 2

UK 3 2 39 18 37 -9 12 -16 9 5 42 20 49 -25

QA2.11 Comment jugez-vous la situation actuelle de chacun des domaines suivants ? La situation de l’économie (NATIONALITE)

QA2.11 How would you judge the current situation in each of the following? The situation of the (NATIONALITY) economy

QA2.11 Wie beurteilen Sie die gegenwärtige Lage in den Bereichen auf dieser Liste? Die Lage der (NATIONALITÄT) Wirtschaft


'Mauvaise'


Ziemlich schlecht

Très mauvaise

Very bad

Sehr schlecht

Very good

Sehr gut

Plutôt bonne

Rather good


Don't know

Weiß nicht

Total 'Bonne'

Total 'Good'

Gesamt 'Gut'

T12






EU 28 12 -1 41 0 18 0 11 0 18 1 53 -1 29 0

BE 17 -4 50 2 17 3 5 1 11 -2 67 -2 22 4

BG 4 2 38 0 29 0 19 -1 10 -1 42 2 48 -1

CZ 8 -4 43 -2 15 -1 8 2 26 5 51 -6 23 1

DK 49 2 34 2 6 -2 4 -1 7 -1 83 4 10 -3

DE 18 -2 46 -4 11 2 4 0 21 4 64 -6 15 2

EE 8 -4 47 8 15 5 6 2 24 -11 55 4 21 7

IE 15 3 39 4 19 -2 15 -7 12 2 54 7 34 -9

EL 2 1 23 3 28 -1 29 3 18 -6 25 4 57 2

ES 5 0 44 12 22 -1 16 -7 13 -4 49 12 38 -8

FR 9 -1 42 -5 11 -1 8 3 30 4 51 -6 19 2

HR 4 -1 38 5 28 1 20 -6 10 1 42 4 48 -5

IT 2 -3 41 1 31 -3 16 2 10 3 43 -2 47 -1

CY 7 0 32 9 12 -1 22 -3 27 -5 39 9 34 -4

LV 9 0 46 -2 17 -2 10 1 18 3 55 -2 27 -1

LT 8 1 39 -2 17 0 13 1 23 0 47 -1 30 1

LU 25 -4 51 1 7 0 3 2 14 1 76 -3 10 2

HU 5 1 27 -3 26 -6 22 4 20 4 32 -2 48 -2

MT 21 9 46 -17 10 -3 3 0 20 11 67 -8 13 -3

NL 23 1 35 -5 12 0 8 3 22 1 58 -4 20 3

AT 26 1 51 -4 10 -2 5 2 8 3 77 -3 15 0

PL 5 0 47 2 26 0 9 -1 13 -1 52 2 35 -1

PT 2 1 41 -3 32 2 14 1 11 -1 43 -2 46 3

RO 2 -1 24 -4 25 8 21 0 28 -3 26 -5 46 8

SI 6 -6 49 4 15 -3 14 -3 16 8 55 -2 29 -6

SK 9 1 43 0 18 -1 8 -3 22 3 52 1 26 -4

FI 43 6 30 -7 10 1 4 -1 13 1 73 -1 14 0

SE 45 -5 35 4 6 0 5 -1 9 2 80 -1 11 -1

UK 22 -2 40 4 12 -1 8 -1 18 0 62 2 20 -2

QA2.12 Comment jugez-vous la situation actuelle de chacun des domaines suivants ? Votre situation professionnelle

QA2.12 How would you judge the current situation in each of the following? Your personal job situation

QA2.12 Wie beurteilen Sie die gegenwärtige Lage in den Bereichen auf dieser Liste? Ihre persönliche berufliche Situation


'Mauvaise'


Ziemlich schlecht

Très mauvaise

Very bad

Sehr schlecht

Very good

Sehr gut

Plutôt bonne

Rather good


Don't know

Weiß nicht

Total 'Bonne'

Total 'Good'

Gesamt 'Gut'

T13






EU 28 8 -1 53 -1 27 1 9 0 3 1 61 -2 36 1

BE 10 -4 59 -7 24 8 4 1 3 2 69 -11 28 9

BG 2 1 33 3 41 -1 21 -3 3 0 35 4 62 -4

CZ 6 1 51 -5 33 2 8 1 2 1 57 -4 41 3

DK 39 3 50 -2 9 0 1 -2 1 1 89 1 10 -2

DE 11 -3 63 -3 17 1 4 1 5 4 74 -6 21 2

EE 4 1 62 0 26 -1 5 -2 3 2 66 1 31 -3

IE 8 2 53 7 27 -5 11 -3 1 -1 61 9 38 -8

EL 1 0 22 0 42 -2 34 1 1 1 23 0 76 -1

ES 2 -2 53 8 35 -1 9 -3 1 -2 55 6 44 -4

FR 5 0 61 -4 24 1 7 2 3 1 66 -4 31 3

HR 3 -1 42 3 37 3 17 -5 1 0 45 2 54 -2

IT 2 -1 44 -1 37 -1 13 1 4 2 46 -2 50 0

CY 3 0 43 5 32 0 21 -6 1 1 46 5 53 -6

LV 3 1 53 -2 33 0 9 0 2 1 56 -1 42 0

LT 4 1 53 -3 32 3 9 -1 2 0 57 -2 41 2

LU 17 -4 70 2 7 -2 2 1 4 3 87 -2 9 -1

HU 3 1 37 5 40 -9 17 2 3 1 40 6 57 -7

MT 15 9 69 -1 12 -6 2 -2 2 0 84 8 14 -8

NL 25 0 58 -2 12 1 3 0 2 1 83 -2 15 1

AT 21 6 55 -6 18 0 5 1 1 -1 76 0 23 1

PL 3 -1 50 -1 32 2 9 0 6 0 53 -2 41 2

PT 1 0 35 0 48 -2 13 1 3 1 36 0 61 -1

RO 3 1 36 -3 42 6 18 -4 1 0 39 -2 60 2

SI 2 -2 61 7 28 -3 7 -4 2 2 63 5 35 -7

SK 4 1 50 3 31 -7 11 1 4 2 54 4 42 -6

FI 19 5 66 -6 13 1 1 -1 1 1 85 -1 14 0

SE 32 -9 56 7 9 2 3 1 0 -1 88 -2 12 3

UK 13 -1 62 0 15 -3 6 1 4 3 75 -1 21 -2

QA2.13 Comment jugez-vous la situation actuelle de chacun des domaines suivants ? La situation financière de votre ménage

QA2.13 How would you judge the current situation in each of the following? The financial situation of your household

QA2.13 Wie beurteilen Sie die gegenwärtige Lage in den Bereichen auf dieser Liste? Die finanzielle Situation Ihres Haushalts


'Mauvaise'


Ziemlich schlecht

Très mauvaise

Very bad

Sehr schlecht

Very good

Sehr gut

Plutôt bonne

Rather good


Don't know

Weiß nicht

Total 'Bonne'

Total 'Good'

Gesamt 'Gut'

T14






EU 28 2 0 20 1 41 1 34 -3 3 1 22 1 75 -2

BE 2 0 21 -11 58 3 17 7 2 1 23 -11 75 10

BG 0 0 2 -1 33 -7 62 7 3 1 2 -1 95 0

CZ 1 0 14 0 48 0 36 0 1 0 15 0 84 0

DK 3 1 49 5 39 -7 5 -2 4 3 52 6 44 -9

DE 6 -1 55 -2 28 -1 5 1 6 3 61 -3 33 0

EE 1 1 25 1 50 -7 12 -1 12 6 26 2 62 -8

IE 2 1 12 5 49 12 36 -18 1 0 14 6 85 -6

EL 1 1 2 1 22 -4 75 2 0 0 3 2 97 -2

ES 0 -1 1 -1 28 9 71 -7 0 0 1 -2 99 2

FR 0 0 4 0 53 1 41 -2 2 1 4 0 94 -1

HR 1 1 2 -1 19 -10 77 9 1 1 3 0 96 -1

IT 0 -2 5 -4 38 2 54 1 3 3 5 -6 92 3

CY 0 0 6 2 31 2 62 -5 1 1 6 2 93 -3

LV 1 0 14 -1 54 0 26 -1 5 2 15 -1 80 -1

LT 1 0 25 4 52 1 18 -6 4 1 26 4 70 -5

LU 2 -2 47 -4 41 5 5 0 5 1 49 -6 46 5

HU 1 0 15 4 45 -9 37 4 2 1 16 4 82 -5

MT 6 5 49 -2 29 -2 6 2 10 -3 55 3 35 0

NL 1 0 22 3 58 -2 16 -2 3 1 23 3 74 -4

AT 6 0 41 -12 42 5 8 5 3 2 47 -12 50 10

PL 1 0 13 2 50 -1 33 -2 3 1 14 2 83 -3

PT 1 1 6 4 50 13 42 -19 1 1 7 5 92 -6

RO 0 0 5 1 35 4 57 -5 3 0 5 1 92 -1

SI 0 0 5 1 24 1 69 -4 2 2 5 1 93 -3

SK 0 -1 6 1 43 -3 49 2 2 1 6 0 92 -1

FI 0 0 16 -18 61 6 21 11 2 1 16 -18 82 17

SE 3 0 32 -1 48 -3 14 2 3 2 35 -1 62 -1

UK 3 2 29 6 47 -1 14 -11 7 4 32 8 61 -12

QA2.14 Comment jugez-vous la situation actuelle de chacun des domaines suivants ? La situation de l’emploi en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA2.14 How would you judge the current situation in each of the following? The employment situation in (OUR COUNTRY)

QA2.14 Wie beurteilen Sie die gegenwärtige Lage in den Bereichen auf dieser Liste? Die Lage auf dem Arbeitsmarkt in (UNSER LAND)


'Mauvaise'


Ziemlich schlecht

Très mauvaise

Very bad

Sehr schlecht

Very good

Sehr gut

Plutôt bonne

Rather good


Don't know

Weiß nicht

Total 'Bonne'

Total 'Good'

Gesamt 'Gut'

T15




SP 408

EU 28 27 4 11 -5 59 1 3 0

BE 22 -5 10 -8 65 11 3 2

BG 15 -3 12 -4 64 3 9 4

CZ 19 4 11 -13 68 9 2 0

DK 32 2 2 -2 64 -2 2 2

DE 21 3 8 -1 69 -3 2 1

EE 38 1 8 -5 50 1 4 3

IE 38 12 5 -13 56 2 1 -1

EL 21 7 34 -11 44 5 1 -1

ES 26 5 8 -10 63 6 3 -1

FR 31 2 12 -5 53 1 4 2

HR 23 1 17 -4 56 0 4 3

IT 21 5 15 -6 59 3 5 -2

CY 27 15 14 -22 53 9 6 -2

LV 34 0 8 -1 55 1 3 0

LT 28 -2 15 2 53 -2 4 2

LU 29 -2 8 0 60 0 3 2

HU 24 4 10 -12 64 7 2 1

MT 38 6 3 -2 49 -4 10 0

NL 29 4 5 -8 65 4 1 0

AT 24 5 8 -2 67 -2 1 -1

PL 26 8 11 -7 58 -2 5 1

PT 19 9 17 -22 60 15 4 -2

RO 34 11 13 -8 48 -3 5 0

SI 21 6 13 -14 62 6 4 2

SK 22 2 9 -10 66 8 3 0

FI 22 -7 3 -1 73 7 2 1

SE 45 2 2 -1 51 -2 2 1

UK 42 6 10 -2 45 -6 3 2

Meilleurs Sans change-ment

Same

Gleich

Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Better

Besser

Moins bons

Worse

Schlechter

QA3.1 Welche Erwartungen haben Sie an die nächsten 12 Monate? Werden die nächsten 12 Monate besser, schlechter oder gleich sein, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Ihr Leben im Allgemeinen

QA3.1 Quelles sont vos attentes pour les douze prochains mois : les douze prochains mois seront-ils meilleurs, moins bons ou sans changement, en ce qui concerne … ? Votre vie en général

QA3.1 What are your expectations for the next twelve months: will the next twelve months be better, worse or the same, when it comes to...? Your life in general

T16




SP 408

EU 28 16 2 7 -4 75 2 2 0

BE 10 -8 8 -2 80 8 2 2

BG 13 -4 7 -1 75 3 5 2

CZ 14 3 6 -8 79 5 1 0

DK 12 -2 6 2 81 0 1 0

DE 8 -1 4 -2 86 1 2 2

EE 29 2 3 -3 65 -1 3 2

IE 21 5 4 -6 75 3 0 -2

EL 15 6 23 -14 61 9 1 -1

ES 13 2 6 -9 80 8 1 -1

FR 19 1 5 0 73 -2 3 1

HR 20 2 14 -3 64 0 2 1

IT 15 1 11 -10 71 9 3 0

CY 17 10 9 -6 71 -6 3 2

LV 24 -3 2 -1 72 4 2 0

LT 21 -1 3 -1 74 1 2 1

LU 16 -2 4 0 78 2 2 0

HU 20 2 9 -8 70 5 1 1

MT 27 6 2 -4 66 -3 5 1

NL 12 0 4 -5 83 5 1 0

AT 13 5 7 -1 79 -4 1 0

PL 21 5 6 -5 68 -4 5 4

PT 12 5 9 -13 77 9 2 -1

RO 29 8 11 -1 57 -7 3 0

SI 16 9 9 -14 72 3 3 2

SK 18 4 8 -7 73 3 1 0

FI 9 -3 3 -1 87 3 1 1

SE 17 -2 3 -1 78 2 2 1

UK 22 4 9 1 67 -6 2 1


Same

Gleich

Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Better

Besser

Moins bons

Worse

Schlechter

QA3.2 Welche Erwartungen haben Sie an die nächsten 12 Monate? Werden die nächsten 12 Monate besser, schlechter oder gleich sein, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Die Gegend, in der Sie leben

