Upload
hunter-cantu
View
24
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
STAR Silicon Vertex Tracker Detector (SVT) Update. Nothing tends so much to the advancement of knowledge as the application of a new instrument - Sir Humphrey Davy (1778-1829). Helen Caines - Yale University. Presentation Overview. SVT Introduction SVT Performance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Vertex 2002 - Nov
STAR Silicon Vertex Tracker Detector (SVT)
Update
Nothing tends so much to the advancement of knowledge as the application of a new instrument - Sir Humphrey Davy (1778-1829)
Helen Caines -Yale University
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Presentation Overview
● SVT Introduction● SVT Performance● Track-to-Hit Matching ● Vertex Reconstruction● Energy Loss● Strange Particle Decays● Summary & Conclusions
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Welcome to BNL- RHIC!
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
The STAR Detector
• 1st year, 2nd year, year-by-year until 2003, installation in 2003
ZCal
Silicon Vertex Tracker *
Central Trigger Barrel+ TOF patch
FTPCs (1 + 1)
Time Projection Chamber
Barrel EM Calorimeter
Vertex Position Detectors
Magnet
Coils
TPC Endcap & MWPC
RICH * yr.1 SVT ladder
Endcap Calorimeter
ZCal
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
SVT Installation
Installed for the first time2001-2 RHIC run
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
p-p vs Au-Au at √sNN=200 GeV
Two very different environments:
p-p - Few tracks, primary vertex not well known
high luminosity
Au-Au – Few 1000 tracks
Vertex well located
Track/hit merging
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Each wafer is 6.3 cm x 6.3 cm area
300 m thick - 0.3%X0
Average radiation length seen by a particle 4.5%X0 incl. fee cards etc.
Consists of 216 wafers
3 Barrels
Outer radius – 15cm
Middle Radius – 10cm
Inner radius - 6cm
Length - 21cm
SVT Design
Inner barrel has 8 ladders – 4 wafers/ladderMiddle barrel has 12 ladders – 6 wafers/ladderOuter barrel has 16 ladders – 7 wafers/ladder
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Silicon Drift Detector - Principle
Ionizing particle
R - position from drift time
Electron cloud
X
SDD
Z - position from readout anode number
Drift time ~ 5 sec240 Anodes/wafer100 samples/anode
Gain : 1 e- = 7.2V 4 mV = 1 ADC
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Calibrations - Pedestals
You can see the edges of the 15 PASA’s and more obviously the
3 analogue buffers where the multiplexing occurs
Anode
First Time bucket
Other 127 Time buckets
Pedestal Subtraction done online
96.5% of 103,680 channels operational91.2% of 103,680 channels used in analysis
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
SVT Performance
Noise: 7 mV for pp 12 mV for Au+Au (due to a
grounding problem now fixed)
4 mV design (<7 mV aim)
cm
cou
nts
•30 m resolution reproducibility
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Drift Velocity Calibration
SDD’s modeled using 2 drift velocities. One in the drift region and one in the focusing region
There is a temperature dependence across the wafer which must be accounted for.
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
SVT Temperature Control
Au-Au
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
1/19/200212:28
1/19/200212:57
1/19/200213:26
1/19/200213:55
1/19/200214:24
1/19/200214:52
1/19/200215:21
1/19/200215:50
1/19/200216:19
1/19/200216:48
1/19/200217:16
Time
Tem
per
atu
re (
Far
enh
eit)
72
72.5
73
73.5
74
74.5
75
9:57 10:04 10:12 10:19 10:26 10:33
Time
Tem
per
atu
re (
Far
enh
eit)
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Hit to Track Matching
Au-AuMixed eventsClosest hit
Are we matching correctly?
Au-AuClosest hitReal events
Yes!
TPC inner radius = 50cmSVT outer radius = 15cm
Project tracks from TPC to SVT
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Drift Residuals vs Wafer
Before Alignment
After Alignment
Magnitudes agree with survey results
Shifted center of SVTRelative to TPC by x=-0.276cm y=-0.82cm
1 2 3
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Using SVT for TPC Calibration
Track dip angle < 0.1
Shift in Z + TPC T0/Vdrift wrong
mean (Z) = 0.0526cm vdrift = 5.56 cm/secTPC T0 shift = 0.0526/5.56 = 9.46 x 10-3 sec
After Corrections
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Vertex Finding - Resolution
p-p
Z offset of 0.005cm – Aligned in Z
STAR Preliminary
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Anode Residuals vs pt
Au-Au
Pt resolution worse at low pt where energy loss and scattering not yet taken into account
STAR Preliminary
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Primary Matching “efficiency”
Efficiency is defined as thenumber of tracks with SVT hits added (2 or more)p-p
p-p
Flat in pt
If you go to ±30cm average effic is 45%
Expect ~85% from simulation of perfect detector
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Impact Parameter Improvement
pp:
Mean 0.7->0.51 cmRMS 0.59->0.48 cm
TPCTPC+SVT
cm
3D impact parameters of track associated to primary vertex should be close to zero
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Energy Loss in the SVT Layers
● 3 sample maximum
● Higher energy resolution
● Good for low momentum
● Independent measure of dE/dx
● Allows 2D cut
Preliminary
Preliminary
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Strange Particle Decays
● Black is TPC only● Red is TPC+SVT
● Blue is TPC only● Red is TPC+SVT
Preliminary
Preliminary
~35-40% greater yield in K0s region
Mostly low pT
+
-
V0 Reconstruction
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Summary & Conclusions
✔ Sharpens the primary vertex reconstruction
✔ Improved PID
✔ More precise low pT tracking
✔ Enhanced analyses (already ~40% more K0)
➔ To Do:
●Improve noise reduction
●Understand track to hit matching
●Take more data!