QA3.2 Quelles sont vos attentes pour les douze prochains mois : les douze prochains mois seront-ils meilleurs, moins bons ou sans changement, en ce qui concerne … ? L’endroit où vous habitez

QA3.2 What are your expectations for the next twelve months: will the next twelve months be better, worse or the same, when it comes to...? The area you live in

T17




SP 408

EU 28 13 2 26 -7 57 4 4 1

BE 12 -4 14 -6 70 7 4 3

BG 9 -7 22 2 60 4 9 1

CZ 10 2 16 -12 71 8 3 2

DK 12 0 14 -9 72 8 2 1

DE 6 0 28 0 64 -1 2 1

EE 22 2 12 -8 59 2 7 4

IE 16 5 27 -12 53 7 4 0

EL 14 7 53 -7 31 -1 2 1

ES 14 5 27 -17 57 13 2 -1

FR 14 2 25 -7 55 2 6 3

HR 14 -4 25 1 58 2 3 1

IT 16 2 29 -7 49 3 6 2

CY 22 14 20 -18 51 1 7 3

LV 13 -1 13 2 69 -2 5 1

LT 17 -1 11 -2 68 2 4 1

LU 11 0 11 -2 75 4 3 -2

HU 15 1 19 -10 64 9 2 0

MT 44 5 4 -1 41 -5 11 1

NL 5 0 48 4 45 -5 2 1

AT 12 3 23 4 63 -8 2 1

PL 12 4 20 -13 62 6 6 3

PT 13 8 25 -23 57 15 5 0

RO 25 7 23 -8 46 1 6 0

SI 9 5 33 -15 53 7 5 3

SK 13 2 19 -7 64 3 4 2

FI 7 0 19 1 71 -3 3 2

SE 24 10 14 -5 57 -9 5 4

UK 17 3 29 -3 50 -2 4 2


Same

Gleich

Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Better

Besser

Moins bons

Worse

Schlechter

QA3.3 Welche Erwartungen haben Sie an die nächsten 12 Monate? Werden die nächsten 12 Monate besser, schlechter oder gleich sein, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Das Gesundheitssystem in (UNSER LAND)

QA3.3 Quelles sont vos attentes pour les douze prochains mois : les douze prochains mois seront-ils meilleurs, moins bons ou sans changement, en ce qui concerne … ? Les prestations des services de santé en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA3.3 What are your expectations for the next twelve months: will the next twelve months be better, worse or the same, when it comes to...? The healthcare system in (OUR COUNTRY)

T18




SP 408

EU 28 12 4 31 -10 49 5 8 1

BE 10 -1 35 -9 49 6 6 4

BG 7 -6 19 1 60 7 14 -2

CZ 9 7 32 -17 52 7 7 3

DK 5 -1 10 -8 78 8 7 1

DE 11 7 32 -4 53 -3 4 0

EE 20 1 11 -8 60 2 9 5

IE 11 3 19 -18 56 12 14 3

EL 12 6 63 -7 23 0 2 1

ES 11 4 30 -22 55 18 4 0

FR 12 3 35 -15 44 11 9 1

HR 11 -2 29 -2 55 1 5 3

IT 16 3 36 -11 40 4 8 4

CY 14 12 25 -37 47 21 14 4

LV 11 -3 13 -3 69 5 7 1

LT 14 3 16 -1 63 -2 7 0

LU 9 4 16 -7 64 11 11 -8

HU 12 -1 22 -9 61 8 5 2

MT 31 8 4 -3 44 -3 21 -2

NL 5 3 46 -18 43 13 6 2

AT 9 1 37 8 51 -7 3 -2

PL 9 1 23 -12 59 5 9 6

PT 11 6 38 -25 45 18 6 1

RO 22 8 26 -5 43 -1 9 -2

SI 6 3 39 -20 48 14 7 3

SK 8 0 24 -9 61 6 7 3

FI 3 -2 16 3 76 -3 5 2

SE 18 10 14 -7 61 -5 7 2

UK 13 4 26 -7 45 2 16 1


Same

Gleich

Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Better

Besser

Moins bons

Worse

Schlechter

QA3.4 Welche Erwartungen haben Sie an die nächsten 12 Monate? Werden die nächsten 12 Monate besser, schlechter oder gleich sein, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Die Rentenversorgung in (UNSER LAND)

QA3.4 Quelles sont vos attentes pour les douze prochains mois : les douze prochains mois seront-ils meilleurs, moins bons ou sans changement, en ce qui concerne … ? Le système de retraites en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA3.4 What are your expectations for the next twelve months: will the next twelve months be better, worse or the same, when it comes to...? The pension system in (OUR COUNTRY)

T19




SP 408

EU 28 11 3 27 -11 51 6 11 2

BE 8 -1 41 -4 44 1 7 4

BG 6 -6 18 1 56 6 20 -1

CZ 6 4 31 -16 54 9 9 3

DK 10 0 16 -10 68 9 6 1

DE 6 2 18 -1 68 -2 8 1

EE 17 1 10 -6 54 -2 19 7

IE 13 6 21 -26 60 20 6 0

EL 12 6 56 -14 29 7 3 1

ES 12 5 33 -22 51 17 4 0

FR 10 2 29 -9 45 6 16 1

HR 10 -3 32 2 51 -2 7 3

IT 16 3 32 -12 38 3 14 6

CY 12 10 29 -30 45 18 14 2

LV 7 -2 10 -1 68 2 15 1

LT 10 1 16 -7 64 8 10 -2

LU 8 2 18 -6 53 5 21 -1

HU 11 2 25 -15 58 13 6 0

MT 27 7 4 0 42 -1 27 -6

NL 4 2 46 -10 42 5 8 3

AT 10 2 24 5 59 -8 7 1

PL 9 2 20 -13 60 6 11 5

PT 11 7 38 -30 43 22 8 1

RO 21 9 24 -5 40 0 15 -4

SI 5 2 38 -25 45 16 12 7

SK 9 2 23 -14 60 9 8 3

FI 3 -2 17 7 74 -7 6 2

SE 26 11 10 -5 52 -11 12 5

UK 11 4 28 -13 42 5 19 4


Same

Gleich

Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Better

Besser

Moins bons

Worse

Schlechter

QA3.5 Welche Erwartungen haben Sie an die nächsten 12 Monate? Werden die nächsten 12 Monate besser, schlechter oder gleich sein, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Die Arbeitslosenunterstützung in (UNSER LAND)

QA3.5 Quelles sont vos attentes pour les douze prochains mois : les douze prochains mois seront-ils meilleurs, moins bons ou sans changement, en ce qui concerne … ? Les allocations chômage en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA3.5 What are your expectations for the next twelve months: will the next twelve months be better, worse or the same, when it comes to...? Unemployment benefits in (OUR COUNTRY)

T20




SP 408

EU 28 11 3 44 -13 41 8 4 2

BE 7 -3 47 -12 42 12 4 3

BG 9 -6 36 1 48 4 7 1

CZ 5 3 54 -17 38 11 3 3

DK 9 1 18 -12 70 9 3 2

DE 5 2 49 -8 44 5 2 1

EE 12 2 48 -15 35 10 5 3

IE 13 3 37 -18 47 14 3 1

EL 14 7 56 -14 29 7 1 0

ES 12 4 38 -16 48 12 2 0

FR 14 5 46 -16 34 7 6 4

HR 10 -2 57 7 31 -5 2 0

IT 18 3 42 -10 34 3 6 4

CY 13 8 35 -32 48 22 4 2

LV 6 -1 39 -12 51 12 4 1

LT 18 6 31 -9 48 2 3 1

LU 9 5 48 -10 39 3 4 2

HU 16 4 32 -18 51 14 1 0

MT 26 4 22 -3 40 0 12 -1

NL 6 3 44 -22 48 17 2 2

AT 9 -1 57 10 32 -9 2 0

PL 8 1 39 -16 47 11 6 4

PT 15 11 47 -28 35 17 3 0

RO 20 8 37 -12 38 4 5 0

SI 4 2 58 -20 34 15 4 3

SK 10 2 36 -22 52 19 2 1

FI 4 0 47 3 47 -5 2 2

SE 10 4 22 -3 62 -5 6 4

UK 14 6 47 -18 36 10 3 2


Same

Gleich

Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Better

Besser

Moins bons

Worse

Schlechter

QA3.6 Welche Erwartungen haben Sie an die nächsten 12 Monate? Werden die nächsten 12 Monate besser, schlechter oder gleich sein, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Die Lebenshaltungskosten in (UNSER LAND)

QA3.6 Quelles sont vos attentes pour les douze prochains mois : les douze prochains mois seront-ils meilleurs, moins bons ou sans changement, en ce qui concerne … ? Le coût de la vie en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA3.6 What are your expectations for the next twelve months: will the next twelve months be better, worse or the same, when it comes to...? The cost of living in (OUR COUNTRY)

T21




SP 408

EU 28 14 2 23 -5 56 0 7 3

BE 10 -3 31 -6 54 5 5 4

BG 13 -1 16 7 63 -6 8 0

CZ 5 -1 35 -3 56 2 4 2

DK 15 -1 15 -8 68 8 2 1

DE 13 4 22 2 58 -8 7 2

EE 20 0 5 -2 66 -4 9 6

IE 17 -1 10 -12 68 12 5 1

EL 14 7 32 -13 52 5 2 1

ES 10 -1 20 -7 67 9 3 -1

FR 14 3 27 -9 47 0 12 6

HR 17 1 17 -4 59 -2 7 5

IT 16 0 21 -9 51 1 12 8

CY 11 9 23 -19 60 6 6 4

LV 12 -3 8 1 76 0 4 2

LT 16 0 5 -2 73 1 6 1

LU 12 -2 14 -3 67 0 7 5

HU 11 -2 15 -9 67 7 7 4

MT 25 1 8 -1 54 -4 13 4

NL 8 2 30 -5 59 1 3 2

AT 13 0 32 8 50 -9 5 1

PL 13 2 14 -3 64 -3 9 4

PT 11 5 19 -9 64 7 6 -3

RO 24 7 14 -2 50 -4 12 -1

SI 6 1 27 -15 62 12 5 2

SK 11 1 16 -3 69 1 4 1

FI 8 -4 11 -1 77 2 4 3

SE 26 5 21 -6 48 -3 5 4

UK 16 0 33 -6 45 3 6 3


Same

Gleich

Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Better

Besser

Moins bons

Worse

Schlechter

QA3.7 Welche Erwartungen haben Sie an die nächsten 12 Monate? Werden die nächsten 12 Monate besser, schlechter oder gleich sein, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Die Beziehungen zwischen Menschen mit unterschiedlichem kulturellen oder religiösen Hintergrund oder verschiedener Nationalitäten in (UNSER LAND)

QA3.7 Quelles sont vos attentes pour les douze prochains mois : les douze prochains mois seront-ils meilleurs, moins bons ou sans changement, en ce qui concerne … ? Les rapports entre les personnes d’origines culturelles ou religieuses différentes ou de nationalités différentes en (NOTRE PAYS) QA3.7 What are your expectations for the next twelve months: will the next twelve months be better, worse or the same, when it comes to...? Relations in (OUR COUNTRY) between people from different cultural or religious backgrounds or nationalities

T22




SP 408

EU 28 13 2 27 -5 53 0 7 3

BE 12 -4 28 -4 55 4 5 4

BG 11 -2 21 1 53 -3 15 4

CZ 5 2 30 -7 60 2 5 3

DK 15 1 13 -6 69 3 3 2

DE 10 2 30 4 55 -7 5 1

EE 20 0 11 -7 56 -3 13 10

IE 15 5 15 -14 65 9 5 0

EL 13 5 48 -10 37 5 2 0

ES 12 3 29 -9 56 6 3 0

FR 14 2 29 -8 49 2 8 4

HR 12 -2 21 -6 62 6 5 2

IT 14 -2 27 -4 48 -2 11 8

CY 15 10 28 -21 51 6 6 5

LV 10 -3 14 1 69 -1 7 3

LT 13 -1 17 2 65 -3 5 2

LU 12 -1 16 -2 67 6 5 -3

HU 13 0 27 -4 57 3 3 1

MT 36 9 5 -1 45 -10 14 2

NL 10 3 30 -9 56 4 4 2

AT 14 2 33 10 47 -12 6 0

PL 12 4 20 -11 60 3 8 4

PT 14 9 32 -16 49 9 5 -2

RO 22 9 24 -2 47 -4 7 -3

SI 7 3 37 -22 50 15 6 4

SK 8 1 22 -9 65 5 5 3

FI 9 -1 16 3 71 -5 4 3

SE 31 15 12 -4 50 -17 7 6

UK 14 1 26 -6 50 1 10 4


Same

Gleich

Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Better

Besser

Moins bons

Worse

Schlechter

QA3.8 Welche Erwartungen haben Sie an die nächsten 12 Monate? Werden die nächsten 12 Monate besser, schlechter oder gleich sein, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Die Art und Weise der Auseinandersetzung mit sozialer Benachteiligung und Armut in (UNSER LAND)

QA3.8 Quelles sont vos attentes pour les douze prochains mois : les douze prochains mois seront-ils meilleurs, moins bons ou sans changement, en ce qui concerne … ? La manière dont les inégalités et la pauvreté sont traitées en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA3.8 What are your expectations for the next twelve months: will the next twelve months be better, worse or the same, when it comes to...? The way inequalities and poverty are addressed in (OUR COUNTRY)

T23




SP 408

EU 28 12 2 40 -8 42 3 6 3

BE 11 -7 44 -2 41 6 4 3

BG 10 -1 19 -5 59 2 12 4

CZ 14 3 12 -7 70 1 4 3

DK 8 1 23 -5 65 2 4 2

DE 5 1 66 -4 27 3 2 0

EE 18 -4 6 -4 69 3 7 5

IE 12 4 35 -12 48 9 5 -1

EL 13 6 49 -17 36 11 2 0

ES 11 3 28 1 57 -3 4 -1

FR 14 4 40 -17 37 8 9 5

HR 14 0 26 -7 53 3 7 4

IT 16 0 30 -9 41 0 13 9

CY 15 8 32 -28 48 20 5 0

LV 10 -6 19 7 66 -3 5 2

LT 20 8 22 -15 54 7 4 0

LU 9 3 38 -12 47 7 6 2

HU 26 3 18 -17 54 14 2 0

MT 50 11 6 -7 32 -2 12 -2

NL 7 -3 33 -4 56 5 4 2

AT 12 2 53 3 32 -6 3 1

PL 11 0 24 -11 58 8 7 3

PT 11 6 44 -23 39 16 6 1

RO 20 9 37 -11 38 4 5 -2

SI 7 2 40 -21 47 15 6 4

SK 11 1 27 -13 58 9 4 3

FI 3 -2 41 1 52 -3 4 4

SE 11 1 19 1 61 -7 9 5

UK 11 3 53 -11 30 4 6 4


Same

Gleich

Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Better

Besser

Moins bons

Worse

Schlechter

QA3.9 Welche Erwartungen haben Sie an die nächsten 12 Monate? Werden die nächsten 12 Monate besser, schlechter oder gleich sein, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Bezahlbare Energie in (UNSER LAND)

QA3.9 Quelles sont vos attentes pour les douze prochains mois : les douze prochains mois seront-ils meilleurs, moins bons ou sans changement, en ce qui concerne … ? Le caractère abordable des coûts de l’énergie en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA3.9 What are your expectations for the next twelve months: will the next twelve months be better, worse or the same, when it comes to...? How affordable energy is in (OUR COUNTRY)

T24




SP 408

EU 28 12 1 37 -6 44 2 7 3

BE 8 -5 43 -1 45 3 4 3

BG 8 -3 18 1 63 1 11 1

CZ 8 -2 19 -10 70 11 3 1

DK 6 0 19 -1 71 -1 4 2

DE 5 1 50 -1 39 -3 6 3

EE 19 1 8 -6 67 3 6 2

IE 15 -1 35 3 44 -1 6 -1

EL 16 7 41 -12 42 5 1 0

ES 13 3 30 -15 55 12 2 0

FR 16 4 36 -11 41 5 7 2

HR 13 -2 27 -5 53 3 7 4

IT 18 2 29 -11 41 1 12 8

CY 16 3 26 -22 53 18 5 1

LV 10 -4 15 6 70 -4 5 2

LT 11 1 27 2 57 -2 5 -1

LU 10 4 51 -3 34 -2 5 1

HU 18 0 23 -15 57 15 2 0

MT 19 3 22 2 46 -2 13 -3

NL 10 -1 38 -13 49 12 3 2

AT 8 -2 54 7 35 -5 3 0

PL 11 3 24 -12 57 7 8 2

PT 11 5 41 -19 42 14 6 0

RO 20 7 30 -3 40 -2 10 -2

SI 13 2 40 -16 40 10 7 4

SK 9 0 28 -16 59 14 4 2

FI 3 -1 45 2 49 -4 3 3

SE 9 4 30 -2 56 -4 5 2

UK 12 0 54 7 28 -9 6 2


Same

Gleich

Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Better

Besser

Moins bons

Worse

Schlechter

QA3.10 Welche Erwartungen haben Sie an die nächsten 12 Monate? Werden die nächsten 12 Monate besser, schlechter oder gleich sein, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Erschwinglicher Wohnraum in (UNSER LAND)

QA3.10 Quelles sont vos attentes pour les douze prochains mois : les douze prochains mois seront-ils meilleurs, moins bons ou sans changement, en ce qui concerne … ? Le caractère abordable du coût du logement en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA3.10 What are your expectations for the next twelve months: will the next twelve months be better, worse or the same, when it comes to...? How affordable housing is in (OUR COUNTRY)

T25




SP 408

EU 28 12 3 21 -6 59 0 8 3

BE 9 -5 18 -7 67 7 6 5

BG 11 -5 14 3 62 1 13 1

CZ 8 2 19 -9 69 5 4 2

DK 9 -1 14 -6 74 5 3 2

DE 5 1 13 1 77 -4 5 2

EE 18 -1 5 -4 64 -2 13 7

IE 11 1 19 -12 62 10 8 1

EL 16 7 46 -10 37 3 1 0

ES 11 4 22 -19 64 16 3 -1

FR 15 5 22 -3 54 -5 9 3

HR 14 -3 22 -5 59 6 5 2

IT 19 4 31 -10 42 0 8 6

CY 16 7 21 -3 57 -5 6 1

LV 13 0 11 1 69 -3 7 2

LT 10 -2 9 -2 69 2 12 2

LU 10 -1 11 2 74 0 5 -1

HU 15 1 16 -5 62 1 7 3

MT 31 -1 8 2 43 0 18 -1

NL 8 4 18 -16 67 9 7 3

AT 11 3 22 9 63 -15 4 3

PL 10 3 18 -7 65 1 7 3

PT 13 8 32 -16 48 9 7 -1

RO 23 6 23 1 46 -6 8 -1

SI 6 0 28 -19 58 14 8 5

SK 10 1 17 -7 66 2 7 4

FI 4 -1 18 4 74 -5 4 2

SE 15 7 11 1 64 -14 10 6

UK 11 1 21 -7 50 -4 18 10


Same

Gleich

Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Better

Besser

Moins bons

Worse

Schlechter

QA3.11 Welche Erwartungen haben Sie an die nächsten 12 Monate? Werden die nächsten 12 Monate besser, schlechter oder gleich sein, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Das Funktionieren der öffentlichen Verwaltung in (UNSER LAND)

QA3.11 Quelles sont vos attentes pour les douze prochains mois : les douze prochains mois seront-ils meilleurs, moins bons ou sans changement, en ce qui concerne … ? Le fonctionnement de l’administration publique en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA3.11 What are your expectations for the next twelve months: will the next twelve months be better, worse or the same, when it comes to...? The way public administration runs in (OUR COUNTRY)

T26




SP 408

EU 28 23 8 26 -16 45 5 6 3

BE 23 4 29 -14 44 6 4 4

BG 13 -5 27 -9 48 11 12 3

CZ 17 10 29 -25 51 13 3 2

DK 50 14 3 -10 45 -5 2 1

DE 20 6 14 -10 62 3 4 1

EE 29 0 18 -4 47 1 6 3

IE 32 17 18 -29 47 12 3 0

EL 17 8 55 -13 27 5 1 0

ES 24 12 29 -20 45 8 2 0

FR 20 7 34 -21 39 10 7 4

HR 14 -3 42 4 41 -2 3 1

IT 21 4 38 -12 35 5 6 3

CY 23 19 29 -45 44 23 4 3

LV 21 -1 21 -2 54 3 4 0

LT 24 3 22 3 50 -7 4 1

LU 14 2 30 -11 52 9 4 0

HU 24 2 24 -12 49 9 3 1

MT 45 6 9 0 33 -3 13 -3

NL 46 29 17 -32 35 2 2 1

AT 20 0 31 6 46 -5 3 -1

PL 14 7 24 -17 55 7 7 3

PT 20 13 41 -33 34 19 5 1

RO 25 7 29 -10 41 4 5 -1

SI 17 11 38 -32 38 16 7 5

SK 17 4 25 -18 53 11 5 3

FI 14 -2 32 2 51 -2 3 2

SE 31 7 13 -10 48 -2 8 5

UK 32 11 20 -17 39 1 9 5


Same

Gleich

Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Better

Besser

Moins bons

Worse

Schlechter

QA3.12 Welche Erwartungen haben Sie an die nächsten 12 Monate? Werden die nächsten 12 Monate besser, schlechter oder gleich sein, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Die wirtschaftliche Lage in (UNSER LAND)

QA3.12 Quelles sont vos attentes pour les douze prochains mois : les douze prochains mois seront-ils meilleurs, moins bons ou sans changement, en ce qui concerne … ? La situation économique en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA3.12 What are your expectations for the next twelve months: will the next twelve months be better, worse or the same, when it comes to...? The economic situation in (OUR COUNTRY)

T27




SP 408

EU 28 19 2 10 -3 60 0 11 1

BE 16 -2 9 -3 66 4 9 1

BG 12 -4 8 -4 68 4 12 4

CZ 11 2 10 -3 58 -2 21 3

DK 20 -2 2 -1 73 0 5 3

DE 16 2 5 0 68 -3 11 1

EE 28 -2 6 0 54 7 12 -5

IE 23 6 7 -13 63 7 7 0

EL 14 6 29 -4 49 0 8 -2

ES 19 3 8 -10 68 7 5 0

FR 24 0 6 -3 50 -1 20 4

HR 20 4 15 -9 59 3 6 2

IT 16 3 18 -7 58 1 8 3

CY 16 12 16 -14 53 10 15 -8

LV 23 -4 5 1 61 4 11 -1

LT 17 -3 11 2 60 3 12 -2

LU 17 -3 5 0 67 3 11 0

HU 15 2 16 -5 58 1 11 2

MT 26 7 3 -2 47 -14 24 9

NL 20 0 8 -1 54 0 18 1

AT 19 3 8 2 69 -3 4 -2

PL 17 5 12 -3 63 -4 8 2

PT 14 4 18 -7 60 3 8 0

RO 22 8 15 -4 43 2 20 -6

SI 12 3 11 -11 67 3 10 5

SK 15 1 9 -4 62 4 14 -1

FI 12 -2 6 1 73 -3 9 4

SE 30 -2 4 0 60 -1 6 3

UK 26 0 7 0 58 2 9 -2


Same

Gleich

Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Better

Besser

Moins bons

Worse

Schlechter

QA3.13 Welche Erwartungen haben Sie an die nächsten 12 Monate? Werden die nächsten 12 Monate besser, schlechter oder gleich sein, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Ihre persönliche berufliche Situation

QA3.13 Quelles sont vos attentes pour les douze prochains mois : les douze prochains mois seront-ils meilleurs, moins bons ou sans changement, en ce qui concerne … ? Votre situation professionnelle

QA3.13 What are your expectations for the next twelve months: will the next twelve months be better, worse or the same, when it comes to...? Your personal job situation

T28




SP 408

EU 28 20 3 15 -6 61 2 4 1

BE 15 -4 14 -1 67 2 4 3

BG 14 -4 16 -4 55 2 15 6

CZ 14 5 21 -9 61 3 4 1

DK 24 0 4 -2 69 0 3 2

DE 15 2 9 -2 73 -2 3 2

EE 31 -3 11 -2 53 1 5 4

IE 23 9 14 -16 61 9 2 -2

EL 16 6 45 -14 37 8 2 0

ES 19 5 12 -12 66 7 3 0

FR 25 0 15 -6 54 3 6 3

HR 20 3 21 -7 55 2 4 2

IT 17 3 22 -5 55 0 6 2

CY 15 11 21 -30 58 20 6 -1

LV 26 -4 10 0 60 2 4 2

LT 20 -1 17 3 60 -2 3 0

LU 17 -3 8 0 71 2 4 1

HU 17 1 20 -9 61 8 2 0

MT 25 2 4 -4 61 -3 10 5

NL 22 4 12 -6 64 2 2 0

AT 19 5 14 2 64 -7 3 0

PL 17 4 16 -8 61 1 6 3

PT 16 7 26 -18 54 12 4 -1

RO 27 7 19 -6 48 -3 6 2

SI 13 4 18 -18 64 11 5 3

SK 17 1 15 -7 64 5 4 1

FI 13 -5 8 0 77 3 2 2

SE 32 1 8 0 57 -3 3 2

UK 27 2 12 -2 58 -1 3 1


Same

Gleich

Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Better

Besser

Moins bons

Worse

Schlechter

QA3.14 Welche Erwartungen haben Sie an die nächsten 12 Monate? Werden die nächsten 12 Monate besser, schlechter oder gleich sein, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Die finanzielle Situation Ihres Haushaltes