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
The STAR CollaborationRussia:MEPHI - MoscowLPP/LHE JINR - DubnaIHEP - Protvino
U.S. Labs:ArgonneBerkeleyBrookhaven
U.S. Universities: Arkansas UniversityUC BerkeleyUC DavisUC Los AngelesCarnegie Mellon UniversityCreighton UniversityIndiana UniversityKent State UniversityMichigan State UniversityCity College of New YorkOhio State UniversityPenn. State UniversityPurdue UniversityRice UniversityTexas A&MUT AustinWashington UniversityWayne State UniversityYale University
Brazil: Universidade de Sao Paolo
China: IHEP – Beijing,IMP - LanzouIPP – WuhanUSTCSINR – ShanghaiTsinghua UniversityEngland: University of Birmingham
France:IReS StrasbourgSUBATECH - Nantes
Germany: MPI – MunichUniversity of Frankfurt
India:IOP - BhubaneswarVECC - CalcuttaPanjab UniversityUniversity of RajasthanJammu UniversityIIT - BombayVECC – Kolcata
Poland:Warsaw University of Technology
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Track Matching
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Simulating Radial Mis-Alignments
Drift residual- No shift
Drift residual-With shift(x=2mm, y=0.8mm)
Barrel 1 Barrel 2 Barrel 3
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Next Year – SSD
The SSD:
Double sided silicon strip detectors 16 wafers per ladder
Stereo angle 35 mrad pitch 95 microns.
Detector size is 7.5cm x 4.2xm
300 microns thick. Resolution is:
15 microns in r
700 microns in z
radiation length of 1 ladder is 0.7%X0
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Simulation vs Data (2)
Black contours SvtSlowSim
Colour contours real data
Simulation under predicts the width
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Simulation vs Data (1)
Black contours SvtSlowSim
Colour contours real data
Noise in systemobvious as no change in peakADC as function of drift
Removed with cut
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Noise
Operational values close to bench measurements
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Anode by Anode Calibration
• Better dE/dx and better position resolution
• Can see edges of PASA (not sure why)• Performed by recoding mean charge
on Anode• Of many events assume min-ionising
and force• Each to a common mean
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Pedestal Subtraction
You can see the first time bucket noise and the first capacitor glitch
Have noise at 1st capacitor and in 1st time bucket
1st capacitor is more of a“problem” because it is in a random position each event.
1st time bucket doesn’t contain data
M. Munhoz
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Welcome to BNL- RHIC!
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Location and Identification of Noise
Noise defined as hits with r > 1cm from track
Clear ladders/wafers that are noisy and are eliminated offline
96.5% of 103,680 channels operational91.2% of 103,680 channels used in analysis
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Drift Velocity Calibration
SDD’s modeled using 2 drift velocities. One in the drift region and one in the focusing region
There is a temperature dependence across the wafer which must be accounted for.
Residuals as a function of drift distance from E896 data
Haven’t quite got focusing region correct
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Charge vs Drift
cmCenter of wafer
Drift Drift
Some evidence of“charge loss”~20%
Probably trouble in cluster analysis.
Also at long drift the hits are beginning to merge with the background which pulls down the total charge found
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Average Drift Residuals
Au-AuMixed eventsClosest hit
Au-AuAll hits
Are we matching correctly?
Au-AuClosest hitReal events
Yes!
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Drift Residuals – T0
T0 wrong by~3 timebins
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
Occupancy vs Pile-up
High Luminosity
Low Luminosity
Pri
mary
Glo
bal
Pri
mary
Glo
bal
Good hits Good hits
Good hits Good hits
Helen Caines
Vertex 2002 – Nov 2002
-2
2
Match Track To CTB To Reject Pileup
Lower Luminosity (Early in Run) Higher Luminosity (Late in Run)
Track Matches CTB Hit
Track Projects To CTBCTB Match Eff. =
Good Measure Of PileupLower Matching Efficiency => Higher Pileup
Azimuth
1
0.5
00 180 360
Z P
osi
tio
n
Azimuth1800 360
Constant matching effic. during whole run.SVT only matches tracks from primary event