QA3.14 Quelles sont vos attentes pour les douze prochains mois : les douze prochains mois seront-ils meilleurs, moins bons ou sans changement, en ce qui concerne … ? La situation financière de votre ménage

QA3.14 What are your expectations for the next twelve months: will the next twelve months be better, worse or the same, when it comes to...? The financial situation of your household

T29




SP 408

EU 28 21 6 28 -15 45 6 6 3

BE 17 1 38 -9 41 6 4 2

BG 12 -5 26 -8 50 13 12 0

CZ 10 3 34 -16 52 10 4 3

DK 52 14 5 -6 40 -10 3 2

DE 15 3 19 -7 59 1 7 3

EE 27 0 13 -5 49 -1 11 6

IE 34 19 16 -27 47 8 3 0

EL 17 8 55 -18 26 9 2 1

ES 25 11 27 -20 45 8 3 1

FR 24 8 35 -20 35 9 6 3

HR 16 -1 44 7 37 -7 3 1

IT 20 1 40 -8 34 4 6 3

CY 18 14 35 -44 43 27 4 3

LV 21 -1 12 0 61 -2 6 3

LT 19 -1 15 1 62 0 4 0

LU 13 0 37 -12 44 10 6 2

HU 17 0 25 -14 54 13 4 1

MT 38 10 9 2 37 -9 16 -3

NL 38 27 27 -35 33 8 2 0

AT 16 -3 38 10 43 -5 3 -2

PL 12 5 26 -17 54 7 8 5

PT 19 12 42 -33 34 19 5 2

RO 23 6 29 -12 42 8 6 -2

SI 17 10 38 -32 40 19 5 3

SK 16 2 26 -20 53 14 5 4

FI 13 -5 36 2 47 0 4 3

SE 36 12 13 -15 43 -3 8 6

UK 30 11 21 -17 42 3 7 3


Same

Gleich

Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Better

Besser

Moins bons

Worse

Schlechter

QA3.15 Welche Erwartungen haben Sie an die nächsten 12 Monate? Werden die nächsten 12 Monate besser, schlechter oder gleich sein, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Die Lage auf dem Arbeitsmarkt in (UNSER LAND)

QA3.15 Quelles sont vos attentes pour les douze prochains mois : les douze prochains mois seront-ils meilleurs, moins bons ou sans changement, en ce qui concerne … ? La situation de l'emploi en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA3.15 What are your expectations for the next twelve months: will the next twelve months be better, worse or the same, when it comes to...? The employment situation in (OUR COUNTRY)

T30




SP 408

EU 28 26 3 33 -4 40 1 1 0

BE 29 1 26 -1 44 -1 1 1

BG 10 2 46 -5 43 3 1 0

CZ 25 6 32 -11 42 4 1 1

DK 48 7 13 -5 38 -2 1 0

DE 29 -1 20 1 50 0 1 0

EE 42 7 26 -10 30 2 2 1

IE 31 8 31 -16 37 8 1 0

EL 4 0 83 1 13 -1 0 0

ES 15 6 52 -9 33 4 0 -1

FR 28 -1 35 -1 35 1 2 1

HR 12 -1 56 -1 31 1 1 1

IT 8 -1 43 -2 47 2 2 1

CY 11 -2 65 5 24 -3 0 0

LV 33 2 28 -8 38 6 1 0

LT 29 1 31 -4 39 3 1 0

LU 38 -9 15 -3 43 9 4 3

HU 22 11 31 -16 47 6 0 -1

MT 52 16 13 -9 33 -9 2 2

NL 35 -1 19 -5 45 5 1 1

AT 33 6 22 0 45 -6 0 0

PL 29 10 27 -6 41 -6 3 2

PT 8 1 60 -8 31 6 1 1

RO 19 3 44 -7 35 3 2 1

SI 14 0 51 -3 34 2 1 1

SK 26 7 31 -11 42 3 1 1

FI 35 -10 16 -2 48 11 1 1

SE 55 -4 13 -1 30 3 2 2

UK 43 8 24 -6 32 -2 1 0

Se sont améliorées Sont restées les mêmes

Stayed about the same

Sind in etwa gleich geblieben

Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Improved

Verbessert

Se sont détériorées

Got worse

Verschlechtert

QA4.1 Haben sich die Dinge im Vergleich zu vor fünf Jahren Ihrer Ansicht nach verbessert oder verschlechtert oder sind sie in etwa gleich geblieben, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Ihr Leben im Allgemeinen

QA4.1 Diriez-vous que, par rapport à il y a cinq ans, les choses se sont améliorées, déteriorées ou sont restées les mêmes en ce qui concerne … ? Votre vie en général

QA4.1 Compared with five years ago, would you say things have improved, got worse or stayed about the same when it comes to…? Your life in general

T31




SP 408

EU 28 19 2 18 -5 60 2 3 1

BE 18 1 14 -1 67 -1 1 1

BG 13 -5 24 0 62 4 1 1

CZ 28 6 17 -5 54 -2 1 1

DK 25 4 12 0 58 -4 5 0

DE 14 -3 9 0 74 1 3 2

EE 39 3 12 0 46 -3 3 0

IE 24 4 14 -9 61 6 1 -1

EL 5 3 56 -8 38 5 1 0

ES 12 3 33 -13 53 9 2 1

FR 25 0 12 -3 59 0 4 3

HR 13 0 41 -5 45 5 1 0

IT 5 -2 32 -9 61 9 2 2

CY 16 3 38 8 45 -12 1 1

LV 31 -3 8 -2 59 6 2 -1

LT 26 0 6 -5 67 6 1 -1

LU 28 -6 5 -4 63 7 4 3

HU 26 9 17 -12 56 2 1 1

MT 35 10 8 -1 55 -9 2 0

NL 22 1 9 -5 66 2 3 2

AT 22 2 12 -4 65 1 1 1

PL 37 11 11 -4 49 -9 3 2

PT 10 -1 29 -2 59 2 2 1

RO 26 3 22 0 50 -4 2 1

SI 11 0 35 -3 53 3 1 0

SK 23 8 21 -4 55 -5 1 1

FI 22 -7 7 -4 68 11 3 0

SE 27 3 8 -1 60 -2 5 0

UK 24 3 15 -2 55 -2 6 1




Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Improved

Verbessert


Got worse

Verschlechtert

QA4.2 Haben sich die Dinge im Vergleich zu vor fünf Jahren Ihrer Ansicht nach verbessert oder verschlechtert oder sind sie in etwa gleich geblieben, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Die Gegend, in der Sie leben

QA4.2 Diriez-vous que, par rapport à il y a cinq ans, les choses se sont améliorées, déteriorées ou sont restées les mêmes en ce qui concerne … ? L’endroit où vous habitez

QA4.2 Compared with five years ago, would you say things have improved, got worse or stayed about the same when it comes to…? The area you live in

T32




SP 408

EU 28 10 2 46 -3 40 0 4 1

BE 16 -2 15 0 65 0 4 2

BG 4 -1 54 -1 39 2 3 0

CZ 18 4 31 -9 48 3 3 2

DK 17 3 27 -5 52 0 4 2

DE 12 1 37 -2 47 -1 4 2

EE 21 1 28 -7 43 2 8 4

IE 9 2 62 -3 24 0 5 1

EL 2 1 90 -1 7 -1 1 1

ES 4 1 74 -2 21 1 1 0

FR 9 1 39 -7 44 3 8 3

HR 8 -1 50 2 39 -3 3 2

IT 4 -1 55 -4 37 2 4 3

CY 8 -3 63 17 25 -13 4 -1

LV 9 -2 33 -2 52 3 6 1

LT 17 4 26 -3 53 0 4 -1

LU 11 -4 9 -4 72 9 8 -1

HU 11 2 41 -11 46 8 2 1

MT 51 4 10 1 35 -5 4 0

NL 10 -1 52 4 34 -6 4 3

AT 15 4 26 -2 57 -3 2 1

PL 10 5 40 -7 46 0 4 2

PT 5 0 59 -6 33 4 3 2

RO 12 3 49 -8 35 5 4 0

SI 3 1 61 3 33 -5 3 1

SK 8 2 46 -2 43 -1 3 1

FI 10 -2 33 -1 53 0 4 3

SE 10 -3 43 0 41 -1 6 4

UK 15 2 38 0 41 -3 6 1




Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Improved

Verbessert


Got worse

Verschlechtert

QA4.3 Haben sich die Dinge im Vergleich zu vor fünf Jahren Ihrer Ansicht nach verbessert oder verschlechtert oder sind sie in etwa gleich geblieben, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Das Gesundheitswesen in (UNSER LAND)

QA4.3 Diriez-vous que, par rapport à il y a cinq ans, les choses se sont améliorées, déteriorées ou sont restées les mêmes en ce qui concerne … ? Les prestations des services de santé en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA4.3 Compared with five years ago, would you say things have improved, got worse or stayed about the same when it comes to…? The healthcare system in (OUR COUNTRY)

T33




SP 408

EU 28 5 1 52 -4 33 1 10 2

BE 6 -4 34 -6 52 7 8 3

BG 3 1 43 -7 43 7 11 -1

CZ 3 -1 51 -7 38 5 8 3

DK 7 1 23 -3 59 0 11 2

DE 9 4 40 -2 44 -3 7 1

EE 13 -4 24 -10 50 9 13 5

IE 7 3 50 -6 25 1 18 2

EL 1 1 93 -4 4 1 2 2

ES 2 1 76 -3 18 2 4 0

FR 2 0 59 -8 27 5 12 3

HR 5 2 55 -5 35 1 5 2

IT 1 -1 69 -6 24 4 6 3

CY 4 -3 71 -1 14 2 11 2

LV 6 1 28 -12 53 10 13 1

LT 7 2 40 0 43 1 10 -3

LU 7 0 13 -6 59 11 21 -5

HU 9 -2 37 -7 47 7 7 2

MT 32 5 4 -8 44 -2 20 5

NL 2 0 65 -15 24 12 9 3

AT 7 1 45 8 43 -9 5 0

PL 5 3 44 -6 43 0 8 3

PT 2 1 73 -10 20 7 5 2

RO 7 2 53 -2 33 4 7 -4

SI 1 0 68 -1 25 -1 6 2

SK 5 -1 42 -2 45 1 8 2

FI 5 -2 22 1 63 -1 10 2

SE 4 -1 35 2 49 -4 12 3

UK 10 2 36 -1 32 -3 22 2




Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Improved

Verbessert


Got worse

Verschlechtert

QA4.4 Haben sich die Dinge im Vergleich zu vor fünf Jahren Ihrer Ansicht nach verbessert oder verschlechtert oder sind sie in etwa gleich geblieben, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Die Rentenversorgung in (UNSER LAND)

QA4.4 Diriez-vous que, par rapport à il y a cinq ans, les choses se sont améliorées, déteriorées ou sont restées les mêmes en ce qui concerne … ? Le système des retraites en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA4.4 Compared with five years ago, would you say things have improved, got worse or stayed about the same when it comes to…? The pension system in (OUR COUNTRY)

T34




SP 408

EU 28 6 1 43 -7 35 3 16 3

BE 7 -3 38 -4 45 3 10 4

BG 3 0 34 -8 45 9 18 -1

CZ 4 1 51 -10 34 6 11 3

DK 8 0 52 6 30 -9 10 3

DE 12 3 20 -4 54 -1 14 2

EE 13 2 19 -5 36 -6 32 9

IE 10 4 49 -9 31 3 10 2

EL 2 1 88 -6 6 2 4 3

ES 3 2 76 -9 17 6 4 1

FR 4 0 34 -11 35 6 27 5

HR 4 1 52 -4 34 0 10 3

IT 1 -2 55 -8 29 5 15 5

CY 3 0 66 0 16 1 15 -1

LV 7 1 22 -10 48 7 23 2

LT 8 1 33 -4 40 4 19 -1

LU 9 -1 14 -4 50 10 27 -5

HU 7 2 49 -19 35 14 9 3

MT 27 6 4 -4 41 1 28 -3

NL 2 -1 55 -5 26 -1 17 7

AT 10 0 27 5 53 -7 10 2

PL 6 3 34 -11 47 4 13 4

PT 1 0 72 -10 20 10 7 0

RO 6 3 47 -6 30 4 17 -1

SI 2 0 61 -10 22 4 15 6

SK 5 0 45 -7 40 5 10 2

FI 6 -2 15 0 64 0 15 2

SE 8 1 46 -3 31 1 15 1

UK 9 2 34 -7 28 -1 29 6




Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Improved

Verbessert


Got worse

Verschlechtert

QA4.5 Haben sich die Dinge im Vergleich zu vor fünf Jahren Ihrer Ansicht nach verbessert oder verschlechtert oder sind sie in etwa gleich geblieben, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Die Arbeitslosenunterstützung in (UNSER LAND)

QA4.5 Diriez-vous que, par rapport à il y a cinq ans, les choses se sont améliorées, déteriorées ou sont restées les mêmes en ce qui concerne … ? Les allocations chômage en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA4.5 Compared with five years ago, would you say things have improved, got worse or stayed about the same when it comes to…? Unemployment benefits in (OUR COUNTRY)

T35




SP 408

EU 28 4 1 74 -7 19 4 3 2

BE 4 -1 73 -5 21 5 2 1

BG 2 1 70 -8 26 6 2 1

CZ 3 1 78 -7 17 4 2 2

DK 6 -1 45 -14 45 13 4 2

DE 5 2 69 -6 24 3 2 1

EE 4 2 80 -8 12 3 4 3

IE 9 5 72 -8 17 3 2 0

EL 2 1 92 -3 6 2 0 0

ES 3 2 86 -5 10 2 1 1

FR 1 0 84 -6 11 4 4 2

HR 3 1 85 4 11 -5 1 0

IT 1 -1 80 -2 15 0 4 3

CY 3 2 89 -2 7 0 1 0

LV 4 1 68 -9 25 7 3 1

LT 6 2 63 -11 27 8 4 1

LU 5 2 69 -8 21 4 5 2

HU 13 7 52 -23 33 14 2 2

MT 22 17 43 -23 30 5 5 1

NL 4 2 69 -11 23 6 4 3

AT 4 -1 72 1 22 -2 2 2

PL 6 3 62 -12 29 7 3 2

PT 2 1 84 -9 11 6 3 2

RO 5 2 69 -10 23 7 3 1

SI 1 1 87 -7 10 5 2 1

SK 5 2 65 -17 27 12 3 3

FI 2 0 73 4 22 -6 3 2

SE 15 2 37 -5 41 0 7 3

UK 7 5 73 -11 15 3 5 3




Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Improved

Verbessert


Got worse

Verschlechtert

QA4.6 Haben sich die Dinge im Vergleich zu vor fünf Jahren Ihrer Ansicht nach verbessert oder verschlechtert oder sind sie in etwa gleich geblieben, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Die Lebenshaltungskosten in (UNSER LAND)

QA4.6 Diriez-vous que, par rapport à il y a cinq ans, les choses se sont améliorées, déteriorées ou sont restées les mêmes en ce qui concerne … ? Le coût de la vie en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA4.6 Compared with five years ago, would you say things have improved, got worse or stayed about the same when it comes to…? The cost of living in (OUR COUNTRY)

T36




SP 408

EU 28 11 1 37 -3 44 -2 8 4

BE 7 -2 44 -2 46 2 3 2

BG 8 3 27 6 59 -10 6 1

CZ 5 -1 52 6 39 -7 4 2

DK 19 1 30 -6 47 3 4 2

DE 16 0 26 1 50 -4 8 3

EE 20 -2 8 0 60 -5 12 7

IE 18 -2 23 -6 52 7 7 1

EL 8 5 64 -8 27 3 1 0

ES 5 -1 46 -1 46 3 3 -1

FR 5 1 51 -4 33 -2 11 5

HR 17 6 29 -8 49 0 5 2

IT 8 -2 38 -9 46 5 8 6

CY 9 4 50 -3 35 -6 6 5

LV 6 -2 18 1 72 -1 4 2

LT 13 3 10 -6 70 2 7 1

LU 12 -4 14 -8 63 6 11 6

HU 10 -1 26 -8 57 5 7 4

MT 29 0 15 0 44 -3 12 3

NL 9 -1 49 6 38 -6 4 1

AT 15 1 38 5 42 -7 5 1

PL 16 4 20 -4 54 -4 10 4

PT 6 2 39 3 48 -5 7 0

RO 12 5 27 0 48 -6 13 1

SI 3 0 49 -2 42 0 6 2

SK 7 1 30 3 57 -6 6 2

FI 16 -3 16 -6 61 5 7 4

SE 14 -3 45 0 37 0 4 3

UK 14 1 41 -5 35 -1 10 5




Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Improved

Verbessert


Got worse

Verschlechtert

QA4.7 Haben sich die Dinge im Vergleich zu vor fünf Jahren Ihrer Ansicht nach verbessert oder verschlechtert oder sind sie in etwa gleich geblieben, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Die Beziehungen zwischen Menschen mit unterschiedlichem kulturellen oder religiösen Hintergrund oder verschiedener Nationalitäten in (UNSER LAND)

QA4.7 Diriez-vous que, par rapport à il y a cinq ans, les choses se sont améliorées, déteriorées ou sont restées les mêmes en ce qui concerne … ? Les rapports entre les personnes d’origines culturelles ou religieuses différentes ou de nationalités différentes en (NOTRE PAYS)QA4.7 Compared with five years ago, would you say things have improved, got worse or stayed about the same when it comes to…? Relations in (OUR COUNTRY) between people from different cultural or religious backgrounds or nationalities

T37




SP 408

EU 28 7 0 46 -1 39 -2 8 3

BE 10 -4 38 3 46 -3 6 4

BG 4 0 37 -4 49 0 10 4

CZ 4 -1 47 1 44 -3 5 3

DK 12 -1 31 -2 51 0 6 3

DE 11 -2 39 7 43 -6 7 1

EE 13 1 20 -6 49 -7 18 12

IE 12 5 37 -6 44 1 7 0

EL 3 1 82 -4 14 2 1 1

ES 5 1 66 -2 27 2 2 -1

FR 5 -2 53 -4 35 3 7 3

HR 8 1 43 -6 45 4 4 1

IT 4 -2 49 -3 37 -2 10 7

CY 7 3 66 0 24 -4 3 1

LV 7 -2 26 1 59 -1 8 2

LT 8 1 30 -5 56 5 6 -1

LU 9 -8 19 2 59 7 13 -1

HU 8 -1 46 -6 42 5 4 2

MT 39 7 9 -2 40 -9 12 4

NL 8 0 42 -5 42 1 8 4

AT 12 1 37 7 46 -9 5 1

PL 9 4 32 -9 50 1 9 4

PT 3 1 68 5 24 -5 5 -1

RO 6 2 46 2 40 -4 8 0

SI 3 -1 63 -6 29 5 5 2

SK 4 -1 41 -5 49 2 6 4

FI 12 -3 26 0 56 -1 6 4

SE 9 0 46 4 39 -7 6 3

UK 10 2 40 -1 35 -7 15 6




Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Improved

Verbessert


Got worse

Verschlechtert

QA4.8 Haben sich die Dinge im Vergleich zu vor fünf Jahren Ihrer Ansicht nach verbessert oder verschlechtert oder sind sie in etwa gleich geblieben, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Die Art und Weise der Auseinandersetzung mit sozialer Benachteiligung und Armut in (UNSER LAND)

QA4.8 Diriez-vous que, par rapport à il y a cinq ans, les choses se sont améliorées, déteriorées ou sont restées les mêmes en ce qui concerne … ? La manière dont les inégalités et la pauvreté sont traitées en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA4.8 Compared with five years ago, would you say things have improved, got worse or stayed about the same when it comes to…? The way inequalities and poverty are addressed in (OUR COUNTRY)

T38




SP 408

EU 28 6 1 63 -6 25 2 6 3

BE 9 0 62 -9 25 7 4 2

BG 8 5 30 -14 52 4 10 5

CZ 23 5 18 -6 56 0 3 1

DK 5 0 42 -10 47 7 6 3

DE 3 1 82 -3 13 1 2 1

EE 28 5 13 -4 52 -5 7 4

IE 8 2 61 -2 25 0 6 0

EL 2 2 88 -7 9 4 1 1

ES 4 -2 67 17 26 -14 3 -1

FR 4 1 68 -9 19 3 9 5

HR 9 6 50 -11 33 -1 8 6

IT 4 -1 58 -11 27 3 11 9

CY 3 2 86 -9 8 4 3 3

LV 9 -7 22 2 63 1 6 4

LT 10 8 53 -22 32 13 5 1

LU 4 1 53 -18 32 14 11 3

HU 35 19 28 -32 35 12 2 1

MT 43 37 25 -43 25 4 7 2

NL 8 3 46 -12 37 5 9 4

AT 8 4 58 -9 31 3 3 2

PL 11 5 39 -14 43 6 7 3

PT 1 -1 80 -8 15 7 4 2

RO 5 3 65 -15 25 9 5 3

SI 6 1 67 -12 23 9 4 2

SK 9 3 47 -20 40 14 4 3

FI 3 0 63 -6 28 2 6 4

SE 12 3 31 -11 45 3 12 5

UK 5 1 76 -5 12 1 7 3




Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Improved

Verbessert


Got worse

Verschlechtert

QA4.9 Haben sich die Dinge im Vergleich zu vor fünf Jahren Ihrer Ansicht nach verbessert oder verschlechtert oder sind sie in etwa gleich geblieben, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Bezahlbare Energie in (UNSER LAND)

QA4.9 Diriez-vous que, par rapport à il y a cinq ans, les choses se sont améliorées, déteriorées ou sont restées les mêmes en ce qui concerne … ? Le caractère abordable des coûts de l’énergie en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA4.9 Compared with five years ago, would you say things have improved, got worse or stayed about the same when it comes to…? How affordable energy is in (OUR COUNTRY)

T39




SP 408

EU 28 6 0 62 -4 25 1 7 3

BE 5 0 65 -4 25 0 5 4

BG 7 3 30 -5 54 1 9 1

CZ 16 1 30 -11 51 9 3 1

DK 13 -3 31 0 51 1 5 2

DE 2 -4 67 5 24 -4 7 3

EE 19 1 22 -3 49 -3 10 5

IE 22 -2 50 6 21 -5 7 1

EL 11 1 75 -3 13 1 1 1

ES 5 2 81 -6 13 4 1 0

FR 2 -1 70 -5 18 1 10 5

HR 10 6 54 -4 29 -6 7 4

IT 4 0 57 -12 27 4 12 8

CY 12 2 70 -2 14 -1 4 1

LV 12 -4 26 2 56 1 6 1

LT 12 1 44 -8 37 7 7 0

LU 2 0 71 -12 19 7 8 5

HU 18 7 37 -26 43 18 2 1

MT 21 13 38 -20 32 6 9 1

NL 9 0 60 -8 24 4 7 4

AT 5 1 66 0 26 -2 3 1

PL 10 2 43 -4 40 2 7 0

PT 2 -2 72 -8 21 8 5 2

RO 12 2 51 -4 28 3 9 -1

SI 7 -1 68 -6 18 2 7 5

SK 8 2 49 -19 38 14 5 3

FI 1 -1 71 -1 24 -1 4 3

SE 7 -1 48 0 38 -1 7 2

UK 8 1 70 4 13 -8 9 3




Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Improved

Verbessert


Got worse

Verschlechtert

QA4.10 Haben sich die Dinge im Vergleich zu vor fünf Jahren Ihrer Ansicht nach verbessert oder verschlechtert oder sind sie in etwa gleich geblieben, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Erschwinglicher Wohnraum in (UNSER LAND)

QA4.10 Diriez-vous que, par rapport à il y a cinq ans, les choses se sont améliorées, déteriorées ou sont restées les mêmes en ce qui concerne … ? Le caractère abordable du coût du logement en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA4.10 Compared with five years ago, would you say things have improved, got worse or stayed about the same when it comes to…? How affordable housing is in (OUR COUNTRY)

T40




SP 408

EU 28 6 1 38 -5 47 0 9 4

BE 10 -5 21 -1 63 3 6 3

BG 7 1 25 -4 57 3 11 0

CZ 9 2 32 -11 54 7 5 2

DK 13 2 27 -7 56 2 4 3

DE 4 -1 16 0 73 -2 7 3

EE 18 2 8 -5 57 -4 17 7

IE 9 4 41 -10 39 3 11 3

EL 6 2 76 -5 17 2 1 1

ES 3 2 68 -6 27 5 2 -1

FR 3 -1 39 -4 47 0 11 5

HR 7 1 47 -6 41 3 5 2

IT 2 -1 61 -8 31 5 6 4

CY 7 1 49 5 37 -11 7 5

LV 9 -3 22 -2 61 3 8 2

LT 9 2 16 -8 59 5 16 1

LU 9 -3 11 2 70 0 10 1

HU 15 0 28 -4 49 2 8 2

MT 30 13 10 -4 40 -16 20 7

NL 7 2 31 -18 51 10 11 6

AT 12 1 27 9 58 -11 3 1

PL 11 4 29 -6 53 -1 7 3

PT 4 2 61 -5 28 1 7 2

RO 8 -3 45 6 38 -4 9 1

SI 4 -1 50 -15 39 13 7 3

SK 7 0 33 -3 51 -2 9 5

FI 3 -3 28 2 62 -3 7 4

SE 6 -2 27 6 55 -9 12 5

UK 6 2 32 -5 39 -9 23 12




Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Improved

Verbessert


Got worse

Verschlechtert

QA4.11 Haben sich die Dinge im Vergleich zu vor fünf Jahren Ihrer Ansicht nach verbessert oder verschlechtert oder sind sie in etwa gleich geblieben, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Das Funktionieren der öffentlichen Verwaltung in (UNSER LAND)

QA4.11 Diriez-vous que, par rapport à il y a cinq ans, les choses se sont améliorées, déteriorées ou sont restées les mêmes en ce qui concerne … ? Le fonctionnement de l’administration publique en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA4.11 Compared with five years ago, would you say things have improved, got worse or stayed about the same when it comes to…? The way public administration runs in (OUR COUNTRY)

T41




SP 408

EU 28 17 7 57 -14 21 4 5 3

BE 11 4 60 -13 26 7 3 2

BG 3 3 61 -23 32 18 4 2

CZ 9 7 58 -25 30 16 3 2

DK 46 33 25 -41 25 6 4 2

DE 49 12 16 -8 32 -4 3 0

EE 36 9 32 -18 24 4 8 5

IE 18 14 60 -21 18 5 4 2

EL 2 2 92 -6 6 4 0 0

ES 3 2 88 -8 8 5 1 1

FR 2 1 82 -7 11 3 5 3

HR 3 1 80 2 15 -4 2 1

IT 1 -1 82 -3 14 1 3 3

CY 1 1 95 -4 4 3 0 0

LV 22 6 38 -21 36 13 4 2

LT 27 15 39 -20 30 5 4 0

LU 11 5 51 -12 28 4 10 3

HU 21 11 40 -25 36 13 3 1

MT 49 30 14 -19 27 -12 10 1

NL 14 13 72 -22 11 7 3 2

AT 14 2 50 -7 34 5 2 0

PL 16 10 41 -19 37 6 6 3

PT 1 0 83 -11 13 8 3 3

RO 8 5 59 -19 29 12 4 2

SI 2 1 88 -5 8 3 2 1

SK 8 4 55 -22 31 13 6 5

FI 4 -4 74 6 19 -3 3 1

SE 34 7 28 -12 31 2 7 3

UK 28 21 45 -32 16 3 11 8




Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Improved

Verbessert


Got worse

Verschlechtert

QA4.12 Haben sich die Dinge im Vergleich zu vor fünf Jahren Ihrer Ansicht nach verbessert oder verschlechtert oder sind sie in etwa gleich geblieben, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Die wirtschaftliche Lage in (UNSER LAND)

QA4.12 Diriez-vous que, par rapport à il y a cinq ans, les choses se sont améliorées, déteriorées ou sont restées les mêmes en ce qui concerne … ? La situation économique en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA4.12 Compared with five years ago, would you say things have improved, got worse or stayed about the same when it comes to…? The economic situation in (OUR COUNTRY)

T42




SP 408

EU 28 17 2 26 -3 47 0 10 1

BE 19 -3 20 2 53 3 8 -2

BG 8 2 29 -6 60 4 3 0

CZ 14 -2 22 -4 45 3 19 3

DK 31 6 11 -6 54 -2 4 2

DE 21 0 13 1 55 -1 11 0

EE 27 2 17 -4 45 8 11 -6

IE 16 3 30 -7 48 4 6 0

EL 3 0 61 3 29 -2 7 -1

ES 8 3 48 -5 42 3 2 -1

FR 22 1 18 -4 39 -4 21 7

HR 9 2 46 -5 39 2 6 1

IT 5 -2 37 -8 52 6 6 4

CY 4 -1 53 2 31 0 12 -1

LV 20 0 21 -4 48 8 11 -4

LT 17 0 26 1 44 1 13 -2

LU 25 -3 9 -2 53 3 13 2

HU 12 3 28 -13 49 7 11 3

MT 29 7 11 -4 43 -10 17 7

NL 20 -4 24 1 37 0 19 3

AT 24 -2 17 4 56 -2 3 0

PL 18 6 23 -5 52 -5 7 4

PT 5 0 50 4 39 -8 6 4

RO 8 0 34 -1 39 4 19 -3

SI 8 -3 38 -3 47 2 7 4

SK 15 0 25 -5 47 3 13 2

FI 18 1 11 -3 62 -2 9 4

SE 42 -1 12 -1 40 1 6 1

UK 25 4 19 -1 46 -2 10 -1




Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Improved

Verbessert


Got worse

Verschlechtert

QA4.13 Haben sich die Dinge im Vergleich zu vor fünf Jahren Ihrer Ansicht nach verbessert oder verschlechtert oder sind sie in etwa gleich geblieben, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Ihre persönliche berufliche Situation

QA4.13 Diriez-vous que, par rapport à il y a cinq ans, les choses se sont améliorées, déteriorées ou sont restées les mêmes en ce qui concerne … ? Votre situation professionnelle

QA4.13 Compared with five years ago, would you say things have improved, got worse or stayed about the same when it comes to…? Your personal job situation

T43




SP 408

EU 28 17 1 38 -3 42 0 3 2

BE 17 -4 28 3 51 -2 4 3

BG 7 2 46 -11 44 7 3 2

CZ 16 2 40 -8 42 4 2 2

DK 34 5 19 -1 45 -5 2 1

DE 21 -2 21 0 55 0 3 2

EE 29 -1 26 -8 42 8 3 1

IE 15 3 48 -2 35 1 2 -2

EL 3 1 87 -2 10 1 0 0

ES 7 3 65 0 28 -2 0 -1

FR 20 -1 39 2 36 -3 5 2

HR 8 0 60 -1 31 0 1 1

IT 3 -2 48 -5 46 5 3 2

CY 3 -1 76 2 20 -1 1 0

LV 23 1 28 -8 46 6 3 1

LT 20 0 35 -3 43 2 2 1

LU 25 -7 12 -2 56 5 7 4

HU 15 4 36 -19 48 15 1 0

MT 30 13 11 -14 56 -1 3 2

NL 22 -4 30 -3 44 4 4 3

AT 21 -1 28 4 50 -3 1 0

PL 18 4 30 -10 47 2 5 4

PT 4 0 66 -3 27 1 3 2

RO 11 0 47 -4 40 3 2 1

SI 6 -3 58 -2 34 4 2 1

SK 16 0 38 -8 43 6 3 2

FI 21 -6 21 4 56 1 2 1

SE 45 -1 22 5 31 -5 2 1

UK 27 5 29 0 40 -6 4 1




Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Improved

Verbessert


Got worse

Verschlechtert

QA4.14 Haben sich die Dinge im Vergleich zu vor fünf Jahren Ihrer Ansicht nach verbessert oder verschlechtert oder sind sie in etwa gleich geblieben, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Die finanzielle Situation Ihres Haushaltes

QA4.14 Diriez-vous que, par rapport à il y a cinq ans, les choses se sont améliorées, déteriorées ou sont restées les mêmes en ce qui concerne … ? La situation financière de votre ménage

QA4.14 Compared with five years ago, would you say things have improved, got worse or stayed about the same when it comes to…? The financial situation of your household

T44




SP 408

EU 28 14 6 60 -11 21 3 5 2

BE 5 0 66 -9 25 6 4 3

BG 3 3 63 -18 30 14 4 1

CZ 4 2 62 -15 32 13 2 0

DK 38 30 31 -40 24 5 7 5

DE 44 7 18 -8 32 -1 6 2

EE 24 6 29 -19 31 5 16 8

IE 15 12 62 -20 21 8 2 0

EL 1 1 95 -3 4 2 0 0

ES 4 3 90 -5 6 2 0 0

FR 1 0 84 -5 10 3 5 2

HR 3 2 84 3 12 -5 1 0

IT 2 0 81 -2 14 -1 3 3

CY 1 1 93 -5 5 3 1 1

LV 18 5 35 -18 40 11 7 2

LT 18 8 34 -14 42 6 6 0

LU 4 -2 62 -13 26 12 8 3

HU 12 4 47 -22 38 16 3 2

MT 36 16 20 -3 33 -11 11 -2

NL 5 3 82 -10 8 3 5 4

AT 8 -1 57 -1 32 1 3 1

PL 7 3 51 -13 36 7 6 3

PT 1 0 83 -12 13 9 3 3

RO 4 1 64 -13 28 11 4 1

SI 1 0 88 -5 9 4 2 1

SK 4 1 59 -21 32 16 5 4

FI 4 -2 76 4 17 -4 3 2

SE 19 11 46 -23 27 9 8 3

UK 24 18 45 -26 21 3 10 5




Ne sais pas

Don't know

Weiß nicht

Improved

Verbessert


Got worse

Verschlechtert

QA4.15 Haben sich die Dinge im Vergleich zu vor fünf Jahren Ihrer Ansicht nach verbessert oder verschlechtert oder sind sie in etwa gleich geblieben, wenn es um Folgendes geht? Die Lage auf dem Arbeitsmarkt in (UNSER LAND)

QA4.15 Diriez-vous que, par rapport à il y a cinq ans, les choses se sont améliorées, déteriorées ou sont restées les mêmes en ce qui concerne … ? La situation de l’emploi en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA4.15 Compared with five years ago, would you say things have improved, got worse or stayed about the same when it comes to…? The employment situation in (OUR COUNTRY)

T45






EU 28 27 6 52 -3 17 -3 1 -1 3 1 79 3 18 -4

BE 29 6 52 -5 17 -1 1 0 1 0 81 1 18 -1

BG 58 7 36 -6 5 0 0 0 1 -1 94 1 5 0

CZ 15 4 59 5 22 -10 1 -1 3 2 74 9 23 -11

DK 5 1 33 -1 57 3 4 -3 1 0 38 0 61 0

DE 17 -2 50 -5 28 6 1 -1 4 2 67 -7 29 5

EE 18 1 62 3 15 -6 1 0 4 2 80 4 16 -6

IE 25 5 54 3 17 -4 1 -4 3 0 79 8 18 -8

EL 55 29 41 -17 3 -12 1 0 0 0 96 12 4 -12

ES 34 15 59 3 6 -15 0 -2 1 -1 93 18 6 -17

FR 30 3 57 -1 11 -3 0 0 2 1 87 2 11 -3

HR 41 52 5 1 1 93 6

IT 39 23 55 -8 5 -12 0 -2 1 -1 94 15 5 -14

CY 21 16 66 33 12 -43 1 -6 0 0 87 49 13 -49

LV 34 -5 53 1 12 3 0 0 1 1 87 -4 12 3

LT 31 -2 54 2 13 -1 1 1 1 0 85 0 14 0

LU 10 2 49 12 35 -12 2 -2 4 0 59 14 37 -14

HU 54 3 39 -5 5 1 1 0 1 1 93 -2 6 1

MT 7 -10 49 11 38 1 1 -4 5 2 56 1 39 -3

NL 18 11 52 0 26 -10 3 -1 1 0 70 11 29 -11

AT 12 6 49 6 30 -12 3 -2 6 2 61 12 33 -14

PL 16 -6 48 -9 24 7 2 1 10 7 64 -15 26 8

PT 39 15 49 -13 11 -1 0 -1 1 0 88 2 11 -2

RO 47 -9 47 7 4 1 1 1 1 0 94 -2 5 2

SI 38 18 53 -9 8 -7 0 -2 1 0 91 9 8 -9

SK 36 9 52 -5 10 -3 0 -1 2 0 88 4 10 -4

FI 4 1 47 0 46 1 2 -2 1 0 51 1 48 -1

SE 5 3 41 10 43 -13 9 2 2 -2 46 13 52 -11

UK 18 2 54 0 19 -3 2 -1 7 2 72 2 21 -4

Total 'Not widespread'

Sehr verbreitet

Ziemlich verbreitet

Nicht sehr verbreitet

Überhaupt nicht

verbreitetWeiß nicht Gesamt

'Verbreitet'Gesamt 'Nicht

verbreitet'

Very widespread

Fairly widespread

Not very widespread

Not at all widespread Don't know Total

'Widespread'

Très répandue Plutôt répandue

Pas très répandue

Pas du tout répandue Ne sais pas Total

'Répandue'Total 'Pas répandue'

QA5 Et diriez-vous que la pauvreté en (NOTRE PAYS) est … ?

QA5 And would you say that poverty in (OUR COUNTRY) is …?

QA5 Wie verbreitet ist Armut in (UNSER LAND)?

T46





SP 355

EU 28 11 -3 12 -3 49 1 13 -3 8 3 7 5

BE 24 7 12 -4 41 0 16 -3 6 0 1 0

BG 9 -1 7 -5 64 7 11 -1 5 1 4 -1

CZ 16 -3 20 -4 36 4 17 -1 5 -1 6 5

DK 40 10 12 0 18 -9 16 -9 10 5 4 3

DE 6 -3 13 -2 48 -10 14 1 12 8 7 6

EE 13 -1 14 -5 39 2 20 -4 7 3 7 5

IE 27 5 10 1 40 -3 15 -1 3 -4 5 2

EL 7 -2 5 -5 60 7 15 -3 12 3 1 0

ES 8 -10 3 -6 70 20 7 -8 8 2 4 2

FR 9 0 10 0 55 -3 16 -3 4 1 6 5

HR 8 7 69 7 5 4

IT 13 -8 7 -2 55 10 14 -1 6 -2 5 3

CY 8 -4 7 -15 57 16 19 0 8 3 1 0

LV 6 -2 24 4 43 -10 12 -1 11 6 4 3

LT 7 -3 31 13 45 -11 9 -2 5 1 3 2

LU 21 8 15 -5 29 -9 20 0 6 -1 9 7

HU 7 -7 13 0 55 -4 11 2 12 8 2 1

MT 9 -3 49 22 15 -17 19 -2 4 -1 4 1

NL 20 5 5 -6 31 -8 18 -6 23 13 3 2

AT 9 -7 19 6 38 -5 16 -1 13 4 5 3

PL 12 -1 18 -7 41 -2 10 -3 6 3 13 10

PT 12 -3 12 -12 56 17 14 1 3 -3 3 0

RO 6 -2 19 2 53 -8 13 5 4 1 5 2

SI 8 1 8 -6 66 6 9 -3 4 -2 5 4

SK 13 -4 12 -7 56 12 10 -2 4 -4 5 5

FI 15 5 8 -4 47 -11 20 3 8 6 2 1

SE 10 0 4 -1 56 5 18 -11 10 6 2 1

UK 15 2 18 -6 34 1 11 -8 7 2 15 9

Weil sie kein Glück hatten

Aufgrund ihrer Faulheit und mangelnden Willenskraft

Aufgrund der vielen Ungerechtigkeiten in unserer Gesellschaft

Weil es ein unvermeidlicher

Teil des Fortschritts ist

Nichts davon (SPONTAN) Weiß nicht

They have been unlucky

They are lazy and lack willpower

There is much injustice in our

society

It’s an inevitable part of progress

None (SPONTANEOUS) Don't know

Elles ont été malchanceuses

Elles sont paresseuses et manquent de

volonté

Il y a beaucoup d’injustice dans notre

société

C’est une part inévitable du

progrès

Aucun (SPONTANE) Ne sais pas

QA6 A votre avis, pourquoi y a-t-il des personnes qui vivent dans la pauvreté ? Voici quatre opinions : laquelle est la plus proche de la vôtre ?

QA6 Why in your opinion are there people who live in poverty? Here are four opinions: which is closest to yours?

QA6 Warum gibt es Ihrer Meinung nach Menschen, die in Armut leben? Welche dieser vier Meinungen kommt Ihrer eigenen am nächsten?

T47






EU 28 52 0 36 0 8 0 1 -1 3 1 88 0 9 -1

BE 43 -3 45 5 9 -3 1 0 2 1 88 2 10 -3

BG 67 1 27 -3 3 1 1 1 2 0 94 -2 4 2

CZ 58 -3 33 1 7 1 1 0 1 1 91 -2 8 1

DK 20 -8 38 1 27 5 12 1 3 1 58 -7 39 6

DE 58 -5 34 5 6 0 1 0 1 0 92 0 7 0

EE 64 -8 27 7 5 -1 1 0 3 2 91 -1 6 -1

IE 44 -6 41 4 10 2 1 0 4 0 85 -2 11 2

EL 56 -2 36 0 6 0 1 1 1 1 92 -2 7 1

ES 70 19 25 -16 3 -2 0 -1 2 0 95 3 3 -3

FR 48 -9 40 7 8 1 1 0 3 1 88 -2 9 1

HR 67 26 4 1 2 93 5

IT 45 10 44 -6 6 -4 2 0 3 0 89 4 8 -4

CY 65 -2 29 3 4 -2 0 0 2 1 94 1 4 -2

LV 73 -6 23 5 3 1 0 0 1 0 96 -1 3 1

LT 66 -4 27 4 4 0 1 0 2 0 93 0 5 0

LU 42 -3 43 3 10 -2 1 -1 4 3 85 0 11 -3

HU 69 -5 19 -2 9 6 2 1 1 0 88 -7 11 7

MT 29 -5 45 4 11 -2 1 -1 14 4 74 -1 12 -3

NL 29 -4 44 9 21 -2 4 -3 2 0 73 5 25 -5

AT 43 3 44 2 9 -4 2 0 2 -1 87 5 11 -4

PL 47 -9 39 3 9 4 2 1 3 1 86 -6 11 5

PT 67 9 28 -8 3 -3 1 1 1 1 95 1 4 -2

RO 58 -9 32 8 6 1 1 0 3 0 90 -1 7 1

SI 77 1 18 -3 3 1 1 0 1 1 95 -2 4 1

SK 66 5 28 -5 4 0 0 -1 2 1 94 0 4 -1

FI 34 -8 47 7 15 1 2 -1 2 1 81 -1 17 0

SE 43 5 39 2 12 -6 4 -2 2 1 82 7 16 -8

UK 43 0 39 0 10 -2 2 -1 6 3 82 0 12 -3

Gesamt 'Stimme nicht

zu'

Stimme voll und ganz zu

Stimme eher zu

Stimme eher nicht zu

Stimme überhaupt nicht zu

Weiß nicht Gesamt 'Stimme zu'

Total 'D'accord'

Total 'Pas d'accord'

Totally agree Tend to agree Tend to disagree

Totally disagree Don't know Total 'Agree' Total

'Disagree'

QA7.1 Bitte teilen Sie mir mit, inwieweit Sie der folgenden Aussage voll und ganz zustimmen, eher zustimmen, eher nicht zustimmen oder überhaupt nicht zustimmen In der heutigen Zeit sind die Einkommensunterschiede in (UNSER LAND) viel zu groß.

Tout à fait d’accord Plutôt d’accord Plutôt pas

d’accordPas du tout

d’accord Ne sais pas

QA7.1 Pour chacune des affirmations suivantes, veuillez me dire si vous êtes … De nos jours, les différences de revenus entre les personnes sont beaucoup trop importantes en (NOTRE PAYS)

QA7.1 For each of the following statements, please tell me whether you ... Nowadays in (OUR COUNTRY) income differences between people are far too large

T48





SP 355

EU 28 9 -1 5 -1 11 0 10 -1 22 1 11 -3

BE 3 -5 5 1 8 -1 9 -1 23 5 16 -1

BG 13 3 7 -5 17 1 10 -7 23 2 9 -2

CZ 13 -9 8 1 15 0 14 2 23 6 8 0

DK 3 -2 1 -1 2 -3 3 -1 8 -8 5 -4

DE 5 -13 4 -3 9 -4 10 -3 24 5 13 3

EE 7 -3 3 -4 9 -3 8 -3 22 -1 12 0

IE 3 -3 3 -4 6 -2 6 -6 21 4 13 0

EL 13 5 11 -2 19 3 12 -7 18 0 7 -2

ES 8 -1 4 -1 15 5 11 3 19 -2 12 -3

FR 7 3 4 0 11 3 11 2 27 1 10 -6

HR 17 6 13 11 21 8

IT 13 8 9 2 13 4 13 2 19 -2 15 -5

CY 37 -22 11 -1 14 6 8 3 14 4 4 2

LV 14 -15 6 -2 10 -2 7 -5 25 7 10 3

LT 11 0 6 3 10 1 9 -1 26 -4 10 -2

LU 5 1 4 1 10 3 8 -1 29 5 11 -7

HU 16 -1 7 0 11 -4 12 -4 23 5 11 1

MT 14 4 8 0 12 3 8 -5 28 5 8 -8

NL 3 0 1 -1 5 -1 5 0 13 1 9 -6

AT 8 -4 3 -3 11 0 9 -5 19 1 14 1

PL 9 -4 5 -1 11 -4 9 0 20 -3 12 -2

PT 5 -7 4 -10 15 -7 13 -6 28 8 12 5

RO 18 12 7 -1 13 4 12 -4 23 2 10 -4

SI 13 3 5 1 13 3 8 -2 22 -3 10 -3

SK 13 -1 7 3 13 0 13 2 25 7 11 -1

FI 1 -1 3 2 6 3 5 -1 10 0 8 -5

SE 3 -2 1 -1 3 -3 6 -2 11 -3 7 -4

UK 9 -1 2 -3 9 -1 6 -3 24 2 7 -7

1. Nicht vorsichtig genug sein

kann

2 3 4 5 6

1. You can't be too careful 2 3 4 5 6

1. Pas du tout confiance 2 3 4 5 6

QA8.1 D’une manière générale, dites-moi dans quelle mesure vous pensez pouvoir faire confiance, ou pas, à la plupart des gens. Merci d'utiliser une échelle de 1 à 10, où '1' signifie que vous ne pouvez "pas du tout faire confiance" à la plupart des gens et '10' signifie que vous pouvez "leur faire tout à fait confiance". QA8.1 Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted or not? Please use a scale from 1 to 10, where '1' means that "most people cannot be trusted" and '10' means that "most people can be trusted". QA8.1 Ganz allgemein gesprochen: Glauben Sie, dass man den meisten Menschen vertrauen kann oder nicht? Bitte sagen Sie es mir anhand einer Skala von 1 bis 10, wobei 1 bedeutet, dass man den meisten Menschen nicht vertrauen kann, und 10 bedeutet, dass man den meisten Menschen vertrauen kann.

T49





SP 355

EU 28 14 0 11 2 3 1 3 1 1 1 0 0

BE 20 0 13 2 1 -1 1 0 1 1 0 0

BG 9 1 6 3 2 2 2 1 2 1 0 0

CZ 11 1 5 -1 1 0 1 -1 1 1 0 0

DK 15 -4 33 11 14 7 16 5 0 0 0 0

DE 18 7 12 6 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0

EE 15 1 13 5 3 1 6 5 2 2 0 0

IE 17 -3 19 9 6 1 5 4 1 0 0 0

EL 10 0 7 1 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0

ES 16 2 11 0 2 -2 2 -1 0 0 0 0

FR 14 -3 11 -1 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0

HR 11 6 3 3 1

IT 10 -7 5 -2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0

CY 6 4 3 2 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0

LV 13 5 9 5 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 0

LT 11 0 11 2 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0

LU 16 -4 11 2 2 -1 2 -1 2 2 0 0

HU 11 2 6 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

MT 11 2 5 -3 2 1 2 0 2 1 0 0

NL 28 -2 24 4 7 3 4 1 1 1 0 0

AT 15 2 13 7 4 0 3 0 1 1 0 0

PL 14 4 11 5 3 2 2 -1 4 4 0 0

PT 13 9 7 5 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 0

RO 7 -7 5 -3 1 -1 2 1 2 1 0 0

SI 10 -5 8 1 3 1 7 3 1 1 0 0

SK 9 -4 5 -3 1 -2 2 -2 1 1 0 0

FI 15 -13 29 7 13 4 9 3 1 1 0 0

SE 21 1 23 6 11 4 14 4 0 0 0 0

UK 15 0 15 6 5 3 7 4 1 0 0 0

7 8 910. Den meisten

Menschen vertrauen kann

Weiß nicht Average

7 8 9 10. Most people can be trusted Don't know Durchschnitt

9 10. Tout à fait confiance Ne sais pas Moyenne7 8

QA8.1 D’une manière générale, dites-moi dans quelle mesure vous pensez pouvoir faire confiance, ou pas, à la plupart des gens. Merci d'utiliser une échelle de 1 à 10, où '1' signifie que vous ne pouvez "pas du tout faire confiance" à la plupart des gens et '10' signifie que vous pouvez "leur faire tout à fait confiance". QA8.1 Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted or not? Please use a scale from 1 to 10, where '1' means that "most people cannot be trusted" and '10' means that "most people can be trusted". QA8.1 Ganz allgemein gesprochen: Glauben Sie, dass man den meisten Menschen vertrauen kann oder nicht? Bitte sagen Sie es mir anhand einer Skala von 1 bis 10, wobei 1 bedeutet, dass man den meisten Menschen nicht vertrauen kann, und 10 bedeutet, dass man den meisten Menschen vertrauen kann.

T50





EU 28 34 -4 33 -1 32 4 1 1 0 0

BE 26 -5 39 4 35 1 0 0 0 0

BG 47 -7 32 -1 19 7 2 1 0 0

CZ 49 -7 31 6 19 0 1 1 0 0

DK 9 -7 13 -12 78 19 0 0 0 0

DE 28 -23 37 8 35 15 0 0 0 0

EE 27 -13 34 -1 37 12 2 2 0 0

IE 18 -15 33 4 48 11 1 0 0 0

EL 55 -1 25 -2 20 3 0 0 0 0

ES 38 6 31 -5 31 -1 0 0 0 0

FR 33 8 36 -6 30 -2 1 0 0 0

HR 46 29 24 1

IT 48 16 34 -7 17 -9 1 0 0 0

CY 70 -14 18 6 11 7 1 1 0 0

LV 37 -23 35 10 28 13 0 0 0 0

LT 36 3 36 -6 28 3 0 0 0 0

LU 27 3 40 -2 31 -3 2 2 0 0

HU 45 -10 34 6 20 3 1 1 0 0

MT 43 3 36 -3 19 -1 2 1 0 0

NL 14 -2 22 -5 64 7 0 0 0 0

AT 31 -12 33 1 35 10 1 1 0 0

PL 34 -9 32 -5 31 11 3 3 0 0

PT 37 -29 40 12 22 16 1 1 0 0

RO 50 11 33 -2 15 -10 2 1 0 0

SI 39 4 33 -5 27 0 1 1 0 0

SK 47 5 36 6 16 -12 1 1 0 0

FI 15 4 17 -6 67 1 1 1 0 0

SE 13 -7 18 -7 69 14 0 0 0 0

UK 26 -8 31 -5 42 12 1 1 0 0

Tend not to trust Neither trust nor distrust Tend to trust Don't know Average

Eher kein Vertrauen Weder ein noch das andere Eher Vertrauen Weiß nicht Durchschnitt

Plutôt pas confiance Ni l'un ni l'autre Plutôt confiance Ne sais pas Moyenne

QA8.2 D’une manière générale, dites-moi dans quelle mesure vous pensez pouvoir faire confiance, ou pas, à la plupart des gens. Merci d'utiliser une échelle de 1 à 10, où '1' signifie que vous ne pouvez "pas du tout faire confiance" à la plupart des gens et '10' signifie que vous pouvez "leur faire tout à fait confiance".

QA8.2 Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted or not? Please use a scale from 1 to 10, where '1' means that "most people cannot be trusted" and '10' means that "most people can be trusted".

QA8.2 Ganz allgemein gesprochen: Glauben Sie, dass man den meisten Menschen vertrauen kann oder nicht? Bitte sagen Sie es mir anhand einer Skala von 1 bis 10, wobei 1 bedeutet, dass man den meisten Menschen nicht vertrauen kann, und 10 bedeutet, dass man den meisten Menschen vertrauen kann.

T51




SP 355

EU 28 43 -9 33 -2 20 10 4 1

BE 42 0 38 -4 19 4 1 0

BG 57 -7 20 -1 18 6 5 2

CZ 59 0 24 -6 13 4 4 2

DK 36 -19 33 -4 29 22 2 1

DE 28 -20 46 2 22 15 4 3

EE 37 -10 22 -9 37 17 4 2

IE 53 -5 23 3 22 5 2 -3

EL 76 7 12 -4 11 -3 1 0

ES 41 -20 32 5 24 15 3 0

FR 20 -9 58 0 19 10 3 -1

HR 69 18 10 3

IT 65 10 17 -9 13 -1 5 0

CY 59 -11 16 2 24 9 1 0

LV 66 -9 13 -2 19 11 2 0

LT 43 -10 29 -4 26 16 2 -2

LU 26 -10 32 -11 39 20 3 1

HU 63 -7 20 -5 16 13 1 -1

MT 35 -22 34 15 28 11 3 -4

NL 40 -11 33 -10 25 20 2 1

AT 38 -13 32 3 27 9 3 1

PL 61 -7 22 -1 10 4 7 4

PT 44 -4 33 2 19 3 4 -1

RO 65 9 21 -10 11 4 3 -3

SI 44 4 28 -13 26 9 2 0

SK 59 -12 28 3 10 7 3 2

FI 36 -13 46 4 16 7 2 2

SE 35 -15 31 -9 31 23 3 1

UK 35 -19 26 -6 33 22 6 3

It is primarily up to the (NATIONALITY) Government to

provide jobs for the unemployed

It is primarily up to private companies and markets in

general to provide jobs for the unemployed

It depends (SPONTANEOUS) Don't know

Es ist hauptsächliche Aufgabe der (NATIONALITÄT)

Regierung, Arbeitsplätze zu schaffen.

Die Schaffung von Arbeitsplätzen sollte

hauptsächlich Aufgabe von Privatunternehmen und der Märkte im Allgemeinen sein.

Kommt darauf an (SPONTAN) Weiß nicht

C’est principalement au Gouvernement (NATIONALITE) de proposer des emplois aux

chômeurs

C'est principalement aux entreprises privées et aux

marchés en général de proposer des emplois aux

chômeurs

Cela dépend (SPONTANE) Ne sais pas

QA9 Les gens ont un avis différent sur les actions qui devraient être prises pour aider à résoudre les problèmes sociaux et économiques en (NOTRE PAYS). Je vais vous lire deux affirmations à ce sujet. Pourriez-vous me dire laquelle se rapproche le plus de votre opinion ?QA9 People have different views on how to help solve social and economic problems in (OUR COUNTRY). I’m going to read you two statements on this topic. Please tell me which one comes closest to your view.

QA9 Es gibt unterschiedliche Ansichten darüber, welche Schritte unternommen werden sollten, um zur Lösung der sozialen und wirtschaftlichen Probleme in (UNSER LAND) beizutragen. Ich werde Ihnen jetzt zwei Aussagen zu diesem Thema vorlesen. Bitte sagen Sie mir, welche dieser Aussagen Ihrer persönlichen Meinung am nächsten kommt.

T52




SP 355

EU 28 52 -7 21 -4 22 10 5 1

BE 42 -6 36 4 21 5 1 -3

BG 41 -11 23 -6 27 12 9 5

CZ 52 1 30 -5 14 3 4 1

DK 51 -14 20 -10 28 24 1 0

DE 61 -4 20 -5 15 7 4 2

EE 42 -12 17 -10 38 21 3 1

IE 47 -8 26 5 23 4 4 -1

EL 62 -2 11 0 22 0 5 2

ES 49 -11 15 -4 32 17 4 -2

FR 55 -5 19 -3 19 9 7 -1

HR 71 14 11 4

IT 43 -2 21 -6 26 4 10 4

CY 61 -10 18 4 19 5 2 1

LV 46 -18 18 -3 32 21 4 0

LT 49 -14 22 -2 24 15 5 1

LU 40 -15 24 2 26 8 10 5

HU 50 -6 26 -8 22 15 2 -1

MT 53 -9 14 1 30 17 3 -9

NL 23 -14 34 -12 40 26 3 0

AT 31 -5 45 4 19 -1 5 2

PL 57 -10 20 0 13 4 10 6

PT 42 -4 30 2 22 0 6 2

RO 59 4 21 -4 15 3 5 -3

SI 61 -7 13 -7 23 13 3 1

SK 55 -6 27 -3 14 7 4 2

FI 52 -10 32 2 14 7 2 1

SE 67 -2 12 -11 19 13 2 0

UK 50 -18 20 -2 27 19 3 1

Education should be totally free, even if this means that the quality

might be lower

Tuition fees are necessary for providing high quality education,

even if this means that some people won’t be able to afford it

It depends (SPONTANEOUS) Don't know

Der Besuch einer Universität sollte für jeden kostenlos sein, auch wenn dies bedeutet, dass die

Bildungsqualität etwas schlechter sein könnte.

Studiengebühren sind notwendig, um eine hohe Bildungsqualität zu gewährleisten, selbst wenn dies bedeutet, dass sich einige Leute

das nicht leisten können.


L’enseignement devrait être entièrement gratuit, même si cela signifie qu’il pourrait être de moins

bonne qualité

Les droits d’inscription sont nécessaires à un enseignement de

haute qualité, même si cela implique que certaines personnes

ne peuvent se le payer


QA10 Laquelle de ces deux affirmations se rapproche le plus de votre opinion ?

QA10 Which of these two statements comes closest to your view?

QA10 Und welche der folgenden zwei Aussagen kommt Ihrer persönlichen Meinung am nächsten?

T53




SP 418

Diff.SP 355

EU 28

BE

BG

CZ

DK

DE

EE

IE

EL

ES

FR

HR

IT

CY

LV

LT

LU

HU

MT

NL

AT

PL

PT

RO

SI

SK

FI

SE

UK

85 4 9 2

56 12 26 6

30 43 16 11

70 16 11 3

24 53 16 7

32 34 30 4

37 34 17 12

40 27 28 5

67 10 21 2

39 28 29 4

40 30 26 4

61 11 23 5

32 32 31 5

57 13 24 6

36 34 27 3

27 31 35 7

34 43 18 5

28 32 30 10

48 14 33 5

47 21 23 9

48 18 27 7

25 40 29 6

54 17 25 4

40 18 36 6

41 33 19 7

67 12 19 2

53 26 19 2

44 15 30 11

46 23 24 7

A high level of health care, education and social spending must be

guaranteed, even if it means that taxes might increase

Taxes should be decreased even if it means a general lower level of health care, education and social spending

It depends (SPONTA-NEOUS)

Don't know

Die Ausgaben für das Gesundheitswesen, das Bildungswesen

und für Sozialleistungen auf hohem Niveau müssen gesichert sein, selbst

wenn dafür eine Steuererhöhung erforderlich wäre.

Die Steuern sollten gesenkt werden, selbst wenn dies bedeuten würde, dass

insgesamt weniger für das Gesundheitswesen, das Bildungswesen und für Sozialleistungen ausgegeben

wird.


Un niveau élevé de soins de santé, d’enseignement et de prestations

sociales devrait être garanti, même si cela signifie que les impôts pourraient

augmenter

Les impôts devraient baisser, même si cela entraîne un niveau plus bas de soins de santé, de l’enseignement et

de prestations sociales


QA11 Toujours à propos des différentes actions qui devraient être prises pour aider à résoudre les problèmes sociaux et économiques en (NOTRE PAYS), laquelle de ces deux affirmations se rapproche le plus de votre opinion ?

QA11 Still about the different steps that should be taken to help solving social and economic problems in (OUR COUNTRY), which of these two statements comes closest to your view? QA11 Widmen wir uns weiter den unterschiedlichen Schritten, die unternommen werden sollten, um zur Lösung der sozialen und wirtschaftlichen Probleme in (UNSER LAND) beizutragen. Welche dieser zwei Aussagen kommt Ihrer Meinung am nächsten?

T54




SP 355

EU 28 48 -7 33 -1 16 7 3 1

BE 47 0 42 -2 10 1 1 1

BG 57 -5 24 0 15 3 4 2

CZ 50 -4 35 0 12 2 3 2

DK 26 -16 53 3 19 12 2 1

DE 44 -13 36 2 18 10 2 1

EE 40 -7 31 -5 26 10 3 2

IE 42 -17 39 13 16 3 3 1

EL 79 3 14 -1 6 -3 1 1

ES 69 -1 17 -4 12 6 2 -1

FR 44 -7 35 -1 18 8 3 0

HR 64 23 11 2

IT 66 2 17 -3 12 0 5 1

CY 66 -4 20 -4 14 8 0 0

LV 48 -12 32 1 18 10 2 1

LT 33 -4 47 -7 17 10 3 1

LU 31 -1 40 -9 25 8 4 2

HU 52 -15 32 5 15 11 1 -1

MT 32 -19 52 20 15 3 1 -4

NL 23 -4 55 -10 21 14 1 0

AT 43 -7 38 7 16 -2 3 2

PL 53 -6 29 -3 11 4 7 5

PT 52 2 34 2 11 -4 3 0

RO 55 -8 33 5 9 3 3 0

SI 44 3 33 -8 21 4 2 1

SK 55 -11 32 2 10 6 3 3

FI 41 -8 45 2 13 6 1 0

SE 33 -7 42 -9 23 16 2 0

UK 26 -16 49 1 22 13 3 2

The (NATIONALITY) Government should take more responsibility to ensure that

everyone is provided for

People should take more responsibility to provide for

themselves

It depends (SPONTA-NEOUS)

Don't know

Die (NATIONALITÄT) Regierung sollte mehr Verantwortung übernehmen, um zu

gewährleisten, dass jeder versorgt ist.

Die Menschen selbst sollten mehr Eigenverantwortung für ihre Versorgung übernehmen.


Le Gouvernement (NATIONALITE) devrait prendre plus de responsabilités pour que

tout le monde ait de quoi s’en sortir

Les gens devraient mieux se prendre en charge pour s’en

sortir seuls


QA12 Et laquelle de ces deux affirmations se rapproche le plus de votre opinion ?

QA12 And which of these two statements comes closest to your view?

QA12 Und welche der folgenden zwei Aussagen kommt Ihrer persönlichen Meinung am nächsten?

T55

Documents

Special Eurobarometer 418 - European Commissionec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_418_e… · Special Eurobarometer 418 SOCIAL CLIMATE REPORT Fieldwork: June